Maybe that will be possible, once 6 or so giant robots produce all the goods that the world requires and energy is so abundant that distribution costs disappear.
Not at all, the presentation of opinion is used as a brand and people are free to select what they follow. That is the free market practice of allowing individual choice. I believe your problem is the sheltered environment you know, ignoring the reality of the world and even of the majority of your fellow Americans. People don't have time to keep up with their own health, their families, or anything else. Why do you insist on increasing the burden for them?
The difference is the kinds of ads that were used. In Trump's case, the vast majority reflected his campaign of populist dogma with no substance and flag waving blame of the whipping-boy of the hour (Arabs, Gays, Disabled Americans, etc.); here the point is pointing out abuse of data for psychological warfare that violates the rights of all people.
Then you get the dictatorship of the wealthy leisure class; they are the ones who can pay for access to all the information (hint: it isn't free) and have the spare time to to redundantly perform the analysis. Problem is that not only is that simply selecting a group to rule without any oversight, it acts to disenfranchise all of the people who do the work that makes civilization possible.
Absolutely! This is truly great news for the world, as this not only secures the trading value of the EU block, it sabotages Putin's plan to remove both nuclear powers from the EU. This outcome vastly improves the EU security situation and removes substantial parts of the risk of invasion by Russia that the Baltic states and Poland faced otherwise.
Why? It is Putin's aim and has been for a decade is to destabilize and isolate all nuclear powers. He succeeded in the US with Trump's isolationist vision, although the totality of congress is keeping him in line so far. He succeeded inthe UK with May's isolationist vision, although demographics show UK return to the EU within a decade. If the ongoing Russian subterfuge had gotten Pen elected then France withdrawing from the international sphere would have left the EU isolated and reliant on the military power of Germany, who lacks their own nuclear weapons as yet.
I am vastly in favor of full rearmament in Germany and Japan, including nuclear weapons. Regional powers for both are abusing the terms that limit their arsenal as means to exert unearned dominance and control. Whether the current nuclear powers all deserve that influence is also up for debate, but the only solution there is mild proliferation.
USD inflation has been less than 10% per year every year since 1982 (Reagan's recession). For 1990-2007 it was less than 5% followed by a brief spike from the Bush Recession, andsince 2009 it has been less than 3% per year. See here. Monthly smoothed averages are down lately, but by its nature that figure is heavily influenced by the distant past more than the recent one, so that pattern can easily reverse. Best timing is to take the money out now or as soon as you can, and put it into durable consumer goods with value. Particularly those you personally use on a daily basis.
This is a matter of economics. Some of the expenses for running an application vary significantly in proportion to use while others do not. In the case of cloud services and particularly for comprehensive services, this allows for the lowest achievable cost as there is not limit on savings at scale and less wasted/unused capacity over time.
You may idealize Hadoop, Pig, Scala, et al. but realize that hosting any part of your own solution requires major investment in hardware, utility, and especially personnel. That isn't just "programmers, that includes maintenance workers from janitors to facilities professionals and everyone else required to keep a building in working order. Then additional financial costs in insurance, loan amortization given the huge capital expenditures otherwise required, etc.
This is what enables arguments for a fixed price or some mix of fixed and metered usage billing. IT in business is a business process, and in most companies IT services are a cost center best minimized to allow more productive investments for actual business growth.
Uber came up with a business model reliant on ignoring safety regulations for drivers and riders. With predictable result of enabling murderers and rapists. Read! Absence of ethics as reflected in stealing money from equity, stealing intellectual property, stiffing drivers with equivalent pay-day auto loans for company vehicles, and allowing wanton sexual harassment without punishment.
You are ignorant and illiterate. Read! Uber's criminal activity before the software fiasco was operating in the city in violation of law banning exactly that. The software was designed explicitly to allow Uber to operate despite the law and evade detection. Now in addition to that original charge, they are guilty of obstruction of justice by interfering with official investigation.
There is only so much land globally, especially land suitable for sophisticated business services which require extensive infrastructure. At most that satisfies the requirement for plant, but it barely scratches the surface of a business model. Consumer data powers new market research and business intelligence; an organization is like an organism, data analysis is how it knows what to do to survive and better to thrive in competitive business environments. Skepticism and arrogance are popular lately but that fails to add anything to any discussion.
facilitating murder sprees or white power movements
Give it a month, Uber is taking pains to hide from oversight for a reason. Practically it will be tied into the same bullshit that has taken root in many of the fake "innovation" companies like Airbnb.
Can't keep the bullshit tag lines straight anymore can you? Trick is to learn how accounting and tax actually works globally, but then you'll understand that echo chamber bullshit for what it is and stop parroting it everywhere. Gain for all parties...
Except for the lesson it teaches other tax-shy firms - make profits, hide revenues, evade taxes. That dismantles the public for private gain. That isn't American. That's Fascist giving firms power replacing the state in the end, which only puts people at the mercy of balance sheets with arbitrary accruals.
Only if you are willfully ignorant of context and history. Where did the "trend" come from? These are development decisions made by state governments with decades of emphasis on heavy industry at lowest cost, and to the exclusion of every other priority. The fact that China and India are acting now shows that there is an alternative which is cheaper and brings other benefits, those highlighted in the respective articles. Investigate and you can find direct links discussing the relationship with the Paris, but the basis in real physical improvements is more concrete demonstrating the benefits derived from it. Technology doesn't develop by itself, it requires careful cultivation with research funding which was made available due to the same pressures which led to the predecessor in Kyoto and eventually the Paris accord.
You want to waste money on all that? There is a functional and effective treaty already. Don't trash past achievements just to make yourself feel accomplished when you repeat them in exactly the same way.
You are just another wacko, so stop with the snake-oil mysticism. Real people need scientifically proven medical treatment that keeps them from dying a grisly and preventable death. Your "viewpoint" dooms people to early death full of unnecessary pain and suffering.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe that will be possible, once 6 or so giant robots produce all the goods that the world requires and energy is so abundant that distribution costs disappear.
Not at all, the presentation of opinion is used as a brand and people are free to select what they follow. That is the free market practice of allowing individual choice. I believe your problem is the sheltered environment you know, ignoring the reality of the world and even of the majority of your fellow Americans. People don't have time to keep up with their own health, their families, or anything else. Why do you insist on increasing the burden for them?
The difference is the kinds of ads that were used. In Trump's case, the vast majority reflected his campaign of populist dogma with no substance and flag waving blame of the whipping-boy of the hour (Arabs, Gays, Disabled Americans, etc.); here the point is pointing out abuse of data for psychological warfare that violates the rights of all people.
Then you get the dictatorship of the wealthy leisure class; they are the ones who can pay for access to all the information (hint: it isn't free) and have the spare time to to redundantly perform the analysis. Problem is that not only is that simply selecting a group to rule without any oversight, it acts to disenfranchise all of the people who do the work that makes civilization possible.
No. Breathing superheated air even at 150C causes burns inside human lungs - that leads to drowning in the fluids released after.
Absolutely! This is truly great news for the world, as this not only secures the trading value of the EU block, it sabotages Putin's plan to remove both nuclear powers from the EU. This outcome vastly improves the EU security situation and removes substantial parts of the risk of invasion by Russia that the Baltic states and Poland faced otherwise.
Why? It is Putin's aim and has been for a decade is to destabilize and isolate all nuclear powers. He succeeded in the US with Trump's isolationist vision, although the totality of congress is keeping him in line so far. He succeeded inthe UK with May's isolationist vision, although demographics show UK return to the EU within a decade. If the ongoing Russian subterfuge had gotten Pen elected then France withdrawing from the international sphere would have left the EU isolated and reliant on the military power of Germany, who lacks their own nuclear weapons as yet.
I am vastly in favor of full rearmament in Germany and Japan, including nuclear weapons. Regional powers for both are abusing the terms that limit their arsenal as means to exert unearned dominance and control. Whether the current nuclear powers all deserve that influence is also up for debate, but the only solution there is mild proliferation.
USD inflation has been less than 10% per year every year since 1982 (Reagan's recession). For 1990-2007 it was less than 5% followed by a brief spike from the Bush Recession, andsince 2009 it has been less than 3% per year. See here. Monthly smoothed averages are down lately, but by its nature that figure is heavily influenced by the distant past more than the recent one, so that pattern can easily reverse. Best timing is to take the money out now or as soon as you can, and put it into durable consumer goods with value. Particularly those you personally use on a daily basis.
Those are heat shields. Even ceramic doesn't cool from 3000C very quickly.
Can't find a less biased source for 1/3 non-representation? There's a reason for that.
This is a matter of economics. Some of the expenses for running an application vary significantly in proportion to use while others do not. In the case of cloud services and particularly for comprehensive services, this allows for the lowest achievable cost as there is not limit on savings at scale and less wasted/unused capacity over time.
You may idealize Hadoop, Pig, Scala, et al. but realize that hosting any part of your own solution requires major investment in hardware, utility, and especially personnel. That isn't just "programmers, that includes maintenance workers from janitors to facilities professionals and everyone else required to keep a building in working order. Then additional financial costs in insurance, loan amortization given the huge capital expenditures otherwise required, etc.
This is what enables arguments for a fixed price or some mix of fixed and metered usage billing. IT in business is a business process, and in most companies IT services are a cost center best minimized to allow more productive investments for actual business growth.
Uber came up with a business model reliant on ignoring safety regulations for drivers and riders. With predictable result of enabling murderers and rapists. Read! Absence of ethics as reflected in stealing money from equity, stealing intellectual property, stiffing drivers with equivalent pay-day auto loans for company vehicles, and allowing wanton sexual harassment without punishment.
You are ignorant and illiterate. Read! Uber's criminal activity before the software fiasco was operating in the city in violation of law banning exactly that. The software was designed explicitly to allow Uber to operate despite the law and evade detection. Now in addition to that original charge, they are guilty of obstruction of justice by interfering with official investigation.
There is only so much land globally, especially land suitable for sophisticated business services which require extensive infrastructure. At most that satisfies the requirement for plant, but it barely scratches the surface of a business model. Consumer data powers new market research and business intelligence; an organization is like an organism, data analysis is how it knows what to do to survive and better to thrive in competitive business environments. Skepticism and arrogance are popular lately but that fails to add anything to any discussion.
Texas was growing only due to NASA, military contracts, and missile defense (all defunded now), so good luck!
You're not supposed to snort the kool-aid, its not cocaine.
facilitating murder sprees or white power movements
Give it a month, Uber is taking pains to hide from oversight for a reason. Practically it will be tied into the same bullshit that has taken root in many of the fake "innovation" companies like Airbnb.
A company can't target denial to government investigators for the explicit purpose of covering up the criminal activities being investigated.
Can't keep the bullshit tag lines straight anymore can you? Trick is to learn how accounting and tax actually works globally, but then you'll understand that echo chamber bullshit for what it is and stop parroting it everywhere. Gain for all parties...
Except for the lesson it teaches other tax-shy firms - make profits, hide revenues, evade taxes. That dismantles the public for private gain. That isn't American. That's Fascist giving firms power replacing the state in the end, which only puts people at the mercy of balance sheets with arbitrary accruals.
Slashdot - news for out of shape and out of date drug addicts who will get cancer soon enough.
Half of the time I notice that you wrote a post I do agree with it. This is one of those times. Good job.
Only if you are willfully ignorant of context and history. Where did the "trend" come from? These are development decisions made by state governments with decades of emphasis on heavy industry at lowest cost, and to the exclusion of every other priority. The fact that China and India are acting now shows that there is an alternative which is cheaper and brings other benefits, those highlighted in the respective articles. Investigate and you can find direct links discussing the relationship with the Paris, but the basis in real physical improvements is more concrete demonstrating the benefits derived from it. Technology doesn't develop by itself, it requires careful cultivation with research funding which was made available due to the same pressures which led to the predecessor in Kyoto and eventually the Paris accord.
Nope, you are wrong. That is just your fantasy of a debate-club argument and not my perception. You are not up to par for this.
You want to waste money on all that? There is a functional and effective treaty already. Don't trash past achievements just to make yourself feel accomplished when you repeat them in exactly the same way.
You are just another wacko, so stop with the snake-oil mysticism. Real people need scientifically proven medical treatment that keeps them from dying a grisly and preventable death. Your "viewpoint" dooms people to early death full of unnecessary pain and suffering.