I'm not voting for Trump, but I doubt it would be any better with Clinton. Just ask yourself this: Has wealth distribution in the U.S. gotten better or worse during Obama's 8 years. Most people would say "The rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer." Now, is that trend likely to continue with Clinton? If not, how is she going to change it?
She should have said that in March. It would be true, but doesn't excuse the use of such a server to bypass federal records laws and security procedures.
I'd also like to see that the places that are gun free zones are held liable for the safety of the people in those places. If they are disallowing the law abiding from carrying a firearm, they have the responsibility to make sure that the non-law abiding people are disarmed as well.
I'll waste a little more bandwidth, and ask, name three things that Hillary has ever done. Just three accomplishments. You can't name three. You'll have to stretch hard to even try it.
- She made $100k in cattle futures from $1k seed money in a very short time.
- She was anointed Senator
- She was secretary of state and at least avoided selling out our allies to terrorist states.
That said, things are different now and it is harder for older people to find suitable partners -- they're fishing in a dwindling pool full of:
- Unpleasant, bitter divorcees who have had their personalities permanently ruined
- The unmarryable -- men and women -- who haven't been able to attract anyone due to serious flaws of one kind or another
- The permanently single -- aka the creepy 55 year old guy still hitting on women in the bar with no intention of settling down or even being honest
If they "inconveniently lose" video evidence, they can just blame the tech guys, say the drive was scratched, and walk away with the liberals happily believing them.
That's not entirely true. If the merchant got a good authorization, the fraud falls back to the bank.
I'd prefer to see it where the merchant was on the hook for the entirety of fraud.
Slashdot Mirror
BleachBit's new tagline: "We're the dustcloth for the DNC!"
No they wouldn't. Don't you know who she is?
Whew! Everything is ok now!
It's all good - the FBI will never find intent.
I'm not voting for Trump, but I doubt it would be any better with Clinton. Just ask yourself this: Has wealth distribution in the U.S. gotten better or worse during Obama's 8 years. Most people would say "The rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer." Now, is that trend likely to continue with Clinton? If not, how is she going to change it?
The Clintons will get richer. That is for sure.
That is true here in the US as well. There are a whole lot of police and not that many actually are involved in shootings.
If the owner of the prepaid card files a claim that says that the withdrawal was unauthorized?
Firearms safety and marksmanship should be a section every year through high school.
Marksmanship and firearm safety should be a part of the curriculum at all K-12 schools.
She should have said that in March. It would be true, but doesn't excuse the use of such a server to bypass federal records laws and security procedures.
I'd also like to see that the places that are gun free zones are held liable for the safety of the people in those places. If they are disallowing the law abiding from carrying a firearm, they have the responsibility to make sure that the non-law abiding people are disarmed as well.
I'll waste a little more bandwidth, and ask, name three things that Hillary has ever done. Just three accomplishments. You can't name three. You'll have to stretch hard to even try it.
- She made $100k in cattle futures from $1k seed money in a very short time. - She was anointed Senator - She was secretary of state and at least avoided selling out our allies to terrorist states.
That said, things are different now and it is harder for older people to find suitable partners -- they're fishing in a dwindling pool full of: - Unpleasant, bitter divorcees who have had their personalities permanently ruined - The unmarryable -- men and women -- who haven't been able to attract anyone due to serious flaws of one kind or another - The permanently single -- aka the creepy 55 year old guy still hitting on women in the bar with no intention of settling down or even being honest
They should be hunting widowers.
$90/pound is not cheaper than bacon.
The $10,000 limit was set forth in 1970 and never indexed for inflation.
The crime, structuring, is unchanged with the Patriot act
Hiding large cash transactions was made illegal in the Bank Secrecy Act and has been illegal since 1970.
They may still happen - is it easier to break a window to extricate you or slice open the body of a vehicle?
If they "inconveniently lose" video evidence, they can just blame the tech guys, say the drive was scratched, and walk away with the liberals happily believing them.
It's better than being a widower.
That's not entirely true. If the merchant got a good authorization, the fraud falls back to the bank. I'd prefer to see it where the merchant was on the hook for the entirety of fraud.
They are a coop telco in Iowa - that means that they are leaps and bounds ahead of the big boys in rural areas for providing good internet access.
BS He's a man and not a king and as such he has no more entitlement to personal safety than anyone else.
Buffet and Edwards both used the tax code to their advantage to minimize their exposure. Both of them also feel that we must pay more in taxes.
John Edwards also sheltered money from taxes. If it is allowed and ethical, each taxpayer has a duty to minimize their taxes.
Warren Buffet is putting a huge chunk o' money into a foundation to avoid paying Nebraska their share of his estate tax when he dies as well.