Slashdot Mirror


Militants Planned Attack On Indian Software Firms

Alien54 writes "Militants killed in an encounter in New Delhi on Saturday night planned to attack leading software companies in Bangalore in addition to the Indian Military Academy in Dehra Dun, Delhi police said on Sunday Indian police claim the men were members of Lashkar-e-Toiba - a Wahabi militant group fighting for an independent Kashmir. Apart from maps of call centers police also recovered 100 kilos of dynamite, 10.5 kilos of RDX explosive, 450 detonators, three AK-56 rifles and a satellite phone."

599 comments

  1. What is the world coming to? by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Dear GOD, where is my TECH SUPPORT?!?!! Nobody in the call center is answering!" Feel free to mod me -1 heartless bastard.

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
    1. Re:What is the world coming to? by AnFraX · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, you see. The militants then proceed to take over the call center, giving out bad advice and in general being mean spirited, causing much grief and sorrow. It is their new method of destroying Western society.

    2. Re:What is the world coming to? by boingyzain · · Score: 2, Funny

      police also recovered 100 kilos of dynamite, 10.5 kilos of RDX explosive, 450 detonators, three AK-56 rifles and a satellite phone.

      They had the satellite phone to make sure they didn't mess the tech support calls, silly.

    3. Re:What is the world coming to? by vranash · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's different from the normal Call Center *HOW*? For another example read all the phone support stuff from BOFH :)

    4. Re:What is the world coming to? by aussie_a · · Score: 1, Redundant

      No, you see. The militants then proceed to take over the call center, giving out bad advice and in general being mean spirite

      How is this different to current tech support?

    5. Re:What is the world coming to? by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Having worked in a couple of call-centres, trust me. Some people really can be this heartless in real-life.

      In my previous job, I had someone pretend to be calling from the hospital with news that the manager's wife was dying in hospital in a bizarre attempt to speak to them. Note sure what they expected.

      Manager: Hi, my wife, how is she?
      Caller: Oh, I was just joking about that so I could speak to you. Now, here are some problems I'd like fixed. Hello?.... Hello?

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    6. Re:What is the world coming to? by dodobh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Support? This is the accounting department, and you are costing us money. By the time we are finished with you, you will owe us money. And don't try to deny it, we have caller id.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    7. Re:What is the world coming to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrorists attacking the world trade center was not funny but this is huh?

    8. Re:What is the world coming to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will there be a security patch for this sort of thing any time soon? I don't want to ragged on by upper management when the network blows up because we didn't have anti-separatist software installed.

    9. Re:What is the world coming to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody died here. It might seem like that shouldn't make a difference, but it always does. If India had lost thousands of people in an attack, I doubt you'd see this reaction.

    10. Re:What is the world coming to? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      See thats why nobody should do business with a bank or stock exchange located in New York. At the rate at which Dubya pisses off new nations every day someone or the other is eventually going to blow up the place. So its high time these banks got outsourced somewhere else.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    11. Re:What is the world coming to? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      2 towers 2 trillion dollars
      4 jet planes 2 billion dollars
      Stupid Slashdot joke on 9-11 Priceless

      See now u r angry. So how is it funny if its happening to someone else?

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    12. Re:What is the world coming to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they expected to prove to themselves that the rude call center jockey was lying through his teeth when he said that the manager wasn't in the office today.

      It seems to have worked. Heartless indeed.

    13. Re:What is the world coming to? by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      He kind of succeeded. He wanted to speak to the manager of the whole place. After being rather shocked at this news, I checked and found that he didn't have a wife.

      Luckily my manager took over and dealt with this piece of human slime.

      It was particularly annoying since he said that "his wife was dying giving birth to his child". Now, my colleague next to me was just getting over his girlfriend having a mis-carriage. If he'd received this call, I dread to think what effect it would have had on him.

      At the time, I'd have paid serious money to break an acid filled pint glass in his face. Gets me angry just thinking about it. Time to have a coffee and a smoke I think.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    14. Re:What is the world coming to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      posted by "ghoul"? Damn dude i thought you were dead...

    15. Re:What is the world coming to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May I be the first to label you heartless asshole. I have a co-worker that is visiting an offshore development firm office in New Delhi as I type this. I was suppose to be the one going too, but had last minute changes. Not funny.

    16. Re:What is the world coming to? by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

      I used to do general support for ... well, doesn't matter, really ... anyway, while resolving some problem, there's these kids crying in the background, your usual whiny-kids-while-youre-on-the-phone problem, so I sort of forgave her general unpleasantness. Then I heard her say "hold on" then yell to them "don't make me get the spoon!" after which I heard this scared little voice say "no mommy we'll be good".

      I wanted to hang up or put her on permanent park (that's hold), but I figured that'd just piss her off and she'd beat the kids harder, so I swallowed my disgust and was as diplomatic as I could be. I hated humanity a little more every day on that job.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    17. Re:What is the world coming to? by dual_boot_brain · · Score: 1

      In this instance the terrorists failed. In the case of the WTC they succeeded (depending on how you classify success). That is the difference. If the WTC attack had been foiled, I have no doubt that there would have been a number of jokes on late-night television about putting all the lawyers/politicians/stock brokers into the towers and let them have another go at it. There might have even been some urban renewal/renovation jokes on Letterman. This is in no way "funny" in a conventional sense. This is, as an earlier poster pointed out, a bit of dark or gallows humor. It is a psychological mechanism for coping. On the other hand, with all of the tech support centers that are in India, the exact monolouge with which you take such umbrage would probably happen. It would also happen if all incoming comlinks were cut.

      --
      There is no reset button in life; however, there are bonus levels.
    18. Re:What is the world coming to? by syrion · · Score: 1

      Because spanking is inherently bad.

    19. Re:What is the world coming to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No it's not. (NSFW)

      Spanking children is pretty sick though.

    20. Re:What is the world coming to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The militants then proceed to take over the call center, giving out bad advice and in general being mean spirited, causing much grief and sorrow.

      Would anyone notice a difference?

    21. Re:What is the world coming to? by AnFraX · · Score: 1

      Making fun of the world is what keeps people from becoming all depressed and sad-like. Perhaps you should go to see a shrink. You sound pretty sad to me.

    22. Re:What is the world coming to? by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      yeah, customer service can make you want to have a shower afterwards.

      I used to go on-site to houses for call-outs. It's amazing how filthy people can allow their houses to be when they know an engineer is coming out.

      I remember one wonderful visit where it was pretty clear that the husband had been beating his wife. While I was downstairs trying to install a device, they were upstairs shouting at each other. I was glad to be out of that house.

      I think you had to do the most difficult thing there in customer service. Try to help someone who is clearly a nasty person.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    23. Re:What is the world coming to? by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      WTF! They brought 250 lbs of high explosives and only three rifles?

      Jesus - next time I spend months praying for something like this, please give me the patience to include technical details in my prayers.

      It's like the metric system, ok?
      Bring 1000 kilos of dynamite, 100 kilos of RDX, 100 men with 100 rifles and 100 bullets apiece.
      And a satellite phone.

      It's ok, we forgive you - but get it right next week.
      Last thing you want is for us to outsource this job to the Chinese, Russians or Israelis.

      Funny thing is that if they had gotten right, they would have caused a MASSIVE ECONOMIC CATASTROPHE to the USA.

      You guys listening? Let me say it again :
      If the bad guys really, really wanted to hurt the USA they would destroy all the tech centers in India.
      The USA would never recover from such economic terrorism - never recover.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    24. Re:What is the world coming to? by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Nobody died here.

      The assulting team lost three men.
      You know how hard it's going to be to replace those three guys, not to mention all that RDX? That stuff was a bitch to procure.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    25. Re:What is the world coming to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there's a difference between smacking with your hand and smacking kids around with kitchen utensils. I suspect she meant a big wooden spoon, not a fucking wendys plastic spoon.

    26. Re:What is the world coming to? by mcmaddog · · Score: 1

      your sig undercuts your message

    27. Re:What is the world coming to? by iocat · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right? I mean, the US should never have recovered from 9/11 -- massive destruction in the heart of our main financial district. I think we could survive the loss of the Indian tech centers.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    28. Re:What is the world coming to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > See now u r angry. So how is it funny if its happening to someone else?

      Why should anyone be angry? AFAIC, there are not enough 9/11 jokes. I remember, shortly after 9/11, when I referred to the destroyed World Trade Center as the "World Trade Crater", several people got pissed off. I have yet to hear a 9/11 joke on SNL (although, to be honest, I don't watch SNL very much any more (except for "Weekend Update" (because Tina Fey is hot!))). Where the hell is your sense of humor, people? So 3000 or so people died. So what? More people die each year on our nation's highways due to automobile accidents, but I never heard people getting all up-in-arms about the old SNL "Toonces the Cat" skits, which usually ended with Toonces the Cat driving a car full of people over a cliff to their firey deaths.

      I mean, how many jokes do you hear about other "national tragedies", like the Space Shuttle exploding on takeoff or breaking up during reentry (Q. What does NASA stand for? A. Need Another Seven Astronauts. Haha, it's as funny for Columbia as it was for Challenger) or the Columbine "Massacre". So why is the 9/11 incident such a sacred cow that people aren't supposed to make jokes about it?

      BTW, I'm not angry about your joke; I just don't think that it was very funny. I thought that the photoshopped picture of the guy on the WTC observation deck with a plane coming toward him in the background was pretty clever, though.

    29. Re:What is the world coming to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You're kidding, right? I mean, the US should never have recovered from 9/11 -- massive destruction in the heart of our main financial district. I think we could survive the loss of the Indian tech centers.

      Oh, yeah, look at what great shape our country is in now, how many more civil liberties we have now than before 9/11, how our troops are here at home instead of rotting in some third-world desert country (no, two countries, forgot about Afghanistan), how our economy is in such great shape that our deficit is as low as it was pre-9/11. Oh, yes, we have recovered splendidly.

    30. Re:What is the world coming to? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      The difference is punk ass callers wont have the guts to make racist comments

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  2. Isn't that a little extreme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't that a little bit of an extreme reaction by the Kashmiris for losing their IT jobs?

    1. Re:Isn't that a little extreme? by Rosyna · · Score: 1

      Depends if Quark was a target or not.

      I know, it's horribly wrong to make a joke about this kind of situation. But I thought the rule was Quark is fodder for anything.

    2. Re:Isn't that a little extreme? by ghoul · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And 9-11 was carried out by bankers who lost their jobs at the WTC? Get real . This is serious stuff . You shouldnt be joking abt it

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    3. Re:Isn't that a little extreme? by bladesjester · · Score: 3, Funny

      "And 9-11 was carried out by bankers who lost their jobs at the WTC? Get real . This is serious stuff . You shouldnt be joking abt it
      --
      **Life is too short to be serious** "

      Now THAT's irony...

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    4. Re:Isn't that a little extreme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it was a bunch of militants belonging to a faction calling itself the "Free Software Foundation". Apparently these companies were developing proprietary software, and that's a bad thing according to this well-known terrorist group.

  3. I bet... by hussain · · Score: 0
    ... that they called up Dell's support, and were just put off by the guy with the thick indian accent.


    but seriously folks, maybe this will make companies think twice about relocating overseas?

    1. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, why did the militants do this? Attacking companies that brings prosperity to the region hardly seems a way to inspire support from the locals or anybody else.


      More proof that terrorism doesn't make sense.

    2. Re:I bet... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For the same reason that Al Qaeda attacked the WTC and Pentagon - to make themselves heard.

      Terrorism is not about sense or economic benefits.

      I'd like to thank the New Delhi police for a job excellently done.

    3. Re:I bet... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Attacking companies that brings prosperity to the region hardly seems a way to inspire support from the locals or anybody else.

      That was the point. Those were Kashmere terrorists blowing up Indian call centers. Al Qaeda was not overly concerned that 911 might be harming NYC's prosperity either, on the contrary!

    4. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The motives of such acts of violence can have many forms. But just labeling it as mindless terrorism is ignoring the larger picture. Know your enemy, Know yourself.

    5. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said:
      I'd like to thank the New Delhi police for a job excellently done.

      I wouldn't!

    6. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Al Qaeda attacked visible symbols of hatred for the fundamentalist Islamic world. These militants wanted to attack software companies that are visible signs of India's prosperity so I don't the parallel or the militants' logic.

      I realize the logic must be very twisted but there had to be some reasoning involved, I mean why not attack BJP offices in Uttar Pradesh?

      I'm not arguing, just curious.

    7. Re:I bet... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

      For one, the BJP is losing power. Also, Bangalore is where a lot of Indian investment is headed. Attacking this would be easiest (New Delhi and Mumbai have large Muslim populations and excellent security).

      In the past, they've tried to attack the Parliament, but failed. I guess they wished to try an economic target this time.

    8. Re:I bet... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have to understand that Kashmiris don't associate themselves all that much with India. They side more with Pakistan, but prefer an independent state, like Nepal.

      The money generated from Bangalore tends to go to other parts of the country, as Kashmir is quite rich on its own. That is why attacking Bangalore's software companies made little difference to the terrorists.

    9. Re:I bet... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

      The Kashmiris want independence, and the Kashmiri terrorist groups are working to this effect with backing with some Pakistani and some Al Qaeda help.

      This is not all too different from the Sikh groups who wanted independence for Punjab in the past.

      I never said it was mindless terrorism, but it is terrorism nonetheless. What is surprising to me is the number of Slashdotters who see this as an opportunity to mock Indian tech support, almost as though this was Fark.com

    10. Re:I bet... by adeydas · · Score: 1

      I agree with you but I don't think Kashmiris want people with AK 47's to rule them. That would be autocracy and not democracy. But they have little to say in a world where might is right.

    11. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, Al Qaeda wasn't really concentrating on hurting NYC's prosperity since they were more focussed on the symbolism of destroying the WTC (I know the companies within the WTC were valuable but the attack was mostly a symbolism thing).
      However it seems that these fundamentalists were primarily concerned with hurting the prosperity of the region by targetting businesses.

      Therefore, I don't understand your comparison between the WTC attacks and these call-centre attacks.

    12. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, I never knew that India had transfer payments between provinces, kinda like Canada does.

      By the way, Nepal isn't too great right now, what with Maoist rebels, coups, and regicide/fraticide.

      But thanks, I learned something about India!

    13. Re:I bet... by mallumax · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kasmhir is a part of India. The way you put it it sounds like Kashmiris are not Indians.If you follow news you will find that the government of Kashmir is elected.Also the majority of Lashkar-e-Toiba members are non kashmiris.Read it here
      BBC Profile of Lashkar-e-Toiba.
      So it is not Kashmiris attacking Indians.Believe it or not most Kashmiris are sick and tired of terrorism.They will rather get on with their life and business.Tourism which was the main source of income for kasmiris declined drastically after the terrorists upped their attacks.
      Lashkar started in Pakistan and has its headquartes in Pakistan and after the US declared it as a terrorist organisation it no longer opeartes publicly in Pakistan.

    14. Re:I bet... by wannabgeek · · Score: 0

      but seriously folks, maybe this will make companies think twice about relocating overseas?

      Yeah, right! They have shut down wall street and all the investment firms etc moved to the west coast after 9/11. Have they?

      --
      I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
    15. Re:I bet... by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      Because the alternative is trying to attack military targets. Which is near impossible when all you have is dynomite and pea shooters.

      Its not like it was when the revolutionary war was fought, you can line up as a civilian and fight the military anymore. So they hit the gov't where it hurts the most, in the pocket book. They lose business's and the tax money from them and their products and citizens and their tax's.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    16. Re:I bet... by afxgrin · · Score: 1

      I thought Kashmir was a heavily disputed part of India and Pakistan, and this has basically been an issue since Pakistan has become an independent state from India?

      Actually, according to the Wiki, China even occupies a large portion of Kashmir ... so to say Kashmir is part of India would be largely misleading and incorrect.

    17. Re:I bet... by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      to make themselves heard.

      If that was their objective, they sure did a lousy job:
      They didn't claim or even admit responsibility. They hardly communicated anything about their wishes or intentions. If the attack had a goal, it was ridiculously vague ('to terrorize the USA into leaving the Middle East alone') and had no chance in hell of succeeding.

      Especially as what little they said made clear they hate the US so much that even pulling out of the Middle East wasn't going to guarantee freedom from being bombed.

      You're right, it's not about sense. It's about blind, consuming hatred.

    18. Re:I bet... by bindster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The nation of India hereby thanks your President and his glorious War on Terror, for giving rise to such short sighted policies as the promotion of Pakistan to MNNA status (Major Non-NATO Ally).
      And by Pakistan, I mean a nuclear armed country which has demonstrated its willingness to proliferate WMD technology, whose intelligence services and military are thoroughly penetrated by Islamic radicals, whose President's life is under constant threat, and whose feigned ignorance of anti-India terror cells is tantamount to tacit support.

      --
      WARNING: DO NOT LET DR. MARIO TOUCH YOUR GENITALS. HE IS NOT A REAL DOCTOR.
    19. Re:I bet... by jalilv · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apparently you don't know the history. Kashmir is of great strategic importance to India, Pakistan and China. Kashmir was an autonomous state after the British rule ended and India & Pakistan were free. Pakistan invaded Kashmir. The King of Kashmir, Maharajah Hari Singh, sought India's help and agreed that Kashmir will merge with India but still have autonomy. Pakistan was defeated and Kashmir became a part of India. Pakistan tried again few years later and was defeated. The Kashmir issue is screwed up because the then Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, to become an international peace hero, agreed in hurry to Simla agreement. Ever since then India has been suffering on Kashmir issue. It is ironic that India won three wars against Pakistan but the outcome was never favourable to India, sigh! India lost a war with China over Kashmir too so there is an on going dispute over the borders with China. Kashmir is, and always was, recognized as a part of India by UN.

      Hope that clears up the confusion a little bit :-)

      - Jalil Vaidya

    20. Re:I bet... by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Whuuaaaa? Or to disuade American ecconomic tampering in the region?

      Most american's think their boss has more power than their government or god. I'm pretty sure that everyone else doesn't want an American boss.

    21. Re:I bet... by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1
      And by Pakistan, I mean a nuclear armed country which has demonstrated its willingness to proliferate WMD technology, whose intelligence services and military are thoroughly penetrated by Islamic radicals, whose President's life is under constant threat, and whose feigned ignorance of anti-India terror cells is tantamount to tacit support.

      India is also a nuclear power, the population far surpasses that of Pakistan. Are you saying you want the US to provide India with security? It seems to me that if Pakistan is such a threat to India, it's in India's best interest to eliminate that threat. I personally would rather that my son and nephew not have to risk their lives for every territorial dispute that comes along. I supported the war in Iraq, we left Saddam in power when I was there. That was a big mistake, we paid for it for 10+ years of deployments to monitor a no fly zone that became "Where shall we drops some bombs today?", while the UN fattened there own and Saddam Husein's wallets with billions made from the oil for food scam .

    22. Re:I bet... by ek-1000-ek · · Score: 1
      Now, I know why they spend so much time with propaganda. Morons like you eat whatever is served.

      1. Only Islamic Kashmiris do not associate themselves with India. Many Muslim do. Also Hindu and Bhuddist (and they are minority) do.

      2. Government spend a huge amount in form of infrastructure, industry, grants, development schemes in that state.

      3. The indian state of Jammu & Kashmir has three big regions. Kashmir is only 1/3rd of the state and gets the BIGGEST chunk of the grants. The state has had no to minimla income since the terror found home. It is indian tax payers who are helping the state sustain itself.

      http://planningcommission.nic.in/popup/jk.htm

      http://indiabudget.nic.in/

      Spend some time at these websites to understand the topic you claim to be expert on!

      --
      where did my sig go? where's my sig at?
    23. Re:I bet... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Terrorism is not about sense or economic benefits.

      Don't forget al Qa'eda planned attacks on Microsoft since its monopoly position puts it in control of such a huge portion of the US economy.

      The real economic damage probably would have come later, when an unpatched vulnerability was exploited.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    24. Re:I bet... by azuredragon23 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the "mistake" Nehru made was agreeing to UN mediation which eventually led to a ruling for holding a plebiscite. It was conditional on Pakistan withdrawing from the territory it had occupied. Since they didn't oblige, India had a reason not to follow through either. Hence the current impasse.

      Shimla agreement came much later (conclusion of Indo-Pak '71 War) where Bhutto and Indira Gandhi hashed out the ceasefire agreement. It basically said that bygones be bygones and the whole matter will be solved by the two parties bilaterally. Indira's "mistake" was not getting more out of Bhutto even though she was the victor in the war. The story Indians are told is that Bhutto literally begged her not to insist on a black&white treaty that made him lose face politically at home. Indira apparently let him go easy since Pakistan already lost Bangladesh as a consequence of the war.

      Quite Messy.

    25. Re:I bet... by Tassach · · Score: 1
      For the same reason that Al Qaeda attacked the WTC and Pentagon - to make themselves heard.
      Silly me, I thought their operational objective was to provoke the US into attacking an Islamic country, thereby gaining them more popular support among hard-line Muslims.

      Looks like they accomplished THOSE objectives perfectly.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    26. Re:I bet... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "1. Only Islamic Kashmiris do not associate themselves with India. Many Muslim do. Also Hindu and Bhuddist (and they are minority) do."

      I don't understand this. I thought Islamic == Muslim??

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    27. Re:I bet... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I thought Kashmir was a really kick ass Led Zeppelin song.....

      If everyone over there 'sparked one up' and listened to that song a few times....doubful that anyone would be very motivated to kill anyone....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    28. Re:I bet... by ek-1000-ek · · Score: 1

      My bad ... read Islamist (generally used to refer to extreme of the muslims)

      --
      where did my sig go? where's my sig at?
    29. Re:I bet... by einhverfr · · Score: 1


      Terrorism is not about sense or economic benefits.


      What makes you say that? The WTC attacks were marketing pure and simple. The idea is not only to cause pain, suffering, and economic damage to your enemies, but to do so in such a way that sympathizers will pay more into your system. This is why providing solutions to the problems raised in terrorist propaganda will be the easiest way to destroy them-- they are only a bunch of common criminals without their marketing....

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    30. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, India isn't very nice either. What about it, a nuclear armed country that has demonstrated its willingness to turn a blind eye to slaughter of Muslims in Gudjarat? What about the BJP, a party of intolerant Hindu fanatics that controlled the government for years? How about the Indian government sitting back and allowing Hindu mobs to destroy the ancient Babri mosque in Ayodhya? A country 'whose feigned ignorance of anti-Muslim hate speech and hate crimes is tantamount to tacit support.'

    31. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, I am sure Bin Laden was hoping that he would lose his warm spot in Afghanistan and IRaq would hold elections , not to mention various other people in Middle Eastern countries protesting en masse in support of Western style self-rule.

      He must be happy like a fucking rabit.

      Ah , you are from Berkley - the same people who happily supported Stalin in his hayday.

    32. Re:I bet... by bindster · · Score: 1
      Disregarding any Oil For Food simiplifications you made, I'm not suggesting that America or anyone else eliminate Pakistan. The problem is that America comes in and throws money at the first guy it thinks is in their corner.

      American support of Pakistan foments an environment wherein Pervez Musharraf becomes even less popular, and unlike in a semi-democracy like India, he will necessarily be removed by force from office in a regime change. Probably by somebody worse, maybe an Islamic radical. Who then has access to nuclear weapons and American dollars. And depending on future arms acquisitions, American F-16s. Interestingly enough, the same thing happened in Iran, when the US sold a squad of F-14 Tomcats to the Shah pretty much the same month that he was ousted. (Thanks, History Channel!)

      --
      WARNING: DO NOT LET DR. MARIO TOUCH YOUR GENITALS. HE IS NOT A REAL DOCTOR.
  4. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..are they sure they weren't just a group of methamphetamine addicts looking to either score a bunch of materials or they cooked up a hair-brained hostage-for-$$$ scheme?

    It's hard to differentiate blind zealotry from drug-riddled score-seeking sometimes.

    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had RDX and AK47s. That's not easy to obtain in India, unlike some other countries I can think of. Drug addicts? I think not.

  5. And then the terrarists get my credit card info... by ABeowulfCluster · · Score: 1, Troll

    Can you say Identity Theft?

  6. I bet not by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1, Troll
    Why?

    There are many call centre operations in India or whereever. If a few get blown up it takes only seconds to divert the call to a new building and a couple of days to say "Check the power cord and reboot".

    At the end of the day, Dell (or whomever) don't really care about the quality of the tech support much (and tech support quality is pretty hard to measure). Where there's a buck to be saved, save it!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:I bet not by NullAndVoid · · Score: 1

      Troll or moron? Do you think that 9/11 was no big deal, because they only got 4 planes and 3 buildings out of the thousands available in the US? I don't think their goal was to hamper Dell's technical support operations.

      --


      -- Sigs are for losers
    2. Re:I bet not by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      You've somehow succeeded in reducing buildings full of people to the same level of importance as a backup electricity generator.

      I doubt that the companies there have a big network of redundant call centres ready in case of terrorist attacks.

      Regarding companies not caring about the quality of support may be right in some cases but not all. Setting up a new call centre is not a trivial matter. Two days would be unrealistic unless you're looking at a tiny non-technical desk.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    3. Re:I bet not by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Rumor has it, Dell will be getting rid of free software tech support all togeather. If you want support, you have to pay for it.

      The idea behind this is to lower the cost of the computers to a level that is more of a disposable rather then an investment. Being that hardware is getting cheaper and cheaper, if something goes wrong with the software you just buy a whole new PC for 200 bucks.

      Welcome to the new and improved disposable society.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:I bet not by net_bh · · Score: 1
      I guess it doesn't matter to you that there are people who work in these 'operations'.

      How about suggesting this to the rest of the Americans - "Don't make a big deal about a loss of a few soldiers in Iraq - there are thousands more waiting in the reserves. It takes only a few days to get them to Iraq."

      Ironic? Racist?

      --
      There is no patch for stupidity

      Visit my blog

  7. How they got caught by TelJanin · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Abdul! I tried to call tech support for the explosives, but all I got was one of those damn foreign Americans! Bloody outsourcing!"

    1. Re:How they got caught by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Abdul isn't a very Indian name... India != the Middle East...

  8. Attacking a major software company! Great! by bcmm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, wait. Physically attacking a software company? Where's the fun in that?

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    1. Re: Attacking a major software company! Great! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Oh, wait. Physically attacking a software company? Where's the fun in that?

      Maybe they got bored with playing in easy mode.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Attacking a major software company! Great! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah...if the Islamic suicide bombers had reached their targets, killing large numbers of people, surely Kashmir would have become independent immediately!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Attacking a major software company! Great! by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      It's an easy target. Using hardware against people who only know how to react to software. They're defenseless.

    4. Re:Attacking a major software company! Great! by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Oh, wait. Physically attacking a software company? Where's the fun in that?

      Indeed!

      I, for one, welcome our new mind flayer overlords.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    5. Re:Attacking a major software company! Great! by killjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you have a small decentralized and poor army attacking hardened military targets would be useless execize. For terrorists it just makes sense to attack civillian economic targets. If anything it causes even more damage and of course increases the amount of terror. As a bonus it also forces undustry to implement extra security measures which increases their costs and erodes their competitiveness.

      The idea is to weaken the entire country and hurt/scare the general population who will eventually give in. I say eventually because terrorists are usually thinking in timespans that take generations.

      Whether it works or not is debatable. Terrorism was a key component of the establishment of Israel as a state. It also worked in Afghanistan against russia. In other places the record is spotty at best.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    6. Re:Attacking a major software company! Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right! That's what happened after 9/11 !!!

    7. Re:Attacking a major software company! Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrorism was a key component of the establishment of Israel as a state. It also worked in Afghanistan against russia.

      In both cases "terrorism" had nothing to do with it.

      The Afghan resistance used Stinger missiles to shoot down russian military aircraft, and sharpshooters and other methods to take out Russian tanks. They attacked military targets. They won by not giving up and wearing down the will of the opposition. Standard by-the-book military strategy.

      Israel was created at the point of a (UN/American) gun. There were no random bombings with the intent of swaying public opinion, they simply pointed a gun at people and said "move".

      Were terroristic atrocities committed in both cases? Yes. But in neither case was terrorism the deciding factor, military power was.

    8. Re:Attacking a major software company! Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ummm ...
      Not familiar with the King David Hotel, are we?

    9. Re:Attacking a major software company! Great! by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Numerous mosques were bombed during the reign of Begin.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    10. Re:Attacking a major software company! Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      king david attack was made by zionists, hitting even jews! you could find historical evidence in historian tom segev's "the 7th million".
      those are transcripts from the mapaalim's archive, for those who know...

    11. Re:Attacking a major software company! Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also worked in Afghanistan against russia.

      I believe it made a cameo(sp) appearance in the American revolution, also.

    12. Re:Attacking a major software company! Great! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The Continental Army made a habit of attacking civilian targets with no military value? When was this?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    13. Re:Attacking a major software company! Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure they had the same value as the schools and hospitals that your average "regular" gov't bombs by "accident" today. What's our excuse? Oh, yeah. The civilians were harboring "terrorists", or military hardware. Yeah, that's it... Killing is wrong. It doesn't matter in the least who does it, or why. It's murder.

    14. Re:Attacking a major software company! Great! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Huh? Did that have a point of any kind? General Washington, hello?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  9. The quantities of explosives is quite unbelievable by tabkey12 · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I'm amazed that they need 100kg Dynamite to attack a few software companies - surely they must have had other plans?

    And why are software companies so important as opposed to centres of government to these terrorists?

  10. i guess this just shows... by bani · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...islamic militants are just as frustrated with tech support as the rest of us!

    many a time i wanted to throttle the fool on the other end of the phone in bangalore...

    1. Re:i guess this just shows... by wannabgeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      many a time i wanted to throttle the fool on the other end of the phone in bangalore...

      I guess you are not a member of open source community. In our community it is always the user who is the fool!

      --
      I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
    2. Re:i guess this just shows... by astra1111 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      if u were so smart u would not need tech support ... there are morons who call and say modems not working.. and the reason being they dont switch it on damn idiots....

    3. Re:i guess this just shows... by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is that only fools use open source?

      Point taken.

  11. Re: Oh, please. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Informative


    > Militants? Militant whats? Militant Communists? Militant Republicans? Militant Anti-Caste activists? Militant Hindu Nationalists? Militant Islamists? Militant Christian Doomsday Fundamentalists? Militant Hello Kitty Fans?

    > Just saying 'militants' is ignorant reporting.

    Perhaps it's militant dislexics who missed the word 'Wahabi' in the overview.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  12. ... I disagree with the tactics used here but ... by Truth_Quark · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Surely an independent Kashmir is a damn fine solution to the bloody tug-of-war that India and Pakistan have been playing for the last 57 years.

    Just do it. It's got to be cheaper than the fisticuffs.

    Another brilliant post by Truth Quark! 60 years of conflict suddenly resolved!
    Now, about Palestine ...

  13. Re:Oh, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    it did say Wahabi which is a fundamental and usually radical form of islam

  14. ...and a satellite phone by lo0ol · · Score: 1

    You know, they're probably just /. readers who happened to read this story and decided they better include a phone in the attack. It's a bit deadlier that way.

  15. With my luck, I would have to file the bug report. by IvyMike · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bug 133925: Primary source code archives at Bangalore outsourcing site destroyed by Lashkar-e-Toiba militants.
    Priority: Critical/Stopper

  16. Re:Oh, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "One of these days, we'll have intelligent reporting that doesn't treat the readers like scared, reactionary six year olds."

    yeah, you would think that the .co.uk sites wouldnt aim for american readers as their primary target audience.

  17. ...wow by Tethys_was_taken · · Score: 5, Insightful

    11 of 25 posts so far have been about Call centres and outsourcing.

    I know most of it is humour (of some sort), but don't you think this is being just a bit insensitive? Mod me down if you must, but there must be a limit to self-centredness, even for Americans.

    </karma-suicide>

    1. Re:...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I'm not American, but shitty call centres blowing up was the first thing the occurred to me as well. Just the way my brain is wired, I guess.

    2. Re:...wow by quarkscat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The correct term is "gallows humor". Apparently you missed the /. memo regarding the recommended 2nd degree for a Comp-Sci student: plumbing -- because it is one profession that will not quickly be offshore outsourced. That said, there is some "strategic" advantage to having a US-based call center, after all, like not having a swarm of Wahabist militants running around with explosives (, at least not yet).

      I wouldn't call it "a bit insensitive" if some of these MBA "salary and bonus-whores" running American corporations that are doing so much offshore outsourcing had THEIR jobs outsourced too. Imagine! - an Indian or Chinese CEO of an American company that was compensated at 6 - 10% of what their American counterpart demanded, and liked it! I would find such a situation deliciously ironic instead of "a bit insensitive".

      Instead, the USA actively promotes the "Peter Principle". How else to explain Carley Fiorina getting $45 Million USD in compensation after leaving HP in such a shambles? I understand that Fiorina is lined up for a sweet job in Dubya's regime (instead of a prolonged visit to Camp XRay for sabatoging a good chunk of American technological prowness).

    3. Re:...wow by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really, only Americans have suffered at the hands of outsourcing in India? What about all those poor Europeans and Asians that have also suffered from Indian outsourcing? I know, another chance to bash America for something that has nothing to do with America. Damn intolerant bastards.

    4. Re:...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Why is it when someone posts something and adds "Karma suicide ", or i will take the karma hit , It instantly gets moded right up to +5

      To go back on topic , humour is a way that humans deal with fear or tragedy , so its not insensitive , it shows feelings

    5. Re:...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An interesting fact: our company is considering off-shoring to the US because the dollar is performing so badly and US workers accept such bad employment conditions. Off-shore contracts don't look so bad now, eh?

    6. Re:...wow by 1u3hr · · Score: 2
      The correct term is "gallows humor".

      No, "gallows humour" refers to making jokes about your own situation. when you make "jokes" about other people being killed, it's called "being an insensitive self-centred ignorant prick".

      The same thing happens every time there is some disaster not affecting Americans, eg, the bushfire in Canberra last year. Woe betide anyone who made jokes about the WTC bombing on the day it happened, but foreigners are fodder for jokes before they're cold in their graves.

    7. Re:...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The effect of this is two-fold:
      • It implies that you have karma to burn. This leads people to believe that you are, by and large, a "good" poster that has earned a good bit of karma.
      • People inherently dislike going against crowd opinion, so modding you up is a safe bet.
      • It shows that you're not afraid to "tell it like it is", even at the cost of your precious karma. Moderators eat this shit up.
    8. Re:...wow by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      No, "gallows humour" refers to making jokes about your own situation. when you make "jokes" about other people being killed, it's called "being an insensitive self-centred ignorant prick".
      How dare you call me ignorant!
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    9. Re:...wow by 1lus10n · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      First off nobody died. Second get off your high horse. These people are making light of our reaction to a possible problem in a region that is supposed to be supplying the replacements for us all. Yeah, sorry if them not having their shit together and us letting them know it offends you. Blow it out your ass.

      Your right we were pissed off about people dancing in the fucking streets about 9/11, I wonder if you were talking to the happy arabs when that happened ? Perhaps you were going doctor phil on them and explaining how insensitive they were being, its a fucking wonder you didnt get your head chopped off.

      Now please explain to me about how a failed attempt at terrorism is anywhere near the level of the worst terrorist action in history ? Then explain to me how your equating those two things is any less insensitive than people joking about call centre's and indian terrorists.

      While your at it perhaps you could explain to me how this is any different than some americans finding humor in the constantly flooded/mud-slided/wild fire/hurricane/snowed on areas of the country ? Or did you miss the fact that we also mock/tease ourselves ?

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    10. Re:...wow by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Now please explain to me about how a failed attempt at terrorism is anywhere near the level of the worst terrorist action in history ?

      Illustrating my point. Terrorism against Americans is the worst thing in history. Against third-worlders, it's just a straight line.

      Have a look at the posts her after the tsunami. Quarter of a million killed. Lots of remarks about how "they" deserved it for stealing American jobs.

      Or did you miss the fact that we also mock/tease ourselves?

      I didn't say you were assholes all the time. Some of my best friends are American.

    11. Re:...wow by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1, Funny
      I know most of it is humour (of some sort), but don't you think this is being just a bit insensitive? Mod me down if you must, but there must be a limit to self-centredness, even for Americans.

      Look, I know exactly two things about Indians: They stole our tech jobs and they constantly try to screw over hard working gambling-addicted Americans by building casinos on their reservations.

    12. Re:...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo, the biggest terrorist act in the world is Iraq.
      When will George be brought to justice?

    13. Re:...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Illustrating my point. Terrorism against Americans is the worst thing in history. Against third-worlders, it's just a straight line.


      Yes, since you're on an "American" (US) site with an "American" majority of posters you can expect a bit of bias. Go back to Albonia you fucking ditch digger and log onto whatever 28k dialup horseshit you're using over there (though anymore you're probably having trouble getting potable drinking water yet manage to have 100 MB/s fiber to your doorstep) to message folks on your local equivalent to slashdot if you don't like it.

      Have a look at the posts her after the tsunami. Quarter of a million killed. Lots of remarks about how "they" deserved it for stealing American jobs.


      After seeing a post-9/11 interview with some so-called middle class families in Indonesia who said we had it coming, I'll make jokes about whatever I goddamned well please. Same goes for the lefties in Europe.

      I didn't say you were assholes all the time. Some of my best friends are American.


      No accounting for taste on their part.
    14. Re:...wow by quarkscat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's pretty hard to equate 3,000 American lives lost, 2 skyscapers and 4 commercial aircraft at the hands of Wahabist terrorists (and a government or two on the sly) with a natural disaster that killed 150,000 people and destroyed the lives and livihoods of millions. (Unless, of course, you are one of these dipshits that thinks the USA somehow caused that earthquake and tsunami.)

      I haven't seen anyone anywhere laughing about the massive loss of life from the tsunami -- but I have seen plenty of people laughing and cheering about 9-11-2001, and how America deserved it. Just like I saw thousands of Palestinians cheering over the invasion, pillaging, and destruction of Kuwait when Saddam Hussein invaded there.

      No doubt you are one of those rabid anti-American bleeding heart "new world order" socialists that will look for anything to help them hate Americans. It was one of our presidents, with a lot of blood and treasure expended, that liberated Kuwait from Saddam's stormtroopers. And it was the USA that has been johnny-on-the-spot to help the victims of the tsunami. And with more aid pouring in over there every day from Americans who may not have their jobs in six months.

      In case you don't "get it", Americans make jokes about some of the worst things that happen to us, including earthquakes, mudslides, massive forest fires, and even 9-11-2001. It is one of the ways that we help to deal with these problems. So a few jokes about a failed terrorist attack against some Indian IT call center isn't so far out of line, except to some cheeky bastard like you.

    15. Re:...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > there must be a limit to self-centredness, even for Americans.

      Nope!

    16. Re:...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I haven't seen anyone anywhere laughing about the massive loss of life from the tsunami

      I saw a bunch of posts here doing exactly that on 26th December.

      In case you don't "get it", Americans make jokes about some of the worst things that happen to us,

      I said it before: making jokes about bad things that happen to your own people is at worst, bad taste. Making jokes about others' misfortune is gross insensitivity. But since 911, Americans think they have a licence to piss on the rest of the world.

      have seen plenty of people laughing and cheering about 9-11-2001

      Take it out on bin Laden. Not at other victims of terrorism.

      I'm posting AC, as I'm done with this.

    17. Re:...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      After seeing a post-9/11 interview with some so-called middle class families in Indonesia who said we had it coming, I'll make jokes about whatever I goddamned well please. Same goes for the lefties in Europe.

      you DID have it coming, and I'd expect more if I were you. The USA response was to use it for propaganda to justify the invasion of Iraq. That resulted in the death of over 15,000 INNOCENT civilians. No one is even counting the dead militants or Iraqi males caught in the crossfire.

      So, 9-11 was around 3,000 innocent lives snuffed out. I'd say you were due another four of them. Unless there is some reason for you to assume that US lives are worth five foreigners?

    18. Re:...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually laughed my ass off about both the tsunami and the 9-11 attack and I'm an american. The 2 things are totally unrelated though other than the fact that people died. One was a mass murder, the other happened by act of god because people wanted to live/vacation near the ocean knowing full well that the ocean can kill you very easily. I live a mile from the ocean myself and if/when I die from a tsunami or any other ocean related death, I'll be laughing at myself too. But anyone who wants to compare a natural event with a mass murder is a fucking moron. Now if you want to compare 9/11 with the US invading Iraq, thats fine but, in Iraq at least 99% of the people dying are choosing to die. The minute you decide to take hostile actions whether you or anyone else believe its morally correct, you're saying that you would rather die than have whatever your hostile action is preventing happen.

    19. Re:...wow by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Far larger quantities of Tsunami aid were given by other nations. For example, Australia gave $700M, Germany something close to that.

      As a nation of charitable givers, the US is far outranked by others, for example, Norway.

    20. Re:...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about all those poor Europeans and Asians that have also suffered from Indian outsourcing?

      Eh? Suffered? Get a grip on life, man

    21. Re:...wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but, in Iraq at least 99% of the people dying are choosing to die

      If they weren't dead, I imagine thousands of Iraqi civilians would disagree with you.

    22. Re:...wow by ashayh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Liberated Kuwait ?

      How is it liberation when half the population STILL cannot vote ? (I admit Saudi is far far worse)

      How is Saddams tyranny on his people, and on Kuwait in 1991 any worse than atrocties on Saudi women, who cant drive, vote, travel alone, get married at age 12 , get no education or jobs etc etc.

      My only complaint is that Saudi and Kuwait were and are a better target for 'liberation' of any kind. What explanation do you have for this blind eye by the US AND by others? Couldnt be oil now could it ?

    23. Re:...wow by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You're right about people's insensitivity when making mean jokes about others' misfortunes. But realize that "gallows humor" can target anyone's misfortune:

      "Humorous treatment of a grave or dire situation".

      BTW, Americans are far from unique in our double standard of insensitivity.

      ""Tragedy is when I cut my finger. Comedy is when you walk into an open sewer and die." - Mel Brooks

      And then there's the German "schadenfreude": delight in another person's misfortune.

      Unfortunately for human harmony, insensitive self-centered ignorant pricks are often funny - if not to the victim.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    24. Re:...wow by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      "Humorous treatment of a grave or dire situation".

      I did see that in most dictionary defnitions. Nevertheless; I do think it should refer to jokes about misfortunes affecting you and your own group. Like soldiers going into battle. Otherwise it is just schadenfreude, as you said. It's somewhat like racial jokes: there's a difference between how, say, Richard Prior can use certain terms, and a white comedian making the same joke would find a hostile reaction.

      BTW, Americans are far from unique in our double standard of insensitivity.

      Sure -- but it's reached new heights when they sneer at others' misfortunes, and then get offended if anyone complains, saying you have no sense of humour. Then they get even more offended if you then make a joke about something sensitive to them.

    25. Re:...wow by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You don't like some kinds of gallows humor (not surprising, given its ironic - even oxymoronic - composition). You might want to change the familiar definition, because you don't like the phenomenon. But that won't change how people act. To the contrary, it would merely repress the transgression, making it harder to deal with when it's inappropriate.

      How is it that you are so familiar with Americans? If you don't live here, perhaps your comparisons among nationals is influenced by the appearance of Americans as characters on TV, and the relative absence of other nationals on TV?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    26. Re:...wow by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      But that won't change how people act

      No, but that doesn't make it any easier to accept.

      How is it that you are so familiar with Americans?

      You pretty much dominate the cultural landscape. And most of those I interact with online are American. But I do know a few in real life, I work for one now (a good guy, as opposed to another I took to court for not paying my salary). I had an American girlfriend once, long ago. I know the difference between the Hollywood image and the reality.

  18. Re:The quantities of explosives is quite unbelieva by NullAndVoid · · Score: 1

    Maybe economics are involved somehow? Is the software/IT industry very important to India?

    -- BTW, I've been living in a cave for the past 10 years

    --


    -- Sigs are for losers
  19. what if they had managed to attack.... by Gopal.V · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The point of terrorism is exactly that - terror !. Once people are afraid, they have essentially achieved their target. These people are not just "militants" - but terrorists.

    Indian software industry is obsessed with Information security that it often does not expect an attack with a car bomb in the parking under ground. And Bangalore is a cosmopolitan city full of all kinds of people. You won't be watched by the entire crowd because you have a 3 inch beard.

    Security is an illusion - but it is a precious illusion for those who keep it.

    1. Re:what if they had managed to attack.... by rsidd · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but Bangalore -- and the south generally -- hasn't really dealt with terrorism, unlike Delhi which has had high security everywhere since the early 1980s at least. Most places in Bangalore (or Chennai or other southern cities) aren't equipped to deal with terrorist threats.

    2. Re: what if they had managed to attack.... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > And Bangalore is a cosmopolitan city full of all kinds of people. You won't be watched by the entire crowd because you have a 3 inch beard.

      Take UNIX gurus in stride, do they?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:what if they had managed to attack.... by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      Just for the sake of argument whats the difference between a terrorist and a person who is fighting for their freedom ?

      This action and those like it are very similar to the actions taken by the people who helped build this country. Surely they did not bomb places of work, but its not exactly like throwing stones at a tank is the same as throwing them at a british soldier who has a single shot muskett.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    4. Re: what if they had managed to attack.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stallman has been to Bangalore several times

    5. Re:what if they had managed to attack.... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      One deliberately attacks civilians for gain, the other does not.

      They are not remotely similar, however much 'spin' you want to put on them.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:what if they had managed to attack.... by j+h+woodyatt · · Score: 1

      Gopal.V writes: The point of terrorism is exactly that - terror !. Once people are afraid, they have essentially achieved their target. These people are not just "militants" - but terrorists.

      Um, no. Once people are terrorized, the terrorist is only beginning to get started. This is one of the most pernicious and dangerous myths about terrorism. (I blame the Americans for propagating it.)

      The point of terrorism is to soften up the civilian population and force them to choose between joining either the insurgency or the counter-insurgency. It works as well as it does because civilian-friendly counter-insurgency is so much more expensive than guerilla terrorism.

      It's nearly impossible to completely wipe out a terrorist insurgency by force. The only way to stop one is to get an overwhelming supermajority of the civilian population, i.e. around 95 to 98 percent of them, to stop providing cover for the terrorists and start insisting that they cease operations.

      The problem is that civilian populations usually have to be coerced into mobilizing for that kind of effort, and that only helps further the cause of the insurgency.

      --
      jhw
  20. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Gosh no! That would amount to ... APARTHEID!!!

    (Just some bastard writing from South Africa...)

  21. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by matria · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, would the independent Kashmir be based upon a policy of the total destruction of the nation of India, the elimination of all ethnic Indians from the peninsula and the destruction of all ancient Indian holy sites?

    Now, about Palestine...

  22. Re:Oh, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > One of these days, we'll have intelligent reporting that doesn't treat
    > the readers like scared, reactionary six year olds.

    Maybe one of these days we'll have readers with an attention span that lets them read past the first line in the article. You can't expect us to believe you're a big fan of critical thinking if you don't read as far as the second sentence: Indian police claim the men were members of Lashkar-e-Toiba - a Wahabi militant group fighting for an independent Kashmir.

    I knew attention spans were getting short, but ... wow. If you don't want to be treated as reactionary, then don't react after reading just a headline.

  23. Re:Oh, please. by adeydas · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lashkar-e-Toiba is a millitant group connected with Al-Qiada and wishes to 'free' Kashmir. They are Muslim Islamists and believes that they are in jihad with almost everybody except them. Talk about ignorance!

  24. Gee, Officer Krupke by Detritus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The article does say that they were members of Lashkar-e-Toiba.

    Would you prefer that we called them disaffected individuals with poor impulse control?

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  25. Need new error codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    308 Web server under fire ..
    507 Web server burning ..
    but at least there is one in place already
    410 Gone

  26. Here you go. by carlmenezes · · Score: 2, Informative

    The "Militants" were a group called the LeT - Lashkar-e-Taiba

    Here's some more background on them. Looks like they're tied into the infamous Al-Qaida too.

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  27. Re:And then the terrarists get my credit card info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The root of the problem is that you have an identity to steal.
    -AC

  28. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yep, that along with a united Ireland and peace between Palestine and Israel. For some reason, some people don't see it that clearly.

    --
    -- Using the preview button since 2005
  29. Re:With my luck, I would have to file the bug repo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Please describe how to reproduce; thanks.

  30. I'm surprised it took this long. by ttys00 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When work is outsourced to countries that are not very stable, or have terrorism problems, or civil wars, it makes portions of that country wealthy. Those wealthy portions become a target for the local Bad People, simply because it will hurt their enemies more than bombing the poor portions.

    1. Re:I'm surprised it took this long. by the_shaitan · · Score: 1

      India is very 'stable' (economically and politically). It does not have or ever had 'civil wars'. Yes, it does have 'terrorism problems' - but as a VICTIM of it - just like the US claims it does.

      So... what's your point exactly? Do you want to stop all work in New York as well?

      Regards, Shaitan

    2. Re:I'm surprised it took this long. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! how twisted an argument can get!

      Next thing you know - you will probably blame WW 3 (whenever that happens) on outsourcing.

      It just shows how little you know about the problem. First of all, they are not _local_ Bad people. They are insurgents, and the term is much much more valid wrt these people than the ones fighting against occupying forces in Iraq.

      If you think about it, your argument applies much more to the Indonesian bombings or Palestinian bombings than this. There the difference in wealth and lifestyle are totally obvious and next to each other.

    3. Re:I'm surprised it took this long. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When work is outsourced to countries that are not very stable, or have terrorism problems, or civil wars, it makes portions of that country wealthy. Those wealthy portions become a target for the local Bad People, simply because it will hurt their enemies more than bombing the poor portions.

      The local 'Bad People' - what marvellous insight, I'm glad you shared your extensive knowledge of this region of the world with us. I imagine it has more to do with the Kashmir conflict than IT work being outsourced to India, do you even know where Kashmir is?

    4. Re:I'm surprised it took this long. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      India is very 'stable' (economically and politically). It does not have or ever had 'civil wars'. Yes, it does have 'terrorism problems' - but as a VICTIM of it - just like the US claims it does.


      I'll tell you what the problem is, it's that India and Pakistan have none of the maturity in dealing with one another with respect to nuclear weapons as exemplified by the Russia vs US (or USSR vs NATO if you prefer) relationship. Your early warning systems suck. Just wait till Musharraff gets whacked.. do you think the US will be the only target of those Pakistani nukes? Think again.

      Every company that outsources from the first world to your neck of the woods literally has to run the numbers with respect to potential indemnification in the event of a nuclear exchange.
    5. Re:I'm surprised it took this long. by parcifal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just wish that people check on their facts before posting. In spite of having a very diverse culture (made up of a number of major religions) and having people of different economic strata, India remains as stable as any developed country, contrary to what the parent says. India has withstood terrorist attempts along its border with much more resilience and probity with more freedom to its citizens then the US which basically is on the path to curtailing all freedoms for its citizens, all in the name of freedom. India is a breath of fresh air compared to what the US is becoming.

    6. Re:I'm surprised it took this long. by Sanga · · Score: 1

      If you read the article, it is not the local bad people that are behind this planning. It is the Bad people from across the border -- the same guys that US considers its right arm in the war against terror.

      Work is outsourced; terrorism is also outsourced -- it is like moving conflict to a screen further away.

    7. Re:I'm surprised it took this long. by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Good man Shaitan, well said! The US has outsourced to Ireland (both ROI & NI) for years and terrorism wasn't an issue.

    8. Re:I'm surprised it took this long. by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Curious here... isn't "Shaitan" Arabic for Satan, literally translated? Is it also true that "Shaitan" is conceptually more of a mischief-maker than the western idea of Satan? I read all of this somewhere once and it seemed bogus to me. It made it sound as if "Death to the Great Satan" wasn't such a bad sentiment after all...

  31. Re:Oh, please. by Rakishi · · Score: 1, Troll

    How the fuck can you talk about "critical thinking" when you don't even read the damn article?

  32. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by johansalk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I second this. Kashmiris never wanted to be part of India and the intervention of the Indian army has caused atrocities there that only made their feelings worse. Let the people have their freedom and decide their own future.

  33. Can't get my schadenfreude on. by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You know, India has stolen a lot of US jobs. It seems that most of the call centers employ people who can't speak (or understand) English very well at all -- and yet they're perfectly willing to take a contact doing phone support for Americans! But despite that, I find I have two feelings about India:

    1. I am more upset with the Americans who ship jobs overseas than I am with the Indians who just want to make a living.
    2. I do not like the idea of people dying, even if they are in worldwide competition with us for jobs.

    I hope this kind of terrorism is caught each and every time, in every country.

    1. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      India hasn't stolen the jobs, US companies have shipped them there. And US tax loopholes have helped them do it too. Believe me, if it wasn't India, they would have found somewhere else that would have taken the jobs.

      But those are the joys of capitalism and the global economy. Funny thing though, when it was blue collar jobs that were being shipped elsewhere no one really gave two hoots (when was the last time you bought clothes that were 100 percent made in the US, with US-sourced materials?), but now it's white collar jobs it's suddenly some sort of travesty.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by rathehun · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What!

      I do not like the idea of people dying, even if they are in worldwide competition with us for jobs.

      (emphasis is mine)

      What has the world come too, where we have to qualify that we don't like the idea of people dying - EVEN IF THEY ARE IN COMPETITION WITH US FOR JOBS!

      I'm hardly a peace-loving, tree-huggin vegan. But this kind of stuff really makes me think that capitalism has really made a wrong turn somewhere. That and our values of course, but, I'm on slightly more shaky ground there.

    3. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by wannabgeek · · Score: 0

      Funny how people are upset with globalization when it is their job that is on the line. It was all fine as long as they simply get to sell their products the world over and win (with superior quality/price ratio - I'm not complaining about that). But when someone is able to sell services with the same USP - better value for money - you cry murder. You will be ignored just the same way - all the anti-globalization folks in small countries were ignored when they protested against opening up of markets to the world. Rightly so.

      But I guess this is /. and probably I will be modded troll while you are modded insightful.

      --
      I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
    4. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by reachbach · · Score: 1

      Excellent point anthony. Those lunatic terrorosits MUST get caught & be brainwashed (if that is possible)every single time. It's human life that's at stake. You need peace to talk science & technology. Social security & well being comes. You can later fight & debate about who's stealing whose jobs.
      btw, people in the us don't realize that, by outsourcing, it's the american companies that are making bigger bucks and bigger profits. => the richer corporates are getting richer & the average tech worker is out on the road on his ass. Absolute,extreme capitalism. The kind that dubyaman promotes. Americans have only themselves to blame for their current state and for voting such nepotists to power. They're solely responsible for the economic unrest & imbalance that the american society is winessing. And how did Mr.Dubya manage to come back to power?Through his doomsday prophecies and by painting bizzare pictures of victory over evil in Iraq. And how many american mothers have lost their sons in the process? Can you even count? And who's benefitting from all this? (Ever heard of halliburton?) Root out the evils in your own land before you ridicule people of another country trying to make a living. You can then compete on an even keel.

    5. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by rjha94 · · Score: 1

      First observation : I dont know what is slashdot now-a-days! is it some kind of call-center-bashing forum ? Most of the people are anyway posting off-topic, so let me add to the dirt.

      1)
      first fact about Business - It is blind/impartial to nationality, cast,creed,gender and rants. Business goes where it sees fit. It does not matter whether it operates in America/India/Timbaktu. it sees and seeks profit. And in a sense business is visionary. who would have thought about moving to india 10 yrs back ? Face it, people making those decisions are smarter and rich !! too.

      2) Most of the people "ranting" about "stupid" call-center jobs today are the kind of people who were in such jobs, lost it to better competition and are now just jealous, thinking w/o head. If you are so smart, i am sure outsourcing of a low-end call-center job should not hurt you. people on slashdot just create funny signatures, use words like troll, mods and think they have become geek , with some kind of halo around theit head.

      3) Do not comment on kashmir issue w/o knowing about it. It is very easy to open your mouth and say whatever you like. It is not for nothing that a proxy war has been going on for almost 20 yrs now, so many people dead. People are not playing games here. its an involved and complex issue.

      4)
      This is a sensitive issue and saying create an independent kashmir may not be the solution. it is not that indians and pakistanis hate each other or anything like that. But how can you concede some part of a country just because some morons with slashdot login think like that.

      5) I think americans get too much w/o doing anything. They should move around the world to actually realize that fact. with your kind of talent, If you were born in india, probably you would not even finish high school.

      6) Militants want to target software companies because they symbolize the "new and confident" face of india.

      7) when indian economy was opened up in 1992, there were talks that soon all the indian would be w/o jobs and then there were re-assurance talks that in an open economy the best always wins! The fact that it has happened the other way round just goes on to show who is better!

      I am ready for more mud-slinging

      --
      No .sig
    6. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      You know, India has stolen a lot of US jobs.

      It was AMERICAN CEOs who chose to outsource nad are doing it more every day. The Indians simply took the work offered. To call it stealing is just stupid xenophobia. Place the blame where it belongs. If not India, it would have been some other country; Pakistan, Philippines, Russia, Poland, etc.

    7. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf? try a remedial reading comprehension class. the guy wrote that "I am more upset with the Americans who ship jobs overseas" and you go on to say "it was AMERICAN CEOS." well duh. mod redundant for you.

    8. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just how the hell do you think it's _YOUR_ job?? Were you born so entitled???? Arrogance and Entitlement - American all over. Moron.

    9. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by artifex2004 · · Score: 1
      Funny thing though, when it was blue collar jobs that were being shipped elsewhere no one really gave two hoots (when was the last time you bought clothes that were 100 percent made in the US, with US-sourced materials?),


      Actually, a lot of people did and do care, but being blue collar workers, the concerns usually get dismissed as the usual union troublemaking. :)

      PBS' Frontline had an excellent show about how bog-box discount stores, Wal-Mart in particular, are affecting the economy, by buying everything overseas.

    10. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      White collar jobs being shipped overseas made the recent Presidential debates, with John Kerry raising the issue as a major concern. Blue collar jobs being shipped overseas rarely have the same impact, except when it suits politicians' purposes to play the patriotism card.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    11. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by 1lus10n · · Score: 4, Informative

      Really ? Perhaps you just lived in a non affected area when the blue collar jobs were leaving. I happened to have lived in an area where 15% of the population was supported by 3 factories, when those factories were going to be shut down all hell broke lose. The govenor of NY at the time (Cumo) showed up, even though our town had only ~20k people in it. Why ? Because it was a hot button issue.

      Of course there is also the fact that when the blue collar jobs went away there were newer easier jobs to take their place. What exactly is replacing the white collar jobs ?

      People worry when it effects them. The presidential campaigns hardly touched this issue even though some media outlets thought it would decide the election. Why wasnt it a major issue ? Because the average american has not yet felt the heat, only the tech sector and the aformentioned blue collar sector have had to feel the full brunt of this issue. This will be a much larger issue in the next two elections as china enters the fray and management level jobs start getting shipped out.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    12. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      but now it's white collar jobs it's suddenly some sort of travesty.

      That's because blue collars sent their kids to school to become engineers so that they wouldn't have to do some backbreaking physical labor. And now those kids of blue collars are seeing their jobs outsourced. What are they supposed to do for jobs, or what are they going to point their kids into doing?

      In other words: yeah, there wasn't much of a complaint as the blue collars had some vertical movement to do. What kind of movement does a college educated comp sci / engineer have now?

    13. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you

    14. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by nickstance · · Score: 2, Interesting

      actually, moving blue-collar jobs overseas was (and still is to a lesser extent) a major political issue. Remember the rallys where you could pay a buck and hit a Toyota with a sledgehammer? Or all the "Made In the USA" commercials. If you happened to live in an area that was affected by that round of outsourcing (and are old enough to remember the 80's and early 90's) you sure would.

      The reason the white-collar jobs are a bigger issue is because we spent TONS of money teaching Joe and Jane Factory worker to answer tech support calls, telling them: "Well, you lost that job, but this one is here to stay" and then we yanked the rug out from under them again.

    15. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can't get my schadenfreude on.

      You need to appreciate the zeitgeist first.

    16. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "and yet they're perfectly willing to take a contact doing phone support for Americans!"

      It takes two to sign a contract.

    17. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by WeirdKid · · Score: 1
      "...newer easier jobs to take their place."

      You're kidding, right? You mean like that $6/hr greeter job at Walmart to replace that $45,000/yr manufacturing job that supported a family?
      <soapbox>
      On a related note, it always amazes me how many people say things like, "45K is too much for a manufacturing job anyway". Granted, it's not the most cerebral occupation, but you have to think of it as "hazard pay". Most manufacturing facilities are deadly, dangerous environments that take their toll often in terms of health, limbs, and life expectancy.
      </soapbox>
      "What exactly is replacing the white collar jobs?"

      Apparently, the same thing that replaced the blue collar jobs.
    18. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It seems that most of the call centers employ people who can't speak (or understand) English very well at all "

      if only americans spoke english..

    19. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      but now it's white collar jobs it's suddenly some sort of travesty.

      But when the blue collar jobs left, they were supposed to be retrained to do white collar jobs. Now that the white collar jobs are leaving, what are we supposed to retrain as? oh, plumbers.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    20. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by swillden · · Score: 1

      What has the world come too, where we have to qualify that we don't like the idea of people dying - EVEN IF THEY ARE IN COMPETITION WITH US FOR JOBS!

      "We" don't have to qualify it, "Anthony Boyd" feels he has to qualify it.

      One person's lack of moral integrity does not define a culture.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    21. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah i saw that episode of west wing last night too smartass.

    22. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by aalobode · · Score: 1

      You know, India has stolen a lot of US jobs. It seems that most of the call centers employ people who can't speak (or understand) English very well at all -- and yet they're perfectly willing to take a contact doing phone support for Americans! But despite that, I find I have two feelings about India

      Read the current issue of The Economist where you will learn: (a) that Europe is the largest market for outsourcing and (b) the largest outsourcing firms worldwide are AMERICAN.

      It takes a lot of nerve to criticize Indian or other Asian firms for providing outsourcing. Consider that IBM and many of the top firms in the USA get more than 50% of their revenues from abroad -- and think of what those countries might say about outsourcing. If they protect their economies in the way Lou Dobbs acidly recommends every night, there will be far more jobs lost here.
    23. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      yeah i saw that episode of west wing last night too smartass.

      As big a fan of The West Wing as I am, I try not to limit myself to using television as my classroom. Believe it or not, some people go to university, read books, newspapers, listen to lectures, observe the world around them and draw their own conclusions.

      Some of them (though, it would seem, not very many) even find time to post on Slashdot. Weird, huh?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    24. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Plumbers? No. Soldiers. That way, we move from blue collar, to white collar, to red collar (red when they get shot). Red, white and blue. Kinda gets your patriotic blood pumpin', eh?

      The militarist state the Neo-Cons are creating is producing the red collar class. I theorize that THAT is the next step. Unfortunately for all of us, the red-collar phase will be even shorter than the white collar one was (which was a lot shorter than the blue collar one was).

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    25. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by prurientknave · · Score: 1

      damn, i wish i had points. Mod this guy up =)

    26. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It takes a lot of nerve to criticize Indian or other Asian firms for providing outsourcing. Consider that IBM and many of the top firms in the USA get more than 50% of their revenues from abroad -- and think of what those countries might say about outsourcing. If they protect their economies in the way Lou Dobbs acidly recommends every night, there will be far more jobs lost here.

      You were doing OK until you started mixing outsourcing with getting revenues from abroad, which can come for nearly any reason, not just outsourcing. So I started wondering if you had begun to overstate the case. Turns out you have overstated it. If every country on Earth were to protect their economies, it appears that there will not be "far more jobs lost here."

      So maybe it doesn't "take a lot of nerve to criticize" outsourcing. Apparently in the larger context -- which you dragged into the picture -- the situation isn't so rosy for US Americans after all.

    27. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yo. Those cow-dung eating curries deserved to die regardless.

    28. Re:Can't get my schadenfreude on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learned about schadenfreude in kindergarten.

  34. Are they trying to reproduce 1993 bomb blasts.. by dwipal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you look into slight history, there were a series major bomb blasts occured in Bombay, the financial capital of india in 1993 in places like the Stock Exchange. These resulted into a lot of tension and communal riots between the people.

    This one seems to be kindof similar to them, just targetting a little more high-tech organizations. These militants just cant see a country prosper and the people getting happy. If you cant do well, dont let anyone do well.

    1. Re:Are they trying to reproduce 1993 bomb blasts.. by dodobh · · Score: 1

      The 1993 bomb blasts certainly did not trigger communal riots.

      But they did result in an enormous backlash against the local mafia which supported the terrorists. Most of the mafia leaders fled to countries with no extradiction treaties, or died.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  35. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by adepali · · Score: 1

    Well the current situation definitely doesn't improve Kashmirite's perception of India, feeding such thoughts. It is just possible that an India-backed independence would be the only way to ameliorate bad feelings.
    Of course I understand it's never that simple, but laying all the blame on one side isn't the way to go.

  36. Wahabis by panurge · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It's quite significant that these are Wahabis, the dominant sect in Saudi Arabia, and that presumably the "Independent Kashmir" they want would be a Taliban run Afghanistan type of place, not a place that most Kashmiris would want to live in. Because the Wahabis are obscurantists, attacking manifestations of the modern world - like software companies - would fit in fine with the overall strategy. It's inevitable that people here will make jokes about Dell technical support - but it will not be funny if it is your turn next.

    It is a pity that words like "Militant" are used for these groups. We really need a word that summarises "Organised criminal gangs that want to steal entire countries". Of course {flamebait} this word would be useful because we could apply it to the Bush/Rumsfeld/Wolfowitz/Rice/Blair/Berlusconi gang as well as the insurgents in Iraq, the part of the IRA that is opposed to the peace process, and the Taliban.{/flamebait} But words like "militant", "terrorist" and "insurgent" conceal rather than illuminate reality.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Wahabis by deimtee · · Score: 5, Funny

      We really need a word that summarises "Organised criminal gangs that want to steal entire countries".

      The word is Government.

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    2. Re:Wahabis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's inevitable that people here will make jokes about Dell technical support - but it will not be funny if it is your turn next.
      Its not funny now. I share my workplace with Dell tech support in Bangalore. There are policemen on the roads in front of the building, and the news is all over the newspapers here.

    3. Re:Wahabis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a pity that words like "Militant" are used for these groups. We really need a word that summarises "Organised criminal gangs that want to steal entire countries". Of course {flamebait} this word would be useful because we could apply it to the Bush/Rumsfeld/Wolfowitz/Rice/Blair/Berlusconi gang as well as the insurgents in Iraq, the part of the IRA that is opposed to the peace process, and the Taliban.{/flamebait} But words like "militant", "terrorist" and "insurgent" conceal rather than illuminate reality.
      I propose "religious fascist". It works for both sides.

    4. Re:Wahabis by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, that word only describes the successful gangs -- how would you describe the up-and-comers?

    5. Re:Wahabis by kbahey · · Score: 1

      How is this insightful?

      Them being Wahhabi has nothing to do with the quest for independance, or using terror tactics. Last time I checked, the IRA and ETA were not Wahhabi either. Both being Catholic does not mean that Catholicism is inherently violent.

      Also, what does "obscurantist" have to do with anything? Do you think Saudis do not use cell phones, computers or the internet?

      Attacking software companies and call center is not attacking technology because presumably Wahhabis are anti-technology, it is simply attacking one of India's visible economic strengths, so as to hurt the economy in an area that Western countries import (i.e. outsource). Hence they will get media coverage and scare future investors from India.

      Many words have lost their original meaning in contemporary discourse, no thanks to the media, such as "terrorist", "insurgent", "Wahhabi", "Islamist", "Patriot", "Homeland Security", ...etc. They are overused to oblivion.

      Let us forget the streotypes and media ignorance/bias for a bit and seek more rational and logical explanations.

    6. Re:Wahabis by bobcave · · Score: 1

      Those Wahabis are true crazy mo-fo's. I mean who else would think of creating a green horseradish-like paste that cleans out your sinuses, makes your eyes water, and temporarily makes your blood pressure go to 300 over 200 and name it after themselves??


      --
      There is no such thing as 'chocohol' or 'workahol'.
    7. Re:Wahabis by archivis · · Score: 1

      Small government?

      --
      In July O7, I got a mac pro. There's no punchline. Just endless joy and wonder.
    8. Re:Wahabis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      political parties, independents?

    9. Re:Wahabis by timjdot · · Score: 1

      And then there's that family that took over Hawaii by lieing the USA was waiting to attack.... ummm, wasn't one of them Vice President of the USA or something?

      --
      Expect Freedom.
    10. Re:Wahabis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for your sane post. It was much needed by this discussion that seemed unable to rise above call-center jokes.

    11. Re:Wahabis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That paste is "Wasabi", you moron.

    12. Re:Wahabis by bobcave · · Score: 1

      No kidding, fucktard. It was a joke, you stupid ass.


      --
      There is no such thing as 'chocohol' or 'workahol'.
  37. It's not that easy I'm afraid... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Uh, I'm guessing you have no idea about the history behind the India-Pakistan conflict over Kashmir because, if you did, you'd know it's not that simple.

    When India was struggling to achieve independence, it became clear that the religious unrest would likely drive the country apart. The solution to this was partition, which divided India into two countries, India and Pakistan (literally "land of the pure"). Kashmir, which was then a kingdom, decided that it didn't like either choice, and its ruler declared Kashmiri independence for itself.

    Everyone accepted Kashmir's position but shortly after independence and partition took place, Pakistan unilaterally invaded Kashmir claiming it for itself. Kashmir, with no hope of surviving by itself, and with no other help coming from elsewhere, asked India for assistance. This call for help put India in a bind, because it didn't want to provoke Pakistan unnecessarily (partition itself had been a bloody affair) and so it presented Kashmir with the only viable option: become part of the sovereign state of India.

    Kashmir chose India over Pakistan, and officially became part of India. Hence, legally at least, Kashmir is Indian territory. However, Pakistan didnt (and still doesnt) accept this, and refused to withdraw its claim on the region.

    Whether or not Kashmir should become independent is a very stickly question. Personally, I'd like to see it happen but, frankly, there's too much at stake - not least of all national pride - for either India or Pakistan to seriously consider it. So the status quo, with part of still Kashmir occupied by Pakistan, remains and probably will continue to do so for some considerable time. Certainly, until Pakistan readopts democracy, its unlikely to change.

    By the way, while the India-Pakistan division was based on religion, it's a fact that India now has a bigger Muslim population than Pakistan. And, apart from a few religious zealots on either side, most Hindus and Muslims (and Christians, Buddhists, etc) manage to co-exist peacefully in India.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Very nice summary!

      Kashmir chose India over Pakistan, and officially became part of India. Hence, legally at least, Kashmir is Indian territory. However, Pakistan didnt (and still doesnt) accept this, and refused to withdraw its claim on the region.


      It is also worth noting that the king of Kashmir at that time was a Hindu, even though it is a majority muslim state.

      There is a very informative BBC article on this.
    2. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U forgot to mention that India has the HIGHEST muslim population compared to any other 'muslim' country in the world, not just Paki!!!

    3. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't Indonesia have more muslims?

    4. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1, Informative
      To point out some counter-arguments your generally informative post,

      Pakistan and India were not ever unified nations until British Colonialism. Pakistan was intended as a grouping of the Muslim parts of the formerly British colony, India as a collection of the Hindu portions. Kashmir is the only majority Muslim state in the Hindu nation, which is about 12% Muslim.

      Initial agreements don't hold as much weight as they would in other nations. Kashmir's leaders at the time weren't democratically elected to reflect the will of the Kashmir people. Instead, they were Hindus, controlling a Muslim state. Certainly their agreements don't carry the final say 60 years later.

      Claiming that India is secular, with Muslims and Hindus engaging in peaceful co-existence, is simply not true. It's far, far more stratified than racial divisions in the US. India was until recently ruled by a still-powerful Fundamentalist Hindu Government. Also most estimates put India's Muslim population as somewhat less than Pakistan's, although that's a bit of a tangent. China's Muslim Population is larger than Saudi Arabia's, who cares?

      Personally I think the people of Kashmir, today, should be allowed to democratically choose a course for their nation - to join either nation, or choose independence. Although India wouldn't let that happen, as Kashmir would likely leave India.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    5. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by krayfx · · Score: 1

      nope indonesia doesnt..., india has the highest muslim population. indian muslims enjoy the most freedom almost akin to the USA which is why india is a democracy that pretty close to USA, the rest of the muslim countries have the sharia law interpreted to a lesser extent or rather harshly . whatever it is, indian muslims have it the best. at the other end is hardline regimes like saudi and te worst of them all taliban.

      pakistan is a moderate and young muslim country with facilities almost similar to india, its just the instability and lack of will on the part of the people of pakistan not to get on with thier business - which is getting forward with thier business. too much corruption, no democracy/ free thinking etc. they are a talented lot too - handicraft, textiles, many things which the race is gifted with - too bad - they are frittering it on frivoulous thinking. of late they have been making advances in many a field. how i wish both countries would make peace!

      anyways, there has been terrorism in these parts for sometime now - jihadis from kashmir/ naxalites-maoists who are quite low tech (comparitively). somehow they further thier cause from the original line of thinking - which is why terrorism always is dangerous and never the answer.

    6. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget to mention that Pakistan holds 2/3 of Kashmir and India 1/3. Pakistan could have easily have held all of Kashmir if it weren't for the raping and pillaging ways of the marauding Pathan warriors...

    7. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Xross_Ied · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your version of history isn't entirely correct/complete..

      1. Yes the raja (roughly translates to king but is more like a local lord) of kashmir wanted to maintain his monarchy (didn't want either pakistan or india as both's political systems were shaping up to be purely parliamentary, i.e. no monarchy).

      2. Under the terms of partition (agreed upon by muslim and hindu political parties..
      a) in states where a popular majority (muslim or hindu) exists, that decides which country that state joins (geographical limitations allowing).
      b) in a state where no clear majority exists, the ruler of the state will decide.

      3. In the case of Kashmir..
      a) there was and still is a muslim majority.
      b) when the political reality of keeping kashmir as an independent monarchy wasn't possible, the raja choose india (against partition rules).

      That is one of the major seeds of discontent that has lead to two wars between the two countries. All this is history.

      For the last 20 years, in an attempt to stamp out terrorism as an excuse, the indian army has been targeting any muslims who raise a political voice; arrest, torture without plausible cause (sometimes leading to dead). It has only created a new generation of terrorists (freedom fighters) and only leads to lend weight to the calls for seperation from india.

      I can only dig up one reference right now:
      http://www.amnesty.org/results/is/eng?queryT ype=0& searchIn=0&query=kashmir&start=1&num=10&max=25&sor tBy=date

      --
      This sig space tolet, reasonable rate.
    8. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Lucidus · · Score: 1

      According to a quick Google search, as of 2003 India had approximately 150 million Muslims, versus 195 million for Indonesia (and 145 million for Pakistan). You are simply incorrect.

    9. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      well here's another reference about your "freedom fighers"

      http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200502/s130 18 33.htm

    10. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by krayfx · · Score: 1

      http://www.islamicpopulation.com/asia_general.html yeah - lucidus, you are right there. i quickly checked it and found the link there.

    11. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pakistan (literally "land of the pure").

      Ugh, kinda. I don't think Pakistan was a real Urdu word but the prefix paki means pure so it worked out. Ah, I found it...

      "The name (Pakistan) is no more than an acronym, confected in the 1930's at Camridge University by a Muslim propagandist named Chaudhri Rahmat Ali. It stands for Punjab, Afghania, Kahmir, and IndusSind, plus the suffix '-stan' maning 'land'. In the Urdu tongue, the resulting word means
      'Land of the Pure.' "

      from p. 439 of "Love, Poverty, and War" by Christopher Hitchens

    12. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by thej1nx · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Unfortunately that is completely incorrect and essentialy a propagandic rewriting of history by the British.

      The region now known as in Indian subcontinent had been fragmented into small kingdoms (much like US districts ofcourse)... ruled by small kings (same status as say mayors ? )... now every now and then there would arise some particular king that would conquer the entire sub-continent over his reign i.e. Chandragupta Maurya ... or King Bharat and s on... but after their death the smaller kingdoms would break away again. So it went on till the muslim invaders came in and conquered literally all of India, forcing all the smaller kings to pay taxes to them and recognize them as the true ruler.

      It was during the period of Emperor Aurangjeb that the British came in and asked permission to set up a trading outpost, from which they went on to capture small kingdoms one by on through their policy of "divide and rule". As such India and Pakistan were actually one country ruled by the Mughal emperors and were a unified nation long before the British. Glad to clear up that piece of propaganda. Feel free to check up on Mughal Emperors and how much of India they governed, on googol or someplace.

      As for democratically elected leaders... India and Pakistan actually were all small kingdoms DESPITE the british rule e.g. Hyderabad, Junagarh, Kashmir and so on. They were made to choose to join one or the other country and yes the choices hold even 60 years later as such. Else the alternative is that none of the choices hold and I think neither India nor Pakistan would wish to accept that alternative. i.e. a full redrawing of map

      AS for India's being secular ... isn't USA supposed to be the same ? Heck it is supposed to treat blacks and whites equally. India to its credit has had a muslim president and a female prime minister. When was the last time US could boast of either or those or a black heading the country ? And despite the declarations of equality and black and whites peacefully coexisting, there have been riots between these two factions often enough.

      Heck in the light of current events I would go as far as to say, USA is ruled by a fundamentalst Christian Government. Care to dispute that ? who cares ? Given the choice Kashmir would leave India *and* Pakistan... and next morning have the Chinese walking in just like Tibbet, costing India a major militarily strategic region, and gaining the Kashmiris nothing as Chinese would be happy to wipe out the local muslim populace to make room for their own.

      So much for that theory of yours ...

    13. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      mods this is supposed to be funny! that was one of the funniest satirical posts i've seen on slashdot! thanks for making my morning. the best propaganda parody I've seen in a long time.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    14. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      China's Muslim Population is larger than Saudi Arabia's, who cares?

      Well, the Chinese government certain does. There's been occasional insurgencies against the Chinese government in Xinjiang Autonomous Region; this made the Chinese government nervous given that a small part of Afghanistan shares a border with China, especially when Afghanistan was under Taliban rule. Today, the Xinjiang region is fast becoming the "Imperial Valley" of China, thanks to the fact that despite the desert conditions there the soil is nutrient-rich enough that any oases in that area (and there are many) could grow high-quality agricultural crops; the Chinese government certainly does NOT want a Muslim insurgency ruining that potential cash cow.

    15. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Feztaa · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Uh, I'm guessing you have no idea about the history behind the India-Pakistan conflict over Kashmir because, if you did, you'd know it's not that simple.

      What? A member of the highly sophisticated Slashdot readership oversimplifying the issues? Impossible!

    16. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      AS for India's being secular ... isn't USA supposed to be the same ? Heck it is supposed to treat blacks and whites equally.

      You are right. The way the USA treats white people is quite unfair. Blacks are given extra points to get into college and civil service jobs. It's institutional racism against white people

      India to its credit has had a muslim president and a female prime minister.

      Who cares? The race nor gender of a leader is really important.

      When was the last time US could boast of either or those or a black heading the country ?

      Colin Powell was the first choice for the Republican party as a nominee for President in 2000. He didn't want the Job. He would get elected very easly in the US since he has a lot of cross-party appeal. Condi Rice may run in 2008, Hillary Clinton will run. It's only a matter of time before there is an African American or Female president, my hope is that they are elected because of their talent, and not race or gender.

      And despite the declarations of equality and black and whites peacefully coexisting, there have been riots between these two factions often enough.

      The last 'riot' was around 1992 over the Rodney King trial and that wasn't much of a riot despite the news coverage. For the most part in American everyone gets along, in another generation or two I doubt it will even be much of an issue.

      Heck in the light of current events I would go as far as to say, USA is ruled by a fundamentalst Christian Government. Care to dispute that ? who cares ?

      You've really bought into this sterotype of Bush as some kind of right wing religious zealot haven't you? Well, as soon as their is forced prayer in school or mandatory bible studies then get back to me. Bush isn't even that far to the right in American politics, I suggest you look up the work of Pat Buchanan.

      Given the choice Kashmir would leave India *and* Pakistan... and next morning have the Chinese walking in just like Tibbet, costing India a major militarily strategic region, and gaining the Kashmiris nothing as Chinese would be happy to wipe out the local muslim populace to make room for their own.

      Highly unlikely. Most of the nations China trades with wouldn't take kindly to such action.

    17. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Hindu revisonism. Only on slashdot would this misinformation get modded +5 informative.

      oh well.

    18. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by valrama · · Score: 1

      Er, you conveniently forgot to mention that the then Indian Prime Minister Nehru thought it fit to publicly promise, given the extreme circumstances under which Kashmir was 'taking sides', that once the shit was behind them and peace was restored in the state, there would be a referendum to allow the people of Kashmir to decide the issue for themselves. Subsequent Indian governments and their cronies in Kashmir maintain a discreet silence over this issue.

      It is not just a matter of national pride for India. It is extreme vital, from a practical POV. The incompetence of the Indian government in catering to minority interests has allowed small time separatist movements to sprout in the corners of the vast land. The tamils have just barely been roped in. The North-East is a catastrophe waiting to happen. If the government cedes one willing inch of Kashmir, all hell will break loose elsewhere. That is what India is more worried about.

    19. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by narsiman · · Score: 1

      Thats right and the Bamiyan Buddha statue, right in the heart of Afghanistan, blown up by the taliban, was erected by Gengis Kahn - right ? What a crock of revisionist history.

    20. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by cortana · · Score: 1

      Your last paragraphs: more evidence that we should kill all the leaders on both sides? :)

    21. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by ek-1000-ek · · Score: 1
      First, Raja != Local lord, but Raja == King

      Do you have any statistics on number of people killed, kidnapped, women (and girls), children orphaned, regular police (eg: traffic cops), lawyers, judges, govenment official (like clerk in salaries offices), innocent bystanders, extortion, pargetted killing on non-muslims, migration of Hindus because of these "freedom fighters"??

      --
      where did my sig go? where's my sig at?
    22. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but why couldn't India just walk away from Kashmir?

      India walked away from Tibet and China got it.

      India is walking away from Nepal and China will get that, too.

      It's an Asian version of Chomsky's theory of great powers: no small non-aligned nation will be permitted to exist. "They will either be yours or ours, but not independent."

    23. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      A couple of point to add: The ruler of Kashmir at the time, Maharaja Hari Singh, was a Hindu. But the majority of Kashmir is Muslim (w/ significant Hindu, Sihk, and Tibetan Buddhist minorities) and they have never been very happy with his choice (or did Lord Mountbatten force him? India may have sent troops into Srinigar before Hari Singh officially asked for them.) to join India. There have been a number of UN Resolutions on the conflict that have called for Pakistan's withdrawl and for India to hold a plebiscite. The UN Resolutions have been ignored by both sides.

    24. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Just a thought: Most of the nations China trades with don't take kindly to a lot of things that nation does. However they (we?) put up with it because trade with China is a higher priority.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    25. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by pinkocommie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not entirely accurate.
      India had both British provinces and princely states. See The 2nd map
      Also check the following Encarta reference . The examples you gave Hyderabad, Junagarh and Kashmir were princely states (Sindh for example was not) that didnt initially decide.
      Hyderabad chose independance but was invaded and conquered by India in 1948.
      Muslim majority Kashmir's Hindu leaders chose to join India which resulted in the military standoff, rebellion and current bloodshed
      Hindu majority Junagardh chose to join Pakistan but a plebescite brought it into India

    26. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 1
      As such India and Pakistan were actually one country ruled by the Mughal emperors and were a unified nation long before the British.
      Not really. See for instance this quote from a SOAS website:

      "Yet even at its most powerful the Mughal empire was never a centralised autocracy. The emperor was Shah-an-Shah, the `king of kings', and this was a precise description rather than a piece of empty rhetoric. His power depended on being able to manipulate the many petty kings and notables who controlled resources and exercised authority in the cities, towns and villages of the empire. The emperor was never an absolute dictator, acting instead as an `entrepreneur in power' who was able to buy obedience by royal honours and enforce it on occasion by military might."

      To say that this represents (present-day) India and Pakistan as a pre-Raj unified state is about as useful as saying that Europe between the Rhine and the Oder was a unified state because they elected a Holy Roman Emperor. The Mughals exercised a form of sovereignty yes, but it was severely circumscribed and Aurangzeb's attempts to enforce a more direct authority in the south stretched the system to breaking point (which is what gave the British their opportunity to 'divide and rule' the various successor states and establish their control over the subcontinent a couple of generations later).

      Regards
      Luke
      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
    27. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bush isn't even that far to the right in American politics, I suggest you look up the work of Pat Buchanan.

      That's like saying Hitler wasn't that bad of a tyrant and suggesting that we read up on Stalin. Submitting arguments to the Supreme Court for keeping god in the Pledge of Allegiance comes darn close to forced prayer in schools. Creating amendments against gays is definitely legislating his own religion. Read more on Bush's views here.

    28. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by g0_p · · Score: 1

      Heck it is supposed to treat blacks and whites equally. India to its credit has had a muslim president and a female prime minister.

      Not to mention that as recently as last year, it was to have a lady prime minister who is of Italian birth. And a current prime minister who is from a minority group - Manmohan Singh.

    29. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      If you disagree with what I've written then why not write a reply that outlines where exactly it's wrong?

      You and your AC friend, who between you have dismissed my post as "satirical", "propaganda" and "Hindu revisonism" are quick with your criticism but not so quick with even a single word explaining where my post is factually incorrect, let alone any evidence to back it up.

      Please, for my benefit if nobody else's, tell this agnostic, Kashmir referendum-supporting fool where his brief history lapses into satire, propaganda or revisionism.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    30. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by cain · · Score: 2

      What the hell is all this reasoned and polite debate doing on slashdot? I come hear to get hot under the collar and spew meaningless, incoherent, and incorrect propaganda - not learn and stuff. Please take this crap elsewhere. Thanks.

    31. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by follower_of_christ · · Score: 1
      AS for India's being secular ... isn't USA supposed to be the same ? Heck it is supposed to treat blacks and whites equally. India to its credit has had a Muslim president and a female prime minister. When was the last time US could boast of either or those or a black heading the country ? And despite the declarations of equality and black and whites peacefully coexisting, there have been riots between these two factions often enough.
      The USA is very secular. The people elect leaders that closely represent their value systems, which comprise a majority of Christian leaders. But that doesn't mean the majority of the society is powerless over their elected officials. Caucasians in the United States don't have explicit government protections like the minority races. "Secular" isn't as simple as define protections for individual races. Secularism derives off of Idealism with the intent of not allowing any one organized religion or racial preference or {insert perceived oppression here} be imposed upon the people. Secularism is also a checks and balances for all forms of government. I think the problem we are seeing today however is that "Atheists" are attempting to call themselves "Secularists" and are attempting to redefine Secularism as their belief system in order to impose their beliefs on the rest of organized religion. Atheism is a form of disorganized religion, which can't be defined because the object of worship is Self and reality is defined as Self's perception and everyone is different. So, Secularism isn't just a system of checks and balances for racial discrimination, its also a system of checks and balances for religious discrimination and helps prevent governments from becoming totalitarian in any facet of life or government.

      Heck in the light of current events I would go as far as to say, USA is ruled by a fundamentalst Christian Government. Care to dispute that ? who cares ?
      Who cares? A majority of the natioan apparently. These are elected officials. And they don't "Rule" in the sense that the government can hand down a law without the accountability of the people of the nation. If a "Fundamentalist Christian" were "ruling", butt sex (Read Leviticus 20:13) and abortion would be immediately outlawed. I'll grant you that our elected officials are moving in this direction, but our system of government holds our elected officials accountable.

    32. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For the most part, your comments seem to be in line with history and I agree with them. However, there are a few problems.

      every now and then there would arise some particular king that would conquer the entire sub-continent over his reign ... Mughal emperors and were a unified nation long before the British.

      Yes, there have been multiple times when the general area of India has been under the rule as one kingdom, but these have never been long lived. This is not unique to India, but there has been constant unification-splitting-reunification for a few millenia. True, the British weren't the first, but it's not realistic to say that Pakistan and India have always been one country.

      They were made to choose to join one or the other country and yes the choices hold even 60 years later as such.

      60 years later the choices have still held, minus the break away of Bangladesh, or East Pakistan if you will. Depending on how you read Indian history, I suppose you could still consider this within the boundaries of the initial building stages of modern India and Pakistan. But I digress. The choices made 60 years ago that still hold today, have not necessarily been the result of peacefull co-existance, but more the pros and cons of breaking away.

      In the case of northern India, specifically Kashmir, you have a very complicated situation. A ruling class of Hindus against a disproportionately large Muslim population, with a real threat from further north, China. That, in addition to nationalistic egos of both Pakistan and India, which have next to nothing to do with the local people of Kashmir. I speak not from book-knowledge, but from actually talking to people in Kashmir about these issues. I last visited 17 years or so ago when Kashmir was in a relatively peacefull period, although I did have the misfortune of accidentally coming across a relatively peacefull demonstration that was broken up by Indian police with tear gas which left me in pain for some while. For those curious souls, I'm American, with no direct connection to the Indian or Pakistani people. I was a curious tourist. That said, some people were relatively pro-Pakistani, while others (even Muslims) were relatively pro-Indian. However, most were pretty much sick of being stuck between a rock and hard spot, and had much more important agendas, such as keeping food on the table. In short, everyone had an opinion, but no one really gave a damn, deep down. The general impression I got was "just get the fuck out of here and let us live already, OK?"

      India to its credit has had a muslim president and a female prime minister.

      Credit given where credit is deserved. However, I still fail to see India as being just as democratic as the U.S. You can give me all the statistics in the world, and while I agree that the U.S. has issues up the nose including racial and religeous ones, I have seen first hand how the supposedly non-existent caste system works. I had a young gentleman ask me what my "designation" was. He couldn't seem to understand that I had no such "designation", and could attempt to work any occupation I so desired. This seemed like (and probably was) a totally foreign concept to him. (Mind you, this was not in Kashmir, but Bombay, back before it reverted to Mumbai.) There were people that begged for a living, because that was the occupation they were born to. (Or so I was told, never really had any intellectual conversations with beggars.)

      There has been much improvement since, and my last visit 4 years ago was quite different with much fewer beggars and cattle in Kolkota (Calcutta) (with semi-realistic rumors that the gov't rounded up the cattle and beggars in trucks and dumped them off in the Rajastan desert...) and a SERIOUSLY lower rate of people with leprosy, I still saw way too much intollerable discrimination. It would make the days of Martin Luther King Jr. look sweet in comparison. At least today you won't see a

    33. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by captainClassLoader · · Score: 1

      Woah, somebody on slashdot has the good will to admit they were wrong, while citing the correct facts?

      That must explain that big flock of pigs I just saw fly past my office window... ;-)

      --
      "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
    34. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      our system of government holds our elected officials accountable

      That's the funniest one I've heard in a looong time! If you really believe that, you need to come out from the rock you're living under. Sorry to burst your bubble, but that just isn't reality.

    35. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by follower_of_christ · · Score: 1
      If George Bush or the congress/senate could overturn Roe vs Wade, do you think they would be able to?

      Or do you think the Judiciary would slap that down?

    36. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If a "Fundamentalist Christian" were "ruling", butt sex (Read Leviticus 20:13 [gospelcom.net]) and abortion would be immediately outlawed.

      I just read your link and I guess we'll also be executing anyone who ever cursed their parents, commited adultery, polygamy, or bestiality. Oh, and of course, we'll banish everyone who has sex with women while they're menstruating.

      That all sounds very reasonable.

    37. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to your story, it seems simple enough to me.. once Kashmir was conquered by Pakistan, it was a done deal. It then belonged to Pakistan. If Kashmir wanted to be part of India it shoulda decided that before the partition. Only after Kashmir was getting it's ass kicked by Pakistan did they decide that all of a sudden they wanted to be part of India. Sorry 'bout it, they f'd up.

    38. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by easternerd · · Score: 1

      i disagree with you mr. If you mean to say beggars and cattle in the streets as Discrimination .. then you need to have a rethought. this is poverty.. and it has been declining massively since the 90s. and for me living has improved so much and 80 % of beggars and almost all cattle have dissapeared. its not a bleak joke when you have a population of over a billion and with more than 32 languages and square that with different caste and religious systems. I personally believe all religions co exist and Kashmir will always be with India cause its not negotiable

    39. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been saying for a while now that ownership
      of Kashmir should be decided by a regular cricket
      tournament between India and Pakistan, just like
      the Ashes

    40. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by timjdot · · Score: 1

      Even Roe herself cannot get that overturned!!! From what I read apparently she feels she was duped into the lawsuit in the first place!

      As far as Bush and fundamentalism, you have a definite point. The Bush-Bashers need another term besides Fundamentalism as this term in no way is accurate. Fundamentalists lean more towards giving up all wealth while Bush is more like the rich man who could not do so.

      If you meet a man focused on personal wealth, then you have not met a Christian Fundamentalist.

      --
      Expect Freedom.
    41. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      Give me a break. India has thousands of people getting killed and even more raped in mass riots. Perhaps you are familiar with Mumbai? The US does not have any equivalent. If you're at all familiar with Indian politics, you know that the Indian Muslim President is a powerless token position, put in there the same way one Black guy who doesn't golf is allowed into a Southern Country Club. And that the Hindu Nationalist party formed and came into power based off people who sympathized or were involved with the riots of Mumbai. Whether the US is secular or not (I could see an argument either way), India most certainly not secular.

      That's not to say the India is a permanent religious riot, but it certainly isn't characterized by peaceful co-existence.

      China taking over Kashmir is one of the oddest ideas I've ever heard about Kashmir. The comparison to Tibet is poor because Tibet was a part of China from 700 AD (about the time Tibet became an entity) until the early 20th century. China was just re-establishing control over an area that had been part of China 18 years earlier. The resistance basically amounted to a feudal, theocratic slave-state with CIA backing (please read the history if you feel this is a misreading of history). Despite the pleas of that cute bald Tibetan guy with an ancestral right to a palace of Tibetan slaves, it wasn't an invasion (besides which, the Dalai Lama also lays claim to substantial parts of India, although strangly enough this escapes people's notice.)

      Regardless, shouldn't the people of Kashmir have the right to decide their fate?

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    42. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by ashayh · · Score: 1

      While Aurangzeb definitely did conquer most of present India-Pak briefly, he never really had any control over it. He was constantly fighting against Generals/Princes in Afghan, Punjab, Bijapur, Golkonda, Maratha, North-East etc. This 'conquest' of not-nearly-entire India never lasted even a few decades(I dont remember the exact time).

      And after that brief period, India went back to a hundred kingdoms ruled by hundred princes. This is no exaggeration. In 1947, there were @500 princely states. Some no bigger than a town of 50,000. The country of India could only be created because most of these princely states had no armies, an unitended good turn done by the British. Except a few like Hyderabad, which had to be invaded.

      Thus, to say that India was ever an unified nation is a fallacy. Its like saying Alexanders or Genghis Khans kingdoms were unified. And let me ask you something: if you went back to 1650 AD and asked a peasant... say in Nagpur which 'country' he belonged in, he would probably have no answer. Ask him who is his lord and chances are he would give his fuedal lords name, not the current emperor. Same goes any other town in India.

      Now think about this: even today, with 50% literacy you will find MILLIONS of Indians who do not know the name of their country. Hell, I have literate relatives who dont know that! My point is that with extreme poverty and illetracy these silly things really dont matter.

      I agree that Kashmir would be a bigger mess if India gave it up.

    43. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GWB is no fundamentalist Christian. If he were, he would not claim Islam has the same God as the Bible (they can't: Moslems say Allah had no son, the Bible is real clear that the Lord Jesus Christ is God's son).

      GWB is doing a great job of claiming to be a Christian, but really what he's doing is tarnishing the name by claiming to be something he isn't. Carter did the same thing, even Clinton did in his first campaign. It's a way to get votes. And lots of undiscerning people blindly accept his statement without checking into it.

      GWB is convincing lots of people that he is a Christian just by the words he chooses; but even his wife has said that he is not born again. And the Bible makes it very clear that is necessary (John 3:7).

      I find it impossible that any born-again Christian would invade a sovereign country on faked evidence. That alone proves GWB is a fake.

    44. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not completely sure if the acronym is authentic, or an after-the-fact idea. One can't always tell.

    45. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it was Pakistan that invaded Kashmir in the beginning. One encyclopedia states that it was Afghani tribesmen from Pakistan (I'm guessing NWFP).

      --A different AC

    46. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by thej1nx · · Score: 1
      Hate to break this to you ... but China has already taken a chunk of Kashmir from the part that Pakistan had managed to grab. So no, China taking over kashmir is not so odd. Coincidentally Tibbet was captured by the british some 200 years back or so rather. China never could hope to fight the british, but saw an opportunity when British left and a nascent India was too weak to protect its territories. India had its butt handed to it in that war, at least.

      As for secular ... my whole point is that *no* country is perfect... least of all, the ones that pretend to be so. So it is pretty stupid to point out a fault in a third world nation that still exists in one of the most developed countries in the world. Feel free to debate that.

      And yes, Kashmiris have the right of determining their own fate. But such rights only go along with your capability to defend them. Which they dont have. If India pulled out, China or Pakistan will march in the next day. An external UN polce force can't really defend the region either for a long period. It has not really been working in Iraq. Eventually soldiers want to go home and get done with being bombed all the time by terrorists.

      Right now Kashmiris just want the right to not to be bombed to smitertheens. And a place where 14 year old girls aren't shot in the knee for just wearing a pair of jeans(against muslim edicts somehow).

    47. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not that the Indian government maintains a discreet silence over the plebiscite. In case you forget nearly half of Kashmir is under Pakistani control and the Indian governments official position is that the plebiscite would take place only in a unified kashmir. Also, the Indian view is that in state elections which have taken place, the turnout has been quite impressive inspite of threats of repurcussions by militants, and the government believes that this is reason enough to believe that the kashmiri people wish to remain a part of india. At least thats the version we're taught in high school...for a more balanced version, check out the bbc article (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/17665 82.stm)

    48. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Xross_Ied · · Score: 1

      The link doesn't work for me.

      Is it a .au only link?

      --
      This sig space tolet, reasonable rate.
    49. Re:It's not that easy I'm afraid... by Xross_Ied · · Score: 1

      Raja as a title translates to king.

      In the indian subcontinent, it applied to lords of states/provinces, e.g. Raja of Hyderabad

      Where Hyderabad is now a state in India.

      I don't have stats for innocent deaths caused by either side. I am sure you could find some if one searched hard enough.

      --
      This sig space tolet, reasonable rate.
  38. Mod parent differently... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you Truth Quark - since you were modded not as troll nor funny, let me add my brilliant solution.

    How about merging Pakistan and Bangaladesh with India like they originally were? That would be even finer solution.

    1. Re: Mod parent differently... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > How about merging Pakistan and Bangaladesh with India like they originally were? That would be even finer solution.

      Better yet, we could quit fighting the future and let the Black Helicopter Guys establish a single world government!

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re: Mod parent differently... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US Customs service wants to establish a single world government?

      http://www.desertaura.com/events/zphotos/airfest/u h-60customs.jpg

    3. Re:Mod parent differently... by damian+cosmas · · Score: 1

      How about merging Pakistan and Bangaladesh with India like they originally were? That would be even finer solution.

      Yeah, that's it. Reinstating British colonial rule is always the answer.

  39. Moderators.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ..... can you please ensure the "Insightful" on the comment avobe is amacked down please?

    If this person can't be bothered to read the posting it can't surely be called "insightful"...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Moderators.... by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      While not defending the Grandparent entirely, I see where he's coming from, somewhat.

      I can say "militants" all day long in the title of my submission. Someone's going to look at that like, "uh-WHA!??! WTF is going on?! Have to check this out!", and then read the submission.

      I'm all for headlines tht entice the reader and all, but there was enough space to clarify a little further. Could we not have been told in the title whether they were Kashmere militants, or Al Qaeda, etc?

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
  40. Re:Oh, please. by jay-be-em · · Score: 1

    You represent everything that is wrong about slashdot.

    --
    "Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." --Eric Blair
  41. The real reason by gtoomey · · Score: 0, Troll
  42. Look comrade.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ..., can I call you comrade, can't I? I mean, you show such ignorance about how open markets work that either you have been in cave for 50 years or are a Communist, comrade. Which one is it?

    The Indians are not stealing your jobs. US people in particular, and Western people in general, are pricing themselves too high given the expensive lifestyles they lead.

    Which expensive lifestyles? SUVs, overeating, rampant consumerism, irrational Imperial wars in the other side of the planet. All tha adds up until your economy, or parts of it, become uncompetitive.

    Indians are "stealing" your jobs in the same sense that a more capable, cheaper worke in the US would be stelaing your job if he was hired to do it instead of yourslef, comrade.

    As for the English capabilities of the Indians,, frankly, stop beating that horse. It has been fucking dead for ages.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Look comrade.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only someone who's in a job that isn't going to get outsourced would come out with a stupid comment like that.

      Look, moron..., can I call you moron can't I? This isn't about normal western people being greedy, it's about the rich fucking over the poor. This is about people like Carly Fiorina screwing over normal, hard-working people because they can take advantage of other companies, and then leaving their job with a multi-million dollar pay off.

      Or maybe you think that everyone except management should be paid less money than they can afford to live on?

      Here's desperately hoping that you get laid off and replaced by someone who gets paid less than a McDonalds employee, when/if you have a family and a mortgage.

    2. Re:Look comrade.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/companies/countries

    3. Re:Look comrade.... by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I mean, you show such ignorance about how open markets work that either you have been in cave for 50 years or are a Communist, comrade. Which one is it?

      Before I respond to the meat of your comment, I just wanted to say how impressed I am with your name calling. Very high minded of you.

      Now, about that ignorance of open markets: please explain the whole "made in the USA" movement? By that I mean, some country was always undercutting the price of US products and services. Either clothes, cars, whatever. And yet apparently "ignorant" people made a conscious choice to buy from within their own community to support the local economy. So since when is that so wrong? Were you whining when Japan got bit by Americans deliberately buying Fords? Do you whine each time a country slaps a tariff on an import?

      Of course it's an open market. That doesn't mean we slavishly, mindlessly uproot our economy when there are perfectly reasonable, time-tested ways of responding to it.

      As for the English capabilities of the Indians,, frankly, stop beating that horse. It has been fucking dead for ages.

      Really? Because I just got off the phone with an Indian providing tech support for my DSL. And it didn't sound like that horse was "fucking dead" as you so crudely put it. Instead, I had to repeat myself a dozen times, even spelling out simple words letter by letter. So how about this: I'll stop beating the dead horse when these call center employees can actually be competent on the phone. Mmmkay?

    4. Re:Look comrade.... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      The Indians are not stealing your jobs. US people in particular, and Western people in general, are pricing themselves too high given the expensive lifestyles they lead.

      Which expensive lifestyles? SUVs, overeating, rampant consumerism, irrational Imperial wars in the other side of the planet. All tha adds up until your economy, or parts of it, become uncompetitive.


      I'll won't comment on the Imperial wars, but as for the rest this is a "catch-22". If less things are bought there is less need for people to make things which would lead to more people, both in the west and abroad, without jobs.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    5. Re:Look comrade.... by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I just got off the phone with an Indian providing tech support for my DSL. And it didn't sound like that horse was "fucking dead" as you so crudely put it. Instead, I had to repeat myself a dozen times, even spelling out simple words letter by letter. So how about this: I'll stop beating the dead horse when these call center employees can actually be competent on the phone

      And who is at fault? The Indian, doing his job to the best of his (perhaps limited) ability, or the American company that hired the lowest cost call center with staff with minimal language skills?

    6. Re:Look comrade.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a guy posts some light protectionist comments and you're all over him? guess what? your own govt in your own country has done far more to limit your beloved open market. there is no such thing as truly free international trade. so when can we expect you will be petitioning your govt to dismantle trade agreements, sanctions, tarifs, and on and on?

    7. Re:Look comrade.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention human rights and a legal system that tries to stop exploitation. I'm sure you're all for the idea of stripping away those too, in order to compete. I mean, in India child prostitution is quite common and there is significant resistance to any efforts to curb it. If the U.S. would stop being so greedy, we too could force 70% of our women into the sex trade!

      Of course I'm showing you are devilish plan, for you see we give billions in aid in order to stop this lovely practice. All so we can drive up the price to compete with us Americans! If only we had morals maybe we too could create a country where the is no regard for the value of human life.

      Go India!

    8. Re:Look comrade.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe its the Indian business owner lying about the quality of his services.

    9. Re:Look comrade.... by the_shaitan · · Score: 1

      ... or the American morons who fell for it? There is no end to this argument. But in reality, just like any other business decision , outsourcing needs careful evaluation.

      If the American corp didn't do it's due diligence before outsourcing - TOUGH! There's a sucker born every minute...

      Regards,
      Shaitan

    10. Re:Look comrade.... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      no you are wrong.

      the problem is that Americans REFUSE to pay what the product is actually worth.

      Zenith and Curtis Mathis used to be the BEST televisions in america. They cost between 60 to 100% more than other brands and typically 200% more than import brands.

      They both went out of business as american made televisions because Americans refused to pay for them. "Holy crap I can buy 3 sony's for the price of that curtis Mathis? gimme the Sony."

      same went for other products. The last Power PC motherboard I purchased cost me $1295.00 and then I needed to buy a processor. 99% of americans will crap their pants at that and run off and buy an Asus for $125.00

      my motherboard was Made in america by people that made a wage that allowed them to live and eat. not buy a group of people that were paid less for their week of pay that the janitor here get's paid in an hour.

      Americans are not willing to pay $225,000.00 for their SUV, $5500.00 for their PC and $6.00 a gallon for gasoline.

      Therefore to make the american consumer happy, third world countries make our products. They do not have to comply with the restrictive US pollution laws, labor laws, or other silly American laws that increase costs.

      THAT is the reason. YOU your Neighbor and your family are the reason that jobs are moving overseas. Because you refuse to pay $7.25 for your american Beef Big Mac at mcdonalds, you refuse to pay for american made goods because they are significantly more expensive.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:Look comrade.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the American manager only needs to sell the promise to the rest of the organization. Afterwards, he is no longer responsible because of the difficulty in tracking customer support to long-term profitability. He shows a short-term win and quickly moves on so when the company starts feeling the pain, his role is forgotten and the whole organization (or departments) are blamed.

      It is in fact an Indian lying and an American manager knowingly accepting this lie for his personal gain. He isn't hurt, just the customers and stockholders.

    12. Re:Look comrade.... by elpapacito · · Score: 1

      Here it is, if you will..without the not necessary yak yak about who's to blame :

      Imagine you make a shoe in India and the very same
      shoe in U.S. Don't worry about the numbers (I didn't care to check) worry about the proportions

      Shoe cost of production USA = USD 10 per pair
      Shoe cost of production Ind = USD 3 per pair

      1. Assume the 7 dollar difference is due to less
      laws, less rights for people, less costs

      Store sale price in USA:
      a) of made in USA shoe = USD 40 per pair
      b) of made in India shoe = USD 35 per pair

      2. Obviously if you like to pay less (and you like to, if your wage is going down) you're going to run like a mad to Schwalmart and pay USD 35..the more people get less wage, the more people will go to Schwalmart willy nilly.

      3. Given that the other shoe, made in U.S. , will suffer due to less sales, they could choose

      a) to lower price, but they can't compete in the short term (couple years) with indian made shoes as they're substantially cheaper
      b) to keep selling less and ___maintaining their profit margin___ while they reduce the cost both by firing people and by reducing lost sales

      4. As a matter of fact, even if you accepted to receive half your salary (which would probably bankrupt you) it still wouldn't suffice

      Root of problem: poor can become more poor, but rich don't want to become poor again EVER and will do anything to stop the process ; that includes keeping their profit margin high even if that means kicking population ass into victorian age by destroying social security.

      GET a Goddamed clue.

    13. Re:Look comrade.... by thej1nx · · Score: 1

      Dude nothing to do with your point ... and I hate to point this out ... but most of the populace in India which lives in rural parts has probably not worn shoes in their entire life. *sigh*. No .. I am not exaggarating.

    14. Re:Look comrade.... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      And who is at fault? The Indian, doing his job to the best of his (perhaps limited) ability, or the American company that hired the lowest cost call center with staff with minimal language skills?

      There's alot of blame to shovel around, however I think the point your quotee is trying to make is about signing up for a job that you don't have the skills for.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    15. Re:Look comrade.... by $raim_n_reezn! · · Score: 1

      Frankly, it's not the place of the average american to criticize the english speaking capabilities of any other group of people. I know 'cause I came from a Queen's english speaking environment and damn! for a people whose first language is english, y'all murder the language at about 3 * 10^8 times a second.

      --
      All straight things must come to a bend
    16. Re:Look comrade.... by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      Your problem would then be: You speak "Queen's English" and we speak "English" See the difference? One of us is speaking a dialect. given that your language is the one with the modifier to the noun, I would normally take that as an indication of which language is the modified form. (Yes, I am aware that "English" or "American English" is the modified form, though I doubt you can consider either the US version or the UK version to be "pure")

    17. Re:Look comrade.... by Rayonic · · Score: 2, Funny
      Americans are not willing to pay $225,000.00 for their SUV, $5500.00 for their PC and $6.00 a gallon for gasoline.

      How the hell are you determining how much these items are worth? You're just pulling numbers out of your ass.
    18. Re:Look comrade.... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      If it is any consolation, my coworker is from India. (Studied in the US and liked it enough to stay.) She can't understand these call center folks.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    19. Re:Look comrade.... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Talk to me about economics when the Chinese cease working for slave wages, and we aren't busting other countries, regularly, for dumping. (I.E. selling below cost to drive other competitors out of the market.)

      It's one thing to compete in a market. What exists today is neither a market, nor particularly competitive.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    20. Re:Look comrade.... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      There's alot of blame to shovel around, however I think the point your quotee is trying to make is about signing up for a job that you don't have the skills for.

      It's not brain surgery. No one will die if they have to repeat themselves a few times. It's simply whether the American company cares what level of service is being offered in their name. Presumably the staff have to meet some standard, pass tests, to be employed. If the bar is too low, it's hardly their fault.

    21. Re:Look comrade.... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      the problem is that Americans REFUSE to pay what the product is actually worth.

      The product is worth what people are willing to pay. Sony still manufactures their domestic TVs in Japan.

      The last Power PC motherboard I purchased cost me $1295.00 and then I needed to buy a processor. 99% of americans will crap their pants at that and run off and buy an Asus for $125.00

      How many of those PPC boards were made vs. the Asus boards? It sounds like you got a reference board.

      Americans are not willing to pay $225,000.00 for their SUV

      How about $30k? that's what a Highlander costs. Hell, the H2 is $55k and people buy those in flocks.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    22. Re:Look comrade.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that wont be problem once they start teaching hindi in your outsourced schools..............

      how good is your hindi anyway???

    23. Re:Look comrade.... by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

      RE: The Indians are not stealing your jobs. US people in particular, and Western people in general, are pricing themselves too high given the expensive lifestyles they lead.

      It's not my fault that housing, food and health insurance cost what they do. If I was out there splurging on truffles, SUVs or the like, I'd be inclined to agree with you. But just putting a roof over your head is about impossible at your so-called "modest" wage...

      I'd be very happy to earn what an Indian earns. Just give me the same prices they pay for things. $40K buys you servants, etc. over there.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    24. Re:Look comrade.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Reading your other posts, its clear you just have a chip on your shoulders against the US. I'm not sure what perceived slight you've filed away in the back of your mind, but it's causing you to not be objective. You seem to want to blame the US no matter what problem is presented, and you seem to think the people in the US should shut up and take it. No one bares responsibility except the US? Bah!

    25. Re:Look comrade.... by Rayonic · · Score: 1

      The Indian for taking the job he cannot perform, the Indian company for hiring him and not training him, and the American company for being duped into hiring that Indian company.

    26. Re:Look comrade.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey dipshit, go price a car that is made 100% in the USA. the only ones available are insanely priced.

      fools like you have no clue. and are the backbone of the Bush administration...

      so why do you not own ANYTHING made in america? why is STEEL imported from china instead of from american mines? because even after shipping it's CHEAPER because of slave labor and no environmental laws. Go to your local lowes or home depot, the steel pipe is made outside the USA... WTF is that!

      even 2x4 lumber is imported!!!!

      lumpster is right.

    27. Re:Look comrade.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Americans are not willing to pay $225,000.00 for their SUV, $5500.00 for their PC and $6.00 a gallon for gasoline.


      Apparently you've never met a Mac owner.
    28. Re:Look comrade.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A dual MAC G5 kicks the crap out of the BEST X86 machine you can build period unless you get close tot he same price point.

      you need a $300.00 CASE to match the Dual G5 case.
      you need a $550.00 motherboard for opterons to match the G5's motherboard.
      you also need screaming opterons to match the 2.5ghz G5's.

      so your point was?

  43. -2 Heartless Indian bastard by the_shaitan · · Score: 1

    Oh no!

    And there go US plans to build in offshore redundancies to protect against (the suddenly highly probable) risk of planes crashing into their onshore development centres!

    Regards,
    Shaitan

  44. "militants"? by haggar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For heaven's sake, when did Slashdot become Politically Correct (TM)?

    Call them what they are, terrorists. Or if "terrorists" is not acceptable, then how about "necromancers festering on people's grief and death"? That's pretty accurate.

    --
    Sigged!
    1. Re:"militants"? by estes_grover · · Score: 1

      Call them what they are, terrorists.

      Or, how about: "members of the militant community"?
      Nice and PC with the added benefit of lots of syllables.

    2. Re:"militants"? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Insightful
      English-language media in Europe has recently begun referring to them as "dissidents".

      You know, Sakharov, Ghandi, Osama bin Laden, Nelson Mandela, those types of guys.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:"militants"? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      was 'shock and awe' terrorism? what about abu ghraib or the guantanamo bay abuses/tortures, or the NYC cops who arrested RNC protectors for way over 24 hours without lawyers in appalling conditions so they wouldn't protest again? were they to terrorists? i agree, anyone who uses violence or the threat of violence to scare people for political gain is a terrorist.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    4. Re:"militants"? by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Militants isn't a politically correct term, is it?

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    5. Re:"militants"? by shift.red.avni · · Score: 1

      I propose that we should call them criminals.

    6. Re:"militants"? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > "A lot" is two words. You wouldn't say "alittle", would you?

      I'd say "belittle". But I wouldn't say "belot". Or "bebig", come to that. I've said "bebop" before and there's no guarantee that I won't do so again at some point.

    7. Re:"militants"? by delete · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Perhaps this is because terrorist has become such a loaded term? It has been applied so frequently and in such arbitrary ways that it has lost its original meaning, just as communist is frequently used as a term of abuse rather than in reference to someone who specifically adheres of the theory of communism.

      This is not to suggest that the murderers involved in this appaling act are not deserving of the highest level of scorn, but rather that the devaluation of the word terrorist makes it rather meaningless in this context.

    8. Re:"militants"? by raile · · Score: 1

      Amen! Wish I had mod points.

    9. Re:"militants"? by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      You know, Sakharov, Ghandi, Osama bin Laden, Nelson Mandela, those types of guys.

      Or Jefferson, Washington, Paine, etc.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    10. Re:"militants"? by halivar · · Score: 1

      Sakharov, Ghandi, Osama bin Laden, Nelson Mandela, those types of guys.

      For some reason, I don't think OBL would appreciate being placed in that particular context. Likely as not, he'd kill the others for no other reason than to make a political statement.

      However, since Ghandi and Nelson Mandela were big proponents of civil disobedience (break the bad laws and face the music), we'll be more than happy to treat OBL the same. By killing his ass, of course.

    11. Re:"militants"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Date, 1776: "Damn colonial terrorists! They aren't even human like us Royalists! Those cowards attack Tory farms in the middle of the night."

    12. Re:"militants"? by Q+Who · · Score: 1

      You are not over twenty, am I right?

      World media used "militants" and "guerilla fighters" terms instead of "terrorists" for a long time, in order to underestimate the crimes these people do.

    13. Re:"militants"? by FreeUser · · Score: 1

      Call them what they are, terrorists. Or if "terrorists" is not acceptable, then how about "necromancers festering on people's grief and death"?

      I like that, but "cowardly murderers" should suffice if people's politics won't let them call a spade a spade, or in this case, a terrorist a terrorist.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    14. Re:"militants"? by pinkocommie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ask the vietnamese? iraqi people @ abu Ghraib and so on who exactly they think a terrorist is? As they say one mans terrorist is anothers freedom fighter (a la Israeli's pre-Israel).
      When you get the time watch the British documentary The Power of Nightmares: The rise of the politics of fear about how terrorism was given prominence when the US politicians lost their primary nemesis due to the fall of the USSR. Very insightful stuff.
      Its available on the bittorrent networks among other places.

    15. Re:"militants"? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Argh. What is this obsession with calling terrorists "cowards?" They're not. You can call them murderers, you can call them evil, you can call them insane, and I won't argue with you -- but calling them cowards, when in fact most terrorists run a far greater risk of dying in the line of what they perceive as their duty than do soldiers in regular armies, is absurd.

      It seems to be part of the overall human need to demonize our opponents by denying them any virtues at all. Reminds me of the run-up to both the Civil War and WW1, when the combatants on both (or in the latter case, all) sides spent a lot of time characterizing their opponents-to-be as paper tigers who talked tough but would fold as soon as the bullets started flying. We know how that turned out.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    16. Re:"militants"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This thing looks really interesting, unfortunately it is on BBC2 and the best thing I can currently access is BBC world (American edition).

      Any chance a gentle soul might put out a torrent of these programs?

    17. Re:"militants"? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      No, they simply have a more nuanced view of things than you do, or a different view of things. What would it benefit them to underestimate their crimes?

    18. Re:"militants"? by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1

      Where in the article did it say they were planning to use magic on the dead?

    19. Re:"militants"? by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      I think "militant" is the right word. They are people fighting with military armaments for a cause and not a country. It has not been "weighted" yet. It is neither PC or politically incorrect. It is just a descriptive word.

      Terrorist just means that you are fighting against U.S. interests, which has yet to be determined. Watch Fox news closely to keep track of their status. If they use the term; "terrorist", then it is going to cost U.S. taxpayers. If they use "extremists", "gorilla fighters" or "rebels", then it won't cost U.S. taxpayers. If the term "freedom fighters", "patriots", or "uprising" is used, it will cost taxpayers money, but we will be on their side. Militant just means that no decision has been made by Homeland PsyOps specialists, so you can safely ignore any pain and suffering in that country and reserve righteous indignation for things that are deemed appropriate.

      Does it make sense now?

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    20. Re:"militants"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumbass. Haven't you read any history? They're not terrorists because they won.

    21. Re:"militants"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call them religious, for the tastiest and most fapworthy part of religion has always been killing non-believers.

    22. Re:"militants"? by Q+Who · · Score: 1

      Doh, it would not get them in conflict with arab states which support terror? (i.e., most of them)

    23. Re:"militants"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell they only are nuanced when it suits them.

      There is no "nuancing" involved when dealing with Nazis and other "politically correct and Europe approved" criminals.

    24. Re:"militants"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and what is wrong with that ?

    25. Re:"militants"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, yeah .... this stuff is only " insightful" because it fits your political bias.

      And you don't even recognize it - pathetic as always pinkocommie.

    26. Re:"militants"? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      How is blowing up oil lines, schools, and voters "Freedom fighting"?

      From what I've been hearing, almost none of the terrorists that are caught now are actually from Iraq.

      So what we have here is armed men entering Iraq for the sole purpose of stirring up shit.

      Sure, you can still say "One man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter", but it seems to be along the lines of "One man's horse is another man's dead rotting carcass that's been sitting there all week."

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    27. Re:"militants"? by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      Have you actually watched the program? I'm not saying i'm right or anything, but no harm in watching it / checking the info they present as facts if you believe them to be incorrect?

    28. Re:"militants"? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Give me an example... I can't think of a single instance where terrorists are treated with kid gloves by the European media. To wit, visit http://news.bbc.co.uk (BBC, UK) or http://www.rte.ie/news (RTE, state broadcaster in the Republic of Ireland) and view the reaction of European media to the latest IRA shenanigans.

      There's no kid gloves or appeasement there.

    29. Re:"militants"? by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      So what we have here is armed men entering Iraq for the sole purpose of stirring up shit.
      *tongue in cheek*... talking about the US army? :)
      My point simply was while you and a significant portion of americans (fyi i am an american) view the US in Iraq as a liberating force they are also viewed by others rightly or wrongly as an occupying force. Hence all the deaths in their pov caused as a result are due to US terrorism?
      i'm not condoning terrorism by anyone - blowing up schools, infrastructure, innocent civilians (and they are innocent until proven otherwise) by the US or Al Qaeda or Iraqi Insurgents is pretty similar in the end result. I guess it goes to the core of the matter, justifying the deaths of an innocent cuz you're a good guy? the ends do not justify the means........

    30. Re:"militants"? by delete · · Score: 1
      You are not over twenty, am I right?
      Sorry, you're rather off the mark there. But thank you kindly for making the assumption, I'm flattered. It may surprise you to learn that I'm aware that the terms militant and guerilla were previously used in contexts where terrorist is now employed.

      While you may believe that this is underestimating their crimes, I would be of the opinion that journalists comprising the "world media" are merely employing their native language correctly. If you read my post rather than insulting me, you might have seen that I suggested that using the term "terrorist" actually serves to underestimate the crimes of these individuals.

      Well, I bow to the "voice of experience", let us just label everyone a terrorist. It's so much simpler than actually distinguishing between individual and groups with different goals, so that we might understand what motivates them and prevent these atrocities from happening again and again.
  45. Subject: YOUVE GOT MAIL BOMB by mbkennel · · Score: 4, Funny

    From: ()S/\M/\ (47/M/cave)
    To: infidel@localhost
    Reply-To: 72virgnluvr@hotmail.com

    where are the well-covered NUB1LE H0USEW1VES in
    my area who wanted to meet me?

    i declare it a pagan and Crusader lie!!!!!!

    DEATH TO HVHAKAK@18j987.bdx.com.in!!!!

  46. Some Info About This Terrorist Group by boingyzain · · Score: 1, Informative

    Most people reading this article might think that Lashkar-e-Toiba is just another one of those Islamic groups from the general area of Iraq fighting just to piss America off, but this isn't the case.

    Lashkar-e-Toiba ("Army of the Pure") are one of the largest terrorist outfits operating in Jammu and Kashmir, fighting to have their states seperate from the rest of India. In a sense, they're fighting for their freedom.

    Though, their professed ideology goes beyond merely challenging India's sovereignty over the State of Jammu and Kashmir. The Lashkar's rhetorical agenda, as outlined in a pamphlet titled, Why are we waging jihad, includes the restoration of Islamic rule over all parts of India. This is where they get marked as terrorists.

    The Indian government has held it responsible for the series of massacres on August 1-2, 2000, which spread over three districts of the State led to the killing of more than 100 persons within a gap of 24 hours, most of who were unarmed civilians. This doesn't help people to harbor sympathy for their freedom fight either.

    1. Re:Some Info About This Terrorist Group by Xiver · · Score: 1

      In a sense, they're fighting for their freedom.

      I would not say they are fighting for their freedom as much as I would say they are fighting to control every one else's freedom.

      --
      10: PRINT "Everything old is new again."
      20: GOTO 10
  47. This already succeeded in the US by cablepokerface · · Score: 3, Funny

    Remember how they set IniTech on fire ? Awful, awful people.

  48. Brings to mind... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


    > And, apart from a few religious zealots on either side, most Hindus and Muslims (and Christians, Buddhists, etc) manage to co-exist peacefully in India.

    One of the most pathetically funny things I've ever seen was a broadcast news story from a few years back, showing two rival groups of Buddhist monks fighting in the street over control of a temple. They were serious about it too; some of them were using what looked like quarterstaffs.

    I'm pretty sure it was on the Pacific Rim rather than in India, though.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  49. Re:And then the terrarists get my credit card info by FinchWorld · · Score: 1
    Idefnity fetph.. Idantifyie felth... Identh...

    Oh Crap! I can't, damn those Militants! Damn them and there clear speech! Damn them!

    --
    "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
  50. Re: Oh, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes and you do know its spelt Dyslexic ;)

  51. CONGRATULATIONS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have outdone just about every other Slashdot reader ever!
    Most readers are content to read the blurb, skip RTFA, and go to the comments, but that wasn't good enough for you. You skipped straight to the comments after the very first sentence!
    Kudos to you , sir!
    The only possible improvement on your comment would be if it was the first post.
    Again, congratulations!
    bkd

  52. Re: Oh, please. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


    > Yes and you do know its spelt Dyslexic ;)

    Perhaps you've stumbled across the reason I know so much about how dislexics think!

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  53. Re:Once again Pakistan is upto its shitty habits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    S$$$$ on you man. The indian goverment is trying to blame the act of every other Mr Gandhi to Pakistan. Why the hell they didnt think about so many freedom fighting armies in their own land, likes of Naga Land and others .. ????

  54. Re:The quantities of explosives is quite unbelieva by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    You mean as opposed to Attacking the Indian Parliament? Someone's already done that...

  55. Re:WTF is an AK-56? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 3, Informative

    AK-56 is a chinese knockoff of the soviet SKS, which is also manufactured in pakistan.

  56. You're wrong. The difference... by hummassa · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    is that USofAns think "oh, outsourcing! the end of the world! lost American jobs!" and the rest of the world thinks "globalization is about if you send McD's to India, suits that you have to send some jobs too."

    Only USofAns are bigots about outsourcing. Nah, not only them, but they are the worse bigots IRT outsourcing.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:You're wrong. The difference... by torpor · · Score: 1

      Americans have the most to lose, after all their economy is mostly drastically over-inflated hype, and since every single American owes the world $50,000, of course you'd expect them to be whining and griping about the strength of other nations in comparison.

      Americans: it is your own damn fault. Stop ignoring the crimes of your government.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:You're wrong. The difference... by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      Americans have the most to lose, after all their economy is mostly drastically over-inflated hype,

      I wouldn't call the American economy 'over-inflated hype' that isn't very accurate. The problem is twofold, the American people spend more than they have, as does the government.

      Americans: it is your own damn fault. Stop ignoring the crimes of your government.

      Please list the 'crimes of the American government'. This I would like to see. Oh, and in your own words, don't just link me to some Geocities site.

    3. Re:You're wrong. The difference... by torpor · · Score: 1

      'over-inflated' == "spending more than you have"

      Hype, because Americans, due to their proclivity for cults of personality and inability to dis-introvert themselves long enough to escape Club Med Nirvana and have a Real Look At The World, hyperbolically still consider theirs the greatest nation on Earth, irresponsibly, when in fact as a nation America is far, far, far less great than many others in an exceedingly expansive number of realms, such as education, agrigultural sciences, manufacturing, even 'entertainment' .. oh wait, militant mass programming of police-state-asseted inebriated peon hordes, America and its Gigantic Drug and Propaganda Apparatus is very great at that.. but in fact, the only bouyant export from the U.S., economically, is police force/forms of warfare, and we all know (those of us who were paying attention in History class) just how long police states can go before collapsing on themselves. (Hint: not very long.)

      Every single one of those Shock and Awe weapons could've been used for far, far greater, peaceful purposes which would have made an awesome impact on world stability, but instead Americans allow their politicians to use its technology to destroy. [Is George W. Bush really the best America can do? Honest?]

      Show me a cruise missile, and I'll show you a highly effective way of peacefully delivering a very badly needed water pump and medical supplies, to precisely where its needed, very rapidly. Show me a fleet of B52 bombers with heavy lift capabilities, and I'll show you a Dafur that didn't need to happen. 10,000 pounds of Uranium would do well to safely improve the condition of life for multiple millions of people, yet America prefers it be weaponized "just in case".

      Crimes of America: Vietnam. Honduras, Nicuragua. Venezuela. Iraq "Highway of Death", Desert Storm. Afghanistan. Iraq War Two. Sure, you've got excuses for every one of these 'wars', but for every excuse to kill, there are also a hundred reasons not to kill thousands of people.

      The list goes on ... And on ... And on ... (not a single Geocities link there, buddy ..)

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    4. Re:You're wrong. The difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an american and I'll agree that some of the things you mentioned are terrible. Desert storm (round 1 iraq) was not a bad thing. The problem is that we (americans) tend to pay morons like saddam there to screw with other countries and then we create a toddler with weapons that turns on us. That is our mistake!

      As for bush, i did NOT vote for him. I'm really tired of foreigners thinking that ALL americans like Bush. We don't. 49% of the country does not like him! Remember that!

      As for the outsourcing, it pisses me off that i can't get a job because some indian is willing to work for practically no money (even by their standards) at night and not take breaks! They need to ask for decent pay, take breaks, and ask for benefits which they deserve. If that were to happen, and outsourcing still happened then i wouldn't mind. In that case they would be "better" than us americans and i could live with that. The other problem is that americans do it to themselves.. we outsource and cut our own jobs. I think WE neeed to take responsibility for that!

      American's screw up but so did everyone before us.. the british were the big dogs before us and way back when spain was too. Every government who acquires to much power becomes what we all hate. Its a fact of life. I figure china will take our place in a few years. They are bigger than us and now they have an economy to take them there.

  57. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by pamri · · Score: 3, Informative
    The conflict in kashmir is more complex than you think and not all kashimiri's want independence or secede from india (esp those living in Ladakh and Jammu) or want to join pakistan. You have to remember that Kashmir is a ethnically & religiously diverse state comprising of Hindus, Muslims and Buddhists and even the Kashmiri muslims and hindus have much more in common with each other than with muslims or hindus from outside the regions. Personally, i feel an autonomous region with free moment among Kashmir, India & Pakistan to be a good idea. But whatever the solution, i want it to happen in my lifetime.

    To be on topic, the LeT is mostly comprised of Pakistani extremists and is a declared terrorist outfit by the USA and one of the first Kashmiri terrorists outfits to be banned by Pakistan. To end on a positive note, read this editorial in the pakistan newspaper Dawn.

  58. I wish... by vistic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...that I had mod points today to mod down these stupid annoying Funny posts.

    I guess even an American can get sick of the typical American attitude sometimes...

    1. Re:I wish... by shift.red.avni · · Score: 1

      Don't get all worked up. We laugh at our homegrown American criminals just the same.

    2. Re:I wish... by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it's not just 'american' to make jokes about _anything_.

      and really, why not? it's not like it's out of someone elses pocket if there's little laughter.

      you can make a funny joke about just anything, and hell, i'd laugh at it. as long as it's a good joke.

      you can make funny jokes about hitler, about winter war, about swedes, about finns about canadians, about liberalists, about capitalists, about terrorists, about tchechenyan freedom fighters and whatever.

      here's one: "what's a moscow elevator? one tchechen presses a button and 12 floors come down". very incorrect but funny still - and some people just plain simply enjoy incorrect fun.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:I wish... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Here is another: Why are the boulevards of Paris lined with trees?

      The Germans don't like to march in the sun.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    4. Re:I wish... by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Finn walks into a bar.

      Bartender says: Hey buddy, why the long Winter War?

  59. and this changes phone support HOW? by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Informative



    I don't think most Americans would notice the difference, other than hold times and chants.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  60. Re:With my luck, I would have to file the bug repo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please describe how to reproduce; thanks.

    Unprotected sex with a member of the opposite gender.

  61. the title, and continue it in the comment body? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't it annoying when people start the message in

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  62. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which nationality are you, if you are an american, you dont fuckin talk abt Intervention.

  63. Re:Once again Pakistan is upto its shitty habits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please be quiet and try to get along or we'll have to come back. We'll bring even more flags this time, too.

    Yours,

    The Commonwealth of Great Britian.

  64. paypal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they have a web page where we can donate to thier cause?

  65. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by Tethys_was_taken · · Score: 1
    Kashmiris never wanted to be part of India
    Back your arguments up with facts, and then argue. Until then, please don't say anything.
  66. Khalistan zundabad, Indira Ghandi mordabad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khalistan zundabad, Indira Ghandi mordabad.

  67. How muslims think, dar-al-Harb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In muslim thought there are two main areas of the world, the land of unbelievers the dar-al-Harb which is a permament abode of war. Then there is the dar-al-Islam, the lands Islam conquered through war, the land of believers which are an abode of peace. Just be thankful if you live in a country that does not border a muslim state, because where muslim states border non-muslim states there is constant conflict orcheastrated by the muslim parties. In muslim thought jihad, a war to make the land of harb into the of Islam is one of the prime duties of every muslim, unlike stupid Western leftists whining about their imperialist past, most muslims are most proud of their imperial past, their times of former military prowess, which are now long gone. May the ground open up and swallow the entire muslim world, good riddance.

    1. Re:How muslims think, dar-al-Harb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Many nations have conflicts over borders. Look at the African countries or the countries in latin/south america. Even Europe many years ago. Was that due to an inherent religious flaw?

      You get whacko muslims who think they are under some kind of seige from the west. And yeah you for example just said you want to kill all of them without regard to who's innocent so I'd say they aren't really living in an illusion about that are they? Does the Koran say some whacko shit .. yeah .. but it also says not to kill people etc. There are a few whacko militant type texts some of the whackos follow .. but those are separate from the Koran, which is technically the only book they are supposed to follow.

      Read http://www.submission.org/ and find out what non whackos (the majority) of muslims believe.

    2. Re:How muslims think, dar-al-Harb by lotsToLearn · · Score: 1

      Islam never dictates that. I only have pity on you and your source of knowledge about Islam.

      The meaning of Jihad mentioned above is not accurate I am afraid.

      "Jihad" is an Arabic word which comes from the Arabic root word "jahada"; which means "exerting utmost effort" or "to strive".
      Jihad refers to struggle only. Struggle for inner peace and spiritual cleansing. War in Islam is the very _last_ resort if the situation arises.
    3. Re:How muslims think, dar-al-Harb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've forwarded your IP address to the FBI. You'll be hearing from them soon. Buh-bye!

    4. Re:How muslims think, dar-al-Harb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I only have pity on you and your source of knowledge about Islam.

      That would be the Koran and hadiths. Not hard to find online, and very definitely eye-opening.

      War in Islam is the very _last_ resort if the situation arises.

      Sure seems to arise a lot. Probably because there's only one resort before the last, and that's to order the infidels to surrender.

    5. Re:How muslims think, dar-al-Harb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the other sand niggers.

    6. Re:How muslims think, dar-al-Harb by lotsToLearn · · Score: 1

      Oooooh.. now I know where its coming from? Its the fibbies! The source of everything evil thats going on around us. Really.

    7. Re:How muslims think, dar-al-Harb by lotsToLearn · · Score: 1
      Islam does NOT want to rule over the "infidels" as you call them. Who told you that? This is wrong.

      Islam advocates peaceful existence of all nations and religions. In fact it is the only religion which recognizes all the other religions. Please refrain from propoganda which the media throws at you. Do you believe it makes sense for any religion to have that kind of ideas? Does it make sense?

      As far as the Quran and Hadiths are concerned please be sure to know the source, and specially the context of those. Also the arabic language is much more elaborate than any other language I think, so the translations quite often do not reflect the true meaning.

  68. but.. by Cryptnotic · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, but the ones who planned the terrorist attack are Islamic militants who want Kashmir to go to the Islamic Pakistan instead of being controlled by India as it is now.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:but.. by clowe · · Score: 0

      Not quite. As I read it, the Sikhs would probably like the world to remember that the Kashmir is their land, neither India's nor Pakistan's. Consider it yet another success story for British nation building.

    2. Re:but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sikhs? The SIKHS?
      I think you owe it to yourself not to make a fool of yourself in public by making statements as ridiculous as this.

    3. Re:but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I read it,[...]

      You know, that statement would be a lot more convincing if, you know, you happened to display the slightest bit of comprehension for the story at hand. But if you want to do it your way, i.e. like a moron, that's cool.

    4. Re:but.. by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      The original Kashmiri militants wanted Kashmir to be independent from both India and Pakistan. Many of the Muslim truck drivers who gave me rides when I was illegally hitchhiking in Indian J&K in the mid 1980s were contemptuous of both countries. More recently, with the rise of Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and with Pakistan's overt support, Islamic militants who seem to want Kashmir to join Pakistan have taken the lead in the insurgency. But it is unclear if their desire to join with Pakistan is simply a result of the fact that Pakistan was training many of them and then helping to infiltrate them across the Line-Of-Control. There are still groups who want independence and it is unclear if the Paki trained militants really represent the desires of most Kashmiris, or even those of most of the insurgents. The BBC has a good overview of the conflict.

    5. Re:but.. by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      Check out part 3 of the UN Resolution
      PART III The Government of India and the Government of Pakistan reaffirm their wish that the future status of the State of Jammu and Kashmir shall be determined in accordance with the will of the people and to that end, upon acceptance of the truce agreement, both Governments agree to enter into consultations with the Commission to determine fair and equitable conditions whereby such free expression will be assured.
      Bottom line it doesnt and SHOULDNT matter what Pakistan or India want, simply ask the people of Kashmir what they want and get it over with.

    6. Re:but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way to fight islam is to support radical Hindu nationalists.
      A war between India and Pakistan would strike a blow for civilisation, since India could win a nuclear war and then wipe out the rest of the Paks with troops.

    7. Re:but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radical Hindu Nationalists? :Shudder:

      Radical Hindu nationalists aren't nice people. Don't they marry their children at pre-pubescent ages? Not even the Muslims do that. On top of that, there's idols and polytheism.

      "When the elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers."

  69. Seriously by Zentac · · Score: 1

    HAHAHA, how many terrorists really do have a 3inch beart? Open your view a bit and see that you wouldn't spot a terrorist if he was your neighbour

  70. No need to wait. by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

    Word has it that the LeT is setting up call centers to respond to inquiries about their latest efforts.

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  71. Re:WTF is an AK-56? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Listed as a Type-56, that would be fine. However, AK-56 is some invented designation. AK is Avtomat Kalashnikova... Kalashnikoff's Assault Rifle, which the Type-56/SKS is clearly not.

    Again, where is the primary source that the Register is receiving information from? I'm still curious.

  72. but the next day there was 90% + attendance ... by proudlyindian · · Score: 1

    Though it was a shocking incident and almost before a decade the world really understood terrorism .... in mumbai life continued at usual the next day chk google for http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1&cl ient=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial& q=mumbai+bomb+blast+1993+attendance&btnG=Search

    1. Re:but the next day there was 90% + attendance ... by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      "a decade before the world really understood terrorism"?!?!? Tell that to the British killed by the IRA in the late 1960s (for example).

      Or elsewhere... the Brigato Rossi? Action Direct? Baader-Meinhof? INLA? IPLO? OIRA?

  73. Re:Oh, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes, it's a grand scheme to trick whitey into believing that all of us muslims aren't just waiting for a signal from our headquarters in Mecca before we put you all in death camps and begin our skin smelting research.

    I guess the jig is up. Back to the drawing board!

  74. Re:Dear GOD by atrizzah · · Score: 1

    I'd mod you as -1 arrogant and assuming. How do you know he's an American? Sure you could have read his blog and inferred, but I'd bet you just couldn't resist a knee-jerk anti-American comment. Very original.

  75. Re:Dear GOD by log2.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's amazing that you didn't get modded down to -5.

    Last time I made an anti-American comment someone told me "You are, quite simply, not welcome here then" and I got modded Redundant. I guess most people don't see it once it goes below 0 so getting to -5 is hard.

    I can tell you're not American simply because you can spell centre ;)

    --
    Can your karma go above being Excellent?
  76. Re:Dear GOD by guet · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How do you know he's an American? Sure you could have read his blog and inferred, but I'd bet you just couldn't resist a knee-jerk anti-American comment. Very original.

    I had a quick look at his blog, and figured he was American, from that and the post of course. I'm not anti-American or Americans in general, I'm writing on an American website with an American designed (built in Asia) computer, it'd be a little hypocritical : )

    I was annoyed by the post (and the host of others like it on this and previous stories about India) because it seems to me that xenophobia and ignorance about the world are valorised at the moment in the States, and that's a real shame.

    Xenophobia exists everywhere, but that doesn't make it acceptable. If this failed attack had been in NYC, you can bet he (and many other readers of this site) would have a very different reaction, and all the talk would be of how to get those dirty Saudi^^^^^ Iraqi terrorists etc etc.

  77. Re:Dear GOD by 1lus10n · · Score: 0, Troll

    and there would also be a group of people making fun of it.

    Welcome to america. Dont like it ? Leave.

    This is how the world works: They hate us, we hate them. Everything else (like who hated who for what reason first) is semantics.

    --
    "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
  78. Re:Dear GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> xenophobia and ignorance about the world are
    >> valorised at the moment in the States

    > Welcome to america. Dont like it ? Leave. This is how the
    > world works: They hate us, we hate them

    QED

  79. DOH!!! by RabidAmerican · · Score: 0, Troll

    It is commendable that this was caught before damage was done.
    Having said that, this should be taken as a wake-up call to companies to refrain from sending U.S. data processing facilities to third-world countries.
    Has it occured to said companies that if an attack, or even a security breach, occurs that it may not be a prosecuteable offense in that particular country???

    --
    /*Dave
    1. Re:DOH!!! by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      Do you one better, it might put that company out of business.

      Imagine the better part of a companies data (backups and all) its employees and IT structure blown to smokey little bits and pieces. The term crippling blow comes to mind.

      Of course I am sure they all have taken this into account, I mean it had to occur to them that there was a reason they were getting the service/labor so cheap. Or it didnt occur to them, and wont until some major US company goes kaput because of something like this, and then everyone acts shocked and runs around like chicken little when the sky was falling, the economy collapse's and the world as we know it ends. Or not.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    2. Re:DOH!!! by thej1nx · · Score: 1

      You my dear friend, have uncovered the true reason why american companies are outsourcing so much ...yes , yes! ... must have been that building that got trashed in NY a few years back ... Imagine the better part of a companies data (backups and all) its employees and IT structure blown to smokey little bits and pieces. The term crippling blow comes to mind.

  80. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by nsupathy · · Score: 1

    No, this will never end. The problem is not that much simple. If Kashmir goes out, Pakistan will shift its focus to other region such as Punjab or Himachal Pradesh or Assam. ISI (Inter Service Intelligence) is more active in these states.
    India as a country cannot allow this to happen.
    The main goal of Pakistan is to destablise India and I really dont know what they are going to do with that.

    --
    #include std_disclaimer.h
  81. Re:Dear GOD by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1

    Yeah I am American, but the post was meant as a VERY sarcastic poke at America-centrism. So come on, lighten up.

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
  82. Anyone else read that as by sammyo · · Score: 1

    Mutants Planned Attack...

  83. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by nsupathy · · Score: 1

    I am trying to get the facts for you, but any individual can have their own opinion.
    Kashmir by constitution is part of India and most of the Kashmiris are muslims. But there are other religions as well. Jammu region is wholly dominated by Hindus while Ladakhs are buddhists.
    They will either be eliminated or massacred if Kashmir becomes independent or joins Pakistan. Believe me that will be the case.
    And nobody denied Kashmiris any freedom. They are as free as me in India.

    --
    #include std_disclaimer.h
  84. Dynamite by dcrocha · · Score: 1

    I've always said that Indian software is dynamite, baby!

  85. It is not that easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an Indian and I know how this can affect us. I travel lot and most of the railway stations are under tight watch of government and law enforcement. Most of the people in Kashmir they don't want this bull shit and neither they want to join Pakistan. Latest report from CIA claims that within 5-10 years it will be fully collapsed no democracy or whatsoever exists in pak.

    The truth is US should stop helping the Pak they are helping them in military powers and other aids most of us know this. However India government also needs to become more US friendly in order cooperative with each other it is quite complex matter and only time will provide answer...

  86. Here it is, with suggested solution and docs by edgedmurasame · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1:Find country with lax labor laws with nearby neighbors described as "militant" to target's country.
    2:Remove the ability to access the data physically or remotely via destructive means. (null routing companies and countries linked to target, political manipulation, EMP, conventional explosives, N/B/C if desperate)
    3:Repeat 2 periodically to insure no third party benefactors such as other countries with proper labor laws (using documented loopholes such as offshoring) are able to prop up target country.

    Bug will manifest itself in countries where lax labor laws, political instability and deep pocketed groups meet.

    Possible solutions:

    -International pressure to encourage target country to harmonize trade laws with countries with higher labor law standards to remove bugs with Free Trade. Militants would still be present but would be in clear minority if present.

    -Limited protectionism until harmonized labor law standards are guaranteed and permanent elimination of all "Ivy League"* style exclusions/barriers to higher education in third party countries such as US/UK. Usefulness would gradually increase as a wider base of the population gains higher education without (practical and theoretical) barriers to entry as documented later on.
    -Countries who provide residence for third parties in the benefit of this bug would be "creatively encouraged" to disallow "representation of a person" to any organization that offshores (and all supporters of disallowed organization to prevent shifting of labor to circumvent) under laws concerning bribery.

    Ivy League style exclusions, specified:
    - Leaving in impractical loophole of excessive amount for admissions/tuition to maintain indirect requirement of fallback of being "well-connected" in the process of obtaining education. Eliminating this may anger the existing benefactors into using defensive measures, but it is a must.
    - Admissions policies that are designed to reject the usable majority to design a deep pocketed minority that proceeds to apply similar policies to society for a nonbeneficial (see Google projects with policies that mirror some universities) and possibly destructive result (See Harvard, Yale, and the non Ivies Berkeley and Stanford).
    - Hypocritical policy of wanting more students that come from backgrounds that arent targeted by them, but only allowing minority amounts of them outside of public controversy to calm public outrage.

    --
    "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
  87. i think they mean a by Suchetha · · Score: 1

    .. chinese made Type-56 (T-56) variant on the ak-47. its pretty popular in the sub continent and all over south and southeast asia.

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
    1. Re:i think they mean a by pi_rules · · Score: 1

      Here's another link on the Type-56.

      Seems that the assault rifle was based off the AK action while the carbine is based off the SKS action. Similar names, very different internals. That also explains why the "carbine" version is longer than the "rile" -- which still doesn't make a lick of sense!

      The only thing that looks prett screwed up on the Type 56 design to me is the rear sling mount. With it there I don't imagine you could use a side-mounted scope like you can on other AK variants that place the rear sling mount on the undersid of the buttstock.

      Oh, and the bayonets are different.

  88. You're not a guy, you wouldn't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "don't you think this is being just a bit insensitive?"

    A heterosexual man would never even type something like this.

    You're either a girl or gay. Not that there's anything wrong with that...

  89. Savages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they had managed to pull this off they could have killed many hundreds. Not a funny situation.

  90. this was almost predicted by marcus ranum by whizzter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i was reading through his articles yesterday after seeing the article posted on slashdot yesterday.
    and one of them was touching this subject: http://www.ranum.com/security/homeland_security/ed itorials/outsource_baghdad/index.html

  91. poor guys, they want it so bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    police claim the men were members of Lashkar-e-Toiba - a Wahabi militant group

    I initially mis-read this as "... a wannabe militant group".

  92. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by thej1nx · · Score: 1
    Oh sure ... except that the region in question falls between Afghanistan, Pakistan, India and China and thanks to the high altitude is of tremendous military strategic importance. So spoken truly like someone who never looked at the map of the world.

    Kashmir becomes independent...next day China walks in like they did with the part of kashmir pakistan had managed to capture a few decades back, uses the added military advantage to browbeat the three other nations into submission and/or nuke the hell out of them from up there, build up their military might even more and proceed to beat the tar of USA (and this is one country that can actually try it thanks to sheer nuber of cannon fodder they have got... acceptable collateral damage and all) and all other countries over the world.

    Sounds unrealistic ? But China has been egging to get a go at that region for years. And you have a president who starts attempting to capture a terrorist in Afghanistan and ends up bombing some dictator in Iraq... so let us leave unrealistic out of it... So goodbye to Indo-pak conflict ...hello to World War IV!!

    You are so brilliant...

  93. Terrorists == Freedom Fighters by Withigo · · Score: 1

    Hey wait a second, those weren't terrorists--those were liberators liberating American jobs!@#

    They deserve medals!

  94. Pakistan funded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those who aren't aware, LET is 100% Pakistan run and funded, it's effectively the terrorist wing of Pakistan's state government.

  95. Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've been thinking that this would happen since before 9/11. While this one was targeting the center themselves, I was actually expecting them to go after the internet and telephone connections. That would be much more disruptive, or for the Paki's to start lobbing nukes around.

    The consequences of wide spread outages in India since the US has outsourced so much would be devistating to the US. I don't doubt that large swaths of the internet would become unmanaged, banking centers would grind to a halt because of the outages and because a lot of the paperwork is done overseas now.

    While we can sit around and make jokes about curry breath and bean curd farts, never forget that if the markets in the US tank, a lot of us are out of work.

  96. Please make sure that if you decide to try to.. by musawilliams · · Score: 1

    identify to whom this group belongs, that you do it correctly. This group belong to a sect called the "khawarij", the same group that 'Usamah Ibnul Laden belongs to. Not the so called and wrongly named "wahabi" group also known as the "Salafee" movement. If you are still ignorant on this subject matter, then I refer you to "The Wahabi Myth" so that you can find out more.

    1. Re:Please make sure that if you decide to try to.. by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Ah ok, So this Usamah Ibnul guy doesn't belong to the wahabbi/salafi sect that Osama Bin Laden does. Gotcha.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Please make sure that if you decide to try to.. by musawilliams · · Score: 1

      First off, in arabic there is no "O" sound. His real name, transliterated correctly is 'Usamah ibnul Laden. Thanks for proving my point on how ignorant people are in regards to this subject.

    3. Re:Please make sure that if you decide to try to.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gives a fuck. He's as good as dead, and he's not going to be with Allah, Mullah, Al-lAH, or who the fuck ever. He may even be in custody being tortured right now (we can only hope). Whether his murderous, backward, Islamic fundie fucking name has an O-sound or a U-sound doesn't really matter.

    4. Re:Please make sure that if you decide to try to.. by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Thank you for proving my point that you have no sense of humor!

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Please make sure that if you decide to try to.. by musawilliams · · Score: 1

      Seeing as I consider myself salafi and I hate the man, i don't find it funny. Cheers

    6. Re:Please make sure that if you decide to try to.. by uujjj · · Score: 1

      Salafi is to Wahabi as Puritan is to Calvinist. Salafism is the Puritan movement in Islam, whereas Wahab was an 18th century leader of the Salafi movement.

  97. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do it now!

  98. Koran supports decapitation, jihad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The Koran does sanction jihad and does delineate the world into dar-al-Harb and the abode of Peace(dar-al-Islam), a form of permament war until all non-muslims are under the land of Islam paying the jiyza poll tax for their very right to existence under Muslim lands.

    008.007
    YUSUFALI: Behold! Allah promised you one of the two (enemy) parties, that it should be yours: Ye wished that the one unarmed should be yours, but Allah willed to justify the Truth according to His words and to cut off the roots of the Unbelievers;-
    PICKTHAL: And when Allah promised you one of the two bands (of the enemy) that it should be yours, and ye longed that other than the armed one might be yours. And Allah willed that He should cause the Truth to triumph by His words, and cut the root of the disbelievers;
    SHAKIR: And when Allah promised you one of the two parties that it shall be yours and you loved that the one not armed should he yours and Allah desired to manifest the truth of what was true by His words and to cut off the root of the unbelievers.

    009.029
    YUSUFALI: Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
    PICKTHAL: Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.
    SHAKIR: Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.

    Remember Nick Berg who was decapitated, that is sanctioned in the Koran as well:

    008.012
    YUSUFALI: Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them."
    PICKTHAL: When thy Lord inspired the angels, (saying): I am with you. So make those who believe stand firm. I will throw fear into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Then smite the necks and smite of them each finger.
    SHAKIR: When your Lord revealed to the angels: I am with you, therefore make firm those who believe. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.

    My source is the following website which contains side by side three of the best English translations of the Koran.

    So mr. lying muslim, I do not need to read some stupid website to tell me what the Koran thinks. I have read the Koran, not only that but there is many translations of Koran on the internet so I can easily bring up the relevant verses without need to type them myself.

    1. Re:Koran supports decapitation, jihad by lotsToLearn · · Score: 1

      I am sad to read about such misconceptions about Islam, Jihad and Quran (not Koran) itself. The site that was quoted (submission.org) does not reflect what the majority of Muslims believe in a few areas (specially with regard to the Prophet PBUH). I am not sure who runs this site but it is clearly wrong in some areas (logically, factually, content-wise etc. which I can prove if you want).

      Now coming to the concept of 'Jihad' it is the most manipulated concept both in the Muslim world as well as the rest. Killing an human being is the worst crime/sin in the eyes of God. He Says in Quran which mean "Killing a human being is like killing the whole humanity" and also "one who wrongly kills a human being cannot be forgiven, ever". The above quoted are completely out of context. Allah allows the Muslims to take up a sword _only_ as a last resort. In fact history is full of examples where the Prophet PBUH or his companions have given up what was righteously theirs just to avoid war.

      But unfortunately it is true that the recent events of the world do not reflect this peace-loving nature of Islam (which is also helped by the exploitation by the media). On the other hand I wonder if the whole West-bashing "terrorists" do this only for this purpose? There has to be a bigger game behind this, which is beyond so-called "religious devotion" or wateva crappy excuse they make for their inhuman acts. I am not sure whats in it for them. There are definitely bigger players involved.

    2. Re:Koran supports decapitation, jihad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, by reporting on 9/11, beslan, bali, embassy in africa, madrid, on and on, the "Media" is really exploiting and propagating a complete distortion.

      Give me a break.

    3. Re:Koran supports decapitation, jihad by copdk4 · · Score: 1

      Allah allows the Muslims to take up a sword _only_ as a last resort. Well, Muslims arent allowed to use 'sword' however, they can use Dynamite, Explosives and 'Planes' ?

    4. Re:Koran supports decapitation, jihad by lotsToLearn · · Score: 1

      If this is an attempt at humour let me tell you it is funny :-) But if not then i guess all these things are disallowed. If someone is doing something it doesnt mean its "allowed". Everyone does things which are not allowed, not that thats O.K.

    5. Re:Koran supports decapitation, jihad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be worthwhile for the parent to read the introduction to get better understanding of the context of the chapters, rather than quoting out of context. Please read the Introduction to the chapters.. that might do you some good. Here is the link from usc

  99. Re:Dear GOD by donbrock · · Score: 0
    Last time I made an anti-American comment someone told me "You are, quite simply, not welcome here then"

    And since I made an anti-Slashdot comment about Michael I'm automatically modded -1 for all new posts.

  100. Right On! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I grew up in a very blue-collar family: nobody cared when Smith Corona went to Mexico, and when all of the manufacturing jobs went elsewhere. It was a great thing because those blue-collar jobs were replaced with white-collar management. I experienced my youth with parents just trying to find a job in their "field" - to little avail. Nobody spoke up for my family.

    I worked very hard to get myself into school, through school, and out of it - and now, my degree is about 1/4 as valuable in a wrecked job market. People spoke, but nothing's been done.

    Until you're on the top, there's never any change because there is nobody looking out for you. If there's a buck to be made, and you're not the source of it, then what good are you?

  101. Question by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    Why wouldn't the militants outsource the insurrection to those very same software companies?! Don't armed militants have to save money too?

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like a catch 22 reference

  102. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely an independent Kashmir is a damn fine solution to the bloody tug-of-war that India and Pakistan have been playing for the last 57 years.

    Just do it. It's got to be cheaper than the fisticuffs.

    Another brilliant post by Truth Quark! 60 years of conflict suddenly resolved! Now, about Palestine .

    ---

    That's right - turn it over to the Wahhabi death-cultists and subjugate Kashmiris of all faiths and beliefs to totalitarian religious extremists who want to take the world back to the 14th century.

    Yeah, you're brillant all right.

    (Note to morons reflexively slapping at the reply link: your Bush jokes are tired and lame.)

  103. Re:Dear GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except for this one it seems....

  104. Re:Dear GOD by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

    Hey, cheer up, Gothmolly posts at -1 by default now.

    --
    -mkb
  105. Most wars and conflicts involve muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ... "Samuel Huntington observes in "The Clash of Civilizations, "Wherever one looks along the perimeter of Islam, Muslims have problems living peacefully with their neighbors... Muslims make up one-fifth of the world's population but in the 1990s they have been far more involved in intergroup violence than people of any other civilization." Hunington goes on to show that more than half of the "ethnopolitical" conflicts of the world involved Muslims and there were "three times as many intercvilizational conflicts involving Muslims as tehre were conflicts between all non-Muslim civilizations. The conflicts within Islam also were more numerous than those in any other civilization.. Conflicts involving Muslims also tended to be heavy in casualities... Three different compilations of data... yield the same conclusion: in the early 1990s Muslims were engaged in more intergroup violence than were non-Muslims, and two-thirds to three-quarters of intercivilization wars were between Muslims and non-Muslims. Islam's borders are bloody, and so are its innards."" [46]

    Spencer, Robert. "Onward Muslim Soldiers: How Jihad Still Threatens America and the West", (Regency Publishing: Washington, D.C; 2003) 183.

    Footnote 46:
    Samuel P. Hunington, "The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order", (New York: Touchstone, 1997), 256-8.

    You do not even that little statistic to figure it out, just turn on the tv or read a paper. The civil in war in Lebanon that muslims got the upperhand in, muslims jihadis in Kashmir, muslim Chechens with Middle Eastern cousins waging jihad on Russia, Israel vs Arabs, muslims causing unrest in Thailand, Arabs in Sudan vs black muslims and black non-muslims, Azerbaijan vs the Armenians of Nagarno-Karabagh, where muslims border non-muslims there is conflict more often then there is peace. Islam is a warlike and retrograde force on the planet, a true pox on all that should be considered decent.

    1. Re:Most wars and conflicts involve muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property -- either as a child, a wife, or a concubine -- must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
      "Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die. But the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytising faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science -- the science against which it had vainly struggled -- the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome."
      -- Winston Churchill

      They didn't listen to him about the Nazis in time either.

      (Posting as AC 'cause I don't want my head cut off.)

    2. Re:Most wars and conflicts involve muslims by uujjj · · Score: 1

      You do not even that little statistic to figure it out, just turn on the tv or read a paper. The civil in war in Lebanon that muslims got the upperhand in, muslims jihadis in Kashmir, muslim Chechens with Middle Eastern cousins waging jihad on Russia, Israel vs Arabs, muslims causing unrest in Thailand, Arabs in Sudan vs black muslims and black non-muslims, Azerbaijan vs the Armenians of Nagarno-Karabagh, where muslims border non-muslims there is conflict more often then there is peace. Islam is a warlike and retrograde force on the planet, a true pox on all that should be considered decent

      Unfortunately, all your examples except Sudan describe instances of the intrusion of non-Muslim rule onto predominantly Muslim lands, which undermines your point. It is unreasonable to expect that Muslims will not fight back when their lands are invaded.

      For instance, Lebanon was a country with a 2/3 Muslim population with a constitution that mandated a Christian majority in the government. Was this fair?

    3. Re:Most wars and conflicts involve muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (Posting as AC 'cause I don't want my head cut off.)

      But I still have your IP address... Mu-haha-haaa

    4. Re:Most wars and conflicts involve muslims by lotsToLearn · · Score: 1
      There are reasons for each of those conflicts which have not much to do with religion. They mite exploit religion to gather support but really Islam has nothing that endorses offensive actions like those.

      Why does Islam come under trial whenever the word muslim is attached to something/someone. If a stupid muslim is bad doesnt mean that Islam is bad. Unfortunately the bad ones dominate/humiliate the much better majority that is out there.

  106. I resent that. by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

    Saying a country is stealing jobs is wrong. The US is the foremost proponent of the free market economy and has tried hard to globalize that idea. What has happened is the US has been successful. The only problem is that there are two sides to everything, including a globalized free market system.

    If you're running a business, won't you try to minimize your costs? Won't you go to the company that can give you what you want for the lowest amount of money?

    Well guess what? Now, companies don't just look for the lowest price in the US, but all over the world. Is it any surprise then, that they manage to find a LOT of other places where labor comes cheap, ESPECIALLY when converted into US Dollars?

    And answer me one more thing please. Why is nobody grumbling about people stealing jobs from Nike sweatshops?

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  107. Yes let them have their freedom. by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Freedom from war and freedom to live.

    Just like in Israel/Palestine, N. Ireland, etc, I bet most Kashmiris never wanted to be part of anything especially a war.

    It's usually only a few assholes/idiots who cause most of the trouble.

    Otherwise it'll just be lots of heated words and everyone else just ignores them and gets on with their lives.

    Look are most Kashmiris much better off if they aren't part of India? I doubt it. Sure India isn't such a great country but what's the big deal being part of it? Is the Indian gov that evil as it is? I doubt it. Plus democracy in India is probably not as big a farce as it is in the US.

    In fact the odds are there'll be genocide if one of those Militant Islamist groups takes over - just look at the track record round the world - e.g. Sudan, Indonesia, Turkey (e.g. Armenia, Kurds), even in Nigeria the Islamists burnt churches and rioted because of what a _newspaper_ said re Muhammad and a beauty contest.

    Even recently in Pakistan some actress got death threats just because of an on-screen kiss - such threats in Pakistan are no joke - over there people's throats have been slit for less.

    --
  108. The questions is: by nabil_IQ · · Score: 1

    Would this attempt effect the raging outsourcing that's been happening over the past few years ? will companies that outsource some of their call center/software dev./etc services to india be concered after reading such news ?

    --

    Won't somebody please think of the Karma!
    1. Re:The questions is: by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      No it wont. Outsourcing is less about economics than it is about breaking the backs of IT professionals. In the 90s programmers, analysts, and support techs were scarce, in high demand, and knew it.

      The industry decided to teach us a lesson. And the really didn't care how crappy the scabs they hired were.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  109. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by northcat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bullshit. Being an Indian, I can tell you that Lashkar-e-Toiba is a Pakistani terrorist group, FUNDED by Pakistan and TRAINDED by ISI, the intelligence service of Pakistan. The terrorists are trying everything - from asking Kashmir to be a state of pakistan to making Kashmir an independent state. Once it becomes independent, the Kashmiri people will themselves "ask" to be merged with Pakistan and Pakistan will "reluctantly" "accept" the offer. Either that, or Kashmir will be an independent state only for name sake; in reality it will be in control of Pakistan. Just look at how Pakistan is controlling it right now. Don't believe everything General Musharraf says. In fact, don't believe ANYTHING he says. If you know the truth, you'll realise that every word Musharraf says is actually just blackmailing India (or extortion or threatening, if you want to be a language nazi).

  110. Re:WTF is an AK-56? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SKS stands for Samozaryadnyj Karabin Simonova--Simonov autoloading rifle. Simonov wasn't Kalashnikov.

  111. Re:Dear GOD by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1
    If this failed attack had been in NYC

    There was an attack in NYC, it didn't fail. We watched on TV as @$$holes from around the world rejoiced. Now you want us to feel sorry when it happens to you? It's seems to me the only national leader who immediately came to the US to offer help was Tony Blair.

  112. Re:Dear GOD by JavaLord · · Score: 1

    was annoyed by the post (and the host of others like it on this and previous stories about India) because it seems to me that xenophobia and ignorance about the world are valorised at the moment in the States, and that's a real shame.

    Dude, he made a joke about the number of tech support reps that are located in India for various companies. How is that Xenophbic, ignorant, or self centered? The only ignorance I see is in your hatred of Americans. You can claim your are not anti-American but your posts suggest otherwise.

    If this failed attack had been in NYC, you can bet he (and many other readers of this site) would have a very different reaction, and all the talk would be of how to get those dirty Saudi^^^^^ Iraqi terrorists etc etc.

    It's hard to pin down one industry you could joke about in NYC. Had it been planned for Canada someone could have said "WHAT ABOUT MY HOCKEY/MAPLE SYRUP". It wasn't a xenophobic comment. I suggest you evaluate yourself for bias before trying to pass judgement on others. Your "Saudi/Iraqi" comment was so ignorant I wont even touch it.

  113. Lashkar-e-Toiba is a Pakistani terrorist group by northcat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Being an Indian I can tell you that Lashkar-e-Toiba is a Pakistani terrorist group. Read my other comment here.

  114. Re:Dear GOD by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    I think you are confusing Xenophobia with black humor. The only reason that it is funny is that it was a failed attack. A failed attack on any tech support call center would probably meet with same type of jokes. It would not matter if it was in Idaho or India.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  115. Control the Wahabis like we did the Stalinists by wytcld · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Any attack on our call centers is an attack on America. We should be clear on that.

    The Soviets gave us much more reason to be terrified than the Wahabis probably ever can. But they never directly attacked our interests. Why? Because we threatened total destruction of their homeland. What is the homeland of the Wahabis? A hint: Mecca is its capitol. What could make the Wahabis stop? A suggestion: A credible threat to totally destroy Mecca if they ever step over the line again.

    Look, Moscow is an incredibly beautiful place deeply rooted in world history too. But why were we so much readier to take ultimate action against those who believed in the utopia of Marx, but unwilling to offer to same level of threat against those who believe in the heaven of Mohammed?

    Both Marx and Mohammed are equally flawed branches of the same tree our own culture grows from. Both have had worldwide followers who, despite sometimes good motivations, individually, collectively brought repression and backwardness to large parts of the world, while threatening more enlightened and realistic regions.

    We're not angels, and the followers of these two flawed ideologues aren't devils: the Russians weren't, and neither are the Islamists, on the whole. But threatening the Russians with total destruction, and meaning it, was integral to surviving their threat and ultimately (or at least temporarily) dissolving their global reach and the depth of repression in their homeland. Let's make the same threat to the Islamists. And let's let them know that, just as we were prepared to defend our interests across the world from the Russians, so too will any significant strike in any part of the world against our interests be the end of Mecca.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    1. Re:Control the Wahabis like we did the Stalinists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need help... A strait jacket might do the trick.

    2. Re:Control the Wahabis like we did the Stalinists by lumpenprole · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Any attack on our call centers is an attack on America. We should be clear on that.

      Speaking on behalf of many people I'd like to say "Muh-wha???".

      If overseas contractors that companies use so they don't have to pay Americans a living wage are worthy of our military support, why aren't they paying taxes for us to defend them? These terrorists get zero sympathy from me, but shouldn't we be putting our own house in order?

      We just had the congress tell us that they can't raise minimum wage because it would hurt companies too much, so now you want the taxes of people working full time and living in poverty to go to the Indian government so that the jobs we lose to them will be safe? Did you forget we're already in the red paying for two wars? Seriously, what the hell are you talking about?

      --
      Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
    3. Re:Control the Wahabis like we did the Stalinists by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      How about if the american corporations start to pay enough taxes to cover the benefits they receive. Or is that what you meant by "putting our own house in order"?

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    4. Re:Control the Wahabis like we did the Stalinists by Boronx · · Score: 1

      It might make it easier to pressure Saudi Arabia if we didn't have a president who was their bitch.

    5. Re:Control the Wahabis like we did the Stalinists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call troll... and not a very good one either!! >:(*

    6. Re:Control the Wahabis like we did the Stalinists by Cletus+the+yokel · · Score: 1

      Wow holy bad analogy Batman!

      For the analogy to hold, if a rogue cell of a splinter group of a breakaway Trotskyite faction bombed Washington DC, during the Cold War, the US would've nuked Moscow as a matter of course.
      Not.

      --
      Wanted: One witty yet thought provoking .sig - Apply here.
  116. Re:With my luck, I would have to file the bug repo by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

    Unprotected sex with a member of the opposite gender.

    I just hate it when tech support throws out all those technical terms.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  117. Nightmare USA scenario by davidwr · · Score: 1

    After 9/11, I started playing "what if" games. What if terrorists...

    * Set off a WMD at a major vendor's HQ, taking out hundreds of key developers thereby crippling development of or shutting down a popular product?

    * Set off a WMD at a trade show or technical conference, killing off top talent from across the industry?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  118. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Kashmir becomes independent...next day China walks in like they did with the part of kashmir pakistan had managed to capture a few decades back, uses the added military advantage to browbeat the three other nations into submission and/or nuke the hell out of them from up there,

    And the rest of the world just stands by and lets this happen? What happens to China's trade relations? Why would China risk alienating the world? It's simply not worth it.

    build up their military might even more and proceed to beat the tar of USA (and this is one country that can actually try it thanks to sheer nuber of cannon fodder they have got... acceptable collateral damage and all) and all other countries over the world.

    OMG RED CHINA IS COMING!!! Seriously, this scenario isn't even close to realistic. The chinese have about 20 nuclear weapons, give or take a few. The US has around 7000. It would take 164 to destroy US command and control, since China doesn't have that, it's an utterly unrealistic scenario for them to pursue. It would take about 400 nuclear missles to wipe out Chinese command and control. There isn't a realistic military option for the Chinese against the US.

    Even if China woke up tommorow with Russia's nuclear capabilities (10,000 weapons) why would she attack the US? Her own trading partner? That is plain silly. If China wants to dominate the world all that is needed to to continue growing her economy and evolving while the US moves to a more service based/low tech economy and the dollar continues to drop.

    Sounds unrealistic ?

    A US/China conflict is even more unrealistic that a US/Russian one at this point.

    And you have a president who starts attempting to capture a terrorist in Afghanistan and ends up bombing some dictator in Iraq... so let us leave unrealistic out of it...

    If you don't understand the fact that he is trying to transform the region and not just 'capture Osama' then you are brain dead. I'm not saying it's going to work, because history says that nation building is usually a failue, but things are looking pretty good right now.

    So goodbye to Indo-pak conflict ...hello to World War IV!!

    Unlikely, the only way you get World War IV is to drag the US and Russia into it on conflicting sides which is not going to happen.

    You are so brilliant...

    Before you go spouting off about nuclear war scenarios, why don't you go read a bit about what each country is capable of?

  119. Re:Dear GOD by guet · · Score: 1

    oh, I think it's just that it was early in the morning, look at it now ; )

  120. Re:Dear GOD by guet · · Score: 1

    (posted as anonymous before by mistake)

    >> xenophobia and ignorance about the world are
    >> valorised at the moment in the States

    > Welcome to america. Dont like it ? Leave. This is how the
    > world works: They hate us, we hate them

    QED

  121. Blame the Jews. by glrotate · · Score: 0, Troll

    From India to Indonesia, from the Netherlands to the Philippines the reason Muslims can't get along with their neighbors is because of Zionist occupied Palestine.

    1. Re:Blame the Jews. by cdodich · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Well considering the Jews are responsible for 9/11 and the Iraq war and insurgent bombings and Yasser Arafat's death and Laci Petterson's death, and Michael Jackson's child molestation and the Pope's fever and smog in Los Angeles and the 2005 tsunami and world hunger and U.N. sexual abuse in the Congo and genocide in Darfur and malaria and everything else evil in the world you are probably right. Blame the Jews!!!

    2. Re:Blame the Jews. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? India is 85% Hindu today, I don't see any statistics of "20 Million" being killed. Show me a real source, and not some BJP propaganda either.

  122. Re:Dear GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We watched on TV as @$$holes from around the world rejoiced. Now you want us to feel sorry when it happens to you?

    It's assholes like you who all around the world rejoice when something bad happens, and all of them are using exactly the same logic. Only way to end that is that assholes like you decide to end it. (But I guess you lack the courage and intelligence to make such a bold step)

  123. Revisionist nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India stole Kashmir from the Muslims.

    Period.

  124. Re:With my luck, I would have to file the bug repo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > Bug 133925: Primary source code archives at Bangalore outsourcing site destroyed by Lashkar-e-Toiba militants.
    > Priority: Critical/Stopper

    Addendum: This bug has appeared before. Apparently, the same executive team that outsourced the source code archival system to Bangalore is the same team that in September 2001, relocated the hot failover server to 2 WTC, to serve in the event of catastrophic failure of the main server in 1 WTC.

    Recommended Action: The Board remains divided 50/50 along party lines, as to whether the proper long-term solution is to remove the goddamn Muslims or to remove the goddamn Executive team.

    /likes the original poster's nick
    //one ticket to hell, please, window seat.

  125. terrorists misidentified by drwho · · Score: 1

    I think the terrorists were identified. It's unemployed american workers wanting their jobs back.

  126. LEGAL SYSTEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I wonder why Gartner Group and all of those consulting firms that make big money from offshoring do not come out and say:

    a. Safety is much much lower in India
    b. Someone may steal your data, source code and there is nothing you can do about it
    c. Help increase India's economic output and its production of unregulated pollution
    d. Help India corporations get big enough to buy out USA corporations

  127. Slashdotters run amock? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    After reading endless anonymous threats to "Kill spammers" or "Knock off the RIAA" on Slashdot it looks like some of them finally went off and tried it against outsourcing. Never piss off desperate cobol programmers I guess.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  128. Re:Because they are relatively soft targets? by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    Bada-Bing

  129. Good old spin by b-baggins · · Score: 1, Informative

    Wahabi militant group is simply doublespeak for terrorists. These are the same islamic nut cases that let a bunch of Saudi school girls burn to death because they weren't wearing their head scarves and so couldn't leave the burning school building. Wahabi "militants" were the nutballs who ran the Taliban. bin Laden is a Wahabi militant as is Hamas and most of the Palestinian terror groups.

    These guys' idea of an "independent" Kashmir is nothing more than another Sharia state to replace Afghanistan and give bin Laden a safer place to hide out.

    --
    You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    1. Re:Good old spin by bombadillo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Shhhh don't you know you can't metion Saudi and Terrorists in the same breath! It may raise to many questions as to why we invaded Iraq and not Saudi Arabi after 911.

      I think the numbers speak for them selves. 14 Saudi High jackers ; 0 Iraqi High Jackers and 0 WMD's found in Iraq.

    2. Re:Good old spin by bombadillo · · Score: 1

      Saudi Arabia is a pretty factioned Kingdom with a lot of players in the Royal family bidding for control. There are extremists in the royal family. The Saudi's can't even keep terrorist operatives out of their military. I found this article regarding a recent FBI memo while reading Drudge Report. I found the following pretty disturbing.
      The Saudi was sent home after it was discovered he provided information to al Qaeda figures in Saudi Arabia, including "coordinates on landmarks in the US," the report says.
      "It's not surprising because we believe the Saudi military is infiltrated at the junior officer level in Saudi Arabia," said Dick Clarke, a former White House counterterrorism czar and now an ABC News Consultant. "And there are so many of them who come here for training."

      Saying that Iraq was sponsoring Terrorism is a pretty week argument to Justify the Iraq war. The U.S. and just about every other political player sponsors some third party group to achieve it's goals. I don't think I have to remind you of Iran/Contra and numerous dictators that were sponsored by the U.S in some form. The fact is the current administration fought hard to link Iraq to 911. The more sobering fact is that Iraq had nothing to do with 911 or our current threat to national security. Our greatest threat is still from terrorists with financing ties back to Saudi Arabi. Saudi Arabi is much more extremist and religous than Iraq. Iraq was probably the most Westernized of all the Islamic countries in the Middle East. Notice I said, "was" meaing the war has changed things. We are friendly with the current faction in charge of the Royal Family. However, it's not unreasonable to say that Saudi Arabia is a politcal event away from being run by a more extremist faction. The existing Saudi Government can not be trusted to control their own extremist factions. Perhaps we went to war with Iraq for that very reason. Meaning that Iraq was an easier target with lots of oil. We can make Saudi Arabi play a little nicer, with out damaging our currently friendly business relationship.

      Bin Laden's banishment was basically a sacrificial cow to us back in the 90's. Recall that Bin Laden was very mad that US troops were stationed on Saudi Soil during the First Gulf war. The Royal Family was very happy to have us there as they needed US firepower to deal with Iraq. It was an easy peace overing for the Saudi's to make. It's also important to note that the Bin Laden family has claimed to have turned their back to Osama since the banishment. However, Bin Laden family members from Saudi Arabi were with Osama at a wedding as resently as 99 after the USS Cole atack. Osama even spoke at the wedding regarding the burning flesh of the "infidels" being a great site.

  130. Re:Dear GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most Americans are ignorant to the fact that the world hates us. Where I work, over $10,000 was donated to the idiots that were hit by the tsunami. My contribution, $0. Why? I know that the world hates me because I'm an American. Before I started reading Slashdot, I was ignorant to this fact. A better person might be able to overlook the constant derogatory comments towards Ameicans on this site, but I can't. If you and those like you want to keep it up, great. All I can do is help educate the ignorant Americans about how they are thought of by the rest of the world.

  131. Re:Dear GOD by Parker703 · · Score: 1

    Do you really think third-rate military dictators would laugh at America and burn our flag in contempt if Ronald Reagan were president?

  132. semantics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If 'militants','activists', or radicals' use terroristic tactics, how are they not terrorists?
    Calling these people 'militants' is as repugnant as calling Himmler an 'activist' These people are terrorists pure and simple or no one is.

  133. RDX Explosive... Sounds familiar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm... RDX explosives. Where have I heard of that before? Oh yeah, it was when 380 tons of the stuff went missing from a US-"controlled" bunker in Iraq.

    NY Times link

    Enjoy!

    -Rick

  134. Re:Dear GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Helloo... logged in users usually start off with posts at 1, but his is at 0, so he *is* actually being penalized due to the negative karma the system has assigned to him as a result of being modded down in the past. It's the way things work. Read the site FAQ if you don't get it yet.

  135. Re:Dear GOD by guet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dude, he made a joke about the number of tech support reps that are located in India for various companies. How is that Xenophbic, ignorant, or self centered? The only ignorance I see is in your hatred of Americans. You can claim your are not anti-American but your posts suggest otherwise.

    Self-centred and ignorant because it takes something very serious in India/Pakistan and turns it into a joke about call centres (which seems to be the farthest most comments get here on any story about India). It's not just that joke - look down through this story and you'll count tens of jokes that are all just as lame and just as insulting to people who have died and are dying in a conflict that's been going on for ages. Yes, it's a joke and not something to get righteous about, but I don't think it should go unchallenged.

    Saying Xenophobia is valorised was a general comment on the insular attitude of the Bush administration since 9/11 who have consistently encouraged the country to disparage other nations (France comes to mind) and promoted a climate of fear and eternal vigilance against an undefined foreign enemy. I couldn't pretend to talk about all Americans and wouldn't want to. I certainly feel no 'hatred of Americans' but if that makes it easier to dismiss the criticism...

    Somehow I don't think if that same joke was made about a failed attack on IT companies in NYC on this same site, people would be defending it as funny.

  136. Re:Dear GOD by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

    Now you want us to feel sorry when it happens to you? It's seems to me the only national leader who immediately came to the US to offer help was Tony Blair.

    What? Even Saddam Hussein condemned the attacks.

    --
    -mkb
  137. Re:Dear GOD by donbrock · · Score: 0
    And since I made an anti-Slashdot comment about Michael I'm automatically modded -1 for all new posts.

    It's actually worse than that. They retroactively modded all my past comments to -1, even some that were 5s.

  138. Simple answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whabbi Muslim fantics want to:

    a. kill all non-Muslims
    b. convert anyone left to Whabbisim
    c. revert back to the year 1200

    Thanks Saudi Arabia for funding this for decades.

    1. Re:Simple answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wahhabis want to kill all non-Muslims? I'd like to see a quote. Even Osama Bin Laden doesn't make that bold a statement. The "convert or die" myth seems to have died off in the media, thank God.

  139. Re:Dear GOD by Tassach · · Score: 1
    Do you really think third-rate military dictators would laugh at America and burn our flag in contempt if Ronald Reagan were president?
    I think the idea of electing the corpse of a man with Altzheimers is pretty laughable. Of course, Ronald Regan's corpse is STILL smarter than The Shrub.
    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  140. I live there! by azuredragon23 · · Score: 1

    Talk about the world being a small place. I am an American living right near the IMA and have just been in Bangalore. The alleged attack on IMA affects me directly (much harder/impossible to go to the golf course there and the nearby FRI where civilians are permitted). Although I can't imagine why any room temprature IQ terrorist would want to attack them. That place is heavily guarded. As much or more so than any US military base I have been to in the US. On special occassions, they have plenty of tanks guarding gates much smaller than themselves. If you have been to any significant size IT organization in India, you would notice they have slavishly adopted a number of ISO (& other) certification for their processes. Consequently, most of them have a disaster recovery plan so even if their primary center is wiped out, the client assets are protected. Additionally, large American firms have wisely minimized their risk by distributing their exposure to muliple companies. Net net -- the apparent targets (Indian military, US clients) of these alleged terrorist had little to worry. I wouldn't even be surprised if the whole thing is fake encounter meant to boost the record of some local police official (after all no logical connection between IMA & Polaris). Nevertheless, in the process, I have been personally inconvinienced. Insensitive bastards!

  141. The quality was rather good too. by Duhavid · · Score: 1

    The quality was rather good too.

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
  142. Re: Look comrade.... - reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >US people in particular, and Western people in general, are pricing
    >themselves too high given the expensive lifestyles they lead.

    1. Pollution laws that are enforced
    2. Sanitary living conditions
    3. A viable legal system that allows those with little resoures to win against those with millions of dollars
    4. Basic health care
    5. Free education for 12 years
    6. Free children immunization
    7. Good infrastructure
    8. Labor laws
    9. Minimal corruption/bribery at all government levels

  143. Re:Dear GOD by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

    Nice job of self-editing your memory, there. I suggest you actually go back and read some articles from right after 9/11. The outpouring of symapthy and support from all over the world for the US was like nothing we've ever seen before -- or, given our behavior since then, are likely ever to see again. For Christ's sake, Syria offered to help us track down the perpetrators. What a difference a few years make ...

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  144. Doodh maango by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kheer denge.

    Kashmir maango... dil cheer denge.

    Ask for milk and we would treat you with pudding, in addition to the milk.
    Ask for Kashmir, and be assured your heart would be ripped out.

    Hindu, muslim - who the hell cares? Kashmir belongs to India and India alone. Now take your jack shit elsewhere.

  145. Nixon forced end of war. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, cuz Nixon about to give the Pakis what they needed to go marching into New Delhi.

    Indira had to back down cuz of American might: a
    situation the Indians are working overtime to overcome.

    A couple more decads of Americans shipping jobs to India ought to tip the balance of power over to the Hindu state.

  146. Terrorists not Militants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Ahhh! Yet another example of my "most journalist are self-serving cowards" thesis. These jerks are terrorists, meaning those who attempt to advance their political agenda by the use of terror and violence directed at civilians (here, those at call centers). They're not "militants," meaning those who want to advance their agenda by aggressive, military means. Militants fight soldiers. Terrorist kill mothers and children. Even the dumbest journalist ought to be able to tell the difference.

    Journalists hope that if they suck up to this monsters, being careful to call them 'macho' names like "militant" they won't get hurt and may even get leads that let them have a cameraman in place when a bomb goes off in a marketplace (as is happening in Iraq). The typical journalist mindset (particularly in the European press) is, "Go blow up that schoolbus filled with Jewish schoolchildren. That's OK. Just leave me alone."

    And have you noticed something else? Around the world it's the political left that's displaying the same zeal to keep blood-thirsty Middle-East tyrants and religious zealots in power that their fathers and grandfathers displayed for Stalin and Mao. The mainstream media is trying to get us to believe that the threat is from "religious fundamentalism," but the evil is the same that attracted so many to Karl Marx, a ideological rationale to kick people around and build a brave new world. It's the same zeal for blood that makes feminist so rabidly proabortion. It's the 'progress comes through death' mindset that lies at the heart of Darwinism, as Darwin himself stated so coldly but eloquently in the last paragraph of The Origin of Species.

    Sick, sick, sick! Thank goodness the Internet and bloggers are giving us an alternative to scum who can't tell the difference between a terrorist and a militant.

    --Mike Perry, Seattle

    Editor: Dachau Liberated

    Editor: Eugenics and Other Evils

    1. Re:Terrorists not Militants by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1

      Damn, you figured us lefties out! We all have a lust for death and support terrorism because we hate humanity.

      And we would have gotten away with it if it weren't for your damned insightfulness!

    2. Re:Terrorists not Militants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, pretty much all of the most "famous" lefties of the last century who ended up with power were involved in large scale murders.

      So yeah, you guys stink big time and the only difference between your typical lazy leftists in US and say Lenin is the fact one had the guts to follow thru with his ideology while others are happy holding corporate jobs while pretending they are part of something "progressive".

      Face it - the left had their chance in the last century and they fucked it up - big time with millions upon millions of dead people to show for their "struggle".
      You are not progressive anymore- you are fucking old news.

  147. Detailed information on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://news.newkerala.com/india-news/?action=fulln ews&id=81204

    Militants planned to strike at IMA, Bangalore IT cos.:

    [India News]: New Delhi, March 6, 2005 : With the killing of three militants and the arrest of two others here, police say they have uncovered a plot to strike at the Indian Military Academy (IMA) in Dehra Dun and major software companies in Bangalore.

    The special cell of the Delhi Police Saturday evening busted a module of the militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba, when they first apprehended two operatives and later neutralised three others in the city. Two of those killed were Pakistanis.

    "The militants who had made the Indian Military Academy in Dehra Dun their target were also planning to attack some big software companies based in Bangalore," Joint Commissioner of Police (Special Cell) Karnail Singh, told a press conference Sunday.

    "The idea was to strike at the economic strength of the country as software is a major sector for India," he said.

    Bangalore, known as India's silicon valley, houses software giants like Infosys, Wipro, Texas Instruments and others.

    One of the arrested militants, Hamid Hussain, 28, had visited Bangalore in December 2004 along with another militant, identified only as Shams alias Pervez, who was shot dead Saturday, to map the locations of major software companies.

    Police, meanwhile, are investigating the activities of the module and Sunday recovered several documents in this regard.

    Raids on various locations in the capital led to the recovery of maps of Dehra Dun, three AK-56 rifles, six magazines and 14 live rounds, close to 100 kg of dynamite, 450 detonators, a satellite phone, a Maruti Zen car and a motor bike.

    Some diaries containing codes also have been recovered and are being decoded, police said.

    The most incriminating piece of evidence was the recovery of a Pakistani passport from one of the slain militants, Bilawal alias Abu Naman, Singh said.

    The passport shows Bilawal's name as Saqib Ali of Sargodha with his current address in Rawalpindi.

    It was issued on Nov 13 and Bilawal had visited the United Arab Emirates and then Nepal on that passport.

    "This is the first time we have got straight evidence of a Pakistani's involvement. Usually when we kill or arrest a Pakistani we do not have evidence and that country conveniently refuses to acknowledge the same," Singh said.

    Police have also recovered an identity card of Bilawal issued in Pakistan.

    Interrogation of Hamid and Mohammad Sariq, 24, arrested Saturday, revealed that Hamid had been a resident of Jaffarabad in east Delhi for 15 years. He originally hails from Hapur, in Uttar Pradesh.

    He was enrolled into the LeT by one Sailm alias Doctor. The duo, along with Shams, visited Kathmandu Feb 3 to meet Abdul Aziz, an alleged senior functionary of the LeT. Aziz discussed various targets with them and also gave the satellite phone to Salim.

    Hamid was later introduced to Shahnawaz alias Abu Talla alias Mohammed Rafiq, a Pakistani who had set up a base in Patna with Shams' help two years ago.

    Shahnawaz was responsible for infiltrating Bilawal and Abu Naman into India. They set up their hideout in Uttam Nagar in west Delhi.

    Hamid had gone to Jammu to bring back explosives and was to be met by Sariq Saturday near the Samaipur Badli by pass road, where they were apprehended, blowing the lid over the entire plot.

    --Indo-Asian News Service

    http://sify.com/news/othernews/fullstory.php?id= 13 687293

    LeT planned to target software cos in Bangalore
    Sunday, 06 March , 2005, 18:14

    New Delhi: The Lashkar-e-Toiba militants killed in an encounter at New Delhi on Saturday night planned to attack software companies in Bangalore besides Indian Military Academy in Dehra Dun, Delhi police said on Sunday.

    The militants visited Bangalore in December last year and surveyed the location of several software comp

  148. its an oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yo! u mixed up the words terrorism and freedom fight. again! i hereby declare your comments "base"less.

  149. Re:Dear GOD by Parker703 · · Score: 1

    Wow. So you missed the reference? No suprise.

  150. Re:Dear GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? Even Saddam Hussein condemned the attacks.

    In public.

    In private, do you really believe he gave a tinker's damn about anybody else?

  151. Jalil what are you smoking by Statman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You fail to mention that the king might have been Hindu, but the majority of Kashmiris were Muslim and either wanted to side with Pakistan (Islamic State) or be independent. Let the Kashmiris be free and autonomous then, since that was the agreement afterall.

    1. Re:Jalil what are you smoking by jalilv · · Score: 0, Troll

      The post just above yours by azuredragon23 tells what happened. azuredragon23 also corrects my statements. I hope it is more clear now. Oh btw, I am a Muslim and I know I'd have elected to be a part of India if there was an option. Although I don't speak for other Muslims and Kashmiris, I believe India is much safer for Muslims as a secular country. Atleast, I won't be called a refugee by India like Pakistan does to Muslims who migrated to Pakistan during independence.

      - Jalil Vaidya

  152. Re:The quantities of explosives is quite unbelieva by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm amazed that they need 100kg Dynamite to attack a few software companies - surely they must have had other plans?

    100Kg of Dynamite is not THAT much. Especially when you consider the massive size of the [insert name of very famous Indian offshore development firm that's not Tata Consultancy here] campus in Bangalore.

    And why are software companies so important as opposed to centres of government to these terrorists?

    Probably because they aren't as heavily fortified as Indian government offices, yet may possibly have a much larger economic impact on the country? Do you have any idea how much money these firms make in comparison to the Indian GDP? Even if they could re-build immediately, and recover data from off-site locations (which they have), and get employees back up and operational immediately, what would YOU think if you were their client? The company could be the best in the world, and it STILL wouldn't be good enough when you consider the risks.

  153. Re:So what? by HbInd · · Score: 1

    would you have cared if it was a company which didn't "take away american jobs" ?

    I don't think so .....


    What part of "capitalism" and "free market economy" do you not understand ----

  154. Wahabi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's interesting that the poster used "Wahabi" to describe the militants, rather than the more widely-understood phrase "Islamic Extremist". Why obfuscate?

    1. Re:Wahabi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They're just being specific. Not all Islamic terrorists are Wahhabi (Salafi) -- for instance the Iranian/Syrian-backed Hizb'Allah are Shia -- but these were. (Don't worry; there are lots of mutually-loathing Islamic sects, and they'll kill each other once they're through with us kufr.)

      And it's not obfuscation unless you've been living under a rock for four years. Wahhabi ~ Salafi ~ Saudi = world's #1 sponsor of terrorist ideology.

  155. Re:So what? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Honestly, no I would not care. But in that case they would not be *deserving*, but they would not be relevant.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  156. Anti Call Centre Attitude by Rac3r5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its rather interesting that ppl here are so much against Indian call centres, complaining about language issues. Of course, you're not gonna understand ppl there, and they're not gonna understand u cause u guys have different accents, not becaue either side can't speak english. I'm from Vancouver, Canada and I find it hard to understand ppl from the South US, australia, and the UK. Here in Canada, when I call up a gov agency, I get some french person speaking english and its pretty hard to understand them too. Not because they don't know english, its because their accent. What I'm even more suprised about is /.'ers who need to call tech support. Can't fix ur own comp eh?

    1. Re:Anti Call Centre Attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm from Vancouver, Canada ... Can't fix ur own comp eh?
      Too bad we can't moderate parts of posts as Redundant...
    2. Re:Anti Call Centre Attitude by Cernst77 · · Score: 1

      Its funny, but how do these dialects transfer to posts on slashdot, or anywhere else for that matter? can we all understand each other when we type? =)

  157. Geeks unite! by Rimbo · · Score: 1

    All right, that's it, I don't care about IT outsourcing any more. Those are our geek brothers and sisters over there, and they're being attacked! Indian or Pakistani or Chinese or Thai or Turk or Russian or American or German or Finn or Swede or Brit or Mexican or Brazilian or Spanish or...

    Geek is geek. A threat to Indian geeks is a threat to all of geekdom!

    Kill the bastards.

    1. Re:Geeks unite! by Rac3r5 · · Score: 1

      haha cheers to that.. lol cheers indeed.. :p

    2. Re:Geeks unite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kill the bastards.

      What with, your rapier wit?

    3. Re:Geeks unite! by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      Who programs the cruise missiles?

      Who writes the credit checking routines?

      Who is the sysadmin of that FBI database?

      Geeks, baby.

  158. Re:Dear GOD by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

    No, but I don't believe any world leader does.

    --
    -mkb
  159. That's not why by donutello · · Score: 1

    These people used to be called terrorists - until they resorted to killing whoever called them that. No news organization will now use the word terrorist to describe them because if they do, they will kill whichever member of that news organization they can get their hand on. The same is true of the terrorists in Iraq who are going around killing innocent citizens to further their agenda and spread terror - Iraqi news organizations are forced to call them "insurgents" rather than the terrorists that they are because members of the news media in Iraq have a habit of turning up dead when they use the word terrorist to describe these people.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
    1. Re:That's not why by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Where are you getting this info? How could they be influencing news organizations here in the U.S.? Really, I'm just curious, I don't know anything about this conflict.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    2. Re:That's not why by donutello · · Score: 1

      No, they are not influencing news organizations in the US. They are influencing news organizations who have reporters in India. Since those news organizations are the ones originating these news stories, the words they use stick.

      This is not particular to this conflict. The same story is being played in Iraq. A female news anchor who insisted on calling the terrorists there terrorists, instead of insurgents was recently shot to death. Any journalists who use the word terrorist to describe them become targets. Journalists working for news organizations that refer to them as terrorists also become terrorits. The CNNs former director Robert Jordan had confessed that CNN would suppress stories about Saddam's atrocities in order to protect their employees in Iraq.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    3. Re:That's not why by delete · · Score: 1

      What exactly are you basing this on? It seems to me that usage of the term terrorist in the Western media is increasing on a daily basis.

      If you don't believe me, perhaps you could take a look here or here or here?

      Seriously, where do these people get these opinions from?

    4. Re:That's not why by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      In Iraq they might use terrorist practices, but they are fighting an occupation in their own country. At least we don't call them "Freedom Fighters". I think Insurgent is a good compromise.

      We use a lot of terrorist practices ourselves. Yet you don't hear much about the death squads we are starting up in Iraq (remember what we did in Latin America?). We are also doing our fare share of torture--though not yet to the extent of Saddam. I think if we don't want the label, we should improve our standards.

      What was "Shock and Awe?" When a bomb lands on your house and your children burn to death at a wedding party, arent' you terrorized?

      So I think it is OK that they use these non-loaded words. Reporters should just stick to what happened. The rest is opinion and we have enough of those.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  160. I called about my Toaster and got Death 2 Yankees by tjstork · · Score: 1

    I called the other day because my Toaster wasn't my toast correctly and I got some guy on the phone saying: "I don't care about your toaster, you zionist pig infidel Yankee American." So I was like, "well, could you transfer me to tech support before you blow yourself up."

    --
    This is my sig.
  161. Re:Dear GOD by Darby · · Score: 1

    It's seems to me the only national leader who immediately came to the US to offer help was Tony Blair.

    Then you're a fucking ignorant moron.

    The whole world with very few exceptions was more supportive of us than at almost any other time in our history.
    The fact that he pissed all of this good will away is one of the major reasons a lot of Americans hate Bush.

  162. sorry folks, but this stuff ain't funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let me see, terrorists want to kill as many innocent people as possible and the slashdot response is humor.....

    Bush is right. These people must be destroyed before they get a chance to carry out acts of destruction against society.

    Laugh all you want and flame me while you're at it. Bottomline: It is better to confront these idiots than to die because some cleric says you're not worthy of life!

    1. Re:sorry folks, but this stuff ain't funny by Vortran · · Score: 1

      I feel with you but you must think...

      You cannot prevent terrorism in a free country. Think about that.

      Ok, so if you cannot prevent it without obliterating freedom and liberty, how do you stop terrorism? How? I sure don't know, but I would start with taking away their motive... their incentive. Then removing their resources.

      --
      Knowledge is like ignorance.. too much can be just as bad as not enough.
    2. Re:sorry folks, but this stuff ain't funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, there will always be crime, and some of this crime will be murder, and some of these murders will be classified as terrorism. This is obvious.

      But I disagree with the "good Karma bonus" that some pathetic mod gave you. Here's why:

      In this specific example, the motive and incentive are both based upon faith in a (twisted form of) religion. There are state sponsored spokemen of this religion called "clerics." These clerics call upon the faithful to practice "jihad." GOOD LUCK REMOVING THE MOTIVE. The incentive is a bogus promise of sex with virgins in the afterlife. GOOD LUCK REMOVING THE INCENTIVE. However, I do agree with removing the terrorist's resources. Specifically, REMOVE LIFE FROM THEIR BODIES.

      I assume I'll get a bad karma mod point here, but Bush is right. You can't stop terrorism completely, but you sure as hell don't have to lay down and die either.

    3. Re:sorry folks, but this stuff ain't funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay, so if you can't stop it, must you accept it? Of course not. The question then becomes how do we protect ourselves against an ongoing threat? How do we minimize our risk? How do we make it difficult for terrorists to do what they want to do? How do we stay alive while people plot our destruction?

      As annoying as Bush is most of the time, on the terrorism issue he is basically right.

  163. Re:Dear GOD by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    We watched on TV as @$$holes from around the world rejoiced.

    So that would be some stock footage of Palestinians dancing? Oh, and Funkmaster Kim from the DPRK didn't immediately condemn the attacks. Ho hum

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  164. That didn't happen after the 1993 blasts by donutello · · Score: 1

    I lived in Bombay at that time. Actually there was a lot of tension and communal riots before the bomb blasts in Bombay.

    It's almost as if the bomb blasts had the opposite effect. There was a very eery calm and absence of violence and reaction in the aftermath of the bombs. The people of Bombay decided not to be cowed by the terrorists and to defy them. Attendance in offices the next day was actually higher than it was during typical days. The blood banks were overflowing within hours after the attacks and they actually had to ask people not to show up to donate blood.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  165. Re:Dear GOD by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

    While simultaneously oppressing the hordes of citizens in the streets celebrating? Nice self-editing of your own memory. Arab governments trying to silence their over joyous citizens in order to prevent a pissed off America thirsting for Muslim blood from storming into the Middle East was typical of 9/11.

  166. Re:Dear GOD by teetam · · Score: 1

    I am sorry, Sir, but you are a moron and an ignoramus. India has been fighting terrorists similar to the 9-11 ones for two decades now. Only America didn't notice because anything that happens outside the USA doesn't matter, does it?

    --
    All your favorite sites in one place!
  167. Re:Dear GOD by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

    Why shouldn't a country that foreigners think won't be able to pay off it's huge debt slice open it's wrists and bleed the last of it's money for corrupt third world government to "help" their people by building themselves a new harem, palace or fund a terrorist attack on their enemies? We all know that when America dies it will go to heaven be given 70 virgins.

  168. Terrorists have driven all the Hindus by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 1

    Having an independent election at present is unfair; I understand that, over the past 20 years, the Kashmiri terrorists have systematically driven out all the Hindus and most of the moderate Muslims, so the region is predominantly Muslim right now. Any election will result in Kashmir voting to join Pakistan.

    This would be like if, in the US, the right wing and neocons drove out all the democrats, non-christians and all left-leaning folks, and subsequently conducted a referendum to decide whether or not the US should be a theocracy.

    The other issue is this: most of the terrorists fighting in Kashmir are not Kashmiris. They are Islamic fundamentalists from other countries funded, trained and politically backed by Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Many of them have publicly declared that Kashmir is only the first step, and they will not stop until they have planted the Islamic flag in Delhi.

    Magnus.

  169. The back story by g8oz · · Score: 1

    Kashmir is majority Muslim, and its inhabitants want to either join Pakistan or become independant. Its not just the terrorists who want Kashmir out of India, its the Kashmiris themselves.

    Some background on the whole situation here
    http://www.fathom.com/course/10701013/session2.htm l

    Human rights abuses have been committed by both the Indian army and militants. The Indian army has been accused of killing 50,000 people in Kashmir since 1989.
    http://www.hrw.org/reports/1999/kashmir/

    1. Re:The back story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US army has killed how many people in how many places since 1989?

    2. Re:The back story by northcat · · Score: 1

      Your first link doesn't say that Kashmir wants to be independent or join Pakistan. And your second link doesn't say that the Indian army has been accused of killing 50,000 people. Nice try.

      And more important, the Indian military only targets (or at least tries to target) people who are actually involved in terrorism or support it. The terrorists, by definition, target civilians. Not just Hindus, but Muslims too.

      [Human rights organisations just love screaming about abuses by government and established authorites rather than abuses by "militant" organisations. It gives more value to their efforts.]

  170. Vote Reagan by AoT · · Score: 1

    Four more years of dead!

  171. Re:WTF is an AK-56? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There seem to be 2 distinct Chinese "Type 56" rifles.

    The Type 56 carbine/SKS knockoff is a semiautomatic, but the Type 56 assault rifle/AK-47 knockoff is an assault rifle capable of automatic fire.

  172. That's what people with nothing to do do by SlashingComments · · Score: 1
    The poor but motivated (wrongly of course) people in pakistan have really nothing to do other than kill people who are not muslim, invade Kashmir and all those things.

    That country has no money, is a home of some of the worst people and only foreign policy they have is to "kashmir" just to keep the local folks distracted.

    Well ... look, they are not going anywhere. India will be bigger, stronger and better world citizen and one day, just like cleaning out a trash can, will clean out pakistan when they stink too bad.

    Yes, I am indian and I am very proud of my country with the progress made in there. Try running a country with 1B population, >80% people under the poverty line, 100's languages, 10 different religons, economically drained by the Brits for 100 yers and still able to come up with a woman as head of state, space technology, self sufficient in food and couple of nobel prizes in 50 years.

    Please let me know when you find one !

    --

    - People who believe other people have no right to live, got no right to live ...

    1. Re:That's what people with nothing to do do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kill people who are not Muslim, eh? What about the millions of Christians and Hindus in Pakistan?

      If you're Indian, how can you make such comments when they can easily be turned against yourself? Pakistan has multiple religions, people under the poverty line, numerous dialects, economically drained by the British just as much, and yet still had a woman as head of state, and is progressing in science and technology nicely as well.

  173. Re:Dear GOD by zemkai · · Score: 1
    Do you really think third-rate military dictators would laugh at America and burn our flag in contempt if Ronald Reagan were president?

    Pity there's no +1 Roger Waters Reference...

    -ZK

  174. Re:The quantities of explosives is quite unbelieva by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Couldn't they just sneak in during the middle of the night and install an unpatched version of Windows 98 on all the computers? That should disable the call center a lot longer than 100kg of Dynamite!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  175. He's being funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, and as usual, the moderators don't get it.

  176. Re:Dear GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck are you talking about?

  177. Re:Dear GOD by Parker703 · · Score: 1

    Thank you Zemkai! Tell him what he's won, Jim!

  178. I have been saying this for 2+ years now... by The_Real_MrRabbit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    on various boards and to friends, co-workers and family...

    When "Osama/Al Queda/Biggy Terrorists" acquire a nuke...they will acquire just one and THEY WILL NOT BRING IT TO THE US.

    Instead they will set it off in India in the general area where the US and other Westernized nations have sent their offshored technical/support and engineering jobs.

    This action alone will bring the US/Westernized economies to their knees worldwide. Furthermore, it is how the terrorists can actually win by getting winning through the efforts of their enemies.

    India's response will be to assume that IT HAD TO COME THROUGH PAKISTAN...and launch a nuke at Pakistan.

    With that powder keg lit...US comes to India's aid...China presses Taiwan thinking our hands our full...we hit back as a form of saying, "not so fast".

    And Russia? Germany? UK? France? I find myself having a hard time calling their responses. Lot has changed since the Cold War.

    If and when this happens - the terrorists get to watch the big boys do most of their work for them which is simple - take each other down - while they go one building their network.

    =8-)

  179. What are you smoking? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    We could deter the Soviets because they are for the most part rational people. Islamic militants are already committing terrorists acts against pilgrims carrying out their sacred duty of a Haj to Mecca... what makes you think they would be detered by threats against Mecca? Again, deterrents only work against people that are capable of logic. Unfortunatly, the only thing that will work against extremist Islamic militants is killing every last one of them, but doing it in a way that doesn't encourage others to join their cause.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  180. I'll bet MSFT is worried by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    after all, they might have to code at home.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  181. Wahabi terrorists by dstone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    True, but any <insert-belief-set> militant group is simply doublespeak for terrorists. Christian, vegetarian, feminist, racial pride, etc.

    Fo an intro to Wahhabism that doesn't resort to conclusions like "nutballs" and "islamic nut cases", there's an article here (probably with its own biases, but I found it more informative and it includes references.)

    1. Re:Wahabi terrorists by b-baggins · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      When you find me these other groups flying jets into buildings while crying Allah Akbahr, call me.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  182. BS by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

    Statements that appeared on rueters did not coincide with the vitrol spewed forth in the local media of many of our so called allies. The crap that we blew up our own buildings or the Isreali's were tipped off started immediately and even made Canadian press. Every single day hundreds of anti-american posts are posted here on slashdot. And long before 9/11 ever happened the European press on any given day sounded more and more like Al Jazeera.

    1. Re:BS by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1
      The crap that we blew up our own buildings or the Isreali's were tipped off started immediately and even made Canadian press.

      And then were quickly refuted.

      Every single day hundreds of anti-american posts are posted here on slashdot.

      Oh heavens, say it isn't so! Every day hundreds of anti-everything posts are posted here on slashdot.

  183. I've realised something over the past few years by asimulator · · Score: 1

    Terrorism isn't terrorsim until the WTC is attacked. And only then is it terrorism and only *that* is terrorism. If you have had 20+ years of attacks on innocent people by a band of murderers based in and funded by some other country, it is just a local conflict largely of *your* making, so fix it.

    And the way to fight terrorism is the way the US fights terrorism and every one else should drop their problem and come join the US. If you disagree the *US* may soon become your problem.

  184. First resort is voluntarily capitulation to jiyza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When a muslim sovereign is waging war it is customary of him to ask the infidels to submit voluntarily to the abode of Islam and pay the jiyza to the muslim ummah to assure their toleration. The last resort if they refuse is as you correctly point out to wage jihad and make them submit to paying the jiyza.

  185. Re:Baliwood by handslikesnakes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Flamebait? Looks like the mods are either sarcasm or not-being-a-racist-dick impaired.

  186. How it happened by xintegerx · · Score: 1

    Agreed. During the campaign, they showed Kerry on TV at somebody's house in Vermont or New Hampshire, holding a rally. There was a really big 'geek' waiting to talk to him. When he finally did, he told Kerry about IT jobs that were being offshored. Kerry said wow (clearly unaware of this), and asked an aide to give his contact information to that geek. Nobody else has brought this up other than Kerry. And how are we supposed to know that when a company lays off 3,000 people, (which makes the news), if it's not simply re-hiring those people in a different country? And then their CEO gets a 12 million dollar bonus? Suddenly, you don't feel sorry for the company anymore.

  187. Re:Dear GOD by bgoss · · Score: 1

    Are you referring to Ronnies "triumphant" invasion of Grenada in '83 or running away from Beirut in '84 after 241 Marines were murdered in their sleep by a terrorist, with no response by your godling Ronnie? You neocons need to start READING history instead of listening to rightie talking heads. Reagan is one of the worst presidents in our countries history and the rights ignorance of what actually happened during his tenure while trying to turn him into some kind of god is tantamount to insanity. But to answer your question, yes I think third-rate military dictators would laugh at America and burn our flag in comtempt if Reagan were president. They were doing it while he WAS president and his policies are part of the reason we are were we are today.

  188. I'm an American... and love it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For all you people who keep saying "Americans think their country is better than any other country, etc" can kiss my ass! God forbid that a countryman loves his country! I'm sick and tired of seeing people repeating over and over that Americans think they're better than everyone else. Please tell me what the problem is with that?!? Is there anything wrong with having a good attitude? Should I shit all over the country I wish to live in? Should I bash the country I was born in? I don't care if you hear (or think) that Americans feel that they excel in all aspects of life, it's none of your business. Maybe you should try it youself sometime. Or is it that you don't feel the same way about your country? One of the great things about being an American is being able to bash your country and disagree with the politics, etc. But on the other hand, if I love my country, that should be no concern to you. I care for the well-being or my fellow countrymen. If I want to bash outsourcing, off-shoring, or anything else that I feel is causing problems for the people of America, I am free to do so. Mind your own business!

  189. Lets just start controlling the corporations by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

    this is an example of how our government has ceased to represent us. Face it, we are in a corpritocracy; or a government for the purpose of corporations. Mostly influenced by larger, multinational concerns which rarely report profits in the countries where they are earned.

    We invaded Chile years ago to keep low the price of copper for our phone systems. This has been going on for a long time but is now pervasive. The only conflict now is which coprorations get to have the say; when energy overlaps the financial houses, who gets to control which policy is followed? When there is no longer enough largess of the population to steal, it's really going to be dangerous when Drug Manufacturers turn against HMOs and Big Oil fights against Weapons Dealers (UNICOL vs. GM).

    To understand what is really going on, you have to read; "Confessions of an Economic Hitman".

    --
    >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  190. American Apparel by mwigmani · · Score: 1
    when was the last time you bought clothes that were 100 percent made in the US, with US-sourced materials?

    American Apparel makes fantsatic t-shirts here in the US (LA to be specific).

    Although I don't know where they get their source material (they'd probably mention it if it was US-sourced, but I couldn't find mention of it anywhere on their site).

  191. Re:Dear GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow I don't think if that same joke was made about a failed attack on IT companies in NYC on this same site, people would be defending it as funny.

    If the planned attack was on Idaho there would be plenty of jokes, which would be defended. You are so far from the realm of reality in the rest of your post I won't even touch it. Your worldview is in conflict with reality, get help.

  192. Re:WTF is an AK-56? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it's not a knockoff of the SKS. What the author meant to say was the Type-56, which is the Chinese version of the AK-M (commonly, but erroneously, refered to as the AK-47). They're made everywhere, and I'm astounded that somebody took the time to identify it as a particular AK variant.

  193. if you job was outsourced to curries ... by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    don't you feel some, eh, sympathy for wahabists?

    1. Re:if you job was outsourced to curries ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karma-Bonus Modifier????? I call BULLSHIT!

      Class, what have we learned today? If you want a good mod rating, suggest sympathy for terrorists. You get an extra point for calling Indians "curries" or some other offensive term.

      GOOD JOB, MOD. You speak well for this community!

    2. Re:if you job was outsourced to curries ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curries smother crackers, you pig.

  194. Re:sorry folks, but MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't reason with extremists. Confrontation may be an unpopular term around here, but there is a time for it.

  195. What a surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anyone really even surprised anymore when we hear of the latest plot to kill "infidels" by muslim radicals? It has become laughable how after every attack we have these muslim PR people and politically-correct politicians spewing propaganda that islam is "a religion of peace". Islam is as much nonviolent as McDonald's is a vegetarian institution just because they happen to sell salads now!

    I am sure this will be modded down to "troll", but my assertions remain valid nonetheless. Can someone please explain why all these people want to kill everyone non-muslim? I honestly would like to know, because I certainly don't understand it.

  196. Re:First resort is voluntarily capitulation to jiy by lotsToLearn · · Score: 1
    I am sorry but this is not the concept of jizya. Jizya is for people already living in the Muslim state, not invade sovereign states and make them pay the tax. Also there is a more purposeful background of Jizya than "protection-money".

    Also I dont think it is being applied anywhere.

    Islam does not allow people to wage war only to rule/invade others. But on the other hand, many people have abused the religion and its beliefs to their advantage, which doesnt mean that the religion endorses those evil. I feel sorry for the actions of those b@st@rd$ for their actions since they not only harm the world in general but actually humiliate such a large "good" crowd that is out there.

    BTW there is one thing I noticed. Whenever a Muslim does something wrong the _whole_ ISLAM comes under trial! Do you agree? Of course recent examples mite make you believe that it has something to do with Islam but its actually evil entities of the world, which have nothing to do with the world, Islam or anything. And they have accomplices in every circle. Its a shame we allowed them to get so big/over-powering.

  197. when I could make 50k instead of 7.20 an hour... by Cernst77 · · Score: 1

    I would buy the american made high priced things, but now, hell yeah I am going to buy the asus motherboard so I can still throw money at rent and food!

  198. OK I'll bite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not meant to be troll but a sincere effort at balancing the comments out there.

    Well, apparantly there is a lot of talk on the issue of Kashmir itself with the majority of Indian favored comments stating a lot of historical inaccuracies (which I don't blame the posters for, but as is countries indoctrinate their ideological versions of history) but it saddens me to see so much of it rated 'informative' without the system balancing them out... regardless here's a summary from a couple of my friends (pakistani and indian)...

    1. The partition of India & Pakistan was a result of a few factors and a few base principles. One of these (highly unusual) was the notion of a separate homeland for two people - one for a hindu majority and one for a muslim majority. This is not my idea, there are a variety of historical documents that support this (ref. see development of the congress party, the division of the muslim league. The division of territory etc. etc all prove this).

    2. Kashmir was an odd case where the population was overwhelmingly muslim but the ruler was hindu. He unilaterally decided to go with India violating the original premise for the partition. (hence the dispute).

    3. Indian 'stablization' troops were dispatched and there was a bloody but short lived (thankfully) war over Kashmir between India and Pakistan right after the two gained independence. At the end, the Indians held a large chunk, Pakistan held a smaller chunk and China another smaller chunk of the territory. These positions exist to today.

    The real Miscreants of this issue are the damn British. Look at how they 'partitioned' India and Pakistan. For that matter look what they did in the Far East and in the Middle East. Each time a bone of contention was left so that the people who lived there would remain in enemity for ever and ever.

    True the british have been gone for a while but that does not diminish the brutal act they did that set both countries down this road.

    So finally, getting back to the topic, blaming Pakistan for something that a rogue group has declared (not done) is not fair. I would say blame the group for its words and demonstrated actions but not anyone else.

  199. Re:when I could make 50k instead of 7.20 an hour.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even if you made 50K you cant afford it.

    Lumpy is right, all these people that scream to buy american made Dont do it themselves.

    drive a FORD? 80% of it is made outside the states. Buy only american made? it does not exist except at local SMALL manufacturers. instead of buying that gas grill at the megamart, buy one at a local manufacturer. it will cost you $1600.00 compared to the $199.00 but it's american made.

    American Charcoal for your cheapie grill? it's $12.95 a bag... that import kingsford crap is $4.25 a bag.

    How about your mop or vaccuum? $1250.00 for an american vaccuum...... $129.95 for a cheapie from south america...

    These are real prices, americans do NOT want to buy american things, they are simply trained to buy the low price slave labor crap....

    FUBU? made by slave children, Nike? same...

    gotta love the "brothers" fightin' da power of whiety on the backs of slavery....

  200. So... by terpri · · Score: 0

    They were going to be upsourced?

  201. Why, that's such a brilliant idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill them, kill them, kill THEEEEM KILLLLLL THEM AAAAAALLLL.

    Remember, the terrorists are among us too.

    Trust no-one, not even your children.

    The time has come to defend yourself, Attack!!

  202. Re:Dear GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idaho has the highest hate groups per capita of any US State. We would be laughing, but we wouldn't be joking. Some things are inherently funny.

  203. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahh! Such righteousness.

  204. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    Just do it. It's got to be cheaper than the fisticuffs.

    But it wouldn't be profitable for the arms merchents that prod them on and do their best to aggravate the situation. Goes for the Middle East, also. There's no profit for the weapons industry in peace. To lose that business could wipe out America's/Europe's biggest export market. The trade defecit would jump 10 times what it is now. And their lobbyists make the entertainment and pharmaceutical lobby look like high school punks. Peace is just bad for business.

    --
    What?
  205. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being an Indian, I can tell you that...

    That would make you unbiased? Are you from Kashmir? or a nice, comparatively safe place like Goa? Go there often? How do I know that you're not just being spoon fed propaganda from the Indian equilivent of FOX? Why should I believe you more than him? I think if I want an unbiased view point, I'll look for somebody that's neither Indian OR Pakistani. Or I'll wait to find out the opinion the people of Kashmir. I certainly don't expect to get the truth from either of the beligerents. That would be like expecting Bush or Blair or Saddam to tell the truth about Iraq. I don't believe any of them.

  206. Re:Dear GOD by mr100percent · · Score: 1
    Wow, what a way to overgeneralize 200 Million people. IIRC, only a group of Palestinians were rejoicing, because they thought the US was being punished for giving Israel weapons to shoot Palestinians with. Interestingly, the terrorism of 9/11 was strongly condemned by every single Palestinian organization including Fatah, the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, Hamas, Workers Unions and Committees, Human Right organizations (AlHaq, Law, Palestine Center for Human Rights), student associations, municipalities, mosques and churches, etc. Palestinians held 2 candlelight vigils to express their grief of such terrorism, and the schools had 5 minutes of silence, and the Jerusalem University held a blood drive to donate their blood to American victims.

    The rest of the Arab world not only condemned the attacks, they held prayer vigils and sent condolences. Kuwait sent so many flowers to the US embassy that it ringed the entire compound. Iranian students burst into spontaneous (unplanned) peace demonstrations in support of the US. Egypt's Al-Azhar University, the highest Sunni authority by many, categorically condemned the attack, and reiterated their previous fatwa that suicide bombing was a major sin. The Organization of the Islamic Conference in Qatar that year condemned the attack. Sheikh Qaradawi, a notable figure appearing on Al Jazeera, condemned the attack as well.

    You don't believe me? Go see some photos all over the Muslim world of solidarity with America on 9/11 and condemnations of the attack from the Arab and Muslim leaders and scholars.

  207. Wrong about IRA, for a start by panurge · · Score: 1
    The official IRA is Marxist-Leninist and the Provisional IRA is Trotskyite. I assume that you have never actually been to Ireland or met a few members of Sinn Fein, or you would know this. It is not something they have tended to emphasise while fund raising in the USA. And, btw, all my sympathies in NI are with the respectable Republicans, and I believe that further progress is totally dependent on Sinn Fein getting the criminal side of the IRA under control.

    It should be obvious too that the Wahabi sect depends for its power base on people who know little about the world. I define as "obscurantist" any religion which seeks to prevent its followers from acquiring knowledge that might cause them to ask too many questions. Modern communications, which make it possible (for instance) for poor Indians to learn more about the outside world through the WWW and mobile phones, are a threat to this kind of dominance through ignorance.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  208. Re:Dear GOD by ErikZ · · Score: 1

    I must of missed that. Besides flowery words, how did the the "Whole world with very few exceptions" support the US?

    Talk is not support. Blood and treasure is support.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  209. Re:With my luck, I would have to file the bug repo by ErikZ · · Score: 1
    With the same species! Same species!

    Damn, I hope he reads this before he trys anything.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  210. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by northcat · · Score: 1

    Clue train: I don't fucking care what you think. I just want Bush (or whoever makes those decisions) to reconsider his strategy of supporting Musharraf so much on one hand and wailing about terrorists attacking USA (which is happening) OTOH. BTW, try going to Kashmir and getting the honest opinions of at least 100 people. You'll know what I'm talking about. AFAIK, it's people who watch FOX who are being spoon fed propaganda by Musharraf. How many interviews of Musharraf have you seen compared to interviews of an Indian Prime Minister or minister or bureaucrat? And BTW, the whole world isn't exactly like whichever country you live in. There are differences.

  211. Re:Koran DOES NOT support decapitation, jihad by lotsToLearn · · Score: 1

    I didnt say that. All I said was that there are bad people, really bad ones, but there is also the media which helps the cause further. You have a point that the so-called Muslim phreakos/phundamentalists did all the above henious acts, but I just wanted to say that this has nothing to do with Islam. No religion in the world can allow that.

  212. Re:... I disagree with the tactics used here but . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever. There's no hope for any kind of peace in India or Pakistan as long as people carry the hate the way you do. You won't be happy until you get the last revenge. As long you all are trying to kill each other off, try not to soil the beaches. Happy hunting.

  213. Re:Dear GOD by chl · · Score: 1
    Let me see if I got that right: you got modded "Redundant, everybody knows this already" for making an anti-American statement? Which resulted in less people seeing your statement.

    Anti-American moderator with a subtle sense of humor? Pro-American idiot who thought redunant means something else?

    chl