Slashdot Mirror


User: black+mariah

black+mariah's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,118
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,118

  1. Re:It's where the idea came from on Take-Two Interactive and Sony Sued Over GTA · · Score: 1

    Blow me. Being an asshole and being a COMPLETE DIPSHIT THAT SHOOTS PEOPLE BECAUSE OF A VIDEO GAME are two entirely different things.

  2. Re:thats not right on Half-Life 2 - A Linux User's Lament · · Score: 1

    Read some of the articles posted here. Get yourself informed.

  3. Re:It's not because of Sony's GTA exclusivity... on Take-Two Interactive and Sony Sued Over GTA · · Score: 1

    Exactly. I've often thought it would be fun to do that whole thing he did with the convenience store guy. Then again, that's a THOUGHT. The movie is a FANTASY. In REALITY you try that shit and you'll get a shotgun blast to the face since most convenience stores don't put up with that shit anymore. :D

  4. Re:2x10^7 on Take-Two Interactive and Sony Sued Over GTA · · Score: 1

    No. Some stores won't sell M rated games to obviously underage kids, but there isn't any kind of actual law preventing it. Several have been tried and failed.

  5. Re:While we are at it... on Take-Two Interactive and Sony Sued Over GTA · · Score: 1

    It's because most parents nowdays are selfish cocks. They grew up in the "me" era of the 70's and 80's and as a result have grand illusions of a world without repercussions. They don't have the mental capacity to understand that THEY CAN FUCK UP. They don't give a damn that their kids are rotten assholes. All they care about is thenselves and fuck everyone else.

    If anyone disagrees, I'll be more than happy to tell you about some of my friends.

  6. Re:It's where the idea came from on Take-Two Interactive and Sony Sued Over GTA · · Score: 1

    Here's a virtual +1 for you.

  7. Re:It's where the idea came from on Take-Two Interactive and Sony Sued Over GTA · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Uh, ever heard of knowing the difference between right and wrong, fantasy and reality. Ever heard of NOT BEING A FUCKING DIPSHIT? Incite my balls. Some fuckhead parents give their dumb-fuck kids a game meant for people that KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A FUCKING GAME AND REALITY and suddenly is the fault of the game makers that the kids are TOTAL FUCKING ASSCLOWNS? Fuck that. That is bullshit, straight up. Incitement to commit a crime is standing up and saying "I want you five guys to go and rape that woman." Incitement to commit a crime is NOT a depiction of violence.

  8. Re:Only exsclusive till 2004 on Take-Two Interactive and Sony Sued Over GTA · · Score: 1

    Rockstar is the creator, Take Two the distributor. IIRC.

  9. Re:unfortunatly... on Half-Life 2 - A Linux User's Lament · · Score: 1

    I've never had to dig into my X11Config file on Windows to get my video drivers working.

    Yes, I am aware there isn't an X11Config on Windows. That's not the point. To install Linux video drivers I had to go in and manually edit what would be a very scary looking file for the overwhelming majority of users, then on top of that I couldn't get X to start up. After some posting on the nVidia troubleshooting forum I found that I needed to enable IgnoreEDID and I still have no clue WTF that does. It took me the better part of two weeks to INSTALL MY DAMN VIDEO DRIVERS because I couldn't get any help with my problem.

    And anyone that can't install Windows is a total dumbass. It's more idiot proof than a freaking Red Hat install! Even my dad can install Windows.

  10. Re:why not support the companies that support us? on Half-Life 2 - A Linux User's Lament · · Score: 1

    Well, who else is pushing the newest cards as hard? Doom 3 is the closest thing to what HL2 is pulling off, and from what I understand their release date is still a ways off so you could EASILY get bitching and moaning from Carmack over the difference in cards.

  11. Re:why not support the companies that support us? on Half-Life 2 - A Linux User's Lament · · Score: 1

    Umm.... no. HL2 on Linux isn't going to convert anyone, so I don't see the Linux user numbers suddenly shooting through the roof. Sometimes a minority group just has to DEAL WITH IT and find something else to champion.

  12. Re:why not support the companies that support us? on Half-Life 2 - A Linux User's Lament · · Score: 1

    Well it would be nice if principle paid the bills, but it doesn't. See Loki Games.

  13. Re:O_o on Beatles Bite Apple · · Score: 1

    Where are those mod points when I need them? Here's a virtual +1 Funny.

  14. Re:O_o on Beatles Bite Apple · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The relevant point here is that Apple Computers had a CONTRACT with Apple Corps that was VIOLATED. You break a contract, you pay. Simple as that.

  15. Re:Well that was a waste. on Initial Half-Life 2 Benchmarks Released · · Score: 1

    Or so you think. If you're willing to trade FPS for resolution, you can crank that baby up to 3200x2400 and watch the 2 FPM (that's minute) glory.

    Not that many years ago I cranked Doom II up to 320x240 and did the same thing...

  16. Re:Yawn... on Initial Half-Life 2 Benchmarks Released · · Score: 1

    Yes, audiophiles are idiots. I will agree with you wholeheartedly on that point.

    I had always heard that 60FPS is approaching how fast the eye registers incoming stuff and things. Of course, you can't really quantify vision in terms of FPS, since vision is just a weeeee bit different.

  17. Re:Art School Proximity on Mystery Tiles From Around the World · · Score: 1

    Yes. All it takes is a stencil and a knife. It isn't handwriting, just some cutout stuff. As long as you have the basic shape right, there's really no way to screw it up.

  18. Re:My Thoughts on String Theory on Current Thoughts in String Theory · · Score: 1

    If particle man got in a fight with string man who would win?

    Triangle man.

  19. Re:Concerts/Music on Perfect Pitch for Those Without It · · Score: 1

    No, I'm talking about the slight clipping of a sine waves top and bottom peaks. Distortion and tone are different things both musically and mathematically.

  20. Re:Concerts/Music on Perfect Pitch for Those Without It · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You're taking me a bit too literally I think. The distortion I was referring to was the inherent distortion in any instrument that's not electronic. You don't have to convince me that distortion just makes bad guitarists sound distorted, I know this all too well. But what minor levels of distortion (those not even heard as actual clipping) do is color a tone, just like an EQ. Also, the parent mentioned that "good musicians don't need effects". My point was that being able to use effects well is a skill in itself and while guys like the Edge from U2 might be able to play without them, it sounds better with them because he knows how to use effects correctly.

    Yeah, back to the topic at hand. Using autotune to save an almost-perfect take is one thing, but doing it to save your entire show? Nah. Total crap. Frankly I think that albums that abuse autotune are worse than Milli Vanilli's lip synching. It's not any better, that's for sure.

  21. Re:Concerts/Music on Perfect Pitch for Those Without It · · Score: 1

    Where did I say guitars produced perfect sine waves? Oh, that's right, I DIDN'T. The cleaner an electric guitar gets, the crappier it sounds. An electric guitar into an amp with no reverb and the EQ set flat is going to sound like total ass. I know this for a fact. I've been building, playing, and working on guitars long enough to know my way around them. Even the cleanest jazz tones (Charlie Christian and Wes Montgomery, for example) have some amount of distortion. Reverb is almost a neccesity to get a good clean tone. You're confusing minor levels if signal distortion, which is what I am referring to, with massive amounts of pedal-driven distortion, which I am not.

    I've tried classical, jazz, bluegrass, country, salsa, reggae, blues, ska, latin styles, basically anything you can throw out. While I don't like all of these genres I am aware of them and respect all of them. Now crawl back under your rock.

  22. Re:Recordings? Yes. Performances? No. on Perfect Pitch for Those Without It · · Score: 1

    I can't remember the last time I saw an opera singer doing backflips during a chorus. THAT would be scary.

  23. Re:Recordings? Yes. Performances? No. on Perfect Pitch for Those Without It · · Score: 1

    If you use really whacked-out autotune settings, it will end up doing something similar. The artifacting can sound something like a vocoder.

  24. Re:Concerts/Music on Perfect Pitch for Those Without It · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, he's completely right. A pure sine wave is damned boring and sounds like ass. Some level of distortion is neccesary to make the sound more interesting. This may not be the over-the-top death/black metal type of distortion, just a really gentle clipping will do. It's also utter crap that good musicians don't need effects and distortion. Good musicians know how to use effects corectly, bad ones use them as band-aids. See David Gilmour for an example. :D

  25. Re:Yeah, then why limit it to SciFi? on Sci-Fi Movies and 'Bad Science' · · Score: 1

    Nah, I think I'll let you keep it. Laws are laws. You break them, you pay. It doesn't matter if you fucking like them or not. Believe me, dipshit, the cops sure as fuck aren't getting rich off of your traffic tickets.