Sources have told The American Spectator that on Tuesday night, after Hillary realized she had lost, she went into a rage. Secret Service officers told at least one source that she began yelling, screaming obscenities, and pounding furniture. She picked up objects and threw them at attendants and staff. She was in an uncontrollable rage. Her aides could not allow her to come out in public. It would take her hours to calm down.
Did you not read the wikileaks emails that showed the Clinton camp conspiring with the MSM, fudging the sampling? Make sure to read the attachment, as you'll see them recommend strategies for different regions and states. For instance, in Florida, it was recommended that "independent" voters in Tampa and Orlando are apparently more dem friendly, so the report suggests filling up independent quotas in those cities first. And by doing this, they manufactured a big lead in the polls for their candidate, hoping to convince Trump supporters that he was going to get slaughtered, so they would not bother to get out and vote.
Horseshit. Supporters chose to support him because he was the only candidate who wasn't a DC insider. Take a trip across the country and talk to people not in the giant urban centers. People are unhappy with Washington. The job market sucks, wages are stagnant, costs keep rising, and there's no sign of any of this changing in the near future. Conservatives are pissed off at the DC establishment Republicans because they've been given control of the House and Senate, but haven't done anything to alter the course. If Trump fails to do anything that will reduce the flow of illegal immigrants into the country as promised, he won't get a second term. My guess is he'll kick the "Climate Change" can down the road rather than pursue any legislation that would put an added financial strain on the working class. But that's just a guess, all we can do is wait and see...
Islam is not a supremacist movement. The Nazi movement was a supremacist movement because they believed the Germanic people were genetically superior to the rest of the human race. Islam only asks that you join them or die. They'll take anyone, regardless of genetics. It's more of a totalitarian ideology.
I'm not going to bother arguing your nonsense about "emerging Jewish supremacy". The Jews have been persecuted in Europe for 2000 years.
Just to clarify, Zionism isn't a supremacist movement. It was a REACTION to the anti-semitism rampant throughout Europe. And Islam isn't a supremacist movement either, it's a religion.
Very odd that this story comes out now, as I just read study about CO2 and fossil fuel emissions that concluded there is no correlation between emission and CO2 concentration. Here's a link: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/p...
I'm not a statistician, so I can't attest to it's accuracy or validity, but it was an interesting read.
Ya, I'm sure the companies of Silicon Valley would want to relocate to Ontario.
And that article was written before another round of electricity rate hikes, and a carbon tax being introduced this year. Ontario used to be referred to as the economic engine of Canada. It's been so poorly managed it is now considered a "have not" province and receives payments from Newfoundland, Saskatchewan, and BC to prop it up.
Not yet, but they're very close to having a monopoly now that Ailes is out at Fox. If you've been following the Wikileaks releases, you would have seen that all of the mainstream media were colluding and working with the Clinton team. All of Hollywood and all of the big networks working overtime for Clinton, controlling the news you hear, massaging, filtering, and shaping the message being delivered to the populace. If not for the internet, Reddit, Wikileaks, and a few others, Clinton would be winning all 50 states and nobody would have a clue.
How obtuse are you? Please spend a few hours reading some of the Wikileaks releases. Washington Post, CNN, Politico, CBS, ABC all working with the DNC and Clinton camp. They gave her debate questions, they asked what questions they should be asking her opponents, they sent stories they were going to publish to get the okay first. It's a massive propaganda machine and you're eating it all up and believing it. And you come on here and tell others they're ignorant?
I don't think Trump was planted by the Dems to get Hillary elected, but I do think the Democrat loving Media did everything they could to help him win the Republican primary so that it would be him against her. There were some very solid and capable candidates in the Republican field that would have done a good job as President.
Huma, stop posting as an AC.
1. Bill's history of abusing his position of power in order to exploit women is very well known and documented. There are plenty of interviews and books written about it by many of the women he's used and abused. And Hillary has a documented history of attacking these same women, in order to silence them or destroy their credibility. Finally, we have actual rape accusations against Bill that have been swept under the rug by a Democrat loving media. Why didn't NBC ever release the full interview they did of Juanita Broaddrick?
2. Did he say he was not going to accept the results at all? Or did he say he'll keep you in suspense?
3. The only people claiming O'Keefe is a liar and that he's engaging in misleading filming and editing are those that have been made to look bad by his revelations. The fact that the people in his videos "he put out weeks before the election" have RESIGNED tells you there doesn't need to be any vetting, they know they've been caught. And the fact that YOU don't want to believe any of it, and want to dismiss all of his revelations as fraudulent tells me you're a huge partisan Democrat hack.
4. http://www.thegatewaypundit.co... 5. http://downtrend.com/71superb/...
Realistic solution: Build desalination plants and water pumps in order to irrigate the Sahara. Turn the Sahara into a tropical forest. It will remove a massive amount of CO2 from the atmosphere in short order.
I disagree with you on this. Trump is egotistical. He's boorish and crude. He often speaks without thinking first. He's reactionary and short-tempered. Given the choice of candidates in the Republican primary, he'd be second last on my list (just ahead of Jeb). But he's not rock bottom like Hillary is. She's got 40 years of exploiting her and Bill's public office positions for personal gain. After seeing the details of the email scandal, it's clear as day that she should be behind bars for her actions. The Clinton Foundation should be shut down. It's nothing but a money laundering machine for the Clintons. How can anyone vote for Hillary knowing she was accepting money from foreign entities in order to make favorable decisions regarding business they had with the State Department? She sold out the US government for personal gain. She set up an email server in order to protect her communications from being seen. She's the biggest crook the US government has ever known, yet she's on the verge of becoming President?
Finally a comment that's actually deserving of being moderated +5 Insightful! You're absolutely correct, if Samsung doesn't push accessory manufacturers to support USB-C as the main connection for devices, the accessory market will fragment, with some supporting the old 3.5" connection, some supporting the older USB connectors, and some supporting the new USB-C.
Are the moderators smoking crack today?
From the article: "Removing the dedicated audio plug will also allow OEMs to create smartphones that are slimmer and have better water resistance capabilities."
And you reply with "it'd be trivially easy to add multiple USB ports, solving that problem and a few others too." How does switching a headphone jack for a USB save space and increase water resistance? Seriously? How? And finally, you end your comment with "Can't see Samsung doing that though, at least, not unless Apple also does it."
Hello, welcome to 2016. Apple has already released a new phone with the headphone jack removed. Moderators, lay off the crack pipe while moderating please.
Slashdot Mirror
Sources have told The American Spectator that on Tuesday night, after Hillary realized she had lost, she went into a rage. Secret Service officers told at least one source that she began yelling, screaming obscenities, and pounding furniture. She picked up objects and threw them at attendants and staff. She was in an uncontrollable rage. Her aides could not allow her to come out in public. It would take her hours to calm down.
Did you not read the wikileaks emails that showed the Clinton camp conspiring with the MSM, fudging the sampling? Make sure to read the attachment, as you'll see them recommend strategies for different regions and states. For instance, in Florida, it was recommended that "independent" voters in Tampa and Orlando are apparently more dem friendly, so the report suggests filling up independent quotas in those cities first. And by doing this, they manufactured a big lead in the polls for their candidate, hoping to convince Trump supporters that he was going to get slaughtered, so they would not bother to get out and vote.
No, she wasn't a sore loser at all
She wasn't cleared of charges. Loretta Lynch chose not to pursue any charges, and made that clear to Comey in their meeting.
Horseshit. Supporters chose to support him because he was the only candidate who wasn't a DC insider. Take a trip across the country and talk to people not in the giant urban centers. People are unhappy with Washington. The job market sucks, wages are stagnant, costs keep rising, and there's no sign of any of this changing in the near future. Conservatives are pissed off at the DC establishment Republicans because they've been given control of the House and Senate, but haven't done anything to alter the course. If Trump fails to do anything that will reduce the flow of illegal immigrants into the country as promised, he won't get a second term. My guess is he'll kick the "Climate Change" can down the road rather than pursue any legislation that would put an added financial strain on the working class. But that's just a guess, all we can do is wait and see...
It's too bad you posted as an AC, your post deserves to be modded up
Islam is not a supremacist movement. The Nazi movement was a supremacist movement because they believed the Germanic people were genetically superior to the rest of the human race. Islam only asks that you join them or die. They'll take anyone, regardless of genetics. It's more of a totalitarian ideology. I'm not going to bother arguing your nonsense about "emerging Jewish supremacy". The Jews have been persecuted in Europe for 2000 years.
Google is your friend. BLM activist advocating White Genocide at Harvard: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... BLM activist chanting "Kill White Babies": https://www.youtube.com/watch?... google Vester Lee Flanagan
Just to clarify, Zionism isn't a supremacist movement. It was a REACTION to the anti-semitism rampant throughout Europe. And Islam isn't a supremacist movement either, it's a religion.
Unless you're a cake maker...in that case, you can't refuse to make a cake because you disagree with what the customer wants written on it...
Very odd that this story comes out now, as I just read study about CO2 and fossil fuel emissions that concluded there is no correlation between emission and CO2 concentration. Here's a link: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/p... I'm not a statistician, so I can't attest to it's accuracy or validity, but it was an interesting read.
And 2% of all drivers is tens of thousands of cars in Germany
But 2% of all Tesla drivers in Germany is less than a hundred...https://electrek.co/2016/04/11/tesla-model-s-deliveries-germany-q1-2016/
Ya, I'm sure the companies of Silicon Valley would want to relocate to Ontario.
And that article was written before another round of electricity rate hikes, and a carbon tax being introduced this year. Ontario used to be referred to as the economic engine of Canada. It's been so poorly managed it is now considered a "have not" province and receives payments from Newfoundland, Saskatchewan, and BC to prop it up.
Not yet, but they're very close to having a monopoly now that Ailes is out at Fox. If you've been following the Wikileaks releases, you would have seen that all of the mainstream media were colluding and working with the Clinton team. All of Hollywood and all of the big networks working overtime for Clinton, controlling the news you hear, massaging, filtering, and shaping the message being delivered to the populace. If not for the internet, Reddit, Wikileaks, and a few others, Clinton would be winning all 50 states and nobody would have a clue.
you honestly trying to tell me Bill won't be back in the White House or won't have any tasks assigned to him at all?
How obtuse are you? Please spend a few hours reading some of the Wikileaks releases. Washington Post, CNN, Politico, CBS, ABC all working with the DNC and Clinton camp. They gave her debate questions, they asked what questions they should be asking her opponents, they sent stories they were going to publish to get the okay first. It's a massive propaganda machine and you're eating it all up and believing it. And you come on here and tell others they're ignorant?
You missed this one: https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/...
Illegal tax avoidance? Citation please
I don't think Trump was planted by the Dems to get Hillary elected, but I do think the Democrat loving Media did everything they could to help him win the Republican primary so that it would be him against her. There were some very solid and capable candidates in the Republican field that would have done a good job as President.
Huma, stop posting as an AC.
1. Bill's history of abusing his position of power in order to exploit women is very well known and documented. There are plenty of interviews and books written about it by many of the women he's used and abused. And Hillary has a documented history of attacking these same women, in order to silence them or destroy their credibility. Finally, we have actual rape accusations against Bill that have been swept under the rug by a Democrat loving media. Why didn't NBC ever release the full interview they did of Juanita Broaddrick?
2. Did he say he was not going to accept the results at all? Or did he say he'll keep you in suspense?
3. The only people claiming O'Keefe is a liar and that he's engaging in misleading filming and editing are those that have been made to look bad by his revelations. The fact that the people in his videos "he put out weeks before the election" have RESIGNED tells you there doesn't need to be any vetting, they know they've been caught. And the fact that YOU don't want to believe any of it, and want to dismiss all of his revelations as fraudulent tells me you're a huge partisan Democrat hack.
4. http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...
5. http://downtrend.com/71superb/...
Realistic solution: Build desalination plants and water pumps in order to irrigate the Sahara. Turn the Sahara into a tropical forest. It will remove a massive amount of CO2 from the atmosphere in short order.
I disagree with you on this. Trump is egotistical. He's boorish and crude. He often speaks without thinking first. He's reactionary and short-tempered. Given the choice of candidates in the Republican primary, he'd be second last on my list (just ahead of Jeb). But he's not rock bottom like Hillary is. She's got 40 years of exploiting her and Bill's public office positions for personal gain. After seeing the details of the email scandal, it's clear as day that she should be behind bars for her actions. The Clinton Foundation should be shut down. It's nothing but a money laundering machine for the Clintons. How can anyone vote for Hillary knowing she was accepting money from foreign entities in order to make favorable decisions regarding business they had with the State Department? She sold out the US government for personal gain. She set up an email server in order to protect her communications from being seen. She's the biggest crook the US government has ever known, yet she's on the verge of becoming President?
Finally a comment that's actually deserving of being moderated +5 Insightful! You're absolutely correct, if Samsung doesn't push accessory manufacturers to support USB-C as the main connection for devices, the accessory market will fragment, with some supporting the old 3.5" connection, some supporting the older USB connectors, and some supporting the new USB-C.
https://www.amazon.ca/HomeSpot...
Are the moderators smoking crack today?
From the article: "Removing the dedicated audio plug will also allow OEMs to create smartphones that are slimmer and have better water resistance capabilities."
And you reply with "it'd be trivially easy to add multiple USB ports, solving that problem and a few others too." How does switching a headphone jack for a USB save space and increase water resistance? Seriously? How? And finally, you end your comment with "Can't see Samsung doing that though, at least, not unless Apple also does it."
Hello, welcome to 2016. Apple has already released a new phone with the headphone jack removed. Moderators, lay off the crack pipe while moderating please.