Slashdot Mirror


User: techno-vampire

techno-vampire's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,957
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,957

  1. One obvious answer to the problem on Managing Personal Electronics and Software In the Workplace · · Score: 1

    TFA tells us that people not only try to use ICQ and personal laptops on the LAN, they expect IT to support it for them. This is not a problem, boys and girls! Every time IT gets a request for such support, it's forwarded to an appropriate department so that the person requesting the support can be disciplined for their failure to follow company policy. No, it won't stop people from doing such things. It will, however, weed out those who can't manage on their own and are too stupid to learn from what happened the first time they asked for help.

  2. Re:just lie, make stuff up on The Stigma of a Tech Support Background · · Score: 3, Interesting
    its called fudging a resume. masters of fudge go a long way.

    I used to have a friend who was a master of fudge. He was great at making up qualifications for jobs he wanted, and after a few years, he'd amassed a long list of jobs he'd gotten that way. The only problem was, he'd lost them all for the same reason: they kept finding out he'd lied to them and fired his sorry little ass. Once, he got a job as a trainee for tech support at an ISP; he didn't last until lunch on his first day.

  3. Re:A serious question for both candidates on Be Part of the 2008 Presidential Youth Debate · · Score: 1

    Of course they'll lie and twist the truth. That's the point. You see, they'll twist the truth to make it look like they're qualified in their own opinion, and that will tell me what they think the qualifications are. That, in turn, will tell me what they think is the most important part of being president, and that's not exactly something they're eager to tell us, are they? It's not their qualifications I'm interested in, as those are a matter of public record, but how they view them. You have to think outside the box.

  4. Re:A serious question for both candidates on Be Part of the 2008 Presidential Youth Debate · · Score: 1
    Seriously? That's a huge softball lob.

    And while they're rambling, I'd be learning what they think the qualifications for the office are, because that's what they'd be emphasizing. It would also have the advantage of catching them off-guard, because most people never ask questions like that.

  5. Re:A serious question for both candidates on Be Part of the 2008 Presidential Youth Debate · · Score: 1
    If you really want to get to know the candidates, ask them something personal about your life.

    I don't want to know how they would run my life, I want to know how they would run the country.

  6. Re:Worlds oldest found rocks found! on World's Oldest Rocks Found · · Score: 1

    I must admit that the article in Wikipedia was as clear as mud to anybody who doesn't already understand the subject, including me. However, I think I have an idea what's going on here. AIUI, there are two elements involved: samarium and neodymium, with samarium decaying to form neodymium. The ratio of the two depends on two things: what type of mineral is involved (which determines the original ratio) and the time since the sample was last melted, because the longer the rock has remained solid, the less samarium there is and the more neodymium because of the decay mentioned above. I'm sure that if I've gotten it wrong, somebody (or, most likely several somebodies) will be eager to correct me.

  7. Re:A serious question for both candidates on Be Part of the 2008 Presidential Youth Debate · · Score: 1
    i hate that question during job interviews.

    If you don't have a good answer to that question, you don't belong at the interview. Both candidates claim to be qualified for the job, and I want to know just what they think their qualifications are. If nothing else, it would be interesting to see what they think it takes to be President.

  8. A serious question for both candidates on Be Part of the 2008 Presidential Youth Debate · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why do you consider yourself qualified to be President of the United States of America?

  9. Re:The basic premise of the policy is flawed on Designing a Patent-Incentive Program? · · Score: 1
    It is a belief system with the assumption that you can create property.

    And what makes you think you can't? That's what manufacturing is about, you know, creating property and selling it. For that matter, that's what agriculture is all about once you get past the subsistence stage.

  10. Re:5 simple things on Google To Fund Ideas That Will Change the World · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Nuclear really can't because contractors are too inept or corrupt to do a job right.

    So, let's see, that means that you're simply going to dismiss the technology because you assert that the people doing the work aren't capable of doing it correctly. Do you have any proof, or are you just expressing your own anti-nuclear bias. Oh, and before I forget, fusion is a form of nuclear energy as well.

  11. Re:Fair and balanced on Microsoft Documentation Declared Unfit For US Consumption · · Score: 1, Interesting
    you find people who really are trying to make the best product they can for computer users.

    I'm sure there are. And the saddest part of this is that with all those people doing the best they can, every Microsoft product is a bloated, buggy mass of security holes.

  12. Re:It's a balance on CA Legislature Torpedoes IT Overtime · · Score: 1
    By joining a union, an individual gives up personal freedom and the opportunity for exceptional advancement.

    Just because you're a member of a union doesn't mean that you have to work for union scale. If you're good enough you can negotiate a deal and get more than scale. My father spent most of his working life as a union member, and except when he was just getting started he never, ever worked for scale.

  13. Re:Yes on Studies Say Ideology Trumps Facts · · Score: 1
    "Wow, that's really fascinating. Can you prove it?"

    I have a friend who's so liberal even he admits that he's well outside the mainstream. If you try something like that with him, he'll cite a number of far-left sources and insist that what they say is true. If you cite any contrary sources, he'll call them liars, adding that they're well-known for twisting the truth. If you ask for sources on that, he'll either refer you back to the original far-left sites or resort to argument by assertion. The sad thing is, he really thinks that he's proved his point by doing this. No matter what you do, in his mind, his ideology is correct and any facts that don't fit are wrong.

  14. Re:Duh on Is There a Linux Client Solution for Exchange 2007? · · Score: 1
    Sendmail should be boycotted for not properly crediting Lovecraft in the design of sendmail.cf

    Thank you! I've just snarffed that for my Usenet sigmonster.

  15. Re:We need a pay-per-email protocol on Postfix's Creator Outlines Spam Solution · · Score: 1
    This would not stop spam but how does it sound getting $0.02 for each spam you receive?

    As long as it's used parallel to SMTP, as you suggested, it will be worthless because spammers will simply refuse to use it. And, blocking all mail sent via SMTP and only accepting this new protocol won't help either, because not everybody's going to have access to it.

  16. Re:Please no! on Keeping Older Drivers Behind the Wheel · · Score: 1
    Again, I have little sympathy for people who let pride compromise their safety as well as others.

    Getting the hearing aids was easy. (Of course, I have VA benefits, so it didn't cost me several thousand dollars each to get them.) The hard part was learning that it's OK to tell people that I have a hearing problem and that they need to speak clearly. (Not louder; in most cases that doesn't help, especially if it just means you're mumbling at the TOP OF YOUR LUNGS.) However, once you get past feeling funny about admitting it to others, you find that almost everybody cooperates once they're made aware of your needs.

  17. Re:Baby Boomers on Keeping Older Drivers Behind the Wheel · · Score: 1
    Nobody is selling me the shit *I* want!

    Same here. I don't need adult diapers, and as for the other, well, I'm here on Slashdot, aren't I?

  18. Re:Please no! on Keeping Older Drivers Behind the Wheel · · Score: 1

    It's not a matter of memory, as I mentioned elsewhere. It's more a matter of having enough things on my mind that the less important parts of driving went on auto-pilot. (The important things, like watching where I'm going, speed and deciding if/when to change lanes stayed in the foreground.) By the time you reach my age, you'll understand.

  19. Re:Please no! on Keeping Older Drivers Behind the Wheel · · Score: 1

    When you've been driving as many decades as I have, you'll find that you don't need to think about turning on your turn indicator. When you need it, you turn it on without thinking.

  20. Re:Please no! on Keeping Older Drivers Behind the Wheel · · Score: 1

    For some reason, the dashboard light just didn't catch my attention, except at night. I'm not sure why, but it might have been right where the line goes across my bifocals (Yes, I'm a six-eyes.) so that it was even less likely that I'd notice it if I weren't looking for it.

  21. Re:answer: puppy linux on Fast-Booting Text-Editor Operating System? · · Score: 1

    I'll second that! I've got it running on an old laptop (PII 266, 96Meg RAM) and it boots into a GUI in well under a minute. On a modern machine, if all you want is a CLI, I can well believe that claim of 7 seconds. If you want an easy, light weight editor, use nano, as has been mentioned elsewhere. It's not included by default, but a quick search of their user forum will find you a download.

  22. Re:Baby Boomers on Keeping Older Drivers Behind the Wheel · · Score: 1

    I'm a baby boomer, and quite frankly, it sounds good to me!

  23. Re:Reduction in reaction time? on Keeping Older Drivers Behind the Wheel · · Score: 3, Funny
    backed off the road (without looking behind her).

    That had nothing to do with her age and everything to do with her ability (or lack of it) to drive. This afternoon, I was in a parking lot when a lady started to back out in front of me, then stopped for me. I waved her on saying, "You're burning gas; I'm not." She continued, after thanking me, and said, "Backing up is scary." I'm sure it was, and not just for her, because at no time did she ever turn her head to see where she was going. At a guess, she was in her mid-30s.

  24. Re:Please no! on Keeping Older Drivers Behind the Wheel · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know you were at least partially joking, but I can tell you how that happens because it used to happen to me, when I was in my mid 50s: my hearing had deteriorated to the point that I often didn't hear the turn signal clicking if I had other things on my mind, so it would, in true Energizer Bunny fashion, keep going and going and going. I finally realized that I had a hearing issue and got hearing aids and it doesn't happen any more. Hearing loss is often gradual, and few people notice it until it's gotten fairly bad, so that elderly driver may simply not realize that they can't quite hear as well as they think they do.

  25. Re:Still taught in schools on Don't Count Cobol Out · · Score: 3, Funny
    What other languages have you had to take that you know will still be in use 30 years from today?

    English comes to mind, but considering some of the posts I see here, I have my doubts.