I submit all space walks are dangerous, but given the history or death and injury during space walks (ZERO) I don't think you have any valid basis for attacking the suits.
Always maintain a strong healthy skepticism of any "Scientific Secrecy" unless it has a monetary basis, (patent medicines for example) or a strategic value (military).
There is no reason this type of information should be secret. In fact, just the opposite. Publish early, publish often would be the best prescription in such cases.
Would not home routers serve as well? Any area not populated densely enough for home routers would not gain anything by having an occasional car drive by.
Mesh networks do not need to be based on mobile elements.
But the sooner or later you reach the edge of the mesh. Then the piper must be paid. Someone has to fund the next hop, whether its a boarder or an ocean.
Do we really need a slash dot story telling us that if you set out to make a movie, game, coloring book, lunch pail, or Barbie dress based on a theme from some outside source you generally make a commitment to have at least a passing resemblance to said source.
Won't Slash Dotters look at this and express their deep disappointment that there is really nothing behind this story, and it doesn't even bear the tiny-est resemblance to an actual Slash Dot story?
> Because the last time we saw a flu with this mortality rate, it killed between 20 and 100 million.
Citation needed.
We have no idea of the mortality rate of this flu. We don't even have reliable ways of distinguishing it from run-of-the-mill flu on any significant scale. Nobody knows the infection rate.
In fact this is nothing at all like 1918. That flu killed young, and old alike, and everyone in between. Strong young adults died by the thousands.
This flu kills small children and the aged only. anyone over 5 and under 70 in reasonably good health will shake it off just like normal seasonable flu.
The american jaw drops when the concept of "people governing" themselves and mention of a "Crown" are mixed in the same sentence.
But I presume the word Grown is used to refer to a British style elected government.
What notions your country WAS based on went out the window with the vote to join the EU.
You are now based on something totally different, and it is not JUST because your national government fails to wield power, it is because YOU (the people) have relegated your national government to a status similar to a Canadian Province, or a US State.
You chose this path.
Your "constitution", like the American "Articles of Confederation" (the first US constitution) is fundamentally flawed. Your best course is a DO OVER, but the bureaucrats are having way too much fun playing president of the month to let that happen.
The OP was not seeking ways of sneaking in a camera.
He was looking for sources without cameras so as to comply with the requirements of his job.
But thanks for all the wonderful suggestions on how to lose your job, get arrested, disbarred, demoted, thrown in the brig, court marshaled, or spend a couple years being someone's bitch behind bars.
You can not tell a camera's electronics from a cell phone's electronics. None of this stuff can be distinguished on Xray. Even a cam embedded in a laptop can't be distinguished from the other electronics in the device.
They see your cell when you go thru the scanner (you put the phone in the basket before going thru).
They have been trained to look for cameras built into computer bezels (even tho 98% of them face the computer user, not the courtroom).
Slashdot Mirror
I submit all space walks are dangerous, but given the history or death and injury during space walks (ZERO) I don't think you have any valid basis for attacking the suits.
Why would the OP link is story to some obscure third party blurb site when a direct link to WWW.NASA.GOV would make far more sense.
You could even watch live at the Nasa site:
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html?param=public
Always maintain a strong healthy skepticism of any "Scientific Secrecy" unless it has a monetary basis, (patent medicines for example) or a strategic value (military).
There is no reason this type of information should be secret. In fact, just the opposite. Publish early, publish often would be the best prescription in such cases.
Who would have thought these self absorbed narcissists actually could serve a useful purpose in spite of themselves.
> sites where I leave ad blocking on -- generally, they're sites that I want to support,
Me thinks ye have your ONs and OFFs reversed me bucko.
Who doesn't see this as a grab for the cash?
"Pay us and we will nag the user for you till they surrender."
Thanks, but no thanks.
Howbout someone come up with a way I can get a quarter of a penny for each ad that gets foisted onto my screen. I'd unblock everyone for that.
Citation needed for both your assertions.
How would they know?
Really, is your imagination so weak that you can't conceive of the REAL customer calling Alienware and telling them that their machine was stolen?
But the company MAY WELL know. If the owner of record reported it stole TO ALIENWARE then they would be protecting the interest of their customers.
Exactly.
Why are cars needed at all in this pipe-dream?
Would not home routers serve as well? Any area not populated densely enough for home routers would not gain anything by having an occasional car drive by.
Mesh networks do not need to be based on mobile elements.
But the sooner or later you reach the edge of the mesh. Then the piper must be paid. Someone has to fund the next hop, whether its a boarder or an ocean.
Mod parent up.
Finally someone who understands the real issue here.
Guy gets sold a stolen lap top. Blames manufacture for failing to be party to his possession of stolen merchandise.
What if the Legit owner ALREADY reported it as stolen? I've seen no definitive statement that the seller was in fact the legit owner here.
>Again, there is no way for Alienware to know whether your possession of the laptop is legit unless the legit owner notifies them of the transfer.
Did you ever stop to think that the REAL owner DID report it stolen?
Who says the seller in the present case was in fact the legit owner?
Cars, AND Computers can be recorded as stolen.
How does the OP know it wasn't stolen by the person selling it to them?
You are correct. This is a useless te.
Opening the bottle destroys the value.
Sort of like Schrodinger's Cat, the mere act of testing destroys the test subject.
An open bottle can never be presumed to be real, and a still sealed one is equally suspect.
Call me back when they can do this right thru th bottle.
> What's more interesting is that if it has happened once it can happen again.
I just struck this match, and it lit ...
Gee, this seems rather obvious.
Do we really need a slash dot story telling us that if you set out to make a movie, game, coloring book, lunch pail, or Barbie dress based on a theme from some outside source you generally make a commitment to have at least a passing resemblance to said source.
Won't Slash Dotters look at this and express their deep disappointment that there is really nothing behind this story, and it doesn't even bear the tiny-est resemblance to an actual Slash Dot story?
Nah! What was I thinking.
One copy of this fear mongering nonsense per SlashDot story is enough. You had your say up-thread.
Stop your fear mongering and go have a beer.
> Because the last time we saw a flu with this mortality rate, it killed between 20 and 100 million.
Citation needed.
We have no idea of the mortality rate of this flu. We don't even have reliable ways of distinguishing it from run-of-the-mill flu on any significant scale. Nobody knows the infection rate.
In fact this is nothing at all like 1918. That flu killed young, and old alike, and everyone in between. Strong young adults died by the thousands.
This flu kills small children and the aged only. anyone over 5 and under 70 in reasonably good health will shake it off just like normal seasonable flu.
Fear monger much?
The american jaw drops when the concept of "people governing" themselves and mention of a "Crown" are mixed in the same sentence.
But I presume the word Grown is used to refer to a British style elected government.
What notions your country WAS based on went out the window with the vote to join the EU.
You are now based on something totally different, and it is not JUST because your national government fails to wield power, it is because YOU (the people) have relegated your national government to a status similar to a Canadian Province, or a US State.
You chose this path.
Your "constitution", like the American "Articles of Confederation" (the first US constitution) is fundamentally flawed. Your best course is a DO OVER, but the bureaucrats are having way too much fun playing president of the month to let that happen.
It wasn't Google, it was Microsoft.
It wasn't a satellite, it was an Airplane.
It wasn't secret info any more, and hadn't been for several years.
http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&FORM=LMLTCC&cp=ryqjpf4s57kc&style=b&lvl=2&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&phx=0&phy=0&phscl=1&scene=10352732&encType=1
> Just imagine the anti-floridation crowd going ballistic if anyone suggested adding Lithium to municipal water supplies.
Not if we add it first, and tell them later...
The OP was not seeking ways of sneaking in a camera.
He was looking for sources without cameras so as to comply with the requirements of his job.
But thanks for all the wonderful suggestions on how to lose your job, get arrested, disbarred, demoted, thrown in the brig, court marshaled, or spend a couple years being someone's bitch behind bars.
Ah, not, that's not true.
You can not tell a camera's electronics from a cell phone's electronics. None of this stuff can be distinguished on Xray. Even a cam embedded in a laptop can't be distinguished from the other electronics in the device.
They see your cell when you go thru the scanner (you put the phone in the basket before going thru).
They have been trained to look for cameras built into computer bezels (even tho 98% of them face the computer user, not the courtroom).
They do it with eyeballs, not Xrays.
And the security guard knows its "completely disabled" HOW???