Slashdot Mirror


Nestle's GPS Tracking Candy Campaign

colinneagle writes "In a cool yet creepy marketing campaign, Nestle plans to stalk UK consumers. The company kicked off a unique promotion called 'We will find you' that involves GPS trackers embedded in chocolate bars. When a winning consumer opens the wrapper, it activates and notifies the prize team who promises to track them down within 24 hours to deliver a check for £10,000. A Nestle spokesman added that 'inside their wrappers, the GPS-enabled bars looked just like normal chocolate bars.'"

172 comments

  1. oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, YOU find chocolate!

    1. Re:oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In Soviet Russia, your fellow man spies on you

      In US (and UK, apparently), it's the other way around!

    2. Re:oblig by flyneye · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Union, Wonka is KGB and Will find you.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    3. Re:oblig by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      I know a guy who works at Nestle and he told me this is just the government trying out their new tracking devices.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know a guy who claims is a government conspiracy?

      Now that's news.

    5. Re:oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not from the same company that sells fluoridated baby water! i won't believe that!

    6. Re:oblig by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Union, Wonka is KGB and Will find you.

      Oompah Loompahs are NKVD. Smile comrad, we know where you are with your Chocotate bar!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:oblig by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, you better find the chocolate fucking fast, even if it's not there.

  2. Not always easy delivering a prize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I won roughly $200 from a lottery, and the guy who was supposed to find me used 14 days to deliver the prize. He sent an email saying that I had won those money and just to register at a site to win the prize. I thought it was an attempt to scam me for money, so I made his job very hard. It didn't help when the company in question changed its name. I wondered what on earth was going on.

    1. Re:Not always easy delivering a prize by todrules · · Score: 4, Funny

      I had almost the same thing happen to me, but I had "won" $25 million from a Nigerian prince, who was in exile. I never did receive my money though.

    2. Re:Not always easy delivering a prize by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      I won roughly $200 from a lottery, and the guy who was supposed to find me used 14 days to deliver the prize. He sent an email saying that I had won those money and just to register at a site to win the prize. I thought it was an attempt to scam me for money, so I made his job very hard. It didn't help when the company in question changed its name. I wondered what on earth was going on.

      AllAboutTheBaby keeps calling my mobile phone and would like my address, birthdate, bank acount, etc, for awarding me a $100 prize. Right!

      Meanwhile, I hope those chocolate bars are clearly labeled or you'll see something like this: Man Sues Candy Company Over Poisoning: "Tasted Like Resistors," Says Victim

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  3. Metal detector? by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wonder how long before someone stars running up and down candy store aisles with a metal detector.

    1. Re:Metal detector? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be highly ineffective, since chocolate bars are wrapped in tin foil.

    2. Re:Metal detector? by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 0

      If it really signals its position, it must emit some form of electromagnetic radiation. I find it hard to believe that this cannot be detected from outside.

      (and I find it hard to believe that it has enough battery life to function for more than one week).

      --
      My first program:

      Hell Segmentation fault

    3. Re:Metal detector? by Immerman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt it's that big a trick - if I were asked to make the tracker I'd give it something like an RFID tag that draws power from mobile-phone or WiFi band EM radiation, from which it will be shielded so long as the foil is in place. Once opened the RFID would then power up and trip a transistor or SCR that switches on the battery-powered tracker that would then phone home at regular intervals. Until the foil is opened and RFID powered up the battery circuit would be open, preventing both charge loss and the tell-tale signal leaking through the foil.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    4. Re:Metal detector? by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      I think that a photodiode is much simpler and reliable.
      Same idea as yours except it is EM radiation of a much higher frequency ;)

    5. Re:Metal detector? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      "That would be highly ineffective, since chocolate bars are wrapped in tin foil."
      Is it really the 1910's in the UK?

      I have not seen a tinfoil wrapped candy bar for over 30 years. plastic wrapped with a Metallica plastic? yes!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Metal detector? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      I think an RF detector set to GPS frequencies would be a lot faster. This is dumb x10. They make Lean Cuisine promotions look smart and they don't even know that men buy their products apparently. So people will accidentally eat the GPS device? Great promotions/law suit inducer.

    7. Re:Metal detector? by nosh · · Score: 1

      "That would be highly ineffective, since chocolate bars are wrapped in tin foil."
      Is it really the 1910's in the UK?

      I have not seen a tinfoil wrapped candy bar for over 30 years. plastic wrapped with a Metallica plastic? yes!

      I don't know about UK, but here in continental Europe, the good chocolare usually has tin foil, while the cheap chocolate and the chocolate-containing-stuff (you are not allowed to call it chocolate if you do not use chocolate butter but some replacement) use some cheap replacement (often not even metallic to make it clear it is a really super-cheap one).

    8. Re:Metal detector? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be highly ineffective, since chocolate bars are wrapped in tin foil.
      Aluminum foil.... not tin foil.

      Still a metal detector would be very useful, because all you need to do is identify the detection signature (using the metal detector's discriminator feature) of a normal, foil-wrapped chocolate bar, and then since the GPS-equipped bars will have different amounts of different kinds of metals associated with them, the detection signature picked up by your metal detector will be different enough to identify the GPS bar.

      And yes, I doubt that the candy makers put enough thought into their scheme to gain knowledge about hiding metal detector discrimination variances, but they did likely use simpleton stealth techniques like making them weight the same.

    9. Re:Metal detector? by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just before this complete trainwreck of fail goes any further:

      The article says "when the winner pulls the tab".

      ie. you pull a bit of plastic out of the battery contacts.

      --
      No sig today...
    10. Re:Metal detector? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could read the article: The bit about "when the winner pulls the tab" is quite informative.

      Dumb, indeed.

      --
      No sig today...
    11. Re:Metal detector? by mikestew · · Score: 1

      I don't know about UK, but here in continental Europe, the good chocolare usually has tin foil

      He was probably being a bit pedantic. Though the good stuff may be wrapped in foil, I doubt the foil is made of tin; aluminum, more than likely. I'm pushing 50 years old, and I don't know that I've ever seen "tin foil".

      Or maybe, as you implied, he just buys cheap chocolate. :)

    12. Re:Metal detector? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Well, unless you're going to check each bar separately, I don't think that would work. And you'd need a table of specs expected for each kind of bar, as I'm relatively sure that an 8 oz. bar wouldn't be the same as a 6 oz. one, and they might well vary between models as well as between sizes.

      (Yes, I know we're talking Britain, so it will be metric sizes, but I don't even have a clue as to what the metric sizes of candy bar are.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    13. Re:Metal detector? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      "I have not seen a tinfoil wrapped candy bar for over 30 years. plastic wrapped with a Metallica plastic? yes!"

      does this wrapper play "Hells Bells" if you hook it to your power mains?? (i think you have an extra L and A in your statement)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    14. Re:Metal detector? by firewrought · · Score: 1

      Just before this complete trainwreck of fail goes any further:

      The article says "when the winner pulls the tab".

      ie. you pull a bit of plastic out of the battery contacts.

      Or maybe... pulling the tab EXPOSES a photodiode, which then enables the battery. :O

      Choo choo!

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    15. Re:Metal detector? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Unsurprisingly, it's the same in the UK, with one exception -- KitKat (cheap chocolate covered biscuit) is wrapped in foil, as the marketing has always tied in to this. One of the products with the GPS thing is a KitKat, the other as Aero, which is a normal plastic-wrapped cheap chocolate bar.

      (Most of the good chocolate here is probably the same brands you can buy.)

    16. Re:Metal detector? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KitKats (made by Nestle, but I didn't RTFA so I don't know if that is what they are using for this promotion) are wrapped in foil, they did try switching to a plastic wrap for a while, but I think people preferred the foil one, so they switched back. I can't think of any other chocolate bars that have a foil wrap though.

    17. Re:Metal detector? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An RF detector set to GPS frequencies would be useless, as GPS devices are receive only. They probably pair the GPS with some phone tech to transmit the location.

    18. Re:Metal detector? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I think an RF detector set to GPS frequencies would be a lot faster.

      You may want to rethink this. GPS does not involve a the location device transmitting anything. Even on phones the airplane mode doesn't disable GPS. Not to mention how well GPS will work indoors :-)

  4. GPS Trackers by smi.james.th · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone who's ever used a GPS, especially not a dedicated device e.g. a smartphone, knows that it's a bit of a mission to get the thing to actually lock on to sattelites. If one was really paranoid one could just carry one's chocolate in a metal box until one gets home, then the GPS will never lock on anyway. So I doubt there are any real privacy implications here...

    --
    One thing I know, and that is that I am ignorant...
    1. Re:GPS Trackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if you won the 10,000 GBP you would just abandon it?

    2. Re:GPS Trackers by lhunath · · Score: 1

      Um, you see no privacy implications involved with having to put your chocolate bars in a metal box in order NOT to be tracked?

      Sounds to me like you're already part of brainwashed society.

      --
      ``OK, so ten out of ten for style, but minus several million for good thinking, yeah?''
    3. Re:GPS Trackers by smi.james.th · · Score: 1

      No, not brainwashed. Just don't care much. They can try to track me if they want to, but embedding a GPS in a chocolate bar is going to be quite ineffective for the reasons that I've mentioned.

      If some hypothetical paranoid person REALLY doesn't want to be tracked but REALLY wants a chocolate, then the metal box would be more than adequate to foil the tracking attempts...

      --
      One thing I know, and that is that I am ignorant...
    4. Re:GPS Trackers by naich · · Score: 1

      That and you have to pull a tab to activate the tracking system, so it's not tracking you until you choose to let it.

    5. Re:GPS Trackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the metal box would be more than adequate to foil the tracking attempts

      Much like the wrapper.

    6. Re:GPS Trackers by smi.james.th · · Score: 1

      I don't live in the UK anymore but as I recall, most of their confectionery comes in plastic wrappers...

      --
      One thing I know, and that is that I am ignorant...
    7. Re:GPS Trackers by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 3, Funny

      If one was really paranoid one could just carry one's chocolate in a metal box until one gets home, then the GPS will never lock on anyway.

      I always carry suspicious items like chocolate bars under my hat.

      Note to /.newbies: When in doubt always assume tin-foil as material for any garment discussed on /.)

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    8. Re:GPS Trackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are there "privacy implications" in tracking chocolate bars? They tracking team won't know who purchased the chocolate bar... it's just a chocolate bar. It is not attached to a person or any personal information.

    9. Re:GPS Trackers by Bigby · · Score: 1

      If you get welfare worth more than 10,000 GBP hinging on the fact that you have no other income, then yes.

    10. Re:GPS Trackers by SleazyRidr · · Score: 2

      I feel compelled to respond to you, but I have no idea where to start. How about we start with how you get >10,000 GBP in welfare...

    11. Re:GPS Trackers by Smauler · · Score: 1

      Many families in London get a lot more than 10,000 GBP per year on housing allowance alone.

    12. Re:GPS Trackers by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I would guess that rather than use a real GPS they used a triangulation system based on cell-phone towers. GPS in urban environments can be quite iffy.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  5. I just hope that a winning bar by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope that a winning bar is taken by a soldier to the front-line in Afghanistan. I'd love to see Nestle track them down and deliver the cheque within 24 hours!

    1. Re:I just hope that a winning bar by Immerman · · Score: 1

      That would be awesome! Quick, everyone break out your metal detectors and lets send a bunch of extra-special care packages to the folks on the front lines.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:I just hope that a winning bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      you're going to shit a little multicolored sphere when you learn that they have an elite fighting force of oompa loompa's and they airdrop those bastards into a village and they go all Robotron on the place.

    3. Re:I just hope that a winning bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just hope they don't go through a US airport on the way!
      Now only will the TSA p0wn the bearer but they will ban passengers from taking chocolate bars.

      I can totally imagine all the TSA screeners with traces of chocolate around their mouths, but banning chocolate bars is about as realistics as banning large-breasted women because their might be gel in there. Although they already give extra scrutiny...

      Dang, my mind's eye went blind again.

    4. Re:I just hope that a winning bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope it's sold to someone in the "Elephant and Castle" neighborhood of London. It's almost as scary, with fewer heavily armed British soldiers to call on.

    5. Re:I just hope that a winning bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://terminallance.com/2010/02/19/terminal-lance-14-the-mr-e-mystery/

    6. Re:I just hope that a winning bar by Tasha26 · · Score: 0

      No. The winner will be a fatty chubby choom-choom... with bad teeth.

    7. Re:I just hope that a winning bar by dontclapthrowmoney · · Score: 1

      elite fighting force of oompa loompas

      I'd read any novel that had this phrase included in the synopsis!

    8. Re:I just hope that a winning bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you're at it, send a few boxes to the brave men exploric Arctic and Antarctic, mountain-climbers at Everest, Amazon rainforests explorers, ...

      Too bad we can't send some to the guys up there at ISS.

    9. Re:I just hope that a winning bar by riT-k0MA · · Score: 1

      They also export some of these bars to South Africa. This could also be interesting.

  6. I'll tell you what this promotion is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This post was removed due to Dice content standards violations.

    1. Re:I'll tell you what this promotion is! by flyneye · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sounds Dicey to me. Who gave the owner mod points? Who is the owner, Raul Castro? Censorship from above gonna pre-empt OUR mod system that was here before the present stockholders started fucking things up? Is this a preview of bullshit to come? Someone explain to the obvious NON GEEKS running the show that if it isn't broke DONT FIX IT or you will ruin what has been cultivated so far, thus driving DOWN the stock, DICE gets -1 Dumbasses.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    2. Re:I'll tell you what this promotion is! by dywolf · · Score: 0

      WTF. Someone tell me that's a joke post protest of the buyout.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    3. Re:I'll tell you what this promotion is! by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      DOOOOOOD.... Big woosh. It was a joke; Dice didn't censor his comment. He wrote it exactly as it was presented on the page.

      He did the same thing yesterday, only under his user name. I countered by responding to his post with a vicious diatribe against Dice which would indeed have been censored if Dice did such a thing here. They don't. Both posts were modded -1 offtopic, as they should have been, but neither was actually removed.

      As to "Who gave the owner mod points?", admins and editors here have always had unlimited mod points. If Samzepus thinks your comment sucks, he can drag that +3 insightful to -1 troll any time he wants to. However, I think it's rear that they do that.

    4. Re:I'll tell you what this promotion is! by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Wull....yeah, but dammit, ok you got me.....f**kers, I was only one cup of coffee into my day with tequila still trickling over my frontal lobes.
        HEY!, but the thing looked modded funny and F#@King wanted to see what it was. THOU SHALT NOT withold funny from fly.
      THOU SHALT NOT make fly part of the funny.

      Yeah I've had loads of "special" treatment over the years, including being studied in the name of a better forum. My particular quirks and attributes seem to keep me in better karma over the years.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    5. Re:I'll tell you what this promotion is! by flyneye · · Score: 1

      What are Anoncow and why we keep getting post from it?

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  7. Its a con by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its that pervo Willy Wonka after kids again.

    1. Re:Its a con by havana9 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Did you say? Actually if you go to Wonka's site http://www.wonka.com/ Yuo'll see that actually they're Nestlè

  8. Golden ticket. by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

    obligatory reference yet. For extra bonus points, let's theorize about what the prize claimant will have to do as part of the claims process.

    --
    Write failed: Broken pipe
    1. Re:Golden ticket. by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

      "Winners will be rendered in extraordinary fashion to a quaint village in Portmeirion..."

    2. Re:Golden ticket. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not a number; I'm a free man.

    3. Re:Golden ticket. by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      You are, Number 6...

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  9. I already know the name of the winners. by havana9 · · Score: 1

    Augustus Gloop Veruca Salt Violet Beauregarde Mike Teavee and Charlie Bucket.

  10. uh what? by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

    If you live there get five friends with metal detectors to canvas stores. Increase your chances.

    1. Re:uh what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get any metal detector app on your android and walk the city !!
      Too bad I don't live in england, I would have love to search all the kandybar stores in town.

    2. Re:uh what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you live there get five friends with metal detectors to canvas stores.

      Yes, 'cause there is nothing strange about 6 people walking into the store to canvass it with metal detectors in unison.

      Also, nothing strange about slashdot UK dwellers having 5 friends.

    3. Re:uh what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're going to get a shit-load of false positives when you hit the kit-kats and fruit pastilles as both are wrapped in foil or foil-backed paper, as are just about any standard bar of chocolate.

    4. Re:uh what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they use steel shelves in shops in the UK? They sure do in the US.

  11. Farady cage? by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 1

    So, do I get more money if I hide the wrapper in a Faraday cage so that they can't find me?

    What happens if I open the bar in the street, and throw the wrapper? Will they track down the garbage?

    The article is a bit light on the details...

    And yes, this is quite creepy. The article talks about a similar promotion in Brazil. A country with a high crime rate. Turns out people were a bit suspicious of strangers knocking on their doors...

    --
    HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
    1. Re:Farady cage? by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      No, but you'll get a LOT more money if you accidentally eat the GPS tracker.

  12. Baby milk by Threni · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Any chance of a promotion to track down the parents of kids who've died in the third world due to the heavy, illegal promition of powdered milk there?

    1. Re:Baby milk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd first worry about the Chinese companies promoting melamine "milk".

    2. Re:Baby milk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy, are people still banging on about that, 35 years on?

      They die because the water they drink is tainted. It would still be tainted when they stop drinking breast milk. If you want to help those kids, donate to sanitation efforts. Boycotting Nestle has absolutely no effect whatsoever. People do it because it's an easy hair shirt to wear and requires no real sacrifice.

    3. Re:Baby milk by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Informative

      Boy, are people still banging on about that, 35 years on?

      Yes they are. And you know why? It's because Nestle are still doing that, 35 years on.

      They die because the water they drink is tainted. It would still be tainted when they stop drinking breast milk.

      No, it's not Nestle's fault that toddlers and older children don't have clean water to drink. It certainly *is* their fault that babies are being exposed to additional risk at a vulnerable age for no justifiable reason other than to bulk up their own profits. Particularly as babies of that relatively undeveloped age (who would normally be drinking breast milk) aren't really meant to be able to handle water-borne pathogens to the same extent as older, weaned children.

      If you want to help those kids, donate to sanitation efforts.

      As a suggestion in its own right, that would be laudible. As an attempt to divert attention and excuse Nestle from responsibility, it's contemptible.

      Nestle were the ones that made the lack of clean water an even bigger problem than it needed to be. Improving sanitation and boycotting Nestle are not mutually incompatible, and suggesting that the water supply should be improved as an attempt to let Nestle off the hook- and indeed to bolster their business- is pretty disgusting.

      Boycotting Nestle has absolutely no effect whatsoever.

      That's open to question. I agree that those greedy fucks wouldn't be doing this "35 years on" if it wasn't making them more money than any boycott was costing them. Whether that means more people should be boycotting them or taking more action is open to question.

      People do it because it's an easy hair shirt to wear and requires no real sacrifice.

      That as may be, peoples' alleged laziness doesn't make Nestle's actions any more acceptable.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:Baby milk by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I'd first worry about the Chinese companies promoting melamine "milk".

      I'd worry about them both. It's pretty stupid to suggest that one precludes dealing with the other.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    5. Re:Baby milk by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Any chance of a promotion to track down the parents of kids who've died in the third world due to the heavy, illegal promition of powdered milk there?

      If Nestle didn't do it, somebody else would.

      At least Nestle doesn't use lead in their products.

      --
      No sig today...
    6. Re:Baby milk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Nestle didn't do it, somebody else would.

      At least Nestle doesn't use lead in their products.

      Poor troll 2/10
      Must try harder.

  13. GPS in Coke can already trried by linebackn · · Score: 3, Informative

    A way while back there was a very similar attempt by Coke to put a GPS in a coke can, and swoop in and award the winner.

    This raised a lot of security concerns, as there are many places where it would be bad for this to go off in, such as inside a military base.

    Links:
    http://tech.slashdot.org/story/03/09/30/189208/track-a-soda-can-with-gps
    http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/04/05/06/136205/gps-cell-phone-in-soda-can-form

  14. Coca-Cola did this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coca-Cola ran essentially the same "competition" in Australia (and likely other countries) back in the early 2000s.

  15. What if they can't find me?? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    What do I win if they can't find me? I mean I'm pretty good at hide & seek you know!

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  16. I predict by giorgist · · Score: 1

    I predict somebody working at some Nestle warehouse to pass all the boxes through a metal detector.

    1. Re:I predict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if they could afford a metal detector they wouldn't be working in a Neslte warehouse now would they?

    2. Re:I predict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metal detectors aren't exactly expensive... (But it would probably never work due to all the other metal in the area. Unless you could isolate each box and that box contained no metal but the tracker.)

    3. Re:I predict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I predict lots of broken candy bars as people all over start bending them.
      If you bend to far then no prize for you.

  17. Analog version didn't work so well for Coke... by Radak · · Score: 1

    Anyone else remember the Coca Cola MagiCan competition from 1990? They had a big problem with the mechanisms jamming, and then there was that rumor the someone died from drinking the contents of one. PR disaster.

    I'm waiting for the first report of Nestlé tracking down some poor dead kid's stomach to award it £10,000.

    1. Re:Analog version didn't work so well for Coke... by tburke261 · · Score: 1

      From your source "There was a rumor in the 1990s and 2000s (decade) that a child had died drinking the liquid in one of the MagiCans. This has since been proven false"

    2. Re:Analog version didn't work so well for Coke... by Radak · · Score: 1

      I did say rumor. It wasn't correct, but it certainly was a rumor, and it was a nightmare for Coca Cola PR. Nothing I said was inaccurate.

  18. Illegal? by DL117 · · Score: 0

    Probably violates wiretapping laws.

    1. Re:Illegal? by Inda · · Score: 1

      Which wiretapping laws would they be?

      "Nestle plans to stalk UK consumers"

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    2. Re:Illegal? by digitig · · Score: 1

      There are wiretapping laws in the UK too. But the consumer has to pull a tab to activate the transmitter, which will presumably be deemed consent.

      What I'm not clear about is whether the transmitter is as well as the chocolate or instead of. If the latter, Nestle had better hope the bar isn't bought by a diabetic who needs a quick sugar fix because they feel themselves going hypo.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    3. Re:Illegal? by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Probably violates wiretapping laws.

      There are two possibilities: a. It doesn't affect you. Most likely. b. They come to your home and offer to hand over £10,000 to you. You have the choice of taking the cash or complaining about violation of wiretapping laws. What will you do?

    4. Re:Illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not without a EULA on the pack.. consent would only be valid if you knew you were consenting. You can't be made to consent to something you knew nothing about.

  19. Every once in a while someone points a study by.. by outsider007 · · Score: 0

    One of these assholes saying chocolate is good for your heart. What kind of wishful thinking would lead a sane person to believe in that level of horseshit? If I knew the answer to that I could rule the world.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  20. Re:I wonder why... by slashrio · · Score: 3, Informative
    ...anyone would mod up what you just wrote, because it shows clearly that you didn't read the article:

    When a winning consumer opens the wrapper, it activates and notifies the prize team who promises to track them down within 24 hours

    Wait, let me explain to you what it means, because I'm not quite sure you got it:
    Only when you open the wrapper does the GPS get activated.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  21. Get used to be tracked and traced everywhere by slashrio · · Score: 1

    That's the real purpose of this campaign.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    1. Re:Get used to be tracked and traced everywhere by equex · · Score: 1

      No! It's all about chocolate! Just a nice company handing out candy!

      --
      Can I light a sig ?
    2. Re:Get used to be tracked and traced everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nestle? A nice company?
      What drugs are you on? Can i have some?

      Cuz in the real world you don't get much more evil than nestle.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nestl%C3%A9

      And that's just the stuff they havent managed to hide.

    3. Re:Get used to be tracked and traced everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever been to London. Why track them when you can just pull them up on one of the CCTV cameras littering every public and private space?

      There's a *reason* that George Orwell wrote "1984". And there's a reason that "Brazil" is so very, very much funnier if you've actually been to England. Not just the UK: England, in particular.

  22. I have diarrhea by Hentes · · Score: 1

    Good luck finding me in the sewers!

    On a more serious note, this could cause loads of trouble to an unsuspecting guy if an airport scanner picks it up.

  23. I bet those golden trackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    make the chocolate taste terrible.

  24. Neat idea, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not entirely up to date with GPS devices, but last time I used one the accuracy really put me off from ever using them seriously. Specifically took part in a demonstration of using GPS devices on RC cars, which was sponsored by a hobby shop. We took them out to a forest and drove them around, with a camera on the car streaming back to the base they set up for us. After an hour when the batteries died we had to use the GPS devices to track down the cars, with first 3 to find the cars allowed to keep them. Long story short the GPS was barely any help, sure it put us in the general area of our cars, but we had to resort to reviewing the last few minutes of footage to narrow down exactly where they were.

    Maybe if Nestle took to heart the considerations that demonstration did for it's future work they just might pull it off without randomly asking people if they have the winning bar. Specifically that demonstration moved on to using short range beacons which could be fit into the remote to narrow down the actual location, complete with a status bar like display where 100% was your within 1ft of the car.

    1. Re:Neat idea, but... by digitig · · Score: 1

      GPS is likely to get them close enough to use a tracker to pick up the source of the signal. They might not do that, though, because Tracker is made by a competitor.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  25. Someone's going to get arrested at an airport. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The electronic device disguised a chocolate bar will be picked up by the X-Rays, taken outside and blown up by the army. Meanwhile the person carrying it will be locked up without trial (it's the UK, not the free world) for months.

  26. Sounds easy enough to cheat by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 0

    If its got a GPS receiver and some sort of transmitter in it, then its going to have metal. Seems like one could easily check an entire box of unopened candy bars for a winner with just a metal-dector.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:Sounds easy enough to cheat by TheMathemagician · · Score: 1

      Yes competitions like this fail because someone in the distribution process with a warehouse full of bars will have enough intelligence to find the bars and get accomplices to plant them in shops.

    2. Re:Sounds easy enough to cheat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of the episode of Green Wing where the staff had a carton of crisp (chip) packets and were passing them through their CAT scanner to see which contained the prize tokens.

    3. Re:Sounds easy enough to cheat by ledow · · Score: 1

      Most of the chocolate bars I see nowadays come in foil packets. But I don't doubt there would be some way to "distinguish" the winning bar if you happened to have access to an entire box of them and time enough to experiment.

  27. Re:Every once in a while someone points a study by by Voxol · · Score: 3, Informative

    Technically it's an active ingredient in cocoa beans.

    In order for it to be good for you, it's necessary to treat the bean differently from the farm to the bar.

    You can buy the active ingredient on it's own. And it really is genuinely good for your heart.

    http://www.cocoavia.com/

    Here's a paper in a peer reviewed journal with some evidence for you:
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098299710000774

  28. Re:Every once in a while someone points a study by by TheMathemagician · · Score: 0

    Real chocolate is good for your heart. "Chocolate and cocoa contain a high level of flavonoids, specifically epicatechin, which may have beneficial cardiovascular effects on health." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocoa_bean Of course the process of turning the beans into chocolate plus the addition of large amounts of condensed milk, sugar and other additives removes virtually all traces of these benefits ...

  29. What you'll get by Telecommando · · Score: 3, Funny

    "the GPS-enabled bars looked just like normal chocolate bars"

    So, broken in 3 or more pieces and melted on one end?

    --
    Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
  30. Clever way to avoid paying out the prize? by cheros · · Score: 1

    Given the average accuracy of a GPS device it's going to be a sod to pinpoint the recipient.

    Having said that, I'd go and look around dentists in the vicinity - if that bar really looks the same as a chocolate bar the unlucky finder may need the prize to pay for the dental damage :)

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  31. Hold on.. GPS only gets the location... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    GPS receivers don't transmit anything (note the "receiver" in "GPS receiver", no transmitter). A transmitter has to send that location back to their webserver(s)... What are they using for that - cellular, wifi? Probably SMS.

  32. Re:Every once in a while someone points a study by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You realise cocoa is a natural food just like potatoes, apples, oranges, and so forth right?

    Just as some fruit isn't all good because the acids in it can rot your teeth, cocoa isn't all bad.

  33. And if they don't find you? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    So what happens if they DON'T find you within the 24 hours? TFA didn't mention whether there is a bonus for hiding yourself well (e.g. in a cave or on a car-ferry or airplane) or whether the prize is lost.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:And if they don't find you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll send Fireball, Buzzsaw and Subzero after you

  34. Overengineered by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    How about a plastic chocolate bar with a phone number engraved: phone here and get ££££!

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  35. So... by Tasha26 · · Score: 1

    You just need a Non-Linear Junction Detector to find it?

  36. Chocolate bar opened indoors? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    And device not taken outdoors. Can't GPS lock through a ceiling.

  37. GPS Tracked Candy by ra1n85 · · Score: 1

    After reading this, I would prefer to have all of my candy tracked. Except Jujubes. No one likes those.

  38. Why did I instally think of: Where in the world... by alphax45 · · Score: 1

    I first thought of "Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego?" Someone with a lot of money and free time could really mess with Nestle, although I doubt they would really try too hard to track you down....

    --
    K Man
  39. So is the GPS thingy actually in the chocolate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or will it just lead them to the nearest bin?

  40. I Swallowed a What? by flyneye · · Score: 3, Funny

    Murphys law says this one will end up promoting stool softener , lawsuits and corporate lessons learned.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  41. wtf by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    >A Nestle spokesman added that 'inside their wrappers, the GPS-enabled bars looked just like normal chocolate bars.'"

    Personally, I make a distinction between the chocolate bar and the wrapping, so this seemed to imply to me that the GPS tracker might be INSIDE the actual chocolate bar and not the wrapper. Putting the tracker IN the actual chocolate... now that would be a bit intrusive.

    1. Re:wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way they'd do that.. the publicity when the first child ended up in hospital thinking it was a chocolate bar would take years to live down (after all these things have batteries, I doubt they're particularly healthy food).

  42. Re:Why not just 'get our folks home'? by Riceballsan · · Score: 2

    Many people would love to, myself included, but until one of us gets elected to both the presidency and another few hundred of us into congress (or maybe if congress listened to it's constituents over the defense contractors that pay them), the best the common man can do is write to the congressmen, vote for the least appalling candidates, and offer what we can to the troops who are stuck over there.

  43. Tin Foil? by MichaelJ · · Score: 1

    I love the fact so many people still refer to it as “Tin Foil” despite the fact we've been using aluminum foil, not tin, since the middle of last century. This gives me hope for such phrases as “dialing the phone.”

    --

    Michael J.
    Root, God, what is difference?
    1. Re:Tin Foil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aluminium tin-foil doesn't block the rays of "Them" That's why we've changed. (The poisonous bits were just a ruse)

      Us truthseekers know the true tinfoil hat is tin or lead based, all those fakies with their home made aluminium foil hats are the first to get it when the Overloards come end of this year.

      FYI

    2. Re:Tin Foil? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I love the fact so many people still refer to it as âoeTin Foilâ despite the fact we've been using aluminum foil, not tin, since the middle of last century.

      Tin was first replaced by aluminium in 1910, when the first aluminium foil rolling plant, "Dr. Lauber, Neher & Cie." was opened in Emmishofen, Switzerland. Not the middle of the last century, the very beginning.

      This gives me hope for such phrases as âoedialing the phone.â

      Well, you'd have to come up with a short enough replacement for "dialing". It's phone dials that have been gone since the middle (or shortly after anyway) the last century. What would you replace "dialing" with? Buttoning? I don't think you need to worry about "dialing" being replaced for some time.

  44. Good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I have to do now is set my stud-finder to "PIPE / METAL" and sweep it over the boxes in supermarkets!

  45. TV Ad by coofercat · · Score: 1

    In the TV ad, they say that the bar will (when opened) send a signal to a satellite, the satellite will then send a signal to Nestle who'll dispatch (what look like) militarised special forces people in helicopters and sliding down abseil ropes to hand you a suitcase full of money.

    Now I must admit, I do like the odd kit-kat (and also a kwik-krap), but I think I'll be abstaining for a few weeks until some other poor sap gets the "prize".

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sk2Lfgh1c4Q

  46. Creepy by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

    And I thought Willy Wonka was creepy...

  47. Who? by MilwaukeeMadAss · · Score: 1

    They have no business being there in the first place.

    Who/what shouldn't be there? The soldiers or the candy bars?

  48. Re:I wonder why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...anyone would mod up what you just wrote, because it shows clearly that you didn't read the article:

    When a winning consumer opens the wrapper, it activates and notifies the prize team who promises to track them down within 24 hours

    Article? I didn't RTFA, but even I knew that. He didn't even RTFS (summary).

  49. Tough to decide how to react by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure this is going to work. If I got one of those bars, I'd be awfully tempted to do something "exotic and strange" with the bar, like finding out some way to spoof the GPS signal or sending it on a trip to some far-flung corner of the world. It would be almost worth $10000 to see what mischief I could cause :-)

  50. Reminds me of the MagiCan.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    prize promotion that Coke tried. At least one child tried to drink the liquid used to weigh down the can and got sick.
    http://www.snopes.com/horrors/poison/cokecan.asp

    How long until a child tries to eat a GPS candy bar?

  51. Re:I wonder why... by FitForTheSun · · Score: 1

    The sentence you quote sounds like marketing speak to me. I wouldn't base implementation assumptions on it. It might work that way, or that might be the way that the Media Director decided to describe it.

  52. Re:I wonder why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Might be why he indicated someone should use a metal detector and not a rf analyzer.

  53. You retarded oaf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, there needs to be some metal to implement a GPS receiver. Second, there needs to be some kind of transmitter, easiest would be cell phone, to send the location to the tracking team, again metal.

  54. Simpler than that by pscottdv · · Score: 1

    I expect people in the UK will start to find that every chocolate bar in the store broken or smashed as people "look" for the winning bars by bending and squeezing them.

    --

    this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

    1. Re:Simpler than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not unusual for promotions to be based on enclosing (something) in a chocolate bar wrapper, and somehow we've managed to continue selling them so far.

  55. I eat chocolate on airplanes by amorsen · · Score: 1

    How will I prevent this thing from going off on the plane? Will it look suspicious when going through security?

    (Not that there is actually anything wrong with cell phones on air planes, but that is a rant for a different time).

    --
    Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  56. Fortunately metal isn't normally present in candy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally...a real use for my Android phone's metal detector app!

    GPS tracker candy bar...I will FIND YOU!!!!!

  57. Grouch Marx's take: by neko+the+frog · · Score: 2

    I've heard of chocolate adding on pounds before but this is ridiculous *chomps cigar*

    --
    -- the opinions stated above aren't those of my employer. in fact, they're probably not even my own. you know what, ju
  58. Re:I wonder why... by rastos1 · · Score: 1

    Ah! You mean that opening the wrapper would transmutate the chocolate bars into metallic circuits implementing a GPS transmitter? Brilliant.

  59. Coca Cola did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They did the exact same thing a couple years ago, with the GPS activated when you open the can.

  60. Re:Every once in a while someone points a study by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You realize chocolate isn't cocoa, right?

  61. Worse than Spring Surprise by boristdog · · Score: 2

    Or Crunchy Frog.

    Constable Clitoris ate one of those!

  62. Prize Team? by schlachter · · Score: 1

    They have a Prize Team? They're taking this tracking you down thing very seriously. I'm imagining a van pulling up on the curb and the A-Team jumping out check in hand.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  63. Boycott Nestle Murderers by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nestl%C3%A9_boycott#The_baby_milk_issue

    This wikipedia article puts it mildy, I'll put it as it s, they're a bunch of fucking scum baby killers who market baby powder to mothers living in places where the water will kill the babys.

    I for one am boycotting all nestle products for life, the company should be shut down for a crime of this size.

    They even admit it on their own website, they say they've stopped, I don't care either way, but from what other sites say, they haven't stopped.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  64. Re:Every once in a while someone points a study by by icebraining · · Score: 1

    In the EU, at least 35% of it is, according to Directive 2000/36/EC.

  65. Headline in The Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Woman gains 10,000 pounds from single chocolate bar!"

  66. Upright and locked position by Nkwe · · Score: 1

    "Please ensure your seat backs and tray tables are in the fully upright and locked position. Please ensure that all electronic devices are switched off at this time. Once the captain has indicated that it is okay, certain electronic devices may be used in flight; please check the magazine in the seat back pocket. Some devices may not be used at any time in the flight, these devices include remote control devices, radios, chocolate bars, ..."

  67. Re:Every once in a while someone points a study by by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    One of these assholes saying chocolate is good for your heart. What kind of wishful thinking would lead a sane person to believe in that level of horseshit?

    Very often, science trumps logic, and even more often it trumps public perception. This is one of those times. Science has demonstrated (others have posted links to studies) that chocolate, especially unsweetened or semi-sweet chocolate, is in fact good for you.

    Of course, public perception is that anything that tastes good is bad for you -- and THAT is the rankest horseshit.

  68. All clothing out of tin foil? by Ameryll · · Score: 1

    Note to /.newbies: When in doubt always assume tin-foil as material for any garment discussed on /.)

    Tin foil pants? Try getting that through airport security.

    1. Re:All clothing out of tin foil? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Even worse: your tin-foil skivvies will crimp when your dedicated TSA agent gives your junk its mandatory anti-weapon-smuggling squeeze. Try to work those kinks out while strapped into your three fourths of a cubic meter of cattle cargo space in Economy.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  69. Re:You misread ... by slashrio · · Score: 1

    His post said: "...it must emit some form of electromagnetic radiation..."
    But according to the article, that radiation would only start after opening the wrapper.
    That a metal detector might work is not disputed by me.
    Try to read, Read, READ.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  70. Re:I wonder why... by slashrio · · Score: 1

    Yes, you are right, but apart from that, I don't see another way of saving the battery from being exhausted long before the bar is bought, other than by activating the device either upon buying or on opening.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  71. Re:Try to read, Read, READ by slashrio · · Score: 1

    No, he did not!

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  72. Re:You retarded oaf yourself by slashrio · · Score: 1

    The poster that I commented on, did not say anything about metal, nor was that what I was replying to.
    I'm sure you didn't even take the time to read, Read, READ properly!

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  73. Re: Only when you open the wrapper by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Wait, what? Isn't the runner up prize here GPS nodes that only activate when protective wrappers are removed?

    A. I wanna see the patent on that!
    B. Gives new meaning to Halloween!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  74. Re:I wonder why... by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it could scavenge cell phone radiation to charge a capacitor? After all, it would only need to work sporadically.

    (OTOH, while I've read about charging capacitors by scavenging rf radiation, I've no idea how practical it really is, or how much power the GPS requires...particularly as if it's cheap and small enough to embed in a candy bar wrapper, it's not a model I've ever encountered. But it certainly shouldn't be broadcasting continuously)

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  75. Creepy by bill_tvm · · Score: 1

    What if somebody eats the gps without knowing?

  76. Re:I wonder why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's only going to be in bars for the £10,000 prize, it doesn't have to be cheap, just small.

  77. Re:I wonder why... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    I'd be pissed, nothing's getting between me and my 2pm sugar craving chocolate bar - oh look at the time...

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  78. Good luck.. by Memroid · · Score: 1

    trying to get through airport security. I swear, I bought it at the store! I have no idea what this device is! I've never seen it in my life before!