Yeah, Google's results are not what they used to be (especially when searching for reviews and benchmarks), but I keep hearing people say they are useless and I have yet to see anything I prefer. I keep wondering if they are using the same Google that I am.
I don't own any, because there's none that I like, but the 7" ones I have messed haven't disappointed me in screen size. Hell, I'm just going to be reading web pages and replying to e-mail on it. If I was going to do anything more and wanted a 10" I already have a netbook.
If you keep a ton of data you need on your phone, or anything, you should probably keep backups. There's plenty of ways to have your device wiped out or destroyed.
If the tweet has no context, there's no way to determine intent. I certainly disagree with all the assertions in your original post, and certainly so do many posters here, so stop pretending your singular interpretation is the sole cut-and-dried truth of the case (since that seems to be all your argument relies on).
Linux is NOT Unix. That's been pretty important since day 1. And Unix doesn't need X, since OSX is Unix (real Unix, not Linux) and only runs X under it's main (non-X) window manager as needed (just as Shuttleworth is talking about doing with Wayland). As a matter of a fact, you can have a Unix or Linux box without any windowing system on it at all! It's amazing, I know, but totally possible.
No more than putting something in print (where technology has existed for some time allowing people to freely copy and redistribute your work) involves giving up control of it. Just because it's easy to do something doesn't mean it's moral or should be legal to do so.
Only if you please explain how Davlik (which does not claim to be Java, although that is the language it uses) is "doing exactly the same thing?" especially since their complaint is that is has LESS features than normal Java, rather than more. I have never seen Google make any claims of 100% cross-compatibility between Davlik and Java.
Thank you. 802.11n vs. 'Draft-N' was exactly what came to mind. If we wait around for standards bodies to approve already functional and complete specs instead of moving on with our lives, technology will progress as slowly as an involuntary bureaucracy would have made it. It's the right thing to choose to move ahead with a complete and functional spec if the paper for it isn't being pushed fast enough.
Probably. The point is that it's a whole new drive interconnect. They have another product that is a standalone card which supports 4 drives in a RAID. These drives only come with a card because it's a new interface technology and they are assuming you won't have a port for it yet.
It's an open standard so they are gambling on it eventually becoming the standard for SSDs and having it built into motherboards and such.
Chinese driving is not compatible with this idea. Chinese cities have some terrifying traffic behavior. Not that I think such a system would even be safe in the nicest town.
Maybe it's more of a problem with our two-faced, overly moralistic society. Instead of "forgetting" that other people started off young and exhibitionist, we should "remember" that many of the people bitching started off the same way too. And maybe those people should forgive other people when they realize they have their own faults. Or even better, not judge people according to their own personal moral codes.
Slashdot Mirror
Ooop. I misread that. Thanks.
No they don't. Just because one study was proved to be fraudulent, they are now all fraudulent? that's poor logic.
Hell, he even told us about how he shot a buck in some guy's front yard when he was a teenager.
And thanks to him this is why we have to have licenses.
Yeah, Google's results are not what they used to be (especially when searching for reviews and benchmarks), but I keep hearing people say they are useless and I have yet to see anything I prefer. I keep wondering if they are using the same Google that I am.
The frog mind controlled the scorpion to set him up for murder, is that what I'm getting here?
I don't disagree, but they already sold it, so they don't have any right to take it back from the people they sold it to.
I don't own any, because there's none that I like, but the 7" ones I have messed haven't disappointed me in screen size. Hell, I'm just going to be reading web pages and replying to e-mail on it. If I was going to do anything more and wanted a 10" I already have a netbook.
Yes, because people who want a different product from the one you want are obviously not geniuses like you. 10" is not what I want in a tablet at all.
How is this better than a web-based news source, even a paywalled one?
They certainly cannot be considered "independent" or "unbiased" at a minimum. So they aren't of much value until real 3rd party tests are performed.
If you keep a ton of data you need on your phone, or anything, you should probably keep backups. There's plenty of ways to have your device wiped out or destroyed.
I *do* like cheap electronics!
If the tweet has no context, there's no way to determine intent. I certainly disagree with all the assertions in your original post, and certainly so do many posters here, so stop pretending your singular interpretation is the sole cut-and-dried truth of the case (since that seems to be all your argument relies on).
Linux is NOT Unix. That's been pretty important since day 1. And Unix doesn't need X, since OSX is Unix (real Unix, not Linux) and only runs X under it's main (non-X) window manager as needed (just as Shuttleworth is talking about doing with Wayland). As a matter of a fact, you can have a Unix or Linux box without any windowing system on it at all! It's amazing, I know, but totally possible.
No more than putting something in print (where technology has existed for some time allowing people to freely copy and redistribute your work) involves giving up control of it. Just because it's easy to do something doesn't mean it's moral or should be legal to do so.
Well, that bandwidth is what I pay my ISP for...
Nothing wrong with releasing it when it's done.
Only if you please explain how Davlik (which does not claim to be Java, although that is the language it uses) is "doing exactly the same thing?" especially since their complaint is that is has LESS features than normal Java, rather than more. I have never seen Google make any claims of 100% cross-compatibility between Davlik and Java.
Thank you. 802.11n vs. 'Draft-N' was exactly what came to mind. If we wait around for standards bodies to approve already functional and complete specs instead of moving on with our lives, technology will progress as slowly as an involuntary bureaucracy would have made it. It's the right thing to choose to move ahead with a complete and functional spec if the paper for it isn't being pushed fast enough.
Probably. The point is that it's a whole new drive interconnect. They have another product that is a standalone card which supports 4 drives in a RAID. These drives only come with a card because it's a new interface technology and they are assuming you won't have a port for it yet. It's an open standard so they are gambling on it eventually becoming the standard for SSDs and having it built into motherboards and such.
Those are just very high-end SAS cables, so yes.
Chinese driving is not compatible with this idea. Chinese cities have some terrifying traffic behavior. Not that I think such a system would even be safe in the nicest town.
I don't think "ill-fated" is a term you would use for something that performed far beyond expectations.
Maybe it's more of a problem with our two-faced, overly moralistic society. Instead of "forgetting" that other people started off young and exhibitionist, we should "remember" that many of the people bitching started off the same way too. And maybe those people should forgive other people when they realize they have their own faults. Or even better, not judge people according to their own personal moral codes.
OpenDNS fails this, too. Hopefully they will be quick on fixing it.