Wow, sure didn't take long to go for the "bad definition" grab. Wonder why this hasn't been used before, when the list first started? And heck, has anyone checked to see if Unix means Unix, or if it means Unix and Linux? 'Cause last I checked, Unix was generally WAY more expensive, per license, then Microsoft.
Get some clothes on people - your biases are showing, and it ain't flattering.:)
"Is this another nail in the coffin of paid content on the internet?" - this is a joke, right? I mean, you do understand that this has no bearing on reality?
Time goes in one direction, for those experiencing it. For you, if you were to go back to before you were born, and kill your father - there is no paradox. You'd still exist. You're father would be dead. You're father wouldn't have a child. But you would still remember growing up, and all the things that happened in your life. If you then went "back to where you started", your father would still be alive. However, if you went back to the same year/month/day/hour, etc., but not the same place, then your father would be dead, and no one would know who you are. But you would still exist, and remember all of the events that happened to you.
The continuum DOES NOT change. There is no paradox. There is no way to make a paradox.
Either you are an idiot, with your "expectations", and therefore it isn't worth reading your little "discovery", or you are a liar, and therefore it isn't worth reading your little rant.
But these are incredibly stupid. I sincerly doubt people will go use Firefox because they are going to have a better orgasm when they see the computer screen, or whatever these commercials are supposed to show.
No, he's saying that as far as the government should be concerned, you have a union. If you want it to be a marriage of some sort, well, good for you. What's the problem with that?
Mr. President, if the government makes laws concerning marriage to confer rights, privileges and benefits, doesn't that mean the government can decide who gets those rights, privileges and benefits?
A better question (that isn't completely missing the point, as this one clearly does) is "Should the government have any laws regarding marriage, etc.? If so, how do I go about making them say what I want them to say?" If you think a constitutional amendment is the "government" deciding who should marry who, then you need to take a civics course. And listen this time.
We don't have machines right here on earth that can mine in easy conditions without a lot of human intervention. Do you think they'd work better in space?
Slashdot Mirror
It uses gasoline (at least the super fast one)
Wow, sure didn't take long to go for the "bad definition" grab. Wonder why this hasn't been used before, when the list first started? And heck, has anyone checked to see if Unix means Unix, or if it means Unix and Linux? 'Cause last I checked, Unix was generally WAY more expensive, per license, then Microsoft. Get some clothes on people - your biases are showing, and it ain't flattering. :)
You must make a lot of money to afford all that tinfoil.
Ain't that a great acronym?
"Is this another nail in the coffin of paid content on the internet?" - this is a joke, right? I mean, you do understand that this has no bearing on reality?
Time goes in one direction, for those experiencing it. For you, if you were to go back to before you were born, and kill your father - there is no paradox. You'd still exist. You're father would be dead. You're father wouldn't have a child. But you would still remember growing up, and all the things that happened in your life. If you then went "back to where you started", your father would still be alive. However, if you went back to the same year/month/day/hour, etc., but not the same place, then your father would be dead, and no one would know who you are. But you would still exist, and remember all of the events that happened to you. The continuum DOES NOT change. There is no paradox. There is no way to make a paradox.
What the hell? This is diplomatic? Luser.
What the hell? This is diplomatic? Luser.
Either you are an idiot, with your "expectations", and therefore it isn't worth reading your little "discovery", or you are a liar, and therefore it isn't worth reading your little rant.
and THEN complain about them. Geesh. Get it straight!
Thank God that we don't get as many security bugs as I.E., dontcha think?
But these are incredibly stupid. I sincerly doubt people will go use Firefox because they are going to have a better orgasm when they see the computer screen, or whatever these commercials are supposed to show.
Doesn't anyone know the difference between a war and a battle? Even if you lose a million battles, that doesn't mean you've lost the war.
Is this whole thing rhetorical? It doesn't take a mental nothing five seconds of searching to find out WHY... sad.
Anyone aware that Comcast is using this?
Do me a favor and check the candidates positions before spouting off again. Thanks!
No, he's saying that as far as the government should be concerned, you have a union. If you want it to be a marriage of some sort, well, good for you. What's the problem with that?
Mr. President, if the government makes laws concerning marriage to confer rights, privileges and benefits, doesn't that mean the government can decide who gets those rights, privileges and benefits? A better question (that isn't completely missing the point, as this one clearly does) is "Should the government have any laws regarding marriage, etc.? If so, how do I go about making them say what I want them to say?" If you think a constitutional amendment is the "government" deciding who should marry who, then you need to take a civics course. And listen this time.
I have an idea - why not have the liberterians AND the greens work to change the Republican party?
let's see, 33 percent of nothing, is.... umm, let's see... nothing! Whoohoo! Another lawyer gets screwed! What a country!
Just tell ya how old the people polled are...
I'm with ya!
Firefly comes out in May of 2005, so no one has seen it yet :)
Aren't myths supposed to be something besides facts? As in, stories that aren't based on fact?
We don't have machines right here on earth that can mine in easy conditions without a lot of human intervention. Do you think they'd work better in space?