Me too. I mean what did people expect from the movie? Its a movie about a guy who goes nuts and smashes things, and there was a lot of nut going and thing smashing occuring. And in addition to that it had a plot which was a lot less crappy than it could have been.
Sure the father's power was kinda stupid, but really you had to have a villian that give the Hulk a run for his money. Unless you wanted a crappy villian with the ability to make people rationally discuss their differences, using a gamma mutant was the only way that didn't involve setting up a completely unrelated backstory.
More like..-. . . -.. / -- . since cancer cells are just normal body cells that don't bother waiting through that pesky interphase thing, and divide as often as they can.
Ah-ah, I know what you're thinking punk. You're thinking are his hands sweaty enough to mess the sensors? And to tell you the truth I've in all this excitement I'm not feeling too fresh. But being this is a.44 Magnum - the most powerful hand gun in the world and will blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself a question--Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya punk!
You don't seem to have made the point sufficiently to convince me that doubting the existence of god is irrational or that all beliefs are irrational.
My post was really more philosophical then anything else. In short "There are more things on this Heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in your Philosophy"
Saying that someone is wrong about their beliefs serves no purpose when those beliefs aren't readily demonstrable. To say that there is no god implies that you possess such a full knowledge of the world that you in fact would be god.
Saying that it is very unlikely that god exists is valid.
Saying that such a powerful god exists that he can exist without being detected by current or future means is equally valid.
In the world as we know it, there is no hint whatsoever of a god. No god in dna, no god in atoms, no god in gravity, no god anywhere whatsoever.
Really? So you fully understand the intricate functioning of dna, atoms, gravity, and everything else? Man what are you doing posting on slashdot? Go write a book explaining general relativity and make millions. Otherwise don't speak of what you can't prove.
To therefore conclude that doubting god is irrational is a very flawed argument. The onus is on you to prove in non existant things.
This statement is most defiantly atheistic.
You claim to be agnostic, but things like this make it apparent that you refuse to acknowledge even the possiblity of a god. That requires as much faith and blind trust in a doctrine as the most devout religious.
I can prove computers exist, as I can prove that rainbows exist. I can also infer quite easily that the tooth fairy and santa claus are non existent, just like god.
Then prove that computers exist.
I am currently typing on something that seems solid to the touch, and appears to reflect, absorb, and emit light in such ways that my eyes percieve it, but last night I had a dream that I was standing on a banana floating through space and in the dream the banana seemed equally real.
Oh, and if you think holding any view whatoever is irrational, then you should aim that argument on your own views.
My views are agnostic. I am just coming at agnostic from the religious side of it.
agnostic ag-nos-tik n.
1. a. One who believes that it is impossible to know whether there is a God.
b. One who is skeptical about the existence of God but does not profess true atheism.
2. One who is doubtful or noncommittal about something.
My belief is that it is possible, but not likely that there is no god. I believe this way due to a combination of being raised in a religious household, and my personal unwillingness to accept a universe without a purpose coupled with some probabilty and mathematic theories.
My belief is by definition irrational because all belief is irrational. I am not trying to make you believe as I do because that is impossible through rational discourse, and rational discourse is all I feel like doing at the moment.
Tell you what I'll bet you five dollars that God exists.
I'll come to collect after we are both dead and you can do the same. (Of course if you win then you won't be able to collect what with there being no afterlife and all, but thems the breaks I guess.)
This game is fun and the data files are moddable.
.rar file.
The main.dat file is actually a renamed
So fix the extension and you can decompress it into the base game data which is written in plain text.
Have you ever been surfing along on the internet, minding your own business, and then suddenly *BAM* goatse.cx/hello.jpg.
That would be about the same sensation.
Yeah.
When velocity light speed it is impossible to reach light speed by decelerating.
Because in all cases you need infinite energy.
Yup keep modding this post +1 Funny!
(So as to crush the user's karma.)
What? I always though wisdom just helped your will save.
I know... I mean why test if you don't do an objective test. And how is this news?
This kevlar armor is ineffective. I mean I tried it out and the knife went right through it.
The MS thing is mostly to get rid of the most annoying worms at this point.
I forgot
In Soviet Russia, the Cell architecture goes deep inside the article.
How long until the first beowulf cluster of ps3s?
Also can it run linux?
More along the lines of all the other students are expelled for plagerism.
(Happened in an epic campaign once)
DM: Universe ends. roll infinity d 6. Reflex save DC 30 for half damage.
Rogue: 1d20+25 take 10: 35 and I have evasion.
First off.
You were totally in the right. The actual games themselves are valid merchandise.
Second off... two words.
*LINE* *BREAKS*.
School PC. :/
The ads on the page make my IE take 99% of the cpu.
To quote Futurama.
"You watched it! You can't unwatch it!"
No no no...
They are extending the scope of the last Star Trek movie namely Nemesis.
They plan to kill off all of the cast members and replace them with retarded versions of themselves.
The exoskeleton does nothing
These things are already as small as they can be.
Why does Alabama get all the playa hate?
Bibles aren't supposedly objective textbook
Yeah less CPU usage is more performance for the applications.
Check this.
Me too. I mean what did people expect from the movie? Its a movie about a guy who goes nuts and smashes things, and there was a lot of nut going and thing smashing occuring. And in addition to that it had a plot which was a lot less crappy than it could have been.
Sure the father's power was kinda stupid, but really you had to have a villian that give the Hulk a run for his money. Unless you wanted a crappy villian with the ability to make people rationally discuss their differences, using a gamma mutant was the only way that didn't involve setting up a completely unrelated backstory.
More like ..-. . . -.. / -- . since cancer cells are just normal body cells that don't bother waiting through that pesky interphase thing, and divide as often as they can.
Ah-ah, I know what you're thinking punk. You're thinking are his hands sweaty enough to mess the sensors? And to tell you the truth I've in all this excitement I'm not feeling too fresh. But being this is a .44 Magnum - the most powerful hand gun in the world and will blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself a question--Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya punk!
I for one welcome our sentient weapon overlords
My post was really more philosophical then anything else. In short "There are more things on this Heaven and Earth than are dreamt of
in your Philosophy"
Saying that someone is wrong about their beliefs serves no purpose when those beliefs aren't readily demonstrable. To say that there is no god implies that you possess such a full knowledge of the world that you in fact would be god.
Saying that it is very unlikely that god exists is valid.
Saying that such a powerful god exists that he can exist without being detected by current or future means is equally valid.
Really? So you fully understand the intricate functioning of dna, atoms, gravity, and everything else? Man what are you doing posting on slashdot? Go write a book explaining general relativity and make millions. Otherwise don't speak of what you can't prove.
This statement is most defiantly atheistic.
You claim to be agnostic, but things like this make it apparent that you refuse to acknowledge even the possiblity of a god. That requires as much faith and blind trust in a doctrine as the most devout religious.
Then prove that computers exist.
I am currently typing on something that seems solid to the touch, and appears to reflect, absorb, and emit light in such ways that my eyes percieve it, but last night I had a dream that I was standing on a banana floating through space and in the dream the banana seemed equally real.
My views are agnostic. I am just coming at agnostic from the religious side of it.
agnostic ag-nos-tik
n.
1. a. One who believes that it is impossible to know whether there is a God.
b. One who is skeptical about the existence of God but does not profess true atheism.
2. One who is doubtful or noncommittal about something.
My belief is that it is possible, but not likely that there is no god. I believe this way due to a combination of being raised in a religious household, and my personal unwillingness to accept a universe without a purpose coupled with some probabilty and mathematic theories.
My belief is by definition irrational because all belief is irrational. I am not trying to make you believe as I do because that is impossible through rational discourse, and rational discourse is all I feel like doing at the moment.
Tell you what I'll bet you five dollars that God exists.
I'll come to collect after we are both dead and you can do the same. (Of course if you win then you won't be able to collect what with there being no afterlife and all, but thems the breaks I guess.)
Enjoy your heathenistic lifestyle!