One could argue that civilized people don't imprison people for extended periods of time. One could also argue that civilized people don't imprison people at all. So what do you do with someone who is hellbent on killing everyone?
I disagree with use of the death penalty myself, but the "civilized people" argument is flawed. The better argument is that there is no moral justification to give one person the authority to kill another person. No matter what the latter person did.
But one could say the same thing about giving someone the authority to imprison someone indefinitely.
That means that we just have to accept immoral authority. "Civilized people" must accept immoral authority.
I think Romney was referring to people who weren't going to vote for him anyway. That was actually the context of the whole speech. He was saying that would vote for Obama no matter what (left out that many are children that can't vote). However, the point still stands. There is a segment of society that will not vote Republican, even if Jesus ran for the party. Just like there is a segment of society that will not vote Democrat. There is no point in Obama trying to woo pro-life voters. They ain't listening.
It is just the reincarnation of the blanket "national security" excuse. These excuses have always been around. Just look at "interstate commerce" and "general welfare".
On another note. ESPN message boards are full of the most vile posts on the Internet. Maybe this one thing will make postings about sports...
No Democrat or Republican will change the Patent system. Because they don't oppose each other on it, it doesn't get any attention. Since it doesn't get attention, it just goes on as business as usual. The Patent clerks don't want to lose their jobs.
The Patent system is Federal. Good luck making that a talking point for candidates for Congress or President. They will snear at it and say they are going to focus on "jobs" or "national security" or how evil the other guy is. Completely ignoring how the patent system is costing us jobs and the eventual demise of small/medium businesses in America.
Was Hitler evil for attacking Poland? Or was everyone else evil for fighting back? Maybe you think both are evil, but at some point people need to fight back. Otherwise, evil wins.
Now, Apple isn't Hitler. I just needed to pull an extreme example to bring out the short-sightedness of your remark. Apple fired the shot that caused a missle to be fired back.
And when you find them, which isn't really that hard with technology, you encounter a fleet of ships. Not just an aircraft carrier. A carrier, by itself, is VERY vulnerable. But its shortcomings are made up for with the countless destroyers, cruisers, submarines, and other ships accompanying it.
The only way you can attack the aircraft carrier is to surprise all of those ships. A supersonic missle would work on an aircraft carrier for the same reason it would work just about anywhere else. If you can't recognize it and react in time with a missle that can intercept a supersonic missle, then you can't stop it.
This is all beside the point. The main purpose of an aircraft carrier is to be multi-purpose. It is a mobile city. Think of a cruise ship with a whole lot more technology and capabilities. It drives on nuclear power, launches air and land vehicles, launches some weapons, carries people, medical/food supplies, etc...
I thought that was obvious. Apparently others like to come up with crazy scenarios. This scenario helps their revenue stream while allowing for users to be anonymous on the Internet. Just not anonymous to Google or those government institutions issuing search warrants to Google.
You alter-ego helps define who you really are. So the advertising target is even better than your PC personal profile.
I think he should put the financial burden on the "local firm". If they want a work force, supply the education center. If the "local firm" works in unbalanced shifts, maybe let the classes run in the "down" shift. That shift might actually be during the day...I am not sure of the market of the "local firm", so I don't know for sure.
Better question. If you need insurance to mitigate the risk of damaging a few hundred dollar phone, should you be spending a few hundred dollars on a phone?
Is it just me or is the 2nd summary deserving of its own post? A room temperature superconductor, if found and practical/abundant, would be one of the greatest discoveries in science.
But warrants can be granted by anyone taking an Oath. Who's to say that a computer can't take an Oath? The computer automatically issues warrants on demand. It doesn't care about the probable cause behind the issuance. It then describes everything being searched.
Slashdot Mirror
One could argue that civilized people don't imprison people for extended periods of time. One could also argue that civilized people don't imprison people at all. So what do you do with someone who is hellbent on killing everyone?
I disagree with use of the death penalty myself, but the "civilized people" argument is flawed. The better argument is that there is no moral justification to give one person the authority to kill another person. No matter what the latter person did.
But one could say the same thing about giving someone the authority to imprison someone indefinitely.
That means that we just have to accept immoral authority. "Civilized people" must accept immoral authority.
If you get welfare worth more than 10,000 GBP hinging on the fact that you have no other income, then yes.
I think Romney was referring to people who weren't going to vote for him anyway. That was actually the context of the whole speech. He was saying that would vote for Obama no matter what (left out that many are children that can't vote). However, the point still stands. There is a segment of society that will not vote Republican, even if Jesus ran for the party. Just like there is a segment of society that will not vote Democrat. There is no point in Obama trying to woo pro-life voters. They ain't listening.
I will require it in my classes if you give me 50% of the proceeds.
So at some level we will be able to store more than off/on information? How many states can we expect? 3? 10?
It is just the reincarnation of the blanket "national security" excuse. These excuses have always been around. Just look at "interstate commerce" and "general welfare".
On another note. ESPN message boards are full of the most vile posts on the Internet. Maybe this one thing will make postings about sports...
Maybe the attach advertising and the originator gets a cut of the revenue. After all, it is just old news. Why not make some more money off of it.
Then they can enforce their copyright on postings to YouTube.
Profit!
No Democrat or Republican will change the Patent system. Because they don't oppose each other on it, it doesn't get any attention. Since it doesn't get attention, it just goes on as business as usual. The Patent clerks don't want to lose their jobs.
The Patent system is Federal. Good luck making that a talking point for candidates for Congress or President. They will snear at it and say they are going to focus on "jobs" or "national security" or how evil the other guy is. Completely ignoring how the patent system is costing us jobs and the eventual demise of small/medium businesses in America.
Was Hitler evil for attacking Poland? Or was everyone else evil for fighting back? Maybe you think both are evil, but at some point people need to fight back. Otherwise, evil wins.
Now, Apple isn't Hitler. I just needed to pull an extreme example to bring out the short-sightedness of your remark. Apple fired the shot that caused a missle to be fired back.
The part of the bargaining process. You need to pull the trump card to make the original suit look stupid.
IBM sued SCO on some of the most prevalent things when SCO first introduced its suit against IBM.
When someone sues you because your dog crapped in their yard, you counter-sue for the 100 times their dog crapped in your yard.
PS: I don't have a dog
I hope they make everyone look so bad that the public just gives up on the "lesser of two evils" method of voting.
Because then the customer can blame Google when something goes wrong with it.
They may have chosen those words because Completely Unique was already taken.
And when you find them, which isn't really that hard with technology, you encounter a fleet of ships. Not just an aircraft carrier. A carrier, by itself, is VERY vulnerable. But its shortcomings are made up for with the countless destroyers, cruisers, submarines, and other ships accompanying it.
The only way you can attack the aircraft carrier is to surprise all of those ships. A supersonic missle would work on an aircraft carrier for the same reason it would work just about anywhere else. If you can't recognize it and react in time with a missle that can intercept a supersonic missle, then you can't stop it.
This is all beside the point. The main purpose of an aircraft carrier is to be multi-purpose. It is a mobile city. Think of a cruise ship with a whole lot more technology and capabilities. It drives on nuclear power, launches air and land vehicles, launches some weapons, carries people, medical/food supplies, etc...
I thought that was obvious. Apparently others like to come up with crazy scenarios. This scenario helps their revenue stream while allowing for users to be anonymous on the Internet. Just not anonymous to Google or those government institutions issuing search warrants to Google.
You alter-ego helps define who you really are. So the advertising target is even better than your PC personal profile.
I think he should put the financial burden on the "local firm". If they want a work force, supply the education center. If the "local firm" works in unbalanced shifts, maybe let the classes run in the "down" shift. That shift might actually be during the day...I am not sure of the market of the "local firm", so I don't know for sure.
Maybe the Federal government will put /. on the National Historic Register list and preserve it.
Although completely unrelated, but a similar circle-back: Roe in Roe v Wade.
I think the Cray will have a higher terminal velocity than the iPad
This is very true. If you are afraid of losing $600 because of a broken phone, then you shouldn't be spending $600 on a phone to begin with.
Better question. If you need insurance to mitigate the risk of damaging a few hundred dollar phone, should you be spending a few hundred dollars on a phone?
Does that mean cameras are witches?
Is it just me or is the 2nd summary deserving of its own post? A room temperature superconductor, if found and practical/abundant, would be one of the greatest discoveries in science.
But warrants can be granted by anyone taking an Oath. Who's to say that a computer can't take an Oath? The computer automatically issues warrants on demand. It doesn't care about the probable cause behind the issuance. It then describes everything being searched.