No, you don't. This is a common misconception about quantum teleportation. You still need a second, non-instantaneous communication channel to complete the information transaction.
Wrong, it is you that has the misconception. You DO NOT need a second channel. Experiments (albeit ones with loopholes) provide strong evidence for this instaneous "quantum bridge". Go to your room.
This and its parent are incorrect.
For the parent: the state of all bits become fixed when observation of any member is read; this is simply a noise correction for what is read, a sort of redundance.
For this: this effect does not supply long distance communication. All it does is supply uncrackable encryption. A signal (probably radio) still needs to be sent in order for information to actually be communicated. Wrong, you are thinking in terms of cllassical mechanics and relativity. A mistake that so many make. Long distance communication is indeed possible in the manner discussed by parent.
Yay, isnt technology wonderful. Instead of making things smaller we are making them bigger -pfff, Intel and AMD both suck for this. I can just see the Opteron now - a big clunky 1878 pin monster with 2 fans. And dual cache - even worse. Come on - pathetic. I expect allot more. Im going to get a tablet laptop with a Via mobo and proc next - in a year (max) they will be small and powerful enough for ALL my needs, with low power consumption and low noise to boot, and probably 1/8th the size of those monsters.
I find it really annoying when people like to play semantics with words. Me too.
Plus Linux is technically an O.S. The kernel is really a bare bones OS - much like MS DOS (D_isc O_perating S_ystem) is also an OS. ALthough I have to admit, certain terms are very annoying. Intellectual Property for exmaple - a lawyers term. It refers to the blob that is copyrights, and trademarks etc. but makes no sense on its own really. I look here for spiritual guidance.
Exactly. My personal machine uses 2.4.26 - the standard and stable default kernel for Slackware 10.0 I dont need anythin from the newer kernel. I read a post saying that the 2.6 series have a better scheduler but we're talking infinitessimally better here. Not worth the hassle of upgrading in my opinion. I really do believe there is not the same need to upgrade with Linux as there is with Windows.
Firstly to triterate a child post, Linux is an OS, not an update centre. There are lots of ways Liux users update, Many distros do. Tools lile apt, Swaret, Potage (emerge), etc. do that very thing. But they dont force it down your throat with a generic one size fits all ball of chaos. ..releasing a patch of this magnitude Yes you make it sound like the deathstar.
and I apologize if i'm wrong. That was the smartest thing you said. You don't need to upgrade your kernel. In favt many choose to use the older more stable kernels instead of the newer unstable ones - i.i 2.6.8.1
Hackers just dont pay the same attention to Linux, and when they do, they are not able to have the same penetration. Linux security is a public work in progress so exploits can be spotted long before they are with Windows. Windows is a good OS - good enough to warrant a small piece of the pie - not the huge amount it actually does. Windows offers: a good GUI, decent plug'n'play, a half-decent office suite, amongst a couple of other things. It deserves credit for that, but thats it. But its not free - like a bird.
The 'proper' word for 'first annual' is 'inaugural.' I don't know whether it guarantees a second one like 'first annual' does though. I proopse a new name: "The First annual, inaugural, and most devine and eternal association of No Homer ermmm I mean free software"
I often have the same thought commrade. Life would be so good I would have to spend time fasting and supressing my emotions in order to get a balance. I would be much more content.
``Theft'' "Copyright apologists often use words like ``stolen'' and ``theft'' to describe copyright infringement. At the same time, they ask us to treat the legal system as an authority on ethics: if copying is forbidden, it must be wrong.
So it is pertinent to mention that the legal system--at least in the US--rejects the idea that copyright infringement is ``theft.'' Copyright apologists are making an appeal to authority...and misrepresenting what authority says.
The idea that laws decide what is right or wrong is mistaken in general. Laws are, at their best, an attempt to achieve justice; to say that laws define justice or ethical conduct is turning things upside down." -- Richard Stallman, Free Software Foundation.
You could read this link to a more intersting story I tried to submit that was rejected. (Flamebait modding unnecessary - just mentioning)
Here =======}*
If Im paying, the virtual girlfriend would need to be jumping out of that phone, becomming real and giving me the most earth shattering screw ever known.
I'd rather go to a bar and meet chicks to spend money on. You want to spend money on them. Just how much do you make?
I'd like to go to a bar, steel their purse, and then pay for everything.
Slashdot Mirror
No, you don't. This is a common misconception about quantum teleportation. You still need a second, non-instantaneous communication channel to complete the information transaction.
Wrong, it is you that has the misconception. You DO NOT need a second channel. Experiments (albeit ones with loopholes) provide strong evidence for this instaneous "quantum bridge". Go to your room.
This and its parent are incorrect. For the parent: the state of all bits become fixed when observation of any member is read; this is simply a noise correction for what is read, a sort of redundance. For this: this effect does not supply long distance communication. All it does is supply uncrackable encryption. A signal (probably radio) still needs to be sent in order for information to actually be communicated.
Wrong, you are thinking in terms of cllassical mechanics and relativity. A mistake that so many make. Long distance communication is indeed possible in the manner discussed by parent.
Other intelligent life in the universe:
1:1 ??
Yay, isnt technology wonderful. Instead of making things smaller we are making them bigger -pfff,
Intel and AMD both suck for this.
I can just see the Opteron now - a big clunky 1878 pin monster with 2 fans. And dual cache - even worse. Come on - pathetic. I expect allot more. Im going to get a tablet laptop with a Via mobo and proc next - in a year (max) they will be small and powerful enough for ALL my needs, with low power consumption and low noise to boot, and probably 1/8th the size of those monsters.
connecting to steam....
cerifying user account....
You are now not playing Counter strike 2
I find it really annoying when people like to play semantics with words.
Me too. Plus Linux is technically an O.S. The kernel is really a bare bones OS - much like MS DOS (D_isc O_perating S_ystem) is also an OS. ALthough I have to admit, certain terms are very annoying. Intellectual Property for exmaple - a lawyers term. It refers to the blob that is copyrights, and trademarks etc. but makes no sense on its own really. I look here for spiritual guidance.
Exactly. My personal machine uses 2.4.26 - the standard and stable default kernel for Slackware 10.0 I dont need anythin from the newer kernel. I read a post saying that the 2.6 series have a better scheduler but we're talking infinitessimally better here. Not worth the hassle of upgrading in my opinion. I really do believe there is not the same need to upgrade with Linux as there is with Windows.
Firstly to triterate a child post, Linux is an OS, not an update centre. There are lots of ways Liux users update, Many distros do. Tools lile apt, Swaret, Potage (emerge), etc. do that very thing. But they dont force it down your throat with a generic one size fits all ball of chaos.
..releasing a patch of this magnitude Yes you make it sound like the deathstar.
and I apologize if i'm wrong.
That was the smartest thing you said. You don't need to upgrade your kernel. In favt many choose to use the older more stable kernels instead of the newer unstable ones - i.i 2.6.8.1
Hackers just dont pay the same attention to Linux, and when they do, they are not able to have the same penetration. Linux security is a public work in progress so exploits can be spotted long before they are with Windows. Windows is a good OS - good enough to warrant a small piece of the pie - not the huge amount it actually does. Windows offers: a good GUI, decent plug'n'play, a half-decent office suite, amongst a couple of other things. It deserves credit for that, but thats it. But its not free - like a bird.
In Slackware I trust- My only OS.
I will never go back to Windows. No crappy Sp's for me thankyou very much.
The 'proper' word for 'first annual' is 'inaugural.' I don't know whether it guarantees a second one like 'first annual' does though.
I proopse a new name: "The First annual, inaugural, and most devine and eternal association of No Homer ermmm I mean free software"
I often have the same thought commrade. Life would be so good I would have to spend time fasting and supressing my emotions in order to get a balance. I would be much more content.
Richard Stallman I salute you.
but not as much sense as capitalism (for the masses) sadly. Enkoy those pancakes. Add extra syrup : )
I have consulter my oracle on the matter -
v oid.html
``Theft''
"Copyright apologists often use words like ``stolen'' and ``theft'' to describe copyright infringement. At the same time, they ask us to treat the legal system as an authority on ethics: if copying is forbidden, it must be wrong.
So it is pertinent to mention that the legal system--at least in the US--rejects the idea that copyright infringement is ``theft.'' Copyright apologists are making an appeal to authority...and misrepresenting what authority says.
The idea that laws decide what is right or wrong is mistaken in general. Laws are, at their best, an attempt to achieve justice; to say that laws define justice or ethical conduct is turning things upside down." -- Richard Stallman, Free Software Foundation.
From:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-a
unless you come up with something new, it's hard to make it to the top by hard work alone.
Socialism.
You could read this link to a more intersting story I tried to submit that was rejected. (Flamebait modding unnecessary - just mentioning)
Here =======} *
the Hedgehog only eats:
Hershey bars
Credits are for the weak. I am in the credits for a game I never tested, and not in the credits for many games I helped to test...
You hurt my feelings with your modding you insensitive clod.
thats the first word that came to my mind ;)
He may or may not in fact be a stalker, but surely he could help out making the game..
We should apply the "good spelling" rule to /. posts.
Yeah, I agreee, wi shud applie the "gud speling" rool t0 slash d0t.
If Im paying, the virtual girlfriend would need to be jumping out of that phone, becomming real and giving me the most earth shattering screw ever known.
not me having the give it flowers
I'd rather go to a bar and meet chicks to spend money on.
You want to spend money on them. Just how much do you make? I'd like to go to a bar, steel their purse, and then pay for everything.
Hello??
The Windows API of course. Cedega4.0 would rule if they had it. Also, the source code for Avalon - Windows next API for Longhorn..