Slashdot Mirror


Lithium In Water "Curbs Suicide"

SpuriousLogic writes "Drinking water which contains lithium may reduce the risk of suicide, a Japanese study suggests. Researchers compared levels of lithium in drinking water to suicide rates in the prefecture of Oita, which has a population of more than one million. The suicide rate was significantly lower in those areas with the highest levels of lithium, they wrote in the British Journal of Psychiatry. And I was only worried about fluoridation affecting my precious bodily fluids before ..."

458 comments

  1. Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where they spike the water to cure aggression in people? It doesn't end well.

    1. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm so happy 'cause today
      I found my friends
      They're in my head
      I'm so ugly, that's okay
      'Cause so are you
      Broke our mirrors
      Sunday morning is everyday
      For all I care
      And I'm not scared
      Light my candles, in a daze
      'Cause I've found God

      Yeah yeah yeah yeah
      Yeah yeah yeah yeah
      Yeah yeah yeah yeah
      Yeah

      I'm so lonely, that's ok
      I shaved my head
      And I'm not sad
      And just maybe
      I'm to blame for all I've heard
      I'm not sure
      I'm so excited
      I can't wait to meet you there
      And I don't care
      I'm so horny, that's okay
      My will is good

      Yeah yeah yeah yeah
      Yeah yeah yeah yeah
      Yeah yeah yeah yeah
      Yeah

      I like it I'm not gonna crack
      I miss you I'm not gonna crack
      I love you I'm not gonna crack
      I killed you I'm not gonna crack

      I like it I'm not gonna crack
      I miss you I'm not gonna crack
      I love you I'm not gonna crack
      I killed you I'm not gonna crack

      I'm so happy 'cause today
      I found my friends
      They're in my head
      I'm so ugly, but that's okay
      'Cause so are you
      Broke our mirrors
      Sunday morning is everyday
      For all I care
      And I'm not scared
      Light my candles in a daze
      'Cause I've found god

      Yeah yeah yeah yeah
      Yeah yeah yeah yeah
      Yeah yeah yeah yeah
      Yeah

      I like it I'm not gonna crack
      I miss you I'm not gonna crack
      I love you I'm not gonna crack
      I killed you I'm not gonna crack

      I like it I'm not gonna crack
      I miss you I'm not gonna crack
      I love you I'm not gonna crack
      I killed you I'm not gonna crack

    2. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methinks of the Reavers.

    3. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or perhaps the Firefly series and the creation of the Reavers.

    4. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Where they spike the water to cure aggression in people? It doesn't end well."

      Who's to say curing aggression would have the same side effects as in stephen kings story? Real life is much more mundance and predictable, that's what makes it REAL LIFE(tm)

    5. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you did thar

    6. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So did I. Too bad the mods didn't. Hint: it's not offtopic.

    7. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why not spike it with booze instead. "Every hour is happy hour!"

      And when people then still continue to "off" themselves, we can say "no big deal, it was just another drunk."

      So, can I have my research grant now?

    8. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a song called Lithium written by a guy who killed himself... not too offtopic, really.

    9. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      Look, this is a strong geographic correlation. If it were much more pronounced, I would choose to raise my family in a high-lithium area. Obviously we need to make sure it doesn't also increase heart attacks or not being a genius, but it's immoral not to normalise levels. Remember, this would only be bringing the deficient areas in line with non-deficient.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    10. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plot to the film Serenity http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0379786/ comes to mind.

    11. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by hackstraw · · Score: 5, Informative

      For those that do not know, lithium is a commonly prescribed medication for people with bipolar/manic depression disorder. Suicide is the only top 10-20 killer among all age groups in the US. The people most likely to commit suicide are bipolar people as opposed to people who are "normal" or those with other psychiatric disorders (major/minor depression, schizophrenia, etc). Similar studies to the one in this story have been done in Texas where lithium levels in the water supply are significantly above average compared to other states and the hospitalizations and suicide rate of bipolar people are less in Texas than other states. Yes, these studies are correlational, but anyone with a basic knowledge of statistics knows that correlation is well beyond the mantra shouted here that "correlation != causation".

      Case in point with Nirvana's Lithium lyrics, the author of the song, Kurt Cobain, was bipolar, and he is now dead from suicide. The reason suicide is so common with bipolar people is because it is so difficult for them to handle the swings from the feelings of mania and euphoria down to the feelings of worthlessness and despair. Also, heavy substance abuse, particularly with central nervous system depressants like alcohol and heroin are common among bipolar people because they temporarily relieve stress (a trigger for instability) and well alcohol and heroin are quite pleasant drugs to do in the first place. Its not uncommon for them to semi-regularly do drugs like cocaine, MDMA, or LSD to bring back the familiar feelings of mania and euphoria.

      Its common for the drug use or other unconventional social behaviors to be incorrectly deemed as causal towards the feelings and behaviors of people with bipolar disorder. I know someone very well who has bipolar disorder who has gone back and forth between a highly functional, well educated, intelligent, middle-class professional to chronic alcoholism, homelessness, in and out of jail and unemployment, to back again to the functional part. In our society, its not very permitted for people to take weeks, months or years away from activities like work or school which is what most people do from 5-65 years of age, and any and all deviations from consistency are heavily punished due to lower pay, lack of promotions, loss of jobs, jail, hospitalization, etc, which is enough to make any "normal" person depressed.

    12. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As everybody knows, mixing alkali metals with water: always a safe prospect.

    13. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps the Firefly series and the creation of the Reavers.

      IMO creating the reavers was a minor setback compared to what 'curing agression' did to everybody else.

    14. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by cizoozic · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but I did hear about one case where people simply stopped caring enough to go on living, while a select few had a negative reaction and turned into Reapers.

    15. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by cizoozic · · Score: 1

      Ah well that's what I get when I don't refresh the page for 20 minutes.

    16. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by bieber · · Score: 0

      Correlation is not "well beyond correlation != causation," it's a pretty basic principle of statistics. Correlation can certainly suggest causation, but without a controlled experiment taking place that's all it can do. Otherwise, both correlated variables could easily be responding to a third, unconsidered variable. For instance, suppose the areas in which lithium is prescribed most frequently have the lowest levels of suicide, because of the number of patients being successfully treated. As a consequence of that much lithium being prescribed, more of it would end up in the water supply when discarded improperly and so on.

    17. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Posting as AC - stigma and all that shit.

      Nice to read a coherent and, dare I say, compassionate post on /. I've been a bipolar cat for most of my professional career. I was fortunate enough to do something about it (chemically, the legal kind, but I'm always open to anything else to ease the mother fucking pain) when my marriage started falling apart. Now, life is a little more bearable, and I treat people, and myself, a little better.

      My creativity as a programmer, closet musician and business entrepreneur have benefited tremendously from my up-swings. Excruciatingly though, the down-swing is very often precipitated by stress (brought on by the pressures of running the shit I've created during my up-swings! - businesses, career, etc).

      Anyway, I just wish there wasn't such a damaging social stigma attached to being flagged "bipolar" - sadly, I don't see that going away any time soon. It may take a generation or three (like IVF). You'd be amazed how many of us fuckers are lurking around in tarzan-swinging-frenzies, creating businesses, destroying businesses, running countries, going to war, creating art, being daddies to their heart-burstingly beautiful daughters, and sometimes creating an elegant algorithm and feeling that rush of a job well done... and being lifted by the secondary rush of euphoria for no reason at all other than a great song just started on Windows Media Player (I piss full throttle on winamp and it's complexity).

    18. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serenity was about something like this wasn't it?
      Not to try to link science fiction with reality, but the principal seems to be the same. For those who haven't seen Serenity[which I highly suggest you do] the short and sweet of it is that the government added "something" to the air called the Pax, which was designed to weed out aggression. Wound up killing a whole bunch of people, and it led to bad things.

    19. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another way to say this,

      I have a lot of birds that crap on the driveway outside my house, as far as I know there has been zero suicides in my driveway. However inside the house I think the probability of suicides goes up as the amount of bird poop goes down. Therefore! We should all cover ourselves in bird poop everyday to avoid suicide.

      -a clinically "approved" bipolar

    20. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except several studies state that lithium actually worsens the symptoms and the drug companies have actually gone as far as putting "a hit" on one company trying to squeeze them out of business for leaking the report onto the internet after the drug company refused them the right to publish it.

    21. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by aywwts4 · · Score: 1

      "it's immoral not to normalise levels. Remember, this would only be bringing the deficient areas in line with non-deficient."

      What a load of doubletalk.

      Was this a joke and I will soon be moderated +1 Woosh?

      You could use this steaming pile of logic to justify pretty much anything.

      --
      Web Developers: Celebrate to our roots! Animated Gifs and Tiled Backgrounds, dont let our history die!
    22. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      Look. This is levels in drinking water. Presumeably, it varies with geographical area, composition of the rocks draining into the water table. One of the more likely variables NOT to be correlated with social/human factors.

      If it turns out this is genuinely a correlation, and it reduces the incidence of suicide, then further studies are required. For example, doping everyone up to the eyeballs with anti-schitzophrenia meds will probably reduce the suicide rate, but at a terrible cost: Mental dullening, health implications and so on.

      Fortunately, because of the aforementioned independance from social/human factors, it would be easy to spot other trends linked to lithium levels in the water. Perhaps it's associated with a lower average IQ, or a greater risk of heart disease, or even a lessened lust for life. Then, we'd do nothing.

      After all of these decision paths, we might arrive at a state where we think low levels of lithium in drinking water reduce the suicide rate without any negative consequences. Knowing that, say, 100 people in abnormally-deficient lithium areas will kill themselves needlessly, it would be immoral not to act on this knowledge. You say a person has a right to kill themself. I say, that decision is being swayed by a low lithium level somehow.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    23. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean that Stanislaw Lem story The Futurological Congress

    24. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      GPP was merely pointing out the correlation, and saying that it suggested possible causation, not categorically stating that correlation could be used to determine causation without a controlled trial.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    25. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by fractoid · · Score: 1
      Your post made me think of two conflicting quotes:

      You only need a teaspoonful to taste the soup.

      vs.

      My bucket of seawater has no fish in it, therefore there are no fish in the sea.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    26. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by vaporland · · Score: 1

      "The suicide rate was significantly lower in those areas with the highest levels of lithium"

      The consciousness rate was probably significantly lower too.

      "Similar studies to the one in this story have been done in Texas where lithium levels in the water supply are significantly above average compared to other states and the hospitalizations and suicide rate of bipolar people are less in Texas than other states."

      This could explain a lot about the last eight years:

      "BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO ATTACK U.S." - "so...? wha? Uhhhh, huh?"

      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
    27. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who has been diagnosed with being bi-polar I must say you are 100% correct. Most people laugh and joke around about being bi-polar but its far from being funny. It effects more then just the person who has it, it has effected my family, friends, and some of the best moments of my life that I will never be able to go back to.

    28. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Hecatonchires · · Score: 1

      It's more likely to increase Kidney disease and absent mindedness

      --

      Yay me!

    29. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it actually is the other way round:

      chlorided water will make you care less about others, and salt with iodine weakens your will.
      tasty recipe for obedient citizens.

    30. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      But it really doesn't show much creativity either, n'est pas?

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    31. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Being a pharmacist, I see Mr. hackstraw's comments as quite intelligent on the subject, and wonder if he too is a health professional. On the other hand, I don't think he goes quite far enough. He mentions alcohol and illicit drugs, but something as simple as caffeine can throw off the workings of lithium. Patients taking lithium are cautioned not to drink any caffeine containing beverages, but continue to drink coffee and energy drinks only to find out the side effects of this interaction.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    32. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by misty4th · · Score: 1

      I love the energizer bunny commercial where they switch to lithium power on the space flight and the astronaut says, "I feel better already!"

    33. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by eldorel · · Score: 1

      For example, doping everyone up to the eyeballs with anti-schitzophrenia meds will probably reduce the suicide rate, but at a terrible cost: Mental dullening, health implications and so on.

      Except that Lithium is one of the most prescribed anti-schitzophrenia meds on the market today, and can cause all sorts of nasty mind dulling effects.

      I recently had a roomate who had been on lithium since her teenage years, everyone though she was kinda stupid.
      Her doctor screwed up and failed to give her a prescription renewal right his office closed for Christmas holiday. This, along with a few other events, ended with her being off of the lithium for 3 weeks. Turns out she's got an iq around 135, and a biting sense of humor to match.

      If they start adding lithium to my water, I'm switching to distilled.

    34. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      You know the levels in water are far below theraputic, right? The point I specifically raised to stop someone like you from missing the point.

      Of course, I accept that "theraputic" doses have side-effects such as mental dullening. Even a 1 point IQ drop across the tapwater range would be unacceptable.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    35. Re:Anyone ever read that Stephen King story? by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

      Lithium Chloride, although somewhat toxic, tastes *exactly*, and I mean *EXACTLY* like Sodium Chloride. I know this from tasting some from a chemistry set when I was a kid. Pretty stupid, but I knew NaCl was OK, and KCl was sold as salt substitute ( tastes real bad nothing like NaCl ) so I assumed a small taste of LiCl wouldn't be hugely damaging if I spit it out, which I did. ( This wasn't too smart I know ). Anyway, If they wanted to spike water, LiCl would be taste indistinguishable from NaCl.

      --
      ...
  2. Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by joetomato · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where they spike the air to cure aggression in people? It doesn't end well.

    1. Re:Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did they become more aggressed?

    2. Re:Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by ushering05401 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It was as if a million voices cried out 'WOOOSH' and were suddenly silenced.

    3. Re:Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, sorry I'm a little too old to watch teen films/shows.

    4. Re:Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by macraig · · Score: 2, Funny

      What are ya talkin' about, man? The title of the movie is all about non-aggression!

    5. Re:Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You do realize the proverbial asswhipping you're going to receive on /. by confusing Miranda and Alderaan, right?

      ;-)

    6. Re:Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or how about that Zach Braff film, "Garden State"?
      (I highly recommend it, by the way).

      Short Version: Because of the lithium, he never feels any emotion at all; eventually chooses to give it up and just resolve the problems that have been making him depressed.

      I still recommend seeing the movie though!

    7. Re:Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      Your a leaf on the what?

    8. Re:Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where they spike the air to cure aggression in people? It doesn't end well.

      REAVERS!

    9. Re:Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You do realize the proverbial asswhipping you're going to receive on /. by confusing Miranda and Alderaan, right? ;-)

      Yeah ... never mix canon between two groups of fanatics, especially when there's significant overlap.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    10. Re:Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Silenced, except for a very small percent of the population, which had the opposite effect.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    11. Re:Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by maxume · · Score: 1

      A relatively elaborate scheme for making out with Natalie Portman if there ever was one.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    12. Re:Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by catmistake · · Score: 1

      am... am I talking... to Miranda, now?

    13. Re:Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please kill yourself now.

    14. Re:Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please kill yourself now.

      I feel the need to reiterate this request to the GP.

    15. Re:Anyone ever watch that Joss Whedon movie? by Naturalis+Philosopho · · Score: 1

      Whatever gets you there...

  3. Not surprising by grapeape · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Concidering that Lithium is used to treat a number of mental illnesses like bipolar and depression that should be expected. Here in the US there are many living with undiagnosed depression and we are seen as a tollerant and accepting society in regards to mental health. In Japan there is far less social acceptance (at least when I lived there, maybe its changed) so I would expect and even higher percentage of non treated people.

    1. Re:Not surprising by XorNand · · Score: 2, Informative

      From my understanding, lithium is used to counter the manic (irrationally and exceptionally happy) episodes of bipolar disorder. Other drugs are used to tame the corresponding depressive behavior.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    2. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Manic episodes are definitely not "irrationally and exceptionally happy" and are very often extremely unpleasant.

      Lithium acts as a mood stabilizer and works on both depression and mania.

      The post you replied to is exactly right. In places with a mood stabilizing chemical in the water, suicide rates are lower. Fairly unsurprising except that the amount of lithium being dealt with is probably well below the known therapeutic threshold.

    3. Re:Not surprising by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lithium is basically a "mood stabilizer" and is increasingly used in recalcitrant depression (plenty of stuff on the web), albeit at much higher doses than what is found in drinking water.

      Just glancing at the study, it's an interesting correlation, but it's going to be hard to do much with this. Just imagine the anti-floridation crowd going ballistic if anyone suggested adding Lithium to municipal water supplies.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Not surprising by waveformwafflehouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And a universally delivered mood stabilizer makes for a conveniently complacent population.

      Get your propaganda goggles on for this one.

    5. Re:Not surprising by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Might as well just ad Prozium to the water supply.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:Not surprising by muridae · · Score: 1

      You don't have to add it to the water anymore. Just implement a 'waste water treatment' plant to purify the water enough for watering lawns and golf courses. Then treat the local river water for municipal drinking supply. Wait till the pill popping house wives take lithium, and presto, profit!

      And if you have to ask what ??? step is, read up on the high levels of birth control hormones in tap water and how they got there.

    7. Re:Not surprising by Z00L00K · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And maybe the real problem is that the body needs a certain amount of lithium to be stable, but some people need it more than other due to genetic predisposition.

      And if we get it through water or through food is a different issue. One contributing fact can also be that we use pure sodium chloride in our cooking instead of a mix of salts where lithium and potassium also are present.

      But it's probably best to avoid chewing on those LiIon batteries. But eating vegetables seems to be a good idea.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    8. Re:Not surprising by feepness · · Score: 5, Funny

      And a universally delivered mood stabilizer makes for a conveniently complacent population. Get your propaganda goggles on for this one.

      At first the idea of this totally pissed me off. But then I had a nice, cool, glass of water and thought better of it.

    9. Re:Not surprising by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Well it wouldn't just be them having a fit. Some folks don't react very well to Lithium, it can cause tremors and kidney damage in those that can't tolerate it. What are the pro Lithium crowd gonna tell them, drink beer?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    10. Re:Not surprising by F-3582 · · Score: 1

      Considering that in some rare cases taking Lithium can make you impotent...

    11. Re:Not surprising by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Good thing my state is running out of water. I'm getting a Big Tank. I don't deny women my essence though. Not going that far.

    12. Re:Not surprising by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      And maybe the real problem is that the body needs a certain amount of lithium to be stable, but some people need it more than other due to genetic predisposition.

      Something to think about if we send people on long missions in space. Maybe drinking absolutely pure water from (say) a fuel cell is not such a good idea.

    13. Re:Not surprising by icebike · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Just imagine the anti-floridation crowd going ballistic if anyone suggested adding Lithium to municipal water supplies.

      Not if we add it first, and tell them later...

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    14. Re:Not surprising by iwein · · Score: 1

      Interesting problem here: on the one hand there is a valid objection to administering mood stabilizing medicines in this manner, but on the other hand drinking water might be unnaturally devoid of certain essential minerals.

      I'm not particularly against unnatural things, but I can't find solid arguments against adding something to the drinking water, provided it is proven that this addition makes it healthier.

      --
      Show a man some news, distract him for an hour. Show a man some mod points, distract him for the rest of his life.
    15. Re:Not surprising by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I'm sure anything they need can be included as part of the food they eat, or at worst a supplement of some sort.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    16. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Wow potatoes contain lithium ? That must be why the Irish are so easy going.

    17. Re:Not surprising by Znork · · Score: 1

      I can't find solid arguments against adding something to the drinking water, provided it is proven that this addition makes it healthier.

      Because something that makes x percent of the population healthier in one way may make y percent of the population less healthy in another. For example, Lithium might reduce suicide, but might also cause heart defects in newborn, kidney problems, weight issues, etc.

      Apart from possible additives that can be verified as having no possible negative aspects at all it's simply better engineering to specifically target the group with the deficit. That way you get both the positive result for that group and avoid the dangers for anyone else.

    18. Re:Not surprising by BikeHelmet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is, too little of X mineral is bad, but too much is also bad.

      We should all be getting hair analysis done to determine what minerals we need. Or maybe we should just live life - that works too for most people.

    19. Re:Not surprising by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Just imagine the anti-floridation crowd going ballistic if anyone suggested adding Lithium to municipal water supplies.

      I did, and it was a scary sight. All those rotten teeth...

    20. Re:Not surprising by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      And a universally delivered mood stabilizer makes for a conveniently complacent population.

      If you only look at the manic side of things. Apathy sits on the other half of that balance.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    21. Re:Not surprising by ssintercept · · Score: 1

      I don't deny women my essence though.

      and that is why you will always fear the bomb.

      yours in abstinence,
      dr strangelove

      --
      "You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."-- Fred Hampton
    22. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on where we did most of our evolution, it could be considered an essential trace nutrient (like selenium or others) instead of a drug. I can just imagine the anti-evolution or anti-floridation people with this one. Maybe they just need more lithium.

    23. Re:Not surprising by yttrstein · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually, anyone prescribing lithium for depression should have their license revoked. And even with bipolar disorder, it's often the last in a long line of options because it's such a dangerous substance.

      I'm not surprised at all that a country like Japan, who's mental health system is... shall we say "somewhat lacking" would be associated with this study.

    24. Re:Not surprising by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      And a universally delivered mood stabilizer makes for a conveniently complacent population. Get your propaganda goggles on for this one.

      "Soma! Soma! Soma! Soma! Soma! Soma! Soma!"

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    25. Re:Not surprising by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't deny women my essence though.

      and that is why you will always fear the bomb. yours in abstinence, dr strangelove

      This thread has gone from Star Wars, to Serenity, and then all the way back to How I learned to stop worrying and Love the Bomb in one easy lesson.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    26. Re:Not surprising by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Wow potatoes contain lithium ? That must be why the Irish are so easy going.

      Yes, but the problem is that they imbibe heavily and have lots of drunken sex.

      Hm. I think I need more potatoes in my diet.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    27. Re:Not surprising by seeker_1us · · Score: 1

      Just imagine the anti-floridation crowd going ballistic if anyone suggested adding Lithium to municipal water supplies.

      I'd imagine alot more crowds would be going ballistic. Lithium levels to control bipolar disorder need to be controlled. Too high and they are toxic. Wouldn't it suck if someone was taking lithium salts for bipolar disorder, then went on a long hike and made sure to bring along plenty of water?

    28. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just glancing at the study, it's an interesting correlation, but it's going to be hard to do much with this. Just imagine the anti-floridation crowd going ballistic if anyone suggested adding Lithium to municipal water supplies.

      The anti-fluoridation crowd needs lithium the most.

    29. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is already there Jack. Not to mention
      steroids, antibiotics and other stuff.

      Someone should do the statistics -- factor
      analysis, principal value, etc. to sort out
      what is going on.

    30. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      manic episodes can be irrationally and exceptionally happy. Also delusional and psychotic in extreme cases.

    31. Re:Not surprising by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Lithium stands out among other mood-stabilizers. In modern medicene, it is old, perhaps older than any other effective treatment for depression/mania. Pretty sure there are locations all over that in ancient times were known as something like healing waters where there was a high concentration of naturally disovled Lithium. The point is its not that its process to achieve its effect is understood, per se, but that its been used safely for perhaps millennia, and it pretty much always works. Consider if they decided to test putting Xanax or Depokote in drinking water supplies... these drugs didn't exist 50 years ago. They seem to be pretty good drugs, but who knows what bad things we might discover about them 450 years from now?

      Also, I don't think its insignificant that the drug is basically just a naturally forming mineral/ element. Although many drugs are naturally occuring, they usually require, unlike Lithium, some more complex process to isolate that molecule that is the drug.

    32. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are you getting your information? I find it difficult to agree with your statement, "here in the US... we are seen as a tollerant and accepting society in regards to mental health." Why do you think groups such as NAMI Stigma Busters exist?

      Two ways your statement is valid:

      1) It would be possible to agree with your statement if you lived outside the USA.

      2) If you agree that locking people up in what some US citizens call "loony bins" in order to shield them from the "normal" US citizen's eyes is accepting and tolerant to mental illness, than sure.

    33. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just imagine the anti-floridation crowd going ballistic if anyone suggested adding Lithium to municipal water supplies.

      Ohhhh.... a chance to tick the anti-fluoridation people twice: Lithium Fluoride
      [grin]

    34. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Japan there is far less social acceptance (at least when I lived there, maybe its changed) so I would expect and even higher percentage of non treated people.

      And the Japanese have immense social pressures to succeed, unlike North America.

      Japan: If you don't get in to the right school, there's no point in living a pointless existence.

      U.S.: If you don't get in to the right school, buy your d1pl0ma online!

    35. Re:Not surprising by mkiwi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think this thread needs some Lithium.. that's on topic, right?

    36. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Whoooosh*

      Prozium is not Prozac. Prozium is from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equilibrium_(film)

    37. Re:Not surprising by Smoke2Joints · · Score: 1
  4. Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is not widely promoted since it can't be patented. This is not a conspiracy theory (even if it sounds like this), see it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_pharmacology

    1. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by Mr+Stubby · · Score: 5, Funny

      from that wiki link - "The most common side effects of lithium are thirst and polyuria."
      So lithium in the water would make people drink more water and get more lithum which makes them drink more water and get more... oh the humanity!

    2. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by irtza · · Score: 2, Informative

      It may not be promoted but is still taught in school as an appropriate mood stabilizer and is commonly used to treat bipolar disorder. I think concern over nephrogenic diabetes insipidus may be more of a limitation in its clinical use.

      --
      When all else fails, try.
    3. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People generally don't drink enough water anyways.

    4. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by jd · · Score: 5, Informative

      It can also cause thyroid problems and kidney failure. Patients must undergo very stringent tests to see if their body can cope with lithium, before it is given to them.

      The problem is, lithium is highly toxic only very slightly above the theraputic threshold, making it extremely dangerous. Failure to drink, or sweating too much, will cause the lithium concentration to become dangerous or possibly deadly.

      Well, that's -a- problem. Another is that it massively reduces the seizure threshold, so anyone potentially subject to seizures must also be put on anti-seizure medication to cancel the side-effect or risk having their brain turn into swiss cheese. However, each time you add medicines, you add risk of an abreaction to the new medication and also risk of the medications interacting in harmful ways.

      (Many who die of medications they were prescribed die because the medications interacted.)

      Despite Lithium being one of the longest-used medications for mental healthcare, it is still not very well understood. Patients are tried on it to see if it'll work for them, because it works much of the time. If it doesn't work, the doctor will try something else at random, and keep on going until something does work.

      Why there haven't been studies using Lithium isotopes to trace the effects and identify the specific class(es) of condition(s) Lithium can deal with and which it can't, I don't know. It would seem easy enough and it would reduce the randomness in the mental healthcare industry.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by Tiro · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The problem is, lithium is highly toxic only very slightly above the theraputic threshold, making it extremely dangerous.

      If this study shows effects from the amount of Li occuring in drinking water, then perhaps pharmacologists should reevaluate what the theraputic threshold is?

    6. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      The problem is, lithium is highly toxic only very slightly above the theraputic threshold, making it extremely dangerous.

      Well, IIRC, the therapeutic window is not as narrow as that of flourine...

      and identify the specific class(es) of condition(s) Lithium can deal with and which it can't, I don't know. It would seem easy enough and it would reduce the randomness in the mental healthcare industry.

      It is my understanding that the psychiatric litterature suffers from not having standards for the different conditions, so it is difficult to compare studies, leading to the slow progress compared to other areas which have better standardisation, such as cancer.

    7. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by Anachragnome · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Why there haven't been studies using Lithium isotopes to trace the effects and identify the specific class(es) of condition(s) Lithium can deal with and which it can't, I don't know."

      Because there is no patent on it, and thus no protected revenue stream.

      In other words, not worth doing unless you possess a soul.

    8. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kidney failure is only an issue in extreme doses near the toxic level.

      Thyroid problems are most likely not an issue if you're under therapeutic levels.

      Get your facts straight.

    9. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by pbhj · · Score: 1

      <tinfoilhat>

      So does high lithium rate correspond to high rates of installation of water meters by the water companies??

    10. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      It is not widely promoted since it can't be patented. This is not a conspiracy theory (even if it sounds like this), see it here: [link]

      Uh... that article talks about how lithium was not widely used because it couldn't be patented, but it was talking about the turn of last century. The next part talks about it's "rediscovery," in 1949. Presumably it's used more now.

      Also it said not widely promoted by the industry. Which makes sense, they're not going to advertise for something they can't profit off of. The real problem, which is scarier than pharmaceutical conspiracy to keep lithium down, is that our health professionals are so susceptible to their promoting efforts that they won't prescribe a drug if it works but they don't have a pen with it's name on it.

      There are also some side effects and public PR problems that go along with lithium which could be limiting it's use.

    11. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by asdfx · · Score: 1

      So lithium in the water would make people drink more water and get more lithum which makes them drink more water and get more... oh the humanity!

      you mean... oh, the profit...?
      Thank you for choosing Evian Plus+, clinically shown to improve your quality of life!

      =Cue awkward middle-aged woman=

      :In this economic climate times are tough, i know. But, with Evian Plus+, I stay hydrated (important for any working girl!) and the bad times just don't seem to drag me down like they used to!!

      Your 401(k) disintegrates, no worries! It's just money, kids; I'll make more!

      =and... cue fast talking guy=

      :Evian Plus+ is not intended to treat, cure or prevent any disease.

      If you ever feel dehydrated, just drink more refreshing Evian Plus+ as necessary.

    12. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      they won't prescribe a drug if it works but they don't have a pen with it's name on it.

      If I were a doctor I wouldn't prescribe lithium at all unless I got one of those new marketing thumb drives with a minimum of 16 GB to hold a small PDF file listing side effects. You can get ones now that are shaped like pills and unscrew and have your drug logo on the outside. If I have those around I can remember what to prescribe my patients.

      There are concerns that physicians overlook traditional and proven treatments in favor of less effective, more expensive new drugs. Well if someone sent me a half-terabyte drive that said LITHIUM on it that would help.

      In a few years medicine will have advanced to the point where I have to have a terabyte drive.

    13. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by Troed · · Score: 1

      At my local airport there's a sign saying "you should drink 1 litre of water for every flight hour"

      I regularly fly trans-atlantic to the US west coast. A 9.5 hour flight.

      Fail.

    14. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they would be all at sea with that salty water

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    15. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by smallfries · · Score: 2, Informative

      What you say used to be true a couple of decades ago when lithium was mainly used in the treatment of "full-blown" type I bipolar disorder. This is what used to be called manic depression before the bipolar disorders were re-classified. In that case a therapeutic does is 1-1.5g lithium per day and toxicity is a major concern, especially over the decades that the drug may be administered for.

      Medicine has come up with lots of different replacements drugs that work well in those chronic cases and so the prescription rates for lithium have fallen. But it has found a new niche in the milder forms of bipolar disorder, such as cyclothemia where the therapeutic dose is much smaller, perhaps as low as 200mg per day. In these cases there is a large effect on symptoms at a level far below that which would be toxic.

      Long-term build-up is still an issue, and rapid changes in lifestyle (taking up a new sport, flying to a different climate) can alter the re-uptake levels and cause problems.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    16. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      At my local airport there's a sign saying "you should drink 1 litre of water for every flight hour"

      I regularly fly trans-atlantic to the US west coast. A 9.5 hour flight.

      Fail.

      Yeah, you really have to wonder from whose ass those kinds of numbers are pulled.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    17. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "In other words, not worth doing unless you possess a soul."

      Or would like to be paid in order to possess food, clothing, and shelter.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    18. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by sjames · · Score: 1

      Translation: The purpose of the pharmaceutical industry is to make piles of money. Any alleviation of suffering, prolongation of life, etc is a mere side effect. That's why they will devote billions to growing peach fuzz on bald heads or on boner pills but not a dime on malaria.

      Corporations have no soul.

    19. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by FiveDozenWhales · · Score: 2, Informative

      At my local airport there's a sign saying "you should drink 1 litre of water for every flight hour"

      I regularly fly trans-atlantic to the US west coast. A 9.5 hour flight.

      Fail.

      Yeah, you really have to wonder from whose ass those kinds of numbers are pulled.

      The company that sells the bottled water on flights and in the airport, of course.

    20. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by FiveDozenWhales · · Score: 1

      Yes, because no university would ever pay a professor who also holds a research position.

    21. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      > Because there is no patent on it, and thus no protected revenue stream.
      >
      > In other words, not worth doing unless you possess a soul.

      That's a bit simplistic... what about government grants? Why haven't those resulted in a lithium study?

    22. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you be willing to pay several $100'000 to find something out too? There's limits to people charity.

    23. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not worth doing *relative* to patentable medications. If there were no patent system, Lithium would get an amount of attention that was based on its actual clinical merits.

    24. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by jd · · Score: 1

      I've a very mild disorder and even I can't drop below the 700-750 range without adverse effects. I can't imagine people with an even milder form having suicidal tendencies. So if the levels in the water are high enough to have an impact on suicide rates, it would seem reasonable to conclude that the level being sustained can't be much below this. On the upside, it means it's impossible to die of water toxicity in Japan.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    25. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by smallfries · · Score: 1

      You should not assume that there is a constant scale. We know something of the mechanisms in the brain that correlate to bipolar disorder - e.g lesions in the frontal lobes, changes in bio-chemistry etc. But this is a long way from understanding the condition, let along the causes. One unanswered question in psychology is whether there is a single underlying physical cause for bipolar symptoms, or whether there is a range of physical causes that all present the same symptoms.

      So although 700-750 may be the bottom of the therapeutic range for you on lithium it doesn't follow that other people don't have an effect at lower doses. I am aware of people for whom 200mg is effective. Then there is the issue that there doesn't appear to be an ordering between the effectiveness of different mood stabilisers that holds across different people.

      It is possible for a more severe case to be treatable at a lower dose. The (poorly understood) effects of lithium vary greatly from person to person, and not strictly in line with the severity of their condition.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    26. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by jd · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, I suppose that's true, which goes back to the thing of using a labeled isotope and tracking the lithium's effects on the brain. Once we know more about what the drug actually targets and does once it gets there, we stand a better chance of knowing what is actually needed by a patient.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    27. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Very true. I find it bizarre that a treatment that has been in use for decades in its current form, and hundreds of years before that is still such a mystery to science. But then I suppose that bipolar touches on the very question of how the fabric of the brain makes us who we are. So it could remain a pressing question for some time. Any science directed at the action and effects of the drugs is a good cause IMO.

      The normal incidence of bipolar is 1-2% within the population at the whole. I wonder what sort of level it is at on slashdot? It doesn't directly correlate to geekyness but from threads over the years I would suspect that it is much higher. Perhaps 5-10%?

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    28. Re: Lithium is used to fight bipolar disorder by jd · · Score: 1

      "Geek Syndrome", which is actually an undifferentiated jumble of bipolar and asperger's, is supposed to be closer to 20% amongst the geeks and the nerds of the world. Also, bear in mind that I suspect mental conditions are under-reported. The UK has twice the number of cases of Asperger's per capita than the US, and it's doubtful that that's genetics. The UK has some stigma with mental conditions, but nowhere near as much, hence the favourable view of eccentrics. It's likely bipolar is equally under-diagnosed in the US, and it's near-certain both are under-diagnosed in both countries as the mechanisms are unknown, so doctors just look at symptoms - which only works if you've a case that fits one of the standard criteria.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  5. me two. by FooAtWFU · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Hi! I also base all my scientific, medical, and public policy opinions on movies and other fiction.

    (Hey, it worked for Inconvenient Truth. :P)

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:me two. by afabbro · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hi! I also base all my scientific, medical, and public policy opinions on movies and other fiction.

      FYI, lithium has been widely proscribed for depression for 25+ years. It's hardly surprising that a population that consumes more of it than normal would have a lower rate of suicide.

      But you were saying about movies and other fiction? One can't make a humorous Strangelove reference in the same paragraph as reporting news?

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    2. Re:me two. by quanticle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm usually not much of a grammar Nazi, but you should probably realize that prescribe and proscribe are almost antonyms.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    3. Re:me two. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm usually not much of a grammar Nazi, but you should probably realize that prescribe and proscribe are almost antonyms.

      Baby steps. ;P

    4. Re:me two. by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      FYI, lithium has been widely proscribed for depression for 25+ years. It's hardly surprising that a population that consumes more of it than normal would have a lower rate of suicide.

      Technically lithium is prescribed for bipolar disorder, not depression. Though I guess that at least makes you 1/2 right. In any case, it is a valid point... fewer lows, fewer suicide attempts...

    5. Re:me two. by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Patent? Lithium? It's an element on the periodic table. How could it possibly have ever had a patent filed against it?

      --
      I hate printers.
    6. Re:me two. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Patent? Lithium? It's an element on the periodic table. How could it possibly have ever had a patent filed against it?

      You must be new here.

    7. Re:me two. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Maybe he meant patents on other drugs which have made them cheaper being able to compete more/become a better choice.

    8. Re:me two. by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      Is lithium still popular as an anti-depressant, or has it fallen out of favor now that the patents have expired?

      It used to be the treatment for depression and bipolar disorder, but IIRC, the long-term health effects from regular consumption are devastating. It's still possible to get a prescription, but not with ease.

      --
      Fnord.
    9. Re:me two. by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You wouldn't proscribe medicine to someone who isn't ill, would you?

      Too much of something good can be very bad. Take Vitamin A for example. If you don't have enough, you get troubles with skin, bones, vision, even your DNA. Too much can make you lose hair, have the shits like you've been sucking on a water faucet in Mexico, anemia and so on.

      You want to take exactly the right amount of a stuff to stay healthy. And for a healthy person, the exactly right amount of a drug is zero.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:me two. by smallfries · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's still very widely prescribed for bipolar disorder. In mild cases, such as cyclothemia, the therapeutic doses are way below the toxicity level, unlike full-blown cases. There has been great success in recent years with low doses (200-600mg per day) in sub-clinic bipolar cases. I know several people who were either prescribed it immediately, or switched to it from more modern drugs.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    11. Re:me two. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is still prescribed, although it is not recommended for bipolar patients to stop taking medicine many do. If one of those patients has a episode and then is cared for by a doctor they ask what worked for you in the past and get the patient on it. In the medicine is lithium guess what they are back on lithium, some doctors then wait a period of time before switching the patient.

      You said, lithium causes health problems long term, how about bipolar causing problems long term, pick your poison.

    12. Re:me two. by tverbeek · · Score: 1, Funny

      You must be new here.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    13. Re:me two. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's still possible to get a prescription, but not with ease.

      Just eat your iPhone battery

    14. Re:me two. by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      Besides, we need all the available lithium for making batteries now; we can't afford to waste it on people who are probably just going to kill themselves anyway.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    15. Re:me two. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      surely a vocabulary problem rather than a grammar problem? ..and don't get me started on the 'z' in realise :)

      Joking - UK chap can't resist :)

    16. Re:me two. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what's the drug in this case? Lithium is just another metallic element like iron, calcium, sodium, and potassium. All of which are very important to the body operating properly.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    17. Re:me two. by PCeye · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lithium is better at treating the "manic" side of bipolar disorder (manic depression) as it is a mood stabilizer.

      When treating depression (unipolar disorder) Lithium is also prescribed to enhance other antidepressants, so he is more than half right.

    18. Re:me two. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Patent? Lithium? It's an element on the periodic table. How could it possibly have ever had a patent filed against it?

      Because the actual drug isn't the only thing you can get a patent on. There's a fair bit of technology behind the manufacture and operation of pills and other drug-delivery systems. If a manufacturer managed to come up with a better way to deliver a clinical dose, I'd think it could be patented. And maybe you can't patent an element, but I suspect (given the USPTO's penchant for issuing marginal if not outright bogus patents lately) you could patent that element as a treatment for a specific ailment. Don't confuse what should be unpatentable for what actually isn't. Not anymore.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    19. Re:me two. by Hubbell · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you ever known someone who took lithium? It kills them inside for all intents and purposes. I knew a kid who after being on it for a few months was essentially dead inside, barely able to feel any emotions. No highs, no lows, just a constant level throughout the day, every day. It was pretty sad to be quite honest.

    20. Re:me two. by The+Slashdot+8Ball · · Score: 3, Informative

      Elemental lithium isn't used as an anti-depressant - I don't think your body would be too pleased if you swallowed a lump of the stuff. However, lithiums salts, such as lithium carbonate, are used as anti-depressants.

      I think your point still stands, as lithium carbonate is a pretty simple probably naturally occurring molecule and this should affect whether is patent is granted. However, some of the other lithium salts used as anti-depressants are more complex, probably harder to derive and are arguably more worthy of being patentable.

      My apologies for two instances of "probably" - IANAChemist

    21. Re:me two. by DarkIye · · Score: 0

      The difference with lithium is that it is a heavy metal, and is poisonous in the same way that lead is. It also has a nasty habit of building up in the body and causing organ failure after a while.

      Interestingly, your body still requires trace amounts of gold (also a heavy metal).

    22. Re:me two. by line-bundle · · Score: 0

      but you should probably realize that prescribe and proscribe are almost antonyms.

      What's an antonym?

      If you are humor-debilitated ignore this comment. You need to convalesce.

    23. Re:me two. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm usually not much of a grammar Nazi, but you should probably realize that prescribe and proscribe are almost antonyms.

      and... erm... you should probably know that semantics isn't usually considered "grammar"

    24. Re:me two. by mokus000 · · Score: 1

      Just eat your iPhone battery

      I've got a bunch of old iPod and laptop batteries you can have too.

      --
      Additive identity, multiplicative cancellation, distributive multiplication over addition: pick any two (unless 1 = 0)
    25. Re:me two. by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Sounds like he was over-medicated. How serious was his condition before he started taking it? I know several people who have taken lithium, err, as I said in the post you replied to.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    26. Re:me two. by cizoozic · · Score: 1

      That's what you think, Copper Top.

    27. Re:me two. by nodrogluap · · Score: 1

      These Japanese researchers are obviously part of the "Communist subversion, and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids".

    28. Re:me two. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, your body still requires trace amounts of gold (also a heavy metal).

      [citation needed]

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    29. Re:me two. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop saying lithium is a heavy metal. As someone else pointed out, it is the furthest thing from a heavy metal there is!

    30. Re:me two. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is afabbro, replying anonymously so I don't lose karma.

      Oh, they're almost ANTONYMS, are they? What the hell is an antonym, idiot? I'll bet that's not only a word. You grammar liberals probably spend all your day smoking crack and pot and thinking about ways to take away my gun rights and hard earned money with your new president OSAMA HUSSEIN, and trolling around the Internet correcting people on piece of shit reasons that probably don't exist! You make me SICK, liberal SCUM. It was obvious what I meant, you stupid chimp, so don't go around "correcting" me for reasons which probably don't even exist. In short, SHUT THE HELL UP.

    31. Re:me two. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has there been a study on people that work at battery factories?

    32. Re:me two. by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      antonym

      semantics

      dictionary

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    33. Re:me two. by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      This is afabbro, replying anonymously

      I can't tell - are you a nutjob, a troll, or just a mediocre talent in the art of parody? It's so hard to tell these days!

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    34. Re:me two. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I can't tell - are you a nutjob, a troll, or just a mediocre talent in the art of parody? It's so hard to tell these days!

      He forgot his medication today...

    35. Re:me two. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I recall the interesting thing about Lithium as an antidepressant is that no one has figured out how it works.

      Unlike other medications there is a significant lag between first administration and any visible effects. As in serval weeks.

      As usual their is a delicate balancing act as too much lithium is quite toxic.

    36. Re:me two. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to nit-pick, but the only reason your body wouldn't like swallowing a lump of lithium is due to the fact that too much is toxic.

      Lithium salts (lithium carbonate is an ionic compound, not a molecule) are used only because they speed the dissociation of lithium into the body, not because they carbon is required for anything.

    37. Re:me two. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Very true, but few of them should be taken in excessive amounts. Our Sodium comes mainly from sodium chloride, which your doc will tell you is unhealthy for you in the amounts we "civilised" people tend to consume.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    38. Re:me two. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but wait..

      Won't eating batteries make you bipolar, positive and negative?

      I can haz energizer nao?

    39. Re:me two. by dword · · Score: 1

      Too much can make you lose hair, have the shits like you've been sucking on a water faucet in Mexico, anemia and so on.

      How do you know what sucking on a water faucet in Mexico feels like?

    40. Re:me two. by HunkirDowne · · Score: 1

      Other than the fact that elemental lithium bursts into flame upon exposure to water. Talk about your hot sauce.

      --
      insert pithy comment here
  6. HS chem may be a fading memory but... by Arainach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Doesn't Lithium react explosively with water?

    1. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by einhverfr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Evidently it is fading for you ;-)

      They are talking about lithium ions in water (from salts like lithium chloride), not dumping metallic lithium in the reservoires ;-)

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    2. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by Norsefire · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's the idea; if you drink exploding water you can't commit suicide.

    3. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by Fuji+Kitakyusho · · Score: 1

      Came here to say exactly this. Although, IIRC, Lithium reacts, but not explosively. As you go down in the alkali metals (lithium's column in the periodic table), the violence of the reaction increases. Lithium --> Sodium --> Potassium --> Rubidium --> Cesium --> Francium. I think you can get a violent explosion at Sodium or greater.

    4. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by Kid+Zero · · Score: 1

      "Energetically" is what wikipedia is calling it.

    5. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      HS chem may be a fading memory but aren't hydrogen and oxygen gases? so why is water a liquid? so confused :(

    6. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by Viros · · Score: 3, Informative

      Perhaps the bigger problem is this: I once dated a young woman who had lithium treatments for bipolar disorder and, as a result, had to constantly get her blood tested to make sure it wasn't at toxic levels.

      Yes, in certain amounts, lithium helps, but in larger amounts, it is toxic to the human body. If we put it in something like water, how are we going to explain to people that drinking too much water might cause bone loss, kidney damage and seizures? This is not to mention the problems lithium can cause on the unborn during pregnancy. What, are we going to add tap water to things women shouldn't ingest when pregnant?

    7. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      They are talking about lithium ions in water (from salts like lithium chloride), not dumping metallic lithium in the reservoires ;-)

      Speak for yourself. I want to see the 'boom'. Getting tired of all this hiney flu stuff.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by besalope · · Score: 1

      Screw lithium, cesium is MUCH better :D

    9. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      Sodium and potassium are both a lot more exciting.

      Lithium kind of disappoints.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    10. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you go down in the alkali metals (lithium's column in the periodic table), the violence of the reaction increases. Lithium --> Sodium --> Potassium --> Rubidium --> Cesium --> Francium. I think you can get a violent explosion at Sodium or greater.

      True, but... dude, what I wouldn't give to see someone crazy enough (or rich enough!) testing the hypothesis with a macroscopic quantity of francium. LOL.

    11. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by sFurbo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not better then sodium or potassium. The much higher atomic mass means that for a gram of cesium, much less hydrogen is made, so there is much less to go boom. On the other hand, lithium doesn't really go boom, not in the demonstrations I have seen. Sodium might go boom, potasium will.

    12. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by mark_hill97 · · Score: 1

      What, are we going to add tap water to things women shouldn't ingest when pregnant?

      This is obviously a plot by expecting mothers to be able to drink alcohol during their pregnancies. Thank god you figured it out man!

    13. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by compro01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The highest concentration found in the water (59 micrograms per litre, so 180micrograms per day assuming 3 litres per day) is about 3 orders of magnitude below the therapeutic range (15-20mg per day).

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    14. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by ultranova · · Score: 3, Informative

      HS chem may be a fading memory but aren't hydrogen and oxygen gases? so why is water a liquid? so confused :(

      Oxygen atoms have a larger nucleus than hydrogen atoms, so in water, the shared electrons spend more time on average near the oxygen end of the molecule than the hydrogen ends. Because of this, the oxygen end has a negative and the hydrogen ends have a positive electric charge. Consequently, nearby water molecules will form networks, with one of the hydrogen atoms in one molecule being attracted to the oxygen atoms in another. This attractive force keeps the molecules partially bonded to each other, the state we call "liquid", in surprisingly high temperatures relative to water's molecular weight.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    15. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      As long as it's halal, I don't see the problem :)

    16. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Sodium might go boom, potasium will.

      I had a chemistry professor who took small beads of sodium and dropped them into a tank of water. The pellets immediately buzzed around the tank floating on the steam generated by the heat of the reaction.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    17. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a flu that makes you Jewish?!
      Spread by matzoh?

    18. Re:HS chem may be a fading memory but... by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Whether sodium explodes depends on a number of factors.

      I watched my HS chem teacher try to do the demonstration you mention and blow up one pitrie dish after another until the whole stack was gone. His mistake? Not enough water (the water also provides a thermal mass as well as a reactant).

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  7. So this means... by actionbastard · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    Sig this!
    1. Re:So this means... by jdong · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Iran, we don't have suicides either, like in your country. We don't have that in our country. In Iran, we do not have this phenomenon. I do not know who has told you that we have it.

  8. He might be right by Norsefire · · Score: 5, Funny

    0% of people who commited suicide in the last year drunk water with Lithium in it.

  9. Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Phizzle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The idea that "scientists" are going to be spiking water supply with Li+, a freaking powerful mood stabilizing aka mood altering drug for the "Greater Good"?! My wildly successful but bipolar Boss took this stuff to deal with his manic lows, and it he would become a zombie. Everything he accomplished as a businessman he did BEFORE taking lithium. I would rather see funding and energy expended to reduce suicides without "stabilizing" the humanity into a calm herd.

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
    1. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      Evil anti-capitalist politicians disagree.

    2. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The idea that "scientists" are going to be spiking water supply with Li+, a freaking powerful mood stabilizing aka mood altering drug for the "Greater Good"?! My wildly successful but bipolar Boss took this stuff to deal with his manic lows, and it he would become a zombie. Everything he accomplished as a businessman he did BEFORE taking lithium. I would rather see funding and energy expended to reduce suicides without "stabilizing" the humanity into a calm herd.

      I now want the government to stay away from my precious bodily fluids, though I didn't complain about flouride.

    3. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Pirate_Pettit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, my first response is "F*** That!". But on further reflection, I seriously doubt it's something to worry about, except in our most Orwellian of nightmares. Who'd approve such an extreme approach, save those desiring world domination? More importantly, who'd drink it? I suspect the study had more to do with curiosity than malicious intent. All of the conspiracy laced subtext appears when a news reporter gets a hold of it. Sensationalism sells, and that's all this is.

    4. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Aerynvala · · Score: 1

      Considering how poorly my body reacted to it, yes, yes I am. And then there's the added bonus of how mixing medications is not remotely a good idea.

      --
      http://transformativeworks.org/
    5. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by altek · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't think anyone's saying anything about scientists PUTTING lithium into the water. They went around and measured levels of lithium already in the water and found that the areas with higher levels had less suicides. Seems like other factors could be at play here too, considering that geographic areas are often different from one another in many societal aspects.

      --
      THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
    6. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by timeOday · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't think anyone's saying anything about scientists PUTTING lithium into the water. They went around and measured levels of lithium already in the water and found that the areas with higher levels had less suicides.

      I suppose all water has some level of lithium. Maybe people evolved for lithium-rich water (compared to the worldwide average today) and millions of people worldwide are actually suffering from lithium deficiency. Heck, it even kills some of them.

    7. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by muridae · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lithium is found naturally in some spring water. Being that it's an an ionic element, as the water filters through certain rocks it can pick up natural lithium salts.

      Some bottled spring water even has trace amounts. Not the "spring water" that is actually from a tap in New Jersey, but real natural springs. Lithium Springs were once all the rage.

    8. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by azgard · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't help them anyway. Lithium may well block any emotional reaction. But in the end, to want freedom and justice is a rational thing. I doubt any sort of chemical can prevent a revolution, unless it would be a chemical to stop rational thinking; but who would want peasants like that?

    9. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Requiem18th · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please could you cut it with the FUD? Evil politicians are neither communists or capitalists, they are fascists, they'll pay lip service to anyone as long as they can have as much power and money as possible.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    10. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, my first response is "F*** That!". But on further reflection, I seriously doubt it's something to worry about, except in our most Orwellian of nightmares. Who'd approve such an extreme approach, save those desiring world domination? More importantly, who'd drink it?
      I suspect the study had more to do with curiosity than malicious intent. All of the conspiracy laced subtext appears when a news reporter gets a hold of it. Sensationalism sells, and that's all this is.

      I predict you'll see a proposal for treating municipal water supplies with lithium in the U.K. within six months.

    11. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as 'creepy' in the Japanese society.

      Japan, only place you can get a mix of bukkake and a crazy game show.

    12. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Pyrmontvillage · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Classic Case of Dealing with the Symptoms as Opposed to the Structural environmental/societal Causes.

    13. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why is being calm equated to being a zombie or being in a herd? Im certainly not advocating spiking the water with anything but fluoride, but its interesting how we react to news like this. We completely accept the speedy society. Hell, politicans and business want us to be stressed out and speedy. They want us to gulp down more afternoon coffee, red bull, bawls, soda, sugar, etc. It makes you more productive right? So, now youre doing the work of two people and catching up on your deadlines. Its not their concern that youre slowly developing heart disease or that youre anxious all the time and finally end up crashing around 3 or 4pm only to go home and veg out in front of the TV until bedtime to start the cycle over again. Theyre just happy they didnt have to hire an extra person in your department.

      So, when someone suggests that calm might be better for you socially and medically, suddenly we're frothing at the mouth and jonsing for starbucks. I think this says a lot about modern society. Personally, I have no patience with the speedy types. You know, the over-worked person at your company who is on her third starbucks before 10am and wont stop talking your ear off or is buzzing around like a loon at all your meetings. Yeah, I want to work on a project with her.

      Perhaps there's something to being in a calm town, regardless whether its water causing it or just people who want to be calm and happy instead of anxious and speedy.

    14. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by darpo · · Score: 1

      Amen. I gave up caffeine (for the Nth time) a couple months back, and it's one of the best things I've ever done. Stable energy levels, no more extreme morning grogginess, less anxiety, more calm. Besides, caffeine isn't necessarily the boost people think it is. Once you've tolerated it, you're just staving off withdrawal symptoms: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6422279.stm

    15. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      The idea that "scientists" are going to be spiking water supply with Li+, a freaking powerful mood stabilizing aka mood altering drug for the "Greater Good"?

      Um ... no, that would be pretty much just you.

      Have you considered seeking help for this paranoia of yours?

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    16. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      You can get spring water out of the ground in Hepburn, which is a couple of hours drive from my home. A few people make it a regular thing to drive there an fill up bottles with spring water. I wonder if there is a bit of unconscious self medication going on there?

    17. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by x2A · · Score: 4, Funny

      "unless it would be a chemical to stop rational thinking"

      Holy water?!!

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    18. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      Manic lows? That's a contradiction in terms, man.

    19. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by jabithew · · Score: 1

      I always think that politics as a career is self-selecting towards power-mad ego-freaks. If you're a fundamentally liberal (classical) person then the appeal of politics is low except in societies with low freedom.

      Perhaps in the West we will see the resurgence of Liberal parties as people become fed up with the encroachment on our civil liberties (from both Left and Right).

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    20. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by value_added · · Score: 1

      Lithium is found naturally in some spring water.

      Given the state of modern living, you could also say that antibiotics, anti-convulsants, mood stabilizers and sex hormones are found "naturally" in our drinking water.

    21. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by x2A · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Im certainly not advocating spiking the water with anything but fluoride"

      Does that mean that you do advocate putting fluoride in water? A chemical used in the treatment of hyperthyroidism (until safer alternatives where found)? I guess it would make sense that if you don't like overly-energetic people (which I'm not arguing with you about!) disrupting TSH receptor site activity within their thyroid gland with fluoride to slow their production of thyroxine probably would be a good thing... so was just wondering if you are a fluoride in water advocate, or whether you mean you're just abstaining from commenting on that one particular chemical? (or of course the option's there that I am mistaken with regards to the effect of fluoride on the thyroid)

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    22. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have a mild form of bipolar disorder called cyclothymia. I have hypomanic episodes and minor depressive episodes.

      There are definitely benefits to the hypomanic phase. You have more ideas and you have the energy to do the work it takes to accomplish them.

      However, I also have to watch out or I can get myself into trouble. When you're leaping from idea to idea it can be easy to jump to conclusions and act foolishly.

      The depressive phase hurts. The world feels dimmer and I feel like I'm just an asshole.

      So I make the best of it. I use the hypomanic phase to accomplish things while constantly reminding myself that I'm human. I use the depressive phase to reflect on the world and myself and constantly remind myself that there are both good and bad in both and I focus on the idea that I can improve them both.

    23. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      I don't really mind, I only drink Coca Cola.

      I however hope showering in lithium will make my skin smooth or something.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    24. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by ortholattice · · Score: 1

      One other thing, people on lithium tend to gain weight. Sometimes significantly. I was married to a woman who turned out to be bipolar, and after she started the lithium that finally stabilized her mood swings she gained 65 pounds - after being thin most of her life prior to that. (Although I'll take the added weight over a life of sheer hell living with a bipolar person, any day.) Anyway, if you think the U.S. has an obesity epidemic now, just wait until lithium is added to the water.

    25. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Evil anti-capitalist politicians disagree.

      Evil pro-capitalist politicians might also.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    26. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      "unless it would be a chemical to stop rational thinking"

      Holy water?!!

      Beer.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    27. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Once you've tolerated it, you're just staving off withdrawal symptoms:

      I second that. I was up to three or four cups a day (we made it strong at work, more like petroleum residue than anything else. Stuff was always trying to crawl out of the cup and escape.) Ten years ago, one cup in the morning and I'd be wide awake and buzzing like the loon the GP mentioned. Still, it got to be a pleasant habit to have a couple cups in the morning. Unfortunately, as you say it eventually had no effect (unless I drank an ungodly amount) and I began suffering hypertension. I went cold-turkey (suffering a couple days of withdrawal hell) and found that my blood pressure dropped about 20 mm/hg after a week. I like coffee but it's not worth it.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    28. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by lxs · · Score: 1

      Actually they are all part of the grand reptoid Illuminati conspiracy.

    29. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. It's surprising how many peculiar trace elements seem to be necessary for humans to remain healthy (e.g., selenium and manganese are good examples -- traces are necessary, but high concentrations are toxic). For many of these elements, the traces we normally receive from food and water are plenty, but there are geographic variations in the concentrations, and the medical effects of those variations are one of the clues to the importance of those nutrients in our diets. Iodine is often added to salt because while regular sea salt contains ample iodine, the processes used for making table salt these days ends up removing much of it. It's added back in to avoid problems.

      Interesting anecdote: the reason for water fluoridation was the discovery of a population in part of Colorado where tooth decay was anomalously low (Pikes Peak area) in concert with brown blotches on people's enamel. It was discovered that the water there had higher-than-normal fluorine concentrations due to the bedrock composition. This changes the chemistry of tooth enamel, making it more resistant to enamel corrosion. Too much, and you get something called "Colorado brown stain"/dental fluorosis, but a small amount discourages dental decay.

      Of course, we all know it is really a Commie plot to contaminate our precious bodily fluids, but it did have its basis in noticing the geographic correlations.

    30. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps there's something to being in a calm town, regardless whether its water causing it or just people who want to be calm and happy instead of anxious and speedy.

      Oh yes, since you don't like "speedy" people, why don't we just drug everyone to keep them calm 24 hours a day? Having the general population's mood altered to fit your idea of a perfect society is great. After all, we can't have a few people more alert and awake than others.

      Caffeine is proven to increase mental alertness and reaction time. Coffee is a known anti-oxidant, which has health benefits. As with most things, moderation is key. The fact that you get bothered when someone talks too much doesn't give you the right to control their moods by drugging them.

      Personally, I accomplish more at work by drinking 2-3 cups of coffee a day. It might not work for you, but what right do you have to control what I do with my body?

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    31. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by jfrankmbl · · Score: 1

      The notion comes from seeing people who are prescribed large doses of "mood-stabilizing" drugs like paxil, xanax, zoloft or lithium. Of course this is anecdotal, and n=100-200, people I talk to who take depression or anxiety medication say a large portion of the time they feel empty. I think it comes from a drastic switch in mindset. You are coming from a place where for however many years, all you know is being really sad or really angry, or at best ambivalent. All the sudden the extreme moods are moderated and you have to learn a new scale and relearn how to deal with situations that arise in your life.

      The brain learns patterns by a process called neuroplasticity. In a very basic sense, thought is a series of electro-chemical impulses and everytime you have a thought or experience, the connection between the related neurons is strengthened. This makes it easier for that thought to occur again.

      Mood-stabilizing drugs help to "smooth" the probability function of you experiencing a certain thought pattern to allow you to choose a more beneficial course, rather than immediately reacting negatively towards external stimulus. Except in very extreme cases, drugs like this are meant as a crutch to help people get through a tough time and learn to deal with life on their own terms, gradually phasing out the drugs. The transitional period can be weird because all the sudden you are dealing with completely new thought patterns and desires. You are still yourself, but you aren't going to react as strongly towards influences. For example, if you used to fly off the handle and scream during the commute home, instead you may get a little agitated, or take a few deep breaths and calm down. On the other hand, things that used to make you really happy also elicit less response, and many people can't have orgasms under medication. These are all temporary states, but they do lead to the idea that people on meds are hollow or zombies.

      In my own personal experience, I hated the way I felt on paxil and xanax so much that I decided I would be better off experiencing the bad along with the good and learned how to moderate my own mental impulses. I am no longer suicidally depressed and only occasionally have anxiety attacks, which can all be prevented or alleviated with a few deep breaths and some positive thinking. I really think a large portion of people on medication now don't really need it, but no one is interested in teaching them (or they are too lazy to learn) how to positively react to situations.

      What happens to someone who moves from an area with high-levels of lithium in the water to an area with little to none in the water? If someone is already prone to mental disorder, do they suddenly find themselves in worse moods or emotionally unstable for no reason?

    32. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by sjames · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not being calm that bothers me, it's the idea of creating and maintaining an extremely unhealthy society that naturally drives people over the edge and then suggesting a pharmaceutical band-aid as the 'solution'.

      Western society has lost the wisdom of "haste makes waste" It values the snap decision even when there is plenty of time to think things through. Much of the workforce is kept much too "busy" for them to actually accomplish anything real.

      The way we use mood stabilizers and anti-depressants is like "treating" a broken leg with massive amounts of morphine.

      What's needed is more sleep and more true leisure time. Time spent in a mental fog because you're too wound up to sleep but too tired to think doesn't count. Big hint, when you've had enough sleep, you'll wake up without an alarm clock.

      Mild to moderate depression and possibly even psychosis can be greatly improved by getting adequate sleep on a more or less regular schedule.

    33. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by mokus000 · · Score: 1

      I always think that politics as a career is self-selecting towards power-mad ego-freaks.

      Yup, Douglas Adams got it right. Anyone who wants to rule is not qualified.

      --
      Additive identity, multiplicative cancellation, distributive multiplication over addition: pick any two (unless 1 = 0)
    34. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Im certainly not advocating spiking the water with anything but fluoride, but its interesting how we react to news like this.

      - it's because of people like you that I end up buying distilled water for drinking and food preparation. In Ontario (Toronto) we have this problem - fluoride spiked water, I don't recommend drinking the tap water to anyone here.

    35. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Why is being calm equated to being a zombie or being in a herd?

      I took antidepressants for a while to treat migraines (WTF, I know), and it turned me into a zombie. My mood was very stable: No highs, no deep lows, just this monotone of uncaring baseline mood.

      Those mood altering drugs didn't make me calm, they made me... less.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    36. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by monk · · Score: 1

      I'm a big fan of calm. I prefer it, but the "zombie like" lack of affect that posters have described for people taking lithium is on an entirely different level than "calm." I have a family member who was on lithium as part of the "shotgun medicine" approach to bipolar disorder, and it was heartbreaking to watch. Later, she described the sensation as being unable to feel any emotion or emotional connection at all, but that was at the current therapeutic doses. I'm with the posters that wonder if this study might be a first indication that we should study the effects of lower doses. And the idea that it's really a deficiency is intriguing.

      --
      [-- Trust the Monkey --]
    37. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      "unless it would be a chemical to stop rational thinking"

      Holy water?!!

      Beer.

      I dearly hope you get modded insightful and not funny. I seem to recall reading that beer's origin was as liquid bread for Egyptian slaves.

      Also, the rate of alcohol poisoning in the US far exceeds lithium poisoning... um... probably...

      *waves hands, hoping a citation would appear*

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    38. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been on lithium before, and yes I *did* feel like a zombie. I didn't get as sad anymore, but I didn't get as happy either. Actually most anti-depressives were that way for me. It felt like hitting the gas in a car then hitting the limiter way too early... you just couldn't muster enough energy to feel happy or even confident enough to take risks.

    39. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by mmortal03 · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but recent research has demonstrated that lithium itself is one of the few substances that have an effect on the circadian rhythm, and this could be why it helps people with bipolar disorder and other psychological disorders. What people with common sense have been saying for ages, scientists may actually be starting to demonstrate in their research: that sleep deprivation and sleep disorders can make you go crazy if you suffer from them for long enough!

      Speaking of logical concepts like "correlation does not necessarily imply causation", well, consider this. There happens to be a higher incidence of sleep disorders in people with psychological disorders. Doctors have traditionally assumed that this was because their patients' psychological problems were keeping them up at night. Well, what if for some of these patients, it is the other way around? What if a number of them have some kind of underlying neurological sleep disorder, and it is their sleep deprivation due to this sleep disorder that is causing their psychological symptoms?

      Here's a link to an overview of info on the lithium/circadian rhythm connection: http://scienceblogs.com/clock/2008/05/lithium_circadian_clocks_and_b_2.php

      Remember, humans are the only animals who volunteer for sleep deprivation.

    40. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Convector · · Score: 1

      Holy water can still have lithium in it. You just have to boil the hell out of it. Thank you, I'll be here all week.

    41. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by sjames · · Score: 1

      I didn't know lithium altered circadian rhythm. That is interesting and does suggest a mechanism for it's action. That was a good link.

    42. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by x2A · · Score: 1

      "Also, the rate of alcohol poisoning in the US far exceeds lithium poisoning... um... probably..."

      Well alcohol would be more readily available, and my guess is, more fun then lithium (although I've not done a comparison myself) ... my guess is they would be the reasons why it's higher.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    43. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who would drink it?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Londonderry_Lithia&oldid=277602126

      http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lithium_pharmacology&oldid=287129841#Lithium_and_culture [2nd paragraph]

      and so forth.

      "Tastes good, improves mood, is mildly addictive" translates into billions of dollars in _legal_ revenue for large corporations today. (cf. smoking, alcohol, caffeine, ...)

      The criminalization of cocaine certainly ended the _legal_ revenue windfalls for many of these same large corporations, but the black market ensures that there remains billions of dollars worth of unlawful transactions.

      The criminalization of marijuana has also not stemmed demand, and marijuana is certainly even more of a mood altering substance than lithium.

      "Who'd drink it?" is not really in much doubt.

      There are, however, some practical difficulties in delivering it through existing waterworks which are not highly tolerant of mineral salts (reactivity, sedimentation), as well as side effects in boilers (tea kettles, hot water heaters). In many cases this would require expensive reengineering, where that money would be more effectively spent in a targeted way at people at risk.

      If it weren't for the fact that the people at risk for dental caries is essentially everyone, there would be no central fluoridation; the money would be better spent on additives in children's drinks, or in droplets that could be added to the drinking water or food of people most in need.

      (That approach was taken for fluoride, and the result was often overdosing to the point of fluorosis of the teeth and bones which worsened when these products were used by people in areas with centrally fluoridated water supplies. Overdosing of lithium has even worse outcomes.)

      The utility of central lithium addition is probably very small for the money involved; the same money applied more directly for people at risk for suicide, and at the social pressures which encourage particular risk groups to consider suicide (homophobia, for example) would probably have better overall outcomes for all involved.

    44. Re:Anyone else massively creeped out by this? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      The depressive phase hurts. The world feels dimmer and I feel like I'm just an asshole

      Oddly, I'm more likely to be an asshole when I'm NOT depressed.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  10. Drug everybody by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    Why not just flood all water supplies with every drug we can think of? Hey, thorazine seems to work! Is it really the governments job to inject vitamins/minerals/animals into our water supply? Sure, flouride seems to work, and I can see this study leading to lithium being added. I wonder if I could make Riddalin(sp?][TM] bottled water? Justs seems to be getting a bit nuts to me that we have to add something to everything.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    1. Re:Drug everybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're water probably already has Lithium in it since it occurs naturally and is unregulated in tap water (not sure for countries other than US).

      http://www.ewg.org/tapwater/contaminants/contaminant.php?contamcode=1083

      Watch out! Only 10 of the 39,751 test for Lithium and almost all of them report it being there. It's so dangerous you could be dead from it already and not even know it.

    2. Re:Drug everybody by jamesh · · Score: 1

      I wonder if I could make Riddalin(sp?][TM] bottled water?

      'Ritalin' is how you spell it, and it's just a stimulant. You can already get it in a can or brew it yourself (although in that form it's spelled and pronounced differently - 'Caffeine' - but the effect is the same :)

      Seriously, I've been on Ritalin before and the effect isn't a lot different to a strong can of Red Bull or similar.

    3. Re:Drug everybody by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Then I wonder why it is used to treat ADHD? I always assumed that people with that condition needed less stimulation.

    4. Re:Drug everybody by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Then I wonder why it is used to treat ADHD? I always assumed that people with that condition needed less stimulation
      As I recall, people with AD(H)D have somewhat reversed reactions to stimulants and depressants. I think it has something to do with a part of the brain responsible for regulating the activity of the rest of the brain being under-active in such people. Stimulants increase the all-over brain activity levels, and that under-active part then reigns in the rest more than it usually would. The opposite happens with depressants.

      Regardless of whether that is the correct explanation, I've seen plenty of anecdotal evidence to be convinced myself. Plenty of friends diagnosed ADHD who have such reactions. An ex-girlfriend of mine was actually prescribed a cup of coffee every morning as early as kindergarten. (Her kindergarten teacher protested, her mom eventually conceded, and sent her to school uncaffeinated; the next day, she came home with a note from her teacher requesting that she be properly caffeinated from now on). As an adult, alcohol would make her hyper, not groggy.

      Having being diagnosed ADD myself as a young child, I've noticed similar effects on myself; a nice cup of chai or a Mountain Dew would chill me out, and alcohol would wire me up. Oddly enough, now that I'm on Prozac, they have the opposite (i.e. normal effects); alcohol makes me drunk, caffeine makes me hyper, etc.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    5. Re:Drug everybody by Gerafix · · Score: 1

      Or even better why not just give everyone a joint a day. You know what they say, a joint a day keeps the... wait what was I talking about... ooh Doritos!

    6. Re:Drug everybody by jamesh · · Score: 1

      the next day, she came home with a note from her teacher requesting that she be properly caffeinated from now on

      That made me laugh - we had the exact same experience with our daughter - some protesting from her teacher until we sent her one day without her ritalin :)

      Oddly enough, now that I'm on Prozac, they have the opposite (i.e. normal effects); alcohol makes me drunk, caffeine makes me hyper, etc.

      I believe that SSRI's compete with alcohol in the liver which leaves the alcohol in your body for longer, which would explain the former. Possibly caffeine is affected in the same way.

      I also believe that self medication with caffeine is the reason that most computer nerds drink coffee to excess :)

    7. Re:Drug everybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why not just flood all water supplies with every drug we can think of?

      Ah, but as the "holistic" crowd has discovered, the difference is in calling it a "supplement" rather than a "drug."

      Hell, lithium is a naturally-occurring element. It's not a drug - it's a "mineral supplement"!

    8. Re:Drug everybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's so dangerous you could be dead from it already and not even know it.

      I LOLed.

  11. This is all a conspiracy... by SupremoMan · · Score: 0, Troll

    by the machines, to turn Humans into Lithium batteries!

  12. ebstein's anomaly by bgeer · · Score: 4, Informative

    lithium can cause cardiac birth defects when taken in the first trimester, so unless they're going to put pregnant women on a separate water system this is probably a bad idea. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/154447-overview

    1. Re:ebstein's anomaly by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      Better not eat any dairy or vegetables when pregnant then, those are loaded with high levels of lithium. Sea salt and kelp are right out. Actually, all drinking water at all anywhere contains lithium, so better get those pregnant women a supply of distilled water. I bet that's why those areas of Japan and the USA with above average levels of lithium have such high rates of birth defects, it's outrageous, we're essentially murdering babies by not evacuating those areas or piping in lithium free water (Except there's pretty much no such thing). This seems to be lost on you, but there is such a thing as different amounts of things. It's not binary. You're either taking none, or taking a lethal dose, right? Therapeutic doses of Lithium are only slightly below the lethal levels. They are very careful. You have to have rigorous kidney tests to be sure you can filter it. You have to drink plenty of water. You can't be pregnant. You can't take ibuprofen. Can't several other things. Contrast this with LOW LEVELS. Nobody needs kidney tests before you allow them to eat the kelp in sushi, or have french fries, both high sources of lithium relative to other foods.

      Lets look at another element. In a survival kit, you may have tincture of iodine to sanitize drinking water. A few drops should kill a lot of nasty bacteria. Oh but don't let a child or pregnant woman drink that, it can be severely harmful, as can putting just a few too many drops in! That means iodized salt is the worst idea in history, and we needed a separate salt supply for children and pregnant women, correct? Incorrect. Somehow, low level doses and therapeutic doses are not equal. You need iodine to live.

      You need lithium to live, too. It's in almost every vegetable, very high in potatoes, it's in dairy because CALVES need it. It's in a human mother's milk, too, which is why breastfeeding mothers shouldn't be taking therapeutic doses, either. If you don't get any in your diet, you will suffer from joint pains, irritability, and eventually paranoid schizophrenia. All drinking water contains trace amounts of sodium, potassium, lithium, calcium, and potentially other electrolytes. This study is only saying that places with higher naturally occurring levels have lower suicide rates compared to places with low lithium levels in the water. Note that there are no places with ZERO lithium levels in the water. It's everywhere in soil, absolutely everywhere. You'd have to drink rain water or something. (And don't collect it in a barrel, there's trace lithium in wood. Especially don't collect it in a terracotta pot, that's made from earth, it's loaded with lithium salts!) This may indicate that the rising rates of depression are a symptom of pandemic lithium deficiency. As in, the body needs some. Clearly not nearly a therapeutic dose, but perhaps a small dose. Kind of like we dose everybody with iodine to prevent nasty diseases since there are so few dietary sources (pretty much just seafood and some plants grown in iodine rich soil). Along that note, imagine a new study that shows a much lower breast cancer rate in Japan, linked with increased iodine consumption due to seafood and kelp. Would you then bang your fearmonger drum and decry how they will be killing babies by adding iodine to water, even though nobody suggested such a thing? (That study is real by the way, but correlation is not causation). The FDA recommends a minimum of 150 ug (damn /.s lack of unicode!) of iodine per day, and a maximum upper limit of 1,100 ug per day. The average is around 300 ug. It may be that 400 is closer to the dose they should recommend. Most minimums are computed based on the idea of "What's the lowest dose where there are no obvious and immediate symptoms of deficiency". It could very well be that Lithium is incorrectly classified, and should be considered an essential trace element, like iodine and selenium. It's certainly impossible to avoid consuming some. There is no recommended minimum amount of li

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    2. Re:ebstein's anomaly by FredMenace · · Score: 1

      Level of lithium found in the water tested in the Japan study: "Levels ranged from 0.7 to 59 micrograms per litre."
      Level of lithium typically used as a therapeutic drug: 300+ milligrams per day.

      Even if your water were at the high end and you drank several litres per day, that's still 1000x lower than the low end of therapeutic use.

      See also: http://grande.nal.usda.gov/ibids/index.php?mode2=detail&origin=ibids_references&therow=207599

      "Using data for 27 Texas counties from 1978-1987, it is shown that the incidence rates of suicide, homicide, and rape are significantly higher in counties whose drinking water supplies contain little or no lithium than in counties with water lithium levels ranging from 70-170 micrograms/L... ...arrests for possession of opium, cocaine, and their derivatives (morphine, heroin, and codeine) from 1981-1986 also produced statistically significant inverse associations"

  13. lithium is well known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    for its ability to suppress suicidal urges. It's significantly more effective at suicide reduction than any other drug available. For this reason, it's still commonly used for treating people with bipolar. Ironically, it's also one of the more toxic drugs and easy to commit suicide with.

    Having drugs that reduce the incidence of suicide is extremely important especially for bipolar. Post diagnosis, there is approximately a 15 to 20% suicide rate for bipolar patients. I was almost in that 15 to 20% I know very clearly why people try to end their lives and I also know that if they're not terminally ill, it can and should be prevented.

    If a friend or family member is seriously down, withdraws from social circles (and not just because they're on a bataan death march coding project), start giving away belongings or are talking about how it hurts too much to stay alive, ask them these three questions.

    Do you have a plan to kill yourself? (Ask how)
    do you have the materials to kill yourself with?
    Do you have a place/time for killing yourself?

    A single yes means stay close, call mental health in the morning. Two yeses or more means get the person to the emergency room and tell the doctor about these questions and responses. If the person will not go with you, call the emergency room, tell them what's going on and they will send emergency personnel to help.

    Almost all people thinking of suicide will give you signals and, even though they may not show it, want someone to stop them. Most importantly, if you try and they kill themselves anyway, don't blame yourself.

    1. Re:lithium is well known by ductonius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mod parent up.

      People who intend to commit suicide tend to talk about it. It means they need help, please try and get them to it/it to them.

    2. Re:lithium is well known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having drugs that reduce the incidence of suicide is extremely important especially for bipolar. Post diagnosis, there is approximately a 15 to 20% suicide rate for bipolar patients.

      See, it's better to just ignore it and not diagnose it.

    3. Re:lithium is well known by kubrick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I also know that if they're not terminally ill, it can and should be prevented.

      Care to back up that assertion of moral authority? My body, my choice.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    4. Re:lithium is well known by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      I have never before heard an argument for suicide before, and certainly never the same one used for abortion. Congratulations.

    5. Re:lithium is well known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Mod parent up.

      People who intend to commit suicide tend to talk about it. It means they need help, please try and get them to it/it to them.

      Isn't assisting suicide illegal? (in the states at least)

    6. Re:lithium is well known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you have the materials to kill yourself with?

      This is a idiotic question? Unless you are living in an insane asylum already you almost certainly have access to at least a dozen different potentially fatal household items.

    7. Re:lithium is well known by Dr.+Hellno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then keep your death wish to yourself. But if you go around making it plain that you intend to take your own life, you make it other peoples' business. Since many people presenting as suicidal are beyond the capability to make a logical decision (people often come to deeply regret suicide attempts), confessing suicidal tendencies to other people puts them in the position of choosing between saving a life (at least temporarily), and potentially watching a preventable and tragic death. Regardless of what you want, it's inhumane to confess your shit to another person and then expect them to take any action other than the one that preempts exposure to guilt over a life lost.

    8. Re:lithium is well known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't realise practising rope knots by myself was suicidal.

    9. Re:lithium is well known by the+donner+party · · Score: 1

      Hey, if your buddy needs your help, you kill them. It's the right thing to do, no need to bring the government into it.

    10. Re:lithium is well known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's pretty horrible being depressed, and in my 20's ,maybe younger, I thought about it, even had a go a few times.

      Now one thing that hasn't changed is getting depressed, that still cycles round, but I found a pattern, suicidal thoughts tend to come at your greatest lows and a natural consequence of a low means there is a gradual upswing from the low.

      So no matter how bad you feel about things now, there is going to be a time when you feel better.

      I was treated with drugs such as Prozac and Valium, some people self medicate with Cannabis or alcohol I did that as well, but to be honest if you can, tough it out, often there is good reason to be depressed but it will pass. I don't like Prozac especially mixing with alcohol it makes me nasty and vicious, maybe even psychotic. Valium is an interesting drug, it wraps your feelings in cotton wool and while your life goes to hell you just don't care and trust me you do need to care to be able to crawl out from that mental black hole. Its kind of unfortunate that the lows tend to be sudden and the recovery is slow. But remember its always the case that things do get better over time and throwing in the towel just means your going to miss out on some of those good times you would have had.

      Money is the least of your worries as long as you have somewhere dry to sleep and enough to eat the rest doesn't particularly matter, just try to live with some honor, help where you can. If you need motivation, just try and make a difference, somehow, any how, it doesn't really matter but make a contribution with your life, even if its something as simple as picking litter in your neighborhood, you are making a difference by being alive.

      Theres no magic formula to being happy, but don't worry about that, just one step at a time and keep trying to make a difference.

      It's with this basic philosophy I cope from day to day when its bad and thrive when its good.
      There are always people worse off than you, they cope, they get by, and so can you.
      I dont do drink or drugs or believe in god or other fairy tales, you need to feel so you can live, and feeling the blackness is as much a part of my life as the many joys in life that I find.

      One more thing don't take E's, they have a very nasty side, they give you a short term positive buzz for an evening but 2 or 3 days later you will feel like crap mainly because your brains chemistry has just been messed with, your body chemistry is kind of self regulating producing whats needed on demand. E's seem to create an over abundance of the chemicals which make you feel happy your body compensates and cuts its production and your left in the blackest of moods and it takes a while for the balance to be restored. In this frame of mind nothing is good or positive so just don't do it to yourself in the first place.

      I hope this helps

    11. Re:lithium is well known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't speak for everyone who's been in my position, but as someone who has lost a friend to suicide: fuck you. I would have greatly preferred being "placed in the position of choosing to save a life" than not being given that option at all because of the stigma people attach to it.

    12. Re:lithium is well known by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Perhaps most importantly, if you aren't there for them enough to want to live, why do you want to keep them in life at all?

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    13. Re:lithium is well known by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      People who intend to commit suicide tend to talk about it. It means they need help, please try and get them to it/it to them.

      Isn't assisting suicide illegal? (in the states at least)

      I don't think the GP meant "assist them in committing suicide", he meant "get them the medical help they need so they don't kill themselves.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    14. Re:lithium is well known by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for everyone who's been in my position, but as someone who has lost a friend to suicide: fuck you. I would have greatly preferred being "placed in the position of choosing to save a life" than not being given that option at all because of the stigma people attach to it.

      I think you should re-read the GP again. Might want to retract that "fuck you".

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    15. Re:lithium is well known by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I also know that if they're not terminally ill, it can and should be prevented.

      Care to back up that assertion of moral authority? My body, my choice.

      Nonsense. People that truly want to commit suicide will do it if they can. There's nothing you can do about it, and odds are, you'll never know anything until after it happens.

      That's not the case with most attempted suicides, so this is NOT a "my body, my choice" scenario. An untimely (or even a timely) death has effects upon others that go far beyond the one individual that died. The one who suicided is beyond caring, but many other people can be damaged or destroyed by their "choice". Unless you are a completely isolated individual with no-one for whom you care (or who cares about you) then taking your own life is a selfish, destructive act. Most of us are not islands and while we may not see any value in our continued existence, others probably do.

      Look, just because a person isn't able to perceive any solution to their problems other than suicide does not imply that that is the answer they truly want! If you really want to help them, give them another option, another choice. Don't just stand by while they snuff themselves out.

      In any event, if someone reaches out to you and you do nothing, then you are an insufficient person. Do the rest of humanity a favor and off yourself first.

      We won't stop you. It's your choice, after all.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    16. Re:lithium is well known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you are a completely isolated individual with no-one for whom you care (or who cares about you) then taking your own life is a selfish, destructive act. Most of us are not islands and while we may not see any value in our continued existence, others probably do.

      Ahhh, the guilt trip. That'll keep 'em from committing suicide. Have you ever considered the possibility that our existence has no value, that there is no god, and that we're all just a bunch of selfish apes scrambling for the next moment of instant gratification? Look around you. We're destroying the environment and ourselves. Look at all the wars and political machinations. We reward backstabbing, lying and greed. Money is our god. We have no vision or direction except to exploit one another. So, what is there to live for except the momentary thrill?

    17. Re:lithium is well known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also know that if they're not terminally ill, it can and should be prevented.

      Care to back up that assertion of moral authority? My body, my choice.

      Firstly, in this context, this seems to be focused on bipolar people. In this case, it should be noted that (unless they're rapid cycling) it's very unlikely that they would want to do this most of the time. They're not making a rational, thought through, choice when they are in the midst of a depressive episode. In fact, in depressive disorders, most first suicide attempts are backed out of, after they cause injury to themselves... Which is good, because it means that then other people can try to help them.

      Furthermore, "my body, my choice" is a morally controversial statement. One can argue that you have an obligation to your friends and family, or even that taking your life is wrong on principle...

    18. Re:lithium is well known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your friends and family's grief,sorrow and self-blame for the rest of _their_ lives. Your choice, indeed.

    19. Re:lithium is well known by wufpak · · Score: 1

      In the USA, the "emergency personnel" that respond to a suicidal person call will probably be cops. The odds of that suicidal person getting himself shot go way up once the police are involved.

      I would exhaust *all* other possibilities before calling the US police on someone I cared about.

    20. Re:lithium is well known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's called Emotional Blackmail.

    21. Re:lithium is well known by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      If they're talking about it, they don't intend on doing it. It's only after they are not heard that they turn to actually committing suicide as a last resort.

    22. Re:lithium is well known by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      > But if you go around making it plain that you intend to take your own life,
      > you make it other peoples' business.

      People who do this are either full of shit or really, really stupid. People don't intentionally do things that make it more difficult for them to achieve their goals unless, you know, they don't want to achieve their goals.

      > Since many people presenting as suicidal are beyond the capability to make
      > a logical decision

      Who decides this?

      > (people often come to deeply regret suicide attempts),

      If they are regretting it, then they weren't successful. Do you think it's hard to kill oneself? It's not. These people you're talking about didn't really want to do it. These are the same people who were blabbing about it to everyone. And after they're all hopped up on meds, of course they're embarrassed about being pathetic.

      > confessing suicidal tendencies to other people puts them in the position
      > of choosing between saving a life (at least temporarily), and potentially
      > watching a preventable and tragic death.

      Or feeling ridiculously guilty after it isn't prevented. Doing this is incredibly selfish, but if it truly is the only way to save their life and the person wants their life saved, then I guess it's worth it.

      > Regardless of what you want, it's inhumane to confess your shit to another
      > person and then expect them to take any action other than the one that
      > preempts exposure to guilt over a life lost.

      Yes, and the person doing this doesn't want you to take any action other than that. Otherwise, they'd keep their mouth shut.

    23. Re:lithium is well known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently took a friend to the emergency room after she took (with suicidal intent) what ended up being just a double-dose of someone else's medication. I'm still not sure if I did the right thing, but seeing your post and realizing that the answers to all three of those questions were yes has made me feel a little better about it...so thanks.

    24. Re:lithium is well known by Dr.+Hellno · · Score: 1

      Yeah I wasn't really saying anything that contradicts you. I was replying to an assertion of "my body, my decision, gtfo of my business" which I took to read "mandatory suicide prevention efforts infringe my rights". I was trying to reply that nobody's going to stop you unless you make your intentions known, so if you want to make your own choice all you have to do is shut your mouth. If you can't do that, you drag other people in, and any infringement of your rights is your own fault.

    25. Re:lithium is well known by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      If they're talking about it, they don't intend on doing it. It's only after they are not heard that they turn to actually committing suicide as a last resort.

      Although this is technically true, it's surprising how few people hear their cries for help. I've been suicidal several times in the past, and you really have to hit people over the head with it to get them to believe you.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    26. Re:lithium is well known by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      I have never before heard an argument for suicide before, and certainly never the same one used for abortion. Congratulations.

      You haven't been listening very hard then. I'd say it's a perfectly rational argument that I've heard verbalized many times before.

      I'm not advocating suicide, but I don't think criminalization and hospitalization are the panacea they're cracked up to be.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    27. Re:lithium is well known by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Regardless of what you want, it's inhumane to confess your shit to another person and then expect them to take any action other than the one that preempts exposure to guilt over a life lost.

      Your issues with guilt are not my concern. If I want to commit suicide, obviously matters of "humanity or inhumanity" are probably not the highest problems on my agenda.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    28. Re:lithium is well known by kubrick · · Score: 1

      So I should keep living purely to make other people feel better? Self-worth, here I come.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    29. Re:lithium is well known by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, this may surprise you, but they might have their own problems to deal with. If you need to feel special, there are help lines you can call where people are being paid to listen to your problems.

  14. That could work by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    Human body heat is only really good for base load power. Add storage to the mix and you have a way to deal with peak load. Sounds like a winner to me.

  15. Does not address core problem by linebackn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Araaag, drugs drugs drugs drugs. How about addressing the core problem of making life not SUCK so much?!

    1. Re:Does not address core problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How do you make life not suck so much? Seriously -- is it better pay? Free sex? More leisure time? I am depressed about 90% of the time and have been since I was 16 (I'm 40 now). I work part-time (about 3 days/week on average), make a (barely) six figure income, and my wife is bi. I'm not making up a word of this. I should feel incredibly happy, but instead, a life-long sense of despair prevents exactly that.

      I think there is a good part of depression that is due to external forces. I can say that when I was poor, it was worse. But a large part of depression is wholly internal and no amount of "making life suck less" is going to change that.

    2. Re:Does not address core problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You could try Zen Buddhism. I went from having to do wacked out shit all the time to get my highs to being able to enjoy previously boring stuff like just paying attention to my breath or eating a salad.

    3. Re:Does not address core problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How do you make life not suck so much? Seriously -- is it better pay? Free sex? More leisure time? I am depressed about 90% of the time and have been since I was 16 (I'm 40 now). I work part-time (about 3 days/week on average), make a (barely) six figure income, and my wife is bi. I'm not making up a word of this. I should feel incredibly happy, but instead, a life-long sense of despair prevents exactly that.

      I think there is a good part of depression that is due to external forces. I can say that when I was poor, it was worse. But a large part of depression is wholly internal and no amount of "making life suck less" is going to change that.

      Perhaps if people didn't generally spend 1/7 of their life in a large building with a well-dressed man telling them they're going to hell because they were born a bad person, they'd feel better.

      Better pay, free sex, and more leisure time are nice, but won't make you as happy as realizing that you really ARE a good person and accepting it. Accepting and living with it is probably more difficult in this sadist society.

    4. Re:Does not address core problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bullshit. 95% of today's teens are atheist, and they still kill themselves. Christians are actually probably less likely to commit suicide, simply because it's considered a sin.

    5. Re:Does not address core problem by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Araaag, drugs drugs drugs drugs. How about addressing the core problem of making life not SUCK so much?!

      Hey, Tom C.! So you are saying we should embrace Scientology?

      Bipolar disorder is a chemical imbalance and lithium does wonders. Much more effective than theta meters.

    6. Re:Does not address core problem by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Start by asking yourself:
      If you could do anything, without limitations, what would you do?
      If you could be anyone, make yourself become any kind of person, what kind of person would you be?
      If you could have any life you wanted, what kind of life would you have?

      I don't actually know anything about you, but these questions can help.

      --
      Qxe4
    7. Re:Does not address core problem by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      We're working on it. Rest assured that, for your average Joe, life sucked quite a bit more a century ago (what with 14-hour work days and all...), and even more so if you look back at several centuries ago (there was this wonderful thing called "serfdom").

      Unfortunately, as quality of life improves, so do expectations. In fact, judging by the rising suicide rate, expectations grow even faster.

    8. Re:Does not address core problem by Maelwryth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ha, I count myself lucky to have been born where I was born, to always have had food and shelter, an education, and the ability to make my own mistakes and get to learn from them.
      In your case, I would suggest mountain climbing and skydiving, possibly base jumping after a while. Adrenaline, dopamine, and the fear of death do wonders for your appreciation of life. Short though it may be. Of course, changing your life based on a /. post may not be sane, but then very little is.

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    9. Re:Does not address core problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing, happiness is like IQ. If average increases to 150, 150 becomes 100.

    10. Re:Does not address core problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free sex?

      Hell yes!

    11. Re:Does not address core problem by StarkRG · · Score: 1

      That's where lithium comes in. Life will still suck, but you won't notice because you're a mindless drone with no memory.

    12. Re:Does not address core problem by runlevelfour · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes none too far in the past there was such a thing called serfdom. Now we have wage-slavery.

    13. Re:Does not address core problem by inasity_rules · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny thing about living through stressful difficult times is you learn to be content with what you have. I live in the third world under an undemocratic government and have a much lower standard of living than you guys, but I'm quite happy.

      I'd say, its the old problem of the more you have, the more you want. Happiness has nothing to do with material wealth or possessions. Its a state of mind.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    14. Re:Does not address core problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, most people spend at least 5/7 of their lives being told they are a bad or inadequate person (teacher or boss). 6/7 if they are not atheist. infinity/7 if their parents are jerks too.

      These fancy scientists should be researching ways to formally instruct people to deal with this kind of stuff. Learn better confidence and socialization skills (they don't teach that in schools you know) and it could very well lead to better pay, free sex, and more leisure time.

      Of course some people may have genuine chemical imbalances and may need drugs to manage.

    15. Re:Does not address core problem by tburkhol · · Score: 1

      How do you make life not suck so much? Seriously -- is it better pay? Free sex? More leisure time?

      These things always seem to come to people's mind first when thinking about what they want, but they're symptoms of happiness, not the cause of happiness. Happiness comes by reaching goals through difficult challenges, so the first key to happiness is to learn to set lofty goals for yourself. The second key to happiness is to commit yourself to achieving those goals.

      Seriously: what do you do with the 4/7 days you don't work? "Relax?" "Spend time with family?" When you look at those days, of what are you proud?

    16. Re:Does not address core problem by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      Araaag, drugs drugs drugs drugs. How about addressing the core problem of making life not SUCK so much?!
      That's up to you. What do you expect governments or scientists to do about it?

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    17. Re:Does not address core problem by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Seriously -- is it better pay? Free sex? More leisure time?

      Most of these, yes. Also, general social mobility so that people can pursue their own wants and dreams in life instead of spending all their time trying to just get by.

      Good to see you acknowledging that most other people would feel happy in your situation, but you have to do what makes you happy -- not what everyone says or thinks should make you happy.

    18. Re:Does not address core problem by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Universal health care, improved education and access to that education for all academically qualified, living wage laws, and maybe lightening up about sex (particularly the douchebags who treat it as a sacrament to be sought above all else).

    19. Re:Does not address core problem by sjames · · Score: 1

      There is a such thing as a person who has an actual clinical depression. Sounds like you may be one of those people. Before concluding that, however, look at possible confounding factors. How secure is your income and relationship? Do you get enough sleep? Do you eat well? Get enough daylight?

      Way too many people now on various drugs or just toughing it out would be fine if all of those various life issues were fine. Western society is so far from healthy today that most people have no idea how much psychological abuse they go through (and put themselves through) daily.

    20. Re:Does not address core problem by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      Free sex would help.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    21. Re:Does not address core problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really love how all of the replies have suggestions. Exercise, meditation, etc. He's doing everything right. It's a chemical imbalance. It's not 100% of the time, so you know what the good times can be like, but, the majority of the time, those things that should make you happy don't. Everything could be perfect, you're driving home from grocery shopping, and you start crying for no apparent reason, and you have a really strong urge to hit the accelerator and slam into a tree at 90MPH. Everything can be perfect, your wife made a special meal for you to celebrate a major accomplishment, but it tastes like ash. There are times when you are physically unable to be happy, despite everything else in your life being in alignment.

      Depression is a disease. Some varieties can be fully treated with counseling; some varieties can not. Of course, nobody wants to rely on a couple $15 pills every day just to be able to feel something that everyone else takes for granted, but sometimes, the only thing you can do is pour chemicals into the brain with the hope that you can figure out which ones will make the intrusive suicidal thoughts stop before you actually follow through with one of those ideas.

      The pills don't make you feel happy, (quite the opposite if you start thinking about how you have to rely on them,) but they do give you the ability to feel happy once you get the rest of your ducks in a row. And THAT is worth all of the horrible side effects, the expense, the near obsessive scheduling you need to do to make sure you always take them, etc. Most people wouldn't take antidepressants if it could be done an easier way. Taking the pills is not easy, but it beats being dead, or so I think, most of the time anyway.

      Once you're able to feel happy again, the counseling, the meditation, the exercise, the sleeping and eating right all start to have the desired effect. But until you are able to feel happy, the best they can do is keep you circling outside the really dark pit of despair, knowing that the slightest push will drop you in.

    22. Re:Does not address core problem by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      If you could do anything, without limitations, what would you do?

      With or without longterm consequences?

      If you could be anyone, make yourself become any kind of person, what kind of person would you be?

      I would be Arnold Schwarzenegger. I've only got 5 inches of height to gain and other physical characteristics to change. I've only got to figure out how to become unparalyzed, backtrack 20 years, move from one country to another, get involved in weight lifting/body building, become the best in the world at that, move to another country, then start a new career in acting, and then start another career in politics. I'll start my time machine now!

      If you could have any life you wanted, what kind of life would you have?

      I really regret snapping my spinal column in a car accident when I was 17. So, I would like to become mobile again.

    23. Re:Does not address core problem by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      If it was worse when you were poor and not having threesomes, that means you are happier now. Congratulations, things will only get worse.

    24. Re:Does not address core problem by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      > I'd say, its the old problem of the more you have, the more you want

      Hogwash. The more you see other people have, either in real life or in advertisements, the more you want.

      See also: anger toward "rich" people

    25. Re:Does not address core problem by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Despite the common thinking on Slashdot, maybe you should try reading the Bible. Being the world's bestselling self-help book for 2000 years, apparently a lot of people are finding something in there that's worthwhile.

      I would tell you that churches can be a great support group that many people lack, but with the background you've already shared, you need to be careful to find an understanding church, if you decide to go that route.

      Good luck finding peace in your life. This is not flippant, I truly wish you well.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    26. Re:Does not address core problem by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      You don't sound depressed.

      --
      Qxe4
    27. Re:Does not address core problem by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If you seriously believe that it's the same thing in terms of undesirable consequences, then you need a reality check. Remember that serfdom, in its extremes (e.g. in Russia or Poland) was essentially slavery, where serfs could be traded away without their consent, or executed at the whim of their owner.

    28. Re:Does not address core problem by inasity_rules · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While what you say is true, it doesn't imply what I said is not true. I forget who said it, but some rich guy, when asked how much money was enough, answered, "just a little more.."

      Chasing wealth to find happiness is a complete waste of time. And you will never be satisfied, if wealth is your only goal. You'll always want more.

      This is why I will take a poor paying job in a research institute/university over some dead boring high paying 8-5 do the same thing every day job with a large salary(which I could easily get with my skills in this country). Because as long as I can live comfortably, I don't really care about the money. Maybe its just me.. but the truth is, I am actually happy. Strange as that may sound.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    29. Re:Does not address core problem by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      The "I will take a job for less money if I'm happier" is not a noble position, it's just a different way of looking at the same thing. It's an effect of the inability to delay gratification. I will take a job for more money that makes me less happy, because I will retire earlier.

      > Chasing wealth to find happiness is a complete waste of time. And you will
      > never be satisfied, if wealth is your only goal. You'll always want more.

      I guess maybe my issue is that I can not relate to this, personally. I make good scratch and spend nearly nothing. A job is a stepping stone toward happiness, whether that is business ownership or eventual retirement. It is not to raise cash to spend money on stupid shit I don't need.

    30. Re:Does not address core problem by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      I don't agree. If you are always "delaying gratification" you will never be content and never enjoy now. I'm not saying never look at the future. I put myself through 5 frustrating years of a degree under adverse circumstances(look up Zimbabwe on the internet if you want to know) to get where I am. Its a balance. The trick is to find something you enjoy and go with it. If you intend to wait for retirement to be "happy", I seriously doubt you will ever be.

      I see no reason why I should not be happy now and when I retire. My happiness has little to do with my bank balance and a lot to do with the fact that I am doing what I chose to do. If I enjoy my job, why should I retire early? Why must the money be the "gratification" and not the job? This way, I will actually be happier far longer than you. But I doubt I'm "normal".

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    31. Re:Does not address core problem by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      > If you are always "delaying gratification" you will never be content
      > and never enjoy now.

      I didn't say anything about "always" delaying gratification.

      > If you intend to wait for retirement to be "happy", I seriously doubt
      > you will ever be.

      What could you possibly be basing that on?

      > I see no reason why I should not be happy now and when I retire.

      Of course you can be happy during both. The question is when will you retire? It will be later if you forgo compensation in order to be happier now.

      > If I enjoy my job, why should I retire early?

      Simple economics. If you would be just as happy doing your job than not doing your job, you wouldn't be paid for it at all. So don't try to tell me you would be just as happy if you were retired or working.

      > Why must the money be the "gratification" and not the job?

      Que? I never said money was the gratification. I said the money was a way to get to the gratification, which is retirement.

      > This way, I will actually be happier far longer than you.

      You will be working for someone else longer than me.

    32. Re:Does not address core problem by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      Oh shut the fuck up. Religious people tend to be happier. Maybe you'd feel happier if you learned to stop resenting those of us who choose to follow a God (Jewish, myself).

      I could choose to take a medication. I am less clear how I would choose to believe in something that I cannot convince myself is rational or probable.

      Am I jealous that many people are able to believe in (what I perceive to be) a pleasant fiction which gives them comfort? I suppose I am.

      On the other hand, the idea that faith brings happiness seems like it could easily be just another pleasant fiction, especially if judged solely by the attitude in your post.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    33. Re:Does not address core problem by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      Free sex?

      Hell yes!

      Don't be fooled - it's never free.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    34. Re:Does not address core problem by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      If you intend to wait for retirement to be "happy", I seriously doubt > you will ever be.

      What could you possibly be basing that on?

      The idea (which may not be true) that you are not happy now. My entire point is that the statement "if I can just do X and get Y then I will be happy" isn't always true. In fact, it rarely is true at all. Happiness and success are not the same thing at all. I have no problem with saving for retirement, just I do not think saving for "happiness" works. I also believe that people who are not capable of being happy now and enjoying work, are not going to be happy no matter how much money they get or how early they retire. But its guesswork if you fit, so my apologies if I am wrong about you.

      > I see no reason why I should not be happy now and when I retire.

      Of course you can be happy during both. The question is when will you retire? It will be later if you forgo compensation in order to be happier now.

      > If I enjoy my job, why should I retire early?

      Simple economics. If you would be just as happy doing your job than not doing your job, you wouldn't be paid for it at all. So don't try to tell me you would be just as happy if you were retired or working.

      Actually, I enjoy working. Strange as that may sound. If I were to retire, I would probably be less happy.. And of course I will always be paid for it. Where do you get the idea that enjoying work means you don't get paid? This is genuinely new to me. I know plenty of counterexamples personally. Is it an American thing?

      > This way, I will actually be happier far longer than you.

      You will be working for someone else longer than me.

      Being happy and working for and with like minded people are hardly mutually exclusive. In the event that I dislike my job, I am free to change. As for working for someone else, I'm fine with that. I have no desire to worry about all the details of running a business - I am happy to leave it to someone who enjoys that sort of thing.

      I suspect that we will have to agree to disagree. Though I'm not sure you see my point. Perhaps I have explained it poorly?

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    35. Re:Does not address core problem by mgblst · · Score: 1

      You sound like a 10 year old kid. Different things make life suck for different people.

    36. Re:Does not address core problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the way it works with those of us with a *chemical* imbalance. I know this first hand.

      I've got a *wonderful* life. Almost ideal. I live in a great place, have a job I love, and a wonderful wife. I've got hobbies that I love. I work out almost every day, and eat very healthy (I also actually *like* healthy food).

      And yet I still have major depressive disorder. Things started to get really bad for me about two years ago. 6 weeks after I started on medication I started to see parts of my "normal" self coming back.

      Let me tell you - sometimes it's 100% chemical.

      It took me almost 18 months to get my chemical balance back to normal. When you've got a chemical imbalance your *world* is just *not logical*. I could say "everything is wonderful in my life", and try my best to "have a good day", but I still couldn't get out of bed, carry on a conversation, or get any work done at all.

      It's not like your wife had an affair, or you're going through a divorce, or you had a car wreck and can't get to work, or you lost your job, car and dog on the same day. You can work through that stuff mentally. You can NOT work through depression mentally. It's chemical. It's *impossible* to cheer yourself up. The root core of the problem for our lives sucking so much is a chemical imbalance, nothing else.

      Imagine yourself underwater, but able to breathe and your vision and hearing are fine. That's *physically what it feels like* for a lot of us. And mentally, well, everything is just too much to handle. It's a downward spiral of despair, that's the only way I can try to explain it. It's impossible to explain until it happens to you.

      It almost cost my my job and my marriage. I wouldn't wish it on anyone. Yet once the imbalance was fixed I'm as good as new.

      It really is a disease. But it's curable.

      Posting anonymously - not because of my current employer, they are 100% supportive of me and my situation. But because of any future employers who may not be...

    37. Re:Does not address core problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try acting insane to better fit in with the rest of the population;)

    38. Re:Does not address core problem by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

      How about addressing the core problem of making life not SUCK so much?!

      You appear to be suffering from typical symptoms of chronic dehydration. Please do something about it!

    39. Re:Does not address core problem by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      If you expect that to make you happy, you'll be disappointed if you ever get it.

      It's like when people move away from their shitty town to try to find a better life, only to realize that their life is still shitty because they brought themselves.

      Or the woman constantly bitching about all her failed relationships, who has failed to realize that she's the common element in all of them.

      Many things can only come from the inside. Happiness- or Life not Sucking- requires much from the individual, and not a lot from their surroundings. /happy guy from a poor, dysfunctional family and a generally shitty background

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    40. Re:Does not address core problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You work part time and make 6 figures? Where do I sign up?

    41. Re:Does not address core problem by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      > My entire point is that the statement "if I can just do X and get Y
      > then I will be happy" isn't always true. In fact, it rarely is true
      > at all.

      That doesn't make any sense. The only way what you're saying could be true is if we had no control over our own happiness.

      > Happiness and success are not the same thing at all. I have no problem
      > with saving for retirement, just I do not think saving for "happiness"
      > works.

      If retirement will not make you happier than working, then there is no reason to save for retirement except that you might one day be unable to work. If that is your only reason to save for retirement, then by all means, take a job that has a good pension and shitty pay now.

      > I also believe that people who are not capable of being happy now and
      > enjoying work, are not going to be happy no matter how much money they
      > get or how early they retire. But its guesswork if you fit, so my apologies
      > if I am wrong about you.

      My issue isn't with the guesswork of whether I fit into this category; my issue is that you seem to have no actual reason to believe this. I am happy with my life, but I am not "happy" with my work (and I have no expectation that I will ever be happy with my work). Work is not a source of happiness. Family, friends, travel, food, wine, baseball games, etc are sources of happiness. Work allows me to have those things. If you don't believe me, then you'll need to explain why people PAY FOR those things I just listed, while they GET PAID FOR work. In other words, you'll need to explain why you don't pay to work, just as you pay for a baseball game, if both are sources of happiness.

      > Actually, I enjoy working. Strange as that may sound. If I were to retire,
      > I would probably be less happy..

      Sounds like you don't have a good hold on things that make you happy, and you need work to keep your mind active.

      > And of course I will always be paid for it. Where do you get the idea that
      > enjoying work means you don't get paid? This is genuinely new to me. I
      > know plenty of counterexamples personally. Is it an American thing?

      I'm sorry that economics is new to you. Your employer pays you because you are not willing to do the work for free. Meaning, if you were not paid, you would rather be doing something else. If you would NOT rather be doing something else, that means you would do the work regardless of the money, therefore your employer would not pay you. This is why I call huge BS when I hear people like you tell me that you are happy at work. You may not be miserable at work, but if you're telling me you wouldn't rather be doing something else, you're either full of it or the person paying you for work you'd do for free is an idiot.

      > Being happy and working for and with like minded people are hardly
      > mutually exclusive.

      I didn't say otherwise! I am happy with my life, but not due to my job.

      > I suspect that we will have to agree to disagree. Though I'm not sure you
      > see my point. Perhaps I have explained it poorly?

      No. Your point is a common one, so you really don't need to explain it well. I just think -- respectfully -- it's bullshit.

    42. Re:Does not address core problem by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry that economics is new to you. Your employer pays you because you are not willing to do the work for free. Meaning, if you were not paid, you would rather be doing something else. If you would NOT rather be doing something else, that means you would do the work regardless of the money, therefore your employer would not pay you. This is why I call huge BS when I hear people like you tell me that you are happy at work. You may not be miserable at work, but if you're telling me you wouldn't rather be doing something else, you're either full of it or the person paying you for work you'd do for free is an idiot.

      Huh? If I am not paid I will take my skills elsewhere. Quite simply if I am benefiting an organisation and enjoying myself, I expect to be paid. If I am not, I will find another organisation. Your argument does not hold up. In the event that no organization will pay me (an unlikely situation), I would be forced to take a job I would not like in order to survive and therefore the organisation would lose my skills. Therefore payment is certain. Its about staff retention. Just because I like work does not mean at times I enjoy other things. The fact that I enjoy my work as much as or more than other things in my life does not mean I will work for free. That is not logical unless you are super-rich or something.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    43. Re:Does not address core problem by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      I noticed you didn't really address the core of my comment, but anyway...

      > I would be forced to take a job I would not like in order to survive
      > and therefore the organisation would lose my skills.

      Now your argument isn't holding up. If this were the case, then everyone would only be paid as much as needed to survive, and not a penny more. And yet our economy clearly does not function like this.

      Secondly, why doesn't the movie theater pay you to watch a movie? There are advertisements at the beginning of the movie, and these are worthless if no one views them; thus your presence there is valuable to the movie theater. So why doesn't it pay you?

      > The fact that I enjoy my work as much as or more than other things in
      > my life does not mean I will work for free.

      It means that you will only work as long as the marginal cost over working with respect to those other things is less than the marginal benefit you get from work over those other things. With work, the marginal cost is negative (you get paid). That leaves only opportunity cost, and since you said you'd rather be working than doing other things, then you will always work, even if you stopped getting paid. You keep arguing with me on this point, which I guess just means you are not familiar with these concepts. Perhaps check wikipedia before giving me another "huh?" response?

    44. Re:Does not address core problem by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're missing it. There are far more factors involved in payment than whether I enjoy my job or not. There are many things like competition for people with my skills, the fact that people who employ other people sometimes have morals, etc. Heck, my boss does not even necessarily know I love my work. Your argument is based on the idea that people are paid what they think they are worth, not what the company which employs them thinks they are worth. I don't need a wikipedia citation for logic. Your model of the motivations for paying people is unreasonably simplistic.

      Consider the following; Starting salary for a research scientist is X. You are qualified and enjoy the work. The organisation offers you X, you agree and take the job. Since you are good at your work (which does correlate with enjoying it by the way) you are promoted and now receive salary Y (Y>X). If they were to offer you Z, where Z is less than X, you may decide not to take the job or even sue for discrimination against people with an extra toe or something. It is in the interests of the organisation to pay you the standard salary or more in order to keep you. If these hypothetical people find you like your job and cut your pay, they are fools because they will lose you, and you are an asset to the organisation.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but the core of your argument appears to be; "if I am enjoying myself, I must pay" and "if I am not enjoying myself, I must be paid". Which I am (attempting) to address... Good organisations look after their assets. If I only come to work because I enjoy my job, what is to stop me from randomly changing my mind? If they give me two reasons, money and enjoyment, even if I lose my enjoyment, I will still serve out my notice, but only if I am being paid.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    45. Re:Does not address core problem by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      > There are far more factors involved in payment than whether I enjoy
      > my job or not

      Of course it's not the only factor!

      > Your argument is based on the idea that people are paid what they
      > think they are worth, not what the company which employs them thinks
      > they are worth

      No, my argument is not based on that. It's much more involved than that. HOWEVER, the bottom line is that it cannot be true that you would rather work than do things like golf, go on vacation, etc.

      > Consider the following

      Your example supports my argument.

      > Correct me if I'm wrong, but the core of your argument appears to be;
      > "if I am enjoying myself, I must pay" and "if I am not enjoying myself,
      > I must be paid".

      Yes, you are wrong. That is not my argument. My argument is that I call bullshit on people who say that they'd rather be working than not working. The things you allude to above is just me fumbling around trying to explain why it's bullshit to you, since you don't have a very good grasp on economics. Fundamentally, money is the encapsulation of enjoyment, because it is the means by which you purchase things that you enjoy (including supporting your family, your puppy, paying your mortgage, etc.). You mix these with "survival", but in reality you do not need money to survive in these days. You can survive without money, utilizing government programs for free food, free medical, and free shelter, as well as numerous charity offerings. What you call "survival" is truly enjoyment, and the quantification of it is money. I know it's a nice colloquialism that money doesn't equal happiness, but these same people cannot say what money then is instead.

      Instead of continuing to be a dick, I will point you to the following document. Parts III and IV are probably not of interest to you, but the first part (Intro and Part II) has a decent historical account of money and an explanation of what money really is, in a language people not trained in economics can understand. http://www.mises.org/books/whathasgovernmentdone.pdf

      > If I only come to work because I enjoy my job, what is to stop me
      > from randomly changing my mind?

      That is a non-argument, because I can say the same thing about equitable pay. If you believe you are being paid fairly/well, what is to stop you from randomly changing your mind? I'm not sure what the meaning of "randomly changing my mind" is, even.

    46. Re:Does not address core problem by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      No, my argument is not based on that. It's much more involved than that. HOWEVER, the bottom line is that it cannot be true that you would rather work than do things like golf, go on vacation, etc.

      I would say that you are not qualified to judge my case, how could you know? There are successful musicians who only care about the music - the music is their work. Most academics fall into this category as well. Its not that unusual. I know a man with a doctorate who chooses to spend his Saturdays at work. He is highly intelligent and is paid relatively well. He is not paid overtime, but he doesn't seem to care.

      > If I only come to work because I enjoy my job, what is to stop me > from randomly changing my mind?

      That is a non-argument, because I can say the same thing about equitable pay. If you believe you are being paid fairly/well, what is to stop you from randomly changing your mind? I'm not sure what the meaning of "randomly changing my mind" is, even.

      The contract. Nobody in their right mind would contractually agree to not get paid but come to work. If I am being paid, most likely there is a contract requiring me to give notice. If I am required to work even when I don't feel like it, I will. If there is no contract, I am free not to come if I felt like going to the bar instead or skipping the country at random. I am also free to ignore deadlines. This is the true cost of not paying people. In the long run, it is cheaper to pay them.

      The document you pointed to while interesting (I know all about government meddling with money, google "Gideon Gono" if you want to know why I know.) do not say anywhere that if I like my job enough to come in on Saturday, I will not be paid for the rest of the week. Evidence is to the contrary anyway.

      Oh, and in this country, you can not survive without money. Its fairly difficult with money too. We have no free food, shelter or medical care. I live in the 3rd world. What I call surviving is food and shelter. Not that merely surviving is the goal.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    47. Re:Does not address core problem by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      I feel like you're just intentionally not getting it, because you continue to pick and choose the elements of my comments that are most irrelevant, and respond to those parts.

      The key part of my comment, which you ignored, was:

      > My argument is that I call bullshit on people who say that they'd rather
      > be working than not working.

      The guy you refer to as a "counterexample" is, in fact, getting paid for his work. You cannot say reliably that he doesn't believe that coming in on Saturdays is good for his career and his compensation.

      I think you *do* get it, because 4-5 comments ago you said this:

      > The fact that I enjoy my work as much as or more than other things in my
      > life does not mean I will work for free. That is not logical unless you
      > are super-rich or something.

      And yet the super-rich still don't work for free! Instead, they do whatever the hell they want, whether that's golf, travel, sit on their ass, etc. What they don't do is computer repair and mow lawns and wash dishes at a restaurant. If you were wealthy enough that you did not have to work, your theory is that you would still work. Rock on if you believe that, but I think all the evidence points to this being simple delusion, so that you are happy with making money for someone else the rest of your life. The fact that you have been arguing with me for a couple days here for no apparent reason also supports this being a defense mechanism of sorts. I don't really care if people want to fool themselves into being happy, but to go around telling people on a rational path to happiness that they will never be happy (and having zero evidence to support that position other than a "gut feeling") is kind of ridiculous. I hope no one ever makes the mistake of listening to it.

      The bottom line is that I derive happiness from the freedom to do what I want. That freedom is unattainable as long as my life is sustained by a bi-weekly paycheck. The further I am able to distance myself from the bi-weekly paycheck, the better. Ask people who have recently been laid off and have no savings how happy they are. Ask people who want to leave their job but can't in this economy (because they have no savings) how happy they are.

      Anyway, like I said, I have no problem with people being "happy" the way you are, but it is not a rational position.

    48. Re:Does not address core problem by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Attitude in my post? Excuse my taking umbrage to yet another smug anonymous coward atheist who hasn't gotten past his teenage resentment of going to church. Just because I'm a happy person in general doesn't mean I never have "negative" emotions.

      Honestly, whether you feel happy or not is your business. I just want people to acknowledge that religion actually correlates with happiness rather than modding "religion's all just a big guilt trip to make you miserable" to +2 insightful.

    49. Re:Does not address core problem by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Oh I know that. It's just that when you add those social elements to a population it appears to become much easier for the individuals in that population to personally achieve whatever makes them personally happy.

      The irrelevance of social programs to individual happiness does not negate their clear relevance to population happiness.

    50. Re:Does not address core problem by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      I'm actually trying to find the rationality in your statements, which is why I've kept up the discussion. That and the remnants of my childish need to make people understand my position. My position is rational. But for some reason, you are blind to that.

      The "example" is an extreme case. He is well paid because he is an asset. They may not pay him over-time, but they do look after him well - better than some others at the organisation. And yes, if I were super-rich, I would still work. I am interested in the work of creating things. Its good fun, you should try it. And the nice thing is, if you are good, people will pay you to do it.

      You derive your happiness from freedom? Guess what, so do I. I freely chose the path I'm going down. My work is not "computer repair" or dishes, it is research and development, which I enjoy.

      Anyway, since we have degenerated to calling each other irrational(and you're right, it has been some time), let us just agree to disagree. Feel free to have the last word if you want, but just as an aside, please don't go calling people who choose similar paths to me irrational. Your lack of understanding of their motivations does not make it so.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    51. Re:Does not address core problem by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      > He is well paid because he is an asset.

      Again, you are an asset to the movie theater because you view their advertisements, yet you pay them instead of the other way around.

      The problem we're having is that neither one of us is "wrong". But the problem you're having is that the value of work is not the primary determinant in an employment scenario. That's why it's called "compensation" and not simply "payment".

      I honestly cannot reconcile the following two statements, if they are supposed to be rational: 1) I would not work if I were not being paid, 2) I would rather work at my job than do anything else.

      Anyway...

  16. No Duh by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    In similar news researchers have discovered that a small town in Canada built on an underground resevoir of naturally-occuring scotch had statistically higher rates of traffic accidents.

  17. Lithiumania by kettal · · Score: 1

    If Lithium reduces suicide, then why does Lithuania have the world's highest suicide rate? This story is bogus.

  18. Fuck man... by LordKaT · · Score: 4, Funny

    Putting mood stabilizers in water. Fuck, that's a creepy thought. I mean ... damn, isn't that supposed to be the realm of Coast to Coast AM?

    1. Re:Fuck man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, even Coast to Coast AM never got that far out there...unless it was orchestrated by a vast government and alien conspiracy who's sole purpose is to reduce the human population down to 100 million and to rule the world....

      Come to think of it you're right, we're fucked. Where's my tin-foil hat?

    2. Re:Fuck man... by shawb · · Score: 4, Funny

      Where's my tin-foil hat?

      Your tin-foil hat has reported back to the Department of Thought as malfunctioning. Fear not, it will soon be returned in proper working order.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    3. Re:Fuck man... by shish · · Score: 1

      Putting mood stabilizers in water. Fuck, that's a creepy thought.

      It is? The government here have been doing that for years, nobody really seems that bothered by it...

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    4. Re:Fuck man... by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      Where's my tin-foil hat?

      Now that's just silly.

      You can't possibly reach therapeutic levels of Sn by the cranial absorption method, no matter how tightly you wrap it around your head. So even if your theory that Sn would improve your cognition is correct, you need another mode of delivery.

      --
      Will
  19. 4ruhl by salesbot · · Score: 1

    my water provides mad voltage, bitches

  20. Unethical by zxjio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You absolutely in no circumstances can ethically give a healthy person mind-altering substances without their consent... People quoted who say it's interesting for potential are on a massive ego trip.

    1. Re:Unethical by BobisOnlyBob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So can we ethically allow mind-altering substances that are naturally present to exist in the water supply? It's a tricky business the moment you cease drinking water from rivers or springs and start piping it anywhere. The people piping it suddenly have an ethical obligation regarding its contents.

      This study was to identify potential NATURAL contaminants that alter emotional disposition. Nothing about changing the water supply. It is potentially interesting, in that it may change our understanding of suicidal behaviour from place to place, and our understanding of something as simple as the water supply's varied social effects.

      When you drink tap water, you (presumably a healthy person) are consuming a substance that may or may not have mind-altering substances just naturally. Almost all chemicals have some negligible effect on the mind, some moreso than others. Your region probably hasn't been analysed for lithium concentrations; you could be in a naturally higher region for all you know. Are you being given a mind-altering substance without your consent? Quite possibly.

      Or to put it another way... There are more shades of grey than there are in your morality.

    2. Re:Unethical by calmond · · Score: 1

      So can we ethically allow mind-altering substances that are naturally (emphasis mine) present to exist in the water supply?

      If a substance is naturally occurring, that means we didn't put it there. How are we morally obligated to remove it if it is below any known threshold of danger? Would you propose that all water used by man be nothing but pure H20? I've got bad news for you, no municipal water supply is ever pure H20 - they add lots of chlorine and other stuff to make it more palatable.

    3. Re:Unethical by BobisOnlyBob · · Score: 1

      I wasn't stating that as fact - I agree with you, no municipality could do that. I was pointing it out for the sake of argument; that this study doesn't imply that the government and municipalities are suddenly going to start drugging the water, and that his line of reasoning was flawed.

  21. Great for mind, not to great for the Kidney's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Long term exposure to this and other heavy metals eventually cause the kidneys to fail. I see two options, live short and happy, or live long and be miserable.

    1. Re:Great for mind, not to great for the Kidney's by compro01 · · Score: 4, Informative

      FYI, lithium is not a heavy metal. It's the lightest metal, and 3rd lightest element, just behind hydrogen and helium.

      That said, yes, it is quite toxic at the higher end of the therapeutic range, but the bottom end of the dosing range is about 5 orders of magnitude above the highest levels found in this (assuming an consumption of average of 3 litres per day), so I would think the toxic results from the naturally occurring lithium would be negligible.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:Great for mind, not to great for the Kidney's by compro01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correction : that should be 3 orders of magnitude, not 5.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    3. Re:Great for mind, not to great for the Kidney's by Sometimes_Rational · · Score: 1

      I had made a similar comment earlier, then did a little reading. In medicine, "heavy metal" refers to any metal whose salts are fairly toxic, and this includes lithium and beryllium. The term "toxic metal" would be more appropriate, but it is not well-defined either.

      Just goes to show that too many med students don't really pay much attention in their science courses.

      --
      Warning: The intelligence of this post may be larger than it appears.
  22. We already do.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Why not just flood all water supplies with every drug we can think of? Hey, thorazine seems to work! Is it really the governments job to inject vitamins/minerals/animals into our water supply? Sure, flouride seems to work, and I can see this study leading to lithium being added. I wonder if I could make Riddalin(sp?][TM] bottled water? Justs seems to be getting a bit nuts to me that we have to add something to everything.

    We already have an abundance of prescription drugs in our water supply, through excretion as well as through the practice of "flushing" unused meds to keep them from the children.

    It'll take 3 seconds on the NY Times, Google, or Wikipedia to uncover numerous reputable articles on this.

    1. Re:We already do.... by FiveDozenWhales · · Score: 1

      And it'll take 2 more seconds to learn that these drugs are in concentrations low enough that unless you live in the water (i.e. are a fish), it's not going to affect you.

  23. Will not work... by Yogiz · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... in case I intend to kill myself eating lithium.

  24. MR PRESIDENT! by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mr. President, we cannot allow a lithium gap!

    --
    No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  25. Understandable by zaunuz · · Score: 1, Redundant

    ..since Lithium has been used as an antidepressive substance for atleast a few decades. Could be that it's been used for that for alot longer, all i know is that it was common in the early 90's

    --
    this is probably the most boring sig in the world
  26. Parepin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard Parepin has this effect as well.

    I'm drinking the water. You should, too.

  27. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do we, as a society, really need more marginal people to survive?

    There are plenty of non hereditary things one could kill off from the water supply, with more urgency than trying to save a small percentage of out of spec population.

  28. Lithium, don't want to lock me up inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lithium, don't want to lock me up inside
    Lithium, don't want to forget how it feels without
    Lithium, I want to stay in love with my sorrow
    Oh but God I want to let it go

    Come to bed, don't make me sleep alone
    Couldn't hide the emptiness you let it show
    Never wanted it to be so cold
    Just didn't drink enough to say you love me

    I can't hold on to me
    Wonder what's wrong with me

    Lithium, don't want to lock me up inside
    Lithium, don't want to forget how it feels without
    Lithium, I want to stay in love with my sorrow

    Don't want to let it lay me down this time
    Drown my will to fly
    Here in the darkness I know myself
    Can't break free until I let it go
    Let me go

    Darling, I forgive you after all
    Anything is better than to be alone
    And in the end I guess I had to fall
    Always find my place among the ashes

    I can't hold on to me
    Wonder what's wrong with me

    Lithium, don't want to lock me up inside
    Lithium, don't want to forget how it feels without
    Lithium, stay in love with you
    Oh I'm gonna let it go

  29. lithium curbs suicide? by myojin+yahiko · · Score: 1

    How about some weaponized lithium spiking of Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan wells?

  30. Yet, by pedrop357 · · Score: 1

    If you swallow a bunch of lithium watch batteries, they'll say you're suicidal. What gives?

  31. Just so you know: by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2

    Lithium is a hard-core drug used by psychiatrists. To quiet those, where nothing else helps anymore.
    It has tons of site-effects. And afterwards, you are usually not the same person anymore. Which may be good, if you were destroying the place, including yourself, before it. But it's bad in any other case.

    Of course I don't know what the dose is that they put in the water. But if it changes people's behavior, it obviously has an effect.

    I know this, because a friend of mine was given this because of a feeling of extreme heart problems while trying to sleep. And when they noticed it did not help, he got something even stronger. He slept like a baby. But only as long as he was on the stuff. Typical symptom therapy with no care for the real cause.
    He was only healed (no problems and no "medicine") after a very intense psychotherapy.

    If they would put lithium in my water, I would sue them for deliberate aggravated assault (or how the lawyers call it in the US) and and psycho-manipulation (something like that).
    Not funny. Not funny at all.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:Just so you know: by StarkRG · · Score: 1

      I haven't RTFA, but I think they're talking about trace amounts already existing in the water supply, not additives. Though it does sound like something someone might do as a result of hearing about this study.

    2. Re:Just so you know: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      and and

      Relax. Here, have a drink of water.

  32. Stop tagging correlationisnotcausation by VirusEqualsVeryYes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People, please stop tagging every study on Slashdot with correlationisnotcausation. I know it's standard here to believe this community is somehow more enlightened than all others, but do you really think that researchers became researchers without being able to ask simple questions? In fact, in an idealized study, it's not even a relevant question!

    Moreover, this moronic practice is especially stupid for this story because the neurological effects of lithium salts have been explored for decades. This is not a revolutionary study by any means. So unless years and years of studies have gone horribly wrong, then yes, in this case, correlation does, in fact, imply causation.

    1. Re:Stop tagging correlationisnotcausation by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't researchers, it's the way the press reports their research.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:Stop tagging correlationisnotcausation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you noticed that the cited study does nothing more than pointing out a correlation? Didn't you noticed that the study pointed out that the lithium concentration in that drinking water is too low to have any therapeutic effect? Do you actually believe that everyone should blindly accept a random correlation as the cause of something just because some vague authoritative figure (the all mighty researcher who can even "ask simple questions") said it was so?

      If you answered "yes" to any of these questions then you should meditate a bit about your lack of common sense and critical thinking, as what you are doing is nothing more than starting off with the belief that a vague authoritative figure is unquestionably right and from there you try to rationalize why exactly are they right.

      So do yourself a favour and think. The world doesn't need more mindless, "daddy knows best" drones.

    3. Re:Stop tagging correlationisnotcausation by Danyul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People, please stop tagging every study on Slashdot with correlationisnotcausation. I know it's standard here to believe this community is somehow more enlightened than all others, but do you really think that researchers became researchers without being able to ask simple questions? In fact, in an idealized study, it's not even a relevant question!

      Moreover, this moronic practice is especially stupid for this story because the neurological effects of lithium salts have been explored for decades. This is not a revolutionary study by any means. So unless years and years of studies have gone horribly wrong, then yes, in this case, correlation does, in fact, imply causation.

      Actually, that's incorrect and reinforces that the correlationisnotcausation tag should still be used for these articles, because obviously even us intelligent Slashdotters can get confused!

      While one might be able to say that lithium causes decreased suicides based on other data from other studies, one cannot infer from this study that the low lithium levels in the water (which would presumably not cause lithium blood levels in the range currently targeted for therapy) are what's responsible for the decreased rates. One can only claim correlation.

      This is due to the possibility of confounding variables (for example, do wealthier neighborhoods tend to have more pure drinking water?).

      Even if you control for all the factors that you know about that could cause such misinterpretation of the data, there is still a very real possibility of an unknown confounder (e.g., could there be another substance in the water that tends to track with lithium levels, and could it be that other substance that is the suicide-protective agent?)

    4. Re:Stop tagging correlationisnotcausation by shaitand · · Score: 1

      you've upset me with your comments. Good thing I'm taking lithium or I might do something crazy.

    5. Re:Stop tagging correlationisnotcausation by VirusEqualsVeryYes · · Score: 1

      No, it's not incorrect, you just failed to understand my point. You are isolating this study from other research and taking it at face value, whereas I am putting it in the context of substantial previous work and knowledge.

      Imagine there were a study that correlated people letting go of things and those things falling to the ground. Taken at face value, as you do with this story, one should ask, for example, whether something else caused both the letting-go and the dropping-to-the-ground. But taken with previous knowledge, that would be an exercise in pointlessness; we all know what gravity is and that it exists, and so we can conclude that letting go of things is in a causal relationship with those things falling to the ground.

      In other words, pedantry doesn't do anyone any good here, because we already have substantial evidence applicable to this new work. I appreciate your and the community's attention to correctness, but in this instance, it's being misapplied.

    6. Re:Stop tagging correlationisnotcausation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a general rule, if you think you're the one exception and everyone else is completely stupid, you're probably wrong.

      Most research we see in the news seems to just be entertaining 'results' that literally are only correlations. That's great, and that's useful information, but it causes a lot of people to 'believe' things that aren't proven true, and that really sucks.

      No matter how many studies there are that show absolute correlation, it never is equivalent to knowing whether there is an actual, physical process leading from a cause to an effect. To say that correlation eventually builds to be equivalent to causation is a drastic misunderstanding of the entire correlation and causation distinction.

    7. Re:Stop tagging correlationisnotcausation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WRONG

    8. Re:Stop tagging correlationisnotcausation by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

      Even if you control for all the factors that you know about that could cause such misinterpretation of the data, there is still a very real possibility of an unknown confounder (e.g., could there be another substance in the water that tends to track with lithium levels, and could it be that other substance that is the suicide-protective agent?)

      Yeah, because when lithium is already found to curb suicide rates, it's much more likely that it's an element OTHER than lithium in the water that is lowering rates in this study...Occam's Razor much?

      This wasn't a study on whether or not Lithium lowers suicide rates- it's been known to for decades. Why are you even questioning that? It's simply the published results of one city with varying levels of Lithium in its water supplies. Is it any surprise that as levels of lithium increase, suicide rates decrease? No. It's not the least bit surprising. Because that was never in question- until you brought it into question.

      Like the GP said: in this case - as in any other where the subject is already well-known and the outcome can be accurately predicted with reasonable certainty - correlation IS causation. Because the research has already gone into the cause, the effect, and the correlation between the two.

    9. Re:Stop tagging correlationisnotcausation by Danyul · · Score: 1

      I did understand your point and I maintain my contention. On what are you basing the claim that there is "substantial previous work and knowledge" supporting efficacy of lithium at the low concentrations one would expect to see in those who drink contaminated tap water? The scientific literature generally has not found benefit to bipolar patients having lithium serum concentrations below 0.4 mmol/L - at the very least. (Do a PubMed/MedLine search!) Any claim that serum concentrations orders of magnitude less will prevent suicide would need much further investigation before being accepted as fact, even in the context (and perhaps especially in the context) of past research.

  33. Side Effects by mr100percent · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to Epocrates, Lithium has side effects

    Common Reactions:
    tremor
    polyuria
    diarrhea
    vomiting
    drowsiness
    muscle weakness
    arrhythmias
    anorexia
    nausea
    blurred vision
    dry mouth
    fatigue

    Serious Reactions:
    coma
    seizures
    ventricular arrhythmias
    bradycardia, severe
    syncope
    goiter
    hypothyroidism
    hyperparathyroidism
    pseudotumor cerebri
    Raynaud's phenomenon
    diabetes insipidus

    1. Re:Side Effects by citizenr · · Score: 1

      that list looks smaller and weaker than the one for Aspirin

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    2. Re:Side Effects by FiveDozenWhales · · Score: 1

      In what quantities? We're talking about naturally occurring levels of lithium here. I doubt it's going to cause any of these.

    3. Re:Side Effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much everything you consume has side effects at high enough dosages... including essential substances you need to live.

      But we should be AFRAID of lithium. It's a DRUG and it's IN THE WATER!

    4. Re:Side Effects by Brother+Seamus · · Score: 1
      You forgot:

      Do not taunt Lithium

  34. They are not? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    In slow motion I turn to you, as 40 metric tons of metallic lithium tumble down into the national reservoir, "you mean this might be a bad thing"?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  35. I'm so happy, 'cause today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found my friends...they're in my head

  36. Not really. by jd · · Score: 1

    Considering that far, far more powerful mood stabilizers, anti-psychotics and other pharmaceuticals are routinely dumped into the US water supply (in sufficient quantities to deform the wildlife even at the level of dilution present), there really isn't much you could add to the water that could make it any more dangerous than it already is.

    Why the hell the water companies don't properly filter the water they get, I don't know. But tap water is heavily polluted - contamination is sometimes orders of magnitude greater than what is permitted in the EU. Frankly, if they add lithium salts, it can't make it much more dangerous than it already is and might even improve the taste,

    (One thing I -really- miss from the UK was water that tasted like water and not like a chemical waste dump.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  37. Everything has side effects by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    If you start worrying about the side effects of everything, you wouldn't even dare to breath. And stop that living! It is the major cause of death!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Everything has side effects by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      That is true, there are side effects to most medications. However, these are a bit more serious than typical aspirin. It's still considered a prescription-only item in America for a good reason.

    2. Re:Everything has side effects by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Oh well I suppose that's a perfectly good rationale for keeping an entire healthy population medicated for an entire lifetime! Now if you'll excuse me I have to make sure your food is packed with supplements of vitamin B12 (which actually isn't worse an idea than that lithium thing, considered how many people could use more B12 and how it deals with depression).

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  38. oblig. Dr. Strangelove reference by SpzToid · · Score: 1

    Mandrake. Mandrake, have you never wondered why I drink only distilled water, or rain water, and only pure grain alcohol?

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  39. Law and Order by dziman · · Score: 1

    I think I saw a Law and Order episode where a person was using this to make their patients feel "better". I believe everything I see on TV.

    1. Re:Law and Order by dziman · · Score: 1

      *DONK* *DONK*

  40. i'm already set. by capoccia · · Score: 1

    the bottled water i usually buy already has 0.07mg/L of lithium.

    1. Re:i'm already set. by Ada_Rules · · Score: 1

      Having it in bottled water makes perfect sense -- that way, you won't feel so bad about contributing to the destruction of the biosphere by drinking bottled water.

      --
      --- Liberty in our Lifetime
    2. Re:i'm already set. by maxume · · Score: 1

      I drink as much bottled water as I can so that no one has a chance to burn the carbon used to make the bottles.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  41. What about the other effects? by Chris+Snook · · Score: 1

    I'd be curious to see a comparison of kidney and thyroid diseases in these areas, as well as other psychiatric indicators. Lithium doesn't just reduce suicide risk.

    --
    There's no failure quite as dissatisfying as a complete and total solution to the wrong problem.
  42. Spike the water supply with booze and weed . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    . . . the weed will give everyone the munchies . . . thus stimulating the junk food industry. The whole world economy will be right on track, before you can say "Dor - ree - toes!"

    . . . the booze will prevent suicide because all the folks will be too tanked to give a shit about anything any more.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  43. Lithium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm so happy 'cause today
    I found my friends
    They're in my head
    I'm so ugly, that's okay, 'cause so are you
    We broke our mirrors
    Sunday morning is everyday for all I care
    And I'm not scared
    Light my candles, in a daze
    'Cause I've found God

  44. Statistics... by pengipengi · · Score: 1

    Someone noticed that if you study electrical engineering, you get taller than if you study chemistry. Statistics told that...

    Then they realized that there was lot more guys in electrical engineering than in chemistry...

    Statistics... statistics...

    1. Re:Statistics... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you control for the gender of the people being examined and there is still a notable difference, it might be an interesting thing to try to understand.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  45. Correlation is not causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correlation is not causation

  46. WMD by AnalPerfume · · Score: 1

    Flip this on it's tail and look at it. This knowledge could be used as a WMD in a modern redefinition of the "poison the well" strategy employed by generals since Rome at least. It'd save taxpayers money on bombs and bullets if the bad guys would just kill themselves; well not counting the nutters with bomb belts out for a hug at a checkpoint.

  47. Nirvana by Amphetam1ne · · Score: 1

    I'm so happy. Cause today I found my friends.
    They're in my head. I'm so ugly. But that's ok.
    'Cause so are you. We've broke our mirrors.
    Sunday morning. Is everyday for all I care.
    And I'm not scared. Light my candles. In a daze cause I've found god.

    Yeah yeah yeah yeah.....

    I'm so lonely. And that's ok.
    I shaved my head. And I'm not sad, and just maybe
    I'm to blame for all I've heard. And I'm not sure.
    I'm so excited. I can't wait to meet you there.
    And I don't care. I'm so horny. But that's ok. My will is good.

    Yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah.....

    (Chorus)
    I like it. I'm not gonna crack.
    I miss you. I'm not gonna crack.
    I love you.I'm not gonna crack.
    I kill you. I'm not gonna crack. (x2)

    I'm so happy. Cause today I found my friends.
    They're in my head. I'm so ugly. But that's ok.
    'Cause so are you. We've broke our mirrors.
    Sunday morning. Is everyday for all I care.
    And I'm not scared. Light my candles.
    In a daze cause I've found god.

    Yeah yeah yeah yeah.....
    (Chorus)..

    --
    I only buy pepper spray that's been tested on anti-vivisectionists.
  48. Cyanide by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    In other news, cyanide in the water curbs suicide by 100%. By killing anyone instantly.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  49. That's not how it works by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 4, Informative

    In fact, it's the complete opposite: depressed people are much more complacent than not. Depression is not "being sad."

    If you'd ever met a bipolar person you'd know what I mean. In their manic phases they'd go fight an army by themselves, they don't care about rules and retribution. In their depressed phase they can't get out of bed, let alone rebel against the established social order.

    1. Re:That's not how it works by aurispector · · Score: 4, Informative

      One of the biggest challenges in diagnosis and treatment of these diseases is defining the terms accurately in a clinically relevant manner. You got the depression part sort of correct, but bipolar disorders encompass a wide variety of symptom presentations. The "classic" manic depressive who might behave as you describe is called "type 1 bipolar disorder", but with type 2 bipolar disorder people are generally depressed with moods cycling downward toward more severe depression, although moods may swing upward toward hypomania. There's also a wide variety in the duration of the cycling, to the point where it may not be apparently different from normal mood changes.

      Ultimately what we are talking about is the behavioral presentation of differences in brain structure and chemistry. On the surface what clinicians try to do is balance neurotransmitters using medications, but in practice what often happens is they merely try a series of medications until they hit on something that works. The effects of lithium are specific enough that it can almost be used diagnostically.

      The interesting question raised here is when a naturally occurring substance becomes a drug. This question has been raging for years around fluoride. As a public health measure fluoridation is measurably effective but people question whether dental health is a sufficiently important reason to add a substance to drinking water. Iodized salt prevents an actual medical problem and goiter is now virtually unknown. Is the iodine a nutrient or a drug? What about fluoride? It seems to me that addition of lithium to the water supply would clearly fall under the definition of a drug. Even if it reduces the rate of suicide and mental illness the precedent set for "drugging the public" is far too serious and impinges on the rights of people who do not have a mental illness or chemical imbalances.

      Treatment of mental illness must remain between a doctor and patient. The main benefit of this study is to increase public awareness of mental health issues, especially in a culture where mental illness is stigmatized.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    2. Re:That's not how it works by catmistake · · Score: 1

      MOD PARENT UP
      (keep up the good work, we're all countin on you)

      Treatment of mental illness must remain between a doctor and a patient.

      What if the patient is a community, or nation? Sometimes doctors have a conflicting interest. I don't think it would be good for the psychiatrics wing if there was a miracle drug to cure mental illness, just as a miracle cure for cancer probably would wipe out oncology as we know it. But if such a drug exists, its probably Lithium. Then again, arguably, all effective drugs/treatments are miracles.

    3. Re:That's not how it works by 7-Vodka · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, you live in a world where public perception is ruled by those in power. Where people make what should be well thought through decisions based on no evidence but the superficial suggestions presented them in propaganda and then hold on to these bullshit models as if their lives depended upon it.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1Oxe2eFkAI

      --

      Liberty.

    4. Re:That's not how it works by aurispector · · Score: 1

      ...and you believe anything people tell you. Conspiracy theories are really boring...

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    5. Re:That's not how it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lithium can also cause organ damage, which is why those taking it clinically need regular blood tests to ensure that no irreversible harm is done. Granted, that's likely to be doses far higher than would be suggested as an addition to drinking water, but it might be a legitimate concern.

      On the other hand, as someone who is depressed I might be interested in trying low dose bottled lithium water, and I don't see a reason why it wouldn't be a practical product to sell, or put in some beverages with appropriate labeling. Under such a model, it would be like how you can buy salt with or without added iodine, as you prefer.

      I do wonder, if we were drinking well or stream water, how much lithium might we be getting that we're missing out on because we use filtered grid systems without the traces of mud and other particulates our ancestors would have gotten?

    6. Re:That's not how it works by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      So if you drink water that naturally has lithium in it, are you drugging yourself?

      --
      Why is this even on SlashDot?... Why is this even on Slashdot?...Why is this even on Slashdot?
  50. Lithium is not aspirine by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Lithium is already prescribed to people who suffer from major mania , it is a very serious pill to take with very serious side effects. If we have a real MD on slashdot reading story, he/she can give more information.

    Countries with serious health system may prevent any disaster occuring because of this BBC headline as people can't go and buy it but in some countries, prescription system is not taken serious at all.

    So what BBC does for sake of having interesting ''weird'' news from Japan may actually kill some people. I am almost sure they will be protested by medical doctors.

    It is 2009, people read the ''headline'' from RSS, Google news etc. and that is it. Japanese scientists aren't to blame, they do such research for actual science, not for general public.

  51. Evanescence by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    (for sake of telling people lithium is a serious thing)
    Lithium lyrics
    Songwriters: Lee, Amy;

    Lithium, don't wanna lock me up inside
    Lithium, don't wanna forget how it feels without
    Lithium, I wanna stay in love with my sorrow
    Oh, but God I wanna let it go

    Come to bed, don't make me sleep alone
    Couldn't hide the emptiness, you let it show
    Never wanted it to be so cold
    Just didn't drink enough to say you love me

    I can't hold on to me
    Wonder what's wrong with me?

    Lithium, don't wanna lock me up inside
    Lithium, don't wanna forget how it feels without
    Lithium, I wanna stay in love with my sorrow

    Don't wanna let it lay me down this time
    Drown my will to fly
    Here in the darkness I know myself
    Can't break free until I let it go, let me go

    Darling, I forgive you after all
    Anything is better than to be alone
    And in the end I guess I had to fall
    Always find my place among the ashes

    I can't hold on to me
    Wonder what's wrong with me?

    Lithium, don't wanna lock me up inside
    Lithium, don't wanna forget how it feels without
    Lithium, stay in love with mmm
    I'm gonna let it go

  52. Re:The Fed by datadigger · · Score: 1

    If there's Lithium in the water, it's likely that the populace won't -revolt- either.

    That's why Lithium is an important ingredient of Soylent Green.

    --
    Aphorisms don't fix code. (Bart Smaalders)
  53. Re:me too by ssintercept · · Score: 3, Informative

    as a person who took lithium for years, i would like to point the kind readers to Lithium toxicity. regular blood tests are highly recommended to prevent your blood from going toxic and killing your ass.
    while lithium bicarbonate worked well for me for several years, the side effects got worse and the drug became ineffective.
    the toxic levels for lithium are close to the therapeutic levels.

    --
    "You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."-- Fred Hampton
  54. G-23 Paxilon Hydrochlorate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reavers anyone?

    Don't do it!

  55. I hope by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "compared levels of lithium in drinking water to suicide rates"

    they mean
    "randomly grouped areas into blinded control and test groups, then added lithium to the drinking supply of the test group. Researchers (who did not know which was the test which was the control) found
    that the test group had a significantly lowered rate of suicide rates following the experiment as compared with both its previous levels and the control group's (unchanged) levels of suicide"

    ?

    No? They just tested levels? [FACEHAND]

  56. Other side effects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they don't tell you that the other side effects are:
      - women want equal rights
      - men's balls triple in size
      - Nobody wants to work anymore

  57. social engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All we need is more chemically induced social engineering. Has no one out there ever read "Brave New World" or "Fahrenheit 451"?

  58. But surely by Snaller · · Score: 1

    But surely the suicide prone are working to reduce the problem already?

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  59. "It is pure, and it is good!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The water, I assume, is still safe to drink in New York, huh?
    Actually, I gotta be fair with you!
    I'm only setting you up a little bit, it's just that... ...another trick question, but it's just a set up, 'cause I don't really care about
    the water, to tell you the truth...!

    I just love to hear the answer to that question!

    I ask that question everywhere I go!

    Everywhere I go, I say: "How's the water?" Haven't got a positive answer yet! Not one!

    Last year I was in forty states, a hundred cities... Not one audience was able to say to me:
    "Yes! Enjoy some of our fine local water!"
    "It is pure, and it is good!"

    Of course, I know, a lot of people don't talk that way anymore, but nobody trusts their local water supply! Nobody! And that amuses me! I like that! I admit I'm a bit perverted! But it amuses me that no one can really trust the water anymore!

  60. Lithim Is A Manic-Depressive Drug by SuperAndy · · Score: 1

    Lithium is a very old drug used for Manic Depression. What it actually does is takes the top and bottom off your moods. So someone with manic depression (which is actually characterised by extremes of mood, not just 'really depressed') will attempt to take those extremes out, hopefully rendering them 'normal'. It is, however, extreme, and most people who take it aren't happy with it, because they don't feel themselves.

    I would imagine, if you had a constant stream of Lithium administered to you throughout your life, you wouldn't know what your were like without it. I wonder if these people are generally less 'extreme' than the majority of people. I am no psychologist/psychiatrist (IANAP if there is such a phrase), but I wonder if you could experimentally determine this, shown in more ways than just a lack of suicide.

    1. Re:Lithim Is A Manic-Depressive Drug by tg123 · · Score: 1

      Lithium Flower

      Album / Collection: Stand Alone Complex

      Description: Ending Song

      Vocal: Scott Matthew
      Words: Tim Jensen
      Music: Yoko Kanno

      she's so cold and human
      it's something humans do
      she stays so golden solo
      she's so number nine
      she's incredible math
      just incredible math

      and is she really human?
      she's just so something new
      a waking lithium flower
      just about to bloom
      I smell lithium now
      smelling lithium now

      how is she when she doesn't surf?
      how is she when she doesn't surf?
      how is she when she doesn't surf?
      I wonder what she does when she wakes up?
      when she wakes up

      so matador
      so calm
      so oil on a fire
      she's so good
      she's so goddess lithium flower
      so sonic wave
      yeah, she's so groove, yeah
      she's so groove
      yeah

      wow, where did she learn how to surf?
      wow, where did she learn how to surf?
      wow, where did she learn how to surf?
      you know I've never seen the girl wipe out

      how does she so perfectly surf?
      how does she so perfectly surf?
      how does she so perfectly surf?
      I wonder what she does when she wakes up?

      I wanna go surfing with her
      I wanna go surfing with her
      I wanna go surfing with her
      I wanna go surfing with her

  61. Homeopathic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IANAMD. The concentrations of Lithium in Texas and Japan were measured in MICROGRAMS/liter. A typical theraputic dose of Lithium is 1 GRAM twice daily.

  62. Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the people of this area simply commit less crime/fail less often than other parts of Japan. Keep in mind, suicide is the solution to a lot of problems in Japan.

  63. Re:me too by DarkIye · · Score: 0

    This is right. Lithium is a heavy metal, like lead, and is toxic in the same way. You shouldn't eat too much of it.

  64. Meds in the drinking water by SamMichaels · · Score: 1

    I don't remember which site had the story (I didn't see it in a quick search of /.), but in some cities drinking water contains trace elements of various pharmaceuticals. Since our waste water is processed and used again for drinking water, it's not being filtered out.

    So we don't need to add in the meds....everyone else is already on so many meds that it's finding its way into the drinking water on its own.

  65. MOD PARENT UP by shentino · · Score: 1

    Insightful.

    And ditto for the economic side effects caused by said backstabbing, lying, and greed.

  66. I'm sure it does curb suicide... by shaitand · · Score: 1

    In fact I bet it curbs just about every form of actual activity.

  67. Re:me too by Sometimes_Rational · · Score: 5, Informative

    Lithium is the third element in the periodic table, and the first metal. In other words, it is as far from being a heavy metal as it is possible to get.

    --
    Warning: The intelligence of this post may be larger than it appears.
  68. In a related story.. by markass530 · · Score: 1

    The higher the level of Meth found in company water coolers, a higher work output per capita was found

  69. How life imitates movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stolen from Grosse Pointe Blank -

    Mr. Grocer: Here's the new stuff, kid. Durazac 15. Makes Prozac seem like a decaf latte. Want a couple? I've got jars.
    Marty: I don't do that stuff anymore.
    Mr. Grocer: No wonder you got the shakes. And don't say "do it," because I don't "do it." I *ingest* it, on orders from my neurophysiologist. It's legal. In five years they'll be putting it in the water for the citizens, like fluoride.

  70. 1984, need I say more by cenc · · Score: 1

    That is so 1984.

  71. That's it. I'm off to the mineral springs. by spun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I resemble this remark. Fortunately for me, there is a mineral hot spring LOADED with lithium an hour away from me.

    So, ah, I'm curious. Who else here has this problem, and how bad? I'm cyclothymic, which is a pretty mild version of bipolor disorder, and I've been keeping it (mostly) under control with sertraline.

    I've had suicidal ideation, mainly as a teen, but no actual attempts. Mostly, I just get totally manic about a project for a month or two, and have a hard time sleeping, eating, or focusing on anything else. Then a couple weeks of normal. Then a month or two of eating too much and not being able to focus on anything, then a week or two of normal again.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:That's it. I'm off to the mineral springs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should exercise

    2. Re:That's it. I'm off to the mineral springs. by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Did... did you just use "I resemble this remark" and NOT mean 'resent'? Woah. Never thought I'd see that. ;)

      I'd think that among smart, creative people (which, let's face it, we all are here on slashdot... ;) the incidence of bipolar disorder would be higher than in the general population, simply because by nature we tend to be the kinds of people who focus maniacally on one thing for long periods of time. That's just my guess, though.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    3. Re:That's it. I'm off to the mineral springs. by spun · · Score: 1

      "Oh, a wise guy, eh? Why I otta..." Although the line is probably even more hoary and ancient than that.

      As for these and other types of mental disorders, they seem to exist in a spectrum. A little bit of this one, plus a dash of that one, and you've got a person who thinks a little differently and may be a little bit smarter in certain situations. Get just the right combination, and you've got genius. Get it wrong, and you've got a semi functional person. Get it dead wrong and you've got a person who is non functional or worse, dangerous.

      Of course, all of this genetics is moderated and shaped by environment. Stress hormones at the wrong time in development can trigger conditions that would lay dormant in a luckier individual. Healthier societies (in my hypothesis) will have more smart people and less dysfunctional types because of lower stress. This could create long term pressures towards more cooperative, less competitive (and thus stressful) societies.

      These long term pressures would more than offset the tendency of society wide traumatic events like famine to make people competitive and selfish for generations. But that is really a separate hypothesis.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    4. Re:That's it. I'm off to the mineral springs. by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      I would also obsess over projects for a month or so before dropping it and not look back. I used to have trouble sleeping, and now I feel I sleep too much.

      SSRIs help, though they have a new nasty side effects. I've recently taken up doing yoga while smoking pot and that slowly allows me to get better instead of just suppressing the symptoms.

      I was a sensitive child in a callous environment, leading to a number of breakdowns, most recently in the army. I've contemplated suicide to the point where little is left unsaid, never attempted it but occasionally behave recklessly for the off chance that it might be my time to leave this cruel world.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    5. Re:That's it. I'm off to the mineral springs. by spun · · Score: 1

      Yoga is good. If only I weren't so lazy. Exercise is good too. Bright lights help some people. I can never stick with anything. Meditation is good. I've tried these things. They help. Why can't I stick with them? Just believing I'm lazy and bad, and punishing myself for it all the time doesn't seem to work. I'd keep a day planner or a schedule, but you know. You have to stick with it for that to work. I've actually written 'check day planner' in a day planner before. Doesn't work.

      Smoking pot is good for some, not good for others. It too has worked for me. It makes other people even more depressed, or paranoid and nervous. And it may stop working for you, or turn bad at any time, but that is true of SSRIs too.

      I had a weird childhood, some really good, some really bad. Bad at the wrong times, though, so my serotonin imbalance got triggered. My wife has serotonin imbalances too. But different in some ways. She's really organized, almost to the point of OCD, so that works out for me. Better than a day planner. :)

      In general, it sucks to be a smart and empathic kid in a bad environment.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    6. Re:That's it. I'm off to the mineral springs. by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Absolutely true Re: Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and Sherlock Holmes (his creation) had an affinity for cocaine a common drug abused by bi-polars

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    7. Re:That's it. I'm off to the mineral springs. by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      "There is a fine line between genius and madness" Oscar Levant 1906-1972

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    8. Re:That's it. I'm off to the mineral springs. by fractoid · · Score: 1

      I actually came extremely close to including that quote in my post above. That's always been a bit of a family motto of ours...

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    9. Re:That's it. I'm off to the mineral springs. by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      The world is cruel. What is the point in being part of it?

  72. Budweiser Lith? by Basehart · · Score: 1

    I wonder if that's where the Lith, sorry Lite, comes from in bottom corner beers like Bud, Miller Etc? Maybe it's just me but after a couple of "real" beers from Seattle's own Maritime Breweries and Baron Etc I feel ready to rock, but after a couple of Buds I feel like going to sleep!

  73. This violates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my right to be able to kill myself with no government intrusion.

  74. Lithium+lisinopril=toxic by plopez · · Score: 1

    don't ask me how I know that. FYI. And HCTZ too. FYI.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  75. Then let me be the first to congradulate... by msimm · · Score: 1

    Bolivia, happiest place on earth.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  76. Someone set us up the lithium... by daveiver · · Score: 1

    All your brain are belong to us.

  77. Have you noticed that the west uses a lot of salt? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1
    --
    Deleted
  78. Re:me too by justthinkit · · Score: 1
    --
    I come here for the love
  79. What's wrong with suicide? by droidsURlooking4 · · Score: 1

    Seriously. If someone wants to end their life, that's their choice. Don't fuck with the drinking water. PS No one who has committed suicide has ever reported regretting it. So, consider that.

  80. Re:me too by Convector · · Score: 1

    Of course if you're an astrophysicist anything heavier than helium is considered a "metal". Even things that are not actual metals.

  81. Re:me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [...] regular blood tests are highly recommended to prevent your blood from going toxic and killing your ass. [...]

    I'm not a $health_related_profession but I'm very interested in this. How does lithium target your ass?

    I have a few lady friends* who might be interested in this.

    * - No I don't.

  82. Re:me too by b93950 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh, thatâ(TM)s good news as I was hoping for lithium-lite to keep the calories down.

  83. Has anyone seen Equilibrium? by Ozlanthos · · Score: 1

    Next thing you know, we'll have to give up all media that has the potential to stir the human spirit in any way. Gosh, how I look forward to my white on white on white life!

    -Oz

  84. Re:me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Heavy" metals depress you so, it stands to reason, "light" metals cheer you up.

  85. Serious Attempts by schmiddy · · Score: 1

    If they are regretting it, then they weren't successful. Do you think it's hard to kill oneself? It's not. These people you're talking about didn't really want to do it. These are the same people who were blabbing about it to everyone. And after they're all hopped up on meds, of course they're embarrassed about being pathetic.

    Not quite true. Read Brent Runyon's "Burn Journals" for a counterexample. (Author pours gasoline all over himself and sets himself on fire -- not exactly a call for help, but he managed to survive and write about the experience.)

    --
    http://cltracker.net -- powerful craigslist multi-city search
    1. Re:Serious Attempts by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      How is that a counterexample? Death by gasoline fire is less likely than a gunshot wound to the head or jumping off of a tall building. The question is WHY did he choose this method over a more certain method. I don't buy that it is a counterexample.

  86. Yerb Mate (South American Tea) by matt20 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yerba Mate -- a popular tea in Argentina and other parts of South America has lithium in it. It is interesting that many claim that this tea makes them happier and more productive. I'm seeing it added more and more to "energy drinks" in the US, such as Red Bull.

    I live in a college town, and I notice that it is consumed more and more by college kids.

    Yerba Maté Chemical Features

    From a chemical point of view, Ilex paraguariensis (Yerba Maté) can be evaluated under its food chemical aspect or as a raw material for several byproducts. Long before its chemical composition was known, Indians used Yerba Maté not only due to the beverage's taste but also and mainly because they knew its virtues, chiefly an increased resistance to fatigue and its thirst and hunger mitigation powers.

    Studies show that the Yerba Maté has the following components: water, cellulose, gums, dextrin, mucilage, glucose, pentose, fat substances, aromatic resin, legumin, albumin, xanthine, theophylline, caffearin, folic acid, caffeic acid, viridic acid, chlorophyll, cholesterin and essence oil. Ashes contain great amounts of potassium, lithium, folic, sulfuric, carbon, chloric and citric acids, beside magnesium, manganese, iron, aluminum and arsenic traces.

    Xanthine, theophylline and theobromine are three strongly related alkaloids found in Yerba Maté and are the most interesting compounds from a therapeutic standpoint.
    The Yerba Maté's xanthine rate averages 1.60%, whereas it is 1.10% in infusions.

    http://www.noborders.net/mate/ingredients.html

  87. Re:me too by rhyder128k · · Score: 1

    Thanks for clearing that up. Now, Led Zeppelin - is that heavy metal or hard rock?

    --
    Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
  88. Re:me too by toddestan · · Score: 1

    To a lot of the medical types, the term "heavy metal" refers to any metal that is toxic to the human body, regardless of where it is on the periodic table. Obviously, this doesn't make sense to chemists, but since there has never been a clear definition in chemistry as to what exactly a "heavy metal" is (and isn't) either, it's not suprising that the term has been misused as such.

  89. Lithium has saved my life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take from that what you will.

  90. Re:me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it's the Celine Dion of metals!

  91. Toxic build up by akayani · · Score: 1

    I don't know anyone with Bipolar that actually likes taking lithium. Most have side effects and all hate the process which includes blood monitoring. It's not a first choice medication.

    That said one of the issue we face is that food is grow on the same fields over and over, with in may cases only NPK added back to the soil, so it might indicate that low levels of lithium like many other trace elements are now depleted in basic foods.

    Then again you could buy God water from Peter Popoff and do away with food entirely. ;)

    The fricken crap you Americans have generated is screwing with me when I fall asleep in front of the TV. If I don't get some youthful essence soon my Danos is going to go all Guthy Renken on Mr T.

  92. GP post is fraud from a Social Services creature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Took everything out of context because that's basically what everyone is doing. They are relying on be awarded the contract for a 72-hour involuntary watch where they get the joy of psychiatry (if not psychology) to begin pushing all the experiments on you to see what kind of personality you grew over the time. Can you realy rely on a determining factor as this:

    talking about how it hurts too much to stay alive, ask them these three questions.

    Do you have a plan to kill yourself? (Ask how)
    do you have the materials to kill yourself with?
    Do you have a place/time for killing yourself?

    That is such a biased question. That's like a murderer asking a butch if he has the means of killing people if not to flay dead animals.

  93. Re:me too by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Depending on whom you talk to, Hydrogen may in fact, be a metal. Other however, state it as a non-metal.

    It would be pretty bizarre to think of water as "liquid rust" eh?

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.