Slashdot Mirror


User: bickerdyke

bickerdyke's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,141
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,141

  1. Firefighters Guild on Firefighters Let House Burn Because Owner Didn't Pay Fee · · Score: 1
  2. Re:PLEASE GO AWAY IDLE on Las Vegas Hotel Vdara an Accidental Death Ray · · Score: 1

    It was a posting about death rays! How could you possibly NOT click on it!

  3. There used to be a time... on Game Reviewers Face Odd Bribery From Publishers · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There used to be a time when those gimmicks would be included in the retail box of the games.

    Infocom comes to mind.

    ok,no rotting meat, but a blood splattered bracelet would SO be in Infocoms style.

  4. wasn't there a time.... on Is the Web Heading Toward Redirect Hell? · · Score: 3, Interesting

    when it was considered a security hole if you DIDN'T use a redirect on your page? IIRC there used to be an attack vector where malicous sites used links from freemail pages to steel session IDs from the referer-headers.

  5. Re:Hmmm that'll do... on Plants Near Chernobyl Adapt To Contaminated Soil · · Score: 1

    That would be the reason he gave as a)

    And of course the fact that you shouldn't eat or drink anything there.

  6. Re:Worthless Trademark on Woman Trademarks Name and Threatens Sites Using It · · Score: 1

    Best PR-move ever!

    Even if YOU are not allowed to use your old name anymore, you can make the public keep on using it by refusing to pick a new one.

  7. Re:Worthless Trademark on Woman Trademarks Name and Threatens Sites Using It · · Score: 1

    "she who doesn't WANT to be named"

    not to be confused with "The artist whose former name was held captive by his record label"

  8. Why can't we just..... on Security Concerns Paramount After Early Reviews of Diaspora Code · · Score: 1

    Why can't we just put our own profiles on ome webspace and model this "friend" thing with something I would e.g. call "link"?

    Throw in some decentralized profile hoster (think of geocities) with the possibility to add your friends as links in the html-header (like googles social graph suggests) and some simple profile-page building tools where you upload your pictures and stuff and your profile is generated automatically. For anything else (messages, groups, status updates) use WHATEVER ANYONE ELSE uses too. (Email, Newsgroups, Twitter)

  9. Re:Aptitude on Why Are Terrorists Often Engineers? · · Score: 1

    +1 Funny for the "Non-Consensual Resurrection"

  10. Re:Do No Evil on Google Engineer Spied On Teen Users · · Score: 1

    Despite "no media coverage", it landed on /.

  11. Sounds dangerous on Anti-Product Placement For Negative Branding · · Score: 1

    This might backfire!

    Wouldn't be the first time to have some stupid anti-celeb turn into a (B-)Celeb and actually start a fashion trend.

  12. Re:Don't know who that person is on Anti-Product Placement For Negative Branding · · Score: 1

    I still don't get it... Why are people watching TV shows featuring people that annoy them?

  13. Isn't that a bit too late? on Facebook To Add Remote Logout · · Score: 1

    Your account is compromised. Changeing passwords would seem a better solution to me. Voiding all other security tokens should be a part of the password-change-process anyway!

    Just logging a hacker out is just like throwing a burgelar out of your house at night and let him keep the keys to your house!

  14. Re:ok... on India Now Wants Access To Google and Skype · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or a "National Security Letter" where you can't neither talk nor complain about?

  15. mandatory diagram on PowerPoint Rant Costs Colonel His Job · · Score: 1

    BTW: Is it mandatory to put the diagram with the three intersecting circles into each and every powerpoint presentation?

  16. Re:Landfill... on Video Adverts On the Printed Page · · Score: 1

    that much for farmers beeing green.....

  17. Re:Stupid on 'Leap Seconds' May Be Eliminated From UTC · · Score: 1

    Not sure, but don't they get timestamped with system timestamps (epoch)? And they could easily be timestamped with TIA. We only would need to agree to a new standard, and not fiddle around with an existing standard thats used in many more scenarios than computer or network stuff.

    Perhaps we should simply go for a big solution and only use timestamps along with meta-information about timescale/zone.

  18. Re:Stupid on 'Leap Seconds' May Be Eliminated From UTC · · Score: 1

    THAT sounds sensible, but more like a implementation detail how an OS should handle time.

  19. Re:Isn't the first rule of Fight Club... on Girls Bugged Teachers' Staff Room · · Score: 1

    Yep.

    We didn't start bragging about nicking the tests a few days in advance until we were long out of school....

  20. Re:Time Zones... the stupidest idea ever conceived on 'Leap Seconds' May Be Eliminated From UTC · · Score: 1

    It would only be confusing if only half of the population switched to the "global time zone".

    Good luck trying to switch the whole world to the same thing at once.

    I'll come back to you when the confusion between inch and m is gone for good. (and I'm not even talking about real SI units!) I guess bythen also everyone drives on the same side of the roads...

  21. Re:Stupid on 'Leap Seconds' May Be Eliminated From UTC · · Score: 2, Informative

    but these are all standards. Different standards for different purposes. And UTC was chosen for civil timekeeping,as this is the standard that aims to keep in sync with the actual astronomical time.

    besides that.. if you took out the leap seconds,you would get TIA! You'd have two identical standards with different names, and none of them would fulfill the requirement for civil timekeeping. (no noon drifting off into the evenings)

  22. Re:Time Zones... the stupidest idea ever conceived on 'Leap Seconds' May Be Eliminated From UTC · · Score: 1

    Because it will be confusing and not clear if you're referring to the "old" or the "new" 11 o'clock.

    you're giving an old expression new semantics. That's confusing at best, newspeak at worst.

    At least make the new timescale different enough from the old one so that it's clear to which someone is referring.

    Swatch did at least this right when they tried their "internet time". (Thats pretty much the same thing you're proposing)

  23. Re:Time Zones... the stupidest idea ever conceived on 'Leap Seconds' May Be Eliminated From UTC · · Score: 1

    If you're proposing a global time without the need for timezones, don't make it confusable with "ordinary" times. People tend to meet at "2 o' clock" and NOT at either "two hours after the sun passing its highest point" or "two hours after the global time resetted to 0"

    Each time would need to be accompanied with information about the timescale in use.

    Or to be more exact: Each time would STILL need to be accompanied with information about the timescale in use.

    This should already be done, but usually can be skipped if you have an idea if the person you're talking with is in the same country.

  24. Re:The problem with leap seconds... on 'Leap Seconds' May Be Eliminated From UTC · · Score: 1

    why are you using UTC-Timestamps in the first place instead of, say, TAI timestamps?

  25. Re:The problem with leap seconds... on 'Leap Seconds' May Be Eliminated From UTC · · Score: 1

    So any clock that wants to stay in sync with UTC must be connected to either NTP or GPS or similar timekeeping service.

    ...except GPS time already doesn't follow leap seconds.

    but, as I learned, at least transmits the offset against UTC (= number of skipped leap seconds) along with the GPS time signal.