...that someone is raising the real issue. I'm in the UK and studied for a science degree and from people I still know who graduated, only one of them is actually working in science now (5 years later). Of other friends I've made in the field most have left their science jobs. The most recent has just retrained as an accountant. She got made redundant from her previous job with a big pharma as they moved her whole lab out to china where they said they could have 6 equally qualified people for what they were paying her. People aren't stupid, they aren't going to study for something where there's no jobs, or what jobs do exist are all low paid rubbish with no chance of advancement. They'll all go become accountants and lawyers. Say hello to globalisation...
Most of the comments here seem to be talking about code copying/sharing/theft.
However this isn't the only way to get code. When I was doing my CS degree I was know as being someone to ask for help when stuck, and people frequently did. This lead to me being asked several times if I'd accept payment to write the assignment for them; of course I declined. These people clearly didn't have the first idea how to construct a program, yet several seemed to pass the course, which always amazed me. That was a few years ago now, and I expect it's only got easier with sites like RentACoder, for people with money to buy their way through courses. A very talented and poor friend of mine on an english course got offered alot of money to write someone's dissertation.
The only way people get caught is if someone grasses them up.
For example I love the way you can use your keyboard to make small/medium/big jumps in Windows Media Player using [SHIFT]+[R.Arrow], [R.Arrow] and [CTRL]+[R.Arrow] respectively.
VLC does that...
CTRL + L/R arrow, ALT + L/R arrow and SHIFT + L/R arrow for big, medium and small jumps forwards and back.
If by 'supposedly' you mean 'definitely' and if by 'most movie theaters' you mean 'all theaters and even all motion picture production processes in recent years', then yes.
I'm sorry but that's not quite correct. I worked as a movie projectionist for several years, so I know this from experience. While 24fps works, and is what used to be used in cinemas, it is noticeably flickery. As with most advancements in cinema technology, they came up with a bit of a hack. While there are still only 24 frames of film per second, the projector shows each frame twice, giving an effective frame rate of 48fps.
I'm not trolling here, but explain to me exactly why this is so terrible?
So what if someone else makes stuff for you? You could say we should all be making our own food, because each person needs food, and if they don't make their own food they're in danger of starving...
As far as I understand it, it was the very fact that moving away from subsistence farming that allowed modern society to flourish.
The trouble is a project of that size usually requires some level of state/federal organisation or funding to secure the necessary investment from private funding and the power to buy the land. Which in the USA seems to cause foaming at the mouth and long rants about the evils of communism.
(I'm assuming here a new high speed railway would require a new less bendy track than already exists)
I think this is part of the confusion really. The banking systems in different countries are quite different and have different charging models. They are just trying to get rid of what is a free service in the UK for personal accounts. I know a few small business owners that use personal accounts for their banking precisely because they don't charge for transactions.
I have to wonder what UK bank the GP is using as I have accounts with three major banks and they all charge around £25 to transfer money between them. I've found the easiest way to change money between accounts is to drive to the bank, withdraw in cash and walk across the street and pay it into the other bank. (luckily all three banks have branches next to each other) Stupid in the 21st century, but it's the quickest and cheapest way for me to do it.
I always find this a slightly strange assertion, being a user from the UK. Yes the site was started by someone in the US, and a big chunk of the userbase is in the USA, but stories are submitted from a global audience and link to content that is hosted globally.
It's a bit like claiming the whole Internet is american, because well that's where it started, or that the web is british, because a british guy invented it. It's all a bit silly really.
As various people here keep saying, you have to consider the whole lifecycle.
I'm not defending the entrenched oligarchy of providers in the US, as they probably are gouging customers to an extent and not being as flexible as they could be. However when quoting all the amazing price deals available there, you have to consider how this is linked to pay levels, because to a certain extent the amount you pay is going to be affected by how much it costs to run the infrastructure, and paying people is a large part of that.
There are also probably far fewer regulations on cell tower placement and power. Building anything probably costs less because labour is again cheap and there are fewer building regulations, environmental regulations and labour laws to comply with. It all costs money.
I wonder why it took until now, for something that’s still worse to come out.
Worse in what aspect? While that is an impressive mpg for any car, the lotus engine has addressed several specific deficiencies with traditional 2-stroke engines, principally the requirement to mix oil with the fuel to lubricate the engine. This has a significant impact on the emissions. It can also run on a variety of fuels. This is one heck of an achievement
oh and
Ford built a Fiesta with a two-stroke engine that achieved 1.4l/100km (that’s 168 mpg!) in 1996!
I'm no eco weenie, but this is total madness... the manufacture of a car creates SIX TIMES the CO2 that the average car will emit in its lifetime... the government should be encouraging people to keep their cars for longer, not pointlessly bail out a few failed car makers...
I think you're missing the point. This is very cheap compared to the other available options.
If you travel alot, or you're just visiting the UK, you either need to sign up for mobile Internet via your phone (with a monthly fee) or use WiFI hotspots, which really are outrageously expensive (typically £6 for an hour!)
So £2 for a whole day and you don't have to hunt for a hotspot? This is great! I travel a couple of times a month and I've been wishing for a service like this at this kind of price...
It's easy. Just about every traditional profession you cite has a professional body with professional qualifications, which believe it or not, can be quite hard to pass!
Professionals in other fields who are incompetant can lose their professional accreditation, incompetant IT workers on the other hand, just move from organisation to organisation. Quite often with good references because their previous employers are pleased to see the back of them.
Tell me about it... I made the same point when I submitted this story yesterday but it got rejected... typical.
I knew this would make it onto/. and I was shocked when it was rejected... and 12 hours later here it is, and I expect to see a dupe, just to add insult to injury...
You're completely missing the point... distributing the source is easy... getting the permission to release it is something completely different.
If the company they outsourced the development to have added to it, they need to get permission from the author to release it, and that probably wasn't part of the original plan... they might even have included code they licenced.
Whatcha do about that? There's not really an easy answer.
Shame really, I'd really like to buy one of these devices, but I'm not going to give them any of my money until their fully compliant.
Again I hope you have to live on £60 a week, maybe you would change you mind.
Been there, done it, got myself out of it. It's the main reason I feel the way I do.
I hope you get a horrible illness even more than before, maybe that would bring you back down to earth.
I am already perfectly well grounded, I just refuse to pay for people that won't help themselves.
Also there is no need for being so offensive; rudeness is a weak man's imitation of strength.
That just gave me a horrible vision of poor people slashing any vegetation they can find just to have it processed as fuel to make a quick buck. Going to have to be careful who can supply the fuel chain or this could just cause more environmental harm.
$2.04
LOL I wish I could get petrol so cheap. I'm assuming that $2.04 is per US gallon. That's 31.0 pence per litre. Here petrol is 94.9, which is $6.25 per US gallon.
effectively and cheaply generate ethanol from cellulose
I wonder does anyone know how much land this would take up?
A. What's the richest source of cellulose
B. Based on the energy value of the ethanol produced from say 1 tonne of the crop, how much land is going to be needed to replace the oil consumtion in private cars in the USA?
Yes I understand that point. However imagine if you were detained by the police for, say 90 days (if they get their way) and you're completely innocent (just like the brazillian man they shot). That's three months... you think your employer is going to keep your job open for you while the police hold you for three months as a terrorist suspect? Imagine being locked up for that long, your life could be totally ruined and you've done nothing wrong, not to mention the huge cost, bills unpaid, lost earnings etc.
I'm sorry but I'd rather take the very tiny increased risk of being blown up than have a system that ruins the lives of the innocent. They are trying to cause terror, and these kind of draconian measures allow them to win. These heavy handed tactics cause more disruption to everyone's lives than a single bomb. It's the same as the old principle that even if it means 100 criminals going free, the innocent should not be wrongfully imprisioned.
Okay so maybe I'm just strange, I hate the utter waste of screen space the tab bar creates, I don't even have the taskbar/wharf showing, I keep track in my head.
Slashdot Mirror
...that someone is raising the real issue. I'm in the UK and studied for a science degree and from people I still know who graduated, only one of them is actually working in science now (5 years later). Of other friends I've made in the field most have left their science jobs. The most recent has just retrained as an accountant. She got made redundant from her previous job with a big pharma as they moved her whole lab out to china where they said they could have 6 equally qualified people for what they were paying her. People aren't stupid, they aren't going to study for something where there's no jobs, or what jobs do exist are all low paid rubbish with no chance of advancement. They'll all go become accountants and lawyers. Say hello to globalisation...
Most of the comments here seem to be talking about code copying/sharing/theft.
However this isn't the only way to get code. When I was doing my CS degree I was know as being someone to ask for help when stuck, and people frequently did. This lead to me being asked several times if I'd accept payment to write the assignment for them; of course I declined. These people clearly didn't have the first idea how to construct a program, yet several seemed to pass the course, which always amazed me. That was a few years ago now, and I expect it's only got easier with sites like RentACoder, for people with money to buy their way through courses. A very talented and poor friend of mine on an english course got offered alot of money to write someone's dissertation.
The only way people get caught is if someone grasses them up.
For example I love the way you can use your keyboard to make small/medium/big jumps in Windows Media Player using [SHIFT]+[R.Arrow], [R.Arrow] and [CTRL]+[R.Arrow] respectively.
VLC does that...
CTRL + L/R arrow, ALT + L/R arrow and SHIFT + L/R arrow for big, medium and small jumps forwards and back.
If by 'supposedly' you mean 'definitely' and if by 'most movie theaters' you mean 'all theaters and even all motion picture production processes in recent years', then yes.
I'm sorry but that's not quite correct. I worked as a movie projectionist for several years, so I know this from experience. While 24fps works, and is what used to be used in cinemas, it is noticeably flickery. As with most advancements in cinema technology, they came up with a bit of a hack. While there are still only 24 frames of film per second, the projector shows each frame twice, giving an effective frame rate of 48fps.
Don't be ignorant.
Don't misrepresent what I said...
The GP was talking about a theoretical collapse, which I clearly quoted, not geomagnetic reversals.
Conceivably they could 'collapse' by becoming too close. The magnetic field would appear to go away
I really hope not. We'd fry and so would the communication satellites if the magnetosphere vanished...
I'm not trolling here, but explain to me exactly why this is so terrible?
So what if someone else makes stuff for you? You could say we should all be making our own food, because each person needs food, and if they don't make their own food they're in danger of starving...
As far as I understand it, it was the very fact that moving away from subsistence farming that allowed modern society to flourish.
How is this any different?
The trouble is a project of that size usually requires some level of state/federal organisation or funding to secure the necessary investment from private funding and the power to buy the land. Which in the USA seems to cause foaming at the mouth and long rants about the evils of communism.
(I'm assuming here a new high speed railway would require a new less bendy track than already exists)
I think this is part of the confusion really. The banking systems in different countries are quite different and have different charging models. They are just trying to get rid of what is a free service in the UK for personal accounts. I know a few small business owners that use personal accounts for their banking precisely because they don't charge for transactions.
I have to wonder what UK bank the GP is using as I have accounts with three major banks and they all charge around £25 to transfer money between them. I've found the easiest way to change money between accounts is to drive to the bank, withdraw in cash and walk across the street and pay it into the other bank. (luckily all three banks have branches next to each other) Stupid in the 21st century, but it's the quickest and cheapest way for me to do it.
This is a US site;
I always find this a slightly strange assertion, being a user from the UK. Yes the site was started by someone in the US, and a big chunk of the userbase is in the USA, but stories are submitted from a global audience and link to content that is hosted globally.
It's a bit like claiming the whole Internet is american, because well that's where it started, or that the web is british, because a british guy invented it. It's all a bit silly really.
As various people here keep saying, you have to consider the whole lifecycle.
I'm not defending the entrenched oligarchy of providers in the US, as they probably are gouging customers to an extent and not being as flexible as they could be. However when quoting all the amazing price deals available there, you have to consider how this is linked to pay levels, because to a certain extent the amount you pay is going to be affected by how much it costs to run the infrastructure, and paying people is a large part of that.
There are also probably far fewer regulations on cell tower placement and power. Building anything probably costs less because labour is again cheap and there are fewer building regulations, environmental regulations and labour laws to comply with. It all costs money.
I wonder why it took until now, for something that’s still worse to come out.
Worse in what aspect? While that is an impressive mpg for any car, the lotus engine has addressed several specific deficiencies with traditional 2-stroke engines, principally the requirement to mix oil with the fuel to lubricate the engine. This has a significant impact on the emissions. It can also run on a variety of fuels. This is one heck of an achievement
oh and
Ford built a Fiesta with a two-stroke engine that achieved 1.4l/100km (that’s 168 mpg!) in 1996!
[citation needed]
I'm no eco weenie, but this is total madness... the manufacture of a car creates SIX TIMES the CO2 that the average car will emit in its lifetime... the government should be encouraging people to keep their cars for longer, not pointlessly bail out a few failed car makers...
I think you're missing the point. This is very cheap compared to the other available options.
If you travel alot, or you're just visiting the UK, you either need to sign up for mobile Internet via your phone (with a monthly fee) or use WiFI hotspots, which really are outrageously expensive (typically £6 for an hour!)
So £2 for a whole day and you don't have to hunt for a hotspot? This is great! I travel a couple of times a month and I've been wishing for a service like this at this kind of price...
It's easy. Just about every traditional profession you cite has a professional body with professional qualifications, which believe it or not, can be quite hard to pass!
Professionals in other fields who are incompetant can lose their professional accreditation, incompetant IT workers on the other hand, just move from organisation to organisation. Quite often with good references because their previous employers are pleased to see the back of them.
That's because soap and water is about mechanical cleaning. The soap loosens the muck and the water washes it away.
Tell me about it... I made the same point when I submitted this story yesterday but it got rejected... typical.
/. and I was shocked when it was rejected... and 12 hours later here it is, and I expect to see a dupe, just to add insult to injury...
:'-(
I knew this would make it onto
Feel my pain
You lucky sod, I pay 11.04p/kWh flat rate...
(That's 20.79 US cents c/kWh)
Really, how hard is it to release source?
You're completely missing the point... distributing the source is easy... getting the permission to release it is something completely different.
If the company they outsourced the development to have added to it, they need to get permission from the author to release it, and that probably wasn't part of the original plan... they might even have included code they licenced.
Whatcha do about that? There's not really an easy answer.
Shame really, I'd really like to buy one of these devices, but I'm not going to give them any of my money until their fully compliant.
There's this fantastic modern invention called "google"... http://gp2x.co.uk/
Again I hope you have to live on £60 a week, maybe you would change you mind.
Been there, done it, got myself out of it. It's the main reason I feel the way I do.
I hope you get a horrible illness even more than before, maybe that would bring you back down to earth.
I am already perfectly well grounded, I just refuse to pay for people that won't help themselves.
Also there is no need for being so offensive; rudeness is a weak man's imitation of strength.
"Slash and trash" from forests
That just gave me a horrible vision of poor people slashing any vegetation they can find just to have it processed as fuel to make a quick buck. Going to have to be careful who can supply the fuel chain or this could just cause more environmental harm.
$2.04
LOL I wish I could get petrol so cheap. I'm assuming that $2.04 is per US gallon. That's 31.0 pence per litre. Here petrol is 94.9, which is $6.25 per US gallon.
*sigh*
effectively and cheaply generate ethanol from cellulose
I wonder does anyone know how much land this would take up?
A. What's the richest source of cellulose
B. Based on the energy value of the ethanol produced from say 1 tonne of the crop, how much land is going to be needed to replace the oil consumtion in private cars in the USA?
I bet it's not a small amount...
Yes I understand that point. However imagine if you were detained by the police for, say 90 days (if they get their way) and you're completely innocent (just like the brazillian man they shot). That's three months... you think your employer is going to keep your job open for you while the police hold you for three months as a terrorist suspect? Imagine being locked up for that long, your life could be totally ruined and you've done nothing wrong, not to mention the huge cost, bills unpaid, lost earnings etc.
I'm sorry but I'd rather take the very tiny increased risk of being blown up than have a system that ruins the lives of the innocent. They are trying to cause terror, and these kind of draconian measures allow them to win. These heavy handed tactics cause more disruption to everyone's lives than a single bomb. It's the same as the old principle that even if it means 100 criminals going free, the innocent should not be wrongfully imprisioned.
Okay so maybe I'm just strange, I hate the utter waste of screen space the tab bar creates, I don't even have the taskbar/wharf showing, I keep track in my head.