The big and crucial difference between the two organizations is that SpaceX has been incrementing up to FH while simultaneously doing something commercially useful, as opposed to NASA's One Big Project approach (which it had to do for a variety of reasons.
Licensing was invented by professional guilds solely to lock in the profit
You go on believing that until some incompetent fraud designs something that kills your loved ones. Then you will be the one whining about the government not protecting it's citizens.
Exactly. Because hardware (whether direct purchase or rented AWS time) doesn't grow on trees that people can just go out and pick during the fall harvest, and neither do programmers (who like high salaries).
Does he really think there won't be 100,000 First World jackasses defacing stop signs for the lulz and religious terrorists hoping that defaced stop signs will cause school buses to crash into synagogues and girls' schools for every 1 political dissident fighting the good fight against repressive regimes?
The valuation on Tesla is insane, just like all the 'unicorn' ones, investors obsessed with new and novel behaving irrationally.
Exactly.
Tesla's P/E ratio is... non-existent. GM's P/E ratio is 5.7 and their dividend yield is 4.46%. GM's If investors had *any* sense, GM's P/E ratio would be 16, which would make it's market cap $141.6B, and Tesla's market cap would be around $10B.
Slashdot Mirror
SpaceX is notorious for delays.
The big and crucial difference between the two organizations is that SpaceX has been incrementing up to FH while simultaneously doing something commercially useful, as opposed to NASA's One Big Project approach (which it had to do for a variety of reasons.
Are there any NATO countries that don't have bilateral extradition treaties?
Isn't that SOP? It should be...
Damn, you beat me to it!
If the problem with coal is pollution (which it is), then don't tie it to "cheap energy" like the article summary did.
and coal is going to die, why the worry and fret about coal deregulation (as opposed to subsidies)?
A /. first: I admit I was wrong.
That's not a medical opinion, but a complaint.
It's both. (Except in this case the opinion is backed up with formulae that may or may not have been correctly applied.)
Shooting the messenger is a bad policy.
Andrew Wakefield (the UK didn't require certification of doctors until 2009) very much should be shot for the message he propounded.
but "engineer" holds a special meaning in the US and only the US.
With lots of "industrial exceptions" (which is why programmers can call themselves software engineers even in Oregon without being fined).
Licensing was invented by professional guilds solely to lock in the profit
You go on believing that until some incompetent fraud designs something that kills your loved ones. Then you will be the one whining about the government not protecting it's citizens.
Perhaps it's not illegal to say "I'm a doctor" as long as you don't then go on to offer a medical opinion
But he did claim to be a "doctor" offer a "medical" opinion.
As if all other First World countries don't have similar professional boards.
If he wins the suit, there's nothing to stop people from claiming to be medical doctors and doing all sorts of (more) harm to society.
Just present the facts without claiming to be an engineer.
Exactly. Because hardware (whether direct purchase or rented AWS time) doesn't grow on trees that people can just go out and pick during the fall harvest, and neither do programmers (who like high salaries).
If you did nothing but take me at my word, you wouldn't have explained the difference between peering and transit.
Why yes, I have worked for a large ISP with millions of customers.
Then you should know that there are more expenses in a business than just transit costs.
because "transit" is what you meant.
Thank you.
It literally costs them about $9/mo to offer you your service
For hardware and peering?
Surprising. I've always been pleased with them. Few outages, and they regularly ratchet up their bandwidth and data caps.
"denoising", where random noise is injected into the training data.
But doesn't the "de-" prefix mean "remove from"?
Does he really think there won't be 100,000 First World jackasses defacing stop signs for the lulz and religious terrorists hoping that defaced stop signs will cause school buses to crash into synagogues and girls' schools for every 1 political dissident fighting the good fight against repressive regimes?
But they can only learn if humans tech them a broad range of adulterated traffic signs.
Are you an Oprah wannabe?
In percentage and absolute terms, Google is more profitable than Microsoft, which "only" earned $17B net income on $85B sales.
Facebook, though, kept 37% of it's $27.6B last year. If this is the future, then FB will be raking in the cash for decades to come.
Why aren't they worried about Tesla's *abysmal* fundamentals?
The valuation on Tesla is insane, just like all the 'unicorn' ones, investors obsessed with new and novel behaving irrationally.
Exactly.
Tesla's P/E ratio is... non-existent.
GM's P/E ratio is 5.7 and their dividend yield is 4.46%. GM's If investors had *any* sense, GM's P/E ratio would be 16, which would make it's market cap $141.6B, and Tesla's market cap would be around $10B.
Honestly, obsessing about market cap is *stupid*.