On that "can look at" note: You'd better be damned sure you're one of the nice contributors and not one of the offensive crap-heads one frequently encounters in OS as your comments will live forever.
Agreed They've chosen atheism and then proceeded to remain ignorant about religions for the rest of their lives. Yet if a Christian (his target group and, to GP, it's derived from a proper name you moron, capitalize it) says something untrue about atheism, they'll be hopping in place with their little fingers pointing in accusation and yelling about indoctrination and brainwashing.
"Far too many of them". Nice and vague. It's also the kind of phrase that can be used against any statistic except perfection. "We only found one half of one percent fit that definition." "That's far too many."
"Most of" the cops I know are decent and honest men who want to guard their communities. There, your vagueness only supported by personal assertion has been countered by mine.
And.... you jump to a conclusion in the extreme then fall into sixth grade level anonymous bitch talk tactics. And at night you wonder why everyone is walking away from you shaking their heads.
You voided your own argument by 1) typing it on a computer and 2) admitting you were watching a movie. Both appliances get stolen all the time. Your last argument is garbage. They'll break into a house to rummage and *see* if you have things, even personal things. Short of it - I don't believe you AC.
I'm sure you understand yet avoid, that the *simplest* solution to all of this is **not to steal**. In other words, the onus of the situation is squarely on the perpetrator.
Instead, you advocate a laid-back attitude of being a willing victim. Right up until that thief breaking in decides that causing you or yours bodily harm is a fun thing to do, which they have certainly been known to do. Then, you'll scream about lack of state protection, assuming you are left capable.
Anyone thinking they have the right to decide that the time I've spent building my life is up for grabs had better expect the exact same disdain for theirs.
Slashdot Mirror
On that "can look at" note: You'd better be damned sure you're one of the nice contributors and not one of the offensive crap-heads one frequently encounters in OS as your comments will live forever.
One guy. Heinlein, Asimov. It's now two to one successful writers.
Mistaking something you don't care for (too many hyphens) as a problem doesn't make it a problem.
It's self-publishing. No, they don't need to proof read.
Agreed They've chosen atheism and then proceeded to remain ignorant about religions for the rest of their lives. Yet if a Christian (his target group and, to GP, it's derived from a proper name you moron, capitalize it) says something untrue about atheism, they'll be hopping in place with their little fingers pointing in accusation and yelling about indoctrination and brainwashing.
"Far too many of them". Nice and vague. It's also the kind of phrase that can be used against any statistic except perfection. "We only found one half of one percent fit that definition." "That's far too many."
"Most of" the cops I know are decent and honest men who want to guard their communities. There, your vagueness only supported by personal assertion has been countered by mine.
And.... you jump to a conclusion in the extreme then fall into sixth grade level anonymous bitch talk tactics. And at night you wonder why everyone is walking away from you shaking their heads.
Globally? Don't think so.
Overworked != lack of due diligence. Learn your terms.
Hah! Joe Six Pack spends a lot of time hunting and fishing. I do believe he would be better at this than Mr IT.
What makes you think it needs to be massive?
The phrase "life form" is not a synonym for "being alive".
From Merriam-Webster: life-form - the body form that characterizes a kind of organism (as a species) at maturity; also : a kind of organism.
Note "characterizes", "as a species" and "maturity".
Kawhoosh!
Said some kid in a poli-sci class.
He didn't mention attack. There are other venues.
You voided your own argument by 1) typing it on a computer and 2) admitting you were watching a movie. Both appliances get stolen all the time. Your last argument is garbage. They'll break into a house to rummage and *see* if you have things, even personal things. Short of it - I don't believe you AC.
I'm sure you understand yet avoid, that the *simplest* solution to all of this is **not to steal**. In other words, the onus of the situation is squarely on the perpetrator.
Instead, you advocate a laid-back attitude of being a willing victim. Right up until that thief breaking in decides that causing you or yours bodily harm is a fun thing to do, which they have certainly been known to do. Then, you'll scream about lack of state protection, assuming you are left capable.
Anyone thinking they have the right to decide that the time I've spent building my life is up for grabs had better expect the exact same disdain for theirs.
Don't break into their house. Easy remedy.
Google disagrees.
Your little experiment is an example of not "behaving properly".
Ah yes, that projected "may" as if it were fact.
If you truly believe this, then you must conclude that blacks are quite racist because they get bent out of shape over this issue.
Or your post simply disappears if it doesn't jibe with their views.
Same thing could be accomplished with an Epic Rant Battle.
Really? Got a cite for that?