For all people who demand non standard pronouns, I use the pronoun "your imperial smarminess".
I mean I'm sure you *would* if you ever met one of those people in person and were actully brave enough to say that to their face when there are other witnesses. I mean that'll teach them, right?
In the bad old days we had a hell of a lot of ridiculous restriction We must somehow made our programs to run successfully inside a RAM that was 48KB in size (yes, 48KB, not 48MB or 48GB), on a CPU with a clock speed of 1.023 MHz
We still have them. In fact some of the systems I've progrmmed hve been more resource limited than the gloriously spacious 32KiB memory of the BBC model B. Take the PIC12F or 10F series. A glorious 64 bytes of RAM, max clock speed of 16MHz, but not unusual to run it 32kHz.
Nowadays I work 9:30-4:30 for a very good, consistent paycheck and let some other "smart person" put in 75 hours a week dealing with hiring
There's nothing wrong with not wnting to run your own business, it's not for most people, and even if it was, the numbers don't add up. But putting the scare qoutes in like that makes it sound like you have huge chip on your shoulder. Those things re just as esential to the business as your work nd without them you wouldn't have the steady 9:30-4:30 with good paycheck.
10% are just causing damage. I'm not talking about terrorists and criminals.
Terrorists and criminals have nothing on those guys. I know guy who is one of those. Worse, he's both motivated and enthusiastic. He also likes to offer help and advice to other people who don't know the systems well.
The classic "respecting your privacy is too hard" argument. Sure, it will take some time for everyone to come into compliance, but that's only because things got so bad already.
Exactly. I mean it's a huge pain in the arse in that you can't be lax with user data, just as it's a huge pain in the rse to pay taxes, file proper accounts and not pullute the local waterways.
He thinks fossils are bullshit, so I'm going to go with a "no" on that one.
He also engaged in some good JAQing off about the death toll estimate of the holocaust. Apparently that doesn't fit his "model of reality" either despite being well documented.
But then again, he does have a "certified genius level IQ" according to him, so who am I to argue, eh?
his critics mine the past to find things to dismiss him for but don't bother to actually listen to what he has said
Yes this is a thing. If someone has a record of spouting large amounts of bullshit, the rational thing to do is simply ignore them in favour of people who have a better record. After all my time is limited and I can't listen to everything everyone has to say then evaluate all of it with an open mind.
If he's pissy about people ignoring him because of the bullshit, then perhaps he should spout less bullshit.
are forced to simply make shit up.
It's ironic you said that: your accusation of "making shit up" is in fact making shit up.
Perhaps the fact that it exists in the first place?
So, people are insisting you not be an asshat in their comminuty and you find that objectionable. Well, that figures. I guess you and the golang community are fundamantally incompatible then.
That someone felt he/she/it/pronounOfTheWeek had the need and the right to tell other people what to think and do.
Seems you have the attitude of "I want to be able to do what I want where I want and when I want and no one should use their free speech to tell me to go away". That's fine, I'm sure you can find a community where there are no conventions of decency. Perhaps 4chan would be to your taste.
No need to be a sensitive snowflake: no one's telling you how to think. They're not even telling you what to do unless you specifically want to spend time with them. Look at it this way, it's there to save your delicate feelings: you know in advance that what you want to do will get you ejected and this will save you tha pain and embarressment.
I personally think go is a miserable language, steeped deep in mediocrity. I don't need to imagine what programming with generics is like: I already know what it's like and it sucks for anything of moderate size and up. I also believe that the world of programming and types has evolved since the early 1970s.
So yeah no fan but......based on what you wrote, I read the code of conduct. I can't see anything objectionable in it. So what, specifically, do you not like.
Watch some Scott Adams videos if you want to know about the courtship ritual between Trump and Kim and
Scott Adams as in the delusional author who used to write a funny comic? Not sure I'll be taking analysis from anyone who things that "fossils are bullshit".
I always learned that states rights was an outdated racist concept
You have a truly unique ability to lern utterly the wrong thing every time. Oddly the wrong thing always seems to be the one that aligns with your "worldview".
The sure thing is that eventually investors will get tired of Elon's sweet crooning and flashy distractions
Oh yes that "flashy distraction" of actually selling more electric cars than he can make to people who want one. He does actually have a product and customers. That's not an accident.
after the billions he's frittered away.
Success or failure he's actually trying to do interesting things with his money.
However the world is and always be full of naysayers who never do anything useful or interesting but take potshots at those who do.
No it's not a slippery slope: the fact it's "on a computer" makes no difference. There's a coninuous line between gambling and not and you can always make slight tweaks to make it more or less like gambling.
This has not prevented gambling from being regulated now or in the past. This is in fact the system working as intended. Gambline is regulated, but somone has to provide some judgement as to whether or not something close to the line is in fact gambling.
I live under the same sky, but can turn my head to see in all directions instead of just nose turned up.
That's crap. You've got your nose permanently turned up at teh libruhl SJW. And the turning your head in all directions is so you can turn it away from any facts which disagree with your ideology.
Even the first compendium of Turkic languages, Kashgari's Diwan Lughat Al Turk, completed in 1074 C.E., cannot be read today by a learned Turk. Only academics versed in the Osmanli script can.
Same could be said of Old English from the same period despite using largely the same alphabet (eth and thorn not withstanding).
Uh... I suggested you hire someone for the bits you *don't* enjoy. Cleaning in my case, and any bits of plumbing that involve dealing with poo. Oh also painting. I mean I'm fine with DIY, but the pros are faster and better and frankly painting gets pretty tedious after the first two walls.
I forgot electrics. FFS. I'm an engineer, I have worked on electronic engineering professionally a little. Household electrics seems to involve contorting yourself into small spaces while trying to deal with wires that are just a little bit too short and above your head. No thanks!
But otherwise, they won't make that much of a distinction between strong and ugly versus strong and handsome. (Of course, this is a generalization; there's always exceptions.)
Yes, the odd 90% or so making that an exception (precise figure made up).
I do, however, think it's very dumb to have everyone in a household working a career. I think there's no such thing as a life-work balance if everyone works a job, and works to maintain a household -- there's simply no time left to enjoy the household.
Or do well paid work you enjoy and spend some of the money on someone who can do the househld bits you don't enjoy.
Putting scare quotes around invented doesn't change the fact you're making shit up. The fact you opened with an alternaitve "fact", then doubled down with an intentional isreading means you are not arguing in good faith. There's therefore no point trying to have an actual conversation, so I'll simply highlight your lies for the benefit of other people.
These things are not equivalent. One post got modded up for posting made up facts and the other got modded down for pointing they were made up facts.
In fact, a bit of patience and you would have seen her original post is at a +4
It is now, but it was not. It being modded down was a definite abuse of mod points. Apparently pointing out blatant mod abuse counts as trolling too now.
Slashdot Mirror
And in the grand scheme of things, it is about as useful as a grain of rice in the programming sense.
They're plenty useful, not for running Firefox, but for automation tasks.
Six pins? You've got two for power,
Yes.
at least one for programming, so that leaves you with 3 pins
No: the ICSP for the PIC doesn't obstruct any of the pins and you can buy them preprogrammed if you're purchasing in volume.
and with so little actual compute power, the best you could really manage is to blink a few LEDs in an interesting pattern.
Either there are a *lot* of people who want to blink LEDs in an interesting pattern or you're mistaken about the use.
For all people who demand non standard pronouns, I use the pronoun "your imperial smarminess".
I mean I'm sure you *would* if you ever met one of those people in person and were actully brave enough to say that to their face when there are other witnesses. I mean that'll teach them, right?
capitalist
I think Inigo Montoya would like word with you.
In the bad old days we had a hell of a lot of ridiculous restriction We must somehow made our programs to run successfully inside a RAM that was 48KB in size (yes, 48KB, not 48MB or 48GB), on a CPU with a clock speed of 1.023 MHz
We still have them. In fact some of the systems I've progrmmed hve been more resource limited than the gloriously spacious 32KiB memory of the BBC model B. Take the PIC12F or 10F series. A glorious 64 bytes of RAM, max clock speed of 16MHz, but not unusual to run it 32kHz.
Nowadays I work 9:30-4:30 for a very good, consistent paycheck and let some other "smart person" put in 75 hours a week dealing with hiring
There's nothing wrong with not wnting to run your own business, it's not for most people, and even if it was, the numbers don't add up. But putting the scare qoutes in like that makes it sound like you have huge chip on your shoulder. Those things re just as esential to the business as your work nd without them you wouldn't have the steady 9:30-4:30 with good paycheck.
10% are just causing damage. I'm not talking about terrorists and criminals.
Terrorists and criminals have nothing on those guys. I know guy who is one of those. Worse, he's both motivated and enthusiastic. He also likes to offer help and advice to other people who don't know the systems well.
The classic "respecting your privacy is too hard" argument. Sure, it will take some time for everyone to come into compliance, but that's only because things got so bad already.
Exactly. I mean it's a huge pain in the arse in that you can't be lax with user data, just as it's a huge pain in the rse to pay taxes, file proper accounts and not pullute the local waterways.
Very interesting post, thanks!
Maybe his model of reality is better than yours.
He thinks fossils are bullshit, so I'm going to go with a "no" on that one.
He also engaged in some good JAQing off about the death toll estimate of the holocaust. Apparently that doesn't fit his "model of reality" either despite being well documented.
But then again, he does have a "certified genius level IQ" according to him, so who am I to argue, eh?
his critics mine the past to find things to dismiss him for but don't bother to actually listen to what he has said
Yes this is a thing. If someone has a record of spouting large amounts of bullshit, the rational thing to do is simply ignore them in favour of people who have a better record. After all my time is limited and I can't listen to everything everyone has to say then evaluate all of it with an open mind.
If he's pissy about people ignoring him because of the bullshit, then perhaps he should spout less bullshit.
are forced to simply make shit up.
It's ironic you said that: your accusation of "making shit up" is in fact making shit up.
Perhaps the fact that it exists in the first place?
So, people are insisting you not be an asshat in their comminuty and you find that objectionable. Well, that figures. I guess you and the golang community are fundamantally incompatible then.
That someone felt he/she/it/pronounOfTheWeek had the need and the right to tell other people what to think and do.
Seems you have the attitude of "I want to be able to do what I want where I want and when I want and no one should use their free speech to tell me to go away". That's fine, I'm sure you can find a community where there are no conventions of decency. Perhaps 4chan would be to your taste.
No need to be a sensitive snowflake: no one's telling you how to think. They're not even telling you what to do unless you specifically want to spend time with them. Look at it this way, it's there to save your delicate feelings: you know in advance that what you want to do will get you ejected and this will save you tha pain and embarressment.
I personally think go is a miserable language, steeped deep in mediocrity. I don't need to imagine what programming with generics is like: I already know what it's like and it sucks for anything of moderate size and up. I also believe that the world of programming and types has evolved since the early 1970s.
So yeah no fan but... ...based on what you wrote, I read the code of conduct. I can't see anything objectionable in it. So what, specifically, do you not like.
https://golang.org/conduct
Watch some Scott Adams videos if you want to know about the courtship ritual between Trump and Kim and
Scott Adams as in the delusional author who used to write a funny comic? Not sure I'll be taking analysis from anyone who things that "fossils are bullshit".
And you're screeching [...]
I would say that it's ironic such an accusation is coming from you, but that would be the height of understatement.
I always learned that states rights was an outdated racist concept
You have a truly unique ability to lern utterly the wrong thing every time. Oddly the wrong thing always seems to be the one that aligns with your "worldview".
The sure thing is that eventually investors will get tired of Elon's sweet crooning and flashy distractions
Oh yes that "flashy distraction" of actually selling more electric cars than he can make to people who want one. He does actually have a product and customers. That's not an accident.
after the billions he's frittered away.
Success or failure he's actually trying to do interesting things with his money.
However the world is and always be full of naysayers who never do anything useful or interesting but take potshots at those who do.
No it's not a slippery slope: the fact it's "on a computer" makes no difference. There's a coninuous line between gambling and not and you can always make slight tweaks to make it more or less like gambling.
This has not prevented gambling from being regulated now or in the past. This is in fact the system working as intended. Gambline is regulated, but somone has to provide some judgement as to whether or not something close to the line is in fact gambling.
That's why judges exist.
I live under the same sky, but can turn my head to see in all directions instead of just nose turned up.
That's crap. You've got your nose permanently turned up at teh libruhl SJW. And the turning your head in all directions is so you can turn it away from any facts which disagree with your ideology.
Have we beatennthe analogy to death yet?
Even the first compendium of Turkic languages, Kashgari's Diwan Lughat Al Turk, completed in 1074 C.E., cannot be read today by a learned Turk. Only academics versed in the Osmanli script can.
Same could be said of Old English from the same period despite using largely the same alphabet (eth and thorn not withstanding).
Uh... I suggested you hire someone for the bits you *don't* enjoy. Cleaning in my case, and any bits of plumbing that involve dealing with poo. Oh also painting. I mean I'm fine with DIY, but the pros are faster and better and frankly painting gets pretty tedious after the first two walls.
I forgot electrics. FFS. I'm an engineer, I have worked on electronic engineering professionally a little. Household electrics seems to involve contorting yourself into small spaces while trying to deal with wires that are just a little bit too short and above your head. No thanks!
Ha! Fair point!
But otherwise, they won't make that much of a distinction between strong and ugly versus strong and handsome. (Of course, this is a generalization; there's always exceptions.)
Yes, the odd 90% or so making that an exception (precise figure made up).
I do, however, think it's very dumb to have everyone in a household working a career. I think there's no such thing as a life-work balance if everyone works a job, and works to maintain a household -- there's simply no time left to enjoy the household.
Or do well paid work you enjoy and spend some of the money on someone who can do the househld bits you don't enjoy.
So my "invented" quote
Putting scare quotes around invented doesn't change the fact you're making shit up. The fact you opened with an alternaitve "fact", then doubled down with an intentional isreading means you are not arguing in good faith. There's therefore no point trying to have an actual conversation, so I'll simply highlight your lies for the benefit of other people.
So you're saying that this is the diversity you had in mind?
So you're not denying your original post was a lie. I mean who cares if it's a lie if it feels right, eh?
Both sides get down modded.
These things are not equivalent. One post got modded up for posting made up facts and the other got modded down for pointing they were made up facts.
In fact, a bit of patience and you would have seen her original post is at a +4
It is now, but it was not. It being modded down was a definite abuse of mod points. Apparently pointing out blatant mod abuse counts as trolling too now.
according to you, a progressive feminist saying that they don't want something is not evidence that progressive feminists don't want it.
That's literally a piece of evidence on what progressive feminists want. I note you didn't demand evidence for the original claim.