I never actually saw that, I was thinking of this film http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0111218/ where Quentin Tarantino explains how Top Gun is a movie with blatant amounts of homosexuality.
Maybe it is because I'm from the UK and I've grown up with Monty Python but I thought these adverts were great though pointless. If they were designed to make me laugh they did a good job. I guess some of the fanbois here can't look at them subjectively. Oh look its Bill Gates we hate him, Oh look its Seinfield, he sucks as a comedian. So in their mind these are already gonna suck, everybody said so before they aired and nobody should change their opinion for fear of being weak minded.
I doubt Seinfield wrote these adverts and I don't care if he did anyway, I enjoyed them and I'd rather see more of this than the next crop of ideas from MS, at least they were lying to me telling me how great Vista is.
Hands up if you saw the word 'clit' first, rather than 'cult'. I have thought with all the stories about scientology on slashdot my subconscious would let me see the second word first.
would be for browsers to have auto correction feature in the address bar. I've typed a comma many times into the bar by accident and no website uses them but why does the browser insist on searching first before telling me the address is incorrect. It should note the error and replace it with the full stop.
The opening sentence is terrible, talk about putting a personal spin on it. Rowling's wealth and success means she can't be a victim? Kdawson is an idiot.
Being a stickler for the details, I wanted to use Picassa, but as a photographer I didn't want them to claim ownership over what I produce. I don't even enter competitions if the organisers want to use my imagery for all eternity.
Then being a newbie blogger, I wanted to blog using googles' blogspot. Again same crappy terms discouraged me from producing my own content for somebody else to own.
well in that case, Apple showed there could be even MORE money to be made. Thus they were very successful. I'm sure the shareholders would agree as well.
I nearly know everyone at the Dynevor Campus and nearly everybody knows of me, even if its only 'that guy with the stripy hat'. I also live next door to it (Pell Street), that makes them my neighbours.:-)
Who are you?
The difference being, we can bring down governments with just Tea. With corporations we have to use lawyers, I know which I would prefer to use in a fight.
I didn't realise until now that we had 1 atmosphere, this was a really insightful article. What I don't understand is if the earth is flat how does the pollution from China reach the US or vice versa, surely once something falls off the side of the earth its gone?
Where did you come to the conclusion that he is related to Swansea Uni, I tried looking at his homepage and links and found nothing to suggest location. I'm in Swansea at Uni and very interested in this revelation.
Nice to know I'm not the only one who won't be having children for environmental reasons. I get odd looks when in conversation mentioning this because the mindset is that EVERYBODY has to have children at some point and we should listen to our genes or something. This is what sets us apart from the other animals, we're able to think about ourselves and how it effects the environment.
I'm sure people question their desire for offspring it but I've met some people who *have* to have children by a certain year and they *have* to be successful earning x amount before then as well. WTF?
it seemed logical to me that if we as a race are living longer, we would want/need to work longer and the retirement age would increase in accordance. But this has already been discussed as a national issue here in the UK and now I'm older I've always been left scratching my head because it seemed so obvious/natural back then.
I can't see how as a society if we live to 100, we could still retire at 60/65 and expect the state to give us cash for another 35 years as opposed to say 30 years ago people were living fewer years past the retirement age and so required less money.
Linux is a good operating system considering how it began. If the world was as black and white as you suggest then its advancement might be even further and so would its penetration. But we don't live in a black and white world, this is proved by MS who interfere with the rule you mentioned by being a complete twat in the market space and not letting their product stand on its own two feet.
isn't that better for the economy overall than paying private company x for a complete solution. At least doing it this way keeps money and jobs nearby.
I never actually saw that, I was thinking of this film http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0111218/ where Quentin Tarantino explains how Top Gun is a movie with blatant amounts of homosexuality.
Maybe it is because I'm from the UK and I've grown up with Monty Python but I thought these adverts were great though pointless. If they were designed to make me laugh they did a good job. I guess some of the fanbois here can't look at them subjectively. Oh look its Bill Gates we hate him, Oh look its Seinfield, he sucks as a comedian. So in their mind these are already gonna suck, everybody said so before they aired and nobody should change their opinion for fear of being weak minded. I doubt Seinfield wrote these adverts and I don't care if he did anyway, I enjoyed them and I'd rather see more of this than the next crop of ideas from MS, at least they were lying to me telling me how great Vista is.
Hands up if you saw the word 'clit' first, rather than 'cult'. I have thought with all the stories about scientology on slashdot my subconscious would let me see the second word first.
Don't forget the blatant amounts of homosexuality. 'You can ride my tail anytime'.
That is one crazy system for making money. 1. Get other people to write content 2. Sell it back to them 3. Profit!
would be for browsers to have auto correction feature in the address bar. I've typed a comma many times into the bar by accident and no website uses them but why does the browser insist on searching first before telling me the address is incorrect. It should note the error and replace it with the full stop.
I've never seen or read a Harry Potter film. I don't care about the franchise but I care about being fair.
Damn posting, Kdawson is an idiot for not removing the personal bias from the blurb.
The opening sentence is terrible, talk about putting a personal spin on it. Rowling's wealth and success means she can't be a victim? Kdawson is an idiot.
google services does not equal = promoting your blog
keywords being 'soley for the purpose of displaying,distributing and promoting your blog'.
Being a stickler for the details, I wanted to use Picassa, but as a photographer I didn't want them to claim ownership over what I produce. I don't even enter competitions if the organisers want to use my imagery for all eternity. Then being a newbie blogger, I wanted to blog using googles' blogspot. Again same crappy terms discouraged me from producing my own content for somebody else to own.
well in that case, Apple showed there could be even MORE money to be made. Thus they were very successful. I'm sure the shareholders would agree as well.
The thing is, the US would benefit more with exploring the Universe than exploring Iraq.
This post was an attempt at satire, stupid mod.
I nearly know everyone at the Dynevor Campus and nearly everybody knows of me, even if its only 'that guy with the stripy hat'. I also live next door to it (Pell Street), that makes them my neighbours. :-)
Who are you?
The difference being, we can bring down governments with just Tea. With corporations we have to use lawyers, I know which I would prefer to use in a fight.
I didn't realise until now that we had 1 atmosphere, this was a really insightful article. What I don't understand is if the earth is flat how does the pollution from China reach the US or vice versa, surely once something falls off the side of the earth its gone?
Where did you come to the conclusion that he is related to Swansea Uni, I tried looking at his homepage and links and found nothing to suggest location. I'm in Swansea at Uni and very interested in this revelation.
Nice to know I'm not the only one who won't be having children for environmental reasons. I get odd looks when in conversation mentioning this because the mindset is that EVERYBODY has to have children at some point and we should listen to our genes or something. This is what sets us apart from the other animals, we're able to think about ourselves and how it effects the environment. I'm sure people question their desire for offspring it but I've met some people who *have* to have children by a certain year and they *have* to be successful earning x amount before then as well. WTF?
it seemed logical to me that if we as a race are living longer, we would want/need to work longer and the retirement age would increase in accordance. But this has already been discussed as a national issue here in the UK and now I'm older I've always been left scratching my head because it seemed so obvious/natural back then. I can't see how as a society if we live to 100, we could still retire at 60/65 and expect the state to give us cash for another 35 years as opposed to say 30 years ago people were living fewer years past the retirement age and so required less money.
You mean like Steve Jobs with the iPhone OS?
Linux is a good operating system considering how it began. If the world was as black and white as you suggest then its advancement might be even further and so would its penetration. But we don't live in a black and white world, this is proved by MS who interfere with the rule you mentioned by being a complete twat in the market space and not letting their product stand on its own two feet.
I thought the Kernel WAS 'Linux'?
isn't that better for the economy overall than paying private company x for a complete solution. At least doing it this way keeps money and jobs nearby.