Almost every way? How 'bout only one way? He had one message, on the economy. Sure, that's an important one. But I don't recall him speaking with much depth on any other topic.
I did the wrong thing -- I voted for Trump. I believed that Trump was much less likely to start another war than Clinton.
Was and still is. Hillary campaigned on shooting down Russian jets in Syria. The fact that you're not a year into a nuclear winter is a pretty good sign you did in fact vote for the "lesser of two evils". Sure, Trump has talked smack about North Korea, but it was Bill Clinton who started the practice invasions of North Korea held every year, which was a huge impetus for North Korea's desire to get nuclear weapons in the first place.
Yes, this! The manipulation of Trump's supporters was so overt that it's mostly uninteresting and just tragic. The manipulation of Bernie supports is the really fascinating thing to me.
As opposed to the mountains of 'schrooms necessary to be a Hillary supporter? This is the woman who said her Iraq vote was a mistake (while blaming Bush) but went on to repeat that same "mistake" in Libya and Syria. This is the woman who spent years being harassed by the GOP and the media for trumped-up scandals on Vince Foster - yet knowing the scrutiny she'd be subjected to, thought it would be a great idea to spend months lying her ass off about being shot at in Bosnia? And to blast the Bush Administration for using private email, only to set up her own private email server within two years?
Serious question time: with Hillary's track record of incompetence, bloodlust and hypocrisy, what business does she have running a Keurig machine, much less a country?
I'm not saying I believe ALL of the reports, but I definitely believe the consensus of the national security organizations.
You mean the same people who lied you into Iraq? If you want to play Charlie to their Lucy with the football, that's your business. Oh, and there is no consensus and never was.
Thus, you have a situation where Clinton received an extremely large number of votes, by far the plurality, and managed to lose despite that.
Because there is no such thing as a popular vote for president in the USA. Hillary's margin of "victory" came from two large states that Trump didn't bother to campaign in, CA and NY, because he knew he wasn't going to win them. As opposed to Hillary, who didn't bother to campaign in blueish Rust Belt States that went for Trump in the general.
If the elitists electoral college was jettisoned, Trump would have campaigned in CA and NY, and by the same token a non-stupid Democrat would have campaigned in Texas. Because everyone's vote would have actually counted; it would have been an entirely different race if the rules were entirely different to start with.
Did you? Not only did Hillary do exactly what Democrats have accused Trump of doing, she paid for it. This is a classic case of Swiftboating - accusing your opponent of something you are far more guilty of.
Even if you only consider inflation, a AAA title that cost $60 in 2005 should cost ~$75 in 2016 dollars.
Except: the game industry is much larger now than in 2006, and what used to be released as free content to keep sales going for existing games (expansion packs) is now being nickel and dimed as DLC.
Very different. Your friends could sell or trade their unwanted football cards....can't do that with Battlefront loot boxes as they're tied to your account. And with physical cards at a store, the publisher couldn't manipulate odds on the fly to keep you buying - but that's trivial for a software company.
i.e. you start playing and have a 1 in 5 chance of getting a good loot item like a Kyber Crystal. But if you're close to completing a set, you could see your odds rise to 1 in 50. I don't know if any game company has actually done such a thing, but it would be soooo easy and get soooo much money from addicted players.
Right... that's why there aren't any European plants growing in the Americas. Because we can't just go ahead and plant them; no, they have to evolve first.
Yes, because you can just up and replace entire ecosystems on a moment's notice with new flora and fauna.
Getting a net CO2 cut would basically require that China stop industrialising. If the Chinese government tried that, they'd be overthrown in a bloody revolution
Ah, yes. Pretending that China with 4-5 times the population of the United States is the problem, and then ignoring that much of China's pollution comes from producing crap for American consumers.
No, it means workers still doing the "full" week of 35 hours will get paid more than those working 28. But the pay raise offsets much of of the difference from those working one less day per week.
You a capitalist fart-sniffer? Germany makes twice as many cars as the US while paying their workers twice as much....so they compete pretty damned well.
And it will remain that way unless we start building nuclear reactors.
You'll get a perpetual motion machine before you get a safe, cost-effective nuclear power plant. You can go ahead and say we'll never have another Chernobyl or Fukushima again, but the Achilles heel of nuclear power is that the cost can never be justified. It costs far too much to build, far to much to run, far too much to decommission, and far too much to deal with the waste.
It's quite amazing this hypocrisy on nuclear power vs. solar and wind.
That word, hypocrisy. It doesn't mean whatever it is you think it means. Unless you have some breaking news on wind farms causing hurricanes, or solar farms accidentally forming an Archimedes mirror and burning down a city, and people are ignoring that.
Right, let's just ignore that there are currently over 400 nuclear power reactors working on the planet right now.
Like you're ignoring the hundreds of billions it will cost to decommission all those plants, and trillions to store the waste for thousands of years. Costs that no wind or solar farm will have to worry about.
I agree that in the long-term nuclear is a pretty good idea. But right now, isn't practically an option
It's never an option that makes any sense, as nuclear power can't be justified based on cost alone. It costs too much to build, too much to decommission, and too much to deal with the waste. And it also takes too long to build.
Nuclear kills fewer people and less wildlife per year than wind or solar.
Less people than zero? Don't confuse industrial accidents with a failure of the power generating technology itself. If Homer is up on a maintenance scaffold, slips and falls at Mr. Burns power plant, that fatality is not due to nuclear power. When you can point to a case of a wind farm starting a tornado, not just a worker falling off a tower, you can talk about how many people wind power has killed.
No distinction or difference. A crawfish in a tank isn't going to be in danger of predators, so it will be free to eat and reproduce to its heart's content.
It's not racist to dislike an ideology that wants to fucking kill you.
Lulz. American Exceptionalists are the worst tough guy crybaby bitches the world has ever seen. Long before you were killing a million people in a bullshit invasion, you killed half a million kids with sanctions, shoot down a passenger jet in their own airspace, and overthrew governments to install dictators like Saddam and the Shah.
If muslims responded to your terrorism the way the U.S. responded to 911, the entire USA would have been nuked down to bedrock decades ago. Then the population would be wished back to life with Dragon Balls just to be bombed back into bedrock again.
The case of Gottfrid Svartholm makes bad liars out of all the concern trolls working on behalf of American Hegemony. Sweden goes to great lengths to extradite someone from a non-extradition country, and immediately throws him in a cell with no contact for weeks, interrogated for a case in another country, and deported to said country.
Slashdot Mirror
Why wouldn't it. It's not like your precious capitalism is working for half the country.
No, he didn't.
Neat how willful ignorance works that way.
Was and still is. Hillary campaigned on shooting down Russian jets in Syria. The fact that you're not a year into a nuclear winter is a pretty good sign you did in fact vote for the "lesser of two evils". Sure, Trump has talked smack about North Korea, but it was Bill Clinton who started the practice invasions of North Korea held every year, which was a huge impetus for North Korea's desire to get nuclear weapons in the first place.
As opposed to the mountains of 'schrooms necessary to be a Hillary supporter? This is the woman who said her Iraq vote was a mistake (while blaming Bush) but went on to repeat that same "mistake" in Libya and Syria. This is the woman who spent years being harassed by the GOP and the media for trumped-up scandals on Vince Foster - yet knowing the scrutiny she'd be subjected to, thought it would be a great idea to spend months lying her ass off about being shot at in Bosnia? And to blast the Bush Administration for using private email, only to set up her own private email server within two years?
Serious question time: with Hillary's track record of incompetence, bloodlust and hypocrisy, what business does she have running a Keurig machine, much less a country?
You mean the same people who lied you into Iraq? If you want to play Charlie to their Lucy with the football, that's your business. Oh, and there is no consensus and never was.
Because there is no such thing as a popular vote for president in the USA. Hillary's margin of "victory" came from two large states that Trump didn't bother to campaign in, CA and NY, because he knew he wasn't going to win them. As opposed to Hillary, who didn't bother to campaign in blueish Rust Belt States that went for Trump in the general.
If the elitists electoral college was jettisoned, Trump would have campaigned in CA and NY, and by the same token a non-stupid Democrat would have campaigned in Texas. Because everyone's vote would have actually counted; it would have been an entirely different race if the rules were entirely different to start with.
Another stubborn donkey, so fitting that it's the party mascot.
Did you? Not only did Hillary do exactly what Democrats have accused Trump of doing, she paid for it. This is a classic case of Swiftboating - accusing your opponent of something you are far more guilty of.
Good thing that's a total straw man, then.
Except: the game industry is much larger now than in 2006, and what used to be released as free content to keep sales going for existing games (expansion packs) is now being nickel and dimed as DLC.
How. It's easy enough to spot a 12 year old walking up to a blackjack table - how would you do this for a MMO with loot boxes?
Very different. Your friends could sell or trade their unwanted football cards....can't do that with Battlefront loot boxes as they're tied to your account. And with physical cards at a store, the publisher couldn't manipulate odds on the fly to keep you buying - but that's trivial for a software company.
i.e. you start playing and have a 1 in 5 chance of getting a good loot item like a Kyber Crystal. But if you're close to completing a set, you could see your odds rise to 1 in 50. I don't know if any game company has actually done such a thing, but it would be soooo easy and get soooo much money from addicted players.
Yes, because you can just up and replace entire ecosystems on a moment's notice with new flora and fauna.
Ah, yes. Pretending that China with 4-5 times the population of the United States is the problem, and then ignoring that much of China's pollution comes from producing crap for American consumers.
Unless, of course:
There are plenty of ways to be a poor property owner.
No, it means workers still doing the "full" week of 35 hours will get paid more than those working 28. But the pay raise offsets much of of the difference from those working one less day per week.
You a capitalist fart-sniffer? Germany makes twice as many cars as the US while paying their workers twice as much....so they compete pretty damned well.
....a German union responded to increasing automation by striking for a 28 hour work week with a pay increase....and they won.
You'll get a perpetual motion machine before you get a safe, cost-effective nuclear power plant. You can go ahead and say we'll never have another Chernobyl or Fukushima again, but the Achilles heel of nuclear power is that the cost can never be justified. It costs far too much to build, far to much to run, far too much to decommission, and far too much to deal with the waste.
That word, hypocrisy. It doesn't mean whatever it is you think it means. Unless you have some breaking news on wind farms causing hurricanes, or solar farms accidentally forming an Archimedes mirror and burning down a city, and people are ignoring that.
Like you're ignoring the hundreds of billions it will cost to decommission all those plants, and trillions to store the waste for thousands of years. Costs that no wind or solar farm will have to worry about.
Ever.
It's never an option that makes any sense, as nuclear power can't be justified based on cost alone. It costs too much to build, too much to decommission, and too much to deal with the waste. And it also takes too long to build.
Less people than zero? Don't confuse industrial accidents with a failure of the power generating technology itself. If Homer is up on a maintenance scaffold, slips and falls at Mr. Burns power plant, that fatality is not due to nuclear power. When you can point to a case of a wind farm starting a tornado, not just a worker falling off a tower, you can talk about how many people wind power has killed.
No distinction or difference. A crawfish in a tank isn't going to be in danger of predators, so it will be free to eat and reproduce to its heart's content.
Lulz. American Exceptionalists are the worst tough guy crybaby bitches the world has ever seen. Long before you were killing a million people in a bullshit invasion, you killed half a million kids with sanctions, shoot down a passenger jet in their own airspace, and overthrew governments to install dictators like Saddam and the Shah.
If muslims responded to your terrorism the way the U.S. responded to 911, the entire USA would have been nuked down to bedrock decades ago. Then the population would be wished back to life with Dragon Balls just to be bombed back into bedrock again.
And that's being merciful.
The case of Gottfrid Svartholm makes bad liars out of all the concern trolls working on behalf of American Hegemony. Sweden goes to great lengths to extradite someone from a non-extradition country, and immediately throws him in a cell with no contact for weeks, interrogated for a case in another country, and deported to said country.
Get lost, dipshit.
Not the neocons who lied them into not one but two wars costing trillions of dollars and 8,000+ American lives? GFTO, dipshit.