And you can do brain surgery while standing in a helicopter during a hurricane, that doesn't mean that's how you should do the job. I've done several intranet sites where I was very happy to have IE as the required browser for all users. I don't think I would have been as successful if I had to worry about cross-browser compatibility at just about every turn, yet I was never completely comfortable doing it that way. The solutions were always vulnerable to the cancer of browser and system upgrades and changes. They had a limited life expectancy and were inherently unstable because of the changing nature of how the browsers adhere to the standards. As long as I or my teams had some sort of administration control of at least the server, and hopefully, any planned changes in company policy concerning the computers the workers used, it was still a manageable solution. As a stand-alone/leave-alone solution, meh, I just hoped the checks cleared before the company broke something.
does it explain why the lemurs didn't wait until the lunch period to eat the eagles? Plus, I don't really think they did eat the eagles because didn't they just have a new album?
They invaded our privacy already and didn't have to pay for it. I think that's a good step toward profitability by lowering costs. Next step is an increase in regular consumer bills to offset the losses and to cover the eventual lawsuits. Result is, we pay to spy on ourselves.
I'll remind you of that when someone you love dies because their health records are inaccessible due to some asshat fucking up the servers.
And if a doctor says fuckit and goes ahead with a life saving procedure because their health records are inaccessible due to some asshat fucking up the servers which would have denied the procedure?
The meaning of life is to be a good consumer. The more you consume, the better a person you are. They are giving you more to consume so you must consume more.
One argument for the government bailing them out is because the government did not protect the consumers from predatory practices of the lenders in the first place. The lenders knew the risks, they targeted the desired marketing audiences, they did not properly explain the risks at a level that the targeted consumers would be able to understand. They used a very enticing carrot while putting a cloak of invisibility around the stick (with adjustable rate hit points). And now they are using the stick with great effect.
Did the lenders NOT see this coming? If they didn't, then its THEIR fault for being stupid. If they did see it coming, well, fine then.
...laws creating a banking cartel and outlawing competition were created by who? The Free Market? No, those same cartels, that's who. Why? Because they made more money with those laws than without.
The underlying cause was greed. The bankers knew they could make alot of money preying on those with less money. The only risk was to the jobs and livelihood of the clients and the minions working for the bankers. So the risk, for the bankers, is 0.
Supply and demand is secondary to (or a subset of) greed and profit in the real world. It really doesn't work well for most people. People who like capitalism tend to be rich to start with or are living under the illusion that a) they are rich or b) the will be rich.
Slashdot Mirror
but its a very user-friendly gun that just works.
Jackie Vatour FTW!
http://www.telefilm.gc.ca/data/production/prod_4147.asp?lang=en&cat=tv&g=doc&y=2006
And you can do brain surgery while standing in a helicopter during a hurricane, that doesn't mean that's how you should do the job. I've done several intranet sites where I was very happy to have IE as the required browser for all users. I don't think I would have been as successful if I had to worry about cross-browser compatibility at just about every turn, yet I was never completely comfortable doing it that way. The solutions were always vulnerable to the cancer of browser and system upgrades and changes. They had a limited life expectancy and were inherently unstable because of the changing nature of how the browsers adhere to the standards. As long as I or my teams had some sort of administration control of at least the server, and hopefully, any planned changes in company policy concerning the computers the workers used, it was still a manageable solution. As a stand-alone/leave-alone solution, meh, I just hoped the checks cleared before the company broke something.
I think its more like IE7 can expose where the app was already broken.
aren't ballistas the people who go to college for four years in order to serve drinks at starbucks?
Only if I want seconds.
does it explain why the lemurs didn't wait until the lunch period to eat the eagles? Plus, I don't really think they did eat the eagles because didn't they just have a new album?
You're assuming the the FBI wouldn't agree to do the unfeasible? The four unfeasible ones could be a subset of the ones they are agreeing to do.
They invaded our privacy already and didn't have to pay for it. I think that's a good step toward profitability by lowering costs. Next step is an increase in regular consumer bills to offset the losses and to cover the eventual lawsuits. Result is, we pay to spy on ourselves.
And if a doctor says fuckit and goes ahead with a life saving procedure because their health records are inaccessible due to some asshat fucking up the servers which would have denied the procedure?
The meaning of life is to be a good consumer. The more you consume, the better a person you are. They are giving you more to consume so you must consume more.
look and see the actual source code running, or look at what they say is the source code?
Thought I saw a buffalo with an aqualung part way down. Might've just been me, 'tho.
I think the idea is "companion to". Plus, there are too many incidents of ThinkPad owners being arrested by the Thought Police.
The imperial measures of rotation include hours, days, lunar months, and years.
Right. Start with the bankers who were preying on the stupid.
Yah, its almost as if some rich dude had the money and influence to set it up that way.
One argument for the government bailing them out is because the government did not protect the consumers from predatory practices of the lenders in the first place. The lenders knew the risks, they targeted the desired marketing audiences, they did not properly explain the risks at a level that the targeted consumers would be able to understand. They used a very enticing carrot while putting a cloak of invisibility around the stick (with adjustable rate hit points). And now they are using the stick with great effect.
Did the lenders NOT see this coming? If they didn't, then its THEIR fault for being stupid. If they did see it coming, well, fine then.
Hope she doesn't offer Adjustable Rate Babysitting. The rates are very good to start (perhaps she even hints it'll be for FREE?).
...laws creating a banking cartel and outlawing competition were created by who? The Free Market? No, those same cartels, that's who. Why? Because they made more money with those laws than without.
The underlying cause was greed. The bankers knew they could make alot of money preying on those with less money. The only risk was to the jobs and livelihood of the clients and the minions working for the bankers. So the risk, for the bankers, is 0.
Supply and demand is secondary to (or a subset of) greed and profit in the real world. It really doesn't work well for most people. People who like capitalism tend to be rich to start with or are living under the illusion that a) they are rich or b) the will be rich.
Yah, people in a free market VOTED for the ARM mortgages. That sure has worked out well, didn't it?
Yah, except I'm thinking we'll end up using more energy because, you know, we're saving on the light bulbs, aren't we?