No they are not. You used current tense there. We have no architecture that even approaches being able to withstand the stresses of that scale resisting the needed forces.
You're aware that one loud asshole constitutes a "vocal minority", right?
We got those folks in exactly the same manner that we got those who self-proclaim their contributions to whatever cause and then obliquely assert that others aren't doing as much as they are thereby gaining a sense of superiority to the bulk of a given community - they exist as a small percentage of humankind and cannot be avoided entirely.
"First is highly specialized knowledge..." Explain then why people with exactly that kind of knowledge can't get their information through page sitting editors.
Straw argument. You can study evolution with no references to geology or paleontology at all by just studying soft tissue in the lab.
You're correct though, that's historic evidence of evolution. Those phenotypes were modified by changes in the gene sequences like those we've seen happen in labs. And some of those gene sequences we've extracted, mapped out and compared to living organisms. So evolution is a proven.
And they respond "Because you asked me to expound upon my imagination." Glad to see you believe string theory and multi-universe don't merit any more discussion than someone's imaginings though.
Oh bullshit it's an inconvenience. There've been enough actual bombs that anyone not understanding because they feel themselves 'elite' is trolling for attention or just being pompous. Bag it and notify. Nothing inconvenient about it.
I would suggest that there are many more examples of "successful" open source projects that have poorly designed interfaces than successful commercial closed source projects.
The is true if and only if you put successful in quotes.
Slashdot Mirror
Unless, of course, they are intelligent people and say no to your request that they burn their lives up for you.
No amount of money can give you back the life you've missed.
No they are not. You used current tense there. We have no architecture that even approaches being able to withstand the stresses of that scale resisting the needed forces.
Which language was able to do it on the first pass?
You're aware that one loud asshole constitutes a "vocal minority", right?
We got those folks in exactly the same manner that we got those who self-proclaim their contributions to whatever cause and then obliquely assert that others aren't doing as much as they are thereby gaining a sense of superiority to the bulk of a given community - they exist as a small percentage of humankind and cannot be avoided entirely.
Much to everyone's chagrin in both instances.
It's only galvanized me against the pompous chest-thumpers. Gain some perspective.
Pomposity however, runs ahead at full steam.
How about a couple of things Sparky. First a definition of what constitutes asshollery and second, a cite for your bullshit assertion.
"First is highly specialized knowledge..." Explain then why people with exactly that kind of knowledge can't get their information through page sitting editors.
Only an asshole believes that.
Pretty sure that happened moments after the rule came out.
That comment would be banned under Twitter's new rules. Heh
In a nine sentence abstract the word subjective is used five times, yet the title is "How Body Postures Influence Your Energy Level".
Science
Which is worse than no machine or monitor how?
You did not describe free.
Never bitten the head off of any animal.
Those interests are not mutually exclusive. Cite evidence otherwise.
Talk about security concerns.
Straw argument. You can study evolution with no references to geology or paleontology at all by just studying soft tissue in the lab.
You're correct though, that's historic evidence of evolution. Those phenotypes were modified by changes in the gene sequences like those we've seen happen in labs. And some of those gene sequences we've extracted, mapped out and compared to living organisms. So evolution is a proven.
You do not understand what evolution is. "Create life" is not in the description.
And they respond "Because you asked me to expound upon my imagination." Glad to see you believe string theory and multi-universe don't merit any more discussion than someone's imaginings though.
Oxford Dictionary:
hy.poth.e.sis
a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation:
What is the limited evidence?
Link to a few please.
Oh bullshit it's an inconvenience. There've been enough actual bombs that anyone not understanding because they feel themselves 'elite' is trolling for attention or just being pompous. Bag it and notify. Nothing inconvenient about it.
The is true if and only if you put successful in quotes.
Just because non-UI/UX open source programming is screwing up doesn't mean you have to follow suit.