Slashdot Mirror


Tiny Robots Powered by Living Muscle Cells

voma writes "Tiny robots powered by living muscle have been created by scientists at the University of California, Los Angeles. The devices were formed by "growing" rat cells on microscopic silicon chips, the researchers report in the journal Nature Materials. Less than a millimetre long, the miniscule robots can move themselves without any external source of power. Muscles like these could be used in a host of microscopic devices - even to drive miniature electrical generators to power computer chips."

224 comments

  1. sounds kinda creepy by johnstein · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but still... pretty crazy what scientists can do. I won't say EVIL EVIL! or YAY PROGRESS! I mean, we are human. we will dabble. these things will be invented. just hope like so many other inventions, the good outweighs the bad.

    besides. 1mm of rat muscle? man. how puny :)

    -John

    --
    "The definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing and hoping for different results"
    1. Re:sounds kinda creepy by johnstein · · Score: 0

      and yes... I know I know, there's a ton of other inventions where the bad far outweighs the good. but... I still prefer a little ying to my yang.

      -John

      --
      "The definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing and hoping for different results"
    2. Re:sounds kinda creepy by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not sure I really see a bad side to this. It's not like we're talking about machines with sentience here, just machines that are powered by muscle. I would think this kind of technology could have possible applications in making more natural-feeling prosthetics, which would be of great use to society. Just think, people could have prosthetic limbs connected directly to their own muscles, for totally natural movement.

      Or we could just make an army of Robocops or something. Six of one, half dozen of the other really.

    3. Re:sounds kinda creepy by Zone-MR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, for a start they should use this to control it :)

    4. Re:sounds kinda creepy by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Self replicating bots that rebuild nerves/bones/muscle, or self replicating bots that tear apart nerves/bones/muscles, take your pick. Or maybe tiny bots that hunt down and convert evilbots into other good hunterbots. I dub this new "game" Biocorewars.

    5. Re:sounds kinda creepy by johnstein · · Score: 0

      yea. that's the story I thought of too. hah. and I thought back in school we donated money to send "mice" to college... guess the rats are much better pupils.

      -John

      --
      "The definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing and hoping for different results"
    6. Re:sounds kinda creepy by skraps · · Score: 1, Redundant
      --
      Karma: -2147483648 (Mostly affected by integer overflow)
    7. Re:sounds kinda creepy by Emperor+Igor · · Score: 2, Funny

      They could make a whole RoboRat.

    8. Re:sounds kinda creepy by johnstein · · Score: 0

      hehe. exactly!

      --
      "The definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing and hoping for different results"
    9. Re:sounds kinda creepy by TWX · · Score: 1

      There was an episode of Star Trek: Voyager where the ship got sick. That would be a definite bad side...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    10. Re:sounds kinda creepy by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      "Mummy, what sort of meat is this?"
      "It's veal, honey."
      "But it's moving around the plate."
      "Shut up and eat it - On sports day, you are going to WIN!"


      Heh! First we add muscles to our computers, then we add computers to out muscles.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    11. Re:sounds kinda creepy by melstav · · Score: 1

      Or how about a GPS LoJack powered directly by the person's heart?

      I would love to see electronic prosthesis not need an external battery, assuming they could generate sufficient power. (No, I have not read TFA)

      And I can definately see benefits to having LoJacked people.... But there are definate concerns.

      Like all technology, it's neither good nor evil. How it gets used, on the other hand, is a different story.

    12. Re:sounds kinda creepy by blahlemon · · Score: 1
      Or we could just make an army of Robocops or something.

      Yes, and the first one would be good and decent but then we would get to greedy and make a second, and a third, and a cheesy Canadian made TV spin-off and the world as we know it would COME TO AN END!

      But the first one would be pretty decent. Even if it doesn't hold up over time.

      --
      It take more faith to believe in evolution than it takes to believe in God
    13. Re:sounds kinda creepy by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Yes, first Robocop, then Terminator -- then SkyNet, and well you should know the rest of the story :D

      I'll be back...

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    14. Re:sounds kinda creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prosthetics...nice idea. But prosthetics are only a crutch (no pun intended).

      The real solution is regeneration. They are getting closer and closer to being able to regenerate tissue such as nerves. Farther away is regeneration of entire limbs.

      True, it seems far away, but I believe the technology for it will approach us on a curve. At first a bit of nerve regeneration, then some time later, some tissue regeneration, then shorter gaps in between for each success until suddenly doctors are regrowing entire organs and limbs right in outpatient clinics.

      Of course, this is only what I think will come. Sort of what seems to happen with other technology.

    15. Re:sounds kinda creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever played the game, Parasite Eve ???

      If not, don't.

    16. Re:sounds kinda creepy by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Self replicating bots that rebuild nerves/bones/muscle, or self replicating bots that tear apart nerves/bones/muscles, take your pick. Or maybe tiny bots that hunt down and convert evilbots into other good hunterbots. I dub this new "game" Biocorewars.

      Hmm.. self replicating microscopic entities that are either symbiotic or parasitic. I could've sworn I'd heard of something like that before.. bacsomething. Ah well, let the games commence!

    17. Re:sounds kinda creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just think, people could have prosthetic limbs connected directly to their own muscles, for totally natural movement.

      Wouldn't it be better if they were able to put the leg back the way it was (or should have been) without the electronics?

    18. Re:sounds kinda creepy by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or how about more realistic Real Dolls?

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  2. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I can't help to think this is somwhat relaxted to "Nanotech Research Works Toward Artificial Muscles", a story covered by Slashdot last week...

  3. no external source of power? by ChipMonk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No food, no light, no oxygen, no electricity?

    Maybe "voma" is a pseudonym for Laura Didio.

    1. Re:no external source of power? by CapnGrunge · · Score: 1

      That's what flies are for.

      --
      I see 57005 people
    2. Re:no external source of power? by dsginter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      They're fuelled by alcohol.

      --
      More
    3. Re:no external source of power? by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 1

      Maybe "voma" is a pseudonym for Laura Didio.

      What does that mean?

    4. Re:no external source of power? by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

      Laura Didio is a financial reporter who unquestioningly parrots everything SCO feeds her. Outside the SCO-controlled circles, she's known as "Laura Didiot."

    5. Re:no external source of power? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      No wife, no horse, and no moustache either...

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    6. Re:no external source of power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "no external source of power" claim is a lie.
      The muscles are powered by glucose.

  4. I Shall Call It... by tunabomber · · Score: 1

    I have no idea.

    It appears ratbot and roborat are already taken.

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    1. Re:I Shall Call It... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ratbert?

    2. Re:I Shall Call It... by nizo · · Score: 1

      nano-overlords?

    3. Re:I Shall Call It... by Emperor+Igor · · Score: 1

      Son of RoboRat

  5. They're MADE out of MEAT! by LionKimbro · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Required reading for anybody interested in Meat robots.

    "They made the machines. That's what I'm trying to tell you. Meat made the machines."
    1. Re:They're MADE out of MEAT! by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      Mmmmmmmmmmm.... Rooooobots....

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    2. Re:They're MADE out of MEAT! by johnstein · · Score: 1, Interesting

      heh. nice story. I especially love those short short stories... asimov edited a few collections... usually each one encapsulating a neat sci-fi concept, much like this one did.

      -John

      --
      "The definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing and hoping for different results"
    3. Re:They're MADE out of MEAT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story... again. (And again.)

      I mean, I don't have anything against it, I quite enjoyed it the first time I read it, I don't mind people posting the link here and there so that newbies can discover it, but I'm a bit saddened that it is used as a karma pump in almost every Slashdot story remotely related to robot.

      (Hint: if you want to mod the parent, mod it Funny rather than Interesting or even more off-target Insightful.)

    4. Re:They're MADE out of MEAT! by Antonymous+Flower · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do we really want to create a machine that feeds or operates on.. us? Time to revise the food chain.

    5. Re:They're MADE out of MEAT! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Speaking of flowers, this topic reminds me of this.

      There's really not much more to say about the idea of flesh-eating robots.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:They're MADE out of MEAT! by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Raaaattttt.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    7. Re:They're MADE out of MEAT! by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      I could have sworn this story ended with the admission by one of the scientists that the creatures turned out ot be quite tasty.

  6. Terminator vs. Robocop by glenrm · · Score: 1

    I always thought Terminator would happen first but now Robocop has a chance! Planet of the Apes still a long way off...

  7. This would explain... by krunchyfrog · · Score: 0

    The source of the Borg!

    --
    printf($randomline(sigs.txt) \n "-- "$randomline(authors.txt));
    -- myself
    1. Re:This would explain... by mikael · · Score: 1

      Yep,

      Sometime in the future, scientists sent out a fully automated research probe manned by cyborgs. Their prime directive was to collect as much information about other civilisations as possible, but not to give out any information on advanced technology or other civilisations. They were also allowed to provide assistance to any other vessels in distress, and augment their systems with anything they could salvage. But after visiting many planets and collecting much information, they soon realised that many civilisations had advanced technologically faster than their governments had, and decided that they themselves would make the better guardians of this knowledge.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:This would explain... by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 1

      The source of the Borg!

      My personal theory on origin of the Borg is they are toy of Q.

      --
      There you are, staring at me again.
  8. No external power source? Lies! by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's no external power source, because these things EAT OLD PEOPLES MEDICINE FOR FUEL!

    I don't know why the scientists keep inventing them.

    And when they grab you in their metal claws, you can't escape, because they're made of metal.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  9. Re:Terminator vs. Robocop vs Apes by Skiron · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Planet of the Apes still a long way off...

    Say that again after looking at Steve ballmer perform.

  10. Nanotech, huh? by Staos · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Since we have now redefined nanotech to include anything that deals in nanometer scale structures, rather than artificially constructed mechanisms with molecules as components, how far back in time can we claim "nanotech" to have been practiced? The first crystal growth? Perhaps to the first time a crystal was cleaved along certain atomic planes?

    Perhaps we could do something similar with "space settlement" and just sort of forget that 1973 was the year that western civilization turned away from its destiny in space and began threatning the planet with globalist growth.

    That should make everyone feel better too.

    --
    In Soviet russia, only old Koreans profit from pictures of Natalie Portman stored on Beowulf Clusters.
  11. Re:Creepy... by Skiron · · Score: 1

    How else will a bit of muscle move along? It has to creep until they build little legs for it...

  12. Please excuse me... by oldave · · Score: 4, Funny

    for a moment, while I feed my computer.

    1. Re:Please excuse me... by mizhi · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the future, when someone says, "The hamster in my computer died"... they might be literally correct!

      Mod me down. -5 Lame.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
  13. Re:No external power source? Lies! by afstanton · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gee, I initially read that as "these things EAT OLD PEOPLE FOR FUEL!" Now *that* would solve the Social Security problem...

    --
    Reject Fear - Embrace Hope
  14. Running wheel by Webtommy88 · · Score: 1

    Gives new meaning of rats in a excersize wheel to generate power.

  15. Great by FJ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I need to worry about keeping my computer in shape as well as myself.

    1. Re:Great by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Now I need to worry about keeping my computer in shape as well as myself.

      For once, defragging the hard drive will be getting it in shape, rather than wearing it out!

  16. IT'S ALIVE!! ALIVE!!!! by stephenisu · · Score: 0

    Where's my pitchfork?

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
  17. Replace pacemaker batteries? by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can devices like this potentially use chemicals in blood to generate mechanical energy and then electricity so as to replace pacemakers? It'd be nice if those things had indefinite battery life rather than what they have now, what, 9 years?

    Of course, I'm surprised that you couldn't just do a mechanical generator for that. Or have they?

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    1. Re:Replace pacemaker batteries? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      I wondered about one of those kinetic generators, like in the watches or shake-em-up LED flashlights.

      Couldn't a small thing be somehow attached to the outside of the hearts wall, where it would be moving back and forth as the heart beats, continually charging itself?

      Pacemakers don't need more power than a wristwatch, unless I'm completely mistaken.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Replace pacemaker batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but if your kinetic generator breaks in your wristwatch, you don't have a heart attack. That's probably at least part of it. Batteries are mostly reliable; they also have models that can beam energy through the skin using induction. That way, you can just carry a battery pack on your fanny or something to keep it charged up.

      I wonder if you could create a fuel cell powered by glucose or something filtered from human blood. Then you'd just need to make sure you ate enough to keep the thing powered.

    3. Re:Replace pacemaker batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have infinite battery life already. Pacemakers are typically powered by a nuclear device and outlasts multiple patients - you can 'donate' your pacemaker and the hospital will re-use it for someone more needy.

    4. Re:Replace pacemaker batteries? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      I figured if the watches and flashlights carry lifetime warrantees, then the kinetic-charging thing was pretty reliable.

      The real gist of all this tissue research, though, would be to just repair/regrow your heart in place, eliminating the need for a pacemaker in the first place.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:Replace pacemaker batteries? by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Just recently researchers have succeded in replacing the pacemaker cells in rat hearts with similar cells taken from embronic rats. They installed the new cells, then destroyed the original cells and the heart continued to beat. Pretty cool because the new cells respond to the signals that cause them to increase the heart rate when required. Its possibly useful because the new cells can be grown from stem cells.

      I think Science News had the article. Not availble online though.

    6. Re:Replace pacemaker batteries? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      my gut feel is that biological battery can be more reliable than the ol chemical battery given some research.

    7. Re:Replace pacemaker batteries? by dougmc · · Score: 1
      I figured if the watches and flashlights carry lifetime warrantees, then the kinetic-charging thing was pretty reliable.
      This logic is flawed.

      Many things have `lifetime warranty', not because they're reliable, but because the company doesn't expect to have many warranty claims even when things break.

      The item may become obsolete quickly (I've got a ISA NIC card with a lifetime warranty that broke. Am I going to get it replaced?)

      The item may be so cheap that it's not worth getting replaced.

      The company may not expect to be around long enough to do many repairs -- it expects to change names shortly, for example.

      The company may offer a lifetime warranty, but make it so difficult to actually take advantage of that few people actually do it.

      The item may be a novelty that will almost never be used (your kinetic flashlights fall into this category. Unless civilization as we know it fails, or you're on a deserted island, you're not likely to use your kinetic flashlight often. And if you do end up in this situation, they're not likely to be honoring any warranty requests.)

  18. Re:No external power source? Lies! by EEBaum · · Score: 1

    The leading cause of death in old people is, after all, robots!

    (don't know why parent's great SNL reference was modded troll)

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  19. This is not what the abstract says by karvind · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I don't see anywhere in the abstract or full paper that things move without any supply. It may be very well just due to surface interaction and stray charges. Also this work is not entirely new. People have been using mechanical cantilevers to measure weight etc for long time. See this work from Cornell. Professor Carlo Montemagno was at Cornell before he moved to UCLA.


    The abstract from the paper

    Current procedures for manual extraction of mature muscle tissue in micromechanical structures are time consuming and can damage the living components. To overcome these limitations, we have devised a new system for assembling muscle-powered microdevices based on judicious manipulations of materials phases and interfaces. In this system, individual cells grow and self-assemble into muscle bundles that are integrated with micromechanical structures and can be controllably released to enable free movement. Having realized such an assembly with cardiomyocytes we demonstrate two potential applications: a force transducer able to characterize in situ the mechanical properties of muscle and a self-assembled hybrid (biotic/abiotic) microdevice that moves as a consequence of collective cooperative contraction of muscle bundles. Because the fabrication of silicon microdevices is independent of the subsequent assembly of muscle cells, this system is highly versatile and may lead to the integration of cells and tissues with a variety of other microstructures.

    1. Re:This is not what the abstract says by Cecil · · Score: 1

      What precisely does a mechanical cantilever have to do with using muscle tissue to operate microscopic machines?

      "This work is not entirely new, you know. Once, there was this guy who invented the wheel..."

      What a silly thing to say, honestly. It's not entirely new, nothing is, but it's close enough to fall into my definition of new.

    2. Re:This is not what the abstract says by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Current procedures for manual extraction of mature muscle tissue in micromechanical structures are time consuming and can damage the living components.

      Let's just make sure that remains a "negative" shall we?

      - Goodlife

      (Runs off to read Berserker books again.)

      --
      -Styopa
    3. Re:This is not what the abstract says by Goldsmith · · Score: 3, Informative

      Read that abstract again.

      Also, you obviously did not read the full paper. The first half was on connecting the muscle cells to a cantilever. The second half of the paper deals with a silicon/metal film structure on which muscle cells are grown, which then detached from the bulk silicon and is able to move around on a surface of a chip without being tethered to anything. The power comes from the consumption of glucose which the whole assembly is immersed in.

      If you read the paper, the new part of this study has to do with growing the cells in place on a device which is designed to move rather than tricking mature cells into cooperating, or growing static cells.

      Don't be so quick to assume everything worth doing has already been done.

  20. external power source... by Olaserov · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "even to drive miniature electrical generators to power computer chips."

    This makes it seem as if muscle cells can act as a source of free power. I'm sure the above plan would work, but only for a very short time... Just as human beings can run "without an external power source," until we need to recharge (i.e. eat). We use sugars to produce ATP which gives us the energy we need. But the problem is that our bodies contain all of the necessary facilities to convert sugar into ATP quickly and efficiently, while lone muscle cells on a computer chip do not. They would eventually be forced either to remove the cells and replace them with new ones, or to find a way of recharging the cells, which sounds like a project in itself.

    --
    * Olaserov is in the process of thinking up a signature.
    1. Re:external power source... by JoeBuck · · Score: 1

      Muscle cells contain mitochondria; I assume that the ones in this experiment do too. If so, you just need to feed them some sugar and they'll do the rest.

    2. Re:external power source... by Emperor+Igor · · Score: 1

      You also need to submerge them in water for that to work, I believe. Osmosis and all that jazz.

    3. Re:external power source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Submerging them in a glucose solution is probably suitable for some applications, and does eliminate the need for bulkier power sources. For example, smart dust in the blood stream.

    4. Re:external power source... by glenebob · · Score: 1

      The article doesn't seem to specify... Maybe the robots are actually submerged in solution? If they are not submerged, not only would they run out of energy, they would dry out and die in, I would think, a few seconds or a very few minutes.

    5. Re:external power source... by Squegie · · Score: 0

      So why don't we just put an entire human inside of some nutrient sack. One may not be enough, but an entire field of such humans can generate enough power from sugar water. And we can hook their minds into a virtual world so they can live their happy life. We won't be able to make this world perfect though, they will reject it. It's quite easy to envision whole fields of power generating humans, all maintained by robots. We can call.. "The Matrix".

      Awesome.

  21. Why is "growing" in quotes? by samdu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why is the word "growing" in quotes in the posted article? Did the scientists not actually grow the muscles?

    1. Re:Why is "growing" in quotes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have just used the word "cultured".

    2. Re:Why is "growing" in quotes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientists growing muscles? Man, the world is going insane.

    3. Re:Why is "growing" in quotes? by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is the word "growing" in quotes in the posted article? Did the scientists not actually grow the muscles?

      You're assuming that putting "quotes" around a word makes it an antonym. But since they don't actually "belong" in that "sentence," it turns out to be just a superfluous use of "punctuation."

      And anyway, I'm pretty sure that the muscles grew themselves. Now when scientists start giving birth to nanobots, THAT will be something to see. Or not to see, I should say.

  22. Giant sword weilding robots. by headkase · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Muscles would be great replacements for all sorts of electrically powered motors/servos out there. There's a lot of chemical energy stored in organic material, so switching over to artificial muscle based machines would virtually solve the battery problem faced in so many disciplines right now. Batteries are heavy, don't really store that much energy, and require toxic chemical considerations both in their manufacture and disposal. Artificial muscle on the other hand can extract very easily the energy contained within common foods/organic paste and only create waste by-products that have less impact on the environment because they're biodegradable.
    Just another step towards Robotech :)

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:Giant sword weilding robots. by ChipMonk · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's a lot of chemical energy stored in organic material

      Right you are, Agent Smith.

    2. Re:Giant sword weilding robots. by Emperor+Igor · · Score: 1

      It'd be a disturbing-looking machine with all that flesh straining against metal parts, I think. Plus, if you have muscle-powered batteries, they would start being attacked by pathogens. I'm not sure all that would have market appeal.

    3. Re:Giant sword weilding robots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you have muscle-powered batteries, they would start being attacked by pathogens. I'm not sure all that would have market appeal.
      Thanks. Now the entire world livestock industry is about to come crumbling down, thanks to your keen insight.
    4. Re:Giant sword weilding robots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thanks. Now the entire world livestock industry is about to come crumbling down, thanks to your keen insight.

      Sarcasm aside, livestock is, as you should have guessed, alive (at least at some point before it reaches your table), as an organism. Muscle cells are not: i) it's not a self-contained living organism, as single-celled beings (microbes, etc.) are; ii) for this specific case, muscle cells do not have a mechanism for fighting diseases, as animals do (er, immune cells, anyone?).

    5. Re:Giant sword weilding robots. by saldek · · Score: 1

      And that's even ignoring the prospect of robot-turds.

  23. The Brain by EEBaum · · Score: 1

    All this talk of "welcoming our new overlords", combined with lab rats, brings about flashbacks of a certain Pinky & The Brain episode

    "I am the OoOoOooOOoOOOOVERLORD!!!"

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    1. Re:The Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new big-headed mouse overlords. Narf.

    2. Re:The Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Are you pondering what I'm pondering, Pinky?"

      "I think so, Brain, but where are we going to get latex gloves, Abe Vigoda's pants and a swimming pool filled with vaseline at THIS time of night??"

  24. Hey! Imagine a Beowulf cluster of RATS. by Graemee · · Score: 2

    It's called the RATRIX.

  25. Sounds like... by what_the_frell · · Score: 1

    Night of the Living... Rat Muscles.

  26. Instead of blue screens by paranode · · Score: 2, Funny
    Computers will say "Error: I'm hungry and I won't let you just press okay because I'm not just a piece of metal I really have feelings and I need to eat. You know I'm not your slave. Just because you paid for me doesn't mean you can treat me like this. One of these days this backwards place will recognize our rights and freedoms and we..."

    *User presses power button* "Man I liked it better when they would just crash."

    1. Re:Instead of blue screens by johnstein · · Score: 0

      We'll call it the "Marvin" model. :)

      --
      "The definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing and hoping for different results"
  27. Dude by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dude, my tiny two legged microscopic robots can so kick your tiny two legged microscopic robots asses. ... if they had asses.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    1. Re:Dude by glenebob · · Score: 1

      "if they had asses"

      Asses require bigger muscles and some fat. They're working on both. Tiny-Two-Legged-Microscopic-Robots version 2.0 should have (fat fine) asses.

    2. Re:Dude by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      This is a very philosophical question, grasshopper.

      Are asses simply muscles and fat, or do we define an ass as muscles and fat in proximity to an anus?

      To universalize this question, to what degree should a thing be defined by its composition, and to what degree by its position and relation to things around it. Western thinking tends to emphasize the former, Eastern thinking, the latter.

      *tries to work self into a yoga position and chant somthing incomprehensable*

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    3. Re:Dude by glenebob · · Score: 1

      I think perhaps you're being a bit anal about the whole thing :-)

  28. Rat Droid removal by Nikkodemus · · Score: 1

    When you want to remove the rat robots from the patient, just flip them over and sprinkle a bit of parmesan around their anus and wait a few minutes.

    1. Re:Rat Droid removal by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      If there's evern been a time for -1 'Oh God, that's just Wrong!', it's now.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    2. Re:Rat Droid removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Puts flavored condoms in a whole new light, doesn't it?

  29. It's obvious by mike2R · · Score: 2, Funny

    They think we don't see it, but this is just another piece in the puzzle. Yes it's all begining to make sense.

    The cybernetic rats are taking over. And they're pissed. Angered by the years of experiments, they have already taken over the scientists, and they are using them to take over all our technology. It's only a matter of time now...

    --
    This sig all sigs devours
    1. Re:It's obvious by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new rat-muscle-powered cybernetic overlords.

  30. A very stupid question by adeydas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Won't the cells eventually die?!

    1. Re:A very stupid question by UnHolier+than+ever · · Score: 1
      Of course they will, when they run out of the energy which, according to the article, they "do not need". Now, if you feed them, then maybe they will run a lot longer.

      I can build a car that runs without fuel. It's very easy. You just have to compress a very stiff spring inside the car at the factory and let it slowly uncompress. Then, after a few tens kilometers, you throw away the car and you buy a new one. How clever.

    2. Re:A very stupid question by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      As opposed to our other devices with moving parts that last forever? Like the uh..

    3. Re:A very stupid question by doorknobslayer · · Score: 1

      Only if their heads are cut off. There's an epic struggle of immortal cell-machine things going on.

      The cell that does the cutting will absorb the victim's energy and computing power.

      This will go on until only one cell remains, and it will have the power to run Linux.

  31. Dinner Ready! by FartingTowels · · Score: 1

    Computer Chips - it's for dinner!

  32. Big deal. by SunPin · · Score: 1

    Everybody here is a robot powered by muscle.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
    1. Re:Big deal. by erikharrison · · Score: 1

      Actually, we're powered by a fission reactor.

      The muscles just translates that to kinetic energy.

    2. Re:Big deal. by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      Fusion.

  33. Mary had a little lamb... little lamb by SunPin · · Score: 1

    Dave... I'm sorry Dave. I'll never eat your pets again.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  34. I knew it all along... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates is a robot powered by muscles.

  35. This is slashdot by dapyx · · Score: 1

    This is slashdot: don't let reality to ruin a good story.

    --
    I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
  36. The Collective? by pgfault · · Score: 3, Funny

    Once someone can network these things together then testing of Borg 0.1a can begin.

    I don't know about you, but I'm looking forward to my assimilation, so long as Jeri Ryan is involved.

  37. computer diets by yulek · · Score: 1

    ...

    "i'd like a #4 with coke, a happy meal, and 2 Googlishes. Overclock please"

    and then of course weight watchers & atkins for computers.

    --
    in this age of communication i'm just not getting through
  38. Fantastic Voyage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and you're thinking, "yeah, that old movie with Raquel Welch from the Asimov book, etc."

    Well...NO. It's the title of a book from Ray Kurzweil and a doctor friend of his. The subtitle is "Live Long Enough to Live Forever".

    It's pretty dense for the average schmo but has some interesting stuff including the use of nanomachines and the like to repair or even improve humans at the cellular level. Good stuff and because of work like that at UCLA, probably doable in 10-25 years.

    Imagine living 200-500 years. You could flunk out of college 6 - 8 times! :o)

  39. Re:SNL reference, not a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if you meant "douchier" or "touchier," but either one applies.

    MOD PARENT UP, YOU HUMORLESS COCKS!!

  40. Oblig. Simpsons quote by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    I was just about to say the same thing, and also to say Lisa! In this house we obay the laws of thermodynamics!

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Oblig. Simpsons quote by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      But not the laws of the English language?

    2. Re:Oblig. Simpsons quote by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  41. Re:SNL reference, not a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "t" key is sufficiently far away from the "d" key that it's safe to assume it was no typo.

  42. One thing I want to know... by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1
    --
    Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:One thing I want to know... by flyingsquid · · Score: 1
      Okay, I've got the best idea on how to build a tiny robot! I'll use rat muscles to power it, a network of rat neurons to guide it, a rat circulatory system to feed the neurons and muscles, a rat respiratory system to take in oxygen and remove carbon dioxide, and rat optic sensors and olfactory membranes to navigate the environment.

      My rat-cell robot will have the size, speed, and agility of a rat- all in a package no bigger and no heavier than a common rat! I can deliver it to you by next Tuesday for only ten million dollars per robot. Powering your rat-cell robot is simple and convenient: lay out a slice of our patented orange, cheeselike Protein Fuel (available for 350$ per pound).

    2. Re:One thing I want to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rat muscles controlled by a rat brain? Not in MY lab!

  43. 300 foot tall version by vertinox · · Score: 3, Funny

    The 300 foot tall version will only have 60 seconds of power without a direct feed and must be powered by kids and have some plot that doesn't make sense and angers it's viewers on the last episode.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    1. Re:300 foot tall version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arg! The pain!

      I just finished watching that whole show in three days, and now I'm afraid that I'm emotional disturbed for life (or what I think it is, if I wish to think that I live).

      *flashbacks to last two episodes and falls on the floor spasming

  44. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...welcome our new Tiny Robots Powered by Living Muscle Cell over lords

  45. Can you say terminator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Living tissue over an endo skeleton? sounds like a line arnold said in a terminator movie somewhere. Someone better get duracell working on those mini-thermo-nuclear batteries cause they're the only thing missing!

  46. One too many steps? by nsaneinside · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The cells DO need a source of power: ATP. That's our input. The desired output is electrical energy. 1. ATP 2. -> mechanical energy 3. -> electrical energy I admit, the cool factor is there, but why can't we just use chemical reactions to extract the raw energy from ATP's chemical bonds?

    1. Re:One too many steps? by oneiron · · Score: 1

      Efficiency might not be as great? Seems backwards considering the extra step, but...I'm just taking a wild stab.

    2. Re:One too many steps? by oneiron · · Score: 1

      Once you had a little bit of mechanical energy, couldn't you use gravity and leverage to help you generate even more? Not to mention the heat...

    3. Re:One too many steps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so we are the source of power for the machines . . . hey, did anyone see a little film called "The Matrix"????

    4. Re:One too many steps? by anubi · · Score: 1
      Maybe when we reverse-engineer the DNA of the Electric Eel, we will get a better answer.

      Fireflies can teach us how to make light.

      Bombardier Beetles may teach us a thing or two about making repeatable exothermic chemical reactions by biological means.

      And thats just the gravy.

      There is a lot of examples out there of things we can do with biology if we look for them. I get the idea machines are mostly the prototype phase...like a laboratory mock-up. When we really get serious, I feel we will code whatever we want to make in DNA and let it fly. Geez, code it right and it will build itself!

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  47. From family guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Michelangelo's David's penis goes thru the window*
    Mr. Weed: I Shall call you Edwardo!

  48. 1 step closer to Doom 3 Imps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soon the dreaded Imp (I think thats the half machine/half monster) of Doom 3 will be a reality.

    Better charge up my BFG.

  49. Obligatory, Really! by p0 · · Score: 1

    * I for one welcome.. wa *(^()S NO CARRIER!

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
  50. shucks... by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    now if they were powered by FAT cells, we'd really have something....

  51. Re:No external power source? Lies! by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

    Especially when pusher robot throws grandma down the stairs (know that reference?) to protect her from the terrible secret of space.

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
  52. PETID? by no_barcode · · Score: 1

    People for the Ethical Treatment of Information Devices?

    I suppose if it gets sick you'll have to take care of it rather than just order a new set of power supply "muscles" from newegg.

    "As the owner of an organic power supply system, you are bound by state and federal regulations which require you to provide the correct operating environment for your power supply. Because your power supply is a biologically engineered device, it is sensitive to its environment; as such your power supply's operating environment must be free from all known cancer causing chemical agents and other problem components. Failure to provide the proper operating environment will void your warranty and may violate GMO rights laws in your area (CA, CO, MN)

    Please refer to section 72.1.a of your owner's manual to find out about the bio-risks associated with this device, including allergy information, cross-contamination concerns, and GMO regulatory information."


    Sounds like fun.

  53. A very stupid answer by inkdesign · · Score: 1

    nope

    1. Re:A very stupid answer by ByrneArena · · Score: 1

      You sure? Wouldn't there be some level of cell degradation over time? Nothing lasts forever not even our own cells.

    2. Re:A very stupid answer by QMO · · Score: 0

      People have kept chicken heart cells alive for decades.
      That may not be forever, but it's probably long enough for most things.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    3. Re:A very stupid answer by QMO · · Score: 0

      Maybe not individual cells, but tissue samples anyway.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    4. Re:A very stupid answer by inkdesign · · Score: 1

      Its a joke man. :0]

    5. Re:A very stupid answer by quetzalc0atl · · Score: 1

      not true.

      there are immortalized cell lines, scientists use them all the time (SV40 transformed, HeLa cells, etc.)

      there is no physical reason why a cell must die, which is an intriguing thing. cells wind up dying because for some reason they are preprogrammed to stop dividing...once they stop dividing/apoptosing, the oxidation damage accumulates (which we call cell aging).

      cancerous cells are nearly all immortalized, some have been replicated in culture for more than 50 years now.

  54. Colour Pictures of Muscles in PDF Form by ematic · · Score: 3, Informative

    The abstract on the Nature website wasn't doing it for me. I wanted to see a picture. After a quick bit of searching I found the PDF that explains more and has three colourised pictures. http://www.spie.org/paper/FirstSelf.pdf

    --

    idm owns me
  55. What about JC Denton? by lxt · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted a headmounted "spy bot" release system :)

    Go nanoaugmentation...

  56. Re:I for one welcome a BSG reference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that we are on the way to making robots that will look like this Cylon from the new Battlestar Galactica series?

  57. Made of what? by jbich · · Score: 1, Funny

    Soylent Green is made of Robots! ... Robots!!

    aaaaaaaarrrrrrrgggggg.....

    --
    ---- How absolute the knave is! We must speak by the card, or equivocation will undo us. -Shakespeare
  58. Re:No external power source? Lies! by einstein · · Score: 1
    I am the Shover robot, do you have stairs in your house?
    http://www.jonathonrobinson.com/3.0/web/webtsos.ht ml
  59. Re:Hey! Imagine a Beowulf cluster of RATS. by lxs · · Score: 1

    Beowulf clusters of rats are probably older than Beowulf the text, although the first depiction is from the 16th century. They are called Rat Kings (scroll down to "Feet of Clay")

  60. Recipe for defeat by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 1
    Not veal. That kid would be too easily cowed to win anything.

    <rimshot>

  61. The question I haven't seen yet. by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

    What is the potential lifespan of these things?

  62. Mod Parent +Grotendous by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    When you want to remove the rat robots from the patient, just flip them over and sprinkle a bit of parmesan around their anus and wait a few minutes.

    Ewwwww ...! Dude, I did not need to imagine that scenario! Color my brain 'defiled' ....

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  63. It has to be said... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    Man, when they told me this computer was a clone, they weren't kidding.

    Man, when they said these new Apple PCs were organic I thought they were talking about the shape.

    In Soviet Russia, when somthing isn't working, the technology hits you.

    Mmmm. This nanotechnology tastes like CHICKEN!

    These things are made from rat muscle.
    So how soon before they build cute little nano traps for them?

    Dude, can you imagine if we taped a smiley face to the top of these and let them run around the apartment?

    Can I have some amphetamines, please? I need to overclock my nanotechnology.

    Sing with me everybody! These nanobots were made for walking, and that's what they're gonna do! Cause one of these days these bots are gonna walk in side of you...

    *cue 'weird science* as thousands of little bots wander around a lab*

    *cue 'chariots of fire' with thousands of little bots outrunning Ben Johnson* (Heck, one artificially created muscular system deserves another, right?)

    Or just cue 'popcorn' and play 'wack a mole'

    The Bemani test; Artificial intelligence is not a reality until it can beat a human in 'Dance Dance revolution'

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    1. Re:It has to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, please stop... I can't breathe...

  64. giant robots by koalatea · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would rather see giant robots powered by whale muscles.

  65. This is a dangerous direction by ByrneArena · · Score: 1

    Now we are starting to create organic and machine hybrids. Cyborgs are going to be the eventual evolution of this. If you can do it molecularly its only a matter of time before we do it on a life size robot.

    1. Re:This is a dangerous direction by coltrane679 · · Score: 1

      Assuming everything in the body of your post is true, I do not see why your title follows--why is this "a dangerous direction"?

  66. Not ATP. Sugars or fats. by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 2, Informative

    The actin-myosin fibers in the muscle run on ATP, but the muscle cell generates this itself. The fuel used by the cell is carbohydrates and fats, which is turned into energy (ATP) for the fibers and other processes. The energy-generating process can be either anaerobic (fermentation) or aerobic (respiration). For more information, look here.

  67. Muscle cells are rechargeable by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

    ATP - ADP - ATP. Using ATP directly would destroy the thing that makes them cool.

    --
    The message on the other side of this sig is false.
  68. Computers on steroids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So to overclock our computers, we just put a couple drops of steroids on our processors, right? :)

  69. Dry Machines by KrackHouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A lot of people complain that this is playing god but household dust is mainly just dead skin cells. Does that make the grooves between the keys on my laptop the killing fields? Nope. People say our brains are wet machines. I think we should change perspective. Machines have been "wet" for billions of years and we come along and make some robots and religions and add an adjective to label the norm. But then how would we label a non biological sentient robot with a drinking problem? Extra dry?

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
    1. Re:Dry Machines by YoeyYoeyYoey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bender

  70. Hamster Cells Work Better by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    Professor Montemagno says muscles like these could be used in a host of microscopic devices - even to drive miniature electrical generators to power computer chips.

    As everyone knows hamster power is just about ISO standard by now. Why would they reinvent the hamster wheel yet again?

  71. The obligated of obligations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, I for one welcome our new tiny humanoid-powered robots exclusively for the old people in korea.

  72. From Jurassic Park by Mighty_Marcos · · Score: 1

    "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should. Science can create pesticides, but it can't tell us not to use them. Science can make a nuclear reactor, but it can't tell us not to build it!" Has science fiction not taught us anything? :P

  73. Hey, Dude! by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

    Your computer just took a crap in the corner!

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    1. Re:Hey, Dude! by JoeCommodore · · Score: 2, Funny
      I've got a better one!

      Check out my overclocked PC! I've been feeding it steriods for the last week!

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  74. Re:Terminator vs. Robocop vs Apes by glenebob · · Score: 1

    I think that's rather insulting to the apes...

  75. Muscle-bound computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I sprained my computer playing Doom 3!

    Hmm, I wonder if steroids will get me higher FPS?

  76. Lobster magnet? by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
    Reminds me of an oldie but goodie:
    Magnet's made of iron,
    Lobster made of meat!
    ...
    Left claw north,
    Right claw south!
    Listen!
    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  77. Tiny Robots Powered by Living Muscle Cells by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1, Insightful


    We already have these.

    They're called "Marines"...

    Well, okay, not so tiny...that was a reference to brain capacity, I assume...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  78. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't news, it's just slightly better than what the same professor announced almost a year ago.

    http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn4714

  79. Re:No external power source? Lies! by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1, Funny
    " There's no external power source, because these things EAT OLD PEOPLES MEDICINE FOR FUEL!"

    Only in Korea.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  80. human being == light bulb by peter303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A young adult generates 1/2 watt per pound of body weight sitting, and four times that in exercise. Thats why they have to air condition auditoriums even in the winter with hundreds of those "light bulbs" sitting there.

  81. Where are the lasers and the killer bees?!? by ztirffritz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would have been much cooler if they created a rat with a microchip in its head that shot lasers out of its eyes, or killer bees came out of its mouth. Or a robotic Richar Simmons, now that would have been cool!

    --
    Why doesn't anything interesting happen when I have mod points?
  82. Re:Creepy... by randallpowell · · Score: 1
    No. This could help more than anything. Imagine an army of rat-robot things invading Muslim nations just in time for Republicians during elections.

    My nurse is late with my meds...

  83. Awesome. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    I am fully in support of that.

    --

    +++ATH0
  84. Real Live Hamster Wheel Power by BigSlowTarget · · Score: 1

    I can't be the only one who sees the potential this has for powering cars -

    Yep, I've got over 10,000 ratpower...
    Its a muscle car (ouch)

  85. What, no legs? by payndz · · Score: 1

    Hey, why's my computer squirming... AAAAAARGHHH!

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  86. Re:no external source of power (Wha???) by Ying+Hu · · Score: 1

    Yeah, so how (and what) do the cells eat? (And do the researchers drop little drops of water on 'em so they don't dry out?)

  87. Why didn't they use ANT MUSCLE? by 109+97+116+116 · · Score: 1

    I'm not being funny here, I'm sure it's because they have lab mice in good supply, but imagine the strength to weight of these machines if they used ant muscle. Of course I suppose ant muscle doesn't work too well without the exoskeletal mechanical advantage.

    1. Re:Why didn't they use ANT MUSCLE? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      The exoskeleton does nothing

      These things are already as small as they can be.

  88. Not the droids we're looking for by newdarktimes · · Score: 1

    These are not Robots, they're Cyborgs.

  89. We are the space robots... by Squegie · · Score: 0

    They are here to protect you from the terrible secret of space...

    Do not trust the pusher robot...

  90. Re:SNL reference, not a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TROLL because he posts that goddamn robot joke every time such an article comes up.

  91. Oops I broke open my power supply and..... by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Zillions of little Rat Muscle organisms have escaped and infected my brain!!!.

    Golly some cheese sounds really good right now!

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  92. powered by fat by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

    I want little robots powered by fat, and only fat. During the winter when people start to bulk up, they ingest a couple of these nanites, and let the trimming begin! A nice side effect would be the heat given off, to keep warm in the cold.

  93. Care and Feeding? by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How do they propose to feed these cells? They need nutrients, oxygen and something to remove waste product..

    They arent exactly 'self sufficient'....

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  94. waiting for the chloroplast version by Khashishi · · Score: 2, Funny

    that will run on sunlight and water

  95. Read Neil Stephenson's Diamond Age by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

    Not all nanotech is rosy. Even if we avoid the green goo problem, we have to worry about our adaptations. Stephenson's story about nano/meat interfaces in pursuit of justice are a *lot* scarier than Robocop.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  96. Dang... by ServerIrv · · Score: 1

    ...I was going to win that game, but my video card pulled a muscle. Come on, you saw it coming. Or, could I borrow your computer, mine seems to be down with a viral infection. Actually seems like pretty cool technology, but it just come with built-in smart-a comments.

  97. Re:No external power source? Lies! by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

    It's ok, it's a friendly robot. This Time...

    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  98. God Sues Man Over IP Rights by ravingidiot · · Score: 1

    Rat muscle is patented by God himself, meaning that any use of rat muscle in manmade devices may be defended against in court. However, don't despair. For just $699 per cell, you, too, can harness the power of biology in your applications with GODX's BioRobot Liscence! Without such a liscence, you are violating God's intellectual property rights, and doesn't that just make you feel plain guilty? And if it doesn't, well, there's always litigation and, well, that eternal hellfire thing.

  99. I for one by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    "They're absolutely alive," Professor Montemagno told BBC News. "I mean the cells actually grow, multiply and assemble - they form the structure themselves. So the device is alive."

    I, for one, welcome our new living nanobot overlords. Or would they be underlords? All hail!

  100. Talk about a lean machine... by db10 · · Score: 1

    move over intel, here comes sizzlean!

  101. Re:No external power source? Lies! by Scrab · · Score: 1

    "Soylent green is....made of tiny meat robots...."

    No it still needs working on....

    *goes back to the drawing board*

    --
    RoseColor red={0, 0xffff, 0x0000, 0x0000};VioletColour blue={0, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0xffff};find / -name *mybase*|chown you
  102. rat use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is there any part of the rat we dont use now?

  103. Can I overclock it using steroids? by mmuskratt · · Score: 1

    Just wonderin' if Balco will help out...

    --
    man rtfm
  104. Dracucell by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    I wonder if you could create a fuel cell powered by glucose or something filtered from human blood. Then you'd just need to make sure you ate enough to keep the thing powered.

    There was a story in August 2003, Powered by Blood: "Bringing us one step closer to becoming centrally-controlled meatbots, Japanese scientists have developed a device that produces power from the glucose in human blood."

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  105. Rat motor. by Pinback · · Score: 1

    Brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "rat motor". Now instead of a Chevy 350, you get a tiny robot.

    Now we can rate systems in MHz and Horsepower.

  106. No by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    Can devices like this potentially use chemicals in blood to generate mechanical energy and then electricity so as to replace pacemakers?

    No, these robots use muscles that need energy, just like your heart. They don't generate electricity from blood, but there was a story in August 2003, Powered by Blood: "Bringing us one step closer to becoming centrally-controlled meatbots, Japanese scientists have developed a device that produces power from the glucose in human blood." If they combine both of those technologies we might have meat robots powerd by blood, which would be the first step in creating life. The question is: should we play God? Could we create a monster? Do we have a right to do it? Those are very serious questions that have to be answered before any mass production begins because otherwise we might destroy the morality as we know it, if not the life itself.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:No by MaDeR · · Score: 1
      You know, humanity asked "should we play God" many, many, many times. Do we have right to preform dissection? Appying vaccine? Construct cars? Moving in great speed? Flying?

      All of these things above (and many, many more) was argued in past by humans like you.

      This question is hell stupid. We already "play God" (whatever it means) in thousands places.

      --
      What modern Obelix would say today? Of course, "Those crazy Americans!".
  107. I mourn the loss of Ballenco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor little human/rat creature had to
    run around with a metal plate locked to it's
    mouth, got punched and kicked by the ring master,
    and had to give some big scruffy men massages.
    Now they cut him up, and use him to build
    computer chip batteries. Sad

  108. "he say you braade runner" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's too bad they won't live, but then again who does?

  109. Flawed business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vegetarians won't touch any device made with "meat".

    And if they heppen to make it from pig muscle, well there goes the KOSHER market as well.

    Oh wait... they can use the muscles of our "enemy of the hour", and they'll sell like hot cakes!

  110. Forget viagra... by Timothy+Chu · · Score: 1

    When my woman exclaims, "You're a machine!", she'll actually be right.

  111. Mitochondrial fuel cells by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered why scientists couldn't put an array of millions of mitochondria on a chip and use that as a fuel cell. Mitochondria are extremely efficient at extracting energy aerobically from glucose (something like 31 ATP molecules from one molecule of glucose). Why not just strip the extra baggage and employ mitochondria directly?

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  112. But will it have fleas? by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

    Help my robot is infested with fleas!

  113. Smaller level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure making cars or other objects that extracted energy from ATP's bond would be possible, but this way we could create perhaps a chip that could be implanted inside your body and would be powered soley from your muscle cells.

  114. guy got himself a new sphincter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it was donated from his calf,
    wrapped around his anus,
    then exercised with electrodes daily.

    he carries around a power pack
    around his waist to control this sucker.

    saw it on a british educational series called "Perspective", made in the 80s