Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Best Laptops For Fans Of Pre-Retina MacBook Pro?

stigmato writes "Once upon a time the MacBook Pro line was well-regarded amongst IT professionals for their quality, performance, serviceability & upgradeability. As appealing as the new Retina displays are, I don't want a device I cannot upgrade or repair. Glued in batteries and soldered in RAM with high prices have made me look to other manufacturers again. What are you buying, /. community? System76? Dell? Old article but still rings true with the latest models. I post this from my 2010 MBP 13" with a 256GB SSD, 1TB HDD in the optical bay, 8GB (possibly 16GB soon) and a user replaced battery."

477 comments

  1. Lenovo. by squisher · · Score: 5, Informative

    I really like my Lenovo T-series laptop. Sure, it may not live up to the legendary build quality back when it was an IBM, but it is still pretty good. It has all the user replacement options that are standard, a good keyboard and screen. It's not getting an award for its looks, but well, who cares.

    1. Re:Lenovo. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      I'm typing this on an Lenovo e-430 with an added mSATA SSD boot drive - you can add one if you get the Centrino wireless option. I got the slowest i5 with AES-NI and VT-d to maximize battery life.

      The T-series are nicer, but I can upgrade this one twice as often for the same money.

      Oh, and it has a matte screen, which was my #1 criteria.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Lenovo. by tapspace · · Score: 2

      T420s owner here. Sure, it's got all the processing power of a MBP and a robust chassis, but the battery life, audio and screen quality are all terrible.

    3. Re:Lenovo. by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I went with a Lenovo Think Pad too.
      They are good professional systems. They just have the opposite aesthetics that apple does.

      Black Matted Rubberized Plastic, the same that they had for 20 years.
      But it is a solid design. A good keyboard even though the new version has a chicklet keyboard, it is still very nice, and feels good.

      If you are actually using Windows 8, you may want to get an X series with touch but it comes down to what you want.

      However unlike Apple where there is a few to choose from there is a good selection of Think Pads to choose from.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Lenovo. by h4rr4r · · Score: 0

      Do they have any hi-res panels available?
      Note; 1080p is not hi-res.

    5. Re:Lenovo. by gsnedders · · Score: 1

      Compared with the MBPs, though, it's a brick. My T410 is almost double the thickness of my older MBP.

      And in the UK, the T410 was only available with a 1280x800 screen --- which is crazy low for a 14.3" laptop. I don't know if that's changed since, though.

    6. Re:Lenovo. by martiniturbide · · Score: 2

      Even that I had my problems with lenovo (Thinkpad Tablet bootloader locked). I think that the Thinkpad brand is still a good choice.

      Something that I really like from the technical point of view is that they always (almost) publish the "Hardware Maintenance Guide", so you know exactly how to disassembly the machines to add more card, replace screen, change/update hdd and RAM.

    7. Re:Lenovo. by nahpets77 · · Score: 1

      I've got a Lenovo T530 with Linux Mint 15 installed and it works great. It even works well with my docking station and dual-monitor setup... very happy with it.

    8. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been very pleased with the Lenovo I bought a couple of months ago. Overall build quality is great, everything you'd want is replaceable, and the price is right. Mine is somewhat of a rare beast with an AMD A10 and dual graphics. (Z585, 8GB, 1TDD HDD).

    9. Re:Lenovo. by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 2

      "Compared with the MBPs, though, it's a brick. My T410 is almost double the thickness of my older MBP."

      Yeah, that's why they started gluing things down and making them hard to repair. It's a tradeoff. The OP doesn't care so much about thin and light.

    10. Re:Lenovo. by webmistressrachel · · Score: 2

      1920 x 1080 is very high-res, compared to my 640x480 VGA panel. What panels did you have in mind, and where can I see one?

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    11. Re:Lenovo. by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not in 2013, it is standard tv resolution.
      A new macbook pro is 2560x1600 or 2880x1800. A Chrome pixel is 2560x1700.

      1920x1080 is not an uncommon android phone resolution. At at 5" just about perfect. For a screen any larger it is simply too low.

    12. Re:Lenovo. by Narcocide · · Score: 4, Informative

      Vertical lines are still very key to some people. Long before 1920x1080 became "HD" after a few years of severe regression in vertical resolution, there *were* 1600x1200 screens.

    13. Re:Lenovo. by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

      Indeed. The only laptops I buy are Lenovo. They last longer, are easier to upgrade, and you can still download the service manuals for free from the manufacturer if you are so inclined. And to top it all off they have pointing devices that are usable instead of ones that get in the way of productivity, which Apple certainly can't claim.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    14. Re:Lenovo. by anechoic · · Score: 1

      I have two Lenovo T500 laptops that have served me well, allowing me to easily swap in larger hard drives and more RAM as needed

    15. Re:Lenovo. by buddyglass · · Score: 0

      I'd buy a MacBook in black rubberized matte if they offered one. I prefer that to the silver aluminum.

    16. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just got a new T440s. Not only is it "nicer" but there was an Full HD IPS screen in it (matte, of course). :-) Are you sure the SSD drive is a boot drive, though? I have it as a cache drive. (Unless you've installed it yourself, in which case you probably know for sure how you're using it.) Seems much more useful that way anyway to me - why have a fixed area of faster disk access when you can have an adaptive one?

    17. Re:Lenovo. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      The W line has some 2880x1620 15.5" IPS models.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    18. Re:Lenovo. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I had one of those back in 2001.
      Once I stop using that laptop I was using inferior screens because of this whole silly HD nonsense.

    19. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a working IBM T43 that refuses to give up or die although it has been obsolete for some time....The Lenova E535 if it lasts even half as long will be well worth it.

    20. Re:Lenovo. by immaterial · · Score: 2

      You prefer the clit mouse to a multitouch trackpad?

    21. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1985 called. They want whatever fucking garbage you're using for a display back. There's probably more value in the gold or heavy metals in that thing than the price of a usable.

    22. Re: Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Dell Inspiron 8100 from 2001 had a 15", 1600x1200 matte IPS screen (and a 1 GHz Pentium M processor).

    23. Re: Lenovo. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      I had the exact same specs in my 2000 Inspiron 8000, probably even the exact same panel too, though to be honest the display looked washed out and had a crap viewing angle compared to even the lower resolution displays we have today. So long as you were looking at it from dead center it looked pretty nice for its time though.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    24. Re:Lenovo. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      640x480 is more 1995. In 1985 it was still very common to use a monochrome plasma display.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    25. Re:Lenovo. by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 1

      For some people, it's the only clit they'll ever touch...

      Personally, I do quite like my Lenevo X230 (with all the options maxed out). It should last me another five years at least.

      --
      HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
    26. Re: Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Dell Inspiron 8100 from 2001 had a 15", 1600x1200 matte IPS screen (and a 1 GHz Pentium M processor).

      I had that very configuration and held on to it for an embarrassingly long time due to the superior keyboard and screen resolution. However, there's no way that panel was IPS. Its viewing angle was something like 5 degrees.

    27. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1985 = 640x350!

    28. Re:Lenovo. by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2

      T420s owner here. Sure, it's got all the processing power of a MBP and a robust chassis, but the battery life, audio and screen quality are all terrible.

      A T410 got me 12hrs of use on an intl flight with 9-cell battery and ultra-bay lipoly. While I don't care enough about audio to comment the screens are all TN only very lately has Lenovo transitioned to IPS for T-series.

      My problem recently with Lenovo and T-series they effectively killed it off in recent iterations by "Appleizing" it. Slimming it down, getting rid of the ultrabay replacing with an internal non-removable battery. I use my ultra bay heavily for archiving to DVD, second battery on long trips and as a sata tray for a second HDD drive for RAID 1 mirror. It could be worse they could have glossy screens but latest iteration of T series is dead to me and this makes me really sad.

    29. Re:Lenovo. by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 2

      I have owned several T (& W for work) series Thinkpads starting with the IBM T21. I am very satisfied with them, and I plan to replace my current T400 next year with a T440. I have ran Linux pretty much exclusively on the T line (early Fedora Cores and eventually Gentoo since 2004 on the T21, exclusively Gentoo now), and because they use mostly Intel parts, I have never had much trouble getting everything to work.

      The features that keep me coming back are:
      Availability of decent resolution (1440x900) matte displays
      The ultrabay (can be used for an optical drive, second battery, or second disk drive)
      The build quality and user replaceable parts.

      I got my current laptop from their outlet as a lease return. It didn't include Windows (actually shipped with Free DOS). I immediately bumped the RAM to 8GB, added a SSD, put the original HDD in the ultra bay, and it's been going strong ever since. I have had to replace the keyboard (spilled some aged vinegar on one it), but other than that no problems. I am only thinking of replacing it next year to move to a quicker processor and more RAM.

      The system is a little bulky, but the build is quite solid. Mine has taken a couple 1.5 ft. coffee table to floor drops thanks to my dog, and it's kept on ticking. I know they also make a slim line T440s and even an ultrabook (T440u) version although that might require giving up some features like the Macbook Pro.

      --
      Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    30. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 for Lenovo. I just got an X230T (convertible notebook). Its running Ubuntu 12.04LTS just fine ... the only thing I haven't got working is the thumbprint reader, but then again, I wouldn't use it anyway...(On the other hand, I use the digitzer everyday). Never owned a Lenovo before and can't comment on upgradeability, etc...but the quality is definitely there.

    31. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stay away from their consumer models.. I regret buying my IdeaPad.. .great specs for the price if you don't mind your laptop falling apart after a year. I've had to replace the hinges twice so far, and its actually messed the whole body up on a break

    32. Re:Lenovo. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Hey according to my book on Basic from 1989 640x480 is labeled Ultra High Resolution.
      High Resolution was 640x200
      Normal Resolution 320x200

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    33. Re:Lenovo. by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      No a Chrome pixel is 1x1. Duh!

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    34. Re:Lenovo. by pahles · · Score: 1

      Apparently he does. Even though using a multitouch mousepad certainly has had a positive influence on my productivity. Then again, he might have only one finger!

      --
      Sig?
    35. Re:Lenovo. by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1920x1080 is not an uncommon android phone resolution. At at 5" just about perfect.

      As a Nexus 5 owner, I think 1920x1080 on a 5" screen is gratuitous and unnecessary. IMO, you need at least 7" (or maybe even larger) to "need" it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    36. Re:Lenovo. by Ingenium13 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I had a Thinkpad T400 and now a T430. I love them. Everything is user replaceable, and they don't look out of style after you've had it for 2 years since the design barely changes.

      That said, the speakers are lacking. On Linux I have to crank the volume up to 200% often. I don't know of a way to do this in WIndows (partner has a T410 with WIndows).

    37. Re:Lenovo. by occasional_dabbler · · Score: 1

      Another +1. I had an X220 dual booting W8 and Ubuntu. Ran both perfectly and with a six-cel battery it would last as long as a tablet for normal use and a good six hours of heavy (e.g. compiling) use. Build quality was excellent, the only downer was the screen, which was a bit low res by today's standards.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs," I said. "we have a protractor"
    38. Re:Lenovo. by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

      Vertical lines are still very key to some people. Long before 1920x1080 became "HD" after a few years of severe regression in vertical resolution, there *were* 1600x1200 screens.

      Yep. And there were 1920x1200 displays as well, giving 16:10. Actually, I'm writing this on a 9½ year old laptop with 1920x1200 pixels on its built-in 17" screen (it's a Sony Vaio VGN-A117S). It runs fine with Xubuntu, and if its replacement lasts as long, it will be a bargain. I had planned on upgrading to something with more pixels, but some years ago all the laptops - other than a few linux-hostile Macs - went to fewer pixels. Luckily, that looks like changing again, although I'll wait a bit for the price to drop before getting one with 3200x1800 pixels. Even 16:9 is acceptable with enough vertical pixels, avoiding the shortscreen consequences of full HD.

      Incidentally, we still have a 20" 1600x1200 display on one of the desktops. It was bought in the last century and has been used daily, often for several hours; it's in perfect working order and a real joy to use. The other desktop has a pair of full HD screens. Turning one sideways gives a narrow screen for viewing A4 pages, while in regular orientation, they're an annoyance even for editing photos. They're going to get replaced by something more useful...

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    39. Re:Lenovo. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      The W line also needs to come with a back brace, because even Lenovo makes some desktops that weigh less.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    40. Re:Lenovo. by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      These kinds of resolutions are little more than a battery drain for developers. I suppose if you're a designer of some type, it could be a good option (over a desktop) but saying 10809 is not high-res because some other laptop has higher resolution doesn't make it true.

    41. Re:Lenovo. by gsnedders · · Score: 1

      My MBP is a mid-2007 model: it has a replaceable RAM and battery, which appears to be what the OP cares about --- it predates Apple slimming them down further (later MBPs had replaceable hard drives, too, at the same thickness). Side by side you can see the T410's opening above the full height of the MBP, as it's almost 50% thicker.

    42. Re:Lenovo. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Well, there's also the T540p line with an option of the same display. Also, I assume you do include the screen weight for those desktops? Otherwise it's apples and oranges, obviously.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    43. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry but 1920 X 1080 is fairly standard for a 21 inch lcd/led even the $600 ones the reason being is that once that resolution is high enough you really can't perceive it any more just like you don't need a speaker with up to 40kHz cause even if you exceptional hearing you can't really hear it anyway.

    44. Re:Lenovo. by Drethon · · Score: 1

      +1 I have a Lenovo Y410p (close enough to T-series ;p) which is a really nice little powerhouse. The only problem I've had with it is the annoying click buttons on the touchpad which don't always work (well the right click)... I want my spring loaded buttons back. Otherwise it has been great.

    45. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO, you need at least 7" (or maybe even larger) to "need" it.

      That's what she said.

    46. Re:Lenovo. by Teun · · Score: 2
      You are a sissy.

      I routinely have a T430s and a W520 in the same bag and even a good looking Stewardess can put it in the overhead bin ;)

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    47. Re:Lenovo. by tiocsti · · Score: 1

      I've got an X series (X1 carbon) I like as well, if you want a smaller/lighter notebook. Only thing I don't like is the ssd size options aren't as good as apples. Lenovo should really offer 512 and 768g ssd options.

    48. Re:Lenovo. by Misagon · · Score: 1

      On computers with different screen sizes and aspect ratios, you can not compare just pixel size.
      1920Ã--1080 is low resolution if your screen is 50" 16:9, like a modern TV.
      If your screen is 13", then 1920Ã--1080 has a resolution of 169.5 pixels per inch, which isn't that bad.

      For a desktop computer's screen, I would say that 100-110 PPI is the "sweet spot" for using most applications without any screen scaling. For a laptop you often have the screen closer to your eyes, so you would want a somewhat higher resolution.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    49. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I preferred using 320x400.

    50. Re:Lenovo. by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

      You prefer the clit mouse to a multitouch trackpad?

      Yes, I do. I can move that with my finger without moving my hands from the keyboard. Furthermore, I never move it by accident with my thumbs or wrist when they are resting at the bottom of the keyboard. I can also push it once and get as far across the screen as I need with whatever resolution I need. I cannot say the same about any touchpad ever made.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    51. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monochrome has nothing to do with resolution. A common graphics standard from around 1985 was Hercules with the following specs:

      The Hercules card's single monochrome graphics mode simply made all pixels directly addressable. This translated to a resolution of not 720×350, but only 720×348 pixels (at 1 bit per pixel) because, for technical reasons, the screen height had to be a multiple of four. (Source: Wikipedia).

    52. Re:Lenovo. by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

      I had been using MBP's but like article wanted something upgradeable. I had ThinkPads in past so got a T530 and so far Linux is fine on it. Just wish I could find a video driver that I could lower the resolution most don't fill the screen when resolution is dropped. I looked at the System76 and interesting, but expensive compared to others. Hope the Levnovo holds up like my IBM ThinkPad did it was a tank.

    53. Re:Lenovo. by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Yep. And there were 1920x1200 displays as well, giving 16:10. Actually, I'm writing this on a 9½ year old laptop with 1920x1200 pixels on its built-in 17" screen (it's a Sony Vaio VGN-A117S). It runs fine with Xubuntu, and if its replacement lasts as long, it will be a bargain. I had planned on upgrading to something with more pixels, but some years ago all the laptops - other than a few linux-hostile Macs - went to fewer pixels. Luckily, that looks like changing again, although I'll wait a bit for the price to drop before getting one with 3200x1800 pixels. Even 16:9 is acceptable with enough vertical pixels, avoiding the shortscreen consequences of full HD.

      No, you could buy Dell laptops with 1920x1200 screens. You still can, too.

      Everyone who complains about low res screens are only limiting themselves - you could always buy a laptop with 1920x1200 screen. You just had to ante up for it because 1920x1080 is a commodity while 1920x1200 is more niche.

      And ignore the $500 and under laptops - those are built to a price and that's the reason 1366x768 is common - everyone looks at you funny if you spend more money than that, yet there are very legitimate reasons to do so, like getting nicer screens, GPUs, etc.

      And Macs were Linux hostile? Linux supported the EFI boot for a long time now - about the only troublesome spots were WiFi (Broadcom), and GPU (NVidia/AMD). Heck, wasn't Linus using a Mac Mini running Linux for a spell?

      And the only reason it's changing is because of ultrabooks - basically it gave a reason for PC manufacturers to raise prices and thus actually put better stuff in laptops. The race to the bottom works only so far - after a certain point corners are cut to meet a price.

    54. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This old G40 is still going strong, despite having only 1 GB memory, a juice-sucking 3 GHz CPU, and a ridiculously tiny hard drive, so it's no good for much in the way of gaming, or the encoding of video. However it's ideal for my normal daily usage which is almost exclusively specialized writing (with specialized software), and it could almost survive being used for target practice by tanks.

    55. Re:Lenovo. by stuporglue · · Score: 1

      I'm not seeing those resolutions. I only see 1600x900 and 1920x1080. Is it in the W-530 line?

      --
      https://www.facebook.com/digitizeicm -- Show your support for the digitization of the Iron County Miner newspaper archiv
    56. Re:Lenovo. by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the T series, but my W laptop has a great screen - it was the IPS upgrade that quite a few of their models have, rather than the base.

    57. Re:Lenovo. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      Macs are noi Linux hostile. Either you keep OS X and just apt get your linux programs or you insert a CD/DVD and install your flavour of Linux.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    58. Re:Lenovo. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      W540 and T540p machines are supposed to have this option.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    59. Re:Lenovo. by nucrash · · Score: 1

      I have a W520 at home. It is a beast of a machine for being right at 2 years old. I am up to 24 GB of RAM, looking to go to 32 as well as having 500 GB HDD with 256 Micro SATA SSD. My options include a 960 GB SSDs as well as swapping out the Optical drive for another disk drive and a battery slice for extended battery life. Being a quad core i7 with a nVidia graphics card in an optimus configuration I wasn't have any problem with going all day at a conference and not needing to plug in, but still had enough power to run VMWorkstation and spin up as many virtuals as needed. I snagged a weaker display, but the device is phenomenal and my primary workhorse.

      --
      Place something witty here
    60. Re:Lenovo. by Burz · · Score: 1

      T430s somewhat improved those issues: Ivy Bridge is easier on the battery, and about 9 months into the model's run Lenovo decided to stick with the AUO panels which are significantly brighter than the T420s displays I've put mine next to. What did not improve is the viewing angles.

      These are strong/fast/light & modular machines. Its worth it to spend a bit more for the bay battery, IMO.

      The X series are also great.

      As for the current crop, the T440s has no bay for an optical drive, and the "front" battery is integrated though I'll bet its easily replaceable with a couple tools on hand. On the plus side it has Haswell, IPS FHD screen and a bit less weight.

      Surprisingly, the bigger T440 also lacks an optical drive.

    61. Re:Lenovo. by stuporglue · · Score: 1

      Looks like you're right! The W-540 page says "Notify me" when it's shipping, but the T-540p is available.

      --
      https://www.facebook.com/digitizeicm -- Show your support for the digitization of the Iron County Miner newspaper archiv
    62. Re: Lenovo. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      That's a nice anecdote, considering the Pentium M didn't come out until 2003.
      Perhaps it was a P3?

    63. Re:Lenovo. by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 1

      I got an X230 Tablet, and it works fine with Ubuntu 12.04. natch.

      --
      HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
    64. Re:Lenovo. by atomicthumbs · · Score: 1

      I have a T410 and thought there weren't any compatible ultrabay batteries. Could you link to one?

      --
      http://pinopsida.com
    65. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You prefer the clit mouse to a multitouch trackpad?

      I can't speak for the GP, but the Thinkpad I use has both. And yes, I definitely prefer both to either.

    66. Re:Lenovo. by sixsixtysix · · Score: 2

      especially considering that quite a few still ship at 1366x 768. in fact, a quick perusing of newegg's 1919 laptops, 583 were 1366x768, with 372 being higher. only 15 were higher than 1080p.

      --
      ...
    67. Re:Lenovo. by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      well lets be honest if you need/want decent audio you buy an external audio interface whether or not its a wintel or mac laptop or a desktop PC

    68. Re:Lenovo. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Thinkpad screens have traditionally had narrow viewing angles so that business uses can't be so easily observed by the person sitting next to them. In other words it's a feature, not a bug.

      If you want to watch video they TN panels are not ideal.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    69. Re:Lenovo. by baerm · · Score: 1

      +1 on the Lenovo. My work MacBook Pro recently croaked and, skipping the hilariously ludicrous IT support (Corp. not Apple), I ended up replacing it with a w530. It was cheaper than an equivalent MacBook and easier to update (ultrabay, express card, etc.). I've been very happy with it. Just having actual mouse buttons made it more than worth it. The only drawback I can see is that the screen is not as high res and I don't believe quite as bright as the current MacBooks. But overall, I'd take one of these over the current MacBooks any day.

    70. Re:Lenovo. by pepty · · Score: 1

      although I'll wait a bit for the price to drop before getting one with 3200x1800 pixels.

      Lenovo convertibles with 13.3" 3200 x 1800 panels are already below $1k. What I will actually do with that resolution I don't know; I'm scheduled to start going farsighted soon so I'll probably just run everything except movies at 1600 x 900 in blissful ignorance.

    71. Re:Lenovo. by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      i like my Thinkpad x220s a fair bit, but looking around now for a replacement and lenovo can't seem to give me everything i want. for example is there a 13inch macbook pro replacement? I don't think so. If you can find a thinkpad with high res and is light weight they wont give you a decent graphics card (not even integrated hd5000, probably so they can claim longer battery life). Partly why i chose lenovo to begin with was the customisibility at sale, but now all they let me choose from is 2 proccessors, and one resoultion. If the Asus ux301 had a track point nipple mouse, i would have already of bought one, it's got everything (slim, very high res, one of the fastest laptop cpu gpu combo you can get, and user serviceable, bit pricey though no more than apple).

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    72. Re:Lenovo. by Dr+Max · · Score: 2

      depends what you do with the computer. If your browsing for pictures of cats then the trackpad is the way to go, if your writing code, the nipple mouse kicks ass because your hands never have to leave the home row.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    73. Re:Lenovo. by swillden · · Score: 1

      You are a sissy.

      I routinely have a T430s and a W520 in the same bag and even a good looking Stewardess can put it in the overhead bin ;)

      I call bullshit. I haven't seen a good-looking stewardess (or flight attendant) for years.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    74. Re:Lenovo. by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

      IMO, you need at least 7" (or maybe even larger) to "need" it.

      Agreed. I'm 7.5" and I need it all the time.

    75. Re:Lenovo. by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

      No, your years are quite wrong, actually. 640x480 (VGA) was common by 1987-88. In 1985 it was 640x350 (EGA). In 1995 we had already gotten past 800x600 and were on 1024x768.

    76. Re:Lenovo. by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

      depends what you do with the computer. If your browsing for pictures of cats then the trackpad is the way to go, if your writing code, the nipple mouse kicks ass because your hands never have to leave the home row.

      I thought it was called the clitoris mouse. Whose nipples are that small?

    77. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been using T and W Series thinkpads since the IBM days. I just switched to a 15" Retina Macbook Pro. (maxed out). I still like my thinkpads but for my use the Macbook is by far better. I run a good number of linux servers and a Windows domain. I had to install a few terminal plugins to make it work properly. As for repairability thats what warranty is for.

    78. Re: Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a nice anecdote, considering the Pentium M didn't come out until 2003.
      Perhaps it was a P3?

      You're right, it was a Pentium III-M, not a "Pentium M"

    79. Re:Lenovo. by Teun · · Score: 1

      Get out of the US :)

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    80. Re:Lenovo. by Goat+of+Death · · Score: 1

      This is actually one of the main things that keeps me on Macs. They're the only ones who's product line for laptops is primarily 16:10 for the displays. I abhor the general conversion to 16:9. That additional vertical resolution is important to me.

    81. Re:Lenovo. by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      It's the ugly ones that have trouble?

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    82. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      depends what you do with the computer. If your browsing for pictures of cats then the trackpad is the way to go, if your writing code, the nipple mouse kicks ass because your hands never have to leave the home row.

      I thought it was called the clitoris mouse. Whose nipples are that small?

      Males.

    83. Re:Lenovo. by chrish · · Score: 1

      Exactly this. When I decided my 2008-ish MacBook Pro needed replacing, all of Apple's decent hardware was locked down in ways I hate.

      After searching for 15" laptops with decent display resolution (hint: 13whatever by 768 is not decent; 1400x900 is minimum for a 15"), I bought an IdeaPad Y500.

      Great laptop, with easily replaceable battery, RAM, and disk, and an optical drive slot that you can replace with a fan or even a second video card. To get a similarly configured (but totally not upgradable or serviceable MacBook Pro) would cost nearly 4x as much, although it would have SSD storage instead of a small SSD cache and a big conventional disk.

      --
      - chrish
    84. Re:Lenovo. by Teun · · Score: 1

      Even less because for them the bag is just a fraction of their body mass :)

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    85. Re:Lenovo. by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      While EGA was available in '85, I wouldn't call it common. Both home PCs and business PCs of the time still typically had either monochrome graphics or CGA.

      Of course, if you really want to discuss a blast from the past, you could get 640x480x256 on a PC XT back in 1984 using the (little known) IBM Professional Graphics Controller.

      I had an ATI graphics card way back in the day that could provide EGA graphics on a CGA display (with a lot of interlacing, mind you). Those were the days.

      Yaz

    86. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck having both. If they want to do that sort of shit give us swappable keyboard modules and let us pick the input device.

      I've used terrible clit mouses and great ones. I've used terrible touchpads and great ones. What I have never seen is a great clit/pad combo as they do not exist. What does happen is that they use a crappy clit mouse that even if it wasn't completely shit, you still need to stretch your thumb to reach the buttons. They also pair that with a crappy pad that you must disable so that the pointer doesn't fly around the screen when any part of your hand comes closer than an inch to the fucker.

      In short, fuck them and fuck laptop makers who still insist that it offers users a 'choice'.

    87. Re:Lenovo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. My laptop has a built in 5.1 speaker system. It still doesn't go super loud, but it sounds great and can easily fill a room.

    88. Re:Lenovo. by swillden · · Score: 1

      Get out of the US :)

      Touché.

      I blame the US equal opportunity employment laws. It's illegal to preferentially hire pretty women. (Not really, but almost).

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    89. Re:Lenovo. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      1920x1080 at 21.5" the pixels are easily visible. You're only at about 100DPI which is pretty much where commonly available desktop LCDs top out at. It's kind of disappointing that while there are now high DPI laptops, not to mention high DPI tablets and phones, nothing really interesting has happened to desktop monitors for some time now.

    90. Re:Lenovo. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      No, you could buy Dell laptops with 1920x1200 screens. You still can, too.

      Everyone who complains about low res screens are only limiting themselves - you could always buy a laptop with 1920x1200 screen. You just had to ante up for it because 1920x1080 is a commodity while 1920x1200 is more niche.

      I'm not aware of any Dell that ships with a 1920x1200 screen. Almost no one does now, and that's the way it's been for a few years. The only laptops I know of in the past few years that still are available with 1920x1200 screens are some of the Apple non-Retina models (these may be gone now), and the Panasonic Toughbooks. So I guess you're right that you could either pony up for an expensive Apple laptop or a Toughbook, but Dell hasn't sold 1920x1200 for some time now.

    91. Re:Lenovo. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Unless Linux is doing some fancy trick on the Thinkpad, the volume range above 100% is simply using dynamic range compression (the same stuff that's currently destroying music) to make things sound louder. Though in this case, it's an appropiate application. I don't know about Windows, but there may be something available that does the same thing.

    92. Re:Lenovo. by StoneyMahoney · · Score: 1

      While most people replying to this seem to have gone the way of the Thinkpad T-series, I went with a 15" Edge. They are significantly cheaper than the T and are obviously not as durable, but the keyboard is excellent and I'm very impressed with the engineering on this thing. Removing a single panel from the bottom exposes the RAM, HDD and the Mini-PCI slots. The keyboard is easy to remove and, although it's not got the Ultrabay system, I picked up an aftermarket caddy and swapped the optical drive with the HDD (SATA2 port) and put an SSD in the free bay (SATA3 port). The battery is easy to replace and the screen has a matte finish to it - I'll never buy another laptop without that last part.

      On the downside, the screen resolution is not great at 1366x768 and the battery life is mediocre at best - 3-4 hours of light use or 1 hour if I really push the AMD A6-3420 APU hard. Speaking of which, while I may have sprung for the quad-core option at build time, I wish I hadn't - the reduced overall clock rate of a single core when running a single threaded process doesn't hit the speed the dual-core would have managed, even with it's turbo boosting features working flat out.

      So, although I have misgivings about this thing, there is one massively important thing that just wipes the floor with almost every other option I looked at - price. It was around a third of the price of other options I considered (Thinkpad T-series and Macbook Pro included) so the fact it's survived two and a half years before the rising threshold of my processor requirements has started to outpace it is highly impressive.

    93. Re:Lenovo. by smash · · Score: 1

      I was running 1024x768 in 1992.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    94. Re:Lenovo. by smash · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, I never move it by accident with my thumbs or wrist when they are resting at the bottom of the keyboard.

      Clearly never used a mac multi-touch trackpad.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    95. Re:Lenovo. by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, I never move it by accident with my thumbs or wrist when they are resting at the bottom of the keyboard.

      Clearly never used a mac multi-touch trackpad.

      I have had exactly the same problems with Mac laptops of the current generation that I have had with every other touchpad ever put on any laptop keyboard, ever. A fancy overpriced laptop does not change the fact that a touchpad is simply an inferior way to move the cursor about.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    96. Re:Lenovo. by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

      Plastidip!

    97. Re:Lenovo. by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Which model Dell? I have been looking at getting a "new" 16:10 screen laptop eventually. The past few years saw the death of the genuine "mid range" laptop. Used to be $800 got you a machine with an optical drive, removable battery, ExpressCard, and Firewire, along with a high res 16:10 screen. Now all of that is pretty much gone. Its hard to find a $1000 laptop with those features now! People are scooping up off lease machines like the Dell Latitude D620 and D820 because they have stuff you can't find in brand new machines.

    98. Re:Lenovo. by jbolden · · Score: 1

      This is an old post. But I just looked, Dell XPS 15 ships with 3200x1800, the 11" has 2560x1440.

  2. Worst MacBook EVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bought a MacBook air a year ago. The first one exploded to blew my hand off. The next one killed my dog. It wouldn't run DR-DOS at all. The wifi screwed up and sterilized my nuts.

    Overall I was left with a really bad feeling about all Apple products, which obviously must all have similar defects. Anecdotes by unverifiable semi-anonymous internet posters prove that to be true.

    1. Re:Worst MacBook EVER by yurtinus · · Score: 1, Funny

      But you got a new one this year, because despite those flaws they are just so *cool*!!!

      --
      +1 Disagree
    2. Re:Worst MacBook EVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It wouldn't run DR-DOS at all.

      And no floppy drive. DOS is much easier to run and install with a floppy drive. Of course Apple doesn't admit to that limitation on the specs page.

    3. Re:Worst MacBook EVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wifi screwed up and sterilized my nuts.

      And nothing of value was lost.

    4. Re:Worst MacBook EVER by epSos-de · · Score: 1

      Have a look at HP business laptops (pro line). They make them intentionally for businesses who order thousands of units and need frequent upgrades. They even provide Bios upgrades for as long as 5 years sometimes. Their consumer models are nowhere near in terms of updatability and support.

  3. Cost vs. Benefits by QuantumBeep · · Score: 2

    I like having a slim laptop (mine's a non-Apple ultrabook, but same build tradeoffs). The specs are adequate, it's fairly cheap, and failure rates are acceptably low.

    I'm not firmly against the end of upgradability/repairability for laptops. It was always kinda spotty anyway.

    1. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by h4rr4r · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They are still repairable. He acts like having to remove some screws and glue is anything new.

      Displays fused to glass are the normal for tablets and phones, but those seem to get repaired fine. Ungluing a battery might mean some customers would need to get apple to do a replacement, but a self respecting slashdotter should be able to do it himself.

    2. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Displays fused to glass are the normal for tablets and phones, but those seem to get repaired fine. Ungluing a battery might mean some customers would need to get apple to do a replacement, but a self respecting slashdotter should be able to do it himself.

      Have you ever really had to replace the display on your laptop?

    3. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Not on mine, but I have done several for family or friends. Almost all were the result of dropping the laptop.

      These days the LCD and LED backlights are all one unit. Adding the glass is not a huge change and likely makes replacement that much easier. I was glad when the backlights became part of the LCD FRU. Doing just the LCD was such a gamble on if you would get dust or a hair trapped in the layers.

    4. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      I'm skeptical about repairability, at least home repairability -- but as long as the cost of, and demand for, RAM and disk continue on their current trajectories, buying what you need now and upgrading over time makes a lot more sense than buying now for your needs two or three years down the road.

      I bought a 2011 MBP 17" partly because I wanted the larger screen, but largely for upgradeability. I put 16GB of RAM in it for under $100 (although I see prices have gone up since then). I've deferred putting in an SSD, because I expect to get 512GB or 1TB for not much more than a 128GB unit would've cost me at purchase time.

    5. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by KonoWatakushi · · Score: 2

      Fused glass display is fine. It is the soldered in RAM, proprietary SSD, and glued in battery that are totally unacceptable. Ordinarily, I'd double the RAM in a year for a pittance, but now Apple forces you to pay a hefty premium for a limited amount of RAM up front, obsoleting the machine that much sooner. Replacement SSDs are available eventually, but with few options at high cost. Finally, who wants to take/send in their machine for battery service every two years? Batteries are consumables, and shouldn't be glued in anymore than a toner cartridge.

    6. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Soldered in ram is standard.
      What proprietary ssd? Is it not just mini-pcie?

      Glue is not hard to remove. Any self respecting slashdotter ought to be able to do this.

      All ultrabooks are like that.

    7. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm skeptical about repairability, at least home repairability -- but as long as the cost of, and demand for, RAM and disk continue on their current trajectories, buying what you need now and upgrading over time makes a lot more sense than buying now for your needs two or three years down the road.

      Well, even the retinas have a removable SSD so that can be upgraded quite easily.

      Memory, not so much - by the time "a few years later" comes around, memory can be hard to find especially in the denser modules as everyone migrated to the new memory standard. If you buy the laptop that's using cutting edge memory, then yes, it makes sense to wait (e.g., DDR4). But if' it's using mainstream memory modules (e.g., DDR3) then buying now means not having to hunt for it when DDR5 is mainstream and DDR3 is now horrendously expensive. (Try finding DDR modules that are denser than 1GB per DIMM for any reasonable price. Even DDR2 - I have a laptop that's got 4GB of RAM, to upgrade it to 8 requires spending serious money. Even back when it came out it was expensive, and it's not much cheaper now years later).

      Batteries are controversial - you get people claiming one thing and another, but the sad reality is, save business laptops, 99.99% of consumers don't not replace the battery at all. Once it dies, it's dead and sits there in the battery bay while the PC may still be in use. Sure they could re-cell them or buy a new battery or whatever (though new is iffy - given the speed of which new models come out). but most people don't give a damn or care.

    8. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by cdwiegand · · Score: 2

      Soldered in RAM is so NOT STANDARD. Before my current job, I worked for almost 6 years at a place where, if we could afford it, we got Lenovo Thinkpads. I could upgrade every single one's memory. Shoot, even my MBP (pre-Retina) can be upgraded. My old Acer laptop, Gateway, shoot even the old Toshiba one (1998?) could all have memory upgraded. Soldered in RAM may be standard in smart phones and tablets, but not laptops.

      --
      . Define sqrt(x) as something really evil like (x / rand()), and bury it deep. Watch your coworkers go nuts.
    9. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      It is for ultrabooks.

      Thinkpads are not ultrabooks. In 1998 ultrabooks did not exist.

    10. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      Apple forces you to pay a hefty premium for a limited amount of RAM up front, obsoleting the machine that much sooner.

      just bought a MBP. I bought the maximum amount of ram. Apple clearly had me over a barrel here and i had no other option (aside from the obvious not buying a MBP). I get what you are saying about Apple forcing customers to pay a lot up front. I don't get your claim that it's going to obsolete the machine that much sooner. Generally when you buy a notebook, it can accept a maximum amount of ram. That maximum stays constant over the life of the product.

    11. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not on mine, but I have done several for family or friends. Almost all were the result of dropping the laptop.

      I am a specialist at dropping laptops on cement -- yes, I am a klutz, it seems -- this is not an issue with modern Apple laptops. I had a MacBook Pro (or I think they called it something else back then -- whatever the top of the line was at the time) in 2000, and dropping that caused some issues (later held together very carefully with a keyring to clamp the display together). With a 2005(?) MBP, this resulted in slight denting. Now with a MacBook Air, just scratches. I can imagine a typical Windows laptop having issues with drops, but Apple has really gotten substantially better with build quality.

    12. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Thinkpads are not ultrabooks.

      That doesn't seem to be true: here and here, there are several Thinkpad ultrabooks listed. Now, if you said that there were no Thinkpad ultrabooks prior to the "Chief River" set of Intel's specifications, that would be true.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    13. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Second link fixed: here. You'd think I'd've learned to use preview.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    14. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      MacBook Pros are not ultrabooks either; soldered in RAM is only reasonable for the MacBook Air.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    15. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by aitikin · · Score: 1

      And the MBP is not supposed to be an ultrabook either. It's supposed to be a super powered Apple laptop. I'm upset about the soldered in RAM like the rest, but I still will deal with it. Unfortunately for me, computers are almost as consumable as laptop batteries.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    16. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and shouldn't be glued in anymore than a toner cartridge.

      Ssh! You'll give the printer manufacturers ideas.

    17. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually with a few recent Apple models, there have been firmware updates available that doubled the maximum ram it could address. I had one. Checked, saw I'd already applied the update when it had become available, ordered some ram, popped it in, no problems. Let me get by with the same old laptop for another year before I jumped to this one.

    18. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      Sure, a given memory technology's prices bottom out and then rise again as new generations come out. It irks me that upgrading my late-2008 MacBooks (now used by the kids) to 6GB would require two 4GB modules at nearly $100 each. But when those machines were new, 4GB modules were not available, period, and when they came out a year or two later they were over a grand. I would've been nuts to max them out early, even if I now wish I'd bought the modules at $60 or whatever the minimum was.

    19. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by pLnCrZy · · Score: 1

      For many consumer-level printers, it's often cheaper to buy a new printer than replace the toner/ink.

      Landfills are printer graveyards.

    20. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much nobody wants to send their machine in for a battery replacement every two years. That's a simple answer to a fairly asinine question. Who wants a prostate examination? I'd ask, who needs to send their machine for a battery replacement every two years?

      The current MacBook Pro batteries are sold as designed to maintain 80% and upwards capacity for 1000 cycles. That's 1.3 full charge/discharge cycles a day, seven days a week for two years. None of these figures are set in stone, and maybe your usage patterns lead to quick death of batteries. I'm a pretty heavy user - the guy who used to lug spare batteries around for a PowerBook G3. I bought about 5 batteries - not because older batteries were dying, more because I needed longer battery life on the road. Each battery would give me maybe a couple of hours, so I'd need more. A current MacBook Pro sees me through the best part of a transatlantic flight. If spare batteries were an option I probably would still carry one, but overall the gains in energy density of batteries means it's nowhere near as necessary or useful as it used to be.

      Toner is not expected to last the life of a printer - not anywhere near its useful life! It's a silly comparison, like wondering why rice can be stored in a cupboard while opened milk must be refrigerated? Integrated batteries, like those in phones, can last the useful life of the product. That doesn't mean in 5 years a laptop will be running at the same capacity it had back in the first year, but then what is on that machine? For laptops in any kind of serious use (like the kind you're implying) I'd say a three year upgrade cycle is realistic. Maybe longer if you're sticking with a relatively sedentary pace in software upgrades.

      tl;dr
      Personal preferences and needs. I'm fine on a three year upgrade cycle, and my battery usage needs fit pretty well in to that. Your mileage may vary.

    21. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about your ultrabooks? We're talking about workstation grade laptops. Not everyone is all hotz for your but.. err, cloud-everything software, so do us all a favor and get off our lawn, you punk!

    22. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      I can imagine a typical Windows laptop having issues with drops

      I wasn't aware Microsoft manufactured laptops, or that installing linux changed the physical characteristics.

    23. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      But they give you half sized toners/ink cartridges when you buy the printer....

    24. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Not being able to replace a drive or a battery without ungluing the damned thing is criminal. Both are *consumables*. Its really no different than if HP sealed in the toner cart and you have to buy a new printer when it ran out...

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    25. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      I recently put in an SSD on my 2011 MBP after I managed to fry my old hard drive and honestly no upgrade I've ever done to this machine has given me such a noticable and amazing performance boost.

      I strongly recomend this upgrade. Macs just sing with an SSD.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    26. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wasn't aware Microsoft manufactured laptops, or that installing linux changed the physical characteristics.

      Well, if you want to be daft like that, Microsoft lists the Surface and variants under laptops. There's only been a million Slashdot discussions on it. Where have you been?

    27. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by pLnCrZy · · Score: 1

      For many consumer-level printers, it's often cheaper to buy 2 new printers than replace the toner/ink.

      Or at least pretty damn close in many cases.

    28. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a DELL XPS 13. The SSD is replaceable. RAM isn't, but 8 gigs should do for a while. If I need more I'll have to make do with swap. The Battery is only screwed in, I have tested removing it. However DELL don't make replacements available. I like my laptops lasting longer than most people expect, so hopefully down I will be able find a replacement.

    29. Re:Cost vs. Benefits by izzo+nizzo · · Score: 1

      Repairs are indeed possible with the new computers. As for upgrades, consider that Mac laptops have excellent resale value and a great set of tools for migrating your data to another Mac.

      So rather than performing an upgrade (and I'm not saying that upgrading RAM was onerous, but yeah, it sometimes was), you can get a new machine and resell your current one. Let's say you're now out $600.

      If you can't accomplish $600 worth of productivity and fun by using a Retina Mac instead of a PC, keep in mind that you're also saving your eyes from strain by using the Retina display.

      I know Slashdot commenters won't appreciate this advice, but I think it's worth mentioning that the high resale value is an alternative to buying an upgradable machine.

  4. Lenovo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an old T61 and a brand new X240, both are excellent.

    1. Re:Lenovo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an old T61 and a brand new X240, both are excellent.

      I have a T61 as well. It's been a very solid laptop.

  5. Thinkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even though lenovo is not as "kewl" as IBM, they still make work laptops, not gaming/multimedia/whatever crap.

  6. Cannot upgrade or repair? by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Informative

    If I can fix sealed phones surely this laptop is repairable.

    This sounds like hyperbole. Ungluing a battery is not impossible. If the ram goes, sure you are out a mobo, but that is pretty normal for ultrabooks. Either you want it small or you want it easy to repair.

    1. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think the point is repairing sealed phones is - for most people, even IT folk - a non-trivial and risk-filled task. Likewise with newer MBPs.

      Generic Wintel laptops, while not entirely user-serviceable (though I've replaced several screens and keyboards without incident and of course RAM and hard drive upgrades are trivial), are much, much easier to upgrade than sealed MBPs. Of course it can be done but generally it's done by "professionals" who have done it a hundred+ times and have the right tools for separating plastics, un-glueing (is that a word? De-glueing?) without cracking screens, cases, etc.

      Likewise a car engine is "user serviceable" if you know what you're doing but I've tried doing relatively minor repairs on my engine (spark plugs and such) and did some real damage because I am just not that great mechanically and had to take it to a mechanic.

    2. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I am not the one complaining about this.
      I said they were repairable.

    3. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But where do you get the spare parts?
      EVERYTHING is nonstandard it will at least raise the price of the parts

    4. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Jethro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not just about being repairable.

      With previous generation Apple laptops, I could put all the money into the machine with the best CPU and pay extra for the hires matte screen, and just get 4gigs of RAM and the cheapest, slowest HDD they had.

      Then I could pay an extra $100 to upgrade it to 16gb of RAM on my own (rather than pay Apple an extra $400 or $600 or whatever) and buy and install my own 1tb harddrive or my own SSD or whatever, again, for a fraction of what Apple charge for that. And, to be clear, that'd be my plan no matter what laptop I bought. Always has been. Every laptop manufacturer charges those insane prices for extra RAM or better HDDs.

      With the RAM (and harddrive!) soldered on, you can't do that anymore.

      It's not just about fixing broken stuff. It's about getting a better deal and potentially saving hundreds of dollars to get a phenomenally better computer.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    5. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      That is a totally different subject.
      Surely from Apple's point of view this is a huge gain. Most customers are just going to pay.

      This is a valid way to save money, but these days I don't bother either from laziness or just the PITA it makes warranty claims.

    6. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Ebay.
      In every laptop or phone parts are nonstandard.

    7. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by BobMcD · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You keep saying 'self respecting slashdotter' like this means a single, measurable thing. Some IT people are hardware types and some are software types and a small handful are both. They are called 'silos'. Look it up.

      Also, among that few who 'like' to work on hardware, many of those are wise enough not to stretch their comfort zones - due to bad experiences, just like the one you replied to above.

      As a 'self respecting slashdotter', you really ought to know this.

      You like Apple and feel like the repair issue isn't a thing. Fine. That's your opinion. How's about letting the other folks express theirs without replying to every. single. post?

    8. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If you are not obsessed with shaving a few mm off each year then you can get pretty slim laptops with socketed RAM and CPUs from Lenovo, Acer, Toshiba, NEC and many others. They are hardly bricks in comparison to an ultrabook.

      If they are available to the OP I suggest looking at some Panasonic Let's Note models, some of which are marketed as Toughbooks outside Japan. Thin, light, lots of features and nearly indestructible, just a bit expensive. Thinkpads are hard to go wrong with as well.

      If you want cheap Acer have reasonable build quality and very inexpensive replacement parts. Some of the lower cost Lenovo line are okay too, as are NEC and Toshibas. Having said that individual models can always have problems, so look for one that is six months old and check Google for persistent problems.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I actually don't really like apple.

      Silos AKA so overspecialized as to be useless. Specialization is for bugs, not people. Self respecting nerds, remember "news for nerds"?

      I think I am only responding to those responding to me.

      I tend to comment a limited amount of times then only reply from my comments page when I see a reply to myself.

    10. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you are in the running for most pathetic Mac fanboi ever!

    11. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is MacBook Pro are now basically MacBook Airs with some spec upgrades. There is no professional laptop from Apple anymore.
       
      For me, personally, it's not the issues of the glued in motherboard and repairability, it's that to get a new Pro to the spec of my old Pro, I would have to buy a separate monitor (17" and anti-glare displays have both been killed), buy a separate CD/DVD drive, and buy a separate hard drive because I'm not paying an extra $800 get a 1 TB flash drive as an option. At that point, I'm just a CP, motherboard, and keyboard shy of an entire separate computer, and I already have a spare keyboard.
       
      There's nothing about buying a MacBook Pro that makes sense for me any longer. If I'm really tied to OS X I might as well use the $800 1 GB hard drive upgrade money to buy a Mac Mini, and use the money that would have gone to MacBook Pro on a laptop from another company.

    12. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Moreover, the new Retina MBPs are quite easily upgradeable too.

      See, unlike a Windows laptop, you can actually sell a Mac laptop for anywhere between 50% and 80% of the original price, depending on its age. It may not be as geeky as using screw drivers to install a new part, but practically speaking, it's really not that much more expensive than upgrading a PC.

    13. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by ernest.cunningham · · Score: 1

      1. The Apple upgrade to 16gb cost me $320NZD ($260 USD) on my rMBP.
      2. The hard drive is not soldered on.
      3. You can still get the old style MBP from Apple so what the fuck are you bitching about right now?

      On a side note, people on slashdot think they are the norm. You're not.

    14. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Specialization is for bugs, not people.

      This was wrong when Heinlein said it, and it's just as wrong when you said it.

    15. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repairable is not just a binary state though. I have been able to repair some issues in recent MacBooks and similar devices that were not meant to be user serviceable. That doesn't mean I want to though, and if given a choice that doesn't involve many trade offs, I would much rather have a repair/upgrade that takes 10-15 minutes instead of a couple to several hours. Some laptops I can be done with the whole process of replacing a hard drive before I can even see the hard drive on others.

    16. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but if you think you're only responding to those who responded to you, you need to pull your head out of your ass. Seriously, I'd like to read 2 comments without one of them being yours. SHUT UP ALREADY!

      And your statement about Silos being so overspecialized as to be useless, but in truth, that's such utter idiocy that there is no way to intelligently respond to it. It's like trying to argue with somebody convinced 2+2=5, there's no point, they're idiots who don't know what they're talking about. I guess I'm useless as my silo I place myself in says that I'm the last person who should preform surgery.

    17. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The definition of 'Pro' differs from person to person. As a software developer, I chose to get the 15" model with 500 GB of storage and 16 GB of RAM and don't see any need within the next few years to go beyond that. "Pro" users don't usually hold on to computers beyond 4-5 years anyway. I don't need more disk space, never needed a CD/DVD drive and a 17" display (which isn't as good as the 15" running at full resolution) wouldn't have met my needs anyway so I bought an external display. In return, I get a very lightweight laptop for the size and a high resolution display for when I do have to work on the road. The battery life could be better but that's mostly due to the apps and resolution I'm running.

    18. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I am only replying to replies.
      Just like this. You replied to me, I am replying back.

      I never suggest you perform surgery. Only that you not be so specialized that you can't operate a screwdriver.

    19. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Jethro · · Score: 2

      It's a different subject, but it's really one of the big problems the OP and I are running into with buying new Apple hardware.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    20. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I can see this from both sides.
      I would not be surprised if they then do not want you as customers.

    21. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      So you get the money back you shouldn't have had to pay in the first place. So what?

    22. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by occasional_dabbler · · Score: 1

      Back in the day when I maintained my own motorcyle the pub-talk was quite often about the problem of replacing spark plugs in early Japanese fours that seemed to have heads made out of a special alloy that was softer than chocolate, especially when getting to the middle two was more like gynecology than mechanics.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs," I said. "we have a protractor"
    23. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Jethro · · Score: 2

      First, I don't think I'm the norm in computer usage at all. Not even close. That doesn't mean I don't have a point of view, and it doesn't mean I can't be sad that my preferred hardware platform is changed in ways I don't like. Again, I'm just expressing my opinion on the matter, I'm not trying to make you agree to it. There is absolutely no need for you to get upset or jump into profanity...

      Now, as to your points:

      1. I can get 16GB of RAM for US$140 (which google tells me is NZD170). And that's a full 16. If I was just upgrading form 8gb it'd be half that. I've just saved about USD$200.
      2. You are correct and I was wrong about the SSD not being replacable. However, the new MBP do not use a standard SSD, and the availability and type they use are limited and more expensive than standard ones.
      3. I am looking at the Apple store website right now. The non-retina MBP are only available in 13", which is not an option I can use.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    24. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Neither would I, sadly, and I don't think they really ever did want us as customers. Nonetheless, they were accommodating (I've taken a self-modified MBP to the apple store to have minor repairs done, and they had zero problems. Even when I told them I personally broke the keyboard while upgrading the HDD).

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    25. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any "self-respecting Slashdotter" should be able to diagnose a malfunctioning (but not visibly-deformed) electrolytic capacitor and replace it. They should be able to replace a surface-mount component, disassemble and reassemble their car's engine, reverse engineer a USB communication protocol, and understand the obfuscated output of an optimizing compiler. They should be able to write an optimized emulator for any arbitrary hardware architecture, after intuiting the nature and function of the opcodes in the processor that they're emulating. Any "self-respecting Slashdotter" shouldn't even *need* a crutch like an electronic computer; a slide rule, pad of graph paper, a pencil, and a compass are the only computing devices necessary.

      After all, no true Scotsman, errrr, "self-respecting Slashdotter" should have any reservations about any area that anyone could conceivably consider technical. After all, we aren't bugs, right h4rr4r? Or, we could just accept that some people don't live in your perfect world and have limitations that you seem incapable of accepting. Not everyone can be H4rr4r, the Great and Powerful!

    26. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by zugmeister · · Score: 1

      While replacing the air filter on her truck, my wife once tried to screw in the top of the airbox cover. Having little experience, she started the screws with a drill. Three of the four were cross-threaded immediately and she was angry at the drill, didn't know to start them by hand. I can totally see someone with a power tool installing plugs and cross threading them into the heads.

    27. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Kagato · · Score: 3, Informative

      First, Ultrabooks are not all that much cheaper than the real Mac Book Air. Often they are just as much, if not more expensive when they try to copy the all metal case. There's a bit more of a delta in price on the larger 15" Mac Book Pro, but the windows machine is still going to be thicker and heavier. Once you start comparing truly comparable hardware the premium is pretty small. This is especially true once you start comparing all metal case laptops.

      Want to save money, go with plastic. Resale value on a plastic laptop is pretty abysmal. The hinges are prone to cosmetic cracks and the finish gets pronounced wear patterns.

      You also need to take into account with mac you're getting a free productivity suite, free OS upgrades, and you don't waste the first few hours of ownership removing a ton of bloatware and crippleware. Add that to the resale value and it makes fiscal sense to me.

    28. Re: Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replacing the spark plug in my KTM required fabricating my own socket. The gap between the spark plug and the surrounding engine case was so small no available socket would fit in.

    29. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      How could you do damage with spark plugs? Take them out, put new one in. Don't crack them.

      Yeah, I was trying to figure that one out too........

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    30. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2

      I don't want it small. Apple does but I'm perfectly fine with the old MBP's size and weight. It's a price I gladly payed for being able to upgrade the RAM and storage myself and for not being forced to use a comparatively tiny, yet expensive SSD. For me, Apple notebooks are great becuse of their build quality and because I like OS X (although it's gotten less enjoyable since Lion). I don't need a razor-thin design object, I need a reliable notebook that is known to run some flavor of Unix well.

      Of course that doesn't make me part of Apple's core demographic but until the retina MBPs showed up choosing a notebook was a no-brainer: Just get a reasonable MBP and upgrade the HDD and RAM for a fraction of what Apple charges. Now I need to buy their RAM at twice the merket rate, the storage is only upgradable for the more expensive models and even then a terabyte costs an order of magnitude more than an HDD of comparable size. (No, not all of us value speed over cost.) Also, no matte screens, no optical drive, no native Ethernet and no microphone jack.

      Apple hardware has gotten too expensive for me while losing features I use and adding nothing I value. I'm disappointed by that since I used to really like their notebook lineup.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    31. Re: Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new more expensive SSD's aren't just limited and hard to find, they are also three times faster than the peak theoretical speed of a sata connection.

      It's worth the trade off.

      Frankly though, this whole discussion is useless. I'm not interested in running windows or linux. I use windows at home for gaming and media, it's great for that. All the servers i'm involved in (well, except for one) are linux and I love it there. But I'm not going to use either for work. No fucking way.

    32. Re: Cannot upgrade or repair? by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I have no choice about using Windows for work. I managed to run Linux for a few years without anyone noticing, but sadly that's not possible anymore.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    33. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not a criticism, just something that makes me laugh to myself.

      I remember buying 16 *MB* of ram for $800. No, not a typo.. 16 MB...

      God I feel fraking old.

    34. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by jafac · · Score: 1

      yes; I do not have the tiny fingers of an 8-year-old Indonesian assembly-line worker, so while I'm very handy with a screwdriver and soldering iron, I admit to being flummoxed in changing ipod-nano batteries. (in fact, the one I tried to replace: I ended up cracking the lcd screen; mail-ordering a replacement, and cracking THAT, during post-battery-swap re-install.)

      As for my car:
      Yes, you can get involved in some seriously costly mayhem if you fuck things up.
      I have done everything from top-end rebuilds, to swapping in aftermarket turbochargers, to rebuilding a fuel injection pump (diesel). Not trivial stuff. Still, I once burned-out an airbag controller, rendering the whole airbag system disabled. A replacement unit would have been $1000. (the replace-job was a simple, 4-screws and connector-plug; plus an ECU re-code).

      There are components that are designed to be user-servicable. Then there's things that your general "handy" person can hack-together in their garage. But I can't personally re-flash a controller module. And I'm not dexterous enough to service miniatureized electronics that were not ever designed to be anything more than disposable commodity items.

      When it comes to laptops - that's some pretty fucking expensive "disposable commodity items" - and while laptops, in general, ARE a pain in the ass to work on (if you're doing more than replacing RAM or HD) - I prefer the standard wintel-style laptop, to the direction Apple's headed.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    35. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      Are they taking a loss on any laptop they sell me?

      No?

      Am I advising my non-technical family and friends on what kind of computer to buy?

      well duh, this is /. - of course I am.

      Therefore, they want me as a customer.

    36. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, I don't know many people that were demanding even thinner or lighter PRO laptops Seriously.. anyone that has an issue w/ a 5LB laptop really needs to go to the f'in gym or something. My laptop/gear bag varies anywhere from 30-50 lbs. I'd gladly trade an extra half pound and a few mm for easier upgradability/serviceability. Pretty sure most PROS that depend on these devices to make a living feel the same.

    37. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      1: That's more than you'll find it for on Black Friday.

      2: The new PCIe based modules are proprietary, probably based on the M2 electrical protocol over a mini-PCI physical layer. They compare favorably to RevoDrives in both price-per-gig and in performance, however. Still, there's no upgrades available at the moment.

      3: Actually, no I can't - if I want a 15" macbook, it's a Retina model. If I want a Macbook Pro with discrete graphics, it's a Retina model. The non-Retina 13" model didn't even get upgraded processors, they're still kickin' it old school with the HD4000 and Ivy Bridge CPUs. Could you have at least dropped a Haswell in the socket, guys?

    38. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Hey my birthday present when I was 14 was an upgrade from 512K to 640K. I don't even WANT to know how much that cost...

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    39. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      A MBP is not an ultrabook. Applying that standard to the MBP is kinda absurd.

    40. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people of slashdot have a lot of different talents. You're apparently good at repairing small electronics and probably awful at flying helicopters, someone else may be just the opposite. Not everyone on slashdot works in IT, in fact it's clear from the range of science, business, and programming threads that they aren't even a majority on the site.

    41. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not being comfortable desoldering and soldering ram is not "overspecialization", it's a point that easily describers a vast number of people on this site if not the majority. Coders don't need to solder, mathematicians don't need to solder, chemists don't need to solder. I've literally never had the need to solder anything in my life, why would I start with RAM upgrades on a $1300 MacBook Pro? Guess I'll hand in my nerd card.

    42. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by ernest.cunningham · · Score: 1

      1. It is still not the $400 - $600 he is claiming.

      2. He said soldered on, which is untrue. Replacement drives will be available during the lifecycle of the machine (iFixit have even said they are planning to release a replacement). If you needed more storage now then you should buy it with more storage. Simple.

      3. Great, so the retina model has the screen size you want, discrete graphics like you want, the processors you want, a better screen, faster memory, faster storage. It is called trade offs. If you really can't bring yourself to getting a better machine because you want upgrade the ram after purchase then get a refurb or one from all the stores who still have stock.

      The problem is that you guys are acting like you have no options. You do. Life is a constant tradeoff. Pros vs Cons. You can buy a reinta and enjoy all its advantages and deal with the lack of ram upgrades, you can buy a 13inch MacBook Pro and deal with no 15inch screen. You can buy a refurb, buy a stock item from a retailer. Upgrade your current machines further (since that is what you are crying out to do). Or buy another machine.

    43. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's more than just difficult, it is designed to discourage users fixing their own hardware. Apple charges for battery replacements. Most manufacturers would happily sell you a replacement pack - after all, batteries are consumable. Apple changed that by making the battery a non-user serviceable and somewhat difficult to remove part. I couldn't even see the parts available for sale on the Apple website if you wanted to try yourself.

      It has little to do with making the products extremely thin because other manufacturers make phones and tablets and laptops that are just as thin but have replaceable consumables.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    44. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about your ultrabooks? We're talking about workstation grade laptops. Not everyone is all hotz for your but.. err, cloud-everything software, so do us all a favor and get off our lawn, fucking punk!

    45. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      1. I suppose so, but it did reach that at the DRAM high-water mark when Thailand flooded. It's a small concern compared to the humanitarian crisis, I suppose, but it left a mark on long-time apple buyers' memory.

      2. I could cram four terabytes into my current Macbook Pro between my two bays, or using the latest from Western Digital, I can have a pair of 128 gig SSD partitions and 2tb of magnetic storage for the purposes of an enormous Fusion Drive. (well, for a laptop) A Macbook Pro currently goes up to 1 terabyte, and a Macbook Air to half a terabyte; you can't go higher for love nor money.

      3. My choice would be to further upgrade my current machine, but it's a Core2 and I don't own a reflow oven. I don't think MBPs go up to 32 gigs RAM, because the modules haven't been invented yet. Also, while the SSDs are blistering fast, their absolute capacity isn't great, and their price-per-gig ratio isn't great either. I'd love to upgrade my machine as you suggest, but she's really at her limits. Had there been a 16 gig Macbook Air configuration, I'd have picked one up, never looked back, and been perfectly happy - but with the current lineup, every single Macbook offers some compromise I don't want to make. And every non-Mac means losing access to some really incredibly useful software - either repurchasing my commercial software on Windows or doing without on Linux, plus either doing without BASH (Windows) or well, I'm sorry to say, a lot of good software.

    46. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Cross-thread, under- or over-torque. Under- results in loss of spark plug while driving, happened to me on a borrowed taurus wagon once. Over- can result in stripped threads, which means the same plus needing your plug socket heli-coiled. Especially a problem either way on modern Aluminum heads. Many people do not seem to be able to operate a torque wrench even if you hand them one...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    47. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      happened to me on a borrowed taurus wagon once.

      Ouch

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    48. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      And that's exactly why I purchased a 13" MacBook Pro Mid-2012 edition (2.9Ghz Core i7) when i did back in July 2013. I knew the MBP non-retina would not get an update. It was the end of the line for this model. So I cashed in my WellsFargo reward points into $400 worth of BestBuy gift cards and purchased my new laptop. Immediately I upgraded to 16GB RAM with an OCZ Vertex 4 256GB SSD. Fucking apple still won't enable TRIM except on their own Apple branded SSDs. For 3rd party SSDs to have TRIM enabled, you have to run some commands from the terminal. After all these years, it's till this way in Mavericks (10.9)!!!. I suppose I should be lucky they didn't create a propritary SATA connector with encrypted device signing. Oh, I suppose that's next...

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    49. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Heh. Well, I got my MBP in 2011 and did more or less the same upgrade you did. Actually Think I did a 500GB spinny disk first, then went to an SSD later. I expect a few more years out of this guy...

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    50. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by drkim · · Score: 1

      While replacing the air filter on her truck, my wife once tried to screw in the top of the airbox cover. Having little experience, she started the screws with a drill. Three of the four were cross-threaded immediately and she was angry at the drill, didn't know to start them by hand. I can totally see someone with a power tool installing plugs and cross threading them into the heads.

      Can you give us a computer analogy to explain this post?

      Thanks.

    51. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's not broken, then don't "fix" it.
      You want processing power? Then get access to a server farm, far cheaper than the hardware.
      You want games? Then buy a desktop with dedicated hardware or even better, one or two consoles, either of those would last a very long time without upgrades these days.
      For me, personally, I don't feel comfortable with hardware, though I'm better at it than most people I know, mostly because when something goes wrong, I keep thinking "Undo! Undo! Ctrl+Z!!!"

    52. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah bro ungluing batteries and stuff sounds tedious with a high chance of failure. I only have so much time and motivation to work on nerdy stuff in my adult life ungluing batteries or actually fixing most things that aren't intended to be fixed is a waste of my precious geek time/motivation.

    53. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Geeky · · Score: 1

      Happened to me but what's worse is it that the spark plugs had only ever been touched by the main dealer as part of a routine service (as required to maintain the service history). So even the "trained" junior mechanic managed to screw it up. Spark plugs actually popped out while driving, stripping the thread in the process.

      I wouldn't trust them to fix it, but the little local garage round the corner rebored and inserted a new helicoil and replaced the spark plugs, all for about £130. Next day, whereas the main dealer wanted to charge twice that and do it the following week...

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    54. Re:Cannot upgrade or repair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed setting the arc gap size. VERRRRRRRRY important.

  7. System 76 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm very happy with the System 76 I purchased a few months ago. I'm a Windows user, so I installed Windows 7 on it and downloaded all of the Windows 7 drivers from the System 76 web site, and it's been rock solid and a really good performer.

    1. Re:System 76 by mrex · · Score: 1

      I want to like System76, but the one I had was overpriced junk.

      Who builds a trackpad with an indistinct sensing area? Worse, even when you did manage purely by luck to have your finger on the pad's surface, the sensitivity was awful. And for that matter, who builds a modern laptop with multiple video outputs that can't drive an external display at 1080p simultaneously with the LCD? Ugh.

    2. Re:System 76 by occasional_dabbler · · Score: 1

      I was going to say that seems a painful way to get a Windows Laptop, but I'd not looked System 76 for a while and some of their stuff looks pretty nice

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs," I said. "we have a protractor"
    3. Re:System 76 by andreicristianpetcu · · Score: 1

      I have a System76 Galago and it's pretty cool. The keyboard has some issues but they created a new keyboard model and they are shipping them for free to any Galago owner. It's easy to replace too... just 4 screws.

    4. Re:System 76 by andreicristianpetcu · · Score: 1

      I have a System76 Galago UltraPro and I got used to the clickpad in 2 weeks. I can even play FPS games on it without a mouse. It's really cool. It also has a right click button just like most desktop keyboards.

  8. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "serviceability & upgradeability"

    When the fuck was this?

    1. Re:Seriously? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      From a time when desktop computers served and empowered their owners, rather than disenfranchise and enslave them with service contracts, SaaS, and one-size-fits-all lowest common denominator design specs.

  9. ThinkPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ThinkPad.

  10. Battery life is more important... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For me, having an extensive battery life is more important than being able to change the battery in 5 years when it is worn out.

    And in that respect, Macs are pretty hard to beat.

    1. Re: Battery life is more important... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled expensive up there.

  11. Next Version? by jythie · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since I have a really slow upgrade cycle, I am mostly just holding out hope that Apple releases a more maintainable MBP again sometime over the next few years. I found my 2006 MBP to be surprisingly maintainable, with parts easy to get and swap out, but nothing was glued in place. Every once in a while I poke around to see if there are any others that I like but so far not much luck.

    1. Re: Next Version? by tysonedwards · · Score: 1

      Computers are taking queues from cell phones and becoming cheap, commodity, throw-away items. There are even desktops from the likes of Dell and Toshiba with soldered on CPUs that simply can't be upgraded or replaced. Add to that Intel and AMD saying that the age of year over year performance increases are over for x86. GPUs are seeming to be the only area where massive performance growth will continue. The road maps for the next few years are on power savings, not performance. As such, upgradable components are also becoming less relevant than they were a decade ago when you could throw $150 at a couple year old computer and double performance.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    2. Re: Next Version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "cue" not "queue"

      Posting AC to protect karma from (deserved) Grammar Nazi accusation.

    3. Re: Next Version? by gnasher719 · · Score: 2

      Computers are taking queues from cell phones and becoming cheap, commodity, throw-away items.

      Calling them "throw-away" items is stupid. There is unrepairable; that's throw-away. There's user repairable, which in practice means I have to fix it in my family. And there's the huge and growing middle ground where you have to pay someone to repair it.

      Things like glued-in batteries are easy to replace if you work at a place that has the right tools.

    4. Re:Next Version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was incredibly skeptical of some of the changes, but battery-wise I'm incredibly happier

      Before:
      * I had a replaceable battery
      * new battery was about $130
      * lasted 3-4 hours (or 1 or 2 when failing)--died on plane trips
      * had to replace every couple years (always prematurely, but outside of warranty)

      After:
      * cannot replace the battery (but very simple after opening the case)
      * new battery is about $130
      * lasts 4-6 hours (even after a few years)--makes it through most plane trips for me
      * haven't had to replace it after a longer period of time and more charge cycles on it

      However, the loss of a DVD drive, non-user replaceable RAM and HDD are making me hold off on getting another.

    5. Re:Next Version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. Late 2006 workhorse still running smooth. Upgraded to SSD last year. Only regular maintenance operation is to blow all dust away and oil the fans biannually.

  12. Lenovo T430S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the bomb. You can hot swap an extra battery or drive caddy from the ultrabay slot for more storage or more power. It takes 16GB ram, and has an mSATA slot for the possibility of three SSDs. Make sure you steer clear of the optimus graphics if you're running linux. I get the intel card and use the open source drivers.

  13. Ultrabooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't suppose you'll find many well-designed metal-bodied portables other than Ultrabooks. I'm in much the same boat, and in my case I also can't figure out why Apple killed the 17" screen format, but they are clearly not interested in what you and I want. I don't know if you're bent on making a hackintosh or not, but for Windows/Linux purposes, the Asus Zenbooks aren't horrible. I've picked up a couple of those and they're okay enough. The HP Envy line didn't impress me with the build quality. Good luck!

  14. If Your Laptop Needs Upgrades, is it good enough? by BoRegardless · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I will make the argument these devices are mostly tools and professional quality ones should be ordered loaded with CPU & RAM that works on the factory warranty & the hard drives can still be easily changed out. Our time is worth a decent amount of $s per hour, after all, and we do NOT have unlimited time.

    A professional laptop recently seems to retain its usefulness for at least 3 years, so these laptops remain functional for a long enough time to justify ordering them loaded with options to make our life and work easier.

  15. If it were me, System and eOS Luna by wjcofkc · · Score: 2

    If I had the money, I would go with a 17.3" Bonobo Extreme from System 76 - It's beefy as is and you can crack it right open for upgrades. The display is very nice, however I really don't know if it goes so far as to meet your Retina requirement. My first order of business would be to wipe out the hard drive and install elementary OS Luna - if you've never used it I promise you will fall in love pretty damn quick. I used Macs exclusively from 2005 until two or three months ago when I gave up OS X for a full migration to eOS after getting hooked on it - something I would have otherwise never believed possible.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:If it were me, System and eOS Luna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I promise you will fall in love pretty damn quick.

      I would first have to overcome my gut feeling that this horrific cloning of OSX pretties must be killed with fire...

    2. Re:If it were me, System and eOS Luna by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      I have one and love it. They have a new 17" that's pretty similar but doesn't have the gaming graphics card. It's significantly cheaper. I wish they both had higher resolution displays, but they're still better than most laptops these days. I like the caddy based HDD/DVD drives as well. Both have them and the Bonobo has an second drive in addition to it.

  16. Welcome to the disposable world. by deviated_prevert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple has realized that making serviceable devices is a dead end when the processor hardware is good enough to be future proof. And their solution is the same solution many sectors of the economy face. Our automobiles are disposable consumer oriented devices, our kitchen appliances are as well, washing machines, you name it all service and repair departments are being down graded to expedite product end life.

    Obsolescence is not just planned it has become a manufacturing industry mantra. With essentially slave labour doing the recycling of these goods, either that or illegal at sea dumping operations turning over the used goods we are headed down a technical path to environmental and consumer driven stupidity!

    --
    This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
    1. Re:Welcome to the disposable world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the time I want to upgrade, the sockets for the RAM and CPU are outdated leading to higher costs than buying new with current hardware in wide scale production.

      My priorities were compatibility with my bosses Adobe files, weight, and size. I went with a MBAir when I retired my MBP. I regret that I bought in before the battery life improvements were made, but it met my goals.

    2. Re:Welcome to the disposable world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your car may be disposable, but I sold my last car when it had 256,000 miles on it. I expect my new car to do the same.

      Electronics may be disposable. Large equipment, such as cars, trucks, etc., are not

    3. Re:Welcome to the disposable world. by armanox · · Score: 1

      Cars are disposable devices? I am sure my 95 Saturn and 88 Ford would love to be told that (with 255K and 150K miles on them, respectively. I drive ~80 miles on a work day).

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    4. Re:Welcome to the disposable world. by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Cars are disposable devices? I am sure my 95 Saturn and 88 Ford would love to be told that (with 255K and 150K miles on them, respectively. I drive ~80 miles on a work day).

      Now they are. I have a 2007 with 150k that is just falling apart. But the dependable car is the 1988 Toyota with over half a million miles on it. When the 07 dies, I am getting a pre-2000 car so that it will last.

    5. Re:Welcome to the disposable world. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Expect all you like. Reality won't give a shit.

    6. Re:Welcome to the disposable world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who recently replaced the flame components in a 12 year old gas dryer for $80 i have to say not all appliances are disposable as well.

      The parts needed were readily available and yes, it took some time but i'd prefer to pay $80 and a few hours vs ~600 and the hassle of getting a new one.

    7. Re:Welcome to the disposable world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:Welcome to the disposable world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stuff is smaller and more specialised. You're not going to open up the back of a modern TV and easily find valves and capacitors that can be easily swapped out. You don't achieve MacBook Pro results by building something that's easily pulled apart and fixed by anyone with off the shelf parts. Laptops have never been particularly amenable to upgrades beyond RAM and the HD. Space, ruggedisation and thermal limits are far more complicated in laptop design than they would be for putting together a desktop. Look at the engine of a Ford Anglia. Now go look at the engine of a current Opel Astra. See much of a difference? Yeah, you could easily smuggle some cats in the empty spaces around the Ford Anglia's engine. How about the Astra? Less space for cats. You think the Astra has slightly better performance than the Ford Anglia? Yeah, and why is that? It's because we stopped building cars out of fucking pig iron and wood. That's why modern things are harder to repair - they got more complicated to provide us the performance and functionality we want.

      Stuff got cheaper and more widely available. I remember when I was a kid, having the same family TV for 10 years or so. These days it'd be realistic for me to get a new TV every five years, and expect some fancy new features.

      TIL: companies like to sell stuff, and people like to buy new stuff. Thanks for that revelation. This doesn't have to come down to some conspiracy to make shit self destruct after x number of years. We as a society just don't hold on to consumer electronics as long as used to because they're cheaper and we want shiny new stuff.

      Start a company. Sell expensive stuff that's assembled so it can be repaired by its owner. I'm sure you'd find a loyal and very small user base in the western world. I'll pass on your valve driven widescreen CRT display.

    9. Re:Welcome to the disposable world. by bored_engineer · · Score: 1

      Our automobiles are disposable consumer oriented devices. . .

      Really? The first car that I had was a '76 El Camino. When I bought it, it had ~80,000 miles on it. By the time that it got to 150,000 miles, I had to replace:
      1. the engine;
      2. the exhaust;
      3. the transmission;
      4. two body panels to head off the rust;
      5. the power steering pump
      6. the starter (twice);
      7. the water pump (twice).

      This, of course, doesn't count normal maintenance items, nor the air conditioning that the previous owner disconnected. I had to replace plugs frequently when it started burning oil. In truth, it was a piece of shit.

      I have a 1997 Chevrolet pickup with 240,000 miles which has needed a fuel pump, water pump and a new fan control switch, aside from normal maintenance. My 1999 Subaru Legacy has 140,000 miles and has needed a power window switch, an oil seal, map light switch, power antenna (-50F is hard on them) and normal maintenance. I have a 1999 Acura that has needed a radiator and a window washer pump. Until 3 years after we married my wife had a 1992 Civic that needed new fuel injectors. (I can provide a better range of examples with the vehicles that my parents had, but this paragraph is already long, and the trend is really clear to me.)

      Cars have become less disposable, not more, and I can still find parts from the OEM for all three of the cars that my wife and I have.

      As to appliances, I replaced an 8-year old over/under washer dryer with a new stackable pair about 10 years ago, and have saved myself no end of trouble. The only repair that it's needed is a $3 latch. The washer and dryer in the other house are a 10 year old pair. The stoves in the two houses are about 10 years old and seem as though they will last some time to come. The refrigerators in both of the houses are beyond 15 years old

      I'm sure that if I checked with my parents, they would confirm that appliances tended to last 10-15 years when I was a child. It seems to me that appliances last about the same as they generally have*, and are becoming more efficient and easier to use. (Come to think about it, did anybody ever get the electro-mechanical timers on older GE stoves to work as you expected?)

      *I'm sure that a cast iron wood-fired cooking stove will outlast today's stoves, but it's MUCH harder to use until you have the knack of it.

    10. Re:Welcome to the disposable world. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But those parts can be reused, even if you are not the one reusing them. I have taken out hard drives and RAM before and used them for other computers, maybe not state of the art ones. If you send it back to Apple chances are they may reuse parts, but if you send back the Mac Air then the likelihood is that it gets shipped to a third world country where a child will try to dismantle it and remove the toxic battery before tossing the rest onto a garbage heap. Maybe some of the aluminum gets saved, but in general there is no real recycling being done. These are not green products no matter how many hippies are using them.

    11. Re:Welcome to the disposable world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But those parts can be reused, even if you are not the one reusing them. I have taken out hard drives and RAM before and used them for other computers, maybe not state of the art ones. If you send it back to Apple chances are they may reuse parts, but if you send back the Mac Air then the likelihood is that it gets shipped to a third world country where a child will try to dismantle it and remove the toxic battery before tossing the rest onto a garbage heap. Maybe some of the aluminum gets saved, but in general there is no real recycling being done. These are not green products no matter how many hippies are using them.

      Liar.

    12. Re:Welcome to the disposable world. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I can believe it if they are both Toyota's. Toyota has been de-contenting their cars for years now, and it's really starting to show. Quality is down, and they are mostly living off their reputation at this point when it comes to cars like the Camry and Corolla. Meanwhile 1988 was about the time Toyota was at the top of their game. Besides rust (if you live in a northern climate) those cars will go forever.

    13. Re:Welcome to the disposable world. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      It takes almost noting to design in user access to batteries, RAM, hard disks and other parts.

      The main reason to block upgrades is to coerce replacement, and that makes sense when your target market can easily afford to replace their computers often.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  17. Asus by Virtucon · · Score: 2

    Asus still makes some great laptops but I still miss 1200P res!

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:Asus by David_Hart · · Score: 2

      Asus still makes some great laptops but I still miss 1200P res!

      I too like Asus laptops and tablets and have had a good experience and good reliability with them.

      However, every time that I post about how good Asus laptops are today, there tend to be a number of post saying just how bad they are. I can only guess that most of those who hate Asus had older models. Asus had a lot of crap in the past, but they have improved the quality of their products by quite a bit.

    2. Re:Asus by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      I have had 6 and other than early Windows 8 driver issues, they've been rock solid.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  18. microsoft fud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get this trash off slashdot

  19. Just bite the bullet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just bite the bullet and buy one maxed out to the T, and you'll have the best damn laptop money can buy.

  20. Nature Of the Beast by Kagato · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As far as the RAM, meh. It's not windows, there's not a lot of cases when you would upgrade the RAM for OSX.

    Battery on the other hand is a real issue. Yeah, the "new batteries" aren't supposed to have recharge issues, but PC makers have been using that line for over a decade.

    It's not like Apple spends it time having a Seance to talk to Steve's ghost just to figure out how to piss people off. You want an ultra-thin notebook and you're going to sacrifice serviceability. You look at windows based ultrabooks and the serviceability is better than Apple, but not by that much. It's still a hassle to fit a battery into that space and an even bigger hassle to replace the battery. You start making the laptop more modular and a few things will happen. 1) You'll compromise on size and weight. 2) You start getting flex issues issues in the case (like it or not the glue on apple products has more to do with durability and case flex than it does with repairs). It become even more pronounced with plastic cases. 3) You end up with design compromises that make the overall experience horrid.

    So where does that leave the IT professional? Well, if it's for work there's likely a service contract. The glue is the problem for some guy at the referb factory. For home? Either put up with it/get applecare contract, or hackintosh one of the cheaper ultrabooks out there and live with what that entails.

    1. Re:Nature Of the Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah they say that... but tell that to my battery that barely holds a charge after a year.

    2. Re:Nature Of the Beast by PaddyM · · Score: 1

      TC1100 had no such compromises. It is small, upgradeable, and serviceable. I can see where soldered-in-RAM may improve performance at the cost of upgradeability, but everything else could be smaller without such compromises.

      I haven't found out how to move on from the TC1100 either. I was thinking an ipad mini with VNC-related software and keyboard (forget about upgrading), but the whole itunes gateway is just ridiculously impractical.

    3. Re:Nature Of the Beast by Kagato · · Score: 1

      Many credit cards have built in 1-year extensions to the warranty. I'd start there.

    4. Re:Nature Of the Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >, there's not a lot of cases when you would upgrade the RAM for OSX.
      pffft hahahahahaha

      I love my MBP, but i need another 4 gb to keep photoshop from thrashing my hdd on some of the bigger pieces I've done. Hell, doing things like sand or denim texture in illustrator REALLY eats into ram.

    5. Re:Nature Of the Beast by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      Same here --- I'm still using a Fujitsu Stylistics ST-4121 of the same vintage and can't find a decent replacement at a reasonable price (though apparently some ThinkPad models have an outdoor viewable display now?).

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    6. Re:Nature Of the Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iDevices no longer need iTunes. They can manage themselves.

    7. Re:Nature Of the Beast by jafac · · Score: 1

      I've had 4 different macbooks, and two macbook pros - and mac laptop batteries have had serious issues with swelling, and burning-out chargers. My son has a 2006 macbook, and yes, he's gone back and replaced boards, and maxxed out ram and replaced the hard drive and optical drive. But the one very annoying recurring problem is when the battery swells, and grounds-out the trackpad. This happens about every year. You buy a new battery, and you have about 12 months. Plus, the chargers, also, keep burning out. They last about 1-2 years, and that's consistent with the mac books of that era as well.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    8. Re:Nature Of the Beast by zugmeister · · Score: 1

      I've had really good luck with my jailbroken ipad3. There are a number of good VNC clients on the Apple store. Weather you like Apple or not their bluetooth keyboard is a great piece of hardware and with the jailbreak you can get BT mouse support as well. If you know anyone with a jailbroken iPad, it may be worth your time to check out.

    9. Re:Nature Of the Beast by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      You want an ultra-thin notebook and you're going to sacrifice serviceability.

      But I don't want an ultra-thin laptop. I'm fine with a laptop that is merely thin but that I can swap out memory and storage.

      I'm also in the realm of being a bit fed up. Don't get me wrong, I understand the argument and I agree with it. My Mom uses her laptop for e-mail, basic word-processing, and Facebook. She will never upgrade the memory or storage and she will appreciate a thin and light laptop.

      But I have different requirements than my Mom. That's why, in theory, Apple has two product lines--MacBook and MacBook Pro. Because Pros care about things like that. Because, if I have work to do and my hard-drive goes tits up, I need to be able to swap out the hard drive with one from the store down the street, not drive an hour and a half to the nearest Apple store and leave my laptop there for the day.

      At the moment, Apple has a serious case of anorexia, where they prize thinness above all else.

    10. Re:Nature Of the Beast by pepty · · Score: 1

      But the one very annoying recurring problem is when the battery swells, and grounds-out the trackpad. This happens about every year. You buy a new battery, and you have about 12 months. Plus, the chargers, also, keep burning out. They last about 1-2 years, and that's consistent with the mac books of that era as well.

      Typing this on a 2006 macbook with a trackpad shimmed with a bit of folded up paper to prevent that very problem. Still have the original charger though; I seem to have gotten the magic one.

    11. Re:Nature Of the Beast by Kagato · · Score: 1

      You may not, but the market says thin and light sells. Otherwise we wouldn't see a ton of companies copying apples Macbook Pro.

    12. Re:Nature Of the Beast by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The problem with Apple chargers is they have no strain relief on the cable. Not slim and stylish enough or something like that. Be super careful with them, and they'll last a long time. But for someone who treats it like any other charger, 1-2 years of normal wear-and-tear is enough to do one in.

  21. MBPr user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was also my concern when I bought MPB with Retina display 1,5 years ago. But I did one smart thing - bought it right away with 16G of RAM. And I knew that 256Gb of SSD will be enough for my work (still have half of the drive left). After one year I have confirmed for myself that I love the machine and that I will be happy to continue using it for a while. So I bought AppleCare to protect the machine for the coming years. With Apple one thing is more of less certain - you know that the next release of OS will not force you to throw your 3-year old machine to the garbage. And after 3, maybe 4, years the machine will probably approach the end of its useful life anyway. So, once AppleCare is over I will be ready to buy another laptop, that's it.

    My only concern is the battery lifespan. Certainly after 2+ years the battery won't be able to hold charge nearly as good as new one. And after 3 years probably it won't even last more than 1-2 hours. That will be a problem but I know Apple does replace the batteries in these machines.

    1. Re:MBPr user by bughunter · · Score: 2

      This is why, when the 15" MBP-Retina was announced in 2012, as I was preparing to replace my late 2006 15" MBP, I immediately went to Apple's online store and bought a refurb late 2011 17" MPB. Although the battery isn't "user replaceable" the older MBP is still at least serviceable by a tech skilled user. The new ones aren't. And for that reason it may very well be the last Apple laptop I purchase. Regrettably.

      Jobs is no longer CEO (again) and Apple is losing its edge (again).

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    2. Re:MBPr user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. Less than two hours, assuming you're not running some very processor/GPU intensive software during those two hours, is only going to happen if you had freakishly heavy usage of the battery in those three years. I'm still getting 3-4 hours (browsing and writing) approximately on a 2010 MacBook Pro, and that machine's being used at work, evenings and the weekend. i.e. the battery is pretty routinely getting hammered.

  22. Artificially Expensive Storage by j-stroy · · Score: 1

    The SSD is the ONLY internal storage option, and the extra bay previously available for expansion drives has been removed. If you want the storage professionals are accustomed to and require on these macs, you won't be able to have a standalone laptop. It will all be external drives and network storage. This is simply not viable, functional or ergonomic for graphics professionals. It is a typical Apple move to take away functionality and feature in a new device, to then slowly reintroduce it as "new" at a premium price. Give me a break, its like walking up a down escalator with them, and frankly they've crossed the line of viability.

    1. Re:Artificially Expensive Storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a professional, I would rather have the external storage over the network or by Thunderbolt. RAID 10, multiple backups, versioning. I don't want to lose my stuff. On the "road" professionals will find this to be a difficult adjustment, but really, there are alternatives--portable USB3/Thunderbolt drives are out there.

    2. Re:Artificially Expensive Storage by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      As a professional with a MBP I completely disagree.

      I use Windows, and my work isn't graphics, but the performance of the SSD is well worth the trade off.

      1) the SSD has more storage than the laptop I replaced.
      2) with USB 3, and thunderbolt, I can get gret performance from an external drive, bonus if it's SSD
      3) I ALWAYS carried 2 external drives that I sync daily, I rapidly outgrow the built in storage anyway doing my work (ever since they started not needing external power, before then I used to use the computer and an external, and hope projects didn't get too big).

      I don't know any professionals that are accustomed to using the internal hard drive of a laptop for storage.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:Artificially Expensive Storage by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 1

      I think plenty of folks working in IT know quite a few (if not the majority at some companies) professionals who use the internal HD for storage almost exclusively (save for times they need to attach something to an email, which they do regardless of advice not to, or dropbox etc..)..and it's questionable whether they are using Time Machine or another backup mechanism. What kind of professional are you talking about?

    4. Re:Artificially Expensive Storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a happy MBP owner and graphics & video professional no amount of internal storage is 'enough', fast connections to external drives which can be moved between machines & workers have more value than an increased local storage pool attached to one machine.

      External drives are exchanged with other physical locations constantly via motorcycle courier, the throughput beats networked solutions on price and speed.

      Soho, London.

    5. Re: Artificially Expensive Storage by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Trial presentation, it's pretty common to have over a tb of video depositions, if you're working on two projects there's pretty much no way to use internal.

      I don't see the common use case where 256 gb is too little, but you don't have so much data as to need external.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re: Artificially Expensive Storage by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 1

      Ah ok. I think that's a bit of a niche profession. Most professionals -- lawyers, businesspeople, executives, marketing folk, even developers/IT people, typically get by with just the internal storage for most daily activities -- especially if they don't store email locally. However niche areas of "professional" like graphic designer, video editor, trial presenter/evidence discovery etc require more robust storage than can be provided via Direct Attached Storage to a laptop, so they need a network based or USB/etc solution.

    7. Re:Artificially Expensive Storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a professional with a MBP I completely disagree.

      I use Windows, and my work isn't graphics, but the performance of the SSD is well worth the trade off.

      1) the SSD has more storage than the laptop I replaced.
      2) with USB 3, and thunderbolt, I can get gret performance from an external drive, bonus if it's SSD
      3) I ALWAYS carried 2 external drives that I sync daily, I rapidly outgrow the built in storage anyway doing my work (ever since they started not needing external power, before then I used to use the computer and an external, and hope projects didn't get too big).

      I don't know any professionals that are accustomed to using the internal hard drive of a laptop for storage.

      If you didn't have a MBP, you wouldn't have outgrown your built in storage options. New Egg and Amazon sell 1TB SSDs for $500-$600. What you mean is you didn't buy the top of the line option from Apple because they wanted 4x market value for the "upgrade" and now you are stuck with a 128/256 SSD that you can't replace.

    8. Re: Artificially Expensive Storage by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      But are these people really using so much space an ssd won't work? I find the premise that 256 isn't enough space, but 1tb is enough a little weak.

      Most of those groups you listed would probably get by on 64 (and a large part probably use citrix for their work extensively ). The OP said ssd is a problem because the proffessionals that use macs (which I took to mean graphic designers ), are used to the kind of storage a spinning disk gives them. I think it's a flawed premise, because they're actually used to needing external disks anyway, the the ssd performance is a huge boost.

      Basically I think apple is right, nobody wanting a good system would take an ssd over a spinning disk for their main drive.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    9. Re:Artificially Expensive Storage by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Even a 2TB spinning disk is going to fill, it's not even an order of magnitude more storage. I think the usage case where a 256GB hard drive fills, but a 2TB spinning one doesn't is a corner case. I didn't pay for a bigger drive, because it's still not big enough. My next externals will be Thunderbolt SSDs for projects that will fit on one, and the 2TB spinning ones for projects too big.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    10. Re: Artificially Expensive Storage by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 1

      Basically I think apple is right, nobody wanting a good system would take an ssd over a spinning disk for their main drive.

      Huh? Anyone wanting a good system would take an SSD over a platter-based disk! New computers like the MBP Retina or the T440 reach a significant bottleneck when using a standard HDD. I've seen users complain about their T430 or T440's with regular disks, only to throw in an SSD and they say "This computer is great!!."

      So I can see why Apple forced it upon its users. When given the choice, many don't understand SSD and aren't willing to pay more for smaller disks. But it makes such a noticeable difference in speed to the consumer they've chosen to force it on folks.

  23. Most notebooks are not really upgradeable by 3247 · · Score: 1

    I don't think that being able to upgrade really matters. In fact, even if you can upgrade, you will soon run into barriers.

    I've upgraded my 2007 MacBook Pro to a 500 GB SSD and 6 GB RAM. The CPU and GPU or everything else can't be upgraded.

    So where is a Retina MacBook Pro worse with respect to upgradeability? The SSD can also be swapped - and it's probably much easier than swapping the SSD on a 2007 MacBook Pro, which has the disk deep inside. Well, the RAM cannot be upgraded on the new model... but wait, I can't go beyond 6 GB on the old one, either (actually, it's already above the official 4GB limit). So if I order a Retina MacBook Pro with the maximum RAM, it does not make a difference at the end of the day.

    --
    Claus
    1. Re:Most notebooks are not really upgradeable by Splab · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit confused by the poster, I have a MBP 13" retina in front of me, and on the back I can see 10 screws, granted, I haven't tried taking them out, but I'm pretty sure you can service it, if you wanted to.

      Personally I'd just load it up with whatever is needed, the machine will (hopefully) run for 3+ years, and we have an upgrade cycle of 2 years, so it should work out just fine.

    2. Re:Most notebooks are not really upgradeable by SengirV · · Score: 2

      define "service" it. There is no way to upgrade the RAM, as that is soldered in. The Battery is glued in, and I don't know of anyone who sells a replacement. And the SSD has a proprietary connection - OWC is the only outfit I see that offers the ability to upgrade the prior generation's SSD(for a markup of course). But so far, no one is offering a way to upgrade the new generation of MBP's SSD. You see, apple reworked it again to make it even LESS upgradable.

      That is why I have the last generation 15" cMBP, and I intend to keep this thing for as long as humanly possible - In hopes that Apple comes to it's senses with respect to not charging way more than the normal Apple Tax amount, for a laptop that satisfies a demanding user. If they don't, I'll be looking for alternatives to the MBP as well.

      --

      Prof. Farnsworth - "Oh a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!"

    3. Re:Most notebooks are not really upgradeable by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      I concur. I have a 15" 2011 MBP. I've already upgraded the ram to 16GB, and replaced the HD with a bigger one.

      I guess all we can do is wait and see what happens. Unless something tragic happens, I expect this machine to easily last me several more years, so I have lots of time. When Apple discontinued the 15" MBP with replaceable bits, I was beyond disappointed.

      What's downright embarrassing, is that the currently descrete graphics chip they put in the current generation only barely outperforms the one in my 2 year old unit!

      If I'm going to pay a premium price, then I demand premium quality.

  24. What you are looking for by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    is a Thinkpad 540p. Great laptop. Battery pops off the back. There's a port to access the ram. It's also a lot less expensive than a MBP.

    1. Re:What you are looking for by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 2

      It's also a lot less expensive than a MBP

      It certainly looks it.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    2. Re:What you are looking for by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Well sure. Personally I like the thinkpad look but I'm not that into fashion. If you need a computer to accessorize your glamorous life you may want to look elsewhere. I use mine for real work though and don't expect them to be fashion accessories.

  25. 15 asus rogs.. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    because a) they're cheap b) fit into backpack c) don't overheat. d) fullhd e) fast enough for gaming for at least two years. (though I guess now most 15"'s are fullhd?) refresh every 2 years or so(1000-1200 bucks).

    of course, not ultra slim or anything like that but if you want something that doesn't have everything soldered down... the second hdd bay was a bit of a bitch to access on this though. as for size, I just think 13"'s are not that good to work with and getting decent performance in that size tends to heat up and cost an arm and a leg and still leave you figuring out if you want ssd or space.. just a bit bigger and you can have both(and still keep the optical drive).

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:15 asus rogs.. by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      and oh.. I guess the question wasn't for me since I wasn't exactly a fan of the pre-retina macbook pro... I did have one for a while though, even if it was from the period when they practically just renamed macbooks as macbook pro's(I mean fuck, there was nothing pro about it, no extra connectors, no extra nothing, 1280 crap screen, crappy gpu.. 2011 model).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:15 asus rogs.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude I had to send my G75 in three times this year. They never fix it and I have to pay for shipping out of my own pocket. Search for asus warranty to see the horror stories.

    3. Re:15 asus rogs.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horrible workmanship and warranty. I have a G75 sent in 3 times and it still does not work. It bricks itself(black screen no post).

  26. Most consumers prefer thin over easily repairable. by Camembert · · Score: 1

    Apple is quite succesful in marketing their thin computers, first the popular Macbook Air, now the Macbook Pro is nearly as thin. And thent here is also the slick ipad Air. I notice that most of my friends love the slick, thin design of these devices, rarely if every people wonder about repairability.
    In this case, i am not sure it is such a big issue in practice. I would recommend to buy the machine with enough RAM to begin with, and despite the battery being glued I understand that Apple can easily exchange it for another one. The screen's lack of easy repairability, yes I can see that issue, but if you take Apple Care (as many do) then you do not need to care about that for three years. Even when repairable, when a laptop screen gives the ghost after say 5 years, most people would rather buy anew computer then rather than repair.
    So, all in all, I am not sure how much of a dealbreaker these elements, esp. Considering that on the plus side you will have a marvelously thin and thus easily portable device.
    I do expect that similar construction will soon be ubiquitous also amongst pc laptops. Most People tend to prefer the stylish presence of elegant, "trim" laptops. It will be difficult to offer both easy upgradability and sleekness together.

  27. MacBook Pro "Classic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know it is dated, but it isn't dead yet. http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook_pro/specs/macbook-pro-core-i5-2.5-13-mid-2012-unibody-usb3-specs.html

    It still has all the replaceable parts your '10 model has. The '10 isn't that old, do you feel it is getting long in tooth? You don't mention what you do, so its hard to recommend anything. I'm posting this as a web/app developer from my '09 Mac Pro. It is still a beast of a machine and I'm not looking to replace for another few years.

    And what is your real reason for not wanting the Retina models? Do you constantly go in your computer and tinker? I know that having the option to upgrade stuff is nice, the base 15" models come with 8GB RAM and 256GB SDD, same as you have now. You can bump the RAM to 16GB if you need as well. How many times have you actually opened up your computer? And do you really buy without AppleCare, assuming your in the USA too?

    1. Re:MacBook Pro "Classic" by stigmato · · Score: 1

      I run a lot of VMs for testing purposes and for work but one of my hobbies is photography and I use Adobe Lightroom & Photoshop. RAM doesn't seem to be a problem right now but my limiting factor is the CPU - import and process jobs take significant amounts of time, with Lightroom pegging the CPU at 100% easily. That's really my achilles heal with this system and although tolerable I've just begun to grow tired of my system being incredibly sluggish when working with RAW files.

      My reasoning for not wanting the Retina models is simply out of price savings. Fully loading a MBPr means spending obscene amounts of money on RAM and HDD that I could purchase on my own for cheaper. Thus my desire to have a laptop that I can buy with high spec monitor, CPU, and GPU then upgrade RAM and disk later for cheaper. It seems like there's a general consensus that the Lenovo T540p is the best fit for my goals; having a full keyboard is an added bonus as well.

      I did upgrade this laptop repeatedly over its lifespan - first to 8GB, then to a 128GB SSD, replaced the DVD with a 1TB HDD, and then finally jumped to a 256GB SSD. I've contemplated springing $200 to purchase 16GB RAM through OWC if I don't end up replacing it. I did purchase AppleCare and had to use it to replace the motherboard as there was a problem with static on the headphone jack. They didn't care about any of my modifications which was nice. At this point though it has expired.

  28. Dell Latitude e6430 by n1ywb · · Score: 1

    Dell Latitude e6430 with Intel graphics. Ubuntu certified. I run Linux Mint that works perfectly too. Everything "just works". Highly configurable. Excellent service manual and easily serviceable without voiding your warranty. Standard parts. Docking station that, again, "just works" with Linux. Built like a tank. Available on refurb from Dell outlet. It's not the smallest or lightest or prettiest cheapest but those are not priorities for me. It's the corporate fleet laptop. I've yet to find something to complain about it.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
    1. Re:Dell Latitude e6430 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Dell just sucks.

  29. Let me help the rest of the slashdot userbase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Once upon a time the MacBook Pro line was well-regarded amongst IT professionals for their quality, performance, serviceability & upgradeability. As appealing as the new Retina displays are, I don't want a device I cannot upgrade or repair."

    Translation:

    "I once thought the price premium for Apple products was worth it, but I do not any longer. Please help me decide which other vendor to throw my money at so I don't have to do any research."

    And here is one simple answer, so we can close this thread up and move on: Decide which features are most important (HD screen, ram upgrade-ability, large keyboard, etc) and make a list of vendors who offer that, then pick the cheapest one from the list. Dell, HP, Lenovo, Asus, Acer, and Samsung all make feature rich, upgrade-ready laptops. The "Best" is strictly a function of your budget divided by your important feature list.

    1. Re:Let me help the rest of the slashdot userbase by Jethro · · Score: 2

      I have to comment on the "price premium" thing.

      Last time I upgraded my laptop (from a macbook pro to another macbook pro) I really wanted to ditch the platform. I was not happy with the direction Apple was going - they had not made things as unupgradable as they are now, but it was obviously heading this way).

      So I did a whole lot of research.

      And there was NO OTHER LAPTOP that came even close for the same price. NONE.

      PC laptops for the same price range had i5 CPUs rather than the Mac's i7. They had much lower resolution screens, and NONE had a matte screen (which at the time was still available on Macs). I could get the cheapest RAM and HDD because I was going to upgrade them myself anyway. The high-end MBP was just a superiour laptop. It cost more than non-apple laptops, but it was actually BETTER than them, too.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    2. Re:Let me help the rest of the slashdot userbase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to comment on the "price premium" thing.

      Last time I upgraded my laptop (from a macbook pro to another macbook pro) I really wanted to ditch the platform. I was not happy with the direction Apple was going - they had not made things as unupgradable as they are now, but it was obviously heading this way).

      So I did a whole lot of research.

      And there was NO OTHER LAPTOP that came even close for the same price. NONE.

      PC laptops for the same price range had i5 CPUs rather than the Mac's i7. They had much lower resolution screens, and NONE had a matte screen (which at the time was still available on Macs). I could get the cheapest RAM and HDD because I was going to upgrade them myself anyway. The high-end MBP was just a superiour laptop. It cost more than non-apple laptops, but it was actually BETTER than them, too.

      My assertion about "the Apple price premium" was in regards to the OPs insistence that the unit be "upgradeable and repairable" which are two facets that really translate to "I want to minimize the money i spend" since you can a) spend more for the top-spec'd unit in order to never have to upgrade and b) buy a warranty to never have to repair. Doing both of these things prices the Apple units far above the competition, even for the specific segment you refer to.

    3. Re:Let me help the rest of the slashdot userbase by Jethro · · Score: 1

      You might be correct on warranty. I've never bought Applecare for any Apple product I've ever owned. But I think OP meant "repairable" as "I can go buy a battery online and install it myself".

      I've minimised the money I've spent on them by buying the cheapest HDD/RAM options and upgrading myself, easily saving at least $500 on the actual computer. I believe that's what the OP means by "upgradable".

      And with those specs, i.e., the lowest-end high-end machine (if that makes sense), a MBP came out on top. There was not even any close competition. Any other i7 laptop cost hundreds of dollars more.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    4. Re:Let me help the rest of the slashdot userbase by stigmato · · Score: 1

      Spot on, that's exactly what I meant. I purchased this originally with the lowest specs and simply upgraded it over time for far cheaper. I think the 256GB SSD option at time of purchase was around $1,000 and 8GB RAM was also very expensive. I'm hoping to find some other laptop out today that I can basically low ball the specs and upgrade on the cheap with a quick win on the RAM and re-use my OCZ Vertex 4 or wait for larger SSDs to come down in price. At the time there just simply was no comparison for quality, cost, and the ability to upgrade over time. Apple stopped caring about giving users that flexibility and I have no ties to the platform other than enjoying the OS's look and feel but that can easily be obtained with a quick install of Debian. My only downside is I use Adobe Lightroom for a photography hobby and that is handled by dual boot.

  30. Prefer upgradability over thin designs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Currently posting from my 2011's Acer Aspire 4560-SB604 with AMD A8-3500 APU and upgraded to 8 GB RAM and 256 GB SSD.
    Sometimes reading /. from a 2006's HP Compaq NX6315 upgraded to 4 GB RAM and 64 GB SSD.
    Using Ubuntu and Windows 7 on both laptops.
    Until recently I was using a 2007's Compaq 515 upgraded to 4 GB RAM and 320 Gb 7200 rpm HDD, using Windows XP and Ubuntu.

    1. Re:Prefer upgradability over thin designs by stigmato · · Score: 1

      How does the HP run with that SSD? I have some older laptops including an Atom based netbook that I've toyed around with plugging a small SSD in. Are the results good enough to repurpose those into a parents or in law's device?

  31. does it matter so much anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it used to be that last years machine was basically unusable. for alot of things now the machine from 3 years ago
    is still quite usable, and aside from gpu performance has only slightly worse specs.

    I get 4 years out of a $1500 laptop from apple, and I think thats quite reasonable. on two of my old machines that I
    give to my children I've gotten free screens and lower assembly to replace trackpad problems after those
    4 without warranty. one of those wont take a charge anymore so it has to be used plugged in.

    I really don't think I'm being ripped off

  32. Moved from Lenovo to Dell XPS 13 (Sputnik) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been a great laptop after owning several T-series laptops:

    http://www.dell.com/learn/us/en/555/campaigns/xps-linux-laptop

    4th Generation Intel® Core i7-4500U processor (4M Cache, up to 3.0 GHz)
    13.3 inch LED Backlit Touch Display with Truelife and FHD resolution (1920 x 1080)
    8GB4 Dual Channel DDR3 SDRAM at 1600MHz
    256GB mSATA Solid State Drive
    Intel® HD Graphics 4400 ... it's sleak, portable, and it comes loaded with LInux (I wiped it and installed another distro).

    If there was an option for a matte screen instead of the glossy, I would give it 10/10.

    1. Re:Moved from Lenovo to Dell XPS 13 (Sputnik) by colin_faber · · Score: 1

      Do you have one of the 4th gen laptops already? I thought they didn't ship until Dec 20th. If you do, what's the battery life like with the new processor?

  33. Look at the Asus K55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I recommend Asus because they have good build quality, accept most aftermarket parts, and are reasonably priced. The k55 model in particular is interesting because of how many variants there are. Most of the parts are interchangeable and upgradeable. The k55n-ha8123k I purchased was upgradeable to a 1920x1080p display panel, matte or glossy. The dvd rom drive was easily thrown in the garbage and replaced with a second hard drive. The external bezel for the dvd rom drive also cleanly fit over the hdd caddy, preserving the look of the laptop. The processor is upgradeable from an a8-4500 to an a10, The ram can be upgraded to low voltage 1.35v ddr3. The wifi card can be upgraded to an intel wireless AC/bluetooth combo card for only 30 dollars.

    Oh, and the base price of the laptop was $330 at best buy of all places. You can view the laptop on newegg here: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834231019

  34. The r question is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Do you want to stick with OSX or are fine with a different OS?" If the former you are stuck. If the latter then decide on a feature set must haves and price point and buy what meets those needs. Dell, HP, Leveno all make good machines so it really comes down to what meets your needs.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:The r question is by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      ***cough*** Hackintosh ***cough***

    2. Re:The r question is by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      If you can live with a bad cough, sure ;-)

    3. Re:The r question is by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Have to disagree. You can run MacOS on non-Apple hardware, and both Dell and HP laptops are crap.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:The r question is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      ***cough*** Hackintosh ***cough***

      While it is absolution it really isn't a mainstream solution; but rather as the name implies a hacker's toy.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    5. Re:The r question is by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Have to disagree. You can run MacOS on non-Apple hardware, and both Dell and HP laptops are crap.

      Run, and run well, is two different things. Sure you can create a Hackintosh but expecting it to work just like a Mac without any issues and to be simple to update to the latest OS version and just have it work is not yet the case.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  35. My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm in the same boat as you. I have the same year MBP as you, but I have the 15" and I went out of my way to get a matte screen on it. And THOSE are no longer available, which is MY biggest problem. Those retina screens are all glossy.

    I could almost live with the non-upgradable stuff.

    Here's my problem, though.

    I need OS X. And no other laptop will give me that.

    Now technically the apps I use can be run on Windows, too, but I am NOT using Windows as my daily driver. Sure, I can get a Lenovo or Alienware (both of which have matte screen options) and dual-boot, but I don't want to do that. I often leave Photoshop open for days (or weeks!) while working on stuff, while I do other things. I do not want to have to shuffle.

    So, for me, the choice is really no choice at all. Apple have kind of taken away some features we've become used to, but I am a little bit tied to the platform.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    1. Re:My problem... by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      That's the downside of locking yourself in Apples pretty little prison. You have to play by their rules.

    2. Re:My problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up! "pretty little prison" is epic.

    3. Re:My problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like 'prison' I've been using walled garden. I realize now that those walls are inescapable, it's truly a prison.

    4. Re:My problem... by meustrus · · Score: 1

      It's not Apple's pretty little prison, it's Adobe's. When you're using "mainstream" software, that means Windows or (most of the time these days) OS X. Lots of people have decided in the last 10 years than Microsoft simply does not make a modern operating system anymore. I'm sure we would all love to have the Linux revolution...any day now...but that's simply not feasible for the people who've invested their skills in Adobe, or MS Office, or ProTools, or any other professional software. There may be equivalent (or superior!) free options but the people who need them would have to start learning from nothing; Photoshop skills don't really translate to GIMP skills.

      So really, it's prisons all around. Would you rather live in Apple's pretty walled garden, or Microsoft's smelly old dungeon? Or would you rather be free and live with the Linux penguins in Antarctica?

      --
      I sometimes ask revealing, often ignorant-seeming questions. Maybe they're harder to answer than you think.
    5. Re:My problem... by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      I often leave Photoshop open for days (or weeks!) while working on stuff, while I do other things.

      I hear Adobe is working on porting Photoshop to Microsoft Windows. If you can just wait til they're done, you'll finally be able to ditch OS X.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    6. Re:My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I can actually do anything I do on my MBP under Windows. I'm not tied to Apple. It's just my preferred OS for this. If Adobe Creative Cloud was available for Linux, that's where I'd be.

      Obviously I use my laptop for other things, too, that are NOT Adobe Creative Cloud related. Those I'd also rather do on Linux but since my choices are OS X and Windows, I prefer OS X. A lot of it is using the terminal to ssh to other machines, anyway, and that's a LOT less of a hassle on OS X than it is on Windows...

      I'm not tied to Apple. It's the lesser of both evils in this case.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    7. Re:My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I prefer to use O X for Creative Suite than I do Windows (and since I'm legally paying for the thing, I can actually switch between them now). I'd LOVE to use Linux for it, because I use Linux for just about everything else (even my OS X usage is largely ssh into my Linux machines) but that is not an option.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    8. Re:My problem... by frinkster · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat as you. I have the same year MBP as you, but I have the 15" and I went out of my way to get a matte screen on it. And THOSE are no longer available, which is MY biggest problem. Those retina screens are all glossy.

      I have the early-2011 15" MBP and paid for the matte upgrade as well as the higher resolution screen (standard was 1440 x 900 and the optional is 1680 x 1050).

      I just recently purchased the 15" rMBP and while I would prefer matte instead of glossy, I'm never going back. The display is just that good. I'll be sure to ask for a premium price when I sell the old MBP. It's nice to know that it is in demand.

    9. Re:My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      You know, I mention in the very comment you quoted that I know I can do this on Windows, but I don't want to use Windows as my daily-driver.

      My desktop (which I use most of the time, including right now) is Linux. I've been using Linux since before there were distributions. Heck, back then I ran Photoshop on an SGI Indy.

      My laptop is OS X. I use it in the evenings, or when I need to do CC stuff, or edit videos, or record music. I have no desire to move all that stuff to Windows, as well as all my Downtime-computing. I was never a Windows person (even before Linux!) I have on occasion installed it and played with it just so I know where it is, and you know what? Still not a fan.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    10. Re:My problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I hate the glare too, but there are matte screen protectors that fit the retina. The best I found was the Moshi iVisor Pro. It's like $40 at amazon for the retina 15 MBP. It does a good job killing glare and it does not form bubbles because the adhesive is only at the edges.

    11. Re:My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I've seen the rMBP. The displays are nice, of course, but I'm sad about the glossy. It is my likely upgrade-path, though.

      I've never sold an old apple laptop. I run those bastards into the ground. I gave away my old 12" Powerbook G4 when it was at the point that it heated up and shut itself down randomly. My girlfriend is using my 2005 Macbook (which I got because there were no 13" MBPs at the time). And she's waiting for me to upgrade form the current 15" MBP so she can have it. I'm hoping to get another year or two out of it.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    12. Re:My problem... by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Does Photoshop not run under wine? Or does gimp not meet your needs? Or are your Photoshop needs so onerous that running Photoshop in a Windows VM couldn't solve them?

      Yes, I did see you mention that the apps you use run under Windows. But I also saw you mention "I need OS X", and the only explanation you seemed to offer was "Photoshop". Perhaps I missed the other justification(s) you have for "needing" OS X?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    13. Re:My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      That's good to know. I'm not really anywhere near needing to upgrade yet (I HOPE) but it's good info for the future!

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    14. Re:My problem... by Kagato · · Score: 1

      The Matte screen is just a film layer of the display. There are plenty of reputable matte film products on the market, and since the bezel is behind the glass in the MBP it's one of the easiest installations out there.

    15. Re:My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      It's not just Photoshp. It's the whole workflow thing with Bridge->ACR->Photoshop. I used to use GIMP+UFRaw and I thought that was great... until I tried Adobe's stuff. GIMP doesn't even come close, it is unbelievably unintuitive and later versions have made this worse. And there is no RAW processor that comes close to ACR for Linux.

      I have no idea if Creative Cloud will run in Wine. I've never tried. Why would I? It would never run as well as it does natively, and getting a Wacom tablet to work correctly on a multiple monitor Linux setup is a pain in the butt under normal circumstances.

      There are other applications I use that come with OS X. I don't use them that often, but I do tend to use iMovie and GarageBand on occasion. Those have alternatives in Windows... I assume... possibly even free ones of the same quality (and I use the term loosely for iMovie). But I'd have to relearn stuff, and I'm betting I couldn't export my old projects to them.

      I've not used Windows at home since Win2K, and that was a dual-boot for games (then I got a PS3). I've not EVER used Windows at home as a primary OS. I had DOS, but the versions of Windows that ran on top of DOS did not support my hardware. Neither did OS/2 (but then again that thing barely supported anything). I was stuck with DOS till Linux came along and since I was a UNIX geek already I just hopped on that bootstrapping bandwagon.

      So yeah, I might not /need/ OS X as such, but I much prefer it to Windows.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    16. Re:My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      So I'm hearing, and noting for the future.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    17. Re:My problem... by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      I also need to work primarily on OS X (and I also use some windows programs in an XP VM). My Mac Pro is great at home, but a few years ago I tried a Macbook on the go and I absolutely hated it for various reasons. I didn't want to spend too much since I am not frequently working away from the Mac Pro, so as an experiment I tried a $150 MSI netbook for which there were instructions to install OS X. It wasn't bad and for the rare trips it was ok to work on, but it was a bit of a hassle to set up (and get everything working) and then update, so when I wanted to get something better and faster recently, I was back to the same dilemma - pony up for an Apple that I won't really enjoy for its price (I also hate glossy), or get a non-apple and waste time setting it up, updating it etc. Then I thought maybe I am going at this all wrong. Why not OS X VM on a very fast Windows host, i.e. the opposite of my usual setup? So, for a little over $500 I got a 2-year old Thinkpad X220 with an i7, 8GB RAM and 160GB SSD, which turned out to be an amazing machine (I highly recommend it if you want a 12.5" ultra-book type), built like a tank yet very light, at a fraction of the cost of an equivalent Mac, and it runs an OS X Mavericks VM very comfortably (on VMWare Player with the OS X client patch applied).
      Now, if you don't like Windows at all, I guess it would not be the best solution to have it just to launch a VM, but if you use both like me and you'd probably have Windows under Fusion anyway, it is a solution worth exploring. There are some great business laptops like the Thinkpads, which you can even get at a bargain since they depreciate like everything else but Apple devices. In my case a $2500 laptop was $500 a little over 2 years later, still in warranty. Just make sure you have an SSD (and plenty of RAM) if you want to have a VM running fast.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    18. Re:My problem... by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      So... OS holy war aside...

      I'm pretty new to amateur digital photography. I use Adobe Lightroom to handle my RAW processing, mainly because I um, "had a copy laying around", and didn't know how else to deal with RAW images. I don't really know what I'm doing, beyond staring at the histogram plots and playing with various sliders to reduce overexposed/underexposed areas. What is this ACR that you speak of, and should I look into it?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    19. Re:My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I don't have Windows anywhere except work. Everything at home is Linux except one OS X laptop. And I'm actually very happy with my MBP.

      I have... doubts about running OS X in a VM and having it reliably use stuff like a Wacom tablet, and use Adobe Creative Cloud (more that I trust Adobe to somehow break). I'd be willing to try but not experiment with. This is stuff I actually use a lot.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    20. Re:My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Hehe. No OS Holy War on MY end. People can use whatever they like. I prefer not to us Windows, and that's my choice.

      ACR, or Adobe Camera Raw, is a lot more basic than Lightroom. It comes with Photoshop. Lightroom basically replaces Bridge+ACR, and from what I understand (and remember from the one time I tried to use it) is a LOT more complicated. I have a friend who's a professional photographer, and has been for many many years, and I learned a LOT about post-processing from her. She used to use Bridge+ACR (which is why I learned to use is). When she moved over to lightroom it was quite the transition. Even for a pro. ACR is a LOT simpler. Buncha sliders on the side, couple of tabs, etc.

      In Bridge you can right-click and go "Open with Adobe Camera Raw". I have no idea how (or if you can) get to that from Lightroom... but if you have a copy of Photoshop "lying around", Bridge and ACR should be a part of that.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    21. Re:My problem... by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip, I'll have to give that a shot. Lightroom has seemed like extreme overkill for what I need, with all the cataloging features, etc.

      And the holy war comment was more geared towards myself. I can't help but trash talk Apple and their products for no reason in particular.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    22. Re:My problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also install OS X directly on most Thinkpads (search for instructions before buying). But of course it involves some work...

    23. Re:My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I'm told that the Develop tab in Lightroom is pretty much identical to ACR, so you can go there. You can adjust the exposure, brightness, saturation, lens compensation etc.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    24. Re:My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I didn't think OS X does very well on any (current) laptop. Definitely a hack, either way.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    25. Re:My problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds more like he needs either Windows or Mac OS X because the third-party developers he relies on will support either of those but not Linux. Of those two, Mac is preferred for many.

      Your assessment is mostly, but not entirely, wrong. It's easy, so far, to use a Mac, avoid most of the lock-in traps, and still come out ahead, user experience-wise, of Linux or Windows. It was easy to avoid all of them until they started requiring an App Store account to apply system patches. If Microsoft had tried this in the 90s, they'd have been crucified.

      The lock-in is not actually as bad as you claim, yet, but the storm is obviously brewing. When it hits, I'll have to make a painful choice to either commit to Apple, or move to an inferior system out of principles. The build of the retina display is just one more worrying indicator.

    26. Re:My problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I upgraded to the glossy retina MBP from the previous version with the matte screen - after using it for a while I got one of the higher end 'screen protectors' for it and that reduced the glare significantly to something that was much closer to my previous matte screen and quite acceptable IMO.

    27. Re:My problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I need OS X. And no other laptop will give me that.

      Hackintoshes are easy. Just pick any Intel laptop with a bit of care.

    28. Re:My problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did one (Green Onion brand, IIRC). It took about an hour and a half start to finish. I had been worried about dust getting trapped, causing bubbles, so I even bothered to run a hot shower before doing the install in the bathroom so the steam would keep the dust down. I shouldn't have bothered, there are plenty of bubbles having no relation to dust. There are also several permanent marks in the screen. When trying to smooth down the part you're laying down, if you press the screen the wrong way, which is very much like the right way, instead of the bubbles coming out it'll fold into itself and leave a mark. It's also not lined up with the screen.
       
      I think a person with experience at it could do a better job, and a small screen would make it easier, but for most people it's mostly likely going to end up like the computer equivalent of the old self-tinted windows kits you'd see bubbling off a cheap car. Don't believe the reviews. That written, I've left it on so far because it seems to help a little with the terribly painful eyestrain my Macbook Pro gives me.

    29. Re:My problem... by twilight30 · · Score: 1

      I second this, I have one myself for the 15" from last year. Tremendous product, and if you're careful about washing and drying it as needed, you will have no regrets that the matte option no longer exists, as the protector is just that good.

      --
      ========================================
      Death will come, and will have your eyes
      -- Pavese
    30. Re:My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you want a hack OS that only sometimes works, doesn't support 100% of your hardware 100% of the time, has troubles with updates, etc.

      That is, unless that got a LOT better since I checked last, a year or two ago. It may have, but I doubt there's any 100% Just Put The OSX Install Media In And Go laptop.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    31. Re:My problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe instead of dual boot, try a virtual machine.

    32. Re:My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I don't really like VMs. I actually tried setting up a VM on my Linux desktop to do video editing and photoshop. This is when my desktop was new, and I like to future-proof my desktops by building them to be fairly overpowered so that they'll still work well 3-4 years down the road. VMs were still really, really horrible for all that. And we're talking a VM with two dedicated CPU cores and 8 gigs of RAM. It was still not a pretty sight. I don't even think I could call it functional.

      VMs are great for testing or running servers, but any intense hardware stuff, especially GPU-related hardware, I've just not ever got it to work really well.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    33. Re:My problem... by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      I need OS X. And no other laptop will give me that.

      And this is why some of us can never embrace OS X.

    34. Re:My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Could've just as easily been any other OS that has applications I need. I need Linux on my desktop, for example.

      Though in my case that should've been "strongly prefer" rather than "need".

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    35. Re:My problem... by dwightk · · Score: 1

      I was pretty disappointed I was going to have to get a glossy screen when I got my Retina MBP... I haven't thought about it more than once or twice since it came in the mail.

      --
      Like anyone can even know that
    36. Re:My problem... by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Honestly I'm waiting to see what's out there in a year or two when I actually have to upgrade (:

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  36. MacBook Pro. by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    The battery is non-removable. But it is rated for 1,000 charge cycles, which should last for many years if you know what you are doing. (Some people don't. Apparently there are people who put their laptop on the desk, remove the charger, work until the battery is empty, then plug in the charger). The battery isn't cheap, but batteries aren't cheap - unless you get one from eBay that looks exactly like the original but isn't an original.

    RAM and hard drive are user upgradeable on the non-Retina MacBook Pro, and if you don't need the optical drive you can build your own Fusion drive. Or you get the retina display and buy it with the amount of RAM you need.

    1. Re:MacBook Pro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you apple charges you 300%-400% more for the ram upgrade than the parts would cost from crucial etc.

    2. Re:MacBook Pro. by meustrus · · Score: 1

      (Some people don't. Apparently there are people who put their laptop on the desk, remove the charger, work until the battery is empty, then plug in the charger)

      This probably has something to do with manufacturer "guidelines" instructing users that they need to completely discharge their battery and then fully charge it at least once a week. Apple was (is?) guilty of this. The guideline has something to do with the computer being able to accurately display time remaining, but it's always seemed like a Bad Idea (tm) to me.

      (Slashdot, would it kill you to allow UTF-8, or even HTML escaped entities like &trade; or at least <sup> tags?)

      --
      I sometimes ask revealing, often ignorant-seeming questions. Maybe they're harder to answer than you think.
    3. Re:MacBook Pro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly correct. The 15" MBP from 2010 had a removable battery, which I never removed because of its long life. I put 600 charge cycles on it and the battery worked like a champ. I could have upgraded the memory and hard drive, but I had no need to do so. I recently purchased the late 2013 MBP Retina and maxed out memory, SSD and processor. I expect to get several years of use, and I don't expect to require repairs because every Apple computer I've owned since 1978 has never needed it.

      I have zero need to upgrade a laptop. If I wanted a computer I could upgrade, I wouldn't bother with a portable.

  37. Apple still sells a non-retina MacBook Pro by the+computer+guy+nex · · Score: 1

    This is the non-ultrabook style that is very easily upgraded.

    http://store.apple.com/us/buy-mac/macbook-pro

    1. Re:Apple still sells a non-retina MacBook Pro by meustrus · · Score: 1

      If you like sub-1080p resolutions and an already-obsolete and non-upgradeable CPU and GPU, sure. Not that those pieces are normally upgradeable, but why pay full price today for last year's technology?

      --
      I sometimes ask revealing, often ignorant-seeming questions. Maybe they're harder to answer than you think.
    2. Re:Apple still sells a non-retina MacBook Pro by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      It's also the non-Haswell, non-GPU, non-bigscreen style, which is rather irritating.

    3. Re:Apple still sells a non-retina MacBook Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but its only 13"

  38. If you want to repair or upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you don't want a laptop nor a tablet. They are specifically designed to be closed systems so that you are forced to buy the next one, and the next one, and the next one, etc...

  39. ASUS Zenbooks by knapper_tech · · Score: 1

    Very high quality build, excellent specs, battery life that makes going mobile reasonable. Spend $1700+ and you have one hell of a laptop. Dual SSD, great display, gobs of ram, massive video card... The Linux support used to require some optimus tweaking, but these days it should "just work." There was a bug that cause the light sensor in the camera to generate keystrokes, but you can put a smiley sticker on top.

    --
    "There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell them." ~ Louis Armstrong
    1. Re:ASUS Zenbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Send it for warranty work let me know how that works out for you. I send my G75 in three times they still did not fix it. Search Asus warranty on google for the horror stories

    2. Re:ASUS Zenbooks by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Spend $1700+ and you have one hell of a laptop.

      Holy shit! For that much money I want at least two hells of laptops!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:ASUS Zenbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very high quality only on a paper. I have on of those Prime Zenbooks with 1080p, i7, NVidia, 500GB + 24GB SSD and 10GB RAM - it stopped working after 3 months and ASUS refused warranty for an issue that is well known amongst Zenbook users and asked almost the same price as new ultrabook for a repair. Make sure you read forums about ASUS to know what are you dealing with...

  40. Apple is for people who can't fix computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thinkpads are the answer. Storage, batteries, memory...all user repairable/replaceable. The chassis is quite strong[magnesium-rollcage].

    And unlike Apple you can spec the laptop as cheap as possible from the website, then upgrade the RAM, storage, etc. for a fraction of the cost that the factory charges...and with top-notch equipment.

    I have a T61p which still running my email server, and vpn services all day everyday. It's been flawless for going on 4 years. Very well built, excellent keyboard, battery lasted 3.5 years and was 85 bucks to replace[9-cell] and lasts ~3 hours.

    The T530 / W530 are what I'd go for today.

  41. Why do you want that in a laptop? by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    I don't want a device I cannot upgrade or repair.

    Why?

    You are imagining you might add more RAM or adjust the HD, which are really the only parts you can ever change out on a laptop anyway.

    For RAM why would you just not max it out now?

    For storage, I once thought as you did but that was before I ran the speed tests on the internal Macbook Pro storage in the newer models. I will happily trade off being able to change that out for the speed of the local storage... if I need more space I just use a compact USB3.0 drive.

    Just all around if you opt for something "more repairable" you are also getting something that is heavier, less well constructed, and does not perform as well. If something goes really wrong with my laptop I'll just wander into an Apple store and grab a new one, and be up and running in an hour or so instead of days waiting for parts and then a repair.

    For something that is as crucial to me as a laptop I no longer want something I can repair, I wan't something that will be working ASAP.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why do you want that in a laptop? by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      If you're only changing out the hard disk or the RAM, you lack imagination. I bought a Thinkpad T61p off eBay for $99. For another $137, I doubled the RAM, got an Intel 6300N wireless chipset, extended battery, and DVD burner (which could have been a Blu-Ray drive if I wanted). The screen has a line through it now; I may need to spend another $50-$60 to change it out. I've had laptops with failed screen inverters that I've swapped out.

      Why not max out RAM now? because 32GB of RAM is stupid expensive now, in a year it'll likely be half the price. No sense in letting the OEM mark it up and throw away your money. Also, RAM and hard disks are the two things most likely to die in a laptop, so being able to change them out is a VERY good thing. Extra storage capacity may not be immediately needed, but be incredibly useful a year or two out.

      Saying that unibody = reliable is not necessarily a direct correlation. There may be some overlap, but the problem is that if something does break, you're completely screwed to the point where one must really, REALLY hope that Apple will hook you up, because Microcenter cannot.

    2. Re:Why do you want that in a laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is some truth to this image: http://www.tudy.ro/2008/03/22/imac-vs-dell-xps-what-if-your-webcam-breaks/

    3. Re:Why do you want that in a laptop? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the guy with the iMac was gone for an hour. The guy with the Dell has to live with that hot mess (literally) for the entire life of the system, no matter that he's still working while a new webcam is shipped in.

      That image says way more about you and all Apple Haters totally not grasping why people prefer Apple than you will ever know.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Why do you want that in a laptop? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Look, if your time is worth nothing that is fine. It's great there are choices for someone like you that can spend lots of time adding bits to a system. I used to be that person to before I fully committed to programming over hardware tinkering.

      But I, like most people using laptops, just want something solid that I can use for about three to five years before I move on to something else.

      Being able to replace all those parts doesn't mean anything to me - if the SSD or Ram in my Macbook dies, like I said I just get a new macbook in an hour. I don't have to hope, I know, thanks to Applecare. How is that not also a VERY good thing? In your case to replace them would take time at least to get the new parts in, time I do not want to take before I have a working laptop.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    5. Re:Why do you want that in a laptop? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      (shrugs) I'm still running a Thinkpad T61p from 2007. It now has 8GB RAM, Win7 Pro and a pair of SSDs after upgrades last year.

      Unless something goes horribly wrong with it, I'll probably use it until 2014-2015.

      (Thinkpads come with 4y or 5y warranties as an option.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    6. Re:Why do you want that in a laptop? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      If the hd and ram are replaceable, then it's a drive to frys/bestbuy/microcenter or a 24hr overnight internet delivery away. Otherwise, it's a 2 week wait minimum. If you truly want something up and running again ASAP, you don't want a laptop, you want a self-built desktop.

    7. Re:Why do you want that in a laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys also forgetting that when you new MacBookPro dies and you have no encryption, Apple tech will be able to see all your data on that hard drive, good luck with that!

    8. Re:Why do you want that in a laptop? by moderators_are_w*nke · · Score: 1

      The battery is usually the first thing to wear out on a laptop, and others are the hard drive (not sure about SSDs though), the CPU fans, the hinges and the catch in my experiece. Software also tends to need more memory over time. It should be reasonably painless to make this happen..

      --
      "XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, use more." - Anonymous Coward
    9. Re:Why do you want that in a laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want a device I cannot upgrade or repair.

      Why?

      Because a user has a different set of priorities than you? Jesus, at least I chimed in with a mac troll that was on-topic. Your only contribution is to insult him with "your wants are bad and you should feel bad". Maybe, just maybe he doesnt have an extra $500 (the price of the RAM and SSD upgrades) to throw away on a computer, but wants to do it next year (when it will cost, at best $250)? Even for a mac user, your horse is high as a fucking kite.

    10. Re:Why do you want that in a laptop? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      You guys also forgetting that when you new MacBookPro dies and you have no encryption

      Except that Apple provides out of box either FileVault to encrypt the whole storage space, or password protected disk images you can mount. The system keychain itself is similarly encrypted and password protected so techs cannot get your passwords either.

      If you are worried about protection of data Apple makes it easier than anyone.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    11. Re:Why do you want that in a laptop? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Maybe, just maybe he doesnt have an extra $500 (the price of the RAM and SSD upgrades) to throw away on a computer

      There's nothing unreasonable about pointing out mistaken assumptions someone might have about laptops you can't easily replace parts in.

      $500 is nothing compared to the extra bother that comes about repairing stuff yourself. Wouldn't you rather spend that time doing something else? And in return you get a better product with much faster storage speeds. That alone is worth something too.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    12. Re:Why do you want that in a laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but the guy with the iMac was gone for an hour. The guy with the Dell has to live with that hot mess (literally) for the entire life of the system, no matter that he's still working while a new webcam is shipped in.

      That image says way more about you and all Apple Haters totally not grasping why people prefer Apple than you will ever know.

      How is the iMac only gone for an hour? Even if you lived next to an Apple Store and they are willing to swap your machine out entirely, you then lose all your apps and data. We understand a desire for clean lines and neat cables, you seem to lack the ability to understand the need for a fallback position, or are just being deliberately dense.

      Non Apple folk dislike the Surface Pro (an amazing machine btw) for the same reason they dislike the the Apple locked down stuff. We want to own our hardware and our data and be able to easily swap a battery when we own it longer than the average life. I still have an x61 tablet from 7 years or so ago that I use as a portable cintiq. PC folk aren't mindless uniform cogs like the "Think Different" crowd has become.

    13. Re:Why do you want that in a laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys also forgetting that when you new MacBookPro dies and you have no encryption

      Except that Apple provides out of box either FileVault to encrypt the whole storage space, or password protected disk images you can mount. The system keychain itself is similarly encrypted and password protected so techs cannot get your passwords either.

      If you are worried about protection of data Apple makes it easier than anyone.

      Yeah, not like Microsoft built equivalents in way back in XP, Vista, 7 or 8. Much less Linux, that insecure mess where security isn't a concern for anyone involved. slashSarcasmEnd

  42. Eurocom by jfbilodeau · · Score: 1

    http://www.eurocom.com/

    Best fully upgrade-able workhorses out there. Not sexy like a Mac, but damn good machines.

    Ex-MacBook user. Written from my Eurocom Racer.

    --
    Goodbye Slashdot. You've changed.
    1. Re:Eurocom by jfbilodeau · · Score: 1

      ...and I should add that you can choose which OS you want on it...

      --
      Goodbye Slashdot. You've changed.
    2. Re:Eurocom by nctritech · · Score: 1

      Thank you for this. I hadn't heard of them before and I am very happy that you pointed them out. When I think of a laptop with my level of power, this is definitely what I want. Thanks again for posting it.

  43. Just buy a refurb/used MBP by mveloso · · Score: 2

    My i7 MBP with hard drive and DVD is chugging away, and will chug away forever - or as close to forever as possible.

    If you need the old ones they're still on Apple's refurb/clearance page. The only thing you can't get is the widescreen glossy display, which most people hated (though I have one and it's great).

    1. Re:Just buy a refurb/used MBP by Megane · · Score: 1

      I bought one of the last 17" MBPs when the Retinas were announced, and downgraded it to 10.6.8. (That was not trivial, you have to find 10.6.6 (?) on TPB, then update it.) Then I upgraded it to 16GB RAM.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  44. I don't care about upgradeability by DrHyde · · Score: 1

    I'm posting this on my Macbook Pro, made of Chinese slaves' retinas. I love it.

    I've never felt the urge to perform brain surgery on any of the laptops I've owned over the years. I bought each one pretty much maxed out, and ran it for four or five years. The one thing that irritates me about my latest Macbook is that I can't carry a spare battery with me. But on the other hand, its battery life is very good and it's very rare for me to spend so long between charging opportunities that it's a problem. And the one time it was, well, it's a price worth paying. Other laptops - and I looked at many when deciding which to buy - all found worse ways to suck.

  45. this is the equation by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Small
    Cheap
    Easy to repair
    Pick two.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:this is the equation by TheRedDuke · · Score: 1

      You can certainly get several Ultrabooks that comprise all three, they just won't be as fast or capable as a top-end Retina MBP. I think your equation needs "power" as well, because while you can get three, you can't get all four.

    2. Re:this is the equation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My laptop goes to 11.

    3. Re:this is the equation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh... It is Apple. You get no choice. They are not easy to repair or cheap. All you get is small (and shiny), and you better like it or you are not holding it right.

    4. Re:this is the equation by TeamSPAM · · Score: 1

      Cheap
      Easy to repair(/upgrade)

      Small is nice, but Apple is leaving ports off of the laptop to make it smaller. I have to go buy an adapter to use ethernet on my rMBP. I can see that for the Air, but I have the Pro version.

      I've been an Apple fanboy for a while, but they are making fewer and fewer computers that I want to buy. My ideal MacBook has an ethernet port and user servicable RAM/HD/battery.

      --
      Brought to you by Team SPAM! where we believe: "Information in the noise!"
    5. Re:this is the equation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Small

      Cheap

      Easy to repair

      Pick two.

      Ok, I don't care about the Cheap part, show me some small but easy to repair/upgrade laptops? That's what this entire discussion is for.

    6. Re:this is the equation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not an equation!

    7. Re:this is the equation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that if you're willing to pay more for all three, Apple no longer has anything available.

    8. Re:this is the equation by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Small
      Cheap
      Easy to repair
      Pick two.

      The Mac only has one of those three. If you want two you need to choose something else.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re:this is the equation by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

      that's reasonable. I accept that modification.
      cheers!

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    10. Re:this is the equation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since when are mac book pros "cheap" and recently they aren't easy to repair either :(

    11. Re:this is the equation by StealthSurge · · Score: 1

      I am an IT professional. I have built 4 "Gamer" class desktops for family and myself in the past year. While I love to "tinker" to get a bunch of hardware to all work together with Microsoft Windows, nothing beats my latest 13" MacBook Pro Retina (late 2013), i7 Haswell, 1 terabyte flash storage, 16 GB RAM and a back lit keyboard and the latest OS X. It just works. And if it doesn't work, that is what Apple Care is for. While you may have been able to add an SSD and I am assuming somehow removing the optical drive and cluging in another hard drive, I am wondering about the processor. Your 3+ year old processor is a dinosaur! I have owned 4 Mac's in the past 5 years. The resale value is awesome and that is how I upgrade often. If your passion for tearing about a Mac has lead you away from Apple, you simply don't get it. You buy a Mac so you don't have to "F" with it all the time!

  46. residual value supports a faster upgrade cycle... by schlachter · · Score: 1

    These MacBook Pros hold their value surprisingly well. They're also rock solid on reliability. Just plan on replacing it with a new one every 2-3 yrs rather than 4-5 yrs and you will be fine.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  47. Not System 76, Eurocom, PCSEX but CLEVO by Arkh89 · · Score: 2

    Clevo is the barebone manufacturer behind System 76, Eurocom, PC-SEX, Malibal, Xotic, Deviltech, and others...
    http://www.clevo.com.tw/en/products/index.asp
    They don't come with all the software layers you can have on Asus, Dell & co and you can upgrade them to your needs..

  48. Mission Accomplished by BaldingByMicrosoft · · Score: 1

    Came looking for Apple fanbois to basically tell the OP to shove off and deal with it.

    Am not disappoint.

  49. Samsung ATIV Book 7 by wheresthefire · · Score: 1

    I have the Samsung ATIV Book 7 (formerly called the Series 7). It's pretty similar in size and weight to a 13" MBP, and it's incredibly upgradeable for an Ultrabook. Here's a nice link: http://www.mobiletechreview.com/notebooks/Samsung-Series-7-Ultra.htm You can easily upgrade the RAM and SSD. You should be able to upgrade the battery, though I've never done that myself. Also, the European version of the computer can be had with a discrete graphics card if that's your thing. By the way, the screen, speakers, and touchpad on the ATIV Book 7 are all fantastic. It's a high-quality laptop.

  50. They are available on apple's refurb site by mveloso · · Score: 1

    Jesus, haven't people heard the good news about Internet shopping? It's 2013.

    1. Re:They are available on apple's refurb site by Jethro · · Score: 1

      They never made retina Macbook Pros with non-glossy screens. They're not available anywhere. They don't exist.

      Or do you thin I want to replace my ageing laptop with the exact same laptop? My laptop is nowhere near obsolete, and sill works just fine. I've had Apple laptops keep going for years and years, and I wont' replace this one until it can no longer actually run he software I need. And when I do, replacing it with the exact same model will make zero sense.

      If you meant something other than those two options, please explain.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    2. Re:They are available on apple's refurb site by mveloso · · Score: 1

      He wants a widescreen matte non-retina display MBP.

    3. Re:They are available on apple's refurb site by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind retina-like resolution. And my current MBP might have that, at the time they offered a higher-res matte screen, and that's what I got.

      Apple do make a non-retina 13" MBP, so I might've been wrong on that, but I don't know if they have it in matte. Plus I need a 15" or higher.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  51. This will probably be your last upgreadable gear by Daniel+Hoffmann · · Score: 1

    I heard intel is going to start selling the processor soldered on the motherboard, it won't be long before even laptops will be like mobile phones where you can only replace the battery. It makes sense for the manufacturers and the end-consumers, SoC designs make things faster, cheaper, more compact less power-hungry. I'm Ok with this as long as the parts with high failure rate (hard drives and batteries) are still replaceable by professionals at least (and don't require custom screwdrivers that no one have Apple!).

  52. Dell Latitude by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    I am a HUGE fan of the Dell Latitude series. Extreamely easy to work on. I picked up a older refurbished d630 about 2 months ago - even though its an older model, came with dual-core 2.4GHz processor and 4 gig of ram for $239 at KMart. I picked up an external Blu-Ray drive for $30, and replaced the network card with a 802.11 N for $10. These things are STUPIDLY SIMPLE to take apart.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTPebVcfKRs

    The newer Latitudes are just as easy to take apart and work on:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0NCPkxSMYA

    As these are business class notebooks, they are pretty durable as well.

    At least for the d630, you can replace the six-cell battery with a 9 cell and extend the operating time to over 4 hours (the operating time seems to be cut in half by the 802.11N WiFi card, but there is a physical switch to easily toggle the WiFi on and off).

    Why did I pick up a 630? Because I had one of these for work for two years when I worked in desktop support (I'm now in networking) and LOVED the thing. Still do. This model came out around 2007ish, and still outperforms my consumer-grade Compaq that I picked up in 2009. Why don't I still have the Compaq? Trying to take it apart to fix the motherboard resulted in me tearing up two ribbon cables, cracking the case, and the LCD pannel cable breaking, After that, I decided to go back to Dell Latitude series. They are hands-down the most tinkerer-friendly laptops you can find. I've replaced nics, drive, ram, keyboards, LCDs motherboards and processors on these things back in my desktop support days. I've worked on Compaqs, HPs, Apples, Gateway, eMachines, Acers and Sonys, and none are as easy to work with as the Dell.

    No, Dell is not paying me to say this. :-) I think some of their business desktop models are crap. But IMHO nothing beats the Latitude line in terms of user servicability!

    1. Re:Dell Latitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      second this.
      I have a latitude 6410 that I picked up refurbished 4 years back. 3 months back I plopped in a second hard drive after removing the CD bay. last week I replaced the keyboard WHILE THE LAPTOP WAS RUNNING - it was absolutely hot swap and took me all of two minutes.
      my fan was heating up, so I put in some arctic mx-4 and a new fan (bought from ebay for 6$).

      I suggest you check out the new latitude 7440 for some serious hacker-friendly ultrabooks.

    2. Re:Dell Latitude by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      second this. This is my second business in a row that equips all its IT workers with a Dell Latitude laptop of their own choice. If we need more computing power, we are free to order a Precision work station. I take my laptop anywhere, and am sure to be able to upgrade it whenever I need: more RAM, extra HD, other NIC, you name it. IT hardware maintenance personnel love the things. Yes, they're ugly - so what ? At home I have a very good-looking Asus K53 that gives me the black screen every 20 to 40 days, I have a love-hate relationship with it. The Dell laptop just runs, on and on and on an on.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  53. Are you sure it is microsoft fud? by deviated_prevert · · Score: 1
    Microsoft fud? Here is why that assumption is questionable.

    get this trash off slashdot

    ON THE CONTRARY IT IS LINUX FUD! There is nothing that Microsoft would love more than to see everybody buy new Surface devices every 2 to three years the way the Apple sheep do with their products. Soldered in ram, batteries, locked down boot loaders make Apple and Microsoft's consumer hardware division leaders have wet dreams in the billions of dollars. As Bill Gates clearly stated "the only thing to fear in computing is Linux" and they are aggressively making sure that the fud keeps going against other devices than the ones that run WINDBLOWS. Try putting Linux or Android on an iPad, or Surface Pro or RT then come back and tell me who is full of fud. As it is my IBM T42 runs like a Russian tank and it still does everything I ask of it and I can still repair it if necessary! AS LONG AS I AM RUNNING LINUX on it.

    --
    This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
    1. Re:Are you sure it is microsoft fud? by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Try putting Linux or Android on an iPad, or Surface Pro or RT then come back and tell me who is full of fud.

      Why would anyone want to ruin a perfectly fine iPad? (Don't know about the Surface Pro or RT).

  54. This Was Widely Predicted by rabtech · · Score: 1

    When the first retina models went to soldered-on RAM, it was obviously that all MacBook Pros would ship this way in the future.

    I miss the upgradability, but I ran the numbers on my non-retina 15" into which I installed two 512GB SSDs and 16GB RAM (the max you can do with two SODIMM slots due to current DRAM density and JDEC standards). It turns out that an equivalent retina MBP with 1TB SSD and 16 GB RAM is roughly the same price (within 10% of the cost).

    Not having swappable batteries and RAM means you don't need a reinforced frame, rugged connectors, screw holes, and cover. That's all space that can be used for more battery and/or reducing size and weight. It's a trade-off, but ultimately I consider it to be worth it.

    Plus I rather enjoy having a nice Mac OS GUI that I don't have to worry about, but can run macports and build Unix utilities from a terminal window.

    --
    Natural != (nontoxic || beneficial)
  55. never had a problem with memory by Chirs · · Score: 1

    I've never had a problem buying memory within a few years. If you let it go really long then it can be an issue, but as long as you're only one generation behind the current then you're likely still fine.

  56. Dell Precision by kimvette · · Score: 1

    I have a Dell Precision M6400 (Quad Core Extreme) Mobile Workstation and it is built like a tank - it has fallen from 4' while open running and hasn't suffered for it. The hinges are still tight, it has two internal HDD bays and has a desktop chipset (Q43) and so is really fast for a laptop - plus all the ports except power on the sides. The notebook is very serviceable - I have opened it up to upgrade the processor (originally had a Core 2 Duo) and have had it open several times since to fully clean the heat sinks. It also has a Quadro video card which was quite fast for the time.

    When I do upgrade I will probably go with an M6700 or whatever its replacement is at the time of upgrade. Battery life isn't as long as the mobile chipsets offer, but even with the 4 year old battery I still get 90 minutes out of it (with power management enabled).

    I have worked with quite a few M6700s and they are similarly built but have the drawback of 1080p screens instead of WUXGA and some of the ports have moved to the back. I am not sure who the original manufacturer is but I think it's actually built by Clevo (there are no indications internally). I like the M6700 but I am going to keep the M6400 as long as it makes sense because I like having more vertical screen estate.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  57. Dell 7000 Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the answer you are looking for is the Dell 7000 Series. We have a number of these deployed at work (12" and 14") and they really are a good compromise of a decent weight, fairly slim design with sacrificing upgradeability/repairability. It's easy to slot in 16GB of RAM, replace the HDD/SDD or the battery AND they work with all of the recent Dell docking stations. They are not nearly as sexy as the MBP's or Samsung's or Zenbook Prime's but they don't look bad and they don't feel cheap either. Plus, in our experience, Dell Next Business Day support actually means Next Business Day. We've had all kinds of warranty issues with Asus, Toshiba and HP but we rarely have a problem getting replacement parts of systems with Dell. I think for someone who wants a powerful, fairly slim and light laptop that is essentially full upgradeable it's absolutely the best option.

  58. Macbooks are still it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm platform agnostic (used Apple, MS, open-source hardware/software for almost 20 years now) and my Macbook Retina is the finest computing device I've ever owned. Upgradeability doesn't matter when it's going to remain the best machine for the next 3 to 5 years. Nothing even comes close.

  59. way cheaper to upgrade them yourself by Chirs · · Score: 2

    Have you *seen* how much Apple/Dell/IBM etc want for RAM? They're charging double (or more) what it costs to get the equivalent stuff elsewhere.

    I can save a hundred bucks getting 16GB of RAM from elsewhere, it's absolutely worth the 10 minutes of my time spent ordering and installing it.

    Similarly, if I want 5GHz wifi but the manufacturer doesn't offer it in the specific model I want, it's only about $25 to buy a wifi card and minutes to install it...assuming the machine uses standard parts.

    1. Re:way cheaper to upgrade them yourself by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      Some people who, like me, work the whole day with computers prefer that others do their work now and then. Also, I don't think it would take me 10 minutes if I could order it online. But since I live in Mexico it most likely means a trip to the shop in the center of the city where I live; pay upfront, waiting 2 weeks, picking it up, installing it, testing it. I rather code some Perl in that time ;-)

  60. Asus not an option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will trade my Asus G75vx for a Mac Pro Retina. Asus warranty sucks. I had to send it too many times, same issues it bricks itself(the dreaded black screen).
    Asus did not even bother assembling the back-plane so yeah I would rather have a Mac if they have to replace the whole unit. And the three year warranty Apple gave me seems to be good.

    I paid for warranty so I do not want to spend the time replacing motherboards on my laptop. I prefer service quality and a company that backs its products so I would stick with Apple.

  61. I have a 2005 Toyota Matrix by Chirs · · Score: 1

    and it's still going strong...

    1. Re:I have a 2005 Toyota Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I've got a 2013 Toyota Prius, and it's still going strong.

  62. I've got this machine by Chirs · · Score: 1

    Also running linux, but work gave me the version with Nvidia+Intel graphics. Grr... There's no benefit to having Nvidia graphics for a coding machine, all it does is use more power.

    1. Re:I've got this machine by n1ywb · · Score: 1

      Given the state of Linux graphics drivers in general I think you're nuts to use anything BUT Intel graphics in a laptop. Intel is the only company that seems to take it serious and ship stable and reliable drives that don't shit their bits when you dock, undock, suspend, resume, or change res. I guess if you absolutely have to have the most bleeding edge graphics performance maybe Intel isn't an option but then maybe a Linux laptop isn't the best choice for you.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    2. Re:I've got this machine by nctritech · · Score: 1

      The AMD open source driver has gotten drastically better over the past couple years. I have no major complaints.

    3. Re:I've got this machine by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      That was an interesting thing about the Macbooks, you could use a big power hungry graphics chip or disable that and use the smaller efficient one if you were just doing basic work.

  63. 1 Year down the line... by DrYak · · Score: 1

    A professional laptop recently seems to retain its usefulness for at least 3 years, so these laptops remain functional for a long enough time to justify ordering them loaded with options to make our life and work easier.

    But then 1 year down the line thanks to Moore's law and friends, you could easily put way much more things that back when you frist ordered it, simply because now these didn't exist already back then (e.g.: 8 GiB was the maximum you could equip. But since then, newer RAM module have been commercialised giving you the possibility to stuff 16GiB or 32GiB in the same machine).

    2 years later, simply replacing the aging battery turns the machine into something almost new.

    3 year later, you consider that this laptop has outlived its usefullness, and throw it away and buy a brand new one. Or, if it was upgradeable, you could just change a few parts around (SSD, CPU, even-more-RAM) and still have a machine good for the next 1 or 2 years.
    Which is:
    - cheaper (you only change the part you really need).
    - way much more eco-friendly (you only replace the parts that you need, you don't throw away a whole machine).
    - a lot less hassle (in some small countries getting an expensive laptop through customs is complicated and are up through the roof. Getting a few RAM modules through the custom, on the other side is well under the minimum limit for tax)

    But might take a little bit more time. The key here is having a well done and easily upgradeable laptop, where indeed equipping the upgrades is taking only a few minutes. If it takes several hours to upgrade an "un-upgradeable, glued shut" laptop, your point about geeks' hours costing premium still applies.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:1 Year down the line... by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      Or you could. you know, plan ahead, and buy a computer that stays good for 3-5 years. My desktop, bought in February 2008 has only recently had a RAM upgrade (2G -> 8G). And a network card has been added because a lightning storm blew up the on board network interface.

    2. Re:1 Year down the line... by captjc · · Score: 1

      That is fine for a processor and maybe even RAM. However, I don't care how well you treat or baby your laptop, your battery will be gone in about 2 years. If you can't swap that out, you are stuck with an under-powered not-so-portable computer.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    3. Re:1 Year down the line... by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      To be honest I have no idea how fast Apple batteries degrade, but the Dell laptop of my wife had only recently (bought in 2008) its battery replaced. Can't recall how long it could be used with the old one, though. But gone as in unusable in 2 years sounds too fast to me.

    4. Re:1 Year down the line... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      This doesn't work so well anymore...

      • RAM is cheap. I usually upgrade it right away to the maximum that the platform supports, anyhow.
      • GPU performance is crucial for gaming --- generally, cannot be upgraded in any laptop.
      • CPU performance is crucial --- generally, cannot be upgraded in any laptop.

      So this "upgradeability" you speak of; seems to be limited to replacing broken or parts so warn, that they failed, or Hard drive capacity.

      On most laptops: upgrading the Hard drive seems to be no issue.

      Swapping broken parts, also doesn't seem to be an issue on any laptops ---- except the recent Macbook Pro retina ones.

  64. Your Answer: Business Laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most upgradeable and serviceable (not to mention very reliable) laptops are any of the business laptops from the big three PC makers: Dell, HP, and Lenovo. That is, nearly most of the Thinkpads (esp the W and T series), the Dell Latitudes and Precisions, and the HP Elitebook/Zbook/Probooks. They generally are all screw or some fastener accessible and have details teardown manuals on their guide. I've owned both the Latitudes and many Elitebooks. The fact that I can take these down to the board level is a huge advantage.

  65. Dell Latitude 6430u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember the laptop with the cat pee smelling touchpad?

    It's equipped, with a user-replaceable battery and user-replaceable memory. Albeit it is on the bulky end of ultrabooks, and its aesthetics are not top in its class, but it is an excellent piece of work.

    http://www.dell.com/us/business/p/latitude-6430u-ultrabook/pd

    1. Re:Dell Latitude 6430u by stigmato · · Score: 1

      Does the cat pee cost extra? And will cats try to mark their territory when they encounter my laptop?

      I'm a little surprised at how cheap the upgrade is to the 1600x900 screen. Seems like a good deal. I've worked with Latitudes in the past and I've always loved how easy they were to work on and the availability of full service manuals on Dell's site.

  66. need to also compare down-market by Chirs · · Score: 2

    The main issue is that Apple doesn't have a product in the low end of the market.

    So yes, if you're shopping in the upper end of the market and you want all the features they offer, then they're good.

    However, if all you want is a basic machine for surfing the web, watching videos, writing emails, and doing basic office documents, then Apple is way more expensive because it's overkill for the purpose. I can find a crappy Acer with 6GB RAM and a 500GB hard drive for under $300. The bottom-end Macbook is $1000.

    1. Re:need to also compare down-market by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Of course. And I'd never suggest to my girlfriend or my pseudo-mother-in-law that they should get a Mac. I tell them I'll take them to Microcenter and we'll find them a refurbished Toshiba for $300 (this worked really well for my PMIL, but my girlfriend prefers to wait for me to upgrade and use my old Mac).

      But the OP (and I) were talking about a MBP. And we're on slashdot. We're not looking for low-end (:

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    2. Re:need to also compare down-market by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      True. Most laptops are intended for people for doing basic computing. Horsepower is not needed there. People that actually need a souped up computer are assumed to be using desktops as workstations. The vast majority of people don't need the extra horsepower, and the vast majority of people who claim they need a higher end computer actually don't.

      Practically speaking, the high end stuff is much hotter which makes it much more difficult to design a laptop that can deal with the heat. Those Macbooks can get HOT!

  67. not as nice a machine by Chirs · · Score: 1

    Doesn't have Iris graphics
    Doesn't have PCIe SSD
    7hrs battery vs 9hrs
    only available in 13"

  68. Re:If Your Laptop Needs Upgrades, is it good enoug by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    Ah, yes, the cry of the well-healed.

  69. Early 2008 17" Macbook Pro by spiritplumber · · Score: 1

    I have an early 2008 17" Macbook Pro that still does everything I need -- just max out the RAM and swap in a SSD, and it will keep up with modern-day work. The battery is still swappable, and batteries can still be bought for cheap. The display is crisp and very bright, which is handy when using it outdoors. Adding a right mouse button to the touchpad is a very simple mod: http://www.instructables.com/id/Adding-a-right-mouse-button-to-a-Macbook/ The whole thing cost around $500, plus half that in two broken laptops for spares.

    --
    Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
    1. Re:Early 2008 17" Macbook Pro by stigmato · · Score: 1

      I'm leaning towards maxing out the RAM to 16GB and giving it another year. However, I've been curious about the potential for replacing the LCD. I'm curious if anyone has attempted taking the display from a Retina 13" and shoving it into a 2011 or older 13" MBP. I googled it a little and saw some pics of the panel; it seems like it might work but no one has attempted it from what I can tell.

  70. Re:This will probably be your last upgreadable gea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pentalobe drivers are no more expensive or hard to get than anything else anymore. Enough with the whimpering cry baby tactics.

  71. MacBook Air by GreatDrok · · Score: 1

    I went from a 2006 model MacBook Pro which I had done all the upgrades on maxing the RAM and putting a 300GB drive in (big for the time I did it) and it is still running. The thing is, while I appreciated that I could upgrade it, it turns out when time came for a new machine I looked at the specs for the i5 MacBook Air and it left my 2006 MBP for dead. I figured, sure, I may not get the 5 years of working life I did out of the Air but it was less than half the price, way lighter, same screen resolution (1440x900) with a better trackpad, way better battery life and an SSD that made it so fast it was nuts. Here I am, two years in and the thing hasn't put a foot wrong. Battery is holding up nicely at just shy of 90% capacity after nearly 200 recharges whereas my old MBP had chewed through 400 recharges by two years and the battery was stuffed and needed replacing (the benefits of twice the run time I guess.)

    Anyway, these days I look at the pros and figure I can't be bothered. I can hang all the stuff I want off this machine and the 4GB of RAM isn't terrible, especially now that Mavericks implements memory compression. Very glad I stumped up for the 256GB SSD and the i5 has proven a very good little workhorse. I have a big PC at home that I use for the heavier compute work and also a Mac mini which is my preferred desktop computer but the MBA is what I use 90% of the time. I wouldn't trade the small and light form factor even for a retina Pro. We have one in the office and it is heavier by far and while the screen is nice it behaves like 1280x800 so appears to have less real-estate.

    I'll easily get another couple of years out of this machine and then I'll go straight back and buy another with the latest specs. The benefits of the largely solid state design, light weight and the wonderful keyboard and trackpad more than make up for any losses. Oh, and the screen, while not matte, doesn't have a glass cover so is actually very nice with the antiglare finish.

    --
    "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
  72. Re:"AN Lenovo"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You are a annoying grammar nazi!

  73. Re:"AN Lenovo"? by Drethon · · Score: 2

    Looks more like he started to type "an e-430" and realized people might not realize it was a Lenovo. Problably didn't think the sensitivities of grammar nazis were important enough to fix the typo either. Personally I prefer clarity over correctness and "an Lenovo e-430" is more clear than "an e-430" is correct...

  74. Same Issue, 17" MBP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a 2007 17" MBP (matte screen) that's starting to show it's age. Since Apple doesn't offer a 17" rig anymore, I've been considering going with a new laptop manufacturer & running Linux with OSX in a VM. However, the new MBPs have Thunderbolt & we still have an XSAN at work... Hooking into the SAN directly with a thunderbolt adaptor would be sweet. That, along with an external display & keyboard should do the trick for a few more years.

  75. Lenovo Retina? by Drethon · · Score: 0

    I'm probably insane (well given anyway) but I'd be tempted to put a retina LCD in my Lenovo laptop if I could figure out how to do that...

  76. American idiot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you AMERICANS keep writing "more... that" and "more... then"?
    Are you so stupid that you can't even understand what the words 'that', 'then' and 'than' mean? Apparently so.

    It's MORE THAN, you American cretin.

  77. Re:Most consumers prefer thin over easily repairab by nctritech · · Score: 1

    *drop*

    Ah, there we go, I think I've helped you find the major downfall of thin computing products. ;)

  78. What do you do for a living? Laptops are tools. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
    Do you upgrade your screw driver? Do you repair your hammer? If the laptop is something that you are using as a tool to do your job then get the correct model in the first place that will meet your current and future needs.

    If you are actually using the laptop get work done, don't sell yourself short to save a few bucks.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    1. Re:What do you do for a living? Laptops are tools. by danlip · · Score: 1

      A laptop is a much bigger investment than a screwdriver or hammer, and enough to strain the budgets of most people. They may not be able to afford the ideal model today, or even if they can what is ideal today may not be ideal tomorrow. A laptop that is upgradable may save you a lot of money in the long run. Plus a hammer doesn't have parts that wear out, a laptop does (in particular the battery).

    2. Re:What do you do for a living? Laptops are tools. by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Interesting analogy, but not all that accurate.

      First, hammers and screwdrivers perform one task. Your modern personal computer is expected to perform many different tasks. My "tool" is used to compile and debug code, write documentation, correspond with others, and provide entertainment. My hammer pounds nails and my screwdriver drives screws. They don't solder, cut wire, or carve wood.

    3. Re:What do you do for a living? Laptops are tools. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Interesting analogy, but not all that accurate.

      First, hammers and screwdrivers perform one task. Your modern personal computer is expected to perform many different tasks. My "tool" is used to compile and debug code, write documentation, correspond with others, and provide entertainment. My hammer pounds nails and my screwdriver drives screws. They don't solder, cut wire, or carve wood.

      Fine. How about a car analogy? If you work in construction as a general contractor, you need to have a truck that is reliable and able to handle all of the loads you might need to haul, you would get the best truck that you can afford. You would ensure that it had the capabilities that you needed and the reliability that you depend upon. Nobody will want to continue to hire you if your broken arse truck keeps on breaking down because you are always "fixing" it.

      If you work in construction then you should be an expert in your field of work and not a jack of all trades. Focus on what you are best at.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    4. Re:What do you do for a living? Laptops are tools. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      A laptop is a much bigger investment than a screwdriver or hammer, and enough to strain the budgets of most people. They may not be able to afford the ideal model today, or even if they can what is ideal today may not be ideal tomorrow. A laptop that is upgradable may save you a lot of money in the long run. Plus a hammer doesn't have parts that wear out, a laptop does (in particular the battery).

      Bullshit. Time is money and if you use a laptop work work, your clients are not going to be interested in your excuses about having upgrade it or get parts for it. You would be a "grown up" and just do what you need to do to get your job done. If your laptop breaks, get a replacement and then worry about repairing the old one. Chances are that if it is more than two years old, it is not even worth repairing in the first place.

      Trying to upgrade a 2 year or older laptop is a waste of money.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  79. Acer aspire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Decent laptops, fairly thin and excellent specs for the price. This model came with a 3rd gen i7, 4gb of ram, and a 128gb ssd for $700. Immediately put linux on it, and it runs great.
    Internally it's fairly simple, the ram and cpu are soldered in as expected, but it's not too hard to replace anything else, it's a lot simpler than the comparable macbook.
    Cons are a mostly plastic case and a weird trackpad, but otherwise I haven't had any problems.

    The asus zenbooks are also pretty good, a bit more expensive but have an entirely aluminum chassis and are slightly thinner.

  80. Apple Refurb non-retina? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not an Apple Refurb non-retina?

    May have to check the site a few times, to find the specific processor speed/screen combo (I prefer the non-glare) you're looking for.. but it'll be what you want, at a lower price ..

    Apple was still selling non-retina MBP 15s as late as this summer (2013)..

    They're still out there.. for now...

    After they're gone?

    Well

    If you want to run MacOS X/Hackintosh it, you may be better off visiting some of the Hackintosh sites/forums and see which specific models are most easily hackintoshed based on what people in the mackintosh community has experienced and shared

    Just my $0.02US

  81. Re:If Your Laptop Needs Upgrades, is it good enoug by dkman · · Score: 1

    I'm with this guy. Get the laptop sufficiently loaded in the first place so you don't have to find parts to add to it to keep it going. Also check out Sager I got one around last Christmas with 2 hard drives and 16GB ram when most Dells only had the option to come with 8GB (and for a hefty price). Don't get me wrong I like Dells, but I wanted 16 gigs and wasn't willing to chop my leg off for it. It runs windows 7 on one drive and multiple flavors of linux on the other.

    --
    I refuse to sign
  82. XPS 15 Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new Dell XPS 15 comes with a 3200x1800 touchscreen, which as the advantage to support putting their big fingers on your beautiful screen.

    It also in a Precision M3800 version with a Quadro graphic card if you do CAD and other.

    -- Sent from my XPS 15 Touch

  83. refurbished by danlip · · Score: 1

    Get a refurbished pre-retina display version from Apple. They are still available, cheaper than a new one, and come with the same warranty. You can even get AppleCare for them last time I checked.

  84. Retina by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    I'm using my first retina-screened MBP for development. Before I got it, which was only because I was moving abroad for 6 months and needed an up-to-date portable, I did not think the retina displays were much more than a nice-to-have-but-mostly-marketing feature.

    I've totally changed my opinion. I have a standard resolution 21" second screen plugged in and I really don't like using it if I have to. It's like needing glasses after having 20-30 vision (yes, there is such a thing, look it up!).

    I haven't had it all that long so I can't comment on whether the non-replaceable battery will be a problem (I have needed new batteries in previous models), but until other laptops come with screens this good, I'm going to be very reluctant to give it up.

    Also, 10.9 has made a serious difference to both battery drain and the temperature of the machine in normal use - quite unexpectedly, those changes to power management really work. Since most of my time is in XCode, editing and compiling (rather than watching video say), battery life is almost double over 10.8.

  85. get a 2013 non-retina 13" mbp as long as they are by unami · · Score: 1

    and stop worrying for another three years.

  86. Re:Lenovo: W540 will do 2880x1620 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lenovo W540 will be 15.5" 3K (2880 x 1620) (300 NITS)

    MacBook Pro is 227ppi at 2880x1800 and so its almost equivilant.

  87. Dell Latitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm typing this on a Dell Latitude E7440. It wasn't cheap but it's a fantastic piece of hardware. Beautiful display, easy to disassemble, pretty good connectivity options; I'm quite pleased.

  88. Re:If Your Laptop Needs Upgrades, is it good enoug by Skadet · · Score: 1

    Well-heeled. It's an expression about the quality of shoes the more well-off wear.

  89. Old School Thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get with the times and purchase a Google ChromeBook. Move all the processing power off your laptop and into a Data Centre. When it breaks, throw it away and buy a new one. Invest the difference in appreciating asset acquisition.

  90. System76 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a System76 that I bought about a year ago as my home machine and I use one of the aforementioned macbook pros with retina for work. The System76 has served me well. I did encounter a hard drive failure early on but the support was responsive and quick to replace it. My System76 is the Gazelle Professional with 16 GB of ram. I use it for dev work and basic gaming, the performance has been great (Especially in Euro Truck Simulator)!

    1. Re:System76 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I highly recommend them

  91. 2011 MBP 15" matte 1680x1050 by clay_shooter · · Score: 1

    I really like my macbook matte 15" with the "betweener" 1680x1050 display. Microcenter has late 2011 apple refurbs for $1399. I have one now and thought about getting another one. They are upgradable with better than normal resolution and the anti-glare screen. It would be a "two year old design" - new machine without USB3.0. GOM18LL/A

    1. Re:2011 MBP 15" matte 1680x1050 by Jethro · · Score: 1

      That's what I have now (: Had it since a bit before they came out. Hoping to get at least another year or two out of it.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  92. Are you being dense? Multiple paths to data by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Even if you lived next to an Apple Store and they are willing to swap your machine out entirely, you then lose all your apps and data.

    Well with an iMac the Apple people can either swap your HD in the store into the new system, or when you get home you restore the entire system from Time Machine which is so easy to use my mom actually uses it - the ultimate test of any backup system.

    Non Apple folk dislike the Surface Pro (an amazing machine btw)

    Yes, I like it quite a lot, but the Windows world has hurt me too much over my life to ever return to it.

    PC folk aren't mindless uniform cogs like the "Think Different" crowd has become.

    Mac people aren't either. They are UNIX sysadmins, moms, programmers, engineers, kids, etc. They are everyone, the whole range.

    What they are is people who want a system that works well for a long time that it's easy for them to resolve issues. That's why you want a "repairable" system to, but for those that don't want the time and aggravation that computer repairs can bring, or simply do not have the technical ability Apple has a system that means they can resolve system issues as easily as someone technical - and that is a great thing. It's also nice as I said for someone that CAN resolve those issues themselves, but choses to spend tim on other things.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  93. Re:Lenovo hi-res by pepty · · Score: 1

    The highest at the moment, actually: 3200 x 1800 on the (Ideapad) 13.3" Yoga 2 Pro. The Yoga flunks RAM upgradeability (soldered in), but battery and SSD are easily replaceable.

  94. I think you can upgrade them by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    I've heard that a co-worker of mine upgraded his MBP's SSD and RAM.

    This website, http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook-air/macbook-air-faq/macbook-air-mid-2012-how-to-replace-upgrade-ssd-storage.html, seems to imply that the only thing you need is a funky screwdriver.

    Back in the 90s, when computers cost $5,000-$10,000 in today's dollars, it made sense to keep upgrading them. Now the top-of-the-line computers are cheap enough that it's easier to just buy one that you can afford to replace every 4 years or so.

  95. Re:Most consumers prefer thin over easily repairab by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    The new ones are definitely slick and fast. However I rarely use them as laptops. I plug in the keyboard and monitor and use it like a normal desktop. I would be very happy with a Mac Mini style except the powers at work want to use a laptop instead. Then you could open it up and repair/upgrade/recycle if you need to. I wouldn't mind having the old Macbook Pro that you could open either, the smaller size is not a win really, and it's still portable so thatyou can take it to a conference room. Sleek stops being important once you're no longer a twenty something doing all their daily work while on a train or in a coffee shop and you're no longer trying to impress the strangers around you.

  96. 1989 Subaru Brumby (BRAT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hasn't missed a beat

  97. Dell XPS 15 or M3800 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are more MBP-like but more serviceable/configurable. Just got an XPS 15 and it seems excellent so far. There are some non-retina configurations if you really hate hi-res.

  98. Lenovo T or Thinkpad Yoga by ianbnet · · Score: 1

    There are a bunch of great options out there, but nothing has ever replaced the Thinkpad line for me. I have spent time with the new Lenovo Thinkpad Yoga, and if you're in the market for a 12.5" device, it's awesome. First thing I did was replace its built in SSD and wifi chip -- took less than 5 minutes -- and it has all the functionality of an amazing Win8.1 convertible as well.

    Then as others have said, there's the tried-and-true T series. The T440s is beautiful in its own way, rugged, and super serviceable.

    --
    --------------------- -me, Crusher of those who are Foolish (don't be foolish)
  99. The 2011 15" and 17" MacBook Pros are garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2011 is the year before Apple came out with the Retina MacBook Pros. The 2011 15" and 17" MacBook Pros include the discrete AMD GPU. Apparently it was poorly designed because the AMD GPUs overheat and eventually die, as many users are now reporting in various Apple forums. Once the AMD GPU dies, the OS will constantly crash and you will be lucky if you can even boot up the machine. If you do manage to boot up the machine, get a program called "gfxCardStatus" installed fast and force the machine to always use the integrated Intel GPU. That is the only workaround for this problem, but then you probably won't be able to play games or edit videos or do anything else that is graphics-intensive. Apple does not have a real solution to this problem, as many users have reported taking their MBPs to Apple and having the entire logic board replaced, but then the replacement board suffers from the same dead GPU within days or weeks.

  100. The MBP has one thing no other laptop has by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The MacBook Pro is the last laptop that has a 16:10 screen aspect ratio. All other laptops have a 16:9 aspect ratio.

  101. I have a hp elitebook 8760w by kayoshiii · · Score: 1

    solid body, good keyboard and touchpad.
    low latency audio capable.
    toolless access to battery, 2 ram slots, (single screw for two hdd slots, wireless card).
    graphics card, processor and other 2 ram slots can be upgraded with some effort.
    optical drive can be replaced with 3rd hdd.
    will connect to second battery if you are going to be away from mains for a while. This also angles the keyboard and keeps your lap from burning.
    certified to run SuSE linux if linux is your thing.

    It's quite a bit heavier than the macbook pro - the w series are portable workstations. The 14 and 15 inch versions are smaller and lighter.

  102. Re:Most consumers prefer thin over easily repairab by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

    I have a MBP (2011 spring) and love the computer. But I have upgraded the ram already. When I bought it, I bought it with minimum ram(4GB) because the upgrade didn't seem worth it. But I noticed when I started trying to tinker with developer work and drive several heavier apps at once (once I got an external display so at home it was a proper desktop replacement), that wasn't nearly enough. I really appreciated not paying apple 300 dollars at the time to get 16 GB, and instead paid 100 dollars and popped the ram in myself.

    I don't know how my use case will change over the 5-6 years I try to keep my laptops around. And frankly, the build quality on this is good enough and my use case has changed enough that I could see keeping this one around for even longer. As long as the CPU and logic board hold together, I can swap hard drives for an SSD, replace ram if it burns out, etc. I like the ability to keep a working computer around with minimal fuss, and I really like ability to modify the specs to a certain degree to make sure the computer can adapt to my needs as they change. They have changed in the last 2 years, and I expect they will change again when I have kids.

  103. Re:residual value supports a faster upgrade cycle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My c2d MBP had more hardware problems than any other computer I've had since 1988, it's also the most expensive computer I've ever bought since 1997. My experience with apple during that time was also negative. The whole time I owned it the only place I felt like I was getting my money's worth was with the aesthetics. They also tried to get me to extend their warranty for 300 dollars because it was a "professional product" but on my first (and only) warranty they wanted to take two weeks turnaround when I was on call and told me the hard drive would likely come back wiped so be sure to back up! They looked at me puzzled when I tried to buy an onsite warranty too... I guess they didn't know that was a thing.. a thing that you normally get on a "professional" product with a 300 dollar warranty although they said none was available at any price.

    Apple doesn't want nerds as customers unless they're paying money to write apps for it's store.

  104. Re:If Your Laptop Needs Upgrades, is it good enoug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with your attitude but apple goes to extremes when gouging people on price for simple and inexpensive upgrades, go on their website and unless they've changed you can add like 1000 bux to the price of most things with the ram alone, if you want it done for you it quickly makes the price so high that the price starts getting hard to justify compared to other people's professional offerings.

    I will say that without all the upgrades the price used to be a little lower for most of their pro products, the higher end the item the more true it was compared to the competition. MBP is not a true pro product anymore and was headed that way for awhile.

  105. System 76 for sure! by andreicristianpetcu · · Score: 1

    Yeah.... but System76 takes care of stuff like broken microphone drivers or bad keyboard. They take Clevo and put Ubuntu on it and make sure everything is ok. I have a System 76 Galago Ultra Pro with HDD AND SSD with a ArchLinux and Debian on it and it works great. I have a killer wireles board with open source wifi drivers. They keyboard was not that great but they are sending new ones to everybody who wants them. They developed a brand new keyboard model witch fixes the old keyboard issues. It's easy to change also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqIj1T-LKrc

  106. No recommndations? by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    This article turned into an Apple discussion. But I don't see a single recommendation for laptops.

    I just replaced my pre-retina MBP 17" as well, but it was easy for me because I hardly used OS X on it. My MBP was a neat laptop because it could also boot OS X if I wanted it too. I enjoyed going somewhere, popping it open, and booting to Windows. It was like a practical joke: look my toaster is actually a dishwasher! But I never had a reason to use OS X, other than to cross-compile something just to show "hey, this builds and runs on OS X! Neat!" I tried, but I didn't find it so compelling that it was worth giving up on the entire world just to be there. That decision freed me a lot, and you should consider it.

    I angsted for months over the new MacBooks. They just weren't what I wanted. Was I being too old-school and just not "getting it?" But I finally decided that if, for some reason, I really need to build on OS X, I'll just buy a cheap mac to test it on. There's no point in struggling and angsting over the hardware when there are thousands of fine Windows + *nix machines out there that meet my needs for price and maintainability.

  107. 2008 17 inch MacBook Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still using my 2008 17 inch MBP upgraded to 4 GB of RAM (thinking about going to 6 if I go to Mavericks), an ExpressCard 48 GB SSD and a WD 1 TB HDD. It does what I need with style and grace. There are lots of them out there for sale on Craigslist for about $600.

  108. Re: Ask Slashdot: Best Laptops For Fans Of Pre-Ret by StealthSurge · · Score: 1

    I am an IT professional. I have built 4 "Gamer" class desktops for family and myself in the past year. While I love to "tinker" to get a bunch of hardware to all work together with Microsoft Windows, nothing beats my latest 13" MacBook Pro Retina (late 2013), i7 Haswell, 1 terabyte flash storage, 16 GB RAM and a back lit keyboard and the latest OS X. It just works. And if it doesn't work, that is what Apple Care is for. While you may have been able to add an SSD and I am assuming somehow removing the optical drive and cluging in another hard drive, I am wondering about the processor. Your 3+ year old processor is a dinosaur! I have owned 4 Mac's in the past 5 years. The resale value is awesome and that is how I upgrade often. If your passion for tearing about a Mac has lead you away from Apple, you simply don't get it. You buy a Mac so you don't have to "F" with it all the time!

  109. Re:Lenovo hi-res by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

    I don't mind soldered-in RAM so much... but only 4GB of it? Ouch.

  110. I like Dell by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think the newer Dell Latitudes look pretty nice. They work well too. I have an E6520 that is going to get upgraded to a Precision next year. I like the Latitude but I can't get the memory I want in it (maxes out at 16gb). Battery life, keyboard, etc aren't hugely important to me because mine spends 95% of its time in a dock so take that for what you will. Hardware wise, I don't have any complaints. Where Dell really shines is their warranty service, usually next business day onsite to fix any problems and you talk to someone in the USA when you call for help (assuming you pay for it, of course). My company did a brief stint with Lenovo and we couldn't get rid of them fast enough. We had T400s and of the 20 or so we bought I think we had about a 20% rate of them needing system boards replaced over the 2 years we used them. They also had a problem where the USB ports would break if you weren't careful when inserting/removing devices, and when you call Lenovo support all they want to do is argue with you about sending someone out to fix your system, even when you paid extra for accidental damage protection and onsite service. Plus there's always the benefit for some people of supporting an American company.

  111. Re: Batteries by dwightk · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I'm weird. I've owned quite a few laptops over the past 15 years and I only once ran into insurmountable issues regarding the battery. And, now that I think about it, it wasn't actually the battery that was the issue because I bought a replacement and it still wouldn't charge, so it was something else in the power chain.

    I think many other people are like me in that they have a laptop and use it quite often while plugged in. As my laptops age, I just don't count on being able to use them away from a plug for long periods of time. Outside of the one unsuccessful battery replacement I mentioned above, I've never bought a replacement battery.

    I can see how it is nice for people who do use their laptops daily, but if the 1000 charge cycles hold up, that's almost 3 years. If you use a computer that much every day, you might consider a new model every once in a while.

    I do think I will miss the ability to add RAM (well, not in this computer since I maxed it out when I bought it, but, the idea of being able to upgrade) but again, assuming anyone else uses their computer in a similar way to me, it isn't a huge deal.

    --
    Like anyone can even know that
  112. Dell XPS and M3800 product lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Haswell based Dell XPS (13 and 15) and the Precision M3800 are probably the notebooks currently in the market that come closest to a MBP Retina that provide some degree of repairability. According to the thread (with pictures) on the forum below the disk drive, memory and battery can be replaced without much difficulty:

    http://forum.notebookreview.com/dell-latitude-vostro-precision/735359-dell-precision-m3800-owners-review.html

    Note that the it's an M3800 shown in the teardown which is the business class version of the XPS 15. I'm assuming the 13 inch XPS notebook has a similar design.

  113. You can buy my... by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

    2010 15" MBP but personally I think you're crazy to worry about the new models. Just buy one with the upgrades you want. If you need repairs, bring it into Apple. There's really no guarantee whatsoever you could repair a laptop from any manufacturer. A lot of the times the MB goes bad and you're fucked anyway.

    --
    Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
  114. Once upon a time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What IT-professional can not afford to get a new 2500EUR laptop a year? If you can not you are NOT a professional.
    The macs are still the best laptop that there are.. I am more concerned about the new Mac Pro... Where do I put all my HDDs? External chassis and a bunch of cables? :-/

  115. good by amonamaranth · · Score: 1

    waiting for it..

  116. Lenovo by dl_sledding · · Score: 1

    Another shout out for a Lenovo. I moved from my MBP to a Lenovo T430S last year. I compared lots of brands, and the Lenovo came out on top, with a mag alloy frame, 16GB of ram, and an Intel I7 processor, at half the cost of a Retina with the same specs. *At the time*, the only other (than Apple) brand that would meet those specs was Alien, and it was twice the cost and weight.

    Mint runs great on it, with absolutely no driver issues at all.

    Only one ding against it: the internal speakers are not that good... but I never use them anyway, so it's a very small ding.

    Absolutely wonderful repair process. My touchpad died a few weeks after I got it. I called in the problem, the next morning a box showed up FedEx. I pulled the HD out and sent it the next morning, and the afternoon after that I got it back, fixed and ready to go. In this day and age, I was extremely impressed with their service attitude and speed.