Because the comment was based on the recipient actually receiving and reviewing the contents of the envelope. I was saying that if the envelope is "intercepted" en route then when it did eventually reach the intended recipient the state would have already been determined.
And you have no way of determining whether I'm a physicist or not until I'm observed;)
I'm 100 percent not a physicist but I thought it wasn't really that the state is determined at the destination, but upon observation. So if some being outside of normal space/time/whatever were to peek into the envelope in transit then the state gets set right then.
I'm Nnot sure all theories are impossible; the right one just hasn't been proven yet:)
That's why I think ArkOS might be onto something. You're holding your own data and sharing it with whomever you'd like. It basically integrates OwnCloud and other disparate solutions and is supposed to offer a non-techie friendly interface to add the stuff you want. Stick photo sharing, chat, one of the various open source social network solutions and it seems like it provides a (somewhat) more secure option.
With one of the earlier stories this week there was talk that NSA had gotten "involved" with the standards-setting working groups. I'm confused how any encryption Google's using wouldn't/couldn't be affected by that. Is there any "guarantee" that they haven't been able to insert something into the technology behind PFS?
is the company you work for, in a similar manner as health insurance, offers "unlimited Internet access" as one of the perks of working there. They'll cover the cost of your being able to surf however much and wherever you'd like (within the guidelines of the EULA that you sign when you start work there) . Of course, it'll only happen via their proxy servers and thus with ads they can target based on your surfing habits (letting them present ads for their subsidiaries' products). Demographics of your habits will also be sold to whichever ad firm is the highest bidder.
Don't worry, your employer will more than make their money back. In fact, they'll make so much they'll be able to launch their own entertainment networks, offering internally developed shows to their employees and licensing the popular ones to other companies, months after their own employees get "exclusive access" to the shows when they come out.
But at least you won't have to deal with Verizon, right?
You have to accept their site cookies when trying to change your password. Cookies from a site belonging to a compromised system rubs me the wrong way for some reason.
Slashdot Mirror
And that's without Verizon capping the monthly bandwidth for NASA's Unlimited Internet plan.
Like the state of a particle isn't set until it's observed? (Question, not a snarky remark).
Because the comment was based on the recipient actually receiving and reviewing the contents of the envelope. I was saying that if the envelope is "intercepted" en route then when it did eventually reach the intended recipient the state would have already been determined.
;)
And you have no way of determining whether I'm a physicist or not until I'm observed
I'm 100 percent not a physicist but I thought it wasn't really that the state is determined at the destination, but upon observation. So if some being outside of normal space/time/whatever were to peek into the envelope in transit then the state gets set right then.
:)
I'm Nnot sure all theories are impossible; the right one just hasn't been proven yet
That's why I think ArkOS might be onto something. You're holding your own data and sharing it with whomever you'd like. It basically integrates OwnCloud and other disparate solutions and is supposed to offer a non-techie friendly interface to add the stuff you want. Stick photo sharing, chat, one of the various open source social network solutions and it seems like it provides a (somewhat) more secure option.
Would it be a non-profit or a not-for-profit? (Not trying to be a smart ass, Just curious if the latter made more sense.)
It's the ugly ones that have trouble?
> Companies have successfully brainwashed the current generation of gamers into believing that cosmetic items are worth money.
Now get off my lawn.
BP used the "xzvf" switches.
Nah. Posting here is fine. The SNR is so high NSA decided it wasn't worth bothering to filter through everything.
In what is serious understatement...
With one of the earlier stories this week there was talk that NSA had gotten "involved" with the standards-setting working groups. I'm confused how any encryption Google's using wouldn't/couldn't be affected by that. Is there any "guarantee" that they haven't been able to insert something into the technology behind PFS?
Couldn't you just embed it in the browser binary itself? For now they care about where the browser goes more than the person at the keyboard.
is the company you work for, in a similar manner as health insurance, offers "unlimited Internet access" as one of the perks of working there. They'll cover the cost of your being able to surf however much and wherever you'd like (within the guidelines of the EULA that you sign when you start work there) . Of course, it'll only happen via their proxy servers and thus with ads they can target based on your surfing habits (letting them present ads for their subsidiaries' products). Demographics of your habits will also be sold to whichever ad firm is the highest bidder.
Don't worry, your employer will more than make their money back. In fact, they'll make so much they'll be able to launch their own entertainment networks, offering internally developed shows to their employees and licensing the popular ones to other companies, months after their own employees get "exclusive access" to the shows when they come out.
But at least you won't have to deal with Verizon, right?
Also with their air defense systems.
> or wear a particular fragrance to work outweighs the rights of others to come to work without fear of developing an illness, or work.
And because asthma is covered by the ADA.
> "go fuck yourself"
More likely, "Go fuck yourself, eh?"
> most influential
I don't know about that. After all, if it wasn't for Nixon the press wouldn't be able to append "gate" to every perceived transgression.
You have to accept their site cookies when trying to change your password. Cookies from a site belonging to a compromised system rubs me the wrong way for some reason.
Specifically taking probiotic supplements, yogurt, etc?
Use someone else's.
Is that the sound the asteroid made? :)
And there we were just thinking you were rude. ;)
This is Slashdot. Of course it does.
Because the alcohol lobbyists paid good money for that not to happen.