Slashdot Mirror


North Magnetic Pole Moving East Due To Core Flux

National Geographic is reporting that the migration of Earth's magnetic pole has accelerated again and is now racing in Russia's direction at a blazing 40 miles per year. This movement began in earnest around 1904 at about 9 miles per year and has been accelerating since. "Geologists think Earth has a magnetic field because the core is made up of a solid iron center surrounded by rapidly spinning liquid rock. This creates a 'dynamo' that drives our magnetic field. Scientists had long suspected that, since the molten core is constantly moving, changes in its magnetism might be affecting the surface location of magnetic north. Although the new research seems to back up this idea, Chulliat is not ready to say whether magnetic north will eventually cross into Russia. 'It's too difficult to forecast,' Chulliat said. Also, nobody knows when another change in the core might pop up elsewhere, sending magnetic north wandering in a new direction."

346 comments

  1. In soviet russia... by pwnies · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...magnetic north will eventually cross into Russia

    Well everything is backwards in Soviet Russia. It was only a matter of time before magnetic North pointed South.

    1. Re:In soviet russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Especially since the magnetic north pole is actually near the south pole. This is why a magnetic north pole on a compass points north towards the Earth's magnetic south pole.

  2. North Pole by SirLurksAlot · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia North Pole comes to YOU!

    --
    God, schmod. I want my monkey man!
    1. Re:North Pole by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 0, Redundant

      In Soviet Russia North Pole... wait... damn, I *knew* someone would beat me to that.

    2. Re:North Pole by AUSman · · Score: 0

      How are Soviet Russia jokes even funny anymore?

    3. Re:North Pole by Kjella · · Score: 1

      How are Soviet Russia jokes even funny anymore?

      Right question, wrong occasion. I actually laughed at this one, don't know when I last laughed at a Soviet Russia joke. The memes do in general get annoying though...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:North Pole by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 1

      Possibly because this one is relevant. Of course, they are a bit tired now, but still. This isn't one of the usual fifty million stupid ones.

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    5. Re:North Pole by Divinemonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      How are Soviet Russia jokes even funny anymore?

      As a meme it's over used and lacking in hilarity. In reference to this particular story though, it could not have been better played.

    6. Re:North Pole by OctaviusIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As Avatar taught us, overused clichés, when in the right hands, remind us why they became cliché in the first place.

      --
      What's this? Another weblog? On transit?
    7. Re:North Pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Imagine a beowulf cluster of overused memes!

    8. Re:North Pole by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome my new beowolf clustered meme overlords from Soviet Russia!

      (Doesn't look like it gets funnier if you add more of them, does it?)

    9. Re:North Pole by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome my new beowolf clustered meme overlords from Soviet Russia!

      (Doesn't look like it gets funnier if you add more of them, does it?)

      In Soviet Russia, new beowolf clustered meme overlords welcome YOU!

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    10. Re:North Pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that Russia claimed that the North Pole was already part of their land mass. They supposedly proved it by following their land mass *under* water with a submarine (which to me never made sense anyway, all the land masses are connected to each other under water).

    11. Re:North Pole by shinzawai · · Score: 1

      1. "How are Soviet Russia jokes even funny anymore?"

      2. ?

      3. Profit.

    12. Re:North Pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our, but before you finish lolcats has some of the best memes of all time, hospitable soviet beowulf clustered meme overlords!

    13. Re:North Pole by mce · · Score: 1
      In Soviet Russia, new naked and petrified beowolf clustered meme overlords welcome YOU!

      There, fixed that for you.

    14. Re:North Pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, new naked and petrified beowulf clusters of north pole overlords welcome YOU!

      Fixed that for you. Please stay relevant to the topic.

    15. Re:North Pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The topic has shifted, you insensitive clod. ;-)

    16. Re:North Pole by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      There was a good article in National Geographic about this, with great maps, reference to the treaties governing claiming of seabed territory, in relation to oil and gas deposits in the Arctic.

      Basically, it has to do with the continental shelf... the Russian continental shelf extends (subject to debate) across the North Pole... here's a map that helps clarify. I couldn't find the NGM map that shows the various claims by the countries surrounding the arctic, but I've pored over that issue of NGM for collective hours while sitting on the shitter (that's the best place to read NGM, IMO).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    17. Re:North Pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A truly clever developer will create code so easy to understand that a less than average developer could debug it."

      i disagree unless debugging doesn't involve executing privileges. as an idiot i have in the past tried writing scripts, mostly to tag log files better by inserting date stamps at midnight every night even if there wasn't anything to log. also some irc stuff that was boring and uninteresting but i spent a lot of time writing the scripts, because languages are too complicated for my mush brain.

    18. Re:North Pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia North Pole comes to YOU!

      You, sir, win the internets today!

    19. Re:North Pole by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Clod is pants

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    20. Re:North Pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would be really interesting is if the north pole moved to a country such as Greece. I mean not the magnetic north, but the geographical north (freezing temperatures, etc ...).

      Then we'd really see a climate change!

  3. Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yet another impact of "global warming". Heating the globe is melting the no-longer-solid iron center. Yikes.

    1. Re:Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hope congress immediately passes a 3000 page bill to solve this issue now! Something must be done and there isn't time to read or think about it!

    2. Re:Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on what metric?

      Girth.

    3. Re:Global Warming by mmcxii · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      So what you're saying is that you're ok with passing large chunks of legislation even tho no single person could possibly have the time to read over it and give it a little time to settle in as to what it means?

    4. Re:Global Warming by QuoteMstr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes, I am. Aren't you comfortable using an operating system that's too large for any one person to understand in its entirety?

      We're long past the days when a single human being could understand all the details of our most complex systems. What a single person can do is learn the broad outlines, and look up detailed information as needed. It's called reductionism, and it's the foundation of all progress we've made since Aristotle.

      Each word of that 3,000 page bill has been read thousands of times, even if not by the same person each time. What's wrong with that?

      Of course, your response will be that we shouldn't need laws that are that complex in the first place. Well, what do you base that on? Your gut feeling? Modern society is complex. Maybe it needs nuanced and sophisticated laws.

      Have you considered that the people harping about a "3,000 page bill" are the ones who passed the byzantine Medicare Part D system? That maybe they're exploiting the hysterical reaction some people have to the page count to serve their ulterior interests? Besides, you know what would be simpler than the current bill? Single payer.

    5. Re:Global Warming by toadlife · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Besides, you know what would be simpler than the current bill? Single payer.

      Stop it with the common sense. Heads are going to explode. ...and a big GFY whomever modded the parent troll.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    6. Re:Global Warming by WED+Fan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Reasonable people differ on the substance of legislation, but opposing something based on its complexity alone smacks of corrosive know-nothingism.

      O.k., Sparky, have you read the health bill? If you say you have, you are a liar.

      Blindly accepting that self-interested career politicians can bring together a patchwork of often contradictory sections of proposed law and amendments that will somehow fix an arguably broken system without creating more problems than it solves is just plain idiocy. The mantra in D.C. is "Fire...Ready...Duck...Aim...Why is everyone angry at us?"

      The simple fact that they rammed it through, at full speed without a fair reading and explanation is enough to make anyone wary.

      This is very much like you giving up on trying to get your wife to let you fuck her anally, so you just jam it in there before she has a chance to say, "no". You got what you wanted, she's going to have deal with the pain, then, she'll deal with you. We are the wife and congress is the jackass husband.

      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    7. Re:Global Warming by Entrope · · Score: 5, Interesting

      An operating system may be too large and complicated for any one person to understand. A code of laws might also be that complicated.

      A single bill, however, is most closely analogous to a patch -- or at most a patch series -- and no open source OS would accept a patch that no one claims to understand. Are you willing to run code on your computer by maintainers who accept that kind of patch? If not, why are you willing to live your entire life according to laws that are equally poorly understood and maintained?

      Even beyond that, computer programs tend to be inherently less ambiguous and more deterministic than laws. These traits allow useful decomposition of programs into a hierarchy that allows a person to focus on single parts of the whole. Because laws lack those traits (and especially in the US where courts look at history and precedent), it is much harder to decompose laws into elements that one can analyze separately. This is compounded by legislatures being loath to revise even obviously outdated or buggy laws, which makes it hard to correct bugs in the law. (The Internet has many examples of dumb or silly laws; an obviously buggy one is the US federal law prohibiting compensation for bone marrow donations by classifying bone marrow as an organ.) On the whole, it is much more important for legislators to understand the whole of the law than it is for software developers to understand the whole of a program.

      Voters are well-known to be rationally ignorant of their choices at the ballot box. Your argument is essentially that legislators should be rationally ignorant regarding the laws they vote on. Is that really what you want to encourage in law-makers?

    8. Re:Global Warming by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Basically what QuoteMstr is saying is that Republicans are to blame for everything. Including Santa hating Linux.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    9. Re:Global Warming by toastar · · Score: 1

      that's why congressmen have staffers, believe it or not they actually have to do stuff other then sleeping with the congressman.

    10. Re:Global Warming by DrLang21 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is a world of difference between Law which affects every person in a country, or potentially in the world, without choice and an operating system that a customer chooses to use. On top of that, there are systems designers who do have a fairly complete upper level understanding of an entire operating system. In addition, there are software quality control measures in place to fend off garbage. Legislation has only those voting on it as quality control. If those voting are not given sufficient time to at least mostly comprehend the entire bill, then there is no quality control.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    11. Re:Global Warming by xmundt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Greetings and Salutations.
                It is one thing to pass a 3000 page bill that Congress understands. However, too often today, they get a 1000 page bill a day or two before they have to vote on it. I find it difficult to believe that your average Congress-person can read and understand a 1000 page bill in two days and make a rational decision on whether passing it is good for the country as a whole, and, not just a few special interest groups.
                Actually, I suspect that far too many of the bills that run through Congress these days are WRITTEN by special interest groups, and, simply emailed to their favorite Congress-person's office for injection into the pipeline.
                  Pleasant dreams.
                  Dave Mundt

      --
      YAB - http://blog.beemandave.com/
    12. Re:Global Warming by nschubach · · Score: 1

      What a single person can do is learn the broad outlines, and look up detailed information as needed.

      So the legislation should come with cliff notes? Our driving license examinations should just cover the gist of the laws and we should look the details up after we get out on the road?

      This is a red, yellow and green signal. [1] You can find out what they mean by following the link if you are really interested in the details. For now, you just need to know you'll see one of these while driving.

      [1]Wikilink: Red/Yellow/Green and what they mean.

      Maybe we should just kind of assume the legality of self defence: shoot first and ask questions later.

      The more legislation and complexity there is, the less people will know and the more ignorant we will be.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    13. Re:Global Warming by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      A single bill, however, is most closely analogous to a patch -- or at most a patch series -- and no open source OS would accept a patch that no one claims to understand.

      I think you'll need to extend that analogy a little - no open source OS would accept a patch no-one qualified claims to understand. You wouldn't extend that umbrella to those unqualified - and it should be similar for the laws. Just because they're written in English, albeit verbose and oft-times needlessly complex, doesn't mean the ordinary person should be expected to understand - unless you're a lawyer.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    14. Re:Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered that the people harping about a "3,000 page bill" are the ones who passed the byzantine Medicare Part D system? That maybe they're exploiting the hysterical reaction some people have to the page count to serve their ulterior interests?

      You mean the politicians on one side or the other? BFD. Of course they latch onto a true argument to serve their partisan ends when there is one, but gleefully ignore the same argument when it interferes with their partisan ends.

      That doesn't mean that I, one who also harps about a 3000 page bill, among other topics, passed or approved of Part D, or that the argument against large unreadable commits is somehow weakened or invalidated. Your bizarre reverse ad hominem argument makes no sense.

    15. Re:Global Warming by Firehed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I can't be expected to understand the laws as a normal human, then I can't reasonably be expected to follow them either.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    16. Re:Global Warming by modecx · · Score: 1

      When something becomes so big and so complicated, not only can a singular individual have no chance of understanding its meaning or any distant implications, you can encounter a situation where nobody understands any of it. Ignorant haste in approving something like this is among the least desirable strategy.

      I for one think it's abundantly healthy to be reluctant in accepting ANY significant amendment to our law (no less a 3000 page monstrosity). Your "reduction" of this bill will be volumes long on its own. Further, the volumes to be written in the coming years--in vain attempt to understand it all--will be enough to herniate a library. Look at the Patriot Act, another set of laws passed hastily with virtually no understanding--merely hundreds of pages long, and it's impossible to measure how much damage it has caused.

      Even the vastly more simple, one liner regulations of government power set fourth in the Bill of Rights have been contested for the length of their existence. These simple words have often been stretched and warped to the point of breaking. If this hasn't been an indication of what is possible (with one liners), it's unimaginable how they will warp this heap of spaghetti.

      I for one believe the en bloc method of this... this... Codex's proponents to be grotesque. It would be more vastly more productive to make it modular. Pass the provisions on which there is little disagreement NOW--and hash out the less important stuff later, instead of using the important provisions as the ram to shove this huge pill down the public's gullet.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    17. Re:Global Warming by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Legislation has only those voting on it as quality control. If those voting are not given sufficient time to at least mostly comprehend the entire bill, then there is no quality control.

      Read between the lines. Our congress critters never gave a damn about quality control from the beginning. It's as though they are the system administrators of a giant network. Instead of performing maintenance, they just keep installing software (features through law) while at the same time keep the system hobbling long enough to pass on to the next generation of congress critters that come after them. It's one giant fucking game of "Hot Potato"!

      So what happens when your network of servers becomes too bloated and difficult to manage? Two options. First: attempt to clean it up, which is never going to happen. Second: format and reinstall OS and only the apps and userdata you really need. Basically, you have a revolution and start over. That time might come sooner than we all thought I'm afraid.

      And we call them civil servants??? I call em douchebags!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    18. Re:Global Warming by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Well, she's just gonna have to take it like a man, and you had better hope that she isn't one, or you'll have to take it like a man, too.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    19. Re:Global Warming by malkir · · Score: 1

      /win

    20. Re:Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      computer code is exact and precise. it only means one thing and can only be interpreted one way. it is carried out by a 'dumb' computer that makes no judgement, it just does what it's told. law code is written in natural language, which is very imprecise and can often be interpreted in different ways. in fact, it is often purposely vague and ambiguous to 'get everyone on board'. law code is carried out by people.

      now, i wonder if you are older than 25 or how much experience you have leading people through 'uncharted waters'. i think most people with a fair amount of experience under their belt know that simpler is better when trying to organize people and set them in motion.

    21. Re:Global Warming by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      An operating system may be too large and complicated for any one person to understand.

      Not true if it is a good operating system.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    22. Re:Global Warming by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      And nobody would be able to predict what happens when it comes into force. We only know what won't happen :
      -> it won't make medicare or medicaid cheaper (according to CBO and common sense)
      -> it cannot be paid with 10 times the amount of money allocated to it (according, again, to CBO and common sense)
      -> it won't allow companies to continue doing medical research like they do today. Perhaps - perhaps - an alternative model will work, but then again, perhaps not
      -> it won't cover the (currently) uninsured
      -> it will change medical delivery from money-based to ration-based (govt. decides who does - and who does not - get medical care, and is not accountable to anyone - not even to congress. This bill means that whether you get a pacemaker is decided by (a person appointed by) Obama, with no recourse for any person), the famous "death panel"

    23. Re:Global Warming by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I have read the entirety of the Single UNIX Specification. I don't need to understand the details of the code of my kernel of choice to use it, only the interfaces. The interfaces are generally considerably simpler than the interface. In contrast, the whole of a law is the interface: the bit that users of the law (i.e. citizens) are expected to understand and abide by. Ignorance of the law is no defence against violating it, and yet laws are passed so quickly that not even the people who are paid exclusively to create laws have a chance to read all of them, let alone the few million who are expected to abide by them.

      Irrespective of whether a simpler law would work or not, a complex law generally won't. Unless a law is simple enough that everyone who is to be bound by it can be reasonably expected to read and understand it, they will not abide by it. They may coincidentally not break it because the law doesn't prohibit anything that they would no do, but then the law is not really achieving anything anyway.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    24. Re:Global Warming by chadplusplus · · Score: 1

      +1 Insightful

    25. Re:Global Warming by locallyunscene · · Score: 1
      Congress' whole process is ridiculous. Up until about 2 weeks ago opencongress.org listed the 2,000 page bill as ~60% changed from the house version. ~3,000 pages is tough for someone to read, but given a month and a half time with reading bills as my full-time job, some aides working under me to summarize portions, and the fact the bills are double spaced with 2 inch margins on each side it doesn't sound impossible. I went to check what the final % changed from the house-passed bill was today and this is what I see:

      Introduced in House 989 n/a n/a
      Engrossed in House 899 3 20%
      Placed on Calendar Senate 970 8 Show Changes Hide Changes 5%
      Amendment in Senate 353,330 753 99%

      Absolutely ridiculous.

    26. Re:Global Warming by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      Actually due to that gigantic thermonuclear reactor floating in the sky that constantly fires ridiculously massive amounts of high-energy charged particles at us, that might be a problem.

      The northern lights aren't the only fenomenon that's caused by the north pole attracting those particles.

      This could very well cause a shift in climate.

    27. Re:Global Warming by suffe · · Score: 1

      You can be expected to understand the laws in the 'areas' in which you live your life.

      Don't own a farm? Not expected to know and understand the laws related to that.

      Don't run a newspaper? Editorial laws and other regulations are not a required reading for you.

      Plan on driving a car? Better brush up on those chapters.

      Of course this is a slight oversimplification and I agree that in some areas it has gone to extremes. What I'm trying to show is that the somewhat witty and often heard responce that you gave is not as clear-cut as it can easily sound.

      --

      Karma: 2.71828182846 (Mostly due to small, fun pills)
    28. Re:Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2,000 pages isn't *that* long, so as to be impossible to read. Come on.

    29. Re:Global Warming by operagost · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this is a problem that can be solved only by international treaty, artificially skyrocketing energy costs, and the creation of an iron credit market.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    30. Re:Global Warming by operagost · · Score: 1

      During his speech at a National Press Club luncheon, House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.), questioned the point of lawmakers reading the health care bill.
      "I love these members, they get up and say, 'Read the bill,'" said Conyers.
      "What good is reading the bill if it's a thousand pages and you don't have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill?"
      http://www.cnsnews.com/Public/Content/Article.aspx?rsrcid=51610

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    31. Re:Global Warming by operagost · · Score: 1

      You know what would be simpler than single payer? Obeying the Constitution.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    32. Re:Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't make us able to predict when people will stop lying to suit their agenda, either. Don't forget that one!

    33. Re:Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...This is very much like you giving up on trying to get your wife to let you fuck her anally, so you just jam it in there before she has a chance to say, "no". You got what you wanted, she's going to have deal with the pain, then, she'll deal with you. We are the wife and congress is the jackass husband.

      IANAL and my wife has started to complain less.

    34. Re:Global Warming by toadlife · · Score: 1

      Constitution? Congress jumped the shark with drug laws decades ago.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    35. Re:Global Warming by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      If I can't be expected to understand the laws as a normal human, then I can't reasonably be expected to follow them either.

      Then what the hell do we have lawyers for? The fact of the matter is that the system is a complex one, and precedent shows there's a certain level of detail that is needed to ensure a law holds up without significant loopholes.

      Maybe once upon a time the full code of laws and common law judgements could be understood by the average educated person, but unless you've got an interest or are law-qualified it's unlikely that the average educated person these days would be able to fully grasp a particular law without some assistance. I'm not suggesting that legislators shouldn't understand at least somewhat more than the average person, but that's what they should have legal staff for, practically speaking.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    36. Re:Global Warming by mmcxii · · Score: 1

      I know many have responded but I must add some and agree with others:

      Yes, I am. Aren't you comfortable using an operating system that's too large for any one person to understand in its entirety?

      Am I more comfortable making a choice while not holding the fate of hundreds of millions in my hands, not even my own? Yes. Am I more comfortable knowing that an OS has to hold to some semblance of mathematical logic? Yes. Am I comfortable knowing that the company I buy the OS from or pay support from is trying to keep me as a customer? Yes. If an Os fails me I can dump it. If legislation fails me and those around me it will be like pulling teeth to get it replaced. Certainly you look at some laws and see them as foolish and/or outdated. Tell me, what's easier? Speaking to the common sense of a nation or replacing a shitty distro?

      We're long past the days when a single human being could understand all the details of our most complex systems. What a single person can do is learn the broad outlines, and look up detailed information as needed. It's called reductionism, and it's the foundation of all progress we've made since Aristotle.

      Ever stop to think that there are some pies that the federal government shouldn't be allowed to paint in wide swaths for the reason that the system is too complex to work efficiently on such a massive scale with a singular set of cumbersome laws? Ever stop to think that if there are so many good individual ideas in there that we should break them down into smaller, more manageable portions that would be easier to recraft if the need arises? It's the foundation of all of modern computing which absolutely kicks Aristotle in the nutsack.

      Each word of that 3,000 page bill has been read thousands of times, even if not by the same person each time. What's wrong with that?

      Ever heard the idiom about the right hand not knowing what the left hand is doing? The massive systems must work in harmony or they will do more damage than good. Wouldn't you agree? Unless you can cover the entire landscape of such legislation you're risking letting huge loopholes take place. Of course, changing them will be a breeze, eh?

      Of course, your response will be that we shouldn't need laws that are that complex in the first place. Well, what do you base that on? Your gut feeling? Modern society is complex. Maybe it needs nuanced and sophisticated laws.

      And what do you base your guess on, pray-tell?

      Have you considered that the people harping about a "3,000 page bill" are the ones who passed the byzantine Medicare Part D system?

      One can not cleanse the self with the sins of someone else.

      That maybe they're exploiting the hysterical reaction some people have to the page count to serve their ulterior interests?

      Ah yes, the assumption is made even more clear... if someone doesn't do the democrat goosestep they must do the republican goosestep. Sorry, I think for myself.

      Besides, you know what would be simpler than the current bill? Single payer.

      I don't believe in universal health care on any level. Ever.

    37. Re:Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could give $300 billion to a crazy black scientist who's developed a material he calls unobtainium and they could build a big drill and go into the center of the planet and plant a couple of nuclear devices... Yeah?

    38. Re:Global Warming by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      And it's only 2000 pages when double spaced large print with giant margins. The senate bill had fewer words than War and Peace.

      Oh wait, I guess the Republicans have a point, nobody's ever read all the way through War and Peace.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    39. Re:Global Warming by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      I don't believe in universal health care on any level. Ever.

      Then you are merely working from your conclusion to your premises.

    40. Re:Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sleek shall inherit the earth?

    41. Re:Global Warming by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Yet we as a society train lawyers to be research librarians first and foremost because the US Code is a CD full of information. Good luck with never running afoul of the law you'll never be able to hold even a decent summary of in your head. BTW, the US already houses more inmates for state and federal crimes as a percentage of population than almost any other country on the planet. Do we really need more reasons to lock people up?

    42. Re:Global Warming by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the US Constitution, which rather plainly state the government has no right to force us to give them data privileged to ourselves and our doctors? I agree.

      Also, you could be stating that providing healthcare coverage isn't regulating interstate commerce and isn't enumerated as a power of the government. I think that's a hard argument to make these days, as that horse left the barn years ago.

    43. Re:Global Warming by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Do you visit a doctor sometimes? Read this 3,000 page orgy of special-interest pork carved from the swine we call taxpayers.

    44. Re:Global Warming by mmcxii · · Score: 1

      I feel this way because of the reasons stated above. There are some basic truths that can not be upheld and have programs like universal health care at the same time. Sorry if you have a problem with that.

    45. Re:Global Warming by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      "There is a world of difference between Law which affects every person in a country, or potentially in the world, without choice and an operating system that a customer chooses to use."

      Thanks, nobody seems to notice that nowadays. I'll cite one of those differences, you (in the 'everybody' meaning) are oblied to know and understand every aspect of the law*. Nobody is oblied to understand an operating system.

      * At least the people that live on countries with European colonisation, that inherited at least in part the Roman law. That is, all of America, Africa, Europe - obviously, most of Oceania and a bit of Asia.

  4. What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by WebManWalking · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's moving East, not South.

    2. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by oldhack · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, what you are saying is that the earth is reversing the polarity of its flux capacitor?

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    3. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      > It's moving East, not South.

      Hmmm.... *BRAIN STRAIN*.... ummm... wouldn't any direction from the north pole be south?

      Aaaah... This is one of these unfunny geeky jokes that I'm not quite geeky enough to get.

      OK OK I fell for it... jokes on me.

      I feel like such a jock now?

    4. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by synaptik · · Score: 5, Informative

      > It's moving East, not South.

      Hmmm.... *BRAIN STRAIN*.... ummm... wouldn't any direction from the north pole be south?

      Since magnetic North does not coincide with true North, then magnetic North can move East by simply circling true North in a counter-clockwise direction, as viewed from above the (true) North Pole.

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    5. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The magnetic pole has never been at the geographic pole for as long as we have been able to chart it, so it's entirely possible for the magnetic north pole to move east without moving south.

    6. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by MadnessASAP · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes but it's okay we just need to realign the neutronium field with a 10 terraquad poloron burst.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    7. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Since magnetic North does not coincide with true North, then magnetic North can move East by simply circling true North in a counter-clockwise direction, as viewed from above the (true) North Pole.

      So wait, magnetic North isn't true North? Magnetic North's nothing but a phony! A big fat phony!

    8. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Magnetic North has been in Canada ever since Canadians invented it. The world owes us a LOT of back royalties for the use of those compasses.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    9. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      The magnetic north pole is also physically a south pole.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    10. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by RobinEggs · · Score: 1

      Since magnetic North does not coincide with true North, then magnetic North can move East by simply circling true North in a counter-clockwise direction, as viewed from above the (true) North Pole.

      Provided magnetic north isn't actually on the north pole, anyway. God knows how we'll figure things out if that ever happens.

    11. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Or north.

      Since where it was before is south of where it is now, it must have moved north.

    12. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how is True North being measured then?

    13. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, with your reasoning, if the north pole moved, it wouldn't move in any direction because north is north.

      Yer dum.

    14. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, man, this is heavy!

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    15. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by azav · · Score: 1

      Either that or they forgot to modulate the frequency.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    16. Re:What, no mention of geomagnetic reversal? by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

      By the rotation axis of the earth.

  5. and the south? by LiquidMind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember reading/hearing in geology (or astronomy? whatever) class that every so-many-thousands of years, the magnetic poles just switch.

    If i'm not just making that up, then this is the first articles of many we'll see...

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
    1. Re:and the south? by hitmark · · Score: 1

      iirc, the switch seems to have been a fairly regular event, going by geological evidence, at least until recently.

      seems its over due, altho i am unsure about the exactly by how much...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    2. Re:and the south? by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Informative

      every so-many-thousands of years, the magnetic poles just switch.

      and traditional compasses are nearly useless during the transition period as the north/south polarity breaks up into mini-poles, which are regional and in constant flux.

    3. Re:and the south? by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Further to the interim multiple poles, other interesting things happen, the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_(astronomy) aurora will appear over those poles, making for interesting light shows, where ever the poles should momentarily settle. The larger problem with momentary pole shift, is solar flares and the ability of radiation from those events to reach to the earth's surface depending upon which temporary pole they align with. So some kind of warning system will be required to reduce human exposure to those very temporary events and possibly the temporary cancellation civil air flights at those regions during those times, if any should coincide.

      It will be interesting to see what impact it gas on migratory birds and what measure will need to be taken to alleviate that impact. Mutation levels in microscopic life will also need to be monitored to pick up upon any dangerous microbe mutations that might have an impact upon people or agriculture.

      Overall it is going to be pretty interesting and any risks involved can be pretty readily minimised with some carefully thought out preparation and planning. On the plus side, you can expect regional tourism to take a major boost should an aurora temporarily settle over a major city, on clear nights you could expect a whole city to spend the next day half awake, aurora parties.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    4. Re:and the south? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does indeed flip every once in a while, but exactly how long passes between flips varies wildly - there have been times when it was about every 400,000 years for millions of years, and times when it flipped every 176,000 years (on average) sustained over several million years. Are we overdue? We don't even know. Certainly it's not too soon for one to happen, but it also wouldn't be terribly surprising if we went another hundred thousand years without a flip.

      And when it does happen, you won't just wake up one morning and have a compass that points south... the field will drop to about nothing at times, and there will be lots of local magnetic poles, before there is again one north and one south pole, at least decades (if not hundreds of years) later. And then we'll have a geographic north (defined by the rotation of the planet) almost exactly opposite of magnetic north, which will be stupid. Which is why it's a good thing compasses will be nearly useless for quite some time beforehand, during which time we can get used to defining north by the spin of the earth instead of the ever-changing magnetic field.

    5. Re:and the south? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It will be interesting to see what impact it gas on migratory birds and what measure will need to be taken to alleviate that impact.

      You mean by the birds? Adaptation and evolution should nail it.

      If you mean by us, we could help by shooting birds that aren't traveling along the correct heading as they fly over Wasilla during the summer.

    6. Re:and the south? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      any risks involved can be pretty readily minimised with some carefully thought out preparation and planning.

      You can't even get everyone to agree on global warming and our not so distant future where we no longer have fossil fuels to rely on. You honestly think we'll have carefully thought out preparation and planning for an event like? More likely mass panic, planes falling out of the sky and robots. Hot, sexy fembots. With beer. It'll be awesome... Wait, what was I talking about? OoOo.... shiny thing...

    7. Re:and the south? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Or, you know, we could just swap N and S on our compasses and continue on.

    8. Re:and the south? by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      I would be willing to put money down that the military has a documented plan for it somewhere. They have plans for tons of scenarios that may or may not happen some day.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    9. Re:and the south? by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      The vatican has just released a statement that their north pole is the one true north pole, and all compasses that point to another north pole should be burned.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    10. Re:and the south? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 FUNNY!

    11. Re:and the south? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      you're a few years late for that joke....

      but thats what you get when you replace the pole with someone from the south. (of germany)

      --
      bickerdyke
    12. Re:and the south? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      There are some things that we could do for ourselves to make the transition easier, but honestly, the whole "monitoring" of the microbes and bird flocks is wholly unnecessary. The pole has switched quite a few times since life arose on this planet. There's been no evidence of mass extinctions along the time frames of the switch. Nature has already proven that it can handle the transition just fine.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    13. Re:and the south? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Be careful with that, elimination of a single species or even a couple of hundred is not a mass extinction, also we are global now, so a mutation in one area will travel to another, so localised species elimination is no longer local and now becomes a global problem. As for the birds, providing food and shelter for lost and confused birds, to avoid to many dead birds scattered in public places, is a logical thing to do.

      Something is bound to crop up and planning and preparing for it help to prevent a problem getting out of control and monitoring is about establishing global protocols, so when playing with probabilities of 1 in a million and you have billions of microbes, you do pick up that rare but inevitable outbreak.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  6. How convenient by SlothDead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is actually pretty cool that this happens at the time our technology is so advanced that we can have electronic compasses that simply use GPS to figure out where they are so they can point to the geographic north pole, instead of towards the magnetic one. Imagine how inconvenient it would have been for people if this had happened a view hundred years earlier; they would have to do some extra calculations to navigate their ships.

    Yay for technology!

    1. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does a GPS device know which way it's facing without a magnetic compass? Please enlighten me.

      Or do you simply mean that with both GPS and a compass, they can automatically correct for geographic north?

    2. Re:How convenient by RobVB · · Score: 4, Informative

      GPS can determine heading in two ways.

      The first way only works if the GPS receiver is moving, in which case it can calculate a course based on your current and previous positions. This course is then approximately your heading - although it can include a pretty large error due to drift (when in a ship or an airplane).

      The second way only works if you have two (or more) GPS receivers a reasonable distance away from each other (say, fore and aft or port and starboard on a large enough ship, or in the tips of the wings of an airplane). Then the GPS device has two positions, and the line through them is your heading (if they're placed fore and aft) or your heading + or - a constant angle (for example, + or - 90 degrees if they're places port and starboard).

      --
      I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
    3. Re:How convenient by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Triangulation based on the fact that the position of the satellites it's getting it's signal from are known.

      On the other hand, even if we didn't have GPS, we've had gyrocompasses for a long long time now. And they don't rely on magnetic fields whatsoever.

    4. Re:How convenient by JaWiB · · Score: 1

      My handheld GPS also has a built-in compass.

    5. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't find the orientation of a single GPS device using GPS triangulation. That only gives you your position. Rotating your device will not affect the signals that you get from GPS satellites (which is just a time).

    6. Re:How convenient by RobVB · · Score: 4, Informative

      If it works when you're standing still (and you can confuse it with a magnet), it's probably a fluxgate compass.

      --
      I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
    7. Re:How convenient by QuoteMstr · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's also the gyrocompass, which finds true north, and which doesn't depend on the earth's magnetic field. It'd work on Mars.

    8. Re:How convenient by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Mostly correct, as long as the device has only one antenna. However a device with two can.

      Assume you have a spherical cow with antennas attached to it's head (A) and tail (B).

      As long as the distance between A&B is greater than twice the error margin for your GPS receiver, taking a reading from both gives you your orientation. More antenna or a greater distance between A&B equals more accuracy.

      Granted, as the commenter previous to my original comment indicated, you need a large cow for this, it's not going to be implemented in your hiking/hand held GPS. But it is something that's used in vessels (ships, aircraft, and I wouldn't be surprised if some types of commercial or military vehicles used this method).

      I do apologize though, I made a poor attempt at explaining that previously.

    9. Re:How convenient by RobVB · · Score: 4, Informative

      I highly doubt a handheld GPS would have an inbuilt gyrocompass. Those things need constant power to keep the gyroscope from slowing down, and if the power fails you have to recalibrate it, for which you need to know your exact heading. Which is why, on ships, they usually have their own backup power source (usually a battery) in case the main and backup power generators are down.

      That, and they're pretty big and heavy. They even get their own room (I also linked to this page in another post about gyrocompasses I made a few minutes ago):

      Almost every naval vessel and merchant ship today carries at least one master gyrocompass, installed in its own gyro room.

      --
      I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
    10. Re:How convenient by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      Interesting link. Thanks!

    11. Re:How convenient by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Plus, even if it used the magnetic compass, software updates could tell the software how to compensate.

    12. Re:How convenient by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      GPS can determine heading in two ways.

      false

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neat! How does this gyrocompass actually find true North all on its own? It must be very smart to know where the Earth's axis is actually located.

      Somehow, I rather think that gyrocompass needs to be aligned using something. A mag compass perhaps? Astro observation? GPS? Maybe magic wand?

    14. Re:How convenient by hitmark · · Score: 1

      while gps can tell you where you are, it cant tell where north is, unless i have misunderstood the system.

      at least not as long as your standing still. Tho if you move in some direction, it can tell you on what axis the change was, and calculate north based on that.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    15. Re:How convenient by RobVB · · Score: 1

      I appreciate your lengthy argumentation, but the link you posted is about speed determination, not heading.

      It does say something about GPS trackpoints being inaccurate with an irregular error, meaning you can't calculate an accurate speed from this data. This also means you can't calculate a very accurate heading from it, which is true, but doesn't make my previous statement false. I never said anything about accuracy, just that it can be done.

      --
      I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
    16. Re:How convenient by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      If you read any of the links that have been provided, they explain how it works. Hint: 'True North' is the 'top' of the axis that the Earth itself spins on.

    17. Re:How convenient by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      OK, so it can do it in three ways.

      It can probably also do it in a lot of additional ways, like throwing it out of the window and then wait to see if the north / south / west / east window is mentioned as broken in the police report.

    18. Re:How convenient by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Granted, as the commenter previous to my original comment indicated, you need a large cow for this

      Your cow would need to be about 30 meters long to get decent nose to tail pointing accuracy.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    19. Re:How convenient by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Hmm. perhaps we have a units issue with our cow? Or have I missed something?

    20. Re:How convenient by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      They must average the hell out of the measurements. Their stated accurtacy using DGPS is 2-3m.

      I did a simple calculation: 3m error, typically you want to get the error below 10%, so that means multiply by 10. Hence a 30m cow.

      Now if you moved the cow and averaged over time, then the error would become smaller and you can shrink your cow.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    21. Re:How convenient by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      The second way only works if you have two (or more) GPS receivers a reasonable distance away from each other (say, fore and aft or port and starboard on a large enough ship, or in the tips of the wings of an airplane). Then the GPS device has two positions, and the line through them is your heading (if they're placed fore and aft) or your heading + or - a constant angle (for example, + or - 90 degrees if they're places port and starboard).

      You can get the same effect with multiple antennas attached to one GPS receiver.
      As an added bonus, it'll make your receiver resistant to GPS spoofing.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    22. Re:How convenient by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, or, to me, the 80 second start up implies that it's not the receiver that's moving...

      No real knowledge here, but if you have to know where the satellites are to a reasonable degree of accuracy already, and you are doing it the 'traditional' method of looking them up in a large almanac type database that stores their orbits, then knowing where they are in a few seconds (in relation to you) should tell you your heading.

    23. Re:How convenient by symbolset · · Score: 1

      They're getting smaller.

      Yeah, I know... it still needs GPS feeds and has a magnetic sensor. It does have accellerometers for pitch and roll and you should be able to rig something up that didn't use magnetism. It's still pretty cool. They're doing some amazing stuff with MEMS these days.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    24. Re:How convenient by RJFerret · · Score: 1

      GPS can determine heading in two ways.

      Actually a GPSr could also determine heading a third way, from Doppler shift. That is how speed is calculated (and doesn't require an accurate fix).

      However I know from experience both a Garmin eTrex and 60cs (with the sensors turned off) do it from positional changes.

      The problem with your second suggestion of lining up two receivers is this quote, "A man with a a GPSr knows where he is, a man with two GPSrs is lost." Put the same make/model/software units side by side and they will read amazingly different locations. Here's a plot of dozens of GPSr readings of a National Geological Survey benchmark--and that was at a beach with clear skies and fabulous accuracy!

    25. Re:How convenient by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      they would have to do some extra calculations to navigate their ships.

      Like figuring declination?

    26. Re:How convenient by SlothDead · · Score: 1

      Since you are the second one who did not understand what I meant I guess it's my fault for not being clear enough. I wasn't talking about "Figure out where North is from looking at your GPS device without using any tricks like moving".

      What I meant is that knowing your exact location will allow you to correct the (magnetic) compass reading to figure out where the geographic north pole is. A couple hundred years ago people only needed to do these tedious calculations when sailing close to the poles. What I was imagining is a world where the magnetic poles are so far off that you would have to do the correction no matter where you are.
      This is where technology comes in: By using GPS in ADDITION to the technology we already have (compasses) we can have an "electronic compass" that has a needle pointing to the geographic pole. So instead of doing calculations by hand you just have a look at your device where a needle graphic shows you the way to go.

      If you ask for technical details: Since the newer iPhones will have a (magnetic) compass inside (or so I heard) you could write an app that does the coordinate transformation for you, having it display an old fashioned compass where the needle wiggles a bit when you shake it before returning to pointing north and use that app to show it off at parties, triggering dialogs like "See, the cool thing about this compass is that it actually points to the geographic pole instead of the magnetic one!" "the whtat???!!" "Uhm, never mind".

      (Of course, all this speculation is just for entertainment purpose, since the magnetic pole is still close enough to the geographic one so that we can just rely on our old magnetic compasses)

    27. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A gyro compass doesn't have to be that big. I was on a Finnish merchant vessel (120 metres long, about 5000 tonnes, perhaps 10 years old) and extracted the signal from the gyro compass to a satellite antenn. The gyro compass was located in the bridge and it's size was about 0.4 x 0.4 x 0. 3 m (width x height x depth).

    28. Re:How convenient by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1

      If you can't track a position that's accurate to within a relatively small tolerance, you cannot derive an accurate heading from it.

      As a devil's advocate experiment, I'm going to determine the accuracy of the heading of a pair of GPS receivers (assuming a +/- 8m accuracy) mounted on the fore and aft of a supertanker (379m long).

      Since the worst case scenario for determining the heading is that one is fully 90 degrees left of travel and the other is 90 degrees right of travel, we basically have a giant pair of right triangles that describe the error. The dimensions of the triangles end up being 8m, 189.5m, and 189.669m.

      Unless I've totally fucked up my trigonometry from decades of disuse, I end up with a maximum error of 2.417 degrees, so the average error is probably about 1 degree. I suspect that for voyages of thousands of kilometers, that's a significant error.

    29. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they do NOT calculate your position twice and tell you the difference. With the cheap GPS you find in a cell phone, that would be remarkably inaccurate, especially at walking speed. Mine can tell me how fast i'm going very accurately, though my heading will be off by 15 degrees divided by my speed in kilometers per hour.

      The GPS satellites transmit at known wavelengths. GPS devices can use doppler to calculate their speed very accurately.

    30. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to learn how to use stars for navigation. Advances in technology has made humans weak and stupid.

    31. Re:How convenient by mce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The first "problem" with your calculation is that you are assuming a 10m worst case error, while for the kind of application you describe more expensive and accurate (e.g. dual-frequency) receivers would be used. Also, SBAS would be used whenever available, making the worst case errors even smaller and less likely to occur (good DGPS systems can reach 0.1m accuracy). Not to mention that at sea one always has open sky conditions, so no canopy or multipath problems (provided the antennae are mounted in a suitable location on the ship, obviously).

      The second problem is that you calculate the average error as being half of your calculated maximum error. This is wrong in two ways: first, your maximum error calculation is symmetrical, meaning that even by your crude method of averaging, the average would be 0; second, the calculation of the average error needs to take the probability of each value into account and the smaller errors are more likely than the extreme ones.

      The third problem is that you assume the worst case error to be constant over the duration of that "voyage of thousands of kilometers", which is totally unrealistic. A real-world GPS system maintains a history of past positions and uses this to correct for instantaneous errors.

      The fourth problem is that in the application you describe, the two antennae are located at a known and unchangeable distance from each other. This means that their physical movements are correlated and hence that the system has extra information at its disposal that it can use to detect physically impossible combinations of positional errors. The more extreme the errors, the more likely they are to be flagged as being suspect. This again can be used as input to the GPS system's calculations.

      Anyway, no sailor worth his or her salt relies on a single source of positioning data. Certainly not for a "voyage of thousands of kilometers".

    32. Re:How convenient by mce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I forgot a fifth problem: because the two antennae are only 379m apart, they would both face the same atmospheric/ionospheric errors. So it is highly unlikely that the antenna on the bow of the ship would see a worst case error in one direction and the one on the stern would see a worst case error in exactly the opposite direction. More likely, they would both be offset by roughly the same distance in roughly the same direction. This means that while the reported position of each might be off be a few meters, the ship's heading calculated from comparing both positions would be much closer to the true heading.

    33. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually GPS does a really crappy job of finding the true north (or south) pole. Since most of the GPS satellites are concentrated away from the poles, the angles to GPS satellites are very shallow near the poles. This leads to a very bad estimate in those locations. SBAS systems and pseudolites can greatly increase accuracy, but if your GPS doesn't support these, good luck finding santa.

    34. Re:How convenient by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      This sixth problem is that if you have GPS, for voyages of thousands of kilometers you're not just going to pick a heading and stick with it anyway (plus you'll need to adjust the heading to compensate for things like drift anyway). But the real issue is that he took it away from the mission statement which was "how do you determine a heading with a GPS?" when compasses don't work, not "how do you navigate thousands of kilometers with a GPS?" (which is pretty trivial)

    35. Re:How convenient by Agripa · · Score: 1

      As long as the distance between A&B is greater than twice the error margin for your GPS receiver, taking a reading from both gives you your orientation. More antenna or a greater distance between A&B equals more accuracy.

      Just measure the carrier phase difference to each satellite using pairs of closely spaced antennas. If you know your location and the satellite locations, then the two closely spaced receive antennas have to be at a specific orientation to generate the measured phase differences. This could be done using simple FM demodulation of each carrier and a Roanoke type of radio direction finder design but I suspect it would be easier to just make sure the carrier phase information is not discarded in the receiver and do the processing digitally. Survey GPS units use carrier phase measurements for more accurate location measurements.

  7. Russia is not that bad they just lunched D-12!! by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Russia is not that bad they just lunched D-12!!

  8. A relative look at scale: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this comes out to be 4.81872031 inches per minute.

  9. The poles are flipping? by MickDownUnder · · Score: 4, Informative

    This article covers it...

    http://scienceblogs.com/highlyallochthonous/2009/02/is_the_earths_magnetic_field_a.php

    I've heard it from several sources though, they have geological proof that the earths magnetic field has been periodically flipping and reversing its polarity, and that it does this at periodic intervals, and that we are in fact due for a flip any millenia now.

    1. Re:The poles are flipping? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      they have geological proof that the earths magnetic field has been periodically flipping and reversing its polarity, and that it does this at periodic intervals, and that we are in fact due for a flip...

      Are you sure they weren't talking about politicians?
           

    2. Re:The poles are flipping? by MickDownUnder · · Score: 5, Funny

      I said "millenia" not "millisecond"

    3. Re:The poles are flipping? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Will make navigation sort of hard with a compass.. "North, well its sort of in that direction, kind of...."

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:The poles are flipping? by RobVB · · Score: 4, Informative
      This is why the International Maritime Organisation has agreed on the following rules (taken from SOLAS chapter V (Safety Of Life At Sea):

      2.5 All ships of 500 gross tonnage and upwards shall, [...] have:
      .1 a gyro compass, or other means, to determine and display their heading by shipborne non-magnetic means [...]
      .2 a gyro compass heading repeater, or other means, to supply heading information visually at the emergency steering position if provided;
      .3 a gyro compass bearing repeater, or other means, to take bearings [...]

      Gyrocompasses are useful for many other reasons: they point to true north instead of magnetic north, which means you don't have to correct for magnetic declination (the difference between true north and magnetic north) and magnetic deviation (the difference between compass north and magnetic north, an error caused by local magnetic influences such as the steel in a ship's construction). They can also give your heading digitally, which means you can connect repeaters to it, and autopilots etc. can use its output.

      From

      this page:

      Almost every naval vessel and merchant ship today carries at least one master gyrocompass, installed in its own gyro room. A transmission system links the master gyrocompass to "repeaters." These are used on the ship for such purposes as steering, position finding, and course recording.

      --
      I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
    5. Re:The poles are flipping? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1
      1. Nobody uses the earth's magnetic field for navigation these days.
      2. The magnetic reversal, when it happens, will not be sudden. The dipole moment of Earth's magnetic field will gradually become less prominent, and quadropole (and higher-order) moments will strengthen. Gradually.
      3. Even without magnetism and modern technology, astronomical observations can provide a heading.
    6. Re:The poles are flipping? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Informative

      A lot of pilots use the earth's magnetic field for navigation. When flying around under visual flight rules in an analog cockpit (which make up the majority of general aviation aircraft), the magnetic compass backs up the gyro-based heading indicator. Every 15-20 minutes, the heading indicator is realigned with the compass heading when in straight and level, unaccelerated flight due to the effects of precession, making that magnetic field very important. Even in a glass cockpit, the FAA requires a backup magnetic compass in case of computer or electrical failure.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    7. Re:The poles are flipping? by RobVB · · Score: 1

      The problem with astronomical observations is that you need a precise time, though.

      --
      I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
    8. Re:The poles are flipping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody uses the earth's magnetic field for navigation [wikipedia.org] these days.
      Tell that to pilots who have lost electrical systems (meaning GPS and other radios are gone) in air. BTW, "Nobody" is a helluva lot of people and is probably more than a bit of hyperbole.

      The magnetic reversal, when it happens, will not be sudden. The dipole moment of Earth's magnetic field will gradually become less prominent, and quadropole (and higher-order) moments will strengthen. Gradually.
      Which, in some ways,is even worse since the error isn't noticed until things are whacked. Little errors can cause really bad things to happen.

      Even without magnetism and modern technology, astronomical observations [wikipedia.org] can provide a heading.
      Except during the daytime out in the oceans where you need accurate clocks to know where you are (remember, you nixed modern technology like accurate chronometers).

    9. Re:The poles are flipping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love astro-head! Put some peanut butter on your taint/ass and get ready for the best rimjob of your life!!!

    10. Re:The poles are flipping? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      AIUI, precise timekeeping is only needed for longitude. Can't you find your latitude and heading by looking at the north star? (The elevation of the north star above the horizon is equal to your latitude.)

    11. Re:The poles are flipping? by RobVB · · Score: 1

      Well, yes. If you're one of those types that never leaves the Northern hemisphere.

      --
      I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
    12. Re:The poles are flipping? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      The other hemisphere? But there be dragons on them antipodes. :)

    13. Re:The poles are flipping? by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      A lot of good alternative navigation will get us when the magnetosphere collapses and the suns radiation kills us all.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    14. Re:The poles are flipping? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the Southern Cross work the same way in the southern hemisphere?

    15. Re:The poles are flipping? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Funny

      Although "any millisecond now" *is* technically valid. :)

    16. Re:The poles are flipping? by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      Not quite - it's not over the pole directly, so it moves, but it's fairly easy to use it to approximate south. See Wikipedia for more info.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    17. Re:The poles are flipping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the flip occurs, anything that uses magnetism for braking/deceleration will probably accelerate instead?

    18. Re:The poles are flipping? by khallow · · Score: 1

      AIUI, precise timekeeping is only needed for longitude.

      Which you usually need to know.

    19. Re:The poles are flipping? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      AIUI, precise timekeeping is only needed for longitude. Can't you find your latitude and heading by looking at the north star? (The elevation of the north star above the horizon is equal to your latitude.)

      +/- 23 degrees, depending on the time of year.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    20. Re:The poles are flipping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No dragons just four toed monsters

    21. Re:The poles are flipping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and that it does this at periodic intervals, and that we are in fact due for a flip any millenia now."

      Except it isn't "periodic". The duration of the normal or reversed periods can span from a few thousand years to millions -- it has a VERY high variance (orders of magnitude). Heck, in the Cretaceous Quiet Zone, the field went for tens of millions of years without a reversal (or if there were any, they were very brief). This is why anyone who says they can predict the timing of the next reversal based on their frequency does not know what they are talking about.

    22. Re:The poles are flipping? by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      ...and if it's not daylight or cloudy.

    23. Re:The poles are flipping? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Stars work as can, for much travel, road signs, maps, satellite GPS, and even GPS-like information from towers such as cell phone towers. Triangulate your position from multiple sources. If we have trouble maintaining one big natural global reference point, why wouldn't we invest in many more local reference points than we have now?

    24. Re:The poles are flipping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and you should have said "millennium" since you were only referring to only *one* particular thousand year span at a time.
      And now you've made the same mistake twice in one thread =)

      I forget, does Godwin apply to grammar nazis like myself?

  10. This explains by failedlogic · · Score: 2, Funny

    This explains why paper notes I've left on my fridge with magnets keep sliding down. So in this conspiracy, the magnetic reversal is the blame of either the Russians or the makers of sticky note paper.

    1. Re:This explains by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      This explains why paper notes I've left on my fridge with magnets keep sliding down. So in this conspiracy, the magnetic reversal is the blame of...

      I kinda expect that. But when they start sliding up is the time to panic.
           

    2. Re:This explains by mkrup99 · · Score: 1

      DON'T PANIC -- Printed in large, friendly letters

  11. A relative look at scale in real-world numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Earth's north magnetic pole is racing toward Russia at almost 40 miles (64 kilometers) a year due to magnetic changes in the planet's core, new research says. - National Geographics

    So it's NOT 40 miles, it's 64 km.

    64 km / 365.25 days = 175.2224503764545 meters per day, 7.300935432352271 meters per hour, 12.16822572058712 cm per minute, 20.28037620097853 mm per second.

    That's 2.3 centimeters per second. Forget global warming, it's the Earth axis that's moving and screwing everything. On Christmas day, snow was fucking MELTING over here and we're way up north. Melting snow used to be for the beginning of march.

    2012. Galaxy/universe pole shift. It's happening, wether we understand it or not.

    1. Re:A relative look at scale in real-world numbers by BSAtHome · · Score: 1

      I think that you are off by a magnitude: 64*10^6mm/(pi*10^7)s ~ 2.03 mm/s

      more accurately: 64*10^6/(365.25*3600*24) ~ 2.028 mm/s

  12. The Core by IonOtter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Alright, who fired D.E.S.T.I.N.I.?

    --
    [End Of Line]
  13. Moving to Russia from Canada by WoodenTable · · Score: 4, Funny

    As a Canadian, I feel there's only one rational response to the Russians taking our magnetic north pole (which is sort of owned by the whole of humanity and indeed the planet itself, but has been held in our trust for some time).

    All out nuclear war.

    And the only downside is nuclear winter! Winter! We can handle a few more months of that each year, easy. It's win-win, really!

    1. Re:Moving to Russia from Canada by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      You only say that because you haven’t got any non-winter months in the first place! ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    2. Re:Moving to Russia from Canada by selven · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, I think summer falls on a Thursday this year.

    3. Re:Moving to Russia from Canada by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      The global warming and nuclear winter will counteract each other.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:Moving to Russia from Canada by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If only we had some nuclear weapons.

    5. Re:Moving to Russia from Canada by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      You only say that because you haven’t got any non-winter months in the first place! ^^

      Sure we do. Mosquitoes, ticks and construction!

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  14. What about the South Pole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Please help this simpleton to understand.

    North pole shifts towards Russia, how about the South pole?

    It takes two to tango, right?

    So, does the South pole shift as well? To where?

    A sincere thank from this simpleton for anyone who can help out !

    1. Re:What about the South Pole? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 4, Informative

      So, does the South pole shift as well?

      Yes.

      To where?

      Antarctica isn't divided up into countries, so it's moving from Antarctica to Antarctica*. That's like saying it's gone from the middle of nowhere (with penguins) to also the middle of nowhere (with penguins): there's just no way of making that an attention grabbing story, despite the penguins.

      *To be technical, magnetic South is near the edge of the sea ice rather than on the continent, which means it's moving from a really cold bit of ocean to another, slightly less cold bit of ocean. While that does entail more penguins, it's still not that interesting.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:What about the South Pole? by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot; we're all about penguins here!

    3. Re:What about the South Pole? by pnewhook · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Actually to confuse things further, the magnetic north pole is physically a 'south' pole, and vice versa.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    4. Re:What about the South Pole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Penguins, you say. Would they be African or European?

    5. Re:What about the South Pole? by sarlos · · Score: 1

      Dooby-dooby-doo... Beware the penguins... o.O http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVWtq-_VYk8

      --
      Government's view of the economy: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving,regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it.
  15. An Inconvenient Proof by ShakaUVM · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's 2.3 centimeters per second. Forget global warming, it's the Earth axis that's moving and screwing everything. On Christmas day, snow was fucking MELTING over here and we're way up north. Melting snow used to be for the beginning of march.

    Don't be ridiculous. We have humans now on the planet, AND the magnetic core is shifting. Coincidence? I think not.

    If we plot C02 emissions alongside the rate of change of the magnetic north pole, even a 5th grade could see they're correlated.

    Humans are to blame for magnetic drift.

    QED.

    1. Re:An Inconvenient Proof by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Funny

      George Bush called. He wants credit for this one, too.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:An Inconvenient Proof by khallow · · Score: 1

      If we plot C02 emissions alongside the rate of change of the magnetic north pole, even a 5th grade could see they're correlated.

      Humans are to blame for magnetic drift.

      I'll fire up my SUV to help. We need to take the Magnetic North Pole away from the vile Canadians.

    3. Re:An Inconvenient Proof by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>George Bush called. He wants credit for this one, too. /slaps own forehead

      Right! Damn, I forgot to add Bush into my proof.

      Bush is ALWAYS a valid reason for any negative conclusion.

      Forgetting to add Bush as a cause to any effect is worth a full letter grade deduction on a proof.

    4. Re:An Inconvenient Proof by QuoteMstr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is it really necessary to politicize even the purest scientific discoveries, and to turn even the slightest enrichment of our collective knowledge into an opportunity for a fleeting partisan jab?

      Merry Christmas to you too.

    5. Re:An Inconvenient Proof by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      How long before you get your Oscar and Nobel Peace Prize.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    6. Re:An Inconvenient Proof by pnewhook · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey! Don't make us start charging for all that free compass use we've been graciously letting you have.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    7. Re:An Inconvenient Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiot

    8. Re:An Inconvenient Proof by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Is it really necessary to politicize even the purest scientific discoveries, and to turn even the slightest enrichment of our collective knowledge into an opportunity for a fleeting partisan jab?

      Next you'll be telling me the increase of temperature on Mars isn't due to the 6-wheeled SUVs we've been flooding the planet with.

    9. Re:An Inconvenient Proof by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      You know, seasonal changes make it more difficult to tell what's going on with the climate. Clearly we need to eliminate the Earth's axial tilt. With a properly constructed world-spanning metallic rail, we can induce an electric current from the solar wind that will create a torque force, rotating the Earth to 0 inclination! As long as we take a few thousand years to do it, lifeforms should have time to adapt. Plus, the difference between when any given person is born and dies will be small enough that no old geezers will complain that winter ain't as cold as it used to be.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    10. Re:An Inconvenient Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, ok. Will carbon credit do ?

    11. Re:An Inconvenient Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not just the magnetic north pole and CO2 and global warming. This article clearly shows how pi has been changing over time.

      http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0903/0903.5321v1.pdf

  16. Canada! by headkase · · Score: 1

    As a Canadian I hope we do not lose the national treasure of having the Pole anytime soon!

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:Canada! by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better keep an eye out for Carmen Sandiego.

  17. It's time for war! by Inominate · · Score: 1

    We cannot allow a magnetic pole gap!

  18. North, South and Reversal by DynaSoar · · Score: 5, Informative

    TFA is only about north. South is moving also, but not nearly as much. Two magnetic poles are not a rigid dipole. Maybe in the core, but at the surface they're fairly independent. Given this, it's quite possible that past geomagnetic events were not 'reversals' with north and south sliding past each other and popping out the other side. Rather north and south might wander far enough out of opposite that the Earth's external magnetic field is far off center, and/or very strong over some parts but weak over others. Conceivably they could 'collapse' by becoming too close. The magnetic field would appear to go away although the generator (and whatever drives it) is still operating. I think this makes more sense than the direct reversal in that it assumes the generator to stop operating, which I find unlikely, and start again of its own accord, which smacks of a planetary "and then a miracle occurs". The data does support this hypothesis as being at lest possible. In 2005 magnetic north of 500 miles from true north, while magnetic south was 1750 miles from true south. Either the dipole is off center, which contradicts the generator idea, or the dipole is bent.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:North, South and Reversal by TheEvilOverlord · · Score: 0

      Conceivably they could 'collapse' by becoming too close. The magnetic field would appear to go away

      I really hope not. We'd fry and so would the communication satellites if the magnetosphere vanished...

    2. Re:North, South and Reversal by Drethon · · Score: 0

      Do magnetic fields get bent?

    3. Re:North, South and Reversal by PieSquared · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't be ignorant. We know for a fact that geomagnetic reversals (including a period of dozens to hundreds of years without a significant magnetic field) happen several times every million years. They are not accompanied by mass extinctions. Therefore, we would not fry. Maybe the incidence of skin cancer would increase by an order of magnitude, and perhaps the amount of atmosphere lost to the solar wind would be above average for a while, but that's about the worst of it.

      Satellites are of course another story, but our magnetic field is not the only thing between the inhabitants of the earth and instant baking in the solar wind.

      --
      Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
    4. Re:North, South and Reversal by dissy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do magnetic fields get bent?

      Yes actually they do.

      The face of the magnetic 'sphere' that is facing the sun (and thus the solar wind and all the magnetically charged particles that come with) push against the magnetic field, so that part of the planet surface sees it much closer inward.

      On the other side of the planet, it gets stretched further from the earths surface, and tapers off towards the end due to the charged particles flowing around it (Think an airplane wing, but in all three dimensions instead of two)

      In fac, it is the flow of these charged particles, starting at the side of our magnetic field facing the sun, that are pushed faster, and end up following the magnetic field and in to the earths pole. This causes the auroras in the sky at the poles.

      If the magnetic field ends up weakening, the field lines could even split and earth would have multiple poles wandering around the surface until two other fields met up and merged later on.
      If that was to happen, the multiple poles would redirect charged particles from space down on more heavily populated areas of the planet and possibly have some health affects on us fragile humans.
      The up side is you will have many auroras at night over many spots on earth.

    5. Re:North, South and Reversal by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      We know for a fact that geomagnetic reversals (including a period of dozens to hundreds of years without a significant magnetic field) happen several times every million years. They are not accompanied by mass extinctions. Therefore, we would not fry.

      Don't you read any scientific journals? http://www.indiadaily.com/editorial/1753.asp

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    6. Re:North, South and Reversal by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Current thinking is not that the generator stops and starts, nor that the poles cross over in the core or even wander along the surface until they flip. The idea is that the dipole field weakens while higher order fields intensify, so we end up with multiple poles all over. Eventually the dipole field strengthens again, with the opposite polarity.

    7. Re:North, South and Reversal by symbolset · · Score: 1

      If you come across a straight one, capture it for me please.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    8. Re:North, South and Reversal by tonique · · Score: 1

      Is "India Daily" a *scientific* journal?

      Certainly, it doesn't look like one!

    9. Re:North, South and Reversal by rockNme2349 · · Score: 1

      it assumes the generator to stop operating, which I find unlikely, and start again of its own accord, which smacks of a planetary "and then a miracle occurs"

      No, I remember when this happened last time. We had to drive a giant drill to the center of the earth and then start the core spinning again with a nuclear bomb, there were lases. I don't remember much, but this definitely already happened once. I'm sure they could go back one more time.

      --
      Sewage Treatment Facilities - "Our duty is clear."
    10. Re:North, South and Reversal by TheEvilOverlord · · Score: 1

      Don't be ignorant.

      Don't misrepresent what I said...

      The GP was talking about a theoretical collapse, which I clearly quoted, not geomagnetic reversals.

  19. And when will we have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an East Pole so that we can have a Western and Eastern Hemisphere?

    1. Re:And when will we have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neysa!

  20. Clearly this is all explained by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Global warming!! After all, it explains everything else...

    1. Re:Clearly this is all explained by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the fact that humans have been removing large amounts of iron from the Earth since 1200 BC. This has been altering the amount left in the Earth's core to the point where it's causing Anthropomorphic Global Magnetic Change (AGMC). Clearly this must stop. We must implement an iron cap and trade in order to reduce the human use of iron so the Earth's magnetic poles won't change. Think of the children. Where is Al Gore?

    2. Re:Clearly this is all explained by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone mod this idiot down; this is the tenth offtopic conservative jab against global warming I've had to scroll past.

    3. Re:Clearly this is all explained by... by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      I would mod him down, but global warming caused my mod points to evaporate.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
  21. Core Flux? by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Like a flux capacitor? Global warming? We're all doomed!

  22. Yeah, it's accelerating, just look at these data! by MathiasRav · · Score: 2, Informative

    40 miles per year? That's a speed, not an acceleration.

  23. Re:Yeah, it's accelerating, just look at these dat by Cwix · · Score: 2, Informative

    It started at 9 miles per year. Source: TFS OR TFA

    --
    You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
  24. Greedy Russians by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    First the Russians tried to claim most of the North Pole by saying it was in their territorial waters. Soon, they're gonna try claiming the magnetic North Pole too.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  25. In Soviet Russia... by MiddleHitter · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, Compass needle points to YOU!

    --
    I don't fear computers, I fear the lack of them. -I. Asimov
  26. Re:It's a usrr supper weapon by Missing_dc · · Score: 1

    It's a usrr supper weapon

    Much like Borscht!

    --
    How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
  27. might not have GPS by r00t · · Score: 4, Informative

    Without a magnetic field to stop the solar wind, satellites tend to die.

    Granted, GPS is military and not LEO, so it might be built a bit better than most.

    1. Re:might not have GPS by hitmark · · Score: 1

      the not next to LEO was a typo, right?

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    2. Re:might not have GPS by r00t · · Score: 1

      no, GPS is mid-level

    3. Re:might not have GPS by pnewhook · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Without a magnetic field to stop the solar wind, satellites tend to die.

      Actually without a magnetic field, and the generated magnetosphere, pretty much all life on earth will die.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    4. Re:might not have GPS by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Odd, since even humans have lived through pole reversals before.

    5. Re:might not have GPS by pnewhook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really? Pole reversals plural??

      How is that since Homo Sapiens only first arrived 195 thousand years ago, mitochondrial eve was 150 thousand years ago, and as far as we cal tell, the last magnetic flip happened 780 000 years ago.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    6. Re:might not have GPS by Nethead · · Score: 3, Funny

      He's confusing it with reverse Polish notation. I remember living through that back in the 80s when I was programming FORTH on a 6502.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    7. Re:might not have GPS by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Our tool making ancestors go back 2-3My, none of them had zinc cream.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    8. Re:might not have GPS by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      Yea, and we need a team of scientist to make a subterranean mole out of unobtainum to restart it again.

      Don't get your science from the movies. It makes you look like a total idiot. Apart from "northern/southern" lights everywhere, and a *few* satellites that are extra sensitive. It will affect close to nothing. Anything that was in the van allen belts will experience even *less* radiation than normal.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    9. Re:might not have GPS by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      It depends on your definition of "human." The human lineage has been around for some three million years.

      Anyway, you're clearly nitpicking because you got caught saying something silly. Clearly "pretty much all life on earth will die" is incorrect since life on Earth has certainly lived through a lot of pole reversals. We don't even find any significant extinction events associated with them.

    10. Re:might not have GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't HP still make RPN calculators?

      I was bought up with RPN - the first calculator the school bought was a HP35.
      I bought one myself a few months later.

    11. Re:might not have GPS by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      No, but they had a lot more hair, just like animals that tend not to get skin cancer.

      They also didn't build a society on technology that will fail without the radiation protection of a magnetosphere.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    12. Re:might not have GPS by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Where is your basis for 'a few'. Satellites in LEO and GEO are not heavily protected from solar flare activity. Many if not all will be fried if the magnetosphere is gone.

      We will also not be protected from solar radiation as much. Special shelters will have to be constructed and skin cancers will go WAY up.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    13. Re:might not have GPS by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      It depends on your definition of "human." The human lineage has been around for some three million years.

      Sure if you want to call our ancestral monkeys 'human'. Typically 'human' refers solely to homo sapien. I don't call that nitpicking. The Neanderthals hadn't even made an appearance yet in the timeframe we are talking about.

      I should clarify. How about without a magnetosphere, a whole shitload of people will die. If the earth gets hit by a solar flare without the protection of the magnetosphere, the radiation will kill a lot of people unless they are protected.

      And what do you base the 'no mass extinction on previous pole reversals from'? No, there wasn't a mass extinction like the dinosaurs as the fossil record clearly shows a big gap in that timeframe. But the fossil records are not complete enough to determine even say a 50% or 70% reduction in the population. The time of the last pole reversal also coincides with the exodus out of Africa for our direct descendants. Maybe that major event in our history were tied to the pole reversal - maybe not. Who knows?

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    14. Re:might not have GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Actually without a magnetic field, and the generated magnetosphere, pretty much all life on earth will die.

      Who the hell modded this "insightful"? it's moronic.

    15. Re:might not have GPS by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, a Republican friend assured me that plants need sunlight so more sunlight = more plants and more food. Also, CO2 is always good.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    16. Re:might not have GPS by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia implies that "human" can and is also used to refer to the genus homo, not just the species and subspecies sapiens sapiens.

      Anyway, you're still making things up. There's no evidence to indicate that we'd even notice a pole reversal except for pretty lights in the sky at latitudes we normally don't see them, and compasses not working so well. If you've got any credible evidence to the contrary, it's time to pony it up.

      PS: "Actually without a magnetic field, and the generated magnetosphere, pretty much all life on earth will die" is pretty hard to translate into "without a magnetosphere, a whole shitload of people will die."

    17. Re:might not have GPS by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      implies that "human" can and is also used to refer to the genus homo, not just the species and subspecies sapiens

      Human: A member of the genus Homo and especially of the species H. sapiens. *Especially*. I doubt that you would find many people who would consider pre-Neanderthals to be 'human'. Maybe human like, but thats about it.

      You're making things up stating that humans have lived for millions of years and have lived through several pole flips without incident. You have no basis for these claims.

      My claim is based on the scientific knowledge of what the radiation from a solar flare will do to someone that has no protection.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    18. Re:might not have GPS by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      We will also not be protected from solar radiation as much. Special shelters will have to be constructed and skin cancers will go WAY up.

      Your still using movies for facts. There is 10 metric tons of atmosphere over every square meter of this planet at sea level. The solar winds, even with a CME will not increase radiation levels down here at all, cus they just don't have the energy. Cosmic rays have the energy to produce showers of secondary particles that can get to sea level.

      Sats are more effected with cosmic rays and while long term exposer to the solar wind will tend to reduce the life of many (and for some it will make little difference at all, and some still are outside anyway), a large CME are still bad news even inside a magnetosphere.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    19. Re:might not have GPS by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      There is 10 metric tons of atmosphere over every square meter of this planet at sea level. The solar winds, even with a CME will not increase radiation levels down here at all, cus they just don't have the energy.

      Do you have a reference to back this up? The atmosphere does provide some protection, but I don't think it is as much as you think. Sure the atmosphere is 1000km think, but even now when you take a flight at 10km up, you are getting the equivalent radiation dose of a medical X-Ray.

      long term exposer to the solar wind will tend to reduce the life of many (and for some it will make little difference at all, and some still are outside anyway)

      There are NO earth orbiting satellites currently outside the magnetosphere. Even GEO satellites are well within the magnetospere boundary. Some satellites in elliptical orbits pass through the Van Allen belts (inside the magnetosphere), but many of these simply turn off their electronics while passing thorough as it is very difficult to shield the electronics.

      The Apollo missions went outside the magnetosphere (obviously). The only reason the astronauts were not killed was because there was no solar flare activity while they were in space. There was a solar flare between the Apollo missions 16 and 17; they now estimate that if the astronauts happened to be in space during that event, they would have absorbed a lethal dose in about 10 hours.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
  28. When I was your age.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    magnetic north pointed north!

  29. Re:Yeah, it's accelerating, just look at these dat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't bother trying to explain the facts to this asshat and his illiterate moderator. This is Slashdot. People rarely pull their head from their ass long enough to learn something. They all think they're too smart for that nonsense.

  30. re: the moving North pole. by Cr0vv · · Score: 1

    Yeah, been saying this for a year + now. There is an intruder in the Solar system that NASA is not talking about (and why would they?) causing this magnetic influence. This, and many more global dots need to be connected to understand the very broad implications this has on Earth. The intruder happens to be a highly magnetic planetary SYSTEM that has been causing the accelerated global changes to the weather and sea level that will lead to a massive global catastrophe. blackcrow.

  31. Re: the moving North pole. by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

    I really can't tell whether you're kidding or not.

  32. Its the American's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the real question is when will they start blaming this shift on the american public?

    1. Re:Its the American's fault by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      They will, like everything else,.blame the Americans for it. They might say something like all of our electronic useage has caused the magnetic drift of the North Pole to Russia. Just like they blame us for global warming, peak oil, and the New World Order that did 9/11 as an inside job, etc.

      At one time the North Pole pointed to the Draco star instead of Polaris, and every few thousands of years the North Pole moves anyway before human beings even learned how to pollute or use fossil fuels or electronics, etc. That is because according to TFA the core of the Earth shifts and it effects the magnetic field.

      Geomagnetic reversal is the key term here that most people are ignorant of, and they always want a scapegoat to blame for their problems anyway. Might as well be us Americans, the cause for all bad things on the planet, eh?

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    2. Re:Its the American's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the magnetic pole and the rotational axis pole aren't related. What they're talking about here has nothing to do with where the rotational axis points.

      Furthermore Draco is a constellation. Thuban is the star that it use to point towards. Maybe in some local colloquialism it's referred to at The Draco Star but I've never seen reference to it.

    3. Re:Its the American's fault by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Yeah Draco's star Thuban was the pole star a few thousand years ago. But during the pole shift it pointed to the Draco constellation instead of the Polaris star in the Ursa Minor constellation.

      I didn't mention rotational axis points did I? I thought I was talking about the magnetic pole and magnetic field? Did you read what I posted, or just skim it and add in words I didn't say for a troll?

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    4. Re:Its the American's fault by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      I didn't mention rotational axis points did I? I thought I was talking about the magnetic pole and magnetic field? Did you read what I posted, or just skim it and add in words I didn't say for a troll?

      Oh, come on, this is what you wrote:

      At one time the North Pole pointed to the Draco star instead of Polaris, and every few thousands of years the North Pole moves anyway before human beings even learned how to pollute or use fossil fuels or electronics, etc. That is because according to TFA the core of the Earth shifts and it effects the magnetic field.

      I'd be embarrassed too if I came up with this mishmash, but I wouldn't defend it with the bluster you did. You were obviously talking about the rotational axis and confusing it with the magnetic one. A rotational axis points at stars. A magnetic pole axis does NOT point at stars, at least not for long, because the magnetic poles are rotating around the true poles just like every other feature on earth. Magnetic poles have nothing to do with Thuban or Polaris. You have to be pretty badly confused to even be mentioning stars when you're talking about magnetic poles.

      They will, like everything else,.blame the Americans for it. They might say something like all of our electronic useage has caused the magnetic drift of the North Pole to Russia. Just like they blame us for global warming, peak oil, and the New World Order that did 9/11 as an inside job, etc.

      You've constructed a nice straw man, but who is suggesting pollution causes magnetic pole reversal? Who's even worrying about where the magnetic poles are anymore? You'll have to explain the basis for that one before it's time to put on your victim hat and start the insufferable Merkin whining that we're all used to.

    5. Re:Its the American's fault by Cr0vv · · Score: 1

      Uh, pollution? Have you heard of climategate? Global warming as per the science-head-bots is a coverup. I's PX as I suggested as an intruder. blackcrow.

    6. Re:Its the American's fault by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I heard of "Climategate" and the massive scientist conspiracy led by archcriminal Al Gore to squeeze science funding research dollars from governments around the world. I totally buy it.

    7. Re:Its the American's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, climate change shit wasn't the issue, it was about magnetic poles, moron.

    8. Re:Its the American's fault by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      No the rotational axis is along the North Geomagnetic Pole not the Magnetic North Pole. You've obviously confused the two.

      Kids are taught to navigate via Polaris but it is not an exact measure of North.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    9. Re:Its the American's fault by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      He had to change the subject so people will forget what I wrote and go for the liberal-baiting climate gate topic/troll instead. This is how someone wins an argument by using a sockpuppet account to change the subject to a flamebait one. People use that on me, when I write a reasonably written post that uses logic and reason and critical thinking to speak about something intelligent yet controversial but interesting.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  33. Re:Yeah, it's accelerating, just look at these dat by Cwix · · Score: 1

    Ahh ok, that does explain alot.

    --
    You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
  34. Re: the moving North pole. by Cr0vv · · Score: 1

    I am absolutely serious, you need to know that. I have a great deal of information on this as it is my all-consuming activity now, between my 2 businesses, singing a new girlfriend. Blackcrow.

  35. What about Santa? by starbugs · · Score: 1

    Will this mean Santa will wear one of those furry Russian hats?

    I always wanted one for Christmas, I think my chances are getting better.

  36. Then think faster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you've had plenty of "time to read or think about" global warming, unless you never learned to read.

  37. Re:Moving east? by Wylfing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've also read postulations that glaciers were not caused by 'ice ages' per se, so much as they were the remains of the north pole ice cap after a shift. I can't find the link right now to the information I found truly interesting (correlation of past poles with existing glaciers) but there's a fair amount of info out there about it. (Some people are correlating it with 2012/doomsday, so be forewarned.)

    Oh good grief. TFA is about movement of the magnetic north pole. This has nothing whatever to do with the axis of rotation of the Earth, or its axial tilt. A wandering magnetic pole isn't going to cause glaciers, or probably any other climatic effect for that matter. A useless compass is about the maximum inconvenience you're likely to encounter. I suspect this "fair amount of info" about glaciation you're referring to is found on the same web sites as the 2012 apocalyptic garbage you seem to believe.

    --
    Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
  38. Re:Moving east? by RobVB · · Score: 1
    As others have said here before, it's the North Magnetic Pole, not the Geographic North Pole where Santa lives.

    In 2001, the North Magnetic Pole was determined by the Geological Survey of Canada to lie near Ellesmere Island in northern Canada at 8118N 11048W. It was estimated to be at 8242N 11424W in 2005.

    --
    I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
  39. I blame Global Warming!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I blame Global Warming!!! ^H^H^H^H^H^H umm, I mean Climate Change

    1. Re:I blame Global Warming!!! by Nutria · · Score: 1

      No, silly. It's George W Bush! Or Dick Cheney. But probably Halliburton. Maybe the coal industry??

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:I blame Global Warming!!! by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      Nope. It's being caused by the LHC.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  40. Some put a supergate in the Solar system and it's by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Some put a supergate in the Solar system and seems like we did not kill all of ORI.

  41. Re:Moving east? by Digicaf · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm bored so I'll throw in. Please don't think I'm condescending. I'm just stuck in a hotel room.

    People often get confused here. What is shifting is the magnetic pole, not the geographic pole. Both the North magnetic and South magnetic poles are shifting at some rate, the northern one moving more rapidly than the southern one. The geographic pole is not at issue here, only the magnetic one. The physical geographic north pole coincides with the rotational axis of the planet which "wobbles" by a known amount (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession)

    The magnetic poles are both effects of some deeper physical process that occurs within the planet. The popular theory at the moment is that the Earth contains an iron core which is rotating rapidly, causing the magnetic field we know and love. It has been sufficiently proven (for a lot of people) that the poles:

    1. Have shifted multiple times throughout history
    2. Are not rigidly dipolar. Meaning that the southern magnetic pole is not directly opposite of the northern magnetic pole.

    You can expect the magnetic poles to shift more rapidly as time goes on until they again stabilize at some point in the future.

    As far as the glacial theory goes, what you've read concerns various theories that the outer crust of the Earth, known as the asthenosphere (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asthenosphere) has shifted rapidly and on a global scale. These shifts would present themselves catastrophically and have massive global effects, such as causing the "then" apparent geographic poles to rapidly move "somewhere else". It should be noted that only the outer crust of the planet would be expected to move (and everything on the crust along with it). The rest of the planet would maintain its previous rotational axis. This theory, while tantalizing, is not widely accepted among most geologists for a number of reasons. Refer to the following for more on that:

    http://survive2012.com/index.php/how-do-poles-shift.html
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_hancock

    I love those theories, they're interesting as heck, but I have to admit the evidence to support them is more than a little thin.

  42. Re:Moving east? by PieSquared · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hooray, what I must assume is deliberate ignorance.

    Look, educate yourself on the difference between the MAGNETIC north pole (the one defined by the magnetic field, probably caused by movement in the molten core of the earth, who's only serious influence on the earth is the direction compasses (including the ones inside a bird's head) point) and the GEOGRAPHIC north pole (the one defined by the rotation of the earth as a whole, which defines the coldest parts of the world).

    The MAGNETIC north pole drifts constantly and flips occasionally (though not what one might call "regularly"). This is not accompanied by any cataclysmic extinction event, and takes place over dozens or even hundreds of years. It did not happen during the Mayan or Egyptian cultures, and unless you think they were sending probes to the mid-Atlantic ridge they were unlikely to even be aware of it much what able to predict it better then modern science (which says the field will probably begin flipping sometime in the next 10 to 200,000 years). The magnetic north pole has no influence over how cold it is in any given place on earth.

    The GEOGRAPHIC north pole doesn't drift appreciably, or flip - ever. If it did flip, the most obvious sign would be that the sun would rise in what we currently think of as the west, and set in what is now the east. Also, all the stuff that got flung into space as the earth stopped spinning suddenly and then started up again in the opposite direction. Or if it happened more gradually, summers and winters would gradually get more extreme until the entire world spent half of every year (as opposed to half of every day) in the sun, and the other half in the shade, at which time the trend would reverse until it came to a rest exactly as it is now but with the sun rising in what was the west and setting in what was the east. Both methods would take similarly ludicrous amounts of energy, and probably kill most large animals and plants.

    --
    Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
  43. Software - a perfect analogy! by mi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First of all, allow me to commend you for the perfect analogy — laws are programs, and law-making is programming... Now, to answer your questions...

    Would you arbitrary limit the Linux kernel to 30,000 lines of code? Who gets to decide what kind of complexity is reasonable?

    Linux kernel is reviewed by thousands of people back and forth all the time. There are automatic tools verifying syntactic and even (rudimentary) semantic correctness. Thousands of "tinderboxes" test any changes for hours every days and report any deviations. The history of changes (diffs) is publicly available at all times, studied and discussed by even more people.

    The two thousands pages of the bill in question has never been read in full by a single person — and when such a feat was undertaken, by the time the hero finished, the bill was already amended to bribe another Senator, etc. No automatic verification tools exist, of course — even a spell-checker would break. The entire country will be the tinderbox — production testing the below alpha-quality software. Oh, and the earlier prototypes (State-wide programs) have been failures...

    And you object to somebody rejecting that software because it is too complex? What happened to coding guidelines, with each function and non-trivial block being carefully commented?

    You? Rush Limbaugh? Based on what metric?

    The metric is very simple — if I can't finish reading (and understanding!) it without somebody "committing" a significant change somewhere, it is too long... The "Senate version" was moved to vote after an all-nigher in the Speaker's office, for crying out loud. All those fancy promises (by the most technically advanced Administration, like, ever, dude) of legislation being posted online for days prior to vote have turned into lies. Unreadable, spaghetti-like code, no testing, and not even code review. Who could possibly object?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by QuoteMstr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Your argument is based on a false dilemma: in your world, either the bill has been read in full by a *single* person, or it's completely unverified. You ignore the possibility that multiple collaborating people could read the bill and together verify its correctness. You're not arguing in good faith.

    2. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by DrLang21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You ignore the possibility that multiple collaborating people could read the bill and together verify its correctness

      I do not accept this possibility. With proper quality control, there is a very careful and thorough review of the entire package before releasing it to production. This review might not go into line by line reviews, but it does go into code reviews and design reviews, verifying that everything has been thoroughly looked at. In addition, there is always the option to quickly amend missed fuck ups later. Law does not have the option to quickly amend fuck ups.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    3. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would be just happy having a chance for anyone other than the writers having a chance to peak at said bill, before it is rushed to vote by people who don't know what is in the bill any more than I do.

      How about a two week public review period before voting on it, so that many eyes have a chance to spot the flaws before irrevocably being instituted as law.

      But hey, I don't expect anything different from a bunch of drunk, check kiting, womanizing, failures who can't run anything, but feels entitled to run everyone else's life, while exempting themselves from all the crap they expect everyone else to live by.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by modecx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about this: Well write a new law: Every bill will be readable for some set period before a vote, but in order for your representative's vote to count, he/she will have to pass a test derived from the law itself! We'll randomly select a number of universities to read the key points of the law, and submit one question each to the congress. A semi-unique test will be generated from a pool of questions for each congress critter, to minimize cheating, and they'll have the entire cool-off duration to study for the test.

      The test will consist of 20 multiple choice questions regarding the key points. If you get seven out of ten correct (a passing C grade in US schools), you get to vote in favor of the bill, otherwise the vote is recorded as negative. Also, each test and representative's grade point average will be posted on the interwebs for all to see.

      This would do several things:

      1) Chiefly, it's going to keep bills short and sweet, and easy to understand.
      2) It's going to force the parties to present reasonably intelligent and up-to-date candidates.
      (fewer ancient career politicians with no understanding of modern issues, for instance)
      3) Reduce or eliminate plausible deniability--if you vote for a bad law, you won't be able to say "golly, I didn't know"

      I think it would work.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    5. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by malkir · · Score: 1

      Actually make politicians...do something? GASP. It's so crazy, it just might work.

    6. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But any real and reasonable review would immediately realize that this bill cannot be paid for by Americans. Not that spending outside of means is anything new for Americans, but this bill is like buying a pacific island when you've defaulted on 2 mortgage payments of your 5 square meter flat and still out of a job.

      It will either destroy medical care by underfunding it, or it will bankrupt America. Probably first the one, then the other.

      If you're suggesting we don't allow democrats to propose unrealistic laws, I'm sure you can asses just how much chance that has. And of course, there's the problem of democrats "gaming" any verification system. Like the CBO for example, which has stated that while it has to follow procedure, it does not think the estimates it was (forced) to give are realistic : the real cost, according to them, is over 10 times what democrats claim it to be. In addition to that, they expect this bill will actually increase the costs of medicare and medicaid programs.

      But this is how democrats govern : Obama has just extended an unlimited loan to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Needless to say, this will crash the economy again. The only reason he might do this is that he believes it will crash the economy only when he's been voted out of office.

      Obama-voters : you owe America a BIG apology.

    7. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The two thousands pages of the bill in question has never been read in full by a single person " WOW. I wonder how the person who wrote the bill, managed to write the whole 2,000 pages with out reading fully what they wrote. Simply amazing :)

    8. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you'd passed the first year of a computer science degree, you'd know that verifying individual parts of a complex system in isolation tells you nothing at all about the system as a whole. Or, in short: Ariane 5 Flight 501.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      All those fancy promises (by the most technically advanced Administration, like, ever, dude) of legislation being posted online for days prior to vote have turned into lies.

      Um, Obama promised that there would be a waiting period before he signed legislation. The legislation has to pass Congress before that happens. Obama has no authority to dictate that Congress wait any amount of time before voting on laws.

      That aside, he HAS broken that promise at least once already, but at least get the facts straight so you can criticize properly.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    10. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe these complex bills should be written as a computer program so the various scenarios can be entered and the result can be returned based on what the bill would say without having to manually guess/interpret.

      For example, enter "Bill is 46. He got laid-off 2 months ago. He lost insurance since he could not afford to continue the increased payments on the former-employer insurance. He was just diagnosed with prostate cancer."

      Many questions rise from this. Will the new health bill continue his coverage even though he can't pay the premiums? Will he get rationed care? Will have to pay out of pocket then file bankruptcy since the costs are too high?

      Even with the current insurance situation, many people worry what their actual costs will end up being after the fact. Will everything be covered? What is excluded? Copays? Coverage caps?

      I feel safer with the estimates from an auto mechanic than I do with health care since you sometimes don't have the luxury of thinking over the costs when it is a life or death matter.

    11. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My proposal has been, for some time, the following:
      1. Any bill must be read aloud in its entirety, by sponsoring/cosponsoring congressmen, before it may be passed into law. This will result in a drastic reduction in the length of bills, and side effects would include removing any claims of "but we didn't know that was in the bill," etc.
      2. Automatic 10-year sunset. For EVERY law. If it isn't important enough to revisit, reread, and reauthorize once a decade, it is probably not important enough to be Federal Law.

      "Ignorance of the law is not an excuse," as the saying goes, but at some point the law becomes so large it it impossible for a single person to know ALL the laws. We are well past that point.

    12. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But this is how democrats govern

      It's how corrupt idiots govern (malicious and incompetent, who'da thunk it?) regardless of what color they paint their lawn signs.

      Medical care in this country is fucked up. This bill isn't going to fix it, the only thing that can possibly fix it is to force Americans to admit that sometimes, people die. Instead we're led by idiot Republicans who whine about pulling the plug and idiot Democrats who line up people who tell sob stories about how they're going to die without someone else paying for their care. We get corrupt Republicans who tell us that private care is SO much better that the government has to pay their donor companies extra over the cost of Medicare for them to offer "Medicare Advantage" plans to old, decrepit customers and corrupt Democrats who pay off their donor pals in pork on this bill.

      I already have my "death panel" (LOL idiot Republicans) do-not-resuscitate order on file with my local hospital. When my MS reaches the point that I can't survive without having to beg the government to pay for it (LOL disability, last SS letter tells me I'll get $400/mo so even when I become a begging cripple the government ain't paying for shit), I'm going to exercise my right to life, and there's nothing that fucktards in either party can do about it.

    13. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by mi · · Score: 1

      We'll randomly select a number of universities to read the key points of the law, and submit one question each to the congress

      I like your idea, but it only moves the problem elsewhere — I wouldn't necessarily trust the universities over the law-makers. The "correct" answer may depend strongly on the question being asked. For example, preparing the questionnaire for the recent Afghan "surge" legislation, a University could ask something like (see? both .edu-links):

      • Do you support killing innocent Afghanis so that Haliburton gets to own a trans-Afghanistan oil pipeline?

      Like it or not, legislating is the job of the elected legislators — we just have to pay more attention to their passing laws, we don't approve of...

      if you vote for a bad law, you won't be able to say "golly, I didn't know"

      Such "not knowing" ought to be a disqualification in itself... If it is not, then the electorate is stupid, not the politician. Relying on some Universities to rephrase the bills into multiple-choice questions is not going to solve the underlying problem... Unfortunately...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    14. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by modecx · · Score: 1

      The "correct" answer may depend strongly on the question being asked.

      See, that's the thing: Were it to actually happen, it's not going to be an evaluative short answer/essay question, unlike your example. It's going to be a multiple choice question based on the facts as they pertain to the proposed legislation. Since we're on the health care reform topic, here's an example or two:

      *The Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill would cost blank over ten years
      a) about three-fiddy
      b) Whatever the congress has in their pockets at the moment
      c) $871 billion
      d) none of the above

      *How will the bill be paid for?
      a) 10% tax on the services of Washington DC male prostitutes
      b) $460 billion in new income taxes
      c) $400 billion in cuts to medicare and medicaid
      d) omg ponies

      Obviously, some fact checking would need to be done, to make sure the questions are legitimate and topical. Make it a feather in the cap of a university/honor society to present a challenging question. Give 'em a plaque or something. A great side effect would be that more eyeballs are looking at the legislation.

      Such "not knowing" ought to be a disqualification in itself... If it is not, then the electorate is stupid, not the politician. Relying on some Universities to rephrase the bills into multiple-choice questions is not going to solve the underlying problem... Unfortunately..

      Yes, you're quite right. It aught to be--but it's not. Unfortunately, this is precisely because the electorate is stupid or lazy, or some combination of the two... If it were possible to solve those problems, the system would tend towards self-correcting... We wouldn't need or want for something like I describe, and that would be ideal. No argument there.

      Anyway, the test really doesn't rephrase anything. The only thing it would do is to measure whether or not the representatives are qualified to make decisions based on their level of knowledge regarding the proposals. Again, it would be ideal if this measurement were to happen at the poles, but it's a crap shoot now. If they don't pass the tests, they will be necessarily ineffectual as representatives, and will likely be replaced at the next election.

      It would attract more well-rounded people to congress. It would also have the effect of shrinking bills to their bare essentials, because they could not hope to pass otherwise. Cutting the cruft out of our laws would be a great service to the public.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    15. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Of course the electorate is largely stupid and lazy. For one, it's made up of people and that's probably enough to assume some stupidity and laziness. For another, if people weren't stupid, lazy, greedy, rude, aggressive slobs we would've never decided we needed a government to protect us from one another and enforce rules of behavior. Problem solved: go somewhere your life can only be affected by smart, friendly, honest, hard-working people.

  44. Re: determining heading by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    The GPS receiver can also calculate heading based on the Doppler velocities (again, assuming that the GPS receiver is moving). This is how many commercial GPS receivers calculate speed (rather than using position differentials, which are noiser over the short term).

  45. Re:Moving east? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The GEOGRAPHIC north pole doesn't drift appreciably, or flip - ever.
    Maybe not but it does exhibit axial precession which has a period of approximately 26,000 years [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axial_precession_(astronomy)"]

  46. Yes. The personal is political. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. The personal is political.
    Or did you miss that mantra of The Left from the 70s?

    That was when The Left gave up being centrist and became openly totalitarian (i.e. their ideology must be ingrated into the total of human activities).

  47. Where is Al Gore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably off conspiring again with the global scientist supermafia you guys uncovered, remember?

  48. superconductors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one thing i've noticed is once a society gets organized it doesn't take long for tech to go exponential. I wouldn't be surprised if the timeline of pole flips of the past matched up with times when dinosaurs or whatever reached a point where they had superconductors and whatnot and as a side effect messed with the earth's dynamo.

  49. 2012.. poles flip.. Canary Islands landslide by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    Uh oh...

    This oughta keep all our psychic friends happy..

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  50. I love how the dynamo theory is taken as fact. by earls · · Score: 1

    Reproduction... meh... not going so well.

  51. Re:Moving east? by zindorsky · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've also read postulations that glaciers were not caused by 'ice ages' per se, so much as they were the remains of the north pole ice cap after a shift.

    Umm ... Are you aware that the reason it's cold at the poles has nothing to do with the earth's magnetic field, but rather the weaker intensity of sunlight at high latitudes? Were you sick on that day in third grade?

    It's a particularly interesting topic if you look at the archaeological records of our past; specifically, the polar relation/geographic locations of Egyptian, Mayan, and other ancient peoples' religious/whatever sites. They seem to predict a pole shift, or at least make subtle suggestion to one occurring in the past.

    The last geomagnetic reversal took place 780,000 years ago. So, bzzt, no.

    Please turn in your geek card on the way out.

    --
    If the geiger counter does not click, the coffee, she is not thick.
  52. Ouch!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apt. off topic. But, apt.

  53. Not good for Russia by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

    IIRCC the magnetic poles of the Earth are sort of "weak spots" in the magnetosphere's protection against cosmic rays and charged particles from the sun, evidenced by the Auroras. If the pole moved over Russia won't that cause possible radiation/EMI issues?

    1. Re:Not good for Russia by heidaro · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a resident of the Arctic I can say that all electrical and communication equipment works fine, even during a solar wind. I think it was in 2003 or so when a pretty big solar wind hit the Earth and all the doomsayers were going on about it but nothing happened, nothing at all. We did get a lovely aurora borealis display though!

  54. Re:Moving east? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The GEOGRAPHIC north pole doesn't drift appreciably, or flip - ever. If it did flip, the most obvious sign would be that the sun would rise in what we currently think of as the west, and set in what is now the east.

    Second most obvious sign. The first most obvious sign would be the kinetic energy of the shift ripping the Earth apart. IOW, it ain't going to happen barring some uberaliens or the Hand Of God adding that amount of energy to the system. You're in Velikovsky territory with *physical* pole shifts.

  55. Shouldn't that be iron? by DougF · · Score: 1

    "Geologists think Earth has a magnetic field because the core is made up of a solid iron center surrounded by rapidly spinning liquid rock...

    Last I knew, the Earth's core was made up of two parts, solid iron surrounded by liquid iron and sulphur, and the spinning outer iron & sulphur core is what generates the Earth's magnetic field, not rock.

    --
    Impetuous! Homeric!
  56. Re:It's a usrr supper weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USSR.

  57. Very strong evidence by mister_playboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The largest body of evidence for this is found in the striping of the ocean's floor. In the areas where rock material moves up from the mantle and solidifies, the molten rock aligns with the current magnetic field before it cools, and this alignment cannot be changed once the rock becomes solid. The entire ocean floor is banded with a north/south/north/south alignment pattern, implying the reversal is very consistent from a cosmological timescale perspective.

    This reversal of the field occurs approximately every 800000 years, with a period of 1000-2000 years around the switch where the magnetic field is disorganized and significantly weaker than normal. This period has very big implications for lifeforms on Earth... obviously not enough to totally end life, but enough to kill lots of animals from various causes (extra solar radiation, messed up internal compass, disrupted migration patterns,etc.).

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    1. Re:Very strong evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets hope it kills off 75% of human population.

    2. Re:Very strong evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but enough to kill lots of animals from various causes"

      On the scale of processes that cause extinction, it isn't much. Paleontologists have looked closely at the timing of magnetic reversals and extinctions and there is nothing but a random correlation between the two.

    3. Re:Very strong evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let me guess, you think you're "special enough" to be in the 25%?

    4. Re:Very strong evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he didn't say that, asshole.

    5. Re:Very strong evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he didn't say that, asshole.

      No, but I bet you think so, dipshit.

  58. Christmas? by BriggsBU · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I can foresee this not being too bad. Maybe Santa will start leaving vodka in my stocking instead of socks.

    1. Re:Christmas? by RobVB · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Socks in your stocking? There's an Xzibit joke in here somewhere.

      --
      I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
  59. figures by circletimessquare · · Score: 0, Troll

    i always knew santa claus was a soviet. the red suit was the clue

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  60. Re:Yeah, it's accelerating, just look at these dat by mkiwi · · Score: 1

    Absolutely no need to say what the parent said... anybody can differentiate between velocity and acceleration.

    I guess some people can't be helped. :-(

  61. Snail's pace by beej · · Score: 1

    40 miles per year is like 12 cm per minute--you could actually watch it go!

  62. Re:It's a usrr supper weapon by rts008 · · Score: 1

    Those tricky Russians! Reversing the polarity of Borscht like that...

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  63. Re:Moving east? by dkf · · Score: 2, Informative

    The GEOGRAPHIC north pole doesn't drift appreciably, or flip - ever.

    It does drift, slowly and not by very much, but the main reason it doesn't flip over time (well, change its orientation massively with respect to the rest of the solar system) is that we've got a very large satellite to stabilize us. It's been conjectured that without it, there would be no higher life on Earth because the climate would be just too nasty. Thanks, Moon!

    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  64. Mods on crack again by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Insightful? Why hasn't this whole thread been modded off-topic? What I see here is a political discussion, nothing about the movement of the magnetic pole due to core flux....

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    1. Re:Mods on crack again by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is no longer for geeky science. The geeky science here only serves as a pretext to allow nerds to come together to vent political angst. There's a Slashdot corollary to Godwin's Law, which states that the longer a discussion goes on, the odds of it spiraling off-topic into a debate over American politics approaches 100%.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    2. Re:Mods on crack again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, since you disagree with the statements, but can offer no intelligent response, your idea is to censor or suppress? How DNC of you.

    3. Re:Mods on crack again by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

      No, I would just like to see the political rants go somewhere else. How is the any of the parent thread even remotely on-topic?

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
  65. Geometric North by AniVisual · · Score: 1

    In other news, the geographic north is moving eastwards relative to the magnetic north pole. Also, the magnetic south pole is moving eastwards. The geographic south pole is ALSO moving eastwards. Don't you just love spherical geometry?

  66. Impossible To Move East by TooLazyToLogon · · Score: 1

    When you are at the North Pole, no matter what direction you go, you are heading South.

    1. Re:Impossible To Move East by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      When you're at the magnetic north pole, you're not at the geographic north pole, and it's possible to move magnetic north in any geographical direction.

      A little thought before the snark, please.

  67. Not heading by yabos · · Score: 1

    GPS will not show your heading if you are in an airplane. Heading while flying is the direction the nose of the aircraft is pointing while track is the direction the airplane is moving across the ground. GPS without a compass will give you your track along the ground but not your heading if you are flying. This is of course due to the airplane moving through a fluid(air) that is always moving relative to the ground.

    1. Re:Not heading by RobVB · · Score: 1
      I did include this in my post:

      This course is then approximately your heading - although it can include a pretty large error due to drift (when in a ship or an airplane).

      --
      I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
  68. We Want Vague Laws. by tjstork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Vagueness in law is a feature.

    Laws are as specific as the Congress cares to make them. While we think a lack of precision in law is a fault, sometimes they are buggy by design. Many a times, Congress will write something that is intentionally vague, hoping the courts will either sort it out, or go the right way, or essentially make new law as circumstances merit.

    As much as we talk about Congress not doing what we want, they know exactly what we want, how we vote, how we feel about issues, etc. The disconnect is that you, me, or other people, all totally do not at all understand what the country as a whole wants, and that is something both political parties are extremely familiar with. They are politicians and they are good at what they do.

    In short, we're not going to get better, more civic minded government, until we get better ourselves. I mean, come on, who wants to hear the truth that taxes need to go up and entitlements need to be capped to balance the budget in a meaningful way. WE've known this for 30 years, yet, the voters really do prefer, to buy all this stuff and not pay for it, so what do the pols do? Borrow it.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:We Want Vague Laws. by kesuki · · Score: 1

      "I mean, come on, who wants to hear the truth that taxes need to go up and entitlements need to be capped to balance the budget in a meaningful way. WE've known this for 30 years, yet, the voters really do prefer, to buy all this stuff and not pay for it, so what do the pols do? Borrow it."

      30 years? i think the knowledge is at least 5000 years old. if you doubt me just look into some old bible stories or other old references. from the genesis on eating from the sacred tree when god had forbidden it people have an ugly history.

  69. 3000 pages by bobbuck · · Score: 1

    People need to stop bitching about the length of this bill because it can easily be summed up in a tidy little package: "Break the backs of the middle class and shovel their money to the insurance companies that paid for the legislation."

    If they were actually trying to make medicine affordable they would steer it towards a free market. Look at the price of free market veterinary medicine vs. people medicine.

  70. traditional Chinese magnetic pole is south by peter303 · · Score: 1

    China independently discovered the compass over a millennia ago. It is literally called the "south pointing device". There was a 50-50 chance of wither direction. Europeans proabbly wanted someting to supplement the North Star when you couldnt see it. In China compasses were used for landscaping, i.e. geomancy. South-facing orientations are more important than north in that craft. Thats probably why the traditional compass points south.

  71. beware of large solar storms killing satellites by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Its only happened once so far - a large storm killed one of two satellites used for pagers in 1994. Since then ground-based cellphones have pretty much replaced pagers.

    In 1989 a large solar storm shut down the east Canadian power grid.

    In 1859 a monster solar storm knocked out the telegraph system. You could see the aurora all the way to the equator. This storm would probably frymost current satellites and the world's power lines.

  72. inner core gains a day every 400 years by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The force of the earth's magnetic is enough to convect outer liquid core a few meters every day. Over the course of time this adds up to an extra core rotation in several centuries. This effect was predicted in a long term computer simulation of the earths magnetic field by a Harvard physicist. It was confirmed by Columbia University seismologists who measured seismic velocities anomalies in the earth's core have moved several degrees in three decades of good data, pointing to core super-rotation.

    This is not the sudden "earth tipover" anticipated by apocalyptists. But it is an amazing rapid event in geologic time scales.

  73. Re:Moving east? by Wonda · · Score: 1

    What everyone seems to miss is that it's going to siberia, that's WEST of canada not east! (well, quite a lot further to the east anyway, they'd mention europe instead)

  74. But will Sarah Palin by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    ...be able to see it from her front porch?

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  75. Without choice by tepples · · Score: 1

    Law which affects every person in a country, or potentially in the world, without choice

    Is emigration from a country with bad laws not choice?

    1. Re:Without choice by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      Not really... after all, where are you going to go to escape bad laws?

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    2. Re:Without choice by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      We still have that choice in the US, which is why we bitch about the bad laws and try to fix them. People still die trying to get to the US or other countries with bad laws which at least let you bitch about them or turn around and leave again,.

  76. Re:Moving east? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    It does drift, slowly and not by very much, but the main reason it doesn't flip over time (well, change its orientation massively with respect to the rest of the solar system) is that we've got a very large satellite to stabilize us.

    Well, that and angular momentum and the lack of any particular reason that the Earth should suddenly wish to flip over. The only reason (according to current thinking) our pole isn't parallel to the Sun's is that we got whacked by a large, slightly out-of-plane object early in our formation. Tidal forces should eventually bring us back into alignment, I think.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  77. Only one problem... by bjk002 · · Score: 1

    Before you get this new law passed you'll need to bribe each of the damned legislature into signing on. That will result in each exempting themselves, or watering down this law so severely as to no longer allow it to accomplish its original goal(s).

    --
    Opinion:=TMyOpinion.Create(Me);
    1. Re:Only one problem... by modecx · · Score: 1

      Bribe... Or blackmail... Etc. Yeah, they will not willfully castrate themselves.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    2. Re:Only one problem... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      I think that explains pages 2 though 743.

  78. If the core is a dynamo, why can't we pull current by Latinhypercube · · Score: 1

    If the core is a dynamo, why can't we pull current from the core ? If there is a MAGNETIC FIELD produced by the core there MUST BE an ELECTRIC CURRENT ALSO. Could this solve our power needs FOREVER ?

  79. Veterinary care? by toadlife · · Score: 1

    You've got to be kidding me?!

    I'm sure putting dad or grandma down at the first sign of trouble with a $70 shot of pentobarbital would save a ton of money. We could also keep recovering patients in 4x4 stainless steel cages instead of those posh heated hospital rooms. Eliminating medical tort would also save a few pennies on the dollar too.

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    1. Re:Veterinary care? by bobbuck · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that's under consideration. The left has regularly espoused the benefits of putting down grandma. Here's a very brief sample: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT7Y0TOBuG4 (and Robert Reich represents mainstream Democrat ideology.) They always promote rationing and taxes over increasing supply through efficiency.

    2. Re:Veterinary care? by toadlife · · Score: 1

      ...and Robert Reich represents mainstream Democrat ideology.

      That's Democratic, asshole.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  80. Re:If the core is a dynamo, why can't we pull curr by Latinhypercube · · Score: 1

    anybody ????

  81. Re:If the core is a dynamo, why can't we pull curr by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    Ok...

    First, we can't get electric current from a constant magnetic field, only from the changes. Earth's magnetic field doesn't change fast, in fact, somebody already posted the figure of 19cm each minute, over some 64000km* radius that is quite a low frequency. Then, Earth's magnetic field is quite weak to begin with. Even if it was rotating at a hight frequency, it wouldn't carry a lot of energy.

    Now, you are right that the field comes from an electric current. It is a strong current, but it flows in a huge amount of conductor so is very weak at any reasonable volume of Earth's core you choose. Anyway, to directly gather that current (without induction), one'd need to probe the Earth's core (on at least two places), what is quite a task.

    * At that latitude, it is less than 64000km. I didn't make the calculations, but it is less than 1 turn every year. That is already too low on any practical sense.

  82. Re:Moving east? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, sorry to have to educate you but the geographic north pole wobbles.

  83. Re:If the core is a dynamo, why can't we pull curr by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    > If the core is a dynamo, why can't we pull current from the core ?

    No reason at all. Just have to burrow down a few thousand miles and hook up to a few million cubic miles of liquid iron. I suggest that you get right on it.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  84. Re:If the core is a dynamo, why can't we pull curr by Latinhypercube · · Score: 1

    So how about gathering the current via induction ? Isn't induction the basis of wi-tricity ?

  85. Re:If the core is a dynamo, why can't we pull curr by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    The problems with induction are on the first paragraph.