Slashdot Mirror


Free Beer That's Free as in Speech

darkonc writes "The CBC has notes and an interview with Dane Rasmus Nielsen who decided to reduce the confusion between 'free as in speech' and 'free as in beer' by making a beer free -- in speech. The result is Vores Oel, an open source beer. The CBC site includes the recipe for the beer which is made with Guarana beans, and gives it a bit of a caffeine-like hit. The danish site downloads include the label for the beer (which is also Open Source)."

379 comments

  1. Wait... by DanielNS84 · · Score: 5, Funny

    But will he send it to me free like a Ubuntu CD?

    1. Re:Wait... by wickedmm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ryan Stiles on the Drew Carey Show, commenting on their "new" Buzz beer recipe - "Coffee flavored beer , I feel like I have to pee already!"

      --
      Don't be a Hem, find some new cheese.
  2. reduce the confusion? by xlyz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... or increase it???

    1. Re:reduce the confusion? by Loualbano2 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I say increase.

      I only looked at this story to leave your exact same comment.

      -Fran

    2. Re:reduce the confusion? by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 1

      There's no way he was being sarcastic!

    3. Re:reduce the confusion? by hobbit · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Yup. Not that it isn't already confusing enough:

      Me to friend not well-versed in libre: "No, that's free as in beer."
      Friend: "Beer isn't free."
      Me: "Well, no. But when it is, it's free-as-in-beer."
      Friend: "Er, right. Suddenly everything becomes clear-as-in-mud."
      Me: "Actually it recently got a bit more complicated..."

      Free-as-in-speech beer is all well and good, but I'd really like to see some of this free-as-in-beer beer that everyone talks about.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    4. Re:reduce the confusion? by Evil+Pete · · Score: 2, Funny

      Friend: "Er, right. Suddenly everything becomes clear-as-in-mud." Me: "Actually it recently got a bit more complicated..."

      No, that usually happens by about Beer 9.0.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    5. Re:reduce the confusion? by springbox · · Score: 1

      No, not really. The statement "free as in beer" makes more sense this way because beer was never free to begin with.

    6. Re:reduce the confusion? by Eivind · · Score: 2
      I realize you're (attempting to :-) be funny, but it really is not very complicated. Unless you've got really braindead friends it should be possible to get the idea across to them that the main idea is freedom, as in the oposite of slavery, the oposite of imprisonment, the oposite of being restrained. And not "free" as in "at no monetary cost".

    7. Re:reduce the confusion? by ndogg · · Score: 1

      I'd really like to see some of this free-as-in-beer beer that everyone talks about.

      Easy enough. Go to a frat party when everyone is drunk.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    8. Re:reduce the confusion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      come drinking with me sometime :) Everybody drinks free when anonymous coward is in town!

    9. Re:reduce the confusion? by jlapier · · Score: 1

      Free-as-in-speech beer is all well and good, but I'd really like to see some of this free-as-in-beer beer that everyone talks about.

      Beer I can afford - what we need more of is some of that free-as-in-speech.

    10. Re:reduce the confusion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had too much of that free-as-in-beer beer and liquor Saturday night, and I'm still nursing a hangover.

    11. Re:reduce the confusion? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      Unless you've got really braindead friends it should be possible to get the idea across to them that the main idea is freedom, as in the oposite of slavery, the oposite of imprisonment, the oposite of being restrained.
      Of course, then you have to explain how somebody can enslave or imprison a bunch of 1's and 0's.
      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    12. Re:reduce the confusion? by Lik · · Score: 1

      Thats easy: just GPL them.

    13. Re:reduce the confusion? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Except that now their confused because they are not enslaved, imprisoned or restrained, so they don't understand why they have to switch.

      The underground railroad didn't need a marketing plan to educate the slaves about why it's good to be free. Nor did they publish rants on why other approaches to freeing slaves weren't truly free. They also didn't scream at reporters for not using the term "GNU/underground railroad."

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    14. Re:reduce the confusion? by Sr.+Pato · · Score: 0
      but I'd really like to see some of this free-as-in-beer beer that everyone talks about.
      Well, they gave you the source. Compile your own copy.
      --
      Nobody's gay for Mole-Man. :-(
    15. Re:reduce the confusion? by GoogolPlexPlex · · Score: 1

      Free beer? Just wait until Google buys the rights to it and gives it out for free.

    16. Re:reduce the confusion? by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Like I said: for that problem to arise you'd have to have really stupid friends.

      There is indeed a lot of things you are not allowed to do with proprietary software. No, users aren't physically chained down, but friends with an iq above room-temperature would in general be able to understand freedom as a *sligthly* more generalised concept than freedom from chains.

      If your friends honestly, after you tried to explain it are unable to understand the distinction between freedom and gratis, then I think you need new friends, or work on your explanation-skills.

      I hear this all the times -- from people who *have* understood it -- that there's, supposedly, hordes of people who have problems grasping this distinction. Comically enough you never seem to meet people who don't understand it. Only people who claim that lots of *others* don't understand it.

    17. Re:reduce the confusion? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      My dictionary has eighteen definitions of "free" in it. Only one of them is pertains to "free as in speech". That happens to be the EXACT same number as those that refer to "free as in beer."

      Does this cause confusion among intelligent people? Of course it does! Think of all the murderous Latin American dictators that have ascended to power by using the words "free" and "freedom". Think of the Nazi slogan "arbeit macht frei". The point is, "free" is a nebulous word, even when you translate it as "libre".

      "Free as in speech" refers to one kind of freedom possessed by human beings. But we're talking about software. Does the "free" in "Free Software" (notice how it's always capitalized) then pertain to the user or to the software?

      When the FSF has spent two decades trying to teach people the right meaning of the word "free", I begin to suspect that it's the FSF with the problem.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    18. Re:reduce the confusion? by hobbit · · Score: 1


      Q: How do you kill a circus troupe?
      A: Go for the juggler!

      You: "I realise that's supposed to be a joke, but in reality, you wouldn't be able to kill a whole circus troupe just by going for the juggler."

      Unless you've got really braindead friends it should be possible for them to explain to you that the main point of my post is that "free-as-in-beer" is simply not a good description for the concept of free-as-in-no-cost.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
  3. It can't be open source by WillerZ · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's already version 1.0.

    If this were in the true open-source spirit it'd be 0.99_rc3_beta1.1 at most.

    --
    I guess today is a passable day to die.
    1. Re:It can't be open source by Virak · · Score: 1

      Bah. They're just boosting the version number, so it looks like they're actually making progress. As an added bonus, it appeals to the general public, because stupid people like nice round numbers, without all of that confusing fractions stuff.

    2. Re:It can't be open source by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      Rather, stupid people think version numbers are fractions. Versions are a set of integers seperated by periods.

      --
      Luke-Jr
    3. Re:It can't be open source by Virak · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I especially hate people who do that.

  4. Free beer is one thing by hobotron · · Score: 4, Funny


    Trusting the Danish for your free beer is quite another.

    *ducks*

    --
    There is truth in humor.
    1. Re:Free beer is one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Trusting the Danish for your free beer is quite another.

      mmmmmm danishhhhh ..... beer? danishhhhhhh .... mmmm ..beerrrr...... danish? .....

      that would confuse the fuck out of homer simpson!

    2. Re:Free beer is one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's hilarious

    3. Re:Free beer is one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's open source, if you don't trust it, you can read the source to be sure what it contains.

    4. Re:Free beer is one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No-one ever bought you a Carlsberg? Try smiling and batting your eyelids better!

    5. Re:Free beer is one thing by TechHSV · · Score: 1

      I agree, if it was something more like a breakfast item I'd try it. Maybe we can convince Germany to Open Source their beer. That would be a good day.

    6. Re:Free beer is one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But is this "gebraut nach deutschem Reinheitsgebot" ? Looks like it isn't.

    7. Re:Free beer is one thing by wolrahnaes · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obviously you haven't been through college if you don't think beer is for breakfast.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    8. Re:Free beer is one thing by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Germany won't open source their beer. Everybody knows that you don't open source something that people will actually pay for *ducks*

    9. Re:Free beer is one thing by Swootech · · Score: 1

      Hey, there is plenty of great Danish beer!!!

      Carlsbergs's "Semper Arden" series is definitely worth the hangovers :]

      Plenty of other goodies:
      http://ohhh.myhead.org/list/1c-den.html

  5. First Prime Factorization Post by 2*2*3*75011 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Recipe for approx. 5*17 ltr. Vores Øl (Our Beer) (approx. 3/(2*5*5) alchohol by volume).

    Malt extract
    For Vores Øl we use four types malted barley:

    2*3 kg pilsner malt
    2*2 kg münsner malt
    1 kg caramel malt
    1 kg lager malt
    The malt is crushed and put in 5*11-2*2*3*5C hot water for 1-2 hours.

    The mixture is filtered and the liquid now contains about 2*5 kg malt extract.

    Taste and sugar
    Besides malt we use:

    2*2*3*5 g Tetnang bitter hops
    2*5*5 g Hallertaver aroma hops
    2*2*3*5*5 g Guarana beans
    2*2 kg sugar
    (Guarana beans can typically be bought at health food stores).

    The malt extact is brought to a boil in a large pot with the hops and approx. 2*5*7 ltr. of water.

    After half an hour, the Guarana beans and sugar is added.

    The mixture simmers for about an hour, and is then filtered and cooled in a sealed container.

    Fermentation

    Yeast is added and the beer is fermented at room temperature for approx. 2 weeks.

    When the beer is fully fermentet it is transferred to bottles. First 2*2 g sugar is added per liter and some yeast from the bottom of the fermentation tanks for priming.

    Vores Øl is then left in the bottles at room temperature for 2*2*2-2*5 days for carbonation. Then the beer is ready to enjoy; cold and refreshing.

    1. Re:First Prime Factorization Post by WillerZ · · Score: 1
      What the hell kind of commie recipe is this!?

      The best kind, a recipe for beer...
      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    2. Re:First Prime Factorization Post by budgenator · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actualy it looks like a pretty good commie recipe, it has plenty of malt to give the brew plenty of body and head; a blend of both bitter and armoma hops to give the beer both taste and bouquet.
      After trying the reciept as is i'd probably decide to cut back the bitter Tetnang hops a bit to balance it to my personal preferences better.
      If any of my fellow americans would like to by your hand at brewing I can assure you that with a trials, you'll be making a brew that is far better, and better personalized than anything you'll see made by the big conglomerates. The hardest part for use is actualy collecting enough bottle of the proper type; our Modern Screw on lids bottles suck ass for home brewing.

      One word of warnning is home brew produces prdigious amounts of very good beer at modest cost, so in order to consume it fast enough to try the modifications to the reciepes, you'll need friends and have to actually scocialize in person.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:First Prime Factorization Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crikey, how many user-ids did you have to go through? Kudos.

    4. Re:First Prime Factorization Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. Create a throwaway account
      2. Add 1 to the UID it got
      3. Run "factor" on Unix on that number
      4. Create another account using the results. It'll have that ID ith a matching nick
      Why are people so amazed at this?
    5. Re:First Prime Factorization Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if throwaway UID +1 is prime?

  6. Open Source Beer? by silvertear72 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So...is there some kind of General Public License for beer similar to the GNU?

    1. Re:Open Source Beer? by teksno · · Score: 1

      no just public intoxication...

    2. Re:Open Source Beer? by shawb · · Score: 3, Informative

      Creative Commons liscenses allows "open sourcing" just about any IP you want: music, visual arts, writing... it's just a license that you have to print the license and the recipie if you want to distribute the beer.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    3. Re:Open Source Beer? by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 5, Funny

      I certainly hope so, since after you drink it you'll have a hard time not producing derivative works...

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    4. Re:Open Source Beer? by MadCow42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Great, now all the toilets will be plugged up with copies of the GPL... which has to be distributed with said derrivitive works.

      MadCow.

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    5. Re:Open Source Beer? by nijk · · Score: 1

      That was the best joke I have ever heard.

      I am such a nerd.

      *cries*

    6. Re:Open Source Beer? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Time to start practicing writing it in the snow.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    7. Re:Open Source Beer? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      I certainly hope so, since after you drink it you'll have a hard time not producing derivative works...

      Miller, Anheuser-Busch, and/or Coors might come after you for infringement, though, with the uncanny similarity between those "derivative works" and their products.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    8. Re:Open Source Beer? by biovoid · · Score: 1

      Just print it on the toilet paper.

  7. Now that will just add to the confusion... by TheRealBlueEAGLE · · Score: 5, Funny

    As everyone knows free beer will make you drink more and get drunk. When you get drunk you will speak more freely. So it will be free speach by free beer. How does this help anyone?

    Except that it helps us get drunk, and that's not a bad thing, is it? ;D

    --
    If pro and con are opposites, what is the opposite of progress?
    1. Re:Now that will just add to the confusion... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Except that it helps us get drunk, and that's not a bad thing, is it? ;D

      When We Drink,
      We Get Drunk.
      When We Get Drunk,
      We Fall Asleep.
      When We Fall Asleep,
      We Commit No Sin.
      When We Commit No Sin,
      We Go To Heaven.
      So, Let's All Get Drunk,
      And Go To Heaven.

      -- Anonymous

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re:Now that will just add to the confusion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But in heaven there is no beer. That's why we drink it here. %-)

  8. The label... by aaza · · Score: 4, Funny
    But is the label free as in beer, or free as in speech?

    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
    In practice, however, there is.
    1. Re:The label... by aaza · · Score: 1
      (shouldn't reply to own post blah, blah)

      And now that beer is free as in speech, what can we use to mean free as in beer?

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
      In practice, however, there is.
    2. Re:The label... by DanielNS84 · · Score: 1

      Free as in Liquor doesn't sound as good but has the same meaning I suppose. Now for that open sourced vodka...or wait...isn't that just potatoes or something?

    3. Re:The label... by miyako · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I suggest "free as in lunch", I think it might really be better than "free as in beer" ever was anyway, because it relates back to "there's no such thing as a free lunch" and basically re-enforces the idea that "free as in speech" = good, "free as in lunch" = be cautious.

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    4. Re:The label... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 1000s of launch recipes available.

    5. Re:The label... by patio11 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the real world, one of the selling points of OSS is that its free-as-in-beer. The whole "You get a software system to do what you mean for NO MONEY" thing is a major driver to adopter (particularly in my own workplace, where we're frequently advising third world governments which don't exactly have large technology budgets). Why would you want to tell people "Hah, the number one reason you want to use OSS is a mirage! Its too good to be true! Sucker! You can't actually download Linux off of the Internet and start using it for free!"

    6. Re:The label... by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Actually "there is no free lunch" just means that somebody paid for it, which is certainly still true for "free as in speech" software. Somebody paid you to buy computer, learn programming and spend time coding.

    7. Re:The label... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest not using the term "free" to describe anything you have to pay for. This whole "free as in speech" software was a scam right from the beginning. Imagine you're in a store and you ask the clerk how much something costs, and he says "that's free". So you put one in your pocket and when you leave the store, he says "hey, you didn't pay for that." "When I said it was free, I meant you could change it once you bought it." Sounds pretty stupid, right.

      Now, this "free as in lunch" is just as confusing, because, as you mentioned, "there's no such thing as a free lunch." But, for example, I've used FLTK on several personal and comercial applications, and I never had to pay any money, and I never will. It's "free as in no cost".

    8. Re:The label... by cached · · Score: 0

      But there is a no free lunch theorem! http://no-free-lunch.org/

      --
      +1 funny, -2 overrated. Life isn't fair.
    9. Re:The label... by Phroggy · · Score: 1
      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  9. caffeine LIKE? by Spoukie · · Score: 1

    umm... guarana HAS caffeine. in fact it is one of the richest natural sources of our beloved caffeine!

    1. Re:caffeine LIKE? by Saven+Marek · · Score: 3, Funny

      > umm... guarana HAS caffeine. in fact it is one of the richest
      > natural sources of our beloved caffeine!

      The important thing is that guarana is better for you as it is a natural source of caffeine. so that's something to remember

    2. Re:caffeine LIKE? by tech49er · · Score: 1

      and its really strong so it'll have you bouncing off the walls like a good stimulant should

      --
      "... always going forward 'cause we cant find reverse! "
    3. Re:caffeine LIKE? by WillerZ · · Score: 1

      Better for you than what?

      How does being a natural source of something make it intrinsically good? Humans need iron and pyrites are a natural source of iron, so by your logic I should be tucking in to a pyrite-and-basalt salad for lunch.

      Phil

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    4. Re:caffeine LIKE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And apple seeds are a natural source for cyanide so they must be better for you as well!

    5. Re:caffeine LIKE? by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      I'm 92.7% sure that he was being sarcastic.

    6. Re:caffeine LIKE? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 2, Informative

      Coffee beans are also a natural source of caffeine, (as are tea leaves), and they have a huge adavntage over guarana, as they don't taste like dirt.

      I'm pretty sure I read the original article some months ago, btw - don't know if it's a /. dup., or if I saw it somewhere else.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    7. Re:caffeine LIKE? by shawb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And the caffeine in coffee and chocolate ISN'T natural? Natural != healthy. The nicotine found in tobacco is perfectly natural: the plant makes it as an insecticide. And even though it's perfectly natural, I doubt snake venom beer would be very good for you (okay, okay, it has been found that small doses of certain snake venoms can actually help patients overcome certain disorders, but in general, not a good idea.) Or how about a nice tetrodotoxin saki? It's made from the all natural pufferfish, a Japanese delicacy.

      And then there's the fact that guarana has not been evaluated by the FDA for safety, effectiveness, or purity. All potential risks and/or advantages of guarana may not be known. Additionally, there are no regulated manufacturing standards in place.

      Now, the caffeine in guarana beans is generally disgested much slower than in, say, a cup of coffee. However the effect when you grind up the bean and mix it with a carbonated alcoholic beverage would probably be to extract the caffeine directly into the liquid, where it can be digested quicker. Not that I'm against mixing caffeine and alcohol within moderation... just as long as you know what's going on and understand that, yes, you are taking risks.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    8. Re:caffeine LIKE? by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The important thing is that guarana is better for you as it is a natural source of caffeine. so that's something to remember
      And you are saying the coffee bean isn't also a natural source of caffeine?

      Tobacco is natural. So is Belladonna. Just being natural does not mean something is good for you.
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    9. Re:caffeine LIKE? by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1
      they have a huge adavntage over guarana, as they don't taste like dirt.

      If guarana is what I think it is (or at least related to the canned drink :) it's DELICIOUS!! you can have can after can after
      [ignamv@localhost:/]$yes after can
      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    10. Re:caffeine LIKE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this supposed to warn us, or encourage us?

    11. Re:caffeine LIKE? by CommiePuddin · · Score: 1
      --
      x = x + ++x; //It's golden.
    12. Re:caffeine LIKE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      rtfrecipe - they claim about 30mg of caffeine in a serving, and nowhere is grinding mentioned.

      Though your points are all valid warnings.

    13. Re:caffeine LIKE? by sbma44 · · Score: 1

      The nicotine found in tobacco is perfectly natural: the plant makes it as an insecticide

      Of course, it isn't the nicotine in cigarettes that kills you. Yes, it is a poison, but in the amounts present in tobacco, not all that dangerous. Also, it's been shown to have a protective effect against parkinson's!

      And, on another related note, smokers metabolize caffeine about twice as fast as the rest of us, for reasons that are still not clearly understood. Hence the coffee & cigarettes cliche -- smokers need more of the stuff to get the same effect.

    14. Re:caffeine LIKE? by Glyphn · · Score: 1
      "And the caffeine in coffee and chocolate ISN'T natural? Natural != healthy."

      This reminds me . . . a couple of years ago I was on an airplane--Icelandair I think--and they had an inflight advertisement for Botox. Anyway, to better peddle the therapy, the talking head emphasized that Botox was "all natural." I had to laugh. The claim was certainly true (yes, the chemical is produced naturally) but by the microbe Clostridium botulinum which produces the most lethal suite of neurotoxins known.

      (Aside, I'm not saying Botox therapy is dangerous. Just that it's funny how the term "all natural" gets used."

    15. Re:caffeine LIKE? by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      They probably put a shitload of sugar and yummy artificial flavours into the drink to mask how horrid it tastes.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    16. Re:caffeine LIKE? by sbma44 · · Score: 1

      Well, okay, yes. But you won't die from smoking two cigarettes, or from eating two. It's all about the route of administration. For example, nutmeg is a hallucinogenic poison, but you unless you're taking it by syringe, you can eat pumpkin pie without worry.

    17. Re:caffeine LIKE? by coopex · · Score: 1

      Smoking 2 ciggs = max 2.8 mg if they're nonfiltered, eating 2 ciggs = max 50 mg = deadly. Nutmeg is a bad example, since it'll take 100ml of the oil to be ld50, though people have died from eating 1 nutmeg seed, while it's extremely dangerous if a child eats a ciggarette, as they will probably will die. A better example for route of administration would be morphine, which is 6x as effective (and lethal) by injection.

      Myristicin and Elemicin (active ingredients in Nutmeg oil)

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
  10. Freedom by KrisCowboy · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Freedom - free as in free beer and free as in free speech. I bet RMS is happy.

    1. Re:Freedom by beware1000 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I bet he's drunk.

    2. Re:Freedom by Orgazmus · · Score: 0, Redundant

      We all suspected that quite a while ago ;)

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    3. Re:Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      He'll be happy when it is renamed to GNU/Beer.

    4. Re:Freedom by tod_miller · · Score: 4, Funny

      Its free as in Free beer, but not as in free beer.

      Shame. *hic*.

      Don't forget - all drivers are incompatible with this open source release, DO NOT DRINK AND DRIVE

      --
      #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
    5. Re:Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? We all like beer, and as an added bonus there is a legendary quote used to explain the concept of free software (now usually referred to as open source software)...


      No. RMS is not happy.
    6. Re:Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RMS is not happy.

      Maybe he thinks it should be called Gnu/Beer

  11. Wired by moyet · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wired had the same story a couple of days ago. Their article is a bit longer and with a bit more background.

    1. Re:Wired by Nakanai_de · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's the link to the Wired story.

      --

      Sono koro, bokura wa, sore ga sekai no shinjitsu da to shinjite ita.

    2. Re:Wired by tuomasr · · Score: 1

      A news site in Copenhagen had this last year...

      http://www.copcap.com/composite-8636.htm

    3. Re:Wired by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Here's the link to the Wired story.
      Which is so full of utter nonsense it's painful.

      Three examples:
      The recipe and brand of their beer is published under a Creative Commons license, which means anyone can use the recipe for pleasure or profit.

      The only catch: If you make money selling their unique beer, you have to give them credit and publish any changes you make to the recipe under a similar license.

      Which is actually *more restrictive* than what exists currently - which is utterly free copying with essentially zero legal restraint.
      On their website, the students said they are interested in seeing how their beer will get better once it is out in the world, acquiring slight improvements as the recipe is shared.
      'Beer' (generic) can't get better - it is what it is. There isn't a platonically ideal 'beer' which we can by slow steps approach.
      In the beer business, more than just recipes are moving toward open source, as some brewers are adopting an open-source business model as well. An ex-Red Hat employee in Australia has developed his love for spirits into an open-source project by creating a brewery that is owned in part by its customers.
      That's not open source - nor is it new. I own (owned actually) a chunk of Anheuser-Busch for several years (I.E. stock). I was a partner in a store where I routinely shopped. (Heck, condo's have been around for decades - and they follow this business model.)

      Niether homebrewing nor OSS is well served with idiotic articles like this one.

  12. Free Beer? by BRonsk · · Score: 1, Funny

    Where's the .torrent?

    1. Re:Free Beer? by datafr0g · · Score: 4, Funny

      yeah yeah, find the torrent but good luck getting the beer out of your PC safely. How do you plan to get the beer out, drip it through that old unused floppy drive?

      Are you crazy?

      Streaming free beer over the internet is pointless without a DRM free RS-232 Bar Tap for output and only RMS has one of those.

      --
      "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
    2. Re:Free Beer? by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 5, Funny

      Use Unix. This is where all those pipes and filters come in handy.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
    3. Re:Free Beer? by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Ha! you though pipingdesign.com was all about industry? Ha!

    4. Re:Free Beer? by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      So if you use tee, does it double your free beer? Or do you just end up with a mess on the floor?

      --
      Be relentless!
    5. Re:Free Beer? by xtracto · · Score: 2, Funny

      Forced simpsons quote:

      To start press any key.
      (reading screen) Where's the "any" key? I see Esc, Catarl, and Pig Up. There doesn't seem to be any "any" key.

      Wo! All this computer hacking is making me thirsty. I think I'll order a Tab.
      (presses TAB key).

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    6. Re:Free Beer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly, what do you think the tab key is for?

    7. Re:Free Beer? by danheretic · · Score: 1

      It's been done, more or less.

  13. Somewhat Lacking? by SpottedKuh · · Score: 1

    Now, I have to admit that this is a really cool idea! Free as in speech-beer.

    But, did anyone else notice that the recipe provided on the CBC website was somewhat lacking? I mean: How much 55-60 degree water? What kind of filter? How much yeast?

    I'd love to try this, but I can't seem to find a complete version of the recipe. Can anyone who speaks Danish tell me if a more complete recipe is availble on the site? Cheers!

    1. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Gantoris · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unless you are already a homebrewer, don't try this recipe - it's a difficult grain recipe, and looking at the recipe, will not will not be a fantastic beer.

      If you are interested in starting with the hobby (and I recommend you do, you'll never look back), go to your local home brew shop and grab a starter kit, you will make some pretty good beer - certianly better than that recipe will get you.

      Once you have made up a few batches, add some Gurana to a recipe you like and you will have a cafinated beer that you will actually enjoy.

    2. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by RoceKiller · · Score: 1

      The english recipe is (almost) a direct translation of the danish one. So no more specefic information is avalible on the danish one. You could of cause mail the Rasmus Nielsen asking him the details.

    3. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The recipe is still in beta as previously stated,

      If you want you can checkout a snapshot from it's SVN repository. There is a link to it at the bottom of the page...

    4. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by grozzie2 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Unless you are already a homebrewer, don't try this recipe - it's a difficult grain recipe, and looking at the recipe, will not will not be a fantastic beer.

      A fantastic beer is all a matter of personal preference. The history of beer in north america was changed dramatically by prohibition. During that period, they were brewing awful stuff, and serving it very very green. What was discovered, if you chill the beer till it's 'cold', folks liked it better. If you look into the specific reason why, it's kind of hillarious. A liquid chilled the way north americans prefer beer (ice cold), will numb many of the tastebuds when it flows over the tongue. Those are specifically the buds that react to the flavour of yeast. When prohibition ended, the brewing industry held onto this concept, because it allows one to serve a green beer, and nobody will taste the yeast. Ever notice how much the industry spends promoting 'cold beer'? That simply because they know, if folks are drinking it chilled, they can sell a beer that's got a horrible yeast flavour, and nobody will notice.

      The recipe in question as given on the website will produce a very interesting beer, but, its definitely a european beer. That means it should be served just below room temp, not well chilled, and, it does need to be fully and properly cured, to get rid of the yeast flavours. the majority of the flavour from this particular beer will be lost if served chilled the north american way.

      If you are doing your own brews, it's a very interesting experiment. Make up a traditional european beer, then try 2 bottles side by side. Chill one 'the north american way', and treat the other exactly the way you would treat a good red wine (8 to 12 degrees below room temp). The chilled variant will taste awful, the room temp bottle will have a host of interesting flavours. Repeat the process with an american beer, and you'll find the room temp bottle will have a horrible yeasty aftertaste, which you dont notice when trying the chilled bottle.

      But, that's the beauty of open source beer :) for our north american folks that prefer ice cold beer, they can fork the recipe, and refine it for one that has acceptable flavours when served chilled, and disregard the yeast artifacts, the the chilled serving will hide them.

    5. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like it's already the Linux of beers, then.

      Hard to set up, isn't that good, and you can add something to something more mainstream to make it do the same thing!

      (just kidding!)

    6. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by lucifer_666 · · Score: 1
      A liquid chilled the way north americans prefer beer (ice cold), will numb many of the tastebuds when it flows over the tongue.
      Are you right about that? I'm not so sure...

      After all, I can still taste Coke when it's icy cold... in fact, I can still taste a lemonade icy-pole well, and it's very cold...?

    7. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by grozzie2 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      After all, I can still taste Coke when it's icy cold... in fact, I can still taste a lemonade icy-pole well, and it's very cold...?

      Did the post say _all_ tastebuds, or many tastebuds ? Some are not affected by the cold, others are. Heat has a similar effect. I'm sure you know at least one food that seems to 'taste better' after it's got cold?

    8. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to understand this topic, check out the excellent tutorial linked to on their site: John Palmer's How To Brew. You'll learn everything you need to know for a basic hobby brew.

    9. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well in Africa beer is generally served ice cold. This is because when it's 30C and above a warm anything is not what you want to be drinking.

      30C is considered an average hot day, 35C is not rare either so imagine drinking your beer at say 25C.

      Besides unless you drink it really quickly it tends to get warm rather quickly. :-)

    10. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Hognoxious · · Score: 0, Troll
      its definitely a european beer. That means it should be served just below room temp, not well chilled
      Right. Because all European beers are the same, aren't they? I mean, if it wasn't for the label, I wouldn't be able to tell a Guinness from a Stella Artois.

      I call bullshit - it's a disgrace that you got modded up when you simply haven't got a clue what you're talking about.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      I call bullshit - it's a disgrace that you got modded up when you simply haven't got a clue what you're talking about.


      The grandparent post is close enough. In any case, Guinness isn't a beer, it's a stout.

    12. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Warm american beer might taste bad, but that's not yeast you are tasting if its commercial. Those beers are filtered up the wazoo.

    13. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by clausiam · · Score: 1
      'd love to try this, but I can't seem to find a complete version of the recipe. Can anyone who speaks Danish tell me if a more complete recipe is availble on the site? Cheers!

      No, the Danish recipe is as lacking in detail as the English one. I'm guessing that it would be about 10 ltr of water since you are supposed to end up with 10 ltr of malt-mixture and you actually filter out all the barley itself.

    14. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, and Coke isn't a beverage its a soda pop.

      Try looking up stout in the dictionary.

    15. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The beer in Denmark is normally cooled to 7 - 8 degrees celcius.

      Some dig a hole in the earth, about 1,5 meter or so.
      Here the temperature is about the 7 - 8 degrees.

    16. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by tcr · · Score: 1

      It was a generalisation, but I think that he's pretty much on the money.

      As an aside, Guinness doesn't travel particularly well (IMHO). There are also several grades of the stuff. They developed an "extra cold" variant a few years ago to make it more appealing when it is served in places where they don't keep it properly.

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
    17. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Luyseyal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pizza is far superior served as a cold breakfast -- especially when you dip the crust in your chocolate milk.

      My breakfast of champions,
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    18. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by CagedBear · · Score: 3, Informative

      "The history of beer in north america was changed dramatically by prohibition. During that period, they were brewing awful stuff, and serving it very very green. What was discovered, if you chill the beer till it's 'cold', folks liked it better. ...beer (ice cold), will numb many of the tastebuds..."

      Ah Bologna. Cold beer in the US dates back at least to the mid 1800's where they used ice houses, especially in the hot west to keep beer cold through the summer. It was hot and it was dusty. And the townsfolk wanted something cold to drink. Plain and simple.

      Here's an interesting beer history link for all the European beer snobs: http://www.beerhistory.com/library/holdings/raley_ timetable.shtml If you scroll down to modern history, it states:
      In the mid-19th Century (1850's) German immigrant brewers introduced cold maturation lagers to the US (Anheuser-Busch, Miller, Coors, Stroh, Schlitz, and Pabst roots begin here).
      The modern era of brewing in the US began in the late 1800's with commercial refrigeration (1860), automatic bottling, pasteurization (1876), and railroad distribution.

      Cold beer is just part of the American culture. There is something about reaching in a cooler after a hard day of work and grabbing a can or bottle that has been sitting in ice for hours. Even in the winter time the beer comes out of the car and goes in a snow bank for deep chilling before serving. And we like it that way!

    19. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by sceptre1067 · · Score: 1

      sigh...

      Disclaimer... I do volunteer work at a brewery in St. Paul MN (tour guide... and yes I home brew too.)

      As others have stated before... this beer will suck because the bulk of its fermentable sugars come from... "4kg sugar" and not the malt listed in the first part of the recipe.

      This tends to produce a very wine like beer as the sugar will fermet pretty much to straight alcohol and not really add any flavor. In additon (as mentioned before) the mashing schedule is f'd to say the least. It will not bring enough "flavor to the party".

      Plus... the hopping schedule is f'd too. Aromatic hops add nothing when you boil them to death.

      This is not a European vs. American beer thing... this is a "homebrewers at a school who want a quick buzz and no taste." issue.

      Oh and on the warm vs. cold... as others have mentioned. Not universal. Ales are best at _celllar_ temperatures. But Lagers are generally designed to be drunk at lower temps (think red vs. white wines.)

      Clarify big myth number 345886... for both wine and beer... Ales and red wines are not meant to be served at or just below room temp. (68 to 72 F) They are meant to be served at cellar temp. (48 to 52 F). So not "warm" by far... White wines are best in the low forties F., and lagers are good from the high 30's to low 40's depending on styles, etc.

    20. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by raddan · · Score: 1
      Stouts are most definitely beers. See Stout BJCP Style Guidelines.

      Unless you mean that take issue with some of the non-Reinheitsgebot ingredients in Guiness, in which case you are just an elitist ass.

    21. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by raddan · · Score: 1

      No, he calls it a European beer because it uses European ingredients, like:

      • pilsner malt
      • münsner malt (Munich malt?)
      • lager malt
      • Tetnang hops
      • Hallertauer (the only American-style beer that I am aware of of that uses this is Sam Adams)

      Furthermore, the use of copious amounts of [candi, probably not table] sugar (4 kg!), would probably make it resemble a Belgian beer.

      Common American beers (what Papazian calls "North American lagers") are brewed mostly with corn or rice, with enough barley added to comply with US brewing laws. If I'm not mistaken, the maximum number of adjuncts allowable by US law is something like 60! So the poster is quite correct-- this is very much a European-style beer.

      It is also simply FACT that you can taste more flavors when a beer is warmer. I was of the impression that American beers were served chilled because they contained more off-flavors do to being brewed with inferior ingredients, and due to the rigours of transport (shaking, temperature variation, exposure to UV light). BTW, the characteristic "flavor" of Corona beer is achieved by exposing it to UV light in the factory, and then by shipping it in clear containers. The lime is there to cover up off-flavors.

      Maybe you should know what you're taking about before you call bullshit. Of course Guinness and Stella Artois taste different. No one said that there was only one kind of European beer!

    22. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are confusing the temperature the beer is kept at while fermenting (cold maturation - or lagering) with the temp. that a beer should be served at. Even then, beer isn't lagered at anywhere near 32F. Serving a beer "Ice Cold" is fine if you don't want to taste the beer... but if you care about tasting it, it's best to serve it a bit warmer... low 40's (F) for a lager, low 50's (F) for an ale.

      Don't believe me? Try a Bud (shiver) or your favorite macro at Ice Cold temps, then again at 55F... it will be nearly undrinkable at 55, beacuse you can actually taste it.

      If you really want to learn more about beer, go here.

    23. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by ClayDowling · · Score: 1

      This is definitely a "hacker release", not for the begginer. There would be some very hillarious results that come from using this recipe. The "sealed container" bit is especially funny.

      For those of you who haven't conducted this experiement on their own, fermentation in a sealed vessel tends to result in explosive decompression. Made the mistake of sealing a brewing yeast culture once. When I opened it every wall in my kitchen and one in my family room needed to have very foul smelling yeast cleaned off of them (beer fermentation residue is vile). I did that as soon as I cleaned it off my face.

      In truth, someplace like http://www.northernbrewer.com/ is a good place for the beggining brewer. Their kits include the instructions that were left out of this recipe.

    24. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by mcfarnsberry · · Score: 1

      hmm...a shitty beer you say?...good thing it's open source and more knowledgeable people can "fix" it as they see fit...

    25. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Icculus · · Score: 1

      I do volunteer work at a brewery in St. Paul MN

      Summit Brewery? I've been meaning to take the tour there some weekend. Are the Saturday tours usually pretty full?

    26. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      As others have stated before... this beer will suck because the bulk of its fermentable sugars come from... "4kg sugar" and not the malt listed in the first part of the recipe.

      They're only getting about a fourth of the fermentables from sugar. That's about typical for a strong Belgian ale; a tripel I make gets 2 lbs. of turbinado sugar (cheaper than candi sugar and it works as well) in a 5-gallon batch.

      In additon (as mentioned before) the mashing schedule is f'd to say the least.

      True...at 130-140F, they probably won't convert anything. 150-155F would be better.

      Plus... the hopping schedule is f'd too.

      I didn't even see anything that looked like a hopping schedule. Maybe they assumed that you would just put in the bittering hops at the start of the boil and the aroma hops at or near the end. Their instructions to let it simmer for an hour are disturbing, though, as there will be little or no alpha-acid isomerization at a simmer.

      ~2 ounces of noble hops in a ~22.5-gallon batch won't exactly contribute a tremendous amount of bitterness, either, especially for the somewhat strong kind of beer they're making.

      Maybe they made their beer open source in the hope that beer geeks would fix their recipe for them. :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    27. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      No one said that there was only one kind of European beer!

      I call bullshit on you, because what I said, sarcastically, was that they are all the same. They being plural, ignoramus (Plural means more than one).

      Now, does the post I called say "its definitely a european beer. That means it should be served just below room temp, not well chilled"? Yes it does. Does that imply that all European beers are all the same? Yes it does. If the pompous cretin had said "it's clearly such and such a type, somewhat like Orval" he might have had a point. He didn't, so he doesn't, and neither do you.

      FWIW, I live in Belgium and used to dabble in brewing from grain, so I do know what I'm talking about.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    28. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      In any case, Guinness isn't a beer, it's a stout.
      So substituting your logic into wikipedia's definition, Guinness isn't a beer, it's a "dark beer made using roasted malts or roast barley".

      Now try with dictionary.com: Guinness isn't a beer, it's "a strong, very dark beer or ale."

      Let's leave aside the fact that it usually appears in the beer section of the supermarket. Or on pub menus with all the other beers. I suppose it must be a kind of wine then.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    29. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

      "The recipe in question as given on the website will produce a very interesting beer, but, its definitely a european beer."

      Yeah, right: it will taste good, thus.

      And, the mecca for good quality beer, even within europe, it must be said, is Belgium. The variety and quality of the beers there are truly unsurpassed.

      --
      --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
    30. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

      "Now, does the post I called say "its definitely a european beer. That means it should be served just below room temp, not well chilled"? Yes it does. Does that imply that all European beers are all the same? Yes it does."

      Umm...no, it doesn't. I'm baffled as to how you come to such a conclusion, frankly.

      A statement about the typical temperatures at which beers are served in no way implies that they taste all the same.

      In fact, reading his post, I rather come to the conclusion he argues that european beer has more flavour. In which he is correct, of course.

      I think most people are well aware that the best beers come from europe in general (which doesn't mean they don't have crapbeer too), and belgium specifically. Of course, 'best' is subjective, but even then the variety and quality of the beers are unsurpassed in Belgium. At the end, beer is an aquired taste, and I once thought that one couldn't comment on what tastes 'better' in this regard. But then I tasted Heiniken, which was the crappiest beer I ever drunk...until I tried corona, that's to say.

      Then I realised that, indeed, there is such thing as a quality beer and tasteless-crap-beer, regardless of personal tastes.

      The strange thing is, we mainly export our crap-beer, and still get praised for it in foreign countries. No wonder people (tourists) actually trying out the local brews are swept from their feet (not only literally ;-).

      --
      --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
    31. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

      "Cold beer is just part of the American culture."

      Well, I won't dispute that. :-)

      But, if you actually want to enjoy the taste of the beer, the "European beer snobs" are right. ;-)

      --
      --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
    32. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Umm...no, it doesn't. I'm baffled as to how you come to such a conclusion, frankly.
      Sigh. I'll repeat the fragment again for the hard of understanding:

      "its definitely a european beer. That means it should be served just below room temp, not well chilled"

      Let me put it a different way, that excerpt hardly implies that there is a wide variation in the recommended serving temperatures of European beers, does it? Perhaps it's talking of a subset of European beers, but in that case you'd expect a qualifier. You know, like the word "some". Ergo, it's a sweeping generalisation and if you can't see that I can see why you're baffled - you clearly don't understand simple logic or the English language.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    33. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

      Well, lets stay honest here. You DID say "[...]Does that imply that all European beers are all the same? Yes it does."

      You DID NOT say: "This hardly implies that there is a wide variation in the recommended serving temperatures of European beers".

      I agree with you it is possible to make a case that your latter statement could be implied. But your former and original claim is clearly unsubstantiated. (Note, however, that even in this case he's probably right; I know of no european beer who is typically 'chilled' the way american beer is. Though, I agree, some beers can be cooled in a way that can be under (or above) 'just below roomtemperature'. In the vast majority of cases, however, the typical temperature for european beer is exactly as he describes.)

      Anyway, saying that they should be served at a certain room-temperature, does not mean the beers are the same (nor does it imply such a thing). And this was your original claim.

      --
      --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
    34. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      You DID NOT say: "This hardly implies that there is a wide variation in the recommended serving temperatures of European beers".
      So what? They aren't even the same in that specific aspect, so it was still wrong.
      Note, however, that even in this case he's probably right; I know of no european beer who is typically 'chilled' the way american beer is.
      Carlsberg? Stella? Those tend to be served pretty cold. Certainly not anywhere near room temperature like Mr Bullshit stated. Denmark and Belgium are part of Europe, by the way.

      Let's try an analogy: "It's a European car. Therefore it's small and front wheel drive". Would you call bullshit on that?

      In the vast majority of cases, however, the typical temperature for european beer is exactly as he describes.
      Rubbish. Plainly and simply wrong. Even English bitter which ignorant piss-drinking colonials think is warm is actually served well below room temperature.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    35. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      It is also simply FACT that you can taste more flavors when a beer is warmer.
      Of course you can, DORK. Nobody said otherwise.

      Now stop showing off how much you know^H^H^H^ can find with google and maybe learn how to express yourself more accurately, huh?

      I was of the impression that American beers were served chilled because they contained more off-flavors do to being brewed with inferior ingredients
      No, it's to disguise the fact that they don't have any taste at all.

      Actually, I've fallen into the same trap as you. WTF does 'American beers' mean? Do you mean mainstream American beers such as (yuk) Bud? I've tasted a few beers round the East coast that do actually have a reasonable amount of flavour to them.

      Of course Guinness and Stella Artois taste different.
      Stella tastes even more different if you serve it at room temperature. Which according to you is how it should be served; it is European, after all.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    36. Re:Somewhat Lacking? by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

      "So what? They aren't even the same in that specific aspect, so it was still wrong."

      Perhaps, but he was wrong in that specific aspect then. It does not follow he claimed it were all the same beers.

      "Carlsberg? Stella? Those tend to be served pretty cold. Certainly not anywhere near room temperature like Mr Bullshit stated."

      True, they tend to be served cold, especially during the summer. Note that cold in this case means 5-6c, however. As far as I know (but, granted, I'm not *THAT* an expert on American beer - mainly because the ones I tried sucked), typical USA beer is served colder than that.

      "Denmark and Belgium are part of Europe, by the way."

      You don't say? ;-)

      Let's not get patronising, shall we? :-)

      "Let's try an analogy: "It's a European car. Therefore it's small and front wheel drive". Would you call bullshit on that?"

      Well, I would call it a generalisation on the issues he raised (small and front wheel), yes. Just as I said you had a point when you were refering to the serving temperatures. That said, as far as a typical car in europe would be more small and have a front wheel car then the commonly used USA car, I could see the point he was trying to make.

      In any case, no one could reasonably conclude that such a person claimed all european cars were the same.

      "Rubbish. Plainly and simply wrong. Even English bitter which ignorant piss-drinking colonials think is warm is actually served well below room temperature."

      Ermm...I think he *did* say below room temperature. Granted, the level of 'below' could be debated endlessly, I fear - which I'm hardly inclined to do.

      Anyway, isn't this discussion rather becomming moot? Clearly, you interpreted the parent poster differently then I did, and that's really all there is to it.

      --
      --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
  14. You can talk about free beer all you want. by mikeophile · · Score: 4, Funny

    Until I'm drinking it, there is no buzz.

    1. Re:You can talk about free beer all you want. by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Until I'm drinking it, there is no buzz.

      So far, it's just vaporware.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:You can talk about free beer all you want. by ShelbyCobra · · Score: 1

      Right, and if you get your hands on some free deviled eggs while you are drinking that free beer, you could get some serious vaporware going on later that day...

      --

      -ShelbyCobra

      Living life in the right side of the s-plane

  15. Forking it by PSVMOrnot · · Score: 1

    I wonder if I can make a version that is suitable for coeliacs...

    1. Re:Forking it by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's called sake.

      I don't know that there are special names for corn beer, or millet beer, or amaranth beer. Then, of course, root beer and birch beer are really beer if you really brew them. Recipes are available on the net, as they are for barley beer, so I'm at something of a loss to explain what this story is all about.

      Me, I generally just go straight for the cognac, but I'd have to move to France to make it myself.

      There's always wild grape rotgut.

      KFG

    2. Re:Forking it by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      Do you have coeliacs? Can you recommend a site on the web with good information about it? A mate of mine has symptoms of it, although he has other food intolerances as well besides gluten. From what I've read on the web, that can happen in cases of coeliacs.

    3. Re:Forking it by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      You might want to do a a search on the rec.crafts.brewing newsgroup. There's some guys there who brew gluten-free beer.

    4. Re:Forking it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Forking it by PSVMOrnot · · Score: 1

      *nods* I've got coeliac disease, and have been on a no gluten diet since I was wee tiny.

      You might want to try looking at http://www.coeliac.co.uk/ for info, although that is a UK organisiation, so if you are from else where you may want to google for a more local site.

      As for your friend, there are medical tests to determine if it is coeliac disease (most commonly an intestinal biopsy), so if you have a vaguely open minded doctor you could go see them about it. Otherwise - and this is what I might go for first - he could try cutting wheat, oats, rye, and barley out of his diet and see if he feels better for it. There's no harm done by avoiding glutenised foods... except maybe to your bank balance; gluten free stuff costs.

      If he does want to try gluten free then point him at the coeliac uk site, and also:
      http://www.trufree.co.uk/
      http://www.glutafin.co.uk/
      http://www.schaer.com/
      http://www.celiacsolutions.com/

      I would point you to the site for Dietary Specialists (who make gorgeous gluten free stuff) but I can't find it. Suffice it to say you can get their stuff at Sainsburys (UK supermarket).

  16. More Free (as in speach) beer by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 2, Informative

    And other drinks over at the Cat's Meow 3 lots of beer related stuff. Of course it will cost you some money to brew a batch, but hey it could be worth it.

    I do not vouch for specific recipies there, as I haven't done any brewing in years.

    --
    Erlang Developer and podcaster
  17. No wonder there is confusion by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The minute folks have got their heads around free beer , they are drunk and stand little chance of grasping the differences between Libra and gratis .

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  18. Where's the source? by AccUser · · Score: 0, Troll

    So I can download the recipe, but not the ingredients. Isn't that rather like being able to download the makefile for a software project, but having to write the code yourself?

    --

    Any fool can talk, but it takes a wise man to listen.

    1. Re:Where's the source? by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1
      So I can download the recipe, but not the ingredients. Isn't that rather like being able to download the makefile for a software project, but having to write the code yourself?

      I know you were probably kidding, but..
      No, no no. It's like downloading all the code but having to run it on a machine you had to buy yourself.

    2. Re:Where's the source? by fbartho · · Score: 1

      I disagree, I think its more like getting the code and the makefile, but having to provide the computer and compiler, and having to provide raw 0 and 1 type bits.

      If you get around to quantum computing you should be able to purchase "bit-packs" which can dissolve into either 0 or 1 bits at runtime or in real world terms can turn into either beer or wine depending on whether you know precisely how fast you're pouring it, or how carefully you're pouring it.

      --
      Gravity Sucks
    3. Re:Where's the source? by Proteus · · Score: 1

      No, the full source is available. However, it does link against some non-free libraries. ;-) For the DIY-er, you can always use home-grown solutions for those libraries, in this case, literally. Growing your own grains (even hops) can be enjoyable. However, I recommend paying the license fee for the yeast, as growing your own is rather difficult.

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
  19. Confused? by the_unknown_soldier · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is the GNU definition:

    ``Free software'' is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of ``free'' as in ``free speech,'' not as in ``free beer.'' Free software is a matter of the users' freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. More precisely, it refers to four kinds of freedom, for the users of the software:


    * The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
    * The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
    * The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2).
    * The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits (freedom 3). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

    http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html

  20. DO NOT follow their directions by IvyMike · · Score: 5, Informative

    The process of brewing beer is easy, but not quite THAT easy.

    A good introduction to brewing is How To Brew by John Palmer. The entire 1st edition of the book is available on the web for free at the URL above. (Perhaps predictably, it's free as in beer, not as in speech :)

    1. Re:DO NOT follow their directions by Poro · · Score: 1
      The process of brewing beer is easy, but not quite THAT easy.
      So I can't just ./configure, make and make install this? Doh!
  21. Uh-oh ... whose beer now? by KlaymenDK · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uh-oh ... I hope "Vores øl" doesn't get in trouble for this (but then again, it's not like this is the US, so there is hope).

    The thing is, a few years ago one of the two major Danish beer labels had a series of commercials in which "Vores øl" was the signature. They might not see this site as such a "free speech" win, though I hope they'll let it pass without raising a fuss.

  22. Article Text, in case of /.ing by hobotron · · Score: 2


    Now ... when you here the words "open source" most people think of computer software programs like Linux ...It is a model where the original "source code" can be modified and improved at little cost...and it's shared among users for free.

    Well now ... thanks to Rasmus Nielsen, beer is free too. At least the recipe is ... in an industry where ingredients and processes are typically kept under constant poliece surveilance. Rasmus Nielsen is one of the creators of the Vores OI beer recipe. We were able to trace the subject to his secluded home in Copehagen, Denmark.

    Recipe for approx. 85 ltr. Vores Øl (Our Beer) (approx. 6% alchohol by volume).

    Malt extract
    For Vores Øl we use four types malted barley:

    6 kg pilsner malt
    4 kg münsner malt
    1 kg caramel malt
    1 kg lager malt
    The malt is crushed and put in 55-60C hot water for 1-2 hours.

    The mixture is filtered and the liquid now contains about 10 kg malt extract.

    Taste and sugar Besides malt we use:

    60 g Tetnang bitter hops

    50 g Hallertaver aroma hops
    300 g Guarana beans
    4 kg sugar
    (Guarana beans can typically be bought at health food stores).

    The malt extact is brought to a boil in a large pot with the hops and approx. 70 ltr. of water.

    After half an hour, the Guarana beans and sugar are added.

    The mixture simmers for about an hour, and is then filtered and cooled in a sealed container.

    Fermentation

    Yeast is added and the beer is fermented at room temperature for approx. 2 weeks.

    When the beer is fully fermented it is transferred to bottles. First 4 g sugar is added per liter and some yeast from the bottom of the fermentation tanks for priming.

    Vores Øl is then left in the bottles at room temperature for 8-10 days for carbonation. Then the beer is ready to enjoy; cold and refreshing.

    --
    There is truth in humor.
  23. Little Known Fact About Free Beer/Free Speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did you know that it is legal to beat the crap of anyone who tries to explain something to you with free as in beer/free as in speech?

    Hopefully someday the ass kicking won't just be legal, but compulsory.

  24. ugh... malt extract by Compay · · Score: 1

    What a bunch of beer noobs. True beer geeks brew all grain.

    1. Re:ugh... malt extract by murukusu · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA, you'll notice that they do use grain:

      6 kg pilsner malt
      4 kg münsner malt
      1 kg caramel malt
      1 kg lager malt
      The malt is crushed and put in 55-60C hot water for 1-2 hours.

      The mixture is filtered and the liquid now contains about 10 kg malt extract.
  25. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a painful response to read! What the hell were you thinking?

  26. Important message from Heineken by datafr0g · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a Heineken representative, I'd just like to remind you all that THERE ARE NO ADVANTAGES to open source beer.

    See our website for zillions of usless statistics and reports (compiled by and independent organisation (funded by us)), that disprove the so called benefits of open source beer.

    As well as conveniently digging up all those old patents we also plan to file numourous lawsuits against the open source beer community - if you are a user of open source beer, watch out - you may be prosecuted.

    --
    "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
    1. Re:Important message from Heineken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know Heineken produces beer :)

    2. Re:Important message from Heineken by dasdrewid · · Score: 1

      Hey, now, Heineken makes a reasonable product. If you'd used something like Milwaukee's Best or Lone Star, that would be a more accurate comparison. And if you don't know what Lone Star is, imagine making your dog drink a bottle of Budweiser (the good one, not the American one), then having them piss in a bottle, then making them drink that, and piss it into another bottle, then adding a little bit more alcohol. Then charge a buck fifty for a keg. That's Lone Star.

      --
      No trespassing. Violators will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    3. Re:Important message from Heineken by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a Heineken representative, I'd just like to remind you all that THERE ARE NO ADVANTAGES to open source beer.

      As a beer "power user", I'd just like to remind you that Heineken tastes like an ass.

    4. Re:Important message from Heineken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we all know that Goatse was the first to open source his ass.

      *ducks*

  27. Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by Vellmont · · Score: 5, Informative

    This recipe is terrible. The most glaring error is they don't specify the type of yeast. Is this an Ale or a Lager? There's a big difference beween the two. Given the room temperature fermenting, you'd assume an Ale, but some Lager yeasts can ferment at room temperature too. Among those two major yeast types there's a huge difference among the various strains that produces very different end products.

    The recipe calls for armoma hops and bitter hops. The only difference between the two is the length of the boil. Bitter hops are boiled on the order of 30 minutes, Aroma hops are boiled on the order of 5 minutes. But no boil times are specified at all. The boiling time of hops impacts the hop level of the beer, which has a major impacts on the flavor of the beer.

    If this recipe were code, it wouldn't compile. You'd have to guess at the yeast type and boil times for the hops. The massive 85 liter batch size isn't terribly usefull either. Most homebrewers do 5-6 gallon batches.

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by datafr0g · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whenever I complained about some open source app not doing what I wanted it to, some dude would always come along and whine something like, "it's free, it's open source - fix it yerself"....

      Ahem... (clears throat)

      "Quit complaining! it's free, it's open source! Fix it yerself"

      But seriously, I agree - it definitly doesn't look ready for a version 1.0 release right now.

      :-)

      --
      "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
    2. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that it's impossible to even know what they're even trying to create in the first place. Without some kind of guideline to start with you might as well ignore the recipe they came up with and use your own.

      It's as if you've got a collection of code that's incomplete, but you're not sure what the completed product was actually supposed to do. How would you possibly fill in the missing pieces of code?

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      I don't really mind that half the world is using backwards units (which half might depend on your viewpoint) but please don't mix gallons and liters when comparing measurements....
      5-6 gallon batches would mean something around 20 liters btw.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    4. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by kailoran · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's simple - you fork. OSB-Lager, OSB-Ale etc...

    5. Re: Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by GanryuMVP · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, everyone drinks beer for the taste... just like I read playboy for the interesting views on philosophy.

    6. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      exactly, and as a home brewer I took offense at the title "worlds first open source beer" which it is not. Myself and several other home-brewers share recipies and techniques all the time.

      Open source beer has been around ever cince home brewing has been around. (like forever)

      I strongly suggest to people wanting to get into home brewing to get some books on the subject, and make a couple of throw away batches (my first 4 batches were HORRIBLE! praanoid sterelization is key to making beer!)

      I would put the recipie as not even a no compiling project but as a project that requires some dependancies but they only tell you generally..

      Oh to compile you need a graphics library. and the lack of details on the rest of it is like not telling you what programming language it is.

      This is not at all like that open source cola recipie that was on the net a few years ago. that one was complete and easy to make (if you can get your hands on the ingredients)

      in fact that open source cola launched me into beer making. I bought several postmix pop canisters for making the pop.... found they are wonderful for fermenting my beer into larger than bottle sized batches. my "mini-keg" so to speak of lumpyale.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by Mr2001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is this an Ale or a Lager?

      Since it's named "Vores Oel", I'd guess it's an ale.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    8. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by hyfe · · Score: 2, Interesting
      exactly, and as a home brewer I took offense at the title "worlds first open source beer" which it is not. Myself and several other home-brewers share recipies and techniques all the time.

      While you're busy taking offense, how about taking a break and realise it's a joke?

      Either way, people were sharing code and programs long before 'open source' got around. What makes open source is the licence (and preferably some idiot standing on a virtual box shouting, 'this is open source'), and this is the first I've heard of anybody trying to attach a licence to their recipe.

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    9. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by dapyx · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Myself and several other home-brewers share recipies and techniques all the time.
      That is "shared source", not "open source".
      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    10. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How so? I make 5 gallons as 22L7, so you'd be more accurate saying "around 25L".

    11. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recipes are not covered by copyright.

    12. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      Heh.. I used google to do the conversion and it defaults to US gallons.
      Another good example why it is important to use only one unit and make sure everything is in the exact same unit when comparing measures :)

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    13. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by Carewolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Be carefull. Though ale is derived from the danish word Øl, the distinction between ale and lager was introduced after both words was already found in the English language. There no such distinction in Danish, which is probably why they don't specify it.

      However most danes consider pilsner a normal beer. So you should use Carlsbergensis yeast.

    14. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note: open source was around WAY before close source was.

      when computers first hit thescene EVERYONE had the source and released their sourcecode. only when microsoft came around did they start acting like assholes and closed it up.

    15. Re: Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by jone1941 · · Score: 1

      True, but I don't see you claiming to read "Nude Granny" in this context. While it may not be priority #1 for you, taste does serve a semi important role when you first start drinking. For some people (maybe it's a maturity thing) it is more important. Remeber it's not the destination, but the ride that you'll remember.

      --
      Fear trumps hope and ignorance trumps both
    16. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by zkn · · Score: 1

      It's a beer made by IT people... They proberbly spend more time making the webpage then acutally reading about brewing(Wich is more of a biology thing).
      I recall back in highschool we had a beerbrewing project in biology class. We spend most of the time studying the history and importants of yeasts.
      Noting that they made this project in cooporation with a beer brewing company, they most likely didn't have anything to do with the process, except maybe the caffeine part.

      It looks more like a concept then v1.0 at this time.

    17. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by hyfe · · Score: 1

      .. hence 'trying'

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    18. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      I think forking is WRONG! Dividing the forces only leads to user confusion and lessens our ability to gain ground against our firmly entrenched proprietary competitor!

      -l

      p.s., Personally, I think Gnome Lager is far superior to KDE Ale as we all know gnomes are much heavier drinkers and better brewmasters.

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    19. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean gLager, gAle, etc.?

      --
      Fuck it
    20. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1

      Yeah, at first I thought it was cool, but further reading made me realize that the recipe probably isn't that good since its process and size isn't close to the homebrewer's standards.

      It seriously should be "ported" to a more standards-compliant platform.

      I'd need to convert it down to 5 gallons first. Although since I'm an extract brewer, I'd have to convert this from all-grain somehow. And seriously, sugar? aside from the pure corn sugar used for priming the bottles, no respectable home-brewer uses sugar. If the beer is supposed to be sweet then malto-dextrin should be used, if it is supposed to be fermented out than use malt extract.

      Ah well, SGDI, i guess i should stop complaining and just fix it.
      (sounds good do it)

    21. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by trcooper · · Score: 1

      Absolutely... That recipe is sucktacular. Over 30% of the fermentables are white sugar. According to the article, they're mashing at 55-60C, there is absolutely no way they're getting 10 lbs of fermentables out of that. Probably half that, which makes the amount of sugar used even worse. I'd be surprised if it was actually drinkable.

      Drop the sugar, Add more base malt. Increase the mash temp to 65-68C (150-155F). Do a 60 minute mash, and mashout at 75C (168F).

      Do a 60 minute boil, with the Tettnanger for the full boil, and add the hallertau with 15 minutes remaining. Hallertau is worthless as an aroma hop IMO.

      I'd use a yeast like WYeast American Ale II, it's a very fast ferment, and clean tasting.

      Of course this is far from the first 'open source' beer. Here's hundreds... http://brewery.org/gambmug/ Many micro breweries are also willing to share recipies or grain bills/hop schrdules with homebrewers who send a friendly email to them.

      Here's my contribution... Would have made a much better 'first open source' beer. This is the perfect beer for people who are afraid of homebrew.

      3.00 lb Pale Malt (2 Row) US (2.0 SRM) Grain 30.0 %
      3.00 lb Wheat Malt, Ger (2.0 SRM) Grain 30.0 %
      0.50 lb Aromatic Malt (26.0 SRM) Grain 5.0 %
      0.50 lb Cara-Pils/Dextrine (2.0 SRM) Grain 5.0 %
      0.50 oz Northern Brewer [8.50%] (60 min) Hops 17.5 IBU
      0.50 oz Fuggles [4.50%] (15 min) Hops 4.6 IBU
      0.50 oz Fuggles [4.50%] (0 min) Hops -
      3.00 lb Honey (1.0 SRM) Sugar 30.0 %
      1 Pkgs American Hefeweizen Ale (White Labs #WLP320) Yeast-Wheat

      Beer Profile

      Est Original Gravity: 1.057 SG
      Measured Original Gravity: 1.055 SG
      Est Final Gravity: 1.015 SG Measured Final Gravity: 1.008 SG
      Estimated Alcohol by Vol: 5.5 % Actual Alcohol by Vol: 6.1 %
      Bitterness: 22.1 IBU Calories: 242 cal/pint
      Est Color: 5.0 SRM Color: Color

      30 minute protien rest at 122, and mash at 150 for 30 more minutes. Mashout at 168F

    22. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 3, Informative
      Not necessarily. What's printed on the label as an ale or lager does not mean what yeast is used. Some states have weird laws determining what you are allowed to call an "ale" which are not the technically correct definitions. (Ale yeast ferement at room temps, 60-70F. Lager yeasts ferment at refrigerated temperatures - 35F.)

      Basically, the ingredients listed here are useless. Brewing is all about technique, not ingredients. In order to realistically clone a beer, you need to know:

      • The yeast strain to produce the correct flavor profile. Even specifying "ale yeast" is not enough. There are dozens and dozens of strains with very different flavors.
      • What kind/brand of grain used and its color. Caramel malt comes in a wide spectrum of colors and varieties.
      • The expected alpha acid % in the hops to normalize for natural differences. One day your Hallertauer might be 2% and the next 4%. If you don't normalize, the second will be roughly twice as bitter.
      • What temperataure it's fermented and conditioned at, and for how long. Some beers have complex fermentation schedules with many changes.
      • Mineral profile of the water they use. You can't substitute hard water for soft and expect it to be the same.
      • How it's mashed. Single infusion? Double? Protein rest? Mash out? Maybe it's a (single/double triple) decoction?

      Without all that, you are not cloning a beer, but merely making something vaguely similar. This level of detail is what brewmasters need to do to make a zillion gallons that all tastes the same, regardless of region. That's why when you buy Sam Adams in Arizona, made with different ingredients, it still tastes like Sam Adams.

      Basically, this recipe is a marketing ploy and not useful in the least.

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
    23. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by darrylo · · Score: 1
      Since it's named "Vores Oel", I'd guess it's an ale.

      Given the recipe's, umm, "attention to detail", perhaps the name is some ancient corruption of "Pore's Oil", which is what some people might call it, after "filling in the missing bits". ;-)

      (And I won't rant on the sad lack of sanitization ....)

    24. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by raddan · · Score: 1

      Try both, I'm sure that either yeast would taste fine. Considering the use of lager malt and münsner malt (Munich malt?), I'm guessing that they intend this to be a lager. Of course, that 4kg of sugar throws me right off. Maybe you should use a high-gravity Belgian yeast? I'd take a hydrometer reading and then decide from there.

      Other obvious problems-- mashing isn't always as simple as just putting grain in water at a certain temperature (this is called a "simple infusion mash"), sparging isn't as simple as just "filtering".

      But someone who has experience brewing, this is more than enough to go on. Half the fun of brewing is seeing how different two brews that have the same ingredients can be. Change the mash to a step infusion or decoction mash, try a different sparging setup, age the beer, whatever. Obviously, the other fun half is drinking your creation :)

    25. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by k98sven · · Score: 1

      Since it's named "Vores Oel", I'd guess it's an ale.

      Bad guess. "Oel", is a translitteration of "Øl",which means "beer". Not any kind in specific.

      Danes mostly drink lagers (Carlsberg & Tuborg), so most of the "øl" out there is not ale at all.

    26. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by pclminion · · Score: 1
      The most glaring error is they don't specify the type of yeast. Is this an Ale or a Lager?

      It's almost certainly not a lager. For one thing, the specified fermentation temperature is too high for a lager. It could be a steam beer, but the recipe doesn't look like a steam beer. The guarana adjunct would be unheard of in a lager. This has to be an ale. As for the strain to use, that's up to you. I'd go with a clean ale yeast to avoid a clash between fruity esters and guarana (which would probably be gross).

      The recipe calls for armoma hops and bitter hops. The only difference between the two is the length of the boil. Bitter hops are boiled on the order of 30 minutes, Aroma hops are boiled on the order of 5 minutes. But no boil times are specified at all.

      In the brewing world, unless otherwise specified, bittering hops go in for 60 minutes, flavor hops for 10-15 minutes, and aroma hops either directly before or concurrently with flameout. There's not much variation on this. The time isn't specified because "bittering" and "aroma" are specification enough.

      The massive 85 liter batch size isn't terribly usefull either. Most homebrewers do 5-6 gallon batches.

      85 liters is about 22 gallons. A large batch which would require special equipment, but nothing completely out of reach of a homebrewer. I've heard of beer being brewed in a 70 gallon water heater tank.

      Having said all this, though, this recipe doesn't look very good, and I doubt that the creators are skillful brewers.

    27. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by digiears · · Score: 1

      OK, here's the brewer geek in me coming out. The recipie is ok, but they add 4kg of sugar that only spikes the alcohol content up to 6%. In brewing, adding raw corn sugar adds no flavor, it only produces more alcohol. And their trick pony is the Guarana. Can you say Bud's E energy drink? I could make a few more comments but it's obvious they just wanted to do something different under the CCL. I can understand the cool factor there.

    28. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1
      All very valid points, but I'm sure the recipe has a plethora of command line options that allows you to specify all this and possibly more. Some combination of options might not really work and could potentially explode the mixture.

      Type

      man vores_oel
      to get an overview of the options.
    29. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by kennie_nm · · Score: 1

      Sorry, no. Oel is just the danish name for beer. Actually it is spelled Øl, but never mind that...

    30. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Myself and several other home-brewers share recipes and techniques all the time.

      That is "shared source", not "open source".

      Get thee to Google, or to any homebrew store - and note the hundreds of recipes available for free (-as-in-air). The grandparent is correct, homebrew recipies have been open source for decades. The creator of the 'beer[1]' in the linked article has done both the homebrew and OSS communities a vast disservice by creating confusion where none existed before.

      [1]I say 'beer' because the recipe as released will produced horrid swill that will drive any drinker back to Budmilloors post haste. If this recipie were code, it would be the 0.0.0.0.0.0.1 release - I.E. about the equivalent of a usenet or slashdot post.

    31. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      I myself have beer recipes published under an FSF and OSI approved license that predate this guy's joke.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    32. Re:Coming from an ameteur brewer.. by Fizzl · · Score: 1
      This recipe is terrible. The most glaring error is they don't specify the type of yeast. Is this an Ale or a Lager?

      Hello mr. expert.
      It seems you are unaware of the fact that there are only one type of yeast. Only thing that matters about yeast is that if you mix it in with the "mäski" (sorry, I don't know the correct word for the barley concentrate in english), the sugar, the water, sprinkle on top of the mix or mix it in after the hot and cold ingredients have been mixed.

      Damn newbies :P
  28. Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's free as in beer label

  29. What ?! by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    They add stuff besides barley malt, yeast, hops and water to the brew and _dare_ to call it beer ?

    Blasphemy !

    1. Re:What ?! by mrjb · · Score: 1

      You must be German - There's a whole world of darn good beers outside the Deutsche Reinheitsgebot. Try them, I promise you won't be disappointed.

      Hoegaarden Grand Cru for example has curacao peel, many white beers and triples have a hint of coriander. Westvleteren 12 trappist has rye in it. Who would _dare_ not to call it a beer?

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    2. Re:What ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would, But I won't.
      I call it yipsee pis.

      The reinheidsgebot dating from 1516 does ensure that brewers produce some of the best beers in the wolrd

      And no, i'm not german.

      retep _ mein leben !!

  30. Re:Open Source Beer? Release Notes by tessonec · · Score: 1

    Well, if you'd RTFA

    http://www.voresoel.dk/main.php?id=70

    It has a Creative Commons License, so if you change it you have to publish your modyfied version as well

  31. Super Flex by KrunZ · · Score: 1

    The beer is currently sold by the art performing group SuperFlex's(http://www.superflex.net/) shop. The shop is called COPYSHOP. Press info:

    "COPYSHOP CHALLENGES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
    COPYSHOP is a place where you can photocopy everything from text to images. We use this name for a shop and information forum which will investigate the phenomena of copying. In COPYSHOP you will find products that challenges intellectual property. It can be modified originals, improved copies, political anti-brands. - or a SUPERCOPY as the new original. COPYSHOP will discuss the control of value in the same place where it is produced and distributed: the market. As an active player the function of COPYSHOP will be as an ordinary shop. Furthermore, COPYSHOP will function as a gathering point and network "

  32. Beer is already free (as in speech) by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry folks, but that's just plainly stupid. All IP issues with recipe for beer should be settled with Hildegard of Bingen. This German Benedictine nun was the first author to suggest that adding hops to the disgusting fluid hitherto known as beer will be generally a good idea. Since the age of Hildegard (12 century), no significant progress has been made in this topic - she has described the beer as we know it today. And as it was with many medieval philospophers, Hildegard created her "intellectual property" just "ad maiorem Dei gloriam", feel free to copy for the greater God's glory. So there is no need to make "open source beer" today - it was open source since last eight centuries.

    Personally, I think the idea of adding guarana to beer is just plainly insane. Beer is meant to relax people. If I want to stay alert and awake I can drink coffee or energy drinks. Beer is something to drink when the work is over and you can relax. Guarana beer is like coffee with sleeping pills.

    1. Re:Beer is already free (as in speech) by cyxxon · · Score: 1, Informative

      And since you already mentioned it: adding Guarana also makes this beer not adhere to the Deitsche Reinheitsgebot (German Purity Law) for beer, which AFAIK is a requirement for selling a beverage under that name in Germany (the law limits the ingedients to hops, malt, yeast and water). So, they probably could distribute their source under some open source license, but I do not think any commercial verndor will pick this up anytime soon and sell it pre-compiled in Germany...

    2. Re:Beer is already free (as in speech) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "No significant progress has been made in this topic."

      Um, how about pasteurization and cold filtering? Guiness' bubbles that go down for a smooth creamy beer? Oh yeah, lagers that aren't super bitter too . . .

      And your link didn't mention the beer thing. Try wikipedia. It mentions a lot that's happened since hops were added.

    3. Re:Beer is already free (as in speech) by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 2, Funny
      But I'm a descendent of Hildegard, and I demand royalties!

      Rich.

    4. Re:Beer is already free (as in speech) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no you are not... she was a nun... you have forked before Hildegard... but you may be a descendent of Hildegards sister or brother...

    5. Re:Beer is already free (as in speech) by venicebeach · · Score: 1

      But any specific recipe may be owned. Take cola, for example; I could probably produce a fine tasting cola, but if I want to make Coca-cola, I'm going to have to have access to their super secret formula which describes the precise proportions of ingredients.

    6. Re:Beer is already free (as in speech) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the late 90', that is not true any more. You can now sell anything under the label "beer". Chances are that nobody would buy it, though.

    7. Re:Beer is already free (as in speech) by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Try a little Prune Juice. More Prune and you get Dr. Pepper or Mr. Pibb. Don't use barbecue or soy sauce -- this could lead to zombism.

      More than for competitive flavor advantages, the formula must remain secret to maintain consumer consumption levels. Because if anyone were to read; "Paint stripper, aluminum silicate [as an antiperspirant] , denatured cocaine and morphene products, humors of mercury, with a dash of newt eye" --well, you can just guess what would happen to sales. I'm sure they've replaced a few natural ingredients like "eye of newt" over the years. But as anyone knows, preservatives ruin most magical potions. So don't think coke will work in a love charm like it does in a Long Island Iced Tea.

      And, a little Off Topic; Couldn't national security considerations force companies to disclose "secret recipes"? I mean, in case we are getting mind altering fluids from alien glands -- you can't be too careful.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    8. Re:Beer is already free (as in speech) by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      I think the "Hops Flavor" in beer was designed as a replacement for Horse Piss. I actually prefer lighter ales and asian rice beers. And let's not forget how Jamaicans added a lime to their Beers -- how's that for "nothing new"? Hmm?

      For me, beer got improved by wine coolers.

      You can hate me now.

      But really, a lot of you drinking those bitter, dark ales, are just pretending to like them. If you weren't, European beers would have come with twist off caps. Twist caps are a convenience. Forcing everyone to get a bottle opener on their Swiss Army Knife is just the peak of pretension. I'd probably have a different view of Dark Beer if it weren't pasteurized like it is in the US -- or if I liked horses in a more disturbing manner.

      One persons Guarana is another persons Hops-- though I've never had "Guarana beer". You have to wonder how many people have made really bad attempts at making beer-- and how many of us are drinking said beers that we "acquired a taste for". I now drink beer due to a lot of peer pressure and time to "acquire a taste" -- which could be much like enjoying prison. The whole beer thing is suspect when someone yells; "Eureka -- it tastes less like piss!"

      I actually even like Blue Cheese now. I may be irredeemable.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    9. Re:Beer is already free (as in speech) by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

      But I'm a descendent of Hildegard, and I demand royalties!

      Sue God - she transfered her rights to Him :-)

    10. Re:Beer is already free (as in speech) by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 1

      just "ad maiorem Dei gloriam", feel free to copy for the greater God's glory.

      "ad maiorem Dei gloriam" means "for the greater glory of God". "maiorem" and "gloriam" are both in the accusative case.

      --
      Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
    11. Re:Beer is already free (as in speech) by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1

      [i]I think the "Hops Flavor" in beer was designed as a replacement for Horse Piss. I actually prefer lighter ales and asian rice beers.[/i]

      Rice beer and "lighter ales" (whatever they may be) all contain hops to give them that "beer flavour". You obviously don't like "hoppy" beers, but even the most piss weak tasteless beers out there have hops in them.

    12. Re:Beer is already free (as in speech) by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Actually, lager yeast is a more recent innovation.

      And don't forget *glassware*! The reason we have clear beers is because glassware enabled people to SEE what they were drinking :-)

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    13. Re:Beer is already free (as in speech) by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      OK, so weak piss flavor is better than strong piss flavor. I didn't know that rice beers had wheat in them (hops). Though, I haven't done anything more than drink these beverages.

      Amstel Light is one of the few light American Beers I like. But I'm also a fan of Australian Beers like Fosters. But, none of this really matters.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  33. Out of morbid curiosity..... by Volvogga · · Score: 3, Funny

    can a person under the legal drinking age purchase these ingrediants without anyone asking for ID?

    I know that malt can be used for other things (although I doubt lager malt has other uses), and hops have properties that stop bacterial reaction (although I have never heard of their use for anything else). Yeast, of course, is used for bread. So for thoes with experience in home bewing, what's the verdict?

    --
    Vol~
    1. Re:Out of morbid curiosity..... by chameleon3 · · Score: 1

      same reason a 16 year-old can buy rolling papers at the drugstore. It's illegal for him/her to use them to smoke... anything... but they are legal to buy.

      Plus, if you're intelligent and patient enough to master fermentation, etc. you deserve to taste the fruits of your labor

    2. Re:Out of morbid curiosity..... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      I can't see why not. I have it on good authority that you can purchase all these ingredients legally in Saudi Arabia, where alcohol of any sort is completely illegal (no matter what your age). Apparently the Saudi cops used to turn a blind eye to expats home-brewing.

      So ... Volvogga ... you wouldn't happen to be under age by any chance, would you?

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    3. Re:Out of morbid curiosity..... by martinX · · Score: 1

      My wife lived in Saudi for a while and she said the supermarket workers would tell you which aisles had all the necessary brewing ingredients.

      Though, just like any illegal practice that the cops allow, they can use it to bust people they don't like.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    4. Re:Out of morbid curiosity..... by spisska · · Score: 2, Interesting

      can a person under the legal drinking age purchase these ingrediants without anyone asking for ID?

      Yes. It doesn't matter what the malt, hops, yeast, airlocks, fermenting bins, bottle cappers, etc can be used for, it matters what they contain, which is not alcohol.

      It's illegal for a person under 21 to buy alcohol, not barley malt or live yeast. It's also illegal for a minor to consume alcohol, but that's a different matter, since you're not going to have any alcohol for at least a couple weeks.

      I did exactly this when I was at university in Ohio about 10 years ago. The summer of my freshman year I moved off campus and was working as a janitor at the school for the summer session (eight hours a night, but the work was done in three and janitors have all the keys).

      Anyway, the Ohio State liquor store (and homebrew shop) was on my way home from school. At first I didn't have any problem buying beer there, but eventually someone realized that I was only 19.

      But the guy who ran the shop was an old-time homebrew guy and we got to talking about beers and the making of them. He said he could sell me whatever I wanted for making beer so long as it didn't have alcohol in it.

      So thanks to my janitor keys, I managed to liberate an old 20-liter spring water container from behind some disused florescent fixtures in an ancient storeroom in one of the social sciences buildings. A trip to the surplus store got me a big ol' army-size aluminum boilin' pot for about $20. All that was left were some sundries from the brew-shop -- airlock, rubber tubing, bottle capper and caps, funnel, etc.

      The guy at the shop was always very helpful and willing to trade recipes, recommend this hop with that malt, and so on. We ended up sharing a few after I turned 21 (his was much better) and I kept brewing up until I finished school.

      Brewing is a lot of work but has very nice rewards.

    5. Re:Out of morbid curiosity..... by RangerRick98 · · Score: 1
      So thanks to my janitor keys, I managed to liberate an old 20-liter spring water container from behind some disused florescent fixtures in an ancient storeroom in one of the social sciences buildings
      ...with a sign on the door saying, "Beware of the Leopard"?
      --
      "You're older than you've ever been, and now you're even older."
    6. Re:Out of morbid curiosity..... by pclminion · · Score: 1
      can a person under the legal drinking age purchase these ingrediants without anyone asking for ID?

      Yes. But some LHBS (homebrew store) proprietors might turn you away.

      I know that malt can be used for other things (although I doubt lager malt has other uses)

      Malt itself is not used for much of anything except making beer and malt extract. Malt extract, on the other hand, is widely used for sweetening purposes, baking, making malt milkshakes, etc.

      hops have properties that stop bacterial reaction (although I have never heard of their use for anything else)

      Pretty much all uses of hops center on their aroma. The smell of fresh hops is other worldly.

      Yeast, of course, is used for bread.

      You would definitely NOT want to ferment beer with bread yeast, nor would you want to make bread with ale/lager yeast! Unless you like such oddities as bubblegum flavored bread.

      At any rate... If you are thinking of brewing your own beer because you aren't old enough to buy it, I should warn you that this hobby is expensive. The cost of ingredients to brew your own beer is approximately the same as the cost of a good microbrew beer (upwards of $9 a six-pack in many places). Any attempts to cut corners to save cost will only result in a substance that resembles a cross between industrial waste and raw sewage.

      Basically, I would recommend sticking to the time-honored method of underage alcohol appropriation: paying a bum a few bucks to buy you a case beer.

    7. Re:Out of morbid curiosity..... by Metex · · Score: 1

      In San Francisco you can. I started brewing beer when I was 16 with my best friend. A great and cheap way to get out of making the usual 'will this store card me if I buy booze?'.

      Also the store http://www.sfbrewcraft.com/ is pretty chill. you can walk in, get your ingrediants and if you dont know where to start the guys who staff it will help you create a recipi on the spot.

      --
      Never could figure out why my girl liked my bitch tits, then I found out she was a lesbian.
    8. Re:Out of morbid curiosity..... by dasdrewid · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Texas. One of the first things I learned from my high school cross country captain is that it's legal for someone over the age of 18 to brew up to 50 (I think 50, but it may be less...) gallons of beer for their own personal use. So yes, you can buy the ingredients, make it, and even drink it under your parent/guardian's supervision (I'm a licensed bartender, so I know that part's legal for sure).

      --
      No trespassing. Violators will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    9. Re:Out of morbid curiosity..... by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      It has not been my experience that the beer is more expensive at all. Decent high quality malt costs maybe 2 bucks a lb. Say you need like 12 - 15 lbs of grain at 2 bucks a shot that is 30 dollars. Plus the hops might cost another 5 dollars. Plus the odd end ingredients. So your up to like say 35-40 bucks. This yields you 45-50 bottles of beer. Where it costs the most is time and effort. Initial equipment purchase need not be expensive. 100 bucks at most. Averaged out across 6-8 batches of beer its still cheaper than a good craft brew. In reality you can usually do a batch of good beer for 30 bucks. Most places sell malt for 1.50 a lb. Its not that expensive and if your careful is usually much less expensive than craft brews. Not astronomically cheaper, but its not an expensive hobby.

      It takes time and patience and a little elbow grease.

      Jeremy

    10. Re:Out of morbid curiosity..... by Bishop · · Score: 1

      Most homebrew shops will sell all the equipment and ingredients to persons under 21, provided that the person is discrete about it. If you go in the shop acting and looking like a 16 year old expect to be turned away. If you look and act like a 20 year old the shopkeep likely won't say a word.

      Most homebrewers I have met think that the drinking age is a farse. Their goal is to make excellent tasteing beer, not cheap liquor to get drunk. The alcohol is a pleasent side effect to be enjoyed in moderation.

    11. Re:Out of morbid curiosity..... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      My source for this said that the Saudi cops _usually_ warned the expats if a raid on a compound was imminent, to give everyone time to tip their homebrew into the sewers. He said there were a lot of pissed rats ...

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
  34. Doesn't look good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being a home brewer I can spot a lousy beer when I see one. Too much alcohol comes from the sugar, it probably tastes something like Carlsberg Elephant. Now that is bad shit! I know the Danish has Carlsberg, the largest producer of crap in the world, but I also know they have some small micro brewers which really know their stuff. So there should be no reason to make it this bad.

  35. Bugs in your beer!! by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    A typical pest in those hot sunny long afternoons!

    I am eagerly awaiting Beerzilla.

    Seriously, this completely confuses the whole issue:

    Someone: Its free folks!
    Folks: Free as in Free Rights or free beer?
    Someone: Erm, Free Beer?
    Folks: Is that free beer or Free Beer?
    Someone: erm, well...

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  36. Alcohol (depressant) + Guarana (stimulant) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that alcohol can quite easily have someone out cold, and coffee can barely keep me awake through a bad lecture, would the net effect of such a drink be significantly different?

    1. Re:Alcohol (depressant) + Guarana (stimulant) by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I'll have to ask my friends on that one...

      They're the ones that put Bailey's Irish Creme in coffee in the morning...

      Of course, them doing it in the morning tells me that the caffeine outweighs the alcohol...

    2. Re:Alcohol (depressant) + Guarana (stimulant) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alcohol actually has a stimulating short-term effect, and appropriately paced can be better at keeping you awake than caffeine.

      As for caffeine, its effects largely depend on how used to it you are; I often fall asleep while drinking coffee, and I have to drink a huge amount for it to keep me awake.

    3. Re:Alcohol (depressant) + Guarana (stimulant) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, good to hear I'm not alone with the Coffee&Baileys addiction. One should be really careful in the morning though, make sure you eat first or its the ultimate laxative ;)

      Anyway, I'm in no doubt it's a combined effect here, but they dont cancel eachother out really, you get the caffeine stimulant effect plus the good things of a moderate alcohol dose. But never, ever drink too much of this sweet stuff or you will get one epic hangover :)

    4. Re:Alcohol (depressant) + Guarana (stimulant) by kennyj449 · · Score: 1

      Actually, if the coffee is hot enough (it SHOULD be brewed near 200 degrees, but most cheap coffeemakers fail here) it'll vaporize most of the alcohol.

      Besides, Bailey's really doesn't have much alcohol in it (it seems to have a kick, but that's just because it's a hot drink - were it cold, you wouldn't even notice the booze.)

      Irish Coffee, on the other hand... THAT can pack a buzz.

      As for the combination of caffeine and alcohol... the effects are seperate and do not cancel out. The exact end effect depends on the individual and his or her reaction to each substance involved. Red Bull, arguably the most famous and popular energy drink and one of the oldest, is very popular in a lot of bars when combined with Jagermeister or various flavored vodkas (cherry seems to have the most call by far.) Drinking a dozen or so shots mixed into five or six cans of Red Bull can put one's heart under a fair amount of stress and has supposedly been cause for a few heart attacks, but that's a hell of a lot more than any normal human being will consume (especially when considering the exhorbitant price of such concoctions at most establishments.) So, if you like how a given drink with both substances goes down, feel free to enjoy a few. Just remember to practice moderation, just as you otherwise would.

  37. I'm not really a beer drinker myself by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

    If beer leaves a sour taste in your mouth, you may find Wine to be much tastier.

  38. Groovy by Papay-Noel · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now I just need debian support to fulfill my dreams:

    apt-get pour beer

    or

    apt-get drink --to-death beer

    Long live to open source!

  39. ALERT!!! DO NOT DRINK IT! by aysa · · Score: 3, Funny

    This beer has a viral license.
    After you drink it you are running embedded beer and you will have to open all your internals for free
    (small fee for sending your intestines is acceptable)

    1. Re:ALERT!!! DO NOT DRINK IT! by ZsoL · · Score: 1

      Anyways, it puts a backdoor in you. One day someone will walk by, and just hack himself into you ;-)

    2. Re:ALERT!!! DO NOT DRINK IT! by aysa · · Score: 1, Funny

      That would only be true if you distribute a modified version of the beer.

      On the other had that is unavoidable.
      Your modified version gets distributed next time you flush the toilet.

      --

  40. Free Beer Machine by Saeger · · Score: 1
    Truly free beer -- as in no $, and no design secrets -- is about 10 to 20 years away.

    This "molecular manufacturing device on every desktop" will eventually enable anyone to reproduce any desired object using a combination of free stored solar energy, recycled, abundant component molecules, and open (or closed) source "3D blueprints".

    Also, a nice side effect of a "make anything replicator" will be to reduce the incentive to want to make source artificially scarce in the first place, since there's no more worries about putting food on the table. Self-sufficiency is very liberating.

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:Free Beer Machine by RPoet · · Score: 1

      Your comment must have prompted a million geeks to think "tea. earl grey. hot." :)

      --
      "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
    2. Re:Free Beer Machine by cornelius1729 · · Score: 1

      Dude, you really might want to consider laying off the Star Trek for a while...

      --
      1729 = 9^3 + 10^3 = 1^3 + 12^3
    3. Re:Free Beer Machine by Saeger · · Score: 1

      I only used the word "replicator" to get the concept across, but despite you wheres-my-flying-car-pessimists, the fact is that molecular manufacturing nanotechnology is well within our grasp and is much simpler than StarTrek's scifi replicators; the former make objects in a way similar to how nature assembles potatos, while the latter requires energy to matter transmutation.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    4. Re:Free Beer Machine by hotzeyboy · · Score: 1

      How much will the replicator cartridges cost? I guess at least initially the cost to produce a beer out of thin air, considering electricity and components will be far more than brewing or purchasing the same beer.

    5. Re:Free Beer Machine by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Well, no doubt HP will try out the model of practically giving away the replicator unit -- just a small one, say, the size of a small uwave oven -- and charging a fortune for replacement matter cartridges. Lexmark will try to use technology to make it illegal to refill a matter cartridge you bought and paid for with your own money, and consequently run afoul of both American law {which specifically permits third-party replacement parts} and European law {which specifically forbids making things artificially difficult to recycle}. And we'll all be spammed to hell with offers of cheap matter cartridges to fit all popular replicator models.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    6. Re:Free Beer Machine by over_exposed · · Score: 1

      Someone just got done reading "Diamond Age" didn't they...

      --
      "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
    7. Re:Free Beer Machine by Saeger · · Score: 1

      A long time ago, along with more serious work. I simply haven't lost my enthusiasm for the inevitable accelerating changes ahead.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  41. might be useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least in Sweden, recipes don't have "verkshöjd" (which means they are not unique enough to be covered by the copyright system). I suspect Danish law is rather similar.

    So you can probably put any license you want on this stuff, and it won't matter. You can treat it like American-style public domain anyway.

    I understand this is a joke, but the long rants about how the open source concept works for beer (as if there were such a thing as 'proprietary beer') might be lost on some people who are unaware of this. There are so many other things that this would have worked on: movies, music, ...

    1. Re:might be useless by RPoet · · Score: 1

      Recipes can get legal protection through being "trade secrets", though. This recipe doesn't have that restriction, so it's a lot freer than any other beer I can think of.

      --
      "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
    2. Re:might be useless by Sam+Ritchie · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure most copyright regimes have similar treatment of recipes - they're not covered by copyright.

      There are some exceptions, eg the layout & presentation of the recipe will fall under copyright, as would (I imagine) descriptive text as part of the method. A list of ingredients should be freely reproducible though.

      --
      This sig is false.
    3. Re:might be useless by dajak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Recipes can get legal protection through being "trade secrets", though. This recipe doesn't have that restriction, so it's a lot freer than any other beer I can think of.

      It's a non issue. Beer is not cola. In countries with beer culture (Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, the UK to some extent, types of recipe were often originally linked to towns, to abbeys etc.

      The basic recipes have been in the public domain for centuries, and you are not held back in any way from making a beer similar to wellknown brand beers.

      There are lots of micro-breweries that sell beer, and recipes are easy to come by. It is also not very hard to make a beer that is better than the commercial ones. It is just hard to market it and make a profit. Compare with orange juice: everyone can make good fresh orange juice, but the knowledge will not make you rich.

      The secret to making wine, liquor, bread, and cheese is also in the public domain. This "free-as-in-speech beer" thing is mildly funny, but I don't want to be bored with free-as-in-speech bread or free-as-in-speech cheese.

      There are a few beers that dominate the world market, but that is only because of shelf space and brand recognition, not closed source recipes or technology lock-in or whatever.

      Having seen the recipe, I don't think this beer is worth trying btw.

  42. GPLed Mead by jd · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The following recipe is mine (mine! mine!) and I am releasing it under the GPL. For those unfamiliar with Mead, it is a honey-wine that dates back something like 6,000 years to either Greece or Cyprus. It has been blamed on various Gods over time and is even in the English language (honeymoon refers to the practice of getting sloshed on Mead for one lunar month after a marriage.)


    Ingredients per gallon of water (scale as appropriate):

    • 4 lbs. of any light-color honey
    • 3 acorns (crushed)
    • 1/4 pint of extra-strong tea
    • Juice of two medium-sized lemons
    • 3-4 tbsp malt extract
    • 1 sachet of Mead or Champagne Yeast
    • 2 x 1 gallon brewing jar
    • One airlock
    • Pint jug
    • Wine siphoning kit


    Method:


    Boil the acorns in a 1/4 pint of water, until the water turns yellow. Strain out the acorns. Boil the gallon of water separately, then let it cool slightly. Add the honey, tea, the water from the acorns and the lemon juice. Stir gently. It is recommended to remove the scum off the top, but I never do. Allow the water to cool to just above blood-warm and pour all but 1/4 pint into a brewing jar.


    Heat 1/2 pint of water in a jug until blood-warm and dissolve into it the maltose. Add the yeast and stir. Let to sit until the yeast is active and a good froth has formed.


    Pour the yeast mix into the brewing jar, then rinse the jug with the remaining 1/4 pint to get the remaining yeast. Also pour into the brewing jar. Shake the brewing jar to ensure a good mix, but not so much as to lose any of the mixture out of the top.


    Fill the air-lock with water (assuming it is a type that uses water) and stopper the brewing jar. Place somewhere warm (most yeasts do best around 78'F). Regardless of what anyone else says, I do recommend direct sunlight.


    Wait until fully fermented, then use the wine siphoning kit to siphon the mead into the empty brewing jar, minus the sludge. Stopper it again and let it settle for a day. Clean the original brewing jar carefully. Place the full brewing jar in a cool, dark location.


    After six months, siphon back to the original brewing jar, stopper it up, and place it back in the dark. After another six months, bottle into dark glass bottles.


    Mead is "best" after being left for 4-5 years, but is extremely drinkable within a day or two of being bottled.


    I use just about any old mead or champagne yeast, but the one that seems to be the most popular is Wyeast's #3632 Dry Mead yeast. If you want something that'll give you an extra kick, START with that until it finishes, then pour out 1/4 pint to make a fresh starter kit. This time, use a high-tolerence yeast (champagne will go to 17 or 18%, but there are yeasts now that'll go to 25%). Once started, pour back into the main brewing jar and let it finish.


    If you want a slightly fruitier flavor, add 1 lb. of blueberries or some other soft fruit, when making the original mix.


    If you want a "cleaner", softer flavor, don't use the acorns.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:GPLed Mead by say · · Score: 3, Funny

      But what good is an open source recipe when it is written in Shakespear-ish measurements like "lbs", "gallons", "sachet", "F" and "pint"? This kind of anglosaxican prejudice is exactly the problem with open source!

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    2. Re:GPLed Mead by Mr2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

      But what good is an open source recipe when it is written in Shakespear-ish measurements like "lbs", "gallons", "sachet", "F" and "pint"?

      Says the guy with RGB colors in his sig. In my country, we only use HSV, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    3. Re:GPLed Mead by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Where can I get some open source bees?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:GPLed Mead by kwoff · · Score: 1

      Well, when I think of mead, I think of the very anglo-saxon Beowulf. Speaking of which, imagine.... :)

    5. Re:GPLed Mead by Lillesvin · · Score: 2, Funny

      For those unfamiliar with Mead, it is a honey-wine that dates back something like 6,000 years to either Greece or Cyprus.

      Judging from your user ID you were one of the inventors, right? :-p

      --
      "Live free or don't."
    6. Re:GPLed Mead by jackbird · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean floating-point Lab? 8-bit HSV would be like trading feet for cubits.

    7. Re:GPLed Mead by Benanov · · Score: 1

      Can you add copyright information to the above recipe? This looks interesting, but as you well know, GPL sits on top of copyright.

    8. Re:GPLed Mead by jd · · Score: 1

      No, that was my cousin Aelfred. :)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  43. a great effort but by pH03n1X · · Score: 1

    i would have still preferred free beer thats free as in "free beer" ....

  44. yuck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it contains guarana it is not adhering to the Reinheitsgebot. This is not beer, but a beer-like liquid substance. It might be just suitable for Americans. Sucks to be you.

  45. Uhhh, yeah..... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    better for you as it is a natural source of caffeine

    Unlike coffee beans which are an unnatural source of .... wait, what? ... never mind.

  46. So with this beer by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

    I do not need to drink coffee afterwards to get a bit more sober again? Hum, just as with other "free" stuff, the fun is taken out of it by integrating the product just a bit too much.

    --

    My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
  47. Tastes like... by dutt · · Score: 1
    ... shite, have you tried this? The recipe isn't specific enough and therefore it's pretty useless. I failed terribly with this.

    I would like the inform all who might try this to avoid it!

  48. Trademark issues by infolib · · Score: 1

    The name "Vores Øl"/"Our Beer" is a slogan used by a major danish brewery (Tuborg I think). So the beer may be very nice and the recipe free but expect a name change if it becomes popular.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  49. So where do I download it? by Filik · · Score: 1

    I assume it understands "./configure" + "make install"?
    -Filik

    1. Re:So where do I download it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to emerge it, it has 20x more guarana this way. sure - it might take some more time brewing, but the result its more bang for the buck. You can also just get the bottle in rpm and drink it directly, someone else brewed it, might not taste as good, and not as much fun.

  50. Carlsberg by zonix · · Score: 1

    The name "Vores Øl"/"Our Beer" is a slogan used by a major danish brewery (Tuborg I think).

    Yup! That's Carlsberg's slogan, in fact. Though, we like Tuborg better. ;-)

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  51. Wohoo! by Dasch · · Score: 1

    These are the times it's great to be a Dane!

    Der er et yndigt land,
    det står med brede bøge
    nær salten østerstrand
    nær salten østerstrand...

  52. I call for a revolution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Open all closed beers! Now!

  53. What next? by vdlgnome · · Score: 1

    Free food? :)

  54. Beta testing by dapyx · · Score: 4, Funny

    Beta testing must be really fun. :-)

    --
    I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    1. Re:Beta testing by The+Tyrant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dunno about that, get one measurement wrong or add in some new ingredient that looks good on paper but isnt and you'd have to drink something really quite foul.

      Rebooting a computer is a pain, but shampooing the carpet is worse.

    2. Re:Beta testing by Urchlay · · Score: 3, Funny
      Beta testing beer has got to be better than beta testing some other products I can think of...

      Did you ever wonder about the poor guys who beta tested preparations A through G? That had to be a crappy job...

    3. Re:Beta testing by tighr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you ever wonder about the poor guys who beta tested preparations A through G? That had to be a crappy job...

      One might even say that job was a pain in the ass!

    4. Re:Beta testing by drotobuso · · Score: 1

      These killjoys are offering us a stinking recipe ... a free recipe not free beer. Bait and switch. As for beta testing, home brewing involves substantial waits - like 4-6 weeks - before your beta testing begins. You spend your money on the materials, then taste to see if you like the recipe. This is like putting a dress pattern on the Internet and declaring "free clothing!" More outrage at http://beeryblog.blogspot.com/2005/07/free-beer-in deed.html

    5. Re:Beta testing by confused.brit · · Score: 1

      I pity the guys who QC rectal thermometers, personally

      --
      Sigs are for wimps
  55. Budweiser Here by Frankie70 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    As a Budweiser representative, I am going to be filing a lawsuit on this open source beer thingy. I think we contributed to the SVR4 version of this recipe & hence this recipe partly belongs to us. We are going to be filing lawsuits on anybody who gets drunk on this beer.

    1. Re:Budweiser Here by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1

      Which Budweiser, this one or this one?

  56. Am I the only one to think... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    "Yeah, sure, just remove the top of the beer barrel, let everyone pour in what they want" and then think of a man peeing into the barrel?

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  57. I remember this beer... by Hecatonchires · · Score: 1

    From an article posted a year ago

    --

    Yay me!

    1. Re:I remember this beer... by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      Well cheer up; you'll get to see it a third time in a couple of days.

  58. On the topic of homemade alcohol... by ovideon · · Score: 1
  59. From an open source beer advocate by Frankie70 · · Score: 3, Insightful


    If this recipe were code, it wouldn't compile.


    Don't whine. Just fix the bugs in the recipe & check
    in the fix. That's what open source beer is all about.

    1. Re:From an open source beer advocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's about him fixing the glaring errors in someone else's work? No thanks, I'll look for recipes that are properly written from the start.

    2. Re:From an open source beer advocate by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      If this recipe were code, it wouldn't compile.

      Don't whine. Just fix the bugs in the recipe & check in the fix. That's what open source beer is all about.

      That's just the point the grandparent is trying to make - you can't fix the bugs because the 'code' is horribly incomplete. You can't even determine what the 'code' is supposed to do, and huge swaths of it are nothing but stubs and terse notes from the programmer to himself ('magic happens here'). What's left after you remove all those parts is outright wrong - I.E. intentional divide-by-zero.

      I could take my experience and use the recipe as a base for preparing my own beer (I'm a reasonably experienced and knowledgeable homebrewer), but it almost certainly wouldn't be the beer the original author intended to create.

  60. Recipes are already free by aridg · · Score: 4, Informative

    In the US anyway, and probably in other countries with similar intellectual property laws, recipes are not covered by copyright.

    Why do you think Coca-Cola keeps their recipes under strict secrecy?

    So brew away -- and feel free to ignore the licensing restrictions of the CC license, at least for the recipe.

    1. Re:Recipes are already free by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Why do you think Coca-Cola keeps their recipes under strict secrecy?

      So that they can *pretend* there's something special about Coca-Cola, when in fact it's all about the marketing.

      Yeah, go on, tell me that Pepsi's sweeter, or that it tastes different. Fact is that if someone managed to (in effect) copy Coca-Cola by reverse engineering, it wouldn't have much effect on Coca-Cola sales because the new cola couldn't call itself by that name, and as I said... it's about marketing.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:Recipes are already free by tgd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually you couldn't reverse engineer Coca-Cola's taste in the US legally. Under the guise of "vegitable extracts", "natural flavors" or whatever other description used in the ingredients depending on the country is decocainized coca leaf extracts. (The favor of the coca leaf with the cocaine removed).

      There's only one company in the US legally allowed to import coca leaves for processing, Stephan Co, in New Jersey. They have an exclusive contract with Coca-Cola to provide the extract, and an exclusive license from the DEA to import the leaves.

      It wouldn't matter if you knew Coke's recipe, you couldn't make it anyway.

    3. Re:Recipes are already free by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      There's only one company in the US legally allowed to import coca leaves for processing, Stephan Co, in New Jersey. They have an exclusive contract with Coca-Cola to provide the extract, and an exclusive license from the DEA to import the leaves.

      Uh... and this is supposed to be the country of free-trade?

      If the government (not the free market) is restricting importation of a substance to one company, and that one company is not required to sell it to anyone who wants it for a reasonable price, then this is effectively a government-backed monopoly for no good reason.

      Either they should allow the importation of coca leaves more freely, or they should require Stephan Co not to abuse their privileged position.

      What is the position on importing pre-processed coca-extract?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:Recipes are already free by CagedBear · · Score: 1

      These guys are also licensing their "design and branding elements". Which I understand to mean you can bottle the stuff, slap their logo on it and sell it?
      I don't know why you would want to do that. But it's certainly in contrast to Coca Cola. Even if you had the recipe or managed to reverse engineer it, you couldn't sell it as Coke or even in a red can for that matter. Unless you enjoy being pecked to death by a swarm of vultures (aka coporate laywers).

    5. Re:Recipes are already free by tgd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No idea. Considering the opportunity for using it to smuggle cocaine into the country, its probably not a very favorable position.

      Its all very stupid, IMHO. Cocaine in comparable quantities is a safer stimulant than caffeine. Like most of the "war on drugs" and and other such rediculousness during the 20th century, this is all politics, nothing more.

    6. Re:Recipes are already free by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      It wouldn't matter if you knew Coke's recipe, you couldn't make it anyway.
      After all, it's impossible to acquire illegal plants in this country. ;)
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    7. Re:Recipes are already free by IceFoot · · Score: 1
      ...decocainized coca leaf extracts. (The favor of the coca leaf with the cocaine removed).... Stephan Co, in New Jersey... have an exclusive contract with Coca-Cola to provide the extract...


      Hmmm... after they ship the extract off to Coke, what do they do with all that cocaine they extracted? Makes you wonder...

  61. he is going to get sued for that name by morten+poulsen · · Score: 1

    "Vores Øl" used to be Carlsberg's slogan in Denmark.

  62. Re:Open Source Beer? Release Notes by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Funny

    if you change it you have to publish your modyfied version as well

    Most of the modifications I make to beer involve kidneys, liver and bladder. There have been a few occasions where I have made their products freely available, but most people seemed more annoyed than grateful.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  63. Free as in trademark law? by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    I suspect Carlsberg would have something to say about marketing a beer as "Vores Øl". They had a major marketing campaign under that name in Denmark.

  64. OpenCola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody remember that? This, like that seems like a good idea. It's a pity that OpenCola isn't being sold anymore.

  65. Or also... by WonderSnatch · · Score: 1

    Check out:

    Skotrat
    Beer Town(home of the Asscoiation of Brewers)
    Tasty Brew
    Stout Billy's

    Brett

    1. Re:Or also... by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      From the home brewers that I have known over the years (including those who have owned brewshops) I have found that they tend to be really nice folks who would like nothing more that to share their beer and how they made it. If you want to brew it is often well worth it to find someone who brews locally and get them to teach you. Chances are whomever it is will be happy to do so and point you at lots of useful stuff.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
  66. Freedom Needs To Proliferate In Other Products... by FosterSJC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Creating a free beer sounds fun but frivolous - one may ask what meaning this really has concerning food, or other physical products. I believe it is quite the opposite; that is, that Vores Øl has given us the freedom to protect our ideas and promote innovation. Already many recipes, cooking methods, ingredients, even entire species of plants and animals are patented and copyrighted. Vores Øl aims to publicize the fact that there is an alternative to the monopolistic act of traditional copyright law - and a simple alternative at that. Share and share alike is the mantra here. So how about you share some of your beer with me?"

    -I wrote this on my food blog last week about the Free beer. Too many real world physical things are becoming patented. Innovation is being stifled and aggressive capitalism is preventing creativity. I think the best part of this project is that it simply raises awareness of the fact that copyright, trademark, int. property law, etc. don't have to continue going the way they are going.

    -Aaron

    http://aliment.blogspot.com/

  67. Great by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

    Next someone will actually start arming bears.

  68. publicity stunt and nothing more.... by Daytona955i · · Score: 1

    Ok, I like free speech and free beer as much as the next guy but it's already law that you can't copyright a list of ingredients and as long as you change the wording on the directions, you're in the clear.

    If you are into homebrewing, there are plenty of places to get recipes. Goto just about any of the online brewing forums and say, "I want a beer that tastes like..." and then insert your favorite beer. You can then use that recipe to your hearts content.

  69. My fave free lunch... by matt+me · · Score: 1

    I and a few friends had lunch on Jesus recently, in Oxford. The churches of the city were running a "feeding of the 5000" - basically a giant free BBQ outside. Were some tasty burgers, and we managed to get away before the worship music started.

  70. Well... by Tickenest · · Score: 1

    As they said on The Simpsons... And yet, I learn nothing!

    --
    This is the NFL, which stands for "Not For Long" if you keep making those bulls*** calls.
  71. Re:English are crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if I ever go suicide-bombing, I'll fit something like a heartbeat sensor to the bomb. That way, even if they shoot to kill me, the bomb will still go off. The system will obviously need a time constant for safety -- this might be just right for detonating the device right in the face of anybody who comes to check I'm really dead.

    OTOH, you only get one try at suicide-bombing -- and if you cock it up, you will have no recourse against the people who will invariably say nasty things about you. So I think I might just sell these devices to aspiring suicide-bombers. I could even offer a money back guarantee with confidence. Is there some sort of paper that these people read, with a classified adverts section at the rear, perhaps?

  72. How about free brewing? by OzeBuddha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or you could take the free as in speech thing one step sideways... and brew using Linux - http://nerdbrew.com/
    ~
    NerdBrew.com
    Beer through technology through beer through technology through beer through beer through beer .... (shameless plug, sorry :P)

    1. Re:How about free brewing? by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1
      Unix, Linux, what's the difference (unless you're in court with SCO)?

      I've been using Unix for so long that Linux is just another flavour of Unix for me.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  73. Open Source Beer Company by microbrewer · · Score: 1

    I used to work for Chuck Hahn in Australia at his Maltshovel Brewery and he used to say "Inovation in Brewing is copying quickly "

    There is also a open source beer company in Australia called Brewtopia and their "Blowfly Beer" has been developed useing open source marketing .

    I was involved with this company as a consultant when they where researching the bussiness.

    http:www.blowfly.com.au//

  74. really old? by racerxroot · · Score: 1

    deja vu. I swear I saw this same story on slashdot, almost a year ago... a really old dupe maybe? unless a whole lot has changed, but it seems like the exact same article to me. of course, i could be hallucinating, but its all the same to me.

    --
    --- Caffeine is directly responsible for some of my greatest ideas, and some of my most embarrassing moments...
    1. Re:really old? by racerxroot · · Score: 2, Informative

      there it is: http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/ 13/1642234&tid=222 if there's one thing that sticks in my memory... it's beer. :-)

      --
      --- Caffeine is directly responsible for some of my greatest ideas, and some of my most embarrassing moments...
  75. Not news. by Stickster · · Score: 1

    http://paul.frields.org/?p=500

    So how does this qualify as "news"?

  76. Re:Large Pot???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It better be a fucking HUGE pot to hold 70 liters of water and 20 lbs of gunk. I think maybe they should have scaled the recipe down to something more manageable for the average person. Note: I said average person, not average slashdotter. The average slashdotter probably doesn't have a 2 quart saucepan let alone a pot that will hold over 70 liters. You can't make beer in a pizzabox or a mac & cheese box :D

  77. well, it's been tried with cola... by mattdm · · Score: 1

    Well, it's been tried with cola -- why not beer?

    Oh, and as for that "bit of a caffeine-like hit", that's no surprise, since guarana, like mate, is a source of the actual real thing, not some imaginary-elf-land "more natural/healthy" alternative.

    1. Re:well, it's been tried with cola... by Proteus · · Score: 1
      Yes, guarana contains caffiene (and TFA acknowledges this, saying the beer has about 35mg per serving [less than coffee]). However guarana also contains other stimulants.

      I prefer guarana-based drinks during the day, as the caffeine is still there but (1)is less per serving, which is great for pacing; (2)is combined with other stimulants, reducing the potential of caffeine dependency and increased tolerance; and (3)I feel better about naturally-occuring caffeine than the chemical powder that is added to many caffinated drinks -- this is also why I drink coffee and tea in lieu of soda, but I don't like much of those in the warmer months.

      Reason (1) is a personal consideration: I don't like to be "perky" at work, just awake and able to concentrate. When I start to get tired, I have an "energy drink" that's made locally and contains guarana. This perks me up enough, but not so much as a cup of coffee. Ideally, I'd have an espresso (25mg caffeine, on average), but the only purveyors within a reasonable distance of work have rank espresso.

      Reason (2) is nice because on the weekends, I don't want to consume caffeine. This is better, long-term, for my heart. Caffeine dependency isn't "dangerous", but I hate the headaches and such that come from withdrawal; when I'm not at work, if I get tired I can merely take a nap -- and that's better than stimulants, period!

      Reason (3) is probably just psychology. There are no studies showing the processed caffeine powder is any more harmful than naturally-occuring caffeine. In fact, it may be better since it's a controlled dose. I still feel better about the naturally-occurring stuff; call it an irrational hunch if you will. ;-)

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
  78. Name that beer by seniorcoder · · Score: 1

    I propose the name "Open Sauce" for this beer.

  79. Use different words by packrat0x · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We have two Latin words that explain the concept just fine.
    Liberty: freedom (free as is speech).
    Gratis: without charge or payment (free as in beer).

    --
    227-3517
  80. What's the big deal? by meadd00d · · Score: 1
    There are plenty of recipes out there already--have been for years.

    These guys have either never heard of the Gambrinus' Mug and its illustrious forbear, the Cat's Meow, or are really picky about licensing agreements.

  81. It already is... by SeekerDarksteel · · Score: 1, Funny

    I propose the name "Open Sauce" for this beer.

    It already is...in Boston.

    --
    The laws of probability forbid it!
  82. Carlsberg will support... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the new free initiative. We have looked at the cooperation between large IT-companies (specifically IBM and Oracle) and the OSS community and are now considering the possibilities in a similar cooperation on the beer market.

    Carlsberg - probably the best beer in the universe...

  83. There is only one Budweiser... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the one from Budvar...

  84. Attn: OS Beer Drinkers by SMS_Design · · Score: 1

    This letter is placing you on notice that you are in posession of an infringing substance. In the creation of the Vores Oel source, they made use of a combination of ingredients which I have held copyright of since the acquiring of a brewery some years ago. For reasons which will remain private, I will not disclose WHICH ingredients are infringing upon my IP rights.

    For a limited time, however, I am prepared to offer licenses to those Vores Oel drinkers who wish to be in compliance with Intellectual Property laws. For the low price of $100/bottle, I will provide a license allowing you to posess and consume the beverage in question.

    For those wishing to purchase licenses, payment should be sent via Western Union to the following recipient:

    Sorin Sitkovetsky
    Bucharest, Romania

  85. Bug report by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Funny

    BEER 1.0
    If you run this app for too long, it causes system glitches (hangover) a while after quitting it.

    (ok, I know, that's not a bug, that's a feature. workaround: non-alcoholic hack)

  86. More Beer by cazbar · · Score: 1
    From a t-shirt on thinkgeek:

    cd /pub
    more beer

  87. FREE BEER by krasmussen · · Score: 1

    Superflex seems to have started a similar project (another beer), FREE BEER, or maybe they're just renaming Vores Øl. I can't quite figure out what the purpose is, but check it out yourself

    Also, Superflex has started another interesting project (somewhat unrelated), Guarana Power. From the site:

    GUARANÁ POWER is an energy softdrink produced by a guaraná farmers cooperative from Maués in the Brazilian Amazon, in collaboration with The Power Foundation. The farmers have organised themselves in response to the activities of the multinational corporations xxxxx and xxxxxxx, a cartel whose monopoly like position on the purchase of the raw material has driven the price of guaraná berries down 80%, while the cost of their products to the consumer has risen.
  88. Forking Beer by lildogie · · Score: 1

    If you don't like this distribution, fork your own.

  89. This is ridiculous by TheCabal · · Score: 1

    It seems like people are slapping the term "Open Source" on anything in order to sound profound or at least fashionable. I remember when inventor of the Internet Al Gore (who later rode the sand worm) said that his website was open source...

    A beer recipe is open source? For $DEITY sake, people have been swapping recipes since we discovered fire.

  90. Germany by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just came back from sixteen days in Europe pretty recently (my first visit) and it's true - though the majority of places at which I drank beer kept it in refrigerators, their temperature was nowhere near as low as we keep them in the US. (This was nice when you go to butter your bread in the morning, incidentally). German beer tastes pretty good warm. You should give it a try sometime.

    I get really sick of this crap that's posted around here though about how we only keep ours cold to kill the flavor. It's not true. As the wise man a few posts below me indicated, we just like cold beverages around here. (In Nebraska, it has been over 40 degrees Celsius for the past week if you need an idea of why that might be) Beer snobbery is HUGE on Slashdot, among both Americans and Europeans and pretty much everyone else here. Snobbery would really lose its effectiveness if you didn't have a great story you completely made up so that you could more verbosely look down on something, right?

    I had by far the best beer I have ever had during those days in Germany and Belgium. (In fact, if anyone knows where I can get a bottle of Chimay for less than $6 I would love to know about it). When I got back to Nebraska, however, the first thing I wanted to drink was an ice cold Pabst Blue Ribbon. There's nothing wrong with a little variety, and I'm just not quite enough of an elitist asshole to complain about a national tradition, I guess.

  91. it's actually free as in ipods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because you have to do a bunch of crap, invest time and money, and you may or may not get your reward.

  92. Re:Free beer UP YOUR NOSE bitch! (FP) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.protestwarrior.com... now conservatives can be as annoying as those inevitable "hey hey, ho ho, has got to go!"

    Yes kids, it's protestwarrior! Pre-fab protest templates so that now *you* don't have to think about your message either!

    w00t!

  93. Budweiser FUD by kkovach · · Score: 0

    Mark Johnson, CEO of Budweiser had this to say about the open source beer ...

    "We have conclusive results from independent studies that show the total cost of ownership for 'Our Beer' is 50% higher than Budweiser.

    Brewers of Our Beer cost 25% more to employ and the maintenance associated with the women you bring home after drinking too much Our Beer is an outrageous %50! Thus, negating the initial reduced cost for the recipe."

    --
    The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
  94. when free as in beer may be better... by burnunit0 · · Score: 1

    ...than free as in speech.

    I appreciate the cuteness of these guys' efforts. But really the homebrew culture has practiced free and/or open source values for a good 30 years. In homebrewing circles, what I've noticed is a huge number of true hackers working in both hardware and software (equipment, recipes) and something else--methods and techniques. It's this last that I feel is the most "free." It gives the willing learner or enthusiastic amateur serious tools to make really world class beer through better knowledge of the various factors involved. This knowledge transfer circumvents--even disrupts--the whole copyright/IP issue.

    Lots of people, myself included, recommend John Palmer's book on how to brew. It's available online for anyone to read. Since he's kept the copyright, clearly noted on the home page, it's only "free as in beer." But it embraces so much learning that a person could walk away from it, make several dozen batches of beer and write their own dang book. Then they could open source that if they really had the gumption to, I suppose.

    But the point is, there's so much practical knowledge available online for free that anyone can become a brewer, and they subsequently couldn't be stopped from teaching other people how to brew--either through direct contact or through an open source/GPL/Creative Commons licensed document of their own. Functionally, that seems about as "free as in speech" as something can be.

    I basically had to cheat to pass my high school chemistry final and was only moderately decent at things like physics. But I'm now quite a bit more comfortable with water chemistry, thermodynamics, electrical engineering, the chemistry involved in starch conversion, the biology of yeasts and microbial life forms, etc. All on a very practical level. And with a noble goal, too!

    There's a lot of great hackers in the beer world and they're not being particularly protective or proprietary about their methods. It's a pretty impressive hack to look at a 10 gallon water cooler and say, "Hey I could use that for holding 10 pounds of ground malted grain and 1.2 qt of hot water per pound for 60 minutes at about 152F. If someone did that, heck, all those starches in the malted grain would probably turn into sugars. Then if I've thought ahead and built a manifold inside that cooler that outlets thru where the spigot used to be, I could drain out just the water and sugar into a big pot on my stove. Boil with some hops, cool, add yeast and keep everything sanitary... I gotta tell a bunch of other guys on the internet about this!" Hack complete, information shared with the world, copyrights never get involved. Sure you can buy a Phil's Phalse Bottom for convenience and there's a place for that kind of "licensed hardware" but if you wanted it, the info is out there to DIY. The knowledge is loose, and there's not much can be done about it. The information wanted to be free pretty badly, and for good reason! (40-80 cents per 12 oz. serving of beer that rivals Guinness, Paulaner or SNPA? I'm all over finding out about that!)

    --
    yes. that's all I'm going to say in all comments from now on.
  95. You know... by interactive_civilian · · Score: 1
    You know what? Powerbook keyboards are not very cheap!

    I only mention that because with that kind of comment, you owe me a new one. I hope you have some money saved up.

    Beer (which I am indeed having for breakfast) is not easy to clean off of a PowerBook keyboard.

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
  96. Stop the madness. by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    decided to reduce the confusion between 'free as in speech' and 'free as in beer'

    Free (of charge) or Free (of licensing restrictions) -- IT'S THE SAME MEANING OF THE WORD.

    In any case, it's a needlessly misleading word. "Open source", folks, since 1998. Get with the program.

  97. Yeast strains by rolofft · · Score: 1

    I baked some bread just last week using trub off a batch of brown ale. It didn't taste any different from using bread yeast. A friend of mine once didn't realize he was out of beer yeast until he was ready to pitch. He used bread yeast instead, and the ale turned out fine. There can be a lot of nuances between yeast strains, but fundamentally they're all the same critter.

    On the other hand, I was chatting with a Slashdotter the other day who works at a lab that studies yeast prions. He said the beer his coworker tried making from the lab yeast turned out quite funky.

    --

    "Give a man a fish and he will ask for tartar sauce and French fries!"

  98. And Linux has CUPS! by theurge14 · · Score: 1

    This is great.

  99. So... by schmelding · · Score: 1

    ...when do we get Open Source Free Speech?

  100. BBspot might have to start rebranding itself... by OwlofDoom · · Score: 1

    ...as a factual news site!

    Following Microsoft's inclusion of a real red screen of death in Longhorn/Vista/Foo, yet another perfectly good piece of satire is rendered pointless by real news.

    Maybe BBspot should market itself as a prescient news source rather than a humour site.

  101. The metric system is the tool of the devil by rolofft · · Score: 1

    I suppose you speak Esperanto and use a metric clock? Grams and liters are OK for rocketry or robotics, but homebrewing should definitely be done in pounds and pints.

    "My car gets fourty rods to the hogshead and that's the way I likes it." - Grandpa Simpson

    --

    "Give a man a fish and he will ask for tartar sauce and French fries!"

  102. Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People have been freely sharing homebrew recipes -- in person, in publications, by mail, by Usenet, and on the web -- for a long, long time. This isn't anything even slightly new or clever.

  103. free beer is stale by klept · · Score: 1

    That story was in Wired mag 2 weeks ago. One of the reasons I pay no attention to CNN.

  104. Re:Large Pot???? by dubbreak · · Score: 1

    good point. I think the largest they should have done the recipe is as a 50 liter batch for full size kegs. Many home brewers use 19L (5 gal us) kegs, at my work we have some 8gal us kegs. Most canadians (in my experience) use 5 gal imp (23 L) carboys while americans use 5 gal us (19L) carboys. So this batch should really be scaled down. I'd have to use 3 fermentors and 3 carboys.

    Also another poster had a good point: this beer contains a fair amount of sugar. Since they aren't going for a belgian triple or the likes it really isn't going to help the recipe (sugar thins a beer out and if more than 30% of the fermentables are dextrose or sucrose you can get a cidery taste).

    Of course this is a move in the right direction. There are some amazing beers out there that aren't available to some markets. With open recipes it would allow others to make the great beer.

    --
    "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
  105. Guarana Safety by TheStonepedo · · Score: 1

    You do have a good point about mixing caffeine and alcohol. The only time to do that is when you're still drunk and have to roll outta bed and get to work.

    I don't believe chain grocery stores would sell Guarana beverages such as Antarctica Guarana Champagne if the FDA had qualms with the safety of the source. Risks-shmisks, its just another fruit drink. So long as the fermentables are of the sort produce "bad" alcohol, guarana beer should be plenty safe.

    --
    I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
  106. You had me at 'free beer...'. by Psyqlone · · Score: 1

    After seeing something like that, I tend to stop reading the ends of sentences.

  107. Dissemblance by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    Besides being a dupe, this story is a dupe of a what is essentially a lie.

    This isn't the "world's first open source beer." That claim is so ridiculous it's amazing that this story got submitted twice. I myself have had "open source" beer recipes publicly available since 1995! And since 1999 under an FSF and OSI approved license! Take any of my recipes and copy, distribute, modify, commercialize, fold, spindle and mutilate my recipes. You have my permission.

    Hell, if anyone has a claim to be first in this regard, it might be me! That's because to the best of my knowledge (I could be wrong) I came out with the first Open Source homebrewing software.It predates Vores Øl, and came with several recipes under the Free and Open Source BSD license. My CVS logs will attest that I was earlier than they.

    Besides, recipes are quite unlike software. Hardly anyone copyrights a recipe, unless you're writing a cook book. You don't have to be exact with recipes, and the beer (cake, bread, chili, fruit salad) will still turn out fine. And they're trivial to reverse engineer. "Cloning" beers is done all the time, to the point that there's even a popular homebrewing book out there with recipes to duplicate your favorite commercial beer. Claiming to be the first open source beer is as silly as claiming to be the first open source peanut butter and jelly sandwich.

    Their claim that they were first is not only a lie, it's stupid.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    1. Re:Dissemblance by microbrewer · · Score: 1

      Also you can read any brewing journal or research paper to find the latest inovation in modern brewing .Beer In a major brewery is usualy the same product for all the product usually with 2 wort sreams and only downstream processing is what makes the beers different with the addition of hop extracts and flavors (hop oils) .Nothing new .

      Craft brewing and Homebrewing isnt rocket science and all recipies are essentialy the same with the simmilar processes .Ive written recipies that are based on percentages so they can scale form the pilot brewery to the brewhouse .These guys have a recipie that is nothing spectacular, people have been brewing for thousnds of years all pretty much in a open source way .

  108. Homebrew is cheaper by Bishop · · Score: 1

    In my experience homebrew is cheaper then store bought. IIRC, my first two batches of beer (made from kits and malt extract) paid for the initial outlay for the equipment includeing cheap plastic bottles. Beer kits easily taste better then commercial beer, and some microbrews. The only thing it costs is the time.

    1. Re:Homebrew is cheaper by pclminion · · Score: 1
      In my experience homebrew is cheaper then store bought. IIRC, my first two batches of beer (made from kits and malt extract) paid for the initial outlay for the equipment includeing cheap plastic bottles. Beer kits easily taste better then commercial beer, and some microbrews. The only thing it costs is the time.

      I'm baffled. I just added up the costs of doing a batch of beer (with the prices I usually pay for ingredients) and it does come out cheaper. Yet whenever I go to the homebrew store I invariably spend upwards of $60. I wonder what the hell I spend it all on...

      There are other recurring costs besides ingredients, like sanitizer (StarSan is kind of pricey), Irish moss (if you use that), brewery wash, the inevitably broken hydrometer, etc etc...

      And I'm still amortizing my all grain equipment costs ;-)

  109. Recommendations? by brakk · · Score: 1

    I've been wanting to get into home brewing for a while. Can you recommend some good books to look at for beginners? What do you think about the mixes they sell with the kits? Is it worth buying a kit at all or are the tools easy to get elsewhere?

    1. Re:Recommendations? by rolofft · · Score: 1

      Although it's somewhat dated, Charles Papazian's Joy of Homebrewing is the canonical introduction to homebrewing. I've heard Homebrewing for Dummies is actually very good. MoreBeer.com is a good place to get equipment and ingredients online. I can vouch for the quality of their kits.

      --

      "Give a man a fish and he will ask for tartar sauce and French fries!"

  110. Prior Example? by BlueFashoo · · Score: 1

    Stone Brewing Company, from San Diego, CA, releases the new Verticle Epic beers every year one day, one month, and one year later than the previous year, e.g. 05/05/05, 06/06/06 etc... Each year they have a contest where homebrewers can make their own versions and compete to see who can make the best replication. Recipes are available here. So Stone gives back to the homebrewing community. I don't work for Stone, but my homebrew club does meet there.

    --
    Nice Marmot
  111. I think I'll call this Open Receipe Beer by SuperDuperMan · · Score: 1

    Unless the source for beer (hops, other incredients) become free.

  112. I'm working at CC for the summer as an intern and by mecredis · · Score: 1

    I'm brewing a modified version of the Vores brew for the intern party at the end of the summer. Check out our blog post here.

    --
    "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American Public." - H.L. Mencken
  113. Please be more specific. by OmgTEHMATRICKS · · Score: 1

    "Free Beer That's Free as in Speech"

    What country's speech rights are we talking about here? I can imagine it now..

    Modifying the contents of this beer will result in military police hunting you down, bludgeoning you into unconsciousness, then awakening you and shooting you in the head.

    "Free Beer That is Free as in China's Free Speech"

  114. Coming from a not so amateur brewer.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh right. Like there's no difference between a hefeweizen and a pilsner. How many batches of beer have you brewed, genius? Ever tried brewing two batches whith the exact same ingredients and two different strains of yeast? Even two different ale yeasts? If so, did they taste the same?

    That recipe is worthless. I agree with previous posters that beer has been pretty much "open source" for the past 5000-6000 years. Just take a big pot of gruel, or porridge, or hell, even soggy bread, and let it sit for a couple of weeks -- POW! you've got beer! It'll taste like s**t, but technically, it's beer. Follow their recipe, and you have pretty much the same thing.

    Or take advantage of what people have learned in the past few thousand years. The Internet is your friend. Usenet is your friend. Google is your friend. Your local homebrew club is a tremendous resource. It isn't that hard to make a really tasty brew, and it's much cheaper than what you get in the liquor store after the initial investment in equipment. Most of the price of commercial beer is transportation/storage, advertising, and tax.

    Try to "roll your own". Just consider that each time you change one parameter and recompile, it takes about a month to get the result. Even the mistakes can be fun, though.

  115. Specific Texas Laws (copy-and-paste warning...) by sydlexius · · Score: 1

    Sec. 109.21. HOME PRODUCTION OF WINE, ALE, MALT LIQUOR, OR BEER.
    (a) The head of a family or an unmarried adult may produce for the use of his family or himself not more than 200 gallons of wine, ale, malt liquor, or beer, per year. No license or permit is required.
    (b) The commission may prohibit the use of any ingredient it finds detrimental to health or susceptible of use to evade this code. Only wine made from the normal alcoholic fermentation of the juices of dandelions or grapes, raisins, or other fruits may be produced under this section. Only ale, malt liquor, or beer made from the normal alcoholic fermentation of malted barley with hops, or their products, and with or without other malted or unmalted cereals, may be produced under this section. The possession of wine, ale, malt liquor, or beer produced under this section is not an offense if the person making it complies with all provisions of this section and the wine, ale, malt liquor, or beer is not distilled, fortified, or otherwise altered to increase its alcohol content.
    (c) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.

    Sec. 106.04. CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL BY A MINOR.
    (a) A minor commits an offense if he consumes an alcoholic beverage.
    (b) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that the alcoholic beverage was consumed in the visible presence of the minor's adult parent, guardian, or spouse.

    For the record, I could not find any provision that defines what the minimum age for the "Head of Household." I lack the patience to look for it elsewhere.

  116. first rule of drugs... by ecloud · · Score: 1

    ...is don't mix uppers and downers, right?

  117. Please tell me.. by haX0rsaw · · Score: 0

    I am serious.. what does it mean.. free as in beer? Honestly?

  118. Really confusing by Trogre · · Score: 1

    So far in the comments we have seen many other examples of beer that's Free as in speech so this is far from the first.

    However I have yet to encounter a single beer that is "free as in beer". Where can I find an example?

    Oh well. Just like battered fish, analogies are rarely perfect I guess.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  119. cold is always better, especially on a hot day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cold is always better, especially on a hot day

    if you want to taste the beer,
    you keep it in your mouth longer

  120. open source? by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

    You do realise that encrypting your recipe goes against the spirit of the GPL, right?

    Please decrypt it, so that all those mysterious 'gallons', 'tbsp', 'lbs' and other forms of encryption are translated in something the average person outside the field of anglo-saxon living can understand. ;-)

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---