Grandparent is valid. The definition of Porn, and by reference, Pornography, doesn't fit here. While it could be argued that a person could be sexually attracted to a computer, it still it WAY out of place. Even for you Mac fiends.
This is because the eye "hit" about > 100 miles north of Miami (Vero Beach I think?). Hurricane force winds went out about 90 miles. Your friend had wind and rain, but it doesn't surprise me he was online the entire time.
Vonage will not read, listen to or disclose to any third parties private e-mail, conversations, or other communications that are transmitted using Vonage services except as required to ensure proper operation of services or as otherwise authorized by law.
I find the word 'authorized' odd. The previous clause said 'required'. As though they'll do it if they are allowed, not just when forced.
I did. I'll admit my naivete in that before I read this thread, I pretty much took for granted that the ratings on Amazon were a relatively accurate overview of the quality of books. I'll still look at the ratings as I've found they do match up pretty closely with the quality of the books. However, I'll just give them a little less credence.
Don't mistake the design faults of this version to be "VB-style" properties being a fad. Indeed, there are some issues with the design and UI, some quite glaring. However, the property page paradigm is quite useful. They just need to get it right, your multi-property example being good.
Also, your numbered points are all pretty much rooted in the core flaw with "round-trip" HTML editing that has been present since v2002. [asbestosSuit] As I understand it, this is to be fixed in the upcoming release. [/asbestosSuit] Granted, if they let this one slip by again, I think you'll see a mass exodus of web developers from the product.
But I shouldn't have to incur the cost of RECEIVING said anonymous speech. I'm not violating someone's rights by demanding they identify themselves to post a message on MY billboard.
Rights schmights.
If jaywalking is illegal and there are officers on-site for the violence and shootings, yes they should be doing their job and handing out tickets for jaywalking.
I suppose it comes down to how "priorities" are handled and what is the right amount of resources to be spent on issue A versus issue B. *Of course* terrorism is a top priority. But how much more effort should be expended against it than going after drug paraphernalia (which is another issue altogether) or after spammers? Obviously more, but how much more? $1B versus $50M? The bulk of the FBI's resources versus a couple of agents on their days off? You didn't see every FBI agent in the US descend upon Arizona. But I suppose the resources that were expended were too much for the OP. I think the key issue is whether they should have been there at all, based on the issue itself, not on its priority.
Granted I don't agree with the raid, but this argument is so overused. Should we stop all traffic enforcement so that we can use those police resources to go solve murder cases?
Funny, on the basis of *your* subject line, I'll bet a lot of filters would have rejected your message.
(Good ideas, though, for us English-based e-mailees).
The annoying factor of people talking on their virtually-invisible handfree earbuds is offset by the humorousness. Sometimes my workplace looks like a loony bin with a bunch of people milling about apparently talking to some unseen spirit. The self-conscious always have their fingers to the bud so they look like foreign news correspondents, but still making it clear they are NOT crazy.
Similar to the parent, this is just a form of whitelisting. This is OK for grandma and her hotmail account where all she uses it for is for family digital pictures and the obligatory "Send this to 5 people and you will receive free doilies for life!" chain letters. But for many ppl, this just doesn't cut it. What about mailing lists where you do not know the sending address ahead of time?
My roommate was arrested in November of last year. There were 10 solicitations in the mailbox 2 days later, 15 the next, and between 7 and 20 everyday for a week thereafter. (South Florida, if it makes a difference).
DAN the name prevalent on these patents is Brian Shuster? Topic of a previous/. article and mentioned in a MSNBC.com article back last May.
Or he could be responsible for some of the finest cinema ever. (I especially like Santa with Muscles).
Slashdot Mirror
I believe that was sarcasm.
Grandparent is valid. The definition of Porn, and by reference, Pornography, doesn't fit here. While it could be argued that a person could be sexually attracted to a computer, it still it WAY out of place. Even for you Mac fiends.
This is because the eye "hit" about > 100 miles north of Miami (Vero Beach I think?). Hurricane force winds went out about 90 miles. Your friend had wind and rain, but it doesn't surprise me he was online the entire time.
I believe it was just that point about Americans which was considered flamebait, especially the jab at Bush.
I find the word 'authorized' odd. The previous clause said 'required'. As though they'll do it if they are allowed, not just when forced.
Oh, here's your answer. Mmmmm, informative.
I did. I'll admit my naivete in that before I read this thread, I pretty much took for granted that the ratings on Amazon were a relatively accurate overview of the quality of books. I'll still look at the ratings as I've found they do match up pretty closely with the quality of the books. However, I'll just give them a little less credence.
Yah, but you still can't see the "300" posts originally reported. Still says only 81.
Funny, last time I went down to the "USPS", they wouldn't let me file a patent on ANYTHING. They would let me mail a letter, though.
Don't mistake the design faults of this version to be "VB-style" properties being a fad. Indeed, there are some issues with the design and UI, some quite glaring. However, the property page paradigm is quite useful. They just need to get it right, your multi-property example being good. Also, your numbered points are all pretty much rooted in the core flaw with "round-trip" HTML editing that has been present since v2002. [asbestosSuit] As I understand it, this is to be fixed in the upcoming release. [/asbestosSuit] Granted, if they let this one slip by again, I think you'll see a mass exodus of web developers from the product.
But I shouldn't have to incur the cost of RECEIVING said anonymous speech. I'm not violating someone's rights by demanding they identify themselves to post a message on MY billboard. Rights schmights.
If jaywalking is illegal and there are officers on-site for the violence and shootings, yes they should be doing their job and handing out tickets for jaywalking.
I suppose it comes down to how "priorities" are handled and what is the right amount of resources to be spent on issue A versus issue B. *Of course* terrorism is a top priority. But how much more effort should be expended against it than going after drug paraphernalia (which is another issue altogether) or after spammers? Obviously more, but how much more? $1B versus $50M? The bulk of the FBI's resources versus a couple of agents on their days off? You didn't see every FBI agent in the US descend upon Arizona. But I suppose the resources that were expended were too much for the OP. I think the key issue is whether they should have been there at all, based on the issue itself, not on its priority.
Granted I don't agree with the raid, but this argument is so overused. Should we stop all traffic enforcement so that we can use those police resources to go solve murder cases?
Funny, on the basis of *your* subject line, I'll bet a lot of filters would have rejected your message. (Good ideas, though, for us English-based e-mailees).
The annoying factor of people talking on their virtually-invisible handfree earbuds is offset by the humorousness. Sometimes my workplace looks like a loony bin with a bunch of people milling about apparently talking to some unseen spirit. The self-conscious always have their fingers to the bud so they look like foreign news correspondents, but still making it clear they are NOT crazy.
Where's Mulder when you need him?
Similar to the parent, this is just a form of whitelisting. This is OK for grandma and her hotmail account where all she uses it for is for family digital pictures and the obligatory "Send this to 5 people and you will receive free doilies for life!" chain letters. But for many ppl, this just doesn't cut it. What about mailing lists where you do not know the sending address ahead of time?
What about mailing lists to which you may want to subscribe? I've found you rarely can find out ahead of time what the sending address will be.
... a fine cup of Earl Grey.
My roommate was arrested in November of last year. There were 10 solicitations in the mailbox 2 days later, 15 the next, and between 7 and 20 everyday for a week thereafter. (South Florida, if it makes a difference).
Yah, like "our sole purpose is to own stuff and sue the p00p out of anyone who thinks otherwise"
DAN the name prevalent on these patents is Brian Shuster? Topic of a previous /. article and mentioned in a MSNBC.com article back last May.
Or he could be responsible for some of the finest cinema ever. (I especially like Santa with Muscles).