Slashdot Mirror


iMac G5 Porn Roundup

boredMDer writes "Apparently someone who has already recieved their iMac G5 has decided to take it apart. Stupid if only for the fact that he's just voided his warranty." pjcreath writes "Apple has posted official pages listing the components that are 'easy' to install (including the LCD!) and describing how to troubleshoot hardware problems using diagnostic LEDs inside the case. For the very curious, you can download the high-resolution TIFF (10MB) of the iMac's innards from Apple."

530 comments

  1. porn roundup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    wtf?

    1. Re:porn roundup by magarity · · Score: 3, Informative

      Duh, people porn is people with their covers removed. Computer porn, in this case iMac porn, is a computer with its cover removed. This should be stunningly obvious. Please feel free to think before posting for a change.

    2. Re:porn roundup by TheGatekeeper · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I dunno, I always thought of computers and people with their covers removed as simply being 'in the nude', and it's not actually 'ponr' per se, unless of course the subject is turned on at the time.

      This leads to the dubious example of situations in which the subject is likely not actually turned on, but made to appear so in order to increase the appeal of the picture.

      Granted the line between nudity and porn is a thin one, and in America one might construe mere nudity as porn, but in more progressive nations actual Software EXchange has to be taking place to be classified as pornographic.

      --
      'The staff in the hand of a wizard may be more than a prop for age,' -Hamá, the doorward
    3. Re:porn roundup by LikelyStory · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For probly the best example of what inspired the "porn" moniker, see http://www.billnoll.com/g5/

      This guy's "photo essay" of his then-new cheesegrater G5 borders on the obsessive. He's a pro photographer, so...

      For the flavor, his opening caption reads:
      "If beauty is only skin deep, nobody told the industrial designers at Apple - the new Power Mac G5 is stunningly gorgeous - both inside and out. I used a Sony DSC-F717, handheld with available light, to capture the metallic textures and elegant curves...."

      Actually, some nice shots!

    4. Re:porn roundup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh YEAH, Baby, show me your ports!

    5. Re:porn roundup by d474 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Porn? It's more like Surgery, I think.

      Porn is like when the CD tray "ejects" a CD in your girlfriends face, or you "insert" a 3.5"er firmly into the warm, purring disc drive.

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    6. Re:porn roundup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh More like Stunningly Stupid.

      Danks for the permishion to thinc, what would all us MORONS do without jeanus's like yoo?

    7. Re:porn roundup by fshalor · · Score: 1

      This actually turned me on... Crap...

      I guess I'm feelin an urge to tear apart our new dual g5 tower. (dual 2.5 GHz 2 gb ram.) I'm still reeling from the dual monitors (23" and 17" SD's).

      I'll start strippin her after this dvd finishes. :)

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    8. Re:porn roundup by nuggetboy · · Score: 1

      Grandparent is valid. The definition of Porn, and by reference, Pornography, doesn't fit here. While it could be argued that a person could be sexually attracted to a computer, it still it WAY out of place. Even for you Mac fiends.

    9. Re:porn roundup by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 0, Troll

      Insert a 3.5"er? I wish! I'm a white guy; it's more like a USB micro-drive.

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    10. Re:porn roundup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, no, wrong again. As others have already said, it's more like surgery.

      What you want is iPod Porn (not work safe).

    11. Re:porn roundup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it could be argued that a person could be sexually attracted to a computer, it still it WAY out of place. Even for you Mac fiends.

      Uhhh, wanna bet?

    12. Re:porn roundup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  2. Didn't void the warranty by halo1982 · · Score: 5, Informative

    This isn't an old iMac. Apple designed this one so that your grandmother could open it and replace its parts. This didn't void the warranty. It has quite an interesting inside. I like how they focused on the inside design as well (i.e. G5 heatsink that no one will ever see but still looks cool) as the outside.

    1. Re:Didn't void the warranty by jargoone · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You like how they focused on the inside design? Please. Companies that mass-produce computers usually operate on a razor-thin profit margin. While spending extra money on external design *might* make sense, a special heatsink is just a waste of money, plain and simple. Oh wait, this is Apple, they can do no wrong, and people are happy to pay for it. So much for the razor-thin margin.

      Just what I need, another line for a Mac zealot: "Does YOUR Pee Cee have a neat little logo on the heat sink?"

      You haters can fuck off: I can buy 4 well-equipped Dells for what you pay for your machine with a cute heat sink.

    2. Re:Didn't void the warranty by wankledot · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, I've never seen a PC that has its insides all done up to look cool. What a waste of time!

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    3. Re:Didn't void the warranty by MrLint · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is more interesting than one might be lead to believe. If the parts are easy to replace then this saves on repair labor costs and it also makes nearly the whole unit a collection of field / user swappable parts. Being a PC field tech for a number of years this is really a radical shift for apple.

      Now keeping this in mind i have seen many a screwless case come and go from both dell and gateway, and i would have preferred that they had screws as the mechanisms they used were so crappy it would have been easier to repair.

    4. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Necro+Spork · · Score: 5, Funny

      But I did void the warranty on this iMac. The plants are happy and you can see the blueberry glow from a good distance! The old iMacs like this one seem much harder to gut.
      http://www2.hawaii.edu/~brandsbe/iPot.jpg

      --
      120 chars of filth!
    5. Re:Didn't void the warranty by jargoone · · Score: 2, Informative

      You completely missed the point. PCs that are done up like this are either modified by the owner to do this, or in certain instances done from the factory. The point is, if it comes like that from the factory, you CHOOSE to pay more for it. Apple doesn't let you choose. Cute heat sinks for everyone!

    6. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The special shiny heatsink is part-n-parcel of the marketing of the "G5" CPU.

    7. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Tanlis · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually he did void the warranty. There are brass colored screws for all the pieces that can be taken off by users. Remove any of the others and your warranty is gone.

    8. Re:Didn't void the warranty by CountBrass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah I know: it really sucks to have Apple force me to have all that quality when I buy a computer from them.

      If you want to buy a cheap pile of shit: buy a Dell.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    9. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's "douche bag", you twit.

    10. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope - he's rather saying it sucks to have to pay for looks that you don't need. If I just want to use the machine, I couldn't care less how it looks inside as long as it works as expected (include reliability here) But maybe it's just me, with this habit of using computers instead of drolling all over them. Of course, if he thing would stay open instead of closed, it might make some sense.

      Anyway, hey, it's not my money - as far as I'm concerned, people can buy a CPU-less iMac with a cool heatsink. Besides, and here is the counter-argument, Apple might want to ride this new hip wave for all it's worth. Unfortunately that's the problem with them never getting mainstream - not enough people would buy more hip instead of more power for the same money.

      P.S. If you want to sound at least passable intelligent, stop the "buy Dell" crap - otherwise someone with less brain-damage could (meta-)mod you down. Everyone knows Dell is crap, but unlike Apple they're not the only vendor around for the hardware. If you didn't realize that, get out of your hole and look around

    11. Re:Didn't void the warranty by c.emmertfoster · · Score: 2, Funny

      The best part of those CRT + computer iMacs is how if you want to open it up to fix something, you can melt off an appendage on one of the capacitors.

      I don't need any fingers, I have an adorable computer which I have named "bubbles!"

      --
      We can neither love nor pity nor forgive. If you make a slip in handling us you die!
    12. Re:Didn't void the warranty by 10Ghz · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yeah I know: it really sucks to have Apple force me to have all that quality when I buy a computer from them.


      You mean like chipping paint on Titanium Powerbooks, "Windtunnel" PowerMac G4's, logic-board failures on iBooks, failing lid-latches on Powerbooks, cracks on the Cube, overheating 12" PowerBooks etc. etc. etc.

      Apple makes very nice machines, but they are not the Holy Grail of quality.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    13. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean like chipping paint on Titanium Powerbooks, "Windtunnel" PowerMac G4's, logic-board failures on iBooks, failing lid-latches on Powerbooks, cracks on the Cube, overheating 12" PowerBooks etc. etc. etc.


      Silence! We will not tolerate your insolence. Mods, take care of it.

      Heil Steve! Heil Steve! Down with the untercomputers!

      On a serious note: yeah, Apple isn't the holy grail, but so what. They are the best at what they do.

    14. Re:Didn't void the warranty by jcr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Apple's finally catching up to the NeXTStation with this machine. Disassembling a NeXT slab required removing a total of four screws: one to hold the case closed, one for the disk drive bracket, one for the floppy drive, and one for the power supply.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    15. Re:Didn't void the warranty by iezhy · · Score: 1, Funny

      u can void imac warranty just by removing some screws?

      then it most user-friendly computer with least user-firendly warranty :-)

    16. Re:Didn't void the warranty by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple makes very nice machines, but they are not the Holy Grail of quality.

      Maybe not, but it's been a long time since you could buy an x86 machine that lasted as long. Back in the early 80's, I remember HP and DEC PC's that would wear like a tank. Today, every x86 machine I see is flimsy as hell.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    17. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're looking in the wrong places. There are plenty of high-quality, heavy-duty PCs. If you want something really sturdy, get a PC for industrial applications. If you want something that looks nice, is sturdy, and silent as well, look at Hush PC.

    18. Re:Didn't void the warranty by quigonn · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that's nothing compared to my VAXstation 4000: you don't need to remove any screws at all. The only tool you need is something like a small ruler to press at a clamp to be able to remove the harddisks. _That_ is great hardware maintainability.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    19. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yeah I know: it really sucks to have Apple force me to have all that quality when I buy a computer from them.

      My own experience with Mac "quality" has been pretty bad: two dead Titanium Powerbooks ($4k each!), chipping paint, unreliable DVD drives, etc. I wonder where the statistics are to back up the claims that Macs are quality machines. You know, just because they look nice (and they do) doesn't mean that they are high quality.

    20. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got nothing on my open-case PC!

    21. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take ity you mean they become old fast. That's what competition is for. I highly doubt that Apple, left as the only computer maker, would have had ... say graphics cards on the level it has today in the G5. Those came because of PC gaming competitiveness and, love it or hate it, Apple followed there. So there's a good part in evolving the components.

      On the other hand, as far as reliability goes, PCs can be as reliable as Macs - I had to replave a 8-year-old PC because of its speed, not hw failure; it couldn't run the latest divx5 decoders fast enough; it still did very well on what it could do. There are exceptions, of course, if you buy really cheap (see the recent capacitor problems due to cheap chinese counterfeits) Not that Macs don't have any problems ever, either.

      It's more like the image PC makers try to sell - buy this new computer, it's soooo much faster than your old one! There's a PC overstock, as opposed to a Mac shortage, so Apple has longer release cycles.

    22. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      iPot!? BWAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAH
      That is just too funny....wait a minute... just what kind of plants are you growing in there?

    23. Re:Didn't void the warranty by 10Ghz · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Maybe not, but it's been a long time since you could buy an x86 machine that lasted as long.


      Sure you can. Well, I build my own machines and they last for a long time. And I have seen name-brand machines that are old, and still keep on working.

      It just seems to me that people remember the Macs that last for a long time, but forget the ones that fail sooner. And when it comes to x86, they remember the ones that failed soon, and forget the ones that keep on working after years and years of use.

      I guess it's because of the perception of the two: Macs are the expensive hi-end machines, whereas x86 is the cheap and crappy computer.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    24. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Necro+Spork · · Score: 1

      I have some sort of fern and two other low light plants. I need to learn more about Hawaiian plants I guess. Nothing illegal if that is what your asking, this is a dorm room... Last year I had a bike in the same place and they made me move it due to the "fire hazard". The iPot is locked to the rail with a thick chain so they will have to tell me to move it.

      --
      120 chars of filth!
    25. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Necro+Spork · · Score: 1

      And some more picture if you like. I should have kept the "extreme vacuum" sticker from the monitor.
      01.jpg
      02.jpg

      --
      120 chars of filth!
    26. Re:Didn't void the warranty by rogerborn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Halo:

      Actually 99 per cent of all Mac owners will never take off the back cover.

      Is Apple's art wasted on them?

      Nah. Its not art. It just excellent design.

      If you design it correctly, it will always be beautiful, both on the outside and on the inside.

      (Which is why beautiful women are beautiful all over - come to think of it, all women are beautiful)

      !!! Whoops, sorry for that aside there - got sidetracted, or something...

      Anyway, everything you see inside the new G5 iMac is perfectly designed for what it does, including the logo on the heatsink that helps focus where the heat goes.

      It can't help but to look pretty, folks!

      Roger Born
      Columnist,
      mymac.com

    27. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      They should probably just glue them shut like the iPods.

      Mac users are just supposed to dispose of their systems and buy a new one when they stop working.

      If you try and fix your Mac, you're stealing from Apple, which makes Steve Jobs cry.

    28. Re:Didn't void the warranty by CanadianCrackPot · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the exploding monitors... damn that hurt taking the glass out of my arm, all I did was walk by the damn thing.

      --
      Good programmers drink beer to relieve job stress.
      Great programmers drink hard liquor and work best hungover.
    29. Re:Didn't void the warranty by spitefulcrow · · Score: 1

      You're joking, right? I have an IBM P3 box downstairs that's been chugging along (with the help of various upgrades) since the late 90s. It's a solid piece of work.

      --
      Sorry, my karma just ran over your dogma.
    30. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 1997 DFI with a Pentium 266 that still chugs along quite nicely, thank you. Originally had Windows 95, then Windows 2000 Pro, now running NetBSD 1.6.2. Once in a while, the CPU fan will start to resonate, but rocking the case back and forth once silences it. This was a relatively cheap box, not one of your IBM/HP/Compaq whatever. It isn't pretty, but it is solid. Like the HP Laserjet IID that is connected to it, lots of steel.

    31. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Amen brother...

      As means of comparison, in Sept 2000 I got a Compaq laptop at work. The POS only lasted two years before pieces of plastic started breaking off. When I turned it in March 2003 I told my boss it was unusable because it was falling apart.

      At the same time, my wife bought a tangerine clamshell iBook. She's still got it, it still runs and, except for the tangerine leaf in the lid of the case all the pieces are there and the computer still runs.

      --
      My father is a blogger.
    32. Re:Didn't void the warranty by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      My old Dell workstation has that beat easily. Push a button and the side pops off, pull a lever and the PCI riser module pops out, another lever pulls out the drive bays. The only screws are the ones holding the drive to the bracket and the PCI cards to the riser module as required in the spec.

    33. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's that? An ATX case? What else did you put plants inside of?

    34. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The old IIcx and IIci had one screw to fasten the lid on the case, and one screw to hold all the guts inside the case. That was in 1989.

    35. Re:Didn't void the warranty by TarlCabbot · · Score: 1
      Why is it not art. Like a sunset at a sertain time/day, or the incredible chalk art done on sidewalks in California and Italy, if you are not there within a day, 99.9% of people won't see it.

      Kinda make me feel lucky to be one of those whose job is to look into them once in a while.

    36. Re:Didn't void the warranty by MouseR · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. It's not like it's the first Apple system that offers easy component replacement.

      Just to name a few, the Mac II LC was exactly thart. Quen the IIci and IICX and the Quadra 700 series, the PowerMac 6100, the 8500, the 8600 and the 800 and 900 series, the Beige G3 and pretty much any tower thereafter (Blue & White G3, the G4 and G5 towers) etc.

      Where this is new is the easy accessibility of the internal components of an all-in-one unit. Any iMac previously (and, for those who haven't realised they're basically the same design, the Performa 5x00 series) all were bitches to dig into. This is where the iMac G5 "innovates", by fixing the internal design failures of previous iMacs.

    37. Re:Didn't void the warranty by MouseR · · Score: 0

      All my typos are belong to me.
      New keyboard :-)

    38. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure they are, if they weren't, you wouldn't be wasting your time trying to tell people they aren't.

      grow up.

    39. Re:Didn't void the warranty by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ugh, iPods are NOT glued shut! You can open them quite easily with a thin flat object (i.e. the plastic spatulas you'll get with any of the variety of replacement batteries on the market).

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    40. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Mouse42 · · Score: 1

      I think this is definitely a "your mileage may vary" sort of issue. Argument with anecdotal evidence a bit useless. I think only a scientific study could really answer the question because there are both surviving PCs and Macs.

      I bought my desktop in 1999, and it's still running great. The only problem I have is that I can't play some video games. But I should be working, anyway. heh.

      I've also gotten into buying used laptops. I had one 1998 laptop last until 2002 when the mother board died. I'll get around to replacing it one of these days...

      I also have a 2000 laptop that is working great to this day.

      My friends and I all bought our computers in 1999 when we entered college. Two PC desktops, PC laptop and one Mac laptop. The Mac laptop died after two years (would not start), as did one of the desktops ("died" as in "completely useless, and I'm going to break it if it doesn't break itself soon").

      My mother on the other hand has been through three laptops in as many years. She is the destroyer of laptops. So certainly, the user influences the life span of a computer, especially laptops.

    41. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got you beat. At work I still use the same Pentium 133 that's been there for years. It's a bit dodgy at times, but it works well enough to not try risking being without a workstation for days attempting to get a new PC setup for all the unreliable legacy apps we have. If I can run the necessary apps plus firefox, there's no reason to upgrade.

    42. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an iBook that had a logic board go bad. It's at least a year out of warrenty. I called up apple and they replaced the board for free. They payed for all shipping and handling, sent me a box to ship it in, and even the tape to seal the box. Aside from that they also would have replaced the combo drive and given me an OS upgrade, but I already had a better drive so I didn't qualify.

      Making any sort of computer will have quality problems sooner or later, and Apple is better than most. As far as I'm concerned they more than amend for their mistakes and gain loyal customers such as myself because of it.

    43. Re:Didn't void the warranty by jcostantino · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually you can do whatever the hell you want with your purchased equipment as long as any modifications you do to it don't cause other components to fail.

      From working in an Apple authorized service center, it didn't matter if a machine with Applecare or Apple's 1 year warranty came in with modifications as long as those changes didn't cause other components to fail. IE: A CPU upgrade fried the motherboard or a HD replacement broke a component off the logic board. Disassembling your Power or iBook would be a huge mistake due to the sheer number of different screws but a careful end user could disassemble his book and put it back together without causing anyone to become suspicious.

      If he disassembled the hard drive to take pictuers, then he would have broken a seal that would have voided his warranty. As it is, I'm sure his warranty is intact.

      I don't know if the Magnusson-Moss warranty act is directly applicable but I don't see why it wouldn't be.

      --
      Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    44. Re:Didn't void the warranty by nial-in-a-box · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Anyone who sells any computer with less than 256MB of RAM should be killed, and anyone who sells a computer with less than 512MB of RAM should be punished.

      --
      I am feeling fat and sassy
    45. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1
      Just to name a few, the Mac II LC was exactly thart. Quen the IIci and IICX and the Quadra 700 series, the PowerMac 6100, the 8500, the 8600 and the 800 and 900 series, the Beige G3 and pretty much any tower thereafter (Blue & White G3, the G4 and G5 towers) etc.


      Have you wrestled with removing the case cover from a Ci, a 6100, a 8500 (!!!), or a Beige G3 Desktop? There is only one screw, but they can be bear to open up, especially the 8500. I'm not sure how easy the LC, the Cx, the Quadra 700 were to open up and replace components because I don't have that experience, but I seem to remember that the Cx had the same form factor as the Ci. The Centris 650/Quadra 650 wasn't a picnic either.

      The big change came with the 8600, which had hinged side panel. I seem to remember that the G3 Beige Tower had similar. The B & W G3s and the G4 towers improved on this greatly, with the motherboard attached to the door, so it when you flip down the door, there is the motherboard, horizontal before you, ready for you to add RAM or PCI cards. The HDs were then easily accessible in sleds on the floor of the tower.

      However, the internal design of the new iMac is a real breakthrough. Easy accessibility when space is so limited is a non-trivial problem, and it's obvious that someone worked really hard at this.

      I also have a bone to pick with the poster of TFA, boredMDer. He calls whoever took the iMac apart stupid. So, if you read this bMD, how stupid is it for a tech site to take apart and examine computer equipment. Would you call reviewers at Tom's Hardware stupid because they voided the warranty on equipment they open up? If you explore the site a little bit, you'll see that they take apart iBooks and Powerbooks as well. Calling the site stupid was stupid. If you can't read Japanese, there is a (admittedly humorous) Babelfish link on the index page! Get a clue, man!
      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    46. Re:Didn't void the warranty by speleo · · Score: 4, Informative

      "chipping paint on Titanium Powerbooks"

      Never happened to mine. It's been dropped a few times and stepped on once or twice and it's bashed and bent and held together with duct tape, but it still works just fine.

      ""Windtunnel" PowerMac G4's"

      I never understood the problem with these. The one I have is loud but it's no worse than your typical Dell PC.

      "logic-board failures on iBooks"

      Don't know about this one -- I never owned a iBook.

      "failing lid-latches on Powerbooks"

      Never had this problem on the 5 Powerbooks I have.

      "cracks on the Cube"

      Had two of these, one had small cosmetic cracks, the other didn't. Not a problem for me, but I can see how some folks would. Nice design, though; wish I still had 'em and didn't give 'em away.

      "overheating 12" PowerBooks"

      My wife has one of these -- she uses it all the time and hasn't had a problem with overheating. I don't think it gets any hotter than the 15" Powerbook I use everyday as my primary machine.

      Now, I'm not saying these problems don't exist. But I personally own a lot of Macs (about 10 in current use around the house right now) of nearly every model and I've had very few of the problems folks complain about. YMMV.

    47. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1
      The point is, if it comes like that from the factory, you CHOOSE to pay more for it. Apple doesn't let you choose.

      You can choose not to buy from Apple. And since you buy Dells it seems you've already figured that out. So what's your problem? Just take it easy.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    48. Re:Didn't void the warranty by bitswapper · · Score: 3, Funny


      You have a piece of shit Mac just for fun, and 3 PCs that probably do the real work.

      3 PCs to play games, you mean. Real work.

    49. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You mean like chipping paint on Titanium Powerbooks,

      ooh, chipping paint, you came up with a real terrible design flaw there. Its only a "problem" with Mac users because they are picky.

      > "Windtunnel" PowerMac G4's,

      They made a loud model. Almost every PC in this lab is louder than the G4's we have.

      > logic-board failures on iBooks

      serious problem, fixed for free by Apple on an indefinitely extended warranty. The one real pervasive and serious issue you mentioned is a non issue. In fact, the replacement boards draw less power and run even cooler and longer on a charge.

      >, failing lid-latches on Powerbooks

      Got 6 iBooks and 4 PowerBooks (Ti and Al) in my local vicinity. I am the guy everyone calls on their Macs. One iBook latch broke of about 20-30 I know of. I know for a fact that the person with that machine beat the crap out of it. This is pretty much a non-issue. Screen hinge clutches are a bigger problem. And, again, much less of one than in the PC world. Only IBM laptops seem to have been impervious to this.

      > cracks on the Cube

      Oh, I almost peed my pants laughing at this one. Have you seen some of these so called "cracks"? They are hairline flaws in the lexan production process. They are nearly invisible and don't compromise the machine in the least.

      > overheating 12" PowerBooks

      Never had one overheat. I've seen and used lot. They just get much hotter than previous PowerBooks. This original 867 runs cooler than the similarly sized Vaio across the room. Sorry, this is a myth perpetuated by those who exaggerated the heat issue. There is a problem that the little rubber feet come off of these ones easier because of the heat issue. You can usually talk someone out of a set of those for free or just epoxy yours back on.

      Sorry, with the pickiest whiners and users in the marketplace Apple still gets good guy ratings and high marks in consumer polls. Overall they are probably the best. In laptops I'd say they are about tied with IBM. When you look at the risks they take and innovation they build in that is amazing.

    50. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Slurms · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While reading the parent and your reply I reflected that we have had similar sorts of problems with 100 or so Dell and Gateway laptops that we have at work over the past 2 years.

      Then it occurred to me that the Dells and Gateways are so anonymous and forgetable that people really don't seem to remember the problems.

      The Apple laptops tend to be memorable and more interesting. So I wonder if it is jut that people remember their problems more readily than they do when they have similar sorts of problems with more generic computers?

      --

      -----
      Pretty Bad Privacy (PBP) Public Key
      6
    51. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They move the keys on ya?

    52. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess that you don't support 100th of the number of Mac's as compared to PC's at work? I think you can figure that one out.

    53. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they dont realize how long it lasted. I sold one of my pc's to a friend almost 2 years ago. I had had the computer at that time for 3 years. The motherboard failed (most likley due to never being cleaned off in a smoke and dust filled enviorment that would make anyone sick). They give me a call and talk about how I sold them a junker. That motherboard lasted for 5 years. To me, thats good for 40.00. I went over there and after cleaning out the pc for a good hour. I was able to replace the motherboard and its still tickin. I had to laugh when they told me the pc was basically brand new and hardware shouldn't fail so fast. When I sold it to them they knew they were buying my old pc.

    54. Re:Didn't void the warranty by pi+radians · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Have you wrestled with removing the case cover from a ... Beige G3 Desktop?"

      Why yes, all the time. Easy as pie. Two latches (basically two big buttons buttons to push up) on the front panel, then you pull the cover towards you. The rest unfolds easily giving you easy access to the PCI slots, RAM, and videocard. I little work to remove or add HDDs or CD-ROMs, but nothing worse than your average PC case.

      I think you may have it confused with another Apple system...

      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    55. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Schmitty81 · · Score: 0

      a careful end user could disassemble his book and put it back together without causing anyone to become suspicious.
      While this is true in theory, in practice I've found it to be quite different. I work at an apple authorized service center as well and maybe your users are different than mine but we can tell 90 % of the time weather someone has been in their machine or not. Of the ones we can tell, that they have been in their machine, their upgrade/modification ended up breaking their stuff and voiding their warranty.

    56. Re:Didn't void the warranty by magarity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      but we can tell 90 % of the time weather someone has been in their machine or not

      Umm, this is a logical contradiction. If you can't determine some of the people have opened their computers, it's impossible to say what percent you caught doing it.

      PS - Weather is whether or not it's raining.

    57. Re:Didn't void the warranty by magarity · · Score: 1

      (i.e. G5 heatsink that no one will ever see but still looks cool)

      I thought that was the #1 indicator that the thing was meant to be user-openable.

    58. Re:Didn't void the warranty by ducman · · Score: 1

      It's a recent switch, but it's not "radical." One of the selling points of the Mac IIci was that there was only one screw holding the thing together, and that one only needed to be there for shipping. Once you removed that screw, all the parts of the computer snapped into place with plastic locking tabs, and could easily be swapped out if needed. Of course, I still have a IIci, which still works fine, and I've never had to swap out anything...

      --
      "We have nothing in common, your attitude annoys me, and your political views are appalling."
    59. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Squishy+Eyeball+Jeff · · Score: 5, Funny
      On a serious note: yeah, Apple isn't the holy grail, but so what. They are the best at what they do.

      Amen to that, brother -- Apple is indeed the best at making Apple computers.

    60. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too have a machine working fine from the late 90's but have not upgraded yet. One of those green iMacs. I plan on slapping in a larger drive and processor upgrade here soon (yes, it is possible) but it's running 10.3.5. slowly but acceptable for file sharing.

      -Use what works for you

    61. Re:Didn't void the warranty by tgd · · Score: 1

      Its not applicable, and its nice that Apple takes that route with its customers, but by no means is it required.

      Magnusson-Moss makes it illegal to tie the use of manfacturer-provided parts and dealer service around scheduled maintennance to warranty coverage.

      It tends to get projected onto other things frequently, where it really isn't applicable. (Aftermarket car parts is a prime example, where it in fact doesn't protect warranty rights in the slightest).

      In this case, Apple would, in fact, be perfectly within their rights to void the warranty, even if in your experience they wouldn't.

    62. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Schmitty81 · · Score: 0

      Ok maybe a specific percentage was incorrect, but a vast majority of the time you can tell, because a, screws are stripped out. b, screws not put back in the proper hole. c, screws missing. d, tape has been torn, moved shifted, gone. Among any other number of signs.
      Macs really are different than PCs in that a tech can actually tell if someone has been in it. The only exception I can think of off the top of my head would be the power macs because of their very nature of being easy to get into and work on.

    63. Re:Didn't void the warranty by iabervon · · Score: 1

      I have a Pentium 90 from IBM that's been running practically continuously since I got it at a fire sale in '95. You can still get the tanks; it's just that people go for the flimsy ones.

    64. Re:Didn't void the warranty by delus10n0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I hate to break it to you, but Compaq makes some of the crappiest notebooks in the world. I've seen laptops that were only a year old start to have their cases seperate, screws randomly fall out, screens fail, and hard drives overheat. What gloriously designed machines.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    65. Re:Didn't void the warranty by delus10n0 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      How is this post helpful? Well gee, you don't have the problem. Big deal. The thing is other people _are_ having problems. One of my photography friends has had to replace the motherboard in his Powerbook twice already-- and there's no explanation on what keeps causing the problems. Apple just keeps sucking it up and offering a replacement motherboard (meanwhile, he's out of a laptop for weeks and weeks, which is important to his photography business.)

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    66. Re:Didn't void the warranty by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "(Which is why beautiful women are beautiful all over - come to think of it, all women are beautiful)"

      Hmm...if this is true, I need to visit where you live...otherwise, I'd advise you to either get some glasses or take the "beer goggles" off

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    67. Re:Didn't void the warranty by rho · · Score: 1
      "chipping paint on Titanium Powerbooks"
      Never happened to mine. It's been dropped a few times and stepped on once or twice and it's bashed and bent and held together with duct tape, but it still works just fine.

      Mine came with chipped paint--I bought mine used from MacResQ (buy stuff from them, they are teh rock). I couldn't generate enough enthusiasm to care. I got a good deal from a reputable company--I knew that if the thing was DOA that the ResQ folks would take it back, unlike a random eBay asshole--and I couldn't care what it looked like. It looked used. Big whoop. A laptop with obvious wear means you actually use the thing, rather than just carry it around for show. I'll bet Stallman's laptop looks like a dog chewed it.

      The important thing is that 667mhz G4 makes a sweet-ass machine. I use it as my main axe these days, and it's done yeoman's labor. It's super-sweet-ass with 10.3.

      Paint chipping, feh. Sexcellent laptop for under $1K? Niiiice.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    68. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      How is such a broad and general statement covering roughly several thousand computer vendors and absolutely no background or anything other an opinion currently modded as insightful and informative?

      What is so informative here?

    69. Re:Didn't void the warranty by phoxix · · Score: 1

      Maybe not, but it's been a long time since you could buy an x86 machine that lasted as long. Back in the early 80's, I remember HP and DEC PC's that would wear like a tank. Today, every x86 machine I see is flimsy as hell.

      Have you purchased an IBM recently ? Or any ThinkPad ever made by IBM ? heh

      Sunny Dubey

    70. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To each his own. Our company used Compaq laptops exclusively for the last 7-10 years (recently started using IBM). We had some problems but overall, very decent machines that run opposite of your claim. YMMV

    71. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Eclypser · · Score: 1

      It's a simple matter of usage. If you don't use something, it can stay like new forever. If you use it a lot then it will get worn out.

      --
      The comment has already been made. Let's move it along people. Nothing to see here.
    72. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      Being a PC field tech for a number of years this is really a radical shift for apple.

      Not so radical. They've had the "open with one latch" G3, G4, and G5 towers for years. That enabled screwless replacement of some parts (ram, airport card), and a (few) screws for optical drives, hard drives, modems. Even the CPU was only 3-4 screws; the hardest part in these cases was the MLB, because everything else had to come out first AND it had 6-12 screws to keep it in place.

      It is a departure on their consumer line, I'll grant. You couldn't do anything to the iMac G4 without instructions and thermal paste, and the eMac was even worse.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    73. Re:Didn't void the warranty by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1
      Maybe not, but it's been a long time since you could buy an x86 machine that lasted as long. Back in the early 80's, I remember HP and DEC PC's that would wear like a tank. Today, every x86 machine I see is flimsy as hell.

      Earlier this year I retired a Thinkpad 750. 486/33 laptop. Bought a very long time ago (1993???), and has long since been fully depreciated. It ran Debian very well, although dselects were taking a long time to load.

      Please compare Apples to comparable quality PCs. As Mac fans we are very quick to point out that Apples are priced to compete against comparable quality and performance x86, yet we bash the x86 world's quality citing the bottom on the line Dells and eMachines. Apples have their strengths, and as far as hardware goes they're in-line with similarly priced x86s. Software, in my opinion, is where the Apple lines earn their value.

    74. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "...come to think of it, all women are beautiful)"
      A dissenting opinion
    75. Re:Didn't void the warranty by DrLex · · Score: 1

      The IIsi which is still in use at home didn't have any screws. You could use one optional screw to lock the case. For the rest you only needed your hands to (dis)assemble the entire computer. My iBook, on the other hand, has about 50 screws and you need 3 different screwdrivers to unscrew them, plus either a very good memory or some paper templates to stick them into. Otherwise you're doomed to experience the IKEA effect when reassembling.

    76. Re:Didn't void the warranty by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      You just said the same thing phrased differently.

      The fact is, you cannot tell how many machines have been taken apart and put together again. All you can tell is that a certain number definitely have. You don't know if you're detecting a minority, majority, or all of them. All you know is that some machines have been taken apart and put back together again.

      Maybe you should go get a job with CBS.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    77. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      He said he was able to tell 90% of the time.

      If I examine 10 machines and can tell that 9 of them have been opened, and I'm not sure if 1 hasn't, then I can tell 90% of the time.

    78. Re:Didn't void the warranty by rthille · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but everytime, the case pulls the cheezy foil EMI blockers off the front, all three of them. And they are a pain in the ass to put back on, with the clips on the sides wanting to slip into the wrong position.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    79. Re:Didn't void the warranty by BHS_Turf · · Score: 1

      I have a Dell that has been running and continues to run and be used that I bought in 1998. I paid nearly $7000 as it was was the first day that they offered the 300MHz PII. I have since killed 3 other PC's so I can see your argument, but I also bought those machines for less than 1/2 the price of an equivalent Mac. So I guess you get what you pay for.

      Is your PowerMac G3 still in use? or did it die before you upgraded?

    80. Re:Didn't void the warranty by lizrd · · Score: 1
      My memory of the Beige G3 my wife owned is that it was fairly easy to get apart, but a real SOB to get put back together. As I recall, there were some sharp springy metal bits on the front behind the plastic that covered unused drive slots that got in the way when attempting to replace the cover.

      As you say though, it's no worse than most PC cases, and far better than most PC cases of the day.

      --
      I don't want free as in beer. I just want free beer.
    81. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If he disassembled the hard drive to take pictuers, then he would have broken a seal that would have voided his warranty.

      And that particular seal really does void your warranty for a reason. Exposing the internals of the hard drive to the air means it will fail, and soon. Those things are assembled in clean rooms so no dust gets in.

    82. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Slurms · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually we only have 3 Apples at work. We haven't had any problems at all with them.

      I was just reflecting on the world at large, that people see problems with more generic (commodity) laptops as the cost of doing business, while a problem with an Apple laptop is newsworthy.

      --

      -----
      Pretty Bad Privacy (PBP) Public Key
      6
    83. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Baseclass · · Score: 2, Insightful
      PCs don't just go bad, components go bad. The quality of any given PC can be determined by the quality of the components therein.

      Apple has complete quality control of their hardware, whereas with x86 PCs any manufacturer can throw together whatever crap meets their bottom line, throw it all in a 'cool' case, print a bunch of big numbers on the outside of the box and watch the lemmings flock bearing their wallets.

      If you want a quality PC then you need to spend the equivalent you'd spend on a Mac or hand pick each and every component and build your own like I do.

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
    84. Re:Didn't void the warranty by green+menace · · Score: 1

      If I examine 10 machines and can tell that 9 of them have been opened, and I'm not sure if 1 hasn't, then I can tell 90% of the time.

      I don't think he meant that 90% of the macs he works on have been obviously opened. I really doubt that 90% of mac users have opened their computer. I think the original response of "this is a logical contradiction. If you can't determine some of the people have opened their computers, it's impossible to say what percent you caught doing it." stands up to your criticism. Damn, i really want to make some pie charts for this... nah, better get back to work.

      On a side note, does anyone know if installing linux on an imac void your warranty?

    85. Re:Didn't void the warranty by badasscat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple makes very nice machines, but they are not the Holy Grail of quality.

      Maybe not, but it's been a long time since you could buy an x86 machine that lasted as long.


      When I read this, the little false logic detectors I have installed behind my left inner ear duct went off...

      How do you know how long today's x86 machines will last? And how do you define this, anyway? The period of time before one single component fails? Or the period of time before the system becomes completely unusable?

      How do you measure the actual lifespan of a PC you've just bought? Sure, the QA testers at Dell or HP or whatever do stress tests that are meant to simulate a period of years of normal use, but that doesn't always translate to the real world (as Apple, with all its defects and recalls, should know as well as anyone).

      Right now I am typing on an IBM Thinkpad manufactured in 1999. That's five years, and I've beaten this thing to all hell and back. When, exactly, would you pinpoint as the time after which you could not purchase an x86 that lasted this long? 2001? How would you know yet? 1998? My PC's proved you wrong already, and anyway by implication you're saying that older x86 machines are built better. So your statement just isn't logical.

      Today, every x86 machine I see is flimsy as hell.

      Some are, some aren't. Apple loyalists generally seem to look at the lowest of the low and assume all PC's are built the same way. Thinkpads are tanks, including the new ones, and so are a lot of other PC laptops. I don't know why you'd need a desktop to be a tank but if you really care about a strong case, just buy a Falcon or any number of other brands using Coolermaster cases. One advantage you do usually get with a manufacturer like this is a good power supply, which is almost a universal issue among the major PC makers. But it's not hard to find a well-built desktop PC.

      And since they all use pretty much standard components (just as Apple does), component life shouldn't really be more of an issue with one brand than any other.

      People need to realize that Apple is one maker, and one brand. You can't compare "Macs" to "PCs" in terms of build quality. You can compare Apple to HP or IBM or Dell or Falcon or Alienware or the guy building white box PCs in his shop down the street. When you buy a PC, you're not buying a computer made by every PC manufacturer out there; you're buying a PC made by one manufacturer (albeit out of a lot of different parts from different manufacturers, but this is no different than Apple). Maybe Apple builds better products than some of those makers. But maybe some of those makers build better products than Apple.

      Apple makes some decent hardware but so do a lot of x86 PC manufacturers. No, not all of them, but you don't have to buy from the bad ones.

    86. Re:Didn't void the warranty by geoffspear · · Score: 0, Troll
      The Performas were even worse. The insides of the cases are loaded with razor-sharp metal bits.

      Then again, the PowerMac 6100 and 7100 were pretty dangerous inside too, IIRC, and they weren't even in a consumer line. I think maybe they just never considered that filing down the sharp edges of metal could save a lot of not-so-careful techs a lot of blood.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    87. Re:Didn't void the warranty by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      My circa 2000 Armada M700 diagrees with your assertion. The battery is shot, but that's forgiveable in a 4 year old notebook.

    88. Re:Didn't void the warranty by macslut · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I managed one of the largest Apple authorized service centers for a few years. Sure, sometimes we could tell that it looked like *someone* had been in the Mac before, but that doesn't mean the person was the customer. It would be one thing if we sold the Mac to the customer and they come back later that day or something, but if it was purchased at another store, we have no way of knowing what the actual history was.

      To be honest, we didn't really care much. If it was obvious that someone who didn't know what they were doing had done something that violated the terms of the warranty, and it resulted in damage, then we would start asking questions...but this was actually very rare...usually the customer would admit what they did because it was so obvious (like a broken ribbon cable).

      The bottom line (which most customers don't/didn't believe) was that it was always in our interest to go in favor of the customer. Apple *paid* us for warranty repairs and in our case, they paid us more than what we charged customers for the same jobs. We would really push the evelope with Apple warranties in terms of what we could get away with and what was ethical.

      YMMV

    89. Re:Didn't void the warranty by jcr · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you, but you've just supported my assertion: that durable machine of yours is at least six years old, isn't it?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    90. Re:Didn't void the warranty by jcr · · Score: 1

      You could still buy a tank in '95, sure. Can you find one today?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    91. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      No it's that people expect that crap from Dell, but buy apples to be perfect. When they're not perfect, people are surprised and pissed off.

    92. Re:Didn't void the warranty by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Informative
      Magnusson-Moss makes it illegal to tie the use of manfacturer-provided parts and dealer service around scheduled maintennance to warranty coverage.

      Incorrect. It has nothing to do with "scheduled" maintenance. It can be consumables like brake pads, windshield wipers, or vacuum cleaner bags. It can be repair parts. Suppose I break the antenna on my car. If I go to Walmart and buy an aftermarket antenna, my car dealer cannot legally refuse me warranty service for the engine siezing, the transmission ceasing to shift, or the air conditioning failing. The only thing that he could refuse to fix under warranty would be something broken by the antenna (e.g., poor radio reception) or by my installation of same (e.g., stripped threads where the antenna screws on).

      Now, if Apple offers free CD-R blanks and you use Sony brand CD-R blanks, then Apple can refuse you warranty service -- because they offered the item for no charge.

      It tends to get projected onto other things frequently, where it really isn't applicable. (Aftermarket car parts is a prime example, where it in fact doesn't protect warranty rights in the slightest).

      From the Specialty Equipment Manufacturer's Association (SEMA) web site:
      The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act may also be helpful. Under this federal law, you can sue on breach of express and implied warranties. The main point of interest here is that the Act says warranty coverage may not be conditioned upon the use of only the vehicle manufacturer's parts unless the parts are provided free of charge. In other words, use of a non-carmaker product should not void your warranty unless it caused the problem.
      I can, of course, pull plenty of additional references to prove my point, but I think that you know how Google works, too.

      In this case, Apple would, in fact, be perfectly within their rights to void the warranty, even if in your experience they wouldn't.

      You are completely wrong about this. The only way that they could legally refuse you warranty service is if you damaged your system through the act of disassembling/reassembling it.

      The purpose of the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act is to protect consumers. It prevents dealers and manufacturers from getting a monopoly on parts and service, since that would lead to much higher prices for the purchasers. It keeps a viable aftermarket of service and parts available. It keeps Hoover from charging you $10 per vacuum cleaner bag (since you can get an aftermarket bag for $1.50). It keeps your dealer from making you pay $140 per tire because Walmart will sell you suitable tires for $59. It keeps your dealer from charging $200 for an oil change because you can get one for under $30 elsewhere.

      That's why Apple can't refuse you warranty service when you elected to service your own system earlier (perhaps to add RAM, figure out what kinds of upgrades might work, etc.)
    93. Re:Didn't void the warranty by tgd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not going to argue this. SEMA is wrong, their position is contrary to case law. You too can use google, if you wish, to dig the references up.

      The "warranty void if removed" stickers on consumer electronics, including computers, have been tried in court and held to be legal. SEMA's position has also been tried in court over aftermarket modifications on cars and in every case its been found SEMA's position is wrong.

      95% of people who argue the Magnusson-Moss relavence online seem to do so out of information they've read online from questionable sources, or in the case of car modders, wishful thinking. In the case of the car modders, I've known quite a few people to learn five-figure lessons on that one, not counting the fees they've paid to lawyers.

      As an aside to your oil change example, one of the reasons free scheduled maintennance is included on so many high end cars now is it frees the dealer from most of the points around Magnusson-Moss. There have been a number of cases of engine warranty cases being denied using a 3rd party oil change as the reason, because the manufacturer pays for the required ones.

      Either way, I have no intent on arguing it any more. I've had that arguement far too many times, and people who so strongly take your position tend to not want to sway their opinion anyway.

      Do what you want, hopefully it won't bite you. A lot of people aren't that lucky.

    94. Re:Didn't void the warranty by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm not going to argue this.

      That's your choice.

      SEMA's position has also been tried in court over aftermarket modifications on cars and in every case its been found SEMA's position is wrong.

      In every one of the cases that I've seen, there was reason to believe that the failure was caused by the aftermarket parts or labor.

      95% of people who argue the Magnusson-Moss relavence online seem to do so out of information they've read online from questionable sources

      Like the Federal Trade Commission's web site, which explains the act as follows:
      "Tie-In Sales" Provisions
      Generally, tie-in sales provisions are not allowed. Such a provision would require a purchaser of the warranted product to buy an item or service from a particular company to use with the warranted product in order to be eligible to receive a remedy under the warranty. The following are examples of prohibited tie-in sales provisions.

      In order to keep your new Plenum Brand Vacuum Cleaner warranty in effect, you must use genuine Plenum Brand Filter Bags. Failure to have scheduled maintenance performed, at your expense, by the Great American Maintenance Company, Inc., voids this warranty.
      If the hypothetical Plenum company cannot void your warranty for use of aftermarket filter bags, what makes you think that GM can void your warranty for using an aftermarket air filter? I don't think so.

      Either way, I have no intent on arguing it any more. I've had that arguement far too many times, and people who so strongly take your position tend to not want to sway their opinion anyway.

      Have you even read the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act? Have you read the interpretations by the FTC? I have.
    95. Re:Didn't void the warranty by plj · · Score: 1

      ...nothing worse than your average PC case.

      You mean a devil's incarnate on Earth?

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    96. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      More to the point, as someone who used to specialise in repairing Apple PowerBooks, half the time the damage was done by over-enthusiastic techs who applied too much force in the wrong locations and didn't pay enough attention to where the screws came from.

      We had one tech in our workshop who used to only ever replace the centre rear screw on the old grey clamshell powerbooks (PB170 era) and rely on the front clips to keep the casing together. Even worse were the units where someone had used the wrong screw in the wrong hole and striped the threads.

      I used to keep stock of all the screws and little random parts for the powerbooks on hand to replace missing and broken bits from units worked on by other techs

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    97. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your anecdotal evidence certainly refutes the parents list of problems. Well done

    98. Re:Didn't void the warranty by spitefulcrow · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call six years an old box.

      --
      Sorry, my karma just ran over your dogma.
    99. Re:Didn't void the warranty by memco · · Score: 1

      I dunno about that, I've been pretty hard on my machine, and it has stood the test of time very well. Of course it's a desktop, pink imac; but I have put it through quite some use. The only problem I've ever had was a "software problem". Or more precisely a PEBKAC: I accidently chown-ed my whole system, thus rendering most system files useless. It was fixed by reinstalling the OS. Seems to me that at least the imac family stands up very well as far as hardware is concerned. My family owns 5 imacs, all still in use, including one of the first aquas. Just run a defragger once every couple months to keep it clean, and it just keeps on tickin'

      --
      Get me a meat pie floater!
    100. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      Most HP-UX machines -were- tanks.. Designed to be fireproof with hard steel cases inside all the plastic outsides.. Those suckers weighed a ton!

      I'm betting you could literally shoot one of those HP-UX machines at inches away several times and the computer would be in better shape than you after all the ricochets.

      Those were some crazy computers. Aside from dead bios batteries that i've replaced, i have some ancient SGI gear thats still trucking away with all original hardware, they don't make em like they used to..

      Micropolis and Seagate SCSI drives that had 10 year warranties (I still have several in operation outside of their warranties)..

      Makes me think about lightbulbs in my grandmothers house that were there when they built it in the 30's and are still burning bright. I bougt a pack of two '2 year' bulbs that lasted all of a month and cost me $14 for the pack. And those are just frickin lightbulbs. Computers are way more complicated and yet most old computers outlast modern lightbulbs (due to intentional flaws in manufacturing to force turnover in both lighbulbs and computers). It's amazing how something so simple which can be made to last almost forever is made cheap and something made to run solidly for a few years is still kicking ass (a) decade(s) later.

    101. Re:Didn't void the warranty by snuffdiddy23 · · Score: 1
      I recently purchased 2 well equipped dual g5 top end powermacs with 3gb ram each, and also 5 Dells that were bottom of the barrel (integrated everything with celeron processors). The 5 Dells were just slightly cheaper than the 2 powermacs and are replacing two year old Dells rather than four year old powermacs.

      The heatsink is not just there to be cutesy. It actually has dramatically thinner fins than a normal pc heatsink that if bumped can bend and impede there performance, much like an airconditioner. When you are dealing with such and expensive heatsink one is smarter to put a cover on it. Adding a G5 logo is a bit overboard, but that is what can be expected. It is virtually identical to the heatsinks on the XServe and Powermacs. I think spending all the money to put in a liquid cooled heatsink in order to maintain design is well worth the money. It is either an expensive heatsink or twice as thick a machine, which would you prefer if you were attempting to create a machine that produces a small footprint.

      Apple can certainly do wrong, but I will still pay for it in favor of having something that outperforms the competition and requires less maintenance. If I did not have such a reliable and easy to maintain machine I might not have time to troll slashdot.

      My mac zealot comment would not be about the heatsink, but more something like "Does your PEE CEE have 64-bit support and graphical unix with commercial support and commercial applications?" or something smart-alecky like "Does that PEE CEE come pre-installed with Worms or do you have to plug it into the internet first?" I know flaimbait doesn't justify more flamebait, but I had to say it.

    102. Re:Didn't void the warranty by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Some of the machines listed on IBM's site look like tanks, although I can't really tell for sure from the pictures. The machines I've gotten from KC Computers have been humvee-like, at least, even if they aren't IBM-class. As for whether they last upwards of 5 years, you'll have to ask me about my current desktop in a year and a half, and my machine at work in 4 and a half years, but I bet they will.

    103. Re:Didn't void the warranty by vortexau · · Score: 1

      > but we can tell 90 % of the time weather someone has been in their machine or not.

      Hmmm! THAT would be because the 'weather' was light rain, and they openned their case up outdoors?
      .

      --
      (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
    104. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My run of machines:

      Good:
      IIvx - 2nd hand - fine
      PB 170 - 2nd hand - fine although screen goes black in corners after a while (old LCD)
      PM 7100/66 - 2nd hand - fine
      PM 8500/120 - fine
      G4/450 SP - fine

      Bad:
      Mac SE w/superdrive - 3x power supplies... still fine
      TiPB - 2x1st gen replaced under warranty (faulty CD/DVD drives in both cases) - 3rd unit (given 2nd gen as replacement) - fine

      Ugly:
      IIvx - dead (suspect mobo as I switched other bits with other unit.) after 4 years
      PB 180c - dead after 4 years

      All units were bought in Melbourne, Australia (if of any interest)

      The 1 PC I ever owned (a 400 Mhz celeron) - dead after 3 years. prob. power supply tho, so easy fix. POS anyway, so no biggie.

      Lessons learned:
      buy 2nd/3rd gen
      mid or top end models, just after they come out.

      Been burned several times by newly released products 1-2 months after purchasing (got suckered by low pricing so shouldn't complain) eg.
      SE -> Classic (save $)
      G4 450SP -> G4 450DP (same $ more power)

    105. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's only because they stopped letting other people make clones...

      ;)

    106. Re:Didn't void the warranty by Selecter · · Score: 1
      you pay more for it if the owner does it too. Or do you think those wonderful laser cut chrome grey alien head fan grills and tri color fans just fall from the sky like manna? I would submit that any Dell, modified into such a beast, would still look like a office computer with christmas tree lights added to it.

      I paid a lot for my G5, and it's been worth every penny. I wouldnt even think of trading it for 4 Dells, even with Xmas tree lights and Grey Alien Head Fan Grillz.

  3. Hosed already by be-fan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Brilliant idea. Post a page of high-res shots to Slashdot...

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    1. Re:Hosed already by TWX · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the collective "we" just took apart his web host...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Hosed already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've certainly never seen *that* kind of post on Slashdot before. Pat yourself on the back, you trailblazer, you.

  4. For those not using Macs... by GrodinTierce · · Score: 2

    an unpacked version of that TIFF would have been nice.

    --


    Tierce
    Who sponsors your feelings?
    1. Re:For those not using Macs... by Unordained · · Score: 3, Informative

      well, winzip opens it just fine ... i'd guess it's not the only tool out there that can?

    2. Re:For those not using Macs... by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      and for those not using windows and winzip?

      --
      I write code.
    3. Re:For those not using Macs... by GrodinTierce · · Score: 1

      Hm, well, WinRAR doesn't, and neither does WinXP natively, so I choose to remain miffed.

      --


      Tierce
      Who sponsors your feelings?
    4. Re:For those not using Macs... by bbdd · · Score: 4, Funny

      i found that winzip de-compresses it as well.

      funny thing is that the compressed .hqx file is 10,316 KB, but the decompressed .tif file is 7,582 KB.

      as the new G5 suggests, those apple folks are sure good at packing a lot of hardware into a tight space. but looks like they still need some help packing the software...

    5. Re:For those not using Macs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      duno, is hqx patented?

    6. Re:For those not using Macs... by 706GL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have no idea how, but Firefox took care of it for me when I downloaded it. After downloading it, it had the name 04imac_inside.tif.hqx.tiff and it opened fine.

      --
      ...
    7. Re:For those not using Macs... by Phroggy · · Score: 5, Informative

      and for those not using windows and winzip?

      StuffIt Expander is available for Linux/x86, Solaris/Sparc and Solaris/x86.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    8. Re:For those not using Macs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The point of hqx isn't compression.

      hqx does two things. First, it allows the resource fork of a file to be transported along with the data fork (remember that all Mac files can potentially appear as two files to the file system). Second, it then allows for the resulting mess to be sent over systems that can only handle the low 7-bits of a byte.

      Think of it as a way to uuencode two files into one.

      I'm so happy I'm using Linux today.

    9. Re:For those not using Macs... by MonoSynth · · Score: 1

      Iceows (http://www.iceows.com/HomePageUS.html) opens it too (and has nice Explorer integration :)).

      The best compression I could achieve was 7.066 MB (RAR). A 24 bit PNG with best compression reduces its size to only 4.7MB.

    10. Re:For those not using Macs... by lintux · · Score: 1

      Those two forks aren't really used on OS X anymore AFAIK, so it's a bit strange that they still want to waste so much bandwidth for just something from OS Classic.

      But well, at least the .tif immediately had a little thumbnail in Finder. :-)

      (But couldn't they use .sit to "compress" the file and get the other forks in?)

    11. Re:For those not using Macs... by Xyde · · Score: 2, Interesting

      HQX is not a compression scheme, it's an encoding scheme. 7 bit binary, IIRC. It's called binhex. (I still don't know why they used it on a .TIFF file.)

    12. Re:For those not using Macs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And what would be the point exactly of buying StuffIt Expander? The GIMP decompresses and opens the file...

    13. Re:For those not using Macs... by Xyde · · Score: 1

      note to self: preview post. 7 bit ASCII that should say.

    14. Re:For those not using Macs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A) TIFFs have no data fork.
      B) HTTP is 8-bit by definition.
      C) Apple is stoopid.

    15. Re:For those not using Macs... by Nermal6693 · · Score: 2, Informative

      StuffIt Expander is free.

    16. Re:For those not using Macs... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      I'd take you up on the compression challenge, but I can't even get the original file down at the moment, it keeps breaking around the 7MB mark.

    17. Re:For those not using Macs... by MonoSynth · · Score: 1

      wget -c

    18. Re:For those not using Macs... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      7zip will take the TIFF and make it 6.94MB. Unfortunately my favourite PNG creator doesn't like CMYK and can't do alpha channels, so when it outputs a 4MB file it's cheating. If you have the time, try running pngout over your PNG to see if it gets any smaller. Warning: I've had 120k 24-bit PNG files take 30 minutes to pack with this program.

    19. Re:For those not using Macs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll?!

      What happened to sarcasm these days? Doesn't anyone understand it anymore?!

    20. Re:For those not using Macs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't realize that the GIMP is free too, sarcasm is lost on the ignorant.

    21. Re:For those not using Macs... by MonoSynth · · Score: 1

      Oops, I divided the size in kB's by 1000 not 1024. RAR will make the file 7066 kB, that's 6.89 MB :)

      PNGOUT.EXE reduces the png from 4826114 to 4227666 bytes.

    22. Re:For those not using Macs... by jherekc · · Score: 2, Informative

      600KB JPEG, looks just as good as the original TIFF.

      Have Fun!

      http://dubious.kicks-ass.net/~jherek/04imac_inside .jpg

      --
      "lack of quality control is one of the pillars of slashdot"
    23. Re:For those not using Macs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just open it directly in The Gimp 2.0

    24. Re:For those not using Macs... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty good showing for pngout. Is that still the same picture, or did it trash the alpha channel? Also, how long did it take?

    25. Re:For those not using Macs... by MonoSynth · · Score: 1
      This time I used an alpha-less png as input and output. Not very much difference with the png libraries that the GIMP uses....
      $ time pngout /c2 /f5 04imac_inside_noalpha.png
      Input: 04imac_inside_noalpha.png coltype:2 (RGB)
      Output: 04imac_inside_noalpha_.png coltype:2 (RGB) filter:5 (mixed)
      File length: 4227666 bytes
      real 26m18.033s
      user 0m0.010s
      sys 0m0.030s

      $ ls -l 04imac_inside_noalpha*
      -rwx------+ 1 Administ ???????? 4229880 Sep 23 15:47 04imac_inside_noalpha.png
      -rwx------+ 1 bart mkgroup- 4227666 Sep 23 16:16 04imac_inside_noalpha_.png
      (win2k/p4 1.7/cygwin)
    26. Re:For those not using Macs... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      This file has a 45860 bytes data fork. And no, I'm not gonna download ResEdit just to see what's in there.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    27. Re:For those not using Macs... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      That image is intendet for publishing. And what OS and what image processing app do most publishers still use? And what kind of file is it? No, it's not just a TIFF.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    28. Re:For those not using Macs... by anethema · · Score: 1

      Did anyone else jsut rename the damn thing to tiff and have it open fine ?

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    29. Re:For those not using Macs... by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Free as in shareware. No thanks.

    30. Re:For those not using Macs... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Shame. Oh well, we did learn a couple of things. Don't use pngout if you've got alpha channels, and if Apple distributed a PNG rather than a binHexed TIFF, they'd be offering a file half the size with identical quality. (Unless some CMYK vs RGB experts can dispute this.)

    31. Re:For those not using Macs... by Baricom · · Score: 1

      Nope, free as in freeware. Only the compression programs cost money.

  5. AAAaaAAArgh... by still_sick · · Score: 4, Funny

    Putting the word "Porn" in the headline when no actual pr0n is involved is just CRUEL.

    --
    ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    1. Re:AAAaaAAArgh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putting the word "Porn" in the headline when no actual pr0n is involved is just CRUEL.

      Hey, just because it doesn't turn you on, doesn't mean it's not pr0n.

    2. Re:AAAaaAAArgh... by Rellik66 · · Score: 0

      The true geek will think of it as pr0n.

      --

      Too many zeros, not enough ones

    3. Re:AAAaaAAArgh... by TheBurningDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      The problem is that 95% of /. users won't be able to tell the difference anyway. And just like real porn... lusting over a mac will leave you alone and feeling ashamed afterward.

    4. Re:AAAaaAAArgh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh yeah, it's pr0n alright. Pr0n for geeks. Sexay, sexay. Take off that backplate and get comfy, honey.

      Brad Pitt ain't got nothin' on the innards of that iMac G5. Come to mama..... :-)____

    5. Re:AAAaaAAArgh... by boisepunk · · Score: 1

      I can just imagine Bender from Futurama at the sight of these "G5 Porn" images. It must be some form of hardcore porn to alcoholic robots...

      --
      main(0)
    6. Re:AAAaaAAArgh... by microsopht · · Score: 1

      POrn i know.
      But what is PrOn?

    7. Re:AAAaaAAArgh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh yeah, Brad.. let's open up your stomach and see what's in you beautiful. I don't think i'll need scalpel for this, screwdriver will do fine.

      Oooh look at your liver, let's see if you have been a good boy.

      Yeah, it's sexy.

    8. Re:AAAaaAAArgh... by caitsith01 · · Score: 1, Funny

      By writing that post you have demonstrated:

      1. that you can type
      2. that you can use a mouse
      3. that you can use a web browser

      I therefore find it very hard to believe that you are struggling to find porn.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    9. Re:AAAaaAAArgh... by trewornan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pr0n is like porn but involves goats.

    10. Re:AAAaaAAArgh... by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 0

      'Putting the word "Porn" in the headline when no actual pr0n is involved is just CRUEL."

      Agreed.
      I, like most people, have the HARDEST time finding porn on the internet. For a short second I thought I might get a glimpse at some boobies... but I guess not.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    11. Re:AAAaaAAArgh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is your friend...

      http://www.xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/gki/toybo x2 0b.jpg

      http://www.xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/gki/apple _g irl/0331.jpg

    12. Re:AAAaaAAArgh... by c.emmertfoster · · Score: 1

      pee-are-zero-enn

      duh get with it
      its what all the cool kids call pornography these days

      porn is so pre intarweb

      --
      We can neither love nor pity nor forgive. If you make a slip in handling us you die!
    13. Re:AAAaaAAArgh... by afxgrin · · Score: 1

      I did a search for pr0n and the first result was fine looking girl.

      This is very not safe for work by the way. Well, depends where you live I guess.

    14. Re:AAAaaAAArgh... by d474 · · Score: 1
      Pr0n is like porn but involves goats.
      Goats OR Kermit the Frog. And I wondered what girls with pierced tongues did in their spare time...
      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  6. I don't think he worries about warranties by kcarlile · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I have my doubts that he's voided the warranty, but the dude who runs this site doesn't seem to care. He always takes things apart and posts the pictures.

    1. Re:I don't think he worries about warranties by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      Redundant? Not at all redundant.

      Kodawarisan's a bona-fide loon - in the best possible way. He had a PowerBook 17" in pieces within a week or two of them being released.

      And he doesn't do things by halves. He literally dismantles every single part that can possibly be dismantled. Proper hardcore hardware pr0n.

      I can guarantee he drove his parents insane as a child. Every single Christmas present would be broken by New Year :)

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
  7. Great news for Bearded Terminal Hackers by SlashdotMirrorer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The new IMac presents a wonderful new opportunity for those of us stuck on the old terminal hacking mode of operation to get with the program. This article even shows that the innards of this machine can be beautiful and may win some appreciation among the Linux and GNU crowd. Despite some of the issues with sound, hopefully this will result in the development of more software for the currently undersupported Mac X OS.

    1. Re:Great news for Bearded Terminal Hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The death of the command line/terminal has been predicted many times. And yet it still lives, stronger than ever.

      GUI folks may not like it, but terminals are still relevant and are not going away.

    2. Re:Great news for Bearded Terminal Hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be an idiot if you're using the word undersupported. either that, or you don't know much about Macs. Either case, you require an education in this field before speaking further on the topic.

  8. Coral CDN by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

    http://www.apple.com.nyud.net:8090/pr/photos/imacf lat/04imac_inside_agreement.html

    I don't love Apple as a corp, but I do kinda like Apple. Please slashdot! Don't hose their server!

    1. Re:Coral CDN by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're kidding, right? This is Apple, the company that runs the long-running movie trailer site and the iTunes Music Store. They've got more bandwidth than Jesus.

      --

      I write in my journal
    2. Re:Coral CDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Technically, Akamai has more bandwidth than Jesus. I know Apple uses them for their movie trailer site; they probably use them for everything else too.

    3. Re: Coral CDN by Omniscient+Ferret · · Score: 3, Funny

      Technically, Akamai has more bandwidth than Jesus.

      Really? What does Jesus have?

    4. Re:Coral CDN by tktk · · Score: 1
      They've got more bandwidth than Jesus.

      Course, that brings up the question "What would Jesus serve?"

    5. Re: Coral CDN by c.emmertfoster · · Score: 1

      I beat Jesus.

      The boss is hard.

      --
      We can neither love nor pity nor forgive. If you make a slip in handling us you die!
    6. Re:Coral CDN by five18pm · · Score: 1

      I guess this comes from speedera.

    7. Re: Coral CDN by NoMaster · · Score: 3, Funny
      Technically, Akamai has more bandwidth than Jesus.

      Really? What does Jesus have?
      More importantly, what would he do with it?
      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    8. Re:Coral CDN by rogerborn · · Score: 1

      Twirlip:

      Actually, I think Jesus has Akamai (and everyone else) beat in the bandwidth department.

      Think about it.

      How much bandwidth does it take to both watch and listen to everyone on earth?

      =)

      Roger Born
      mymac.com

    9. Re: Coral CDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does Jesus have?

      Besides some cool scars?

      An OC48....out of my ASS

    10. Re:Coral CDN by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      Jesus Alou was not available for comment.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    11. Re: Coral CDN by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      Perfect. Absolutely perfect.

    12. Re:Coral CDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Moises was.

    13. Re:Coral CDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I am not about to go tracerouting but I would assume they do not have all of their bandwidth for the entire company coming from the same place. If so, they have a huge incedent waiting to happen.

    14. Re: Coral CDN by g0_p · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter. Jesus uses Akamai. :-p

    15. Re:Coral CDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Porn

    16. Re: Coral CDN by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 1
      Really? What does Jesus have?

      A direct line to God.

      --
      CT

  9. Isn't there already a book on iMac hacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    I thought so. Ahh, here it is: Mac hacking for Dummies

    1. Re:Isn't there already a book on iMac hacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who thinks this was kinda funny?

  10. The Monitor is for the new iMac! by rogerborn · · Score: 5, Informative


    Actually, he didn't void his warrantee by doing this. The new G5 iMac is extremely easy for customer troubleshooting, upgrading and generally messing around inside the thing. This is way better than even the big G5 PowerMacs.

    Regards
    Roger Born
    writing.borngraphics.com
    "These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others."

    1. Re:The Monitor is for the new iMac! by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      I can't believe that merely opening the case ever voided the warranty! I mean, if you open a case and look inside, how can this possibly be related to a hard disk failure, for example? Or faulty RAM?

      I suspect most PC owners here would not buy a machine from a manufacturer that prohibited the opening of the case. I also know that in many countries such a prohibition would be ineffective because of statutory warranty regimes - in Australia, for instance, Apple could not refuse claims within 1 year for faulty manufacture or assembly, no matter if you disassembled the entire thing down to its constituent parts and then put it back together. Unles they could show that you actually broke it when you disassembled it, they would be legally bound to stand by the quality of their product and honour any warranty claims within that period.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    2. Re:The Monitor is for the new iMac! by KitFox · · Score: 4, Informative
      I suspect most PC owners here would not buy a machine from a manufacturer that prohibited the opening of the case.

      Actually at least -some- PC manufacturers definitely void the warranty based on opening the case. Anything from those funky self-destructing stickers to case intrusion switches can detect this, and they make way too much use of them.

      I'm looking at this computer here at work. Not sure what brand it is, as that information has all been removed *Grr*. Might be an off brand. But it has a big sticker on the back of it that reads: "WARNING: All guarentees and warranties are void if case is opened or main BIOS settings are modified in any way. This system contains modification-detection technology. NO USER SERVICABLE PARTS INSIDE. Please contact your dealer for service." This sticker has not one, but THREE little holographic self-detsructing fingers sealing the main siade of the case up, and there are two on the backside side of the case, and two on each side of the case between the front cover and the sides.

      Admittedly, this is a system bought by the US Federal Government, but still. I've done work on computers in private homes that had the same deal. It's scary to think about.

      At the same time, it makes sense. Most PC Owners honestly wouldn't know a DIMM from a CF card, let alone how to safely change even a PCI card. The vast majority of them are more likely to break something in trying. They just want a computer that works for what they want it to do, and not have to worry. Plus, if the manufacturer can convince people that they -must- return it to their service shops for service, then they can make a killing on labor.

      Honestly, it's VERY nice to see a computer of any type that ENCOURAGES ease of opening and meddling even for the people who are not completely tech savvy.

      --

      @Whee

    3. Re:The Monitor is for the new iMac! by nathanh · · Score: 1
      Actually at least -some- PC manufacturers definitely void the warranty based on opening the case. Anything from those funky self-destructing stickers to case intrusion switches can detect this, and they make way too much use of them.

      If your opening of the case didn't cause the damage then they have to honour the warranty. It doesn't matter how many stickers or warnings they stick on the case. Manufacturers can't absolve themselves of legally required warranties with hyperbole and holographic stickers. Extended warranties might be a different matter because they are contracts.

      This "you open the case, you have no warranty" belief is an urban myth. It's right up there with the popular belief that stores have the right to search your bags just by sticking up a sign "a condition of entry is that we can search your bags". Nope. They still can't search your bags. They can't negate your right to privacy with a sign.

    4. Re:The Monitor is for the new iMac! by KitFox · · Score: 4, Informative
      This "you open the case, you have no warranty" belief is an urban myth.

      If you have a warranty contract that states that intrusion into the system voids the warranty, then what is the situation then? Where precisely is it REQUIRED for them to warrant their equipment? It's not here. If they said "you are buying this 'As Is'", then there would be no warranty anyway, with the exceptions of implied warrantee (Such as in product specifications, claims, etc.) Because a lot of places do not legally require warranties. (These are usually noted in the Warranty text as "Warranty void if ... except in or other places where prohibited by law.")

      It seems that you also come from AU, or are possibly thinking of that country, which likely has differnet laws in effect than other places. In the US, they can and do legally say "We will warrant this as long as you don't open it." So overall, it has a huge dependancy on where you buy it.

      It's right up there with the popular belief that stores have the right to search your bags just by sticking up a sign "a condition of entry is that we can search your bags". Nope. They still can't search your bags. They can't negate your right to privacy with a sign.

      Again, you seem to have forgotten difference in laws. It depends on whether 'search of personal property' requires implicit or explicit permission. In many places, it requires only implicit permission. As such, by entering a store with a PROMINENTLY placed sign stating "By entering this property, you give us the right to search your bags" or anything of the sort, then you have effectively given them permission to search your bags.

      In all cases, the permission issue is the key. If asked for permission to search your bags, and you give this permission, then you have just given up the right to privacy within your bags. You cannot then watch them search it, and say "How dare you search my bags!?" and sue them, since you directly gave permission. heck, this is even apparent with police officers, who, without due cause, cannot search your person. That is why they ask "Do you mind if I pat you down?" or somesuch, with the understanding that MOST people will just agree, which then means you have relinquished your right to privacy in that specific case. You -DO- technically have the right to say "I do not want you to search me." (Though of course this will make them suspicious of you, and could make matters worse in the future.)

      The other consideration is that if they require you to allow a bag search upon ENTRY, then they have another thing to go by. You cannot just walk in, refuse a bag search, and then expect to still be allowed in the store. They are private property, and they have the right to require you to waive any waivable rights (Right to privacy is a waivable right) you have in order to gain access to their private property. Failure to comply can and WILL result in denial of access to the property. And if you insist, then the owner or any agent thereof can have you arrested for trespass.

      I used to work at Fry's Electronics in California. Believe me, we were seen as the Gustapo just because we had signs like you mention, and because we looked through all outgoing bags. Now the funny thing is that the PRIMARY meaning of "By entering this premises, you agree that we have the right to search all bags" was for the shopping bags that were leaving the store. But we occasionally had to search backpacks too. When somebody objected (99% of the time they had stolen something if they did), we would simply place them under citizen's arrest and call the police. By entering the store, and staying in it with no intent to actually allow search after giving implicit permission advised by the prominent sign, they were trespassing. With the police present, they were given a choice. May we search your bags, or do you want to go to jail on charges of trespassing? The 1% that ddid not steal anything would generally allow a bag search at that point and be released, albeit g

      --

      @Whee

    5. Re:The Monitor is for the new iMac! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually at least -some- PC manufacturers definitely void the warranty based on opening the case. Anything from those funky self-destructing stickers to case intrusion switches can detect this, and they make way too much use of them.

      I haven't seen this, even with HP, Dell, Gateway and eMachines PCs. In fact, most machines made by these companies (in the last 5 or 6 years at least) have a thumb-screw that allows the entire case to be removed; Dells often simply require pushing a mechanical plastic button to remove the outer case/cover -- even some very old Dell PCs have this feature (an old P-75 desktop machine sitting here is like this).

      I've yet to see any of these with a "warranty void if removed" type of sticker on the outer case... at least with any of the "major" brand machines.

      My dad (not very tech-savvy) upgraded his RAM in the first month of owning a PC -- having never dealt with PCs (much less Windows ME) before -- without a problem, and without losing his warranty/support. Another friend (with some over-the-phone help) replaced a crappy modem with a better one, again without causing any trouble with the vendor/retailer/manufacturer.

      Having also done warranty repairs for Gateway myself (temp contract), we never checked warranty stickers, or even checked whether components were original or not (cheaper to replace whatever was broken than to research the model #). Admittedly most cases happened to be virus-related (this in about 2001, and I can't even remember what the name of the common virus/worm at the time was)...

      ...but as long as the reported problem didn't look like it was directly caused by the user, we would simply fix the problem or replace the faulty component.

      The point is, I've seen very few PCs with "warranty stickers" on them. Unlike most consumer electronics, computers are generally considered "user servicable" or at lease "user upgradable", even on the Mac side of things. No high voltages are exposed (the power supply unit is sourced from a third-party and generally self-contained/enclosed); and computers are generally built and sold with the idea that certain things can be upgraded by the purchaser (thus adding value to the computer at sale-time, at least for some potential purchasers)...

      Posting anon since I'm fucked up and not sure how much sense I'm making right now :) Tribute to the late Rick James... (Chappelle fans will understand -- it's a hell of a drug!)

    6. Re:The Monitor is for the new iMac! by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Because a lot of places do not legally require warranties.

      As long as we're only sticking to the rich, first-world countries - what places are that? Apart from the US...? I know there's a two year warranty on mostly everything mandated in the EU, I assume the non-EU countries in Western Europe have similar laws. I don't know about Australia, Canada and Japan/Asia in general.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    7. Re:The Monitor is for the new iMac! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you have a warranty contract that states that intrusion into the system voids the warranty, then what is the situation then? Where precisely is it REQUIRED for them to warrant their equipment?

      In many (most?) states, there exist laws that require a company to -- at mimimum -- warrant that a product will work as advertised for a reasonable (subjective, yes) period of time. Hence the terms "void where prohibited" and "except where not applicable by law", etc.

      Regarding the search of bags issue, I do agree. If you enter my property (private or public) and I have a specific condition -- such as making sure you leave only with what you came in with -- that should be my (eg, the property/business owner's) right, and I believe in most US states, that is the case provided some kind of indication is posted and visible prior to entry by the customer.

      I'm not entirely sure if a store employee can actually search a potential shop-lifter (I really don't know; may be a per-state thing?) but I do know that one representing the store (eg, a security officer or manager) can hold the person while waiting for the police, provided there is probable cause (eg, the employee has sufficient reason to believe the customer has done something wrong).

      As far as warranties, it does seem this is a per-state (in the US) thing; usually warranty statements have various exclusions for certain states, and of course the catch-all "if any term is deemed illegal the rest of this stands" blah blah...

      I know there are certain minimum warranty requirements, even on products that proclaim "no warranty, express or implied" -- there are still certain requirements imposed by US and/or state laws, at minimum truth in advertising or misrepresentation of a product's capabilities, etc. Just because the warranty card says something doesn't necessarily mean it's legal or binding.

      On the bright side (as the parent post mentioned), if you disagree with the warranty terms, most retail stores will gladly accept returns for cash/credit or exchange, depending on circumstances (presense of receipt, time since purchase, condition of the item, etc). ...due to the fact that you were unable to know your contractual obligations prior to the opening of the box. ... As I was writing the previous paragraph, and quoting the above, it occurred to me how similar this is to the license one "agrees to", when they install a software application, where the license is only known at install-time -- after having opened the product where (most) stores won't accept open-item software returns... how similar are these items? Can a company claim inside the product packaging that they aren't liable? Similarly with software, can a company (again known only once having opened and read the packaging) say you can't create a backup copy of a software program? Can they prevent you from writing down/photocopying/photographing your "product key" or whatever, in case it is lost?

      Ugh, I'm gonna stop before I get entirely carried away (I now know how Dennis Miller feels... ;)

    8. Re:The Monitor is for the new iMac! by Epistax · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm surprised he needed a screwdriver. I thought those things would open on the user's sense of elitism alone.

    9. Re:The Monitor is for the new iMac! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Along the line of the warranty, if you disagree with the terms of a warranty that is listed fully INSIDE the box, then most places say that you can reverse the transaction for a full refund regardless of the fact that the box has been open, due to the fact that you were unable to know your contractual obligations prior to the opening of the box.

      Actually, in the U.S. the Mangusen-Moss Warranty Act requires that, for any product selling for $15 or more, the seller make the warranty terms available to you in writing prior to completing the sale of the item in question. And yes, having a website with the warranty terms counts.

    10. Re:The Monitor is for the new iMac! by Mouse42 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, it's VERY nice to see a computer of any type that ENCOURAGES ease of opening and meddling even for the people who are not completely tech savvy.

      I know that Dell encourages opening up the case when you call in with a problem. Several friends and I have been asked by their tech support to open up the computer and change this and that.

      They'd prefer you doing it than taking up valuable technician time to just reseat a card.

    11. Re:The Monitor is for the new iMac! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't make a citizen's arrest in this case. You need to accuse them of a felony. At best, in most cases, you are only claiming a misdemeanor. In that case all you can do is try to get info and report it to the police.

    12. Re:The Monitor is for the new iMac! by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      I used to work at Fry's Electronics in California.

      Funny. I always, always walk out of Fry's without showing my receipt. I'm just waiting for them to pull that. I'd so love to sue them for false arrest.

      (I've never stolen anything)

    13. Re:The Monitor is for the new iMac! by lidocaineus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know what kind of backasswards Fry's you were working at, but every other one I've been to has NEVER had that sign (and I live in a VERY LARGE metro area). While they do check your receipts at the door, there is NO WAY they can force you to comply after you've paid, unless they accuse you of shoplifting... and since you worked there, you should know exactly what kind of can of worms that entails to run the risk of falsely accusing someone (slander, kidnapping, and lots of court time).

      I never show my receipt. I walk out the door despite their constant and increasingly malevolent protests, but they are obviously told to never touch a customer, nor mention "stealing" when they don't know for absolutely sure. What I'm doing is not illegal, because I never gave permission, implicit or otherwise, to search my person, *especially* after I've paid for it (the property is now mine).

  11. Linkey to the blog by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.kodawarisan.com.nyud.net:8090/imacg5/im acg501.html

    This is one server that really won't survive a slashdotting too well, so better use the CDN!

    1. Re:Linkey to the blog by fsterman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there is definitely a reason coral cache is still in beta

      --
      Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
    2. Re:Linkey to the blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one of the few image heavy links on /. since coral that I think actually works well(relative path to images). Lots of them lately seem to have absolute links to the images even when they are on the same server and a relative path would work as well.

  12. Re:one min after its posted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you insensitive clod! I just screwed your father last night and NOW you tell me he's dead?

  13. Nice webserver by peawee03 · · Score: 1

    It's slow, but still running, even with hosting an image-based site. W00t.

    --
    I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
  14. Coral cache link by p0 · · Score: 5, Informative


    Save the guy's website! Use this coral cache link instead

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Coral cache link by phaze3000 · · Score: 1

      That's great: a miror that's slower than the original!

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    2. Re:Coral cache link by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      This is yet another site that is using full URLs for his image links instead of relative links. A fatal flaw.

      All these images are being loaded off the slashdotted server instead of through the cache. If the author of the page had instead used relative images, the coral cache would be positively zippy.

  15. mirror of images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  16. Since the server is already busy... by sokoban · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apple has had some high res pics of the iMac insides for a while. Here (http://www.apple.com/pr/photos/imacflat/04imac.ht ml) they are.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
  17. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And now we took apart his web server

  18. Come to think of it by gotr00t · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's not suprising when you realize that they are one of the few companies with a class A network block (17.*.*.*)

    Natrually, you would expect their bandwidth to have at least some relation to this fact.

  19. Re:iMac G5 Porn Roundup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    You must not be an Apple zealot. Those get a hard-on whenever they see a Mac, and jack off to the apple.com website or photos of a Mac being "undressed"... Just another bunch of deviants.

  20. Re:iMac G5 Porn Roundup by inziga · · Score: 1

    They call it porn in the title because the "clothes" are taken off the hardware.

  21. iMac Pr0n and loss of cooling of sweaty feet. by a3217055 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was quite suprised at the Porn heading... and yes it was cruel. But carrying on looking at the box, it seems very tightly fitted. Looks like a really well thought system. I wish the guy could show some more important images of the system like how well it sucks in air and removes it. But the most amazing thing about the iMac is the price and technology. A nice PPC chip with a Nvidia 5200 board all sounds great. It would be great if Apple made the system such that you could just use it as a media center. It plays DVDs like that, even though a MAC out of sleep mode does not take too long ... But the Broadcom ethernet chip is a real bad one. Broadcom runs hotter, they should've got the Intel Pro 1000. They also supposedly run at higher MTUs. But how many people are gonna run these boxes on a gigabit network. But definately a nice thin client is very appreciated. I use my workstation's fans to cool of my sweaty feet. Over all a great system I give it 4 out of 5. Kind of pricey, and loss of sweaty feet drier :). ( but a G5 with a dual FPU is nice, and that PPC architecture kicks ass. ). But thin clients are the way to go for the home. So much easier to move around and easy for that 2 year old to knock around. :)

    1. Re:iMac Pr0n and loss of cooling of sweaty feet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pal, instead of lusting over an iMac, go take a writing class

    2. Re:iMac Pr0n and loss of cooling of sweaty feet. by eyeye · · Score: 1

      Nvidia 5200 sounds great?

      Only if you are upgrading from a 1mb trident.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
  22. pr0n? by riceslimbo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm gonna void your warrenty allll night long!

  23. Title by Hypharse · · Score: 2, Funny

    HAHA. When I first read the title I thought it said G5 Porn and thought it was funny because you know "HAHA it looks like porn". Then I looked at it the second time, saw that it still said G5 porn. Then instead of laughing I conjured up images some of the mac zealots in my college closing the door, turning off the lights, and lubing up usb port. Now I can't get it out of my head. Someone shoot me.

    1. Re:Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USB port? Man, that's just sick. It's supposed to be the firewire port.

  24. Re:iMac G5 Porn Roundup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That's goatse.cx.

    And I don't know that from overtyping, I swear...

  25. Re:iMac G5 Porn Roundup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must not be an Apple zealot. Those get a hard-on whenever they see a Mac, and jack off to the apple.com website or photos of a Mac being "undressed"... Just another bunch of deviants

    Wrong. Actually I am an Apple zealot, but I have a girlfriend.

    I know it's a rarity, but we do exist.

  26. Very nice by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was wondering around my local Microcenter the other day when I saw one of these. "Funny," I thought to myself, "I've never seen this style of Apple flatscreen. I thought they were all styled in the Cinema line." Little did I know it was a full computer! Very impressive.

  27. That is fucking cool by paragon_au · · Score: 1

    Stuff the benchmarks, that is one cool computer in anyones book. I wonder if someone will make a device to turn it into a laptop.

    I'll be buying one for sure.

    1. Re:That is fucking cool by System.out.println() · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ok, let's turn the 17-inch iMac into a laptop. First, the thing weighs 18.5 pounds, compared to the already weighty Powerbook G4 at 6.9 pounds. Second, the iMac's weight is entirely in the screen - assuming you'd want to put it on your lap, it would fall over backwards. Third, it would be hideously un-portable as the computer is bigger even than the 17" screen (note the chunk at the bottom). Throw in a battery of some sort and you've got either a 30-minute laptop or a 3-inch, 25 pound machine.

      Yes, that's a 'no'. I want a G5 laptop too, but turning an iMac into one is far from a good idea.

    2. Re:That is fucking cool by CountBrass · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "good" and "dell" in the same sentence? What are you smoking?

      I'm typing this on my work Dell Latitude (yes they put a gun to my head:( ) and let's see:

      • Work Dell: the case is super-cheap plastic;
      • My Powerbook: shiney aluminium.
      • Work Dell: Cheap keyboard that flexes.
      • My PB: Metal keyboard that does not flex.
      • Work Dell: Comes complete with not 1, not 2, not even 3 but 4 mouse buttons. Well 2 pairs of 2 really. One with the nipple and the other with the trackpad.
      • My Apple: only comes with a trackpad and one mouse button (wait for it...)
      • Work Dell: Of the 4 mouse buttons NONE work reliably (2 don't work at all). The nipple is unreliable to the point of being unusable. The track pad works but is small and cramped.
      • My PB: Trackpad works flawlessly, every single time, and so does the button.
      • Work Dell: Bluetooth radio: doesn't work. At all. With any of my BT devices.
      • My PB: Bluetooth works seamlessly with all my BT devices including my MS mouse & P900.
      • Work Dell: Comes with XP. worst. operating. system. ever. (yes I think it's worse than ME).
      • My PB: Comes with OSX. best. operating. system. ever.

      So you can understand why I laugh in the face of anyone that describes any consumer computer made by Dell as good. They're not. They are the epitome of why Wintel PCs are shit.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    3. Re:That is fucking cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a horrible design by Apple to try to reinvent the Laptop and charge $x4 for it.

      Wow, I could have purchased it for (1300 / 4 = ) $325 instead?

    4. Re:That is fucking cool by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Minor nit- Powerbook keyboards are made out of plastic too. The keys are just painted to precisely match the metal case.

    5. Re:That is fucking cool by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Work Dell: Comes with XP. worst. operating. system. ever. (yes I think it's worse than ME).

      Why don't you just come out and say "I'm a moron!" No one in their right mind would say ME > XP. No one.

    6. Re:That is fucking cool by nathos · · Score: 0

      Um....weighty? Last time I checked, the 17-inch Powerbook, weighing 6.9 pounds, is the LIGHTEST 17-inch notebook on the market. Most comparable 17-inch notebooks from HP/Sony/Toshiba are in the 9-10 pound range.

    7. Re:That is fucking cool by atriusofbricia · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah, as much as I hate to admit it, I have to agree. As bad as XP is, it's better then ME. It's a less revolting pile of shite.

      He says from his government mandated Dell XP machine.

      DAMN DELL!!

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    8. Re:That is fucking cool by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, 98 > XP. Definetely. Plus when 98 does fail, it's easier than dealing with NTFS which is what everybody seems to default to these days.

    9. Re:That is fucking cool by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      NTFS is not a problem to deal with. Go get yourself a Knoppix Linux distro on CD. Boot off of it and use the NT tools to recover the data off of the NTFS drive. If you don't do Linux look picking up a copy of ERD Commander or other similar recovery CD products. ERD Commander is nice in that it can roll XP back to any available system restore states as well as recover data off of NTFS.
      That being said - is there any reason to use NTFS over FAT32? Hell yeah. 4k block sizes versus the 32k or higher for modern drives on FAT32. You will get MUCH less wasted disk space out of the drive. Additionally NTFS is more reliable than FAT32 and less prone to unrecoverable crap outs.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    10. Re:That is fucking cool by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      I guess you hate your work laptop?
      Seriously I have a Dell Latitude D600 at work which is a solid machine and works well.
      Sure the Powerbook is prettier - but its not like Apple has never made a machine with design flaws. My friend just had to pick up replacement hinges for his Powerbook (not the latest but one generation back PR G4) due to the problem with the weakness of the double hinge design on that model.
      BTW your post may have valid points but they are pretty much negated by the tone and extreme bias. You hate wintel - you love Apple. Yet another Mac zealot just like the ones who modded you informative.
      I have no problem with Apple - I just happen to enjoy not being shoehorned into specific hardware configurations. Want a mid range Mac with a good video card? Guess what? You are out of luck. Don't have $3000 for the tower plus monitor to get a Mac with a good video card? Too bad.
      With x86 I get flexibility in hardware choices at low cost as well as several operating systems to choose from and the largest software base in the world. And while OSX is a nice operating system, I'll take the flexibility of x86 over it.
      Some day in the distant future perhaps Mac users and the rest of the world will be able to have a reasonable discussion about computers without it degenerating into drivel. But then again perhaps not.
      Disclaimer: I use and administer Mac OS 9 and OS X, Windows 98-XP, FreeBSD 4.10 and various Linux distros. They all have their good points and they all have their bad. Some are best for certain tasks (Mac for DTP) and others for different tasks (Windows XP for games). I've been OS agnostic since the Amiga died. Now if you want to talk about a REAL computer... ;)

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    11. Re:That is fucking cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol god people are clueless. Just because your a tech newbie and don't know how to work with NTFS doesn't make 98 better. What stupid ass logic. If you knew anything about FAT32 vs. NTFS would would have never made that idiotic comment. Get educated.

    12. Re:That is fucking cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm you either have a very low end or old Latitude. My D600 is metal, super sturdy, and an excellent made laptop. Zero problems and I can run alot more operating systems of my choice (Windows platforms, BSD and Linux flavors, and much more). I'm not limited to OS X (which I don't care for) and Yellow Dog.

      And to top it off it's alot cheaper for more performance. I don't think Mac's are shit, I'm not a blind dumbass zealot, but you don't get great value.

    13. Re:That is fucking cool by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Well, that's beside the point anyway. To me the 17" PB feels a lot heavier than it looks, hence, i consider it weighty. *shrug*

    14. Re:That is fucking cool by flyboy974 · · Score: 0

      Wow, all these replies and I was Trolled on my original post. I wonder if our moderator is an Apple lover. Oh wait, we're in the Apple.slashdot.org area.

      I like OSX for one reason, it's Unix based. It's a bastardized Unix, but, weren't all of them at one point?

      While XP isn't the greatest, it does do a lot of stuff. I can run all of those Adobe products that use to be exclusively Mac. My scanner works when I plug it in. I have software so I can launch X apps on my XP desktop at work. I can go and buy upgrades for a lot less $$. Now what does your MAC do that I can't do on a Windows/Linux box?

      BTW, I liked the fact that your single "Button" works good. My wireless Logitech keyboard and mouse have never once failed.

    15. Re:That is fucking cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can run alot more operating systems of my choice (Windows platforms, BSD and Linux flavors, and much more). I'm not limited to OS X (which I don't care for) and Yellow Dog.

      Never heard of Virtual PC, eh? You won't be doing any gaming on an emulated PC, but performance is usually acceptable for most other apps that don't have Mac versions.

  28. Just in case it gets slashdotted, here is the text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Image Use Agreement
    Important Image Use Information

    By copying or making any use of the image below, you acknowledge that you have read and understand, and agree to, the Image Usage Agreement below that governs your use of the Image. If you do not agree to the Agreement's terms, do not copy or use the Image in any way, unless you have written permission signed by Apple.

    Usage Agreement:

    Subject to the terms of this Agreement, you may use the Image solely in whole for editorial use by press and/or industry analysts. This right to use is personal to you and is not transferable by you to another party. The Image cannot be used to promote or sell any product or technology (such as on advertising, brochures, book-covers, stock photos, t-shirts, or other promotional merchandise). You may not alter, or modify the Image, in whole or in part, for any reason.

    As between you and Apple, Apple is and shall remain the sole and exclusive owner of the Image. You will not delete, alter, or obfuscate any proprietary legends relating to the Image, and each use will be accompanied by the applicable proprietary attribution shown next to the Image.
    The Image is provided by Apple on an 'as is' basis, without warranty of any kind, including non-infringement or ownership. You, not Apple, are responsible for your use of the Image. Any misuse of the Image or breach of this Agreement will cause Apple irreparable harm. Apple is either an owner or licensee of the image, not an agent for the owner. We understand that you will give our company a credit line as follows: "Courtesy of Apple " and also credit the photographer if noted.

    I have read and understand, and agree to, the Image Usage Agreement.
    (Image will immediately begin download)

    I disagree and would like to return to the Apple PR site.

    --

  29. When you look that good... by paragon_au · · Score: 1

    ... who cares about the brains?

  30. Interesting but somewhat oblique story by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Voided the warranty? Nah, just get another one of those sealing stickers. Assuming that's what they use, no idea really, just wanted to relate this story.

    Fella I know is an exporter in China. One time, they were exporting sunglasses. My friend wants to know, do these have UV protective coatings? After several confused back-and-forths through the translator, the Chinese factory rep finally lights up, and says, "Yes! We have sticker!"

    True story.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  31. laptop-like? + AirPort vs. AirMac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only is it compact, it even has a backup battery. How long can it operate on those?

    BTW, the geek called one of the components "AirMac" which is the name Apple is using in Japan for what they call "AirPort" in the US.

  32. Re:iMac G5 Porn Roundup by Inthewire · · Score: 1

    I know it's a rarity, but we do exist.

    Girls that read slashdot?

    --


    Writers imply. Readers infer.
  33. G5 is aliiiive by jupo · · Score: 3, Funny

    No disassemble G5, NOOOO!!!!

    --
    Me I'm a maker, mostly of axioms.
  34. Re:hqx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Binhex, originally. Stuffit Expander will work in a pinch though.

  35. Taking apart by philoticjane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I took apart a 20" iMac G5 today. It took 45 minutes to take it 100% apart (well, at least 100% as far as under warranty replacement parts are concerned) and put it back together.

    Easy as pie, as long as you don't strip the screws like an idiot.

    Plus, the midplane isn't very heavy or awkward at all, I'm not a burly geek girl, and I could handle it all by me onesy.

    --
    Cthulu saves... in case he gets hungry later.
    ::helping geeks get laid since 1983::
    1. Re:Taking apart by SenorCitizen · · Score: 1, Troll
      Plus, the midplane isn't very heavy or awkward at all, I'm not a burly geek girl, and I could handle it all by me onesy.

      I wonder how many moderators rated this post "Interesting" just because the poster mentioned she was a girl...

    2. Re:Taking apart by cheese_wallet · · Score: 1

      Easy as pie, as long as you don't strip the screws like an idiot.

      instead of stripping them like an intelligent geek?

    3. Re:Taking apart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Circle takes the square..goodnight folks

    4. Re:Taking apart by Kehvarl · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      42

    5. Re:Taking apart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will you marry me?

    6. Re:Taking apart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For all the Jane fans out there that modded her to +5...

      Here's her journal...

      Which links to her web site...

      Which is full of pics! Look! A girl who likes hardware! *runs*

  36. iMac G5 Diagnostics by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Informative

    Does anyone else find the iMac diagnostic page's instructions a little interesting?

    If you follow the instructions exactly as specified, nobody is going to be able to diagnose their iMac.

    It says in step one to turn off the machine and remove all cables. Then in step seven it describes how to read the status LED's. The problem is the instructions never tell you to plug the computer back in and turn it on while it is open, so none of the LED's are going to function.

    1. Re:iMac G5 Diagnostics by CountBrass · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why can't we mod posts stupid?

      Lucky for you we can't.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    2. Re:iMac G5 Diagnostics by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      I'm not being stupid, I'm just reading the instructions.

      It may seem silly to you, but have you ever worked end-user support?

      I talked to a guy two days ago who had dialup internet and couldn't connect. After talking to him for a bit I learned he had no home phone service.

      Even the simple things can trip people up.

    3. Re:iMac G5 Diagnostics by The+Munger · · Score: 1

      Could it be that the LEDs are run of the clock battery? A couple of LEDs don't take a lot of power.

      --
      Refuse to make a statement in your sig!
    4. Re:iMac G5 Diagnostics by sendai2ci · · Score: 1

      Other than this post, did you bother clicking one of the radio buttons and sending Apple a little comment about how the article was ambiguous/hard to understand?

    5. Re:iMac G5 Diagnostics by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Could it be that the LEDs are run of the clock battery? A couple of LEDs don't take a lot of power.

      You didn't read the article it seems:

      7. Locate the large white arrow in the middle of the computer.

      Above this arrow, you'll see four LEDs:

      * LED 1 indicates that trickle voltage from the power supply has been detected. This LED will be ON when the computer is turned off and your power supply is working correctly.

      * LED 2 indicates that the main logic board has detected proper power from the power supply when the computer is turned on. This LED will be ON when the computer is turned on and the power supply is working correctly.

      * LED 3 indicates that the computer and the LCD display are communicating. This LED will be ON when the computer is turned on and video signal is being generated.

      * LED 4 lights only if the computer detects an over-temperature condition. This LED will be OFF when the computer is turned on and running at the correct temperature.


      Now which of these LED is going to light up when the power supply is disconnected?

    6. Re:iMac G5 Diagnostics by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1

      * LED 3 indicates that the computer and the LCD display are communicating. This LED will be ON when the computer is turned on and video signal is being generated.

      Holy crap, from reading that it looks like the iMac has to be ON to determine the status of that LED. Now, afiak the setup manual for the iMac at no point indicates that you can turn it on without plugging in the power cord.

      I bet a first grader could tell you that to turn on a computer that it needs to be plugged into the wall.

      Caveat, I worked tech support for 5 years, so I know people's propensity for idiocy. But I'll have to say I never took a call from a Mac using granny that complained of the computer not turning on and then noticing it was unplugged. (Not that I couldn't have, I have taken a call where the power cord had been chewed through by a dog, but it was a Wintel. So before anyone flames me, I'm not saying Apple's have dog resistant power cords :)

      --
      Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
    7. Re:iMac G5 Diagnostics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah well if you got as far as taking it apart, one would hope you would have mastered the oh so subtle art of KNOWING HOW POWER WORKS

    8. Re:iMac G5 Diagnostics by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      I've had customers try to install a modem into a system with a spot welder.

      Never underestimate the stupidity of an end user.

    9. Re:iMac G5 Diagnostics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they've updated the instructions since you posted this, but right now, it says:

      7. Reconnect the power cord to the back of the computer.

      8. Locate the large white arrow in the middle of the computer. ...

      They don't say to turn the power back on before you check the LED that indicates that the computer is turned on and receiving full power, but maybe they consider that step self-evident.

  37. Haiku Porn by andy55 · · Score: 5, Funny


    "They say porn!", I shout.
    Only circuit boards I see.
    But wait, slot loading?

  38. Why were you surprised at the porn heading? by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny
    This is what you wrote:

    But carrying on looking at the box, it seems very tightly fitted.... I wish the guy could show some more important images ... like how well it sucks .... But definately a nice thin client is very appreciated.... my sweaty feet... I give it 4 out of 5. ...sweaty feet ... ass. But thin clients are the way to go for the home. So much easier to move around and easy ... to knock [up]. :)
    1. Re:Why were you surprised at the porn heading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funniest thing i've read this year! i was eating a brownie and it's on my keyboard now.

  39. Pomp and circumstance... by Anubis333 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Although it looks like a great, easy way to pop Linux machines into expensive cars and places with a small form factor for people who can afford to pay extra for things that look pretty, it kind of annoys me sometimes how Apple latches onto ideas that have been around for ages and tries to tout them as 'unique' and 'truly modern'. Read the linked page, it's an 'innovative architecture' that 'dwells in an enchanting display'..

    I mean it's nothing new, they bought Pioneer DVDRs, and called them 'Super Drive's' "Only Apple has the 'Super Drive'", or the "First 64 bit Desktop"...

    I used to be a big fan of Apple, but sometimes they just need to nose down out of the clouds, it looks like a great machine, but it's not too innovative.. Heh, it 'provides hardware transform and lighting (T&L)', as a computer animator/TD this had me on the floor, its been years since I saw people bragging about T&L like it's some rare feature!

    I feel this was pretty straight and to the point, nothing glossed over or biasedly bashed, but for some reason I will still get modded down, Apple fans rule with an iron fist.. :)

    1. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had points, I would have got you but for the fact you were far enough down. Lucky... ;)

    2. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by saltydogdesign · · Score: 0

      Hey dumbbell, the rest of us are looking at the industrial design which is indeed unmatched elsewhere. You must be the guy that looks at the Toyota Prius and says, "Eh, I've got the same brand of tires on my car."

      --
      // This is not a sig.
    3. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called marketing and every company does it. Ever hear of hyperthreading? Netburst? iLink? Seriously, try getting your own head out of the clouds and enter the real world where every product marketing page you visit is laden with marketspeak to make the product appear to be unique and innovative.

      And I sincerely hope your comment about Linux wasn't implying the Mac OS X is Linux or based on Linux. It's not, it's an amalgamation primarily consisting of *BSD. Of course you can install Linux on it if that's what you were implying.

      If you're modded down, it's because you're naive, not because of some rabid Apple fans. In all honesty, I would mod you down only because your post is rather pointless.

    4. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by Rura+Penthe · · Score: 1

      Yeah that must be what it is. Apple invented marketing and nobody else ever does it.

      The only reason people will mod your post down is because it adds absolutely nothing to the discussion since it's just plain stupid.

    5. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by ender81b · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While they aren't the first in alot of things they are usually the first to perfect a concept, or make it usable to the vast majority of people.

      Por ejemplo, these all-in-ones have been around for a few years. They have also universally sucked. We got a chance to demo two models (one from Omnitech now MPC and another from Gateway) back in June. Each one was nearly 40 pounds. They were *beasts*. Each was constructed mainly of plastic and felt very flimsey - the gateway model had a few little plastic panels that fell off while we were demoing it (yeah, we're gonna buy this for University students to use...). In addition, each one had a - basically - notebook cdrom drive with a tray. Ever try putting a cd in a tray that's sideways? It sucks. Apple realized this and came out with the nice slot loading concept. There were also a lot of little things wrong with them (buttons placed on the front that weren't very easy to read at a distance, ports on 3 sides left, right, front, etc).

      Basically every single thing wrong with the all-in-ones we demo'd apple fixed. *Directly because of this* for the first time in forever we are going to add apple's to our public rotation of computers. Good job apple!

    6. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by Anubis333 · · Score: 1

      No, I was talking about Yellow Dog, or any other PPC flavor.

    7. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TOOT TOOT!
      The Clue-train has arrived, time to get on board!

      Superdrive as a name was reused because when Apple was the first to use 1.44MB floppies in the SE (1987), they called that 3.5 inch drive, the Superdrive.

      This journey won't include the First 64-bit Desktop deal, because it's been done to death multiple times. (hint: look at the word after 'bit') !

      Thanks for traveling on the Clue-train !

    8. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by EconolineCrush · · Score: 1

      What makes the PowerMac G5 a desktop system? The PCI-X slots? Seriously, there were Opteron systems available with very similar configurations (hard drives, graphics, motherboard features, etc...) to the G5 systems before they were released. I've yet to see anyone come up with a compelling reason why the G5 is a desktop but a similarly-configured Opteron system is a workstation.

    9. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by wagemonkey · · Score: 1

      Because Apple say so?

    10. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 3, Informative
      Por ejemplo, these all-in-ones have been around for a few years. They have also universally sucked. We got a chance to demo two models (one from Omnitech now MPC and another from Gateway) back in June. Each one was nearly 40 pounds. They were *beasts*.

      For everyone to compare here are pics of an iMac G5 and a Sony Vaio all-in-one:

      http://www.macbase.de/Xchange/vaio_vs_imacg5.jpg

      From a site called Sonystyle:

      http://www.sonystyle.com/intershoproot/eCS/Store/e n/imagesProducts/MoreImages/PCVV100G_4.jpg

      And a sideway tray-loading CD-ROM:

      http://www.sonystyle.com/intershoproot/eCS/Store/e n/imagesProducts/MoreImages/PCVV100G_7.jpg

    11. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TOOT TOOT! Clue-train is back!

      but unfortunately we are out of clues to deliver :p

      Yeah I know its stupid, but if they want to market it as a desktop instead of a workstation then that's their stupid marketing department's fault. It doesn't really make sense, since the g5 is a server cpu (xserve) workstation cpu (powermac) and desktop cpu (imac). Maybe they should go POWER in the xserve, and big cache + ppc970fx in the powermac, and the normal ppc970 in the imac. who knows? only Steve!

    12. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kinda like when apple introduced the concept of a CDROM drive in desktop computers, or computer speakers, or the 3.5" floppy.

      THey don't invent cool shit, they make it useful, practical, and eventually, the world follows in Apple's wise footsteps.

      grow up.

    13. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by ender81b · · Score: 1

      Jesus that sony is worse than the omnitech or the gateway. Sad.

    14. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... that's a little unfair to show the Vaio W series vs. the iMac G5, as the W-series is an old design that's now been discontinued. The new Vaio all-in-ones (V2, 2 generations newer than the W-series) are a bit special, and should give the iMac G5 a run for their money. Take a look for yourself: http://www.vaio.sony.co.jp/Products/VGC-V202/ I run a retail store in the UK, and we are selling both. I have received no iMac G5s, despite placing the first backorder TechData UK (C2K) took. I have a projected shipdate for both the V2 and iMac G5 of the same day, so it'll be interesting to compare. As standard, the (UK version - Japanese is different) Vaio V2 series have a wireless keyboard and mouse, wi-fi built in, TV tuner, Dual-layer DVD-RW, 160GB or larger HD, 512MB RAM. The SRP is higher for the V2 vs. the iMac, but when you compare the specs, the V2 is a good deal -- I started adding all the kit to take the iMac G5 up to close to the V2 and it got pretty expensive quite quickly.

    15. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by Anubis333 · · Score: 1

      Sure, they picked some huge thing, these computers have been around for ages, and many are barely distinguishable from the new iMac, here are two:

      http://news.com.com/2100-1003-5139927.html
      http ://www.allproducts.com/manufacture98/qiyan/pro duct1.jpg
      http://products.gateway.com/products/GC onfig/prodD etails.asp?system_id=prf5sc&seg=hm

      Sure, they dont have slot loading features and arent made of metal, because many of the ones online are $999-$1,000.

      I think it's very funny how this was moded up to a 5 when people were reading the comment, then over time, as people returned, trickle by trickle, it got modded down..

    16. Re:Pomp and circumstance... by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
      Sure, they picked some huge thing, these computers have been around for ages,

      Ages? I can't remember a TFT all-in-one older than four years.

      and many are barely distinguishable from the new iMac, here are two:

      http://news.com.com/2100-1003-5139927.html

      Quoting linked article:"Pelham Sloane's PS1500 starts at $1,629 and comes with a 15-inch LCD, a 1GHz Via Technologies C3 processor, 256MB of RAM, a 40GB hard drive and a CD-ROM drive. A version of the machine with a 1.7GHz Intel Celeron costs $1,769, and one with a 2.4GHz Pentium 4 processor starts at $1,889. A model with a 17-inch screen is in the works, Jensen said."

      Huh. These are quite expensive. Maybe I'm not the only one who thought that, their website is not very informative ... But luckily I found these side- and rear-views of the machine:

      http://makeashorterlink.com/?I48825D59

      http://makeashorterlink.com/?R2A812D59

      Aaaaahh ... Just like the iPod ...

      http://www.allproducts.com/manufacture98/qiyan/pro duct1.jpg

      Yeah, right, barely distinguishable from the iMac ... Very difficult to get more information on that machine:

      http://www.allproducts.com/manufacture98/qiyan/pro duct1.html

      And this is some braindead design, you can't swivel the monitor around as with the desk lamp iMac, and you can't mount the computer to an arm like the new iMac either. And it is an 2003 model too, just like the above.

      http://products.gateway.com/products/GConfig/prodD etails.asp?system_id=prf5sc&seg=hm

      ... uhhmmm ... cough .... Yeah. Almost. Almost like the new iMac. If I didn't know it was the Gateway site, I would have thought: "Hey this must be the Apple store!" This picture is best to get the pure elegance of the design:

      http://supcontent.gateway.com/support.gateway.com/ s/Profile/profile5/3501739/350173920.jpg

      I think it's very funny how this was moded up to a 5 when people were reading the comment, then over time, as people returned, trickle by trickle, it got modded down..

      What are you talking about? I only got:

      Moderation +2 100% Informative

      P.S.: If you are able to find any sarcasm in this post you are allowed to keep it.

  40. Forget diagnostics...Apple to the Rescue! by flaneur · · Score: 5, Funny

    LED diagnostics? That's way too complicated...

    I think THIS Apple tech note is much more helpful.

    Thanks for the tip!

    1. Re:Forget diagnostics...Apple to the Rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Apple suddenly wonders why they get a spike in their traffic from /. for this article...

    2. Re:Forget diagnostics...Apple to the Rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, very funny when read by any sane person but...

      This is America and was it not for that note an 'I picked it up by the power cord and it fell on my foot' class action lawsuit would be just around the corner.

    3. Re:Forget diagnostics...Apple to the Rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but technote 31 is much more informative. It's recently been updated by technote 1031 too!

  41. File Size by daern · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Errr, is it me or does that 10MB archive file actually contain an 7.7MB tiff file?

    Unless my (Windows XP) PC is doing something very odd (unlikely), Apple have managed to compress this file and make it bigger!

    For comparison, a zipped version (done using the Windows built in stuff) is 7.4MB so it was hardly worth bothering in the first place...

    1. Re:File Size by Grey_14 · · Score: 1

      Unless my (Windows XP) PC is doing something very odd (unlikely)

      ... No, Y'know what, I'm not even gonna comment on that.

    2. Re:File Size by daern · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, Y'know what, I'm not even gonna comment on that.

      Seeing as how this is slashdot and how the level of balanced criticism of "alternative" (i.e. non-*nix) software recently has been a little askew, I'd probably appreciate it if you didn't. I suspect that many others would appreciate it too. Well done for your restraint.

    3. Re:File Size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that many others would appreciate it too.

      No, not really. Most of us here, except the wintrolls, don't get their feelings hurt if somebody criticizes M$ and their products. But hey, if that's what you think is important, go ahead and express your appreciation.

    4. Re:File Size by Kranium · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that .hqx is a binary-to-text encoding that makes the files safe to send as e-mail attachments, for example. That explains the increase in size. Funny that the web site is still using .hqx encoding, however.

  42. Re:iMac G5 Porn Roundup by Tezkah · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is robot pornography. See Futurama.

  43. Re:Another limitation by Tanlis · · Score: 1

    Most people who are going to be buying an iMac G5 are not going to be thinking about needing to have more than one hard drive most likely.

    Of course there is always Firewire and USB drives that could be attached.

    The iMac has always been form over function.

  44. What should I do? by xabi · · Score: 0

    As geek as I am what should I do as soon as I get my new Imac? Don't you think I'll try to take a look inside?

    --
    Check populicio.us
  45. Re:Another limitation by CountBrass · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So stick with your cheap Dell-clone and leave the quality computers the those of that can are a willing to afford them.

    If can afford the quality, and want maximum expandability, then the PowerMac is what you should be looking at. The iMac isn't aimed at people that habitually rip stuff out and put other stuff in its place: never has been. It's aimed at people that want to be able to use a computer.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  46. Re:hqx by daern · · Score: 1

    Servant Salamander from http://www.altap.cz/ will open more or less all archives including hqx. It will also do loads of other cool stuff and is my file manager of choice :-)

    Shareware, not freeware, BTW. There is a free version available, but I suspect it won't open all of the archives that the full version does at it is quite an old build.

  47. Re:Another limitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, there's only one HDD, but it's actually not that big of a deal since the iMac ships with USB 2.0 and Firewire 400 ports. Simply add an array of firewire drives if you need more storage. I personally have two 250MB LaCie D2 drives connected to my mac laptop via firewire and it's an ideal solution an extremely convenient. Yeah, it may add to desktop clutter, but the iMac has an extremely small footprint so it's not a huge deal.

    I do, however agree with you on the GPU. If it were upgradeable, it would be okay, but since it's soldered to the logic board, Apple should have at least thrown in an ATI 9600XT or even a 9700/9800 Mobility if heat were an issue. I know I'm dreaming, but I keep hoping the next iMac will feature the new mini PCI-e slots ATI and NVidia are developing... As for people recommending Macs for hardcore gaming, I really don't know who you talk to. Most avid mac fans would probably say that gaming is adequate, but if you're a hardcore gamer you'd be better off buying a console or designated PC since it takes forever to get games ported.

  48. When will we... by KitFox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Combine a G5 type thing with a Wacom Cinteq so that we can have some seriously scary tablet computer stuff for artists? I mean, the G5 is almost completely a Tablet computer, it just lacks a way to point directly at the screen. So why not do overkill? The only problem is that if you straight out combine the prices, it gets pretty sick.

    --

    @Whee

    1. Re:When will we... by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      Wow yes you're right: the G5 iMac is parctically a tablet computer. And so's my G5 PowerMac.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    2. Re:When will we... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sorry that would sux.
      Tablet computers for drawing sound nice in principle but when you actually try to use them you realise that they are absolute POS. The reason is quite simple although hard to explain. When you draw on a format you never actually really look at what you are drawing instead you measure out how things should look: either in real life or in your minds eye and trace that image onto the format.
      When you draw 90% of your time is spent looking at the object you intend to render and you only tend to look at the paper when you need to realign your pencil to the edge. You might get a dialog happing - example you could draw a cool looking wing so you might draw it from another angle (rotating it around using your minds eye). However in general thats how is works.
      To illustrate - you might start by selecting a one object, say the head of a naked girl, then you lay out the rest of the drawing depending on that object, her tits may be three "heads" down and five heads from the edge to the painting etc. and after a while you master work comes out like a puzzle.
      Basically the story is that you need a nice stable format with a good amount of tactile feedback - a 90c sketchbook just own's in this regard and this ain't going to charge. Personally, I know people who have trouble going from A4 to Legal sizes because their image starts to warp, leading to that tragic situation where you realise that halfway through a job you have to start over because you got the shape of one of the eye's wrong or whatever.
      I have a Wacom Tablet which I use to trace out images which I have drawn and I can just about use the thing to draw directly onto the computer if I pretend that the computer monitor is a viewfinder but I would get seriously annoyed if I was forced to draw directly onto the screen, It just wouldn't work for me.
      I heard a rumour on a slashdot post that Gabe who does penny-arcade uses tablets but since the guy posts dumps from his sketchbook I image he just uses them to save time like I do with my Wacom.
      In short, there probally is a use for tablets outside of yuppie toys (DVD players perhaps?) but drawing directly onto the screen is not one of them in my opinion. Sorry to be harsh but people act like this is some killer feature that is going to sell tablets when it just isn't the case. I'm also getting a bit sick of this POV getting posted on almost every apple article whining that apple won't release a tablet saying that it would be cool for artist and getting modded up as interesting. Poor slashdot for showing its demographic. Seriously dude some of the colour schemes on this website are crap.
      It's like me saying that speech command is a killer feature for programmers because 90% of the time they use a shell along with a editor and since using a shell is just like telling the computer what to do they will be more productive because they don't have to switch to the shell to do stuff (emacs jokes aside). Sorry but this argument is bollocks and has no connecton with reality.
      Only people who think they are artist will buy tablets for work. The rest of use who can actually draw will hang onto our 90c sketchbooks.

    3. Re:When will we... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, being called a twat because I state my opinion and dare to differ with slashdot, while dudes like you get modded up when they just repeat the same crap over and over again. This rinse/ repeat cycle for every article just gets old and you guys are just plain wrong on this one IMHO. Just because someting seems right doesn't make it so. Even more true when your talking outside of your area of experience. After all the idea that the earth is flat seems right. Name calling ain't going to change that. I thought geeks were spose to be objective and rational, hang your head in shame.
      Ofcourse you could have just fallen on that old standby of just taking the piss out of my spelling and gramma.
      This is why I don't post on slashdot.
      BTW Shrek 2 was a the worst movie I ever saw.

    4. Re:When will we... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Your opinion is wrong because you present *your* opinion as gospel truth. Artists are fairly individual - I know some who love their tablet, and some who can't use one. Saying "They suck" (BTW - the terminology 'that would sux' is stupid in and of itself) is a traditional fallacy of internet argument, wherein you assume that whatever applies to yourself must apply to all others. This is the exact opposite of the objectivity you claim to espouse. Hang your head in shame; at least I admit who I am.

      Hence, to use your vernacular - you sux, and to use my vernacular, you're still a twat.

      Didn't see Shrek 2. Didn't see it in this argument, either. Try again.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    5. Re:When will we... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Your argument is completely unsound, because you're inferring a general truth from a single personal experience. I know most posters to Slashdot have *nothing* in the way of knowledge in formal rhetoric, but yes, an argument can be proved false, or ignorable, simply by its methodology. One of those methods is inference from a single example, which is exactly what you're doing.

      I think someone with over 2000 posts would pick the reference.

      God. Do I really have 2000 posts on slashdot? I need a life. That said, I still have better things to waste my memory on than slashdot flamewars.

      Back to the point.

      Your argument, as I said, is that "If its true for me, it must be true for everyone." I have no objection to *you* disliking a tablet, I simply object to your extending that dislike to everyone. I've drawn with a tablet, and while I'm just as bad of an artist with a tablet as with a sketchpad, I wasn't too annoyed by the experience. I know a few people who draw well who really like using a tablet. The point is that its personal preference, and that there is *nothing* inherently inferior about using a tablet vs. a sketchpad.

      Next time you want to claim I haven't picked on any of your numerous errors, read my post enough to pick up on my major point - that your argument is entirely unusable, and as such I don't need to pick on individual errors, as the argument itself is false.

      By the way, paragraphs. Learn em. Love em.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    6. Re:When will we... by KitFox · · Score: 1
      Whatta ruddy silly argument. Kiryat, I have to say I agree with you wholeheartedly here as well. Downgrading my filter to -1 to read the other person's arguments, it seems that his primary disgruntlement is "/.'ers always say 'Why not a tablet for artists!' and in reality, tablets suck for artists, because they suck for me, and everybody I know." Now, admittedly, I only skimmed over his posts, but that is the gist I caught.

      Definitely an issue of making opinion into fact here. Seen that a lot lately, seems to be on the rise.

      ANYWAY, rather than just complaining about his complaint, I'll look at the actual factors here. Firstly, I am a CG Artist. I haven't done anything in ages, but I have a tablet and it is a godsend for accurate and decent work. My wife is an artist (OMG!!! A Slashdotter who is MARRIED!?!). She will happily draw on any paper size, from a drink coaster to posterboard, and her art does not suffer from paper size changes.

      I know several artists who are absolutely THRILLED with tablets, whether they be standard ones, or even Cinteqs. The ones I know who can afford a Cinteq like it because it gives them direct visualisation of "Pen is here, mark is here" on the screen. To them, it makes a great way to zoom in and work on some disgustingly fine details with a very natural motion and mindset.

      Primarily the reason behind the idea of combining Cinteq + Mac is due to the premium on space in many situations. A Cinteq tablet simply adds another device to an already-existing computer, thus taking up "Yet More Space". The combination of a Cinteq like tablet situation with the Mac would mean that the space consumption has been reduced substantially. The thing is that it would be EXCEPTIONALLY expensive, and appeal only to a small population. And those who it doesn't appeal to, like our friendly AC there, just have no way of understanding the mindset or needs of people who would ue it. In the event of something such as a production work graphics design department, space savings and digital art tablet capability together can make a big difference.

      So, really, AC, just because you wouldn't like it, don't assume that nobody else would. And DEFINITELY don't assume that the 'annoying people who comment about how cool it would be' are just know-nothings who have no ties to art other than that they THINK it would be cool for artists. Because the person who posted the original post just might be an artist who would love that. (Wow, look, he is! Weird world we live in, isn't it?)

      --

      @Whee

  49. Cruel? by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Putting the word "Porn" in the headline when no actual pr0n is involved is just CRUEL.

    This is not only cruel but also quite dangerous as it has just caused Slashdot to be firewalled here in my lab. Not that it would be a bad idea productivity-wise... Maybe whitelisting it wasn't so good idea after all.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  50. no way! squirrel cage fans inside? by ztwilight · · Score: 1

    Now I've REALLY got to get a new iMac. Squirrel cage fans rock! (no wonder apple was boasting about how quiet they are)

    --
    Who moved my sig?
  51. Is it me? by ImaLamer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Or does the new iMac with it's cover off look similar to a SEGA Dreamcast with it's cover removed?

  52. Back in the day by cyberzephyr · · Score: 1

    When Apple had a Mac with the "HYPERDRIVE". Remember it? Don't? Well i won't be surprised, it normally blew out everything. HD,Floppy etc...

    I've been using and building computers for 20+ yrs and my first computer was a TI-99.

    Second: Commodore 64.

    Third MAC 2E (i bought it used, so no HYPERDRIVE)(fav game was The Art of War)

    Cracking a Mac case is NOT a COOL thing for me. I was Cracking Mac cases when i had to lug that obnoxious square bag around DC.

    MAc's and Open Machines have been looking alike for a long time. I have to admit that i would love to have the speakers on most of them. Hell just go to the San Diego Supercomputing center and get the thrill of your life!

    The first thing when you get in is a MAC and rightly so.

    As a person who loves PC's because some person won't charge me $100.00 to $150.00/hr to look at my stylish MAC I will always love them for their efficiency and beauty. Adobe started somewhere and it was on a MAC.

    I'm typing on a PC right now and will do so until something else that I can fix pop's up. BTW I can crack a Mac case anytime i want.

    --
    I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
    1. Re:Back in the day by _vSyncBomb · · Score: 1
      >I'm typing on a PC right now and will do so until >something else that I can fix pop's up. BTW I can >crack a Mac case anytime i want.

      Not only are hyperdrives still around, they've gotten a lot cheaper! My old one cost me $2200 for 10 megs, but you can get 10000% the storage for 10% of the price now...

      And, uh, it's a lot smaller...

    2. Re:Back in the day by danieleran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      *Boggle*

      What's a MAC 2E?

      An Apple IIe? Mac SE/30? Mac IIcx? Mac LC III?

      And what's a HYPERDRIVE? Macs had what Apple called a "SuperDrive," but that was a high density 3.5" floppy. Recently the same name got applied to a DVD-R drive.

      I charge plenty of PC owners $100/hr to fix their Windows crap.

      I have to wonder about clients who think they are saving $300 on a cheaper no name PC from Costco, only to spend a couple years on a crappy machine that runs poorly, has flakey software bundled with it, and requires expensive repair time when users plug it into their DSL, fire up IE and saturate their machine with viruses and malware.

      If they bought a Mac, they could pay me to teach them useful things like learning Photoshop or AppleScripting their workflow instead of bailing out their Windows problems.

    3. Re:Back in the day by Arcady13 · · Score: 1
      Hyperdrive? What does that have to do with anything? The Hyperdrive was a third party hard drive made by GCC for old Macs (1985 era) and probably taxed the old power supplies, which were not designed to power a hard drive (and usually died by themselves anyway.) The Hyperdrive was over $2000 in 1985, for a whopping 10 megabytes.

      Also, there is no such thing as a "MAC 2E." There was an Apple IIe, but that was not a Mac. You mention a square bag, so I assume you had a compact Mac - maybe a Mac 512kE model?

      Oh, and "Mac" is not an acronym. Please stop writing it in all caps. Thank you.

    4. Re:Back in the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you sound like you're on drugs, or lack something upstairs.

    5. Re:Back in the day by cyberzephyr · · Score: 1

      Your'e correct. I was half asleep when i wrote that. I do know better than that.

      --
      I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
  53. torrent of webpage by snips · · Score: 1

    bitTorrent of his web page

  54. Re:Another limitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what's "quality" about a GF 5200 again?

    So, remember Mac users, you're paying for "Quality" (tm)(r), NOT a jet for Steve Jobs to snort coke on while devising new DRM schemes with hollywood executives.

  55. Flamebait my ass by c.emmertfoster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Companies that mass-produce computers usually operate on a razor-thin profit margin.

    That's a valid point.

    If money is no object and you're willing to pay extra for something that you might never see like a heatsink as a casual computer consumer, then you are purchasing a luxury item.

    Please! His points were accurate. If you are HP or Gateway or Dell, then that statement is wholely true. The differences are trivial and end-cost is a hugely important factor. This is not flamebait, merely a statement of why purchasing apple is a status symbol!

    --
    We can neither love nor pity nor forgive. If you make a slip in handling us you die!
    1. Re:Flamebait my ass by CountBrass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Personally I think you're talking out of your arse.

      Sure some iMacs are probably bought to pretty up a reception area. But most are bought by people who want: A Unix-like with a usable GUI, a computer that just works, a computer that does take hours of frustrating effort just to plug in a standard peripheral, etc etc etc.

      If you don't want to pay for an Apple, fine stick with your Dell. I decided not to have a Porsche Boxster as my company car (yes, I really had that option) I decided to have extra cash and a Ford Focus. But you don't hear me bitching about how a Boxster is overpriced because it has a pretty engine (it has).

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    2. Re:Flamebait my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, that's reasonable, but how long have you been able to brag about your BSD based OS? Three years?

      Don't mistake me, it's a good one, but its core user group of people who buy Apples don't give two shits about that.

      They could decide to make OS ELF based upon urinal-cake-punch-cards and you'd still have graphic designers lining up to buy the new versions and slobbering-on-cocks about how "revolutionary" it is.

    3. Re:Flamebait my ass by samhain_tm · · Score: 1

      A Unix-like with a usable GUI, a computer that just works, a computer that does take hours of frustrating effort just to plug in a standard peripheral, etc etc etc

      Uhmm... I've been using my XP GUI for about 6 weeks straight now without any stability issues other than when I was forced to install iTunes so I could watch fullscreen quicktime trailers. And when it crashed explorer... it was back up within seconds.

      I also rarely have problems pluging in peripherals, whether they are USB or even when I crack the case to stick in a new card. This may be because I don't buy the cheap-ass Genius, BTC, or other 2 bit hardware manufacture crap and stick to relatively name brand equipment.
      I also use Dell equipment in a corporate network environment, but when Uncle Sam tells you to by Dell or your a terrorist... you do what he wants. Even though, the Dell equipment is relatively stable as long as it's set up properly and not with a Dell image.

      --
      I'm the root of all that's evil, yeah, but you can call me cookie.
    4. Re:Flamebait my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What sort of fool chooses a Focus instead of a Boxster?

      Hell, I'd rather crawl on a soggy sawn-off leg than drive a Ford Focus.

    5. Re:Flamebait my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What sort of fool chooses a Focus instead of a Boxster?

      The one who chooses the WRC spec Focus. It's approximately 50 times the car the Boxster could ever hope to be.

    6. Re:Flamebait my ass by jgs · · Score: 1

      The sort that gets the price difference back in cash. Which is what the grandparent implied he got ("I decided to have extra cash and a Ford Focus.")

      Let's see... cars.com says roughly $19k for a top-end Focus and about $38k for a bottom-end Boxter (both invoice). Yes, I think a lot of people would like to have the $19k pocket money.

    7. Re:Flamebait my ass by Trespass · · Score: 5, Funny

      "What sort of fool chooses a Focus instead of a Boxster?"

      One with a functioning penis and a full head of hair?

    8. Re:Flamebait my ass by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Sure some iMacs are probably bought to pretty up a reception area. But most are bought by people who want: A Unix-like with a usable GUI, a computer that just works, a computer that does take hours of frustrating effort just to plug in a standard peripheral, etc etc etc.

      As someone who spends a most of his time supporting Macs (College thats all-Mac for faculty and staff) I have to disagree. The majority of Macs are bought by people who have always bought Macs and aren't going to buy anything else, damnit. That said, I'd say that their _new_ market growth is about half techies who like OS X and about half artistically oriented types who like the new look. (Based totally on my personal experience)

      --
      Why?
    9. Re:Flamebait my ass by marktwen0 · · Score: 1
      urinal-cake-punch-cards

      The mind reels with innovative possibilities. heh.

      slobbering-on-cocks

      This sounds like a Britishism...

    10. Re:Flamebait my ass by Stone316 · · Score: 1
      If he's in such a position that the company will provide him with a porche boxster as a company car, then he's making enough bucks to be driving his own fancy rig. In other words, he doesn't need that cash unless there is something we don't know about.

      Also, he mustn't be married cause there's no way his wife would let him drive her around in a focus over a boxster.

      --
      "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    11. Re:Flamebait my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought the 20" iMac for that same reason. I have a relatively expensive photo printer that advertises Linux support (fuck off, Epson!) and it doesn't work.

      I want a DVD burner, a system that just works. It's now my testing and workstation. I won't switch my servers for Macs, but for workstations... why not? There is no compelling reason. The new iMacs give me exactly what I need. A price point under $2K per user, 20" LCD (that's a huge perk) and a great system.

      And it works.

      Just got it last night, and I'm extremely pleased so far.

    12. Re:Flamebait my ass by jgs · · Score: 1

      In other words, he doesn't need that cash unless there is something we don't know about.

      For almost everyone, the slogan "you can never be too rich or too thin" applies. Well, I don't know about the thin part, but there aren't very many people (the well-paid included) who just don't feel like having an additional $19k.

      I'm not sure what you're suggesting by the "something we don't know about".

      there's no way his wife would let him drive her around in a focus over a boxster

      I don't know about him, but I would venture to guess that you're not.

      Not everyone is status-obsessed.

    13. Re:Flamebait my ass by d474 · · Score: 1
      While it is true that the parts you pointed out were NOT flamebait, you missed the last sentence of his post, which WAS flamebait:
      You haters can fuck off: I can buy 4 well-equipped Dells for what you pay for your machine with a cute heat sink.
      If he left that out, he would have had a solid post.
      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    14. Re:Flamebait my ass by IanO · · Score: 1

      The engine on the Boxster really isn't that pretty... Porsche engines typically aren't very nice to look at (exception: Carrera GT) but they are nice to work on . It's also a PITA to access the engine in the Boxster as you have to remove the storage compartment and engine cover while working around the partially opened top.

      Note: I'm assuming you meant pretty in a design sense.

      --
      ------
      Objects in Mirror are Losing!
    15. Re:Flamebait my ass by alset_tech · · Score: 1
      The majority of Macs are bought by people who have always bought Macs and aren't going to buy anything else, damnit. That said, I'd say that their _new_ market growth is about half techies who like OS X and about half artistically oriented types who like the new look. (Based totally on my personal experience)

      My experience in an Apple Store shows otherwise - I find a _huge_ amount of my customers are people who are sick of Windows. Lots of X11 geeks, lots of die-hard Mac heads, and a hell of a lot of people who have heard about a secure system that's easy to use. Demoing the machines and the software blows them out of the water. The number of people bailing out of Windows is astonishing.

      --
      Standing on the shoulders of giants.
    16. Re:Flamebait my ass by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 1
      My experience in an Apple Store shows otherwise - I find a _huge_ amount of my customers are people who are sick of Windows. Lots of X11 geeks, lots of die-hard Mac heads, and a hell of a lot of people who have heard about a secure system that's easy to use. Demoing the machines and the software blows them out of the water. The number of people bailing out of Windows is astonishing.

      I will admit my sample is somewhat biased, containing as it does a large number of middle aged female secretaries. One of the told me flat out that we could take her mac "when we pried it from her cold dead hands". This was in reaction to the notice that we'd be supporting both windows and macs for faculty members....Personally, there are about three interface things I can't stand on the Mac. Otherwise, from a technical standpoint, I'd take it over windows any day.

      --
      Why?
    17. Re:Flamebait my ass by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      As an owner of a Focus, I'd like to add that there are a L O T of cars, some of which are even cheap, that are better than a Ford Focus. Its a POS, I don't care what Consumer Reports says about it.

      I can't wait to get rid of mine.

  56. Important Part of Aesthetics by SpootFinallyRegister · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It sure looks nice, but looking at the picture of the fans and how tightly everythign is packed, I'm curious as to how this sounds. Anyone know?

    To me, a pretty computer ceases to be pretty when it sounds like a vacuum cleaner.

    1. Re:Important Part of Aesthetics by CountBrass · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's literally quieter than a whisper. All those fans are there so that the Mac can turn on only the ones it needs for the bits that need cooling at that moment. The PowerMacs have something similar (although on mine it's spoilt by the crappy, loud fan on the 9800pro video card.)

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    2. Re:Important Part of Aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people report it to be very quiet under moderate load. However, I've yet to see anyone mention how loud it gets when the G5 is going full blast for hours at a time, which is what I want to know about.

    3. Re:Important Part of Aesthetics by xactuary · · Score: 1

      I stopped by the Apple Store and here's my 2 cents: They had a 20 inch iMac G5 running the video demo and it was noticably loud. I couldn't hear a thing on it's little brother, which was running only Finder at the time.

      --
      Say hello to my little sig.
  57. Parts left over? by panda+attack · · Score: 3, Funny

    Question is how many bits did he have left over when he put it back together?

    You always end up with a few spare widgets, I think they put them in just to confuse you.

    1. Re:Parts left over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to put them in the next computer I'm working on.

      Haley Joel Osment taught me to pay it forward, so I do.

      (My computers don't fare any better than he did in the movie though...)

  58. Re:Another limitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell would a Mac need a fancy graphics card for? To play.. nothing, exactly? The iMac is a consumer computer and Apple understand their OS sucks for gaming. I wish this wasn't the case, but it's sensible for them to just put in a reasonable graphics card (y'know, the one Dell sells with a system of comparable price) that can do Quartz but not much else.

    Do you really think you'd buy a Mac if you were into PC gaming? They mostly ignore that market at this point and it makes sense.

  59. Re:Another limitation by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is it just me, or does that thing only take 1 HDD? If this is the case, how do you upgrade?

    1 connect a USB or FireWire drive.
    2 Go out on a limb and *replace* it.

    Seems like in some ways, Apple clearly favours form over function.

    In some maybe, but not all. Form _is_ function in other ways. The iMac is quite and requires a small amount of space. That is being functional without intrusive.

    My current, beige-box PC has 4 hard drives... if I run out of space, I just slap in a new one for $50-$200 depending on what size I need and how rich I am. As far as I can see, if you run out of space on the G5 iMac, you have to buy a new iMac or at least replace your hard disk with a new one.


    1 Your beige box is noisier, takes up a lot more space and probably has a rats-next of wires coming out the back.
    2 4 Hard drives ?! That must be noisy as sin. I used to have 3 and that was bad enough.
    3 Well, you can just slap in a new one too, as long as you "slap out" the old one first. So, your point is...?

    But the 5200 is not exactly a sizzling card. Meybe that's why they chose it -- for thermal reasons.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  60. I want one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I want a different screen.

    Why do they always "glue" everything together, so it's not possible to buy the combination one likes the best?

    1. Re:I want one... by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0

      Because it is designed to be all-in-one. If you don't want "glued together", Apple offers the Power Mac G5. Let's get a clue, folks.

      --
      Karma Schmarma
  61. Thanks :( by rooijan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Instead of quietly dragging yourself into a corner and drinking away the pictures, you had to share that charming piece of mental imagery with all of us. Now we can't get rid of it either.

    Thanks for everything. I'll be sending my therapist's bill shortly.

    --
    Daar is nie 'n lepel nie
  62. Re:Another limitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So your argument is that Macs are less useful than PCs?

  63. Re:Another limitation by CountBrass · · Score: 1

    fuck you

    Ah the reasoned arguments of a a PC user. Shouldn't you be cleaning out viruses or patching the patches on the patches to Windows?

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  64. Messianic Connectivity by Farley+Mullet · · Score: 5, Funny
    [Apple's] got more bandwidth than Jesus.

    Unlike Xerox, GE, IBM, Ford Motors, Halliburton (what the fuck?) and, yes, Apple, Jesus doesn't have a Class A NetBlock. Plus, alongside seemingly half of the Fortune 500, Apple has it's backend provided by Akamai, and frankly, that sort of setup wouldn't ever need resurrection, because it'd never go down.

    However, Jesus does have the edge in RFC 2629: Delivery of Packets via Archangel and Shepherd.

    1. Re:Messianic Connectivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but HP has apple beat! they have both the HP Class A, *and* the DEC class A!

      *drool*

    2. Re:Messianic Connectivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Jesus could break up packets and always have more packets to distribute. I would think that's a lot of bandwidth.

    3. Re:Messianic Connectivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "frankly, that sort of setup wouldn't ever need resurrection, because it'd never go down."
      • I've got the same problem with my girlfriend....

    4. Re:Messianic Connectivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried going down on her first? Most girls enjoy a good licking too.

    5. Re:Messianic Connectivity by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      "that sort of setup wouldn't ever need resurrection, because it'd never go down"

      Unless someone DDoS's their DNS servers. Then they go down for a few hours (if you recall).

  65. Photo of the 20 inch version here. by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've seen many photos of the 17" iMac, from Apple's own documentation (the 10MB tiff) to some other disassemblies, but This spymac image is a picture of the insides of the 20" version.

    The fans are laid out differently, the HD and inverter in a slightly different position, and looks like there would be room for a dual CPU if apple were so inclined.

    1. Re:Photo of the 20 inch version here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "G5" processor has an AMD logo on it??? These aren't really G5 processors? Do they run some kind of x86 OSX or something? Why didn't this make a bigger story?

    2. Re:Photo of the 20 inch version here. by rebeka+thomas · · Score: 1

      > The "G5" processor has an AMD logo on it??? These aren't really G5 processors?

      Where did you hear this?

      --
      RST
    3. Re:Photo of the 20 inch version here. by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      On some of the photos on th net, of the iMac G5 inards, if you look carefully you can see an AMD logo on one of the chips. The fact you can see the logo is a clear sign that this not a CPU, since otherwise it would have a heat sink on it. AMD produces controller chips for both PCI-X and Hypertransport (I'm not sure of the relationship between the two technologies) and you'll probably find that this is what the chip is.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  66. Re:Another limitation by c.emmertfoster · · Score: 1

    No, I'm running a heavily modified version of Windows ME. Viruses don't care about me!

    Also, I was being ironic. It's sad that your only retort to my joke is mockery!

    --
    We can neither love nor pity nor forgive. If you make a slip in handling us you die!
  67. Of course it's porn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Judging from the images, it's apparent that even Mac fanatics like a tight box.

  68. Design by emiste · · Score: 1

    It's interesting to see how Apple even puts a lot of effort in designing the inside of their computers. I love that.

  69. Not sure which is worse by michaeldot · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure which is worse: The Mac fanboys or the self-appointed "adult supervision" telling them to grow up and stop being enthusiastic about things and instead become sad and cynical like them.

    (It's even worse when those same cynics start going gaga when such an innovation finally makes it way into the their world.)

    Think I prefer the childish enthusiasm of the fanboys. At least their zeal is consistent.

  70. Arrgh! by C0rinthian · · Score: 2, Funny

    My eyes! The goggles do nothing!

    1. Re:Arrgh! by Bwerf · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's because you have mouths in your eyesockets instead of eyes?

      --
      If noone rtfa, then what's the slashdot effect?
  71. Re:Another limitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At games, Macs are definitely less useful. There's about a hundred times less games, they come out later, they often lack features and don't adapt well to the one button mouse.. I don't think even the most high and mighty Mac zealot would ever argue against that.

    Otherwise (for "work" and internet and file organisation usage.. y'know, iMac users), it's a matter of opinion. I personally like most of Mac OS X, being a switcher of two weeks. If you agree that's okay, but I think it's alright that the new iMac has a miserable graphics card.

  72. Rackmount this by Arcady13 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This looks like a great form factor motherboard to place in a nice 1U rack. It would make a great entry-level server. If you get rid of the LCD, there would be plenty of room to fit it all in. The only thing that would need work is the ports which would end up facing the top, but that could be solved with right-angle connectors that run to a new backplate.

    If anyone at Marathon is listening, I'd buy a rack kit in 2 seconds. Include a power supply to install in the iMac case and power the LCD, plus add a DVI port, and you end up with a great rackmounted Mac and a nice display to use on some other Mac.

    I wonder if I can order all the parts except the case and LCD, and get the computer cheaper that way. Probably not.

    1. Re:Rackmount this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA...or i guess look at TF pictures.
      the imac HAS an internal power supply people. damn.

    2. Re:Rackmount this by shr1n1 · · Score: 1

      Why in the world would you do this ? The Xserve is already out there.

    3. Re:Rackmount this by Arcady13 · · Score: 1
      I meant an additional power supply to put in the now-empty iMac shell, to power the LCD display, and turn the leftover parts into a working monitor.

      Make sense now?

    4. Re:Rackmount this by Arcady13 · · Score: 1
      There are several reasons I would want to do this. The Xserve is $3000 to $4000. It is also 28 inches deep, which is too large for many smaller racks (like mine.) The iMac is $1300 to $1500 (for a 17 inch) so I have money leftover, or I can buy two for the price of one Xserve.

      Marathon sells rack kits for the old CRT iMacs, which put the whole thing (minus CRT of course) in a 1U rack. It is cheap and easy to make a small basic server. I like the fact that you don't need a really deep rack, and that if I want multiple computers, they don't all have monitors built-in, wasting space.

      I would like the same thing, but with a G5. The G3's in those old iMacs are not going to win any races these days.

      I know this would be a niche market, but they seem to be staying in business selling similar products already.

  73. Re:Another limitation by Alioth · · Score: 1

    You never have been (and possibly never will be) in the market that Apple are aiming the iMac at. The iMac isn't aimed at people who are quite happy having a rodents-nest of wiring under their desk - the iMac is aimed at people who care about form. I wager over 99.9% of iMac owners have no intention of adding an extra hard drive (and wouldn't even if they had a grey-box PC).

  74. I'll wait for my new iMac ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple has missed the boat on this new iMac
    roll-out. They SHOULD HAVE included a model
    that incorporates the 23" HD display -- plus
    S-video, component IN/OUT, and (external)
    HDTV tuner.

    Such a product would forever make Microsoft's
    MediaPC a relic for the scrap heap of history.

    Okay, so what? I can dream, can't I? It isn't
    like there is no market for such a media-centric
    Mac. And HD porn is THE WAY to go ...

  75. iTome by wildsurf · · Score: 0

    So how long until someone pops off the aluminum stand, hooks up a small external battery and just calls the thing a G5 Laptop?

    Bonus for being the first to use it on an airplane... (most airplanes have power plugs available anyway, don't they?)

    --
    Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    1. Re:iTome by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      The thing potentially uses up to 180W of power. I don't think any external battery that would let you use it for any length of time would qualify as "small".

      A few airliners have power plugs, if you have the right adapter for it. I doubt if they let you pull 180W from it, though.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  76. The high res TIFF is nice and all... by caryw · · Score: 1

    ...but how about a damn .jpg? (489K)

    Hope I don't fry the server too bad, my boss wouldn't be happy... unless it generated some revenue.
    (Yes Bruce, that's my way of saying sorry. The shell server? It's done for.)

  77. Re:Geforce FX 5200 Ultra? by cgadd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wasn't trolling, just very suprised that a machine that looks like it's intended to be fairly high-end would use a very weak video processor....

    The Geforce FX 5200 processors, while supporting the latest features, are slower than the previous generation Geforce Ti4200. Lots of people in the PC world were suckered into buying a 5200 based card in the recent doom upgrade craze, only to find out that they are amazingly slow.

    I guess any comment that points out a shortcoming must automatically be a troll.....

  78. Fujitsu-Siemens by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    At least on the crappy home machine I'm fixing for someone, where I've just snipped off a Fujitsu "Void if Removed" cable tie that was holding the case closed. Ugh.

  79. A theory as to why it's BinHex-ed.... by edw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You're right. BinHex II (.hqx) is a format from the early days of the net and online services. Back when people would e-mail programs to a repository, get them through FTP-mail getways, or using Kermit. In this case, as someone else noted, all you're getting is the file meta-data, including icon.

    The file was probably made available as a .hqx simply because its intended use is to be downloaded and used in Illustrator, Photoshop, InDesign, Freehand, Quark, or other design tool. Making it an .hqx file has the virtue of making it go to your hard drive, not perhaps a browser window. As a son-in-law of a graphic designer, I can say that the overhead of the BinHexing the file is more than worth not having to explain how to save an image in a browser window, especially if a designer's browser shows nothing but a broken image icon, because it can't display TIFFs.

    Dragging and dropping as well as right- or control-clicking are, sadly, not techniques used extensively by many people. Of course a designer is dragging and dropping all the time in e.g. Illustrator or Photoshop, but the idea that you can drag a picture from a browser window to your desktop or to a folder can be mind blowing.

    1. Re:A theory as to why it's BinHex-ed.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well firefox here just opened it for me ;)

    2. Re:A theory as to why it's BinHex-ed.... by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      The file was probably made available as a .hqx simply because its intended use is to be downloaded and used in Illustrator, Photoshop, InDesign, Freehand, Quark, or other design tool. Making it an .hqx file has the virtue of making it go to your hard drive, not perhaps a browser window.

      Ideally, if that was the primary reason, Apple could have used either MacBinary (.bin) or a disk image (.dmg) to pull that feat off without out the text encoding overhead.

      That said, you're probably right. Some web browsers and servers just don't grok .bin and .dmg files correctly, but almost anything on the Mac knows about .hqx. Which is a shame, this legacy format should have died a quick, painful death long ago; it hurts the platform's public perception since most naive PCs server admins think of .hqx as the Mac equivalent of .zip, when that designation belongs to the StuffIt .sit format. As a result, some PCs admins think Macs are inefficient since this makes Mac files stored on servers twice as big as they should be.

      The .hqx inertia can probably be traced to the old "Info Mac" archives that used to be stored at sumex-aim.stanford.edu. This had the same significance to Mac users during the pre-web era as TuCows does for post-web PC users. Their submission system was FTP and e-mail based, and they used the HQX format to combine a "digest" summary of the file with the HQX encoding for ease of linking and posting updates to USENET. Ah, those were the days...

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
  80. So tiny, what is there to see ? by billcopc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just "accidentally" visited the apple wwwstore a few days ago and needed all of my restraint to not call Visa and extend my credit a couple G's :) Those tiny G5's are damn sexy, and if they didn't cost so much I think I'd crack one open as well. I have a hunch they're using notebook technology in there. Heck, my P4 notebook is bigger than this G5 =)

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  81. More pics by risings0n · · Score: 1

    More pics to mirror here

  82. Re:Another limitation by rogerborn · · Score: 1

    WINDOWS ME?!!

    Windows ME is a virus!

    =)

  83. It's a holdover from the original Macs by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

    the little fellows with their 9" monitors even had torx screws to prevent tampering. Why? Well, mainly because of the CRT capacitor, and the fact that it had the potential to deliver a fatal shock. Those things really were dangerous back then.

    Apple has been moving away from this policy, even designing things like the RAM and AirPort slots on my PowerBook for easy access. The towers and desktops have always been relatively easy to open (my old 8500, f'rex), and the thin little book pointed out how to install more RAM. Still, Apple warns that a lot of the other stuff is off limits (basically anything that was soldered or otherwise can't simply be unplugged).

    So Apple (and most other manufacturers) make those scary warranty claims mostly to protect themselves from getting sued by owners that either a) zapped themselves or b) fiddled with parts that were squooshed into rilly tight cases, and never seem to fit right when you put it back together.

  84. Very smart unified heatsink. by curious.corn · · Score: 1

    as far as I can tell the cpu and the gpu share the same ducted massive heatsink. Am I the only one that thinks that this is the smartest idea in a while in terms of board design? PCI heatsinks and turbo-molexed-fan AGP cards are inevitably louder and bulky. Nice

    --
    Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
  85. Jesus' net Connection by bjmurph · · Score: 1

    It would appear that Jesus has huge incoming bandwidth, but not a whole lot of outging.

    Hmm, maybe he's got a satellite conection.

  86. Thanks! Now my wife's iMac is safe ... by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Thanks for posting this!

    Now when ours arrives tomorrow I'll be able to resist the urge to open it up and see what's inside.

    Well, hopefully.

  87. Well if your talkin about Apple porn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    take a look at http://www.msdos.netfirms.com/imagessome if these cartoons i made up about some of my friends and more importantly why you should stay away from mac users

  88. Damn slashdot effect... by flimflam · · Score: 2, Funny

    I saw the first couple pages, but the server died before I got to the porn...

    --
    -- It only takes 20 minutes for a liberal to become a conservative thanks to our new outpatient surgical procedure!
  89. Mod Parent Up! by FatSean · · Score: 0

    Can't believe the original poster took the time to type out those 'reasons'. Geez..

    --
    Blar.
  90. Re:Another limitation by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

    I already countered your Apple == Quality-argument here ;)

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  91. Stop Unpacking! by 955301 · · Score: 1


    It looks to me that this guy just intended to take gloating picture of getting his new I-Mac, but wasn't sure at what point to stop unpacking it and start trying to get it to run.

    Hmmm, do I have to take this green thing with all the little parts out of the white box too?

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  92. Mirror by beeessdee · · Score: 1

    A mirror:

    http://www.speakeasy.net/~bsd/www.kodawarisan.co m/ imacg5/

    -b

  93. Re:Another limitation by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Luckily for me, I have this extra space in my office...it's called "under the desk" and its where I have two beige (Actually, dark grey) boxes with a total of 5 hard drives and about 1TB of storage. There's a clock in the next room which ticks louder than both boxes combined (it's far more annoying from my chair than the fans on the systems).

    The only things computer-related on my desk are two monitors (with two cables each running behind the desk to their respective ports) a wireless keyboard and a wireless mouse. (oops...got a PDA cradle, too).

    One computer has a free slot for a removable hard drive (no, it's not hot pluggable). The other one is just about full, but I think I can sneak in another SATA drive or two in a pinch.

    Oh, I forgot to mention...both machines are less than a year old and - combined - cost me less than $1000. (That doesn't count the two 21" Hitachi monitors, which weigh in at $200 combined and about 250lbs, but I bought those used from my former employer so I thought that they shouldn't count). I could buy back most of my "wasted" desk space by dropping $1600 on a pair of LCDs, but it doesn't seem worth it, yet.

    Apple makes sexy machines, but I wouldn't want to justify them on a price basis (or performance for that matter, as my primary application is not distributed on any apple OS).

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  94. Re:hqx by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1

    If you're using Windows, WinZip will open it.

    --
    Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
  95. New Mac User Replacable Parts? by Opalima · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the annals of yesteryear our department maintained a few MAC's. Being a PC tech at the time I knew sweet little about the little beige boxes, but when they did break I always offered a hand to see if I could fix what was wrong.

    An external floppy drive at one point died on the unit (which was out of warranty). I verified that it was indeed toast and called our local Apple shop to source a replacement.

    They gave me a price and we were in the middle of processing the order when the slipped in a By The Way.

    "We need the old drive back"

    I told them No You Don't. The machine isn't under warranty. I'm buying a replacement part - this isn't a warranty service.

    They pushed the point and said that they couldn't sell me the replacement drive unless I gave them the old drive back.

    At that point I hung up on them and bought the replacement drive through an online vendor.

    Is Apple still as anal these days about dispensing replacement parts for out of warranty repairs?

    1. Re:New Mac User Replacable Parts? by Warlock7 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're speaking of this as if it were a long time ago. Yet you are also saying that you were trying to get service from an Apple retail store, which have only been around for a few years now and which don't do any in house service. The very first Apple retail location has only been around since May of 2001.

      It's an interesting story, but I just have to question the veracity of it. As far as I can recall, Apple hasn't made their own external floppy drives since they made them for the Apple II and early Macintoshes, if that's what you are referring to then it would be way out of warranty. That and the "beige boxes" that you refer to had internal floppies, the internals were discontinued back in 1999, just a bit after all the colorful machines started being produced.

  96. Porn. Porn?! by ayeco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Poor use of the word. How silly. What is this, Fark? Surely you geeks could come up with a better headline / summary.

    Main Entry: pornography
    Function: noun
    Etymology: Greek pornographos, adjective, writing about prostitutes, from pornE prostitute + graphein to write; akin to Greek pernanai to sell, poros journey -- more at FARE, CARVE
    1 : the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement
    2 : material (as books or a photograph) that depicts erotic behavior and is intended to cause sexual excitement
    3 : the depiction of acts in a sensational manner so as to arouse a quick intense emotional reaction
    - pornographic /"por-n&-'gra-fik/ adjective
    - pornographically /-fi-k(&-)lE/ adverb

  97. Re:Another limitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for definitively clearing that up for us.

    Do you have a newsletter that I can subscribe to?

  98. We need the original part... by adzoox · · Score: 1

    My question, as a tech, why did YOU want to keep the old part?

    I always keep the old part as PART of the service of fixing.

    Concerning Apple parts - out of warranty parts are usually astronomical in price. I can usually fix anything - some just may take too much time and it's cheaper just to order a new part.

    I also may be able able to use "your broken unit" to repair other units and possibly resell on eBay or my website or in my store.

    Apple used "trade ins/exchanges" to resell to parts dealers like Preowned Electronics and Sun Remarketing - so sources would be available for years to come for Apple parts and service sources.

    I'm slightly different than Apple, in that, I don't charge absorbadant prices for replacement parts or for repair really, but I do rely on trade in/exchange as part of my "fee".

    Apple has a pretty big business in selling off refurb/open box/old inventory.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:We need the original part... by Opalima · · Score: 1

      Our office was a fair distance from the Apple retailer in question. I was told I had to either send or drop off the old drive to Apple at my expense. Didn't have the time nor the inclination. Under normal circumstances I wouldn't have cared about relinquishing the old part, but between Apple kicking up such a big stink about having the old part and the fact I would have to travel out of my way or spend the extra $$ to have it couriered, I just wasn't interested in playing.

    2. Re:We need the original part... by badasscat · · Score: 1

      My question, as a tech, why did YOU want to keep the old part?

      Maybe because his company owns it?

      I always keep the old part as PART of the service of fixing.

      I don't know if you quite read his post. He was buying a replacement. He wasn't asking to get the old one fixed. He wasn't asking for "service". He was buying a component. I don't care what your procedures are, Apple has no right to ask for a broken part in return.

      I also may be able able to use "your broken unit" to repair other units and possibly resell on eBay or my website or in my store.

      Apple used "trade ins/exchanges" to resell to parts dealers like Preowned Electronics and Sun Remarketing - so sources would be available for years to come for Apple parts and service sources.


      And this explains what, exactly? If anything, this would convince me even more not to give them my broken part. It's not theirs to sell.

      This isn't just Apple, some PC manufacturers do this as well. But they really have no right to; it's his broken part, and if he's paying for a new one out of warranty, they have no right to ask him for the old one back. They're not doing him any favors; he's giving them more money/profits by buying a replacement. He owes them nothing in return; they simply owe him a new part in exchange for his cash money.

    3. Re:We need the original part... by adzoox · · Score: 1

      And this explains what, exactly? If anything, this would convince me even more not to give them my broken part. It's not theirs to sell.

      Ummm, so others can have the benefit of having their parts fixed ... maybe.

      Also, why hold it, what good is it doing you?

      Holding because you can isn't good reason to hold it. It is a requirement for any repair that I get an exchange part if a new part is used or purchased (period) - this is truly so someone else may benefit from the part if said part is out of warranty and hard to find or unreasonably priced.

      Take the iMac DV slot drives for instance $239 service part - these drives can be had for as little as $40. They can also be fixed pretty easily or refurbed.

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  99. what happened to slashdot? by bmajik · · Score: 1

    an article about taking apart new cool hardware (in a nondestructive manner, no less) and the submitter harps on "voiding the warranty"?

    its a personal computer. If you cant take it apart, what's the point?

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  100. Your machines sound great by guet · · Score: 1

    I'm glad you're happy. Thank you for telling us about them : )

    Some people aren't buying a computer for their office. Some people don't need more than 80GB of internal drive space right now. Some people would prefer an LCD to two huge, cheap monitors. Some people wouldn't even consider opening the case. Some people want to use OS X.

    Most people are not like you.

    1. Re:Your machines sound great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually most people are more like him I would bet you by a long shot since Apple only has a 5% market share...

  101. Can anyone tell if the processor is removable? by adzoox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't tell from the kodawarison take apart or the Apple diagrams if the processor itself is on a daughtercard this time.

    If so, I wonder how long it will be before PowerLogix or Sonnet can come out with a faster CPU.

    I've also wondered about the GPU (Graphics card) since the educational units have such a different graphics card - I wondered if they were making motherboards specifically for education for the new iMacs or whether the GPU was simply on a card that easy to replace.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  102. Punish him for his insolence.... by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 0, Troll

    What, you think that just because you paid for that G5, you have the right to get in under the hood? A hundred million hits on your server ought to do it, you heretic. Just to be nasty, we'll post the story on /.'s front page, so the barrage will begin at 2:00 in the morning ... nothing like a phone call from your webhosting ISP in the wee hours to start the day off right. No rest for the wicked, I say.

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
  103. Re:Another limitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ATI Radeon 9600XT is faster than the Nvidia FX 5200, yet it can be cooled by a large heatsink alone, without a fan.
    Altough I've only seen one fanless model so far, but I've seen none based on the Nvidia FX series.

  104. Re:Geforce FX 5200 Ultra? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed, they should have thrown in a ATI Mobility Radeon 9800 in there, or atleast a 9600.

  105. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't a mod down, he just has really bad karma.

  106. Re:iMac G5 Porn Roundup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does your mind work exactly? We were talking about zealots and their lust towards Macs, no mention of girlfriends. So how does the (supposed) fact that you have a girlfriend make anything wrong?? nutjob.

  107. Re:iMac G5 Porn Roundup by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    If your robot has a sick vivisectionist fantasy.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  108. NERD PR0N! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PMFG!

  109. A new dawn. Now modders can do more Apple clones. by samberdoo · · Score: 1

    Case modders have primarily focused on intel style PC's.. Now that components are more available and the prices, we hope, will come down, then more builders can opt for Apple rigs. Viva la choice.

  110. Do the Grammar Nazi! (sorry) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case you care, it's exorbitant. Not absorbitant. It means out of orbit, or out of the normal bounds of things.

  111. Re:How is that "offtopic"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm... I'm pretty sure he didn't say anything about it being off topic. Perhaps he is questioning the use of the word "porn" in conjunction with taking apart a mac.

    You should think before your overzealously try and correct someone.

  112. Re:Well if your talkin about Apple porn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you're a pitiful little retard aren't you?

  113. NeXTstation still beats them all by green+pizza · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The NeXTstation slab was built with the precision of a swiss watch and the strength of a bulldozer. The 4 screws were just about perfect -- they kept tool-less folks from poking around inside, and the prevented the need for cheap "easy to use" latches and such.

    Still, my favorite part of the NeXTstation was the airflow design. Air was pulled in through a row of holes across the top of the rear of the case, flowed past the CPU heatsink, pushed out via a downward-facing fan near the front of the case, then back under the case past the power supply heatsink, and finally out the lower left rear of the case.

    The NeXT keys and mouse were awesome too -- control key where it belongs, no traditional "caps lock" key. Full size power, brightness, and audio keys above the arrow keys. And the best part? The keyboard and mouse were surrounded by a thin rubber bumper to muffle any plastic "clump" sound that would otherwise be made if the mouse were to bump into the keyboard.

    Oh, and the price matched the engineering! :)

    1. Re:NeXTstation still beats them all by jcr · · Score: 1

      The NeXT keys and mouse were awesome too

      Heh. I still use a NeXT ADB keyboard with my G5. Love the command bar, and having a control key where it belongs.

      If anyone from Griffin reads this, thanks for making that ADB-USB frob!

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  114. It isn't just perception by ianscot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You think the evidence is anecdotal, and to support that you provide your own anecdotal evidence. Let's look at yours: you build your own machines, plural, and they last a long time? How many can you possibly have built to know this? Big sample? How can that be, if they last so very long? How old are you? ;-)

    There are numbers out there about the longevity of Macs in workplaces, both in terms of their not breaking down and in terms of how long they're usable for their task. The Gartner Group has done some, I know.

    The evidence isn't just anecdotal, but it is muddied by stuff like the fact that OS X has actually been getting noticably faster for older machines. (Ars technica: "Here's another way to look at Panther's performance. For over three years now, Mac OS X has gotten faster with every release -- and not just "faster in the experience of most end users", but faster on the same hardware. This trend is unheard of among contemporary desktop operating systems.") That's not just a physical measure of the machine, it's to do with the whole set of end-to-end stuff that Apple can control in its little proprietary world. And yeah, it's a high-quality market niche, and nope, that's not just an imagined difference.

    It's a choice you can still make, but it's not an illusory choice. Some people drive a Kia, some people drive a BMW, and some people drive a Subaru. Even met someone who was religious about their brand of cars because it had been so dang reliable?

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:It isn't just perception by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Let's look at yours: you build your own machines, plural, and they last a long time?


      Yep

      How many can you possibly have built to know this?


      How many machines do I have to build to know that machines built by me work for a long time? I don't know. I do know that the machines I have built so far have lasted for quite some time.

      How can that be, if they last so very long? How old are you? ;-)


      27. I have built 4 machines for myself in the last 10 years) and few machines for friends/family. First machine war around 10 years ago, and, AFAIK, it's still being used every day today. Not alot of machines, I know. But it does show that x86-machines can last for a long time.

      "faster in the experience of most end users", but faster on the same hardware. This trend is unheard of among contemporary desktop operating systems."


      Well, I have noticed the same behavior on my KDE-desktop, so it's not unheard of ;).
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    2. Re:It isn't just perception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Even met someone who was religious about their brand of cars because it had been so dang reliable?
      Me! I bought a Geo Metro in 1991, the only maintenance has been consumables (gas, oil, tires), and it's still going strong; only now has trouble with the clutch.

      Oh wait...that doesn't mean I'm going to be buying a '05 Geo Metro when (if) mine dies, because the models change over the years, as does their reliability, and not necessarily for the better.
    3. Re:It isn't just perception by hai.uchida · · Score: 1

      It's a choice you can still make, but it's not an illusory choice. Some people drive a Kia, some people drive a BMW, and some people drive a Subaru. Even met someone who was religious about their brand of cars because it had been so dang reliable?

      Uh... Every Honda owner? The depreciation of Hondas is about the same as for Macs, which is "not all that much."

      --
      my password is private, but unchanged.
    4. Re:It isn't just perception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing that depreciates faster than a PC (MAC, x86, etc...) is a hand grenade.

    5. Re:It isn't just perception by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      yeah nice collection of links to backup those claims. heres a test, go to your local bank branch. Look behind the counter at some of their command line type machines. My bank has a few 486dx 66mhz machines still happily ticking along. also many stores have these sorts of PC's visible.

      Those IBM POS (point of sale not the other meaning) systems also are over 10 years old. What do you do with a 512k mac? use photoshop 1? i'd recomend a doorstop because you wont be running osx on that!

      i've met lots of people who have car bios's.. what exactly was your point with that sentance? people buy cars for their utility. a person buying a beamer and a person buying a kia are buying them for different reasons. same as a mac and PC.

      on the other hand DOS still runs flawlessly on a 486. see many MAC POS systems? i wonder why...

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    6. Re:It isn't just perception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Washington Mutual (in Seattle) has (or at least has until recently) very old (Mac SE?) Mac's in use on every desk in their Pioneer Square office (maybe others too). I think the problem is more that Macs weren't really ever used as POS systems than that they are unreliable.

  115. Actually... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I see where you are coming from on this (I build every non-Apple box I use), some of the perception probably comes from the software that they run.

    For example, I've had this PowerBook for two years, and I've had to reinstall the Mac OS once and that's only because I wanted to start fresh... there was nothing wrong with it.

    However, the reference-platform dual Xeon workstation that I have in my home office has had four reinstalls of Windows 2000 and XP during the same time period, due to irrecoverable failures of the OS.

    With that track record, I would say that my Mac lasts for a long time, where the x86 box fails sooner.

    However, if I mix in Linux on that x86 box, we're in a whole new ballpark...

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    1. Re:Actually... by delus10n0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Clearly you're not qualified to own or operate that piece of hardware (the dual Xeon workstation.) Please package it up immediately and ship it to my address.

      Thanks.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    2. Re:Actually... by badasscat · · Score: 1

      For example, I've had this PowerBook for two years, and I've had to reinstall the Mac OS once and that's only because I wanted to start fresh... there was nothing wrong with it.

      However, the reference-platform dual Xeon workstation that I have in my home office has had four reinstalls of Windows 2000 and XP during the same time period, due to irrecoverable failures of the OS.


      See, I hear this kind of thing every once in a while too and it always makes me wonder. What exactly happened that forced you to re-install the OS? I have not ever heard of an unrecoverable Windows error that was not hardware-related (usually a failed hard drive), yet you're describing this as if Windows just up and committed suicide completely on its own. Recoverable Windows errors, sure, but unrecoverable? There has to be an underlying issue there, and since you've had to reinstall the OS four times, it sounds like it's not being addressed.

      I've got two PC's that I've scratch-built myself, both of which are years old and have just been constantly upgraded (one is nearly 15 years old and is no longer really the same machine - the last vestige of the original, the floppy drive, was replaced about 4 years ago just because I wanted one in black). Both are on their original install of Windows XP. The really old one was running Windows 2000 previously, was upgraded to Windows XP as soon as it was released (as an "upgrade", not a clean install) and has been purring happily ever since. I do various things to maintain the OS (just basic stuff, defrag, chkdsk, etc.) but otherwise it's been fine since installing XP about 4 years ago.

      In fact, I've never had to reinstall any Windows since Windows 95, on any machine, including three desktops and four laptops that I've owned since the release of Windows 2000. (Windows 95 did require reinstalls every year or two.) My work PC's have also been running their original install of Windows 2000 since, well, sometime around the year 2000.

      It sounds like you probably just have an underlying hardware defect in your workstation, you might want to look further into it. There's nothing about Windows itself that requires it be reinstalled every once in a while, as seems to be a popular myth (probably perpetuated because of Windows 95, which definitely was an unreliable OS).

    3. Re:Actually... by jcr · · Score: 1

      While I see where you are coming from on this (I build every non-Apple box I use), some of the perception probably comes from the software that they run.

      No, I'm talking about the physical construction. Margins are so slim in the PC world that they actually have to choose polystyrene over polycarbonate. It really matters what gague sheet metal they use. Go to a store and pick up a Sony VAIO laptop, for example: as soon as you touch it, you can tell that it's flimsy.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:Actually... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I knew someone was going to go here, and here's the issue that I have come up against with Windows XP about four different times, on three different machines:

      After the BIOS is done posting, but before the white "chunker bar" (the one that you press F8 during to go to safe mode, etc.), I get a message saying:

      Windows cannot load due to missing or corrupt files

      C:\Windows\System32\Config

      Blah Blah Blah.

      As this has happened on three different systems, in three different locations, with very different hardware (one Dual Xeon on an Intel e7505-based board, one Pentium-4 1.8Ghz with i845, and one AMD Athlon XP 2400+ w/ NVidia nForce2), I don't see how a hardware issue could cause the files in this directory (otherwise known as the Windows Registry) to go corrupt. Soundcards and Video Cards don't do that very often.

      Oh, and using the recovery console to go into that directory shows that everything is still there, and of size that would be normal. The registry just tore the hell out of itself and died.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    5. Re:Actually... by Inuchance · · Score: 1

      If you're running Linux, you have to reinstall your OS every few years as soon as the next cool distro comes out, so that everyone still thinks you're awesome.

  116. Wall Street Loves the G5 iMac by rogerborn · · Score: 1

    Apple's Latest iMac Is Elegant, Powerful, Surprisingly Affordable

    By WALTER S. MOSSBERG

    I am writing these words on the most elegant desktop computer I've ever used, a computer that is not only uncommonly beautiful but fast and powerful, virus-free and surprisingly affordable.

    This machine takes up no more space on a desk than a flat-panel monitor. In fact, the entire computer is contained behind a flat-panel screen in a space just 2 inches thick -- thinner than most flat-panel monitors alone.

    Yet it houses one of the most advanced processors on the market; a roomy hard disk; a CD or DVD recorder; wired or wireless Internet connectivity; and a full complement of ports and connectors.

    I'm talking about Apple Computer's new iMac G5 desktop, which starts at $1,299 for a model with a 17-inch wide-screen display, and rises to $1,899 for a version with a massive 20-inch wide-screen display. It's another design coup by Apple.

    This is the third major iteration of the iMac, Apple's stylish consumer machine that features a built-in monitor. But now the computer's guts have been shrunk to the point where they are essentially invisible. And this version uses the G5 processor, a chip that is in some respects more powerful than the Intel Pentium processors that power most Windows computers.

    The iMac G5 isn't the first computer to be crammed into the back of a flat-panel display. But the iMac is much thinner and more attractive than the others.

    Apple has enclosed the computer in a gleaming white body trimmed with a clear border that gives the whole thing an airy, floating feeling. The machine sits atop a built-in, adjustable aluminum stand.

    A wide selection of ports and connectors is arrayed in a neat vertical lineup on the back. A hole in the aluminum stand feeds any cords away from the machine and out of sight. You can actually reduce the whole thing to just two cords -- a power cord and a printer cord -- by adding a wireless keyboard and mouse, for an extra $99, and a wireless networking card, for $79.

    The new iMac has three fans, but they are so quiet that the computer was nearly silent in my tests, much quieter than my Windows desktop. The speakers are built in, but sound very good.

    The base 17-inch model comes with 256 megabytes of memory, an 80-gigabyte hard disk and a DVD drive that can play and record CDs. The top-of-the-line 20-inch model has a slightly faster G5 chip, a 160-gigabyte hard disk and a drive that can record DVDs.

    In my tests, the iMac G5 performed flawlessly and speedily. It worked perfectly on my broadband Internet connection, via my home Wi-Fi network, even though the network is powered by gear from Linksys, not Apple. It was easily able to transfer files over the network to and from Windows computers and other Macs. I installed Microsoft Office for the Mac, and it handled that perfectly.

    The G5 processor made the new iMac significantly faster at key tasks than my Apple PowerBook laptop, which runs on the older G4 processor. Even though the laptop has more than double my test iMac's 512 megabytes of memory, the new desktop was able to perform tasks like opening large groups of Web pages and importing music CDs much faster than the laptop could.

    About the only important feature the new iMac G5 lacks is a built-in reader for memory cards used in digital cameras, PDAs and smart phones, which is becoming common in better Windows desktops. And Apple scrimped on memory -- even the top model of the new iMac has just 256 megabytes, when 512 megabytes is common on high-end Windows consumer machines. Apple charges $75 extra to bring the iMac up to 512 megabytes.

    That brings us to price. Consumers perceive Mac desktops as pricey, partly because the company doesn't play in the very cheapest segment of the PC market, and partly because Apple's prices include built-in monitors that are often unlisted extras in ads for bargain Windows machines.

    But the new iMac actually costs less than comparable Wi

  117. Reports? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

    Does anyone out there own one of these? I'm considering replacing my PoS home built AMD box with one (once I get a job, of course :() but I'd be interested in Slashdotter's opinion of them. Are they really as good as they say?

    1. Re:Reports? by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      General opinion in a number of places is that they are pretty nice. Recommend going to 512 MB RAM (some say using the dual bank feature is worth it).

      Based on my G4 PowerBook, I want one. :)

      Supposedly the 20" is the bomb.

  118. why use TIFF any more? by frankie · · Score: 1
    Is there any reason other than inertia to use uncompressed TIFF? It's just a lossless color bitmap format, which PNG can do even better (lossless, compressed, alpha). Let me repeat: other than inertia, why?

    ObMac: I'm still annoyed that Apple removed the ability (after Puma) to save screenshots directly to PNG.

    1. Re:why use TIFF any more? by rthille · · Score: 1

      Well, TIFF is more of a container format than an image format. There's really no reason to use uncompressed TIFFs because TIFF supports JPEG or losslessly compressed image data within them. I've dealt with JPEG compressed TIFFS and LZW compressed TIFFs since NeXTStep 2.x or 3.x.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    2. Re:why use TIFF any more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JPEG compressed TIFFS and LZW compressed TIFFs

      Compared to JPEGs or GIFs or LZW BMPs, is the TIFF wrapper just extra overhead for no useful purpose?

    3. Re:why use TIFF any more? by rthille · · Score: 1

      TIFFs give you more capabilities. You can have multiple images in a single TIFF file. You can store the same image with different resolutions (for icons), different bit-depths (so you get the best for a true-color monitor, and a 2-bit grayscale), etc.
      Also, you can store all the pages of a fax transmission in a single TIFF file.
      TIFF includes the resolution (BPI) of an image, so you can know the 'true' size of the image.

      For regular old internet porn, TIFFs are overkill, but the capabilities are useful in lots of other situations.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  119. Two Words by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

    Stupid...warranty
    Says it all, wouldn't you say? Or maybe someone's not quite on the ball when it comes to reading the warranty terms.

    --

    The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
  120. Why does this story make me . . . . . . by theparanoidcynic · · Score: 1

    think of a Futurama line?

    Bender: "drive to Vegas, pick up some Flooziebots and void their warranties all night long!"

    --
    Only in a Slashdot fantasy can a Slackware install turn into several hours of sex . . . . .
  121. So what... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    I've got an HP Omibook 4150 that's almost 4 years old and I'm using it right now. Only issue is a section of the LCD is fading a bit.

    Like anything else, it all depends. At least with Apple's laptops, you're pretty much guaranteed that any particular model is built to last.

    But that doesn't mean you can't find a real robust PC laptop. Trick is to not rush out and by a new model right away.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:So what... by Knara · · Score: 1

      I wish I had your luck. My HP Pavillion 4125 when I first bought it had bad pixels, so exchanged it. About 5 months into it the left mouse button started acting funny, but I used a mouse so I kept forgetting to get it serviced under warranty. Then the battery failed (amusing thing about that model, when the power subsystem tried to get the status on the battery, it would miss user input interrupts... confused the hell out of me why when it was on AC that it acted weird. once I pulled out the battery it worked great, though). Finally, the mainboard died about a month after it was out of warranty. And the worst of it all? Never could get linux to run reliably on it (almost always got a kernel panic on the PCMCIA chipset or just a hang) Apple for me this time around, I think (or one of those slick Dell D600 mini things)

  122. Porn is appropriate for this discussion by xyloplax · · Score: 1

    Those Macs look like impaled breast implants.

    --
    -- "You can lead a yak to water, but you can't teach an old dog to make a silk purse out of a pig in a poke" - Opus
  123. warranty, schmarranty... by capsteve · · Score: 3, Insightful

    you all noticed kodawarisan is japanese, and fearlessly, he tore into his brand new imac g5, without a care for the warranty...

    culturally, the japanese have a fetish for "brand new" things (a.k.a. atarashii), so breaking the "seal" on a new product, even if it voids the warranty, is not a threat. the worry is to be embarrassed by having old things, almost counter to american ideology that old/vintage is cool... to the japanese old/vintage is shameful and embarrassing, not to be flaunted at all.

    kodawarisan will probably get new imac in the next 12 months.

    --
    three can keep a secret, if two are dead - benjamin franklin
  124. Feh. Mine actually *works* by jhesse · · Score: 1
    --

    --
    "I have also mastered pomposity, even if I do say so myself." -Kryten
  125. If you read Dan Simmons you would know. by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    He had a very good explanation for the bandwidth God has.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  126. Ahhhh rats I thought by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 2, Funny

    it was about that little anime vixen finally loosing that skimpy little blue suit!!,br>

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  127. Because the same people make them? by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    Lets see, Dell laptops are made by the same people who make Apple laptops. I wish I still had the link but there was a list of computers and their true makers.

    What was interesting is that most machines are made by 8 or less different companies. This includes Apple as well. The standout was that certain Dell laptops are made by the same company as the Apple Powerbooks.

    Now the key of course is specifications. I can buy metal cased laptops from several sources and I would bet the quality will be similar. However comparing a plastic hulled laptop to a metal one isn't apples to oranges.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  128. Choose one by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    So would you rather have a bit of flaking paint, or a HD fail from heat buildup like my Dell (well, multiple Dells - not an isolated failure) at work?

    Oh, Apple also fixed my paint for free under Applecare.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  129. mod parent up by jcuervo · · Score: 1
    to the japanese old/vintage is shameful and embarrassing, not to be flaunted at all.
    Wonder if Japanese geeks still have their 386s doing firewall duty.
    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  130. Re:Another limitation by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
    Is it just me, or does that thing only take 1 HDD? If this is the case, how do you upgrade?

    Lacie's Bigger Disk. 1 TB with Firewire, Firewire 800, and USB 2.0.
    That's how I'd upgrade. Either that, or chain along up to 64 drives on each Firewire bus, or 128 on each USB2.0 bus.

    -T

  131. Re:Geforce FX 5200 Ultra? by bjb · · Score: 1
    The Geforce FX 5200 processors, while supporting the latest features, are slower than the previous generation Geforce Ti4200. Lots of people in the PC world were suckered into buying a 5200 based card in the recent doom upgrade craze, only to find out that they are amazingly slow.

    It's actually for this reason that I'm hesitant to recommend upgrading to the new iMac to family members; considerig how much the OS X operating system uses 3D GPU functions, I'm surprised how weak a chip they put into these things. The cost and heat difference between the 5200 Ultra and a Radeon 9600 should be negligable. However, the performance difference is rather significant.

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  132. Re:How is that "offtopic"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was talking about the moderation.

    Pot. Kettle. Black.

  133. WDJH by infinite9 · · Score: 1

    What does Jesus have?

    Isn't that on a bumper sticker or something?

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  134. Are you fucking kidding me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a GF2MX in my 400Mhz PowerMac. There's no problem with using the "3D GPU functions" in OS X. In fact, the only problem I had was that the shitty ATi Rage 128 card that came with the computer wouldn't do the "3D GPU functions" aka Quartz Extreme and I had to throw the piece of crap out. Now I can play Quake 3, RTCW, etc...

    I'm sorry, the FX 5200 is perfectly acceptable for 3D use. Just because it isn't the current midrange doesn't mean it sucks. You are all spoiled rotten with your trilinear filtering and 8x anisotropic anti-aliasing or whatever the hell the current buzzwords are. Nobody needs that crap all the time. It's miniscule detail, just icing on the cake. The FX 5200 with the 10% of the features that nobody will notice unless they're doing a side-by-side comparison is just fine for normal people.

    Sheesh. What spoiled brats.....

    1. Re:Are you fucking kidding me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you can play games that are a couple of years old now, I'm impressed. It's a major crappy card for now. Of course it can play old junk.

      What an idiot...

    2. Re:Are you fucking kidding me? by FLAGGR · · Score: 1

      According to apple, it can play Doom 3, and the Halo speeds kicked the previous iMac's ass, and we all know how much of a resource hog Halo PC/Mac is (no matter how old)

  135. Re:Geforce FX 5200 Ultra? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
    very suprised that a machine that looks like it's intended to be fairly high-end would use a very weak video processor

    Here's the oversimplified breakdown:

    • eMac - low end home/school desktop ($799, $999)
    • iBook - low end home/school laptop ($1099, $1299, $1499)
    • iMac - mid-range home/school desktop ($1299, $1499, $1899)
    • PowerMac - high end professional desktop ($1999, $2499, $2999)
    • PowerBook - high end professional laptop ($1599, $1799, $1999, $2499, $2799)
    The pricing basically tells you what each is meant to be. The iMac is most definitely not meant to cannibalize PowerMac sales.
  136. Free Cubes by CptnSbaitso · · Score: 1
    ...wish I still had 'em and didn't give 'em away.

    Hello, friend. If you have any spares, I'll be glad to take them off your hands.
  137. Re:Geforce FX 5200 Ultra? by slughead · · Score: 1

    The pricing basically tells you what each is meant to be. The iMac is most definitely not meant to cannibalize PowerMac sales.

    Maybe the iMac IS just a mid-range computer.. but that's still now excuse for the LOW-range video card.

    People seem to forget that the ATI 9600/9800 + Nvidia 58xx/59xx are now mid-range cards, with the Nvidia 68xx + ATI Xx00 at the high end.

    The 5200, as the previous poster said, isn't fit for even many mid-range graphics games that came out in '03/'04, and Doom III isn't even a question.

    You're probably going to be using this computer for 3-4 years. Imagine the games out NEXT year, let alone 2007/8.

  138. NOT new for Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have several old Macs in my basement, a pair of pre-iMac all-in-ones, a color classic, and several whose numeric names I forget. Several are very easy to open and swap parts from. In some cases there are screws that are unnecessary, because there are nice (non-crappy, non-dell-style) clips that do the job. In the all-in-ones and the color classic, I can slide the motherboard out of the case without removing any screws, and add and remove components easily (for some components: for others it can be a pain).

    I don't remember about the color classic, but the all-in-ones have a face plate that pops off, allowing me to very easily swap out the hard drive, or the CD-ROM or floppy drive. I've never seen a PC that has been this easy, and I was a PC technician for a while too. I worked as a tech before every cracking a Mac open, so for a long time I believed the lies about Macs being un-upgradable. It's total B.S., although there certainly are several Macs that can be difficult to upgrade. (Cracking open early iMacs is not for the faint-of-heart!) But the across-the-board statement about Macs being difficult to work with is crap. By far the easiest computers to upgrade that I've every worked on have ALL been Macs. (As well as the hardest ones, from which the misconceptions must emanate.)

  139. If you don't get modded +5... by revscat · · Score: 1

    You damn well should be. That was great.

  140. Duhhhh Mr. Clueless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pontificate about your Mac all day, but Dell makes good laptops. And ME better than XP? Shows what a clueless Mac-bot idiot you are. Enjoy your Mac, it's good to have something in your life.

  141. Nifty by dchamp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have to admit, the G5 iMacs look pretty nifty. Not that I'm going to buy one... but my main complaint would be that the video processor is imbedded on the mainboard... so there's no way to upgrade it a year from now when it won't play the latest / greatest games any more.
    Some laptops (like Dell Inspirons since it Inspiron 8000) have the video card on a seperate (but proprietary) daughter card. While it's not officially supported by Dell, you can purchase a newer / faster video card for them.
    Too bad there isn't a "standard" mini-agp, or mini-pci-x video card for laptops and all-in-one units like the G5 iMac.

    1. Re:Nifty by dchamp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, crap... there is such a thing as mini agp

    2. Re:Nifty by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      It's a Mac. It'll NEVER play the latest/greatest games, everybody knows that.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  142. gee, looks just like mine... by kendoka · · Score: 1

    If he's an idiot I must be too - I did the same thing last night to install a wireless adapter. This iMac's back panel is removable.

  143. Re:Geforce FX 5200 Ultra? by FlyingPostman · · Score: 0

    Games? Macintosh? Where? Oh right, the iMac comes preloaded with that Marble game.

  144. Re:Another limitation by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

    This is not a suprise. No iMac since their conception has been upgradeable to any notable degree. Since USB came out, Apple has focused on external upgrades. At this point, the PowerMac G5, their "professional model" can only take one optical drive and 2 internal hard drives. I am not against Apple's idea, since plugging in a little box is a lot more convienient than opening the case, but it also makes the whole simplicity thing dificult, once you have a burner or two attached, and a small array of hard drives for video editing, the beauty of these machines is going to be hidden in a rats nest of multicolored USB and Firewire cables. As to the 5200, if you want a nice graphics card, buy a high end mac, not the consumer model. Plus, it has been proven time and time again that there are more games for PCs and that they run faster there. If you want a computer to listen to music and make videos, buy a Mac. If you know what DirectX 9.0 is, buy a PC.

  145. are you serious? by PDubNYC · · Score: 1

    Have you ever had to replace the RAM on an 8500? you have to take the whole thing apart to get to the RAM slots. F'n sucks

  146. chuck em by PDubNYC · · Score: 1

    I throw them out if they don't play nice

  147. Stupid? by Cloud+K · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Apparently someone who has already recieved their iMac G5 has decided to take it apart. Stupid if only for the fact that he's just voided his warranty."

    What kind of attitude is that for Slashdot?! The first thing *any* true geek does with a new piece of electronics like that, regardless of warranty or expense, is take the thing apart and take a look around!

    Tsch, kids nowadays. Don't even know they're born!

  148. Re:Macpr0n? Coming right up! by flaneur · · Score: 1

    I've got your Macpr0n right here!

    Yum.

  149. Easy to work on, my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a former Porsche mechanic, I'd have to disagree. The aircooled 911 engines were quite attractive IMHO--but were quite a hassle to work on for any type of routine maintenance, due to the small size and positioning of the engine compartment.

    Once removed from the vehicle, however, they were quite easy to work on. but of course, you would never do this unless you were rebuilding the engine or replacing the clutch, etc.

    The 914 motor, on the other hand, was ugly as hell and a pain in the ass to work on.

    Just my $0.02.

  150. Re:Another limitation by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

    Actually I build my own machine, selecting each part myself based on a number of criteria, including reputation for quality. I wouldn't be surprised if there were even some parts from companies that the mighty Apple sees fit to deal with. I would buy an Apple over a Dell, but I would not sacrifice the level of flexibility I have now for an iMac. And in many other areas I have an advantage - for example, I have had optical audio output for far longer than it has been available (for less than an outrageous upgrade fee) on Macs.

    So stick with your cheap Apple-clone and leave the quality computers to those of us that are willing to build them ourselves...

    --
    Read Pynchon.
  151. Re:Another limitation by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

    1 connect a USB or FireWire drive.
    2 Go out on a limb and *replace* it.


    That was kinda my point - if I have, say, 100GB, and I want an extra 100GB, I would have to (a) fork out for a 200GB disk or (b) fork out for an external enclosure and have a 'rats-nest of wires' on my desk... the horror! But either way it costs me money. And how exactly do I transfer the data without another Mac?

    1 Your beige box is noisier - Actually it's pretty close to silent using a Vantec fan and an AOpen noise killer case.

    takes up a lot more space and probably has a rats-next of wires coming out the back. - Yeah, but it's under my desk in an unobtrusive position, so neither of these things affect me. Plus I can actually play games, burn cds from disc-to-disc, store loads of data and upgrade at will... seems like a fair trade to me.

    2 4 Hard drives ?! That must be noisy as sin. I used to have 3 and that was bad enough. - Well, I don't know what kind of hard drives you were using but mine are extremely quiet Western Digitals and because there is ample space in my case, they don't require anything in the way of individual cooling. I couldn't tell the difference between the noise of 4 and the noise of 1 in my case, to be honest.

    --
    Read Pynchon.
  152. Re:Another limitation by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

    From Macworld:

    LaCie Bigger Disk
    Price as rated: $1,199


    Uh... huh...

    --
    Read Pynchon.
  153. Sauce for the goose... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

    "Apple loyalists generally seem to look at the lowest of the low and assume all PC's are built the same way."

    I take you point, so how about this, when PC advocates stop trying to do price comparisons between Macs and no-name wintel boxen, Apple advocates will stop using the same frame of reference for doing quality comparisons...

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  154. It's a fricken metaphor by AnEmbodiedMind · · Score: 1

    It's a fricken metaphor

    1. Re:It's a fricken metaphor by dave1212 · · Score: 1

      mmmm... lower Slashdot UID wins.

  155. Apple jam by essreenim · · Score: 1

    Same for their jam company. Dont open the lid to tast or you cannot sue them for food poisoning.

    Dont touch that, woooohh you touched it didnt you.
    Touching leads to curiosity - curiosity leads to meddling. Meddling leads to opening the case. Opening the case leads to the dark side...

  156. Re:hqx by snuffdiddy23 · · Score: 1

    Stuffit Expander opens .hqx files without a problem, WinZip and WinRAR should also handle them fine.

  157. You are a poet! by backdoorstudent · · Score: 1

    Do you know that?

  158. iMac G5 Porn? Badda bing! by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1

    What, so it ships with a Goatse screen saver now?

  159. Very nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like it.