I think the GP and GGGP posts are arguing, and justifiably so, that "likely" does not convert to scientific law. It is theory. And not evolutionary theory, but a lower level theory.
Remember, we are talking science. Not democracy. The majority doesn't win the day. Statistics don't win the day. Proof wins the day.
He more or less saying it is like a scanner/printer vs a scanner/printer/copier. It has what you need, but when you need to make a copy, you have to scan and then print.
Unless you are employed by the government, you do not have a right to privacy. In fact, you don't have a right to privacy. You have a right to keep your things private. Privacy comes into play when you have 1 option: divulge. In this case you have 2 options: divulge or quit.
Hydro is by far the best out of all energy generation we use today. A nuclear plant can't last that long, has direct fueling costs, and low maintenance. A dam just has HUGE upfront real estate costs. Or in the case of Niagara Falls (4.4 GW), flow changes to a natural wonder.
95% of the revenue they get from ads (which make up 96% percent of its revenue) is their ability to use statistics to best target the users they are delivering ads to.
So Google is a data mining company, not an ad company. Ads are just their currently outlet at leveraging the data they have collected and will collect in the future.
In a few years, when Google knows you are hungry (based on patterns) and knows you are next to a restaurant you loved a year ago and it suggests that you go there without you even asking the phone, then you'll know that it is about the data mining.
They could leverage the data into other spaces outside advertising. Like catching a terrorist, criminal activity, monitoring competition for clients, credit rating, etc... It doesn't have to all be about selling you something.
The Federal government has exceptions on which they can govern. One is inter-state commerce. The people have exceptions on what rights they DON'T have and none pertain to transportation or what people can purchase. If you believe their business is inter-state commerce, then what isn't interstate commerce? It is about interstate commerce as taxis, a farm, Hollywood, or even a church.
So if a government doesn't regulate, then nobody regulates? I guess customers don't exist anymore... Businesses can just wreck havoc across everything and suppress everyone...oh wait, there is only one entity with those powers.
If the airline had control over the TSA, then I would agree with your premise. But since the TSA is mandated, it is not a private entity choosing to search their passenger's luggage and persons. It is effectively government entity performing warrant-less searches.
The government can't quarter troops in your home, but this is like them allowing a private company, by law, to quarter their employees in your home on business trips.
This happens in PA too. The laws promote the practice of "stocking up" rather than "drinking less". And "stocking up" leads to "drinking more". Go into any alcohol drinker's basement in PA and you'll find their own little distributor.
Slashdot Mirror
what's causing it? climate change. The climate has been changing forever too. The whole summary was like...so?
I think the GP and GGGP posts are arguing, and justifiably so, that "likely" does not convert to scientific law. It is theory. And not evolutionary theory, but a lower level theory.
Remember, we are talking science. Not democracy. The majority doesn't win the day. Statistics don't win the day. Proof wins the day.
He can find $5 parking; There are several places where you can park for 10 minutes for around that price.
He more or less saying it is like a scanner/printer vs a scanner/printer/copier. It has what you need, but when you need to make a copy, you have to scan and then print.
Nice to see Einstein is still making an impact on lives 60 years later.
If you are irreplaceable, that would work. You are likely not and they will just end the interview.
Unless you are employed by the government, you do not have a right to privacy. In fact, you don't have a right to privacy. You have a right to keep your things private. Privacy comes into play when you have 1 option: divulge. In this case you have 2 options: divulge or quit.
Someone in the City government has got to know a lawyer, right?
Hydro is by far the best out of all energy generation we use today. A nuclear plant can't last that long, has direct fueling costs, and low maintenance. A dam just has HUGE upfront real estate costs. Or in the case of Niagara Falls (4.4 GW), flow changes to a natural wonder.
95% of the revenue they get from ads (which make up 96% percent of its revenue) is their ability to use statistics to best target the users they are delivering ads to.
So Google is a data mining company, not an ad company. Ads are just their currently outlet at leveraging the data they have collected and will collect in the future.
In a few years, when Google knows you are hungry (based on patterns) and knows you are next to a restaurant you loved a year ago and it suggests that you go there without you even asking the phone, then you'll know that it is about the data mining.
They could leverage the data into other spaces outside advertising. Like catching a terrorist, criminal activity, monitoring competition for clients, credit rating, etc... It doesn't have to all be about selling you something.
The Federal government has exceptions on which they can govern. One is inter-state commerce. The people have exceptions on what rights they DON'T have and none pertain to transportation or what people can purchase. If you believe their business is inter-state commerce, then what isn't interstate commerce? It is about interstate commerce as taxis, a farm, Hollywood, or even a church.
So if a government doesn't regulate, then nobody regulates? I guess customers don't exist anymore... Businesses can just wreck havoc across everything and suppress everyone...oh wait, there is only one entity with those powers.
If the airline had control over the TSA, then I would agree with your premise. But since the TSA is mandated, it is not a private entity choosing to search their passenger's luggage and persons. It is effectively government entity performing warrant-less searches.
The government can't quarter troops in your home, but this is like them allowing a private company, by law, to quarter their employees in your home on business trips.
This happens in PA too. The laws promote the practice of "stocking up" rather than "drinking less". And "stocking up" leads to "drinking more". Go into any alcohol drinker's basement in PA and you'll find their own little distributor.
Or the car analogy would be using them!
Is that like putting a bird in a crypt?
With an RSA public encryption key around his neck
Do you believe this kind of anomaly has never happened before? Or do you choose to believe weather started existing in 1870?
And even the money in "tax heavens" winds up coming back to employ people or it will employ people in other countries who needed jobs as well.
Or they bought audio books or free speeches/readings
A human can cleverly clobber a crossword computer with brute force.
She should be fired for not having a class of teenagers read the book themselves. What a waste of class time...
They don't have to be inane. Simply a ridiculous amount of laws leads to forced ignorance.
Can I buy a used MP3?
Any sane person would say that...unless we are talking about forced labor. No one has a right to a job. They have a right to work (or not work).
I sense that someone REALLY hates patent trolls.