Slashdot Mirror


User: gavri

gavri's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
178
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 178

  1. Re:reduce the confusion? on Free Beer That's Free as in Speech · · Score: -1

    Definitely reduce. Next time somebody is confused about what Free Software is, you just point to this web-site and say "See? If a beer was Free-like-in-Free-Software this is how it would be Free"

  2. *Rolls eyes* on Why FreeBSD · · Score: -1, Troll

    Oooooooooooooooooookay!

  3. Re:Why not just issue a theme? on Longhorn's Offical Name is Windows Vista · · Score: -1

    I sometimes wonder, 'Does Gates ever read comments to stories about Windows on Slashdot?' And if so, does he find them funny and laugh?

  4. Re:Beem him on up... on Star Trek's Scotty Dies at 85 · · Score: -1

    Sure, now that you're born, _you_ aren't going to feel sorry and neither are those who know you cause they love you.
    But that also means that you're looking at this from a skewed perspective.

    Because by that logic, isn't a person justified in say having five hundred children? And wouldn't birth control be kind of wrong, because "think of all those unborn children"

  5. Google! Those Kids!! on Google Moon Debuts · · Score: -1

    They just wanna have fun

  6. Re:Is IBM is stupid? on User Group Urges IBM To Open OS/2 · · Score: -1

    This should be +10 (+5 Funny and +5 Insightful)

  7. Re:Think for a second. on Googling May Break Copyright in Canada · · Score: -1

    Grandparent is being sarcastic

  8. There should be a Slashdot Story... on Study Shows One Third of All Studies Are Nonsense · · Score: -1

    ...about how one-third of all Slashdot stories are dupes.

  9. Re:A point of clarification on Astrologer Sues NASA Over Comet Probe · · Score: -1

    This bullshit gets modded +5?
    Damn! That Comet Probe is screwing everything up!

  10. Re:They're public domain on Attack of the $1 DVDs · · Score: -1

    So what should the mods do when I express one of my legitimate views, but I do it for the sole purpose of flamebaiting?
    Do intentions matter?

  11. Re:Nice... on A $251 Million Typo · · Score: -1

    Firing her ensures everybody else double-checks what they do. Worth it.

  12. Phew! on 164 Million Broadband Subscribers Worldwide · · Score: -1

    You almost forgot Poland!

  13. Re:you ARE the weakest link. Goodbye! on Greatest Beams In Movie History · · Score: 0, Funny
  14. Re:Crime and Punishment on Indian Call Centre Worker Sells Customer Details · · Score: -1

    I always have to laugh when I hear "Land of the Free" in reference to America. How's that Slave system working out for you?

  15. Answer on Ajax On Rails · · Score: -1

    (b)

    (a) isn't irony. It's just plain weird.

  16. Rails book from the Pragmatic Bookshelf on Ajax On Rails · · Score: 4, Informative

    Get the Beta book http://pragmaticprogrammer.com/titles/rails/index. html If you're interested in Rails at all, this book is all you need.

  17. Re:this is good, and here's more material on AJAX Buzzword Reinvigorates Javascript · · Score: -1

    Fonts can grow or shrink. Tables can add or lose lines. Colors can change. Although none of these capabilities are new to programmers accustomed to building client applications -- or, for that matter, Java applets -- they are novelties to Web designers who would otherwise be forced to rely on Macromedia (Profile, Products, Articles) Flash.

    All of this was possible long before xmlhttprequest/ajax came along. The difference now is requests can be made to the server while this shit happens.

  18. Re:Not yet, I guess... on Researchers Pinpoint Brain's Sarcasm Sensor · · Score: -1

    The moderation to the parent post was sarcastic sarcastic-sarcasm.

  19. Re:Fair enough... on The Pseudoscience of Intelligent Design · · Score: -1

    I was always bothered about how absolutely mind-bogglingly idiotic that "fossils were put here to test our faith" shit was. In fact, it's so idiotic that I never knew how to succinctly counter it (..a limitation of my intelligence, I know).....

    The Parent comment is simply fucking beautiful, damn!

  20. You are right that power corrupts on Google's Impact on the Internet · · Score: -1

    But it's too early to worry about that. Let Google achieve some semblance of power before we start wishing for more competitors. Google is nowhere near monopolising the industry.
    More competitors right now is a bad thing for Google which is a good thing for MS.

  21. Re:You are all wrong on Ruby On Rails Showdown with Java Spring/Hibernate · · Score: -1

    Patrick Peak (co-author of Hibernate Quickly) has made a comparision of Hibernate and Active Revord based on factors other than performance. Very informative.

  22. Re:Padding? on Google Prefetching for Mozilla Browsers · · Score: -1

    The pages linked from ads aren't pre-fetched

  23. I have a great comment on this story on CSS Support IE 7.0's Weakest Link · · Score: 0, Funny

    But I think I'll polish it up over the weekend and post in for the next dupe

  24. Re:That's it?! on 'Online Poker' Googlebomb · · Score: -1

    It's going to be fun when Google's IFL link changes in 5 years. More likely too.

  25. Interesting Signature (Totally off-topic. Sorry) on Hobbit Movie in Four Years? · · Score: -1

    However it is devoid of any insight or meaning. Listen to George Carlin use the same tactic, but providing a lot more insight:

    You know where the sanctity of life came from? We made it up. You know why? 'Cuz we're alive. Self-interest. Living people have a strong interest in promoting the idea that somehow life is sacred. You don't see Abbott and Costello running around, talking about this shit, do you? We're not hearing a whole lot from Musolini on the subject. What's the latest from JFK? Not a goddamn thing. 'Cuz JFK, Musolini and Abbott and Costello are fucking dead. They're fucking dead. And dead people give less than a shit about the sanctity of life. Only living people care about it so the whole thing grows out of a completely biased point of view. It's a self serving, man-made bullshit story.

    It's one of these things we tell ourselves so we'll feel noble. Life is sacred. Makes you feel noble. Well let me ask you this: if everything that ever lived is dead, and everything alive is gonna die, where does the sacred part come in? I'm having trouble with that.'Cuz, I mean, even with all this stuff we preach about the sanctity of life, we don't practice it. We don't practice it. Look at what we'd kill: Mosquitos and flies. 'Cuz they're pests. Lions and tigers. 'Cuz it's fun! Chickens and pigs. 'Cuz we're hungry. Pheasants and quails. 'Cuz it's fun. And we're hungry. And people. We kill people... 'Cuz they're pests. And it's fun!