Slashdot Mirror


Chandrayaan-1 Successfully Reaches 100km Lunar Orbit

Matt_dk writes "Today, Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft has successfully reached its intended operational orbit at a height of about 100 km from the lunar surface. This followed a series of three orbit reduction manoeuvres conducted during the past three days by repeatedly firing the spacecraft's 440 Newton Liquid Engine. The next major event of Chandrayaan-1 mission planned in the coming days is the release of Moon Impact Probe (MIP) from the spacecraft and its eventual hitting of the moon's surface."

152 comments

  1. How do you pronounce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    the name? My guess? shan-DRAY-uh-ann

    ???

    and, btw.. I think this is FP too!

    1. Re:How do you pronounce by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      How is this offtopic? It's a good question, and worth an answer. Any Indian here to help?
      After all, it's bad enough that the whole world starts writing Brasil with z, and Deutschland "Germany" and so on, just because nobody cared for the actual name in the actual original language.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    2. Re:How do you pronounce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      chan rhymes with shun
      dra rhymes with bra
      yan rhymes with yen(currency)

    3. Re:How do you pronounce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except the last syllable is yaaaaaan

    4. Re:How do you pronounce by kraemate · · Score: 2, Informative

      OK here goes:
      The chand is like chand in chandler.
      ra is pronounced "raa"
      yaan is with the soft a. think of it as "yarn" but soften out the 'r'

      Hope this helps.

    5. Re:How do you pronounce by kquasar · · Score: 1

      It is spelled as 'chun-dra-yaan' means 'Moon Vehicle in Hindi.

    6. Re:How do you pronounce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, Chand is not pronunced like chandler..
      Chand, the word meaning moon, is pronounced like chaand...
      The word chandra, also meaning moon, is prounced like the u in bunk.

    7. Re:How do you pronounce by anilg · · Score: 1
      --
      http://dilemma.gulecha.org - My philospohical short film.
    8. Re:How do you pronounce by oxygen_deprived · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a native hindi speaking Indian, I vouch for the above response to be fairly accurate :-) Just to make it a little more accurate, (ch) should sound like the ch of chicken. (andra) is like "un" + "the" + "ra", spoken in rapid succession ."un" sounds like "un" of "unknown". The "a" in "ra" is like how you say "a" as in "a boy". The yarn with a muted r, instead of a soft r is closer home. "chandra" means moon, and "yaan" means vehicle

    9. Re:How do you pronounce by kraemate · · Score: 1

      i _am_ a native hindi speaker you insensitive clod!

    10. Re:How do you pronounce by prayag · · Score: 1

      But you don't know how to pronounce chandler now. Do you ?? :D

    11. Re:How do you pronounce by prayag · · Score: 1

      I don't know how much help this would be but here you go:
      Chan: (like chinese name Chen (not Chan, but Chen)
      dar: (like you pronounce "dra" in Drakula)
      yaan: (like you pronounce "yarn" with r silent)

      So its "Chen-dra-yarn"

    12. Re:How do you pronounce by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why is it bad for a language to have its own word for a country? It's not exactly uncommon - for example, the Spanish call the United States "los Estados Unidos", rather than its name in English, and they call Americans "estadounidenses", literally United Statesians. Pretty much every language has its own words for names of countries. And for what it's worth, we call it Spain, but the Spanish call it España.

  2. Great. by 2names · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now the moon is going to fall out of the sky.

    And I JUST GOT CABLE!

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:Great. by shashark · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Moon is a harsh mistress.

    2. Re:Great. by genner · · Score: 1

      Now the moon is going to fall out of the sky. And I JUST GOT CABLE!

      Meh direct TV is better.

    3. Re:Great. by Windows_NT · · Score: 1

      They uses a 400 Liquid huh? My Arctic cat Z440 fan cooled can not only orbit the moon ... It can jump it!

      --
      Go go Gadget Nailgun!
    4. Re:Great. by Velex · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. If anime's taught me anything, the moon is just a giant spaceship, and we'll surely defeat the anti-spirals! (I just got done watching Gurren Lagann btw.)

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
  3. Is that an I J or K motor? by jbeaupre · · Score: 4, Insightful
    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    1. Re:Is that an I J or K motor? by OSDever · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I imagine that's sustained Newtons for the duration of the fuel. So yeah, it's technically a liquid powered engine with the thrust capabilities of an I, but with significantly more fuel. An I engine should be plenty enough for maneuvering a small spacecraft in space.

      --
      The above comments are the opinions of a non-qualified amateur rocketry fan. Please take with ~ 2.7 ounces of salt.

      --
      What is the airspeed of a fully laden swallow?
    2. Re:Is that an I J or K motor? by wjh31 · · Score: 1

      i doubt its either

      for a start the measurement in the summary is in newtons not newton seconds like in the wiki article, so in theory it could be any of those depending on how long it lasts, i.e 440N for only 0.005s would be an A motor, also the wiki article looks to be for rocket motors, not for controlled thrusters, so in all likelyhood, your question is nonsense, sorry

    3. Re:Is that an I J or K motor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please take with ~ 2.7 ounces of salt.

      Wow that's a lot of salt.

    4. Re:Is that an I J or K motor? by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      No apology needed. It was intended to a funny comparison between a serious thruster and "hobby" rockets.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    5. Re:Is that an I J or K motor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The above comments are the opinions of a non-qualified amateur rocketry fan. Please take with ~ 2.7 ounces of salt.

      I can't my doctor has me on a low sodium diet!

    6. Re:Is that an I J or K motor? by wjh31 · · Score: 1

      well that went over me, maybe slighlty too subtle for me

    7. Re:Is that an I J or K motor? by smithmc · · Score: 1

      The above comments are the opinions of a non-qualified amateur rocketry fan. Please take with ~ 2.7 ounces of salt.

      Did you mean 0.0023 ounces?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    8. Re:Is that an I J or K motor? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      You can't tell from TFA. 440 newtons (actually probably the 103 lbs IHI biprop) is the thrust, not the total impulse.

              Brett

    9. Re:Is that an I J or K motor? by sulimma · · Score: 1

      It is an X440 Engine. (The first number specifies the thrust)

      If the fuel lasts for one second it is an I440, if it lasts for two seconds it is an J440, and so on.

      Considering the weight of the engine it is probably far beyond O440.

    10. Re:Is that an I J or K motor? by OSDever · · Score: 1

      No, that would clearly be 1,181.25 grains [google.com].

      --
      What is the airspeed of a fully laden swallow?
  4. Global cooperation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So when America returns to the moon, they can look forward to a variety of tasty lunar takeout joints already established by the Indians and Chinese. The resulting outbreaks of explosive diarrhea can be put to good use in terraforming the moon.

    1. Re:Global cooperation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and right after America buys up all these diarrhea-inducing restaurants and places NDA's on their previous owners, just so they can claim that they "invented" it first and sue anyone who comes down with diarrhea afterwards?

      Sounds about right.

    2. Re:Global cooperation by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Right on. You know what? Why don't you just keep on laughing at these foreigners with their funny names and funny foods and your stereotype clichés. By the time Uncle Sam gets back to the moon, most people will be cracking jokes about McDonalds on the moon and astronauts making footprints in their cowboy boots. Or maybe they're more mature and don't have the same racist instincts.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:Global cooperation by khallow · · Score: 1

      By the time Uncle Sam gets back to the moon, most people will be cracking jokes about McDonalds on the moon and astronauts making footprints in their cowboy boots. Or maybe they're more mature and don't have the same racist instincts.

      Right. I'll just have to prepare myself for lunar cowboy jokes then.

      Q: So why did the astronaut wear spurs?

      A: Because he'd look silly wearing only one.

    4. Re:Global cooperation by denobug · · Score: 1

      Well I like Outbacks a lot better. Steaks are more of the national food for Americans than the cheezy hamburgers from McD. You insensitive clod!

  5. new plot by ad0n · · Score: 5, Funny

    can't wait for the bollywood industry to set their hindi love films in space.. (cue dancers)

    1. Re:new plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      ha..ha..ha... now that is funny!!!

    2. Re:new plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can just imagine a large group men and women nicely separated, team dancing. I always imagine a Lord of the Rings battle sequence (say Pellinor Fields) where all the Orks --instead of storming the castle-- are team dancing as in a Bollywood movie. Now take that image, and have all the choreography happen in low gravity. Amazing.

    3. Re:new plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can't wait for the bollywood industry to set their hindi love films in space.. (cue dancers)

      Clearly you haven't seen the ending scene of the bollywood movie Jaan-e-mann

  6. Correct pronunciation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anybody give me the pronunciation of "Chandrayaan" phonetically?

    1. Re:Correct pronunciation? by bigfatdeal · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ch as in cheddar
      andra as in tundra (except 'r' pronounced like the spanish 'r')
      yaan - the long vowel is pronounced like the 'a' in bar (or, even better, like the scandinavian first name "jan")

      The stress is on the last syllable - chandrayAn

    2. Re:Correct pronunciation? by RudeIota · · Score: 1

      Forward to 3:17... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00AvB-9RFUI

      This video (which is in english, so who knows if it is right) pronounces it something like this:

      Chan - 'an' as in 'wand'
      dra - 'dra' as in 'drain', but the 'r' sounds like a soft d
      yan - 'yan' as 'yawn', but without the 'w' and perhaps held a little longer.

      Again, this is based on an British-English speaking video I found, but it sounds like he makes an attempt to pronounce it outside of his own language. Maybe someone who actually speaks the language will respond.

      --
      Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
    3. Re:Correct pronunciation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      chun-dhura-yan :)

    4. Re:Correct pronunciation? by somegeekynick · · Score: 1

      Actually, the video was made in India, and the narrator is also Indian. The pronunciation is correct.

    5. Re:Correct pronunciation? by xigxag · · Score: 2, Informative

      If still confused, refer to YouTube (about 7 seconds into the clip, or 25 seconds if you prefer a woman's voice).

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    6. Re:Correct pronunciation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chandrayaan is pronounced as
      cha - like cha in charm
      "ndra" - like "ndr" in Spanish name Andre (without e)
      yaa - like "ya" in yahoo
      n - like n in "tin"

      Meaning:Chandra = Moon Yaan = Vehicle in Sanskrit.
      Your retarded and "out of date" English is bullshit when it comes to pronunciation of what is written. Devnagari rocks. There is only one way to pronounce what you write in it no ambiguities.

  7. apollo lander module? by krystar · · Score: 4, Funny

    so did they take pix of the supposed apollo landing site to prove once and for all whether or not the moon landing was fake?

  8. Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by WiglyWorm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now we can outsource all of Houston Mission Control's operations to India, it should be a real cost saving measure.

    1. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Funny

      I cannot wait to listen to the first "Bangalore, we have a problem" support call...

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by JayAitch · · Score: 1

      You deserve a promotion for that brilliant idea you will not see through to completion to make sure it's implemented correctly!

    3. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by iammani · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know you are trying to funny. But this moon mission has indeed prompted NASA scientist of Indian Origin to knock at Indian ISRO's door. Source: http://ibnlive.in.com/news/space-there-nasa-scientists-call-up-isro/76741-11.html?from=search

    4. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by iammani · · Score: 1

      Before someone flames me, knocking meant looking for jobs at ISRO and not outsource to ISRO.

    5. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by monkeySauce · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "Please may I just be placing you on hold for a moment while I research this problem..."

    6. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by elnyka · · Score: 1

      Now we can outsource all of Houston Mission Control's operations to India, it should be a real cost saving measure.

      Hahaha :) Maybe NASA will see the writings on the wall and begins to cut the fat and start moving in the right direction.

    7. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by jollyreaper · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I cannot wait to listen to the first "Bangalore, we have a problem" support call...

      Have you tried rebooting your spacecraft, sir?

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    8. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by TheLink · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "Your call is important to us"
      *music*
      <voice style=advert> NASA: For the Benefit of All... </voice>

      --
    9. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      NASA: Bangalore, we have problem! We think the heat shielding is starting to break up!
      Customer Service: Thank you for holding, sir, I'll be glad to help you if you can confirm the name on the account...
      NASA: Fer cryin' out loud! It's NASA!! We were told we were going to have a dedicated control center available 24/7!! We're gonna lose this ship real soon if we can't get some data from you NOW!
      Customer Service: I understand your urgency and frustration, sir. If you could be patient for just one moment while I pull up your account details...Hmmm...yes...just as I suspected. Sir, are you aware that your account appears to be $3,133,730,000.42 overdue? Would you like to pay that balance now?
      NASA: What is wrong with you?! This is an EMERGENCY!! If we don't correct that flight path in the n--
      - from the background on NASA's end comes a wail of "Oh, the humanity!" Followed by stunned silence -
      Customer Service: Sir, are you still there? Sir, about that payment...

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    10. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Persistent "funny" comments that equate everything Indian to call center, outsourcing, curry and caste.

      Hope the day will come when being ignorance and stupidity is no longer fashionable.

    11. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by sdpuppy · · Score: 1

      "Your call is important to us" *music*

      NASA: For the Benefit of All...

      [and the music goes on...]

      Except the ones who are dead.

      But there's no sense crying

      over every mistake.

      You just keep on trying

      till you run out of cake.

    12. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by jbezorg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You'll get use to it because it's kinda like someone thinking all U.S. Citizens are obese, xenophobic, gun toting rednecks. Just gotta laugh when you know it's a joke and... shoot the foreigner who think it's true. Then go get some beer and waddle up to the all-you-can-eat buffet.

      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    13. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now we can outsource all of Houston Mission Control's operations to India, it should be a real cost saving measure.

      OK first of all "Have you plugged in your spacecraft, OK, Unplug and try again"

    14. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cake is a lie!

    15. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YEA!

      Because no other country drinks beer! hah
      You stupid americans and your beer.

    16. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by pkphilip · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Chandrayaan mission cost India USD 87 million which is just a shade over the cost of a Boeing 737-900ER aircraft (USD 85 million).

      That is actually less than half of what the chinese spent (USD 180+ million).

      So yes, there is some truth to the fact that this is indeed a very low cost mission.

    17. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by neumayr · · Score: 1

      fashionable!=funny, or the other way around.
      You, sir, have quite the stick up your ass.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    18. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q : How do you distinguish between piss and American beer?

      A: Beer is cold

    19. Re:Just what we needed in this financial crisis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The first thing and the only thing that I know about India is call center. I am not sure what the article is about, and I do not care. I am just going to open my big mouth and advertise my knowledge. Hope you guys are impressed. 117th time"

  9. Indian Flag on moon by iammani · · Score: 5, Informative
    Some interesting facts about this attempt:

    India will drop its flag on the moon to establish its presence, Nair said in an interview. This will make India the fourth country after the US, Russia, and Japan to have its flag on the moon.

    Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/India_will_plant_flag_on_the_moon_ISRO_chief/articleshow/3620255.cms

    With today's (on 8th Nov) successful manoeuvre, India becomes the fifth country to send a spacecraft to Moon. The other countries, which have sent spacecraft to Moon, are the United States, former Soviet Union, Japan and China. Besides, the European Space Agency (ESA), a consortium of 17 countries, has also sent a spacecraft to moon.

    Source: http://www.hindu.com/nic/0061/release11.htm

    1. Re:Indian Flag on moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "With today's (on 8th Nov) successful manoeuvre, "

      HA! Fail! Did you see how he spelled "maneuver"?

    2. Re:Indian Flag on moon by phantomcircuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait so they are just going to drop their flag on the moon?

      That is just incredibly disingenuous, planting a flag has always meant that a human has set foot on the land.

      Also Russia and Japan are lame for that as well.

    3. Re:Indian Flag on moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      "With today's (on 8th Nov) successful manoeuvre, "

      HA! Fail! Did you see how he spelled "maneuver"?

      manoeuvre is the way it was spelt in English..

      you're spelling in American ... which is an evolving flavor (flavour) of English...

    4. Re:Indian Flag on moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "With today's (on 8th Nov) successful manoeuvre, "

      HA! Fail! Did you see how he spelled "maneuver"?

      Well,

      "manoeuvre" is British spelling
      "maneuver" is American spelling

      Indians use British English. So, there is nothing wrong in the spelling. If doubt persists then go and do some googling.

    5. Re:Indian Flag on moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, there is no US flag on the moon at all. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/moon.htm

    6. Re:Indian Flag on moon by sdpuppy · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the United States flag be planted on the surface while the other ones which have been dropped, be lying on the surface?

    7. Re:Indian Flag on moon by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      Projectile flags?

    8. Re:Indian Flag on moon by radtea · · Score: 1

      The other countries, which have sent spacecraft to Moon, are the United States, former Soviet Union, Japan and China

      So what you're saying is that nations that send a spacecraft to the Moon have a 20% chance of ceasing to exist within a couple of decades?

      Joking aside, this is wonderful news for India and the world.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  10. Does This Mean the Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . is now made out of green curry?

    1. Re:Does This Mean the Moon by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      . . . is now made out of green curry?

      Nope, Green curry's Thai, not Indian.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  11. Re:apollo lander module? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Informative

    so did they take pix of the supposed apollo landing site to prove once and for all whether or not the moon landing was fake?

    So, I know this is a recurring joke around here on Slashdot ... but you can actually demonstrate this fact by using the Lunar Laser Ranging thingy they installed.

    That is, if you're willing to take the time to educate yourself on the hard science behind this.

    Cheers

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  12. Re:apollo lander module? by ashitaka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Terrain Mapping Camera on board has a 5m resolution so even something as big as the LEM descent unit or the lunar rovers will only be 1 pixel in size.

    Not enough to shut the hoaxers up. (Not that anything short of dumping them on the lunar surface will)

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  13. Suck it, conspiritards... by qbasicjedi · · Score: 1

    When does it start taking high-res pics of the landing sites that we can rub in the faces of the conspiritards?

    1. Re:Suck it, conspiritards... by bugeaterr · · Score: 2, Funny

      We conspiritards aren't stoopid, we know such pictures can be easily faked.
      Now if you want to see some REAL evidence, I have some alien autopsy pics that will BLOW YOUR MIND!

  14. Re:apollo lander module? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    Not enough to shut the hoaxers up. (Not that anything short of dumping them on the lunar surface will)

    With no helmet.

  15. Re:apollo lander module? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Informative

    The MythBusters (yeah, yeah) demonstrated this on their Moon Hoax show. It was the last thing they did.

    They went to an observatory and had the person show that pointing the laser away from the moon produced no return signal whereas when they pointed the laser at a specific spot on the moon, they did get a signal.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  16. Next they'll be opening the first oribital casino by bugeaterr · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Oh wait, wrong Indians. ;)

  17. Re:apollo lander module? by krystar · · Score: 1

    yea but it'd be the difference between a pixel that's the same shade/color as the background vs a pixel that's not.

  18. Re:India's first astronaut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I am taking one small step for man, and I am taking one giant step for mankind, excepting the lower castes. Thank you please come again."

    well, it was not exactly an obama or a'brother' that went to the moon, right, eh?

    atleast Indian's leadership has been open for every strata of its society/caste in the mere 50 years of its independence. You guys took 300 years to get one obama in. so please shut your uninformed mouth.

  19. That's just the Martians by andrewd18 · · Score: 2, Funny

    They went to an observatory and had the person show that pointing the laser away from the moon produced no return signal whereas when they pointed the laser at a specific spot on the moon, they did get a signal.

    Pfff. That's just the Martians they paid to sit on the moon and respond to lasers.

  20. Re:apollo lander module? by gnick · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bouncing a beam off of the lunar laser ranger demonstrates only that we (or more likely the underlings working for the alien overlords known as the Illuminati) planted the device on the moon. It does not prove that it was placed there during the supposed "Apollo" mission nor does it prove that man has ever escaped Earth's orbit or that the moon is in fact real rather than a sophisticated projection on the outside of our fishbowl. There's actually a documentary where OJ Simpson demonstrates how a similar hoax could be pulled off for a manned Mars landing.

    (May the gods help us if anyone interprets the above as anything other than a goofy attempt at humor.)

    Seriously, though, good for the Indians. Considering the $$ that the US has shot into space (development, production, etc), and the continued global interest in space exploration, this could be a very valuable market for them.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  21. That is enough to show surface disturbance by toby · · Score: 1

    At any of the Apollo sites. The astronauts did quite a few kilometres of driving around - and nearly rolled the rover once or twice. :)

    --
    you had me at #!
  22. Re:India's first astronaut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama was elected in 2081?

    Wow.

  23. Lucky the Americans didn't set up base permanently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mind you it's lucky the Americans haven't set up base permanently, otherwise none of the astronauts who visited would be able to get back into their spaceships and come back. They'd all be too obese to fit through the hatches of their lunar modules from eating the high quality cuisine the USA has given the world, supersized burgers and fries washed down with gallon buckets of coca-cola... ;-)

  24. "Its eventual hitting of the moon's surface"? by Atario · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are you looking for the phrase "impact on"? Maybe "collision with"? Or even "hit on"? There are a plethora of choices...

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  25. Re:apollo lander module? by baKanale · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Not to call doubt upon the Moon landing, but retroreflectors have been placed on the Moon as part of the unmanned Lunokhod program. According to the link you posted:

    "The unmanned Soviet Lunokhod 1 and Lunokhod 2 rovers carried smaller arrays. Reflected signals were initially received from Lunokhod 1, but no return signals have been detected since 1971, at least in part due to some uncertainty in its location on the Moon. Lunokhod 2's array continues to return signals to Earth."

    Now, I dislike the Moon landing conspiracy nutters as much as the next guy, but the retroreflector thing isn't going to convince them. But then again nothing really will...

  26. Re:apollo lander module? by Comboman · · Score: 1
    So, I know this is a recurring joke around here on Slashdot ... but you can actually demonstrate this fact by using the Lunar Laser Ranging thingy they installed.

    Since unmanned Soviet landers had similar laser ranging thingies, that hardly proves that men have landed on the moon.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  27. Re:apollo lander module? by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

    And no moon.

  28. Re:India's first astronaut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The term 'untouchable' is banned in India. The current Chief Justice of India's Supreme Court is an 'untouchable'. The Chief Minister (== governor) of Uttar Pradesh (the most populous state, and one with the most number of representatives in parliament) is an 'untouchable' lady. The president before the last one, was an untouchable. Doesnt prove anything, but things are improving.

  29. Re:apollo lander module? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you think they're aiming the impact at?! 'Accidental' destruction of the evidence... or... is it?

  30. Re:India's first astronaut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe he's coming back... from the future!

    "It's not you Barack -- it's your kids! Something's got to be done about your kids!"

  31. Re:apollo lander module? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, you could totally fake that.

    (runs away plugging ears shouting "LA LA LA LA")

  32. Worst case scenario by Phazeless · · Score: 1

    Gee, I hope they don't miss. Ohh, wouldn't that be embarrassing.

  33. Re:Next they'll be opening the first oribital casi by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 1

    The Native Americans have almost enough money from their casinos to launch a mission! I think it's pretty funny that there are whites that gamble away everything they have at those casinos up to and including their mortgages...
    "Indian steal white man's land"

    --
    The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
  34. Re:apollo lander module? by arelas · · Score: 1

    So that's what Ignignokt and Err have been up to all this time. psst...don't let Boston know...they'll freak out!

  35. One day in Space by EEPROMS · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    [Large tentacled alien enters space station, glass doors slide open]
    Shopkeeper "Hello sir how may I be helping you"
    Queeg [vicious tone] "My name is queeg you puss filled mud breeder, show me your leader"
    Shopkeeper "Sorry sir but the manager is not being in right now, would you like some jelly dogs, they are on special"
    Queeg "hmm, they look good, give me two"
    [a few minutes later alien leaves space station]
    Shopkeeper [calls out] "thank you be coming again"
    [Alien stops outside glass doors looks at food in tentacles]
    Queeg "what the ...."

  36. Re:apollo lander module? by Windows_NT · · Score: 1

    nothing can stop, the QUAD-LASER!

    --
    Go go Gadget Nailgun!
  37. Re:apollo lander module? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so did they take pix of the supposed apollo landing site to prove once and for all whether or not the moon landing was fake?

    So, I know this is a recurring joke around here on Slashdot ... but you can actually demonstrate this fact by using the Lunar Laser Ranging thingy they installed.

    That is, if you're willing to take the time to educate yourself on the hard science behind this.

    Cheers

    It still does not prove that Man was on moon. Man doesnt have to be on moon to place reflectors on the surface

  38. Re:India's first astronaut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So India's leadership has been open to every class huh?

    Why don't we ask the untouchables that people like you pretend don't exist anymore how accepted they feel.

    Until then, why don't you stop lying to yourself and the audience, and shut YOUR uniformed mouth.

    Have YOU asked our 'untouchables'? Our constitution banned such discrimination right when it was written. Infact, the scholar who prepared ours was infact from the community you call 'untouchables'. So there.

    Show many how many years after your american independence your blacks got freedom, voting rights, womens voting rights, etc etc legally. Just a couple of years back I heard on your radio that a judge asked a cop not to treat blacks like animals. That's where you guys are now, and you have the nerve to lecture to me about our society?
    Thanks but no thanks.

  39. Re:apollo lander module? by CriX · · Score: 1

    Every dollar that the US Space Program has spent was done so on EARTH... you bastard! NASA isn't perfect but it's not like they fill up the space shuttle with cash and launch it into space. All the money is spent on Earth and most of it goes into the pockets of American citizens.

    --
    Moderation: +1 pwnage
  40. Re:apollo lander module? by Leuf · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Not that I think it was faked, but seriously.. when they type in coordinates X,Y into their black box supposedly a laser beam reflects off the moon and lights up their receptors, when just as easily there could be no laser at all and it's just programmed to display a spike when you type in the right coordinates. Unless you put together the laser and equipment independently from NASA it proves nothing.

  41. Re:apollo lander module? by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

    All the money is spent on Earth and most of it goes into the pockets of American citizens.

    And all of it came from the pockets of American citizens too.

    --
    If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
  42. Re:apollo lander module? by Namlak · · Score: 1

    The Terrain Mapping Camera on board has a 5m resolution so even something as big as the LEM descent unit or the lunar rovers will only be 1 pixel in size.

    Big deal, I can do that:

    .

  43. Re:apollo lander module? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't take this as a criticism of NASA (I'll do that some other time) but you might not know what spending money really means.

    When NASA pays $10 for some fuel and then burns that fuel, $10 of wealth has been destroyed -- effectively the same thing as sending $10 away from the earth.

    Don't fall for the Broken Window puzzle.

  44. Re:apollo lander module? by CriX · · Score: 1

    And??

    --
    Moderation: +1 pwnage
  45. Let's hope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's just hope this Indian craft doesn't go plunging into a lunar gully just because it didn't want to hit some sacred cow that was jumping over the moon.

  46. Re:apollo lander module? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When NASA pays $10 for some fuel and then burns that fuel, $10 of wealth has been destroyed -- effectively the same thing as sending $10 away from the earth.

    How is that? Someone on Earth was paid that $10 to make the fuel. Seems to me money changed hands and it stayed right here on Earth.

  47. Re:apollo lander module? by khallow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember they went to an observatory. NASA doesn't have any observatories on Earth. If you're at that stage of the conspiracy where the observatory is in on the scam, then Mythbusters itself isn't sufficiently independent of NASA.

  48. Re:apollo lander module? by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to remind people that stealing money from people and then giving it back to them is not actually a net gain, even if it's better than stealing it and not giving it back.

    --
    If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
  49. Re:apollo lander module? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They probably would have wasted it on liquor and hookers, anyways.

  50. Re:apollo lander module? by CriX · · Score: 1

    We're talking about spaceflight. Not taxation. Whatever... I'm just ranting too.

    --
    Moderation: +1 pwnage
  51. Re:India's first astronaut by XchristX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hate crimes do take place against the disadvantaged groups in rural areas from time to time. The difference is that the educated middle class (numbering 300 million people from many walks of life) generally takes a dim view on caste intolerance in the country. I myself am middle class, and the product of an intercaste marriage (mother's family is a "high-caste" Brahmin though poor refugees from East Pakistan, father's family is a Dalit "untouchable" though relatively wealthy) and there never were any problems from anybody. Plus, India outlaws any discrimination against disadvantaged peoples, and has 50% affirmative action in schools, colleges and jobs for all disadvantaged peoples.

    --
    l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
  52. Re:apollo lander module? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You realize, of course, that your argument could equally well be used to justify hiring 100's of people to torch rain forests? After all, the money is creating jobs here on Earth. The only costs are natural resources and failing to fund more worthy causes.

  53. Re:Next they'll be opening the first oribital casi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Native Americans have almost enough money from their casinos to launch a mission! I think it's pretty funny that there are whites that gamble away everything they have at those casinos up to and including their mortgages...
    "Indian steal white man's land"

    Native Americans are Americans. The Space Mission that is being discussed here is by India.

    Native Americans are also called Indians because when Christopher Columbus began his journey to find an alternate route to south asia (India), he hit reached America and assuming he reached his destiniation called them indians. This is how the name stuck.

  54. Re:apollo lander module? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was the last thing they did.

    It's scary the lengths the government will go to in order to cover up their moon landing hoax.

  55. Cool! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    They successfully did with 2008 technology what we did with 1967 technology.

    Well, at least they are doing it!

    1. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right you are Jane, Q- but don't forget that India got her independence only 20 yrs before 1967. We still grapple with poverty, corruption, illiteracy- but believe in democracy, equality, secularism, spirituality and scientific advancement.

      There's much India has to learn from the west, and much the west can learn from India- the relationship can be truly symbiotic.

    2. Re:Cool! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Like I said, at least they are doing it. Unlike ourselves this year. Or last. Or next.

  56. Chandrayaan-2 by sanman2 · · Score: 1

    India is going to be sending another mission to the Moon in 2011, this time putting a rover on the surface.

  57. Re:apollo lander module? by CriX · · Score: 1

    When you eat a 5 dollar hamburger you are turning that money into SHIT!! lol. Superb job, everyone, on keeping things logical.

    --
    Moderation: +1 pwnage
  58. Re:apollo lander module? by CriX · · Score: 1

    See how powerful my argument is?! It can justify anything!

    --
    Moderation: +1 pwnage
  59. meaning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    chandrayaan => chandra = moon, yaan = vehicle (well, approximately)

  60. drop a flag ? ! by bruceslog · · Score: 1

    I thought that a human had to step foot on the 'new found' soil and PLANT a flag and do some kinda ritual chant to claim 'new found' lands. Someone must have changed the rules. If I recall, America has a spacecraft leaving our solar system, if it 'drops a flag' just before, and sometime after leaving our solar system, does that mean that America can lay claim to the solar system and then the Universe ? Not to mention our Mars rovers. They have flags on them, I believe. So America can claim Mars too ? Seeing as how Canada is supposed to be building a fleet of robotic ocean floor crawlers to lay claim to the oceans surrounding the Arctic as it melts away, I reckon they can lay claim to it in this way as well ? They say they can. This is getting silly.

    --
    If it has tires or tits, it will give you problems.
  61. In space, no one can hear you shit yourself by PeDRoRist · · Score: 1

    Explosive diarrhea in a spacesuit, sounds like an horror movie I wouldn't want to see.

    --

    Anything you do can get you slashdotted, including nothing.
  62. Re:India's first astronaut by neumayr · · Score: 1

    While you might have a point, you totally fail bringing it across.
    It's not like there were blacks in any positions that even begin to compare to those the AC listed above in those days...

    --
    Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
  63. Re:apollo lander module? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lunokhod 2 reflector array is in the location different from the Apollo ones. The whole point of the experiment is to point the beam at the known location - which coincides with the claimed location of a given Apollo landing - and receive the signal. If you do, then someone or something installed the equipment there, and it couldn't be Lunokhod, because it installed its equipment elsewhere (and you can check where it did that, too).

  64. Re:apollo lander module? by baKanale · · Score: 1

    Right, but the point is that if the unmanned Lunokhod probes could put retroreflector arrays up then the US could have sent probes, instead of astronauts, to place their retroreflectors.

  65. Re:India's first astronaut by Deefburger · · Score: 1

    I am thinking I am on the moon? I am not knowing. I am new to the area.

    --
    Most people are mostly good most of the time.
  66. Re:India's first astronaut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To put this in perspective. The next president of US is half black.. and...and --Doesn't prove anything but things are improving--

  67. Travel by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    The most obvious problem is travel, when you get an n^2 name problem.

    I know that Spain is España, but when I'm in Germany or Belgium, what's Spain called?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  68. Hinduism = Casteism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Castes are a form of socio-economic collusion in India since 12th century. Hinduism's caste system is a religious-based system of separating groups and keeping one class (the Brahmins) over everyone else.

    In America there is no system in place today that forces people to remain separate or keeps one class subservient to another. If you were born the son of a street sweeper, but excelled, you could become a doctor or lawyer or some celebrity or entrepreneur - and at the same time you would be fully accepted by your peers.

    Not so in India. The caste system freezes everyone in place. It is extremely difficult - almost impossible - for someone from the lowest caste to rise in education and social status.

    A Dalit would never be allowed to marry into one of the higher castes and would never be accepted as an equal. And for a Dalit to make it into medical school or become a member of high society in India is very rare indeed. Only by escaping from the grasp of Hinduism do they have much of a chance....

    And only 1% of marriages in India are Inter-Caste or Inter-Religious.

    1. Re:Hinduism = Casteism by XchristX · · Score: 1

      A Dalit would never be allowed to marry into one of the higher castes and would never be accepted as an equal

      My father was, and he's as Dalit as they come. Over 25% of India's Chief Ministers of state are Dalits. Try harder, Osama.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    2. Re:Hinduism = Casteism by XchristX · · Score: 1

      Castes are a form of socio-economic collusion in India since 12th century. Hinduism's caste system is a religious-based system of separating groups and keeping one class (the Brahmins) over everyone else.

      Oh really? Then explain how Muslims segregate their "Biradaris" and "Qaums" into "Ashraf" (noble ones) and "Arzal" (degraded ones, also called Dalit Muslims) and how Christians in India also practice against Dalits in Churches, schools and village communities.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    3. Re:Hinduism = Casteism by XchristX · · Score: 1

      Nice try, but Dalits are as Hindu as any other. In Islamic Pakistan (where Hindus are a persecuted minority) Dalits brave discrimination from Muslim fanatics in order to go pray in temples:

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7667850.stm

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
  69. Hinduism = Socio-economic collusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brahmins are people residing in India who have created caste/religion system in India 3000 years ago, which assigns each person a "fixed" place in the social hierarchy.
    As per this system Brahmins by birth are privileged to stay "on top" of social and economic hierarchy.
    Currently they predominantly practice this ancient caste system and deprive and deny other Indians of social and economic benefits.
    Currently the population of Brahmins in India is only 5%.
    But,
    95% of the jobs in "Business" are occupied by Brahmins.

    95% of the positions in "Judiciary" are occupied by Brahmins.

    95% of the time India is "Ruled" by Brahmins after independence.

    50% of the positions in government "Administration" are occupied by Brahmins.

    How to balance this situation?
    Solution is to restrict all Brahmins to "live and work" in only one state in India.

    1. Re:Hinduism = Socio-economic collusion by XchristX · · Score: 1

      You've been reading Pakistani propaganda a bit too much I think...

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand