All this means is that Zuckerberg is a greater fool than Balmer.
I don't buy that for a second. Some college kid creates 2 billion dollars in his dorm room (never mind whatever swindling and conniving he did along the way for a secod), and buying some AOL patents suddenly makes him a fool? I don't think so. Something else is afoot.
We shall, of course, ignore the fact that the majority of these scams come from Nigera, for as we all know, its better to be politically correct than aware.
"The smallest minority on earth is the individual.
Those who deny individual rights cannot
claim to be defenders of minorities."
- Ayn Rand
First they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists and I did not speak out because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.
Why, because only Americans are ingenious enough to be engineers?
Asia has a fantastic output capacity, they can make anything, cheaply, and they have lots of hardware engineers and can whip out tech like nobody's business. What they lack is software and innovation. I saw this first hand myself while in Japan. Do a search on sony and why they are having problems. In Japan they have sayings about doing things the same old way, being different (innovative) is not rewarded. Kind of the same thing in China, only there, if it doesn't work, you get shot. I'm being drammatic, but not by much. There's a very good reason they have spies here, and its not all about troop movements. All of the software innovation in the last 30 years has come out of the US. the chinese and the indians send their best undergrads to American Universities. Is that becuase they just have a bunch of money to spend and want to spend it here? Don't think so.
I'm not so sure that's exactly true. It's easy to throw up a web site, a bit harder, but still possible to push up its visibility. Getting people to use it? Not sure sure anything short of voodoo makes that happen. I still don't really get twitter. Seems like voodoo to me.
Staticly based ICBMs are usually housed in hardened bunkers designed to withstand concentrated attacks. And mobile launchers are difficult to find. Drones are a good answer for both; you hit the missle during first phase, which would be difficult for the launching belligerant to conceal. Air superiority may not be nessessary with drones, they're too small and can fly too low to be seen with most warning systems. Of course you need to know where the mobile launcher is for the drone to be effective against that. That's where your intelligence comes in to play. Mobile is probably going to be the best defense against a drone.
Why, exactly? Becuase you and a bunch of other morons say its real? 80% (or more) of the earth's population believes in some religious creed. As a (nearly) life-long athiest I find belief in creationist myths silly and beneath dignity. But becuase everyone else is doing it, I should jump in as well? Your argument for GW is EXACTLY the same, as far as I'm concerned.
You've illustrated the issue perfectly. Your point, a map showing fish population differences over time is just that. Any researcher's first question is going to be "Why?", so what's the cause? It is in no way obvious from that statement. Of course they're going to be skeptical, that's the very deffinition of science. If you call yourself a scientist and aren't skeptical you aren't a scientist.
He wasn't really a whistleblwer. The action he took is described as a "quiet internal memo". The story only blew after 17 months of the company screwing with him. They should have thanked him, at least told him they were working on the situation, and left him alone, If they had taken that action, we probably would have never heard of it. Now, they come out smelling like garbage, he has a hell of a lawsuit he can throw at them, and all becuase they wanted to act like babies when some one told THEM that they were screwing up. I don't think naivete has anything to do with this.
It hasn't "become" complex, it simply is, and uncovering its true nature and describing it is complex becuase we're essentially putting our hands in a black box, feeling around, and trying to describe what we feel in a logical way. Trying to describe something you can't directly observe is nessessarily going to have a complex way about it. You can describe the physics of a bouncing ball in a simple way, or you can describe it exactly using mathematical terms. Same with particle physics, bet we're trying to describe objects and phenomena that don't have good parrallels in the everyday world. But you can describe them in general terms as well, see Hawkings "A Brief History of Time".
While an associate researcher gave a quick tour of the 50 tonne target detetor reporters he drew out a small metal drawer in th side of the machine and said "...plus it has a place for your weed, man."
Slashdot Mirror
Assuming the world doesn't end in December I guess we'll all see...
All this means is that Zuckerberg is a greater fool than Balmer.
I don't buy that for a second. Some college kid creates 2 billion dollars in his dorm room (never mind whatever swindling and conniving he did along the way for a secod), and buying some AOL patents suddenly makes him a fool? I don't think so. Something else is afoot.
Too bad you can't see past her nonsense to the truth in those words.
We shall, of course, ignore the fact that the majority of these scams come from Nigera, for as we all know, its better to be politically correct than aware.
They'll never use automation, no sport in it.
"The smallest minority on earth is the individual.
Those who deny individual rights cannot
claim to be defenders of minorities."
- Ayn Rand
First they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists and I did not speak out because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-57414373-64/sonys-fall-and-japans-hang-ups/?tag=mncol;editorPicks http://www.firstpost.com/business/sony-gets-beaten-by-apple-samsung-innovation-sees-2-9-bn-loss-201493.html I was there, I know how business is done in Japan, its not efficient. The Chinese simply lack the know-how, I'm sure they'll catch up though.
Why, because only Americans are ingenious enough to be engineers?
Asia has a fantastic output capacity, they can make anything, cheaply, and they have lots of hardware engineers and can whip out tech like nobody's business. What they lack is software and innovation. I saw this first hand myself while in Japan. Do a search on sony and why they are having problems. In Japan they have sayings about doing things the same old way, being different (innovative) is not rewarded. Kind of the same thing in China, only there, if it doesn't work, you get shot. I'm being drammatic, but not by much. There's a very good reason they have spies here, and its not all about troop movements. All of the software innovation in the last 30 years has come out of the US. the chinese and the indians send their best undergrads to American Universities. Is that becuase they just have a bunch of money to spend and want to spend it here? Don't think so.
Yeah I can talk about of rediciulous crap too. GTFO.
And you're telling me you do?
This would have never gone down with a liberatarian administration.
Never the less I think google is down one employee soon...
Creating products that people use is easy.
I'm not so sure that's exactly true. It's easy to throw up a web site, a bit harder, but still possible to push up its visibility. Getting people to use it? Not sure sure anything short of voodoo makes that happen. I still don't really get twitter. Seems like voodoo to me.
Dark outlooks and gloomy dystopian futures sell right now. That's all there is to it.
Yes, its very immature to shit money every time you sit down, stand up, flush the lever, wipe, put on your hat, breath...
I'm confused on why Florida is doing this. I point does it make or purpose does it serve? They must be doing it for some reason, right?
Staticly based ICBMs are usually housed in hardened bunkers designed to withstand concentrated attacks. And mobile launchers are difficult to find. Drones are a good answer for both; you hit the missle during first phase, which would be difficult for the launching belligerant to conceal. Air superiority may not be nessessary with drones, they're too small and can fly too low to be seen with most warning systems. Of course you need to know where the mobile launcher is for the drone to be effective against that. That's where your intelligence comes in to play. Mobile is probably going to be the best defense against a drone.
Drones are a lot cheaper, and would be able to take down an ICBM during first phase, something an anti-ballistic missle can't do.
No one has come up with anything credible that GW is happening either. Score so far; 0-0.
Being a GW denier is silly.
Why, exactly? Becuase you and a bunch of other morons say its real? 80% (or more) of the earth's population believes in some religious creed. As a (nearly) life-long athiest I find belief in creationist myths silly and beneath dignity. But becuase everyone else is doing it, I should jump in as well? Your argument for GW is EXACTLY the same, as far as I'm concerned.
You've illustrated the issue perfectly. Your point, a map showing fish population differences over time is just that. Any researcher's first question is going to be "Why?", so what's the cause? It is in no way obvious from that statement. Of course they're going to be skeptical, that's the very deffinition of science. If you call yourself a scientist and aren't skeptical you aren't a scientist.
Agreed. TEN YEARS of stalking, yet she has the time and means to crowdfund a project. Interdasting...
He wasn't really a whistleblwer. The action he took is described as a "quiet internal memo". The story only blew after 17 months of the company screwing with him. They should have thanked him, at least told him they were working on the situation, and left him alone, If they had taken that action, we probably would have never heard of it. Now, they come out smelling like garbage, he has a hell of a lawsuit he can throw at them, and all becuase they wanted to act like babies when some one told THEM that they were screwing up. I don't think naivete has anything to do with this.
No, but a circle of protection engraved with Postgresql specific charms might.
It hasn't "become" complex, it simply is, and uncovering its true nature and describing it is complex becuase we're essentially putting our hands in a black box, feeling around, and trying to describe what we feel in a logical way. Trying to describe something you can't directly observe is nessessarily going to have a complex way about it. You can describe the physics of a bouncing ball in a simple way, or you can describe it exactly using mathematical terms. Same with particle physics, bet we're trying to describe objects and phenomena that don't have good parrallels in the everyday world. But you can describe them in general terms as well, see Hawkings "A Brief History of Time".
While an associate researcher gave a quick tour of the 50 tonne target detetor reporters he drew out a small metal drawer in th side of the machine and said "...plus it has a place for your weed, man."