Which is why Amazon is struggling, there is a lot of competition in that market and once you are happy with your store, you tend to stick with it until they do something wrong. For me to change from Coles, it took those idiots, purposefully running down the number of check out chicks, so that you had to waitt 10 to 15 minutes to get served even in the middle of the day or use the self service check out. Well, the other alternative was to go to the competitors, seriously you want to give me shite service on purpose to force me to do what you want me to do, well, dropped going to their stores and ordered deliveries from somewhere else, that 20 odd minutes of forced waiting will cost 2 years of custom, minimum, already at the six month mark.
Look Amazon has a pretty shitty rep, abuse staff and staff are customers as are the people who know that staff and well, supermarkets of all sorts of brands are everywhere. So a reasonable, reliable job and you keep custom, fail and you lose them until their next supplier fails. Would I order groceries from Amazon, no until my current supplier screws up, why bother, the prices will be much of a muchness and it will be down to service and reliability. Amazon is about cheap and nothing else, they have nothing to sell in the grocery market, buy cheap, sell cheap is who they are and probably quality has taken a nose dive at whole foods in pursuit of cheap.
Keep in mind, people often chat with staff at grocery stores, it's a more personal shopping space, driving them to focus on store stuff and ignore customers, is guaranteed to lose you customers in that working space. Can Amazon with it's corporate nature ever do groceries effectively, probably not, it has no idea about person to person customer service.
What they really failed to cover was the ramifications of a hack, firing on friendly forces, would have been the result. Do no put idiot failed jock strap douche bags in charge of computer equipment, catastrophic failure is guaranteed but I know, the problem, really smart people have no interest in running around killing people.
Did you know every criminal act by an American outside of the USA, is actually a criminal act of the US government, they are all linked to the US government, provable, they are citizens. Of course no member of the CIA or NSA or FBI etc has ever, committed a criminal act overseas.
Things are competitive the globe over, sure the government of China will do stuff, less than the US or it's corporations but also individuals in China will commit criminal acts in the rest of the world, regardless of who they are meant to be working at the time.
Want better outcomes though, you have to work with other governments and not against them. Work against them and well, they wont care, what crimes their citizens commit in your country. USA stop dragging Australia into your bullshit, all you have done is turn Australia's rep into shit and made any comments you force them to make utterly pointless, not independent but foreign policy vassal state. The USA keeps going to that well, long after it has become bone dry, complete waste of fucking time and fuck with Australian trade with China and cripple the Australian economy and no part of the US economy is Australia will be safe, fucking none.
So what you are saying is the US government should use more automation and sack as many people as possible and this will solve the problem.
Automation does not seem to be the problem, how you distribute the income of automation does. So do you automate to the level where you have no workers and thus eliminate all workers as customers and thus do not need any automation because you have no customers.
Really the only problem how to distribute the rewards of automation. We all know the psychopathic 1% wants it all, not most, ALL and for the rest, well we are consumables to be used and abused, to feed ego and lusts. That is the reality of the conflict, a class one, the exploiters, the psychopaths vs the normies, the exploited.
The reality in this case, the crime is not what they share, the crime lies with the creators and distributors of the content. Is there a problem on the web site, no, the problem appears to be a failure with policing to track down the creators of the problems on those web sites. Encrypted, should not be a problem, if it looks bad, check into the end user, if they are overseas, well, use cyber treaties (oh wait you can because hack the planet), well then fucking establish treaties and if they wont play ball, cut them off, not their balls of course back their backbone connections.
The problem is not the distribution of that content but it's creation, and that can not be encrypted and this bullshit to weaken encryption, just more bullshit. The problem can readily be dealt with if the US government would simply stop being dickbags and stop trying to hack the planet.
How did the US/UK espionage find this out, oh, they noticed the extra traffic whilst they were doing the exact same thing and you just know that is true. How did they track it in China, well, of course because they were hacking servers in China. It's not like they can reach for the global treaty to block these attacks and blocks global propaganda services, why because the US don't want them because they want to hack and propagandise the entire rest of the planet, to serve US citizens, absolutely not, to serve infinite greed and ego, of the psychopathic pin heads at the top.
The story should read, How the US hacked China, to show how China hacks the US to find out how the US hacks China, to publicly demonstrate why treaties are required and for me to condemn the US government as a pack of lying cunts for blocking those cyber treaties. Stop fucking with the internet you fucking dick brains and oh yeah and merry fucking Christmas.
Security through, well, the lowest of the low. Let's be clear what is really happening here. The tech industry as hovered up all the good intellectual employees, all the first raters, all the second raters and all the third raters and what's left, well, hello working for failed jock strap douche bags in the military. Forget all the other stuff, yep the department of defence mainly gets the left overs and they perform at that skill level ie really poorly.
They are there to suck up space, get paid, hate their job and hate the arseholes they have to take orders from. They don't care, they simply just do barely enough to not get fired and really who can blame them. Bring in contractors and well they get paid to do a job and they only continue to get paid, if they do not do that job ie keep getting paid to fail and use lobbyists and hookers to smooth over the problems it causes.
Yeah, the problem is the war industrial complex mainly gets shite employees and the expected results are produced. How the fuck wants to earn massive negative life balance in work in mass murder industries, not any of the properly skilled people and it is having an major impact, on the war industrial complex.
Well, Google try really, really, hard to pretend they are not evil, all those positive research projects, which are really just marketing to make them look good. In this case, well, the damage has been Google, Google as evil as fuck and ain't no amount of feel good research projects are going to fix that. So a job poorly done by Google turns out to be a job well done for us. No more bullshitting about the kind of evil at it's core company we are dealing with, a marketing engine that uses social media as bait, the social function of search to taint and corrupt the global mind scape, just as evil as fuck.
People now have to stop and think whether they want to be evil and how evil, before they consider working for Google and a lot of existing employees, well, they know their employer is evil enough that they have to fight against it and that, well, is a disgusting thing to have to put up with. I do feel sorrow and empathy for those Google employees who have woken up to have evil the company they contribute to is. Fight against them or leave, only one sound choice leave, when your good efforts are turned to evil, those efforts are still evil once you become aware of the negative outcomes.
You would look exactly there. You just need to fix the carbon dioxide emission, get it back into a solid, say crystalline form, that can be added back into the Portland cement.
I would think biological treatment could work, a massive structure containing, algae or bacteria to take up the carbon dioxide and like tiny little factories, make it into something we can use and as such sell.
Turn something bad into something useful. Two useful products, sodium carbonate and carbon tetrachloride, so just add salt water to waste carbon dioxide, the required chemical processes and you are done. Those are both manufactured chemicals, so bloody manufacture them next door to portland cement plants that a close to the sea.
Perhaps, just possibly, complementary chemically manufacturing should be a thing, some ones trash can be another persons treasure.
How about when the enemy of my enemy is also my enemy, well as long as they destroy each other, they are both my ally and I'll help and strive to maintain the required mutually assured destructive balance and even help them attack each other:).
Well, the headline was not very clear. So suicide hotline, is that to help or to prevent suicide ie person - I want to commit suicide, hotline - I suggest a small cylinder of nitrogen and a face mask, just saying. Suicide for when people are more scared of living than they are of dying. I understand why suicide is illegal, you don't want psychopaths running around murdering people and trying to make it look like suicide, you need a proper investigation every time to prove it was suicide but as you own your own life, you are certainly entitled to end it as you see fit as you as you strive to inconvenience others as little as possible, don't want to add negatively to your life balance on the way out after all. So a suicide hot line to help or prevent suicide;).
Well actually you can. You can demand, that your government, build a facility to manufacturer network equipment upon fully audited production lines, and the code all FOSS. Calling it essential infrastructure and demanding that it be free from any foreign control whether government or private. So all the network equipment required from inside you home out through all the ISPs, one brand for all, secured and audited. Secure form the worst predations of the US government or the minor inconveniences of the government of China.
In reality a prime example of why net neutrality is required, unfortunately a really bad time for it to happen with regard to the US market. The US incumbents will take one look at this, ohh, I never thought we could do that and voila, you just know they will start doing it all over the place.
The report basically claims, any Russian, ANY RUSSIAN, who commented on the internet in English, is a Russian agent. So you Russians, any of you speak English, write or read English and use the internet and you are an enemy combatant so says the US corporate democrats. Oh you Americans just so full of shite.
Why exactly is 'FUCK' more offensive than 'SEXUAL INTERCOURSE', I mean is it evil to use less letters, or are 'F' and 'K' inherently disturbing. I mean how about hump or screw, is hump OK because camels do it and of course banning the word screw would be stupid even when it is the implication in context.
How about you silly fuckers try to stop taking offence at everything, chill the fuck out, and realise the difference between words and physical actions. You know like I learnt in kindy, sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me. Instead of the silly crap now, ohh ahh, they said some dirty words, let's get some sticks and stones and break the bones.
Fuck off with this silly shite already, everyone needs to grow the fuck up. The artful fun use of words is the artful fun use of words, want to take offence, go right ahead it will just make it even more fun.
I'll make it simpler. People who spend less time concentrating, focusing on a single subject and less time verbally communicating, exchanging information and emotional states directly, visually person to person, will show shrinking in those areas of the brain associated with those tasks. Oddly enough the outside layers of the brain would be those areas evolutionarily speaking, we are most able to risk harm to and still survive and reproduce. Screen time, although you are concentrating on that device, the content your are experiencing is widely spread and rapidly changing, so definitely not a single point of focus and when you are communicating, your are communicating with the device, so your emotional state and exchange is hugely different, people do not LOL when they lol, by far most of the time, the same with the expression of other emotions. When direct video exchanges dominate, that problem will ease up because feeling and expression of emotional state will improve with the direct visual contact, preferable upon as large a screen as possible.
Taking all the nonsense out, how about we stick to the basics, men are more interested in stuff and women are more interested in people. You could call it roughly the 80:20 rule, 80% of men prefer their content to be 80% about stuff and 20% about people (people doing something with stuff is about the stuff not the people) and 80% of women prefer the content to be 80% about people and 20% about stuff (that 20% stuff includes, clothing, make up, jewellery and of course shoes). So if you try to get woke and make your content 50% stuff and 50% people you will bore and piss of 80% of men and 80% of women. Want to make your content suit 20% of women and 20% of men, don't forget that is a spectrum from people who want content to be 100% about stuff or 100% about people, so shitty market because you will miss most of them because they are so broadly spread.
So sci fi example for games, want games for men, makes star trek game about star ships and land conflict using stuff, want a game for women startrek families, think sims in a star trek universe ie managing a family in a star trek universe. Again screw the 20%, too wildly spread in their desires to be worth it economically (you will not appeal to the 20% but a small percentage of that 20% because their tastes are so widely spread). So the same for a TV series, star trek starships and exploration problems for men and for women, star trek families and even star trek politics. Want to do 50% 50%, well you'll be lucky to appeal to about 5% of each group, maybe at most 10%.
Want to target men, make your content suit men, want to target women, make that content suit women, want to target no on, try to target men and women at the same fucking time, idiots, it's CDF (the definition for CDF as I was taught it, is COMMON DOG FUCK).
The more time you spend talking about being productive, the less time you spend being productive vs hear the story about the woodsman that was taking to long to cut down trees because he could not stop to sharpen his axe. Choose and perish.
The only thing that needs to change is the political nature of the FOSS movement. They need to form an aggressive politically active association, that will fund aggressive lobbyists and also coordinate political action to actively force the adoption of FOSS software into government. They must force government to justify the payment of software licences especially to foreign corporations, they must make it cost as many votes as possibly to buy closed source proprietary software, the perpetual software licence payment system.
Simply fund a politically active organisation to make it extremely painful in terms of votes, for a politician not to push the use of FOSS software. Fuck being polite, let's get all piratey, arghh, fuck em.
They are not a media company or a tech company, everyone is being quite explicit, they are a direct delivery advertising agency. They are an advertising platform, that uses social media as bait to get people in and then uses psychological manipulation techniques to keep them hooked. They pretty much are a dickbrain corporation, not giving one fuck about what they do or they harm they cause, as long as they generate maximum profits. They should be held legally liable for the advertisements they show, if false, Facebook should pay the penalty and also they should pay the cost of any other harm their business model causes, including substantive psychological harm to it's users, it's addicts and it's victims.
Apparently it is very abundantly clear, it damages them psychologically and they act out. So yes, communities should be able to decide whether or not they allow unmanned robot vehicles in their community.
Look how about this as balance, if a Waymo vehicle is hacked and run downs a kills a person, the coders responsible for securing that code and their managers get the death penalty, personally I oppose the death penalty, so perhaps if male coders their testicles on the line and if female, their face, you know scarification, something like shit coder scared across their forehead and cheeks.
Want to take the fucking gamble with robot vehicles take it with your own life and not someone else's. When you are willing to bet your life (or your testicles) on the security and reliability of your code, fine, until then, quite simply, bugger off.
Actually your claim is totally the exact opposite of reality. It is not about Google making money, it is how much it would cost google to personally and individually review every single piece of content uploaded, 576,000 hours of content per day (https://www.businessinsider.com/viewers-find-objectionable-content-on-youtube-kids-2017-11/?utm_source=feedly&%3Butm_medium=referral&r=AU&IR=T) times by say $25 per hour because the people doing should be very knowledgeable in law, every single day. So it is not about making money, it is solely about them being not able to afford it, end of story, done and finished. Can it be automated, no, they pretend it can but it can't because any attempt to automate results in far too many false positives which cost way more to review, a person much watch the entire bit of content and do the consultation process with the uploader, the added cost on the other option.
So want a public video content sharing channel, well, it is going to be public and what goes up, goes up. Have a complaint about a specific bit of content by a specific users, well fucking make it to Google, each and every fucking single time, just the way it fucking is. You want content protected, than you fucking pay to protect it, otherwise fuck off.
This is worse story that Facebook is trying to make it look. Those private photos, could be exceedingly private, as in personally pornographic in nature. There are laws against publishing explicit personal photos of inviduals, Facebook has factually broken those laws and should face full criminal penalties.
Remember when all of a sudden a series of web sites banned porn not long back, guess why the panic. Well at what age do females start to feel the urge for expensive clothing, makeup, jewellery and of course shoes and at what age do they start getting targeted by intense marketing and how do you get that money. Now you have the very humorous thot troll, dob in a thot to the IRS and the big reaction by thots to that would have trigger an IRS internal investigation. So a review uncovers the age of many of the upcoming self publishing porn producers and wham a lot of those social media sites that allow users to earn money with posting, well, where allowing the publishing of really troublesome content, for which don't pass GO, no $200, straight to jail they should have gone.
You can start to see where this would be extremely troubling for Facebook.
Slashdot Mirror
Which is why Amazon is struggling, there is a lot of competition in that market and once you are happy with your store, you tend to stick with it until they do something wrong. For me to change from Coles, it took those idiots, purposefully running down the number of check out chicks, so that you had to waitt 10 to 15 minutes to get served even in the middle of the day or use the self service check out. Well, the other alternative was to go to the competitors, seriously you want to give me shite service on purpose to force me to do what you want me to do, well, dropped going to their stores and ordered deliveries from somewhere else, that 20 odd minutes of forced waiting will cost 2 years of custom, minimum, already at the six month mark.
Look Amazon has a pretty shitty rep, abuse staff and staff are customers as are the people who know that staff and well, supermarkets of all sorts of brands are everywhere. So a reasonable, reliable job and you keep custom, fail and you lose them until their next supplier fails. Would I order groceries from Amazon, no until my current supplier screws up, why bother, the prices will be much of a muchness and it will be down to service and reliability. Amazon is about cheap and nothing else, they have nothing to sell in the grocery market, buy cheap, sell cheap is who they are and probably quality has taken a nose dive at whole foods in pursuit of cheap.
Keep in mind, people often chat with staff at grocery stores, it's a more personal shopping space, driving them to focus on store stuff and ignore customers, is guaranteed to lose you customers in that working space. Can Amazon with it's corporate nature ever do groceries effectively, probably not, it has no idea about person to person customer service.
What they really failed to cover was the ramifications of a hack, firing on friendly forces, would have been the result. Do no put idiot failed jock strap douche bags in charge of computer equipment, catastrophic failure is guaranteed but I know, the problem, really smart people have no interest in running around killing people.
Did you know every criminal act by an American outside of the USA, is actually a criminal act of the US government, they are all linked to the US government, provable, they are citizens. Of course no member of the CIA or NSA or FBI etc has ever, committed a criminal act overseas.
Things are competitive the globe over, sure the government of China will do stuff, less than the US or it's corporations but also individuals in China will commit criminal acts in the rest of the world, regardless of who they are meant to be working at the time.
Want better outcomes though, you have to work with other governments and not against them. Work against them and well, they wont care, what crimes their citizens commit in your country. USA stop dragging Australia into your bullshit, all you have done is turn Australia's rep into shit and made any comments you force them to make utterly pointless, not independent but foreign policy vassal state. The USA keeps going to that well, long after it has become bone dry, complete waste of fucking time and fuck with Australian trade with China and cripple the Australian economy and no part of the US economy is Australia will be safe, fucking none.
So what you are saying is the US government should use more automation and sack as many people as possible and this will solve the problem.
Automation does not seem to be the problem, how you distribute the income of automation does. So do you automate to the level where you have no workers and thus eliminate all workers as customers and thus do not need any automation because you have no customers.
Really the only problem how to distribute the rewards of automation. We all know the psychopathic 1% wants it all, not most, ALL and for the rest, well we are consumables to be used and abused, to feed ego and lusts. That is the reality of the conflict, a class one, the exploiters, the psychopaths vs the normies, the exploited.
The reality in this case, the crime is not what they share, the crime lies with the creators and distributors of the content. Is there a problem on the web site, no, the problem appears to be a failure with policing to track down the creators of the problems on those web sites. Encrypted, should not be a problem, if it looks bad, check into the end user, if they are overseas, well, use cyber treaties (oh wait you can because hack the planet), well then fucking establish treaties and if they wont play ball, cut them off, not their balls of course back their backbone connections.
The problem is not the distribution of that content but it's creation, and that can not be encrypted and this bullshit to weaken encryption, just more bullshit. The problem can readily be dealt with if the US government would simply stop being dickbags and stop trying to hack the planet.
How did the US/UK espionage find this out, oh, they noticed the extra traffic whilst they were doing the exact same thing and you just know that is true. How did they track it in China, well, of course because they were hacking servers in China. It's not like they can reach for the global treaty to block these attacks and blocks global propaganda services, why because the US don't want them because they want to hack and propagandise the entire rest of the planet, to serve US citizens, absolutely not, to serve infinite greed and ego, of the psychopathic pin heads at the top.
The story should read, How the US hacked China, to show how China hacks the US to find out how the US hacks China, to publicly demonstrate why treaties are required and for me to condemn the US government as a pack of lying cunts for blocking those cyber treaties. Stop fucking with the internet you fucking dick brains and oh yeah and merry fucking Christmas.
Security through, well, the lowest of the low. Let's be clear what is really happening here. The tech industry as hovered up all the good intellectual employees, all the first raters, all the second raters and all the third raters and what's left, well, hello working for failed jock strap douche bags in the military. Forget all the other stuff, yep the department of defence mainly gets the left overs and they perform at that skill level ie really poorly.
They are there to suck up space, get paid, hate their job and hate the arseholes they have to take orders from. They don't care, they simply just do barely enough to not get fired and really who can blame them. Bring in contractors and well they get paid to do a job and they only continue to get paid, if they do not do that job ie keep getting paid to fail and use lobbyists and hookers to smooth over the problems it causes.
Yeah, the problem is the war industrial complex mainly gets shite employees and the expected results are produced. How the fuck wants to earn massive negative life balance in work in mass murder industries, not any of the properly skilled people and it is having an major impact, on the war industrial complex.
Well, Google try really, really, hard to pretend they are not evil, all those positive research projects, which are really just marketing to make them look good. In this case, well, the damage has been Google, Google as evil as fuck and ain't no amount of feel good research projects are going to fix that. So a job poorly done by Google turns out to be a job well done for us. No more bullshitting about the kind of evil at it's core company we are dealing with, a marketing engine that uses social media as bait, the social function of search to taint and corrupt the global mind scape, just as evil as fuck.
People now have to stop and think whether they want to be evil and how evil, before they consider working for Google and a lot of existing employees, well, they know their employer is evil enough that they have to fight against it and that, well, is a disgusting thing to have to put up with. I do feel sorrow and empathy for those Google employees who have woken up to have evil the company they contribute to is. Fight against them or leave, only one sound choice leave, when your good efforts are turned to evil, those efforts are still evil once you become aware of the negative outcomes.
You would look exactly there. You just need to fix the carbon dioxide emission, get it back into a solid, say crystalline form, that can be added back into the Portland cement.
I would think biological treatment could work, a massive structure containing, algae or bacteria to take up the carbon dioxide and like tiny little factories, make it into something we can use and as such sell.
Turn something bad into something useful. Two useful products, sodium carbonate and carbon tetrachloride, so just add salt water to waste carbon dioxide, the required chemical processes and you are done. Those are both manufactured chemicals, so bloody manufacture them next door to portland cement plants that a close to the sea.
Perhaps, just possibly, complementary chemically manufacturing should be a thing, some ones trash can be another persons treasure.
How about when the enemy of my enemy is also my enemy, well as long as they destroy each other, they are both my ally and I'll help and strive to maintain the required mutually assured destructive balance and even help them attack each other :).
Well, the headline was not very clear. So suicide hotline, is that to help or to prevent suicide ie person - I want to commit suicide, hotline - I suggest a small cylinder of nitrogen and a face mask, just saying. Suicide for when people are more scared of living than they are of dying. I understand why suicide is illegal, you don't want psychopaths running around murdering people and trying to make it look like suicide, you need a proper investigation every time to prove it was suicide but as you own your own life, you are certainly entitled to end it as you see fit as you as you strive to inconvenience others as little as possible, don't want to add negatively to your life balance on the way out after all. So a suicide hot line to help or prevent suicide ;).
Well actually you can. You can demand, that your government, build a facility to manufacturer network equipment upon fully audited production lines, and the code all FOSS. Calling it essential infrastructure and demanding that it be free from any foreign control whether government or private. So all the network equipment required from inside you home out through all the ISPs, one brand for all, secured and audited. Secure form the worst predations of the US government or the minor inconveniences of the government of China.
In reality a prime example of why net neutrality is required, unfortunately a really bad time for it to happen with regard to the US market. The US incumbents will take one look at this, ohh, I never thought we could do that and voila, you just know they will start doing it all over the place.
The report basically claims, any Russian, ANY RUSSIAN, who commented on the internet in English, is a Russian agent. So you Russians, any of you speak English, write or read English and use the internet and you are an enemy combatant so says the US corporate democrats. Oh you Americans just so full of shite.
Why exactly is 'FUCK' more offensive than 'SEXUAL INTERCOURSE', I mean is it evil to use less letters, or are 'F' and 'K' inherently disturbing. I mean how about hump or screw, is hump OK because camels do it and of course banning the word screw would be stupid even when it is the implication in context.
How about you silly fuckers try to stop taking offence at everything, chill the fuck out, and realise the difference between words and physical actions. You know like I learnt in kindy, sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me. Instead of the silly crap now, ohh ahh, they said some dirty words, let's get some sticks and stones and break the bones.
Fuck off with this silly shite already, everyone needs to grow the fuck up. The artful fun use of words is the artful fun use of words, want to take offence, go right ahead it will just make it even more fun.
I'll make it simpler. People who spend less time concentrating, focusing on a single subject and less time verbally communicating, exchanging information and emotional states directly, visually person to person, will show shrinking in those areas of the brain associated with those tasks. Oddly enough the outside layers of the brain would be those areas evolutionarily speaking, we are most able to risk harm to and still survive and reproduce. Screen time, although you are concentrating on that device, the content your are experiencing is widely spread and rapidly changing, so definitely not a single point of focus and when you are communicating, your are communicating with the device, so your emotional state and exchange is hugely different, people do not LOL when they lol, by far most of the time, the same with the expression of other emotions. When direct video exchanges dominate, that problem will ease up because feeling and expression of emotional state will improve with the direct visual contact, preferable upon as large a screen as possible.
Taking all the nonsense out, how about we stick to the basics, men are more interested in stuff and women are more interested in people. You could call it roughly the 80:20 rule, 80% of men prefer their content to be 80% about stuff and 20% about people (people doing something with stuff is about the stuff not the people) and 80% of women prefer the content to be 80% about people and 20% about stuff (that 20% stuff includes, clothing, make up, jewellery and of course shoes). So if you try to get woke and make your content 50% stuff and 50% people you will bore and piss of 80% of men and 80% of women. Want to make your content suit 20% of women and 20% of men, don't forget that is a spectrum from people who want content to be 100% about stuff or 100% about people, so shitty market because you will miss most of them because they are so broadly spread.
So sci fi example for games, want games for men, makes star trek game about star ships and land conflict using stuff, want a game for women startrek families, think sims in a star trek universe ie managing a family in a star trek universe. Again screw the 20%, too wildly spread in their desires to be worth it economically (you will not appeal to the 20% but a small percentage of that 20% because their tastes are so widely spread). So the same for a TV series, star trek starships and exploration problems for men and for women, star trek families and even star trek politics. Want to do 50% 50%, well you'll be lucky to appeal to about 5% of each group, maybe at most 10%.
Want to target men, make your content suit men, want to target women, make that content suit women, want to target no on, try to target men and women at the same fucking time, idiots, it's CDF (the definition for CDF as I was taught it, is COMMON DOG FUCK).
The more time you spend talking about being productive, the less time you spend being productive vs hear the story about the woodsman that was taking to long to cut down trees because he could not stop to sharpen his axe. Choose and perish.
The only thing that needs to change is the political nature of the FOSS movement. They need to form an aggressive politically active association, that will fund aggressive lobbyists and also coordinate political action to actively force the adoption of FOSS software into government. They must force government to justify the payment of software licences especially to foreign corporations, they must make it cost as many votes as possibly to buy closed source proprietary software, the perpetual software licence payment system.
Simply fund a politically active organisation to make it extremely painful in terms of votes, for a politician not to push the use of FOSS software. Fuck being polite, let's get all piratey, arghh, fuck em.
They are not a media company or a tech company, everyone is being quite explicit, they are a direct delivery advertising agency. They are an advertising platform, that uses social media as bait to get people in and then uses psychological manipulation techniques to keep them hooked. They pretty much are a dickbrain corporation, not giving one fuck about what they do or they harm they cause, as long as they generate maximum profits. They should be held legally liable for the advertisements they show, if false, Facebook should pay the penalty and also they should pay the cost of any other harm their business model causes, including substantive psychological harm to it's users, it's addicts and it's victims.
Apparently it is very abundantly clear, it damages them psychologically and they act out. So yes, communities should be able to decide whether or not they allow unmanned robot vehicles in their community.
Look how about this as balance, if a Waymo vehicle is hacked and run downs a kills a person, the coders responsible for securing that code and their managers get the death penalty, personally I oppose the death penalty, so perhaps if male coders their testicles on the line and if female, their face, you know scarification, something like shit coder scared across their forehead and cheeks.
Want to take the fucking gamble with robot vehicles take it with your own life and not someone else's. When you are willing to bet your life (or your testicles) on the security and reliability of your code, fine, until then, quite simply, bugger off.
Actually your claim is totally the exact opposite of reality. It is not about Google making money, it is how much it would cost google to personally and individually review every single piece of content uploaded, 576,000 hours of content per day (https://www.businessinsider.com/viewers-find-objectionable-content-on-youtube-kids-2017-11/?utm_source=feedly&%3Butm_medium=referral&r=AU&IR=T) times by say $25 per hour because the people doing should be very knowledgeable in law, every single day. So it is not about making money, it is solely about them being not able to afford it, end of story, done and finished. Can it be automated, no, they pretend it can but it can't because any attempt to automate results in far too many false positives which cost way more to review, a person much watch the entire bit of content and do the consultation process with the uploader, the added cost on the other option.
So want a public video content sharing channel, well, it is going to be public and what goes up, goes up. Have a complaint about a specific bit of content by a specific users, well fucking make it to Google, each and every fucking single time, just the way it fucking is. You want content protected, than you fucking pay to protect it, otherwise fuck off.
This is worse story that Facebook is trying to make it look. Those private photos, could be exceedingly private, as in personally pornographic in nature. There are laws against publishing explicit personal photos of inviduals, Facebook has factually broken those laws and should face full criminal penalties.
Remember when all of a sudden a series of web sites banned porn not long back, guess why the panic. Well at what age do females start to feel the urge for expensive clothing, makeup, jewellery and of course shoes and at what age do they start getting targeted by intense marketing and how do you get that money. Now you have the very humorous thot troll, dob in a thot to the IRS and the big reaction by thots to that would have trigger an IRS internal investigation. So a review uncovers the age of many of the upcoming self publishing porn producers and wham a lot of those social media sites that allow users to earn money with posting, well, where allowing the publishing of really troublesome content, for which don't pass GO, no $200, straight to jail they should have gone.
You can start to see where this would be extremely troubling for Facebook.
Disposable workers == disposable employers == disposable customers. You get what you create.
How pathetic?!?, I was thing more along the lines of "Muther fuckin' puss bucket, what the fuck".