Hm... wouldn't we normally call it entrapment if...
DUDE! Are you not paying attention? It's *ALL* a set-up by the Pentagon to make Wikileaks unattractive to potential leakers. This Army guy is in on it, he'll probably get a fucking Achievement Medal and a trip to Officer's Candidate School out of it.
And perpetually ban that developer/team/company from every having access again.
Or change their rules for updates, because according to the "official" Mozilla response, TACO 3.0 passed all the requirements. Mozilla doesn't seem to have a problem with it.
Honestly, if you're going to leak government docs to Wikileaks, you should't go around tooting your horn about it to random "hackers" you find on-line. This guy may have been caught in the end anyway, but he didn't do himself any favors by not KEEPING HIS MOUTH SHUT about it.
So out of many gigabytes of accidentally-collected data...
It is so unlikely - essentially zero - that they "accentually" collected this data. That statement is pure bullshit. But as you say, it was out there in the air unencrypted...
It's a rather weird suggestion as the internet was designed by a government agency.
I understand what you're saying, of course.
But people often say things like this as if things don't change. It's really irrelevant TODAY how and why the Internet was developed because what it was developed for and by who is not what it is TODAY. Things change.
I don't see this happening. The "GoogleSphere" revolves around leveraging personal information. It's *ALL* about data mining and relationships.
You know, Google isn't the only one, organically your info can live in the Intertubes forever. It's up to the indevidual to protect their personal information, not blame someone else for their own stupidity of telling everyone on Facebook or whatever that they like to feel up boys while loaded on malt beer...
Obviously you're not one of the cool kids. It's the hip trendy thing now to grossly exaggerate the price of a cup of coffee at Starbucks to show how cool you are...
I said a 20 ounce DRIP was under $2.
Now, that Iced Chai Mocha Caffè Macchiato (Organic Rain Forrest) Light Soy Whip With a Carab Dusting and a Shot Of Almond... That was $27. In a recycled paper cup.
Slashdot Mirror
I wonder how much cocaine is consumed on the Microsoft Campus everyday?
Or am I misunderstanding that feature?
Saying "PDF files will render as seamlessly as HTML" is not the same as "PDF files will render as HTML".
So, yes, I think you misunderstand.
The parent is "Offtopic"? Really?
Hm... wouldn't we normally call it entrapment if...
DUDE! Are you not paying attention? It's *ALL* a set-up by the Pentagon to make Wikileaks unattractive to potential leakers. This Army guy is in on it, he'll probably get a fucking Achievement Medal and a trip to Officer's Candidate School out of it.
I mean, turn in your tin-foil hat dude!
And perpetually ban that developer/team/company from every having access again.
Or change their rules for updates, because according to the "official" Mozilla response, TACO 3.0 passed all the requirements. Mozilla doesn't seem to have a problem with it.
Honestly, if you're going to leak government docs to Wikileaks, you should't go around tooting your horn about it to random "hackers" you find on-line. This guy may have been caught in the end anyway, but he didn't do himself any favors by not KEEPING HIS MOUTH SHUT about it.
If you don't want to get caught keep your damn mouth shut.
Indeed. This guy "outed" himself by bragging online to other people.
Nothing says a story fork has to be lighter, though at Slashdot it usually is - lighter on facts generally!
It's not a dupe, it's a FORK! Quit your complaining...
Why accept the obvious answer when you can assume the paranoid answer?
So out of many gigabytes of accidentally-collected data...
It is so unlikely - essentially zero - that they "accentually" collected this data. That statement is pure bullshit. But as you say, it was out there in the air unencrypted...
It's a rather weird suggestion as the internet was designed by a government agency.
I understand what you're saying, of course.
But people often say things like this as if things don't change. It's really irrelevant TODAY how and why the Internet was developed because what it was developed for and by who is not what it is TODAY. Things change.
This is very clever of you. But suppose millions of people do? Should everyone know where every bit of data on every device goes before he uses it?
When you put your personal information on the Internet, you accept that you lose control over that info. Or, you are an idiot. Which is it?
Yeah, but with more and more "personal" computing happening in "the cloud" people will hardly know that their data is *not* (only) on their device.
Once again, you are personally responsible for what personal info you put out there. I don't use "the cloud".
Every day, you should...
How about "every day" you take Personal Responsibility for the crap you leave on the Intertubes?
I don't see this happening. The "GoogleSphere" revolves around leveraging personal information. It's *ALL* about data mining and relationships.
You know, Google isn't the only one, organically your info can live in the Intertubes forever. It's up to the indevidual to protect their personal information, not blame someone else for their own stupidity of telling everyone on Facebook or whatever that they like to feel up boys while loaded on malt beer...
Even though our company writes our own CMS and e-commerce software, I am glad to see Wordpress moving forward.
Even though I like to masturbate, I like to watch other masturbate as well. I'm glad to see young tight boys enjoying themselves.
I've never heard of Bebo. 850 million? Maybe that's (just another reason) why AOL sucks.
Chatroulette is visual Twitter.
This is all a bunch af HOOEY to justify tossing out a legit candidate that none of the BIG MONEY wanted. Too bad, so sad, HE WON!
What the fuck in Tim blathering about? I mean, HUH?
Obviously you're not one of the cool kids. It's the hip trendy thing now to grossly exaggerate the price of a cup of coffee at Starbucks to show how cool you are...
I said a 20 ounce DRIP was under $2.
Now, that Iced Chai Mocha Caffè Macchiato (Organic Rain Forrest) Light Soy Whip With a Carab Dusting and a Shot Of Almond... That was $27. In a recycled paper cup.
...when I'm inside even at peak time Linux temporarily becomes more popular than Windows.
So you're the only guy that actually sits down and pays for Wi-Fi at Starbucks?
I know people like to make fun of Starbucks for "$7" coffee, but last time I visited one here in Seattle, a 20 ounce drip was under $2.
Are they seriously trying to convince me that someone would want to pirate Uwe Boll's movies?
I sure as Hell wouldn't *PAY* for a copy...