I tweet a lot of nastiness on Twitter from Sweden and my account haven't been affected at all, and I want it that way.
Fuck legitimization and censorship, they are all anti-democratic and against me and my opinion and views.
If you don't agree then express that don't cut me off.
I don't know what the Terms of Service is for twitter but it seem very tolerant and that's why I used that instead of communist Facebook let alone any Swedish main-stream media (some trash was applauding how a bunch of Swedish news papers or whatever had removed the comment section altogether since supposedly now it get rid of a lot of racism. Guess what? The racism are still there, we still don't want the invaders and our traitor government, the correct way of dealing with that will is to not let them in not cut us off. Cutting away the capability to express and raise the opinion of course have some effect (see North Korea) but it also leave little room except illegal one to act so don't come complain about anti-democratic methods and fear and terrorism and what not if you don't allow people to have a voice and participate.)
As for ISIS they can likely just spread their opinion anyway, meet it with an argument and a different stance instead, offer a better alternative rather than just trying to censor it.
My impression is that the AMD performance with hair comes from poorer tessellation performance on the AMD cards.
So that one could likely be solved by just making them better at tessellation.
Nvidia is of course happy throwing in lots of fur and hair in games if the performance hit is low on Nvidia cards and high on AMD cards leading to worse performance numbers for the AMD Cards in said games and more sales of Nvidia cards.
From my apartment I can pick: 1) Any cellular phone service. 2) DSL - various companies. 3) 50-1000 mbps by the cable TV network. 4) Connect through the first Ethernet network we got in the area back in year 2000 which I don't know what speeds they sell because for whatever reason I can't connect to their webpage right now (even though I still use them.) 5) Connect through the municipal network which has 13 different providers which offer Internet at a speed from 10 - 500 mbps.
I don't know how many options that give me in total and many of the companies in the industry of course do all of Internet, regular telephony and cellular telephony but at-least I'm not stuck with just one single option.
And this is in Sweden. Seem like America has something to learn about free market and competition?;) (Sure the telephone-network is built by the former exclusively government/nation-owned company and sure the municipal network is built by the municipality but it's a dark net and both networks are open for competition among service providers.)
Or you could link the basic income to the number of years as a legal citizen in that country.
Mean-while in Sweden the immigrant get accounted for in the pension system for the years they spend BACK HOME since age 18.
So.. yeah.. Also one of the rapefugees (Afghani, in a home for supposedly 14-17 year olds but here in Sweden they like like crazy because "kids" get asylum more easily of course) killed a 22 year female worker in the home today.
A couple in SödertÃlje (culturally enriched city) was found dead recently, someone dropped down and died in i think Stockholm this weekend or something and a 90 year old was held down her bed while four people robbed her in her home.
Such enrichment! Such splendor! Much humanism! Totally better! No racism! No violence against them back, just take murder, robbery, rape, theft, a government against you, genocide of your own people.
Good times! Traitors! Fuck EU and the Swedish government. Fuck the anti-whites. Fuck Marxism. Fuck rapefugees. Fuck Islam. Questions? Don't ask them. I think I've made my point clear enough.
There was an article with photo showing a huge and horrible looking mass of lines and cables strung around utility poles in some town in China or India. Mayor got totally pissed at so many poles of all these ugly cables he ordered city crews to tear them all down to beautify the city streets. Result was town was delivered to the Sixth century.
Their comment about the tower in Stockholm: "A telephone tower in Stockholm, Sweden, with 5000 connected lines. It was used between 1887 and 1913, but the tower stood there until 1953, when it fell down after a fire."
This is clear evidence that the US is trying to kill Iran's petroleum market, one not tagged to the dollar. Petrodollars are the last thread holding up the fragile US economy before it falls off a cliff.
How is it killed by letting them sell more of it?
Sure USA may want to keep dollar still somewhat of a standard currency for transactions.
800x600 / 1024x768 / 1280x1024 and so on was the standards of the CRT era but the first LCD/TFT monitors...
Here's a TomÂs hardware article from 2004: http://www.tomshardware.com/re... "Getting hold of a suitable TFT panel presents no difficulties, as we said before: an old 15.1" flatscreen monitor makes the ideal basis for building a powerful projector. Most displays offer a physical resolution of 1024x768 (i.e. 786,432) pixels, for playing back high-quality DVD videos or displaying the Windows screen. Some models even offer resolution of 1280x1024 pixels, making them suitable for 3D games, too." "The table above lists the principal resolutions; note that resolutions higher than SXGA are seldom available in 15" format."
That was using older monitors though.. But still, I don't really think the majority used 1080p 10 years ago, even less played games in it.
I think conservatism when unsure is likely a good idea. You know what you have but.. It's hard to turn something such back in a democratic, nice and humanistic way too.
At-least with global socialism/well-fare we wouldn't have to destroy people and cultures.
I still wonder if 100% heritage tax but no/little tax during life wouldn't had been a good solution. Would had let everyone start on equal footing and all progress would benefit everyone but while in life you could affect your outcome. Sure it would destroy the wealth in the rich part of the world and in rich families but then again have their children done anything more to deserve it really?
Personally I'm ok with capitalism but as wealth accumulate at large volume in very few places as the economical system is setup it's not really that fair long-term is it?
Sweden had 162 000 asylum seekers last year vs a population of 9.65 million.
That would be 5.4 million to US against 322 million.
I think the best would be to offer them very little benefits, then fewer would come here and those who come likely did so because they had a capability and at-least you're not feeding & housing them. The same would be true for the US.
Like one year ago it was said 250 000 homes was needed in Sweden until 2020, then they said 426 000 and now they say 700 000 to 2025.
Who will build and pay for those? The tax pressure: Denmark: 50.9% (see why they may not like "refugees"? France: 45.2% Belgium: 44.7% Finland: 43.9% Italy: 43.6% Austria: 43.0% Sweden: 42.7% Norway: 39.1% (Oil.) Iceland: 38.7%
Turkey: 28.7% Switzerland: 26.6% (!!) USA: 26.0% South Korea: 24.6%
GB handles the immigrants better than Sweden do, economically/in the workforce, AFAIK. Or maybe it's different immigrants.
At most you pay a little more than 60% income tax in Sweden, and 25% VAT, and VAT on the tax on gasoline and electricity =P
USA already is quite diverse and you should have a strong constitution and conservatism of the society and everyone should be expected that those are the American ideals and then I guess it would make somewhat less difference.
Sweden mean-while had 1% immigrants 80 years ago and have more foreign born people now than USA does and got like 35 times more refugees / capita in 2014 I think I heard. Our basic law is many different laws and they can be altered with one majority decisions following another one with an election in-between so they are fairly easy to change if one want to and they are changed a lot. Also the Swedish government ran the "Sweden together" event where they claimed that there was no native culture and they call all the immigrants or their children when they commit crimes abroad for "Swedes" and they don't want to view the white majority people of Sweden which has been living here for a long time Swedes whereas the others are citizens . The idea of that is of course to deconstruct any foundation for "racist" claims but while doing so they more or less say I and my people don't exist and that we have no bigger right to this country and that my history doesn't matter. Mix that with the idea that they don't give a fuck that more Swedes have always wanted less immigrants rather than more and leave the borders open and say it will be that way (which has likely been an ideological trap for them the whole time in that they want to fight racism and don't grant power to the anti-immigration party or accept "racist" / anti-immigration voices) and that of course make them seem like undemocratic traitors who don't give a shit and run you over and leave no room for you and your thoughts or worries. It's hard to build up a respectful and tolerant environment if you're treating people like that.
They likely knew that if they ignored and didn't cared about t
Back when I was a teen I had the ideology that I shouldn't be harassed because of my opinion and I still have the ideology that I should be free to think and say what I want and as such I have very often acted like that.
I kinda want to stand by and be a brand of my opinions. I just don't want to have anything bad happen to be because of them. I'm proud of my opinions and not ashamed. I don't want to have to hide or act like if they were wrong.
Now my thoughts of the world and the actual reality of the world will and is wrong.
I would want both states and individuals to accept the freedom of others but they won't.
Also I'm doing civil disobedience. It will most likely be viewed as a fault or limit the values of my opinions by some but I do it for the normalization of such behavior and expressions so it will be more accepted and don't have that stigma. I've held a 2.4 and 3 meter flag on a 4 and 5 meter pole up on the town with no further message than just doing so. But people form their own ideas about why I'm doing it and upset themselves from it but that's IMHO wrong and why be upset about it? In normal nations people wouldn't view it as negative and there's still a few in Sweden who don't. Often when I talk about a black person I write "nigger", not because I think black people are subhumans or because it have any meaning whatsoever in itself but because I'm not supposed to. I have no intention to degrade them with the word, I just mean black.
I don't think calling them black by whatever word is much of a problem. There exist bigger crime. But now when I think about it maybe actually using the word in some way can lead to different behavior against them. I don't feel I behave wrongly against immigrants in Sweden but they sure are unwanted as far as my opinion goes. Maybe your people and culture isn't important, maybe it is, maybe one is an ass-hole to think it is, maybe that's pretty normal. Regardless I think the Swedish government should had listened and took more care about the will of it's own citizens (not including the ones they have just made citizens) rather than what they could do for others who weren't citizens.
Is anonymous speech not allowed in Sweden? I knew most European countries had more restrictive laws on speech, but I didn't know it was that bad.
I guess it is in theory, if one had a legal right to be anonymous I see that as closer to a guarantee of free-speech, it make it harder for both the state and other interests to go after you if they don't really know who you are.
Sweden have quite free speech and if you post as a legally responsible publisher you have slightly more freedom I think. The laws may be about the same but there's a difference in how your are sentenced between the both. However to be a legally responsible publisher you must pay and also inform who are the legally responsible publisher so you lose all anonymity, however others can be anonymous through you by giving you information and so on which you spread and they are protected by law and completely anonymous because YOU are the one responsible for whatever your posted.
So there exist a mechanic for spreading thoughts anonymously in Sweden but it make someone else responsible for the content and for it to actually happen they must of course be willing to both take that risk and also have be ok with spreading the information/opinion by itself and not be against it.
The part where I see my government as my enemy is in the immigration politics but mainstream media won't want to cover my sort of opinions so there they won't happen. Mr Zuckerberg & Facebook has decided against letting those ideas flourish too so Facebook is a dead medium, all Swedish places with legally responsible publishers will be bound to hate-speech laws but they will remove more than what would result in a sentence in a court either because they think it's the right thing to do or because they take their responsibility seriously. If you post something as yourself you can always take a risk that no-one will report you and that you won't get sentenced but if it's a censored media by someone else your opinion simply won't pass.
Someone had made a video which whatever government or whatever didn't liked and Google refused to take it down so maybe YouTube is slightly better, but many of those places have their own rules against hate-speech even if the countries where they are located don't.
Twitter seem to be freest and as far as I know if a European post anything "racist" and European authorities ask for the IP of said individual from Twitter they don't get it because it's not a crime in the US. So Twitter offer a higher amount of freedom of speech than other places do.
My hate is pretty reasonable. I don't want to destroy our unity, people, culture, historical heritage and what we have in common there and so on and any attempt to destroy us by purpose is covered by the genocide convention, one are free to think whatever about that but back in these days they obviously thought a nationality and people mattered. Also since Sweden is a well-fare state and the immigrants get the same rights as swedes that mean they will cost money, money which will be stolen from the Swedish people and I'm at-least not interested in that. That part they could solve by either not granting them right to the well-fare money but that they would likely consider racist (even if it was there own decision to come to Sweden or not) or a more equal solution by removing the well-fare state for everyone. The existence of the well-fare state and the possibilities it grant the immigrants of course isn't the fault of the immigrants, but it make them more unwanted.
The way I see it the reason Sweden get the most immigrants by far in the EU is because we have immigration laws which are more lose and give them the most money and benefits. If we had removed the well-fare state Sweden would be much less interesting for them because most of them would have a very hard time here so why even come here? Those who could make it here would at-least hold a higher standard and be more likely to contribute.
Maybe the parent's problem is with crappy Windows.
Here in Sweden it's called SBS - Skit bakom spakarna - Shit behind the controls.
I've never(? Maybe in some obscure webkit/KTHML beta browser with a weird java-script engine or such) had a problem with it. And I do use Chrome, I don't know what's doing.
I have a very rigorous hiring process. First of all, you cannot apply. I don't post job openings anywhere. There is no official mechanism to approach me for a job.
When I decide I need to hire someone, I seek out applicants on my own, based on reputation in industry, published works, patents, and other factors. When I identify someone I want to hire, I send my talent team to make contact in person (i.e. stalk them haha), often literally with a tap on the shoulder.
The process works. In 15 years, I've never had anyone leave (except to retire), and I've never had to let anyone go.
I saw a video of some gang whatever they was called in Rust. They surrounded one guy nude and sang weirdly or whatever. He copied their acting (afraid to be killed?) and because they got alone well enough they chanted one of us and now he was a member.
Perhaps it's the special snowflake effect that comes from hiring all these ostensible geniuses that makes gapps and google web apps so shit. I can't think of a single one that didn't start out more usable than it is today. Inbox barely works; it eats mouse clicks left and right, just completely ignores them. I have to click 2-3 times just to get an email to open and the menu buttons on the emails themselves only work without actually opening the email maybe one load in ten. (One load of the site, that is.) And what's sad is that most of these sites perform badly in Firefox, but they perform worse in Chrome! They can't even make a webapp work properly in their own browser.
It's just because your answers have to be 140 characters or less.
Worse yet: To answer the interview you need to enter your e-mail address and you never get the confirmation e-mail even though you've tried and tried to get one.
As long as we have a well-fare state (and not enough police and guards) it's totally legit criticism regardless even if the immigrants themselves may not even be causing factor with the first one (then again they'd likely vote to uphold it - but make it a human right to not have to deal with such demands.)
Make collectivism & insurances something voluntarily to participate in instead and it make open borders better working (I at first wrote a border-less world but in a border-less world it wouldn't matter because there the rights would be the same everywhere and hence as far as migration and well-fare goes borders would make no difference (but enforced collectivism could still be there.))
Raising the lowest people have likely done us quite a bit of good but with open borders it's destructive so.. pick one. Personally I'd rather see we help the poor develop their own societies (possibly let people in who came for the culture and society rather than for the well-fare.)
Do you actually live in Europe? Integration does not work. We have whole suburbs of "insert immigrant nationality" because they don't integrate. Even politicians have to admit that multiculturalism failed. The cultures are just too different and there are far too many at the same time.
Angela Merkel said it had failed some years ago.
And then she decided to copy Sweden and flood Germany with almost as many immigrants (but of course Sweden beat itself by taking in twice as many and crushed the German attempt in self-sacrifice and white-genocide.)
In my view the well-fare states should be destroyed, most of them can't compete on a European scale and can't afford to live here as recent immigrants so they would be doomed to even attempt and the Europeans/rich would be superior and the poor/immigrants would be their labor and servants.
Also for those who are here already but couldn't afford it at-least if they come recently maybe they would move back home.
Of course it would lead to equality, shitty neighbourhoods and possibly more crime but parts of that can be solved by segregation and law-enforcement.
Here in Sweden the left (who claim to be pro equality, abuse the word liberal, claim to be anti-racists and anti-sexist but it's all of course wrong) are just fine with segregated bath time because the MENA people can't behave and it's impossible for women to bath together with at-least some MENA men and hence the solution supposedly is to split the two so the women don't have to meet and be taken advantage of by the MENA men (the "anti-racist" "feminists" of course say that's a problem with men (which is a weird thing since being a man is just a social construct and it's all blamed on the patriarchy but if being a man is just a social thing and not a biological thing and acting like a man is a cultural / society thing too then how the fuck is the problem having a penis and not what you've been taught which IS your culture?) and not with Muslims or black people (I can agree that it's not a race issue as such, just as I don't think it's much of a sex/biological issue, their skin-color or religion is just an indicator for what culture they have been brought up with and what views they may hold and from that follows how they behave, an assimilated adapted and Europeanized Muslim or black person won't behave like that, the problem is most likely recent immigrants who haven't become adapted to how things are here yet.) The leftards completely misses the point and just hold back the response and fix for it by their stupid lies and denial.... anyway, where were I? The Swedish society seem to be fine with separating women and men to not have MENA men abused women - so why not separate society to not have various ethnicities / cultures abused each other?
Why not even rather than segregate a country (which they may be ok with) segregate the world and like, you know, have nations with borders and without people moving around in them changing culture? Wouldn't that be a good and protective measurement? I wonder why no-one has thought about that one before..
Slashdot Mirror
I tweet a lot of nastiness on Twitter from Sweden and my account haven't been affected at all, and I want it that way.
Fuck legitimization and censorship, they are all anti-democratic and against me and my opinion and views.
If you don't agree then express that don't cut me off.
I don't know what the Terms of Service is for twitter but it seem very tolerant and that's why I used that instead of communist Facebook let alone any Swedish main-stream media (some trash was applauding how a bunch of Swedish news papers or whatever had removed the comment section altogether since supposedly now it get rid of a lot of racism. Guess what? The racism are still there, we still don't want the invaders and our traitor government, the correct way of dealing with that will is to not let them in not cut us off. Cutting away the capability to express and raise the opinion of course have some effect (see North Korea) but it also leave little room except illegal one to act so don't come complain about anti-democratic methods and fear and terrorism and what not if you don't allow people to have a voice and participate.)
As for ISIS they can likely just spread their opinion anyway, meet it with an argument and a different stance instead, offer a better alternative rather than just trying to censor it.
They also use encrypted phrases such as "Go now"
Highly advanced trickery using Google "I feel lucky" search:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Mosul+201...
How on earth will the CIA ever figure that one out?!
Why bother at all.
It's not like we've bothered to learn to read Arabic.
They can just send it in clear-text and we'll write it off as completely useless gibberish.
No no, 'console games' as in "games you want to play when you're finally bored with shooters".
They make games you will never want to play?!
My impression is that the AMD performance with hair comes from poorer tessellation performance on the AMD cards.
So that one could likely be solved by just making them better at tessellation.
Nvidia is of course happy throwing in lots of fur and hair in games if the performance hit is low on Nvidia cards and high on AMD cards leading to worse performance numbers for the AMD Cards in said games and more sales of Nvidia cards.
Here's a hint: You don't need a $400 GPU for Netflix.
and regarding to what AC, http://hardware.slashdot.org/c..., said:
Here's a hint: You don't need a $400 x86 CPU for Netflix, either.
AMD A10 7850K (3.7 GHz quad-core) with integrated graphics: $130.
AMD Athlon II 860K (3.7 GHz quad-core) without integrated graphics: $75.
Price difference for integrated graphics: $55
And for whom want to play games: GTX 750Ti $105, which are of course are better added to the $75 rather than the $130 CPU.
No. It's about Nvidia.
From my apartment I can pick:
1) Any cellular phone service.
2) DSL - various companies.
3) 50-1000 mbps by the cable TV network.
4) Connect through the first Ethernet network we got in the area back in year 2000 which I don't know what speeds they sell because for whatever reason I can't connect to their webpage right now (even though I still use them.)
5) Connect through the municipal network which has 13 different providers which offer Internet at a speed from 10 - 500 mbps.
I don't know how many options that give me in total and many of the companies in the industry of course do all of Internet, regular telephony and cellular telephony but at-least I'm not stuck with just one single option.
And this is in Sweden. ;)
Seem like America has something to learn about free market and competition?
(Sure the telephone-network is built by the former exclusively government/nation-owned company and sure the municipal network is built by the municipality but it's a dark net and both networks are open for competition among service providers.)
Or you could link the basic income to the number of years as a legal citizen in that country.
Mean-while in Sweden the immigrant get accounted for in the pension system for the years they spend BACK HOME since age 18.
So.. yeah.. Also one of the rapefugees (Afghani, in a home for supposedly 14-17 year olds but here in Sweden they like like crazy because "kids" get asylum more easily of course) killed a 22 year female worker in the home today.
A couple in SödertÃlje (culturally enriched city) was found dead recently, someone dropped down and died in i think Stockholm this weekend or something and a 90 year old was held down her bed while four people robbed her in her home.
Such enrichment! Such splendor! Much humanism! Totally better! No racism! No violence against them back, just take murder, robbery, rape, theft, a government against you, genocide of your own people.
Good times! Traitors! Fuck EU and the Swedish government. Fuck the anti-whites. Fuck Marxism. Fuck rapefugees. Fuck Islam. Questions? Don't ask them. I think I've made my point clear enough.
There was an article with photo showing a huge and horrible looking mass of lines and cables strung around utility poles in some town in China or India. Mayor got totally pissed at so many poles of all these ugly cables he ordered city crews to tear them all down to beautify the city streets. Result was town was delivered to the Sixth century.
Welcome to the telephone tower of Stockholm 1887-1913:
http://hugelolcdn.com/hugewoah...
http://www.ericsson.com/thinki...
https://i.imgur.com/pWidlce.jp...
New York:
http://static.messynessychic.c...
Pratt, Kansas:
http://static.messynessychic.c...
"The railway station at Pearl Street, Boston, Massachusetts, after a hurricane in January 1881":
http://static.messynessychic.c...
Their comment about the tower in Stockholm:
"A telephone tower in Stockholm, Sweden, with 5000 connected lines. It was used between 1887 and 1913, but the tower stood there until 1953, when it fell down after a fire."
"An 1880s postcard of Broadway, New York":
http://static.messynessychic.c...
"Power lines and supporting structure in a lane west of Main Street in Vancouver, British Columbia, March 1914":
http://static.messynessychic.c...
Later pictures and texts taken from: http://www.messynessychic.com/...
This is clear evidence that the US is trying to kill Iran's petroleum market, one not tagged to the dollar. Petrodollars are the last thread holding up the fragile US economy before it falls off a cliff.
How is it killed by letting them sell more of it?
Sure USA may want to keep dollar still somewhat of a standard currency for transactions.
800x600 / 1024x768 / 1280x1024 and so on was the standards of the CRT era but the first LCD/TFT monitors ...
Here's a TomÂs hardware article from 2004:
http://www.tomshardware.com/re...
"Getting hold of a suitable TFT panel presents no difficulties, as we said before: an old 15.1" flatscreen monitor makes the ideal basis for building a powerful projector. Most displays offer a physical resolution of 1024x768 (i.e. 786,432) pixels, for playing back high-quality DVD videos or displaying the Windows screen. Some models even offer resolution of 1280x1024 pixels, making them suitable for 3D games, too."
"The table above lists the principal resolutions; note that resolutions higher than SXGA are seldom available in 15" format."
That was using older monitors though.. But still, I don't really think the majority used 1080p 10 years ago, even less played games in it.
Ah. Then I get it :)
I think conservatism when unsure is likely a good idea. You know what you have but .. It's hard to turn something such back in a democratic, nice and humanistic way too.
At-least with global socialism/well-fare we wouldn't have to destroy people and cultures.
I still wonder if 100% heritage tax but no/little tax during life wouldn't had been a good solution.
Would had let everyone start on equal footing and all progress would benefit everyone but while in life you could affect your outcome.
Sure it would destroy the wealth in the rich part of the world and in rich families but then again have their children done anything more to deserve it really?
Personally I'm ok with capitalism but as wealth accumulate at large volume in very few places as the economical system is setup it's not really that fair long-term is it?
Sweden had 162 000 asylum seekers last year vs a population of 9.65 million.
That would be 5.4 million to US against 322 million.
I think the best would be to offer them very little benefits, then fewer would come here and those who come likely did so because they had a capability and at-least you're not feeding & housing them. The same would be true for the US.
Like one year ago it was said 250 000 homes was needed in Sweden until 2020, then they said 426 000 and now they say 700 000 to 2025.
Who will build and pay for those? The tax pressure:
Denmark: 50.9% (see why they may not like "refugees"?
France: 45.2%
Belgium: 44.7%
Finland: 43.9%
Italy: 43.6%
Austria: 43.0%
Sweden: 42.7%
Norway: 39.1% (Oil.)
Iceland: 38.7%
Germany: 36.1%
Greece: 35.9%
GB: 32.6%
Israel: 31.1%
Canada: 30.8%
Japan: 30.3%
Turkey: 28.7%
Switzerland: 26.6% (!!)
USA: 26.0%
South Korea: 24.6%
GB handles the immigrants better than Sweden do, economically/in the workforce, AFAIK. Or maybe it's different immigrants.
At most you pay a little more than 60% income tax in Sweden, and 25% VAT, and VAT on the tax on gasoline and electricity =P
USA already is quite diverse and you should have a strong constitution and conservatism of the society and everyone should be expected that those are the American ideals and then I guess it would make somewhat less difference.
Sweden mean-while had 1% immigrants 80 years ago and have more foreign born people now than USA does and got like 35 times more refugees / capita in 2014 I think I heard. Our basic law is many different laws and they can be altered with one majority decisions following another one with an election in-between so they are fairly easy to change if one want to and they are changed a lot. Also the Swedish government ran the "Sweden together" event where they claimed that there was no native culture and they call all the immigrants or their children when they commit crimes abroad for "Swedes" and they don't want to view the white majority people of Sweden which has been living here for a long time Swedes whereas the others are citizens . The idea of that is of course to deconstruct any foundation for "racist" claims but while doing so they more or less say I and my people don't exist and that we have no bigger right to this country and that my history doesn't matter. Mix that with the idea that they don't give a fuck that more Swedes have always wanted less immigrants rather than more and leave the borders open and say it will be that way (which has likely been an ideological trap for them the whole time in that they want to fight racism and don't grant power to the anti-immigration party or accept "racist" / anti-immigration voices) and that of course make them seem like undemocratic traitors who don't give a shit and run you over and leave no room for you and your thoughts or worries. It's hard to build up a respectful and tolerant environment if you're treating people like that.
They likely knew that if they ignored and didn't cared about t
Back when I was a teen I had the ideology that I shouldn't be harassed because of my opinion and I still have the ideology that I should be free to think and say what I want and as such I have very often acted like that.
I kinda want to stand by and be a brand of my opinions. I just don't want to have anything bad happen to be because of them. I'm proud of my opinions and not ashamed. I don't want to have to hide or act like if they were wrong.
Now my thoughts of the world and the actual reality of the world will and is wrong.
I would want both states and individuals to accept the freedom of others but they won't.
Also I'm doing civil disobedience. It will most likely be viewed as a fault or limit the values of my opinions by some but I do it for the normalization of such behavior and expressions so it will be more accepted and don't have that stigma. I've held a 2.4 and 3 meter flag on a 4 and 5 meter pole up on the town with no further message than just doing so. But people form their own ideas about why I'm doing it and upset themselves from it but that's IMHO wrong and why be upset about it? In normal nations people wouldn't view it as negative and there's still a few in Sweden who don't.
Often when I talk about a black person I write "nigger", not because I think black people are subhumans or because it have any meaning whatsoever in itself but because I'm not supposed to. I have no intention to degrade them with the word, I just mean black.
I don't think calling them black by whatever word is much of a problem. There exist bigger crime. But now when I think about it maybe actually using the word in some way can lead to different behavior against them. I don't feel I behave wrongly against immigrants in Sweden but they sure are unwanted as far as my opinion goes. Maybe your people and culture isn't important, maybe it is, maybe one is an ass-hole to think it is, maybe that's pretty normal.
Regardless I think the Swedish government should had listened and took more care about the will of it's own citizens (not including the ones they have just made citizens) rather than what they could do for others who weren't citizens.
Is anonymous speech not allowed in Sweden? I knew most European countries had more restrictive laws on speech, but I didn't know it was that bad.
I guess it is in theory, if one had a legal right to be anonymous I see that as closer to a guarantee of free-speech, it make it harder for both the state and other interests to go after you if they don't really know who you are.
Sweden have quite free speech and if you post as a legally responsible publisher you have slightly more freedom I think. The laws may be about the same but there's a difference in how your are sentenced between the both. However to be a legally responsible publisher you must pay and also inform who are the legally responsible publisher so you lose all anonymity, however others can be anonymous through you by giving you information and so on which you spread and they are protected by law and completely anonymous because YOU are the one responsible for whatever your posted.
So there exist a mechanic for spreading thoughts anonymously in Sweden but it make someone else responsible for the content and for it to actually happen they must of course be willing to both take that risk and also have be ok with spreading the information/opinion by itself and not be against it.
The part where I see my government as my enemy is in the immigration politics but mainstream media won't want to cover my sort of opinions so there they won't happen. Mr Zuckerberg & Facebook has decided against letting those ideas flourish too so Facebook is a dead medium, all Swedish places with legally responsible publishers will be bound to hate-speech laws but they will remove more than what would result in a sentence in a court either because they think it's the right thing to do or because they take their responsibility seriously. If you post something as yourself you can always take a risk that no-one will report you and that you won't get sentenced but if it's a censored media by someone else your opinion simply won't pass.
Someone had made a video which whatever government or whatever didn't liked and Google refused to take it down so maybe YouTube is slightly better, but many of those places have their own rules against hate-speech even if the countries where they are located don't.
Twitter seem to be freest and as far as I know if a European post anything "racist" and European authorities ask for the IP of said individual from Twitter they don't get it because it's not a crime in the US. So Twitter offer a higher amount of freedom of speech than other places do.
My hate is pretty reasonable. I don't want to destroy our unity, people, culture, historical heritage and what we have in common there and so on and any attempt to destroy us by purpose is covered by the genocide convention, one are free to think whatever about that but back in these days they obviously thought a nationality and people mattered.
Also since Sweden is a well-fare state and the immigrants get the same rights as swedes that mean they will cost money, money which will be stolen from the Swedish people and I'm at-least not interested in that. That part they could solve by either not granting them right to the well-fare money but that they would likely consider racist (even if it was there own decision to come to Sweden or not) or a more equal solution by removing the well-fare state for everyone.
The existence of the well-fare state and the possibilities it grant the immigrants of course isn't the fault of the immigrants, but it make them more unwanted.
The way I see it the reason Sweden get the most immigrants by far in the EU is because we have immigration laws which are more lose and give them the most money and benefits. If we had removed the well-fare state Sweden would be much less interesting for them because most of them would have a very hard time here so why even come here? Those who could make it here would at-least hold a higher standard and be more likely to contribute.
I also question why the will and r
I so envy Americans.
Freedom of speech - including anonymous speech!
Fuck Sweden and the Swedish government.
Sweden has turned into the land of the Shrew, and the home of .. no, not Dave but Muhammed.
So we're likely back to where we started.
Yeah, because rendering the first Tomb rider in 4K would had been so hard ..
Also most people use 1080p _NOW_, ten years ago maybe they used 1280x1024 or something.
To work/complexity has increased a lot of course and will continue to do so with increasing capability for games.
For desktop & even video work it likely haven't increased as fast as the capabilities of the cards.
They know others through knowing themselves and what they'd do.
Maybe the parent's problem is with crappy Windows.
Here in Sweden it's called SBS - Skit bakom spakarna - Shit behind the controls.
I've never(? Maybe in some obscure webkit/KTHML beta browser with a weird java-script engine or such) had a problem with it. And I do use Chrome, I don't know what's doing.
I have a very rigorous hiring process. First of all, you cannot apply. I don't post job openings anywhere. There is no official mechanism to approach me for a job.
When I decide I need to hire someone, I seek out applicants on my own, based on reputation in industry, published works, patents, and other factors. When I identify someone I want to hire, I send my talent team to make contact in person (i.e. stalk them haha), often literally with a tap on the shoulder.
The process works. In 15 years, I've never had anyone leave (except to retire), and I've never had to let anyone go.
I saw a video of some gang whatever they was called in Rust. They surrounded one guy nude and sang weirdly or whatever. He copied their acting (afraid to be killed?) and because they got alone well enough they chanted one of us and now he was a member.
I imagine that's something similar ..
Perhaps it's the special snowflake effect that comes from hiring all these ostensible geniuses that makes gapps and google web apps so shit. I can't think of a single one that didn't start out more usable than it is today. Inbox barely works; it eats mouse clicks left and right, just completely ignores them. I have to click 2-3 times just to get an email to open and the menu buttons on the emails themselves only work without actually opening the email maybe one load in ten. (One load of the site, that is.) And what's sad is that most of these sites perform badly in Firefox, but they perform worse in Chrome! They can't even make a webapp work properly in their own browser.
Obligatory: Works fine here!
" but Twitter's is perceived as the worst"
It's just because your answers have to be 140 characters or less.
Worse yet:
To answer the interview you need to enter your e-mail address and you never get the confirmation e-mail even though you've tried and tried to get one.
As long as we have a well-fare state (and not enough police and guards) it's totally legit criticism regardless even if the immigrants themselves may not even be causing factor with the first one (then again they'd likely vote to uphold it - but make it a human right to not have to deal with such demands.)
Make collectivism & insurances something voluntarily to participate in instead and it make open borders better working (I at first wrote a border-less world but in a border-less world it wouldn't matter because there the rights would be the same everywhere and hence as far as migration and well-fare goes borders would make no difference (but enforced collectivism could still be there.))
Raising the lowest people have likely done us quite a bit of good but with open borders it's destructive so .. pick one. Personally I'd rather see we help the poor develop their own societies (possibly let people in who came for the culture and society rather than for the well-fare.)
Do you actually live in Europe? Integration does not work. We have whole suburbs of "insert immigrant nationality" because they don't integrate. Even politicians have to admit that multiculturalism failed. The cultures are just too different and there are far too many at the same time.
Angela Merkel said it had failed some years ago.
And then she decided to copy Sweden and flood Germany with almost as many immigrants (but of course Sweden beat itself by taking in twice as many and crushed the German attempt in self-sacrifice and white-genocide.)
In my view the well-fare states should be destroyed, most of them can't compete on a European scale and can't afford to live here as recent immigrants so they would be doomed to even attempt and the Europeans/rich would be superior and the poor/immigrants would be their labor and servants.
Also for those who are here already but couldn't afford it at-least if they come recently maybe they would move back home.
Of course it would lead to equality, shitty neighbourhoods and possibly more crime but parts of that can be solved by segregation and law-enforcement.
Here in Sweden the left (who claim to be pro equality, abuse the word liberal, claim to be anti-racists and anti-sexist but it's all of course wrong) are just fine with segregated bath time because the MENA people can't behave and it's impossible for women to bath together with at-least some MENA men and hence the solution supposedly is to split the two so the women don't have to meet and be taken advantage of by the MENA men (the "anti-racist" "feminists" of course say that's a problem with men (which is a weird thing since being a man is just a social construct and it's all blamed on the patriarchy but if being a man is just a social thing and not a biological thing and acting like a man is a cultural / society thing too then how the fuck is the problem having a penis and not what you've been taught which IS your culture?) and not with Muslims or black people (I can agree that it's not a race issue as such, just as I don't think it's much of a sex/biological issue, their skin-color or religion is just an indicator for what culture they have been brought up with and what views they may hold and from that follows how they behave, an assimilated adapted and Europeanized Muslim or black person won't behave like that, the problem is most likely recent immigrants who haven't become adapted to how things are here yet.) ... anyway, where were I?
The leftards completely misses the point and just hold back the response and fix for it by their stupid lies and denial.
The Swedish society seem to be fine with separating women and men to not have MENA men abused women - so why not separate society to not have various ethnicities / cultures abused each other?
Why not even rather than segregate a country (which they may be ok with) segregate the world and like, you know, have nations with borders and without people moving around in them changing culture? Wouldn't that be a good and protective measurement? I wonder why no-one has thought about that one before ..