Sure, freedom of movement is guaranteed in Canada, but does Canada guarantee against having secret laws that the citizens are not allowed to read? That is what the real issue is here - having secret laws that you are subject to, are supposed to know about, yet are not allowed to know about.
Yes an alias or nickname is legal, but you have to declare them when asked. Many official forms have a 'box' for aliases. For example, it is very common in Canada, for people of foreign descent, to use an anglican alias.
Ignorance of the law is not an excuse. However, an unpublished secret law, would be untenable in most countries. How does the US government get away with that?
Yes sure - but FISA does not control activities that occur *outside* the USA. it is only concerned with activities inside the country, pertaining to foreign intelligence.
See this: http://www.eff.org/Censorship/Terrorism_militias/f isa_faq.html
"FISA does not regulate the use of electronic surveillance outside of the United States. For instance, electronic surveillance of electronic communications like e-mail is only governed by 1801(f)(4) if the surveillance device is installed "in the United States." When e-mail sent by a U.S. person to a foreign person is intercepted outside the United States, that interception does not meet this definition."
As I understand it, the wiretaps are only on foreign communications - although it applies to citizens and foreigners alike, it is not a tap on local domestic communications.
The US 'Daisy Cutter' bombs are fuel air bombs. Some other countries also have these devices. They explode with enormous force and flattens everything on the ground. The resulting firestorm and mushroom cloud looks like a textbook nuclear explosion.
So, what I'm saying is - it all depends on the circumstances. I would not like to have been anywhere close to the shuttle tank explosion...
Yup, I had the unfortunate experience of being inside a fireball *twice*. The first one looked blue. The second one looked red. The sound was a kind of 'wump'. In both cases, nothing much happened to me, except some singed hair.
However - I wouldn't recommend anyone trying it and I sure as hell don't want it to happen a third time...
There are two kinds of computer users: Those that have lost data and those that will. Any CEO knows that from first hand experience.
Companies have dealt with information loss ever since the first person scratched something on a rock. The important thing to remember is that most data is useless anyway, so it doesn't matter if you lose it. Most stuff is saved because it is convenient, not because it is essential to save it.
Software has no substance. It is neither matter, nor energy. It cannot be a product. If you think it is a product, then I would like to buy it by weight.
Re:Cool, does it run under KDE?
on
IE7 Leaked
·
· Score: 1
I would guess that 95% of the original Mozaic code is still in there. That would be the 5% of the IE code base that doesn't have bugs...
Ahah - so the Cylons were actually a bunch of medical orderly robots gone wild who decided that the only way to eradicate all disease is to eradicate the human carriers...
Sure, freedom of movement is guaranteed in Canada, but does Canada guarantee against having secret laws that the citizens are not allowed to read? That is what the real issue is here - having secret laws that you are subject to, are supposed to know about, yet are not allowed to know about.
Yes an alias or nickname is legal, but you have to declare them when asked. Many official forms have a 'box' for aliases. For example, it is very common in Canada, for people of foreign descent, to use an anglican alias.
Ignorance of the law is not an excuse. However, an unpublished secret law, would be untenable in most countries. How does the US government get away with that?
The right to breathe is not in the constitution... ;-)
Walk, cycle or horseback...
Yes sure - but FISA does not control activities that occur *outside* the USA. it is only concerned with activities inside the country, pertaining to foreign intelligence. See this: http://www.eff.org/Censorship/Terrorism_militias/f isa_faq.html
"FISA does not regulate the use of electronic surveillance outside of the United States. For instance, electronic surveillance of electronic communications like e-mail is only governed by 1801(f)(4) if the surveillance device is installed "in the United States." When e-mail sent by a U.S. person to a foreign person is intercepted outside the United States, that interception does not meet this definition."
Well, perhaps after eating a tuna sandwich 'baited' would be more accurate.
Furnulum pani nolo UNIX.
Well, FISA doesn't apply to foreign actions, so it is an important distinction is it not?
As I understand it, the wiretaps are only on foreign communications - although it applies to citizens and foreigners alike, it is not a tap on local domestic communications.
The US 'Daisy Cutter' bombs are fuel air bombs. Some other countries also have these devices. They explode with enormous force and flattens everything on the ground. The resulting firestorm and mushroom cloud looks like a textbook nuclear explosion.
So, what I'm saying is - it all depends on the circumstances. I would not like to have been anywhere close to the shuttle tank explosion...
Yup, I had the unfortunate experience of being inside a fireball *twice*. The first one looked blue. The second one looked red. The sound was a kind of 'wump'. In both cases, nothing much happened to me, except some singed hair.
However - I wouldn't recommend anyone trying it and I sure as hell don't want it to happen a third time...
Well, this is a Canadian label...
Uhhh, ever heard of rsync?
Huh? The FSF *is* a software business. It just has different business model from some others.
No, it is 45 Newton Meters - a very forceful chip...
Patents and copyrights don't apply to military projects anyway. That is one of the reasons it is very nice to work at a military equipment developer.
That is perfectly legal with an iPod. It is simply the first sale doctrine. Same as selliing used CDs.
There are two kinds of computer users: Those that have lost data and those that will. Any CEO knows that from first hand experience. Companies have dealt with information loss ever since the first person scratched something on a rock. The important thing to remember is that most data is useless anyway, so it doesn't matter if you lose it. Most stuff is saved because it is convenient, not because it is essential to save it.
Well, I suppose undervolting is revolting...
Software has no substance. It is neither matter, nor energy. It cannot be a product. If you think it is a product, then I would like to buy it by weight.
I would guess that 95% of the original Mozaic code is still in there. That would be the 5% of the IE code base that doesn't have bugs...
Software is not a product. Software is merely a branch of mathematics. The computer is a product.
Ahah - so the Cylons were actually a bunch of medical orderly robots gone wild who decided that the only way to eradicate all disease is to eradicate the human carriers...
Gee, why would anyone want to effect cancer? I would think there are enough carcinogens out there to effect cancer already.