Some feminist psychos will nuts of those results, and not over the mens' nuts. Here is an example of meat and sex, gone wrong... Seriously and dangerously wrong:
"The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory" (http://www.amazon.com/The-Sexual-Politics-Meat-Feminist-Vegetarian/dp/0826411843)
"First published in 1990, The Sexual Politics of Meat is a landmark text in the ongoing debates about animal rights. In the two decades since, the book has inspired controversy and heated debate. The Sexual Politics of Meat argues that what, or more precisely who, we eat is determined by the patriarchal politics of our culture, and that the meanings attached to meat eating are often clustered around virility. We live in a world in which men still have considerable power over women, both in public and in private. Carol Adams argues that gender politics is inextricably related to how we view animals, especially animals who are consumed. Further, she argues that vegetarianism and fighting for animal rights fit perfectly alongside working to improve the lives of disenfranchised and suffering people, under the wide umbrella of compassionate activism."
That book can be seen as part of the ongoing degradation of general observations and science into something very dangerous - views and opinions based on random whims, often with a feminist, religious, sexual or otherwise subjective world-view.
One can hope these new results will help raising the arguments to a decent intellectual level.
"The problem with computer chips is that there is no fundamental death/life reward system unless we as humans implement it. And there will always be a need for us to do this because nature doesn't care about logic gates, we do. If you make a set of chips to provide an environment for incubating and reward or punishing the first set of chips, you merely have another layer where humans must evaluate and instruct the chips as to what it is that we want."
Don't despair, this is how humans have hade breeding programs for the domestic animals like cattle, goats, sheep, horses, cats, and dogs for millennia.
So, of course we will have evaluate them at some points before we can hope to use them.
"The start of the Ediacaran period is defined by one of the most severe climate change events recorded in Earth history—the recovery from the Marinoan ‘snowball’ ice age,,635 Myr ago. [...]
The distinctive features of Marinoan deglaciation that define the base of the Ediacaran period can be attributed to the effects of permafrost methane clathrate destabilization. In contrast to the balanced feedbacks and progressive glacial–interglacial cycles of Cenozoic deglaciation, the violent opening of the highly volatile shelf-permafrost methane clathrate pool could act as a trigger to catastrophic climate and biogeochemical reorganization of the Earth system, abruptly bringing the long-lived and icy Cryogenian period to a close and setting the stage for the appearance of metazoans and dominance of a new Earth system. This event both identifies the range of function of the climate system, and demonstrates a mechanism activated by strong climate forcing not unlike projected future effects of atmospheric CO2."
Why test in the backyard? Even if it involves a risk (www.google.com/search?q=underground+test+nuclear+risk+assessment)?
I guess that given that NK is a small country I can understand their willingness to do it in the backyard and that they have come to the conclusion it must be a fairly low risk.
But, still? What if they screw up like they did with their rocket?
That competition is ok and a good thing, as opposed to the stupid kde/gnome/unity/kfce/lxde joke. The office suits whirl around the standards, whereas the kde/gnome/unity/xfce/lxde joke more is about penises less than 6 inches.
Go for standard formats and keep up competition where it works!
Don''t be silly. The US Army is superior becuase it has both quantity and quality.
No army in the EU has both quantity and quality. And even if you combine the armies in the EU (or NATO) to get quantity you lose in quality, because of coordination issues due to different languages; like the French want to have a saying in all (even if no-one cares, really). Look at Libya. There are several reasons why there where no ground troops.
Soviet, had quantity and overkill power. A bit rusty perhaps, but it worked. Russia is gradually returning. Slowly but steadily. Watch the news, monthly.
China, had 2 billion armed bicycles but have replaced them with ultra-high technology at a pace which makes them a serious contender in the near to short long run. Watch the news, weekly.
Mexico? They're disorganized when it comes to the army. But their organised crime syndicates are fucking well organised, and probably rank among the best paid suppliers to the troops. Watch the local news, daily.
So, don''t be silly. The US Army still is superior becuase it has both quantity and quality.
Strange, there are so few svg animation programs? Ktoon appears unsupported, Synfig has no importer for svg files and an addon for Inkscape still is in the making... Sad.
Microsoft's Bing probably has it too, in droves. In fact, any decent crawler may have it.Why sholdn't they? You don't realize until it is too late I guess.
"No true Scotsman is an informal logical fallacy, an ad hoc attempt to retain an unreasoned assertion.[1] When faced with a counterexample to a universal claim, rather than denying the counterexample or rejecting the original universal claim, this fallacy modifies the subject of the assertion to exclude the specific case or others like it by rhetoric, without reference to any specific objective rule."
Slashdot Mirror
Some feminist psychos will nuts of those results, and not over the mens' nuts. Here is an example of meat and sex, gone wrong... Seriously and dangerously wrong:
"The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory" (http://www.amazon.com/The-Sexual-Politics-Meat-Feminist-Vegetarian/dp/0826411843)
"First published in 1990, The Sexual Politics of Meat is a landmark text in the ongoing debates about animal rights. In the two decades since, the book has inspired controversy and heated debate. The Sexual Politics of Meat argues that what, or more precisely who, we eat is determined by the patriarchal politics of our culture, and that the meanings attached to meat eating are often clustered around virility. We live in a world in which men still have considerable power over women, both in public and in private. Carol Adams argues that gender politics is inextricably related to how we view animals, especially animals who are consumed. Further, she argues that vegetarianism and fighting for animal rights fit perfectly alongside working to improve the lives of disenfranchised and suffering people, under the wide umbrella of compassionate activism."
That book can be seen as part of the ongoing degradation of general observations and science into something very dangerous - views and opinions based on random whims, often with a feminist, religious, sexual or otherwise subjective world-view.
One can hope these new results will help raising the arguments to a decent intellectual level.
"The problem with computer chips is that there is no fundamental death/life reward system unless we as humans implement it. And there will always be a need for us to do this because nature doesn't care about logic gates, we do. If you make a set of chips to provide an environment for incubating and reward or punishing the first set of chips, you merely have another layer where humans must evaluate and instruct the chips as to what it is that we want."
Don't despair, this is how humans have hade breeding programs for the domestic animals like cattle, goats, sheep, horses, cats, and dogs for millennia.
So, of course we will have evaluate them at some points before we can hope to use them.
I found this from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~martink/pdfs/Kennedy_2008_Nature.pdf
"The start of the Ediacaran period is defined by one of the most ,635 Myr ago. [...]
severe climate change events recorded in Earth history—the recovery
from the Marinoan ‘snowball’ ice age,
The distinctive features of Marinoan deglaciation that define the
base of the Ediacaran period can be attributed to the effects of
permafrost methane clathrate destabilization. In contrast to the
balanced feedbacks and progressive glacial–interglacial cycles of
Cenozoic deglaciation, the violent opening of the highly volatile
shelf-permafrost methane clathrate pool could act as a trigger to
catastrophic climate and biogeochemical reorganization of the
Earth system, abruptly bringing the long-lived and icy Cryogenian
period to a close and setting the stage for the appearance of metazoans
and dominance of a new Earth system. This event both identifies
the range of function of the climate system, and demonstrates a
mechanism activated by strong climate forcing not unlike projected
future effects of atmospheric CO2."
We have been a "snowball Earth", but life changed that some 2-3 billion years ago. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryogenian
Without life, Earth would probably have remained a snowball Earth.
What is the problem?
"Kaspersky refers to it as 'Backdoor.OSX.SabPub.a' while Sophos calls it at 'SX/Sabpab-A.'""
G3ckoG33k calls it BotOxAss-A.
Why test in the backyard? Even if it involves a risk (www.google.com/search?q=underground+test+nuclear+risk+assessment)?
I guess that given that NK is a small country I can understand their willingness to do it in the backyard and that they have come to the conclusion it must be a fairly low risk.
But, still? What if they screw up like they did with their rocket?
I don't believe in this as an indication of life on Mars.
To me it looks like misunderstood chemistry. There is an oops somewhere. That is my bet.
'libreoffice is probably the best'
That competition is ok and a good thing, as opposed to the stupid kde/gnome/unity/kfce/lxde joke. The office suits whirl around the standards, whereas the kde/gnome/unity/xfce/lxde joke more is about penises less than 6 inches.
Go for standard formats and keep up competition where it works!
Not folding arms on floor.
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%85%92%E7%B2%BE%E4%B8%AD%E6%AF%92
Big white F35-phone over.
Rice paper higher fly.
"America, take note"
WTF, Santorum ends his bid for GOP nomination.
He must have read what you wrote. Scary stuff :|
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57411949-503544/rick-santorum-ends-bid-for-gop-nomination/
Don''t be silly. The US Army is superior becuase it has both quantity and quality.
No army in the EU has both quantity and quality. And even if you combine the armies in the EU (or NATO) to get quantity you lose in quality, because of coordination issues due to different languages; like the French want to have a saying in all (even if no-one cares, really). Look at Libya. There are several reasons why there where no ground troops.
Soviet, had quantity and overkill power. A bit rusty perhaps, but it worked. Russia is gradually returning. Slowly but steadily. Watch the news, monthly.
China, had 2 billion armed bicycles but have replaced them with ultra-high technology at a pace which makes them a serious contender in the near to short long run. Watch the news, weekly.
Mexico? They're disorganized when it comes to the army. But their organised crime syndicates are fucking well organised, and probably rank among the best paid suppliers to the troops. Watch the local news, daily.
So, don''t be silly. The US Army still is superior becuase it has both quantity and quality.
Synfig (http://www.synfig.org/) has an importer for svg files!
It has been around since a few subreleases. Just right-click on the workspace.
Nice to see!
LOL!
Mod current, (Score:5, Funny), as underrated!
Strange, there are so few svg animation programs? Ktoon appears unsupported, Synfig has no importer for svg files and an addon for Inkscape still is in the making... Sad.
Microsoft's Bing probably has it too, in droves. In fact, any decent crawler may have it.Why sholdn't they? You don't realize until it is too late I guess.
For three milliseventeenths of a ninety-seventh of a fortnight, I had no idea what you were on to.
I wish politicians would step down in light of evidence. Not like the Santorum henchmen...
"there is still the question of using a public bank or a private one (and which one to trust)"
I wouldn't trust them with anything. At least my childs blood.
"No true Scotsman is an informal logical fallacy, an ad hoc attempt to retain an unreasoned assertion.[1] When faced with a counterexample to a universal claim, rather than denying the counterexample or rejecting the original universal claim, this fallacy modifies the subject of the assertion to exclude the specific case or others like it by rhetoric, without reference to any specific objective rule."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
QED
DNA is large. Hasn't it been tested?
"metal surfaces scarred by exposure to radiation"
No pics? Booo.
It is probably more advance than any Apollo... The Apollo series is complex but still cast iron technology by comparison I guess.
Will we see a growth of vigilantes because of this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vigilante
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_squads
One could see this as move to privatize the business, favoring an entrepreneurial attitude!
Very scary.
What insights will we gain from this breakthrough? As it stands it sounds as impressive as the Burj Khalifa in Dubai. Cool, but sort of useless.
Why did they choose 100 Tesla as a target? Why not 117 Tesla? That is even more!
Debian rulez! :)