Slashdot Mirror


State Of The Simputer

2br02b writes "Readers might recall the Simputer (Simple, Inexpensive, Multilingual Computer) whose story Slashdot has been following over the past few years, including its release in October 2002 and most recently the Scientific American article in November. Rediff.com has an informative overview on the status of what was introduced as a low-cost computer for the poor to be sold for under Rs 10000 ($200). Of the two companies that have been given licences, one has yet to put the product on the market while the other is only looking at bulk sales at prices from Rs 12000 to Rs 20000 ($400). Only between 1500 and 2000 Simputers are out on the market."

219 comments

  1. Computer for the poor? by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    HOw about we concentrate on basic human needs like food, clean, running water and shelter before we go doling out handhelds to people?

    I'm not at all against technology education and maximizing its use wherever possible, but there truly are some things that must take priority here.

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
    1. Re: computer for the poor? by bmongar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apart from that fact that I have to wonder whatfor people living in some fuckin slum need a computer!
      How about to educate themselves and get out of the slum. I came from a poor rural area not realy a slum. My parents overextended their budget buing a C64 for us when I was in junior high. Many people saw that as a waste of money. My parents saw that as an investment. It paid off. I'm a programmer now.

      --
      As x approaches total apathy I couldn't care less.
    2. Re:Computer for the poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats wrong with books, and old copies of Hustler? These fucking third world slackers want the moon on a stick!

    3. Re:Computer for the poor? by msheppard · · Score: 1

      The POINT is that this computer will enable them to better provide for themselves. Learn about farming methods, medicine, alternitive housing ideas, &c.

      It's the whole "Give a man a fish/Teach a man to fish" idea.

      M@

      --
      Krispy Cream is people
    4. Re:Computer for the poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is such an age old troll that it is not funny. You can actually post it to every article and slashdot and be on topic. Why buy a new iBook when we could stop world hunger? Why upgrade your kernel when you could be in Africa building houses? There is always something better than we can be doing with our time. If you are so altruistic then what are you doing posting on slashdot?

      This is a device that is meant to help close the digital divide. You take for granted how much information is at your fingertips and what advantages there are to having that information. If you are looking for a job where are you going to start? Probably on Monster or HotJobs or some other site. Send out some resumes by email that you typed in your word processor. Now take away your computer and try to do the old fashioned way. Type your resume on a typewriter, pay to have it photocopied, flip through a newspaper and walk door to door only to have them reject you because you don't have computer experience.

      Not everything is about helping the poorest of the poor. There are a lot more people out there who need some help too.

    5. Re: computer for the poor? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


      Have you've seen the pictures of this computer?

      The thing doesn't even have a keyboard. I doubt that it even has end-user friendly programming language. And I can get an old desktop computer for cheaper.

      Not sure how much serious real-world skills from a thing that looks like an over-glorified GameBoy.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    6. Re: computer for the poor? by I8TheWorm · · Score: 4, Informative

      What's the point when for $200 the "poor" could by a Linux pc from Wal-Mart.

      Let's not discount the fact that the per capita GDP in India is $2,540, which would make a $200 PC in India worth $2960.63 in US dollars (US per capita GDP = $37,600).

      Some help that is...

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    7. Re: computer for the poor? by NineNine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So then, every poor kid that gets a computer is gonna be a programmer? I kinda' doubt that. Computers are still largely uneeded luxuries for most people on this planet.

    8. Re: computer for the poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine. Why don't you sell yours and send the money to some poor person in India? Or maybe you should just let them decide whether YOU "need" a computer.

      Do you have any idea how arrogant you sound? Let them decide for themselves whether they want computers or not, for God's sake.

    9. Re: computer for the poor? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      First off, I don't have that kind of money. I'm not donating to anybody until I'm in some kind of good financial shape, so they can just deal with it. Secondly, my point is that if somebody is going to spend time and effort doing something so silly, they need to do it better so that it's effective. A $400 computer only benefits the rich in 3rd world countries.

    10. Re: computer for the poor? by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree that $200 - $400 is quite a bit for a lower middle class person, let alone a poor indian. However, the poor do "need" a computer. If not today, tomorrow. At least shared computers, like those in public libraries in US.

      The access to latest information (and educational resources) can potentially open the gateway out of the slums.

      S

    11. Re:Computer for the poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The same old dumb argument, like poor people only need food and water to graduate from illetarcy into smart ones like this poster.

      On the same logical reasoning, poor coutnries like India should not have space programmes (go into space, what for ?), or any such advanced technolgy pursuits since basic amenities like "Food and Water" are still a scarcity in rural India, so...

      Development does not enatil just providing food and water, it also includes economic development with the work alongside, so that you can compete in the world economy.
      Farmers in rural India can do with instant informatin about crop, fertliser prices etc so that they can better their yeaild and bring their procude faster to market. Thigs like technoloigy will help them in this regard.

      See even developed nations like the US and EU have subsidies for their farmers ( and not poor ones by any means) since they cant compete against produce from developing nation sin terms of yeild and quality and price. As a result the WTO meet failed since they wouldnt remove subsidies.

      So just food and water does not make a developed nation out of a developing nation - not anymore.

    12. Re: computer for the poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't seen the homeless programmers begging for money in silicon valley....

    13. Re: computer for the poor? by bhima · · Score: 2, Insightful
      10 seconds of thinking: MIT Open Course Ware, so they can make a way out for themselves

      Just a thought...

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    14. Re:Computer for the poor? by geekmetal · · Score: 1

      Wonder what moron thinks that the parent post is *insightful*, if the world were to run on that advice there would be no progress! Grow up buddy

      --
      There are two kinds of egotists: 1) Those who admit it 2) The rest of us
    15. Re: computer for the poor? by bhima · · Score: 1

      Another thought:Learn good English Learn computing Take support jobs away from overpaid arrogant first worlders.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    16. Re: computer for the poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Will drop pants, write Perl for food

    17. Re: computer for the poor? by Vaginal+Discharge · · Score: 1

      So they can order groceries online... duh. :-D

      --
      "Glory is fleeting but obscurity is forever" - Napoleon Bonapart.
    18. Re: computer for the poor? by Viol8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Poor people are generally poor because they are either dumb, lazy, or both"

      What a clueless moron you are. That may well be true in the affluent west where if you work hard
      you can better yourself but in some countries the children don't get a chance to be educated before they're out in the fields helping their parents
      grow food or even supporting their brothers and sisters after their parents have died from disease or war!

      "They just want the government to hand them welfare and be done with it. "

      Yeah , the welfare systems in africa and india are known to be the best in the world right!
      Jesus , get a clue you insular dick!

    19. Re:Computer for the poor? by garrulous · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can actually post it to every article and slashdot and be on topic. Why buy a new iBook when we could stop world hunger? Why upgrade your kernel when you could be in Africa building houses? There is always something better than we can be doing with our time. And sadly its the same argument that seems to get so much weight with those who think manned space exploration is a waste. Funny how the beneficiaries of humankind's temerity think so little of it.

    20. Re: computer for the poor? by mrtrumbe · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Right...

      And why should poor people be buying books? I mean they can just go to the library, right?

      And why should poor people be buying toys for their kids? Send them outside to play, or let them go to a park!

      This mentality is so shortsighted. These things that you consider a luxury for a "poor" person are actually great ways to encourage your kids to learn and enjoy learning. By buying your kids books, educational toys, even a computer you are encouraging them to enjoy learning and setting an example for them, showing them that education is important and should take precendence to other items in a budget.

      Those are very positive lessons.

      And of course there are other ways to do this, and over-extravagence even when buying positive items is sending the wrong message. But I for one think it is important to show kids early on that an investment in education is a very important thing.

      I think a reasonably priced computer is a very good way to encourage learning at home and priorities in making wise purchases. Involve your kids in the purchase and tell them why you think its important.

      BTW, I'm not defending the PC mentioned in the original story. I don't have an opinion either way on these things. But in general, a computer can be a good investment, if properly approached.

      Taft

    21. Re: computer for the poor? by alienw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Computers are still largely uneeded luxuries for most people on this planet.

      In that case, why are you using one? Computers are excellent means of communication. You do understand that with a computer, you can access all kinds of information you couldn't get otherwise? You know, not everyone has a library near his/her house, and not everyone can read, especially in 3rd world countries? A computer can efficiently solve both of these problems.

      You have to realize that the 3rd world is very different. A cellphone might be a luxury in the US, but in Africa one could be much cheaper than a landline telephone. Same thing with computers. They are an inexpensive way to give people access to information, government services, and so on.

    22. Re: computer for the poor? by *weasel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      so you mean that indians would be paying the same relative part of their salary on a computer now that boomers spent in the 70s and 80s?

      i would say its pretty clear that many gen-X-ers got quite a bit of a technological leg-up from their boomer parents overextending their salary similarly.

      the sale of cheap computing to underdeveloped countries is a Good Thing (tm).

      sure, they need improvements in other basic areas too - but not everyone who wants to help can work on the same project (too many cooks), and some people just don't have expertise or experience in providing and distributing clean water, replenishing spent soil, or extending the electrical infrastructure.

      does it make it a less noble goal to bring computing prices down? to provide an educational and informational medium to these people?

      indians in particular living in the world's oldest democracy, would certainly tangibly benefit from being more educated voters.
      the broader online marketplace also provides tangible benefits, even for the underprivileged (who benefit more from better prices/competition).

      if anything, that money makes more sense for them now than it did when the boomers bought into it for X-ers. The internet adds exponentially to the value of a home computer.

      not all of their children will grow up to be programmers or engineers, but there are tangible benefits to be had. yes, it requires some proactivity, and yes - not everyone in india (or any other underdeveloped nation) needs/would actually benefit from a PC.

      but if only a dozen, or a hundred take the opportunity and turn it to their will - that'd make it a worthwhile cause.

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    23. Re: computer for the poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      problem here is you don't understand the agenda behind Simputer. It is not meant to be sold to every individual but probably one per community.

      so in effect it is a good idea to educate people to provide them with right information in a fast easy and cheap way.

    24. Re: computer for the poor? by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      That makes sense, but that $200 PC ($2,960.63) that these guys are saying will be more like $300-400 ($4,440.95-5,921.26) isn't going to help in the least. They'd be better off with the ads you find in the computer section of the greensheet hyping "internet ready" PC's (translate, a 486 or P1 with a small hard drive, modem, and crappy 15" monitor) for $100. They would have the ability to get online, and still be able to afford dinner.

      What those GDP numbers fail to show is disposable income. If my $37,600/yr salary provides $10,000/yr of disposable income because all of my housing/food/clothing needs are met, then I'm in good shape. But if their $2,540 only provides for $300/yr in disposable income, then the computer is priced even more out of their range.

      Yes, it makes sense to provide the worlds largest collection of knowledge (and porn ads) to impoverished people (of course, that is not to say that everyone in India is impoverished). But it doesn't make any sense to attempt to provide that at a cost that most will deem out of their purchasing ability.

      It's all about what a person deems important and affordable. Food - check. Roof - check. Computer - maybe next year.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    25. Re: computer for the poor? by *weasel · · Score: 1

      i'm just a big fan of people actually trying to bring the price down, to open opportunities.

      yes, i think the better solution would be to sell used/refurbished PCs with a localized fork of linux for $100-$150.

      but i'm not running their show. maybe they think the internet requires something more than a dx66 or a p1 350. maybe they have production contacts and not software contacts; so its easier for them to arrange for new machines than to find people to code support for old ones.

      i was just trying to point out:

      . a PC is a great investment for the underprivileged, if they can make it. therefore, Any effort that pushes the common price down is much better than having done nothing.

      . trying to help with this is not mutually exclusive of other aid efforts

      . it's a legitimate effort in and of itself

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    26. Re: computer for the poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If India is the world's oldest democracy, then what was all that business with Gandhi and the "Untouchables"?

    27. Re: computer for the poor? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      and not everyone can read, especially in 3rd world countries? A computer can efficiently solve both of these problems.

      A computer that doesn't involve reading??? Where can I get one??

    28. Re: computer for the poor? by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      With that I agree wholeheartedly. Having access to the information on the internet is a privelage that shouldn't be focused only on the wealthy.

      I just don't think this particular effort is newsworthy. To me it's just another half-hearted attempt to do the right thing, but make a buck or two hundred in the process.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    29. Re: computer for the poor? by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "What's the point when for $200 the "poor" could by a Linux pc from Wal-Mart"

      Why spend $200 on a walmart PC, when you can get a used PC for $20. I just bought 6 of them (Pentium 200, 96MB, 2.5GB, CD, floppy, modem, 10/100 ethernet) to replace some older 286's we have (yes, there are still uses for these old machines)

      Sure it doesn't run Half-Life, but for the needs of "poor" people without a PC, it would be more than adequate. Besides it keeps it from ending up in a landfill.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    30. Re:Computer for the poor? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Funny
      HOw about we concentrate on basic human needs like food, clean, running water and shelter before we go doling out handhelds to people? I'm not at all against technology education and maximizing its use wherever possible, but there truly are some things that must take priority here.

      "we"? Where do you get this "we" from? The Simputer is manufactured by a for-profit corporation in India. Are you saying that they (a bunch of tech guys, obviously) should have gone into the food water and housing business? Or are you saying that "we"-- as in all of humanity-- should drop whatever we're doing and rush to the aid of the hungry, thirsty, and homeless? Yeah, that would work. Both scenarios are ridiculous, so maybe you meant something else?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    31. Re: computer for the poor? by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Exactly! That's the point I was trying to make. This "effort" to make computers for the poor is half-hearted at best. There are MANY more CHEAPER ways to do it. But of course, the profit margin in selling used pc's isn't quite the same as making some new ones and selling them for whatever you want to.

      I was given two P-Pro 266's by a former employer who would have had to pay to get rid of them. Two used 30GB HD's and two 128MB sticks of PC-133 later (to the tune of $100) and they're now "servers" on my home network (to test distributed objects). Much cheaper than the $300 option these guys are talking about. If all you want to do is hit the web, a P-Pro 266 isn't a bad option at all.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    32. Re: computer for the poor? by ahoehn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was in Malawi and Zambia a couple weeks ago, and it was funny to be driving in a beat up 1970's japanise minibus down a dirt road past mud huts, and have the african next to me answer his cellphone.

      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    33. Re: computer for the poor? by Ewan · · Score: 1

      One of the parts of the simputer was that it could have a purely image driven interface, and it could teach you to read as it went.

    34. Re: computer for the poor? by Ewan · · Score: 1
      The simputer is not just hardware as you seem to assume, it's a whole interface and system, developed for use by people who have never used a computer before.

      For example, it doesn't have a keyboard or mouse, and doesn't need you to know what one is.

      If you had read the article from Scientific American at http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000454A E-7675-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000 you'd of found all this out.

      Ewan

    35. Re: computer for the poor? by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Well, I did actually read the article (again), and while I wasn't suggesting that a $20 PC can replace the whole "interface and system" of the Simputer, it is certainly an alternative worth considering - particularly since there seems to be some difficulty delivering the system at the price originally stated in the article.

      I think the last paragraph of the SciAm article say is best:

      "Perhaps the greatest obstacle for the Simputer, though, is cost. Will people in developing countries be able to justify the expenditure of $250 on a device that may be helpful but is not essential? When so many communities in the Third World still lack clean drinking water and adequate medical facilities, are computers really a priority?"

      The Simputer vision is a good and noble one, but it seems there are more economically feasable ways to meet that vision, especially wnen considering the amount of PC's that are thrown away annually.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    36. Re:Computer for the poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit making condescending and patronizing comments, you moron. I guess you also think educating people in developing countries is a bad thing. A computer is one way people can get information and educate themselves. It is better IMHO to empower people to provide for themselves rather than give them free "basic human needs". By freely providing these needs, you will turn them into animals.

    37. Re: computer for the poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit making condescending and patronizing comments, you moron. You probably came from one such slum yourself. The idea is to get a bunch of these people in the "Slums" to own such a device.

      Pray why the (Score:4, Insightful) for such a dumbass comment.

    38. Re: computer for the poor? by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Actually, I did read the article. $250-$300 for a palm pilot with some interactive software on it. Woo-friggin-hoo. That's different from a computer with the same software on it.. how?

      The bottom line is it's too expensive. Besides, have you ever tried to educate yourself with a palm pilot? Not easy to read a book at 200 or less characters per page. 64MB of RAM and 32MB of flash RAM. Wow. All for the low price of $250? That would help those people a lot, considering it's still tied to a modem line. Not mobile, small amount of memory, and small. Once again, for much less, they could have a PC tied to that modem line, running linux, and have much more capability. I think it's throwing money in the wrong direction to help people.

      Hell, let them eat cake!

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    39. Re:Computer for the poor? by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      One problem I see with this device is that it doesn't have a good way to connect to the internet. Yes it has a modem, but from what I have read, there aren't many land line phones in the third world, and instead of laying copper, the trend is to go with cell phones. It is cheaper to put up cell towers and let "the last mile" be bridged by RF rather than laying copper, which is more expensive can be taken.


      I would think that either a cell modem or 802.11 would be a more effective solution for this application. What good is a simputer with a modem jack if you have to find someone with a land line to hook up to. If that is the case, then real PCs at an internet cafe (I believe this is done in India) is a better solution. One can read iBooks, prepare resumes, and surf the web at a cafe for a small charge instead of having to buy a simputer and go looking for a hook up. Just my $0.02.

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    40. Re: computer for the poor? by default+luser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Once again, for much less, they could have a PC tied to that modem line, running linux, and have much more capability. I think it's throwing money in the wrong direction to help people.

      You're missing the aspects of this device that make it more attractive than a used PC plunked down in a corner. The whole concept of using a simple palm-like device makes it low-power, rugged and ultra-portable.

      How were you planning on powering that old PC that sucks 30 watts of power, when there's no electrical hookup for miles? Your Simputer uses two orders of magnitude less power, and can be run off 2 AA batteries for a month.

      How were you planning on taking that computer with you at all times, given the distances that people have to travel between towns and farms, often on foot? Are you going to leave your useful computer at home?

      That would help those people a lot, considering it's still tied to a modem line.

      Perhaps you've never heard of a cell phone, they're actually more common in the third world than landlines these days.

      Honestly, a Palm Pilot with all the advantages of low-powered, higly rugged platform paired with a simple to use interface could be a real winner. It's a lot more likely to catch on than used desktops in these rural areas.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    41. Re:Computer for the poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As usual, there's always the crowd that say "those filthy wogs don't need no stinking computers, lazy bastards can't even read" and as usual they're the first to chime in and sour the mood of those who show up later.

      Next time you idiots get that notion in your heads think of a little thing called the solar powered calculator, and how that little $5 device makes life so much easier in day to day life. Now strain your brains and think of a group of people wealthy enough to buy a simputer, say a farmers market, wow, food, that's essential isn't it ! So supplies are running low, and they use the simputer to check a small database to see who has what in the area. This saves then time, and gets the product to where it needs to be. now strain your little brains even harder, and think to things like construction, or anything else that might need a portable device to replace 60 pounds of hardcopy to get the job done.

      Now you may need a big injection of smart drugs for this, think to 5 years in the future, the simputer is now $45, for $5 you add a wireless network device to it and every little hamlet in the 3rd world is tied into a mesh network. People with nothing to do find out that someone 40 miles away needs a work crew, they communicate, set up transportation, they make money, the other guy gets his work done. Thus begins an improving economy.

    42. Re:Computer for the poor? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Light a man a fire, he will stay warm for a night. Light a man afire, and he will stay warm for the rest of his life.

      Wait, that's the wrong adage. The point is, education is the long-term solution, and doing shit for people is short-term.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    43. Re: computer for the poor? by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      and can be run off 2 AA batteries for a month

      Given that it's a tool to be used by many people, do you honestly think 2 AA batteries will power it for a month? I would love to have that kind of technology myself.

      I keep revisiting it, but everyone that's posted back to this keeps ignoring the price issue. That undersized computer would cost them the equivalent of $8,000 US. Hell, why don't they just get a palm pilot and a modem card for $120 instead of this thing for $250 ($300 for color)? Because there's no money in the overhead for the company that's producing these things.

      Yes, smaller and battery powered is cooler. But if you can't afford it, it's of no use whatsoever.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    44. Re: computer for the poor? by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Somehow, i'm not too worried....Probably 90% of the Indians and other Asians i've had to deal with in support positions frankly don't know shit about computing.

      Case in point: The Indian lab assistant I had to deal with this morning. The computer I was at couldn't see or allow setup of the normal network printer for some reason, so I waved him over. After seeing the situation, he then proceded to randomly click around in the root C: folder for 5 minutes, muttering "It should be in here somewhere...". After he tried the same "procedure" for the 3rd time, I just gave up and went to another building.

      Also of note is the fact that my employer told me I beat out 30 or so other canidates for my co-op as a support technician this summer. When I asked him how that was, he said they'd had a huge amount of foreign students (at RIT, this means a high percentage of Indians, followed by Chinese, Koreans, and Vietnamese.) apply, but that when interviewed, none of them knew enough about computing to actually perform the duties they were applying for.

      As for "learn good English", i'm afraid there's still a long way to go here as well. I do not define "good" as having such a thick accent or bad pronunciation that I have to ask them to repeat themselves three times before I can understand a sentence.

      Take support jobs away from overpaid arrogant first worlders.

      Oh, so sad that we're overpaid and arrogant. If you really want to do something about the imbalance, you'd work to change your own country instead of sounding just as arrogant yourselves.

    45. Re: computer for the poor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about this! All your jobs will be shipped overseas to India anyways unless you do something about it! Get involved! Goto WashTech and sign up for the email!

    46. Re:Computer for the poor? by sv67 · · Score: 1

      Are simputer effort & helping the poor mutually exclusive ? Putting it another way, is abandoning simputer effort a guarantee to feeding the poor ? By such a mind set electricity, automobile, aeroplanes, credit cards et all should not have been invented till the entire world is fully fed & clothed. Come on, be practical AND wise.

    47. Re: computer for the poor? by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1
      A friend told me this rule abotu buying cars (CDN $): "If you buy a car that costs $1000, count on spending $1000 more on repairs before the year is out."

      In third world countries it's not so much the cost of the repairs on an old junker that are the problem, it's the availability of parts. How is it useful to buy old 486 and P1 systems when those systems need an expert in the old ways and a nearby used computer store to be maintained? We in teh first world have the accumulation of ten years of commodity parts to draw on if we want to toy with an older system. It doesn't work that way in the Congo.

    48. Re: computer for the poor? by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      You make a strong point. However, imagine Cuba, where the cars people drive are leftovers from the days before embargos against them. Everyone drives vehicles from the 50's. But those cars are still running, and you can imagine alternators don't last 50 years.

      Hit eBay, and see how many 486 procs come up in a query. Better yet, hit www.pcsurplusonline.com. There is a plethora of spare parts from out of date computers for sale everywhere here. So ship some old boxen, and some spare parts. I mean, sure we have the accumulation of 10 years of these parts. Send them along too. I just saw 486 procs for $5 on eBay. If the proc in a simputer frags, what do you suppose the repair will cost? $5 or less? Hardly. And it doesn't take an expert, or even someone with a saudering iron to maintain a PC. However, the smaller form factors, laptops, handhelds, are much more difficult to upgrade/repair because a good portion of the hardware is integrated. P1's weren't so long ago that an "expert in the old ways" would be necessary. They mobo's look the same, RAM goes in the same way, peripherals (IDE?) the same. They're a far cry from a maintenance nightmare.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    49. Re:Computer for the poor? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      think manned space exploration is a waste.

      There's no such thing as "manned space exploration" anymore. The last time a man explored space was in 1969.

      Since then, manned space travel has continued, but it's a far cry from exploration. And yes, space travel is a waste.

  2. computer for the poor? by Karamchand · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I guess 200-400$ aren't that little for a poor Indian. Apart from that fact that I have to wonder whatfor people living in some fuckin slum need a computer!

  3. Not much point by Ckwop · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I don't think there is much point in this.. a mobile phone could encapsulate most of this functionality for a quater the price. Simon.

    1. Re:Not much point by Inflatable+Hippo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > I don't think there is much point in this.. a mobile phone could encapsulate most of this functionality for a quater the price. Simon.

      That's true for us rich westerners.

      Fancy smartphones are sold to us at a loss by the telcos because they assume (and it's a risk) that they'll recoup the cost as we use data services
      over a fixed term contract with inclusive rental charges.

      Ask Vodafone how much a P800 would cost with no contract and you might find the Simputer starts looking like good value for money.

      And let's not assume that its only value is in the hands of random end users - who obviously can't afford it.

      Take a nationwide census as an example. Put one of these in the hands of the (thousands of) census takers on the ground and they'll (hopefully) gather more accurate data faster. With this information it's possible to spend development money more wisely on those who are never going to see a computer in their lives.

      Another example would be stock control of perishable foodstuffs, each employee in the warehouses would have one, the benefits are obvious.

      Yes its "expensive" technology and beyond the reach of most, but that doesn't mean it can't be a worthwhile investment in the right circumstances. It may well be the cheapest (real) solution if the right apps get written.

      I guess we'll have to wait and see...

    2. Re:Not much point by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Point taken on app space, but just to comment on this "westerner" notion, cellphones in the Indian grey market are at least seven times cheaper than this.

  4. how do they expect it to sell? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So now pricing it up there with laptops and high end handhelds will get it selling? Wasn't the whole point of the simputer as computing for the masses and not the uber-rich? (Yes kiddies, you are considered Uber rich to 4/5ths the worlds' population.)

    Another great idea tanked by a bunch of PHB's

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  5. I'm going to go into direct competition by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

    with my Automated Bead Array Computational Unit System. This can be made much more cheaply, the batteries alst forever, and it never crashes!

    1. Re:I'm going to go into direct competition by Graemee · · Score: 1

      "and it never crashes!"

      Unless you trip & drop it

    2. Re:I'm going to go into direct competition by JonTurner · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>with my Automated Bead Array Computational Unit System. This can be made much more cheaply, the batteries alst forever, and it never crashes!

      Is this compatible with Dirt-And-Stick 1.0? I've been looking to upgrade. I hate losing all my documents every time it rains...

  6. just donate your old ones by chrimage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    isn't there a better way to provide computing technology to the third-world masses? perhaps someone should start a program for donating old, outdated computers for the good of poorer nations. (if there isn't already one)

    1. Re:just donate your old ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > someone should start a program for donating old, outdated computers for the good of poorer nations.

      The economics don't work out. When you add the costs of collecting, refurbishing, reinstalling software, shipping and distributing, it turns out that a new computer costs less.

      Moreover, import restrictions in India and most of the third world do not permit duty-free import of used computers. Import duty has to be paid, and this is based on the original list price, not the current depreciated value. So if you send an old 486DX4/100 which had an original list price of $3000 in 1993, the recipient will have to pay about 60% of that ($1800) as import duty, making it unviable. When you consider that you can get a new ASUS nforce2 + AXP/2400 combo for less than $200 in India, it makes no sense to import used.

    2. Re:just donate your old ones by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      isn't there a better way to provide computing technology to the third-world masses? perhaps someone should start a program for donating old, outdated computers for the good of poorer nations. (if there isn't already one)

      [eyeroll]
      Didn't any of y'all RTFA? The Simputer isn't a 1:1 replacement for a desktop machine. It has a modem, GSM/CDMA interface, and GPS system built in. It runs on batteries. Figured out what it is yet? It's a PDA. It's not meant to be a tool for teaching children how to write "hello world" programs in turbo pascal. It's meant to provide usefull computing resources to the general population in their own language. You're not going to fill it's intended niche by mailing them your crappy eMachines celeron box.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:just donate your old ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a great idea..
      our company throws out/warehouses so many pIIs..
      never going to be used..

    4. Re:just donate your old ones by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      The problem is shipping. It would probably cost more to ship them and distribute them (more shipping, but overland) than they are worth at this point. It makes much more sense to buy the materials closer.

      As an interesting side note; Japan buys our recycled steel at like, a penny a ton or something. Imagine the disparity between purchase price and shipping price there :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. More Simputer photos and review!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
  8. Aren't we all poor to some extent? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In the reverse of many of the comments on here, who wouldn't want a less expensive computer, provided it still did the functions they need? I agree that gamers need the latest hardware, etc. but shouldn't these machines first go to replace the expensive desktops here in the U.S., and perhaps some of our excess food supply could go over there? A poor person would probably prefer numerous free lunches to a free laptop.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Aren't we all poor to some extent? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if businesses in poor nations were equipped with these machines, it might be easier for them to pay a living wage... assuming they had customers that could afford their services in the first place!

      --
      stuff |
    2. Re:Aren't we all poor to some extent? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

      My point was that anyone looking to get a computer wants to get a good deal, not "oh, wee-oo-wee-oo I am so poor." Obviously, I am exceedingly wealthy compared to most of the world, and I am greatful every day for that, as everyone in my position should be.

      --
      stuff |
    3. Re:Aren't we all poor to some extent? by zungu · · Score: 0

      Kindly note that India is self-sufficient in food since many many years. Yes, there are problems with distribution system, and due to which hunger exists. However, we do not need your foods which you feed to your hogs.

  9. What a shame by McPLUR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To be so close to having a computer accessible by all. It is hard to estimate what the implications could have been if everyone, every where had access to a computer. But of course the inventors yet again failed to factor in corporate greed.

    --
    If you don't stop reading this right now you owe me $1,000. Send check or money order too...
    1. Re:What a shame by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      To be so close to having a computer accessible by all.

      ... even one with "fixed lithium-iron batteries."

      That sounds like a galvanising combination :-)

      All right, I'll shut up...

  10. Utopian ideals... by Ratface · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An idea like this sounds fantastic - but is riddled with potential problems.

    If they produce something with low capabilities, but a low, low price, then they will be accused of producing underpowered rubbish.

    As soon as you start to increase the potential of the platform, the costs start to rise until you have an elitist product that the intended market cannot afford.

    There *may* be a happy medium somewhere, but the edvil is in the details of finding it. In the consumerist marketplace we have in the West, production prices are already pushed as low as possible. Squeezing out extra pennies in production is almost impossible. The potential is there though to reduce prices through the marketing and adminitration side of things (pay no fat-cat salaries to the sales & management departments), but then again the product quickly becomes unfashionable and therefore undesirable.

    I would love to see such a product to succeed, but it's a hell of an uphill stuggle!

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
    1. Re:Utopian ideals... by Suhas · · Score: 1

      >but the edvil is in the details of finding it
      ...You forgot,the first and the last characters have to be in the same place....

    2. Re:Utopian ideals... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Their biggest mistake was the color display. You can get more display area cheaper if you use greyscale, which is sufficient for people in developing countries - hell, it's sufficient for 99% of what people do with computers in this country.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. Those well-paid Indians by vudufixit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If that's where our tech support and software development jobs are going, then their wages will go up, and an increasing number of them will be able to afford the simputer, right? As for those knee-jerkers who say, "let's provide food, water, etc. first" please remember that this is being marketed and sold by a private company that has no obligation to address those sorts of social problems. If anything, increasing a country's tech literacy helps increase the general prosperity

  12. What it all comes down to is by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They fucked up. $400 is way too expensive for a poor indian person to afford.

    "Well, it's not a cheap computer.

    Its proponents have since discarded the buzzword -- 'cheap computer' -- that brought the Simputer into the limelight.

    "We are not making a cheap computer. We are making a sophisticated device that will make computing possible for everyone," declares Professor Manohar."

    What a crock of bull. How is computing possible for "everyone" when "most" Indians can't afford to spend $400 on a PDA?

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:What it all comes down to is by koistinen · · Score: 1

      Think: Internet Cafe

    2. Re:What it all comes down to is by Illserve · · Score: 0

      Wrsot... ieda... eevr!

    3. Re:What it all comes down to is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you fools would bother to go read through the simputer home site you would see that it is designed to allow multiple people to share the device and keep their private data on memory cards.

      If ten or twenty people in a single village go in toegether to buy the device the price starts to become reasonable.

      PDA is probably a misnomer.

    4. Re:What it all comes down to is by Sayan · · Score: 1
      The problem with most of the people posting is that most of them have never been to India let alone know what are the problems of the people.

      A solution can only be given if you know the problem well enough.

      So bringing my Indian perspective, i would like to bring to notice to the other slashdotters that there a plenty of initiatives to bring the fruits of the IT revolution to the masses.

      Check out e-choupal(some of the site is in Hindi) which aims to bridge the logistics gap between rural producers and markets. It is a run away success and the company which started it ITC is planning to roll it out in 10,000 villages. Another innovative e-goverance project is Gyandoot (Messenger of Knowledge). This aims to bring the government closer to the people. In all these cases low-cost PCs ($400 ones) not PDAs have proven to be useful.

      These are just some examples where IT has been proven to be useful in the rural hinterland obviously much more needs to be done as there are over 700,000 villages in India.

      The problem in India is often not the lack of resources (India today is one of the world's largest economies, one of the fastest growing, has one of the biggest reserves of over $86 billion) but mismanagement and corruption, and add to it restrictive trade practices of the West. It is then no wonder that most Indian farmers are stuck in the 18th century.

      While researching for my paper most of the problems of the basic needs can be solved if the rural people have access to cheap and plentiful source of power- electricity. Ask any farmer what is the one thing they need which they can use to improve their lives almost all reply "electricity" - to run everything from water-pumps to computers. Even though now most of the Indian villages are electrified, the sad condition of the state-run electricity boards means that they get power only for a few hours if at all.

      Off-grid community solutions like bio-gas have a lot of potential if implemented. In conclusion PDAs may be cool to look at but the real need is for electricity.

      --
      resurrect my .sig
  13. Comparitive Soscio-Economics by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I guess 200-400$ aren't that little for a poor Indian. Apart from that fact that I have to wonder whatfor people living in some **** slum need a computer!

    I'm not sure how it works in India, but it is probably (please correct me if I'm wrong) similar to the Philippines where the average college graduate makes about $300 / month.

    If you assume that the average college graduate in the US makes $3k - $4k / month, then a fair comparison would be a $3500 computer in the U.S. to a $300 computer in the Philippines (or perhaps, India). From an expense point of view, it is likely to be affordable (although certainly a luxury).

    But to imagine that these people do not wish to communicate, learn and reach out to the world through the Internet is fairly ignorant. In my experience with families from the third world, a computer (and even a broadband connection, which can be had for pennies on our dollars) is more desirable than a telephone or television.

    My conclusion? The simputer may not fit the bill, but the need and economics are right on.

    --
    The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
  14. Um... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1, Insightful


    >people were interchanging polarities while inserting batteries and battery contacts were coming loose due to rough handling.

    The UI interface better be really really simple.

    And yes I think this is a dumb idea. Just give them old desktop computers. There is no reason for portability to be simple, inexpensive or multilingual.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:Um... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      first off those are poor design problems. battery contacts can easily be engineered to withstand a severe stick beating and as for the batteries being put in the wrong way. That can be solved also with first better markings, second with a few simple diodes to make it work even if batteries were inserted randomly.

      they are making the outer casing insanely cheap to make up for the fact they screwed up big time on the innards.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Um... by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      Diodes won't do much good, it will cost you a lot of energy (current going through diode and voltage over diode) and it won't protect you from somebody putting in 5 batteries in the right direction and one the wrong way...
      What would work is make use of the shape of the batreries, they have a pin on the positive side for a reason, a few simple modifications to the plastic (to only allow a small pin to the contact instead of the entire back side) would do the trick and would be far cheaper.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    3. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... unless you put the diode in parallel to the battery. Yes, this will drain your batteries real quick if you put them in wrong, but in normal operation you don't pay the price of protection.

      Of course the right battery shape could solve this problem, but since the standards have been set long ago, that's not realistic. Especially for this application: it is supposed to work without any special care, and getting batteries that are unique to this device certainly counts as special care.

    4. Re:Um... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Yes it will you can simply do bridge rectifiers on every battery with efficient diodes. (.2 to .3 volt drop.)
      that way any battery can be inserted in any direction and the power will still work.

      Yes you will lose about a half a volt per bettery but that's the price you pay to make something idiot proof.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Um... by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      A bridge rectifier takes two diodes that's even worse... Assuming a drop of .2 volt and three batteries (which will probably not be enough) you are already using an entire battery just for the diodes. Using the right form is so much easier and it will be just as idiot proof.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  15. argueable, but... by fons · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You could argue that the poor could use these cheap computers to help them get food, water etc.

    For example: If you give poor farmers in Africa, India, ... computers, they could use them to improve there farming and harvest more food or to make a better profit selling their harvest.
    This is much better than just giving them food. Computers could help solve THE PROBLEM instead of just curing the symptoms.

    However, there are many other problems:
    - Lot's of poor people can't read/write.
    - If they can read/write, can they often can't read/write English
    - in some poor countries there is a power shortage
    - Who will educate all these people on how to use computers?

    1. Re:argueable, but... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      >If you give poor farmers in Africa, India, ... computers, they could use them to improve there farming and harvest more food or to make a better profit selling their harvest.

      Of course, because behind every third world poor farmer is a computer programming genius who can just program C/C++ his way into better and efficent ways of growing things.

      Next on freshmeat.net: GNU/RainMiracle.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:argueable, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they could use them to improve there farming and harvest more food or to make a better profit selling their harvest.

      Well lets add a few more points:

      - Computers cannot end a drought, or revive poor soil.
      - "Free Trade" agreements have proven to mean that many third world farmers cannot compete with cheap imported food from first world countries. The most efficient farming techniques available to most third world farmers still cannot compete with intensive farming from the U.S and Europe.

    3. Re:argueable, but... by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The most efficient farming techniques available to most third world farmers still cannot compete with intensive farming from the U.S and Europe

      You forgot the word "subsidised".

    4. Re:argueable, but... by KDan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think quite possibly what he meant is that they can use the computers to learn about ways of improving their farming, to learn to dig wells, etc.

      Knowledge is power, as they say...

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    5. Re:argueable, but... by bhima · · Score: 0

      you could argue that not speaking English as being a good thing

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    6. Re:argueable, but... by bhima · · Score: 1
      Yes, But I worry that the farming practices in the US in particular are not sustainable. What is really needed is some appropriate technology that has meaning to them.

      I've spent years teaching tribals fish farming only to see them abandon it as soon as we left.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    7. Re:argueable, but... by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 0, Troll

      Nah, more likely they'll get bombarded by information (read "adverts") for western GM crops, western fertilisers, pesticides and so on and told "if you want to improve your farming, you need to use these".

      Never underestimate the depths to which western corporations will go in the name of the Gread God Profit.

    8. Re:argueable, but... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      You've got it backwards. The efficiency of our farmng cannot compete with that of peasent farming. At least peasent farmers get more energy out of farming then they put into it. Western nations get less energy (in terms of kilocalories) out of farming than they put into it. Literally, they turn oil (or another source of energy) into food.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    9. Re:argueable, but... by perly-king-69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For example: If you give poor farmers in Africa, India, ... computers, they could use them to improve there farming and harvest more food or to make a better profit selling their harvest.

      3rd world farmers suffer more from trade barriers, dumping by the US and Europe, beauracracy and wars than a lack of efficiency

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

    10. Re:argueable, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You're confusing mechanical or physical efficiency (What you're talking about) with economic efficiency (What I'm talking about) Subsidised, intensive western farming techniques produce huge mountains of food, very cheaply. Far, far cheaper than the labour intensive methods of the third world countries ever could. Even when you add in a profit margin and transport costs to the first world produce, third world farmers cannot compete on price.

    11. Re:argueable, but... by MuppetMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please mod parent up!

      One of the biggest problems for african farmers are not droughts, but the fact that subsidised American rice/wheat is dumped almost for free, driving all local farmers out of business. On top of this cippling, protectionist taxes are charged on anything the third world tries to export to the first.

      Although the simputer may not have turned out as well as hoped, it is a good first step to freeing the third world from tech designed for the first world. With this tech and its progeny the people of the third world may be able to FREE THEMSELVES from the shackles of poverty, without any more "charity".

      /rant;)

    12. Re:argueable, but... by KDan · · Score: 1

      So long as they also learn how to dig wells (not as common knowledge as you'd think in certain parts of the world) it's worth the adverts. Would you rather die of thirst or see an AOL popup?



      Hmm, ok, maybe the example is badly chosen, but you know what I mean... ;-)

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    13. Re:argueable, but... by lostinchicago · · Score: 1

      OR... they will sell the electronics for a little bit of cash and buy drugs with that money

    14. Re:argueable, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. Basic education is needed, but computers can actually help people to practice reading and writing. (As long as the user doesn't get addicted to Tetris or something.)

      In this particular case the question is probably moot. The vast amount of money spent on this project with such embarassingly little return suggests that, all along, it was just one more manifestation of India's notorious political corruption.

    15. Re:argueable, but... by inkedmn · · Score: 1

      sadly, you're probably right (in most cases)

      --
      well, it's nothing one behind the ear wouldn't cure
    16. Re:argueable, but... by plumby · · Score: 1

      It's not done Americans any harm.

    17. Re:argueable, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      So long as they also learn how to dig wells (not as common knowledge as you'd think in certain parts of the world)


      Bull-fucking-shit!

      Unless of course, by "digging a well" you mean installing a diesel drinking pump to pump the water (which just modifies the problem of no water to no diesel fuel, therefore no water)

      The basics of low tech well digging are well understood and well disseminated.

      High tech wells are a recipee for disaster (and thirst) in locations and cultures that can't support them.

      Innovative wells need to be carefully though out and placed by hand by experienced folks who understand the long term likelyhood that the well can be maintained.

      The idea that folks in the third world will be able to solve their problems by surfing the web is laughable. 90% of the web is crap, and the remaining 10% is focused on the needs of the first world. There is almost nothing of value for them there.

    18. Re:argueable, but... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      However, there are many other problems:
      - Lot's of poor people can't read/write.
      - If they can read/write, can they often can't read/write English - Who will educate all these people on how to use computers?

      They have interfaces in local languages and try to be graphical enough to be "intuitive", though of course they still need some hands one instruction.

      PS No apostrophe in "lots".

    19. Re:argueable, but... by supershake · · Score: 1

      Super point!!!

    20. Re:argueable, but... by KDan · · Score: 1

      Well understood and well-disseminated in first-world countries, but don't make assumptions about the rest of the world.

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
  16. Newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They're called "books". They've been around for hundreds of centuries, they have been translated and localised into every laungauage conceivable, they have documented almost every achivement known to man, and they run without batteries.

    Technology for technolgies sake. What a load of rubbish.

    1. Re:Newsflash by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      If the amount of information I get on a daily base from using google would be delivered in print on my doorstep I it would mean the end of the rain forrest for sure... Books also tend to be outdated the moment they are printed.
      Books only tell you what the author found important on that specific subject. Computers can do so much more. (e.g. setting up mailinglists between villages so you can discuss important issues in an efficient way)

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:Newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But we're not talking about you. We're talking about a third world farmer. Apparently, they'll use this wonderful Simputer to "Learn about farming methods, medicine, alternitive housing ideas" The amount of practical information on those topics (And any other topics which would be directly beneficial to a third world farmer) is limited, and a small library of books have the same information as could be sourced via. the internet on a Simputer. The books still don't need batteries, either.

    3. Re:Newsflash by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      In that case you are assuming that all the farmess kids will grow up to be farmers just like their dad learning from the same books.....
      Good education means being able to do new things.
      Made the kids want to be school teachers? Mechanics? Doctors???? (Its unlikely medicine is covered in dad's 'Farming for dummies')
      All three occupations are usefull in a farming village, and once you have that kind of development the village will need more people in different situations.
      E.g. once these three are there electricity might be nice so you need electricians, running water and a sewage system.... A need for better housing leads to an need to understand architecture.
      By now we already have enough books to fill a library.
      People have a hunger for knowledge far greater than we can feed by sending some farming books.
      Just look at the frontpage of slashdot, is all that information needed for the one occupation you are practicing (or want to practice). A good programmer would only need a single book about his programming language, a system admin would only need one book about his system, yet we all feel some compulsory need to look at this site... And yes once in a while there is a story that I can actually learn something from that is usefull yet not completly related to the work I am currently doing.

      Jeroen

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  17. Why a special product? by lcsjk · · Score: 1

    One can already but desktops (with monitors) for less than $300. They are not what is needed but the price is there.
    I also am aware that any computer for 3rd world must have batteries and solar capability, AND be dirt/water resistant. But with lower prices for smaller (12in.) flat screens and integration, why is it so hard? As an afterthought, ever wondered what these computers would use for printers? Do they come with a roll of 5-inch "cash register" paper and a few spares for an internal printer?

    1. Re:Why a special product? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if you have ever been to anyone's house in a third-world country, but I have, and I can tell you that there is a premium on space. Most people live in *very* small houses (if they're lucky enough to have a house) or rooms, and may not even have a proper desk for a desktop model. A handheld would be the way to go, though battery requirements would probably have to be dealt with. Rechargeables would be best, as disposable batteries are usually too expensive to buy consistently. A NiMh or NiCad battery with an AC adapter would be the best bet (similar to the trend in hand-held radio scanners)

  18. Needs a few changes by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. AA batteries, not AAA or fixed rechargeable Li-ION. AAA have a terribly low capacity (~450mAh compared to up to 1900mAh for AA).

    2. Cheap and robust external power supply. Batteries are expensive.

    2. B&W screen, for godsake. Color is luxury, make a high-contrast large, protected B&W screen that can show decent amounts of information.

    3. Little chiclet keyboard that plugs in to a mini-USB slot. Something like the old Spectrum keyboards, cheap, nasty, unbreakable.

    That would make it cheaper and more useful. Imagine a computer you'd happily give to an 10-year old, no matter if it breaks.

    Lastly, I'd add bluetooth because it's a tiny extra cost, only a few $, and provides unbreakable networking and connectivity better than any physical connection, and make the whole thing run on a stripped-down embedded Linux.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Needs a few changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Something like the old Spectrum keyboards, cheap, nasty, unbreakable.

      Then it would be nothing like the Spectrum keyboards. What you want is cheap, nasty and held together with tinfoil and an old bandaid.

    2. Re:Needs a few changes by MickLinux · · Score: 1

      Okay, here's my list:

      (1) Basic similar to Applesoft, but with native-language lookup tables. Instead of "GR" for "Graphics", you can have "PI" for "pirstiniai"

      (2) C compiler.

      (3) Assembler/Disassembler a la DOS Debug.

      (4) Two ports: USB and Infrared, for file exchange, I/O, and so on.

      (5) Solar power blanket. Hang it outside your wall for the power, if you need it.

      (6) SRAM (no HDD).

      (7) Substitutable mapped ASCII codes. That is, the computer allows you to map a Win98-equivalent character set's specific country codes into a single-byte pseudo ASCII code.

      (8) Takes C cells, has slow processor speed, long life, B/W graphics only (okay, maybe 16 grays).

      (9) Reboot without wiping the "disk" memory

      (10) Possibility of interfacing with the USB keychain Ram-pseudo-disks.

      My thought and feeling on this is that the Basic (like Applesoft) can help a person learn the basics of programming -- therefore, it must be in a local language. However, since the commands will be stored as ASCII bytecode, you can transmit the code from one languaged computer to another.

      Next, the IR file exchange will make it easy for two friends to swap programs. That's going to help a program base grow.

      The Assembler/Disassembler combo will help people who want to write in Basic, but have just a bit of code in assembler. They'll be able to learn the byte code that they need.

      The USB will allow printers to take output from these things; will allow cheap USB keyboards; and indeed will even allow such things as internet connectivity. That means that they can plug into a network, and upload/download email.

      Since the thing is going to be as slow as molassas in order to minimize power consumption, you don't want a lot of graphics; rather, you want efficient code. But that being the case, it makes sense to have the OS hard coded in the ROM.

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    3. Re:Needs a few changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who designed this are mostly academics, so it isn't surprising that they've made obvious engineering blunders.

      The most obvious is the AAA vs. AA issue. AAA alkalines cost $1 each in India (no, we don't have a Costco where one can get 40-packs for $10 or so), which is about the same as a AA alkaline, except that it has only about 1/3 the capacity. This would be laughably obvious to anyone who has used or designed handhelds in the US.

      Secondly, it pays to be able to use NiCd or NiMH AA cells, with the capability to charge in situ (a la HP 200LX). You don't want to be inserting and removing batteries frequently, because that will destroy the contacts and the battery door latch.

      Thirdly, clamshell form factor with integrated keyboard (again, like the 200LX) is preferable to a touchpad/stylus design. Linux is primarily a command-line OS.

      Fourthly, a low-powered x86 design (Via Eden or EPIA) will obliterate the XScale on price/performance, and will also have Windows compatibility - a big plus in rural India.

      Many other alternatives exist, almost all of which are better solutions than the Simputer.

      The Thais made an excellent choice by going with Via C3 notebooks for $400 or so. It's perfectly usable as it stands, but they can also be upgraded later with Celerons/PIIIs as the tail-market price drops to $10 or less.

  19. Re:Yeah, but... by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I must be tired today... i fell for that link twice!

    --
    stuff |
  20. $400 is much too expensive by NineNine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Considering the fact that 16% of the planet doesn't even make $400 a year , this is still ridiculously expensive.

    1. Re:$400 is much too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I agree. It wasn't until I was 16 years old that my allowance exceeded $300. This situation is simply intolerable.

  21. have they not heard of... by agentforsythe · · Score: 0

    X-box linux?

  22. Intention and Commercialism by Unfallen · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Views subject to media-frenzied hype and/or misunderstanding, as pointed out in the article, but nevertheless...


    "We are fairly clear that commercial success has to go with our development goals,"


    I seem to remember, when the Simputer first hit the backpages of IT newspaper supplements, that the point of the simputer was to provide a set of designs that could be produced cheaply, the idea being that this production would then be available to anyone with the right resources/motivation, rather than just those who wanted to sell it for profit to geeky businessmen. When I signed onto the Simputer mailing list, there was a lot of talk about this, and the method in which a charge would only be entailed for mass-producers - everybody else, wanting to produce less than a certain number of units, was free to take the designs (and the software, IIRC) and use them.

    Casting an eye over the Simputer site reveals an interesting addition - the SGPL, or Simputer General Public License. There are then TWO separate licenses (the SDML and the, uh, SDML to manufacture it. Alas, I have no time at the moment to work out precisely what the differences are, though judging by the title ("Simputer" versus "Simputerised"), this is something to do with which components you intend to use.

    Nevertheless, it would seem that the original intention to roll out a technology for the common good has slipped a little, though the reasons for this I can only speculate on, and would be wrong to do so... Alas, I think that the most practical way to achieve the original goals, to promote the use of communication technologies (as this is the essential bit) in the same way that radio technology spread, is to make it truly owned by nobody, veritably public domain. To achieve it alongside commercial interests means something usually has to give on one side or the other.

    On a different note, perhaps the EU could gleam some advice on patents from the SGPL too...

  23. The High Cost of Software by TheVidiot · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's strange how SimCity, SimCoaster, SimSafari and the Sims all were priced normally, and yet SimPuter appears to be behind schedule and way overpriced.

    Perhaps moving development offshore isn't the cost saver it's been promoted as.

    :)

    1. Re:The High Cost of Software by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      I played The Sims in one of it's early incarnations, and realized it was sucking my life away, while I was constantly making just one more adjustment. So I haven't played in a while...

      I'm wondering, that now with The Sims being so advanced with all of the add-ons, etc... Can you give one of your Sims a computer with 'The Sims' on it? You can then sit and watch your Sim play the The Sims all day.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
  24. I can't seem to find.. by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 1

    I can't seem to find the machine in your second link. Would you mind pointing it out to me?

  25. What is so special about that? by danila · · Score: 1

    I dunno, but at Price.Ru you can find plenty of PCs for $200+ and plenty of monitors for $100+. That's $300-350 for a new off-the-shelf computer and you don't even need a new name for that. There surely must be a way to make a functional computer for $200. That would be worth mentioning, not a $400 low-end PC.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  26. obsolete before released by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Commodity computers are still on "Internet time". The design-to-distribution cycle of a Dell, Gateway etc. is less than sic months. Their performance-per-price nearly doubles annually. Custom computers cannot keep up. Silicon Valley is littered with the wreckage of scientific computing companies and PDAs who fell off this relentless developement trajectory.

  27. Palm Zire is cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An everyday mexican supermarket store (Gigante GDL) is selling the Palm Zire for about $52 USD.
    I've seen them on the shelves for $95 USD since January and they didn't seem to move out.

    Volume manufacture by medievaly underpaid chinese labour shall prove hard to overcome for the Simputer project.

    LE+

  28. and let me repeat (this is not flambeaux) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone should learn to read, speak, and write English. Then we can defenestrate unicode and use good old ascii for everything. This incredibly simplifies the task of writing cheap hardware and software.

    A.R. Nemmer

  29. Simputer became expensive because.. by mritunjai · · Score: 2

    ... it was loaded with goodies. Quoting from the article- "Our Simputer comes with a smart card reader. It has a USB master that can host different kind of peripherals. It has an in-built modem, GSM/CDMA data interface, GPS receiver and the equivalent of a 400 MHZ Celeron [comment: its a SA proc]. It is a power packed machine," says Samyeer Metrani, group manager (embedded systems), Encore Technologies. Probably they needed to include the goodies for special purposes, but somehow they got in the "basic" model where many of these weren't even needed. Comeon... even Palm and Zaurus don't have GPS receiver and CDMA+GSM interface, buildin modem and a 400(!) MHz processor. The cost can surely be brought down, but then they would be competing with established players. So they chose the alternative route to play in niche markets with feature packed versions... and its very well known that benefits of economies of scale are usually not available to niche players!

    --
    - mritunjai
    1. Re:Simputer became expensive because.. by zungu · · Score: 0

      I think they need these extra features because they want to make it a true GUI. Illiterate people can then easily use it by clicking icons. Also, in remote places where telephones are not available, CMDA+GSM interface could be a big boon. Otherwise, it would be another Nintendo gameboy.

    2. Re:Simputer became expensive because.. by Jage · · Score: 1

      400MHz SA (StrongArm)? Never heard of such a thing, but I assume it's an X-Scale (PCA-25x or PCA-26x) instead. 400MHz X-Scale is equivalent to magnitude of 20Mhz Pentium in floating point math, maybe 150-200Mhz Pentium in integer math. Afterall, Celeron has a huge cache compared to these (yeah, even the old joke-Celeron with a tiny cache has maybe 2-4 times more cache than this thing!)

      In reality the simputer is equivelant to about 50-100Mhz Pentium, all things considered.

    3. Re:Simputer became expensive because.. by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

      My Libretto has a 120 MHz pentium. It runs W95, and has an acceptable performance for most tasks using Office 97 and IE5.

      Given an optimised software suite I see no reason why a "100 MHz Pentium" would be overloaded in the context of a handheld. I don't know about handwriting recognition, admittedly, if they have that.

  30. Simputer "became" expensive because... by mritunjai · · Score: 1

    [sorry for HTML submission previously.] ... it was loaded with goodies. Quoting from the article-

    "Our Simputer comes with a smart card reader. It has a USB master that can host different kind of peripherals. It has an in-built modem, GSM/CDMA data interface, GPS receiver and the equivalent of a 400 MHZ Celeron [comment: its a SA proc]. It is a power packed machine," says Samyeer Metrani, group manager (embedded systems), Encore Technologies.

    Probably they needed to include the goodies for special purposes, but somehow they got in the "basic" model where many of these weren't even needed. Comeon... even Palm and Zaurus don't have GPS receiver and CDMA+GSM interface, buildin modem and a 400(!) MHz processor.

    The cost can surely be brought down, but then they would be competing with established players. So they chose the alternative route to play in niche markets with feature packed versions... and its very well known that benefits of economies of scale are usually not available to niche players!

    --
    - mritunjai
  31. Cheaper than the Simputer by cyber_rigger · · Score: 2, Informative


    The Simputer is a neat idea
    but who is going to buy them
    if you can already get something cheaper/faster
    with more storage?

    Here is a 1.2 Duron with a 20 gig drive for $200 US.

    http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.gsp?product _id=2138700&cat=86796&type=19&dept=3944&path=0%3A3 944%3A3951%3A41937%3A86796

    Of course if you have no place to plug it in
    then you're hosed.

  32. Deceptive Marketing by Brahmastra · · Score: 1

    I think this whole Simputer deal was all about deceptive marketing by a company to get their name out. They touted a cheap computer for the poor and got a lot of media attention. They came up with an expensive PDA and their name got quite well publicized in the bargain

    1. Re:Deceptive Marketing by romit_icarus · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with you.
      Being in India and part of the industry, this was pretty much the accepted view of most who were in the know. The simputer made excellent headlines for those interested in sustainable IT in developing countries...

      Good headlines, but it was always going to be poor execution...

  33. Should have outsourced design and marketing to US by Eight+01 · · Score: 1

    Maybe if they had outsourced the design and marketing to the U.S. the thing would be successfull! ;)

  34. The original concept was like this... by mysticgoat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    [This is recycled from something I posted about a year ago.]

    Alice is a shrewd 17 year old who plans to build on her investment in a Simputer and a cell phone until she achieves world domination. With the optimism of youth, she figures that will happen when she's about 25. After all, she needs two years to pay off the Co-op loan she took to get the things, and then she needs to really learn how read and write, too. That might take a little while. But she's willing to put off starting her family until she's 25. Much as she wants kids, she wants to be rich, first.

    One of Alice's clients of the day is Bob, who is a 28 year old who has a full set of socket wrenches, a number of other tools, a backpack, and an excellent memory of the exploded diagrams of the half dozen different types of Briggs & Stratton engines that are in use within walking distance. Today he brings Alice a broken fan belt from Chuck's rototiller. With him helping her figure out the part identification code, Alice is able to find a store that has a replacement in stock, fifteen miles-- a round-trip walk of only a day-- away. That's much better than the fifty mile trip to the city.

    Chuck, who tagged along with Bob in a very worried fashion, is delighted at this good news. Three years ago his tiller had also broken down in the middle of planting season, and it had taken a week of sending a runner around to the distant towns to find the needed part. A week without work had thrown off the usual schedule, and while his farmer clients understood these things happen, some of their wives were angry at him because their kids had to be pulled out of school to hoe the fields, and those families had become the butt of village jokes for months. Nobody likes to be called "old fashioned", not that way. Chuck had lost something much more important than just the loss of income in that debacle, and he did not want to repeat it.

    Alice, the shrewd businesswoman, suggested that if Bob and Chuck wanted her to, maybe she could try to broker a delivery deal and get the new belt into Bob's hands before noon. At first they thought she was joking: same day delivery, better even than the mythical FedEx! But after a few minutes of enjoyable haggling, the three agreed to a payment. Then Alice chased them out of hearing distance, while she did furtive things with the internet access and the cell phone. No, I won't reveal her trade secrets, so don't ask me. Something about a regional network of teenage girls with Simputers, but you didn't hear that from me.

    The upshot was that 10 minutes later Chuck started sloshing across the western marsh to the highway, where he was to flag down a Frito Lay delivery truck heading east. The driver would give him the fan belt, and also a dozen batteries and a bag of potato chips for Alice. Meanwhile, Bob went back to the rototiller and began removing cover plates and things that needed to come off before the new belt could go on.

    End of story: Chuck is back in business before the day has even started to get hot. Bob's reputation for fast, friendly, quality field service is even more enhanced. That evening Alice counts the day's take with a laugh, and then gently tells her latest suitor that no, she's not yet ready to marry. There is a world out there and she is going to claim her piece of it. Marriage and children have to wait awhile.

    [It seems like this original vision is not going to happen-- reality always gets in the way of guiding visions. Nevertheless, if low cost computers promote coop purchases of supplies or coop selling arrangements, these Simputers would improve the lives of villagers.]

    1. Re:The original concept was like this... by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      But she's willing to put off starting her family until she's 25. Much as she wants kids, she wants to be rich, first.

      ...

      Marriage and children have to wait awhile.

      Alice is in for a rude awakening, if she wants kids. Peak fertility in women is 15-25, as many Americans and Europeans are finding out the hard way. Of course, if the third world started limiting its population, maybe the first world will have a chance to catch up--so it's a good thing for us...

    2. Re:The original concept was like this... by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree. Not at all.

      But let's put this in context.

      First, all seventeen year olds are in for a rude awakening. That's the nature of adolescence.

      Second, for women in good health the statistical drop-off in fertility is not concern before the mid thirties. These figures are generally based on births per 100,000 of population, and don't reflect the basic biology-- they are more reflective of societal norms, the pressures for birth control that come with the second, third, umpteenth child, and so on.

      Third, while I know you are correct about fertility rates, if you look further, you'll also find that WHO and other health agencies consistently report that five year survival rates of the children of teenagers are much lower than for women in their mid-twenties. For a young woman who wants to raise a child, the statistics suggest that she will be better off waiting a few years before she begins her family, as otherwise she runs a higher risk of experiencing the grief of burying her first born.

    3. Re:The original concept was like this... by GuruJ · · Score: 1

      "Third, while I know you are correct about fertility rates, if you look further, you'll also find that WHO and other health agencies consistently report that five year survival rates of the children of teenagers are much lower than for women in their mid-twenties."

      Just out of interest:
      Has anyone worked out whether this is because women are more likely to conceive a healthy baby at 25, or because the woman is more likely to have the financial resources (husband, job, whatever) to support the baby properly?

      --
      -- Askari: Give JavaScript the bird.
    4. Re:The original concept was like this... by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      Has anyone worked out whether this is because women are more likely to conceive a healthy baby at 25, or because the woman is more likely to have the financial resources (husband, job, whatever) to support the baby properly?

      The epidemiologists have found this to be a very murky area. (I am not one of them; I am an RN who has attempted to follow some of the research).

      Within the teen mother population within the US, there is a greater number of babies born with addictions to crack, heroin, or with fetal alcohol syndrome than in the general population, so one factor is that pregnant teenage women in the US are, as a group, less likely to have good prenatal care. But that doesn't account for all the difference. Other things are going on.

      Morbidity studies of accidental deaths of young children show a disproportionate number of children of teenage mothers die of drownings, falls, vehicle accidents, ingestions of household poisons, and other generally preventable causes. There is also a higher morbidity associated with diseases, but AFAIK it isn't clear whether this is because such children are more prone to serious illness or less likely to get early medical intervention. My guess is that in many of these cases, the young mother is less likely to assess the danger properly, and less likely to arrange early intervention. But you can't really tell that kind of thing from the numbers.

      Still, there is a clear argument that teenage mothers lack the general experience in protective behaviors that older mothers have.

      This statistical approach is too abstract to really be of much use in a forum like slashdot. So...

      Say Amy and Betty were born on the same day to neighbors in a wealthy suburb. Both have unremarkable childhoods where they get everything they need and a lot of what they want (except of course for the ponies). On their 13th birthday, they open their hearts to each other and find that they each wants more than anything else to have kids. But Amy decides she wants to start her family while she's young, maybe with that good looking brown haired new boy at school who is such a dreamboat. While Betty decides that she'll wait until after college.

      If Amy has her first baby at the age of 17, she will start off with four years of purposeful study of child-rearing behind her. If Betty waits until she is 22, she will have been studying in the same field for eight years and for the last four of them, she will have benefitted from the vicarious experiences that Amy, her best friend, has shared. So even disregarding the differences in critical thinking that occur over this time frame, which of these two young women is more likely to recognize potential threats to her baby and take effective risk reduction methods?

      That question sort of brings the whole discussion to a very down-to-earth focus.

  35. The solution is... by gregeth · · Score: 1

    I know, when SCO loses this battle, we could just make them send a dollar or two for every slashdot article about them to a third world country of our choice. Before you know it, no more world hunger!

  36. education by slimey_limey · · Score: 0

    > Who will educate all these people on how to use computers?

    I believe that most people on this earth are intelligent enough to eventually figure out what's going on, even if it takes them a while. Manuals help *a lot*.

    1. Re:education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea.

      Haven't you heard about the tech support stories?

  37. Teach a man to fish by Felinoid · · Score: 1

    It's seldom so simple as that.
    There are quite a few successful programs delivering food and shelter some even have access to the Internet through public libarys.
    To you the Internet may not seam to be a basic need but for someone whom information means the diffrence between dying in the gutter and making a better life a pocket computer is a life saver.

    The worse the situation is the more a portable computer can help.

    Education is vital if a person is to break out of poverty and a portable computer is probably the best possable way to getting that education to the poor who are busy trying to stay alive.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  38. Re:Should have outsourced design and marketing to by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

    Nah, it would have been to big, to heavy, to poluting, have useless spoilers and would run on a gallon (ofcourse it would also ignore the easier metric system) of oil per minute and burn a hole in the ozon layer.....
    And SimputerOnline would be carpet bombing india with memory sticks containing a rebranded browser.

    Jeroen

    --
    Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  39. Tired of Patronizing Attitude of Slasdotters by zungu · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why does everyone keep saying "poor Indian" again and again. It ain't all that poor at all. India is the largest consumer of gold in the world. Indian programmers are among the best in the world (no offence to others). If you visit India you will see that the social system is very strong. Relatives help others, and strangers help others too. That is the reason that we do not have any social security system. Kids take care of their parents, unlike here where they go and dump them in an old-age home. People are overall a lot happy than they are in the west. IMHO.

    1. Re:Tired of Patronizing Attitude of Slasdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit whining you delusional fool. Indians are among the POOREST people on earth. The per capita income is LESS than 500 dollars a YEAR. The greedy and heartless hindus like you who hoard gold while their brethren remain chronically malnourished are EVIL. Shame on you for bragging about such selfish greed.

      Indian programmers are basically coolies working for foreigners. Name something original that has come out of India.

    2. Re:Tired of Patronizing Attitude of Slasdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen a TON of Indian, Chineese and Japanese code and virtually NONE of it comes close to being "Good". In very rare instances, the Japanese can make a "good" showing. China, indea, and oh yeah, Estonia (No not Elbonia) as well rates from poor to crap.

      I suppose if the current level of Indian code is all you have ever seen or dealt with you might actually think it was good. But believe me there are much MUCH better coders in Europe and the US than Eastern Europe, Mideast or Asia.

      Go ahead and call me racist (Especially since you don't know who I am) but my opinion is at least based on actually having seen, dealt with, and unnecessarily had to fix a TON of stuff from those regions.

    3. Re:Tired of Patronizing Attitude of Slasdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yes, poor indians... they earn about 2000 US$ per capita per year. And their growth has fallen under 5%

      Before being the largest consumers of gold on the planet, indians should build a correct fiscal system. And then do what the WTO tells them to do.

      That's not so complicated.

    4. Re:Tired of Patronizing Attitude of Slasdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indians earn about 500 US$ per capita per year, not 2000.

    5. Re:Tired of Patronizing Attitude of Slasdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indians are among the POOREST people on earth. The per capita income is LESS than 500 dollars a YEAR
      30% of the Indians are below the poverty line. rest do ok.
      The greedy and heartless hindus like you who hoard gold while their brethren remain chronically malnourished are EVIL.
      rant rant .. more rant. Its the British who empoverished our country - suggesting that hindus empoverished others in India doesnt make much sense.
      Indian programmers are basically coolies working for foreigners.
      so are most programmers - coolies for their corporate masters. btw, there is something called dignity of labour. your mom didnt tell u that?
      Name something original that has come out of India.
      civilization for instance? counting.. those zeros and ones your comp pushes around... medicine.. surgery.. astronomy.. list keeps growing. bottom line is, rant all you want... after 20 yrs, watch us.

    6. Re:Tired of Patronizing Attitude of Slasdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are not worth being called names. and yea generalizations do great in the real world..

      i ground where I stand looks flat, so the rest of the earth must be flat too.. so thought aristotle and so believed the church for centuries and centuries... you just proved that u are in the same league.

    7. Re:Tired of Patronizing Attitude of Slasdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can give silly and narrow examples so can I.
      Google news was the brainchild of an Indian.
      There are many indian employees in high places at IBM, Intel, Oracle etc.
      The world's first free web mail (Hotmail) is the brainchild of an Indian. 20 to 30% of silicon valley startups were started by Indians.

      Bose was an Indian. (ever hear of bosons, bose-einstein particles ?)
      Hell, even decimal system and the very numbers you use now came from india otherwise we would be using the roman system(how much is XCXII anyone?)

      I have seen some code by US undergrads and grads and it really really sucks.

      To use your own argument:

      Go ahead and call me racist (Especially since you don't know who I am) but my opinion is at least based on actually having seen, dealt with, and unnecessarily had to fix a TON of stuff from those
      regions

      Yes, I had to fix lots of sucking code from US grad students.

      heh. Just realize that programming skills see no race or color.

  40. How about you... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    ... read "How the World Was One" by Arthur C. Clarke? In it, he describes (among other things) the massive social and economic improvements in rural India brought about by the SITE satellite TV project. A single satellite dish and even a small TV can be seen by a whole village, bringing education to even the poor and illiterate farmers.

  41. The first and last characters... by Ratface · · Score: 1

    ARE in place. I meant to say that

    "the evdil is in the details" of course ;-)

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
  42. more tech details about the simputer by pamri · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not long ago, the guys from encore gave a talk at our local lug on the simputer and from what i could gleam, they now seem to be moving towards customizing the simputer for special sectors like Manufacturing cos., etc., instead of relying too much on it's original purpose to fund themselves. You can find slides from the talks here.

  43. Mod parent down by pubjames · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I guess 200-400$ aren't that little for a poor Indian. Apart from that fact that I have to wonder whatfor people living in some fuckin slum need a computer!

    Please mod this ignorant comment down. It is not insightful.

    I assist a charity that is installing computer training colleges in Ethiopia. The colleges have a huge effect - the students can go on to get jobs, move to a better location - it can literally change their lives, and they help pick up the local economy.

    I read comments like this whenever this type of topic comes up on Slashdot ("why give them computers when they have hardly got enough food and drinking water..?") If all you do is provide basic necessities then these people will never be able to break out of the poverty trap.

  44. The 35 cent solution. by JonTurner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >>They can use the computers to learn about ways of improving their farming...

    So what's wrong with a photocopied pamphlet or even a book? Hundreds, perhaps thousands of booklets could be printed for the cost of one of these computers.

    If the goal is the distribution of information, this is the wrong tool for the job.

    1. Re:The 35 cent solution. by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Great. BTW, what is the cost of printing the entire internet in pamphlet form 1000 times and distributing it to poor Indian farmers? Unless you plan to know in advance all of the information they want to know, how are you going to print these pamphlets?

      Besides, even if the printing is cheap (not a given), distributing tons of printed material in areas with poor infastructure is problematic at best.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:The 35 cent solution. by twalk · · Score: 1

      Distributing tons of batteries in areas with poor infastructure is problematic at best. (Not to mention expensive.)

    3. Re:The 35 cent solution. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      If the goal is the distribution of information, this is the wrong tool for the job.

      For a small distribution, perhaps. However, printing thousands or millions of pamphlets (and then distributing them) gets expensive.

      If each town had, say, 10 of these computers, 10 printers, and a hell-of-a-lotta paper (and ink), then the printing and distribution costs would be reduced.

      Further, these computers don't distribute information as a one-shot deal. Sure, the first pamphlet would "cost" a lot, but then you get economies of scale, such that the 10th or 100th pamphlet distributed would cost little more than the cost of electricity, bandwidth, and ink.

      And as to the right tool for the job, I think the Internet is exactly the right tool for information distribution. I mean, just look at the popularity (right or wrong) of P2P networks; it is information distribution at its finest (except the porn you get when searching for Finding Nemo (to some it's a bonus, but not parents with small children)).

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    4. Re:The 35 cent solution. by turgid · · Score: 1

      I think to people in business, especially the ones running the business, e.g. a farmer, a spreadsheet is a far more useful tool than a document viewer or word processor. Connection to the Internet, on the other hand, would be highly valuable, since it is a quick, cheap, open and ubiquitous medium for communication.

  45. Outsourcing bonanza! by JonTurner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    >> have to wonder whatfor people living in some ... slum need a computer! ...
    >>I'm a programmer now.

    Enjoy it while it lasts. I can't help but wonder how long before your company outsources your job to some kid with a Simputer willing to work for 35 cents a day? Ouch!

  46. I think we're missing the point.... by gordie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    IIRC the whole point of the simputer, was to produce a cheap multi-language system that would work reliably in third world conditions i.e. areas with unreliable or no local power, high levels of dust etc. for sale to poor governments, NGA's etc. for use in educational programs. The ideal setting is one set up in the "mud hut" one room school in a small rural village. The teacher uses it for classes, both for the village children and adults. Yes our obsolete systems could be donated, but if they sit unused because of overheating and dust or a burned out power supply, due to the poor local electrical system etc., then all we have done, is save space in our own landfill.

    1. Re:I think we're missing the point.... by gordie · · Score: 1

      Sorry missed a /B tag in there - I ment to hit the preview button not submit!

    2. Re:I think we're missing the point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said friend. Why did the Slashdot moderators give you a 2 score to something sensible when they give a "5, insightful" or "5, interesting" rating to ignorant comments?

  47. This product makes sense in India. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have seen all the previous responses - provide them food, not computers.. provide them clothing and health facilities .. not computers.. blah blah blah..
    But obviously who ever was posting it didnt have even the vaguest idea about India or for that matter any third world over populated nation.
    Firstly, this is not for personal ownership. I dont think that marketing people in India expect to sell $400 product to Bhole Ram (equivalent of Joe Consumer) who earns $500 annually. This product would be for collective use - like those internet cafes- most people in developed countries use internet cafes(if at all) because they cannot lug their pc/laptop around. But its a different story in developing countries - people use them because they cant afford to buy a pc and have regular internet connection. So it makes perfect sense for a village governing body to buy one of these and provide some kind of access scheme to the villagers to use it. Why a simputer? why not a pc? firstly cost.. secondly size... last but not the least usability and maintanance.
    Cellphone networks are easier to get access to than regular phone lines in india and it makes perfect sense to make provision for wireless internet access in the simputer.

    Now I want to address the "why computers to the hungry?" part. Its about information dissemenation.
    1. Natural disasters - floods, cyclones, forest fires.. earth quakes.
    2. accidents...
    3. pestilences and animal diseases.
    4. Information about governance

    Time and again the above have proved to be major problems in India and they took large toll because of the lack of information. In a 1977 storm surge 20k people died in coastal Andhra villages and the reason is that they never knew about the impending cyclone.

    plant and animal pestilences usually sweep across the nation.. nothing much can be done about it if people are not informed in advance.

    proper medical care never reaches accident victims in villages because the nearest phone is 20 miles away and the nearest doctor is 50 miles away.

    Redtape is a way of life in India. If you dont know the rules of the red tape, you are so screwed. poor uninformed villagers are the ones who usually fall prey to these practises.

    Now - coming to the hungry and starving part of things, people in one part of the country can die of starvation without any help reaching them - only due to the lack of information.
    yes - there are millions of people under the poverty line in India. many of them can get only 1 meal a day with difficulty.. the only way to empower these people is by providing them access to information and letting them decide what they want to with their own lives.
    now all you booers and nay sayers can take ur crock and shove it... u know where.
    they got no food.. why give them clothes? they got no clothes.. why give them houses? they got no houses.. why freedom of speech?... you all are mary antoinettes...

  48. The Global Civil Society Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In short, the Global Civil Society Laptop should be:

    • Not very particular about the size and number of components you put in it.
    • Not very particular about how you power it.
    • Not very particular about how you hook it up to other devices.
    • Not very particular about dust and water
    • And not very particular about how where it gets mounted/placed
    I respectfully submit to the Viridian Design movement, the internet, and the occasional slashdot reader what I felt was the best solution to these constraints - the VacuumPacked Computer The Vacuum Packed Laptop

    2tec ~ wants one
  49. Why? by pagercam2 · · Score: 1

    With devices like the Palm Zire at $99 why do you invent a "low cost" device at $400??? The Zire 71 has colour, integrated camera, lots of memory, memory card (SD/MMC), 320x320 screen what else do people need? Startup hardware companies just don't make sense anymore buy a standard platform or have some far east company (China, Singapore, Taiwain, Malayasia ....) build a standard or copy a standard, write some custom software for you're app and you are done. These guys had some blue sky idea that they could become rich selling to the poor, and then got over confident and suffered from the old standard featue creap and instead of getting rich they will be looking for a new job. They were supposed to be going low cost, but they have obviously failed. There are plenty of $400 devices on the market already I think there are PocketPC devices below $300 what is missing is the India specific stuff, and thats what they should be concentating on!!!

  50. cheap linux pc by mehtars · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Currently in india, as soon as a community gets electric power, the first thing they buy is a TV.
    The tv becomes their gateway to the rest of the world-- a one way feed.
    if you really want, you should build a computer that costs 150$ linux machine and uses the tv as a monitor-- i think that would be a more ideal solution. Basically, if walmart can make linux machines and sell them at $200, it shouldn't be that much harder to bring the price down by 50.
    in cost in rupees, that would be 7500/- cheaper than the simputer.

    1. Re:cheap linux pc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TV-out VGA cards are readily available for $20 or less, and inexpensive systems powered by Via C3 CPUs are already available at the $150 price point, worldwide.

      However, the resolution of a TV is unsuitable for anything except game-playing and video playback. In particular, it cannot be used for any application that displays text.

    2. Re:cheap linux pc by The+Cydonian · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Heard of 'Sinclair' ZX Spectrum +? Yes, it was sold in India too, used to cost about Rs 14,000, and yes, you needed to plug in to the TV. And oh, *all* apps in it were open-source, and if I'm not wrong, it actually had GUI even before IBM PC's did (this app called 'Artist II')

      There are, of course, many reasons why it flopped, but here's one reason why it flopped in my household:- the Spectrum + had to fight for TV space along with daily soaps, news and cartoons, among other things. You know which ones won over.

  51. Pictures by $exyNerdie · · Score: 3, Informative

    I know ya'll like pictures and here are some (before the final outer design):

    More recent picture
    Picture 1

    Picture 2

    Picture 3

    Picture 4

    Picture 5

    Use of Simputer for Spot Billing of Electricity Metering

    More Case

    Studies

  52. Re:eek by mantera · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    'The world's poorest two billion people desperately need healthcare, not laptops,' he said.

    How is this off-topic??!!

  53. Fishing! by picardsb · · Score: 1

    Give a man a fish and he will have a good meal that day.

    Teach the man how to fish - and he will eat for a lifetime.

    I guess teaching someone how to walk on they own feet, is much better than wheeling them around. A great opportunity is being created - which has the potential to
    1. mass educate people
    2. eradicate poverty
    3. further TRUE democracy (information is power)

    Already the Indian media is far more "fair and balanced" than that in the US. People know more about the "WORLD" there. Now there is a big chance of people knowing much much more - and hopefully correcting the ways of life that hinder the growth of 1.2 billion people.
    Why not support the idea? Is the rest of us afraid?

  54. slashdotters are a sheltered bunch by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 1
    What's the point when for $200 the "poor" could by a Linux pc from Wal-Mart.

    The simputer is design to be *gasp* simpler then the regular desktop computer.

    (i) It was made to to used in areas where electricity is very undependable or non-existant. Where are you going to plug in that walmart PC?

    (ii) It was made to be easily shared amongst a large group of people. eg. a co-operative. How are you going to share a desktop amongst a few dozen people? Wouldn't be easier to share a mobile computer?

    (iii) It was made to be robust. Are you going to replace walmart's crap keyboad once someone spills something on it?

    (iv) It was meant to be financed or bought as an investment. You know, like how westerners buy cars and play for college etc.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
  55. Re:Tired of Patronizing Attitude of Slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well said friend. Some of these morons have no understanding of the situation in India. Add to that the Slashdot moderators who give a "insightful" or "interesting" rating to ignorant comments.

  56. The one I saw needed a lot of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the article, there have been many recent improvements. The unit I saw a few weeks ago was no different than when I first looked at it over a year ago, so I can't comment on that.

    The person I spoke with said that the intention was not for everyone to have one of these in his or her pocket, but that they were available for use and everybody gets a CF card for personal data. Not Quake stats, but more like medical records. Organizations may even give away CF cards, at a quantity cost of about a buck each.

    Very few records are kept on computers in India. My feeling is that unless there is a pressing need for people to use this, then individuals are likely to think not "I have this interesting data card that can improve my life" but "I have this thing that I can sell for a dollar." Those of you that have been forced to use the All-Knowing-Magnetic-Encoded-Card by your university will understand my point about "pressing need". Additional infrastructure is needed for it to be useful.

    The unit I played with (some time back) ran on AA batteries. At the time, a set of NiMh batteries lasted about an hour. This is a major problem and I hope that progress has been made. One thing I learned from years working with device manufacturers is that power is the one of the last things to be optimized in the design.

    I have heard that the localization is hardcoded and that this makes it difficult to add additional language support. I don't have any more information on that. That is another important issue that needs to be addressed.

    It is not "A computer for the masses." That would be about as helpful as giving everyone in India an electric bagel slicer, nobody would know what to do with it and there is no place to plug it in anyway. It is more like a point-of-sale system for personal information that is currently kept on paper. Widespread use of such a device may be helpful, but only if the CF cards are properly looked after by their keepers. I have not heard of any ideas for backup of (presumably important) electronic data.

  57. For some facts about this bullshit by abhisarda · · Score: 1

    The guys who made simputer might have had a benevolent idea in mind but its fucking going to go nowhere. Why?
    Firstly, at the rate the cost of electronics is dropping, PDA's made by Palm and other companies are more or less in the same price range as this simputer.
    Secondly, mismanagament is the name of the game for the Indians. They might make shit but selling it is another matter.
    Those people who have 200, 400 $ to spend are *very* brand aware.
    They know the fucking difference between a palm, handspring, sony or the zaurus.
    Thirdly, if these simputer people had any brains, they could know it made more financial and business sense to import second hand pda's or outsource their pda needs from taiwan.
    If the customs duty was the problem, it could setup a factory to assemble or make the pdas but here is a problem*.

    Fourth, *There is not much fucking DEMAND in India for pda's.
    In the US about 4 million pda's are sold every year. In India, the number of PC's sold is LESS than that. The number of notebooks is even more pathetic(60,000 as to 5 million in the US).
    So unless you have a decent demand, how are you going to be able to justify your R&D costs? It doesn't matter if that pda is developed in india or mongolia.
    Making 5,000-10,000 pda's is just *not* economical.
    It would be better if the indian govt setup a scheme for notebooks like the thai govt. But don't worry, thats not going to happen. The indian govt has its hands tied up in so many other bullshit stuff that worrying about who gets pda's and notebooks is the least of its worries.

    1. Re:For some facts about this bullshit by anandcp · · Score: 0

      Bullshit!!! Indians are the biggest spenders in Europe & USA & Asia !!! Visit SIngapore, Australia or Europe (Amsterdam) and you will see indians outspending americans, etc. Get the facts right, before you put your foot in your mouth!

      --
      -------- Cluster bombing from B-52s is very, very accurate -- the bombs always hit the ground.
  58. The Solo Computer fits the bill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Solo Computer fits part of the bill. It's ruggedized, uses ultra-low power (it can run on a solar panel), and it runs RISCOS, not Windows, so it won't get infected with worms.

    A.R. Nemmer

  59. It's actually not supposed to be a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idea when they developed the simputer (which was by some college professors and students, not a company) was that it would be bought in bulk by some agency, like a co-operative or an NGO, and rented out at a pretty low rate to those who need it. In this way, the idea was that a farmer could take it into the field and record any necessary things about his crops, a milk vendor could use it on her daily rounds and so on. Somehow, I doubt that the 486 you'd give these people would do anything to help here. And like someone else said, these things are meant to be rugged, and used in a very harsh environment. BTW, a decent (new) computer here costs about Rs. 25000, and the original cost of the Simputer (before it was bought and taken over) was Rs. 10000, which is not really that much for buying in bulk by a co-operative.

    It's a mistake to look at it in terms of a PC, like we're all used to.

  60. Welcome to the real world Neo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    subject says it all

  61. See Simputer in action in the Bay Area by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Peninsula Linux Users Group (PenLUG) will be hosting a talk on the Simputer at their September 25th meeting down near Redwood City, in the SF Bay Area.

    The same speaker will be visiting the Linux Users' Group of Davis (LUGOD) on October 20th, near Sacramento, Calif.

  62. computer sharing saves money and physique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please not everybody behind a computer all the time.

  63. Nah, the plastic case cracks too easily... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...when you use it as a shovel. But they do make neato roof tiles if you have enough of them.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  64. Energy is expensive. ARM cpus are energy efficient by aat · · Score: 1

    Electricity is more expensive in third world countries. Older computers are quite energy inefficient for their speed. The ARM chip, used in simputers, was designed to be a low power device, thus lowering the running costs of the machine.http://www.slashdot.org/

  65. Why does everyone Underestimate or belittle India? by anandcp · · Score: 0

    Why is that whenever something technologically advanced comes out of India like the Moon Shot, or Simputer people always say indians should concentrate on basic needs like food, clothing...?
    Is it a bias against india as a whole?
    or is it the mentality that all countries except USA is a third world country?

    --
    -------- Cluster bombing from B-52s is very, very accurate -- the bombs always hit the ground.