I know, never got it if all "team fortress 2 orange box" is the whole box or just TF2 though, because there is a couple of those and a couple of just "orange box" when I search for prices, and I don't know if I want to waste storage on Windows, though I should.
I was told TFC was buggy, HL physics weird and that they was cheating by a friend enjoying watching time attacks, and the comment section was quite negative to, so maybe it wasn't as impressive as it looked to me as a Quaker:D
Fucking amazing, I haven't played Halflife so I don't know how powerful the weapons and bunny jumping is there but I know the methods used and I so like to watch people with mad skills in a game:D
I really liked Quake and Team Fortress but I still haven't played TF 2, mostly because I have a mac.
Anyway though wifi play on the DS suck I think it would had been a nice title on the DS. The graphics probably makes it somewhat easier to render with the very limited amount of polygons usable on the DS, the controls would probably work somewhat and the graphics would be good enough for old school enjoyment.
Too bad it will never happen =P, 360? Couldn't care less, I'd prefer it on PC any day.
Did they change something in the presentation videothingy or did they added some support/fixes into moonlight? I'd assume the later which indeed was very nice of them:)
Mine did at first until the fan failed but then most of them didn't had a fan anyway so it seemed kind of unnecessary, put the zalman chipset heatsink there but no luck =P
I have no idea if current stuff is as crappy as you say buy yes I had to run my KT400 board at 100 MHz FSB instead of 133 since it locked up all the time if I didn't.
May also have worked like crap in Solaris, or if that was my MSI board (which is K8T800 in any case..)
Just hosting it as fucking video would make even more sense, open format would be even better I'd assume though for most people it would make it more inconvenient and less accessible because they suck.
Right now, thousands of homeowners are evicted every day despite the $750B given to the banks that own the homes. It's a fucking tragedy.
What I think suck is that I'd assume a very exclusive minority will earn even more money from getting these bailouts (and be protected for their risk taking, something small people aren't.)
Maybe they should had created a government ran bank which overtook the loans and gave better deals for the people and their homes while this last?
I don't understand why you try to save them. Is it to save jobs or what?
The money could be used to support the people who got unemployed but more importantly people still have demands for the products the companies used to create so there would be a gap for new companies manufacturing those products. So if for instance all your car companies died I assume there would be new people willing to take their place and create a new industry.
I understand that some knowledge and ideas would get lost if something like that happened in the tech area but I wonder if that's such a huge loss since many of the people in the old companies would probably be active within the new ones.
I don't remember what our swedish prime minister Fredrik Reinfeldt said one the matter but I really hope they stay on the line of "evolution" instead of trying to save failing companies.
Apple tried that. Back in the '90s Apple did allow other companies to make Mac clones [wikipedia.org]. But when they brought Steve back he took a look at the books and saw Apple was loosing money because of the clones.
I can't understand that all idiots think that I suggest they should do that because they would earn more money from it.
But earlier in the thread they talked about if the loss of Steve would kill Apple and all I say is that even if they lose their initiatives in new products and hype they still have their software which some people like and that software will be around no matter what and they could always sell that and therefor survive in some form.
Apple did not make enough from licensing the Mac OS to cover the loss in hardware sales.
I don't say that OS X licenses would generate more incomes than macs, all I say is that if people for whatever reason stopped buying macs they could still sell the software which already exist and in the current state don't cost much to just sell but would still generate an income.
Another thing, one reason one of the things that makes Macs good is that they "just work".
Windows work to, my Macbook Pro is almost 16 months old now, issues:
* Still the same crippled GFX performance from 128 MB vram. * Safari crashes all the fucking time. * The aluminium front around the lid button is lose. * Since Safari always eat all CPU the machine gets hot and therefor my battery life is down to around 8%. * There are some bright "scratches" in the screen, probably something weird with the backlight spreader. * The "SuperDrive" is "SuperCrappy" and have had issues with burning disks before, it can't even burn Verbatim 16x DVD+R MCC004 discs, I think it failed on my TYG003 Taiyo Yudens to. * I've had plenty of graphics errors which is probably thanks to Nvidias broken 8600m-chips. * The power cord is lose against the connector so the machine loses power every now and then. Seems like a really huge issue on Amazon where one guy had bought EIGHT of them in the first year. * No mic input is retarded. * Optical mini-toslink out is retarded to, when I finally got adapter the first one died in three days because the plastic snapped when I moved the computer, the second one died in 2 days because I stepped on it. Metallic 3.5 mm stereo plugs can handle more of course, but they should just have made it coaxial or use regular tos-link and it would had been a non-issue. * I could get wireless sound with an Airport Express, and I could get wireless disk and backup with an Airport Extreme, why the fuck can't I get BOTH functions in one unit? Not to mention the Extreme is rather expensive and time capsules are insane. * Even if I had an Airport Express Apple fails because they only use wireless iTunes sound, not wireless for all applications, how retarded isn't that? Airfoil solve that but it's still really retarded.
In the end the only thing I like about Apple are their user-interfaces and deciding which is the better way to do things (to some extent.)
The good parts in their apps comes from the nice user-interfaces but often they lack functionality: * Let me play modules in iTunes damnit. * Better spam filtering in Mail. * Less memory leakage in Safari or whatever is wrong with that POS. * Let iPhoto and Aperture co-exist so I can fix images in a program which doesn't suck (iPhotos fixed images looks much worse) but sort, view and order items from iPhoto. Though I use Lightroom since the 128 VRAM issue makes Aperture too slow and annoying. But I want to use iPhoto TO.
And so on, I have no idea what "just works" on a mac, the drivers? If I bought a branded PC with Windows it would "just work" to, and if I didn't I would just find the drivers, how hard is that?
With a limited line of Macs Apple can make sure the hardware and software work well together. If Apple were to license OS X to
Slashdot Mirror
Well, the DS has a Quake2 port to, though I think it requires a memory expansion (with Opera or EzFlash V 3in1 or similar.)
http://se.youtube.com/watch?v=QYBs_lslyuY&fmt=18
I know, never got it if all "team fortress 2 orange box" is the whole box or just TF2 though, because there is a couple of those and a couple of just "orange box" when I search for prices, and I don't know if I want to waste storage on Windows, though I should.
I was told TFC was buggy, HL physics weird and that they was cheating by a friend enjoying watching time attacks, and the comment section was quite negative to, so maybe it wasn't as impressive as it looked to me as a Quaker :D
He told me to look at http://www.own-age.com/vids/1950 instead (and a Q3 mod called defrag.)
Omg, was browsing around videos and found this:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=VqBPq48x6GA&fmt=18
Fucking amazing, I haven't played Halflife so I don't know how powerful the weapons and bunny jumping is there but I know the methods used and I so like to watch people with mad skills in a game :D
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=cyo4CgwvLgA&fmt=18 Video of map.
http://www.planetfortress.com/fragopolis/html/2fort5.html General information about map.
http://www.planetfortress.com/engineering101/maps/forts.htmWhere to put sentrys on map.
http://redfort.ytmnd.com/ loool :D
http://www.fileshack.com/file.x?fid=9172 Download.
All we used to play was 2fort5, guess I missed out :D
Unreals "2 fort" maps was quite fun to, guess I should get back into FPSs :D
I really liked Quake and Team Fortress but I still haven't played TF 2, mostly because I have a mac.
Anyway though wifi play on the DS suck I think it would had been a nice title on the DS. The graphics probably makes it somewhat easier to render with the very limited amount of polygons usable on the DS, the controls would probably work somewhat and the graphics would be good enough for old school enjoyment.
Too bad it will never happen =P, 360? Couldn't care less, I'd prefer it on PC any day.
Ok, more understandable fix but still nice, guess they didn't wanted all the negative publicity on the issue :D
Couldn't they just have implemented HTML5 video support in IE instead? :D
I thought they reasoned that a copy was more than one lost sale.
Like 30 songs = shared to plenty of people = possible 3000 downloads and lost sales.
So 1000 albums according to RIAA would probably mean you're stealing one million album sales from them, your thief! :D
So just pay back the 15 million dollars you own them thanks to your piracy and it's all fine! :D
Did they change something in the presentation videothingy or did they added some support/fixes into moonlight? I'd assume the later which indeed was very nice of them :)
"It's not like we don't trust in evolution, it's just that we believe there's an intelligent mutating design!"
But even in the cases of mutating code the first code was intelligently designed (or not so it mutates in very bad ways :D)
Mine did at first until the fan failed but then most of them didn't had a fan anyway so it seemed kind of unnecessary, put the zalman chipset heatsink there but no luck =P
I have no idea if current stuff is as crappy as you say buy yes I had to run my KT400 board at 100 MHz FSB instead of 133 since it locked up all the time if I didn't.
May also have worked like crap in Solaris, or if that was my MSI board (which is K8T800 in any case ..)
All crap =P
Of course it's designed to stop pirates forever but they are probably well aware that it's likely to fail.
OH MY GOD! +4 strength, +4 stamina leather belt!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZM4k9bNe6w&fmt=18
Just hosting it as fucking video would make even more sense, open format would be even better I'd assume though for most people it would make it more inconvenient and less accessible because they suck.
Right now, thousands of homeowners are evicted every day despite the $750B given to the banks that own the homes. It's a fucking tragedy.
What I think suck is that I'd assume a very exclusive minority will earn even more money from getting these bailouts (and be protected for their risk taking, something small people aren't.)
Maybe they should had created a government ran bank which overtook the loans and gave better deals for the people and their homes while this last?
I don't understand why you try to save them. Is it to save jobs or what?
The money could be used to support the people who got unemployed but more importantly people still have demands for the products the companies used to create so there would be a gap for new companies manufacturing those products. So if for instance all your car companies died I assume there would be new people willing to take their place and create a new industry.
I understand that some knowledge and ideas would get lost if something like that happened in the tech area but I wonder if that's such a huge loss since many of the people in the old companies would probably be active within the new ones.
I don't remember what our swedish prime minister Fredrik Reinfeldt said one the matter but I really hope they stay on the line of "evolution" instead of trying to save failing companies.
Darwin has the solution on that one.
Homeopathy
Hey, magic had already been suggested!
Apple tried that. Back in the '90s Apple did allow other companies to make Mac clones [wikipedia.org]. But when they brought Steve back he took a look at the books and saw Apple was loosing money because of the clones.
I can't understand that all idiots think that I suggest they should do that because they would earn more money from it.
But earlier in the thread they talked about if the loss of Steve would kill Apple and all I say is that even if they lose their initiatives in new products and hype they still have their software which some people like and that software will be around no matter what and they could always sell that and therefor survive in some form.
Apple did not make enough from licensing the Mac OS to cover the loss in hardware sales.
I don't say that OS X licenses would generate more incomes than macs, all I say is that if people for whatever reason stopped buying macs they could still sell the software which already exist and in the current state don't cost much to just sell but would still generate an income.
Another thing, one reason one of the things that makes Macs good is that they "just work".
Windows work to, my Macbook Pro is almost 16 months old now, issues:
* Still the same crippled GFX performance from 128 MB vram.
* Safari crashes all the fucking time.
* The aluminium front around the lid button is lose.
* Since Safari always eat all CPU the machine gets hot and therefor my battery life is down to around 8%.
* There are some bright "scratches" in the screen, probably something weird with the backlight spreader.
* The "SuperDrive" is "SuperCrappy" and have had issues with burning disks before, it can't even burn Verbatim 16x DVD+R MCC004 discs, I think it failed on my TYG003 Taiyo Yudens to.
* I've had plenty of graphics errors which is probably thanks to Nvidias broken 8600m-chips.
* The power cord is lose against the connector so the machine loses power every now and then. Seems like a really huge issue on Amazon where one guy had bought EIGHT of them in the first year.
* No mic input is retarded.
* Optical mini-toslink out is retarded to, when I finally got adapter the first one died in three days because the plastic snapped when I moved the computer, the second one died in 2 days because I stepped on it. Metallic 3.5 mm stereo plugs can handle more of course, but they should just have made it coaxial or use regular tos-link and it would had been a non-issue.
* I could get wireless sound with an Airport Express, and I could get wireless disk and backup with an Airport Extreme, why the fuck can't I get BOTH functions in one unit? Not to mention the Extreme is rather expensive and time capsules are insane.
* Even if I had an Airport Express Apple fails because they only use wireless iTunes sound, not wireless for all applications, how retarded isn't that? Airfoil solve that but it's still really retarded.
In the end the only thing I like about Apple are their user-interfaces and deciding which is the better way to do things (to some extent.)
The good parts in their apps comes from the nice user-interfaces but often they lack functionality:
* Let me play modules in iTunes damnit.
* Better spam filtering in Mail.
* Less memory leakage in Safari or whatever is wrong with that POS.
* Let iPhoto and Aperture co-exist so I can fix images in a program which doesn't suck (iPhotos fixed images looks much worse) but sort, view and order items from iPhoto. Though I use Lightroom since the 128 VRAM issue makes Aperture too slow and annoying. But I want to use iPhoto TO.
And so on, I have no idea what "just works" on a mac, the drivers? If I bought a branded PC with Windows it would "just work" to, and if I didn't I would just find the drivers, how hard is that?
With a limited line of Macs Apple can make sure the hardware and software work well together. If Apple were to license OS X to
Do they all contain photons? Do other wavelengths have other "particles"?