Didn't the FDA just approve a closed-loop artificial pancreas?
Yes, although calling it an artificial pancreas is a lot like calling an iron lung an artificial lung. The device works in conjunction with an insulin pump and continuous glucose monitor, sampling every 5 minutes glucose levels and dosing insulin in response. It's a hybrid system though that only handles basal insulin while bolus insulin from meals needs to be manually specified, as well as periods of exercising.
The FDA specifically worked with MedTronic to accelerate the pre-market compliance testing that usually grinds development slowly.
As a type-2 diabetic, the system isn't designed for me yet, but it is exciting to see development in the area. Maybe one day I can just wear a watch like device that takes care of all my monitoring and dosing and missed injections and going hypo- or hyper-glycemic will be a thing of the past.
It's not the main (usually) 16 digit card number. It's the 3 digit code on the back of the card. Your risk goes up slightly that a unknowingly compromised card might be usable at some point again in the future, about once every 21 days, but it's more convenient than having to replace the card once all 1000 digits have been used.
So Wikilinks is under a malware attack when they release files and documents that were already infected? That's like saying you got beat up by your own fist punching yourself.
To me it's not that either one of them carried over losses. The tax code allows it and you are smart to use existing code to your advantage. It's not even a questionable use of the code.
For me, it's the amount. Trump carried forward $916m. Clinton $700k. Lots of people (ok, maybe not LOTS, but it's not unusual) have taken a $700k loss in an investment. How many have taken a personal $916m? There is no comparison between the two.
Aside from lies, bigotry, and fear mongering Trump has campaigned on, he also campaigns on how successful he is and how he's going to make America Great Again by cutting taxes. If he is so successful, how does his business lose nearly a billion dollars during that market? How does that carry forward to 15-18 years worth of taxes if he claims he pays more in a year than we make in a lifetime? How is he being punished by heavy taxes if he doesn't pay any? If half of american doesn't pay taxes and it's crippling us, why isn't he part of the solution instead of the alleged problem?
Trump just shows how hypocritical he is. He says one thing, but evidence points that he does the exact opposite in his own life.
But who wants a rigid, flat board to sit on. With thinner phones, they bend to your butt's contours so much more easily. And it also increases phone manufacturers and repair shop revenues nicely.
It's a fine line, but an unofficial request is not the same as a legal subpoena. You can't be accused of altering records under subpoena if they hadn't actually been subpoena yet.
Also, has it been demonstrated that he actually altered any records? If he didn't, then at most it's intent to be fucking corrupt or at least being fucking stupid, neither of which are actual crimes (although both probably should be, but we already have overcrowding in prison without putting EVERY fucking stupid person in there as well...)
How so? I didn't get that. What I got out of the article is that CloudFlare is claiming they are just a caching service. They don't know or care what the underlying content is, and that even if they close down, the content still remains available via whatever the original distribution method was.
It may not have to be a traditional office. Sales tax law for instance considers if you have a nexus in the state as to if you need to collect and remit state sales tax.
My company has sales staff in nearly every state, yet only has real offices in one. We have to collect tax though for each individual state because that 1 employee that drives around almost every day makes us have a nexus in the state.
I'd be very surprised if IMDB would be able to get away with having only remote workers in California and not have to comply with California law.
Snapchat filters are effects that can be applied to pictures and short videos. Filters may be something as simple as an overlay or some stylized text, but usually they employ some tracking of facial features to distort or alter the subject's appearance. Recent filters have included dog, cat, bee, a sad effect that makes you look like you have down syndrome, drag queen, Harley Quinn, face swapping, and more.
Some filters are available for long periods of time pretty much anywhere you go. Other filters, the geofilters, may only be available in the vicinity of a particular venue for a limited time.
Who really needs their Plex library "in the cloud"?
Many people share their libraries with friends and family. If your local hardware or bandwidth isn't up to snuff this can make sharing multiple streams simultaneously a poor user experience as it will either stutter or video quality suffers.
Is the service needed by everyone? No. Is it required that everyone run Plex now in the cloud? No. Can it be of benefit to some users? Yes. I think it's far better to have the option and not use it, than to not have the option and need it.
It's also not just actors although they are visibly the most obvious example of looking an age. Directors, producers, other production staff, etc would also be covered. Not usually appearing on camera, it's harder to argue that they need to look an age in order to properly perform their job, yet they are the subject of ageism as well.
IMDBPro, the paid service that the entertainment industry can subscribe to for finding work (among other things), appears to be based in Santa Monica based on the careers page. That'd make it subject to California law.
I saw a comment the other day that said "Voting for Johnson was like drinking RC Cola. Yeah it's ok, but who are we kidding". I think the same sentiment applies for any 3rd party candidate.
Does that apply to special issuance passports for official state department travel/business or other "special" passports?
Obama was elected in 2008 so the family getting official business passports in December 2008 isn't far fetched. Add 5 years puts it in 2013 when it gets reissued. Not saying that is what happened, but it'd be plausible.
The state isn't enforcing an ISP monopoly. The state is just preventing the local government from getting into the ISP business, that's all. It's a completely different issue that in no way enforces an ISPs monopoly. Nope. None at all. Completely different.
Double-jeopardy doesn't apply if new evidence is brought in most countries.
It doesn't matter what happens in most countries, it only matters what the law is in the United States.
In Clinton's case, jeopardy never attached so double jeopardy doesn't even apply. If an actual trial had happened, a jury sworn in, and a dismissal due to lack of evidence or an acquittal happened, double jeopardy definitely would apply even if a "smoking gun" was later found. Once a case has been decided in trial prosecution doesn't get the opportunity to try, try again if better evidence shows up. That's the whole reasoning behind not bringing charges even when everyone "knows they did it" but there isn't sufficient evidence to prove it. If sufficient evidence later is found, then charges may be able to be brought up then to gain a conviction.
Actually, it's not when you're talking on the phone. It's muting or reducing the volume of the ringer for an incoming call, but performing a predetermined operation (aka pushing a button) just silences/reduces it. Performing said action does not affect the incoming call so the caller does not have the "unpleasant feeling" of being ignored, sent to voice mail, etc.
If an implementation silenced a call and immediately sent it to voice mail, then that would not be a violation of at least this patent (although there's probably a stupid patent for doing that too).
Slashdot Mirror
Please. That 737-700 probably was only $50m or $60m. They could have risked it.
Yes, although calling it an artificial pancreas is a lot like calling an iron lung an artificial lung. The device works in conjunction with an insulin pump and continuous glucose monitor, sampling every 5 minutes glucose levels and dosing insulin in response. It's a hybrid system though that only handles basal insulin while bolus insulin from meals needs to be manually specified, as well as periods of exercising.
The FDA specifically worked with MedTronic to accelerate the pre-market compliance testing that usually grinds development slowly.
As a type-2 diabetic, the system isn't designed for me yet, but it is exciting to see development in the area. Maybe one day I can just wear a watch like device that takes care of all my monitoring and dosing and missed injections and going hypo- or hyper-glycemic will be a thing of the past.
It's not the main (usually) 16 digit card number. It's the 3 digit code on the back of the card. Your risk goes up slightly that a unknowingly compromised card might be usable at some point again in the future, about once every 21 days, but it's more convenient than having to replace the card once all 1000 digits have been used.
So Wikilinks is under a malware attack when they release files and documents that were already infected? That's like saying you got beat up by your own fist punching yourself.
To me it's not that either one of them carried over losses. The tax code allows it and you are smart to use existing code to your advantage. It's not even a questionable use of the code.
For me, it's the amount. Trump carried forward $916m. Clinton $700k. Lots of people (ok, maybe not LOTS, but it's not unusual) have taken a $700k loss in an investment. How many have taken a personal $916m? There is no comparison between the two.
Aside from lies, bigotry, and fear mongering Trump has campaigned on, he also campaigns on how successful he is and how he's going to make America Great Again by cutting taxes. If he is so successful, how does his business lose nearly a billion dollars during that market? How does that carry forward to 15-18 years worth of taxes if he claims he pays more in a year than we make in a lifetime? How is he being punished by heavy taxes if he doesn't pay any? If half of american doesn't pay taxes and it's crippling us, why isn't he part of the solution instead of the alleged problem?
Trump just shows how hypocritical he is. He says one thing, but evidence points that he does the exact opposite in his own life.
That's easy. You'll just know it when you see it
But who wants a rigid, flat board to sit on. With thinner phones, they bend to your butt's contours so much more easily. And it also increases phone manufacturers and repair shop revenues nicely.
When exactly were the records officially subpoenaed or at least intent to be subponaed? July 24, 2014 was when the reddit post was made. The closest that I could quickly find was that an unofficial request was made sometime in July of 2014, the State Department didn't work with Clinton until August to turn over emails, and finally a formal request in October to all previous Secretaries going back to Madeleine K. Albright for any records that hadn't been turned in to the State Department.
It's a fine line, but an unofficial request is not the same as a legal subpoena. You can't be accused of altering records under subpoena if they hadn't actually been subpoena yet.
Also, has it been demonstrated that he actually altered any records? If he didn't, then at most it's intent to be fucking corrupt or at least being fucking stupid, neither of which are actual crimes (although both probably should be, but we already have overcrowding in prison without putting EVERY fucking stupid person in there as well...)
How so? I didn't get that. What I got out of the article is that CloudFlare is claiming they are just a caching service. They don't know or care what the underlying content is, and that even if they close down, the content still remains available via whatever the original distribution method was.
It may not have to be a traditional office. Sales tax law for instance considers if you have a nexus in the state as to if you need to collect and remit state sales tax.
My company has sales staff in nearly every state, yet only has real offices in one. We have to collect tax though for each individual state because that 1 employee that drives around almost every day makes us have a nexus in the state.
I'd be very surprised if IMDB would be able to get away with having only remote workers in California and not have to comply with California law.
Was there an ad before you played it 50,000 times on YouTube?
If you are just serving up DVD you purchased/ripped then you aren't anywhere near 1080.
Chinese spies may be Asian. News at 11.
Snapchat filters are effects that can be applied to pictures and short videos. Filters may be something as simple as an overlay or some stylized text, but usually they employ some tracking of facial features to distort or alter the subject's appearance. Recent filters have included dog, cat, bee, a sad effect that makes you look like you have down syndrome, drag queen, Harley Quinn, face swapping, and more.
Some filters are available for long periods of time pretty much anywhere you go. Other filters, the geofilters, may only be available in the vicinity of a particular venue for a limited time.
Many people share their libraries with friends and family. If your local hardware or bandwidth isn't up to snuff this can make sharing multiple streams simultaneously a poor user experience as it will either stutter or video quality suffers.
Is the service needed by everyone? No. Is it required that everyone run Plex now in the cloud? No. Can it be of benefit to some users? Yes. I think it's far better to have the option and not use it, than to not have the option and need it.
It's not even a issue if the discrimination is done for a bona fide occupational qualification.
It's also not just actors although they are visibly the most obvious example of looking an age. Directors, producers, other production staff, etc would also be covered. Not usually appearing on camera, it's harder to argue that they need to look an age in order to properly perform their job, yet they are the subject of ageism as well.
IMDBPro, the paid service that the entertainment industry can subscribe to for finding work (among other things), appears to be based in Santa Monica based on the careers page. That'd make it subject to California law.
Wikipedia doesn't allow paid subscribers to post resumes, headshots or other information for prospective employers.
Yes
At least a few times it looks.
I saw a comment the other day that said "Voting for Johnson was like drinking RC Cola. Yeah it's ok, but who are we kidding". I think the same sentiment applies for any 3rd party candidate.
Does that apply to special issuance passports for official state department travel/business or other "special" passports?
Obama was elected in 2008 so the family getting official business passports in December 2008 isn't far fetched. Add 5 years puts it in 2013 when it gets reissued. Not saying that is what happened, but it'd be plausible.
The state isn't enforcing an ISP monopoly. The state is just preventing the local government from getting into the ISP business, that's all. It's a completely different issue that in no way enforces an ISPs monopoly. Nope. None at all. Completely different.
It doesn't matter what happens in most countries, it only matters what the law is in the United States.
In Clinton's case, jeopardy never attached so double jeopardy doesn't even apply. If an actual trial had happened, a jury sworn in, and a dismissal due to lack of evidence or an acquittal happened, double jeopardy definitely would apply even if a "smoking gun" was later found. Once a case has been decided in trial prosecution doesn't get the opportunity to try, try again if better evidence shows up. That's the whole reasoning behind not bringing charges even when everyone "knows they did it" but there isn't sufficient evidence to prove it. If sufficient evidence later is found, then charges may be able to be brought up then to gain a conviction.
Initial appeals had already started and finished. It stated as much in the summary and even linked to the Appeals Court judgement.
Actually, it's not when you're talking on the phone. It's muting or reducing the volume of the ringer for an incoming call, but performing a predetermined operation (aka pushing a button) just silences/reduces it. Performing said action does not affect the incoming call so the caller does not have the "unpleasant feeling" of being ignored, sent to voice mail, etc.
If an implementation silenced a call and immediately sent it to voice mail, then that would not be a violation of at least this patent (although there's probably a stupid patent for doing that too).