RTFA. They aren't closing the source, they are purchasing uTorrent and keeping uTorrent's source closed. They will still be releasing an SDK. They will still support the old client. They're just moving on to work on a closed source project.
So basically BitTorrent bought uTorrent and is staying closed source (as uTorrent is now).
Q: How will this impact the BitTorrent open source development community as a whole?
A: There will be no impact to the BitTorrent open source development community. We are committed to maintaining the preeminent reference implementation of BitTorrent under an open source license.Although the latest documentations won't be published for the world to see, an aspiring BitTorrent developer or a hardened coder can still obtain the specifications on the latest protocol extensions by obtaining a SDK license.
It would take nearly forever for you to cool off that much, you would explode due to pressure differential long before you would cool down, as any cooling would be due to releasing radiant heat. There is neither conductive nor convective heat loss as there is nothing cooler than you there, as there is nothing but you.
Not around 14 years, but up to 14 years. There is a possibility that the first key tried works. It will only take 14 years if the 1/14 years happens to be the last one tried in those 14 years, more likely it will be one of the other [14years-1] worth. (yes, this means that for any particular key attempted it is more likely to be one of the others that will be attempted]. Odds are just that, odds.
You can work as a network tech managing servers and software in a newsroom or other production environment or you can just get more hands on and actually do the video production work. Nothing beats the thrill of *live* [not edited, just do everything, including effects, live or live-to-tape] production.
I'm guessing that if its actually *DEAD*, they throw it out [read: some lucky employee gets a dead server to putz with], otherwise they probably keep using it in some form or another.
For helpdesk IT, play dumb, set up a system with windows broken, sit in front of it, don't let him see it, and have him walk you through getting it running.
For hands-on IT, same thing, but let him sit in front of it.
I do the same thing with the terminals (closing after use), I usually keep around 18 copies of IRSSI running in screen on my server (one per network) as well as a copy of VI. Everything else I do locally on my windows client [usually about 4 or 5 windows open, although this number can drastically increase if I'm working on video editing or something similar].
Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. Shouldn't that say something along the lines of "No band for you to transmit here, please move along." ???
Re:Seriously, what does AOL really have to offer?
on
The AOL Roller Coaster
·
· Score: 1
I know plenty of tech-savvy people who have RoadRunner. The reason they have it is they don't have many other options in the price range, they are disgusted with it, dislike giving AOL the money, but their options are limited.
Note that/. posters != "tech-savvy", sure there are tech-savvy people who post here, but not all of them are.
Re:Seriously, what does AOL really have to offer?
on
The AOL Roller Coaster
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
And now AOL wants to reach out to the "tech-savvy" segment? Do they not understand that the tech-savvy have spent the last 10 years laughing derisively at the AOL brand name? They would be much better off developing a new brand name for that purpose.
That won't work well, as most tech-savvy people are smart enough to see through the guise.
Actually, what if you use two copies of VLC, have one set up in web interface mode just to feed a stream to another that plays it out to video. This allows you to change the playlist on the fly and do rudimentary switching.
Note that you should have some sort of live switcher for master control upstream of the server, with a camera pointed at a logo (and possibly a live set) for backup.
Slashdot Mirror
RTFA. They aren't closing the source, they are purchasing uTorrent and keeping uTorrent's source closed. They will still be releasing an SDK. They will still support the old client. They're just moving on to work on a closed source project.
So basically BitTorrent bought uTorrent and is staying closed source (as uTorrent is now). Q: How will this impact the BitTorrent open source development community as a whole? A: There will be no impact to the BitTorrent open source development community. We are committed to maintaining the preeminent reference implementation of BitTorrent under an open source license. Although the latest documentations won't be published for the world to see, an aspiring BitTorrent developer or a hardened coder can still obtain the specifications on the latest protocol extensions by obtaining a SDK license.
How about the best way of protecting user search records: DON'T CREATE ANY.
It would take nearly forever for you to cool off that much, you would explode due to pressure differential long before you would cool down, as any cooling would be due to releasing radiant heat. There is neither conductive nor convective heat loss as there is nothing cooler than you there, as there is nothing but you.
How easily deployable are settings of this sort?
Not around 14 years, but up to 14 years. There is a possibility that the first key tried works. It will only take 14 years if the 1/14 years happens to be the last one tried in those 14 years, more likely it will be one of the other [14years-1] worth. (yes, this means that for any particular key attempted it is more likely to be one of the others that will be attempted]. Odds are just that, odds.
So if I steal a DVD and own a DVD player, I have a license to decrypt the content on the DVD to watch it? That's even more asinine.
You can work as a network tech managing servers and software in a newsroom or other production environment or you can just get more hands on and actually do the video production work. Nothing beats the thrill of *live* [not edited, just do everything, including effects, live or live-to-tape] production.
I grew up programming, I have a strong tech mind, and nothing beats the thrill of a live production.
I'm guessing that if its actually *DEAD*, they throw it out [read: some lucky employee gets a dead server to putz with], otherwise they probably keep using it in some form or another.
Is there anywhere that slashdotters can have a go at the test, so we know just what the results mean?
Ever think it may be because of advertising? This is the first time I'm hearing of eBay Express.
The kernel and packages have had 64-bit support for years. I have run Linux, WinNT, and BSD on a DEC-Alpha processor, no trouble.
For helpdesk IT, play dumb, set up a system with windows broken, sit in front of it, don't let him see it, and have him walk you through getting it running.
For hands-on IT, same thing, but let him sit in front of it.
Opening scene of Pirates of Silicon Valley.
...or you can use the seven dirty words, your choice.
I do the same thing with the terminals (closing after use), I usually keep around 18 copies of IRSSI running in screen on my server (one per network) as well as a copy of VI. Everything else I do locally on my windows client [usually about 4 or 5 windows open, although this number can drastically increase if I'm working on video editing or something similar].
No, this is a luggable.
Nothing for you to see here. Please move along.
Shouldn't that say something along the lines of "No band for you to transmit here, please move along." ???
I know plenty of tech-savvy people who have RoadRunner. The reason they have it is they don't have many other options in the price range, they are disgusted with it, dislike giving AOL the money, but their options are limited.
/. posters != "tech-savvy", sure there are tech-savvy people who post here, but not all of them are.
Note that
And now AOL wants to reach out to the "tech-savvy" segment? Do they not understand that the tech-savvy have spent the last 10 years laughing derisively at the AOL brand name? They would be much better off developing a new brand name for that purpose.
That won't work well, as most tech-savvy people are smart enough to see through the guise.
Actually, what if you use two copies of VLC, have one set up in web interface mode just to feed a stream to another that plays it out to video. This allows you to change the playlist on the fly and do rudimentary switching.
Note that you should have some sort of live switcher for master control upstream of the server, with a camera pointed at a logo (and possibly a live set) for backup.
Yes, but it is faster than flash.
/.
Doesn't anybody ever actually read these links? Oh wait, this is
No, he didn't. He asked about the "SAT Reasoning Test" which is the full and proper name of the examination.
1) Form giant superstore
2) ?????
3) Profit
For those of you not paying attention, 2 is "Join forces with another giant superstore"
The SB 16 is actually [still] one of the better consumer sound cards, however I think that this company would be better served by a LynxOne.