Slashdot Mirror


An Affordable Pro-Quality Sound Card?

TFGeditor asks: "The company I work for is launching a pre-recorded radio program. I will be working with other staff (all in remote locations) to create the sound clips and then cobbling the show together (mixing). I will also interface with the co-host at a remote studio over the net via uber-broadband connection, producing our portion of the show as if we were in the same studio interacting with each other. What is the best sound card for the money (PC/XP) for this type of application?"

126 comments

  1. Your output is no better than the weakest link by Skippy_kangaroo · · Score: 1

    The one that is marginally better than your speakers/headphones. What kind of speakers will you be using to preview the sound?

    There is no point getting an über sound card if you have unter speakers.

    1. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by qortra · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not necessarily. People keep pushing this viewpoint, but it isn't always true. Sure, if you're using a fisher price speaker with your computer, you might not be able to discrimiate between sound cards, but in general, a relay race is a more apt analogy for audio equipment than a chain. Each component can single-handedly degrade or improve the performance of the entire system regardless of the other components' performance.

      To answer the original question, I think the M-Audio Audiophile 24/96 is one of the best consumer audio cards on the market (so long as you're not looking for a ton of I/O).

    2. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by sr180 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      To answer the original question, I think the M-Audio Audiophile 24/96 is one of the best consumer audio cards on the market (so long as you're not looking for a ton of I/O).

      I must concur with this. The M-Audio card mentioned is excellent. We use it for professional recording and it performs well.

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
    3. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I third the M-Audio 24/96. I own this card and I use it for recording my own music. It's very quiet and sounds very nice. I'm not an "audiophile" but it lets me make my music without any problems on the recording fidelity side of things.

    4. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by xmodem_and_rommon · · Score: 1

      I must concur. Even with $20 budget speakers, i can tell the difference between onboard and my card, an audigy value.

    5. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by buswolley · · Score: 3, Informative
      Another worthy M-audio card is the Delta 44.

      If you need to record audio from microphones with XLR inputs I'd go with something like the M-Audio Delta 44 24bit/96. It has 4 ins and 4 outs that can be used for recording from a mixer using professional microphones. The quality A/D and D/A converters are pretty good, and keeps in sync well. I've gotten some good recordings out of the card.

      If you require more ins and outs, I believe that you can stack multiple M-Audio cards.

      Note: They provide drivers for Linux too.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    6. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by Skippy_kangaroo · · Score: 1

      It's not so much that you can't discriminate between the soundcards or that the signal is degraded (which it won't be because of the speakers obviously) - but that you optimise your sound for the flawed speakers. If the speakers have no bass response and the top end is tinny you will mix and EQ the sound in a very different way than if you were using better speakers which give more faithful reproduction. It will still sound better to you with a better soundcard but your output will be poor. I suppose the visual equivalent is colour calibration matters.

      (An analogy - the levels you set mixing live for a concert are very different to those you set mixing for recording. At the extreme, you will mix your radio program very differently if you have speakers with a blown tweeter than if you have fully functional speakers.)

    7. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by nnet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      note: Balanced and unbalanced I/O :)

    8. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by yabba-dabba-do · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but there is NO piece of equipment that can improve the sound. When we capture audio with a microphone, there is a Signal to Noise ratio. Every piece of equipment in the signal chain adds a (hopefully) small amount of noise, thus the ratio decreases with every piece of gear in the chain. If you start with a very high signal to noise ratio, then the small amounts of noise can be barely noticable. This is why Pro Soundboard manufacturers have been using very high quality Mic Preamps. If they get the signal in clean, it can be kept clean. if it comes in dirty, you will NEVER get it clean. BTW, there is a huge difference between a cheap Peavy Mic Pre and a Midas Mic Pre. In the digital world, spend the bucks on Mics, Mic Pres and ADC.

    9. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by buswolley · · Score: 1

      Yep, I forgot about that too. Good to have.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    10. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      M-Audio has some great hardware. They are owned by Avvid, which is also the parent company of DigiDesigns, known for their professional interfaces and ProTools (Note that you can also get ProTools M-Powered, which is the same software but works with M-Audio interfaces instead of DigiDesigns interfaces). Edirol gear is also DEFINATELY worth looking into. I've done quite a bit with an Edirol UA-25 USB interface. It's inexpensive and has GREAT sound, provides full 48v phantom power, etc. Also, Roland helped write the specs for USB-Audio, so the Edirol is probably one of the most standards-compliant USB interfaces on the market (Edirol is a Roland brand). For anyone interested, the Edirol UA-25 *does* work out of the box on Linux. I haven't tested the M-Audio stuff so I couldn't say for sure, but it likely does too.

      In the interest of full disclosure, I manage a store which is a dealer for Roland/Edirol and soon to be a dealer for M-Audio as well. I haven't decided yet which I'm going to buy for myself. Possibly both.

    11. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      I have the 1010lt (cheaper than the above). For your needs (not multitrack music) it would certainly not be your weakest component, which, of course, is what you have to worry about.

      In fact, considering the state of codecs, broadband, and computer speakers, the guy who suggested the Soundblaster isn't too far of the mark.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    12. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by Znork · · Score: 1

      Just got an M-Audio card myself (Revolution 7.1), and I must say I'm perfectly happy with it. A large improvement in quality over the sound I got from the integrated NVidia card.

    13. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by cloak42 · · Score: 1

      Does it support phantom power? I've been considering getting a higher-end audio card for recording on my home PC and I've been wondering if anything that I do buy will be able to support any higher-end microphones I might consider buying as well. You can buy a USB condenser mic, but it seems kind of like a waste, although I bet you couldn't find anything better for the price. But I'd prefer getting a traditional mic and hooking it up through more traditional means.

    14. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by buswolley · · Score: 1
      No. You still need to buy some preamps. So my simple set-up is:

      1. M-Audio Delta 44 ($150)

      2. Behringer Eurorack UB1222FX-PRO Mixer $199(has phantom power),

      3. Rode NT-1A or NT3 Condenser microphone.($199 A really good mic).

      SOme cables etc. Then your good.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    15. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by buswolley · · Score: 1

      Wait I noticed something...The M-Audio Delta 1010 LT PCI Digital Audio System has preamps.. I dont know much about that card.,..I think it only has two analog ins though xlr

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    16. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by DataSpring · · Score: 1

      I strongly recommend against purchasing a Behringer mixer. I have reports from reliable people that as a company, Behringer goes out and buys a competitor's product, disassembles it, then builds one of their own using ultra-cheap components. Often times, they will keep the color scheme and in some cases, even the model name or number. This gets you a very poor-quality product having an unpredictable lifetime.

      Nevermind that you get a piss-poor product for a low price - I'm ok with that, as I buy cheapo products "on the cheap" at times. The bigger problem I have is that Behringer is a completely unethical company, and will sell you crap claiming it is gold. I don't mind companies that put out crap when they spend their own money and time researching and developing said crap.

      If you want a very quiet mixer (little noise introduced into the system from the mixer itself), try Allen & Heath, or one or two others, though I hear Mackey boards have a noise problem (sounds like static on the output.)

      The particular Behringer board referenced above appears to be a copy of a Phonic mixer - perhaps the Phonic AM 642D (http://210.243.85.5/partner/modules/product_explo r/products_detail.php?product_id=616)

      I'm not bashing Behringer because I got burned by them or anything like that - I just don't want to see anyone getting bad products from an unethical company that should be run out of business, when there are much higher-quality products that are very similar or exactly the same, for just a little bit more money.

    17. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by buswolley · · Score: 1
      The actual Behringer I have is the EuroRack Mx 1604A. An affordable mixer which my dad was kind enough to give to me as a gift. As far as quality.. Well I don't have too much experience to allow me to compare. Thanks for the info.

      The company does talk up the board quite a bit.

      I AM having a strange leak problem between channels. Its pissing me off.I've heard of reliability issues.

      I hear that a top priority in a mixer is to have really good pre-amps. Any thought on this?

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    18. Re:Your output is no better than the weakest link by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      I think that by 'Improving the sound', the parent wasn't necessarily talking about S/N ratio. Any processing we do to a signal (EQ/Compression/etc) is meant to 'improve' the sound, at the expense of S/N.

  2. M-Audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    M-AUDIO has some fantastic pro-sumer sound cards and equipment.

    http://www.m-audio.com/

  3. Wrong place. by Eideewt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get thee to an Audio forum, fool.

    I'm not normally one to complain about "Ask Slashdot" questions, but this isn't the best community to turn to for a recording question. There are forums in which nearly every member has bought many different audio interfaces -- you want one of those, not Slashdot.

    1. Re:Wrong place. by Eideewt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I should add: your question is very vague. Will you be recording audio yourself? If so, you'll be wanting a decent microphone and preamp, as well as a quiet recording environment, more than a special sound card (assuming you've got something better than a Soundblaster), although the sound card is good to have. If you're not recording, just get some decent monitors and call it a day.

  4. conflicting terms by perlchild · · Score: 1

    Just why do I think the terms "pro-quality" and "affordable" don't mix?

    IMO, "pro-quality" means: having this be less good than your competitor's means you don't eat. "Affordable" well seems to be a little less picky.

    1. Re:conflicting terms by buswolley · · Score: 1
      I believe that we are in the age where pro and amateur equipment quality are not easily distinguishable. Amateur recordings are getting better and better. Oh and cheaper and cheaper. When my dad built a studio in the 70's he spent thousands on a Teac 4-track 1/4" reel to reel. Now you can spend that much and get really good digital equipment or if analog is your thing you can spend $3000 dollars and buy yourself a 2" reel to reel 16 track recorder that used to go for $100,000.

      The fact is there are really only a couple of things that hold serious amateurs down these days.

      1. A recording room. To build a truly professional room for monitoring your recording and doing mastering requires a lot of money. Say $100,000 minimum.

      2.A trained engineer with a good ear. .. Equipment is cheap these days, but a bad engineer will not record well no matter what equipment he uses.

      Oh and Guys...Lay off the compressors. You're killing the sound. With digital recording we have enormous dynamic ranges available to us. So use it!

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    2. Re:conflicting terms by s4m7 · · Score: 1
      Just why do I think the terms "pro-quality" and "affordable" don't mix?

      most likely because you are not familiar with the many "prosumer" audio offerings to choose from. There is a large pool of very decent hardware that is not quite professional but far beyond the needs of the average consumer. Frankly, any of the soundblasters from Live! on would be adequate for the task described. The good low-end pro models are the M-Audios, which I think are what the submitter is looking for, being both mac and pc compatible, having very decent snr's and having a really wide variety of configurations to choose from to suit the needs of the studio in question. You can get a LOT from these guys for $600-$1000

      Now, if you wanted to go PRO-PRO, I'd suggest something in a MOTU box that would run you at a bare MINIMUM, $1600 for something with enough I/O that it would be truly useful for an application such as submitter describes. It's really in how much of "a friggin lot" do you want to spend for this kind of thing.

      --
      This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
    3. Re:conflicting terms by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      Let me just say as someone who is a bit of an audiophile and audio engineer that pro-quality and affordable are no longer mutually exclusive terms. In the past ten years in particular, I've seen gear that would have cost you $10k+ drop to less than $500. Many technological advances have attributed to this; better A/D technology, better DSPs, USB, Firewire, faster desktop systems, better drivers!, etc. So, the recording gear, i.e., the A/D boxes, the HD recorders, etc. has gotten better and cheaper on a much steeper curve than most realize. Your real cost these days comes into play with the analog devices both on the input and output side. Those mics, cables, monitors, etc. have not improved as much as the recording devices (mostly because they haven't had to) and consequently they are still AMAZINGLY expensive. But, in the world of mics, cables, and other analog gear you often get what you pay for. Cheap crap is just that, crap, although, I've bought some high-end mics that sucked too!

    4. Re:conflicting terms by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      >>Oh and Guys...Lay off the compressors. You're killing the sound. With digital recording we have enormous dynamic ranges available to us. So use it!

      I agree. But if you lay off the compressors and processing in most pop music, the artists would be exposed for the frauds they are. There goes 90% of the recording industry!!!

      Not that I wouldn't rather be recording symphonies for a living, but those jobs are few and far between.

    5. Re:conflicting terms by buswolley · · Score: 1

      got me bastard. ;)

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  5. Lots of options... by DavidChristopher · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's hard to make a recommendation without knowing at a granular level what you want to do. How many inputs? How many outputs? Is latency an issue? What about frequency/bitrate? Digital inputs? Analog? MADI? Lightpipe? Some light reading... On the ULTRA high end, you would go with Apogee- http://www.apogeedigital.com/ - these are some of the industry's best da/ad converters; and with something like a big ben+rosetta on firewire, you'd be in good hands. Another contender could be rme http://www.rme-audio.com/ Then there's motu's line of products - http://www.motu.com/ - I've personally owned several of their interfaces and can tell you right out of the gate they're great. Good bang for the buck... Then you've got m-audio http://www.m-audio.com/ edirol http://www.edirol.com/ presonus http://www.presonus.com/

    --
    http://www.bistolas.net
  6. some general advice... by wrfelts · · Score: 3, Insightful
    First, identify the tools (software & hardware) you will be using. THEN, see which boards are 1) recommended and 2) of good reputation with said software+hardware (review sites & blogs are good places to search). Look for reported compatibility problems and see if the vendor has corrected them. After you get done with that, you will have a very short list of boards you KNOW are working in the field.

    good luck...

  7. audiophile + motu by ElephanTS · · Score: 2, Informative

    I probably wouldn't go for an internal card. Better to have an external box in many ways. This one a friend of mine has and it's very good for the money.

    http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/AudiophileUS B-main.html

    I've only used it on OSX but I think the drivers should be just as reliable on XP.

    This one sounds even better but is more expensive and you'll need firewire.

    http://www.motu.com/newsitems/traveler-press

    I've got their 828mkII and this one uses the same DAC/DAC as that which sound really good.

    --
    spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    1. Re:audiophile + motu by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      I have problems believing a USB sound card would be the best solution. Mainly because I do not trust USB and Firewire for realtime transfers. If you're going to sugest an external box, how about one with a better connection to the computer? Some in the Creative Audigy series have external boxes that connect to an internal sound card. Most of the processing is done in the box, not on board. Works great and is just as convienient.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:audiophile + motu by Skippy_kangaroo · · Score: 1

      Why would you not trust Firewire for realtime transfers?

      I can understand your concerns with USB - but Firewire is designed for real-time video transfer and provides rock-steady bandwidth. Why would there be a problem with realtime audio transfer over Firewire?

    3. Re:audiophile + motu by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 1

      I have recorded 10 channels of 44.1 KHz audio at 24 bits simultaniously. That requires a thoughput of 10 megabits a second, while firewire can handle 40 times that. DV25 streams flawlessly...

      Firewire is rock-solid. The only problem I have with it is the sensitivity of bridge chips to static electricity.

      That being said, I still prefer a PCI solution.

      Also, USB is crap for realtime. If I remember correctly, IEEE1394 uses hardware-based buss control, and USB is software based.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    4. Re:audiophile + motu by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      For firewire it mainly comes down to no direct experience with it. I haven't had a peripheral yet that used it so I have no idea how good it is. I know it was designed for realtime video. However, without the experience of having used it I won't recomend it. I have direct experience with the Audigy cards, hence why I recomend it instead.

      Related to this. I generally don't trust external general purpose connections. This is mostly due to USB, PCMCIA and TCP experience.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    5. Re:audiophile + motu by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Do you find it suspiscious that MOTU refuses to publish their SNR / DNR for their cards? I was interested in a traveler but couldn't find the specs for it ANYWHERE.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    6. Re:audiophile + motu by DrSkwid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I can't think why we use Firewire to transfer data from our DV cameras into the computer for online editing ready for TV broadcast, it's just so lossy! 25 Mbit/s is just sooooo demanding.

      Stick to what you know sunshine.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    7. Re:audiophile + motu by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Firewire is basically a step between scsi and usb in terms of CPU utilization, at least in my experience. One of the reasons I like my 4G ipod so much over the 5G is the fact that it'll still transfer over the firewire bus. Makes it a lot faster when you have 10 gigs of music you're sending over; I zap my ipod every few months because I've found, at least in my experience, that the iPod'll lose song and send over a group it's already sent over.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    8. Re:audiophile + motu by forkazoo · · Score: 2, Informative
      I have problems believing a USB sound card would be the best solution. Mainly because I do not trust USB and Firewire for realtime transfers. If you're going to sugest an external box, how about one with a better connection to the computer? Some in the Creative Audigy series have external boxes that connect to an internal sound card. Most of the processing is done in the box, not on board. Works great and is just as convienient.


      Well, feel free to not believe all you want. You can pry my USB audio hardware from my cold, dead hands. Now, I will admit that if you are doing some crazy multi-device work which requires perfect synchronisation, you may run into some very very slight issues by mixing USB and PCI sound hardware. But, you will probably run into very similar issues by mixing different types of PCI hardware, so I don't consider this a weakness of USB. Almost nobody actually needs that kind of latency. Those who do, shouldn't ask about it on slashdot.

      My USB hardware isn't even high end. It was $30 dollars and came with a headset with microphone. Seriously. It sounds better than the internal audio hardware on my Mac, my Dell, and my Athlon64. I've also tried one or two PCI sound cards in the Athlon. I even did a blind test with my room mate to see if I was just imagining the better sound quality. Moving the DAC outside of the computer has a very appreciable effect. What's more, I can bring it with me and plug it into a laptop when I want to record something on location, and I can plug it into my Athlon when I want to record using my nice dual monitor workstation. It works with Windows, Linux, and OS-X. (I've had some issues with Linux, but I always seem to have shit luck with Linux and sound, so I don't think it's any fiddlier than PCI sound hardware would be.)

      And, if I wanted, I could get a half dozen of the little USB audio dongles to do multitrack recording. I don't have that many PCI slots. Certainly not in my laptop.
    9. Re:audiophile + motu by hab136 · · Score: 1
      For firewire it mainly comes down to no direct experience with it. I haven't had a peripheral yet that used it so I have no idea how good it is. I know it was designed for realtime video. However, without the experience of having used it I won't recomend it. I have direct experience with the Audigy cards, hence why I recomend it instead.

      "For internal combustion engines it mainly comes down to no direct experience with it. I haven't had a vehicle yet that used it so I have no idea how good it is. I know it was designed for traveling long distances. However, without the experience of having used it I won't recomend it. I have direct experience with bicycles, hence why I recomend it instead."

      Do you see how silly this type of post is?

      Related to this. I generally don't trust external general purpose connections. This is mostly due to USB, PCMCIA and TCP experience.

      I've never heard of a hardware port called TCP, and Google is no help (it wants to talk about TCP/IP). Care to enlighten me?
    10. Re:audiophile + motu by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of a hardware port called TCP, and Google is no help (it wants to talk about TCP/IP). Care to enlighten me?

      You haven't? Gee. You must be really new to computers then TCP is what TCP/IP sits on. Several companies actually use this for direct communication over RJ-45 connectors and CAT5 cable. Some are for high end video applications as well, but that requires some expensive high end hardware. They don't bother using TCP/IP as that just adds an extra layer of complexity onto the TCP layer. Perhaps you should read up a bit more about networking?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    11. Re:audiophile + motu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's TCP that is a layer over IP...

    12. Re:audiophile + motu by hab136 · · Score: 1
      You haven't? Gee. You must be really new to computers

      Insults aside, I'd really like to learn what you're talking about.

      then TCP is what TCP/IP sits on. Several companies actually use this for direct communication over RJ-45 connectors and CAT5 cable. Some are for high end video applications as well, but that requires some expensive high end hardware. They don't bother using TCP/IP as that just adds an extra layer of complexity onto the TCP layer. Perhaps you should read up a bit more about networking?

      You originally said "I generally don't trust external general purpose connections. This is mostly due to USB, PCMCIA and TCP experience." which is why I said I hadn't heard of a hardware port called TCP. Now you're saying that TCP is something run over CAT5 cable and RJ-45 connectors (which would obviously connect to RJ-45 hardware ports).

      So is TCP the name of a hardware port/connector?

      RJ-45 is a hardware port. It has 8 pins, and a squarish connector with a clip. Looks like a telephone cord connector (RJ11) but with two more pins. http://www.cablestogo.com/resources/modular.asp
      USB is a hardware port. It has 4 pins and a thin, rectangular connector. http://www.cablestogo.com/resources/usb.asp
      PCMCIA is a hardware port with 68 pins. It's apparently called "PC Card" today, but I still call it PCMCIA. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC_card

      If TCP is the name of an "external general purpose connection", I'd love to know what it looks like, because as I've said, I've never seen or heard of one.

      Whether or not it's a hardware port, TCP is the name of "Transmission Control Protocol", which is the TCP part of TCP/IP. You can also have UDP/IP (mainly used for games/streaming video), ICMP/IP (ping), AH/IP and ESP/IP (encrypted tunnels).

      Here's a decent description of the OSI model:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSI_model

      TCP, UDP, ICMP, AH, and ESP are all layer 4. It's the way you assemble random packets into streams. You may get packet 1-2-6-4-5, and TCP will request the missing 3, then straighten them all out into 1-2-3-4-5-6 so that your program will have a stream of data instead of random packets.
      IP is layer 3. It's simply a way of addressing networks. IPX/SPX is another way, as is NetBEUI (what Windows filesharing used before TCP/IP).
      Ethernet is layer 2. This is where MAC addresses and ethernet frames come in. Ethernet is a way of saying that the data on the cable is destined for a specific computer.
      The actual signaling is layer 1. This is electricity over copper, light over fiber, or whatever physcial means you have of transferring data. If the electrical signal is 20V for 5ms then 0V for 5ms to indicate a 1, and 10V for 5 ms then 0V for 5ms to indicate a 0, that's layer 1.

      I mention all this because this is what I know of TCP. You've now made the claim "They don't bother using TCP/IP as that just adds an extra layer of complexity onto the TCP layer." Again, Google fails to provide anything.

      Now, I ask you, please, please provide some more information (prefereably a link) to the claims you've made:

      1. TCP as a hardware connector
      2. TCP/IP over TCP
      3. High-end video over TCP without using TCP/IP

      I'm perfectly willing to believe that there's something I've never heard of in my 9 years of working networking and security, and that the 17 other engineers I work with at work have never heard of such a thing (I asked). I am falliable, as are Google and my co-workers. I'd really like to learn. Please, enlighten me.
    13. Re:audiophile + motu by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Stereo audio is very low bandwith by todays standard. CDs, for example, are sampled at 2 channels, 16 bit depth at a frequency of 44.1 Khz. This works out to 44100*2*16 = 1411200bps, or about 150KB/second.

      This is an itsy-bitsy tiny-winy part of a current USB or Firewire-connection. There's no issues that I'm aware of with realtime audio over either USB or Firewire.

  8. Soundblaster X-Fi by Shimdaddy · · Score: 0

    I have a soundblaster X-Fi: XtremeMusic. If you can get over the kind of goofy name, it's a very, very nice card. I have only done a little recording on it, but it's powerful (51 mn transistors) and clear (136 decibel signal to noise ratio). It can do all the normal stuff like surround sound, plus some cool stereo -> surround stuff. If you need weird inputs or an optical out, you'll need to go with one of the slightly more expensive cards, but for digital i/o or 3 stereo plugs, this card is awesome.

    1. Re:Soundblaster X-Fi by dpu · · Score: 1

      For the record (and I don't like to blast CreativeLabs, because I love most of their consumer stuff), *never* go near Creative Labs gear for anything resembling audio recording or mixing.

      Aside from their marketing lies (136db signal-to-noise is impossible in consumer hardware - even professional studios rarely make it over 120db), the converters aren't particularly good and the cards are very susceptible to ground noise - which, of course, you won't hear until you play the music back on a computer that's plugged into a different electrical circuit. On top of that, their ASIO drivers suck - expect a lot of latency on some systems (20ms or more) and a *whole* lot of latency on others (60ms and up). Even the cheapest prosumer cards (like the Delta 44 or 66) can achieve 5ms latency and record with a 112db noise floor - well worth the money.

      If you're getting a clear signal recording on that SB card, more power to you. But if you really want to hear what a recording is supposed to sound like, pick up an Echo or MOTU or even M-Audio device and try it out.

      --
      Dammit, I meant to post that anonymously!
  9. What's the best car? by Paul+Carver · · Score: 1

    You've more or less asked what's the best car for driving to and from work and around town. Good luck with that.

    There's a huge variety of pro and semi-pro audio gear on the market. If you've got detailed requirements then you need to start reading tech specs and reviews. If you don't have detailed requirements then just search for "usb audio interface" and/or "firewire audio interface" and pick something in the $100-$200 range.

    There are a vast number of features and quite a wide price range and I really doubt there's an objective "best" any more than there's an objective "best" car that everyone would agree is better than all the others.

  10. M-Audio Audiophile 2496 by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

    It's a great card. I own one and it's great if you can manage the wiring. It's all unbalanced RCA and MIDI connections, so it's not that out of thr ordinary. But if you don't have RCA jacks on your speakers you'll need a adapter for them. The card runs about 100 bucks.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  11. The iMic rocks by akh · · Score: 1

    The iMic USB soundcards are really nice. Good quality parts, 48k@24 bit recording (iirc). Interface-wise these cards are very simple. They pretty much just have volume and balance, no frilly features to speak of. Oh, and it runs on Mac, Linux, Windows, etc. without special drivers. By far one of the best (consumer-grade) sound cards I've ever used. And no, I don't work for them.

    --
    Accept Eris as your Fnord and personally sate her
    1. Re:The iMic rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one and I'd also recommend it if you have only two channels to record at a particular location (or you could try several of them in a USB2 hub). As a bonus, they're external so there's less interference from RF sources inside the case.

      You can get a R/L mike splitter for about $7 so you can record two people at the same time.

    2. Re:The iMic rocks by hanwen · · Score: 1

      The iMic really sucks. It actually has more noise output than the audio jack on my Mac Mini.

      --

      Han-Wen Nienhuys -- LilyPond

  12. Hit zzounds.com and look around. by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

    You probably want something like an M-Audio firewire unit. Another poster recommended the 2496 box, which is excellent. Their other models work well, too.

    An external unit will prevent the electric noise from your PC from causing issues, and using firewire instead of USB will mean less CPU usage for the same work.

    1. Re:Hit zzounds.com and look around. by ben+there... · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd recommend M-Audio as well. In a break out box. All the professional solutions are external. If you can find a cheap one that is still external, it's probably at least better than most consumer cards.

      You'll still have some latency problems because of your PC, but I'm not sure if that will be an issue with what you're using it for. Check M-Audio's recommended PCs/Macs if it's an issue.

  13. I would suggest an Echo product by GrizlyAdams · · Score: 2

    Echo makes some good budget pro audio cards, 20 or 24 bit DACs, well designed, with propper sheilding. Pick one that meets your needs for input / output channels. Be sure to have a sound engineer hook things up, or at the very least learn how to avoid ground loops. If you don't have any PCI slots, theres good external boxes out there that plug in via Firewire. Also you can possibly find a good PCIe card.

  14. Parent has the right answer by Optic7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm no expert at this, but hang out in certain audio/video boards and read professionals' opinions on this (and stayed at a Holiday Inn last night). The common advice is to get an external audio interface that hooks to your computer via USB 2.0 or Firewire. The reason for this is that the electronic environment inside the PC case is extremely noisy (RF interference) making it almost impossible to get really clean audio if the analog audio circuitry is in there. That's why any professional audio card you see is usually external. I have seen M-Audio and motu recommended too. Oh, and what someone said about noise-free environment (quiet room) and correct microphone are also very important.

    By the way, I imagine you'll probably find a better selection (and prices) of these interfaces at your local Guitar Center or discount music superstore than at your regular computer parts store.

    Good luck.

    1. Re:Parent has the right answer by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Ummm, don't you mean that you stayed at a Holiday Inn Express? The regular Holiday Inn is for dumbasses, or so their commercials would lead me to believe.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    2. Re:Parent has the right answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "The reason for this is that the electronic environment inside the PC case is extremely noisy (RF interference) making it almost impossible to get really clean audio if the analog audio circuitry is in there."

      This is not true. Two reasons.
      First, look at the Lynx cards.
      200Khz max sample rate, 117db dynamic range. Very quiet, and those are real world specs, not just the converters datasheet. It's all down to careful design of ground planes and layout.
      The external boxes also have noisy computer parts in them for firewire/usb/control etc.

      Second, PC power supplies are pretty good for this kind of thing, given a little additional filtering.
      Nice stiff +12 and +5 with loads of current. Better than most wall warts.

    3. Re:Parent has the right answer by recursiv · · Score: 1

      USB has timing issues.

      FWIW, I achieved a much higher S/N ratio with an internal M-Audio Audiophile 24/96 than I did with an Edirol USB interface. Internal isn't always bad. Most of the comments are overstating the effect of interference on a quality board.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    4. Re:Parent has the right answer by L33t+Windozer · · Score: 1

      As long as you do not use the D/A on your internal Soundcard, but for example a digital output, the "RF interference" inside the Computer won't affect sound quality at all.

  15. I second the motion by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Internal sound cards have gotten pretty darn good, but you can still wind up with RF noise leaking into the audio. Keeping the ADC/DAC outside of the computer eliminates the possibility.

  16. Other Sound Cards by knuxed · · Score: 2, Informative

    The ESI Julia@ and Audiotrak Prodigy 7.1 are very very nice cards.Quite popular in Malaysia as it is dirt cheap,or u could even go for a modified 0404 ,though i am not so sure on the price

  17. RME Hammerfall by chill · · Score: 1

    Since discontinued, but more likely than not better quality than anything you're going to need.

    Get thee to Ebay!

    (No, that is not my auction.)

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  18. Re:I recommend the Soundblaster 16 by tonsofpcs · · Score: 2, Funny

    The SB 16 is actually [still] one of the better consumer sound cards, however I think that this company would be better served by a LynxOne.

  19. I agree .. by HMC+CS+Major · · Score: 1

    M-Audio make great cards in a wide price range. Their lower end units aren't "pro-quality", but they're definitely on the right path.

  20. Avoid Creative Labs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously. Their quality has gone up quite a bit in the past few years, but it's still not as nice as the MOTU, Echo, or M-Audio gear. Creative sells a great deal of gear to people who believe gimmickry like their claims of impossible S/N ratios, so you must understand that their efforts are really focused on attention-grabbing features (like 5.1 simulations from stereo in hardware) instead of quality (like rock-solid clock signals). Also, their drivers suck. Professionals DO NOT use Creative's products, and their attention to professional features like simple, solid drivers is lacking for that reason. Other manufacturers cater to the crowd that is more discriminating about these details and don't care about 3D audio accelleration in games, for example.

    Finally, they recently had a serious issue where they advertised 24bit audio, but it was only 24bit on PLAYBACK. This may have been resolved, but I recently saw some posts on a forum that indicated that it wasn't. I have been doing semi-pro audio on PC's since the days of the Turtle Beach Tahiti in 1994 (back when TB made really wonderful gear... sigh) and I would never trust my music to a Creative Labs product. -NEVER-

    A friend has the Mia and we're wrapping up an EP on it for our mastering setup. We recorded at my place where I use a Yamaha 01V digital mixer with an optical connection to a Terratec EWS/88D (older stuff, but I like it). The Mia is nice. I've heard great things about the recent M-Audio products as well. You should strongly consider an external box if you are doing recording (as opposed to mixing). Cards are still prone to noise (although it's much better these days than when PC audio first started) and breaking it out from the inside of the EM-washed case makes a big difference. Not to mention that if you get a firewire or USB device you can use it with your laptop and have a mobile recording solution (of course, you will then not be able to match the latency of a PCI card; this explains why I have a card but I use the card as a digital interface to an external A/D D/A converter, my mixer).

    1. Re:Avoid Creative Labs by revlayle · · Score: 1

      Plus for overall audio/recording use, their Audigy 4 line is NOT signigficantly better than say the class SBLive 5.1 card they released 6 or so years ago. (ok, Audigy 4 really really for reals does 24 bit now, but, honestly, a lot of mixing software can do that internally, no need for an audio card, per-se, to accomplish that). Of course, there are other brands out there better for "pro" use than Creative these days.

    2. Re:Avoid Creative Labs by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      You forgot a more interesting point - a lot of the Pro audio cards with better DACs and everything... cost less than the fancier Creative Labs cards! (Look at the X-Fi line - ouch! You can get very decent M-Audio cards that cost half the price.) Looks like the next audiophile is the gamer.

      Sure if you start adding fancy I/O (well, basic I/O for pro use) the cost starts adding up, but the top of the line X-Fi is still overpriced and you can probably get cards with that kind of I/O for way less. Maybe even a few Firewire audio cards. M-Audio makes some nice USB ones as well...

    3. Re:Avoid Creative Labs by revlayle · · Score: 1

      Even then, there are better cards with the *NECESSARY* audio I/O ports need for comparable or cheaper prices.

      At the time, the inputs on the SBLive (for the price) were quite good compared to the competition. However, there were a few inputs I had absolutely no use for. Besides a line in and a mic input, and occassionaly MIDI (which a card is not even need for thes days, aren't there USB 2.0 to MIDI connectors now?), I didn't need anything else. Yeah there was the optical out (why??) and SPDIF (which is good if i needed digital audio transfer... i guess, which i didn't), but those were not nearly as commonly used as the other inputs. Maybe, these days, the demand for those types of ports are greater?

    4. Re:Avoid Creative Labs by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      About Creative Labs: I find their stuff is usually a good deal when you don't need to run their software. At work, I use a USB Sound Blaster Live for listening to music. It was a bargain at $50. The virtual 5.1 is useless if your source material is stereo, but it does sound excellent when listening to 5.1 music from DVD, (which I do).

    5. Re:Avoid Creative Labs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...3D audio accelleration in games, for example.

      Can anyone tell me what, exactly, this is? I've heard of it, but I can't find an explanation. What is being accelerated? Does the sound board do audio mixing in hardware (the way EsounD or dmix or USound do in software)?

  21. Re:I recommend the Soundblaster 16 by Uncle+Snuffagus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Soundblaster cards are great for games, movies, and listening to music. When the intented use is to record, however, they are a poor choice because the input convertors are not very good. There is also the issue that they are internally rate locked to 48k and will force SRC onto streams of any other rates (such as the CD standard of 44.1k). Good for games, but not so good for the project studio. A simple low-end pro card like an audiophile 24/96 is a much better choice for about $100 or so, if you can deal with only having line-level inputs. Do you need Mic inputs? Phantom power? How many input signals will you be dealing with at the same time? After you have the answers to these questions, you can compare products with the feature set you need from M-audio, RME, and Presonus to determine the exact card that is best for you. You can't go wrong with products from any of these three companies.

  22. Toyota Prius by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    Good gas milage, looks stupid (turns heads), and your farts will smell like roses.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  23. Re:I recommend the Soundblaster 16 by dch24 · · Score: 1

    Parent is right on the money.

    Polish is something that many people can hear subconsciously, even if they can't explain exactly why they like one podcast over another. And, TFGeditor, if you're reading this, you're doing a podcast, aren't you? You just don't want apple to sue you, huh? I understand.

  24. What part of this is analog? by Animats · · Score: 0

    If you're just mixing down prerecorded clips already in digital form, then delivering them to another location in digital form, your sound card doesn't matter. The content isn't going through it. What does matter is the software you're using to assemble the show.

  25. We dont all go to bed early. by Bit_Squeezer · · Score: 1

    So how come /. and Fark fade out and leave me sans entertainment before I crash? Cant we outsource some help to a different time zone?

  26. Oxymoron? by xirtap · · Score: 1

    Is this what you english people would call an oxymoron?

    1. Re:Oxymoron? by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      Not at all. Decent audio gear is very affordable.

  27. E-MU by Jim3535 · · Score: 1

    You might also want to check out E-MU cards. I'm not in the business, but their products seem pretty professional to me. I own an E-MU 1212m (because I am into hi-fi) and love it.

    1. Re:E-MU by mythalethe · · Score: 1

      E-MU is made by Creative. Their drivers do not have a great reputation.

  28. Soundcards by clockwise_music · · Score: 4, Informative
    • Stay the hell away from any internal cards. Noisy and a royal pain in the bum.
    • A "breakout" box will make your life a lot easier. Try to get something that has at least 4 ins and 2 outs. Avoid those things that are an internal card but come with a jack with lots of female plugs. Ergh.
    • Stay the hell away from anything by Creative.
    • Try to get yourself a decent microphone. A nice condenser makes everything sound a lot better.
    • Have you considered software? What are you going to use? What have you used previously?
    • Myself, I have an MBox2 by digidesign. Doesn't seem like a long of bang for your buck, but it does come with ProTools. While this may be overkill for a radio show, if you want to seriously get into recording and mixing, it's really the industry standard. Works fine in XP. (Also consider Cubase).
    • M-Audio hardware is meant to be ok. Check it out.
    • Don't listen to those losers who tell you that you need a Mac. You'll be paying twice the price (no offense, I love OSX, but hardware is $$$) for the same thing.
    • Getting a great soundcard + mic will make a big difference, even if you have crap speakers (or headphones). Especially if you're doing stuff for other people. Mixing will be difficult though.
    • Get yourself a good pair of headphones. Annoying, but a lot cheaper than a good pair of speakers (+ amp).
    • Go to a recording studio and ask if you can 'shut up and watch' for a while. Don't go a super-duper expensive studio, maybe just a place where they record demos. If the guy is nice enough you'll learn a lot.
    • Keep it simple! The less stuff you have, less can go wrong!
    • Mixers are cheap as hell these days. The behringer stuff is very cheap and good. If you're not recording multiple sound sources simultaneously, consider getting a good soundcard that only has 2 or 4 good AD converters and piping everything through your mixer.
    • Don't skimp on patch leads and plugs and connectors.
    • Sales people will bullshit you into buying expensive crap! Don't listen to them! Find someone who is genuially interested in helping you meet your needs!
    • Good luck!
    1. Re:Soundcards by WasterDave · · Score: 1

      Myself, I have an MBox2 by digidesign. Doesn't seem like a long of bang for your buck, but it does come with ProTools.

      Other way round, ProTools comes with a 'free' MBox. It's a fucking expensive piece of software. I believe there is a light version around now - look on Digi's site for "M-Powered" - that works with M-Audio's gear.

      Don't listen to those losers who tell you that you need a Mac. You'll be paying twice the price (no offense, I love OSX, but hardware is $$$) for the same thing.

      ProTools 7.2 on Intel Mac (including the bottom end laptops) runs like a rocket. Macs aren't really any more expensive than a PC laptop.

      Dave

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    2. Re:Soundcards by phazer · · Score: 1

      "Mixers are cheap as hell these days. The behringer stuff is very cheap and good. If you're not recording multiple sound sources simultaneously, consider getting a good soundcard that only has 2 or 4 good AD converters and piping everything through your mixer."

      Behringer? The entire bussiness model is based on making knock-off's of successful products. It's all very cheap, but also cheaply designed and engineered.
      I've considered buying their items a few times now (Guitar AMP, digital effects.) They look great on paper but every time I've actually touched them they just felt all wrong. Every time it's come down to:
      1) Expensive "pro" tool
      2) Behringer knockoff of "pro" tool
      3) Not-so-expensive Semi-pro tool.

      I've always opted for another brand so far, and never regretted it. Check for Behringer user opinions, you'll hear lots of tales of poor engineering, notoriously bad and failing components, etc.

      So, either get the expensive stuff, or something well-built that you can afford. Avoid Behringer.

    3. Re:Soundcards by SkunkPussy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Stay the hell away from anything by Creative.

      hear, hear. I have had no end of problems with 2 different soundblaster lives. In both cases, creative's own drivers refused to install claiming no soundblaster product existed in my system. For reasons known only to creative, they wrap their drivers in some shite installer that fails to detect their soundcards in many cases. They cripple their drivers so that they cannot be installed through the normal windows hardware detection routines, so when their installer doesn't work, you're fucked. Why Creative? Why?

      To compound it all, if you think to download the latest drivers which may now be fixed, well the drivers they make available on their website are not full drivers in their own right, merely upgrades to the ones provided on cd with the product - WHICH DON'T FUCKING INSTALL!

      I went through their customer support process and they were reasonably helpful to the point of posting me a new driver cd - but when that didn't work either, I just gave up.

      Creative's soundcards are full of gimmicky features and never live up to marketing promises. For example creative advertised their soundblaster live cards as being upgradeable - promising new features via their "liveware" sytem (i.e. some kind of firmware on the device I suppose)...guess what, when I get my soundblaster live, the liveware was at version 3, and at no time since I bought the card has Creative released a new version of "liveware" beyond incremental bugfixes. Lying bastards.

      Creative are not an engineering company, they are a scummy den of marketing snakes and it is in nobody's interest to buy from them.

      Even their name is a joke - no serious creative professional would touch a creative card with a bargepole.

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    4. Re:Soundcards by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to figure out why some idiot mod moderated this as 'flamebait.' Like any opinion-based discussion, some will take issue with a few of his points. But by and large, it's pretty much correct.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    5. Re:Soundcards by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Macs really are better for audio production - it's not a silly myth. I'm a pro and if a guy turns up with a PC for serious use everyone just thinks 'amateur'. Sorry, it's just the way it is.

      --
      spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    6. Re:Soundcards by multimediavt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Liked this post and just wanted to add (to the OP, not this one), What do you define as "pro audio"? Today's high-end systems are 24-bit, 192kHz; to me, that's pro audio. There aren't a lot of vendors out there making USB or Firewire equipment that operates in this realm, and the ones that do have really big price tags. I do a lot of live and studio recording for musician buddies of mine. Haven't done anything for money for a while, but do work for beer! If this person is only going to be doing voice recording, an everyday 16-bit, 44 or 48 kHz solution could be all they need. If you're talking about doing audio production where instruments, foley, and other audio is going to be recorded and mixed, then a higher-end system is a better choice. I also agree that your audio quality is GREATLY affected by, not only your recording hardware/software, but by the microphone(s) you use. I can make a 24/192 recording device sound worse than 16/44 if I use a crappy microphone. If you're doing voice (this is to the orignal post again), spend the money on really nice cardio-condenser mics and good cables, and get a decent M-audio or Lexicon USB input device. MusiciansFriend.com has decent prices, but shop around (Sweetwater, etc.). You should spend more money on your mic(s) than you do on the input box. Rode, Shure, AKG, Neumann, are some good mic brands.

    7. Re:Soundcards by cpct0 · · Score: 1

      Flamebait are very quick to happen in Slashdot, ppl should relax a little.

      - I agree for Creative products. They are getting trumped all the time, and basically M-Audio is much better bang at the same buck. Although I cannot say if Creative's products are *cough* misleading anymore, they used to sell 96KHz 24bits products that barely was able to recognize 14-15 bits of stuff with deceiving frequencies.
      - The message was not about microphones. If he's doing radio, he only needs to invest in decent cables with a variety of connectors. A console will be his friend anyways.
      - I am a "loser" that tells that you need to have a Mac :) Although I've had good luck with PC products in pro audio, I've had it usually with dedicated machines, where only the proper software was installed. Otherwise, inevitably, I got problems with latency, underruns, and so on. The main advantage of Mac is it's much less prone to acting weird on you. Main problem with Macs is NOT the price (very competitive since Mac OS X machines era IMHO) but you do not have low-end products. It's mostly either pro or it's non-existent.
      - Headphones... word... I got 2 pairs, one open and one closed (both Sennheisers, mid-end) and one is very useful to listen at home instead of having good speakers... and the other one is very useful in studios.
      - Motu is good in general, like written elsewhere. I got a Motu Traveler for my main recording and it's a hell of a machine. Very good sound quality (the most neutral one in many tests), does not require external power, offers plenty of ins and outs to record at least your sub outs, very versatile everywhere. The only grudge I got is (like again written elsewhere) when I plug it on my PC, every software wants to change its playback frequency... The other side of the medal is if you are not making it change the playback frequency, the software will output at the speed it wants, and Windows will box-interpolate its way to make it at the required frequency, achieving a very good kill of any remnants of sound quality. Again saying PCs are good when you dedicate your tasks in them.
      - OSS and OSS/OSes... well ... there aren't many choices, alas. Anyone found good gear, drivers and pro software that works in Bsd/Linux ? I am genuinely curious here, as it might be a very good alternative computer.

    8. Re:Soundcards by illerd · · Score: 1

      http://kxproject.lugosoft.com/

      Don't throw your SB Live away yet. Try the kx drivers. They're incredible. Open source too. I haven't bought a soundcard in ages, but if these SB Lives you're talking about are still based on the EMU10K chip, then this is all you need. The only reason to buy a more expensive card is if you need good analog ins/outs. For home recording, then 1/8 inchers on the SB Live are fine. If you're like me (and like the poster, from what it sounds like) and all the audio stays in the digital domain, then you really can't beat an EMU10K-based card with kx drivers.

      I should note that I'm one of those people who thinks that most people are full of bullshit when it comes to comparing audio products. I can't judge things like "warmth" and "clarity." The only basis I have for saying these drivers are hot shit is that they give ~5ms latencies. True, internal cards may be noisy, but I have good hearing and I don't hear any noise. Maybe they "muddy" up the sound or whatever, but thats probably just bullshit.

    9. Re:Soundcards by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      99% of audio production ends up in the 16bit/44.1kHz(or48kHz) domain in the end. I would say this satisfies most definitions of 'Pro-Audio'.

      'Pro' is just a gimmick. A 'Pro' engineer has a working understanding of acoustics, psychoacoustics, signal processing, music, electrical engineering, and knowledge of audio history as well as a sense of current recording/broadcast styles. The equipment that a 'Pro' engineer chooses to work with is almost always based on usability, and how it will enhance/impede his creative process, as well as the creative process of the artists being heard. Ask a dozen engineers what mics they recommend based on the way they 'sound' and you'll almost always get a dozen answers. Ask a dozen engineers what mics they recommend based on durability and usefulness, and your range of answers will be much more narrow.

      Audio engineering is an art, and anyone can be an artist if they take the time to practice.

    10. Re:Soundcards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Stay the hell away from any internal cards. Noisy and a royal pain in the bum."

      What a knobend. I bet your 'golden ears' are just so superior to the rest of the planet's.

      What 'noisy' internal cards exist right now? You're talking bullshit.

    11. Re:Soundcards by cyclop · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Macs really are better for audio production - it's not a silly myth. I'm a pro and if a guy turns up with a PC for serious use everyone just thinks 'amateur'. Sorry, it's just the way it is.

      Any actual, practical reason for this? Or am I just feeding a troll?

      --
      -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
  29. For what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He asked a specific yet open-ended question on slashdot, of the form "pro performance for cheap". He's obviously not looking for a real answer. He's looking for entertaintment.

    Dear slashdot editors, YHBT.

  30. The Rules by BigFootApe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now, the only audio input work I've done was digitizing vinyl, which isn't all that taxing. However, I'm fairly particular about sound quality.

    What I've determined is that even good quality on board D/A equipment is poor. Much better, for a number of reasons, to use an external converter plugged in to an spdif jack (input and output).

    1. Re:The Rules by mrpolecat · · Score: 1

      and what do you use to digitize vinyl? any recommendations?

    2. Re:The Rules by BigFootApe · · Score: 1
  31. Look to EMU by BoneFlower · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm very happy with my EMU 1820, though for what you plan to do it may be overkill- I doubt you have much of a need for 8 channels of analog input + 10 digital channels, not to mention the other 14 host sources you can mix in(total of 32 channels hardware mixing). But the EMU cards also offer hardware accelerated effects... some of which, especially compression, can be quite important for broadcasting. Taking the load off your CPU can make a big difference sometimes.

    Look for high quality DACs. Don't worry too much about 24 bit bit depth, or 96/192khz sample rates... 44.1/16 implemented well will be overkill as it is for any sort of radio broadcast or webcast. If you do want to go further, bit depth will generally mean more than sample rates, at least in my experience recording stuff- but there is little need unless you want to master for an analog medium and get aural advantages over compact discs.

    The one problem with EMU cards is the tendency for the driver to go mental and corrupt itself. On the upside, this has only happened to me on boot- you really don't need to worry aobut it dying in the middle of a session. On the other hand it sometimes requires registry surgery and manual deletion of files in c:\windows\system32\ to let you reinstall the drivers. This doesn't happen often, but it's certainly a pain in the ass when it does.

    For the capabilities they offer, the EMU cards are priced quite low. But as explained above, driver stability can sometimes be a significant issue. If you need 24/7 immediate availability, don't get them. But given that the worst case is probably that you lose an hour a day every 4-6 months(probably less), they can be quite good for many contexts.

  32. Re:I recommend the Soundblaster 16 by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Informative

    This company would be better served by asking on an audio board. You should ask on ProSoundWeb if you're feeling lucky. Otherwise, homerecording.com has a BBS that a lot of recording folks frequent (myself included). Neither the SB 16 nor LynxOne will EVER be recommended on an audio board. You can't even get Mac OS X drivers for the LynxOne (according to the company's website). It's a fossil. And the SB 16 is a toy. Utterly a toy.

    The first mistake the person asking the question made is to use the words "sound card" and "professional" (well, pro-quality) in the same sentence. These days, the correct term is "audio interface" because almost every modern interface these days is NOT a card. I would strongly recommend FireWire; USB is at best marginal, IMHO. Above all else, though, get something that is external. I say this for three reasons:

    • Internal bus architectures cannot be easily adapted to new bus architectures. PCI is being phased out in favor of PCI Express which is not compatible with legacy parallel PCI cards, so with a PCI card, you'll be stuck with a large investment that you won't be able use after you replace your computer a couple of times.
    • External audio interfaces are more immune to interference generated by electronics inside your computer. While it is possible to achieve this with PCI cards using a breakout box, it's less than ideal.
    • FireWire audio interfaces can be used with laptops.

    With a PCI interface, you're stuck on a Windows PC desktop forever (unless you want to try to run Ardour under Linux). You'll never be able to switch to a Mac because current Macs don't have legacy parallel PCI slots. You'll never be able to move to a laptop because the cost of a PCI breakout box is much, much more than it would cost to buy a FireWire interface . Finally, within about 5 years or slightly over, you'll be stuck trying to keep your current computer running because you'll be hard pressed to find a motherboard that still supports PCI.

    I'm not going to give any specific recommendations within the FireWire space. I'll say that the Presonus pres are slightly better than the M-Audio pres, IMHO, and I've heard some people also mention that Presonus pres are better than the TASCAM pres. So if you're going for that very last tiny drop of quality, that's something to consider. Of course, if you're really trying to spend money, you can't go wrong with an RME Fireface or an Echo AudioFire. I'm also a fan of MOTU; of course, while a lot of Mac users swear by them, I've heard some PC users swear at them, so YMMV.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  33. Re: FrAudigy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    With the Fraudigy, despite the fact that the box says you can record up to 24/96 kHz, you are locked to a 48 kHz sample rate for audio work, except that on the Audigy 2 Platinum eX (only the most expensive one), you can also record at 24/96. Most audio bound for CDs needs a 44.1 kHz sample rate, and if you buy sample loops and things these will also be 44.1 kHz. So this means potentially a lot of back and forth converting of sample rates.


    You pay extras for the shiny box and the horrible software that's forcibly tacked on. Skip the Audigy.

    Seconding the Audiophile 2496 request by the way, it's a workhorse of a card.
  34. Re:I recommend the Soundblaster 16 by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    Some things I forgot to mention, in no particular order:

    • TapeOp bulletin board
    • Avoid the M-Audio AudioBuddy. There are a number of reports of significant undervoltage in the phantom power and some reports of toasting the op amps with a shorted cable. Oh, and reportedly electolytic caps in the audio path.... :-(
    • The Presonus FIREPOD has a new big brother. If you're considering the FIREPOD, spend the extra money for the new model and avoid the FireWire port issues that a number of people have reported with the FIREPOD.
    • MOTU just released a new 8-channel interface that puts their prices more in line with Presonus and M-Audio (available RSN). Worth checking out.
    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  35. Look at Echo products by cachorro · · Score: 2

    The best bang for the buck I've found (and used) is the Echo Mia Midi PCI card. It is a pain getting it to work on Linux, but it will work there and I assume it is much more easily configured under Windows or on a Mac.

    AFAIK all the songs at the site www.mauiruhisongs.com were recorded using that card [disclaimer: religious content], so you can listen there to get an idea of the quality of the sound.

    Two channels in and two out are not enough for some though.

  36. Get thee an Apogee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here be Apogee they make reasonable convertors. I know people doing voice work with the audiophile but let's not pretend it's professional kit, it isn't.

  37. some different vendors to check out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I own an Echo Mia MIDI, which has the same ADACs as the M-Audio 24-96 but lower noise and better sound (circut design??). Some other popular high-end vendors in a slightly higher price range are Marian and RME

  38. Get also a decent mixer and good microphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you're going to record voice you'll need a bunch of good condenser microphones and a mixer capable of supplying them the 48V phantom power. That means unbalanced inputs (at least) and XLR connectors + noiseless cables. You will also need a good environment to take recordings: take into account some sound absorbing panels, they're not cheap. As for the soundcard, the M-Audio is a good cheap (and Linux compatible) choice: I love my Delta 44 also because of the nice penguin on its box:*).

    A couple hints on voice recording: when you use compressors and limiters, don't do as many cheap TV and radio station "sound technicians" do, ie don't set them to maximum or automatic mode: you will need to adjust them each and every time on the voice of the recorded person. If somebody talks too softly or too far from the mic, the compressor must -not- be set to raise the signal level to the point that you get a ton of background noise: you have to talk to the person and ask him/her to talk straight into the mic at one palm distance.

  39. My choice.. by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

    For my home studio I use an M-Audio Delta 1010LT. It has 10 ins, 10 outs, and two balanced xlr inputs. It records 24bit at 96KHz and there is no audible noise. Works great with Ardour. The card itself is around $200. It's best to pick up a decent mixer with Inserts for managing the channels.

    Make sure to get some decent speakers for them or a good set of headphones with a flat frequency response. Flat frequency response is important to make sure what you edit sounds good everywhere. When I first started with recording, the headphones I used put a lot of bass in the sound. Guess what my mixes were lacking when played through other setups?

    --
    "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    1. Re:My choice.. by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      And here we arrive at the golden rule of mixing: never do it with headphones. And always test your mix on systems like the one your audience will be using (bundled computer speakers, in this case).

  40. Re:I recommend the Soundblaster 16 by ShadowLeo · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have to agree with the parent. This is most certainly not the place to be asking this kind of question. However, I'm willing to throw in my 1.5 cents, as a musician.

    Now you said this is primarily a radio show, so I'm going to take a jump here and say you won't actually be playing much live music. If this is the case, then you don't have to splurge on the much higher end stuff for that "perfect" sound. In fact, your recording quality doesn't have to be the max you can handle either. I will recommend that you do yourself a favor and go get yourself a nice quality Condenser Microphone with a pop shield(those funny felt looking disks they suspend in front). This will help reduce the wind noise generated by certain sounds you will make(Such as P's and B's).

    I have to say, from experience, that my absolute favorite recording card is the Mark Of The Unicorn 828 mkII, but it has a serious amount of inputs that you may not need. You may find the Traveler or the Ultralite more your cup of tea. Either way, nothing beats getting into your local audio shop and trying one out

    One final question I have is what program are you using? If you are using anything but Pro Tools, such as Cubase, then the MOTU stuff should be good for you. However, if you DO plan to use Pro Tools: then you are kind of locked into M-Audio or Digidesign. Pro Tools will only work with Digidesign/M-Audio approved hardware. Namely their own.

    Don't skimp on a good mixer, be it software or a physical one; make sure your mixer is up to par with what you are doing. If you prefer to work with more physical equipment rather than virtual, then I would also recommend getting a compressor for your voice. These things can do wonders for your sound and levels

    Finally, above all else: Be careful WHERE YOU RECORD!. 90% of people overlook this one critical, CRITICAL variable. You could have this amazing live sound, your could be Howard Stern (or Opie and Anthony); and if your acoustical environment is terrible: your recording will suck. There are some excellent resources out there. You just have to google for it.

  41. Go External. by LazyPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Here's another vote for an external firewire interface.

    For what you are trying to accomplish, you should be able to get an interface and a chinese large-diaphragm condenser together in the $300-500 range. For example, a PreSonus Firebox (~$300) and a Studio Projects B1 (~$100).

    For a place to get started shopping, Sweetwater has incredible customer service. BSW has some "podcast" packages with everything you'd need to get started.

  42. Edirol vs M-Audio by Optic · · Score: 1

    I've had experience with both Edirol and M-Audio devices, and in my experience the Edirol ones come closer to meeting their advertised capabilities and are more likely to come with drivers that work. I had an M-Audio Transit audio interface for my mac, and they were NEVER able to get the drivers to work properly. My friend returned a fairly high-end M-Audio Firewire interface box because it wouldn't work properly with his computer (again, a driver issue we suspect)... I've seen none of these problems with equipment from Edirol.

  43. sweetwater by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

    You might want to give Sweetwater Sound a call and explain to them what your goals are. Also give them the budget you have to work with. They should be able to help you put together a package that suits your needs. Also note that when you look at their Computer Audio section that they don't sell a single thing by Creative. There's a reason for this.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  44. Get a Mac by rf600r · · Score: 1

    No joke. Not trolling. Consider the cost of something like an iMac that might be able to most or all of this right "out of the box."

  45. Use Mackie, Not M-Audio by PaulMorel · · Score: 1

    I can't believe that people on here are recommending M-Audio. I admit, if you want to pay next-to-nothing, then M-Audio is reasonable. If you don't actually want to do professional production (just high quality amateur stuff), then M-Audio is fine. Then again, for just a little more money, you can get some of the best preamps on the market.

    For the price, the Mackie Onyx preamps are absolutely unbeatable. I have used many, many, many, many mixers and preamps, and the Mackie Onyx is the only "live" mixer that I will also use in the studio (I use it when I need more than the 24 tracks offered by my d8b).

    A full Onyx mixer is probably more than you need, but lucky for you, Mackie sells a two channel, firewire enabled Onyx preamp called the Onyx Satellite for only $500.

    And, it comes bundled with Mackie Tracktion, which is, admittedly, not as great as some of the other software packages, but for the price it is remarkably solid.

    --
    burrocrisy
    and that would be what? Ruling by jackasses? Never has a slashdot misspelling been more apropos
  46. VIA Vinyl Envy24 by nbritton · · Score: 1

    The VIA Envy24 chip combined with a quality I2S codec chip (AKM Semiconductor) will suit your needs. Stay away from the Envy24HT-S, Envy24PT, and Envy24GT as they are lower-end chips geared for the consumer markets. I'd go for S/PDIF digital interconnects if you can foot the bill.

  47. Question for this group... by DoctorDyna · · Score: 1

    Do they even make a sound card with discrete components in the output stage, or are they all made with the same OP amp cheap ass output stages? Personally, I would like a sound card that the rest of my high-end audio system doesn't laugh at.

    --
    Windows has more viruses because linux has more virus coders.
  48. Tascam by the_wesman · · Score: 1

    The Tascam US-122 is cheap (around 200 last time I checked), runs over USB (so it works with just about everything) and has 2 mic/line inputs with phantom power. It also comes with recording software bundled into it - I sold pro audio for years and this thing is fantastic bang-for-buck - if you want more "industry standard compatibility" get an MBox which comes with protools. If that's not your concern, just get the Tascam and spend the money you saved to buy a pair of nice condensor mics. The RE-20 is a classic radio mic - on the cheaper tip, I have a R0DE NT-1 and for the 200 earth dollars it costs, it sounds great - really warm and pretty
    -w

    --
    calling all destroyers
  49. A working pro's verbose setup by PlaidCamel · · Score: 1

    I have scored several films ,produced and engineered quite a few albums and cut several radio and podcast spots using Presonus Firepods http://www.presonus.com/. It has just about all the IO you could ask for in an 8 (10 if you count spdif) channel box. You can also daisy chain 3 of them for a 24 channel stack. Also, it is rack mountable so you can readily take it on the road. Overall things just work and I, and my customers, have been very pleased with the sound quality. Not to mention, you get balanced and unbalanced capabilities. To keep things quiet I don't run anything unbalanced if there is more that 3 feet of cable.

    If the firepod is a bit much they also offer cut down versions. The firebox, which is a 2 channel unit, and the inspire which has 4 channels.

    Digidesign http://www.digidesign.com/, Echo http://www.echoaudio.com/ and Mackie http://www.mackie.com/ also have some really nice gear but can be a bit pricy. I do agree with staying away from m-audio. Their MIDI stuff is phenominal but the audio gear is lacking. I would say the same for lower level Alesis and anything from Behringer.

    I also must echo earlier posts in saying that you shouldn't skimp on mics. Your end product is only as good as your source. I would recommend a good condenser from AudioTechnica or MXL for price/quality.

    Also, your monitors (for you non-audio folks these are the speakers, not the video display) are also critical to getting a mix that translates well to other systems. You will find that if you use standard stereo speakers or, God forbid, computer speakers what you put out will sound extremely different from stereo to stereo as you listen in different environments.

    I personally use Event TR8Ns with a KRK Rockit 10 subwoofer but these babies ain't cheap at $1000.00US per pair. I would recommend looking into KRK http://www.krksys.com/. I did some post work on the latest Stereofuge album with Mark Slaughter producing and we did the entire mix on them and it sounded fat-tastic. In any case, you will want a good near-field monitor that is self powered to eliminate transients.

    Finally, clean up your power. You'll be amazed at the difference a $60.00US power conditioner can make to the quality of the sound you get. I use Furman http://www.furmansound.com/ conditioners. This is a good tip for anyone who has a home-theater or high-end gaming system as well.

    A good set of reference books for audio newbs is a series of books by Bobby Owsinski. Starting with the recording engineers handbook (available at amazon) they will give you enough info to be extremely dangerous.

    I didn't mean to be so verbose but I hope some of this is useful.

  50. Mbox 2 from DigiDesign by MMHere · · Score: 1

    I have one and am very happy with it. It's an external USB 2.0 device, which IMHO provides a couple of key advantages: (1) being external, it is isolated from computer noise; (2) being USB 2.0, it is easily moved between computers.

    Several other advantages: (3) it works with laptops if you want to be more portable; (4) it's supported by a wide variety of software; (5) it does PC or Mac (I happen to use it with a Mac laptop).

    It does audio in/out (all kinds of connectors, both analog and digital), and also provides a MIDI interface, should you need that.

  51. Re:I recommend the Soundblaster 16 by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up. Room treatment is the #1 most overlooked thing in setting up a small recording studio, which is a shame because it is the most important aspect of the sound, bar none.

    I'm not sure I'd recommend a condenser mic. Depends on the voice of the person being recorded. For radio, dynamics are more common because they're more forgiving of room acoustics. If you do go condenser, go large diaphragm, as the small diaphragm condensers are likely to have too flat a response for voice to really sound good. For that classic radio sound, you could also consider a ribbon, assuming you buy something with decent pres.

    The choice of mic is as individual as your choice of underwear (except that everyone can tell if you chose a bad microphone). Definitely ask around on recording boards and get a feel for what mic would best suit your voice. It helps if you have tried a couple of mics and can describe what you don't like about them, but at the very least, you need to tell what kind of voice you have. And don't be afraid to use the search feature on the boards. There's a lot of useful information, particularly in the MIc forum on homerec and other boards.

    On the issue of pop filters, one small tip: spend the extra money and buy a metal screen pop filter. They don't rot and you can clean them more easily than the fabric pop filters. Just my $0.02.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  52. Re:I recommend the Soundblaster 16 by lkeagle · · Score: 1

    I would have to recommend a good dynamic microphone. Mainly because you can hammer nails with them and they'll still work fine for decades. I would explicitly not recommend ribbon microphones as they are easily damaged by shock and moving air. Dynamic microphones also tend to be cheaper, and therefore you can afford more of them (the biggest mistake you could make is to not have a complete set of backup microphones).

    With dynamic microphones, however, you have to worry about proximity effect. Some engineers love the effect, some work really hard and buy extra processing gear to counteract it. You don't have that issue with condenser mics.

  53. Re:I recommend the Soundblaster 16 by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    Ribbon mics are a lot more robust than most folks think. I mean, sure, you don't want to use them in front of a bass drum or anything, but most of the current ones have a fair amount of wind screen material inside to limit the amount of damage you can do during normal use. They should be treated with reasonable care, but the same applies to any microphone that you actually want to keep....

    Also, FWIW, you have to worry about proximity effect with any directional microphone, regardless of whether it is dynamic or not. It's the nature of the pickup pattern, not the nature of the mechanism. Condensers can have a ton of proximity effect. If you don't want proximity effect, get an omni mic. The tighter the pickup pattern, the more proximity effect, so a hypercardioid has more proximity effect than a cardioid, which has more than a figure-8, with an omni having essentially none (though purists will probably point out that there's always a little bit of directionality even with an omni mic, and that the amount depends on the frequency and the size of the diaphragm, and thus, there should always be a little bit of proximity effect, at least in theory, but... that's probably just a bit too pedantic).

    I will concede that cheap dynamic mics tend to have unusually harsh proximity effect, particularly in the supercardioid/hypercardioid varieties (two patterns that I've never even seen in anything other than moving coil dynamics)... but condensers do have proximity effect unless they are omni (which you would typically not want for a vocal mic...).

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  54. HDA Digital Mistique by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    I have been searching for a good sound card myself, started with Adlib, had on the road SB16, 32, Gravis Ultrasound (PRO) and currently I got a Digital Mistique. A very cheap and quality soundcard where you can change the DAC's. I've been using it for digitalizing my vinyl and sampling and the signal-to-noise ratio is pretty low for this soundcard (even with the already existing DAC's).

    It supports 7.1, Dolby Live, has a optical and coaxial SP/DIF ; it just works.

    With the Creative Labs Audigy I always had the problems that the SP/DIF did not return true surround ; which was needed for me for my productions. This card has true surround which gets exported through its digital connector; instead of with the Creative Labs where you need to buy an additional box to get the 3 speakercables to a true 5.1/7.1 digital connection....

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  55. Three simple ways to get an affordable soundcard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a job, get a better job, or save your money. Then you should be able afford a darned good sound card, even the ones at $1000.

  56. Re:I recommend the Soundblaster 16 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow - you must have those 'golden ears' too... You're talking shit. "I'm not going to give any specific recommendations within the FireWire space." Can you say that again in English? "within the FireWire 'space'"? What the fuck are you talking about, you pretentious twat?

    The original poster can manage quite happily with any soundcard on the market today. Any Creative card will do fine. Any other card, for that matter, will do fine. What's the betting that nobody can hear the difference between any of them?

  57. Drivers by phorm · · Score: 1

    I'd have to agree 101% with that. I had my machine consistently crash in windows XP, and I would honestly have to absolve Microsoft of blame in the face that creative's shitty drives seemed to be the cause. Running linux with open drives had no such issues (and for cards of similar cost, I *do* recommend creative labs cards for linux, or at least SBLive, because the Open-Source drivers are pretty decent and do handle hardware mixing). When I later tried it on other windows machines, they crashed as well until I found a third-party driver (tons of functionality, and more stable).. though offhand I can't remember the name (I use it at work on some machines, not home).