Slashdot Mirror


Phone Plus Sensory Deprivation Equals...

Solo-Malee writes "The BBC has an article about a new phone technology that isolates the user from all other sensory input. This in theory means the user is not distracted by other things occurring in their immediate surroundings. If these catch on, it looks like getting a Jacuzzi for the office could be easier than you might expect."

337 comments

  1. The phone is your leash by grub · · Score: 4, Interesting


    [PET_PEEVE-2978741]

    This in theory means the user is not distracted by other things occurring in their immediate surroundings.

    For me the phone is a major distraction. When I'm busy I don't want a damn phone call from anyone. Unfortunately some people live by the phone; watch when a phone rings and see how people jump to answer it. Screw that: the phone is a convenient tool for me not a backdoor by which others can invade my space and privacy.

    When I had a land-line at the house I didn't own an answering machine. Caller ID let me know who called and I could decide if a return call was warranted because once a message is left the onus is on you to call back. I have just my cell now and don't give out the number to non-friends & family. Take control of your life, the phone isn't your master.

    [/PET_PEEVE-2978741]

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:The phone is your leash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did people leave messages if you didn't have an answering machine/voice mail?

    2. Re:The phone is your leash by grub · · Score: 1

      They didn't. I would see who called via CID and I'd call back if I wanted. "Sears Canada", for example, would never get a return call. I don't need one of their credit cards.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:The phone is your leash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep my phone unplugged unless I want to call somebody or I know that a friend wants to call me. If my woman's out of town, she'll drop me an email telling me to plug in the phone at $TIME so she can call. Otherwise, the damned phone stays unplugged.

    4. Re:The phone is your leash by theLastPossibleName · · Score: 0

      This you own end up owning you

    5. Re:The phone is your leash by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Caller ID let me know who called and I could ecide if a return call was warranted because once a message is left the onus is on you to call back.

      I can't stand you people... at least once a month, I get a call from someone that says, "Hi, I have your number in my caller id."
      And I reply, "Ok, who are you?"
      "I am such and such, you called my house."
      "6 people live in my household. I don't know who called you. Were you expecting a call from us?"

      And then they get all annoyed because they realize that they have no idea why they called. Meanwhile, you interrupted my chicken salad sandwich.

    6. Re:The phone is your leash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yep. I only call back when I know the caller. Otherwise it's some charity or sales pitch.

    7. Re:The phone is your leash by kzinti · · Score: 4, Funny

      Meanwhile, you interrupted my chicken salad sandwich.

      I eat ham & cheese and this never happens to me. Maybe you should try switching sandwiches.

    8. Re:The phone is your leash by kaltkalt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well said. My cellphone is a one-way street. It's for ME to call you, and not vice-versa. I usually leave it in my car. If you (and i mean the global 'you') have something to tell me, leave a message and if it's worth my time, I'll get back to you. I don't do the "hey what's up? Nuthin'" thing.

      Likewise, no phone conversation is worth getting into a pool and isolation helmet for. Blowjob, maybe. Phone call... no fucking way.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    9. Re:The phone is your leash by SMOC · · Score: 0

      I only know two languages...English and bad english

      Let me guess, the former is not your native language?

      --
      All errors in this comment are mine. Corrections are considered a derivative work, and punishable under copyright law.
    10. Re:The phone is your leash by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you have enough time to read/post on slashdot, I am forced to assume that you might be able to sqeeze in a 'hello' when a friend calls. Seriously, you aren't that important.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:The phone is your leash by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're missing the point. If you're eating your chicken salad sandwich, don't answer the phone. Let caller ID pick it up, finish your sandwich, and then if you're remotely concerned that you might have missed a call that you cared about, you can check caller ID. If it's some asshat calling just because he has your number on hist caller ID, and it's not a number that you recognize, forget about it and move on with your life. One of the 5 other people in the house will see that number eventually and if the call is important to them they'll call that guy back themselves.

    12. Re:The phone is your leash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But when one of the 5 see the number and decide to call that guy back, they will just get his caller ID again. It's an infinite loop.

    13. Re:The phone is your leash by William+Baric · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately some people live by the phone

      The problem with most people is they feel they are not needed. They feel they have no value and no power over other people. So each time the phone ring, they hope it's someone who will say "I'd like to see you" or "I need your help" (as long as the person calling has value and power, of course). And they don't want that person to call someone else because they didn't answer the phone! Oh, no!

    14. Re:The phone is your leash by thunderbird46 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I got one of those once. It was a wrong number. The woman on the other end started out, rather rudely, "What were you calling me for? I have your number in my Caller ID." I say "umm... I don't think anyone here tried to call you." She was quite adamant about us calling her, so I asked her what phone number she'd intended to dial. Turned out she misdialed! :)

    15. Re:The phone is your leash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, you must be really important!!!!

    16. Re:The phone is your leash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure who is the bigger retard. You, for the phone thing, or your mom for facilitating your behavior by playing along and sending you emails.

    17. Re:The phone is your leash by gregmac · · Score: 1
      When I had a land-line at the house I didn't own an answering machine. Caller ID let me know who called and I could decide if a return call was warranted because once a message is left the onus is on you to call back.

      If everyone thought like you, no one would ever talk to each other.

      Why is leaving a message such a bad thing? At home, I have an answering machine (CID is too expensive, I pay Bell enough money as it is). If I'm there, and not busy, I answer. Otherwise, I let the machine get it. I can even hear the message as people are leaving it - if I was busy, but hear it's someone I want to talk to, then I can answer it. If someone doesn't leave a message, then it obviously wasn't important. If they do, then I can call them back and deal with it when it's convienent to me.

      On my cell I have both CID and voice mail. I have my cell with me pretty much 24/7. If I'm working, and out at a client's site, for example, I won't usually answer when one of my friends calls, but if it's the office, then I will. At the same time though, like you, I don't give out my cell number to very many people. If it's for work, people can call the office and they can patch them through to me.

      It's very easy to get a hold of me, but at the same time, it doesn't intrude on my life (except when someone calls early in the morning on Saturday and wakes me up -- though I just turn the ringer off and go back to sleep).

      --
      Speak before you think
    18. Re:The phone is your leash by pohl · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You would be assuming so erroneously. A general purpose computer allows you to interleave emails and web-forum-postings among a myriad other useful things that you can be doing with your machine at the same time. This prevents you from making assumptions about what else someone is doing with their time. (You can't assume that no one else uses their computer time wisely simply because you do not.)

      The phone, on the other hand, is a mutex lock on you...a very rude medium for low-importance/low-urgency communications.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    19. Re:The phone is your leash by JofCoRe · · Score: 1

      That's why I've found the best combination is caller ID and answering machine. I agree completely w/the original poster. I really don't like phones much at all. I completely agree that it's a convenience item for me, not for other people to be able to rach me whenever.

      The caller ID/answering machine seems to work quite well for me. The caller ID gives me a good idea most of the time who's calling, and then the answering machine gives me an extra level of protection. You know, there's some times when you really don't feel like talking to someone, but if it's really important, you'll make an exception. The answering machine lets me decide based on what they want, and then I can decide when to fit them into my schedule. Besides, my parents seem to like to use calling cards from home, so I'm always seeing these weird out of state calls from them on caller id... so the answering machine is neccessary in that instance too.

      --

      Place sig here.
    20. Re:The phone is your leash by maxume · · Score: 1
      Blah blah blah What?!?

      He still isn't that important...

      Pretty much anyone I know, if they are busy, won't answer the phone/has it turned off/leaves it somewhere they aren't. They don't do this because 'thier phone is a one way conduit' or to avoid 'a mutex lock', they do it because they have something else to do. I was commenting more to the rather extreme attitude exhibited in the original post, not to the idea that he should answer his phone more just cause I said he should. Sorry you missed that.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    21. Re:The phone is your leash by LetterJ · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think we have to worry. Someone who uses the phrase "mutext lock on you" in normal conversation probably doesn't get all that many "personal" calls.

    22. Re:The phone is your leash by W32.Klez.A · · Score: 5, Funny

      10 PRINT "Hi, your number was on my caller ID."
      20 PRINT "Yeah, I was calling because your number was on my caller ID."
      30 PRINT "Oh."
      40 PRINT "Yeah."
      50 PRINT "So..."
      60 PRINT "Yeah."
      70 GOTO 50

    23. Re:The phone is your leash by TClevenger · · Score: 1
      The phone, on the other hand, is a mutex lock on you...a very rude medium for low-importance/low-urgency communications.

      Then there's the phone's bastard stepchild: the conference call. I am required to be on a conference call every day--even if there's nothing important that couldn't have been said in an email. Worse yet, if I'm out of the office or working on a high-priority outage, I might miss some project or other announcement on the call, to which there is never an email follow-up. (Sigh.)

    24. Re:The phone is your leash by Grendol · · Score: 1

      Really? I don't eat in my office Jacuzzi. Though a slushy drink sounds good.

    25. Re:The phone is your leash by fubar1971 · · Score: 1

      Likewise, no phone conversation is worth getting into a pool and isolation helmet for. Blowjob, maybe. Phone call... no fucking way

      How about 1-900 numbers.

    26. Re:The phone is your leash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's for ME to call you, and not vice-versa.

      But who you gonna call if nobody answers their phone?

    27. Re:The phone is your leash by YourFaceHere · · Score: 1

      I think you mean: The things you own end up owning you. Though, I think we all saw Fight Club already

    28. Re:The phone is your leash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you aren't that important

      you neither.

    29. Re:The phone is your leash by theLastPossibleName · · Score: 0

      That's what I get for double checking what I wrote after I posted. After realizing the mistake I tried to post a correction but I didn't have the patience to wait for that damn waiting period. That's what I get for trying to be a beautiful and unique snowflake.

    30. Re:The phone is your leash by pohl · · Score: 1, Interesting
      They don't do this...to avoid 'a mutex lock', they do it because they have something else to do.

      That's exactly what the term "mutex" implies. It is short for "mutually exclusive". If someone has something else to do, they cannot devote that time to the phone call because they feel that the two activities require mutually exclusive access to themselves. Sorry if the jargon lost you. I find that the concepts behind software design are very useful metaphors for how people interact. You might find the metaphors a bit silly if you're just imagining conversations among friends and family, but when you start thinking about communications in large organizations, it is vital that someone think in these terms...because the problems are exactly the same: resource contention, scheduling conflicts, interruption of essential tasks, request/response latency versus total throughput, etc...

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    31. Re:The phone is your leash by PD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had a cordless telephone with a bad battery that would dial random numbers when the juice got too low. Sometimes the people would call back. Luckily it never dialed a phone sex operator in Barbados...

    32. Re:The phone is your leash by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1
      [PET_PEEVE-2978741]
      You have 2.9 million pet peeves!? Try some zoloft or something. You seem way to stressed out about this trivial thing that is the phone.

      --

      (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

    33. Re:The phone is your leash by ahoehn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, that's great, because you're better than all of us, and we should wait around so we can answer our phones whenever you're damn well ready to return our calls, and consider ourselves lucky to have the priviledge of talking to you.

      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    34. Re:The phone is your leash by momus_radar · · Score: 1
      For me the phone is a major distraction.

      I agree with you completely. That is why I've turned the ring volume of my work phone to a level that only I can hear it. If I'm not busy I'll answer it, otherwise I let voicemail handle it.
      Unfortunately some people live by the phone; watch when a phone rings and see how people jump to answer it.

      My boss is like that. You could be in the middle of an important conversation and when the phone rings he starts looking around for the cordless. If the phone rings more than twice he yells "Somebody get that!" It's a good thing we are a photo studio where the work atmosphere is more lax than an corporate setting.
      When I had a land-line at the house I didn't own an answering machine. Caller ID let me know who called and I could decide if a return call was warranted because once a message is left the onus is on you to call back.

      I have an answering machine at home and I've completely lowered it's volume and turned off the phone's ringer completely. If it's important they'll leave a message. Everyone who calls me regularly knows I won't answer. If they don't like leaving a message than that's their problem.
      Screw that: the phone is a convenient tool for me not a backdoor by which others can invade my space and privacy.

      Here, Here!
    35. Re:The phone is your leash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [PET_PEEVE-2978741]

      297-8741?

      hm... *dials*

      Dang, must be a different area code.

    36. Re:The phone is your leash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you need to get out more.

      Better yet, get laid.

    37. Re:The phone is your leash by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

      When you are driving, you are busy. When you are exercising at the gym, you are busy. Despite that, everyone in their car and on the stairmaster at the gym is yapping on their cellphone. "hey what's up, nothing, you, nada, yeah, yeah, uh huh, yep, ok, yeah... uh huh... no way... no way... uh.. i think.. yeah.. ok, ok, bye." Only to have it ring again a minute later and repeat the process. It's not a question of importance/ego. I don't think i'm any more important than the people trying to call me. But if i'm doing something, there is nothing so important that can't be left in a message. Now, were I ACTUALLY important (i.e. president of the US, etc.) then I would answer, because there could be things that are so important that, were they left in a message, would be detrimental to me and others. But i'm not the president.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    38. Re:The phone is your leash by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you dont want your chicken salad sandwich interrupted, all you have to do is use a Isochickensalad, a device that isolates the user from all sensory input other than chicken salad sandwich.

      The helmet delivers pre-gnawed chicken salad sandwich directly to the mouth, to avoid the distraction of having to carry the sandwich to the mouth and chewing it.

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    39. Re:The phone is your leash by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

      I'll call one of the many people who are leashed to their cell phone, and would freak out if they missed a call. In other words, pretty much everyone. Just because *I* don't answer my phone doesn't mean everyone else doesn't. I fail to see how you can come to such an illogical conclusion.

      Even if everyone did act like me, I'd simply leave a message (but only if I actually had something of value to communicate) and maybe the person would call me back, if necessary. Leaving messages should be utilized more often (by the one with the answering service).

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    40. Re:The phone is your leash by maxume · · Score: 1

      It isn't clear to me that I implied that I am...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    41. Re:The phone is your leash by maxume · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ok. So the jargon means the same thing as the simpler statement. Show me two people in your large organization that, while avoiding communication, think 'mutex lock' and not 'I'm busy, asshole'. Two. I'll grant that it is probably a very good idea for somebody at that organization to be doing this thinking, my point is that it isn't the busy people who are avoiding the phone, at least at the moment that they decide not to answer the phone.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    42. Re:The phone is your leash by mechugena · · Score: 1

      I think it's the sandwich as well. Just make the chicken-salad sandwich without the chicken-salad, then hold the chicken between your knees. I can almost guarantee nobody you know will ever want to call you again

    43. Re:The phone is your leash by pohl · · Score: 0, Troll

      The nomenclature used by the person at the time of the interruption is not relevant to the nomenclature used during analysis. The former doesn't invalidate the latter. Good luck ridding slashdot of jargon. You've chosen an uphill battle.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    44. Re:The phone is your leash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Really? I don't eat in my office Jacuzzi. Though a slushy drink sounds good.

      Your Jacuzzi has a chiller?

  2. Driving... by cjustus · · Score: 5, Funny

    You don't want to be driving while using this phone...

    1. Re:Driving... by Mephie · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Yes, especially given that you'd have to be in a pool full of water.. That's not usually good on cars.

    2. Re:Driving... by cjustus · · Score: 1
      If only I RTFA...

      :)

    3. Re:Driving... by slaad · · Score: 0

      It would have been perfect in Homer's car last season though...

      --


      ~Warning!~ The above is encrypted using rot676!
    4. Re:Driving... by w3weasel · · Score: 1

      Bah! You can't not talk and drive!

      --

      Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    5. Re:Driving... by mechugena · · Score: 3, Funny

      What if you're in the carpool lane...then can you use it?

  3. Damn it by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 2, Funny
    "...that isolates the user from all other sensory input"

    Sounds like sex isn't going to be as much fun as before.

    1. Re:Damn it by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


      Sounds like sex isn't going to be as much fun as before.

      Your hands are still free while floating in the pool. You are referring to phone-sex0r, right?

      --
      Trolling is a art,
  4. Sonds like great technology for car phones! by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why should the driver be bothered by my horn, or the wrecked bus of burning nuns?

    1. Re:Sonds like great technology for car phones! by sharkey · · Score: 1
      wrecked bus of burning nuns

      Do they always transport burning nuns by bus where you live?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Sonds like great technology for car phones! by mr.+methane · · Score: 1
      I'd be more curious about a non-wrecked bus of burning nuns, honestly. I'm on FIRE with the spirit! someone put me OUT, please!

      The amusing part of this article was the mention about "having an in-depth conversation with a spouse or loved one". Now, don't get me wrong, but... do I REALLY want to be wearing a speedo in front of a room (pool?) full of other people while I'm having an "in depth" talk with my wife??

      Or worse... if the guy talking to his wife happens to drift towards the rear end of some poor guy getting worked over by an IRS agent...... Damn, I'm a sick pup.

  5. This just in... by garrulous · · Score: 1

    mobile phone conversant drivers have new bouts of accidents while trying sensory deprivation in the aforementioned circumstances

    1. Re:This just in... by Griim · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding?! Most people that I've seen, yapping on the phone while driving, may as well be in Sensory Deprivation Tanks...

    2. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like common sense deprivation tanks.

  6. Phone Plus Sensory Deprivation Equals... by ryanvm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Phone Plus Sensory Deprivation Equals...

    MY JOB.

    1. Re:Phone Plus Sensory Deprivation Equals... by savaget · · Score: 1

      ....an automobile driver on a cell phone.

    2. Re:Phone Plus Sensory Deprivation Equals... by arivanov · · Score: 1

      There is another interesting one:

      Phone minus sensory deprivation equals reading too much Stanislav Lem. The device in question is described in one of the Navigator Pirx stories as used to determine psychological stability in a Navigation school exam.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    3. Re:Phone Plus Sensory Deprivation Equals... by dbretton · · Score: 1


      hehe, more like bad eyesight! Deprivation is spelled ok. I need to stop using this damn phone...

      glug glug glug

  7. I'm sorry, who is this for? by Future+Man+3000 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    CEOs of companies that could afford this don't need it; they've already got other mechanisms to avoid distractions on the phone.

    Unless they're filling the office pool with water, this sounds like something that missed its (.com) era.

    --

    I never vote for anyone. I always vote against.
    -- W.C. Fields

    1. Re:I'm sorry, who is this for? by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      I've been tracking a noticable upward trend in dot-com style practises lately, from a dot-com job site advertising on television to google thinking they can give stuff away and somehow profit. I think the next big thing will be to move as many jobs as possible overseas, or cut them and then do the dot-com business methods again because they were fun and allowed for huge boosts in upper management pay scales while allowing those guys to pretend to be running a company. And yes, most of them were just playing make-believe.

      You'd think investors would have learned a thing or two, but judging from the stock prices of a couple of companies that are still playing make-believe, investors haven't learned a thing.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  8. Sorry About That, Chief! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks a lot like the "Cone of Silence" from Get Smart. Bet it works just as well. :)

    1. Re:Sorry About That, Chief! by kzinti · · Score: 1

      Bet it works just as well.

      Yeah, but only if you're talking on your shoephone.

    2. Re:Sorry About That, Chief! by ArekRashan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I knew that if I flattened the comments and searched for "smart", I would end up right here. Anyone remember the episode with the portable cone of silence? Pure comedic gold.

    3. Re:Sorry About That, Chief! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?

    4. Re:Sorry About That, Chief! by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      Fuck! Now you've got me thinking about Get Smart and I'm going to have to hunt down every episode on the file-stealing networks.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
  9. No sensation and no... by questamor · · Score: 1, Redundant

    ...ability to drive?

    And you thought people using mobile phones while driving NOW were dangerous.

    fun.

    1. Re:No sensation and no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not funny, and no I don't think we're dangerous. I absolutely need to use my phone while driving, and pulling over to the side of the road while using the phone every time I had a call would make me even more dangerous than using the phone while moving along. Besides, I'm only on the phone for less than 5 minutes. Personally I think you have to be a bit brain damaged to not be able to do more than talk when you're driving.

    2. Re:No sensation and no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For every person that can handle it there are ten that can't. Hell I've seen people that can't have a conversation with the person sitting next to them without losing focus on the road. No matter you think cell phones are very dangerous in most people hands while driving. I've seen people run stop signs, drive 30 miles per hour on the highway, swerve wildly, cut across three lanes to make a turn they missed. My sister was actually in an accident because of a cell phone.

      No one is saying to pull over but for God's sake at least buy a $10 headset or speaker phone attachment for it.

    3. Re:No sensation and no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think we're dangerous

      Oh sure, no one ever does. "I can drive faster than the speed limit because I'm a better driver and that means I'm not dangerous!" or "I can steer with my knees because I'm in control and I'm not dangerous!"

      I absolutely need to use my phone while driving

      Oh really? Tell us Mr. President, how do you find time to relax with your oh so busy schedule? It must be hell, poor you!

      Besides, I'm only on the phone for less than 5 minutes.

      Oh, five minutes, is that all? Lets see, five minutes at 50Mph...that 4 Miles you covered without paying proper attention to what you're doing. Thats O.K though, because you're not dangerous, right?

    4. Re:No sensation and no... by Palos · · Score: 1

      Well I don't think that's much of a problem since you need to use this thing inside of a pool :)
      From the article: "And whenever you want to make a call, you will need to have your Isophone with you, plus a heated swimming pool."

    5. Re:No sensation and no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your making a very big presumption on buying headsets and the like for the phone. Have you ever used one or become tangled up in them? Yeah that's safe driving for you. Or a speaker phone where you spend all your time repeating what your saying because the other end is just getting bullshit driving sounds. Really, it's like your trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist and making things more of a problem! I sure wish people thought things through more.

    6. Re:No sensation and no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem obviously does exist. Denying it isn't going to make it any better. I agree that neither solution is idle but it is still better than driving one-handed - escpecially at high speeds.

      The headsets are the best solution as long as you prepare them ahead of time. I agree that struggling to grab a headset while driving is far worse but if you are like my girlfriend and your cell phone is your business then you put it on as soon as you get in the car - much like a seatbelt.

      If you only use the phone rarely and for a minute or two at a time then I have no problem with just using the phone as a handset. That is not much different then fiddling with the radio or adjusting a mirror.

      As for thinking things through - I am guessing it is you who hasn't thought this through much since you are in denial of the problem. Maybe you just don't drive much or on highways.

    7. Re:No sensation and no... by FileNotFound · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's really the "conversation" on the phone that distracts people while driving.

      I think it's people who try to dial a number while driving, and I don't mean quick dial. I mean people pounding in 6...1...0...3...3..4.'oops'..-...8..0..3...8.."is that right?" "Ooops" -...9...5..."connect"

      I mean sure you only have one hand to drive with, but it only limits your ability to make turns greater than 45 degrees. So unless you're trying to park a car, you're not at all limited.

      I don't make a habit of using the phone while driving, but at time I 'need' to call, quick dial is your friend.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    8. Re:No sensation and no... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Well, I have hands free and voice dialing. I just say "Home" or "Office" or whatever and the phone does the work for me.

      You can't legislate common sense, and I wish people would get off the "ban phones/smoking/talking while driving" crap. The woman who just had a fight with her boyfriend is more dangerous on the road, since she's not paying attention.

      If you're driving recklessly, then you should be charged as such. If you arent, then you shouldn't be.

      The real solution is to have traffic cops actually pull over tailgaters and morons who swerve across lanes without signalling, rather than just standing around like Mr Potatohead with a radar gun (which has been proven to cause a ton of accidents as motorists slam on the brakes suddenly when they catch sight of him).

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    9. Re:No sensation and no... by SMOC · · Score: 0

      if you are like my girlfriend and your cell phone is your business then you put it on as soon as you get in the car

      Does she take it off when she arives at the customer's motelroom? I find hookers, sorry escorts, with headsets a real turnoff.

      --
      All errors in this comment are mine. Corrections are considered a derivative work, and punishable under copyright law.
    10. Re:No sensation and no... by FileNotFound · · Score: 0

      You know people only tailgate because the guy in front is doing 35 in a 45 zone nevermind that normaly cars do 60 in that zone.

      I once had a guy get out and bitch at me for tailgating. I was dumbfounded, not only did I not think I was tailgating him but he was doing 30ish in a 40 zone and slowed down to a CRAWL regularly. He made some idiotic threats "If you ever tailgate me again you won't like what happens!" Still pisses me off...yeah I'd like to know what'd happen...he's 5' round like a ball and I'm 6'6".

      Seriously though, nothing pisses me off as much as people who don't free up the left lane on high ways "because they're doing the speed limit" and that makes it "ok". There are such things as Lane Courtesy (aka Lane Discipline) but it seems that only the "good" drivers know about it and those are not the ones that crawl along the left at a steady 55...

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    11. Re:No sensation and no... by kevquinn · · Score: 1

      Garbage. You do not _need_ to use your phone while driving. You _choose_ to do so, you don't _need_ to. If your travelling time is so valuable you need to do other stuff, take the train, take a taxi, or get a driver (depending on how valuable your time really is).

      You say you're on the phone for less than 5 minutes - how many junctions do you go through in that time? Do you pay full attention to the junction (rhetorical)? Sensible driving takes a lot of brain power - you need to think and react fast to rapidly changing situations; you're not taking a walk in the park.

      In my experience, one of the easiest things to spot on the road is a car where the driver is on their mobile phone. Invariably they're all over the shop - indeed they often drive as if they're drunk. Maybe that's why you're still alive - people see you driving erratically and give you a wide berth...

      What kind of suicidal moderators modded the parent up as "insightful" - perhaps we could have a new moderation counter, "homicidal". Bet those responsible for the "insightful"s all use their mobile phones whilst driving...

    12. Re:No sensation and no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I think you have to be a bit brain damaged to not be able to do more than talk when you're driving.

      You are aware that you can talk on a phone without physically being inside a car, right?

    13. Re:No sensation and no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's silly. If I can smoke a cigarette, drink a beer, eat a burrito and shift gears all at the same time, what's so hard about holding a phone, too? Christ, are you people retarded? Or are you just so new to driving that it's not a habit yet? Or so new to cellphones that they're not a habit yet?

    14. Re:No sensation and no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. That's what I'm missing. I need a mother figure to tell me whats good for me!

      So, no cell phone while driving, and a clean pair of underwear.

    15. Re:No sensation and no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, if you want to drive at 70Mph with one hand while you make a cell call and drive yourself into a tree, go right ahead. I won't stop you.

      Of course the problem is you're not the only person on the road, and it probably won't be an inanimate object that you hit. Why should someone else die because you're an asshole?

    16. Re:No sensation and no... by KurdtX · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I don't think we're dangerous
      Oh sure, no one ever does
      The problem is that some people can drive while talking on the phone and some can't (some can't even drive, period). The ones who can drive while talking on a cell phone you never notice (as it should be). As I live in California, where everyone has a cell phone, and frequently use them in cars, I've actually spent time (when riding as a passenger) noting who are talking on their cell phones and who aren't. About half of the solo drivers are typically on their phones, and yet I only see one or two people per trip who get themselves in trouble because of the phone.

      Granted, anyone can talk on the phone while driving in a straight line at a constant speed (I've actually known guys who've fallen asleep on long straight roads and done fine), but it's the emergency situations that the people on phones can't deal with. And the problem is 1) they forget the basic rule of driving of looking as far ahead as you can see and 2) they won't stop their conversation to deal with the situation. Since talking on a cell phone should be equivalent to talking to a passenger, they need to realize that when talking to a passenger, you both stop talking when someone cuts you off.

      Personally, I've told people to hold on, put the phone down, done what I had to do, and then resumed the conversation (with explination). I also drive 10-15 mph slower (I like to drive 80-90 mph) when on the phone, as I realize that they are a distraction and my reaction speed will be slowed (I do the same when I have passengers in the car, too). I'd also like to mention that I don't use cell phones on local roads, as there are too many things that could happen that can't in the controlled environment of a freeway. A little bit of thought (often lacking) and cell phones aren't as much of a problem as you think they are.

      Given that you said you drive 50mph I take it you're not in California, and probably not anywhere with much traffic, or hour+ long commutes that really have turned the cell phone into a necessity (I don't even have a land line, 'cause I'm never home except to sleep). Maybe instead of assuming everyone is like you (I salute you if you recognize that you don't have the ability to talk on the phone and drive at the same time), realize how diverse people are in their abilities. Hey, someone was doing alright at running a country, but thought that fooling around with an intern in the White House would stay a secret.
      --

      Kurdt
      I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.
    17. Re:No sensation and no... by teromajusa · · Score: 1

      A national safety council study found that hands-free cellphones do not improve driving performance over hand held cellphones:

      http://www.nsc.org/news/nr012703.htm

      I just glanced over the study, but it doesn't seem to reach the obvious conclusion: having conversations while driving is the problem, not the phone itself. If thats the case, then talking on cellphones is no more dangerous that simply talking to a passenger in the car with you. Surely we aren't going to ban that, are we? Also, it does not address the benefits of conversation for keeping you aware while driving at night.

    18. Re:No sensation and no... by esper · · Score: 1

      I mean sure you only have one hand to drive with, but it only limits your ability to make turns greater than 45 degrees.

      Really? You have trouble with that? I drive one-handed (and not on the phone - it obstructs too much of my field of vision for my taste) constantly and have no problems steering or parking. Just let up the death grip on the wheel and you can turn it from full left to full right with only one hand. Pretty trivial, really. Provided you have power steering, anyhow. I've never driven a car with manual steering, so I don't know how much extra force they need.

      If one-handed driving is the problem with cellphones, then why don't we hear a similar level of complaints about people who drive with their left arm out the window?

    19. Re:No sensation and no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen people run stop signs, drive 30 miles per hour on the highway, swerve wildly, cut across three lanes to make a turn they missed.

      What's that got to do with a cell phone? People have been driving that way for a LONG time.

    20. Re:No sensation and no... by FileNotFound · · Score: 1

      The difference is that the other hand is available when you "need" it.

      For example, you are driving and holding the phone in the left hand; your right hand is on the wheel at about 4 oclock. In that position you can make a left turn moving your hand as high as 11 oclock before it is no longer confortable. This degree on my chrysler concorde is about enough to turn the car 40 degrees or so, for a 90 turn you would need to move your hand all the way to 9 oclock from the 4 oclock position, impossible to do one handed without letting go of the wheel or doing some other 'odd' way, like hooking it etc.

      I used to drive a Nissan Maxima and on that car I stuck a steering knob on the wheel. Some thought it was idiotic, "only trucks need those", but seriously, that thing was awesome. I love how it let me spin the wheel 360* one way than the other with one hand and NO delay. I could park that car in seconds.

      I still have the knob but I don't want to put it on my leather wraped wheel, I'm afraid it'll leave nasty holes or something (it has "teeth like things).

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    21. Re:No sensation and no... by FileNotFound · · Score: 1

      -1 Overrated? Why? Oh did I offend you? Do you do 50 on the highway and get tailgated so you mod me down?

      What a pathetic loser..

      -1 Flamebait for this I suppose... It's ok meta mod will smack your stupid ass back to where it belongs.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    22. Re:No sensation and no... by FL180 · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      There are people that can't handle it, but there are people that can.

      Take a decent pilot, for example. I know personally that I can both talk to ATC (on a radio, by the way, which requres you to also use a Push to Talk button) and land an airplane at the same time, in a crosswind no less.

      Someone that can do that can easily handle driving a car while talking on a phone. But, I also agree that there are many people that can't handle even driving a car, let alone talking on a phone while trying to do it...

      And,I also think that headsets help.

    23. Re:No sensation and no... by ChozCunningham · · Score: 1
      Bullshit(TM). Perhaps we should change the definition of 'insightful' to: agrees with you. Then we could choose a fancy new word for modding a post that convey a quality of insight.

      When you lack anything but a trolling whine about the above post, start with "Bulshit." I read garbage and thought there might be something OYHO (Outside Your Humble Opinion.)

      To include something beside flaming a flamer, I'd have to say it was really easy to dind a decent cell phone with a built in memory dial and a speakerphone. Boy that made it all easy. Mixed with a few handy phrases, such as, "Hang on," and "Wait a sec," I found that using my phone driving was as easy as using it everywhere. No extra crap to carry, no dumb dialing...I even set 411 to speed-dial 4 so I could have the operator connect me on the rare chance i needed a number outside of my list. Wow. That was real hard.

    24. Re:No sensation and no... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      I just glanced over the study, but it doesn't seem to reach the obvious conclusion: having conversations while driving is the problem, not the phone itself. If thats the case, then talking on cellphones is no more dangerous that simply talking to a passenger in the car with you.

      The difference (and problem with mobile phones) is that the person in the car with you has context. That is, they will stop talking and wait for you during times that extra driving concentration is needed (heavy traffic, intersections, etc). The person on the other end of a mobile can't. *That* is why talking on a mobile phone is more dangerous than simply having a conversation with a passenger.

    25. Re:No sensation and no... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      The real solution is to have traffic cops actually pull over tailgaters and morons who swerve across lanes without signalling, rather than just standing around like Mr Potatohead with a radar gun [...]

      But there's no money to be made doing that !

    26. Re:No sensation and no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have fun dying in a car wreck...seriously.
      Have fun dying.
      Fuck-o

    27. Re:No sensation and no... by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      I can give you some video from Monday's rush hour that clearly shows that there already are plenty of drivers who have no sensation, phone or not.

    28. Re:No sensation and no... by kevquinn · · Score: 1

      In what way does your flaccid flame relate to my message? You obviously didn't read it - hey what's new on /. At least you're not AC - credit for that.

      The road accident statistics are against you. Dialling is not really an issue - voice dialling is easy enough. The problem is the lack of attention paid to the road whilst concentrating on a phone call. The fact remains that driving a half-ton lump of metal at 30mph in town requires full attention in order to be safe. A fraction of a second's difference in reaction time can make the difference between life and death. It's not a video game. I don't know what the US law enforcement view on this is, but the UK police consider it to be "driving without due care and attention", whether you have hands-free or not. They take this view as a result of numerous studies on road safety and the collection of facts from accidents they attend, not out of petulance or bloody-mindedness.

      Anyway, I don't know why I'm bothering. You won't change your dangerous behaviour in response to anything I say. People who hold other people's lives in such low esteem aren't going to be swayed by mere reasoned argument. And no-one else is reading this thread now, surely...

  10. Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by FileNotFound · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The subject says it all...

    I'm sorry..but this is so retarded I don't know where to begin.

    Why? Ugh..god...

    I want what they're smoking...

    --
    In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    1. Re:Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree.

      If this catches on, how am I going to enjoy my hummer from the intern underneath my desk?

      -Bill Clinton

    2. Re:Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by h00pla · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Absolutely. I read an article a while back but I don't remember exactly where I saw it - I think it was in The Guardian - but it said we're now entering a period where inventors are producing stuff that has dubious value for society. It talks about how companies are now putting a great deal of effort into providing features for things - I think they mentioned cell phones - and they know that people don't use these features. The article points out that instead of making the phone better in other ways - they take surveys to find out why people aren't using the features. Here we have another example of this kind of misplaced creativity. The inventor actually says this:

      Whilst it's not necessarily very efficient, in many ways it's very pragmatic ...

      That's a pretty telling statement.

      --
      I've been swashdotted -- Elmer Fudd
    3. Re:Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by theLastPossibleName · · Score: 1, Interesting

      this is almost as dumb as laptop steering wheel mount

    4. Re:Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Imagine you're a salesman or some other profession where you spend all day in your car. Ever tried to use a laptop in a car, while you're sitting in the drivers seat? Being able to hang it on the wheel is ideal.

      Nah that's not dumb. Using the laptop while you're driving is dumb.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, am all about a phone that makes women strip down to bikinis just to talk.

      Granted, some of the office wenches around wouldn't be too pleasing a sight, but the interns and co-ops?

      ~Another AC

    6. Re:Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by theLastPossibleName · · Score: 0

      You're right. What I was trying to point out was how one person's innovative idea is bound to be improperly used.

    7. Re:Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!

      In USA, you pay for the television to watch you!

    8. Re:Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by watzinaneihm · · Score: 1

      I want what they're smoking...
      Probably they tested the prototype on themselves and the line got cut
      Lemme explain, In "You must be joking Mr.Feynmann" Richard Feynmann (Nobel prize winning physicist and overall colorful charecter) talks about his experiences with a thing like this. Somebody had set up a salt water tank (same sp. gravity as human body), totally dark and noise proof and at exact temp. as human body. So a person inside it cannot feel gravity, noise, temperature, anything at all. Feynmann spent some time in it and what he says is that after a few minutes in it, you start hallucinating and start having totally extrasensory experiences. Something about body compensating for all the lack of feeling
      These guys just added a phone to it.

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    9. Re:Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by walrus-zero · · Score: 1
      My thoughts exactly, perhaps James Auger (the inventor) was the one who came up with n-gages system for changing games :)

      However the 'isophone' would probably be good for listening to music, be a nice tool for escapism that way.

    10. Re:Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by apol · · Score: 1
      but it said we're now entering a period where inventors are producing stuff that has dubious value for society

      For the society, yes, but wait until RIAA and other corporations realise the usefulness of such things. In some decades we could all live in cells like these and we will have to pay royalties for all "sensory stimulation".

      Do you want to see the buildings around you? OK, but you have to pay the architecht's IP, otherwise you are stealing, profiting from someone else's work. Architechts deserve a decent earning, don't they?

      Do you want to see the beautiful girl just in front of you? No problem, just pay the fee to the stylist that designed her dress and that contributed her nice appearence.

      A new version of DMCA will rule out all tentative of scaping from these cells as an atempt to violate copyright holders' propriety.

      Freedom activists will defend the right to escape from the cells for 1 or 2 reasons they can figure out that still don't infringe copyrights, while others will argue that most of us trying to escape from cells are actually really just willing to break copyrights.

      Palladium is already a step in this direction, but soon people will realise that protecting only the IP that we can access through the computer leaves too much room to infringers...

    11. Re:Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I want what they're smoking...

      A-ha! They've found the secret stash of moderator crack. Its effects can be observed by either reading the article, or seeing your post modded as +5, insightful.

    12. Re:Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by butterbarrel · · Score: 1
      but it said we're now entering a period where inventors are producing stuff that has dubious value for society
      1. This sort of reminds me of an argument made by Jared Diamond in "Guns Germs and Steel" ... Namely that most innovations throughout history have only found practical uses long after they were initially created. (for example, steam engine, wheel, laser ...) So as long as people are fucking around with stuff and sharing ideas, I think it is for the better. (Whatever "better" means for a society in general). Perhaps this is a stupid idea but elements of it might find uses in gaming or therapy ... or nothing.
    13. Re:Dumbest Thing I've seen. - Ever. by timeOday · · Score: 1

      One thing I can imagine this being used for is neurobiology. If you want to study the brain's response to some stimuli, it's easier if there isn't a lot of interference from other stimuli. But that wasn't mentioned in the article, so I guess you're right.

  11. No smell? by turg · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the story.

    "You can't hear anything else, you can't see anything else, you can't smell anything else, all you have coming in is the telephone call.

    That is, you can't smell anything else if the swimming pool isn't chlorinated.

    Hmmm. No, I guess that wouldn't actually help much either

    --
    <sig>Guvf vf abg n frperg zrffntr
    1. Re:No smell? by Smeg}{ead · · Score: 1

      Just don't fart in the suit, that could distract you from your phone call ;)

  12. Slashdot Effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard they're licencing the Slashdot effect and applying it to Humans...

  13. LiVo? by photomic · · Score: 1

    I'd buy this if it had some enhanced buffering features. Why not design some sort of real-time TiVo-like personal interface (LiVo?), with goggles and audio and all? That way, you could simply fast forward through conversations and encounters that are unenjoyable, boring, or repulsive. Isn't life too short to have to confront the mundane all of the time? Live personal LiVo secretaries could sift through the data and only bring us up to real-time when something/someone important happens. The rest of the time, we would be watching TeeVee, of course. With TiVo.

  14. This technology is obviously already there... by TWX · · Score: 1

    ... to anyone who has ever seen people drive while talking on the phone...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  15. Bad idea by Andrewkov · · Score: 3, Funny

    This sounds like a bad idea ... It's annoying enough talking listening to people on the phone when I can distract myself by doing other things. Imagine if I cound't read Slashdot while users where telling me their life stories? How tedious would that be?! ;-)

  16. Made me smile by ewanb · · Score: 3, Funny

    The idea that people would actively get into
    a swimming pool and put on a helmet to answer
    a work phone call. The mental image... is
    quite worrying in some cases.

    Though I find the best thing about working from
    home is that people dont have my phone number
    here, so ... noone calls me. And I go to no
    meetings. Magical.

    1. Re:Made me smile by CrayzyJ · · Score: 1

      " people dont have my phone number
      here, so ... noone calls me. And I go to no
      meetings."

      Is your 'job' title "Unemployed"???

      --
      Holy s-, it's Jesus!
    2. Re:Made me smile by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Do not post like that
      I always assume you are
      writing in Haiku

  17. Isolation... but at what cost? by zanderredux · · Score: 1

    Does it mean that you have to wear your swim clothes just to answer a phone call? Answering phones do not require that. Although I find it useful for air traffic controllers - they need concentration!

  18. What this device should be for... by fruey · · Score: 1
    ...is for talking to some real hot babe (hot because of her voice, not her body), or playing recordings of really mellowing music. Most people I'd end up talking to on the phone would defeat the whole object of forgetting my surroundings.

    Now, some device like this to chill with a possibility of a soundtrack with erotic noises and some chick with breathing apparatus going at me ... I shudder to think where this is all coming from. Maybe it's because it's Friday afternoon.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    1. Re:What this device should be for... by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 1

      Dude - it's an article about a novel conceptual environment for mobile phone usage... not a prompt for you to tell us about your fantasies... both hands on the desk now, please.

      --
      "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
    2. Re:What this device should be for... by fruey · · Score: 1
      It's not a mobile phone, you have to be in a freakin' swimming pool to use it. Go look at the article and the pictures, forgive me my wandering mind perhaps, but go look.

      As usual, my final comment in a post leaves the first part (reasonably relevant) to be ignored.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  19. Sense free, but not other-thoughts free by Richardsonke1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First of all, it would take a while for me to not be distracted using this "phone." How many of you are not in some way excited every time you get a new tech toy. I would be thinking more about the device, how it works, and the fact that I am in water, more than about the conversation. Your general conversations: "Dude! I'm floating in water while I talk! Isn't that cool?!"

    --
    "Men lie."
    "Yeah, about sleeping with other women, but never about bioluminescent plankton."
    -Dan Brown
    1. Re:Sense free, but not other-thoughts free by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      The one thought rampaging through my brain would be "I'm utterly defenseless."

      This thing just asks for someone to sneak up and scare you or dump a bucket of ice water on your head, or else rob your wallet from your clothes, rob the rest of your house, then burn the house down while you're completely oblivious. An extra spy-movie-worthy idea would be slipping a few poisonous water snakes into the pool, or maybe a few piranhas. Piranhas OF DOOM.

      --
      ...
    2. Re:Sense free, but not other-thoughts free by runcible · · Score: 1

      This thing would leave you completely at the mercy of anyone who happened upon you while using it -- even if I was in a locked room, I'd be too paranoid about being helpless, effectively blind and deaf, to pay any attention whatsoever to the person I was talking to..

      --
      remember the wisdom of Mahatma Gandhi: If enough peasants die horribly, someone will probably notice
    3. Re:Sense free, but not other-thoughts free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  20. Remember kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't put this in your ass!

  21. I can see it now by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 4, Funny
    Just as you're in the middle of your early morning swim, when some prat walks in wearing a helmet and calls out

    HELLO? I'M IN THE POOL!

    On the plus side, it'll be easier to drown them...

    1. Re:I can see it now by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      HELLO? I'M IN THE POOL!

      CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW? GOOD!

      ...and some lowercase text to pass the lameness filter...and some more...ah, that did it...

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  22. I wish the rest of the inusry woult take a clue by Duckman5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It ignores novelties such as polyphonic ringtones and games and instead it is designed to help you concentrate on a phone call itself.

    I'm sick of seeing all sorts of pointless features added to phones. The manufacturers know no bounds. This device isn't particularly useful, being as you need a swimming pool, but if it were made smaller, this could be something really useful when making important phone calls (when not driving, of course). I wish all the cell phone manufacturers would focus on making useful advancements such as this and better call clarity.

  23. Driving with a phone would be illegal then... by Yousef · · Score: 1

    No one will pay attension to the road.

    --
    -- "To ask a question is to show ignorance; Not to ask a question means you'll remain ignorant."
    1. Re:Driving with a phone would be illegal then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      a) The joke has been made ten times already.
      b) Driving with a cell phone is already illegal in many states.
      c) Must people don't drive in a pool.
      d) You're a moron.
      e) The reply to this post will be - "Get a sense of humor."
      f) The reply to that post will be - "Get a job you stinking pile of shit."

    2. Re:Driving with a phone would be illegal then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol get a sence of humour!!1!

  24. Doesn't solve the problem! by klaxor · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Whilst it's not necessarily very efficient, in many ways it's very pragmatic, in that the user will be totally focused on who they're talking to.

    Um, excuse me, but that's the problem with existing phones - the person concentrates only on the conversation, to the exclusion of everything else, including driving. If anything, we need a phone that would allow a person to do something else other than just talking. (And yes, I know about wireless headsets and I think they're great...)

    1. Re:Doesn't solve the problem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know at first I was hoping that it was a device that would block the sounds from the person on the other end. You know how many times somebody has gotten pissed because I was pinching a loaf while on the phone. I obiously could mute but then they would be able to tell (no sound at all).

  25. Sensory Deprivation... by Thomas+M+Hughes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article doesn't really say how you would dial when you're immersed in complete sensory deprivation. I mean, your sense of sight, sound, and smell are supposedly completely removed by the device, and your body is supposed to be in body temperature water, getting rid of gravity and most of your touch. Wouldn't that make dialing a number difficult?

    I suppose maybe you could only receive calls on the thing. But then, wouldn't it be impossible for two people to use them? If the point is to focus everything onto the conversation itself, if only one person has the experience, I imagine the person in the deprivation would be pretty pissed that the other person wasn't pay as much attention as they were.

    Then again, this is a luxury item, and might only be available to executives for business calls. Perhaps they have their secretaries do all the dialing and then its just forwarded to the device, so they don't even have to worry about that aspect of it.

    Ultimately, I think its impractical, though I'm glad that some people are doing truly innovative work. I give it a B for effort.

    1. Re:Sensory Deprivation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Impractical? Yes.

      But, a sensory deprivation tank, a few hours to kill, and a big phat joint makes for a great Friday afternoon. Hey, its Fri....^^^^^No Carrier.

    2. Re:Sensory Deprivation... by davids-world.com · · Score: 1

      speech recognition? works well if you just need to enter a couple of digits, also for known names...

  26. The unmobile-mobile phone by DGtlRift · · Score: 1, Insightful

    These pictures don't really give me the impression that this is very convenient. I get charged for both air-time and pool time? I take it that this is just a prototype, but let's be realistic, how is this going to work outside the lab setting?

    Oh, and this contraption looks like something from that show Get Smart.. you remember "The Cone of Silence"?

    --
    How about a spell checker for slashdot, or even more impressive, a spell checker for strings in C-Code? Use lint! -DG
    1. Re:The unmobile-mobile phone by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      this contraption looks like something from that show Get Smart.. you remember "The Cone of Silence"?

      WHAT'S THAT CHIEF?

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
  27. wacky.. by l8apex · · Score: 0

    It's not April 15th, is it??

  28. Intentional rimshot? by Ambush · · Score: 1
    In a way it's a luxury item that allows for a really in-depth conversation

    What more can be said?

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people; those who know ternary, those who don't, and those now hunting for a dictionary.
  29. stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so... media lab europe is just as stupid and pointless as the original mit media lab. all buzzwords, no substance.

    1. Re:stupid by HerringFlavoredFowl · · Score: 1

      But they have a cool swimming pool to talk on the phone in.

      --
      TastesLikeHerringFlavoredChicken
  30. Claustrophobia? Hydrophobia? by KillerHamster · · Score: 1

    ...wearing a darkened helmet in a swimming pool

    This sounds like enough to drive someone insane who has a condition like this. Heck, it would even make me a bit uncomfortable.

    That and, of course, communicating with another human using voice instead of a computer.

  31. I knew it! by Soko · · Score: 1

    If you are making a business call, you will probably want to refer to your notes.
    This is not an easy task if you are wearing a darkened helmet in a swimming pool.


    This is a tool of the Dark Side! It will seduce our business leaders and make them slaves to dark forces that only MBAs will understand!
    Oh, wait...

    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  32. umm ... by Abm0raz · · Score: 1

    Ok, who's getting fired at the BBC for accidently releasing next year's April Fool's story early?

    -Ab

    --
    Nothing fails quite like prayer.
  33. Background Noises by sinjayde · · Score: 1

    I work in telemarketing (well its classed as that, even though I wouldn't really call it that) and we have to actually listen out for background noises as a way of identify a persons interests. For example, a baby crying, a dog barking, Pearl Jam playing on the CD. Guess this will mean one less thing to think about when on the phone, sounds like a good idea!

  34. Old stuff by cerberusss · · Score: 1

    *yawns* This is old stuff. I have a book here called "Shadow Run" from Fasa and it's all explained right here. I'm getting sick and tired of this site.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  35. All the meanwhile by antis0c · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your house is burning down, your kid cut his hand off, your husband is having a heart attack but your zoned out on your phone call to to vote for the next American Idol.

    --

    ..There's a-dooin's a-transpirin'
  36. Be Afraid.... by Tsali · · Score: 1

    ... Do I have to wear tight red shorts to use it? That would be distracting as it is.

    Looks like some R&D team has too much time on their hands.

    --
    This space for rent.
  37. You silly boy by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

    Around here, we keep the office pool filled with champagne.

  38. Look at the pictures in the article by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

    ...and tell me that this doesn't remind you vaguely of a popular movie series involving people that plug in and out of a virtual reality universe....

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  39. One question. by Deflagro · · Score: 1

    Will this work in an iLoo? I know I could get some serious work done then.

    --
    Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
  40. At last a *practical* phone accessory! by Phil+John · · Score: 1

    Brilliant, now all they need to do is shrink it down so it can fit in my pocket.

    Seriously, these guys get paid to come up with rubish like this? Anyone who can't concentrate on, say, a phone call and cooking probably doesn't know how to work a phone, let alone make a call.

    Yet another case of coming up with a device and then trying to justify it.

    --
    I am NaN
  41. we already have this by avandesande · · Score: 1

    It's called the automobile.....

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  42. Cingular signs deal with Campus Frat-houses by Wvyern · · Score: 1

    This just in, College Frat-houses have banded together and signed a deal with Cingular. Cingular will now provide sensory deprivation mobile phones, free of charge, to all female students on approximately 70% of the American campuses. This of course means that the drop off rate for female students will climb through the roof as the pregnancy occurences for freshman females grows.

    --
    "Sheep just follow the easiest path and run from scary noises and intimidating creatures." - Me
    1. Re:Cingular signs deal with Campus Frat-houses by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Can I just go on record here and tell you that your post was one of the most offensive, idiotic and humourless ones EVER to disgrace the Internet? Thank you.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    2. Re:Cingular signs deal with Campus Frat-houses by Wvyern · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You don't read much on here do you? If you are so uptight and thin-skinned as to get offended that easily, I would suggest a nice Republican forum instead of slash dot.

      --
      "Sheep just follow the easiest path and run from scary noises and intimidating creatures." - Me
    3. Re:Cingular signs deal with Campus Frat-houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that offended you I guess a proposal for a nice fat Portuguese sausage up your faggot Greek ass is out of the question?
      Limey raised homo!

    4. Re:Cingular signs deal with Campus Frat-houses by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      It wasn't offensive.

      It was just the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

      And that takes serious effort. =P

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    5. Re:Cingular signs deal with Campus Frat-houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For someone who claims to read /. at -1, you really need to grow some skin.

    6. Re:Cingular signs deal with Campus Frat-houses by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1
      Excuse me, but please ponder the irony of pointing out to someone that they "don't read much on here" while posting with a UID>700000. Oh the hilarity.

      But you are actually correct, for all the time I spend here, I cannot get used to people's stupidity.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    7. Re:Cingular signs deal with Campus Frat-houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He has, its an enormous foreskin to cover his giant dickhead!!

  43. YAY! by phloydphreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    hm, I dont have the attention span or caring to devote time to a phone call, locking my door and spending quality time with loved ones. I guess I will buy a sensory deprivation phone so that my ADD (read American upbringing) wont interfere with the quality time I am not willing to put effort into.

    After all, a phone is not enough to converse, but with a helmet, all things things are possible. I mean... its a helmet.

    --
    "this is the gloaming"
    radiohead
  44. a bit of my sensory deprivation experience by zptdooda · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds great - except for the phone.

    When I tried a sensory deprivation tank (no phone, just epsom salts thanks), it was a big egg-shaped tank without any lights. Afterwards my date and I got totally engrossed in cutlery at the restaurant. We were swimming in over-perception. The effect waned over a few days.

    Guess with this one you could get your computer to phone you and play "Echoes" by Pink Floyd, or just shut the phone off.

    Anyone know any good sensory deprivation music? Polly would need a hi-fi phone though...

    BTW I'm experimenting with browsing at -4 funny, o/w my comment would have been something like "Looks like the woman's phone has 5 spheres not 3. Oh wait ..." (someone's probably said this by now, let me check ...)

    --
    Esteem isn't a zero sum game
    1. Re:a bit of my sensory deprivation experience by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1
      Anyone know any good sensory deprivation music?

      I think you're missing the point here mate...

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    2. Re:a bit of my sensory deprivation experience by zptdooda · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing out my oxymoronic statement.

      As in most conversations though, there can be more than one point. One of mine was trying to learn about some unusual music to get that "Altered States" effect happening :)

      Sensory deprivation tanks can make a person feel pretty "out there", as can Echoes by Pink Floyd (all 23 minutes of it, whales sounds and all), even with the other 4 senses impinging.

      I wonder how it would feel to have everything but hearing gone, and then be taken on a trip via it.

      --
      Esteem isn't a zero sum game
    3. Re:a bit of my sensory deprivation experience by plastik55 · · Score: 1

      Consumed by Plastikman.

      Works very well if you turn off the lights and, well, sensorily deprive yourself aside from the music. Need a good stereo get get the bass without distorting.

      I've had honest-to-goodness hallucinations brought on by that album.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  45. Sorry, I got distracted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about you guys, but this thing would have to be very good to keep me from noticing the chick in the black bikini in the background...

  46. Mandatory Simpsons quote by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 0

    Worst...invention...ever.

    -B

    1. Re:Mandatory Simpsons quote by arnie_apesacrappin · · Score: 1
      I was actually thinking:

      I can't hear you son. I'm wearing a Jacuzzi suit.

      --

      Still, with a plan, you only get the best you can imagine. I'd always hoped for something better than that. -CP

  47. OT question by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Why is this in the "related links" section?

    "Compare the best prices on: Consumer Electronics"

    Which forwards you to osdn.pricegrabber.com?

    Is tricking people into generating those $0.00001 referral clicks is the new business model? Not selling enough subscriptions?

    What's the deal?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  48. This is just what I've been looking for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to really help me concentrate on masturbating! And makes for easy cleanup!

    1. Re:This is just what I've been looking for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just put a sock on it,makes for a good disposable beat rag!

  49. This is already happening now by Denver_80203 · · Score: 1

    Just look at the cell phone users who drive!

  50. Re:Hello, mods? by FileNotFound · · Score: 1

    Use your imagination and try to think for a second. I assure you it's refreshing.

    If you can answer the "Why?" then it's not the dumbest thing I've ever seen. But I don't think you can.

    So far nobody has. Total focus on the phone call? Who needs a swimming pool and that hidous helmet for that? If you can't focus as is, you got real problems.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
  51. Cars by ianfs · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but I sure don't want to have someone in the car in front of me removed from all sensory stimulation during the morning commute!

    --
    "Terminate?"
    "Terminate... with extreme prejudice"
  52. Don't walk on the sidewalks! by Bendebecker · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet some fool will get it for his car...
    "Yeah, officer, I was driving down the highway at 65mph when my phone rang. I have no idea how I ended up in this field! And why is the front of my car all covered in blood?"

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
    1. Re:Don't walk on the sidewalks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, now...what we need is to put people in sensory deprivation so they can RTFA.

    2. Re:Don't walk on the sidewalks! by 955301 · · Score: 1

      Only if the fool drove his/her car into a lake. In which case, problem solved. Unless you are a passenger..

      Driver - Hang on a sec' let me get this call... *SPLASH*

      Passenger - What the Hell?!

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    3. Re:Don't walk on the sidewalks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we need to put people in sensory deprivation so they can focus on the taste of shit and the feeling of cock up their asshole.

  53. Abusable by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 2, Funny


    Imagine running and jumping into the pool, strapping on your Lunar Lander floating headset, and getting all situated, just to find a telemarketer on the other end of the line!

    I don't know what's worse, that you have to get out and dry off, or that the telemarketer has your TOTAL ATTENTION.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  54. Logical application by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    I'm struggling on a logical application on this one. The only thing I can think of is the super duper isophonesex lines. You can really focus in on the caller breathing heavy as you masturbate in a luke warm pool. It's an experence, and probally legal in most civilized countries.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:Logical application by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Nah, say you're a new age yuppie/hippie and you're all into power crystals and sensory deprivation but are also an important exec at a dotcom startup. You want to meditate, but don't want to miss an important call while you're in the tank.

      Besides, who says stuff needs to be useful? Look at Apple - they've built an empire out of useless yuppie crap.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Logical application by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Nah, say you're a new age yuppie/hippie and you're all into power crystals and sensory deprivation but are also an important exec at a dotcom startup. You want to meditate, but don't want to miss an important call while you're in the tank.

      In that case... I would think that scuba technology would be more approperate. For most amatures you ususally don't need a full hemlet with radio, but they do indeed exist. A good wetsuit 1/4 inch will heat up to body temp even in coldish waters.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  55. eh? by publius1234 · · Score: 1

    when did gravity become a distraction?

  56. Finally... by mofochickamo · · Score: 1

    a Slashdot story that has pictures of a woman in a bikini!

    --
    Honk if you're horny.
  57. [OT] music & sensory deprivation by ballpoint · · Score: 1

    One of the things I really like doing in bed (lame replies welcome) is listening to music with excellent earphones (Sony MDR-EX51LP Fontopia). The deprivation of other senses at night (floating on the matress, pitch dark, no other sounds) lets you fully grasp the details in the music. Beats listening to a stupid phone.

    --
    Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    1. Re:[OT] music & sensory deprivation by ballpoint · · Score: 1

      Correction:

      1,$s/music/Non-RIAA music/gp
      w
      q

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    2. Re:[OT] music & sensory deprivation by greenhide · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

      Just because an artists' label is overseen by the RIAA doesn't mean that it's not good music that you should listen to.

      I mean, the US Government does some pretty lousy things. Does that mean you should never go to the Smithsonian, or a public library, or collect Social Security?

      No, it simply means that organize activism against the actions and behavior that you don't like. Boycotts won't work in this case -- I don't think there would ever be enough momentum there to affect their sales on a large scale. Yes, the fact that a lot of people are swapping MP3s has affected sales, but most of these people are not swapping for politically-motivated purposes.

      An easy way to get RIAA-controlled music without supporting the RIAA is to buy used CDs rather than new ones. That way, you're supporting the local music store, which often does a lot of good in the community, supporting and promoting local musicians.

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
  58. I can think of a least one use... by Skier4Life · · Score: 1

    My brother works at a call centre and they are always being lectured on how they have to pay attention and stay focused on the customer.

    I can see it now, every call centre gets rid of the cubicles and installs giant swimming pools, people leaving work looking like giant raisins. They wouldn't even have to leave their phone to take a pee, as long as the water doesn't contain the stuff that turns purple if someone pees.

    --


    [SIG] Far better to be thought a fool then to post on /. and remove all doubt.
  59. To sum up the article in one sentance. by Badgerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People with too much time on their hands invent incredibly impractical device for easily distracted people who probably will never use it anyway.

    --
    "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
    1. Re:To sum up the article in one sentance. by ThosLives · · Score: 1
      People pay money to let people research this!?

      face begins to twitch.... can't.... stop....cackling.....maniacally

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
  60. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    does it work outside water? Or everytime the phone rings: *ring* *ring*
    AAAAAAAARGH not again
    *takes off clothes*
    *puts on helmet*
    *dives into water*
    Hi, we have this great new vacuum cleaner we're selling

  61. The date on my computer must be wrong... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1, Funny

    Computer says that it is September 12, but reading this article, I am sure that it is April 1.

  62. 'Hi honey, I'm on the mech! ' by Channard · · Score: 1
    *yawns* This is old stuff. I have a book here called "Shadow Run" from Fasa and it's all explained right here. I'm getting sick and tired of this site.

    That's all we need - a mobile using mech user, completely oblivious while his Atlas crushes four grocery stores an a kindergarten beneath its feet.

  63. Re:Hello, mods? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Because you are a delicate genius who is called upon to solve prolems of global import, and need 100% focus upon the problem at hand, else countless lives may be at stake.

    Like me. I get those calls all the time and it's hard to negotiate peace in the middle east and solve the energy crisis with the TV blaring and some kid pulling my pantleg asking if he can have some Oreos a half hour before dinner.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  64. Driving with a phone should be illegal anyhow... by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

    Because that already happens with most of the phone-equipped drivers I see during the day...

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  65. Cell phone uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if those damn drivers on cell phones weren't bad enough...

  66. Call centers? by autocracy · · Score: 1, Funny

    Like it wasn't bad enough working for one already.... "Alright, everyone in the pool!"

    --
    SIG: HUP
  67. need one for my ex wife by kamend · · Score: 1

    Is there a suck-air-out option?

  68. Great...now if someone could design a device... by Darkstar9969 · · Score: 1, Interesting
    ...that mutes the person on the cell phone so everyone around them does not have to listen to their conversation.

    THAT would be a cool technology!!!

    --
    MMMmmmmmm....erotic cakes!!! Homer J. Simpson - Treehouse of Horror VI
  69. Re:Hello, mods? by FileNotFound · · Score: 1

    Hmm...

    I was wrong. There IS a use for these things.

    We'll put GWBush and whatever other idiots we can find in these things, toss them in a pool... and NEVER EVER call them.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
  70. When will the wireless version be available? by kelzer · · Score: 1

    I could really use one of these while I'm driving.

    I find I'm often distracted by what other cars are doing, and trying to hold a conversation while monitoring my speed and dealing with traffic lights, stop signs, and cray drivers is a real pain.

    --

    ---------------------------------------------
    SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  71. What is it with extremes? by Xugumad · · Score: 1

    First of all we have The Tyranny of E-mail, which complained about how it broke your concentration. Now it's a good thing that your communication method forces you to forget absolutely everything else?

    More seriously, if people were that worried about the call, they could find a way to focus. If you're outside, find somewhere out of the way, or a phonebooth, either works. If you're inside, why are distractions a problem? If I'm not completely focused on call, it's because something in real life is more important/interesting!

  72. This has been in use for years... by CommieLib · · Score: 1

    by America's top intelligence agencies. See here.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  73. right... by riffraff · · Score: 1, Funny

    I could see people talking on their cell phone and driving with one of these. Talking about a disaster. People can't drive now...

  74. removes the distraction of gravity by Tharsis · · Score: 1

    Finally, I never seem to be able to concentrate with all this gravity around!

  75. Stupid, Stupid, Stupid by genevaroth · · Score: 0

    I can't believe that this is getting coverage, what a stupid 1st year community art college dropout idea.
    This has by far some better design ideas
    http://design-engine.com

  76. What's pragmatic? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    What's pragmatic about having to dive in a pool to make a phone call?

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  77. Not bad as a flotation tank by iso · · Score: 1

    It's a bit silly as a phone, but without dialing anybody it might make a pretty good sensory deprivation tank. I enjoy "tanking" on occassion in a John-Lilly-style tank, but the biggest problem I've found is with the Epsom salts (that stuff is nasty if it gets in your eyes). Has anybody here tried a tank that works like the one in the story? It doesn't look as comfortable as lying down, but it does do without the salts.

    Jason

  78. What about good old ear protection? by millwall · · Score: 1

    If you don't want to be disturbed by external sounds, why don't you just use ear protection together with ear plugs?

    The floating in water thing is just over the top.

  79. Car phone version coming soon? by Shoten · · Score: 0

    OOH, I hope so! That would be just swell!

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  80. Sensory Deprivation by turgid · · Score: 0

    Q. What am I if I have a jelly in one ear and custard in the other?
    A. A trifle deaf.
    *ducks*

  81. 300Hz-4kHz ... by the+bluebrain · · Score: 1

    This thing sounds great.
    Except they'd first have to work on the 0.3-4kHz bandpass filter regular phones have, to get that "natural conversation feel" going. Oh, and stereo wouldn't be bad, either.
    OK, so it's a silly idea after all.

    Comments:
    Anyone else dig the way they so obviously used a silver-sprayed motorcycle helmet? "It looks cool, kind of futury".
    No dear, it doesn't. It looks like crap.

    2: Quote: "We will have to see if the Isophone is worth the trouble. In the meantime it will just drift in a sea of ideas."
    That was very, very funny.
    Oh, if we only had that wit in every single thing we ever read, heard, or saw. Can you imagine?

    --
    yes, we have no bananas
  82. RE: Who is this for? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

    Its for call centers, stupid.

    As an added benefit, you can power the predictive dialers using these phones combined with a form of fusion.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  83. my new phone routine? by 514x0r · · Score: 2, Funny

    so now i have to run upstairs, strip down to a swimsuit, jump in the pool and get the headgear on all in the 4 rings before it goes to voicemail?

    --

    !(^((ri)|(mp))aa$)
  84. Ideal for VR applications by Dominic+Burns · · Score: 1

    The first thing I thought on seeing the setup was 'That'd be great for virtual reality'.

    There's resistance and freedom of motion for simulating a variety of environments. Augmented with, say, a servo-assisted suit for resistance variables.

    Pipe whatever into the helmet and away you go...or not, in this case. Imagine all those UT2K3-VR[tm] gamers thrashing around in a pool :)

    Might be worth employing some sort of anchor, too.

  85. Get Smart? by identity0 · · Score: 1

    If this is anything like the "Cone of Silence" from the old TV series "Get Smart", I'm sure lots of people will buy it for their bosses :) (The cone of silence was a pair of bubbles that came down over two people's heads so they could block outside sound while talking. It worked so well, the two people couldn't talk to each other, either)

    Now all I need is a shoe phone from Nokia - the N-Shoe!

  86. What I'd much rather see... by squarooticus · · Score: 1

    ...is a phone that keeps other people from hearing your conversations. It's really annoying when you're sitting next to someone on the commuter rail, and they insist on spending the entire trip gabbing to no particular end at about 10dB higher than they need to.

    An acceptable alternative would be to designate one car as a "cellphone car," and let the rest of us read in peace.

    --
    [ home ]
  87. Great..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so, ye' old /. editor thinks jacuzzi in the office. Why was the only thing that popped into my head was the Cone of Silence(tm)?

  88. A bit off topic by dkone · · Score: 1

    but it does mess with my sensory input.. why does slashdot a a single white pixel at the bottom center of their top ad banner. Every time I see it I think I have to clean my screen.

    DK

  89. I will pay good money for the Cone of Silence! by Mouth+of+Sauron · · Score: 1
    The Cone of Silence and other innovations

    Get Smart was prohetic to say the least! Would you believe this much?

  90. Why don't they... by dcordeiro · · Score: 1

    send the researchers of this *great* piece of technology to the moon?

    Problem solved (if there is no air, there is no sound to distract you), and no need to spend *a lot* of money on crap projects...

    Let's face it... they have a big market. They only need to find ppl that:
    1 - Want to travel with a phone the size of a elephant. (to avoid unnecessary replies: the big gray ones from Africa, not the small ones from India)
    2 - Work inside a pool.
    3 - Need to have a conversation while in the pool.
    4 - Need a brain surgery because they can't concentrate on a stupid phone call.

    A ***HUGE*** market I must admit.

  91. Cluster of Minds. by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    Could this be as close to a "brain-cluster" as possible?

    You set 10 people together to discuss an idea or problem in a conference call mode, let them figure out a protocol.. Or, each person is patched into three other "mind-nodes", auditory only, and must precede all communications with a command. The voice packets are then sen to the appropriate node

    "Bill, what if... ,Bill" "Jane, how about.., Jane".. when I say Jane, she gets my next statement, but Bill can't hear it.

    Course, what happens when people start hallucinating from the sensory dep?

    --
    meh
    1. Re:Cluster of Minds. by pohl · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that would be an interesting experiment...it's basically IRC in sensory-deprivation tanks. It might make a good brainstorming device, or an interesting kind of jury where no input goes into the cluster that isn't admissible ("the jury will disregard the last statement"...yeah, right).

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

  92. EFC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like they grabbed the idea right out of EFC (Earth Final Conflict). Sendep was used as a form of criminal punishment. Now, we take that idea, and make people focus on the conversation.

    Even the inventor's name, James Auger, is straight from EFC (Auger was put into sendep)...

    Coincidence?

  93. Ooooooooh goody. Then I could work. . . by kfg · · Score: 1

    in a tech support Matrix.

    I hearby sentence the inventors to "death by their own product." We're going to put them in one of these things for 12 hours a day. . . then unlist their phone number.

    Won't do much for them but it'll nicely isolate us from whatever further sensory input they might unleash upon us.

    KFG

  94. Phone Plus Sensory Deprivation Equals... by johnthorensen · · Score: 1

    ...20 car pile-up.

    -JT

  95. Girl in the bikini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This researcher should be celebrated - he figured out how to do "research" involving girls in bikinis. Brilliant.

  96. What a waste by dkone · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah I am sure these will catch on. Not only that it should be a big boost to the pool industry. Don't worry about the fact that in many areas you will only be able to use your phone during the summer months. Hmmm, I can just see it now... "well, I am not going to call my mother/sister/brother during the winter, because I know she/she/he will not be paying attention to me.

    Just some random thoughts:

    Everytime I get in the pool I always have to pee, which would be a distraction in itself.

    Other people would probably be swiming in the pool, there is nothing more irritating to me then someone splashing me while I am in the pool.

    Do you have to sit in the pool all day waiting for a call, or do you answer a call and ask the person to hold while you put your bathing suit on.

    What if there is an electrical storm while you are on the phone? You would not know and could die.

    Do you think the ring tone should be the theme to Jaws?

  97. Most retarded invention. Evar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets take the whole point of mobile phones - that you can use them anywhere - and destroy it...What rocket scientists were behind this one?

  98. Preach on brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Similarly, I absolutely need to drive while drinking a fifth of Jack Daniels. But try telling that to the cops, sheesh!

  99. Not to be a jerk but... by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

    Who the heck paid for this? Can I have some money for my "Sensory Deprivation, I want some money" idea? I mean, am I the only one that is kind of hoping this is a joke?

  100. Bathroom brake by Ligur · · Score: 1

    Well, it should atleast eliminate the distraction of an in-call bathroom brake...

    eww.

    --
    Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.
  101. Just a minute now... by JimPooley · · Score: 1

    You just know that if Linux was involved in any way, shape or form with this device, hordes of slashdotters would be proclaiming it the greatest invention ever!

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  102. Re:Cone of SIlence by HiThere · · Score: 1

    The one in Dune worked properly. And wasn't all that portable. (I don't think it was Dune 1, though. Possibly Dune Messiah.)

    In all events, the general concept has shown up in several places. It's basically a high-tech phone booth with a closing door. Usuall big enough to allow a few people simultaneous occupancy, and usually without visible (or very visible) boundries. The first time I encountered it was in 1940's Science Fiction. Something by A.E. van Vogt I think.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  103. erm, ok, but one tiny thing... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    I noticed what might be construed as a minor implediment to adoption and implementation in that YoU HaVE To bE StAnDInG StILL In A %$#% SwIMMING PoOL WiTH FoUR BLaSTED UgLY PLaSTIC PoDS ARoUND YoUR NoGGIN To MaKE A SImPLE STInKING PHoNE CaLL!

    Ahem.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  104. Re: Who is this for? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
    Its for call centers, stupid.

    Can't be for call centers. How do the mindless drones take down my credit card info when they can't see?

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  105. Distraction of Gravity (and breathing) by virtigex · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but they seem to expect a low level of cognitive ability if you can be distracted by gravity. In fact, I would argue that the distraction of having to breath is greater than that of gravity. Having said that, the device might be also designed to releive you of the necessity for breating also, resulting in a very profound sense of peace.

  106. Tool for brainwashing by genner · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or does this seem like some insidious tool for brainwashign someone. I'm mean think about it...being cut off from all sensations except...that voice.

  107. Not very mobile... by nettdata · · Score: 1

    From the article: The device is a Media Lab Europe project which goes against the grain of mobile development.

    Against the grain? I'll say! Cuz we all know how portable a POOL is.

    I also bet that they got some sort of grant money for this as well.

    Do they expect to be taken seriously with this work? I fully expect the only user of this thing to be Austin Powers, with a bunch of sharks with fricken lasers on their heads swimming around him.

    Hell, this is even too stupid for Get Smart... and he had the "Cones of Silence".

    Even after my second cup of coffee, this just doesn't make sense... it belongs on the Onion more than the BBC.

    *sigh*

    --



    $0.02 (CDN)
  108. Practical Joke Opportunity by virtigex · · Score: 1
    1. Obatin plastic bag full of ice.

    2. Approach phone user silently w/ hand in bag.

    3. Remove hand from bag and place on selected part of anatomy.

  109. "removes the distraction of gravity" by mediumgreen · · Score: 1

    We all know how distracting gravity can be!

  110. That's just dumb by bobaferret · · Score: 1

    Some schmuck out there will by this along with his 10,000 dollar gold shower curtain. Reminds me a little of minority report and the folks floating in the pool. But it's still dumb.

  111. Time for a phone call by Ajaxamander · · Score: 1

    Could someone get me the isophone number of that girl in the pictures from the article? I'd love to have an in-depth conversation with her. ;-)

  112. Official Site by Mr.Gibs · · Score: 1

    If you click on the Research & Development link at the bottom of this page, you can see a movie and some more info about the IsoPhone!

    --
    I live to gib...
  113. No, No, you've missed the point by bill2009 · · Score: 0

    Nobody would voluntarily get in the swimming pool to make a call. This is aversion therapy for people who use cell phones in public places.

  114. telemarketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if only the telemarketers could get one of these to drop down out of the sky every time they called me ...

  115. A question... by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 1

    Would there be a function where you could get interrupted, I don't mean like call waiting, bujt say that you were sitting in your cube and your buddies wanted to go out to lunch but you were on the phone with some idiot. I mean, it sounds like ka nice idea, but I don't really find that things around are distracting from phbone conversations unless the conversation is terribly boring, or it's with someone I dislike.

    Which would mean that if these devices were used to aid my attentnion in such a situation it would essentially become an instrument of torture.

  116. You don't get it. by datawar · · Score: 1

    A very important trend in Human-Computer Interaction is to create devices that are of dubious practical value, but tell us a lot about the needs/wants/feelings of society. Basically, this device allows people to really think about what they want out a cellphone conversation, to tell stories about themselves, and what telephones mean to them. These stories then go into making real devices with features people *really* need, instead of those that engineers *think* people need.

    The article clearly didn't make this clear enough, and even made it sound like they were planning to sell the device. I highly doubt that's the case (the story about the business man in Japan is exactly that - a story about someone with a particular need that may not be met by current technology).

    I also suspect this is the fault of the reporter, not the researchers, as the reporter just wanted to make a funny/weird sounding story, and probably missed a lot of what the researchers were saying.

  117. Good Sesnory Deprivation Music by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    Anything by Perfume Tree.

    Or Rammstein (Which is off the other end of the scale)

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  118. Just wait for the 2.5mm jack adaptor by digrieze · · Score: 1

    Do they realize the market for this is saturated? It's called soccer moms in rush hour on cellphones. They already have no cognizance of their surroundings!

    --
    It doesn't matter what you wrap your emotions around, Reality is a brick wall specifically designed to scramble eggs
  119. CDs+Beer and Cellphones + water by subspacemsg · · Score: 1

    why do we have these lame stories today?

  120. how about the other way around? protect us ... by Wilk4 · · Score: 1

    "... isolates the user from all other sensory input. This in theory means the user is not distracted by other things occurring in their immediate surroundings..." Instead of protecting cell phone users from outside distractions, I want cell phone users to have something that stops them from distracting/annoying others. Maybe we need a portable maxwell-smart-like cone-of-silence that cell-phone users can use when they just *have* to have that (non-) private, loud conversation in a restaurant or other public place... Perhaps a nice big sound-deadening bag. Put it over their head while they make the call. ;-)

  121. That is the future by apol · · Score: 1
    In future we will likely all be in cells like these and we will have to pay royalties for all "sensory stimulation".

    Do you want to see the buildings around you? OK, but you have to pay the architecht's IP, otherwise you are stealing, profiting from someone else's work. Architechts deserve a decent earning, don't they?

    Do you want to see the beautiful girl just in front of you? No problem, just pay the fee to the stylist that designed her dress and that contributed her nice appearence.

    A new version of DMCA will rule out all tentative of scaping from these cells as an atempt to violate copyright holders' propriety.

    Freedom activists will defend the right to escape from the cells for 1 or 2 reasons they can figure out that still don't infringe copyrights, while others will argue that most of us trying to escape from cells are actually really just willing to break copyrights.

  122. Deprived but not depraved by nekosej · · Score: 1

    I guess the sensory deprivation would be a bummer if you tried to have phone sex. Shame - could be kinda kinky in the pool.

    --
    Never pet a burning dog.
  123. When can I get one??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do tech support, and I would love one of these in our noisy call center!

  124. Phone Plus Sensory Deprivation Equals... by dbretton · · Score: 1

    Phone Plus Sensory Deprivation Equals...

    - Bad Spelling -

  125. I find it funny by fullmetal55 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lots of people think the phone is a convenience item for them, not to allow other people to reach you. well what about the phone number you're dialing? do they feel the same way as you? then aren't you just as bad as that big bad person calling you? In my previous job I hated people like that, who would never pick up the phone until I called 10 times, instead choosing to verbally abuse me after they finally pick up,without knowing why i was calling, or who I was. Dispite the fact that I was calling back to solve a problem they were having with their computer, calling back to solve it any way possible. the caller ID didn't say who i was, Just which line I was calling out of, it didn't even have my proper line. Answering machines are better, then I can leave a message. but the people who only use caller ID are very arrogant. what if the number was that of a hospital which didn't come up as "hospital" but just as a number you didn't know. Would you ignore it? dispite the fact that they are attempting to contact you about, for example, your child, your parent, your sibling, your spouse. The phone is a two way street. like it or lump it, it is a two way street.

    1. Re:I find it funny by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 3, Funny

      My solution is to have two cell phones. I use one to call the other. That way I'm not the "big bad person calling." I know when I call myself i don't mind being called at that particular moment. Likewise, when my phone rings, it's conveniently always at a time I'm ready to answer. Then when I'm walking down the street or on the train or in an elevator I can conspicuiously talk about what important shit I'm working on or how cool I am.

      The added bonus is I have a cell phone in each hand over each ear. I'm a total badass and this lets people know it! BTW, I tried this with those handsfree one-ear headsets. Unfortunately people just thought I was listening to an iPod and talking to myself. "I'm a badass, I'm not crazy," I would have to tell them. It got to be a pain.

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
  126. Now THAT'S insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no way a broad is going to put up with his crap.

    1. Re:Now THAT'S insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, unless she's as neurotic and antisocial as he is.

  127. Wow by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Can't you just see Nelson Muntz having a field day? What a haul of geek's swim suits he would have!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  128. You must not appreciate the beauty... by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

    ... of Darwinism at work.

    --
    It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
  129. Very useful! by FatalTourist · · Score: 1

    When there are computers beeping, phones ringing, and people yelling it's very hard to focus on your phone sex--- errr.. important business call. Yes. Ahem.

    --


    Escape Pod Films: Sketch Comedy and Web Series
  130. I can't find a job but... by endus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...someone still has the money to develop this. This is without a doubt the dumbest thing I have ever seen in my entire life. Whoever wasted money on developing this is an idiot...although smoehow I have the feeling that someone else will be dumb enough to buy it. Completely pointless...black goggles and a headset will do the same thing. Why do you need to be isolated from physical input while on the phone....sosososososososososososo stupid.

  131. LAME, LAME, LAME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What limits are there to non-sense?

  132. Wait a minute... by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    Are you saying that cell phones used in cars *don't* do this now? As a motorcyclist, I decided years ago that was the only explantion for cell phone drivers.

    But... this would imply they're all simply idiots!

  133. hey stop picking on me! by anonymous+loser · · Score: 2, Funny
    or the wrecked bus of burning nuns

    You turn ONE LITTLE bus full of nuns into burning wreckage and that's all everyone talks about. "Hey AL! How many hail Marys did ya get?"

  134. Finnaly the device I've been waiting for by BullSnot · · Score: 1

    Now I have a reason to get a hot tub for my office, and write it off as a business expense!

    The sweet lords of slackerdom have smiled upon me yet again.

  135. GLASS:half full/half empty by flyneye · · Score: 1

    have some imagination buddy!
    I see the ultimate masturbatorium for phone sex there.lol

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  136. ZzZzZzZzzz by DrewCapu · · Score: 1

    Forget about phone calls.

    It looks like this may be more useful for insomniacs.

  137. Outsource by Asmodean · · Score: 1

    Great, now instead of outsourcing all of our call centers overseas they will outsource them in-the-seas!

    --
    It's a good thing the world sucks or we'd all fall off.
  138. Such a thing already exists by jschank · · Score: 1

    Pah, we already have that. Its called a Car Phone.

  139. clancyesqe display doesn't fool me by kraksmoka · · Score: 1
    this "phone" is just a dumbed down version of a sensory deprivation tank in the clancy novel "cardinal of the kremlin". the use of such a tank is interrogation and its victims are broken as surely as time, because we are social creatures and that works against us inasmuch as we need sensory input to maintain our sanity. well, works in the book, but do i have to fight a clancy proof flame war to say that he's usually pretty on the money.

    this doesn't look like a positive development, but more like a government showing off its dark side with a light article. kind of like the USA showing the underground satelite map of the Nile delta to rattle soviet chains.

    --
    "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
  140. prior art by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a new phone technology that isolates the user from all other sensory input

    You mean like... a PHONE BOOTH?

  141. The Onion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure this article wasnt written for The Onion?

  142. hallucinating from the sensory dep by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

    Hmmmmmmm.....bacon.....canadian bacon.....mexican bacon!

  143. I think I saw this in a movie somewhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, let's see....plugged in, unaware of the outside world. Hmmmm. Art does precede life, I guess.

    1. Re:I think I saw this in a movie somewhere. by nucal · · Score: 1

      That's funny, because it made me think of Altered States

  144. Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can I get one of these put into my car so I can use it while driving?

  145. Then go live alone in the wilderness by MacFury · · Score: 1
    Screw that: the phone is a convenient tool for me not a backdoor by which others can invade my space and privacy.

    You shound exactly like one of my stupid friends. He has no caller ID, never checks his answering machine and never answers his phone...ever.

    Can I call him to tell him to turn on the news quick because his dad is on live tv? Can I call him and tell him store A has one copy of that piece of software he wants left for $200 off? When he doesn't get wind of these sort of things quick enough, he bitches like crazy...but always he returns to his foolish thought that the phone is soley a convenient tool for him, never the other way around.

  146. Just imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how long until people will be driving around with these things on their head oblivious to other vehicles on the road?

  147. Can I get one for my Car by SirLanse · · Score: 1

    Normal cell phones are banned, can I get one of these??

  148. I challenge anyone by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

    to find a practical use for this 'invention'. I think someone really needs to find something better to do with his time. Sensory deprivation+Mobile phone? Hang on a minute, I'm going to take this call in my sensory deprivation tank. What is an 'in depth' phone call? If I want to spend a lot of money to have an 'in depth conversation', I'll use a video phone. I think this comes from the long line of ideas that starts with:
    1. Anything
    2. Mobile Phone + Anything
    3. Profit!!!

    --


    TallGreen CMS hosting
  149. Phone Plus Sensory Deprivation Equals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Phone Plus Sensory Deprivation Equal = most people with PhDs = no practical experience

  150. You don't understand... by Snafoo · · Score: 1

    This isn't a technological advance, it's... art! Yes! The complete impracticality (not to mention redundancy) of an underwater sense-dep telephone is a brilliant, scathing critique of the techno-scientifically induced phenomenon that Husserl called 'activity in passivity'. It is not until our culture rediscovers the underlying crisis in the Western project --- that instrumental advances alter and, yes, perhaps even narrow, the horizon of subjective existence --- that we will fully understand the work of this visionary.

    Either that, or he's a government-funded british crackpot inventor who happens to like tanks, and telephones, and decided to put the two together. You decide.

    --
    - undoware.ca
    1. Re:You don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nooo, you won't get an +1 Insightful for this crap

  151. It might just be... by vidnet · · Score: 1

    It might just be a trick of light and shadow, but the guy from the picture in the article seems very excited about this technology.

  152. Re:Cone of SIlence by vistic · · Score: 1

    I think it was in the first Dune because as far as I can recall it was mentioned in an arena, used by Devries and Fenring to converse while Harkonnen was watching Feyd battle some people. Only Fenring survives of that bunch to go on to Dune Messiah... but I might be wrong who was there.

    When I read it, I could only think about Get Smart.

  153. Hey! by jpellino · · Score: 1

    We learned to drive with our knees from watching our pastor do it when we had to go serve mass at the local convalescent homes - he was good - could light his pipe while taking corners at high (to a fifth grader) speed steering with his knees.

    I consider it a valuable skill and it was passed down from someone of great social and moral authority. I'll stop doing it when you pry my steering wheel from my cold dead knees!

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  154. What do you mean, I called you? by AzureLunatic · · Score: 1
    A roommate of mine seems to negate all cellphone key-locking measures short of him turning it off and putting it down somewhere that he can't touch it. I've recieved accidental calls from him several times. I can hear what's going on around him, but the phone's clipped to his belt and he's not aware it's transmitting...

    We didn't have reliable caller ID at the time, so I had to guess who it was based on what I could hear, which sometimes wasn't very enlightening, and was sometimes quite interesting.

    I'm sure he does this to other random people in his address book.

    I hope one wouldn't be able to dial the isophone accidentally.

  155. damn straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you worthless monkey

  156. Other uses?... by topside420 · · Score: 1
    While I can't see any practical uses when considered in relation to phones, I definitly see a use for these in psychedelic trips.

    Nothing better than complete sensory deprivation (even cutting of the sense of gravity) when taking a large amount of LSD/psilocybin mushrooms/DMT/etc. For those who wish to experience an amazing 'inner journey' - this would be perfect. Your mind's imagination will be the only thing that will feed the sensory parts of the brain.

    Now for THAT use, I can *definitly* see a small market. For proof of concept, we can take a look at Alex Grey's Mindfold. Even good old George Bush owns one!

  157. Wow ... by jmbauer · · Score: 1

    That could be used for the world's best (albeit most expensive) phone sex ...

  158. Great for obscene phone calls by CracktownHts · · Score: 1

    (pervert voice)
    Do you know who this is? I sure know who you are. Guess what? I got naked and strapped myself in a nomex diving suit, put on a life support helmet and submerged myself in warm saline just so I could be totally and completely alone with your voice. How do you like that? ssssssssssss....
    (/pervert voice)

  159. And people wonder by rk · · Score: 1

    why I don't get a paid subscription to /.

    Bah!

  160. Looks great for TeleWanking by AhFep · · Score: 1

    Who wants to use the pool after me?

    --
    The little voices told me to stay@home & clean the guns.
  161. stupid dumbasses getting money for being idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf? this is research? jesus here we are in a f-ing recession and imbeciles are using real $$ to develop dumbass stuff like this.

    Next you'll hear we are going to the moon again..oh i guess we are..

    oh, forgot to add..

    GEORGE BUSH IS A FASCIST PIG AND HIS CRONIES CAN SUCK MY COCK

  162. MARCO! by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

    POLO!

  163. Precog rights NOW! by Atario · · Score: 1

    Finally, the Precogs in Minority Report can spookily yap on the phone to one another between dreams. "Yer crazy! The killer had on a white shirt. Ecru, my ass."

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  164. I picture banks of operators in Matrix like pods. by spun · · Score: 1

    Whole huge banks of telemarketers and operators in these things, corporate policy, you know? Filtration systems mean no time lost due to bathroom breaks, benzadrine in the pool water to keep the operators sharp & keeps them from needing to eat for 18 hours at a stretch, hooked up to all kinds of scary medical monitors. A lot of companies already use prison labor to answer their phones, would it be much of a stretch to require prisoners to use these?

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  165. Optimize! by Syriloth · · Score: 1

    A more optimal solution would have been:

    40 PRINT "Yeah."
    50 PRINT "So..."
    60 GOTO 40

  166. Just what we need: sense-deprived drivers? by macraig · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I can HARDLY WAIT for them to incorporate this same concept (of course in a different form) into cellphones that jackass people can use while driving! As if they aren't dangerous enough already, yeah: let's completely isolate them from the inputs they might use to drive without being a public hazard....

  167. Re:Phone Plus Sensory Deprivation Equals: not much by ZvlvLord · · Score: 1

    I want my CyberDeck. I wanna 'jack-in' dammit !!!

    *wannabe cowboy dreaming about the Matrix/Cyberspace*

    *should start calling Gibson to complain*

    Oh why, why did I believe him ???

  168. Phone Sex by ces · · Score: 1

    Is the only real use for this.

    I mean what other kind of phone call would you want to devote your complete and undivided attention to?

    I suppose calls to one's SO would be another use. But any call to my SO I want to give that much attention to is bordering on phone sex anyway.

    --
    Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  169. Not new. by Tukla · · Score: 1
    a new phone technology that isolates the user from all other sensory input.

    That's not new. Teenaged girls have been doing this for decades.