Since Sweden and the US doesn't change at the same dates (maybe also hours?) It mess up for me anywat because things happening at 20:00 CET suddenly happen at 19:00 CET for instance since its American time.
Well it's sure as fuck easier to just change the time for work than to change the middle of night and day (especially when the time of the day changes with them.)
Go with DST and the system no longer make any sense.
Just start everything one hour earlier if you want too. Make sense since people doesn't sleep 20-04 as is.
But could we please also switch to 10 hours and 100 minutes? Counting hours at 24 hour clocks is some sort of work. Because of analog clocks I guess. 7-4 is simpler than 17-9.
I don't know how it works there or for you but here in Sweden the party need 4+% of the votes and the lock the lists so really the only thing you CAN do is vote for THEM.
Also we have a minority government. The EU is even worse. We have no clue there. Plus it's not all that democratic in the first place.
Sweden is a democrature but democracy risk just being socialism and lack of freedom anyway. That suck. It's shit regardless.
As for time if I could had mine be 24 / 10 hours per day and then just be awake whenever the fuck I wanted that would be nice.
the camera sensor work with light and since a paler skin reflect more light than a darker one the signal to noise ratio increase and more features will be visible and hence the program can do more of it's magic.
Assuming you don't measure the whole scene and use the same exposure you could expose the image for longer (and get something more blurry due to movement) or raise the gain (and gain more noise) but the simple technological fact is that the darker skin will never be as easy to capture as the brighter one. Eventually both may still be good enough but that's the fact.
As for whatever the algorithms somehow are worse for darker people I don't know. But to conclude that from a poorer result on them isn't evidence by itself, especially since there's a totally believable reason and prediction for why this would be the case.
Similarly for women due to makeup their and hair work their appearance may change more plus also be harder to process both naturally and because they blend their skin to a smoother tone using make-up. Camouflage and disguise if you so want.
Put a brown bag on your face and see how discriminating the algorithm become.. Then it won't have a clue!!
That you shouldn't choose the best person for the job sound like something the worst people would say.... as for not being able to figure out whom is the best; sure.
But to claim that the best can't be creative and that you're better of with people who are subjectively worse at the task?..
I mean the company which do a lot of massive box of plastic Kickstarter projects. Zombicide and such. I haven't really been into the game for ~three years or so so maybe I thought about the wrong name then.
As a Swede and thinking about vikings but also our technologically good current military ships even though we kinda make none I kinda wanted to say they could order them from us / let us build them, and then suggest they could take some kebabs in return.
However now I see the "the ship doesn't even float right" and we've had that problem too, sadly: https://www.vasamuseet.se/en
AFAIU both were exploitable through java-script too. It's all about timing I suppose.
In the case of Chrome though I assume Google may have put in their retpoline solution and hence if you tried even on a non-patched hardware system I assume it will no longer work.
As long as the cost of transfer cost (including spread and fees to get them in thr first place and then get another more usable currency again) more and isn't faster than PayPal then it doesn't provide any additional value except possibly for illegal trades but since those are in the blockchain too it's not all that useful their either.
Also other coins may do what bitcoin does better. With an unstable valuation people may not want to have them though.
"Low-quality, extremist, sensationalist and conspiratorial news"
Except nothing of that is fake. "Fake" clearly is new-speak for "stuff we don't agree with", just as their definition of democracy isn't freedom of thought, speak, information, raising opinion and voting but rather what they consider the best for the collective/society and their "freedom" is what they grant you and their "equality" is "discrimination for the sake of enabling equal outcome."
I've kinda wondered whatever the first "alternative facts" were actually straight up lies of what Trump thought was also facts / equally valuable beliefs but for an alternative conclusion / pointing in the other direction.
The sad part is of course that so many will believe that fake actually mean fake and that fake news are lies just as they believe immigrants, children and people of their nationality actually mean refugees, children and people of their nationality rather than whatever immigrant / person on their soil, human claiming to be a child and (at-least this one is less of a lie) people whom actually have some "been living in that country" connection at-least.
The only fake here is calling those things fake because the ideologists at Oxford doesn't like the opinions expressed of those people.
Low quality - Possible. But it exist because the other media doesn't cover it. It's alternative additional information not necessarily a replacement. Also shouldn't you consider main-stream media low quality too when it also doesn't cover everything and leave this gap in the information and coverage it provides?
Extremist - Things which they consider far from their own ideas. Boho... Meaningless shaming of other people and their ideas.
Sensationalist - All media are guilty. And it become a big deal I guess because it's new information not found in their stupid lying press.
Conspiratorial - This one I actually do consider a problem. Just because it's not the widely believed story though doesn't necessarily make it false. Though it may definitely be.
There was a new block-chained based start-up which seemed nice.
The game transactions is stored in the block-chain so you can sell your game, however my impression of "selling your game" there is that there was no secondary discounted games market but rather your game is just sold at the full cost so you aren't competing with new sales for what is identical title/thing and as such the developers / publishers may be totally fine with that sale. The seller would just get if it was like 20% or so of the new price which may suck relative console games sales but if it's relative full price on Steam with sales and bundles sometimes then it's acceptable and while the publisher would lose some of the profit there the share to their own store was much lower than Valve I think it was like 10% on new sales and 5% on the used sales and as such the publishers / developers would still get a larger share of the money than on Steam if Steam take 30% no matter what.
Some something like: New sale: * 10% to sales platform * 90% to publisher
Used sale: * 5% to sales platform * 20% to former owner * 75% to publisher
Valve: * 30% to sales platform * 70% to publisher (And no used sales.)
I think it was connected to their own coin, maybe you get your sold money back into that to buy new games with? And I guess people would be able to mine/run the block-chain work with possibly being able to buy games in return?
If I just stop buying and playing games then I become a non-consumer and why should they care and if I pirate games then I become a pirate and why should they care.
It's not like I've got much choice to buy from some other platform. There's likely some titles I could buy and own somewhere. I have no idea where, and there's GOG which offer the games DRM-free but otherwise it doesn't change anything.
So.. Where was that place I was supposed to vote with my wallet?
Also if that place offer deals much worse than bundles then simple value for money may make me not choose them and if they don't allow me to transfer my licenses from Steam to their platform then I would still have to use Steam for all I own.
Well.. On the other hand they were worth just cents back when the transactions was much more efficient =P
Technically it's not impressive any longer. As for how much the biggest idiot want to pay who knows (I say just to buy some later at 10-100 times the current price!;D)
Slashdot Mirror
Since Sweden and the US doesn't change at the same dates (maybe also hours?) It mess up for me anywat because things happening at 20:00 CET suddenly happen at 19:00 CET for instance since its American time.
Well it's sure as fuck easier to just change the time for work than to change the middle of night and day (especially when the time of the day changes with them.)
Go with DST and the system no longer make any sense.
Just start everything one hour earlier if you want too. Make sense since people doesn't sleep 20-04 as is.
But could we please also switch to 10 hours and 100 minutes?
Counting hours at 24 hour clocks is some sort of work. Because of analog clocks I guess. 7-4 is simpler than 17-9.
Sleep 9-2 if you want to ;)
I don't know how it works there or for you but here in Sweden the party need 4+% of the votes and the lock the lists so really the only thing you CAN do is vote for THEM.
Also we have a minority government. The EU is even worse. We have no clue there. Plus it's not all that democratic in the first place.
Sweden is a democrature but democracy risk just being socialism and lack of freedom anyway. That suck. It's shit regardless.
As for time if I could had mine be 24 / 10 hours per day and then just be awake whenever the fuck I wanted that would be nice.
You're completely retarded for thinking the fact social media got so much power and bans us is actually an argument against us or their point.
the camera sensor work with light and since a paler skin reflect more light than a darker one the signal to noise ratio increase and more features will be visible and hence the program can do more of it's magic.
Assuming you don't measure the whole scene and use the same exposure you could expose the image for longer (and get something more blurry due to movement) or raise the gain (and gain more noise) but the simple technological fact is that the darker skin will never be as easy to capture as the brighter one. Eventually both may still be good enough but that's the fact.
As for whatever the algorithms somehow are worse for darker people I don't know. But to conclude that from a poorer result on them isn't evidence by itself, especially since there's a totally believable reason and prediction for why this would be the case.
Similarly for women due to makeup their and hair work their appearance may change more plus also be harder to process both naturally and because they blend their skin to a smoother tone using make-up. Camouflage and disguise if you so want.
Put a brown bag on your face and see how discriminating the algorithm become .. Then it won't have a clue!!
objectively.
That you shouldn't choose the best person for the job sound like something the worst people would say .. .. as for not being able to figure out whom is the best; sure.
But to claim that the best can't be creative and that you're better of with people who are subjectively worse at the task? ..
... it is because the Earth is flat. Get with it, people.
What I don't get is how they change the bulb.
Here in Sweden it's rather land which has lifted. Because the weight of all that ice matter.
I mean the company which do a lot of massive box of plastic Kickstarter projects. Zombicide and such. I haven't really been into the game for ~three years or so so maybe I thought about the wrong name then.
Cool Mini or Not. Close enough .. :D
Niche player into shit-games it seem.
Asmodee have all the modern ones?
But there's also cool stuff Inc atleast
Seem like she was actually used for 34 years and one don't know for sure why she sank.
Or ship however sank straight away and for a known reason ;D
Sank ship sure =P, seem like the British got some use of theirs.
Sure we did too, 300+ years later, the most visited museum in Scandinavia. ;D
Crap:
As a Swede and thinking about vikings but also our technologically good current military ships even though we kinda make none I kinda wanted to say they could order them from us / let us build them, and then suggest they could take some kebabs in return.
However now I see the "the ship doesn't even float right" and we've had that problem too, sadly:
https://www.vasamuseet.se/en
AFAIU both were exploitable through java-script too. It's all about timing I suppose.
In the case of Chrome though I assume Google may have put in their retpoline solution and hence if you tried even on a non-patched hardware system I assume it will no longer work.
At 215 kWh / transaction which it was before 1 trade per swede and day would use 5 times out electricy production.
As long as the cost of transfer cost (including spread and fees to get them in thr first place and then get another more usable currency again) more and isn't faster than PayPal then it doesn't provide any additional value except possibly for illegal trades but since those are in the blockchain too it's not all that useful their either.
Also other coins may do what bitcoin does better. With an unstable valuation people may not want to have them though.
But why should it become more valuable considering the technical merits?
"Low-quality, extremist, sensationalist and conspiratorial news"
Except nothing of that is fake.
"Fake" clearly is new-speak for "stuff we don't agree with", just as their definition of democracy isn't freedom of thought, speak, information, raising opinion and voting but rather what they consider the best for the collective/society and their "freedom" is what they grant you and their "equality" is "discrimination for the sake of enabling equal outcome."
I've kinda wondered whatever the first "alternative facts" were actually straight up lies of what Trump thought was also facts / equally valuable beliefs but for an alternative conclusion / pointing in the other direction.
The sad part is of course that so many will believe that fake actually mean fake and that fake news are lies just as they believe immigrants, children and people of their nationality actually mean refugees, children and people of their nationality rather than whatever immigrant / person on their soil, human claiming to be a child and (at-least this one is less of a lie) people whom actually have some "been living in that country" connection at-least.
The only fake here is calling those things fake because the ideologists at Oxford doesn't like the opinions expressed of those people.
Low quality - Possible. But it exist because the other media doesn't cover it. It's alternative additional information not necessarily a replacement. Also shouldn't you consider main-stream media low quality too when it also doesn't cover everything and leave this gap in the information and coverage it provides?
Extremist - Things which they consider far from their own ideas. Boho ... Meaningless shaming of other people and their ideas.
Sensationalist - All media are guilty. And it become a big deal I guess because it's new information not found in their stupid lying press.
Conspiratorial - This one I actually do consider a problem. Just because it's not the widely believed story though doesn't necessarily make it false. Though it may definitely be.
There's a quick, easy solution to this.
How do they taste?
Because it's the tasty animals we're running out of ...
That's why we have so few chickens, cows, pigs, ..
There was a new block-chained based start-up which seemed nice.
The game transactions is stored in the block-chain so you can sell your game, however my impression of "selling your game" there is that there was no secondary discounted games market but rather your game is just sold at the full cost so you aren't competing with new sales for what is identical title/thing and as such the developers / publishers may be totally fine with that sale. The seller would just get if it was like 20% or so of the new price which may suck relative console games sales but if it's relative full price on Steam with sales and bundles sometimes then it's acceptable and while the publisher would lose some of the profit there the share to their own store was much lower than Valve I think it was like 10% on new sales and 5% on the used sales and as such the publishers / developers would still get a larger share of the money than on Steam if Steam take 30% no matter what.
Some something like:
New sale:
* 10% to sales platform
* 90% to publisher
Used sale:
* 5% to sales platform
* 20% to former owner
* 75% to publisher
Valve:
* 30% to sales platform
* 70% to publisher
(And no used sales.)
I think it was connected to their own coin, maybe you get your sold money back into that to buy new games with? And I guess people would be able to mine/run the block-chain work with possibly being able to buy games in return?
But there really is no alternative.
If I just stop buying and playing games then I become a non-consumer and why should they care and if I pirate games then I become a pirate and why should they care.
It's not like I've got much choice to buy from some other platform. There's likely some titles I could buy and own somewhere. I have no idea where, and there's GOG which offer the games DRM-free but otherwise it doesn't change anything.
So.. Where was that place I was supposed to vote with my wallet?
Also if that place offer deals much worse than bundles then simple value for money may make me not choose them and if they don't allow me to transfer my licenses from Steam to their platform then I would still have to use Steam for all I own.
I boot Windows 10 in seconds. And I don't even have a fast SSD.
i7 8700K on Z370-F Strix with Samsung EVO 850 SATA 250 GB.
Yeah. Valve is great.
One single platform for all PC-games which you aren't owning and where Valve take 30% of the sale.
The great defender of consumer rights!!
Well.. On the other hand they were worth just cents back when the transactions was much more efficient =P
Technically it's not impressive any longer. As for how much the biggest idiot want to pay who knows (I say just to buy some later at 10-100 times the current price! ;D)
When people invest in currencies they actually do get interest ..