They mean money should not be spent on things that can not be instantly monetized. That's what was killing Bell Labs ; once they went the instant monetize project route it was all wine and roses.
Google is at risk of not becoming another Bell Labs.
"I only play it for the fighting, I appreciate the expansive multi-tiered environments with the 16 playable characters and pixel shading bump-mapping... "
"Snicker"
"... and the rich plot development. Seriously, why else would I play it?"
Wouldn't that make sense? Their social circle is more defined by their contracting company (more visible on LinkedIn) where as their work history is more defined by the company they were contracted to (more visible on the resume).
I'd love to see you try to explain it while ignoring the fact that rice is not pure sugar, or even simple sugars, does not equate rice with chocolate bars and ignores the fact that the majority of the Far East lives on a diet based on rice.
Being pedantic doesn't make you right. Believing that you have some better insight into things because the person who challenged your assertions must be religious doesn't make you right. Ignoring that I quoted Rice along with wheat and your ignoring that trying to make it like I do not know of the world outside of European and Semitic areas doesn't make you right. These are not citations.
Most of human history, in basically every way except raw time, occurred after agriculture.
So, for the armchair anthropologist, since the dawn of major civilizations built around farming after giving up our hunter/gatherer roots, which covers the lives of most humans that have lived and died on this planet, grains such as wheat and rice have fed and continued to feed, most people.
So once again, I ask you to back up your claim that wheat and rice are 'horrible' for you, since nothing you said does.
Windows and OS X are also used by IT professionals, and so provide some tools professionals would use. Neither Windows or OS X ever expect their users to drop to a shell to do anything. While it is happening less and less, you will be told to drop to a shell at some point when you use Linux.
The enforceability of an EULA depends on several factors, one of them being the court in which the case is heard. Some courts that have addressed the validity of the shrinkwrap license agreements have found some EULAs to be invalid... Other courts have determined that the shrinkwrap license agreement is valid and enforceable... No court has ruled on the validity of EULAs generally; decisions are limited to particular provisions and terms.
Do you have any proof that there might be violations or are you just proposing that any large, successful software project must be infringing on GPL software?
Or they did a cost analysis of the situation and figured that it wasn't worth it to do it without downtime. And they'd probably be right, they probably won't loose any money on it.
But HR does not like tech schools and community colleges.
This is seriously a problem with society. If it doesn't make you money, or if it isn't directly related to making money, it is thought of as useless. GP said he would take classes for fun, who cares what any company thinks about it. I did the Stanford machine learning course because it was interesting, not because it would help me make money in any way, I will do more for the same reason, and in more diverse fields. People learning about things not related to their job or area of expertise is a good thing, it is something to be encouraged.
Without the CRTC, you couldn't get on TV just by being 'Canadian content.' You'd actually have to provide something of worth.
Honestly, I don't know what you would define as Canadian Culture if you put the stipulation on the definition that it can not contain or reference the US in any way. Each province could become a state in the US and nothing would change.
They're separating out based on motivation.
Sounds like a match made in heaven then.
They mean money should not be spent on things that can not be instantly monetized. That's what was killing Bell Labs ; once they went the instant monetize project route it was all wine and roses.
Google is at risk of not becoming another Bell Labs.
"I only play it for the fighting, I appreciate the expansive multi-tiered environments with the 16 playable characters and pixel shading bump-mapping ... "
... and the rich plot development. Seriously, why else would I play it?"
"Snicker"
"
"She kicks high"
Virtual Collectable Cards. Did someone think the servers would be online forever so they could 'keep' these bits of data?
Well don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
Wouldn't that make sense? Their social circle is more defined by their contracting company (more visible on LinkedIn) where as their work history is more defined by the company they were contracted to (more visible on the resume).
You mean like how you could run all those Xbox games on your PC?
By that, no one would do anything, you weren't born knowing how to do anything. You have to start somewhere.
I'd love to see you try to explain it while ignoring the fact that rice is not pure sugar, or even simple sugars, does not equate rice with chocolate bars and ignores the fact that the majority of the Far East lives on a diet based on rice.
Being pedantic doesn't make you right. Believing that you have some better insight into things because the person who challenged your assertions must be religious doesn't make you right. Ignoring that I quoted Rice along with wheat and your ignoring that trying to make it like I do not know of the world outside of European and Semitic areas doesn't make you right. These are not citations.
Most of human history, in basically every way except raw time, occurred after agriculture.
So, for the armchair anthropologist, since the dawn of major civilizations built around farming after giving up our hunter/gatherer roots, which covers the lives of most humans that have lived and died on this planet, grains such as wheat and rice have fed and continued to feed, most people.
So once again, I ask you to back up your claim that wheat and rice are 'horrible' for you, since nothing you said does.
[citation_needed]
You're going to need to back that up. Throughout most human history and quite frankly most of the world now, people lived on basically just that.
Difficulty: Gluten is not the devil.
I'm pretty sure citizenship does entitle you to a passport.
As I understand it, Microsoft is following the spec properly. Google is exploiting a loophole in the spec.
So obviously research into the limits of the current technology is pointless?
Windows and OS X are also used by IT professionals, and so provide some tools professionals would use. Neither Windows or OS X ever expect their users to drop to a shell to do anything. While it is happening less and less, you will be told to drop to a shell at some point when you use Linux.
No, there are not.
Enforceability_of_EULAs_in_the_United_States
Do you have any proof that there might be violations or are you just proposing that any large, successful software project must be infringing on GPL software?
"News for Nerds." I think users here can figure out how to do a web search if they didn't already know Micron made RAM.
Or they did a cost analysis of the situation and figured that it wasn't worth it to do it without downtime. And they'd probably be right, they probably won't loose any money on it.
This is seriously a problem with society. If it doesn't make you money, or if it isn't directly related to making money, it is thought of as useless. GP said he would take classes for fun, who cares what any company thinks about it. I did the Stanford machine learning course because it was interesting, not because it would help me make money in any way, I will do more for the same reason, and in more diverse fields. People learning about things not related to their job or area of expertise is a good thing, it is something to be encouraged.
Blindly doing whatever the US does.
They did say 'for good aesthetics.'
Without the CRTC, you couldn't get on TV just by being 'Canadian content.' You'd actually have to provide something of worth.
Honestly, I don't know what you would define as Canadian Culture if you put the stipulation on the definition that it can not contain or reference the US in any way. Each province could become a state in the US and nothing would change.