You're forgetting that those pictures of child pornography are generally produced for profit by the perpretrators themselves.
Bullshit. Ever been on USENET? How about FreeNet? Here, have some kiddy porn, free of charge. (disclaimer: nothing to actually see - it's GPGed and I have no idea whether it actually is what I think it is or where you would get a key to decrypt it)
Even if this stuff wasn't available for free, I have difficulty believing that child molesters are doing it for the money rather than love of molesting children.
What value does a child's innocence have? What do you mean by "innocence" anyhow? Do you honestly think that seeing pornography as a child will screw somebody up?
That's ridiculous. The involvement of an intelligent entity affects what the outcome of change will be, but I don't see how you can say that it will affect the possibility of a change.
Unless you want to invoke some sort of spooky new-age junk - bonus points for using the word "quantum".
Ignoring all the political reasons that it's a terrible idea; it could work, but MS would have to actually document their "standard". Which is part of what they were supposed to be doing as a member of the W3C.
No, it was probably modded flamebait because of your utterly retarded statement that "Society has to have some standards of decency or we're right back to caveman civilization."
It went over my head too - probably because it was a completely pointless comment. (I mean, really. Has anybody ever said that Unicode would prevent this kind of thing? how was the original statement relevant at all?)
Slashdot Mirror
Bullshit. Ever been on USENET? How about FreeNet? Here, have some kiddy porn, free of charge. (disclaimer: nothing to actually see - it's GPGed and I have no idea whether it actually is what I think it is or where you would get a key to decrypt it)
Even if this stuff wasn't available for free, I have difficulty believing that child molesters are doing it for the money rather than love of molesting children.
Heretic! is presentational. You want text-decoration: blink;
I imagine it would be useful in a lot of those cases if they were given robotic eyes as newborns.
Heresay is the new loose.
What value does a child's innocence have? What do you mean by "innocence" anyhow? Do you honestly think that seeing pornography as a child will screw somebody up?
That's ridiculous. The involvement of an intelligent entity affects what the outcome of change will be, but I don't see how you can say that it will affect the possibility of a change.
Unless you want to invoke some sort of spooky new-age junk - bonus points for using the word "quantum".Wishful thinking, my friend. Well, maybe if you're in Vancouver.
They could use MIME type switching though. If they actually cared. Which I'm quite certain they don't.
Ignoring all the political reasons that it's a terrible idea; it could work, but MS would have to actually document their "standard". Which is part of what they were supposed to be doing as a member of the W3C.
Right clicking isn't discoverable either, then. Where's the "Context menu" menu option?
And I would be awfully surprised to find out that every GUI has used ^X, ^C, ^V.Damn, you figured us lefties out! We all have a lust for death and support terrorism because we hate humanity.
And we would have gotten away with it if it weren't for your damned insightfulness!
Where in the article did it say they were planning to use magic on the dead?
Flamebait? Looks like the mods are either sarcasm or not-being-a-racist-dick impaired.
And then were quickly refuted.
Oh heavens, say it isn't so! Every day hundreds of anti-everything posts are posted here on slashdot.
Hey, it worked for Jesus.
It works for me in lynx.
He was probably talking about the two-axis model rather than that specific site.
No, it was probably modded flamebait because of your utterly retarded statement that "Society has to have some standards of decency or we're right back to caveman civilization."
Um... if you do a F&R, how is the new copy going to know whether you've activated or if your hardware has changed?
Being a Windows XP Support Professional (read: outsourced phone monkey) was shitty enough without having to deal with this kind of crap.
That doesn't stop people from claiming it though.
It went over my head too - probably because it was a completely pointless comment. (I mean, really. Has anybody ever said that Unicode would prevent this kind of thing? how was the original statement relevant at all?)
lynx http://user:password@ip doesn't work?