If your going to promote freedom and liberation to those who are opressed, do NOT bite off more then you can chew. The war in Iraq and Afghanistan were worthy causes IMHO. As for China though, we can't take them on nor would we. Dealing with China is going to take a different stratagy.
1. China breaks out into civil war and start a revolution.
2. Through liberation, we gain more allies needed to put the pressure on China in this grand tug-of-war on freedom vs totalitarianism.
3.Fuck it: Lets just lob nukes and have God sort it out.
What you're advocating is a controlled "bomb". No seriously, do the math and you will find the energy density is rather tight.
BTW, I used to work at Dell in the safety division. I've seen video footage of laptop batteries explode. Now mind you, these were 3rd party batteries people of bought off e-bay and the like. So technically, these issues are NOT cause by Dell. None the less, it is something to be concerned about.
You either have the work eithic or are willing to get educated to make yourself more marketable; or you don't. Life is NOT about free handouts. If it was, those that are willing to work hard would have no incentive to do so, and thus a downward trend in productivity loss.
A perfect example was the Soviet Union. Now, are you going to tell us on Slashdot that you want the US to return to that shit-hole of a society out of the aspect of economic equality?
Did you not learn anything? Communism FAILS! Jesus Christ. If we continue to have people that think like you do, the world is doomed to repeat history.
Yup, that is what capitalism is about - ripping off everyone you possibly can and screw common decency.
First of all, your idiot for trusting the government over the free market being that it's the free market that provides polititions with profit you might not otherwise be aware of. At least in a free market, you can vote with your wallet. In government, you should only have to vote with your voice via ticket.
Just because they are able to breed doesn't make them physically able to do so. There is a VERY good chance a mother of 13 years of age will die from birth complications.
As Libertarian with republican family values, I'm very happy to hear about this ruling! But as for the comment about hypocrisy, this is nothing new. It's called "politics".
On the other hand, I wouldn't by a car, computer, cloths, or name-your-own product-X just because someone famous uses them. I'm a trend setting, and like to be unique and think for myself and my needs. To follow someone like the rest of the sheeple in the world is an insult.
I used to hang out under the stairs at the Galleria in Houston TX back in the 90s. All we really did was talk about Free BSD, Win NT, networking, and hacking door cards to hotels and such shit. And when the whole gang was togeather, we would walk outside to the park and smoke weed. Ahh the fond memories.
Very interesting! So I guess the P4 was designed the way it was because Intel thought it would scale well to increase in clock speed in the future. And though the P3 design is more efficient, it does NOT scale well and thus they thought it had a limited future. I guess they were wrong.
Try turning up the volume on the iPod and adjust your amp accordingly. Now you should be getting "base fade". It sounds like the iPod just doesn't have enough capacitor to sustain continous base. But, if the volume on the ipod is set to it's minimum (low enough not to drop out of it's rated SNR) then "base fade" should not be an issue.
The fact that there are problem is not what pisses me off. Hell, I know. I've worked in IT so I'm all to familiar with issues can arise from such a large project.
What DOES piss me off is the damn "cookie cutter" response from Blizzard. I find it rather patronizing and an insult to my intelligence!
Check out this, Al-Qaida blatently admits ownership of the car bombings. And they are in Iraq. Imagine that... On the positive note, we have more bullets then they have bodies to blow up. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6727646 Would the contras fall under this definition, or were they "freedom fighters"?
How about the mujahadin in Afghanistan, led by arch-enemy Osama Bin Laden? When they won the cold war for you, were they terrorists or freedom fighters?
At the time, it was a good idea to hire the locals to do your bidding. After all, they know the culture and terrain better than we do. And they too were against Soviet occupation.
Soon after, Osama quickly went from friend to foe. That backstabber rat-fucked us good. Not to mention his oppressive Taliban regime in Afghanistan was pushing the envelope of what humanity would stand for. Is it any wonder we came down on him like the wrath of God?
I thought you tried that once already. Given the outcome of the last attempt, I'm not sure if the South Koreans are too keen for you to have another go. Especially as your occupying force has been driving around drunk and running over 6 year old girls recently.
But hey! Can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs, much less a full scale all Asia war!
Hey, that was a cheap shot! But none the less, those solders responsible have been dealt with in the name of civil justice as were those responsible for the heinous acts of torture on the POWs just recently. Truth be know; humanity will always have its wild animals in the proverbial garden. Sad, but true.
As for N. Korea, we may just end up bidding our time. They are on the verge of total political breakdown via power struggle. Honestly, I would not be surprised if Kim becomes assassinated. Hell, many attemps might have been made by his own gards already. I guess will never know until the fall of the N. Korean regime comes to fruition and books are written by those that live there to tell the tale. Should such a scenario take place that is...
Ahh, but influence is not the same word as impeach. But don't let that inconvenient fact stop you.
When the government does not listen to the majority of the people, revolutions have historically been known to happen. I guess it all depends on how much influence is needed. Either by voice, or by arms.
Clearly. Californians were absolutely outraged at the power outages, which were eventually traced back to one corrupt, soon to be bankrupt company and their Republican cronies. But of course it was Davis's fault. And who wouldn't vote for the Terminator?
You couldn't be more wrong. And I should know the facts on this issue. I was an employee for Sempra Energy in the Houston TX branch office back in 1998-2000. The main office of course is based in San Diego CA. Basically, we dealed in the market of deregulated energy, setting up contracts for the retrofit of lighting, and HVAC system for building owners to save energy. So rather then me having to type the real reasons till my fingers bleed, I've provided a more credible link that also explains the issue better then I could. http://www.rppi.org/electricity/ebrief011001.html
If we can solve the aging issue, surely we can reset a womens "clock" to have the overies make new eggs. Of course, a women is born with her eggs at birth but I'm science will find away around it.
Lower taxes is only cures the symptoms, not the cause. Sure, raising taxes will reduce and even reverse debt. However, less income for families means more dependance on government...which will require even more tax dollars to support and staff the government to provide those service.
See a trend? It's a downword spiral of transfering the power and responsibilty from the people to the government. Worst case scenario, we turn into a nation of communism.
Honestly, I think what needs to happen is another ecconomic depression in order to set into motion a wake-up call and change our culture on how to save and spend properly. And, we may not be too far from it...
Of course they do. Because everyone knows that while your not waching, they will sprout legs and eyes and fire at you for no reason at all. But the really tricky part is when you turn around to look at the gun, they legs are gone! How cunning!!!
I'm far from wealthy. But I'm happy to say that I'm clear out of debt. So there is something positive for having a surplus of income regardless how little it is. I've just learned I had to live withen my means.
I can't afford the latest "bling bling", but I'm far more happy to know I don't have to deal with the daily stress of debt (debt is such a vile word to me).
You couldn't be more wrong. My worldview was completely affirmed by the events of 911. That so many people were taken in by such a transparent charade is the frightening thing. But you go ahead and believe that the terrorists are under your bed. Won't change anything really. Simple-minded people always need something external to be frightened of. It helps them rationalise their bigotry.
Ahhh, the classic condescending liberal. Simple-minded people eh? I'm still laughing over your fallacious statement. At first I was surprised to read this, but then the effect quickly subsided. You see, you're bigotry is a constant affirmation of just how hypocritical you libs really are. It's just...SAD!
Which is why the world must resist American imperialism as much as possible. Since WWII, American behaviour on the world stage has deteriorated to the point where it is completely unconscionable. That is, no one of conscience can stand it any longer. Sure, the racist, the bigoted, the xenophobic, and the just plain greedy love it as long as they receive the benefits. But those people don't count the cost, either to others or their fellow citizens.
Oh I get it now! You're for peace, but against the means to obtain it. The very notion that you would stand up against America's goal to rid the world of terrorism and oppression makes you an enemy of mankind. Based on your post, I would say the statement of "the racist, the bigoted, the xenophobic" clearly apply to YOU. How you can come to the conclusion that its Americas fault for the current events (such as terrorism) in this world is sophistry.
So which terrorist organisation was based in Iraq?
Was??? More like IS. Have you not been paying attention to the news? We have terrorist blowing up car bombs outside of Iraqi (not American) police stations, abducting innocent international civilians and sawing their heads off in the most barbaric of ways. Keep in mind that these terrorist activities will only increase the closer Iraq gets to democratic election time. If you must know one thing, know this. The terrorists do NOT want a democratic Iraq. They know the moment Iraq becomes a democracy is the moment they lose power and control over the majority of the people.
Just for clarification, let me provide you with the definition of terrorism according to Dictionary.com.
Terrorism: "The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons"
And no, America does not fall into the definition of a Terrorist organization simply because the vast majority of Iraqis want our help. It's sad I even have to point this out. But being that you hate America, I feel I must.
Would you care to back that statement up with some facts?
I'm going to attempt this from a different angle. First, take a look at this article. http://www.commondreams.org/views/100100-102.htm
Now, please read this one. http://www.heritage.org/Research/TradeandForeignAi d/wm630.cfm
Do you noticed something wrong with the over all picture? I do. Libs will often attack America for it's lack of contribution based on sol monetary value given by it's government alone. Yet, the dirty little secret your never told is the amount of donations by the private sector and donated man power from both military (oh ya, that's evil. How could I have forgotten *sarcasm*) and the Peace Corps.
Speaking of aid, did you know that it was America who was the first to physically (not monetary) bring aid to Indonesia the moment news got loose regarding the tsunami. Now you may criticize the initial 15 million proposed by Bush. However, at the time it was still unknown how much damage there really was. So to this day, the ca
For one thing, there is no "free market place". A totally free market would be anarchy. Without government intervention, there would be no TV, radio, Wi-Fi, etc., because there would be no standards set and enforced. Every industrialized country has an equivalent to our FCC, for good reason.
I agree. Thus I concede to your point of view regarding standardization.
Second, the broadcast flag and other DRM measures have little to do with the government. These are initiatives by private corporations, who want to maximize their profit. The only reason the FCC is agreeing to it is 1) because the content providers want it, and 2) the current FCC under Michael Powell is corrupt.
I call bullshit on this one. It's the government that legally backs up and enforces the penalties for breaking the law regarding "digital theft". Your have your cartels such as the RIAA and MPAA to thank for this.
Had such laws and cartels not be in place, there would be self industry reform and paradigm shifts to reflect current public trends on how to effectively do business without the legal restrictions of government.
And if you want to get political about it, let's talk about the DMCA signed under Bill Clinton shall we? Or, how about democrat "Fritz" Hollings and his proposed Hollywood bill such as the TCPA (which reeks of fascism). So please, don't even go down that road unless you want to step in it big time.
Which is EXACTLY why I want the government OUT of the free market place. We don't need government to patch the system when clearly they themselves are the cause.
Get the fucking government OUT of the free market. How many times must this be said?
Slashdot Mirror
If your going to promote freedom and liberation to those who are opressed, do NOT bite off more then you can chew. The war in Iraq and Afghanistan were worthy causes IMHO. As for China though, we can't take them on nor would we. Dealing with China is going to take a different stratagy.
1. China breaks out into civil war and start a revolution.
2. Through liberation, we gain more allies needed to put the pressure on China in this grand tug-of-war on freedom vs totalitarianism.
3.Fuck it: Lets just lob nukes and have God sort it out.
I really REALLY don't want to see #3 happen.
What you're advocating is a controlled "bomb". No seriously, do the math and you will find the energy density is rather tight.
BTW, I used to work at Dell in the safety division. I've seen video footage of laptop batteries explode. Now mind you, these were 3rd party batteries people of bought off e-bay and the like. So technically, these issues are NOT cause by Dell. None the less, it is something to be concerned about.
Better yet, how about preventing or getting rid of the dupes?
The point is that you don't get the API that is needed to get a larger viewing audience unless you pay Google.
In other words, Google will be totally biased on what search resaults are available based on how fat a check you right to Google.
Yey, it's like Yahoo all over again. Yippe!
You DO realize that the above mentioned are paid for by taxes, right? They are not free handouts.
Remember, the more you demand from government, the more they must tax you in order to pay for said services.
Ya, that's right. Tough shit.
You either have the work eithic or are willing to get educated to make yourself more marketable; or you don't. Life is NOT about free handouts. If it was, those that are willing to work hard would have no incentive to do so, and thus a downward trend in productivity loss.
A perfect example was the Soviet Union. Now, are you going to tell us on Slashdot that you want the US to return to that shit-hole of a society out of the aspect of economic equality?
Did you not learn anything? Communism FAILS! Jesus Christ. If we continue to have people that think like you do, the world is doomed to repeat history.
Yup, that is what capitalism is about - ripping off everyone you possibly can and screw common decency.
First of all, your idiot for trusting the government over the free market being that it's the free market that provides polititions with profit you might not otherwise be aware of. At least in a free market, you can vote with your wallet. In government, you should only have to vote with your voice via ticket.
Just because they are able to breed doesn't make them physically able to do so. There is a VERY good chance a mother of 13 years of age will die from birth complications.
As Libertarian with republican family values, I'm very happy to hear about this ruling! But as for the comment about hypocrisy, this is nothing new. It's called "politics".
My cordless Panasonic shaver charges the same way as those electric tooth brushes. Why is this even news? *sigh*
On the other hand, I wouldn't by a car, computer, cloths, or name-your-own product-X just because someone famous uses them. I'm a trend setting, and like to be unique and think for myself and my needs. To follow someone like the rest of the sheeple in the world is an insult.
I used to hang out under the stairs at the Galleria in Houston TX back in the 90s. All we really did was talk about Free BSD, Win NT, networking, and hacking door cards to hotels and such shit. And when the whole gang was togeather, we would walk outside to the park and smoke weed. Ahh the fond memories.
Very interesting! So I guess the P4 was designed the way it was because Intel thought it would scale well to increase in clock speed in the future. And though the P3 design is more efficient, it does NOT scale well and thus they thought it had a limited future. I guess they were wrong.
Try turning up the volume on the iPod and adjust your amp accordingly. Now you should be getting "base fade". It sounds like the iPod just doesn't have enough capacitor to sustain continous base. But, if the volume on the ipod is set to it's minimum (low enough not to drop out of it's rated SNR) then "base fade" should not be an issue.
In other news, over 90% of the CPU cycles will be used to encrypt and decrypt the DRM content to prevent hacking.
It's Sony folks, what did else did you expect?
Only if you had a woman with you...only then can you get REAL fusion going. Tisk tisk tisk.
And if your lucky, she will be your breeder reactor too.
The fact that there are problem is not what pisses me off. Hell, I know. I've worked in IT so I'm all to familiar with issues can arise from such a large project.
What DOES piss me off is the damn "cookie cutter" response from Blizzard. I find it rather patronizing and an insult to my intelligence!
Check out this, Al-Qaida blatently admits ownership of the car bombings. And they are in Iraq. Imagine that... On the positive note, we have more bullets then they have bodies to blow up. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6727646
Would the contras fall under this definition, or were they "freedom fighters"? How about the mujahadin in Afghanistan, led by arch-enemy Osama Bin Laden? When they won the cold war for you, were they terrorists or freedom fighters?
At the time, it was a good idea to hire the locals to do your bidding. After all, they know the culture and terrain better than we do. And they too were against Soviet occupation.
Soon after, Osama quickly went from friend to foe. That backstabber rat-fucked us good. Not to mention his oppressive Taliban regime in Afghanistan was pushing the envelope of what humanity would stand for. Is it any wonder we came down on him like the wrath of God?
I thought you tried that once already. Given the outcome of the last attempt, I'm not sure if the South Koreans are too keen for you to have another go. Especially as your occupying force has been driving around drunk and running over 6 year old girls recently. But hey! Can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs, much less a full scale all Asia war!
Hey, that was a cheap shot! But none the less, those solders responsible have been dealt with in the name of civil justice as were those responsible for the heinous acts of torture on the POWs just recently. Truth be know; humanity will always have its wild animals in the proverbial garden. Sad, but true.
As for N. Korea, we may just end up bidding our time. They are on the verge of total political breakdown via power struggle. Honestly, I would not be surprised if Kim becomes assassinated. Hell, many attemps might have been made by his own gards already. I guess will never know until the fall of the N. Korean regime comes to fruition and books are written by those that live there to tell the tale. Should such a scenario take place that is...
Ahh, but influence is not the same word as impeach. But don't let that inconvenient fact stop you.
When the government does not listen to the majority of the people, revolutions have historically been known to happen. I guess it all depends on how much influence is needed. Either by voice, or by arms.
Clearly. Californians were absolutely outraged at the power outages, which were eventually traced back to one corrupt, soon to be bankrupt company and their Republican cronies. But of course it was Davis's fault. And who wouldn't vote for the Terminator?
You couldn't be more wrong. And I should know the facts on this issue. I was an employee for Sempra Energy in the Houston TX branch office back in 1998-2000. The main office of course is based in San Diego CA. Basically, we dealed in the market of deregulated energy, setting up contracts for the retrofit of lighting, and HVAC system for building owners to save energy. So rather then me having to type the real reasons till my fingers bleed, I've provided a more credible link that also explains the issue better then I could. http://www.rppi.org/electricity/ebrief011001.html
If we can solve the aging issue, surely we can reset a womens "clock" to have the overies make new eggs. Of course, a women is born with her eggs at birth but I'm science will find away around it.
Lower taxes is only cures the symptoms, not the cause. Sure, raising taxes will reduce and even reverse debt. However, less income for families means more dependance on government...which will require even more tax dollars to support and staff the government to provide those service.
See a trend? It's a downword spiral of transfering the power and responsibilty from the people to the government. Worst case scenario, we turn into a nation of communism.
Honestly, I think what needs to happen is another ecconomic depression in order to set into motion a wake-up call and change our culture on how to save and spend properly. And, we may not be too far from it...
Of course they do. Because everyone knows that while your not waching, they will sprout legs and eyes and fire at you for no reason at all. But the really tricky part is when you turn around to look at the gun, they legs are gone! How cunning!!!
Mod up as "scary"
I'm far from wealthy. But I'm happy to say that I'm clear out of debt. So there is something positive for having a surplus of income regardless how little it is. I've just learned I had to live withen my means.
I can't afford the latest "bling bling", but I'm far more happy to know I don't have to deal with the daily stress of debt (debt is such a vile word to me).
You couldn't be more wrong. My worldview was completely affirmed by the events of 911. That so many people were taken in by such a transparent charade is the frightening thing. But you go ahead and believe that the terrorists are under your bed. Won't change anything really. Simple-minded people always need something external to be frightened of. It helps them rationalise their bigotry.
Ahhh, the classic condescending liberal. Simple-minded people eh? I'm still laughing over your fallacious statement. At first I was surprised to read this, but then the effect quickly subsided. You see, you're bigotry is a constant affirmation of just how hypocritical you libs really are. It's just...SAD!
Which is why the world must resist American imperialism as much as possible. Since WWII, American behaviour on the world stage has deteriorated to the point where it is completely unconscionable. That is, no one of conscience can stand it any longer. Sure, the racist, the bigoted, the xenophobic, and the just plain greedy love it as long as they receive the benefits. But those people don't count the cost, either to others or their fellow citizens.
Oh I get it now! You're for peace, but against the means to obtain it. The very notion that you would stand up against America's goal to rid the world of terrorism and oppression makes you an enemy of mankind. Based on your post, I would say the statement of "the racist, the bigoted, the xenophobic" clearly apply to YOU. How you can come to the conclusion that its Americas fault for the current events (such as terrorism) in this world is sophistry.
So which terrorist organisation was based in Iraq?
Was??? More like IS. Have you not been paying attention to the news? We have terrorist blowing up car bombs outside of Iraqi (not American) police stations, abducting innocent international civilians and sawing their heads off in the most barbaric of ways. Keep in mind that these terrorist activities will only increase the closer Iraq gets to democratic election time. If you must know one thing, know this. The terrorists do NOT want a democratic Iraq. They know the moment Iraq becomes a democracy is the moment they lose power and control over the majority of the people.
Just for clarification, let me provide you with the definition of terrorism according to Dictionary.com.
Terrorism: "The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons"
And no, America does not fall into the definition of a Terrorist organization simply because the vast majority of Iraqis want our help. It's sad I even have to point this out. But being that you hate America, I feel I must.
Would you care to back that statement up with some facts?
I'm going to attempt this from a different angle. First, take a look at this article. http://www.commondreams.org/views/100100-102.htm
Now, please read this one. http://www.heritage.org/Research/TradeandForeignAi d/wm630.cfm
Do you noticed something wrong with the over all picture? I do. Libs will often attack America for it's lack of contribution based on sol monetary value given by it's government alone. Yet, the dirty little secret your never told is the amount of donations by the private sector and donated man power from both military (oh ya, that's evil. How could I have forgotten *sarcasm*) and the Peace Corps.
Speaking of aid, did you know that it was America who was the first to physically (not monetary) bring aid to Indonesia the moment news got loose regarding the tsunami. Now you may criticize the initial 15 million proposed by Bush. However, at the time it was still unknown how much damage there really was. So to this day, the ca
For one thing, there is no "free market place". A totally free market would be anarchy. Without government intervention, there would be no TV, radio, Wi-Fi, etc., because there would be no standards set and enforced. Every industrialized country has an equivalent to our FCC, for good reason.
I agree. Thus I concede to your point of view regarding standardization.
Second, the broadcast flag and other DRM measures have little to do with the government. These are initiatives by private corporations, who want to maximize their profit. The only reason the FCC is agreeing to it is 1) because the content providers want it, and 2) the current FCC under Michael Powell is corrupt.
I call bullshit on this one. It's the government that legally backs up and enforces the penalties for breaking the law regarding "digital theft". Your have your cartels such as the RIAA and MPAA to thank for this.
Had such laws and cartels not be in place, there would be self industry reform and paradigm shifts to reflect current public trends on how to effectively do business without the legal restrictions of government.
And if you want to get political about it, let's talk about the DMCA signed under Bill Clinton shall we? Or, how about democrat "Fritz" Hollings and his proposed Hollywood bill such as the TCPA (which reeks of fascism). So please, don't even go down that road unless you want to step in it big time.
Which is EXACTLY why I want the government OUT of the free market place. We don't need government to patch the system when clearly they themselves are the cause.
Get the fucking government OUT of the free market. How many times must this be said?