Maybe NAT isn't the best means of securing a network but if it stops one person from getting in then it is providing security.
NAT by itslef does not reduce exposure. The best example of this would be those who configure nat in a hurry on linux 2.4 systems.
No, that sounds like the worst example. Faulting the whole of NAT for its weakest implementation seems like a straw man fallacy.
A weak door is still a security measure. Not as secure as a stronger door by definition. But it does keep out the passing strangers who might be tempted to enter if I left it open.
And dont sound so unforgiving, I doubt you follow all the laws.
I'm willing to bet that he'd say that you are free to break laws as long as you are also willing to accept the risk of getting caught and being punished.
There are laws on all kinds of things that there shouldnt be. Me I follow morals before i follow laws. You democratic republic escuse is bull.
Actually your comments would suggest that you follow the lame platitudes espoused by your peers.
So you say most people use aol so all of us should. Great way to look at things
Actually your choice of ISP isn't a matter of law. So no, I don't think DesScorp would say that.
Also I think as much harm that has come from religion, thats where civilization came from not laws.
Ever hear of religious law? Oh right, they don't cover that in theosophy for asshats. Sorry.
You can actually post it to every article and slashdot and be on topic. Why buy a new iBook when we could stop world hunger? Why upgrade your kernel when you could be in Africa building houses? There is always something better than we can be doing with our time.
And sadly its the same argument that seems to get so much weight with those who think manned space exploration is a waste. Funny how the beneficiaries of humankind's temerity think so little of it.
I'm still far from convinced that the American system is "better" in anyway
I wish those explanations hadn't come with built in aggrandizement. The system can stand on its own relative merits doesn't need advocates. The rest of the world thinks we Americans proselytize too much as it is.
isn't rate of descent dependant upon density and wind resistance and not weight? Thousands of nanotubes wouldn't be any denser than a single tube. I would think that the basic structure, being an elongated plane would catch a lot of resistance.
There's that problem of "leaky" abstraction layers again. They can make the medium itself as strong as adamantite, but if the data submitted is bogus then their "unfalsifiable" IDs are just so much plastic.
"Corporal James Smith, Third Mounted Infantry, World War One." You'd know that even if the sword was real, the inscription was years after WWII, making it less valuable, and lessening it's voracity
I'm thinking I'm going load up a bunch of public domain crap and change the file names to Britney Spears songs. Kill two birds with one stone. Piss off The RIAA and contribute my small part to the end of the proliferation of crap.
anyone want to guess what's going to happen to a billion unemployed Chinamen? It might lead to class warfare in the US, but it will be apocalyptic in the manufacturing sector.
"a heuristic tool that learns the behavioral patterns of a human and alerts the human when something deviates from the norm"
makes a really cummy acronym
But it sure can be fought with it. Face it, there's no logical argument asides from the judicial hammer that is going to get SCO to stop yanking everyone's chain, but it doesn't mean that the public can't cause them some mischief and mayhem in the meantime. Most/.ers aren't going to have anything to do with the final fallout of the ruling, but they can each contribute in their own juvenile, petty and thoroughly satisfying way.
The first continuous signal from outside our Solar system is just about decoded. Here is it....What's this? It's written in an obsolete proprietary Microsoft file format! Someone owes some licensing fees.
Slashdot Mirror
n/t
Maybe NAT isn't the best means of securing a network but if it stops one person from getting in then it is providing security. NAT by itslef does not reduce exposure. The best example of this would be those who configure nat in a hurry on linux 2.4 systems. No, that sounds like the worst example. Faulting the whole of NAT for its weakest implementation seems like a straw man fallacy. A weak door is still a security measure. Not as secure as a stronger door by definition. But it does keep out the passing strangers who might be tempted to enter if I left it open.
I'm willing to bet that he'd say that you are free to break laws as long as you are also willing to accept the risk of getting caught and being punished.
There are laws on all kinds of things that there shouldnt be. Me I follow morals before i follow laws. You democratic republic escuse is bull.
Actually your comments would suggest that you follow the lame platitudes espoused by your peers.
So you say most people use aol so all of us should. Great way to look at things
Actually your choice of ISP isn't a matter of law. So no, I don't think DesScorp would say that.
Also I think as much harm that has come from religion, thats where civilization came from not laws.
Ever hear of religious law? Oh right, they don't cover that in theosophy for asshats. Sorry.
You can actually post it to every article and slashdot and be on topic. Why buy a new iBook when we could stop world hunger? Why upgrade your kernel when you could be in Africa building houses? There is always something better than we can be doing with our time. And sadly its the same argument that seems to get so much weight with those who think manned space exploration is a waste. Funny how the beneficiaries of humankind's temerity think so little of it.
I wish those explanations hadn't come with built in aggrandizement. The system can stand on its own relative merits doesn't need advocates. The rest of the world thinks we Americans proselytize too much as it is.
Well you better hand over all those Lego Mindstorm kits.
isn't rate of descent dependant upon density and wind resistance and not weight? Thousands of nanotubes wouldn't be any denser than a single tube. I would think that the basic structure, being an elongated plane would catch a lot of resistance.
Yes it has four sides, a top and a bottom. There are various small planes about the hood and windshield, but they're rather standard too.
PROFIT???
There's that problem of "leaky" abstraction layers again. They can make the medium itself as strong as adamantite, but if the data submitted is bogus then their "unfalsifiable" IDs are just so much plastic.
mobile phone conversant drivers have new bouts of accidents while trying sensory deprivation in the aforementioned circumstances
Wait for India and Pakistan to let the nukes fly.
"Corporal James Smith, Third Mounted Infantry, World War One." You'd know that even if the sword was real, the inscription was years after WWII, making it less valuable, and lessening it's voracity
It hungered for recognition no less.
Really now, give me some credit. If I didn't prefer it, I wouldn't have used it.
I'm thinking I'm going load up a bunch of public domain crap and change the file names to Britney Spears songs. Kill two birds with one stone. Piss off The RIAA and contribute my small part to the end of the proliferation of crap.
anyone want to guess what's going to happen to a billion unemployed Chinamen? It might lead to class warfare in the US, but it will be apocalyptic in the manufacturing sector.
Texas is large but it isn't a nation.
You can't just leave us hanging!
"a heuristic tool that learns the behavioral patterns of a human and alerts the human when something deviates from the norm" makes a really cummy acronym
But it sure can be fought with it. Face it, there's no logical argument asides from the judicial hammer that is going to get SCO to stop yanking everyone's chain, but it doesn't mean that the public can't cause them some mischief and mayhem in the meantime. Most /.ers aren't going to have anything to do with the final fallout of the ruling, but they can each contribute in their own juvenile, petty and thoroughly satisfying way.
when is bandwidth going to be so available/cheap that this is going to matter?
I remember a couple of weeks ago in an article on wifi for Africa, someone was lamenting the decrepit 128 kbps isdn backbone in Japan, or somesuch.
The first continuous signal from outside our Solar system is just about decoded. Here is it....What's this? It's written in an obsolete proprietary Microsoft file format! Someone owes some licensing fees.
Would using an anonymizing proxy server protect a downloader? Would the RIAA just go after whoever is supporting the proxies?
We have the luxury of as another poster put it "dipping the chicken nugget in barbeque sauce" while they starve. Maybe we should be pitying Americans.